Sei sulla pagina 1di 699

WWW.

RESI
STANCE2010.
COM
TRACKING LADON GOG
And The

HEBREW ROSE

Part One

This paperback is for those who don’t like computer-screen


reading. However, it does not include maps and other images accessable
only from the (free) online version. Internet links active on the webpage
merely come underlined here, meaning that their hidden URLs are not
identified in the text; but whatever URLs show in the online text do
appear here. The online version will see more. I intend to make a
section, “Additions/Corrections in the Paperbook,” which can be
accessed from the website:
http://www.tribwatch.com/ladon.htm

This edition was published with Lulu on November 1, 2006.

My email address is
trib_watch@yahoo.com

COPYRIGHT © tribwatch.com 2006


CONTENTS
2 Asshur! Gog Bee-Less You
14 Asshur! Guzuntight
24 The Garden of Guti
32 Rome as an Extension of Tyre and Atlantis
45 Gog: A Gorgon Conclusion
55 The Hercules Circle of Gogi
66 The Wolf Peoples
75 Russians Are Manes-ly Because of the Medes
91 Hyper-Gog
100 Roslin and the Rose Line
112 Who's the Wheel Dragon Line?
126 The Goats of Hermes were Goths
142 The Latest Buz on Atlantis
158 Atlantis Founded by Hebrew-Khazars
174 Atlantis Moves to Israel
184 I Taut I Saw a Buzi Cat
193 Twins Found Western Atlantis
202 Checks Cohenside with Stewarts
216 Edom and Avva
231 Cohanim Cats In the Buz-Um of Nahor
243 Sheba and Dedan in Greece
255 My Calydonian Boar Hunt
267 The Golden Apples of Idun
278 Sheba Conquers Kybele
291 Who's the Leda of the Pack?
301 Satan's Via Della Rose
314 Merlin, Priest of Western Atlantis
325 These Butes Were Made for...
341 Half the Dane in Edoni...
355 ...an Half the Dane from the Danann
369 Frankly, Scarlet, You Can Go to Rotterdam
383 Merovingians Are From Po-Land
398 Frogs from the Dragon's Throat
415 Kabala is Babylon the Hor
431 Vere's the Ham?
441 Vere-y Interestink
455 Buzi as a Bee
486 Bias Will Be Boiis
479 Proto-Greeks from Pre-Israelite Israel
493 Where Art Thou, Opis' Stinger of Death?
510 Codes of Arms
520 Beware the Global-Fleece Job
536 The Bij, the Bad Bulls, and the Bolgy
550 Child Sacrifices to the King Bee
559 The Horus-icrucian Rose in Akkadia
577 Veins of Black Cole
590 The Cohens of Ireland
603 From Molech to the Bruce-Stewarts
624 It Was Good Day for Cohen Salian
636 Who Pict Green for Lothian?
649 The Red Irish Hand of Abkhazia
671 Well Albi Damned
682 Molech is Sick, Cat-Scan Reveals

1
ASSHUR! GOG BEE-LESS YOU
Written June 2006, later than upcoming chapters; due to a new Hebrew theme

Let me tell you a story about the way things went for me
recently (2005/6). For various reasons my computer was unable to
get online, and eventually the machine crashed altogether due to a
critical software problem that wouldn't allow me to make a
recovery of the system. The repairman wanted $45 per hour to
come in and fix it, with no guarantee that he could.
I had decided to spend about a month clearing brush in my
forest, and while awaiting a friend from Canada to visit me, I
sensed the Spirit telling me to stop working in the forest, but not
knowing that it was the Spirit, I continued anyway, until on the 5th
day I caught a large and terrible case of poison oak. This reminded
me of a situation a few weeks earlier when I sensed my spirit
telling me to shave because someone was about to pop in
unexpectedly (I hadn't shaved for five days). I did not listen to that
small voice because I didn't know it was the Spirit, until five
minutes later when someone popped in on me unexpectedly.
The next day my friend arrived, the purpose of which was not
in our minds to fix my computer, but he being computer smart
fixed the problems (it took him two full days). I started taking all
of this to mean that I was to get back online to finish my research
on the dragon bloodline. After my friend left, I was still scratching
my skin off (painfully) due to the poison oak, and so I got cracking
on the research rather than continuing the forest clean up.
Within a couple of days, I latched onto the Abrahamic
Asshurites (Genesis 25), whom I had never before acknowledged
although I had read Genesis many times, and I began to sense in
my spirit that these peoples could be part of the Germanic
bloodline that was sacred to the secret societies under the
Rosicrucian banner. On the other hand, I thought the idea to be a
little fantastic, and began to conclude that my imagination was
simply running away on me.
By the third day of research, I had found some convincing
evidence, and on the fourth day I found what seemed to me the
"Holy Grail" that no one is d to discover. It was merely
this, that Abraham's brother, supUor,had a son named Buz
(Gensi25:1).Whatdmelws,inyprevou
years of research, I had traced the dragon bloodline to a

2
Bias/Buzas peoples of Greek myth, a peoples that I thought
furnished the Merovingian (French) kings, the Stewarts that sat on
the British throne, and who knows who else of secret-society
importance.
I had already published these findings (see "Buzi as a Bee"
and "Bias Will Be Boiis"), and I felt that most readers would not
be overwhelmingly convinced that I had found something of a key
in breaking the roots of Rosicrucian secret societies wide
open ... which had been my very task, though not knowing the full
value when I started back in 2002. Now that the Da Vinci code has
sold 40 million books, etc., I can see why it's important to God to
expose Da Vinci and friends as the real con artists whose purpose
it has always been to destroy Faith in Christ.
On the day that I had gone through the motions of a victory
dance, delighted because I felt that finally I was nearing the end of
this arduous research project, and because I felt that I had not
wasted my time after all, I went to my garden to pull weeds for the
purpose of thinking over the importance of Buz, son of Nahor.
After being in the garden just a few minutes, I sensed in my spirit
that I should stop pulling weeds and continue the writing project
instead, but I didn't go in immediately because I didn't know then
that it was the Spirit (I typically let the Spirit down like this, and I
have prayed repeatedly that He speak louder, with a voice I can
differentiate from my own conscience).
Just five minutes later, a bumble bee came close, and I waved
my hand to get it away, but it came a second time, and I waved my
hand a second time, but it came third time more determined, at
which point I let it know I meant murderous business if it didn't
get lost. As it flew away I watched it, and as I watched one of the
largest bees I had ever seen, the bee became super-focused in my
mind, at which moment I realized that this little event was sent by
God to assure me to include Buz, son of Nahor, in my research.
For the Bias/Byzas-line peoples I had identified, a year or two
earlier, used bees and honey to symbolize themselves (for
example, the Merovingian kings had gold bees buried with them).
So here I am on the sixth day, writing to you this story; where the
research will lead I do not yet know, but I have a good reason to
believe that Buz, son of Nahor, became the bee-people Greeks (i.e.
the goddess Melia, and Merope/Merops), the Merovingian Franks
(note how "Merop" evokes the king, "Merovi"), and that this is
why a Hebrew/Millennial element is found woven into the fabric
of Rosicrucianism.
A couple of days after the bee incident, I received an email
from a part-Hebrew Christian person who had been a member of
the Illuminati-related Rosicrucian organization, AMORC.
Although we had been engaged daily on my topic of the Buzi and

3
the Bute family of royal-Stewart importance, it wasn't until a week
later that I realized, after glossing over the emailer's surname
several times, that it started with, and had as its root, "Bot." This
correspondance with a Bot---- surname just seemed too non-
coincidental. I was told that this name was Hungarian, and I know
that Hungarians descend from Magyars and Kabars, the latter
definitely having Hebrew elements and related to the Hebrew-
ruled Khazars (north-east Caucasia). The Khazars are thought by
many to be somehow connected to Rosicrucians/Templars.
Long before the Magyars came to Hungary, proto-Hungary
was inhabited by Bessi Thracians that I suspected were rooted in
Buzi Medes. I had already figured that the Buda portion of Buda-
Pest (twin-city capital of Hungary) was founded either by the
Budii or Buzi Medes. I’ve yet to find whether these two similar
names were the same stalk of peoples, but it seems feasible.
Previously, correspondence with another Christian, of the
Stewart bloodline (and who suggested that her husband had been
murdered by Illuminati agents), had inadvertently led me to the
Bute surname of Stewart importance. Upon my developing a
Stewart-Bute connection to the Greek god, Butes, I emphasized it
as the name to trace across Europe, and Buda of Hungary was in
my mind good clue in tracing this bloodline.
Ezekiel 38:13 tells that Sheba and Dedan will wonder why
Gog has come to Israel, and ask whether or not it's to take a spoil
of war there. The mention of these brother-peoples seems pregnant
with the purpose of revealing the route of Gog at that time. The
problem is, there are two men in the Bible each of whom named
two of his sons, Sheba and Dedan, and this has so created a
controversy among historians that I sometimes wonder if God
didn't want certain truths to remain unknowable.
While one pair of Sheba-and-Dedan brothers are widely
thought to have formed people groups in Saudi Arabia, the other
pair of brothers formed uncertain peoples to the north of Israel.
The latter pair were sons of Abraham's son, Jokshan (Genesis
25:3), and I have some reasons to believe that these, too, are tied to
the blood roots of secret societies.
Genesis 25:3 tells that the Dedanites of Abrahamic blood
formed the Asshurites, revealing that a certain descendant of the
Dedanites was named "Asshur.". While these Asshurites must be
distinguished from those who had earlier named the city of
Asshur/Ashur (after which the Assyrians are said to be named), it
comes to me with revelatory importance that a Dedanite
descendant should furnish his son with a name honoring the capital
city of Assyria. It tends to verify what some already believe, that
Assyria was a Semite kingdom. It would therefore be likely that

