Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MODULE :
LEADERSHIP IN ORGANIZATIONS
FACILITATOR :
En. HISHAMUDDIN DAHALAN
PREPARED BY :
FAIZUL ZAKARIYA
( Matric : 805629 )
NAME OF FACILITATOR :
En. Hishamuddin Dahlan
NOVEMBER 2010
_____________________________________________________
I confirm that the materials contained in this project paper are my own work.
Where the words of others have been drawn upon, whether published or
unpublished, due acknowledgements have been given. I also hereby declare
that the materials contained in this project paper have not been published
before or presented for another programmed or Master in any University.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I also would like to thank Universiti Utara Malaysia for giving students
vast exposure to a real real experience of study. I will be able to apply the
skills that I have gained throughout their academic years. In addition, I can
enhance my knowledge and abilities at the companies that I attached to.
TABLE OF CONTENT
Details Of Student & Organization.…………………………………………………………..…..8
1.0 Cases 1 International Bank………..…….………………………………………….….9
1.1 Question 1………………………………………………………………………………..9
1.2 Question 2……………………………………………………………………..…….….10
1.3 Question 3……………………………………………………………………………….10
FIGURE TABLE
PROFILE
Tel : 012-2321742
E-Mail : Faizulz @ Yahoo.com
Company : Samsung Corning (M) Sdn Bhd
Age : 34 Year
Gender : Male
Course : Master Business Administrator
( Universiti Utara Malaysia )
Based on personality assessment, I will choose candidate F.C as a leader for the group
of loan officers due to he has :-
i)- High extraversion- sociable, talkative and make new friends quickly have a
tendency to seek out the company and stimulation of other people.
ii)-High conscientiousness- good at formulating long-range goals, organizing and
planning routes to these goals, and working consistently to achieve them. Despite
short-term obstacles they may encounter.
iii)-High emotional stability- They tend to be emotionally stable, calm, and do not
constantly experience negative feelings
v)- High Positive attitude- Key factor for successful effective leader
-In my thinking this listed are best additional items to select the best candidate and I
will test on :-
1.1). Technical Skills - Able to understand the operation & able to tackle and make
tough decision.
1.2). Human Skills - Enable a supervisor to develop cooperation within the work
group - must aware of your own feelings, beliefs & attitudes toward others
1.3). Conceptual Skills - Can understand all parts of a business & how each part
contributes to the whole.
3)- How much weight do you think should be given to the personality
assessment ? Do you believe personality test can be useful in predicting the best
person for a job? Discuss.
1)- Describe the two different mental models represented in this story.
-Both of them have difference creator Sam Nolan have leadership characteristic where
he believes that human intelligence that collaborates with technology to easygoing
employees job and fast run the company like linking all internal resources between
each other, easy to conduct job applicants, save time, double internal hiring, save
training costs.
But Tom Carr no talent as a leader thinking, he still stick at old management style and
he doesn't care about how his actions impact others.
-Sam Nolan- Globalization and high tech job base open minded, support team based
work, encourage open information sharing.
-Tom Carr-Stubborn and narrow minded, conservative and opposed to great high-tech
job.
2)- What are some of the assumption and perceptions that shape the mindset of
Sam Nolan? Of Tom Carr?
-Sam Nolan have good knowledge and good technical background he need t look goal
for company achievement by collaborates with system and technology but for Tom
Carr he no have technical background and he believe the old style of working like
human can manage human are the best way. Also from my assumption Tom Carr are
scare if Sam Nolan are more better than he because Sam Nolan got the advantage.
3)- Do you think it is possible for Carr to shift to a new mental model? If you
were Sam Nolan, what would you do?
-From my thinking Tom Carr mental model can be change by select him as a advisor
or group member of the project in organization that mean the idea are coming up from
Sam Nolan and Tom Carr (sharing idea) in this case can make Tom Carr are in
position, no heart feeling and full support for the project.
2)- Do you believe it would take courage for Rasinghe to vote against the motion?
What sources of courage might he call upon to help him vote his conscience?
No, Rasinghe agreed that the system was flawed, but he was surprised by their
suggestion for a solution. One member made an informal motion that in the next
apprisal every member of council should simply give every other member the highest
rating in aech category.
