Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
CONTENT
Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Metal Matrix Composite a brief 1.2 Ex-situ Metal Matrix Composites 1.3 In-Situ Metal Matrix Composites 1.4 Processing of MMC Chapter 2: Objective One Of The Possible Ways 2.1 Dispersion Strengthening Mechanism of Strengthened Composite Page 8 2.2 Strengthening Mechanism of Particulate Composite Matrix Composites 2.4 In-Situ Metal Matrix Composites an overview Page 8 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Chapter 3: Literature Survey 3.1 Current Status of Research and Development of Metal Matrix Composite 3.2 Preparation of Particulate Composites 3.3 Processing Methods of In-Situ Metal Matrix Composites 3.3.1 Application of Reinforcement/ Matrix Pre-Treatment Strategy 3.3.2 Reactive Gas Injection Process 3.3.3 Displacement Reaction Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 12 Page 13 2.3 Problems Associated with the Preparation of Ex-Situ Metal Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 6
3.3.4 XD and LANXIDE Insitu Composite Materials Page 16 3.3.5 Combustion Synthesis Process or Self Propagating HighTemperature Synthesis 3.3.6 In situ formation of metal-ceramic composites by Reduction Reaction Page 18
Page: 1
Page 17
Development of Fe - Aluminide Reinforced Al Matrix Nanocomposite 3.3.7 Reactive Infiltration Technique for Manufacturing of Net Shaped Al-Matrix Composites 3.3.8 Stir Casting Method of Fabrication of Mmcs 3.4 Processing Of Insitu Intermetallic Composite 3.5 Interaction between Matrix and Precipitate at High Temperature 3.6 Metal-Matrix Composite Spectromicroscopy Chapter 4: Experimental Procedure 4.1 Preparation of Insitu Metal Matrix Composite by MeltCast Route 4.2 Characterizations of Metal Matrix Composite 4.2.1 Tensile Test 4.2.2 Micro hardness test 4.2.3 Charpy Impact Testing 4.2.4 Microstructural study Optical Microscopy Chapter 5: Results and Discussions 5.1 Prediction through Optical Microscopy 5.2 Micro Hardness Measurements and Analysis 5.3 Tensile Testing 5.4 Charpy Impact testing Chapter 6: Conclusions Chapter 7: References Page 34 Page 38 Page 40 Page 41 Page 43 Page 45 Page 27 Page 28 Page 30 Page 31 Page 26 Page 23 Page 23 Page 18 Page 19 Page 21
Page: 2
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Metal Matrix Composite a brief Ex-situ Metal Matrix Composites In-Situ Metal Matrix Composites
Processing of MMC
Page: 3
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
A composite material is a macroscopic combination of two or more distinct materials, having a recognizable interface between them. Composite is a multiphase material that exhibits a significant proportion of the properties of both constituent phases such that a better combination of properties is realized. This is termed as the principle of combined action. The composites industry has begun to recognize that the commercial applications of composites promise to offer much larger business opportunities than the aerospace sector due to the sheer size of transportation industry. Thus the shift of composite applications from aircraft to other commercial uses has become prominent in recent years. The various reasons for the use of composites are due to To increase stiffness, strength and dimensional stability. To increase tough and impact strength. To increase heat deflection temperature. To increase mechanical damping. To reduce permeability to gases and liquids. To modify electrical properties. To reduce cost. To decrease thermal expansion. To increase chemical wear and corrosion resistance. To reduce weight. To maintain strength/stiffness at high temperatures while under strain conditions in a corrosive environment. To increase secondary uses and recyclability, and to reduce negative impact on the environment.
The matrix in a metal matrix composite (MMC) is usually an alloy, rather than a pure metal, and there are three types of such composites, namely, Dispersion-strengthened, in which the matrix contains a uniform dispersion of very fine particles with diameters in the range 10100 nm, Page: 4
It has been reported that the properties of the MMCs are influenced to a great extent by the nature of the reinforcements and their distribution in the host metal matrix. Ceramic whiskers, fibers and particles reinforced Aluminium alloys are now considered as candidate materials to replace some of the existing structural components, mostly made of Fe based alloys. For example, pistons and cylinder liners in automotive engines are currently being fabricated from Al-based composites. [1] Recently, the technique of reinforcing metal matrices by in situ reaction has gained considerable attention. In this technique, the reinforcing phase(s) is (are) formed in the host matrix via in situ chemical reaction between the matrix and the precursor element(s)/compound(s) during the composite fabrication. These composites, termed as in situ metal matrix composites and often referred as second generation metal matrix composites, offer many advantages over the conventional composites. The most important advantage among many is that the reinforcements so formed by the in situ reaction are finer in size and their distribution is more uniform, resulting in better mechanical properties of composites. However, here it would be worthwhile to mention that in most of the cases due to the high initiation temperature of the in situ reaction(s), formation of the reinforcements within the host matrix necessitates high processing temperature. But processing the composites at high temperatures involves the risk of oxidation of the matrix and may also cause agglomeration and coarsening of the reinforcements, which will cast an adverse influence on the mechanical properties of the composite. Based on the method of preparation metal matrix composite are classified into two types: Ex-situ metal matrix composite and In-situ metal matrix composite.
