Alta Mesa Holdings, LP

Company Overview

March 2012

Confidential

Forward Looking Statements

This material includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions about future events and are based on currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. They are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect the companys operations, markets, products, services and prices and cause its actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may include statements about our: business strategy; reserves, including changes to our reserves presentation in accordance with newly adopted SEC rules; financial strategy, liquidity and capital required for our development program; realized natural gas and oil prices; timing and amount of future production of natural gas and oil; hedging strategy and results; future drilling plans; competition and government regulations; marketing of natural gas and oil; leasehold or business acquisitions; costs of developing our properties and conducting our gathering and other midstream operations; general economic conditions; credit markets; liquidity and access to capital; uncertainty regarding our future operating results; and plans, objectives, expectations and intentions that are not historical. We caution you that these forward-looking statements are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, incident to the exploration for and development, production, gathering and sale of natural gas and oil. These risks include, but are not limited to: commodity price volatility; inflation; lack of availability of drilling and production equipment and services; environmental risks; drilling and other operating risks; regulatory changes; the uncertainty inherent in estimating natural gas and oil reserves and in projecting future rates of production, cash flow and access to capital; the timing of development expenditures; and other risks. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The SEC requires oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose proved reserves that a company has demonstrated by actual production or conclusive formation tests to be economically and legally producible under existing economic and operating conditions. We use the terms estimated ultimate recovery, EUR, probable, 3P, possible, and non-proven reserves, reserve potential or upside, unrisked potential or other descriptions of volumes of reserves potentially recoverable through additional drilling or recovery techniques that are not classified as proved reserves, may not have been calculated as defined by SEC regulations and SECs guidelines may prohibit us from including in any future filings with the SEC. These estimates are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and accordingly are subject to substantially greater risk of being actually realized by the company. We believe these estimates are reasonable, but such estimates have not been reviewed by independent engineers. Estimates may change significantly as development provides additional data, and actual quantities that are ultimately recovered may differ substantially from prior estimates. Our production forecasts are dependent upon many assumptions, including estimates of production decline rates from existing wells and the outcome of future drilling activity. Although we believe the forecasts are reasonable, we can give no assurance they will prove to have been correct. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions and data or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Market and industry data and forecasts used in this presentation have been obtained from independent industry sources as well as from research reports prepared for other purposes. Although we believe these third-party sources to be reliable, we have not independently verified the data obtained from these sources and we cannot assure you of the accuracy or completeness of the data. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from these sources are subject to the same qualifications and uncertainties as the other forwardlooking statements in this presentation. Alta Mesa Holdings, LP 2

Alta Mesa Overview

High Quality & Diversified Asset Portfolio
Core Operating Areas

Corporate Overview
Privately held company, founded in 1987, engaged in onshore conventional oil and gas acquisition, exploitation, exploration and production Our diverse asset base is characterized by low-risk, repeatable opportunities in well-established fields, which allows us to cost effectively grow reserves and production Seasoned management and technical team that creates value by rigorously applying new technology and new knowledge in established fields and areas that are underdeveloped or over-looked Since 2007, increased proved reserves and production at 31% and 52% CAGR, respectively

Key Metrics1
Proved Reserves (SEC Case) Proved Reserves PV10 (SEC Case) Crude Oil Proved Reserves Future Total Proved Revenue from Oil % Proved Developed R/P 2011 Production 2012E CAPEX (Drill, Facilities) Dec 2011 Production Mix (Gas / Oil) 348 BCFE $1,070 MM 38% 73% 72% 8.7x 114 MMCFED $220-$240 MM 69% / 31%

Reserve statistics and R/P metric as of Year End 2011 SEC Reserve Report

Low-Risk Business Model

We create value in under-developed and over-looked areas with the following characteristics

Attractive Economics Proven Geology Multiple Pay Zones Repeatability Control Over Pace of Development Available Rigs and Services Established Infrastructure Stable Regulatory Environment
4

Proved Reserves
Proved Reserves by Type (Bcfe)
72% of Proved Reserves are Developed
PUD 96 BCFE 28%

Proved Reserves by Commodity (Bcfe)