4
Assyria, prior to the formation of Israelites, was filled with
Hebrews.
In Ezekiel 27, both sets of Sheba-and-Dedan brothers are
mentioned as traders with Tyre. The mention of Dedan in verse 20
is followed by mention of Arabia (v 21), and then by Sheba and
his father Raamah in verse 22. Then, in verse 23, Sheba is
mentioned again, but this time he is not likely the son of Raamah,
for immediately after the mention of this Sheba there is the
mention of Asshur, in which case I am confident that this Sheba-
and-Asshur couplet are descendants of Abraham.
As the Muslims consider themselves holy for being
descended from Abraham, so also the Asshurites may have viewed
themselves, so as to start a cult around the fact. With subsequent
generations and predictable rejection from the YHWH-honoring
Israelites, the cult may have devolved into the Rosicrucian/Kabala
secret society, and perhaps certain descendants of Nahor joined
that cult. Both the Asshurites and Buzites were in truth Hebrews,
for Abraham's father was a descendant of Eber (Genesis 11:16-26).
Sheba and Asshur are mentioned alongside Haran, Canneh,
Eden, Chilmad, and Tarshish (still in Ezekiel 27), and this reveals
the general location of the Abrahamic brothers. The location of
Haran is in modern southeast Turkey a few tens of miles from the
Euphrates river. Abraham's family lived in Haran for a time before
migrating to Israel. Abraham's brother, Haran, was apparently
named after that city, even though Haran lived and died in Ur.
This is the first clue that Hebrews in Ur were connected to
Hebrews in Haran, what may be extremely important in
identifying the historical peoples that they were, perhaps even tied
to the dragon bloodline.
The question then becomes, did God make the Abrahamic
Asshurites into a great nation (i.e. since he promised Abraham to
make his seed into many great nations)? When the Assyrians, over
a thousand years after Abraham, were sent by God to take the 10
tribes of Israel away into exile, were the invaders in large part
descended from the Abrahamic Asshurites? How deep into Assyria
had the latter penetrated, if at all? I realize that I'm starting to
sound like a proponent of British-Israelism here, and to my own
surprise I find myself going down a similar trail no matter how I
try to avoid their writings. I Asshur you, I am not attempting to
promote their view, nor anyone else's, but am seeking the realities
as I alone see them.
While many proponents of British-Israelism, for example the
late Herbert Armstrong of Plain-Truth-Magazine fame, have
taught that Germans descend from Assyrians, and that many of the
those Assyrian-come-Germans were Hebrews of the lost ten tribes,
who became certain European nations/kingdoms, including

5
Britain, I am beginning to see quite differently, that many
European nations, especially the Germanics (and including the
British), stem from Abrahamic Sheba and Dedan, and Nahorites,
not (in particular, anyway) the Israelites that went to exile in
Assyria. It’s extremely important for British-Israelists to recognize
that the non-Israelite Hebrews put forth the seeds of European
peoples long before the Assyrian exile of Israelites. Moreover, the
Hebrew-based Europeans were also of Aryan blood, and it is one
of my tasks in this book to discover which Aryans they had mixed
with in Mesopotamia.
Long before I had even known that there was a people of
Abraham called the Asshurites, I had spent years researching and
writing 25 chapters of of this book. Independent of the lines of
thought that belong to anyone else, I traced the Germanics back to
Armenia, and believing that they were connected to the sun god of
Sumer and Akkadia, I yet avoided tracing the Armenians to that
sun-god cult via the Assyrians. Why? Because the Armenians were
an Aryan-speaking peoples (the politically-correct term is "Indo-
European"), which connects them to Japheth (son of Noah).
Armenians themselves claim to be from Togarmah, son of
Gomer, son of Japheth. I resisted to include any Hebrew elements
in with the Armenians, until I should find satisfactory evidence for
that mix of blood.
I ignored those (including British-Israeli proponents) who
viewed the Assyrians as stemming from Shem simply because he
had a son by the name of "Ashshur." That's jumping to
conclusions, for in no way does the Bible make this Ashshur the
progenitor of Assyria. Granted, there are two ways that Genesis
10:11 can be, and are, translated: 1) "From that land he
[Nimrod] went forth to Ashshur and built Nineveh..."; or, 2)
"From that land, Ashshur went forth and built Nineveh..." My
Hebrew interlinear (by Jay P. Green, Sr.) uses 1) above, and that
translation seems correct because no man by the name of Ashshur
is mentioned thus far in the Genesis text. A man by that name, he
being the son of Shem, is mentioned later, in verse 22.
It’s possible, since Genesis was written long after Nimrod,
that Nimrod did not found the city of Asshur by that name; the
human author of Genesis used that name because that’s what it
was in his day. It's of course possible that the city was founded by
Ashshur, son of Shem, and it's interesting that, throughout the
Hebrew Bible, Assyria the nation/empire is referred to by exactly
the same spelling: "Ashshur." But it’s also possible that Assyria
was named after Asshur, son of Abraham, and I intend to look into
that possibility and report my findings to you.
Assyrians virtually disappear from historical records for
many centuries, and when they re-emerge as the Assyrian empire

6
that brought Israel into exile, they were not likely Hamites (as was
Nimrod) any longer, at least not the majority. It is predictable that
Assyrians would have mixed with Aryan elements in Caucusia
and/or Mede regions, and moreover there was significant Semite
blood on both the west and south sides of Assyria i.e. so why not
also in it?
Is it possible that Scandinavians and other Germanic tribes --
because they claimed to be of the "Aesir" gods/bloodline --
descend from the Abrahamic Asshurites? Did a secret cult of
Asshurites become so large and powerful as to contribute to much
of Europe?
Was the mythical Asgard, depicted with a tree of life as per
the Garden of Eden -- which Garden is moreover implied in the
Scandinavian phrase, "Golden Apples of Idun" -- a nation of the
Abrahamic Asshurites? How else could the Aesir Scandinavians
have come to use the Garden of Eden as the bedrock of their pagan
religon?PasdfethowabndBilc
concepts, who instead worship their ancestors.
It's even more interesting that the pre-tribulation rapture was
invented by a cult (Catholic Apostolic Church) that held with wild
abandon to European-Israelism. It's fine to theorize that many
Europeans stem from Hebrew stock, but to attempt to make
Europe a twelve-tribe Theocracy in the name of Biblical Israel, as
the Catholic Apostolic Church attempted, is Christian lunacy. To
their dying days, the twelve apostles of that cult (one for the
United States as well) awaited the return of Jesus to rule Israelite
Europe as per the Biblical Millennium. Imagine that. I am certain
that it was an Illuminati cult of the highest order, unbeknown to its
naive membership, of course.
Most often, European-Israelism (rejected by mainline
Christianity) includes the notion that the Israelite tribe of Dan
moved from Greece into the Danube river and then to Denmark,
etc., all the while spreading Dan-blood throughout Europe (e.g. to
become the Germanic tribes). However, when I noticed the
similarity between "Dan" and "Dedan" I immediately pondered
whether secret societies, in teaching their Freemason pawns their
secrets, have substituted Dan for Dedan in order to have them
unwittingly teach a non-truth, in order to deflect the reality from
the masses? My feelers tell me that it’s of prime importance to the
secret societies to convince us that they are from Israelites and
Levites, and should historians discover that in fact the European
“Jews” are from the non-Israelite, non-Levite blood of Chaldea,
the hopes of the secret societies will be dashed for producing their
counterfeit Millennium in the nane of Israel and/or Jesus.
We must distinguish between Freemasons at large, and those
who rule the Freemasonic institutions, for Freemasons are simply