Other conventional ex-situ composites, which are produced by some mechanical mixing of the constituents, typically have far from ideal microstructure with random rather than uniform Page: 5
1.3.
In situ metal matrix composites are defined as multiphase materials whose reinforcing phases are formed in situ during the fabrication of the metal by the reaction between the precursors materials used. [5]
Page: 6
Chapter 2
Page: 7
2.3 Problems Associated with the Preparation of Ex-Situ Metal Matrix Composites
Higher cost of some material system. Relatively immature technology Complex fabrication methods for fiber reinforced systems (except for casting) Page: 8
Development of Fe - Aluminide Reinforced Al Matrix Nanocomposite 2.5 Iron Aluminide Reinforced Al Matrix Composite as the choice
Ordered intermetallics based on aluminides of transition metals such as iron, nickel, niobium, titanium and cobalt have been evaluated for their potential as high temperature structural materials for the last several decades. The amount of Aluminium in these alloys exceeds that used in conventional alloys and can range from 10 to 30 wt. %. This concentration of Aluminium allows the formation of an impervious oxide layer which is responsible for the excellent oxidation, sulfidation and carburization resistance at temperatures of 1000oC or higher. In particular, iron aluminide intermetallic alloys have a lower density than most stainless steels. They possess high oxidation resistance and are unequalled in their resistance to sulfidation in H 2S and SO2 gases. Iron aluminides have also been found to be resistant to corrosion in certain molten salts. They are potentially less expensive than many currently used high-temperature alloys, as they contain no nickel and only minor amounts of other alloying elements. A significant improvement in the room temperature properties has resulted from recent development efforts. However, the strength of iron aluminides decreases above 873 K and thus the advantages they offer in terms of corrosion resistance have not been fully exploited. In order to improve the high-temperature strength of intermetallic alloys, ceramic particles can be utilized as reinforcements. In particular, FeAl and Fe3Al alloys have been the subject of investigations where ceramic particles have been introduced into the matrix in attempts to increase the high temperature creep strength. Mixing of dissimilar materials such as the reinforcement and the matrix phases may lead to interfacial reactions during service at high temperatures, due to the lack of a thermodynamic equilibrium between the two phases. These interfacial reactions may produce brittle phases at the interface leading to premature failure. On the other hand, reinforcement phases that are thermodynamically compatible with the matrix can be produced by in situ processing. One of the many available in situ processing techniques includes fabrication using displacement reactions. Processing by displacement reactions allows the in situ growth of reinforcements in the composite matrix resulting in composites with unique combinations of reinforcements and matrices. Near net-shape metal and intermetallic oxide composites can be obtained by appropriately selecting the reactants and processing parameters, taking care to minimize the volume changes resulting from the reaction. Displacement reactions are phase transformations between two or more elements or compounds resulting in the formation of new product compounds that are thermodynamically more stable than the starting reactants. The product phases exhibit specific morphologies that depend on the relative stabilities of the growth interfaces of the product phases. While some systems demonstrate stable planar or layered growth features throughout the reaction, other systems exhibit morphological instabilities that cause the product phases to interpenetrate the parent phase during growth from initially planar interfaces. Therefore, displacement reactions exhibiting morphological instabilities have the potential to grow interpenetrating reinforcement phases in situ.
