Minnesota Department of Transportation

Memo
Geotechnical Engineering Section Office of Materials (MS 645) 1400 Gervais Avenue, Maplewood, MN 55109 Date: To: From Subject: January 9, 2007 Nicole Rosen Metro Design, Waters Edge G.J. Person, Foundations Engineer Foundations Unit Office Tel: (651) 366-5598 Office Fax: (651) 366-5616

SP 2750-57 Wall FLYRW2 USTH169 Triangle Foundation Investigation and Recommendations

Digitally signed by Gary Person

Subsurface Investigation Information

The foundation soils for the wall consist of mostly granular soils. Water was encountered at an approximate depth of 25 feet below the existing ground line. An additional 10 to 15 feet of fill will be placed on in-situ soils. Please refer to the attached boring logs for a more complete description of the foundation soils.

Foundation Analysis

Wall Loading: 2 ft. Live Load Surcharge

Wall Type: Std. Concrete Cantilever

The wall is assumed to vary in height from 5-12 ft. Bearing capacities were computed for the foundation soils and compared with the required base pressures listed in the Bridge Design Manual. Based on our analysis, the foundation soils have adequate bearing capacities to support the retaining wall on the in-place granular soils, including the 10 to 15 feet of fill.

Estimated Settlement
Wall settlements were calculated based on the bearing pressures listed in the Bridge Standard Plans Manual using the retaining wall/noise wall heights. In addition, our analysis was based on a triangular strip loading stress distribution with the load varying from the maximum at the toe, to zero, at the heel. Based on our analysis, we estimate that the wall will settle one to two inches with a maximum differential settlement of less than two inches between wall panels. This settlement should occur during construction and backfilling operations.

Foundation Recommendations Wall Station Foundation Type FLYRW2 20+00 to 21+86.29

Proposed Subcut N/A -

Subcut Elevation -

Subcut Backfill Material -

Backfill Spec. No.

Estimated Settlement one to two inches

Spread Footing

Additional Recommendations: 1. Topsoil and other organic material should be removed from areas where fill is to be placed. 2. The walls should be backfilled according to the attached Diagram F-1 3. Footings should be buried a minimum of 4.5 ft. below the final ground line for frost protection. 4. The wall should be supported with a spread footing foundation placed on the in-place granular soils and granular backfill where subcuts were required.
Attachments: Soundings: T40 (Unique #67257), c073, c074 (Unique #68238, 68239), T46 (Unique #67843) Diagram F1, Boring Index, Boring Plan, Boring Profile cc: G. Engstrom, D. Van Deusen, File, R. Lamb

fdn rec CIP TemplateFLYRW2.xls

Page 1 of 1

P OR ON TAT I

M
DE ME PART

NE SOT IN A

R VA

IAB

BA LE

CK

SLO

PE

EXISTING GROUND

N T

S OF TRAN

1 C SELECT GRANULAR

MINIMUM LIMITS OF WEDGE OF SPECIFIED

TO < 10% PASSING EXISTING GROUND NO. 200 SIEVE

2:1

BORROW, MODIFIED

BACKFILL MATERIAL

L INA

GR

2:1

AD

ANY SUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL

A
4.5

2:1
1.5

PAY LIMITS FOR STRUCTURAL B

1.5
2: 1

EXCAVATION WHEN A SUBCUT IS REQUIRED. ACTUAL EXCAVATION SLOPE IS DETERMINED BY OSHA REGULATIONS AND IN-SITU SOILS.

BACKFILL MATERIAL

2:

ANY SUITABLE

2 GRANULAR BORROW

SUBCUT DEPTH (D) DETERMINED FROM FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATION REPORT

NOT TO SCALE
All slope dimensions shown as V:H THE RECOMMENDATIONS MAY BE MODIFIED AS PER THE ATTACHED FOUNDATIONS INVESTIGATION AND RECOMMENDATION REPORT

EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL NOTES:

DRAINAGE SYSTEM NOTES:

1 Mn/DOT SPEC. 3149.2B2 MODIFIED TO 10% PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE COMPACT BACKFILL TO SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD Mn/DOT SPEC. 2105.3F1 2 IF SUBCUT IS REQUIRED, BACKFILL WITH GRANLAR BORROW, Mn/DOT SPEC. 3149.2B1. COMPACT BACKFILL TO 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR (T-99). REFER TO FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATION LETTER FOR SUBCUT
PU

