Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Teaching Notes
In the earlier chapters, we have looked at certain problems that involve long range planning such as facility location, layout and major equipment purchase decisions. Aggregate planning involves medium range planning. The planning horizon for medium range plans varies from a couple of months to 18 months. A major component of aggregate planning is to plan aggregate production and inventory levels to achieve a desired level of customer service. In preparing the aggregate plan, a major consideration is to check the desired production plan against the estimated capacity. On the other hand, in determining the estimated capacity, we must take into account the expected demand and the resulting medium range production plan. We use the term aggregate plan in lieu of medium range production plan for two reasons: 1. 2. It generally involves the production plan for a group or a family of products (aggregation of products). It aggregates daily or weekly (short-range) demand and the resulting production plan (aggregation of time periods).
Even though the aggregate plan is a function of many different factors, the key factor is the forecasted demand over the length of the medium-range planning horizon. After developing an aggregate plan consistent with the forecasted demand and capacity, it is disaggregated into shorter time periods. The process of disaggregation is the beginning of short range planning using master scheduling and operations scheduling. Both master scheduling and operations scheduling are designed to implement the medium range plan on the shop floor. In determining the aggregate plan, integration and communication between various functions of the firm are vital. Expected changes in the work force levels need to be communicated to the human resources department, while any major equipment purchases, layout changes and capacity additions must involve the approval of the finance department. On the other hand, changes in anticipated inventory levels and especially, expected stockouts must be discussed with the marketing department.
85
4. The need for aggregate planning is to begin to translate long-term decisions into short-term operating plans. Aggregate planning constitutes the intermediate step in this process. 5. In both manufacturing and service, managers can vary the size of the workforce and subcontract work. Manufacturers have the additional option of varying the size of inventories. 6. The difficulty relates to finding a common unit on which to base aggregate plans when there is a variety of products or services to contend with. 7. a. Maintaining a constant workforce has the advantage of making estimation of labor costs relatively easy, is good for morale, and minimizes hiring and layoff costs. However, inventory carrying costs tend to be high. b. Since labor force has to be continually adjusted, hiring and layoff costs tend to be high. Due to the instability of the labor force, employee morale is low. However, the inventory carrying costs are very low because production is matched with demand, resulting in little or no inventory. c. Varying the workforce can cause morale problems. Moreover, working overtime generally is less productive, increases quality problems, and increases the risk of accidents. 8. Informal techniques are visual, easy to comprehend, and enable planners to compare alternatives. Their chief limitation is that they do not necessarily produce optimum solutions. a. Spreadsheets are intuitively appealing and easy to understand, but solutions are not necessarily optimal. b. Linear Programming (LP): LP approach is a method of obtaining optimal solutions to problems involving allocation of limited resources. The objective of linear programming is either maximization of profit or minimization of cost. In Aggregate Planning, the objective is usually the minimization of costs related to labor time (regular and overtime), inventory carrying, hiring and layoffs. LP is a valid approach if the cost and variable relationships and assumptions are linear and demand can be treated as deterministic. Even for fairly small problems, LP approach requires computerization due to massive data manipulation and calculations. c. Simulation: It is a highly flexible computerized trial-and-error approach that provides testing of the model under different conditions, assumptions or scenarios. It provides a what-if capability to identify possible options to a given aggregate planning problem based on trial-and-error. Simulation requires the use of the computer. Therefore, computer programming and customization of different conditions and scenarios may be time consuming. 10. The master schedule has three inputs: the beginning inventory, forecasts for each period of the schedule, and customer outputs. Its outputs are projected inventory, production requirements, and uncommitted (available-to-promise) inventory.
9.
Taking Stock
1. When we freeze a portion of the master schedule, we make the schedule more stable and reduce the nervousness of the schedule. However, freezing the schedule also leads to inflexibility and reduced customer service because we will not be able to respond to the demands of the customers in a timely fashion.