Page: 10
Chapter 3
LITERATURE SURVEY
Current Status of Research And Development Of Metal Matrix Composite Preparation of Particulate Composites Processing Methods of In-Situ Metal Matrix Composites Processing Of Insitu Intermetallic Composite Interaction between Matrix and Precipitate at High Temperature Metal-Matrix Composite Spectromicroscopy
Page: 11
Because of the great potential that the In-situ metal matrix composites offered for widespread application, many techniques are recently developed to produce them. Although important processing details are not generally reported in the open literature the number of publication in this area has been decreasing worldwide. In most of the cases in-situ techniques use chemical reaction for the formation of the reinforcement; these technologies include Self-propagating High Temperature Synthesis (SHS), Direct Metal Oxidation Method (DIMOX), Exothermic Dispersion (XD) Mechanical alloying [12-17] and reactive infiltration [18-21] or reactive powder metallurgy. [22-23] Because of the fineness and thermodynamic stability of the reinforcing phase, it is expected that these in-situ composites
Page: 12
Fig 3.2: Schematic of process for production of original Lanxide Dimox material
Page: 16
Fig 3.3: Schematic representation of the temperature-time curve during SHS reaction
Page: 17
3.3.7 Reactive Infiltration Technique for Manufacturing of Net Shaped Al-Matrix Composites [43]
Reactive infiltration has potential for fabricating complex near net shaped MMC components. The process consists of infiltrating a carbon or polymer precursor preform with a reactive alloy and possible reactions are dependent on the relative thermodynamic stability and reaction kinetics. Page: 18
Al-Ti/Si + [C]* Al + TiC/SiC Al-Ti/Si + [AlN] Al + TiN/Si3N4 Al Ti/Si + [C2H5]n Al + TiC/SiC (Preform materials in parenthesis) It is possible to tailor the preform to have graded reinforcement and controlled reinforcement volume fractions. The polymeric performs can also be selected to have non-carbide reinforcement. The matrix reinforcement i.e., Vf, size, gradient can be controlled by designing the appropriate preform. Reticulated graphite preform or carbon preform can be used but it is believed that it is preferable to use carbon perform instead of the reticulated graphite due to higher reactivity of the carbon as compared to the reticulated graphite. Three different Aluminium alloys were utilized for infiltration; Al - 10wt% Ti, Al - 25wt% Si and Al - 22wt% Si - 1.5wt%Mg - 1.5wt%Zn. Mg and Zn were added to the Al - Si alloy to study the effect of tertiary and quaternary addition on infiltration kinetics. The infiltration was done in a pressure casting facility with carbon perform, 27.5 mm diameter and 45 mm high. The preform was preheated to 1250oC and infiltrated with the selected alloys at 1150oC; the casting was held at 1150oC for 15 minutes and then cooled to room temperature.
Heating Coil
Speed of Rotation: The control of mould speed is very important for successful production of casting. Rotational speed also influences the structure, the most common effect of increase in speed being to promote refinement and instability of the liquid mass at very low speed. It is logical to use the highest speed consistent with the avoidance of tearing. Pouring Temperature: Pouring temperature exerts a major role on the mode of solidification and needs to determine partly in relation to type of structure required. Low temperature is associated with maximum grain refinement and equiaxed structures while higher temperature promotes columnar growth in many alloys. However practical consideration limits the range .The pouring temperature must be sufficiently high to ensure satisfactory metal flow and freedom from cold laps whilst avoiding coarse structures. Pouring speed: This is governed primarily by the need to finish casting before the metal become sluggish; although too high a rate can cause excessive turbulence and rejection. In practice slow pouring offers number advantages. Directional solidification and feeding are promoted whilst the slow development of full centrifugal pressure on the other solidification skin reduces and risk of tearing. Excessive slow pouring rate and low pouring temperature would lead to form surface lap. Mould Temperature: The use of metal die produces marked refinement when compared with sand cast but mould temperature is only of secondary importance in relation to the structure formation. Its principal signification lies in the degree of expansion of the die with preheating .Expansion diminishes the risk of tearing in casting. In nonferrous castings, the mould temperature should neither be too low or too high. The mould should be at least 25 mm thick with the thickness increasing with size and weight of casting. Mould Coatings: Various types of coating materials are used. The coating material is sprayed on the inside of the metal mould. The purpose of the coating is to reduce the heat transfer to the mould .Defects like