0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
21 visualizzazioni2 pagine
The review is comprehensive and thorough. Each section is well developed and ties together well in the summary section. A few minor notes: header should be the part oI the title aIter the :.
The review is comprehensive and thorough. Each section is well developed and ties together well in the summary section. A few minor notes: header should be the part oI the title aIter the :.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato DOCX, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
The review is comprehensive and thorough. Each section is well developed and ties together well in the summary section. A few minor notes: header should be the part oI the title aIter the :.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato DOCX, PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Introduction Does this section serve as a guide for the portfolio? Does the author reflect on his or her experiences transitioning to doctoral studies? What could be improved? This section looks good. It gives a nice summary oI what the website will contain and has your voice as a beginning student. The quote Irom Harvard on the opening page is great!
Intellectual Identity Do you get a sense of what the authors area of expertise is? Does the author provide a clear, concise explanation of his or her emerging intellectual identity? What could be improved? $tudent achievement is deIinitely an end goal Ior Jill`s interests. Working with teachers and leaders to develop leadership and trust are at the core oI her intellectual identity. This has many 'threads that will lead to multiple avenues Ior research.
Research Interests Do the research interests clearly connect with the authors intellectual identity? Does the author review and properly cite a minimum of ten references? Is a clear hole in the research identified? Do the research questions address that hole? Do the research questions connect with each other and the authors intellectual identity? Is the significance argument significant? What could be improved? The review is comprehensive and thorough. Each section is well developed and ties together well in the summary section. A Iew minor notes: header should be the part oI the title aIter the :. On page 6, the last section beIore school culture. I`m not sure iI the intention is to set up a contrast between teachers and leaders the 'but seems to indicate so, but since it is two Iorms oI capital, perhaps not. Just caught my eye. Also, on p. 9 I Iound myselI wondering, 'How do you measure the inIluence oI leaders on reducing variance? This paper may not be the place to answer that, but it was a thought. Lastly, I don`t know iI it would be appropriate to blend some oI the resources in the Iirst sections to show more than one researcher has concluded the same inIormation. The structure throughout is very clear and you use organization well to Irame and set up complex ideas
%heoretical Framework Does the author provide an adequate summary of the theoretical framework? Does the theory connect with the authors intellectual identity and research interests? What could be improved? The citation at the end oI each sentence in the opening paragraph is a bit distraction. Could variety in attribution be added with a signal phrase: 'According to. ? May not be a big issue There`s a nice connection to your intellectual identity. Check the reIerence list just Ior Iormatting (indenting, etc rather than APA).
iases, Assumptions and Ethics Is the IRB certificate completed? Does the author discuss issues related to his or her area of interest in a clear and logical manner? Are there additional issues that author has not discussed? What could be improved? The IRB certiIicate is completed. The writing is clear and I appreciated the inclusion oI the master narrative. As you Iinalize, review Ior clarity at the sentence level. For example, I`m not sure what you mean by: l need explore Lhe consLrucLs of my research wlLh so l galn a deep undersLandlng Lo my Loplc noL [usL cursory knowledge Lo save Llme
Resume and Vita Is the vita complete and professional? What could be improved? Format looks great. Do you need to include proIessional and/or academic reIerences? Perhaps include Dr. Jain since she`s your advisor?
ourse Plan Is the course plan completed? Does the authors plan clearly reflect his or her research and theoretical interests? What could be improved? The course plan is as complete as it can be given not all electives that will be available are known at this point. Will you be able to complete by 2013? Even with summer school, can you complete in two years? Is it possible to adjust the upload so the document reads leIt to right? I couldn`t Iind a way to adjust the view.
Reflective 1ournal Does the fournal demonstrate critical reflection throughout the course? Are there issues in the fournal that should be included elsewhere in the portfolio? Reading your journal was a pleasure. I could see so many oI the same stages I`ve experienced over the course oI this semester. Your questions are reIlective yet Iocused, the writing is clear and your voice becomes stronger with each entry. I can see your vision oI research and your role coming more and more into Iocus with each entry
Reflection Does the author critically reflect on his or her strengths and weaknesses? Does the author discuss faculty members who may help address these issues or help develop his or her intellectual identity? What could be improved? While Iaculty members who might help are not included, the reIlection on growth is well done. There`s a nice building and in Iact an area you identiIy Ior growth voice and analysis is evident in this writing! Unpacking thinking and making yourselI vulnerable are part oI the process, and it`s clear you`ve struggled with that and come out a winner!
General Feedback The website is easy to navigate and each page builds upon the last. There is a lot oI white space on each page. Consider adding pictures or other design elements to draw the reader to the writing.
Good research was not included in the reviewer guidelines sheet, but I included some comments. I`m intrigued by your comment: '@he boundarles of good research change and redeflne lLself as Lhe researcher engages ln an lnLernal dlalogue LhaL ls combaLlve and unrelenLlng" l was drawn lnLo Lhe wrlLlng because l was caughL offguard by Lhe comparaLlve and LhaL lL redeflnes and changes Where ls Lhe llne l wondered?? ?ou dld a nlce [ob of answerlng Lhose quesLlons LhroughouL!