400 350 300
PDP 151 BCFE 43%

Gas Oil

250 200 150 100

PDNP 101 BCFE 29%

50 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Proved PV-10 by Region ($MM) 1

PV-10 Value of $1,070 MM
East TX $316 MM Gulf Coast $546 MM

Proved PV-10 Growth ($MM)

$1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 PD PUD

Oklahoma $207 MM

$0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Excludes Appalachia PV-10 of $1.1 MM

Operating Efficiency & Profitable Growth

Revenue1 Growth($MM)
$350 Annual Revenue ($ in Millions) $300 $250 $200 $150 $99.0 $100 $56.7 $50 $0 2007 2008 2009 PF 2010
2

EBITDAXGrowth($MM)
$323.9 Annual EBITDAX ($ in Millions) $250 $201 $200 $146

$238.4

$150

$100 $64 $50 $41 $58

$102.3

$0 2011 2007 2008 2009 PF 2010

2011

ProductionGrowth(Bcfe)
45 40 Annual Production (Bcfe) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2007
1 2

LeaseandPlantOperatingExpense($/Mcfe)
41.5 $2.50 $2.15

34.5 Annual LOE ($/Mcfe)

$2.00

$1.89 $1.71 $1.51

$1.50

$1.35

13.9 7.7 9.6

$1.00

$0.50

2008

2009

PF 2010 2

2011

$0.00 2007 2008 2009 PF 2010

2011

Excludes unrealized hedging gains and other revenues. Pro forma adjustments for Meridian for entire 1H 2010.

2012 CAPEX Plan

Continued Focus on High Margin Liquids Rich Projects

Manage to cash flow neutral position, with Capex for the year expected to range between $220 and $240 million Significant HBP positions in core areas allow management to accelerate / defer projects as economics dictate Over 90% of 2012E drilling and recompletion dollars directed to oil and liquids rich properties Capital shifted from gas only Deep Bossier to oily prospects at Weeks Island, Oklahoma, East Texas and Eagle Ford Oil and liquids expected to generate greater than 35% of production (equivalent basis) in 2012 Multi-year drilling inventory with over 125 identified PUD locations

CAPEX Focus

Planned Drilling & Recompletion CAPEX by Field ($MMs)

$80 $70 2012 Expected CAPEX ($MM) $60 $50 Eagle Ford $40 $30 Hilltop $20 $10 $0 -100% ($10) 0% 100% 200% 300% 400% Other South Texas East Texas Oklahoma

SLA

%Gas 33% % Liquids 67%

%Gas 8%

% Liquids 92%

2011E

2012E

Other

Year over Year Change in CAPEX 7

Natural Gas Hedges

Daily Hedged Volumes and Average Floor Prices
70,000 $7.00 2012 Swap Contracts Collar Contracts $6.00 $5.50 Long Call Options Short Put Options 50,000 $4.43 $4.76 $5.00 2013 Swap Contracts Collar Contracts Short Swaps Short Call Options Long Put Options 40,000 MMbtu/d $4.00 Long Call Options Short Put Options 2014 Swap Contracts $3.00 Collar Contracts Short Call Options Long Put Options Short Put Options 2015 Swap Contracts 2016 Collar Contracts Short Swaps Short Call Options Long Put Options Short Put Options 2012 Swaps 2013 Puts 2014 Average Floor Price 2015 2016 $0.00 3,475,000 1,650,000 1,200,000 1,825,000 455,000 455,000 455,000 $7.05 $6.73 $5.50 $5.91 $7.50 $5.50 $4.00 $9.00 $7.00 $5.50 $5.91 $7.50 $5.50 $4.00 $6.00 $6.00 $5.50 $5.91 $7.50 $5.50 $4.00 Short Swaps 3,625,000 17,325,000 3,125,000 $5.87 $3.20 $6.27 $7.00 $5.00 $7.50 $4.75 $3.00 $5.60 5,035,000 13,701,250 19,400,000 1,825,000 1,500,000 $4.73 $3.72 $4.75 $5.25 $6.09 $5.00 $4.50 $9.15 $5.25 $6.15 $4.00 $3.00 $3.30 $5.25 $6.00

Hedge Positions 2012 - 2016

Period and Type of Contract Short Swaps Short Call Options Long Put Options Volume in Mmbtu Weighted Average 15,580,000 8,935,000 6,866,250 $4.99 $5.56 $5.22 High Low

$6.04 60,000

$5.91

$8.83 $3.30 $6.00 $4.50 $6.75 $4.00

30,000

20,000

$2.00

10,000

$1.00

NYMEX as of 3/22/2012

Note: Hedge positions as of 3/22/12; NYMEX strip as of 3/22/12.