7
the lowly pawns knowing not what they are doing on behalf of
their masters. Only if they show anti-Christian qualities enough
may they be taken from the religious sea into higher circles where
the true political agenda becomes known. As always, world rule.
One can see how a peoples would like to promote themselves
as the Chosen People just for being descended from Abraham. But
I say none of all this to say that the descendants of Keturah
(Abraham's wife) were Israelites just because they were Abraham's
descendants, for Israelites stem from his son, Isaac, not from
Keturah's children. However, both Abraham and Nahor were
Hebrews since both were descended from Eber, thus making
Hebrews out of both the Asshurites and Buzites.
In that the Buzites from Nahor are distinct from the
Asshurites from Abraham, it implies the formation of two cults,
one the Buzi Germanics (Merovingians included), and the other
the Aesir Germanics (Swedes included). Obviously, making such a
wild claim as this is a hollow bucket without some evidence. The
first order of business is to discount the common idea that Sheba
and Dedan are found only in Arabia, for Arabia is not part of the
dragon bloodline leading from Armenia to the Germanics.
I have already mentioned Haran, that this city was mentioned
alongside Sheba and Asshur (Ezekiel 27) to show that the pair
were to the north of Israel, not in Arabia. Haran was smack
between Syria and Assyria, far from Arabia. Along with Haran,
Chilmad is also mentioned, and this term may be the same as
Kulmadara, a city in Syrian Unqi (i.e. in northwest Syria). Canneh
is also mentioned, which may be a city named after the Canaanites
(Cana of Galilee?). Tarshish is not only mentioned in this Ezekiel
list, but it's also side by side with Sheba and Dedan in Ezekiel 38,
reinforcing in my mind that this latter mention (important to end-
time prophecy concerning Gog) refers to the Abrahamic pair, for
Tarshish is known to refer to Tarsus of ancient Cilicia, now in
southern Turkey on the Mediterranean (see map of the Middle
East. Click arrow-icon to enlarge).
One informative article on the Kittim has this to say:
"During the Second Temple period, naming Syria as Asshur is
a well known fact..."
http://orion.mscc.huji.ac.il/symposiums/4th/papers/Eshel99.html
As the Assyrian empire had disappeared by the second
Temple period, and seeing that the Abrahamic Asshurites are listed
in Ezekiel 27 with peoples in and around Syria, one may entertain
the possibility that Syria had been commonly called "Asshur" due
to the Abrahamic Asshurites. On the other hand, Syrian Asshur
may have been from the stalk of Asshur, son of Shem. In fact,
Syria was at first known as Aram, and this title is overwhelmingly
thought to derive from Aram, son of Shem (Genesis 10:22). It's

8
true that Nahor's grandson was named, " Aram," but by the time of
his birth, there were already a people called "Arameans."
The importance of Nahor in God's plan is underscored where
He sent Isaac to obtain his wife from Nahor's bosom, far away in
Haran. She was Rebekah, daughter of Bethuel, son of Nahor
(Genesis 22:23). Bethuel is said to be an Aramean, but as the
Aram of Nahor blood was not likely an adult as yet, Bethuel must
have been from the loins of Aram, son of Shem (you can see here
that God is keeping the Israelite bloodline fully Semitic). As Nahor
was descended from Eber, how did Aramean blood find it's way to
his son, Bethuel? The only two choices are that the Aramean blood
was in Milcah (Nahor's wife) or in Nahor's mother. When I read
Deuteronomy 26:5, where the Israelites are said by God to have
Arameans as their "father," I would conclude that Nahor's mother
was the one with Aramean blood, for she also bore Abraham (who
became the Israelites to which Deuteronomy 26:5 speaks).
The point here is to reinforce the location in which Nahor
lived, not in Arabia, nor even in the face of Arabia, but in the face
of Syria. In fact, and few would contest it, the Genesis account
pegs him as living in Haran, or at least nearby. And that's the
general vicinity in which I would expect the Buzites, and other
family groups from Nahor, to have started out. I had already made
a tentative tie between the Greek bee peoples (Buzas/Byzas) and
the Buzi tribe of Medes, but now I want to know if the Buzi Medes
were not named after Buzites from Nahor. If Buzites moved into
Iran/Medea to thereby become the Buzi Mede tribe, then it could
easily explain why Rosicrucians/Kabalists were fond of the magic
craft, for the Medes were by and large wizards. One other pertinent
question is, did the Bute(s) name derive from “Bethuel”?
The gravitation of the Abrahamic Asshurites into Syria (i.e.
so as to account for Syria's being called "Asshur") becomes a
promising theory, for kin tend to seek out kin when moving about
(e.g. as refugees of war). That is, the Asshurites went to live with
their Aramean kin.
Arameans worshipped Sumerian gods, including Ishtar, and
so they, even though they were descendants of Shem, were b no
means on God's good side. There is a scripture (Joshua 74:2)
implying Nahor's worshiping of other gods as Laban (Nahor’s
grandson) did, but it seems that God chose his bloodline in spite of
it. Indeed, for he also sent Jacob to find a wife from Nahor's seed,
this time from the two daughters of Laban! And Laban was, like
Rebekah, the son of Bethuel the Aramean, so that Laban is
likewise called an Aramean (Genesis 25:20).
It’s possible that Sumeria was named after Shem himself. It’s
then feasible that the dragon sun god, Ishtar's husband,
Dumuzi/Tammuz, was of the Shem bloodline, for Tammuz was

9
an extention of the Sumerian sun gods, Enki and Utu. Ur was just a
hop from Erech/Uruk, the hometown of Tammuz. Utu (Ishtar’s
brother) and Enki were from the city of Eridu virtually on the
outskirts of Ur (see map of the Middle East). Note that a pertinent
region in Syria was called, "Unqi," almost the same as " Enki.”
Terms sacred to Enki and Eridu keep coming up all the way
to Greece, and in fact I have tentatively tied the Redones of France
(called "Aereda") to Eridu. The Redones were Gauls, and it is
common knowledge that Gaul religion ties back to Greece, which
in turn is known to tie back to Sumeria. It is thought that the
Merovingians were tied closely to the Redones.
It's interesting that I had already pegged the Edones of
Thrace as playing a significant role in the Redone dragon line. It is
a commonlyw kno n fact that Zeus was connected to Mount Ida of
Crete, and that there was another sacred mountain called by the
same name, near the foot of which Troy was built. Not only does
"Ida" look as though it may be related to the root of "Edone," but
ancient "Bit-Adini", known also as " Beth Eden," was an Aramean
countryveaH,dmyhveincluHar.T
earlier name of Beth Eden had been "Ashtata," in memory of
Ishtar ("Ashtarte" in Syria), I presume, and this connects Beth
Eden to Ishtar’s family roots in Eridu, the latter being very near
where the Garden of Eden was thought to be (at the confluence of
the Euphrates and Tigris rivers). I hope you’re getting my point,
that the dragon cult was an Eden cult.
And so where Ezekiel 27 lists several Syrian
localities/peoples that lived alongside the Abrahamic Sheba and
Dedan, "Eden" was one of them, for which reason I would point
the finger to Beth Eden in identifying it. One may ask if “Dedan”
doesn’t mean “of Eden.”
Although the early people off the south shores of the Black
sea were Hatti and Meshech, the Greeks in later times viewed the
Black-sea coast as inhabited by "White Syrians." One can only see
in this phrase a distinction being made between the darker Syrians
nearer to Phoenicia and Israel. That is, the White Syrians were an
inter-marriage between the Semite Syrians and certain sons of
Japheth that lived near them, especially the Meshech (the major
power in the region). The Meshech made up the major part of the
Phrygian fold, and while Phrygians are by and large thought to
have been descended from the Thracians/Trojans, Scandinavians
can be traced to Phrygians (e.g. Odin's wife, "Frigg" ).
In the controversial Book of Jasher (which I and many others
feel is a fake version of the Biblical Book of Jasher), it reads:
"And the sons of Meshech were Dedon, Zaron and
Shebashni." One can hardly fail to see the Sheba and Dedan in

