Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
October 2012
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Are residents aware they live in a hospital district and do they want to preser ve this system, either for their personal benefit or the benefit of the community? How is Valley Medical Center perceived by the community in comparison to other health providers? Has awareness of Valley Medical Centers af filiation with UW Medicine increased and, if so, what does the community think of this relationship? Is it producing positive results? Is there awareness of changes to Board governance as a result of the af filiation? What changes does the community agree or disagree with? Looking ahead, how should Valley Medical Center make decisions regarding administrative pay, debt and continuing to be part of a district system? What are the communitys priorities?
2
METHODOLOGY
Sample Universe Field Dates Sample Size Survey Length Phone Types Margin of Error
King County Public Hospital District #1 September 10-16, 2012 N=500 20 minutes Landlines and Cell Phones 4.5%, larger for subgroups
SAMPLE PROFILE
GENDER
Male Female AGE 18-24 25-34 35-49 50-64 65+ REF. 46% 54%
ETHNICITY White Non-White LEG. DISTRICT 4% 9% 16% 38% 31% 2% 36% 64% 5th 11th 33rd 37th 41st 47th INCOME Under $50,000 Over $50,000 28% 59% 2% 34% 13% 7% 7% 36% 79% 21%
PATIENT? Yes, self Yes, other Yes, both No HOUSEHOLD Single, no children Couple, no children Single, with children Couple, with children EDUCATION College Non-College 51% 48%
4
PARENT
Yes No
PATIENT PROFILE
50-65 years old Non-College 65+ years old
Women
5
KEY FINDINGS
1. The hospital district system is highly valued, not only by patients, but, after education, by potential patients to Valley Medical. The community does not want to see the district sold to pay off its debt. 2. Over 40 percent of residents do not know they live in the hospital district boundary. It is common for younger people, non-whites and parents to be more confused by this. In comparison, a higher percentage of residents know about the affiliation with UW Medicine (67%). 3. Satisfaction with the medical care provided by Valley Medical is high and unchanged since the 2011 Elway survey. 4. However, strong majorities of residents also say affiliation has made no impact on the cost of care, access to research, access to specialists, personal attention from providers or the hospitals community involvement. 6
KEY FINDINGS
5. 82 percent of survey participants said they had no knowledge of changes to Board structure or governance since the affiliation with UW Medicine. 6. There is consensus that changes to board structure (size, process of expansion) should require a public vote and that voting members live in the district. The community also believes the community can best provide input to the Board through an Advisory Committee, without expanding the full voting board to include new members. 7. Furthermore, there is consensus that administrator pay align with executive pay at other area hospitals.
29%
26%
26%
16%
4%
COMMUNIT Y HOSPITALS HAVE THE GREATEST VALUE TO OLDER RESIDENTS, PAST PATIENTS AND WOMEN
I would like you to tell me how valuable your community hospital is to you personally (Give a ranking of 1-5). ?
65+ years old
43%
29%
Non-College
36% 34% 33% 25% 23% 25% 20% 30% 30% 28% 40%
Ranked #1 Ranked #2
Patients of VMC
Women
Groups that Rank Hospitals Lower: Men Residents Under 50 Couples with Kids Singles with Kids Non-Patients of VMC
Under 50
College
Men
0%
60%
80%
10
11
PARENTS, YOUNG PEOPLE AND NON-WHITES ARE THE LEAST INFORMED ABOUT BEING IN A DISTRICT
Do you know if you live within the boundary of a public hospital district?
55% 52%
50% 35%
12% 3%
Don't Know
13
SINGLES AND NON-WHITES ARE LESS LIKELY TO NAME VMC AS THEIR LOCAL HOSPITAL
Total % Considering VMC their Local Hospital
Patient White Couple, no kids Total Single, no kids Non-white Non-Patient 0% 10% 20% 30% 39% 35% 40% 50% 60% 70%
14
ECONOMIC INDICATORS
Overall, do you think the economy in your area is:
Getting better
27%
The same
47%
Getting worse
0% 10% 20%
23%
30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
15
75 74 74 74 72 72 71 68 66 62 59 55 54 51 49 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
16
40% 53% 37% 40% 40% 39% 31% 37% 25% 32% 31% 25% 22% 19% 14% 18% 12% 14% 11% 12% 19% 8% 12% 6% 9% 4% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
17
0%
65+ years old 18-34 years old
NO CHANGE IN SATISFACTION: In 2011 (Elway Poll), 75% of all respondents rated the quality of medical treatment provided was Very Good or Good.