PROVIDE WALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM A, B OR C

A B PLACE A 6 IN. I.D. NON-STEEL PERFORATED PIPE(Mn/DOT SPEC. 3245) WRAPPED WITH A TYPE I GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (Mn/DOT SPEC. 3733) RUNNING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE WALL AND LAID A MINIMUM OF 2 IN. ABOVE THE TOP OF FOOTING (OPTION A) OR BOTTOM ELEVATION OF THE FOOTING (OPTION B). STRUCTURAL BACKFILL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLETELY SURROUND THE PIPE. AT ALL TIMES, THE SLOPE OF THE PIPE SHALL BE CHECKED TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. FREQUENT TIES (SPACED APPROXIMATELY 200 FT. APART) SHALL BE MADE FROM THE PIPE TO THE INPLACE OR PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM.

DEPTHS.

C PROVIDE WEEP HOLES AS SPECFIED IN THE BRIDGE STANDARD PLANS MANUAL, STANDARD SHEET 5-297.621 TO 5-297.623.

STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STRUCTURAL BACKFILL, FOOTING SUBCUT & DRAINAGE SYSTEM TREATMENT (STANDARD CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL DESIGN) November 2005 PREPARED BY THE FOUNDATIONS UNIT

DIAGRAM NO.

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SECTION - OFFICE OF MATERIALS

F-1

V R

ER W 1

{ {

LY F

LY F
55

c075

c076

T40

c073

20

R Y FL

c074

T46

2 { IS

FLYRW2
F2-10 F2-11 F2-9
FINISHED GROUNDLINE

F2-12

TOP OF RAIL TOP OF RETAINING WALL FINISHED GROUNDLINE (EAST SIDE OF WALL) TOP OF FOOTING HEEL

F2-3

F2-2

F2-5

F2-6

F2-1

F2-7

4 BOTTOM OF FOOTING

F2-8

(WEST SIDE OF WALL)

F2-4

c074 - #
3
3000 6000 100

c073 - #
- 884.2
3000 6000

- 883.7 4" TP PERFORATED PIPE

100 50

4
5

T40 - #67257
10

T46 - #67843
Coh SPT slorg slpl SL w/ a few 20 pebbles, dk brn & moist 6 4 8 12 LS w/ a little G, pocket pl SL; brn w/ dk brn; moist

INPLACE GROUNDLINE
5 10

50

TH 169 NB, 884+30.19, 646.1Lt - 884.5 Coh SPT slorg LS w/ a little G, dk

TH 169 NB, 882+24.42, 533.5Lt - 882.3 PWP (psi)

Tip Stress (psi)

FR (%)

PWP (psi)

Tip Stress (psi)

FR (%)

21
7 6 13 16 14

brn & moist

FS, lt brn to lt gray-brn, damp FS w/ layer horg pl L w/ roots & straw @ 6.5, lt brn & lt gray-brn, damp

S w/ a little G, lt brn & 15 18 17 damp FS, lt gray-brn & damp mixed S & LS, brns & moist 9 9 10 39 24 S w/ a little G, brn to gray-brn, sat 65 Bottom of Hole - 30.5 Water level assumed to be at saturated granular layer 56 14 20 8 50/.5

S, brn & sat

S w/ a little G, layer FG @ 34.5; brn to gray-brn; sat

LS w/ a little G, layer S & G; dk brn & sat 39

46

LS w/ some G, layer 57 CrG; dk brn & sat

81

S, brn & sat 90 FS w/ seam G, lt 36 50/.4 gray-brn & sat Bottom of Hole - 70.4 Water measured at 25.3 while sampling and/or drilling with augers

Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section

Boring Log Descriptive Terminology (English Units)