10
those sons. And of course these were not the Arabian Sheba and
Dedan.
The Book of Jasher also claims to know the sons of Tubal,
Magog, and Madai, even though these sons are not listed in the
Bible. My opinion is that the writer(s) (probably Kabbalists) of the
fake book chose names for those sons that reflected people groups.
In other words, the writer(s) viewed the Meshech nation as
consisting of peoples from Sheba and Dedan, and therefore created
the names, "Dedon and "Shebashni," to act as the sons of
Meshech.
Job was born in Uz , and there is an Uz who just happens to
be the first son of Nahor, the elder brother of Buz. However, there
was another Uz, son of Aram. When Satan came to destroy Job's
family, it was at the hands of the Sabeans that the first strike came.
There is difference of opinion as to who these Sabeans were, some
identifying them as the Arabian Sheba/Seba. But because the
Buzites (also mentioned in Job) are located by most to the north of
Israel, and also due to Uz being identified as Damascus, others do
not think that the Sabeans of Arabia are in view here. It is possible,
therefore, that these Sabeans were of Abrahamic Sheba.
Behold this online statement: "...but the reference in the
following verse to the 'merchants of Sheba,' together with
Haran, Canneh, Eden Asshur, and Chilmad, who by
implication would be Asiatics, is probably a mere dittography,
and is rightly omitted in the Septuagint."
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=20&letter=S )
Unbelievable. This controversy was (and still is) so divisive
that those who chose to view the Sabeans as the Arabian Sheba,
including the Septuagint writers, just ignore that a second Sheba
4verse 27) is included in the Ezekiel list, where it is situated beside
` Asshur” and a list of other Asian/Syrian peoples. The core of the
controversy concerns the Queen of Sheba, she being a symbol of
honor to whatever country she belongs, and of course there are
those who wish to view her as being from Arabian Sheba, and
those who wish to view her as from Ethiopian Seba (son of Cush),
and those who wish to view her as from Abrahamic Sheba.
Uz has been located by some (for various reasons that I won't
get into here) in Edom, or in the face of Edom, much closer to
Arabia. This view better allows the Sabeans of the Job text to be
those of Arabia. But as Uz was the son of Aram, the latter being
the father of what was later Syria, that southern positioning is
unlikely. Moreover, one of Job's friends was a "Shuchiy" (i.e.
"Shuhite"), and Strong's dictionary says that this term is from
"Shuwach," the very same spelling as a son of Abraham by
Keturah. This Shuwach (or "Shuah") was the uncle of the
Abrahamic Sheba-and-Dedan brothers.

11
It has been suggested by some, and I am in agreement, that
the land of Uz spread from Damascus to Edom, the land that
belonged collectively to Ammon, Moab and Edom (see map of
Israel). Lamentations 4:21 places Edom in the land of Uz, but not
the other way around. Put it this way, that peoples in and near
Damascus have throughout history considered the city to have
been the home of Job. That may not turn out to be true, but it
certainly exposes the weight of that opinion.
Josephus claimed that Damascus was founded by Uz, son of
Aram. It throttled me to find (on day seven of this new Hebrew-
Aryan theory) that, in the same sentence, Josephus claimed
Armenia as founded by Hul/Ul, Uz's brother. Might Damascus
have been founded by the other Uz, the brother of Buz? Even if
not, I can still make the point that Nahor's first son was named Uz
in honor of Uz, son of Aram.
Now Sevan was a region in Armenia (Lake Sevan is still in
Armenia), and because a "b" commonly modifies to a "v" (e.g.
Negev/Negeb, Tuval/Tubal), "Sheba" is expected to modify to
"Sheva/Seva" and other similar terms. Having already connected
the Sevan region with the Swedes over a year ago, since the
Swedes were known as "Svi/Sviones," I would now claim that
Sevan in Armenia was founded by Abraham blood, and that the
Swedes descend from that Sheba blood. Note that a major
Germanic people whose origins are known only as far back as
Sweden were the Suebi (or Suevi). If that doesn't spell "Sheba" all
over, what does?
I repeated in multiple chapters of this book that the Bia
peoples, who are said to have founded Lake Van in Armenia,
became a peoples by a similar name in Greece and Europe. I had
no idea where that theory was going to lead, and very little solid
bases for even holding to the theory. It turned out leading to the
Merovingians (progenitors of the Franks) even though I was
determined to leave the Merovingians out of my research as much
as was possible. Then I came across "Bias" and "Boiis" terms,
found in Greek myth/history. But here, merely on day seven of my
new Hebrew-Aryan theory, I find that the cousin of Buz may have
founded Sevan, wherefore I'm scratching my head asking if Buz
might have founded the Bia people. Might "Bia" have originally
been "Bias"? Is this not at least a plausibility since a "Nairi"
peolswruatLkeVn?
As the Buzi Medes were probably sorcerers, as were their
neighbors, the Magi Medes, it is perhaps meaningful that
Herodotus considered the "Neuri" peoples to have been sorcerers,
while others have identified them as Nahorites, an idea I have
previously shunned for lack of evidence. The Neuri lived north of
Thrace on the Bug river, and some do connect them to the Nairi of

12
Lake Van. To substantiate that Nahor left behind a peoples by his
own name, there is this statement online: “Nahor: The name
Nahor, Abraham’s brother, has been found in the Mari texts
when referring to a city by that name.” Mari was on the
Euphrates between Erech and Haran, but was also a land in Iran (in
Margiana) next to Aria (land of the Aryans). It had been my
suspicion that the Roman god, Mars, was a depiction of peoples
from Mari, for it is "looked upon as the ancient Paradise, the
cradle of the Aryan families of mankind..."
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Merv
I had independently tied the Odin-worshipping Scandinavians
to the blue-eyed and blonde "Budini," since that term is
essentially equal to "Woten/Voten" (i.e. Odin). I had only found
one other person online who took that position, all others seemed
stumped or else pointed in general to the Thracians as the
ancestors of the Swedes. It was only later when I discovered that,
according to Herodotus, the Budini and the Neuri lived in each
other's midst. And behold what I found yesterday, day six of my
new theory:
The 18th century Swedish historian Olof von Dalin
wrote that the Neuri were a mixture of Scythians, Greeks
and Hebrews who accompanied another race, the Budiner
or "Shepherd Scythians", to the Swedish islands around 400
BC, because of pressure from the Macedonians.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuri
Hocus Pocus, that came at me like a rabbit out of a hat,
grinning.
However, one must be wary of the possibility that the author
(Von Dalin) may have had a pre-conceived notion that the Neuri
were Nahor's offspring, and for that reason alone concluded
Hebrew blood as part of the Neuri.
Note that it was the Macedonians (i.e. MacEdonians) who
chased the two allies to Scandinavia. In the same way that I view
both the Edonians and the Budini as terms furnishing, "Odin," I
view the two peoples as one, even the same as the Bithynians. In
fact, the Bithyni are listed as a Thracian tribe (i.e. as are the
Edones). In that case, since I view the Macedonians as Edonians, it
would seem that the two were having a family conflict when the
one was routed toward Sweden. A larger point is that the peoples
of Greece to which I tied the bee/honey symbol had strong
connection to Bithynia (details in a coming chapter).

13
ASSHUR! GUZUNTIGHT
June 2006

In Norse myth, it is said that a Nor/Nori and Gor founded


Norway, and that Nor had a son by the name "Gard," a term
evoking the old name of the Kurds, said to have been the same as
the Guti peoples of Iran. It therefore seems an easy deduction (as
some, though not all, historians believe) that the Guti/Gard became
the Getae/Edones of Thrace who in turn became the Goths/Jutes of
Scandinavia (that were there called "Eotens/Ytones").
Behold that Gor had two sons, Heiti and Beiti, and these
reflect Nahor's first two sons, Uwts and Buwz, (i.e. Uz and Buz).
The Hebrew-Bible form of "Uz" is "Uwts," pronounced "oots."
The Hebrew-Bible form of "Buz" is "Buwz" (Strong's dictionary
#938), pronounced "booz." I don't know why the King James
people chose to use "Huz" rather than "Uz" when referring to the
son of Nahor (the Biblical word for "Huz" is exactly the same as
the one used for "Uz"), but the Huz variation (i.e. "Huwts") nicely
reflects "Heiti."
Nor's father was tagged, "Thorri," the king of Gotland. That
the ruler of Gotland was made the "father" of Nor would imply (if
you permit me to conjecture a little to see where it might lead) that
the Getae Thracians were in Scandinavia first, before the Neuri
arrived with the Budini. But as "Woten/Odin" is furnished by
either "Budini" or "Getae/Edone/Eoten," the Budini must have
been a branch of Getae. If the Budini were in truth the Buzi
Medes, while the Getae were Guti Aryans (in Iran), then it would
seem that these peoples were allied all the way back to Aryan
lands. The very term, “Eden” is thus connected to the Guti,
wherefore the dragon bloodline is rooted in the Guti, yet the
question is, to what extent were the Guti a Hebrew/Semitic
bloodline?
It would appear that when the Budini and Neuri were chased
out of their Bug-river homeland by the Macedonians, the Budini
led the Neuri to Budini relatives in Scandinavia, and there the
Neuri settled the extreme west (what is now Norway) because
there were populations in Sweden already.
As proto-Macedonia was conquered by the Dorians, note
how the latter peoples reflect "Thorri." This then suggests that
Dorians were in Scandinavia first, and that Dorians were part of