shrinkage and cracking that are likely to occur in metal moulds can be eliminated, thus increasing the die life. The role of coating and solidification can be adjusted to the optimum value for a particular alloy by varying the thickness of coating layer. For Aluminium alloys, the coating is a mixture of Silicate and graphite in water. Mould Life: Metal mould in casting is subjected to thermal stresses due to continuous operation. This may lead to failure of the mould. The magnitude of the stresses depends on the mould thickness and thickness of the coating layer, both of which influence the production rate. Deterioration takes place faster in cast iron mould than in steel mould. [45] Stir Casting is characterized by the following features: 1. Content of dispersed phase is limited (usually not more than 30 vol. %). 2. Distribution of dispersed phase throughout the matrix is not perfectly homogeneous: Page: 20
Fig 3.5: Laboratory Technique of Melt Cast Route to Process Insitu Composite
from the molten metal matrix during solidification there of such that the intermetallics formed during solidification wet and engulf said refractory particles. The added particles may be very small and serve only to refine the precipitating intermetallics in the alloy or they may be larger and serve as reinforcing particles in a composite with the alloy. The products obtained are also novel. A discontinuously reinforced metal matrix composite wherein the reinforcing material is a particulate binary intermetallic compound is described along with methods for preparing the Page: 21
Development of Fe - Aluminide Reinforced Al Matrix Nanocomposite 3.5 Interaction between Matrix and Precipitate at High Temperature
The product of interaction between Al and iron Fe3Al at elevated temperature has a wide range of applications in refractory, structural and electronics. If the interfacial region between the reactant compounds is examined using analytical techniques; the formation of Fe 3Al as the interfacial compound is described. The thermodynamics of the Al Fe O system is explained as it relates to the particular conditions for the Al Fe3Al reaction research. Thermodynamic principles have been used to demonstrate that the formation of Fe3Al is favored instead of other FexAly compounds for the set of conditions outlined in this thesis. A study of the mechanism of interactions in the interfacial region can help towards being able to determine the reaction kinetics that lead to the control of microstructure and thus an improvement in the material performance. The formation of Fe3Al at the interface is a result of the reduction reaction between Fe 2O3 and Al. The O released during the reduction of Fe2O3 has been investigated and demonstrated to partly remain dissolved in Fe3Al at the interfacial region. Some O reacts with Al as well to form crystalline Al2O3 in the interfacial layer. [53-56, 59] The interaction between Al and Fe2O3 yields Fe3Al and possibly another compound at the interface. The interfacial layer was found to be continuous; but the thickness was not uniform. The interfacial region physically separated the surfaces that were in contact with each other. Such an interfacial layer could act as a self-formed barrier against the diffusion of the reacting species towards each other; for example, the diffusion of Al towards the Fe2O3 substrate, and the diffusion of Fe or O towards the Al film. The self-formation of the diffusion barrier between the reacting components would be useful in structural applications and in electronic device applications. It was necessary to understand the nucleation and growth of the interfacial compound that would be the outcome of the interaction between the two surfaces in contact at elevated temperature. Presence of magnesium enhances the diffusivity of Fe atom through the matrix by increasing wettability. So in case of our project the magnesium addition that we have preferred due to support the diffusion and for the solid solution strengthening of Al matrix. The formation process of the interfacial compound (FeAl) could be described in the following way: Step I: Melted Al was in contact with the Fe2O3 substrate at elevated temperature. Step II: Al diffused into the Fe2O3 substrates more quickly through the stacking faults in the Fe2O3 substrate. Step III: At the stacking faults, Fe2O3 is reduced by Al to form Fe and O. Fe reacts with Al near the stacking fault sites to form Fe3Al. These kind of stacking fault sites are accelerated formed due to addition of a high amount of Mg. Step IV: The interfacial region containing Fe3Al grows near the stacking fault sites into the Fe2O3 substrate. [60-62]
[63]
Composite materials appear everywhere in life, both man-made (such as fiberglass) and biologically produced (like mammalian bones). The purpose of a composite man-made material is to alter and improve the properties of the matrix material, by the addition of some second material with very different chemical and structural properties. Examples of an important area of composite research are metal-matrix composites, in which a metallic host material is modified Page: 23