USER NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS - Additional information available in Geotechnical Manual.
This boring was made by ordinary and conventional methods and with care deemed adequate for the Department's design purposes. Since this boring was not taken to gather information relating to the construction of the project, the data noted in the field and recorded may not necessarily be the same as that which a contractor would desire. While the Department believes that the information as to the conditions and materials reported is accurate, it does not warrant that the information is necessarily complete. This information has been edited or abridged and may not reveal all the information which might be useful or of interest to the contractor. Consequently, the Department will make available at its offices, the field logs relating to this boring. Since subsurface conditions outside each borehole are unknown, and soil, rock and water conditions cannot be relied upon to be consistent or uniform, no warrant is made that conditions adjacent to this boring will necessarily be the same as or similar to those shown on this log. Furthermore, the Department will not be responsible for any interpretations, assumptions, projections or interpolations made by contractors, or other users of this log. Water levels recorded on this log should be used with discretion since the use of drilling fluids in borings may seriously distort the true field conditions. Also, water levels in cohesive soils often take extended periods of time to reach equilibrium and thus reflect their true field level. Water levels can be expected to vary both seasonally and yearly. The absence of notations on this log regarding water does not necessarily mean that this boring was dry or that the contractor will not encounter subsurface water during the course of construction. WATER MEASUREMENT AB ........................ After Bailing AC ........................ After Completion AF......................... After Flushing w/C....................... with Casing w/M ...................... with Mud WSD ..................... While Sampling/Drilling w/AUG.................. with Hollow Stem Auger MISCELLANEOUS NA ........................ Not Applicable w/ ......................... with w/o ....................... with out sat ........................ saturated WH ................... Weight of Hammer WR ................... Weight of Rod Mud.................. Drilling Fluids in Sample CS .................... Continuous Sample SOIL/CORE TESTS SPT N60 ............ ASTM D1586 Modified Blows per foot with 140 lb. hammer and a standard energy of 210 ft-lbs. This energy represents 60% of the potential energy of the system and is the average energy provided by a Rope & Cathead system. MC.................... Moisture Content COH ................. Cohesion ....................... Sample Density LL..................... Liquid Limit PI...................... Plasticity Index ...................... Phi Angle REC.................. Percent Core Recovered RQD ................. Rock Quality Description (Percent of total core interval consisting of unbroken pieces 4 inches or longer) ACL .................. Average Core Length (Average length of core that is greater than 4 inches long) Core Breaks .... Number of natural core breaks per 2-foot interval. DISCONTINUITY SPACING Distance Bedding Fractures Very Close........ <2 inches ............Very Thin Close ................ 2-12 inches .........Thin Mod. Close ....... 12-36 inches .......Medium Wide ................. >36 inches ..........Thick very loose....................................0-4 loose ...........................................5-10 medium dense ............................11-24 dense ..........................................25-50 very dense...................................>50 BPF Consistency - Cohesive Soils very soft.......................................0-1 soft ..............................................2-4 firm ..............................................5-8 stiff ..............................................9-15 very stiff.......................................16-30 hard .............................................31-60 very hard .....................................> 60 COLOR blk .................. Black wht ...........White grn ................. Green brn............Brown orng ............... Orange yel.............Yellow dk ................... Dark lt ...............Light IOS ................. Iron Oxide Stained GRAIN SIZE /PLASTICITY VF............. Very Fine pl ............Plastic F ............... Fine slpl .........Slightly Cr ............. Coarse Plastic SOIL/ROCK TERMS C............... Clay Lmst .......Limestone L ............... Loam Sst ..........Sandstone S............... Sand Dolo........Dolostone Si.............. Silt wx...........weathered G .............. Gravel (No. 10 Sieve to 3 inches) Bldr .......... Boulder (over 3 inches) T ............... till (unsorted, nonstratified glacial deposits)

DRILLING SYMBOLS

Mn/DOT Triangular Textural Soil Classification System

Vane Shear Test

WS

Washed Sample
(Collected during plug drilling)

100 % 10 20 90 80 70 60

Augered
PD

Plug Drilled
30

Split Tube Sample

(SPT N60 2 in. spilt tube with liners)

40

% Sand
60 70 80 90 100%

% Clay
50 40

50

Thin Wall Sample

(3 in. Shelby Tube)

SC SCL
(plastic)

Si
30

Core Drilled
DRILLING OPERATIONS AUG ................. Augered CD .................... Core Drilled DBD.................. Disturbed by Drilling DBJ .................. Disturbed by Jetting PD .................... Plug Drilled ST..................... Split Tube (SPT test) TW.................... Thinwall (Shelby Tube) WS.................... Wash Sample NSR.................. No Sample Retrieved
(NV Core Barrel unless otherwise noted)

CL L

SiCL SiL

20 10

CS Continuous Soil

Sample A/J Augered & Jetted Jet Jetted A/P Augered & Plug Drilled
RELATIVE DENSITY Compactness - Granular Soils

LS S
10 20

SL
(slightly plastic) 30 40

Si
80 90 100%

50

60

70

% Silt

Index Sheet No. 3.0 March 2003 G:\geotech\Public\Forms\INDEX30.doc

BPF

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION LABORATORY LOG & TEST RESULTS - SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

UNIQUE NUMBER 67257

U.S. Customary Units
State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. Ground Elevation

2750-57
Location

27R22

US Highway 169
Y=215423
(ft.)