86 Operations Management, 9/e
2. Purchasing agents, production planning and control manager, planners, schedulers, and marketing personnel need to interface with the master schedule. Purchasing agents, planners and schedulers need direct information from the MPS to order the parts, manage the inventories of the parts and schedule the machines in producing the parts going into the end items master scheduled. The production planning and control manager needs the MPS information to determine capacity needs of the labor, machinery and equipment. Marketing personnel need this information so that they could let their customers know if there is a delay in the completion of an order. In the case of capacity constrained manufacturing, marketing personnel also need to provide the master scheduler with key information as to which orders to delay and which orders are crucial to try to complete on time. 3. The new communication tools made it easier to communicate changes in the master schedule. Therefore, when a change is necessary in the master schedule (addition or a deletion of an order, change in the due date or the quantity of an order), it can be communicated to the master scheduler faster through new communication tools (e-mail, fax, etc.). The master scheduler can take this information, and through the utilization of a computerized production planning and control system, incorporate the changes to the schedule (assuming the changes are feasible). After incorporating the changes and making sure that the MPS is feasible he/she can disseminate the information to the appropriate parties and to the shop floor very quickly so that the manufacturing system can respond to the changes in a timely fashion.
87
Level strategy maintains a constant workforce and constant production. It has the advantage of minimizing hiring and layoff costs and keeping employee morale high. However, inventory carrying costs tend to be high.
88
Solutions
1. From example 1. Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Subcontract OutputForecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog Costs: Output Regular Overtime Subcontract Inventory Backorder @ 5 Total 1 200 300 2 200 300 3 300 300 4 400 0 5 500 450 6 200 450 Total 1,800 1,800
100 0 100 50 0
(50) 0 0 0 250
$600 50 0 $650
2. a. (Other plans are possible) Period 1 Forecast 200 Output Regular 290 Overtime OutputForecast 90 Inventory Beginning 0 Ending 90 Average 45 Backlog 0 Costs: Regular @ 2 Overtime @ 3 Inventory @ 1 Backorder @ 5 Total
560 90
$580 0 45 0 $625
89
Solutions (continued) 2. b. (Other plans are possible) Period 1 Forecast 200 Output Regular 290 Subcontract OutputForecast 90 Inventory Beginning 0 Ending 90 Average 45 Backlog 0 Costs: Regular @ 2 Subcontract @ 6 Inventory @ 1 Backorder @ 5 Total 2 3 200 300 290 290 90 (10) 4 400 290 10 5 500 290 50 6 200 290 90 0 0 0 0 Total 1,800 1,740 60
510 90
$580 0 45 0 $625
580 60 120 0
90
Solutions (continued) 3. Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Subcontract OutputForecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog 1 200 280 0 0 80 0 80 40 0 2 3 200 300 280 280 0 40 0 0 80 20 4 400 280 40 0 (80) 180 100 140 0 5 6 500 200 280 280 40 0 0 0 (180) 100 0 50 80 80 0 0 0 0 Total 1,800 1,680 120 0
520 80
Costs: Output Regular @ 2 $560 Overtime @ 3 0 Subcontract @ 6 0 Inventory @ 1 40 Backorder @ 5 0 Total 4. Period Forecast Output Regular Subcontract OutputForecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog 1 200 280 0 80 0 80 40 0 $600
560 560 0 120 0 0 120 170 0 0 680 850 2 200 280 0 80 80 160 120 0 3 300 280 20 0 160 160 160 0
560 560 $3,360 120 0 360 0 0 0 50 0 520 400 0 400 1,120 560 $4,640 5 6 500 200 280 280 50 0 (170) 90 0 45 80 80 0 0 0 0 Total 1,800 1,680 120
490 80
560 560 $3,360 300 0 720 45 0 490 400 0 400 1,305 560 $4,970
No. The above plan costs: ($4,970 4,640) = $330 more than the plan in example 2.