14
the Getae Thracians. The alternative is that the Getae arrived to
Gotland first, and were then replaced by the Dorians arriving later.
Let me remind you that none of these "gods" were
individuals, but were mere terms specially created to depict real
people groups. The fabulous/fantastical stories behind the myths
are studded with codes that only the initiated understand, and, to a
lesser degree, those of us who have caught on to their methods and
craft. Of course, murders of gods represent wars with the
murderers being the victors. Marriage between gods must depict
alliances, the female partner being the inferior of two parties (since
the myths were written by men). Only the chief Scandinavian gods
should be connected to the Greek and/or Asian theaters; the other
gods would depict people groups in Scandinavia itself.
Behold thou, unbelievers. Another son of Nor was said to be
"Raum," and to this I'll share that Job's friend, Elihu, was a Buzite
Ram (Job 32:2). fromtheusld
Germanics were descended largely from the mythical
"Hermin" (son of Mannus = "Mennae/Armenia"), and "Hermes"
looks like "Armenia." Note that Hermes is alternatively "Thoth,"
"Tuisto." As Tuisto is theandthefroMuswa
mythical father of all Germanics, they all descend from Thoth,
who, while commonly known to have been an historical king of
Egypt (son of king Menes of Egypt!), was also a king in Sidon. As
I had already concluded that the Menes and Thoth (of Egypt) were
Aryan Egyptians (from a Greek peoples), so I would hypothesize
that the Thoth in Sidon was, not Canaanite/Hamite, but
Phoenician... where I define Phoenicians as a Semite-Aryan mix.
Greek myth makes the Phoenicians a peoples stemming from
Egypt/Libya but descended from the Greek god, Poseidon,
wherefore they were Aryan Egyptians.
Note how "Sidon" looks like "Sitones," that latter term
known to have been a Germanic tribe. And Edones were
alternatively, "Sithones." Could it be that Germanic blood passed
through Phoenician Sidon?
There was a city of Dor in northern Israel in the face of
Phoenicia, and its people may have been the Dorians (of
Macedonia). My findings were that Trojans, escaping the Trojan
war (1200ish BC) as the so-called Sea Peoples, retreated in part to
Dor and other Phoenician ports. One can then imagine that the
Dorians of Dor, strengthened by Trojans itching for vengeance on
Greece, went out and took Greece together for that reason. After
some time their influence in some part of the Greek theater
diminished, wherefore they were forced into Europe and finally up
to Scandinavia. This would have been prior to the arrival of the
Neuri in 400 BC...if indeed the Dorians were depicted by "Thorri."

15
It is believed that Dor was a colony of Sidon, and recalling
that the Edonians were called "Sithones," one might have a mind
to identify the Dorians as Edones, an idea supported by those who
equate the Dorians with Macedonians (anciently, "Makedoni" i.e.
MakEdoni).
Joshua 17:11-12 says that the people of Dor remained in their
city even after the Joshua-led Israelites conquered them. The same
is said of Megiddo in Judges 1:27. Keep in mind that “ Megiddo”
soundlike“Ma(),”ndthboermsculanGt
Edones ("megus" is Greek for "great'). This could explain why,
when the Dorians invaded Greece, they started in Macedonia, the
Macedonians being their relatives back in Phoenician-ruled
Canaan.
I don’t think it’s a coincidence that "Dor" and "Megiddo"
reflect "Dori" and "Makedoni" so well. It's true that both the
inhabitants of Dor and Megiddo (situated beside one another) are
said by the Bible to have been Canaanites initially, but this was
back in the days of Joshua, some centuries before the Trojan war,
and even longer before the Trojans subjugated those maritime
cities.
Sidon was founded by Sidon, son of Canaan, son of Ham,
wherefore I would date the Macedonian Sithones to a period after
Sidon was no longer ruled by Hamites. Because it seems obvious
that MacEdonains were from the Eden cult, where that was also
the dragon cult, “Armageddon” may have been so named after
“Megiddo(n)” because the armies of end-time Gog will be an
extension of that Eden cult. I’m suggesting that the Megiddo
peoples of the Eden cult (in Mesopotamia) came to rule Sidon as
the proto-Macedonians.
Strabo supports my case in that he saw the Mygdones (i.e.
Macedonians) as Edone Thracians. Modern Macedonians argue
that their ancestors stemmed from Thracians and Phrygians.
Diodores wrote: "But some historians, and Ephoros is one of
them, record that the Daktyloi Idaioi [these were the proto-
Trojans] were in fact born on the Mt Ide which is in Phrygia
and passed over to Europe together with Mygdon; and since
they were wizards..." (brackets mine).
http://www.theoi.com//Georgikos/Kouretes.html
The Greeks also stemmed from the proto-Trojans mentioned
above, for Zeus was the chief Greek god raised at Mount Ida of
Crete, the sister-colony of Mount Ida at Troy.
The Danes are widely thought to derive in part from Swedes,
and my research had, aside from any consideration of the term
"Halfdan," previously defined the Danes as half Swedes and half
British "Danann." I (and others) identify these Danann as an
extension of Greek "Danaans" (not quite the same spelling but

16
close enough), but more particularly the Danaan branches called
"Hercules," he in turn being a descendant of Perseus. I identified
Perseus and Hercules as a Greek branch of Gorgons (simply
because Perseus gave birth to Gorgphones), and behold that now,
day seven of my Buz theory, I learn that Dorians (of Greece)
claimed to have descended from Hercules. That's to say that the
Scandinavian god, Thorri, if he did depict the Dorians, was a
Gorgon peoples. And if I am correct in equating the Gorgons with
the Gogi, then Scandinavia was a Gogi settlement.
I read that the peoples depicted by Hercules, when escaping
war, went into exile among the Dorians. It was upon this
Mycenaean escape to Asia Minor (including Cilicia) that the
Dorians came and conquered Macedonia and much of the Greek
theater, including the Aegean sea otherwise known as the empire
of Atlantis. Therefore, Greece was overtaken by a Dorian-Danaan
alliance, the same that must later have furnished the Thorri
Scandinavians in Gotland and the Danes in Norway.
Hercules is known in myth to have contributed to the
propping up of Western Atlantis in and around the British Isles.
These were the Greek Danaans come British Danann. In a region
that I have identified as Erethlyn, Wales, Hercules invaded the
monster, Geryon (looks like "Gorgon"). Britannica viewed
Erethlyn and Haeredaland in Norway as colonies of the same
Vikings, but didn't specify/know which group of Vikings. I had
concluded that the British Danaan of Erethlyn settled Haeredaland,
and from there mixed with Swedes to become the Danes. That
conclusion came before I knew anything about Nahor or the
Dorians; the Dorians enter my story only as a result of my
equating Nahor with Nor (founder of Norway), and Nor's
father/ancestor, Thorri, with the Dori(ans).
I would now suggest that the Dorians had come to Britain
with/before the Hercules Danaans, and I would peg them as the
Fomorians who lived at Tory island. I would moreover suggest
that both "Tory" and "Dori" stem from "Taurus," and that Zeus,
because the secret societies depicted him as Taurus, depicted these
very peoples. The question is, are "Dori/Tory" and "Tyrus" to be
somehow equated/connected?
It is my belief, as per my previous research, that
Rosicrucianism, which practices Hebrew Kabala, was steeped
heavily in the Danann. Perseus was placed by one myth in Joppa, a
city/region in Mediterranean Israel south of Dor. The mother of
Perseus was tagged, "Dana," and she descended from a peoples in
Rhodes called "Danaus" (Greek myth tells that Danaus built cities
on Rhodes).
While in Joppa, and just after killing the Gorgon Medusa,
Perseus gave birth to "Gorgophone" when mating with

17
Andromeda ("men of Medea," apparently). I expect, therefore, that
Joppa, and elsewhere on the Mediterranean coast, was rife with
Gorgons, which may have been a point in time prior to the arrival
of the Israelites from Egypt. That is, the Israelite tribe of Dan was
not there yet. For when the Israelites did come into the Promised
Land (with Joshua), they defeated the "king of Dor" (Joshua
12:23), by which I mean to say that the Dorians had already been
there.
The next statement in Joshua includes "the king of Goyim in
Gilgal." Not only is this particular Gilgal near Dor, as Strong's
Concordance concurs, but the daughter of Gor (in Scandinavian
myth) was tagged, "Goi." Were the Goy in Gilgal the descendants
of Nahor, therefore, since I'm theorizing that Gor (brother of Nor)
depicts Nahorite blood? Biblically, it's "Nachor," and per chance
this became "Nagor” in Scandinavia, and was finally corrupted to
"Gor." [But I have another theory, to be addressed later, that "Gor"
refers to the Horites amongst whom Nahor lived. In that theory,
the Horites, Carians, and Curetes are one and the same ... until
proven otherwise.]
One of the tribes of Greek Dorians was "Hylleis," and so I
find that one of the early kings of Gotland (before Thorri) was
"Hler." The Biblical Hul, son of Aram, is evoked as well, whom
Josephus claimed to be the founder of Armenia. Hler's brother was
tagged, "Kari," evoking the Carians of Asia Minor. It's possible
that "Gor" also depicts the Carians, the latter tagged "Car" in
Greek myth, but in Homer's brief writings on the topic of Dorians
we find: "the home of the Asiatic Dorians is simply Caria."
http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/D/DO/DORIANS.htm
The same website has this to say, equally astounding:
In the 5th century Pindar ascribes to Aegimius the
institutions of the Peloponnesian Dorians, and describes
them as the Dorian folk of Hyilus and Aegimius."
The names of those two Dorian tribes is a golden find here on
day seven, for on the same day I found that Scandinavian myth
claims "Aegir" to be an alternative term for describing Hler. And
Hler's/Aegir's good drinking buddy was Thor , and with that comes
to mind, once again, the Dorians. Thor was Odin's first son, the
mother of whom was Jord, that latter term evoking the Kurti/Kurd
branch of Hurrians [probably the Kartli/Kartvelians of Caucasian
Georgia]. Thor's brother is "Meili," and this reflects the ancestor of
Boeotia (Greek = "Boiotia"), the honey/bee goddess, Melia (that
name means "honey"). It is to Boiotia that I traced the Buzi Medes
when tracing them to Greece. Moreover, Melia was a princess of
Bithynia. I gather from this that the Greek Dorians had allied
themselves, and moved to Scandinavia, with some Boiotians and

