Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

To: the Tverskoy District Court From: Magnitsky Sergey Leonidovich Retain in custody FBU IZ-77/2 UFSIN RF in Moscow

application in the procedure of Chapter 25 of Civil Proc. Code of the Russian Federation. 10th June 2009 I lodged a complaint to the General Prosecutor RF, registered office is 15A, Bolshaya Dmitrovka, Moscow, GSP-3, 125993, Russian Federation, on the actions of Deputy Director of General Prosecutor`s Office RF, supervising investigation for particularly important cases (Name). Appealed actions of mentioned executive officer consisted in service of unmotivated answer of 19th May 2009 34/3-139-08, which didn`t exactly confirmed to the stipulations in regulatory legal acts, to my complaint of 18th April 2009 on actions and several acts of omissions of Burov A.V., Public Prosecutor in the Department supervising criminal cases in the Investigative Committee of MVD of Russian Federation in General Prosecutor`s Office of Russian Federation supervising particularly important cases. Burov A.V., in his turn, didn`t examined my complaint against Criminal Investigator of the Investigation Committee of the MVD of RF, connecting with my transferring from SIZO to IVS, and issued my complaint to those official, whose actions are appealed here, i.e. to the Criminal Investigator Silchenko O.F. My complaint of 10th June 2009 was sent to the General Prosecutor RF through the Administration of FBU SIZO-1 FSIN of RF, O/Ref 10/44-M19 of 10th June 2009. Under the provisions of Federal Law of 2nd May 2006 On the Prosedure for the Consideration of Public Appeals in Russian Federation, period of consideration is not to be above the limit of 30 days. Under the Chapter 1, Article 124 Code for Criminal Procedure of Russian Federation, Public Prosecutor tries on complaint within 3 days of the date of receipt and, under the Chapter 3, Article 124 Code for Criminal Procedure of Russian Federation, promptly gives the notice to the appellant disposition witn reference to complaint. Despite the specified law provisions I had not received from General Prosecutor RF the data of the consequent with reference to the consideration of my complaint of 10th June 2009 and of disposition in regard to the complaint up to date. As specified omission of General Prosecutor is to be illegal and breaks the rights and freedoms fixed by Article 33, 45, 52 Constitution of Russian Federation, in relation to it, I lodge a complaint and have recourse to the Court to resolve legitimately the file of duty of General Prosecutor RF and rectify the infringement of my rights and freedoms. Motion request for admission of required documents: From General Prosecutor RF: copies of my complaint of 10th June 2009, either documents attached to receiving and consideration. From administration of FBU SIZO-1 FSIN of Russian Federation and FBU IZ-77/2 UFSIN of Russian Federation in Moscow: data and copies of documents relating to the service of my complaint of 10th June 2009 to the General Prosecutor more specifically,

the copies of letter FBU SIZO-1 FSIN of Russian Federation of 10th June 2009 10/44M19. Specified evidences are to confirm the matter of service of my complaint of 10th June 2009 to the General Prosecutor of Russian Federation and to confirm the content of the pointed complaint. The receipt of the specified evidences is unenforceable, because I am in charge of SIZO. Here my motions to the first aid measures are ignored for weeks that proved the self-consistent attempt to receive the evidences is inefficient. Motion to attend the court judicial section on the issue of this particular application. The dateline and time I ask to represent to my defenders Kharitonov D.V. and Oreshnikova E.A. to the address: Bar association Gridnev and partners, BZ DOMUS, office 9, 1, 1 Golutvinsky Pereulok, Moscow, 119180, Tel.: 739-25-23. I hereby declare the defenders first before written are designees to stand for my interests in the court during the service of present application with all rights of legal representatives provided for in Chapter 5 Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, including the appeal of adjudication. 17th August 2009 Magnitsky S.L. Encl.: The copy of the application in 4 pages

Potrebbero piacerti anche