KENCH SURVEYS LIMITED

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

ON THE

HARBOUR SITE
FOR

JOLOMI ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED

AT MUSHESHE FISH YARD, OFF ENERHEN ROAD, WARRI

Client:
Jolomi Engineering Services Limited, Warri, Delta State

Consultants:
Kench Surveys Limited Warri. Delta State

August 2010

CONTENT NOTATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF WORK SITE DESCRIPTION AND GEOLOGY FIELD WORK LABORATORY TESTS SOIL STRATIGRAPHY ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF THE SOILS DISCUSSIONS BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATIONS Shallow Foundation BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATIONS Pile Foundation DESIGN LENGTH OF SHEET PILE RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSIONS LIMITATIONS References APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Site Plan APPENDIX B: Borehole Logs APPENDIX C: Index Summary APPENDIX D: Atterberg Limits APPENDIX E: Triaxial Shear Strength APPENDIX F: Direct Shear Strength APPENDIX G: Consolidation Results APPENDIX H:Particle Size Distriution iii iv 1 1 2 3 5 6 7 9 10 12 16 18 19 20 21

ii

NOTATIONS B b values BS c Cv f H I K mv Nq Po q Qall width of raft foundation half the width of raft foundation in the calculation of settlement British Standard

undrained cohesion of the soil coefficients of consolidation unit skin friction Thickness of strata under consideration = 2B Influence factor from Bousinesqs chart coefficient of lateral earth pressure coefficient of volume compressibility bearing capacity factor effective overburden pressure of the soil at the point, kPa unit end bearing capacity for driven piles allowable bearing capacity for raft foundation for a safety factor of 3 safe bearing capacity for a limiting maximum settlement of 50mm for raft ultimate bearing capacity for raft foundation consolidation settlement immediate settlement = Immediate settlement + consolidation settlement

Qs foundation Qu Sc Si St Soed Su v 4x v SPT 1.0 -

Total settlement = Si + Sc -

One dimensional consolidation calculated from laboratory oedometer test undrained shear strength of the cohesive soil vertical stress, at the point under consideration, beneath the corner of a rectangular foundation vertical stress, at the point under consideration, beneath the centre of a rectangular foundation Standard Penetration Test pile bearing capacity factor = 0.5-0.50 unit weight of soil ratio of undrained shear strength to overburden pressure = Su/Po friction angle between the soil and pile wall Applied pressure at point under consideration angle of friction taking as zero for undrained condition of the soil for < 1.0 & 0.5-0.25 for >

iii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kench Surveys Limited was commissioned by Jolomi Engineering Surveys Limited to carry out a geotechnical investigation at the site for its proposed administrative office, warehouse, jetty, harbour and slipway at its property site in Musheshe Fish yard, off Enerhen road, Effurun near Warri in Delta State. The investigation is to obtain soil parameters for the foundation design of the proposed facilities at the site. The scope of the investigation, which was, carried out on August 22 and 23, 2010 includes the exploration of two (2) number boreholes using the cable percussive drilling method. All explorations were to a maximum depth of 20m below the existing ground level. The stratigraphy reveals a stratum of loose to dense sand on the entire site overlaid by a 4.5m thick layer of soft to firm clay at the approach of the site and a 4.0m thick layer of clayey peat towards the waterfront. From analysis, using the average shear strength value of 23kPa for a soft to firm clay, the allowable bearing capacity for a rectangular footing founded at a depth of 1.0m below the ground level is observed to be between 45 and 65kPa, for a breadthlength (B/L) aspect ratio between 0.1 and 1.0. Individual pad footings founded at a minimum depth of 1.0m below the existing ground level is recommended to support the administrative building. The warehouse should be founded also on raft foundations founded at the same depth. The jetty should be supported on driven concrete piles to check corrosion while the harbour should be heldin by steel sheet piles. and harbour building. Settlements from the pile foundations are not expected to exceed 50mm. However, pile load test should be carried out on all piles driven to confirm their working loads.

iv

1.0

INTRODUCTION Jolomi Engineering Services Limited is proposing the construction of administrative building and a warehouse on their site at the Mosheshe Fish Yard, off Enerhen road, Effurun, near Warri in Delta State. At the water front, the construction of a jetty and an harbour are being proposed also. Kench Surveys Limited was contracted by Jolomi Engineering Services Limited to carry out a geotechnical investigation on the site for these facilities. The investigation is to obtain soil parameters for the The scope of the foundation design of the proposed facilities at this site.

investigation, which was, carried out on August 22 and 23, 2010 includes the exploration of two (2) number boreholes using the cable percussive drilling method. All boreholes explorations were to a maximum depth of 20m below the existing ground level.

