Ate Evaluation by CTSA and POMP, Two New Methods for Direct Analysis of Transient Stability Mostafa Fidiani, Student Member 1 Sciences and Researches Campus of Azad University i@iBgroup.net Abstract: This paper proposes wo new approaches for rans! stability analysis and they have the new ideas, These approaches use ‘hays PEBS. 0). The frst method is called CTSA that fs complex ‘Simulation and Athays PEBS. CTSA is mot eliable thn all existing methods that use uatable equilibrium point (UEP) does use say convergence methods [23 POMPS method follows ibe point of maximum potential enerey on postsfaut system eaectory thal this point is approximated to TaSlors ‘expansion second onder “This paper presents a tiled implementation of alan accurate ‘method for Available Transfer Capability (ATC) calculations, We we {ho new methods fr termination cttra in ATC calculations 'A novel formulation of the ATC problem hasbeen adopted based on full a¢ power flow solution with matrix operation to incorporate the effets of voltage lms. and voltage collapse. This program ‘writen by MATLAB and dont use any do loop then his power How Program siete faster han any program ia MATLAB, "The ideas ae demonstrated on 4,7 and 30 bos IEEE. Keywords: Direct Analysis of Transient Stabiliy, PEBS, CTSA, POMP and ATC 1. Introduction ‘Order 889 mandated cach control area to compute ATC and post them on a communication system called the Open Access Same-Time Information System (OASIS). Approaches of computing ATC can be divided into the following groups STATIC METHODS and DYNAMIC METHODS, STATIC Methods can be divided into OPF (linear & nonlinear optimization) and SENSITIVITY (linearization) 4] and CPF: (Cominuation Power Flow) [3]. In OPF, for each transaction, the generations and loads are increased until allowable transmission between two areas reaches maximum, In CPF. for each transaction, the generation and load. are increased until one line reaches its MVA limit or other static terminated conditions ‘Termination criteria in Static methods are: Transmission line ‘ow constraints (Thermal and Static stability), Diverging DC lead flow, Diverging AC load flow (including Voltage Collapse) and Or Voltage limits on each bus (0.95 Vy then fault-on system is integrated forward (tan) and else ifs integrated backward (1-41). LE VeVi then time is rita. (t) 623, C: EPOMP: CLEARING 42-7 613 gus 2 Flom an postu stn trjestans nd EPOMP 10). 4, Numerical results CTSA and POMP methods have been tested fortwo tes systems. Simulation results fortwo systems, 4 and 7 machines (CIGRE), show the comparison of CTSA, POMP and Athay’s EBS approaches. Transient stability and ertical clearing time are studied for several faults, Classica model of generator and energy function at center of inertia reference frame (COI) used (7a. Clearing fault means fault elimination, so pre-Fault and post- fault systems are equa 4-1. Test system No, 1 (4 machines) This test system has 4 generators, 7 buses and & lines. Single line diagram of test system is shown in figure (3). System parameters and operating. points are shovn in Figure @) and table (1) [9]. Symmetric three phase short circuits are applied in lines. 7-3, 34 and 7-5 at point %6K from beginning of line. “ale | Sytem porumeter an operating points of machine [9 No | xu) | Mis TDS) i] 0008 {100 [02 2 [10 [1s _[ 0.005, 3710s |_3.0_[-0.006, 4 | 08 [3.0 [0.004 1526