18
Bithynians. The two latter terms almost look identical, and if they
became the Boudini north of Thrace, then perhaps also the Bessi
tribe of Thracians (see map of Thrace).
Thor's other brother is Tyr, and I think that speaks for itself
(for Dor was very near Tyre). Tyr, the god of war, is not to be
mistaken for the German god of war, Tiwaz, the very spelling of a
Luvian god. This suggests that the Germans who first worshiped
Tiwaz were from what was later Lydia (near Caria): "In the oldest
texts that area was referred to as Luwiya. Much later, this
same area came to be known as Lydia..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luwian
Lydia, a Trojan ally, and filled with worshipers of Hercules,
was smack beside Bithynia. Thus the Asian god Tiwaz was
exported to Germanic regions from Asia Minor in the face of Troy,
and afterward a peoples honoring Odin (probably the Bithynians)
moved in and took over the rule: "It was believed that Tiwaz was
the original sky-god and god of war, until Wodan gained in
popularity, and inherited many of Tiwaz's roles."
The Luwian language was a wide-spread Indo-European one,
spreading across Anatolia and into the Middle East, and be cause it
comes in Hieroglyphic form as well, it must have been of the very
early Japhethites. It's unfortunate and probably erroneous that
these Aryans are deemed "Hittites" to this day, for Hittites are
Biblically, "children of Heth," he being a son of Canaan (Genesis
10:15). When the Indo-Europeans of Anatolia (Turkey) came to
replace the Hatti in their kingdom, surrounding nations continued
to call them "Hatti" erroneously, leading historians to view them
as the Biblical Hittites... until modern historians learned that their
language was Indo-European unlike that of the Canaanites.
Therefore, the so-called Hittites of modern documents are not
Hittites. These were the worshipers of Tiwaz [I say Hurrians were
Horites].
I wonder if Tiwas wasn't Zeus, since the two terms look
similar enough. "Zeus" is said to be a variation of Deus = "god",
and "Tiwaz" looks as though it could qualify as the same. "Proto-
Indo-European deiwos (god of daylight) was the supreme deity
of Indo-European pagan pantheon. He was worshipped among
Anatolians as well, and was called tiwat (sun god) in
Luwian ... "
http://www.lhhpaleo.religionstatistics.net/LHH%20italia.html
Hunker down, for this is the SUPREME god of ALL Aryans.
But look at how "Tiwat/Tiwaz" starts to look like Thoth and/or
Tuisto. I can therefore conjecture that the almighty was Thoth in
Sidon, Tiwaz/t in Sithone country (i.e. Edonia), and Tuisto in
Sitone country.

19
The Germans called their god of thunder, "Donar," which
seems synonymous with "Danir," the alternative of "Vanir" The
Gauls I had traced to the Veneti (north Italy) and therefore to Lake
Van, wherefore those who interpret “Donar” and other Dan-like
terms as the Israelite tribe of Dan really do need to look at this
alternative origin at Armenia’s Lake Van. From the Veneti
stemmed the Vandal Germanics, relatives (or even ancestors) of
the Slav Rus. The importance here is that the Neuri peoples are
thought by some to be ancestors of the Slavs. Online
Encyclopedia: there is much probability in Schafarik's
"...

conjecture that the Neuri are nothing but the ancestors of the
Slavs."
Doesn't it make absolute sense that, if the Neuri were proto-
Slav Rus, then the Varangian Rus (of Sweden) were also of Neuri.
It is solid history that the two Rus peoples (above) allied
themselves in Kiev much later (by the ninth century AD), and then
went on to become the Moscovite Russians.
I've never read anywhere that the Slav Rus stemmed from
Sweden, but behold how two of their greatest gods, "Svarog" and
evoke "Sviar" and "Sviones," two historical terms "Sventih,
for the Swedes. The latter god has the variations, "Svetovid",
"Suvid", and "Swietowit" that are essentially, "Swede." This is a
super find here on day nine, for I had previously traced the
Western Slavs to a mix of Veneti and Rugii Swedes who moved
to, and named, the island of Rugen (off Germany). Behold that
"The main temple of [the Slav god] Swietowit was located in
Arkona on Rugia Island ... today Rügen ... "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svantevit
Then I found that many historians of the past equated the
Suevi and the Slavs (Suevi was also "Suebi" and therefore quite
possibly derived from "Sheba," Dedan's brother). "Ptolemy
(about A.D. 100-178) mentioned in his work, "Geographike
hyphegesis", a tribe called... Soubenoi ... [it] refers very
probably to the ancestors of the present Slavs ... This theory was
accepted b many scholars ... It was first advanced probably in
1679 by H7artknoch who was supported in modern times by
many scholars. The opinion once held by some German and
many Slavonic scholars that the names Suevi and Slav were
the same and that these two peoples were identical... must be
rejected."
http ://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14042a.htm
I don't reject it. The names of the Slav gods (mentioned
above) act to verify it. As historical records available to the
general public (secret societies probably have the rest hidden) can
trace the Suebi only as far back as Sweden, I would suggest a
tracing further back to Abraham's Sheba.

20
It's an awesome concept, that Russians are in-part Hebrews
(but not Israelites), and while Russians may be ancestral to
Rosicrucians proper, I think that we ought to seek Rosicrucians of
end-time importance in another line (i.e. aside from the Russians)
coming forth from the Swede line. The Swede line leading to the
Merovingian Franks is suspect as only one major branch. I had
found that the Merovingians stemmed from a Pomeranian peoples
(who depicted themselves with several dragons) in a region of
Europe that faces Rugen!
The statue of Sweitovik having four faces under one hat was
a Hermes temple , and it is well known that Hermes temples were
depictions of a penis/bloodline (in this case four bloodlines).
The leader of the Vanir gods was initially "Njord," and
thanks to an email from Greenway7, I am now able to connect the
term quite confidently to “Nerthus,” the Mother-Earth goddess of
the Saxons. Njord married "Skadi," a Scythian peoples,
apparently, and Saxons are thought by many to be named after
“Saka/Scythian.” Skadi forsook Nyord to marry "Ull," an Aesir,
who may have been Ul (son of Aram), the of Armenia.
As “Nerthus” was probably rooted in the root of our “earth,”
the Aereda peoples = Redones/Ruthenes may apply, especially as
Tacitus included the “Reudigni” as part of the Nerthus-worshiping
Saxons. The Scandinavian goddess, Rind, plays very well into the
story:
"In Gesta Danorum (History of the Danes), Saxo
recounted a different version of Balder's death, where Rind
was called Rinda or Wrinda, daughter of the King of the
Ruthenians."
http://www.timelessmyths.com/norse/aesir.html#Idun
From the Ruthenian/Redones came both the Slav Rus and the
Varangian Rus, according to my research. “Wrinda” may even be
a development of “Varangian.” Because Rind was the sun goddess,
she would configure to Rhoda, wife of Helios. I had connected
Helios with the city of Verkhana (modern Gorgan) in my
previous research (that ended a year ago), and behold what I found
on day nine of my Buz theory:
“Perun is strongly correlated with the near-identical
Perkunas/Perkons from Baltic mythology...”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perun
Perun was the chief god of the Slavs, and as that term was a
variation of "Perkunas," note how the latter is essentially
identical with "Verkhana" (with a common "v" modification to a
"b/p").