91
Solutions (continued) 5. a. Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Subcontract Output - Forecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog Costs: Output Regular @ 60 Overtime @ 90 Subcontract Inventory @ 5 Backorder Total
1 120 120 0 2 135 130 5 (5) 3 140 130 10 (10) 4 120 120 0 5 125 125 0 6 125 125 0 7 140 130 10 (10) 8 135 130 5 (5) Total 1,040 1,010 30
7,800 900
7,200
7,500
7,500
7,800 900
7,200
8,250
8,700
7,200
b. Period 1 2 3 4 Forecast 120 135 140 120 Output Regular 130 130 130 130 Overtime Subcontract Output - Forecast 10 (5) (10) 10 Inventory Beginning 0 10 5 0 Ending 10 5 0 5 Average 5 7.5 2.5 2.5 Backlog 5 Costs: Output Regular @ 60 $7,800 7,800 7,800 7,800 Overtime Subcontract @ 50 Inventory @ $2 10 15 5 5 Backorder @ $90 450 Total $7,810 7,815 8,255 7,805
7,800 15 7,815
7,800 25 7,825
7,800 20 7,820
7,800 5 7,805
92
Solutions (continued) 6. a. Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Subcontract Output - Forecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog Costs: Output Regular @ 40 Overtime @ 60 Subcontract Inventory Backorder Total b. Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Subcontract Output - Forecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog Costs: Regular Overtime Subcontract Inventory Backorder Total
1 250 250 2 300 275 25 3 250 250 4 300 275 25 5 280 275 5 6 275 275 7 270 250 20 Total 1,850 75
10,000
11,000 1,500
11,000 300
11,000
10,000 1,200
$74,000 4,500
$10,000 12,500
10,000
12,500
11,300
11,000
11,200
$78,500
11,000
11,000
93
Solutions (continued) 7. a. Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Subcontract Output - Forecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog Costs: Regular Overtime Subcontract Inventory Total b. Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Subcontract Output - Forecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog Costs: Regular Overtime Subcontract Inventory Backlog Total No backlogs are allowed Mar. Apr. May 50 44 55
40 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 3,200 960 280 0 4,440 40 8 0 4 0 4 2 0 3,200 960 0 20 4,180 40 8 3 4 4 0 2 0 3,200 960 420 20 4,600 Jun. 60 40 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 3,200 960 1,680 0 5,840 July 50 40 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 3,200 960 280 0 4,440 Aug. 40 40 3 0 3 0 3 1.5 0 3,200 360 0 15 3,575 Sep. 51 40 8 0 3 3 0 1.5 0 3,200 960 0 15 4,175 Total 350 280 51 19
94
Solutions (continued) 8. a. Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Output - Forecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog Costs: Regular @ 10 Overtime @ 16 Inventory @ 1 Back orders @ 10 Total Level production supplemented with overtime as needed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total 4,000 4,800 5,600 7,200 6,400 5,000 33,000
5,000 1,000 1,000 500.0 0 50,000 0 500 0 50,500 5,000 200 5,000 600 5,000 1,600 600 600 0 300.0 0 50,000 25,600 300 0 75,900 5,000 1,400 0 0 0 0.0 0 50,000 22,400 0 0 72,400 5,000 0 0 0 0.0 0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 30,000 3,000 0
1,000 1,200 1,200 600 1,100.0 900.0 0 0 50,000 0 1,100 0 51,100 50,000 0 900 0 50,900
b. Combination of overtime, inventory and subcontracting to handle variations in demand. Max. overtime = 500, max. subcontracting = 500 units. Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total Forecast 4,000 4,800 5,600 7,200 6,400 5,000 33,000 Output Regular 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 Overtime 500 500 500 500 500 2,500 Subcontract 500 500 Output - Forecast 1,500 700 100 1,700 400 0 0 Inventory Beginning 1,500 2,200 2,100 400 0 Ending 1,500 2,200 2,100 400 0 0 Average 750.0 1,850.0 2,150.0 1,250.0 200.0 0.0 6,200 Backlog 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Costs: Regular @ 10 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Overtime @ 16 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 0 40,000 Subcontract @ 20 0 0 0 0 10,000 0 10,000 Inventory @ 1 750 1,850 2,150 1,250 200 0 6,200 Back orders @ 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 58,750 59,850 60,150 59,250 68,200 50,000 356,200
95
Solutions (continued) c.
Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Output - Forecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog Costs: Regular @ 10 Overtime @ 16 Hire/Lay off Inventory @ 1 Back orders @ 10 Total
Overtime up to 750 units per period maximum to handle variations in demand. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Total 4,000 4,800 5,600 7,200 6,400 5,000 33,000
5,000 1,000 1,000 500 0 50,000 0 500 0 50,500 5,000 750 950 1,000 1,950 1,475 0 50,000 12,000 1,475 0 63,475 5,000 750 150 1,950 2,100 2,025 0 50,000 12,000 2,025 0 64,025 5,000 750 1,450 2,100 650 1,375 0 50,000 12,000 1,375 0 63,375 5,000 750 650 650 0 325 0 50,000 12,000 325 0 62,325 5,000 0 0 0 0.0 0 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 30,000 3,000 0
We should choose the plan generated in part a because $350,800 < 353,700 < 356,200. 9. Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Subcontract Output- Forecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog Costs: Regular Overtime Subcontract Inventory Backlog Total
96
Solutions (continued) 10. Plan B: Hire one worker and subcontract. Workforce = 20 + 1 = 21 workers. Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Forecast 190 230 260 280 210 170 160 260 180 Output Regular 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 210 Overtime Subcontract 10 20 20 OutputForecast 30 0 (30) (70) 0 40 50 (50) 30 Inventory Beginning 0 30 30 0 0 0 0 20 0 Ending 30 30 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 Average 15 30 15 0 0 0 10 10 0 Backlog 0 0 0 70 70 30 0 30 0
Costs: Output Regular @ 6 Overtime Subcontract @ 8 Inventory @ 5 Backorder @ 10 Total Total 1,940 1,890 50
80 200
$1,260 80 75 0 $1,415
1,260 0 50 0 1,310
The total cost for Plan B is $14,140 plus $200 to hire one additional worker. Total = $14,340. Plan C: No additional workers are to be hired. It is assumed that the present workforce is retained. Only subcontracting is to be used with a maximum of 20 per period. Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Total Forecast 190 230 260 280 210 170 160 260 180 1,940 Output Regular 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 1,800 Overtime Subcontract 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 20 0 140 OutputForecast 30 (10) (40) (60) 10 50 40 (40) 20 Inventory Beginning 0 30 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 Ending 30 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 Average 15 25 10 0 0 0 10 10 0 70 Backlog 0 0 20 80 70 20 0 20 0 210
Costs: Output Regular @ 6 Overtime Subcontract @ 8 Inventory @ 5 Backorder @ 10 Total
1,200 0 50 0 1,250
1,200 0 0 0 1,200
Plan Total Cost Rank A $14,290 3 B 14,370 2 C 14,370 1 The lowest cost is for Plan A = $14,290.
97
Solutions (continued) 11. Assume that the $5 cost per unit for the temporary workers is in addition to $6 per unit for regular time cost. Part-time workers are to be hired to produce at least 170 units. Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Forecast 190 230 260 280 210 170 160 260 180 Output Regular 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Part-Time 50 50 50 Subcontract OutputForecast 10 20 (10) (30) (10) 30 40 (60) 20 Inventory Beginning 0 10 30 20 0 0 10 50 0 Ending 10 30 20 0 0 10 50 0 10 Average 5 20 25 10 0 5 30 25 5 Backlog 0 0 0 10 20 0 0 10 0
Costs: Output Regular @ 6 Part-Time @ 11 Subcontract Inventory @ 5 Backorder @ 10 Total
125 40
$1,200 25 0 $1,225
1,200 25 0 1,225
The same number of part-time workers must be used in any period where they are used. It is assumed that a worker (part-time) will work for the entire period producing 10 units. With these constraints it is necessary to produce more than 170 units by using part-time workers. Employ 5 temporary workers during periods 2, 3, and 4 with a total cost of $13,475.
98
Solutions (continued) 12. Objective here is to minimize backlogs. Period 1 2 3 Forecast 190 230 260 Output Regular 200 200 200 Overtime 25 25 25 Subcontract 0 0 0 OutputForecast 35 (5) (35) Inventory Beginning 0 35 30 Ending 35 30 0 Average 17.5 32.5 15 Backlog 0 0 5
5 210 200 25 0 15 0 0 0 45
6 170 200 15 0 45 0 0 0 0
7 160 200 0 40 0 40 20 0
9 180 200 0 20 0 0 0 0
252 130
Costs: Output Regular @ 6 $1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 $10,800 Overtime @ 9 225 225 225 225 225 135 0 0 $1,260 Subcontract 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inventory @ 5 87.5 162.5 75 0 0 0 100 100 0 $525 Backorder @ 10 0 0 50 600 450 0 0 200 0 $1,300 Total $1,512.5 1,587.5 1,550 2,025 1,875 1,335 1,300 1,500 1,200 $13,885 If minimization of cost is the primary objective (instead of Min. backlogs), overtime units in period 6 could be reduced to 0. The cost for this plan is $13,885.