His gut feeling is that such a solution to the problem of the rating system would be
dishonest and unethical. But he remembers what it felt like to be an outsider and he
doesn't want to be there again.
3)- What do you think about the current rating system? If you were in
Rasinghe’s position, what would you do? Discuss.
-From my thinking it not very effective, Bias will be happen by manipulate the data
where the evaluation result given from members are not honestly. The council
evaluator is a team member were young manager come for the same purpose, same
interest to get position in top management.
-If I in Rasinghe position , although Im not agree with the system but I will decide just
follow the Top management decision due to I’m part of the management side. I need
showing where I’m capable of the task given by management.
-Be a smart good leader and maintain job as usual. Be proactive and keep job in track.
Try to get the discussion with the boss by showing collecting data as a evidence to
support and proving our statement for make the decision. Seeking ideas & opinions of
others to help him make a decision. Work together , sharing the idea and be a good
follower for the boss.
3)- If you were Garrow’s boss and Mitchell came to see you, what would you
say?
-If I am the Garrow’s boss and Mitchell came to see me, I will hear out and lessoning
the problem and issue highlight by Mitchell carefully, I will collect the info for
investigate what happening in the process. After that I will call Garrow’s to hear what
the real problem happening. Decision will make by me after get the real causes.
1)- Contrast the beliefs about motivation held by Purvis and McCarthy.
Contrast the beliefs about motivation held by Purvis and McCarthy are :-
Mc Carthy
• Eliminated employees benefit.
• Poor rapport with staff.
• One way communication – avoid to take feedback from staff and customers.
• Single mindedly decision ( change menu ).
• No acknowledgement for staff on whatever that the staff has sacrificed.
• No gain sharing – not motivate staff to work together.
Purvis
• Pay for performance – pay Mc Carthy straight salary plus percentage of the
amount he saved for company.
• Even though busy with other business but he still follow up on the changes in
Parlor.
• Empowered employees where he consider their job and also employees
important.
• Good rapport with staff and also customers.
3)- What would you do now if you were in Purvis’s position? Why?
I will do the discussion with my worker and get the info and true story for the
evidence.
After that I will terminate McCarthy cause of unsuccessful and bad performance as a
manager and leader for the company where make the business dropped and workers in
trouble .
1)- How would you rate the communication climate at Imperial Metal products?
2)- What channels do you think top manager should use to improve
communications and both keep employees informed as well as learn about what
they are thinking?
3)- If you were a top manager at Imperial, what is the first step you would take?
Why?
I’m as a top manager, I will arrange employee meeting with top management Season,
This season will be arrange batch by batch to get their response and passing the
information about improvement project where implementation by company for
beneficence to employees.
I will take is to organizes a face to face dialogue with employees in Imperial.
1)- Why do you think the experiment in team work at Burgess Industries has
been unsuccessful ? Consider the definition of teams, team characteristics and
team dynamics, and issues of leadership.
From my thinking the team work at Burgess Industries has been unsuccessful in term
of money of the pay system are not fair.
i)- Team – In one team all are need work hard together to achieve the goal or task for
meet the target. But in this case the goal given are clear to assemble complete the
garments but the man power are miss matching where skill and unskilled worker are
unbalance. New system are no advantage for the skill worker.
iii)-Team Dynamics – No dynamic & no have the ability to inspire other make other
want to follow the directions and work with leader. Member technical competency are
weak.
v)-Issues of Leadership - To play the role as supervisor or leader to manage other, but
in fact they didn’t understand the requirement of leader function,
The basic leader Job function should be introduced to them.
1)-Communicate with all members of the team. Try to get to know a little bit about
everyone, as well as their specific role in the team.
2)-Ask other team members for help when you come across a problem you can't
solve. It will most likely result with someone coming up with a solution that you
had never considered. It will also encourage team members to go to you or someone
else when they have a problem, instead of just struggling with it on their own.
3)-Never shut down a person's idea immediately. This can hurt a person's chances of
ever speaking up again. It can also deter other members of the team from
brainstorming on a problem. Be supportive of everyone's ideas and later weed out
ideas that don't work with the group.
4)-Be accountable for your actions and never blame another team member a mistake
that you made. Never shut down a person's idea immediately. This can hurt a
person's chances of ever speaking up again. It can also deter other members of the
team from brainstorming on a problem. Be supportive of everyone's ideas and later
weed out ideas that don't work with the group
1)- What is your initial reaction to this story? Why do you think you had this
reaction.