Oil Hedges
Daily Hedged Volumes and Average Floor Prices
6,000 $120
2013 Swap Contracts Collar Contracts

Hedge Positions 2012 - 2016

Period / Type of Contract Short Swaps Short Swaps Short Call Options Long Put Options Long Call Options Short Put Options Short Call Options Long Put Options Short Put Options Index Volume in Bbls WTI Brent WTI WTI WTI WTI Brent Brent Brent WTI Brent WTI WTI WTI WTI Brent Brent Brent WTI Brent WTI WTI WTI Brent Brent Brent WTI WTI WTI Brent WTI WTI WTI 36,600 407,250 401,896 105,018 229,144 113,480 1,317,600 1,317,600 1,317,600 136,500 255,500 368,660 96,000 124,475 178,500 557,000 1,177,500 1,360,000 127,300 127,750 273,750 488,450 488,450 182,500 182,500 401,500 246,350 319,350 319,350 292,800 36,400 36,400 36,400 Weighted Average $80.20 $116.11 $111.33 $69.89 $103.78 $67.35 High $80.20 $121.15 $130.00 $81.00 $123.50 $70.00 Low $80.20 $110.93 $100.00 $65.00 $90.20 $60.00

5,000

$101.92

$103.97 $94.10 $94.96

$100

$91.32 4,000

$121.22 $132.00 $108.25 $100.69 $105.00 $95.00 $80.69 $85.00 $75.00 $84.35 $92.64 $108.80 $87.15 $95.19 $63.84 $94.74 $92.75 $123.90 $90.00 $127.00 $70.00 $77.00 $92.35 $90.00 $85.00 $79.00 $60.00

$80

2013 Swap Contracts Collar Contracts

Bbl/d

3,000

$60

Short Swaps Short Swaps Short Call Options Long Put Options Long Call Options Short Put Options Short Call Options Long Put Options Short Put Options

$125.91 $133.00 $120.10 $110.07 $115.00 $95.00 $83.09 $90.00 $70.00 $87.63 $105.48 $125.70 $85.33 $65.33 $91.05 $105.48 $133.50 $90.00 $70.00 $81.00 $105.48 $107.50 $80.00 $60.00

2,000

$40

2014 Swap Contracts Collar Contracts

Short Swaps Short Swaps Short Call Options Long Put Options Short Put Options Long Put Options Short Put Options

1,000

$20
2015 Swap Contracts Collar Contracts

$100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 $99.30 $125.12 $87.57 $66.86 $94.95 $130.00 $95.00 $75.00 $99.30 $135.98 $90.00 $70.00 $95.00 $130.00 $95.00 $75.00 $99.30 $116.40 $85.00 $60.00 $94.90 $130.00 $95.00 $75.00

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

$0
Swap Contracts Collar Contracts

Short Swaps Short Call Options Long Put Options Short Put Options 2016 Short Swaps Short Call Options Long Put Options Short Put Options

Swaps

Puts

Average Floor Price

WTI NYMEX as of 3/22/2012

Note: Hedge positions as of 3/22/12; NYMEX strip as of 3/22/12.

