Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Testing and Extrapolation Methods, Resistance, Uncertainty Analysis Spreadsheet for Resistance Measurements
7.5 02 02 03
Page 1 of 5 Effective Date 2002 Revision 00
Table of Contents
7.5 02 02 03
Page 2 of 5 Effective Date 2002 Revision 00
2.1 Inputs Symbol Units Definition Facility Type of ship Period of tests performed References Number of Tests Total Resistance Coefficient CT value (single test)
M CT
7.5 02 02 03
Page 3 of 5 Effective Date 2002 Revision 00
CT
CT LWL B T S g m m m m2 m/s kg/m3 m2/s
2
k K V tw BS1
B
m/s C m2
m2 m/s kg kg kg kg
o
BMx4
B
Btw B
B
C kg/m3
Standard deviation of CT (single test) Total Resistance Coefficient CT values (multiple test) Length along waterline Beam Draft, even keel Wetted surface, including rudder Model basin gravity Model basin water density Model basin water kinematic viscosity Form factor Coverage factor for standard deviation Model speed Water temperature Assumed error in hull form bias Error in displacement bias Speed bias Resistance calibration bias Resistance curve fit bias Resistance load cell misalignment bias Resistance towing force inclination bias Water temperature bias Water density bias
CT CT (15oC)
CT
CF (15oC) Fr Mx kg
Coefficient CT average (single test) at 15 oC Total Resistance Coefficient CT average (multiple test) Total Resistance Coefficient CT average (multiple test) at 15 oC Standard deviation of CT (multiple test) Frictional resistance coefficient at 15oC Froude Number Total resistance mass in x-direction Resistance average Total Resistance Coefficient CT average at (15oC) Frictional resistance coefficient at measured temperature, tw 2 % of BS due to BS12
B
BS
B
% of B due to BS22 Wetted surface bias % of wetted surface range, S % of speed range, V 2 % of B M x due to BMx12
2 S
B B
2 % of B M x due to BMx22
B
2 % of B M x due to BMx32
B
2.2 Outputs Symbol Units CT (15oC) Definition Statement of purpose Total Resistance
2 % of B M x due to BMx42
B
BMx
B
kg
Total resistance mass bias % of total resistance mass range, Mx % of water temperature range, tw
7.5 02 02 03
Page 4 of 5 Effective Date 2002 Revision 00
% of water density range, S 1/m Sensitivity coefficient for wetted surface, S V 1/(m/s) Sensitivity coefficient for speed, V Mx m/N*s2 Sensitivity coefficient for total resistance mass, Mx m3/kg Sensitivity coefficient for water density, o tw 1/ C Sensitivity coefficient for water temperature, tw BCT Resistance Coefficient bias limit % of Resistance Coefficient range, CT15 deg C CT Standard deviation of CT M Number of tests PCT Resistance Coefficient precision limit % of Resistance Coefficient range, CT15 deg C % of Resistance Coefficient total Uncertainty, UCT 15 deg C due to bias % of Resistance Coefficient total Uncertainty, UCT 15 deg C due to precision UCT15 deg C Resistance Coefficient total uncertainty % of Resistance Coefficient range, CT15 deg C
2
B
3 PROCEDURE 3.1 Instructions The inputs appear as empty white boxes. The outputs appear as grey boxes and are calculated for the user. The user can select single or multiple test method by entering the corresponding number of tests, 1 for single test method, >1 for multiple test method. For single test method, enter average CT and standard deviation of CT from best available data. For multiple test method, enter measured CT values from each test. There are 15 CT inputs for multiple test method. If the user does not have 15 CT inputs, use as many as necessary and leave the remaining CT inputs blank, not zero. Water density and viscosity input values should be determined from the ITTC standard in 7.5-02-01-03 Density and Viscosity of Water. Upon entering of all inputs, the uncertainty will be calculated for the user at the end of the spreadsheet. 3.2 Spreadsheet The uncertainty analysis spreadsheet for resistance test is provided by attached Resistance-blank.xls excel document.
Resistance-blank.xls
7.5 02 02 03
Page 5 of 5 Effective Date 2002 Revision 00
4 VALIDATION Example use of the uncertainty analysis spreadsheet for resistance test for single and multiple test methods are provided by attached Resistance-single test example.xls and Resistance-multiple test example.xls excel documents. The examples are based on Longo and Stern (1998), which was one of the 22nd ITTC Resistance Committee member contributions to 7.5-02-02-02 Uncertainty Analysis in EFD, Example for Resistance Test.
"Resistance-single test example.xls" "Resistance-multiple test example.xls"
5 REFERENCES (1) Longo, J. and Stern, F., (1998) Resistance, Sinkage and Trim, Wave Profile, and Nominal Wake and Uncertainty Assessment for DTMB Model 5512, Proc. 25th ATTC, Iowa City, IA.