Page: 24
Chapter 4
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
Preparation of Insitu Metal Matrix Composite by MeltCast Route Characterizations of Metal Matrix Composite
Page: 25
First of all the Iron Oxide (Fe2O3) powder is taken into the ball mill as the required amount (50 g) with respect to the amount of Aluminium (Al) taken for the melting to produce 10 vol% Al2O3 & Fe3Al reinforced Aluminium metal matrix composite. The ball mill (wet process) is run for 35 hours to prepare nano size (30 to 40 nm) Fe2O3 powder. Toluene is used in this process for wet medium. Hence after completion of ball mill operation toluene is evaporated by hot oven at the temperature range of 75 150 oC. Now after evaporation of Toluene the nano size Fe2O3 powder is taken out from the oven and intimate mixture of nano size iron oxide powder are preheated in a sealed Aluminium tube at 550 for 1 hour and finall raised to 600 just before addition. 50 g Mg is taken in the form of small cakes for the addition during melting to increase the wettability of the reinforcement in the Al matrix and to prevent Al loss. It is considered here that due to loss of ignition only 10-15 g Mg will go into the solution. That will lead a 2-3 vol% of Mg addition. On the other hand the commercially pure Aluminium (500 g) is taken in a graphite crucible and put into a furnace at 750 oC. When solid Aluminium is melt then Flux is added for preventing it from oxidation. After 15 minutes holding when the preheated tubes containing the iron oxide are put into the molten Aluminium then a splashing reaction takes place. The magnesium is added at this time. Starring of the metal is done by a drill gun. As it is an exothermic reaction the furnace temperature suddenly increases upto 1000-1100 . Due to the high temperature, some amount of Al gets oxidized; therefore additional amount of Al is taken into account whereas this additional amount of Al is also used for the dilution of the reinforcement. Thus the molten composite is produced and poured into the metal mould. The following reactions are expected to be taken place during melting. Fe2O3 + Mg FeO + MgO Al + FeO Fe3Al + Al2O3 Al2O3 + Mg MgO + Al Now this Fe3Al particles present there as the major reinforcement with very small amount of MgO and Al2O3 particles. Page: 26
Development of Fe - Aluminide Reinforced Al Matrix Nanocomposite 4.2 Characterizations of Metal Matrix Composite
The composite samples so prepared were characterized extensively by Microhardness measurement, tensile test, Impact test, optical microscopy.
Page: 27
d=mean value of the diagonal of the indentation (mm). =Angle between the opposite faces at the vortex of Diamond indenter.
In the case where the unit of test loads F is in kgf, Vickers hardness shall be calculated according to the following formula:-( ) ( ) ( ( ) ) ( ) ( ( ( ) ) )
Page: 29
However the assumption of a constant pendulum velocit v is not valid, for v decreases in proportion to the load on the specimen. It is usually assumed that Et = E (1 - ) Where Et = the total fracture energy =E / 4E0 where E0 is the initial energy of the pendulum
The impact testing is done with the sub sized samples having dimensions 55mm X 10mm X 5mm.
Page: 32
Chapter 5
Page: 33
Fig 5.1: Microstructure of Fe3Al Reinforced Al matrix insitu composite (As Cast Structure) Magnification: 100X Bright phase: Matrix Dark phase: Reinforcements
Page: 34
Fig 5.2: Microstructure of Fe3Al Reinforced Al matrix insitu composite (As Cast Structure) Magnification: 200X Bright phase: Matrix Dark phase: Reinforcements
Fig 5.3: Microstructure of Fe3Al Reinforced Al matrix insitu composite (As Cast Structure) Magnification: 500X Bright phase: Matrix Dark phase: Reinforcements
Page: 35
Fig 5.4: Microstructure of Fe3Al Reinforced Al matrix insitu composite (30% hot rolled Structure) Magnification: 100X Bright phase: Matrix Dark phase: Reinforcements
Fig 5.5: Microstructure of Fe3Al Reinforced Al matrix insitu composite (30% hot rolled Structure) Magnification: 200X Bright phase: Matrix Dark phase: Reinforcements
Page: 36
Fig 5.4: Microstructure of Fe3Al Reinforced Al matrix insitu composite (30% hot rolled Structure) Magnification: 500X Bright phase: Matrix Dark phase: Reinforcements
Fig 5.4: Microstructure of Fe3Al Reinforced Al matrix insitu composite (30% hot rolled Structure) Magnification: 500X Bright phase: Matrix Dark phase: Reinforcements
Page: 37
Sample ID
Load
Remarks
The HVN values around or above 100 are got from the indentation of which the major parts are on reinforcement phases. The points are bolded in the table. The values marked star are eliminated from calculation as they show abrupt low values of HVN. The indentations corresponding to those points are on some irregular shaped black patches. They are most probably the irregular surface dimple created by the displacement of reinforcement during grinding from that point.