T40
Drill Machine 93165 GEFCO F6 6x6 Hammer Mobile Auto Calibrated

884.5

(from Plan)

TH 169 NB, 884+30.19, 646.1'Lt

Longitude (West)=9323'40.66"

Hennepin Co. Coordinate: X=497084 Latitude (North)=4506'27.61"

Lithology DEPTH

SHEET 1 of 3 Drilling Completed 6/16/05

Drilling Operation

Depth Elev.

SPT N60

(%)

(psf)

(pcf)

Classification

REC RQD ACL Core (%) (%) (ft) Breaks

Soil Rock

MC COH

Other Tests Or Remarks Formation or Member

7 slorg LS w/ a little G, dk brn & moist

5.0 879.5

10

13

16

FS w/ layer horg pl L w/ roots & straw @ 6.5', lt brn & lt gray-brn, damp 15

14

20

10 23.5 861.0 25 39 S, brn & sat 857.5 27.0 Index Sheet Code 3.0

16

(Continued Next Page)

Soil Class:DSB Rock Class: Edit: DMS Date: 12/11/06

G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\2750-57.GPJ

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION LABORATORY LOG & TEST RESULTS - SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

UNIQUE NUMBER 67257

U.S. Customary Units
Mn/DOT GEOTECHNICAL SECTION - LOG & TEST RESULTS
State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No.

SHEET 2 of 3
Ground Elevation

2750-57
Lithology

27R22

US Highway 169
Drilling Operation

T40
SPT N60
(%) (psf) (pcf)

884.5
Soil

(from Plan)

MC COH

DEPTH

Depth Elev.

Other Tests Or Remarks Formation or Member

Classification

REC RQD ACL Core (%) (%) (ft) Breaks

14 30 20 S w/ a little G, layer FG @ 34.5'; brn to gray-brn; sat

16

20

35

8/.5 50/.5

37.5 847.0

40

56

LS w/ a little G, layer S & G; dk brn & sat 45 39 10

50

50.0 834.5

46

12

LS w/ some G, layer CrG; dk brn & sat

(Continued Next Page)

Soil Class:DSB Rock Class: Edit: DMS Date: 12/11/06

G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\2750-57.GPJ

Rock

small boulders 35.0'-36.0'

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION LABORATORY LOG & TEST RESULTS - SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

UNIQUE NUMBER 67257

U.S. Customary Units
Mn/DOT GEOTECHNICAL SECTION - LOG & TEST RESULTS
State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No.

SHEET 3 of 3
Ground Elevation

2750-57
Lithology

27R22

US Highway 169
Drilling Operation

T40
SPT N60
(%) (psf) (pcf)

884.5
Soil

(from Plan)

MC COH

DEPTH

Depth Elev.

Other Tests Or Remarks Formation or Member

Classification

REC RQD ACL Core (%) (%) (ft) Breaks

57 13

55

LS w/ some G, layer CrG; dk brn & sat (continued)

60

60.5 824.0

81

12

S, brn & sat 65 90 13

68.0 816.5 FS w/ seam G, lt gray-brn & sat 70 70.4 814.1

36/.5 50/.4

18

Bottom of Hole - 70.4' Water measured at 25.3' while sampling and/or drilling with augers

Soil Class:DSB Rock Class: Edit: DMS Date: 12/11/06

G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\2750-57.GPJ

Rock

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION LABORATORY LOG & TEST RESULTS - SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

UNIQUE NUMBER 67843

U.S. Customary Units
State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. Ground Elevation

2750-57
Location

Ret Wall

US Highway 169
Y=215225
(ft.)

