Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
9.2m
1.8m
Single Circuit LV or 11 kV
1.8m
Single Circuit
7/14/2011
Australian Panel B2 Overhead Lines Seminar AS/NZS Overhead Line Design Sydney 28 -29 March 2011
7/14/2011
Australian Panel B2 Overhead Lines Seminar AS/NZS Overhead Line Design Sydney 28 -29 March 2011
AS/NZS 1170.2
Australian Panel B2 Overhead Lines Seminar AS/NZS Overhead Line Design Sydney 28 -29 March 2011
7/14/2011
Pole details
Item Pole type Embedment Depth Conductor attachment Ht Transverse Base width @GL Longitudinal Base width @GL Transverse Tip width Longitudinal tip width Pole tip load longitudinal capacity Pole tip load transverse capacity Assumed Pole Details 11m PSC Rectangular I section 1.8m 9.2m 430mm 150 mm 160 mm 150 mm 8.0kN 22.0kN
7/14/2011
Conductor details
DOG ACSR Everyday Temperature (EDT): Minimum Temperature: Maximum Design Temperature: Stringing Temperature: Stringing Tension, 10% UTS Stringing Tension, (EDT) Nominal Overall Diam: Cross Sectional Area: Initial Mod Of Elasticity: Ultimate Tensile Strength: VALUE 10 -5.76 50 15 3.00 3.29 14.2 118.8 56.54 x 109 3357 32.93 Self weight: 0.396 0.00388 UNIT DegC DegC DegC DegC kN kN mm m2 Pa kg kN kg/m kN/m
Wind Pressures
Unit Design Wind Pressures: Regional site design wind velocity Unit Design Wind Pressure
Vsit, qz
Element Design Wind Pressures: Conductors (Cd = 1.0): = 913 x 1.00 (Design Wind Pressure x Drag Force Coef) = 913 Pa = 913 x 1.6 (Design Wind Pressure x Drag Force Coef) = 1460 Pa = 913 x 1.2 (Design Wind Pressure x Drag Force Coef) = 1096 Pa = 913 x 1.2 (Design Wind Pressure x Drag Force Coef) = 1096 Pa
7/14/2011
Australian Panel B2 Overhead Lines Seminar AS/NZS 7000 :2010 Overhead line Design Sydney 28-29 March 2011
Symbol
Fat Fat Fat Ftw
Design Load
3.27 kN 4.57 kN 3.99 kN
8.76 kN
Maximum wind load condition, minimum temperature -5.76 DegC, Wind = 913 Pa
Ftw
9.26 kN
Fb
3.97 kN
7/14/2011
Tid = 2 x Fat x
sin
Sum of design ultimate loads at conductor level on top of insulator: kiTi = ki x Wind load + 1.25 x deviation load = 0.75x0.91+1.25x1.53 = 2.59 kN
< (72) or 3.5 kN for 1130W, < (0.85 x 9.6) kN for M20 high tensile pin,
(Load Factor 1.1 from Table 7.3 AS/NZS 7000) < (72) kN for 1130W, OK Use 1130W, Pin M20 High Tensile
7/14/2011
Where; X = Projected horizontal distance (m) between conductors midspan Y = Projected vertical distance (m) between conductors midspan U = r.m.s. vector difference in potential (kV) k = Constant, normally equal to 0.4 D = Greater of two conductor sags centre equiv. span, 50 DegC, still air l = Length in metres of any free swing conductor In this structure case Y = 0 m;U = 11 kV; k = 0.4 ; D = 1.14 m ; and l = 0 m Therefore; X 11 / 150 + 0.4 x (1.142 + 0) 0.529 m and X = (X1 + X2)/2 = (300 + 950)/2 for 1400 x 100 x 75 HW crossarm, Ie X1 = 300, X2 = 950 Distance between conductors midspan X = 0.625 m Minimum required separation; 0.529 OK for 1400 x 100 x 75 HW crossarm and electrical separations are OK
HW Crossarm Design
Check conductors vertical loads Vertical Bending in crossarm: Vertical Load of conductors = unit weight x weight span x 9.806 = .00388x70 = .27kN For intermediate suspension structures the conductor vertical loads are very small and would only govern design where ice loads apply and for design spans > 250m. Here, span = 70m . Therefore OK Check conductors horizontal loads: (Assuming loads are transferred through to pole via a single bolts in shear and stabilized by standard flat plate braces) Ultimate horizontal load Wu = (ki x Wind load + 1.25 x deviation load) x 3 = ((0.75 x 0.91) + (1.25 x 1.53))x 3 i.e. N = 7.76 kN
7/14/2011
