akandabaratam : Message: Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy (katrathu ...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/akandabaratam/message/58462

New User? Register

Sign In

Help

Make Y! My Homepage

Mail

My Y!

Yahoo!

Search

Chandigarh Disclaimer: Dr Batra's collects the information within this ad and is solely responsible for their use of it. Please read their .Privacy policy.Yahoo! does not collect or use this information in any way.

akandabaratam
Home Messages Attachments Calendar
Members Only

Messages
Topic List

Message #

Go Search:

Search Advanced Messages Help

< Prev Topic | Next Topic > << First < Prev Next > Last >> Reply

Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy (katrathu kaiman alavu, kallathathu Ulagala) Posted By: ganaeshram2002 Wed Jan 4, 2012 6:38 pm | Options

Post Files Photos Links Database Polls Members Promote "katrathu kaiman alavu, kallathathu Ulagalavu"--Tamil proverb "What we learnt is only handful and what we don't know is ocean" Pathmaji, Humble request to you. Please soften your attitude towards non-Tamil. Our Bangla friend Sunilji has crossed regional and religious barrier and trying hard to understand Tamil and Tamil religion Saivism. We have to consider this fact. Your experience may be my age and your knowledge may be unparallel, so understand what junior in me conveying to you... regards, Ganaesh.R

SPONSOR RESULTS

Girokonto Vergleich
www.banken-auskunft.de - Top Konditionen & Zinsen jetzt Girokonten vergleichen!

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

PTLLS courses-levels 3&4

www.an-ed.co.uk - 4 Day PTLLS courses at J3 M25, London/Kent. Home Study & in-house too.

Info

Settings

Group Information
Members: 333 Category: Hinduism Founded: Feb 13, 2002 Language: English

Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know... Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

--- In akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com, "Pathmarajah" <pathma@...> wrote: > > From what they once were, just look at them today, especially those > brahmins who are not in their traditional occupations but in secular > professions. (Priests will not behave like that.) Today there are mere > dogs, grovelling for acceptance, grappling to stay relevant. Just see > how the others discourse compared with this fellow. > > Lying, deceitful, arrogance, pretending to be knowledgeable, > supremacists, know no dignity and shame - such are a features of this > group. Even if one spits at them, they come back again grovelling. How > about that! In one generation they have willingly reduced themselves to > this! > > The Hindu polity will not have them. Not now. Not ever. > > What blame is there if I say these are the pariahs today! I gave my > reasons. > > Pathma > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com, Sunil Bhattacharjya > <sunil_bhattacharjya@> wrote: >> > > Ha ha If you can argue please do but not abuse like a coward when you > cannot argue. All people like you who condemn people from other > community are the greatest idiots and do not deserve to be called a > human being. Now Pathmarajah has been exposed and you stupid fellow want > to save Pathmarajah by abusing the brahmins. Now you know why God has > made you what you are and not a brahmin. >> >> >> >> > > ________________________________ > > From: sandrasegaran vasimuthu sandrasegaran_vasimuthu@ > > To: "akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com" akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 9:14 PM > > Subject: Re: [akandabaratam] Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy >> >> >> > > Hi >> > > All brahmins are stupid. Otherwise they want to be identified as > brahmins! >> > > Chandran >>

bus travel
www.redBus.in - Quality buses. Standard fares. Compare multiple bus options easily

1 of 4

9/10/2012 5:24 PM

akandabaratam : Message: Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy (katrathu ...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/akandabaratam/message/58462

> > From: Pathmarajah pathma@ > > To: akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Wednesday, 4 January 2012, 13:00 > > Subject: [akandabaratam] Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy >> >> >> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/akandabaratam/message/58425 >> > > See for yourself folks. What a stupid brahminst hindutva idiot! >> > > Pathma >> >> >> >> >> >> > > --- In akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com, Sunil Bhattacharjya > sunil_bhattacharjya@ wrote: >>> > > > When did Loga admit that he had not read the Nandikesvarakasika. You > are a shameless conman yourself trying to criticise the Hindu scriptures > and shedding crocodil,e tears for the Hindus. To prove that you > are telling the truth you give the message number so that the members > can see for themselves. I have not seen such a report. Now your mask > will be out. >>> > > > SKB >>> >>> >>> > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Pathmarajah pathma@ > > > To: akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 > > 7:57 PM > > > Subject: [akandabaratam] Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy >>> >>> > > > >>> > > > What we have here is a conman, who is working deceptively with a few > others as a team. Hinduism throws up so many charlatans and bogus > scholars! Dr. Loga has already replied he has not. If you have read the > NK, post it, otherwise be quiet. >>> > > > Pathma >>> > > > --- In akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com, Sunil Bhattacharjya > sunil_bhattacharjya@ wrote: >>>> > > > > You shut up as you lack common sense. Loga is yet > to reply to my earlier question as to whether he had read > the Nandikesvarakasikas or not. Until I receive his reply in the > negative I will not assume that he had not read it. He could have read > that otherwise he would not pose as expert on Shaivism. Do you > understand this simple thing? Of cpourse he may be afraid > that if he says that he had read it he > > would have to share that with us. >>>> > > > > SKB >>>> >>>> >>>> > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: Pathmarajah pathma@ > > > > To: akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 5:09 PM > > > > Subject: [akandabaratam] Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy >>>> >>>> > > > > > > > > I asked this before. >>>> > > > > Do you have the Nandikesvara Kesika? >>>> > > > > If not shut up. >>>> > > > > Pathma >>>> > > > > --- In akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com, Sunil Bhattacharjya > <sunil_bhattacharjya@> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > Loga, >>>>> > > > > > Have you compared the 26 verses of Nandikesvara with Tirumular's > Tirumantiram as well with the 12 verses of Meykandar. If nobody has done > that so far then it is time > > that somebody does it' ASAP. >>>>> > > > > > Sunil >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > From: K. Loganathan <ulagankmy@> > > > > > To: "meykandar@egroups.com" meykandar@egroups.com; > "akandabaratam@egroups.com" akandabaratam@yahoogroups.com;