21
Herodotus claimed that the Neuri changed into wolves once
per year, and he may have been referring to an annual wolf-mask
celebration unto their family roots. The connection between the
Neuri and the Slavs (made by some historians) is just for their
common emphasis on wolves/werewolves. As "Verkhana" means
"wolf land" ("verk" means "wolf), I had previously traced my so-
called "wolf-line peoples" to that Gorgon/Parthian region (south
Caspian sea).
I will note here that since the city of Verkhana has since
become "Gorgan," that the "V" was interchangeable with a "G".
Apparently, since Verkhana was also "Hyrcania," a (common) "H"
to "G" change to "Gergania," or vice-versa, seems possible
enough. Therefore, "Perkunas/Perun" was a Slav god that may be
viewed as a G-to-H-to-V-to-P modification, over the centuries,
starting with "Gergana." Behold the identity of Perkunas in the
following "Paricanians": "In the list of Persian satrapies given
by the Greek historian Herodotus, the Paricanians may have
been the Hyrcanians."
http://www.geocities.com/gorgancity/History.html
There you go, all of you historians who do not know the roots
of the Slavs in either the Gorgons of the Caspian sea, nor of the
Swedes that came forth from those Gorgons.
Is it a coincidence that "In Slavic mythology, the world was
represented by a sacred tree" (website above) of the same
fashion as that in Norse myth? Is it also a coincidence that I had
traced the Illuminati eagle to Verkhana, and that I now find the
god, Perun, to be depicted on the Slav tree as "an eagle sitting on
the top of the tallest branch of the tree"? Perun was depicted
with three heads/faces, and this very concept reflects the Gorgon
Medusa and other sorcerous terms such as Medea (granddaughter
of Helios) and her goddess, Hecate. Perun carries an ax or mace
and is the god of thunder, suggesting that he evolved into the
European peoples depicted by "Thor." And so look to the Gorgons
to be the root of the Dorians, even as the Gorgons can be easily
connected to the Taurus symbol.
Perun's arch-enemy was Veles, god of the underworld, who
connects with the Neuri in that it was to Veles that certain "vucari"
(i.e. wolfmen) celebrated the event of "...Velja noc ... Young men,
known as koledari or vucari would dress long coats of sheep's
wool and don grotesque masks, roaming around villages in
groups and raising a lot of noise."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veles_%28god%29
The grandson of Veles was "Boyin" (a wizard depicted with
wolves and eagles), and he could this depict the founders of Lake
Van, whom historians have identified as the "Biaini" (i.e. Bia
peoples)? This information leads me to suggest that certain

22
Nahorites of the Lake Van region – the Nairi – became mixed with
the Gorgons that founded Verkana, and that the two together were
the proto-Rus? I would then identify Veles as Baal/Beles/Belus.
Easter, in the form of the Easter-bunny eggs, arose from an
event celebrating the oldest Slav god, Rod (god of ancestors). The
question is, how is it that Easter eggs have survived to this day in
America, unless America is controlled by Rosicrucians tracing
their roots to the Slav Rus and Rod ...whose wife was Rozanica ?
Russians were only one peoples who came forth from the dragon
bloodline. Germanics were others, and North Americans are by
and large from the Germanics.

23
THE GARDEN OF GUTI
June 2006

I had been wondering whether or not to share that the


Letushites , also sons of Abrahamic Dedan, may have became the
Lydians, since in ancient times the country was "Lydus," a
perfect match with the root of "Letushite." We may be on the rim
of the Holy Grail while discussing Lydia, for many have thought
that nation to be the Biblical Gog; my position is that they were a
Gogi branch but not necessarily the Gog of Ezekiel 38. In Greek
myth, the Lydians were, in my opinion, Apollo's mother, Leto. The
first Roman Caesars descended from Lydia; they worshipped both
Lydia and Apollo. But how can I even consider that Biblical Gog
and/or Satanic Rome come from the loins of Abraham? Only by
recognizing that the blood of Abraham plays a small part; the most
of it must have been Aryan.
The father of the god, Lydus, was Attis, whom I think was
Utu of Babylon/Sumer. "Ziusudra," representing a people who
worshiped Utu, were inhabitants of Eridu, and came to rule the
city after the people who honored Enki had ruled there. Zeus was
possibly a peoples (of Thrace and Greece) stemming from
"Ziasudra." One website says that the Sanskrit, "udra," means
"water", wherefore "Ziasudra" may be an Aryan term, which of
course would then mean, "god of the waters." It just so happens
that Enki was god of the waters.
As it's known that Haran's son, Laban, worshiped carved
gods, what gods did he worship if not those of Eridu or Erech? I
will repeat here that Haran (Abraham's brother) was in Ur and
died there, and that his being given that name shows ties between
his family in Ur and the city of Haran. That is, it is possible, if not
a concrete-hard fact, that Abraham's family in Ur already had
relatives in Haran (before they set out for Canaan), this explaining
why they stopped at Haran and lived there a while. Here is what
convinces me:
"Nanna is a god in Mesopotamian mythology, god of
the moon ... His sacred city was Ur...He was named Sin in
Babylonia and Assyrian and was also worshipped by them
in Harran ... His wife was Ningal ('Great Lady') who bore
him Utu 'Sun' and Inana ... The two chief seats of Sin's
worship were Ur in the south, and Harran to the north."

24
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanna%28Sumeriandeity%29
There you have it. Ur and Haran shared many relatives, more
than any other two cities among which lived the worshipers of Sin.
And as the moon god was otherwise known as "Min," perhaps
"Sin" evolved into it. But the moon god was known in many Min-
variations (e.g. Mani/Mene), and one can then surmise that the city
and people of Mannae (Biblical "Minni"?) was named after him.
It just so happens that the "father" of Attis was "Manes," this
revealing not only that Lydians descended from Armenia, but the
possibility that the Armenians were descended from Sin i.e.
peoples of Ur. As Josephus was convinced that Armenia was
founded by Arameans, it may have been the Arameans from Ur
who developed the dragon cult.
In the above quote we see that the so-called "Great Mother"
"Ishtar" titlegodes,InacfromSi.Itsadher
was Semitic, from the Akkadians. Inana's brother, Utu, was
"Shammash" to the Akkadians, and so note that the Semitic/Bible
word for "sun" is "shemesh" (Strong's #8122). It's interesting that
"Shem" seems to be the root of "shemesh." Indeed, we would
expect the Semites to have deified Shem with some term or
another. Keep in mind that Aram was the son of Shem.
"Ishtar" is said by some to be a variation of "Asshur," and
suddenly I see that, if true, it wouldn't be Assyria in view, but the
Abrahamic Asshurites ... the brothers of the Letushites. If the latter
were the Lydians, then the Lydians become the seed of
Abraham...which would then make Lydians Hebrews rather than
Arameans (Arameans were not Hebrews).
Aram also gave birth to "Mash" (some Bible versions
wrongly insert "Meshech"), and as the dragon aspect of the
Utu/Shamash sun god was called "mushu/mushus," one can now
wonder if Mash was not responsible. Do we see a ShemMash?
Moreover, did "Mash" form part of "Dumuzi/Tammuz" ?
I trust that online writers have a good reason for not
mentioning whether or not "Hurrian" is rooted in "Haran," or
whether the two are rooted in yet a third term, but as yet I haven't
found that reason. Multiple writers assert only that Haran was a
Hurrian city, and perhaps the difficulty lies in the non-Aryan
nature of Haran (Hurrians are classified as Aryans). I found this
quote online: “Originally speakers of Hurrian, [Arameans]
early on adopted a form of Akkadian that gave birth to the
Aramaic language.” And so the Arameans must have gotten very
close to some of those gorgeous blue-eyed blondes with beautiful
long white toes, and in mating with them they must have produced
an Aryan-Semitic mix.
Enki of Eridu is depicted as the Biblical God, and is allied to
Ziasudra, the latter of whom is depicted as Noah. This supports the

25
idea that "Ziasudra" means "god of the waters," in which case one
may assume with measurable plausibility that he was a god named
by Aryans, since "udra" is Sanskrit while Sanskrit was long ago a
sister language to Aryan. Moreover, as the Lithuanian language
today is said to be one of the closest to the ancient Aryan, note that
"udra" in Lithuanian is an otter (i.e. an aquatic creature).
Udra was also an Aryan-family language called "Prakrit,"
anditjusohpe languof"Apbhrms(canwe
see an "Abraham" in that?) grew out of Prakrit (in Christian
centuries) in northern India. According to one website,
"Apabhramsa is mentioned as the 'dialect of the Abhiras' and
was called 'Abhiri.'"
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Ithaca/1335/Lang/prakrit.html
What's that? A Sanskrit language in India that smacks of
“Hebrew” while apparently being credited to Abraham, which in
earlier centuries was called the "Udra" language? Is this evidence
that Ziasudra was in part a Hebrew entity ... and/or of the
Abrahamic bloodline? Is this why Zeus carries features akin to
Noah's (i.e. the true) God?
It has been stipulated that Enki's Babylonian version, "Ea,"
"Yah," because, aside from other istheorgnfBblca
reasons, the two terms sound virtually the same. These things are
used by non-believing historians to connect the Biblical God to
Babylonian/Sumerian myths/tales, by which they mean to assert
that the Biblical God was an invention of the Israelites but based
on Sumerian concepts.
The non-believers need to re-think. The Sumerian myths
were not pure inventions, but twisted forms of the truth, acquired
from varying (or even conflicting) versions of what Noah's sons
passed on to their sons. Wicked sons who, instead of honoring the
God of Noah, began to worship themselves and their ancestors
were the inventors of the myths. Moreover, they gave honor to the
serpent of Eden and to the apple rather than to the God who had
created the Garden along with all the Earth and all life within it.
The True God saw this dangerous situation and rectified it,
calling out a people of His own from that cradle of civilization,
and then telling the Truth through their prophets (in the Old
Testament), thus acting as a Light for all peoples and nations amid
many dark versions of the Truth. Non-believers have yet to realize
that God was concerned enough with mankind to set the record
straight in spite of his many enemies.
It would seem to be fact, from the quote below, that
Sumerians of some sort knew about the Garden of Eden even prior
to the writing of Genesis, wherefore the history of the event must
have been passed down by Noah's sons. I don't know the origin of

