Document no.

IMS

FPIP Sto. Tomas Batangas Title Judgment Criteria

Date Made: June 2

KAIZEN EVALUATION CRITERIA

a. Presentation Kaizen Improvement must be presented through report . Should consider the reason why to come up any change . Monitoring of result for three months should included on the report. Ensure that improvement activity must be standardize. 5 = 25 % imperfect data and no implementation 10 = 50% imperfect data but inconsistent implementation 15 = 75% perfect data but inconsistent implementation 20 = 100% perfect data and 100% implementation b . Achievement / Goal - Ensure that result of innovation meet the goal 5 = 25 % achievement 15 = 75 % achievement 10 = 50 % achievement 20 = 100 % achievement c. Cost Savings - tangible benefits of improvement must be clear on 3 months monitoring 5 = 100,000 below savings monthly 20= 101,000 to 150, 000 monthly savings 25 = perfect data 151,000 - 200,000 monthly savings 30 = 201,000 over monthly savings . d. Investment cost - cost for the kaizen activity will also consider in the evaluation . The lesser cost but result contribute big savings the better. 1 5 = 101, 000 over 20= 50,001 to 100, 000 cost investment 25 = 10,001 to 50 ,000 cost investment 30 = 10,000 below cost investment e . Technical ideas - adopting of unique ideas to increase productivity and improve quality and reduce scrap 5 = 9% and below increase 10 = 10% to 19 % productivity increase 15 = 20% to 29 % productivity increase 20 = 30% over productivity increase Performance Evaluation Table Target Score 15 20 25 20 20

Key Indicators Kaizen Presentation Achievement Cost Savings Investment Cost Technical ideas

Actual Score

Document no. IMS-114-00

Date Made: June 2, 2008

KAIZEN EVALUATION CRITERIA