99
Solutions (continued) 13. Several solutions are possible. Here is one. Period Forecast Output Regular Overtime Subcontract OutputForecast Inventory Beginning Ending Average Backlog 1 190 210 2 230 210 10 20 10 20 30 25 0 3 260 210 25 20 (5) 30 25 27.5 0 4 280 210 25 20 (25) 25 0 12.5 0 5 210 210 6 170 180 7 160 180 20 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 5 0 40 10 50 30 0 8 260 180 10 20 (50) 50 0 25 0 9 180 180 Total 1,940 1,770 70 100
20 0 20 10 0
0 0 0 0 0
135
Costs: Output Regular @ 6 $1,260 Overtime @ 9 0 Subcontract @ 8 0 Hiring @ 200 200 Layoff-firing @100 0 Inventory @ 5 50 Backorder @ 10 0 Total 1,510
1,260 1,260 225 225 160 160 0 0 0 0 137.5 62.5 0 0 1,782.5 1,707.5
1,260 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,260
1080 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,080
100
Solutions (continued) 14. Period +1 61 81 91 60 80 90 59 79 89 3 2 1 1 1 100 450 0 0 4 4 4 8 8 8 550 2 1 100 450 0 0 5 5 5 10 10 10 550 0 2 0 50 50 30 500 50 20 4 4 4 700 0 2 0 50 50 0 500 50 50 5 5 5 700 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 500 50 100 750 2 3 0 0 0 30 0 0 70 500 50 100 750 91 Unused Cap 0 90 0 30 0 10 0 90 0 31 0 11 0 1 0 32 0 12 0 2 90 92 4 +90 +30 +10 90 +32 +12 +2 +34 +14 +4 90 Total 100 500 50 120 500 50 120 500 50 100 2,090 Total Cap. 100 500 50 120 500 50 120 500 50 100 2,090
Beg. Inv. Reg. Over. Sub. Reg. Over. Sub. Reg. Over. Sub. Demand
0 60 80 90 63 83 93 66 86 96
1 61 81 91 60 80 90 63 83 93
2 62 82 92 61 81 91 60 80 90
15. Period 21 62 82 92 60 80 90 58 78 88 3 2 1
Beg. Inv. Reg. Over. Sub. Reg. Over. Sub. Reg. Over. Sub. Demand
0 60 80 90 63 83 93 66 86 96
2 62 82 92 60 80 90 63 83 93
4 64 84 94 62 82 92 60 80 90
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
101
Sources
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
Demand Iteration: 3
Sources
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 90 30 10 ( 30 ) 31 11 1 32 12 2 30
Demand 550 700 750 ( ) = number of units to ship, other entries are reduced costs.
Optimal solution: Iteration: 3 Total shipping cost : $126,650 Ship 100 units from source Ship 450 units from source Ship 50 units from source Ship 50 units from source Ship 90 units from source Ship 500 units from source Ship 30 units from source Ship 40 units from source Ship 120 units from source Ship 440 units from source Ship 50 units from source Ship 100 units from source Ship 10 units from source
1 2 2 3 4 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 6
to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest.
1 1 2 2 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 2
102
17.
Problem title: 914 AP Number of sources: 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 0 60 80 90 63 83 93 66 86 96 550 2 2 62 82 92 60 80 90 63 83 93 700 Number of destinations: 4 Destinations 3 4 64 84 94 62 82 92 60 80 90 750 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 Supply 100 500 50 120 500 50 120 440 50 100
Sources
Sources
1 ( 100 ) ( 450 ) 0 0 5 5 5 10 10 10
2 0 ( 50 ) ( 50 ) ( 90 ) ( 500 ) ( 10 ) 0 5 5 5
4 90 30 10 ( 30 ) 32 12 2 34 14 4 30
Demand 550 700 750 ( ) = number of units to ship, other entries are reduced costs.
Optimal solution: Iteration: 3 Total shipping cost: $127,00 Ship 100 units from source Ship 450 units from source Ship 50 units from source Ship 50 units from source Ship 90 units from source Ship 500 units from source Ship 30 units from source Ship 40 units from source Ship 120 units from source Ship 440 units from source Ship 50 units from source Ship 100 units from source Ship 10 units from source Additional cost = $127,000 $126,650 = $350
1 2 2 3 4 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 6
to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest. to dest.