10 Grams
15 Seconds
Page: 38
Obs. No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Sample ID
Load
Remarks
The points, bolded here show the lowest values among all the HVN values. This is probably due to the highest part of the indentation at the matrix. Rest of all the data show the minimum amount of variation due to extended indentation size and get the bulk hardness as particular.
25 Grams
15 Seconds
Obs. No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Sample ID
Load
Remarks
The obvious trademark of these observations is the lower variation range of the hardness values. The variation lies between minimum 64.7 HVN to the maximum 87.2 HVN. The indentations corresponding to the points, bolded here are taken surrounding the black patches which are supposed to be reinforced particles. The rest are taken exclusively on the white matrix. Now the more or less uniformity in hardness values are probably due to the
25 Grams
20 Seconds
Page: 39
Sample ID
Load
Remarks
10 Grams
15 Seconds
61.6
As the hardness values are tested on commercially pure Aluminium grains, the hardness values are uniform.
Modulus (GPa)
55.1
YS (0.2%) (MPa)
138.88
UTS (MPa)
255.14
UEL (%)
14.94
TEL (%)
18.27
Toughness (J)
33.5
Table 5.4: Tensile Data for Fe3Al Reinforced Al Matrix Composite (30% Hot Rolled At 250oC)
Page: 40
Fig 5.5: Tensile Curve for Fe3Al Reinforced Al Matrix Composite (30% Hot Rolled At 250oC)
Specimen Label
Commercially Pure Aluminium
Modulus (GPa)
46.5
YS (0.2%) (MPa)
43.35
UTS (MPa)
94.64
UEL (%)
21.38
TEL (%)
38.59
Toughness (J)
30.70
Sample
Load (mkg) 15 20 25
Sample
Load (mkg) 15 15
Error (mkg) 0 0
Page: 42
Chapter 6
CONCLUSIONS
Page: 43
CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS
The microstructural analysis exhibits a more or less uniform distribution of reinforcement particles, mostly expected to be Iron Aluminide (Fe3Al) intermetallic in a continuous nice matrix of Al and some small amount of expected magnesium. The precipitations of reinforced particles are found to be very fine and very uniformly distributed along the grain boundaries. Microhardness values show that a very good improvement of Vickers number. After heat treatment the uniformity in hardness is a very exclusive set of property got to be concluded about superior properties of the composite. Tensile property also reviles a very good improvement in yield strength. It improves about two folds with compare to the commercially pure Aluminium. Though the overall ductility reduces the property is much enough superior to have an application for structural use. Ultimate Tensile Strength improves two and half times which is very much important. In case of commercially pure Al the Tensile strength is around 100 MPa whereas the composite shows a Tensile strength value of about 250 MPa. Regarding Charpy impact Value of sub sized sample of MMC Charpy impact value of 3.1 is no doubt very attractive. The produced MMC may be very much useful for aerospace application, structural applications etc. But response of the composite in various application environments should be tested. The corrosion properties, wear properties are very much important for these kinds of applications. If we consider corrosion property here is always a chance of formation of galvanic couple between matrix and reinforcements. On other hand regarding wear property the hard intermetallic embedded in soft matrix may act as a rough surface and during wear test the soft Al matrix may be eroded faster living behind the embedded hard intermetallic which may resist further wear of the matrix. We can predict a brittle and cleavage type of fracture as compared to the high ductile fracture of the pure Aluminium. The brittle and cleavage type fracture in the former is responsible for the low impact and tensile properties of the MMC. Due to insufficient facilities the XRD, EDX analysis cannot be carried out and hence the exact quantitative analyses about the constituents are not done rather being predicted.