2.0

SCOPE OF WORK The detailed work scope for the investigation is as presented below: (i) Carry out two (2) number soil boring at the designated locations to a maximum depth of 20m below the existing ground level. (ii) Perform Standard Penetration Test on cohesionless material encountered in the borehole. (iii) Perform standard laboratory tests on soil samples obtained from (i) above and determine relevant soil properties. (iv) Submit of a detailed report including: (a) An assessment of the sub-soil conditions for the proposed project and suggested soil improvement where necessary. (b) Engineering properties of the soils encountered and their effects on the project. (c) Assessment of the suitability of the soil and recommendation of appropriate foundation type and design parameters.

3.0

SITE DESCRIPTION AND GEOLOGY The project site is situated within the Musheshe Fish yard off Enerhen road in Enerhen Community of Delta State Part of the site towards the water front is occasionally flooded by virtue of the fact that the entire area was a Swamp forest in Delta State. Delta State is one of the nine states of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. The local geology of the location is composed of sediments which are characteristic of several depositional environments as the River Niger empties her load into the Atlantic ocean. The tidal swamp forest covers a substantial area of the delta coastline, with the exception of the zone adjacent to the river plains, where they are overlain by recent deposits of river mouth sediments. The growth of plants on the surfaces of this sediment aided the slowing down of the Niger River flow which encouraged further plant growth. community, on which this site lies. At the time of this investigation, the entire project site was bare and empty. Slowly these sediment deposits had displaced portions of the river water to give way to what we now have as the Enerhen

4.0

FIELD WORK The investigation comprised mainly drilling two (2) geotechnical boreholes. Appendix A shows the location of the test points. The field work for the investigation was carried out between August 22 and 23, 2010. The boreholes were advanced using a cable percussion boring rig.

4.1

Boring The boreholes were drilled by the shell and auger cable percussive method, using a manual drilling rig. The manual drilling rig is fitted with a free fall auger. The auger is lifted to a height of about 1.0m above ground level. At this height it is allowed to freefall under gravity to advance the boring. As the auger falls it cuts through the soil such that the cut soil material is retained inside it by means of a non-return flap valve (commonly called the clark) at its lower end. The auger is then brought to the surface where the soil retained in it is emptied out and samples taken. To prevent collapse of the borehole wall, the hole is lined with 100mm diameter steel casings (commonly called shells).

4.1.1

Collecting Undisturbed Samples Undisturbed samples were taken at approximately 1.0m intervals of depths in clays and silts. This is done by driving thin-walled tube into the soil, using a U4 bomber to its full length of 0.45m or otherwise penetration refusal. The tube is then pulled to the surface, removed from the sampling hammer, labelled and waxed top and bottom to prevent loss of natural moisture from the soil.

4.1.2

Collecting Disturbed Sample Representative disturbed samples were taken at regular intervals of 1.0m depth, and also when a change in soil type was observed. The samples were used for a detailed and systematic description of the soil in each stratum in terms of its visual properties and for laboratory analysis. The borehole log obtained is presented in Appendix B. A large number of disturbed samples were taken for examination and laboratory analysis.

4.2

Groundwater Conditions Field measurements of ground water showed that the ground water was observed at a depth of 4.50m below the existing ground surface, at the time of the field work.

5.0

LABORATORY TESTS

Detailed laboratory investigations are being carried out on representative samples obtained from the borehole for the classification tests and other tests. All tests are being carried out in accordance with BS1377:1990 Methods of test for soil for civil engineering purposes. Brief comments on the tests are given below: Classification Atterberg consistency limit tests were carried out on the cohesive samples. The results show that the samples are low to medium plasticity silty clay. The particle size distributions of a number of representative samples of the cohesionless soils were determined by sieve analysis. The results disclosed that the samples are predominantly, fine to medium dense sand with occasional gravels as shown in Appendix D. Undrained Shear Strength
This type of test is usually performed on undisturbed samples of cohesive soils. Depending on the consistency of the cohesive material, the test specimen is prepared by trimming the sample or by pushing a mould into the sample. A latex membrane with thickness of approximately 0.2mm is placed around the specimen. A lateral confining pressure of 600kPa to 1000 kPa is maintained during axial compression loading of the specimen. Consolidation and drainage of pore water during testing is not allowed. The test is deformation controlled (strain rate of 60%/h), single stage, and stopped when an axial strain of 15% is achieved. The deviator stress is calculated from the measured load assuming that the specimen deforms as a right cylinder. The presentation of test results includes a plot of a Mohr circle. The undrained shear strength, Cu, is taken as the point of intercession of a common tangent to the semi-circles and the ordinate of the chart.

