Sei sulla pagina 1di 1

Archived Information

Fiscal Year 2006 Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - NEVADA


Maximum Required
Expenditures For
Choice-Related Maximum Per-Child
Transportation Expenditure For
FY 2006 Title I And Supplemental Supplemental
LEA ID District Allocation* Educational Services** Educational Services***

3200390 CARSON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,140,243 228,049 906.39


3200030 CHURCHILL COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 772,600 154,520 1,062.72
3200060 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 59,889,152 11,977,830 1,358.40
3200090 DOUGLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 531,500 106,300 798.05
3200120 ELKO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 932,382 186,476 856.18
3200150 ESMERALDA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 21,600 4,320 1,661.56
3200180 EUREKA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 30,326 6,065 798.05
3200210 HUMBOLDT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 380,669 76,134 813.40
3200240 LANDER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 113,323 22,665 827.17
3200270 LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 138,132 27,626 1,000.96
3200300 LYON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 973,753 194,751 932.71
3200330 MINERAL COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 171,021 34,204 994.31
3200360 NYE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1,165,352 233,070 1,016.89
3200420 PERSHING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 170,641 34,128 997.90
3200450 STOREY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 32,881 6,576 1,060.67
3200480 WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 9,536,530 1,907,306 1,207.31
3200510 WHITE PINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 223,298 44,660 1,058.29
3299998 Undistributed 0 0 0.00
3299999 PART D SUBPART 2 488,297 97,659 0.00

* Actual amounts received by LEAs will be smaller than shown here due to State-level adjustments to Federal Title I allocations. States adjust
allocations, for example, to reflect LEA boundary changes or the creation of new LEAs, including charter school LEAs, that are not accounted
for in the statutory calculations. States also are permitted to reserve up to 1 percent of allocations for administration and generally must
reserve 4 percent in fiscal year 2006 for school improvement activities. These adjustments will reduce the actual amounts available
under all three columns of the table.

** An LEA must use up to an amount equal to 20 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation (the “20-percent reservation”) received from the State
to cover choice-related transportation costs for students who exercise a choice option and to pay for supplemental educational services for
students whose parents request such services. The 20-percent reservation may include Title I, Part A funds or funding from other Federal,
State, local, and private sources. The amount shown in this column is the Department’s estimate of the amount that affected LEAs - those
with schools identified for improvement, corrective action, or restructuring - may have to spend to meet this requirement. Actual
expenditures will depend on such factors as the number of students exercising a choice option or receiving supplemental educational services and
the costs of satisfying these requests. An LEA has discretion to determine the allocation of these funds between choice-related transportation
and supplemental educational services, except that it must spend at least one-quarter of the 20-percent reservation - or an amount equal to
5 percent of its Title I, Part A allocation - on each activity if there is demand for both from students and their parents.

*** An LEA that must arrange for supplemental educational services is required to pay, for each child receiving services, the lesser of the actual cost
of the services or an amount equal to the LEA’s Title I, Part A allocation received from the State divided by the number of poor students in the
LEA, as determined by estimates produced by the US Bureau of the Census. Thus the amount shown in this column reflects the statutory “cap”
on per-child expenditures for supplemental educational services.

Potrebbero piacerti anche