Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
A
A
A
= A
) (
:
:
) 2 (
) 1 (
t C
C
C
C
(
(
(
(
(
A
A
A
= A
) (
:
:
) 2 (
) 1 (
t C
C
C
C
F
F
F
F
and
(
(
(
(
(
A
A
A
= A
) (
:
:
) 2 (
) 1 (
t C
C
C
C
NN
NN
NN
NN
where,
F
C A
is the fuzzy controller output and
NN
C A
is the neural network output. Then using
the equation, the maximum output of the converter is determined.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The proposed hill climbing algorithm based hybrid controller is implemented in the working
platform of MATLAB version 7.10. The description of the PV array is given in Table. 2 and the module
current and module power voltage versus the voltage shown in Figure 5 (a) and Figure 5 (b).The
efficiency of the proposed controller is tested with PV system. Then, the output performance of the
proposed hill climbing based hybrid controller is compared with the fuzzy controller, neural network,
and without using control technique. The simulation model of the proposed controller based PV system
is illustrated in Figure 6. From the developed model, the output power characteristics of the proposed
system are analyzed. The PV output of the system is analyzed at different time interval. The system
output is analyzed based on the current, voltage, and the corresponding power value. Then, the change
values are determined based on the current value and the previous value. The maximum converter output
depends on the change of current and the change of power value.
Table 2: Description of the PV Array
Parameters Range
PV Array
Short Circuit Current 5.45 A
Open Circuit Voltage 22.2 V
Maximum Power 85.14 W
8 M D Goudar, V Kumar & B P Patil
Figure 5: (a) Module Current versus Voltage (b) Module Power versus Voltage Characteristic
curves
Figure 6: Simulation Model of Hybrid Controller Based PV System.
Where, the fuzzy rules are generated with respect to the change of current, the change of voltage,
and the change of DC-DC converter output. The range of rules is defined based on the parameter values
selected for implementation. The membership function diagram of the change of current, the change of
power, and the 3-D structure of the fuzzy rules is described in Figure 7.
Neuro-Fuzzy Controller Algorithm for Obtaining Maximum Power Point 9
Tracking of Photovoltaic System for Dynamic Environmental Conditions
Figure 7 Structure of Input and Output Fuzzy Rules.
Furthermore, the output of the fuzzy controller, the input and output performance of the neural
network are analyzed. The back propagation is used for training error of the network for achieving the
target of the system. After that, the outputs of the fuzzy and neural network are hybridized using mean
operator and the N-F hybrid controller is developed. Finally, the output of the fuzzy controller, neural
network, and the neuro-fuzzy controller are compared. The comparison performance is shown in Figure
8.
From the comparison performance, the efficiency of the proposed hybrid controller in obtaining
maximum power point is revealed. The proposed neural network and fuzzy controller based hybrid
controller has accurately reached the maximum power tracking point of PV system. The convergence
time of the hybrid controller is less compared to fuzzy and neural network based control techniques.
Thus, the enhanced hill climbing algorithm based N-F controller is suitable for obtaining maximum
power tracking point of photovoltaic system.
10 M D Goudar, V Kumar & B P Patil
Figure 8: Comparison Performance of FLC, ANN and NFC
CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, the enhanced hill climbing algorithm based hybrid controller was proposed for
obtaining MPPT of photovoltaic system. The proposed controller based PV system was implemented in
MATLAB and the output performance was tested. Moreover, the output current and voltage of the PV
system were analyzed. Using the output current and voltage of the PV system, the power value was
determined. Then, the change of current, change of voltage, and the change of power values were
determined by the enhanced hill climbing search algorithm. The output of the search algorithm was
applied to the input of the fuzzy controller and neural network. The applied inputs were change of current
and change of voltage. On the basis of input, the change of converter output was determined as well as
the maximum power tracking performance was analyzed. Furthermore, the performance was compared
with the fuzzy controller and neural network. From the analyzed performance, it was found that the
proposed controller has achieved maximum converter output compared to other controller. As a result,
the proposed controller has reached a remarkable level in obtaining maximum power of PV system.
REFERENCES
1. Chang Y and Chang C (2010), A Maximum Power Point Tracking of PV System by Scaling
Fuzzy Control, International Multi conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, 2.
2. Devishree J, et. al. (2006), An Improved Photovoltaic Power Supply System With Tracking,
DSP Journal 6 (1), September, 2006, pp. 1-7.
3. Goudar M D, Patil B P, Kumar V (2010), A Review of Improved Maximum Peak Power
Tracking Algorithms for Photovoltaic Systems, Int. J. Electr. Eng. Techno. (IJEET), 1 (1), 72-
94.
Neuro-Fuzzy Controller Algorithm for Obtaining Maximum Power Point 11
Tracking of Photovoltaic System for Dynamic Environmental Conditions
4. Goudar M D, Patil B P, Kumar V (2011), Review of Topology for Maximum Power Point
Tracking Based Photovoltaic Interface, Int. J. Res. Eng. Sci. & Techno. (INJOREST), (2) 1,
35-40.
5. Hohm D P and Ropp M E (2003), Comparative Study of Maximum Power Point Tracking
Algorithms, Progress in Photovoltaic: Research and Applications, 11, 4762.
6. Ngan C, Tan C (2011), Multiple Peaks Tracking Algorithm using Particle Swarm Optimization
Incorporated with Artificial Neural Network, World Academy of Science, Engineering and
Technology, 58, 379-384.
7. Prodanovic M, Timothy C and Green (2003), Control and Filter Design of Three-Phase
Inverters for High Power Quality Grid Connection, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 18
(1), 373-380.
8. Premrudeepreechacharn S and Patanapirom N (2003), Solar-Array Modelling and Maximum
Power Point Tracking Using Neural Networks, IEEE Conference on Power Engineering.
9. Solanki S (2009), Solar Photovoltaics Fundamentals, Technologies and Applications, PHI.
10. Takun P, Kaitwanidvilai S and Jettanasen C (2011), Maximum Power Point Tracking using
Fuzzy Logic Control for Photovoltaic Systems, International Multi Conference of Engineers and
Computer Scientists, 2.
11. Xiao W, Ozog N and Dunford (2007), Topology Study of Photovoltaic Interface for Maximum
Power Point Tracking, IEEE Transactions On Industrial Electronics, 54 (3),1696-1704.
12. Yu T, Lin Y (2010), A Study on Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Photovoltaic
Systems, Longhua Science and Technology University, 27-35.