T46
Drill Machine 92730 Failing 1500 4x4 Hammer Mobile Auto Calibrated

882.3

(Survey)

TH 169 NB, 882+24.42, 533.5'Lt

Longitude (West)=9323'40.33"

Hennepin Co. Coordinate: X=497107 Latitude (North)=4506'25.66"

Lithology DEPTH

SHEET 1 of 2 Drilling Completed 12/6/05

Drilling Operation

Depth Elev.

SPT N60

(%)

(psf)

(pcf)

Classification

REC RQD ACL Core (%) (%) (ft) Breaks

Soil Rock

MC COH

Other Tests Or Remarks Formation or Member

slorg slpl SL w/ a few pebbles, dk brn & moist

4.0 878.3 5 6.0 876.3 4 6 LS w/ a little G, pocket pl SL; brn w/ dk brn; moist 6 10

10

FS, lt brn to lt gray-brn, damp

12

12 13.5 868.8 S w/ a little G, lt brn & damp 16.0 866.3 FS, lt gray-brn & damp 18.5 863.8 17 mixed S & LS, brns & moist 18 15

15

20

14

860.3 22.0 Index Sheet Code 3.0

(Continued Next Page)

Soil Class:DSB Rock Class: Edit: DMS Date: 12/11/06

G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\2750-57.GPJ

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION LABORATORY LOG & TEST RESULTS - SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

UNIQUE NUMBER 67843

U.S. Customary Units
Mn/DOT GEOTECHNICAL SECTION - LOG & TEST RESULTS
State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No.

SHEET 2 of 2
Ground Elevation

2750-57
Lithology

Ret Wall

US Highway 169
Drilling Operation

T46
SPT N60
(%) (psf) (pcf)

882.3
Soil

(Survey)

MC COH

DEPTH

Depth Elev.

Other Tests Or Remarks Formation or Member

Classification

REC RQD ACL Core (%) (%) (ft) Breaks

25 S w/ a little G, brn to gray-brn, sat

24

30

65 30.5 851.8 Bottom of Hole - 30.5' Water level assumed to be at saturated granular layer

16

Soil Class:DSB Rock Class: Edit: DMS Date: 12/11/06

G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\2750-57.GPJ

Rock

Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section

Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)
USER NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS
This Index sheet accompanies Cone Penetration Test Data. Please refer to the Boring Log Descriptive Terminology Sheet for information relevant to conventional boring logs. This Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Sounding follows ASTM D 5778 and was made by ordinary and conventional methods and with care deemed adequate for the Department's design purposes. Since this sounding was not taken to gather information relating to the construction of the project, the data noted in the field and recorded may not necessarily be the same as that which a contractor would desire. While the Department believes that the information as to the conditions and materials reported is accurate, it does not warrant that the information is necessarily complete. This information has been edited or abridged and may not reveal all the information which might be useful or of interest to the contractor. Consequently, the Department will make available at its offices, the field logs relating to this sounding. Since subsurface conditions outside each CPT Sounding are unknown, and soil, rock and water conditions cannot be relied upon to be consistent or uniform, no warrant is made that conditions adjacent to this sounding will necessarily be the same as or similar to those shown on this log. Furthermore, the Department will not be responsible for any interpretations, assumptions, projections or interpolations made by contractors, or other users of this log. Water pressure measurements and subsequent interpreted water levels shown on this log should be used with discretion since they represent dynamic conditions. Dynamic Pore water pressure measurements may deviate substantially from hydrostatic conditions, especially in cohesive soils. In cohesive soils, water pressures often take extended periods of time to reach equilibrium and thus reflect their true field level. Water levels can be expected to vary both seasonally and yearly. The absence of notations on this log regarding water does not necessarily mean that this boring was dry or that the contractor will not encounter subsurface water during the course of construction.

Ratio of sleeve friction over corrected tip resistance. FR = fs/qt

Vs Shear Wave Velocity

A measure of the speed at which a siesmic wave travels through soil/rock. PORE WATER MEASUREMENTS
Pore water measurements reported on CPT Log are representative of water pressures measured at the U2 location, just behind the cone tip, prior to the sleeve, as shown in the figure below. These measurements are considered to be dynamic water pressures due to the local disturbance caused by the cone tip. Dynamic water pressure decay and Static water pressure measurements are reported on a Pore Water Pressure Dissipation Graph.