A leader not fully understands the culture of India about important of bangles for
Indian girls. Look like leaders are very rude and racist.
Solution:-
Management need do the right thing, Management are need do the round table
meeting with committee members before implementing the rules. Explain details why
company are strongly not allowed worker wearing bangles. This is related to Safety
purpose. All the workers are need to follow the company rules and regulation.
2)- Base on this limited information, how would you rate this organization in
terms of developing leadership diversity ? Discuss.
3)- If you were a top manager at this company, how would you handle this
problem ?
If I’m’ the top manager of this company I will arrange the meeting with all parties
sitting for discussion, get the solution. In safety purpose are no compromises. To
implement, practice and maintain safety and health rules and regulation all must be
followed and obedient. Companies are care about all the workers. All level must
follow from the top until the bottom.
If still not get the solution I will give the option for sign the agreement letter who still
want wearing the bangles any accident happen will be your own risk.
1)- How would you explain the board’s selection of standard system ?
Small local consulting firm but have potential
2)- Discuss the type, sources, and relative amount of power for the three main
characters in this story.
REFERENT
1.JAMES POWER
HSU • Doesn’t have
2.AMELIA LASSITER • Have this power
3. LUCY LEE
• Have this this power • Control the
power
TYPE OF POWER •• NoDoesn’t have
Political •dependency
Political
SOURCES OF LEADER
• Politics dependency
approach • Control all
approach
POWER approach – •• Not
Notuse
control the •information
Use her position
INTERDEPARTMENTAL
impression information
legimate power to legitimate power
DENPENDENCY
management • No expert power
• Have expert
• Control the
LEGITIMATE POWER – inexperience
power because
• power
Authority have knowledge &
CONTROL OVER
using formal skills by doing her
INFORMATION
position in an own research on
• Have the
organization the project
EXPERT POWER control
• Lack of
expect power
Figure 2 : characters Table
3)- How might Lassiter have increased her power and influence over this
decision ? If you were in her position, what would you do now ?
Lassiter can increase her power and influence over this decision by applying 7 habit
method :-
1)- How effective would you rate Coleman as a visionary leader? Discuss.
The Goal - The goal in any task is to get the job done. Leadership style controls
efficiency, which controls competitive value of product or service, which determines
the winner.
2)- Where would you place Coleman on the chart of types of leaders in Exhibit
13.8? Where would you place Deacon?
I will place Deacon as the Doer on the chart given because he has ability as a good
follower to Coleman and he work so hard for the project and well understood about
the importance and rationale underlying the vision he Inspired the employees about
what they and company will get as well as the aircraft industry.
-If I am a Deacon, I will make a meeting with Coleman and discuss to find solutions
how and what kind of strategic action possibly be executed before Deacon’s team and
to make it worst other employees’ trusts towards the organizational change
diminished. Helping Coleman to find his best way to execute the plan.
Dominant at Omega is Clan Culture where Omega an open and friendly place to
work where people share a lot of themselves. It is like an extended family. Leaders
are considered to be mentors or even parental figures. Group loyalty and sense of
tradition are strong.
There is an emphasis on the long-term benefits of human resources development
and great importance is given to group cohesion. There is a strong concern for people.
The organization places a premium on teamwork, participation, and consensus.
2)- Is there a culture gap? Which type of culture do you think is most
appropriate for the newly merged company? Why?
Yes, there are Culture Gap. From my thinking Clan culture are most appropriate for
the newly merged company due to In the values matrix Collaborate (clan) there is an
3)- If you were John Tyler, what techniques would you use to integrate and
shape the culture to overcome the culture gap?
I will keeping in mind that the provider company has a different way of solving
problems and doing business, should set a few rules from the start. For instance :-
1)- Why do you think employees are reacting in this way to the study?
2)- How could leaders have handled this situation to get greater cooperation
from employees?
3)- If you were Ramona Fossett, what would you do now? What would you do to
implement any changes recommended by the study?
-www.Thomsonrights.com
The Leadership Experience Fourth Edition
(Richard L.Daft with Patricia G. Lane ) copyright 2008