6.0

SOIL SRATIGRAPHY

The soil stratigraphy encountered on the project site as observed from the explored boreholes are as presented in Appendix B - borehole logs. The stratigraphy reveals a stratum of loose to dense sand overlain by a 4.0m thick layer of soft to firm clay around borehole 1 and a 4.0m thick layer of clayey peat around borehole 2. The sand stratum is observed, in the entire site, to the maximum 20.0m depth of the investigation. The soil profile is as presented below. Table 1:The profile is as presented in table 1 below.
Stratum No. Description CLAY, soft to firm, dark reddish brown (in borehole 1) 1 PEAT, clayey, very soft, blackish grey (in borehole 2) 2 SAND, loose to dense, occasionally clayey, light grey to whitish grey 4.0 - 20 0 - 4.0 Average depth (m)

7.0

ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF THE SOIL

The engineering properties of the formation encountered during the investigation are as summarised below.
7.1 THE SOFT TO FIRM CLAY

This surface soft to firm clay is characterized by moderate compressibility and, moderate moisture content. This clay stratum is encountered from the ground level to a depth of 4.0m below the existing ground level. The variation in the engineering properties is as presented below:
Min Moisture content (%) Bulk unit weight (kN/m3) Dry unit weight (kN/m3) Liquid limit (%) Plastic limit (%) Plasticity index (%) Liquidity index Consistency index Undrained strength (kPa) 47 19.20 13.06 49 20 29 0.80 0.20 23 Max 47 21.60 14.69 53 24 29 0.94 0.06 23 Mean 47 20.40 13.88 51 22 29 0.87 0.13 23

7.2

THE CLAYEY PEAT

This surface, very soft clayey peat observed close to the water front is characterized by very high compressibility and moderate moisture content. This peat is fibrous and possesses no engineering property of significance. That it is fibrous confirms the fact that the settlement cannot be predicted. Under any imposed stress, the organic fibres will continually decompose and reduce in volume. This reduction in volume will give rise to large unpredicted settlements. It is recommended that about 2.0m thick of this material be removed and replaced with clean river sand. This will reduce the overall settlement that would have resulted from the entire mass. The variation in the engineering properties is as presented below:

Min

Max

Mean

Moisture content (%) Bulk unit weight (kN/m3) Dry unit weight (kN/m3) Liquid limit (%) Plastic limit (%) Plasticity index (%) Liquidity index Consistency index Undrained strength (kPa)

89 19.22 9.91 116 48 82 0.50 0.50 8

94 21.46 11.35 130 130 83 0.74 0.26 8

92 20.34 10.63 123 89 82 0.62 0.38 8

7.3

LOOSE to DENSE SAND

The fine to coarse silty sand encountered immediately beneath the firm to stiff clay is of medium dense to very dense sand. This sand formation presents an SPT N value between 9 and 41. From the SPT values it is observed that the sand formation increases in density with depth. This formation of sand is competent to support high bearing pressures without excessive settlement. The variation of the geotechnical parameters is as presented below:
Min Effective Particle Size, d10 (mm) Mean Particle Size, d30 (mm) Particle Size, d60 (mm) Coefficient of Uniformity, Cu = d60/ d10 Coefficient of Curvature, Cc = d302/d10.d60 Angle of Frictional Resistance, 0.08 0.09 0.16 2.00 0.71 29 Max 0.14 0.27 0.60 4.29 0.91 40 Ave 0.11 0.17 0.30 2.83 0.80 35

8.0

DISCUSSIONS

The investigation was carried out with the aim of obtaining geotechnical parameters for the administrative building, warehouse, jetty and harbour belonging to Jolomi Engineering Services Limited on her property at the Musheshe Fish yard, Enerhen near Warri. The 4m thick near surface soft to firm clay soil encountered toward the entrance to the site is of moderate compressibility but the peat towards the water front is of very high compressibility. This peat is characterized by very low shear strength and high moisture content. This peat is fibrous and possesses no engineering property of significance. The fibrous nature confirms the fact that the settlement cannot be predicted. Under any imposed stress, the organic material will decompose and reduce the entire volume of the mass. This reduction in volume will give rise to large unpredicted settlements. As a result, it has to be removed to as deep as 2.0m, and replaced with clean river sand, for the construction of the slipway. This will minimize the overall settlement that would have resulted from the entire mass. The administrative building and the warehouse can be supported on raft foundations directly on the formation. Settlements from these rafts should create no problems.