Timber Joint Design (Crossarm to Pole) Now for a M16 Grade 4.6 bolt Qskl = 23.4 kN for Joint Group J1 (ironbark) Table 4.9(B) AS 1720.1 where beff = 75 mm (parallel to grain) & single shear so design capacity; Nj N* Nj = k1 k16 k17 n Qskl (Clause 4.4.3.2 of AS1720.1 1997) where = 0.8; k1 = 0.57 (duration of load - say permanent for deviation); k16 = 1 ( bolt loads not transferred by side plates); k17 = 1 (from Table 4.11 AS 1720.1); n = 1 (No. of bolts = 1) therefore Nj = 10.67 kN 7.76 kN OK for M16 bolt to pole in 75mm wide crossarm, 1400 x 100 x 75 HW crossarm OK
7/14/2011
10
7/14/2011
Pole foundation
. Assumed pole butt details: Average pole width: = (150 + 240)/2 = 195 mm Embedment depth: = 1.8 - 0.20 = 1.60m Load height: = 9.280 m (from crossarm attachment to 200 below GL.) Assume no blocking Assumed soil type : Firm sandy clay Assumed soil properties: bearing strength fbu = 200 kPa (above water table) Pole Loads: Pole tip load = 10.82kN
11
7/14/2011
Pole foundation
Embedment depth (D) may be determined from the following equation based on ASCE Method:
D= 3.6 H R + 12.96 H 2 + 16.2 CM R 2C
Where C = fbu.b for ultimate limit state, Fbu = the maximum bearing strength of the foundation material (kPa) b = the effective width of the footing, projected on a plane perpendicular to the direction of the resultant horizontal force acting on the pole (m) M = the overturning moment acting on the pole at ground level (kNm) = HR.hr HR= the resultant of the horizontal forces acting on the pole tip (kN) Hr = the height above ground level at which HR acts (m)
Soil description
Silty clays and Wet clays; silty Damp clays; sandy sands; loose dry loams; wet or clays; damp sands sands loose sands
Dry clays; clayey sands; coarse san Gravels; dry ds; compact clays sands
fbu 100
12
7/14/2011
Compacted Soil Footing: Assume standard heel block (490 x 225) b = 490 mm h = 225 mm Average pole width b = ((240 -(240-150)/3) + 240)/2 = 225 mm Applying values to formula D = 3.44m > 1.60 available Stabilized backfill footing : Assume use compacted stabilised backfill or compacted road base backfill in 600 dia bored hole with standard heel block. ie b=600 Applying assumed soil values D= 2.00m > 1.60 available Note: Neither of these two alternatives are acceptable. This is due to the high O/T moment being applied by the deviation loads (52.78kNm out of 90.43kNm )
Alternative stabilized backfill footing : Assume use compacted stabilised backfill or compacted road base backfill in 900 mm dia. bored hole with standard heel block. ie b=.900m Applying assumed soil values D= 1.6m c/w 1.6 available and would be OK
13
7/14/2011
Breast Block Alternative: Once breast logs are utilised the overturning moments are resisted by reaction mobilised by the bearing blocks and base block Assume 1200wide x 360 deep block 200 below GL Resolving BMs around pinned base Rbreast = 10.82 x (9.280 +1.60) / (1.60 - 0.180) = 82.49 kN Rbase = 82.49 10.82 = 72.08 kN Bearing block area = 1.2 x .360 = .432 m2 Bearing pressure = 82.49/.432=195kPa < 200 kPa assumed
Back stay alternative : Due to the high O/T moment being applied by the deviation loads (52.78kNm out of 90.43kNm ) this option may be more suitable in soft soil sites OTM on pole = 90.43 kNm Assume stay attachment point is at crossarm brace bolt at 330 mm below crossarm attachment point Stay attachment height = 9.28- 0.33 = 8.95m Therefore Rh = 90.43/8.95 = 10.10 kN Stay Tension Ts = Rh / Cos45 = 14.28kN 9.5mm dia stay wire has rated capacity of 45kN Use 9.5mm stay wire and standard dead man anchor Vertical load component of stay load = Rh x tan45 =14.28kN This is a relative small vertical load on the pole and is OK
Rh Ts RV
Stay
14
7/14/2011
Questions?
Australian Panel B2 Overhead Lines Seminar AS/NZS Overhead Line Design Sydney 28 -29 March 2011
15