Robertson CPTU 1990 Soil Behavior type based on pore pressure

U2

SBT

SOIL BEHAVIOR TYPE

Soil Classification methods for the Cone Penetration Test are based on correlation charts developed from observations of CPT data and conventional borings. Please note that these classification charts are meant to provide a guide to Soil Behavior Type and should not be used to infer a soil classification based on grain size distribution.

CPT Terminology
CPT ............. Cone Penetration Test CPTU........... Cone Penetration Test with Pore Pressure measurements SCPTU ......... Cone Penetration Test with Pore Pressure and Seismic measurements Piezocone...Common name for CPTU test (Note: This test is not related to the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer DCP)

The numbers corresponding to different regions on the charts represent the following soil behavior types: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Sensitive, Fine Grained Organic Soils - Peats Clays - Clay to Silty Clay Silt Mixtures - Clayey Silt to Silty Clay Sand Mixtures - Silty Sand to Sandy Silt Sands - Clean Sand to Silty Sand Gravelly Sand to Sand Very Stiff Sand to Clayey Sand Very Stiff, Fine Grained

where ... QT.......................... normalized cone resistance Bq .......................... pore pressure ratio
B

Fr ........................... Normalized friction ratio vo ........................ overburden pressure vo ....................... effective over burden pressure u2 .......................... measured pore pressure u0 .......................... equilibrium pore pressure
G:\GEOTECH\PUBLIC\FORMS\CPTINDEX.DOC January 30, 2002

qT TIP RESISTANCE
The resistance at the cone corrected for water pressure. Data is from cone with 60 degree apex angle and a 10 cm2 end area.

fs SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE

Note that engineering judgment, and comparison with conventional borings is especially important in the proper interpretation of CPT data in certain geomaterials. The following charts are used to provide a Soil Behavior Type for the CPT Data. Robertson CPT 1990 Soil Behavior type based on friction ratio

The resistance along the sleeve of the penetrometer.

FR Friction Ratio

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION CONE PENETRATION TEST RESULTS

UNIQUE NUMBER 68238

U.S. Customary Units
State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Sounding No. Ground Elevation

2750-57
Location

Ret Wall , , ft. LT

US Highway 169
CPT Machine

c073
99649 CPT Track lueck
(ft.) CPT Operator

884.2

(from Plan)

SHEET 1 of 1
Date Completed

Hennepin Co. Coordinate: X=497088 Latitude (North)=4506'27.06"

Depth Elevation 0
884.2

Y=215367

Longitude (West)=9323'40.60"

Hole Type undesignated

5/17/06

Interpreted Soil Behavior Type UBC 1990 FR 0 2 4 6 8 10

Sleeve Friction (psi)

20 16 12 8 4 0 1200

Tip Resistance (psi)

2400 3600 4800 6000 0

Friction Ratio (%)

2 4 6

Pore Pressure (psi)

8 10 0 20 40 60 80

5
879.2

10
874.2

15
869.2

20
864.2

End of Data

Bottom of Hole 24.41424

Index Sheet Code 3.0

A17Y0602C.DAT

Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 12/7/06

G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\2750-57.GPJ

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - GEOTECHNICAL SECTION CONE PENETRATION TEST RESULTS

UNIQUE NUMBER 68239

U.S. Customary Units
State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Trunk Highway/Location Sounding No. Ground Elevation

2750-57
Location

Ret Wall , , ft. LT

US Highway 169
CPT Machine

c074
99649 CPT Track lueck
(ft.) CPT Operator

883.7

(from Plan)

SHEET 1 of 1
Date Completed

Hennepin Co. Coordinate: X=497099 Latitude (North)=4506'26.22"

Depth Elevation 0
883.7

Y=215282

Longitude (West)=9323'40.44"

Hole Type undesignated

5/17/06

Interpreted Soil Behavior Type UBC 1990 FR 0 2 4 6 8 10

Sleeve Friction (psi)

20 16 12 8 4 0 1200

Tip Resistance (psi)

2400 3600 4800 6000 0

Friction Ratio (%)

2 4 6

Pore Pressure (psi)

8 10 0 20 40 60 80

5
878.7

10
873.7

15
868.7

20
863.7

End of Data

Bottom of Hole 24.49069

Index Sheet Code 3.0

A17Y0604C.DAT

Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 12/7/06

G:\GINT\PROJECTS-ACTIVE\2750-57.GPJ