Sei sulla pagina 1di 10

“Interfacing with the User”:

Techno-Fetish and Porno-


Bricolage as sociotechnological
practices

Doris Allhutter
Austrian Academy of Sciences
doris.allhutter@oeaw.ac.at
„Dispositivs of digital pornography“

Information ethics discourse


sticks to free speech vs. equality
-> Identify contradictions and blind spots

develop
categories
(1)
digital pornographies as
(2) sociotechnological
artefact

(3)

EU internet policy
framing of ‘harmful content’
and pornography
Focus

? mainstream, digital / sociotechnological artefact,


hardcore ?

How do sociotechnological practices


change/reproduce mainstream pornographic genre
conventions and ideologies of gender difference in
digital pornographies ?

How do designers/users appropriate pornographic


imaginations of erogeneity, of the sexual body and
sexual activity?
Poser 6 Models
„Porno-Bricolage“
Gender different „realism“
„Natural Gravity Breast Morphs“ „Real Skin Penis“

„Notice how they look more natural


and just the way most breasts
do in the real world.“ „…contains Foreskin Roll Back Morphs,
GlansStyle Morphs, Midshaftscale Morphs,
Realism Scrotum Morphs“
„giving and receiving poses“
„Arousal“ as game logic
„Imagined users“
Conclusions

• Intelligibility through simulation of


• film conventions
• „difference“ as representation strategy

• „Porno-Bricolage“: sociotechnological practices


of design-use as affective immersion into techno-
pornographic fantasies

• „Techno-Fetish“: Immersion due to intertwining


pornographic fetishes and techno-fetish

Potrebbero piacerti anche