Alta Mesas Focus Areas1

Oklahoma
Reserves 60 Bcfe PV10 ($MM) $207.5 % Gas (Reserves) 26% % Proved Developed 70% R/P 28.6x 4Q 2011 Production 953 Boepd % Gas (Production) 48% 2012E Capex ($MM) $30 - $35

East Texas
Reserves 68 Bcfe PV10 ($MM) $203.4 % Gas (Reserves) 70% % Proved Developed 88% R/P 10.1x 4Q 2011 Prod 18.4 Mmcfed % Gas (Production) 62% 2012E Capex ($MM) $32 - $35

South Louisiana
Reserves 74 Bcfe PV10 ($MM) $293.2 % Gas (Reserves) 67% % Proved Developed 70% R/P 7.1x 4Q 2011 Prod 28.7 Mmcfed % Gas (Production) 54% 2012E Capex ($MM) $72 - $75

Hilltop
Reserves 85 Bcfe PV10 ($MM) $112.4 % Gas (Reserves) 99% % Proved Developed 72% R/P 5.5x 4Q 2011 Prod 42 Mmcfed % Gas (Production) 100% 2012E Capex ($MM) $23 - $25

Other AMH Properties

Reserves 40 Bcfe PV10 ($MM) $122.8 % Gas (Reserves) 47% % Proved Developed 69% R/P 16.3x 4Q 2011 Prod 6.6 Mmcfed % Gas (Production) 67% 2012E Capex ($MM) $20 - $22
1

Eagle Ford Shale

Reserves 21 Bcfe PV10 ($MM) $130.9 % Gas (Reserves) 9% % Proved Developed 45% R/P 7.3x 4Q 2011 Prod 1,339 Boepd % Gas (Production) 13% 2012E Capex ($MM) $43 - $48

Reserve statistics and R/P metric as of Year End 2011 SEC Reserve Report

10

Eagle Ford Shale Overview

Significant Acreage Position Concentrated in Karnes County
Overview1
Proved Reserves PV10 ($MM) % Gas (Reserves) % Proved Developed R/P Q4 2011 Production % Gas (Production) 2012E Capex ($MM) 3.6 MMBOE $130.9 9% 45% 7.3x 1,339 BOEPD 13% $43 - $48 MM

Eagle Ford Map

Oil Wet Gas/Condensate Dry Gas

Karnes County is industry recognized core

area of EFS Trend

120 well development program underway

with operator Murphy; 3 rigs currently operating

Based on 160 acre spacing Infrastructure & facilities to handle

production
Alta Mesa Acreage

Optimizing initial rates to maximize ultimate

recovery

Reserve data as of year end 2011 SEC Reserve Report

Confidential

11

Eagle Ford Shale: Maximizing EUR & Profitability

Production and EUR highly sensitive to drawdown
Early EFS wells exhibit severe well damage from high drawdown Theoretically, high drawdown may be collapsing the near well bore frac zone, crushing proppant, and limiting connectivity to the reservoir Since mechanism of failure is mechanical, it is unlikely that damaged wells can be repaired by restricting the rate once the damage is done Recent presentations/discussions by PetroHawk, Pioneer, and Chesapeake support this theory

Our wells demonstrate positive effects with restricting rate early in well life
Post high IPs, wells experience severe decline; lower IPs equate to lower decline

Restricting rate has flattened decline and potentially enhanced EUR

Time Normalized Average AMH Karnes County Oil Well Decline Profile
1,000

30 Day Avg Rate 615 BOEPD

100 BOPD

Average well produces > 100 MBOE in first 6 months1

60 Day Avg Rate 611 BOEPD 90 Day Avg Rate 597 BOEPD

10

120 Day Avg Rate 583 BOEPD

1 1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118 127 136 145 154 163 172 181 190 199 208 217 226 235 244 253 262 271 280 289 298 307 316 325 334 343 352 361 370 379 388 397 406 415 424 433 442 451 460 469 Days
1

150 Day Avg Rate 574 BOEPD

Data set inclusive of initial 21 Eagle Ford wells ; production mix is 87% oil and 13% gas.