9.0

BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATIONS Shallow Foundation

(Administrative Building and Warehouse)

The ultimate bearing capacity, Qu, for shallow rectangular foundations on cohesive soils, using consistency values of a soft to firm clay is given below as: Qu where Df c B L Nc = = = = = = = .Df. + 0.67c[1+0.3(B/L)]Nc unit weight of soil at depth depth of foundation shear strength of the soil Foundation width Foundation Length Bearing Capacity factor

Below are bearing capacity charts for ultimate bearing capacity versus foundation aspect ratios at various depth of foundation
Table 2: Values of Ultimate Bearing Capacity, kPa, for various foundation depth

Df (m) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.1 111 120 129 137 0.2 114 123 131 140

B/L Ratio 0.5 123 132 140 149 1.0 138 147 155 164

Table 3: Values of Allowable Bearing Capacity, kPa, for various foundation depth

Df (m) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.1 37 40 43 46 0.2 38 41 44 47

B/L Ratio 0.5 41 44 47 50 1.0 46 49 52 55

Below are the charts for both the ultimate and allowable bearing capacities

10

Fig. 1: Ultimate Bearing Capacity Chart for foundations at different Breadth/Length ratios

11

Fig. 2: Allowable Bearing Capacity Chart for foundations at different Breadth/Length ratios

12

9.1

SETTLEMENT Shallow Foundation Total settlements for the allowable bearing capacity are within the limits of maximum allowable settlement. Settlement of this formation under the administrative building will not exceed the maximum allowable settlement were a raft on individual pad foundation is used.

10.0

BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATIONS Pile Foundation

(Jetty and Harbour)

The ultimate bearing capacity, Qu, of driven piles is determined by the equation below: Qu where q f Ab As = = = = = q.Ab + f.As unit end bearing capacity = kPa unit skin friction = kPa gross base area of pile tip, m2 side surface area of pile, m2

10.1

End Bearing & Skin Friction in Cohesive Soils For piles in cohesive soils, The unit end bearing, q The unit skin friction, f Where, Su = = = 9. Su .Su 9.1.1
9.1.2

undrained shear strength of the soil, kPa

10.2

End Bearing & Skin Friction in Cohesionless Soils For piles in cohesionless soils, The unit skin friction, f The unit end bearing, q Where, K = = coefficient of lateral earth pressure friction angle between the soil and pile wall = = K Po tan po Nq 9.2.1 9.2.2

13

= Nq po = =

0.75 x (angle of frictional resistance) bearing capacity factor effective overburden pressure of the soil at the point, kPa

Chart of Ultimate Pile Capacity for Concrete Piles

14

Fig. 3 Chart of Ultimate pile capacity for straight shaft steel pipe pile

Using a safety factor of 3 on the ultimate pile capacity, the chart for the allowable pile capacity is as presented in figure 4 below.

Chart of Allowable Pile Capacity for Concrete Piles

Fig. 4 Chart of Allowable pile capacity for straight shaft steel pipe pile

15

Table 4: Allowable Pile Capacity, kN for concrete pile at various depth (m) Pile depth (m) 10 15 20
300mm pile diameter 400mm pile diameter 500mm diameter pile

55 176 389

80 257 558

108 349 746

11.0

DESIGN LENGTH OF SHEET PILE In cohesionless soil, C is zero. The active and passive lateral earth pressure of soil can be written as Ka=tan2(45- /2) is the active lateral earth pressure coefficient Kp= tan2(45+ /2) is the passive lateral earth pressure coefficient, and is internal friction angle. is unit weight of soil, h is the height difference between the existing ground level and the river-bed. The lateral forces Pa is calculated as Pa= Ka h2/2

Below the bottom of excavation, the sheet pile is subjected to active pressure on the earth side and passive pressure on the side of the river-bed. Where Kp is passive earth pressure coefficient. When the sheet pile rotates away from the earth side, there are active pressure on the earth side and passive pressure on the river bed side.

Calculating embed depth D 16

Once D is determined, the minimum embedded depth of entire sheet pile is equal to h+D. Usually a factor of safety between 1.2 and 1.4 is applied to D, and the length of sheet pile L is equal to h+D*FS. FS is factor of safety from 1.2 to 1.4.

Example 1: Design cantilever sheet pile in cohesionless soil.