2 of 4

9/10/2012 5:24 PM

akandabaratam : Message: Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy (katrathu ...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/akandabaratam/message/58462

> "agamicpsychology@egroups.com" agamicpsychology@egroups.com; > "sacred_tamil@egroups.com" sacred_tamil@egroups.com; > "tolkaappiyar@egroups.com" tolkaappiyar@egroups.com > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 2, 2012 11:32 PM > > > > > Subject: [akandabaratam] History of Dravidian Philosophy >>>>> >>>>> > > > > > ' > > > > > History of Dravidian Philosophy > > > > > ' > > > > > Friends > > > > > ' > > > > > In the year 1993 > > I was really inspired to > > > > > write a monograph running to about 140 pages in Tamil on the > History of > > > > > Dravidian Philosophy where I also refer to some aspects of > SumeruTamil > > > > > literature. I put aside this monograph and forgot all > ' about it. But recently when I was cleaning > my > > > > > library I recovered a copy of the monograph and decided to > publish it online > > > > > with the necessary revisions. > > > > > ' > > > > > I believe this study provides a NEW METHOD in > > > > > Historiography where I see the burst of metaphysical ideas, the > various schools > > > > > of thoughts in Tamil literature as something prompted by the > Unconscious forces > > > > > that are archetypes and so forth. Thus I describe first Agamism > in a nutshell > > > > > where it divides into EntrayaNa MantrayaNa and TantrayaNa > > evidences for which are > > > > > furnished by Access Tests. > > > > > ' > > > > > Then I take my facts the various kinds > > > > > literature' - the CaGkam literature > the > > > > > Grammatical the Post Cagkam literature with is focus on Ethics , > the Bakti > > > > > literature, the Logical studies the MeykaNda Sastras the post > Meykanda Sastras > > > > > , the very extensive Sri VaishNava literature, the Vedantic > Literature the > > > > > Idealistic literature and so forth. The yet to be written > chapters include the > > > > > literature centering on the Samayaateetam, the transcendence of > all religions > > > > > emphasized by Tayumanvar and VaLLalaar. I am planning to include > also my own > > > > > contributions specially my resuscitations of Hermeneutic Logic > and studies and > > > > > developments of many > > Hermeneutic Sciences already available in Tamil literature > > > > > such as Tirumantiram and so forth. > > > > > ' > > > > > At the moment I am posting this monograph in > > > > > Tamil in Meykandar and Tolkaappiyam egroups. > > > > > ' > > > > > As I re-read and grasp the essence it appears > > > > > to me that there is an inner dynamics in the growth of Dravidian > philosophies > > > > > from Sumerian times, a dynamics which can be understood only in > terms of > > > > > MantrayaNa. > > > > > ' > > > > > Loga > > > > > ' > > > > > ' > > > > > ' > > > > > ' >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >

<< First

< Prev

Next >

Last >>

Reply

Expand Messages

Author

Sort by Date Jan 4, 2012 5:19 pm

Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy Ha ha. A Malaysian worried about India but not about Malaysia. A non-brahmin worried about a brahmin but not about the non-brahmins. Are all the non-brahmins... Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy (katrathu kaiman alavu, kallatha "katrathu kaiman alavu, kallathathu Ulagalavu"--Tamil proverb "What we learnt is only handful and what we don't know is ocean" Pathmaji, Humble request to you.... Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy (katrathu kaiman alavu, kallatha Dear Ganaesh, Most of us have no problems carrying out a civil discourse and discussion. Fortunately I know for a fact that a

Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhatta...

GR ganaeshram2002

Jan 4, 2012 6:38 pm

Pathmarajah beastmy

Jan 5, 2012 2:55 am

3 of 4

9/10/2012 5:24 PM

akandabaratam : Message: Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy (katrathu ...

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/akandabaratam/message/58462

brahminist hindutva group sends... Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy (katrathu kaiman alavu, kallatha Ha ha a liar gives advice. Tirumular must be cursing this liar. THis liar will call Nandinatha as a bull with two horns and not a man like he calls Hanumana as... Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy All Dravidians who have Aryan based names should change them to Dravidian based names. Pathmarajah, lets start with you. How about it? Vedic culture... Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy Dear friends, You can see for yourself the text of the reply in the message no. 58425 quoted below. Pathamarajah has no intelligence to see that Loga has not... Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy Sunilji, For your posts: 58421, 58423, Dr Loganathan sir replied by the post no: 58425. Hope it helps you clear the confusion. regards, Ganaesh.R... Re: History of Dravidian Philosophy Dear Loga, You can clear the confusion. Have you read the original 26 verses of Nandikesvarakashika and do you have these verses? Sunil KB ...

Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhatta...

Jan 5, 2012 5:50 am

Singh - Jat jatrajput

Jan 6, 2012 6:21 am

Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhatta...

Jan 4, 2012 5:24 am

GR ganaeshram2002

Jan 4, 2012 5:21 pm

Sunil Bhattacharjya sunil_bhatta...

Jan 4, 2012 5:32 pm

First | < Prev | Next > | Last

< Prev Topic | Next Topic >

Copyright 2012 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Guidelines NEW - Help

4 of 4

9/10/2012 5:24 PM