18
ASSESSMENT OF REPUTATION
How would you rate the overall reputation of Valley Medical Center in your community? Would you say it is Very Good, Good, Average or Poor? TOTAL Very good Good TOTAL Average Poor Dont Know 48% 30% 78% 14% 7% 2% Seniors Under Over 65 50 57% 19% 76% 14% 7% 3% 37% 44% 81% 15% 4% 0% Parents with Kids 41% 42% 83% 12% 5% 0% Patient 53% 30% 83% 12% 5% 1% White 50% 29% 79% 13% 7% 2% Non-White 41% 33% 74% 17% 6% 2%
SLIGHT DROP IN REPUTATION: In 2011 (Elway Poll), 83% of all respondents rated the overall reputation of VMC was Very Good or Good.
19
Somewhere Else
23%
DK or It Depends
5%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
20
6%
21
AWARENESS OF AFFILIATION
AWARENESS OF AFFILIATION
Prior to this call, were you aware that Valley Medical Center is now affiliated with UW Medicine? Yes 67% In 2011 (Elway Poll), 55% were aware of the affiliation with UW Medicine 32% No Don't know
+35
70%
+ 63% 61%
38%
Women
Men
Non-White
24
AWARENESS OF AFFILIATION
How informed would you say you are about Valley Medical Centers affiliation with UW? 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Extremely well Well informed Somewhat well informed informed Not well informed Never heard of
25
5%
SOME GROUPS (RIGHT BOX) HAVE NOT HEARD AS MUCH ABOUT THE AFFILIATION
Most Informed
All Voters Well Informed or Extremely Well Informed Seniors Over 65 Patients College Women Over $50K Income Total 28% 28% 27% 26% 25% 23% Men Non-College 35-49 year olds 18-34 year olds Under $50K Income Non-Patients
Least Informed
All Voters Well Informed or Extremely Well Informed 20% 20% 18% 16% 16% 15%
26
ALMOST 50 PERCENT SAY THE AFFILIATION WITH UW MEDICINE HAS MADE NO IMPACT
Thinking about the following areas, has the affiliation made a positive or negative impact or have you not observed a significant difference?
Access to research Cost of health care Programs/Community involvement Access to specialists Personal attention Quality of care Ability to remain a community hospital Competitiveness
0%
50%
82%
Hospital administration salaries at Valley Medical Center should be comparable with other public hospitals in this area The best way for the community to provide guidance and insights is to create a Community Advisory Group to advise the Board of Commissioners Every voting member of the Board must reside within the boundaries of the hospital district The hospital CEO has been serving in his position for 25 years; so its time to think about new leadership As part of the affiliation, UW should have some responsibility for paying down the hospitals debt There should be a public vote before any changes are made to the duties or structure of the board running the hospital Only individuals elected by the public should have decisionmaking authority for a public hospital district
68%
68% 71%
20% 25%
60%
34%
4% 19%
The salaries are not justified. Hospital administrative pay needs to be competitive, but also aligned with other public hospitals in the area The salaries of the CEO and other leaders are justified. The pay and incentives help retain top talent and provide stable leadership
77%
Don't Know
32
77%
76%
75%
11%
Hospital should pay down some of its debt Hospital should save funds for reinvestment/other needs
17% 71%
Don't Know
34
80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Strongly yes Somewhat yes Somewhat no Strongly no Don't Know 35 8% 17% 18% 10% 25% 65% 47%
FINAL CONCLUSIONS
AWARENESS OF HOSPITAL DISTRICT/PRESERVATION -Public education to parents, non-whites (perhaps in non-English language materials) and young people will help them identify with their hospital districts. DO RESIDENTS IDENTIFY VALLEY AS THEIR LOCAL HOSPITAL? -Perceptions of VMC are strong across the board, but patient loyalty is truly the more accurate benchmark to track. As more younger people, parents and non-whites become patients, their likelihood of identifying VMC as their local hospital increases. AWARENESS OF AFFILIATION - Awareness of Valleys af filiation with UW has grown from 55% to 67% in one year. However, the public does not know why the af filiation happened, the goals or what has changed.
36
FINAL CONCLUSIONS
AWARENESS OF CHANGES TO BOARD GOVERNANCE -Very few residents know of changes to the Boards duties and structure since the affiliation took place. That being said, there is widespread community support and validation for past Board resolutions regarding executive pay. -There is also a high level of community support if the Board pursues a renegotiation of roles and responsibilities with UW Medicine. COMMUNIT YS PRIORITIES -There was consensus around paying down the hospitals debt and very little support around selling the hospitals clinic system to eliminate the hospital district.
37
October 2012