Given: Depth of existing ground level to river bed, h = 6 m Take depth of sheet pile below the river bed as D Therefore (h + D) = depth between existing ground level and bottom of sheet pile Unit weight of soil, = 19.8 9.81 = 9.99 say 10.0 kN/m3 Average Internal friction angle, = 30 degree

Requirement: Design length of a cantilever sheet pile

Solution: Design length of sheet pile: Calculate lateral earth pressure coefficients: Ka = tan2 (45- /2) = 0.333 Kp = tan2 (45+ /2) = 3 The lateral earth pressure at bottom of excavation is pa =0.5Ka (h+D)2 = 0.5*0.333*10.0*(6 + D)2 = 1.665(6 + D)2 pp =0.5Kp D2 = 0.5*3.0*10.0* D2 = 15.0D2 Taking moment of these forces about the base of the wall, we have Mo = pa * (h+D)/3 - pp * D/3 = 0 1.665(6 + D)2 *(h+D)/3 - 15.0D2 *( D/3) = 0 0.555(6 + D)3 - 5 D3 = 0 Solving for the depth D by trial and error, we have D = 5.55m , say 6.0m

17

Checking pa = 1.665(6 + D)2 = 1.665*122 = 239 kN pp = 15 * 62 = 540 kN pa * (h+D)/3 = 239 * 4 = 956 kNm pp * D/3 = 1080 kNm Length of sheet pile = h + D = 6 + 6 = 12m Using a safety factor of 1.4 for D Total length of sheet pile 6 + 1.4 * 6 = 14.4m Use pile length of 15m from the existing ground level.

12.0

RECOMMENDATIONS Considering the imposed load from the administrative building, which is not expected to be more than a one-storey high, and the moderate compressibility of the soft to firm clay, it is recommended that the administrative building and the warehouse be founded on raft foundations. Driven concrete piles are preferred for the jetty area to check the problem of corrosion to steel pipe piles. Analysis has been carried out for 300mm, 400mm and 500mm diameter concrete piles in this report. Other sizes can be provided upon request. The minimum embedded depth for the sheet piles is 15.0m below the existing ground level, that is about 9.0m below the river bed. Sheet piles are commonly of steel which are susceptible to corrosion hence, adequate cathodic protection should be put in place to minimize corrosion of the sheet piles.

13.0

CONCLUSION

18

Kench Surveys Limited was requested by Jolomi Engineering Surveys Limited to carry out a geotechnical investigation on a six storey building along Airport Road, Warri in Delta State. The investigation was by means of two (2) number boreholes to a maximum depth of 20m. Field and laboratory investigations revealed a surface soft to firm clay spanning to a depth of 4.0m below the existing ground level. Beneath the clay, the formation presents a stratum of loose to dense to the final 20.0m depth of investigation. Determination of ultimate bearing capacity using the average cohesion of a soft to firm clay of 23kPa gave an ultimate bearing capacity of 120kPa for a rectangular footing founded at a depth of 1.0m below the ground level. Using a safety factor of 3, the allowable bearing capacity for this soil at this depth is observed to be about 40kPa. Considering the moderate compressibility of the surface soft to firm clay, the administrative building and the warehouse can be founded on a raft, but the jetty can only be founded on piles. The sheet piles should be taken to a minimum depth of 15.0m below the existing ground level that is about 9.0m below the river bed. Driven concrete piles are preferred for the jetty area to check the problem of corrosion to steel pipe piles. Settlement of the piles is not expected to be more than 25mm where the maximum imposed load on the group is taken as half the total number of single piles in the group multiplied by the allowable bearing capacity. However, pile load tests should be carried out on all piles installed to confirm their work load.

14.0

LIMITATIONS

19

This investigation is carried out in accordance with accepted geotechnical engineering practice. The recommendations and conclusions reached in the report are based on the data obtained from soil boring, and the laboratory analysis. It is not anticipated that the soil conditions will vary significantly from those described. However, should the soil conditions during actual construction vary, it would be necessary to evaluate the engineering significance of such variations which could result in further investigations and supplemental recommendations.

Suv. Chris Ojukoko

20

References 1. Bowles, J. E, (1997); Foundation Analysis and Design, McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.; 5th edition

2. Gopal, R. & Rao, A.S.R, (1991); Basic and Applied Soil Mechanics, pages 474 -545; New Age International Publishers; 2nd edition.

3. Murthy, V. N. S, (2007); Textbook of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, page 630; CBS Publishers; 1st edition.

4. Tomlinson, M. J. (1994); Pile Design and Construction Practice; E & F N Spon; 4th edition,

21