12

East Texas Overview

Increasing Reserves and Production from Established Fields
Overview1
Proved Reserves PV10 ($MM) % Gas (Reserves) % Proved Developed R/P Q4 2011 Production % Gas (Production) 2012E Capex ($MM) 68 BCFE $203.4 70% 88% 10.1x 18.4 MMCFED 62% $32 - $35 MM

East Texas Assets Map

Liquids-rich gas from over 40 potential pay sands in the Yegua and Wilcox formations Anne Parsons field produces out of the Austin Chalk formation Low-risk expansions of well established fields discovered in 1950s and 1960s by Amoco and other large companies Applying modern geological analysis and engineering techniques to drive production and reserve growth Took over Cold Springs operations in Q22011
13

Reserve data as of year end 2011 SEC Reserve Report

Urbana and Cold Springs Field

Urbana Overview

Known structure with multiple pay zones Field re-development since buying Famcor WI Recent advances have led to increased reserves - Low resistivity pay: modern logging - Fracture stimulations - Gas lifting and lowering surface system pressure New 3D data will drive additional development - One of four new fault blocks to be tested in 1H 12 - Deeper pay potential to be tested in 2012-2013
1951 1989 2005 53 2008 60 2009 64 0 50 100 150 200
*Does not include oil/condensate, 25 BO/MM

Urbana 3P EUR (Bcf)

Reserves (BCF) Cum EUR* Cumulative to Date Remaining 3P 35 37 65 113 160 Amoco sale to Famcor & Alta Mesa Urbana A-8 confirms lowresistivity pay Alta Mesa drilling confirms added pay Urbana 3-D complete 0 0 Milestones Wilcox Discovery

BCF

Cold Springs Overview

Known structure with multiple pay zones Like Urbana, but larger with more development potential Acquired > 50% working interest in past three years Initiated development drilling and recompletions - Very low-resistivity pay (<0.8 ohms) - Modern logging technology and fracture stimulations Field re-development and expansion - Confirmed 1,500-acre western field extension in multiple Wilcox Sands - 3D survey planned to identify Yegua potential and delineate the Wilcox formation - 19 PUDs documented - Shallow oil sand actively being developed
1951 1989 2005 2007 2009 2011 0

Cold Springs 3P EUR (Bcf)

Reserves (BCF) Cum EUR* Cumulative to Date Remaining 3P Milestones

0 25 53 55 60 72

0 27 80 82 189 195

Wilcox Discovery Famcor Purchase Urbana A-8 confirms lowresistivity pay Alta Mesa purchases 50% Famcor, other WI West Cold Springs extension proved Purchased remaining 50% of Famcor East CS WI; Rediscover 7900 oil sand 14

100 BCF

200

Source: Internal reserve report.

*Does not include oil/condensate, 60 BO/MM

East Texas - Hilltop

Large Position in a Highly Prolific, Expanding Play
Overview1
Proved Reserves PV10 ($MM) % Gas (Reserves) % Proved Developed R/P Q4 2011 Production % Gas (Production) 2012E Capex ($MM) 85 BCFE $112.4 99% 72% 5.5x 42.2 MMCFED 100% $23 - $25 MM

Oil Zones Actively Being Pursued Along Trend

Permitted HZL Wells2 (Since January 1, 2010) Producing HZL Wells2 (Drilled Post - January 1, 2010)

Principal objectives are Austin Chalk,

Woodbine, and Eagle Ford between 6,000 and 8,000 ft; historic objective has been Deep Bossier and Knowles Lime at 15,000 to 20,000 ft

Field is highly productive with multiple pays,

low F&D and low LOE

Value derived through active participation

with operator on engineering, operations and geology/geophysics

- EnCana operates approximately 85% of Alta

Mesas production
1

Reserve data as of year end 2011 SEC Reserve Report 2 Permitted and producing HZL wells with target of Woodbine and/or Eagle Ford formations; data through March 2012

15

South Louisiana Overview

Historically Prolific Area Originally Developed by Majors
Overview1,2
Proved Reserves PV10 ($MM) % Gas (Reserves) % Proved Developed R/P Q4 2011 Production % Gas (Production) 2012E Capex ($MM) 74 BCFE $293.2 67% 70% 7.1x 28.7 MMCFED 54% $72 - $75 MM

South Louisiana Assets

Long-standing focus area of Alta Mesa team Primary fields are South Hayes and Weeks
Island