Page: 44
Chapter 7
REFERENCES
Page: 45
CHAPTER 7: REFERENCES
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. http://www.machinedesign.com/bde/materials/composite/rvm/2d.ht R. J. Amserault and R. M. Fischer, Scr. Metal 17 (1983) M. F. Ashby Phil Mag. 21 (1970) G. S. Anisell in oxide dispersion strength edited b G. S. Anisell, .D. ooper and F. V. Lenel (Gardoa and Brcach New York 1968) R.M. Alkin Jr. JOM 1997, 35 Z.Fan, A.P Miodownik, L Chandresekaran and M Ward-Clore. J Mater. Science 29, 1127 (1994) Z. Fan H .J Niu , A.P.Miodownik, T.Saito & B. Canter J. Engg Mater. 127-131, 423 (1997). T.W Clyne & P. J Withers, An introduction to metal matrix composites, 2 nd edition (Cambridge university press) Cambridge 1997. K. Mussent, he development of second generation metal matrix composites Internal Home Page of T.U.Delft, The Netherlands, 1997. A. L. Geiger and J. A. Walker JOM 1991, 8 J. H. Brinkman, J Daszczyk and L Kategerman. Scripta mater, 1997, 37(3) 293
12. K. Subhash and K. Michael, Matar Sci, Engg. A 162, 153 (1993) 13. R. W. Rice J Mater. Sci 26, 6533 (1991) 14. A. Stanidav and A.S Nagelberg. J. A. Ceramic, SOC, 75, 447 (1992) 15. A. K. Kuruvilla, K. S. Prasad and Y. R. Mahajan, Scripta Metall. Mater 24, 873 (1990) 16. 17. 18. 19. I. Gotman and M. J Koczak , Mater Sci Engg A 187,189(1994) K. M. Lea and I. H. Moon, Mate Sci Engg A 185, 165(1994) H. Fakungea and X. G. Wang J Mater. Sci, 10 23(1991) F. Wagner, D. E. Garchi, A Krupp and N Clausses, J Eur Ceram Soc 19, 2229(1999)
20. R. E. Lachman, K Ewsuk and A. P. Tomvia, J. Am. Ceramic Soc. 79,27 (1996) 21. M. C. Breslim, J. Ringnalda, A. L. Marasco G. S Daehn and H. L. Fraster ceramic Engg Sci Proc 15, 104 (1994) 22. Z. Y. Ma and S. C. Tjong Metall Mater Traus 28A, 1931(1977) 23. Z. Y. MA and S. C. Tjong Mate Sci Engg A 256,120(1988) 24. Z. A. Muniv and U. A. Tamburini Mater Sci Rep 3,277 (1989) 25. H. X. Peng Z. Fan & D. Z. Wang. J Mater, Res. Vol 15, 1943 (2000) 26. Lu, L., Gokhale, A. B. and Abbaschian, R. Matls Sci and Eng, A144, (1991)11 27. M. J. Koczak and K. S. Kumar, In situ process for producing a composite containing refractor materials, U. S. Patent4, 808, 372 (1989) Page: 46
36.
37. W.B. Johnson, T. D. Claar and G. H. Schirok , preparation and processing of platelet reinforced ceramic by directed reaction of zirconium with Boron arbide, eram, Eng Sci Proc [7-8] (1989) 38. K. S. Kumar and S. K. Mannan, Nickel aluminide/ itanium diboride composites, Martin Marietta laboratories Rept. MML-Tr-88-66c, ONR contract No. N00014-85-c-0639, August, 1988 39. L. hristodolon, Engineered Metal Matrix Processing report, 4[1]3-4 (April, 1989) omposite microstructures; Materials and
40. Z. A. Munir, U. Anselmi -Tantowini reports, 3, (1989), 227-365. 41. H. J Feng, J. J. More, D. G. Wirth, he application of combustion synthesis in the production of dense ceramic composites, annual AcerSOc conference, incinnati, April 1992, to be published by AcerSoc 42. E. Ustundag, R. Subramanian, R. Dieckmann and S. L. Sass Insitu formation of metal-ceramic composites and ductile phase toughened ceramics b Reduction Reaction, In Situ Composites: Science and Technology, Proceedingd of Symposium of Composite materials, [97-113] October 1993 43. Subhas Khatri, Victori a Shtessel, Michael Koczak, A. P. Divecha and Jim Kerr, Net Shaped manufacturing of Aluminium matrix composites via reactive infiltration, In Situ composites:Science and Technology, Proceedingd of Symposium of Composite materials, [115-121] October 1993 Page: 47
59. Strategy in Development of New Materials for Efficient Energy Conversion, Osaka, 1987 60. P. Sahoo, M.J. Koczak, Mater. Sci. Eng. A131 (1991) 61. J. Pan, J.H. Li, H. Fukunaka, X.G. Ning, H.Q. Ye, Z.K. Yao, M. Yang, Composites Sci. Technol. 57 (1997) 62. J.J. Valencia, C. McCullough, J. Rosler, C.G. Levi, R. Mehrabian, in: P. Rohatgi, et al. (Eds.), Solidification of Metal Matrix Composites, Warrendale, PA, TMS, 1990 63. http://www.hut.fi/Units/PhysicalMetallurgy/English/now2.html
Page: 48