1 1 2 2 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 2
103
Solutions (continued) 18. a. Initially, David should develop one aggregate plan for the next six months in order to determine his output rate, employment levels and changes, inventory levels and changes, back orders, and subcontracting. This will help him to achieve a plan that will more effectively and efficiently utilize the organizations resources to satisfy expected demand. For the first two months though, David will need to disaggregate his plan into a short-run master schedule for each size wheel. Adjustments will be made in the planning process as needs arise over time and the planning horizon gets shorter. b. and c. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. April Forecast 1,500 1,400 900 1,200 1,500 1,700 Output Reg. 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 Output 17 17 17 17 17 15 Overtime Output Minus (83) 17 517 217 (83) (285) Forecast Inventory 0 0 0 451 668 585 Begin Ending 0 0 451 668 585 300 Average 0 0 225.5 559.5 626.5 442.5 Backlog 83 66 0 0 0 0 Cost Reg. 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Overtime 127.50 127.50 127.50 127.50 127.50 112.50 Inventory 0 0 225.50 559.5 626.5 442.5 Backorders $498 396 0 0 0 0 Personnel 800.00 Layoffs Totals $8,425.50 $7,523.50 $7,353.00 $7,687 $7,754 $7,555 Total 8,200 8,400 100 300 300 1,854 149.0 42,000 750 1,854 894 800 $46,298
104
Solutions (continued) 19. 64 Forecast Customer Orders Projected on-hand inventory MPS ATP 1 30 33 31 31 June 2 3 30 30 20 71 70 36 10 41 4 30 4 11 5 40 2 41 70 68 71 70 70 31 61 70 70 July 6 7 40 40 8 40
Week
Inventory Net Projected From PreInventories On-Hand vious Wk. Requirements Before MPS (70) MPS Inventory
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 20. 64 Forecast Customer Orders Projected on-hand inventory MPS ATP 1 30 33 31 6 June 2 3 30 30 25 1 16 41 70 43
64 31 71 41 11 41 71 31
33 30 30 30 40 40 40 40
31 1 41 11 29 1 31 9 July 6 7 40 40 3 1 31 70 70 61 70 70
70 70 70 70
31 71 41 11 41 71 31 61
4 30 11 11
5 40 8 41 70 59
8 40
Week
Inventory Net Projected From PreInventories On-Hand vious Wk. Requirements Before MPS (70) MPS Inventory
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
64 31 1 41 11 41 1 31
33 30 30 30 40 40 40 40
31 1 29 11 29 1 39 9
70 70 70 70
31 1 41 11 41 1 31 61
105
Solutions (continued) 21. Forecast Customer Orders Projected on-hand inventory MPS ATP 1 50 52 23 75 23 June 2 3 50 50 35 48 75 40 20 73 75 43 4 50 12 23 48 75 75 73 75 75 23 48 75 75 5 50 July 6 7 50 50 8 50
Week
Inventory Net Projected From PreInventories On-Hand vious Wk. Requirements Before MPS (70) MPS Inventory
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 22.
0 23 48 73 23 48 73 23
52 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
52 27 2 23 27 2 23 27
75 75 75 75 75 75
23 48 73 23 48 73 23 48
Starting Inventory = 0 units Period 1 Forecast 50 Customer Orders 52 Projected On-Hand 23 MPS 75 ATP 23 Starting Inventory = 20 units Period 1 Forecast 80 Customer Orders 82 Projected On-Hand 8 MPS 70 ATP 8
2 50 35 48 75 40 2 80 80 -2 70 0
3 50 20 73 75 43 3 60 60 8 70 8
4 50 12 23 0 0 4 60 40 10 62 72 5 60 20 10 60 40
23.
106
Strategy 2: A combination of overtime, inventory and subcontracting. Period May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Forecast 50 60 70 90 80 70 Output Regular 60 60 60 60 60 60 Overtime 10 10 10 10 10 Subcontract 10 Output - Forecast 10 10 0 20 0 0 Inventory Beginning 0 10 20 20 0 0 Ending 10 20 20 0 0 0 Average 5 15 20 10 0 0 Backlog 0 0 0 0 0 0 Costs: Regular @ $10 600 600 600 600 600 600 Overtime @ $16 0 160 160 160 160 160 Subcontract @ $18 180 Inventory 10 30 40 20 0 0 Backlog 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 610 790 800 780 940 760
107
Since $4,660 < $4,680 < $4,740, the company should choose the third strategy.
108