Historically prolific areas originally developed by

Shell, Texaco and Exxon

St Gabriel Weeks Island

Biloxi Marshland

Significant multi-pay opportunities with oil and

liquids rich gas targets

Multiple low risk exploration and development

targets

Gibson South Hayes Ramos Turtle Bayou Humphreys

Outstanding reservoir quality that yields high

rates, quick payouts and strong ROI

Oil production is priced against the LLS index

1 2

Data is inclusive of all assets in Louisiana. Reserve data as of year end 2011 SEC Reserve Report

16

Weeks Island - Overview

High Value Oil Field with Significant Upside Potential
Overview1
Proved Reserves PV10 ($MM) % Gas (Reserves) % Proved Developed R/P Q4 2011 Production % Gas (Production) 2012E Capex ($MM) 3.2 MMBOE $140.0 27% 53% 5.2x 1,720 BOEPD 21% $42 - $45 MM

Weeks Island: Multiple Oil Pay Zones

Discovered by Shell in 1945 Significant oil field characterized by low-risk, multi-pay targets Continuous 2012 drilling program underway 18 PDNP and 18 PUD locations booked, with multiple additional locations identified for 20+ MMBOE potential Drilling targets developed through intense, multi-discipline analysis of geologic, geophysical, and engineering data Ability to increase production and lower costs by optimizing facilities

Piercement Salt Dome

Oil & Gas bearing sediments

17

Reserve data as of year end 2011 SEC Reserve Report

Oklahoma Current Activity

Long-lived, Stable Oil Production
Overview1
Proved Reserves PV10 ($MM) % Gas (Reserves) % Proved Developed R/P Q4 2011 Production % Gas (Production) 2012E Capex ($MM) 10.0 MMBOE $207.5 26% 70% 28.6x 953 BOEPD 48% $30 - $35 MM
Dover Unit Infill Drilling

Oklahoma Activity Map

Re-Drill Locations

East Hennessey Waterflood Expansion

Principal assets are large fields developed by

Conoco, Texaco and Exxon on 80-acre spacing, unitized and waterflooded

Lincoln North Unit Infill Drilling

Oil dominated, long life assets with shallow

declines and steady cash flow
Lincoln North Unit Waterflood Expansion

Potential to more than double production and

reserves with down-spacing and waterflood

Key area players include: Chaparral,

Chesapeake and Devon
Lincoln Southeast Waterflood Expansion

Reserve data as of year end 2011 SEC Reserve Report

18

Regional Development of Mississippian Formation

AMH Currently Identifying and Testing Mississippi Locations on its Acreage
Wells Targeting Mississippian Formation

AMH Acreage

19

Key Considerations
Average 25+ years industry and technical experience Strong Management Team Successfully completed over $340mm of acquisitions at $1.61/mcfe1 with Proven Since 2007, increased proved reserves and production at 31% and 52% Track Record CAGR, respectively
High Quality & Diversified Asset Portfolio

Diverse asset base with significant drilling opportunities 38% of reserve volume from oil and liquids (31% of Dec11 production) Approximately 2/3rds of oil production is indexed to LLS pricing 77% of wells are controlled by operations2 All-source 3-year avg. F&D of $2.17/Mcfe compares favorably to peers3 2011 LOE of $1.51/mcfe Multi-year drilling inventory with 125 current PUD locations >100% of PDP volume hedged through 2016

Operational Control and Low F&D Costs

Low-Risk & Significant positions in Oklahoma, East Texas Wilcox and South Multi-Year Drilling Louisiana; upside from Eagle Ford shale and Eaglebine positions Inventory
1 2

Statisticfor2007 2011period ExcludesEagleFordandHilltopplayswhichconstitutesapproximately23%ofAMHsPV10valueandwhereMurphyandEnCanaaretheprincipaloperatorrespectively. 3 F&Ddatacalculatedfor2009 2011period

20

Contact Information

Hal Chappelle, President & CEO

Phone: 281-943-1353 Email: hchappelle@altamesa.net

Michael McCabe, Vice President & CFO

Phone: 281-530-0991 Email: mmcabe@altamesa.net

Lance Weaver, Director of Investor Relations

Phone: 281-943-5597 Email: lweaver@altamesa.net

www.altamesa.net
3-28-12 21