26
the following quote, and it's one of a kind online, but here you
have it:
"Dumuzi ... also bears the Sumerian title mulu-edin-na
"Lord of Edin."
http://www.bibleorigins.net/ningishzida.html
As Dumuzi in Uruk was not far from the confluence of the
Tigris and Euphrates river, Sumerians of some sort must have
known that Eden had been at that confluence. The Garden was/is
no longer visible, as it now sits about 3,000 feet below ground
level. How do I know? Because crude-oil sources in the region are
3,000 feet deep, give or take some. These sources constitute some
of the world's richest supply, predictably in that Eden was prolific
in vegetation/forestation. There is no other way for anyone today
to know that Eden was at the confluence of the two rivers unless
Noah's sons passed it on, for the Garden just isn't there any more,
and in fact scientists will tell us that the location where the two
rivers meet was under ocean water in the time of Ur and Eridu,
since those cities were on the ocean shore at the time of their
building. But snow falling on Greenland and Antactica, always
freezing and never running back to the oceans, causes sea level to
decline gradually century after century:
"Today it is known that during the Ubaid period the
waters of the world were between 1.5 and 5 metres higher
than their current level, with the result that Eridu was a
port city..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enki
Prior to the Flood, the Tigris and Euphrates rivers joined at
some other location than where they now do, as would be expected
since the Flood covered the region with some 3,000 feet of
sediment (since turned to hard rock); sedimentary strata are 5,000
feet thick on average in North America, say the geologists. It
wasn't an ordinary flood, or even a big one. It was mountain high,
not formed from 40 days of rain alone, but, as says the Genesis-6
account, from the waters below the oceans exploding forth through
the sea floors... through what are now the so-called "mid-ocean
ridges," a poor term indeed to describe what are vast volcanic
ranges thousands of miles long. They spewed out water and molten
material together, and the cold ocean waters caused the hot rock
material to explode into smaller debris. The waters were so dense
in this debris that trilobites were covered without hope; then
smaller/weaker fish gave up the fight and were covered in strata
above the trilobites; then larger fish above the smaller fish; and last
of all the creatures living on the continents were also buried. These

27
strata, along with their fossils, were formed in the span of a few
months, not millions of years. I tell you, that while the Sumerians
are gone, it's the unbelievers who are now inventing the tales.
My point is that the Hebrews in Sumeria were likely
worshiping the gods of the dragon sun, and may even have created
those gods, and yet God chose the daughters of Laban -- an idol
worshiper himself -- to become the mothers of eight tribes of
Israel...Dan not included.
Now the modern Hebrews have this ridiculous idea that God
doesn't want them to speak the name of God, "YHWH," even
though God uses it for Himself and is found almost 7,000 times in
the Bible. The King-James translators must have thought along the
same lines because they translated it, "LORD." And modern
versions follow suit. But how does God feel about His name being
wiped out of the Bible? Some Jews use "Lord" as well (Hebrew
"Adonai"), and other Jews use Ha Shem, which is supposed to
mean, "The Name." Just wonderful, isn't it (I'm being sarcastic)?
And so when they pray they say, "Dear heavenly Father,
TheName, please accept me as your friend today, O loving
TheName..."
If I continue like this, I won't have any readers left. Note how
Ha Shem evokes Shem, or even the sun god, Shammash.
Kabalistic Hebrews (i.e. occult Hebrews) have a large influence in
Jewry, and as Rosicrucians creep into Christianity to distort it, so
Kabalists creep into synagogues to distort Judaism. All distortions
are expected to lean toward the dragon-sun cult, for a man is what
he believes, and he teaches what he is
As Shammash was Utu in Sumeria, the first point I would
make is that the Hebrew, "Ittay," is the English, "Gittite."
Guti, therefore? If so, the Couldn'tUhavebsymolft
Guti were of the same nation that named Utu, which is a good
reason to identify the Aryan Guti with Arameans if indeed “Utu”
derived from Uts, son of Aram.
One can speculate that "Utu" was at first "ushus," since that
latter version means "snake." Note the Akkadian/Semite term,
"mushhushshu," in the following expose by Jeremy Black and
Anthony Green: "The snake-dragon (with horns, snake's body
and neck, lion's forelegs and bird's hindlegs) is represented
from the Akkadian Period down to the Hellenistic Period as a
symbol of various gods ... the creature's Akkadian name as
mushhushshu, 'furious snake'...”
http://www.bibleorigins.net/ningishzida.html
That description is of the very dragon sun god that I have
been referring to (see ancient picture). The same article later
exposes Dumuzi as having had the title of, "Lord of the Tree of
Life." It then introduces his partner-god, "Gizzida," he instead

28
being "Lord of the Tree of Truth." The article attempts to connect
the dralT sun god to the serpent in Eden in a way that undermines
Biblicaaith, but I would have to concur that the connection is a
very good theory, though in quite a different way: as in Satan
establishing his own, loyal bloodline through which to control the
world by anything other than Truth.
"Gizzida" certainly qualifies as a possible variation of "Guti."
The website also shares an old Ishtar-related poem with she calling
out to the following god, asking him to open the gate of the
Underworld for her: "NINNGHIZHIDDA! Serpent of the
Deep!" One would break that term down to Ninn-Ghizidda, of
course ("nin" means "lord"). Later in that poem, the serpent says to
her, "Enter Queen of Heaven of the Great Above, that KUR
may rejoice, that CUTHA may give praise, that KUTU may
smile."
Who was Cutha and Kutu, those terms that look so much
like "Cotys" (son of Manes and father of Attis i.e. the gods
leading to Lydia)? What I found was astounding. In the fraudulent
Sixth and Seventh Book of Moses, written by Kabbalists
attempting to contort the true books of Moses, we read:
"The language and manuscript of this rare and eternal
monument of light, and of a higher wisdom, are borrowed
from the Cuthans, a tribe of the Samaritans, who were
called Cuthim in the Chaldee dialect according to the
Talmud, and they were so called in a spirit of derision. They
were termed sorcerers, because they taught in Cutha, their
original place of abode, and afterward, in Samaria, the
Kabala or Higher Magic (Book of Kings). Caspar, Melchior,
and Balthasar, the chosen arch-priests, are shining lights
among the eastern Magicians. They were both kings and
teachers - the first Priest-teachers of this glorious
knowledge, and from these Samaritan Cuthans - from these
omnipotent priests of the fountain of light, who were called
Nergal, according to the traditions of Talmud, originated
the Gypsies, who, through degeneracy, lost the consecration
of their primordial power" (page 82).
http://www.antiqillum.com/texts/bg/Qadosh/qadosh053.htm
This was an astounding find for me, because I had previously
traced the dragon bloodline to the Gypsies, and the Gypsies to the
god, Hermes. But there you have it from the horse's mouth, that
Kabala started among the Cutha of Chaldea. And if that term refers
to the Guti, then one must suspect that Hebrews and/or Semites of
Chaldee were somehow connected to the Guti.
Chaldee was in Babylon, and yet was a Semitic region
speaking Aramaic. It is indeed revealing that the Ishtar poem

29
should cite the Cuthans as her friends/relatives. But along with
Cuthan is "Kutu," and this may be Utu uncorrupted.
The website above makes mention of a seven-headed dragon
belonging to the Sumerian theater, and there is also a seven-headed
dragon in Greece, wherefore one could be led to conclude that the
seven-headed dragon in Revelation is an extension of the same.
Certainly God may have been making that very connection. The
Great Mother (Ishtar) is more than likely the "Babylon the Great,
Mother of Abominations" that is depicted as riding on the
dragon's back (Revelation 17). The task is to trace these entities to
the modern day, and Biblical prophecy is very helpful with this
task.
On this day eight of the Buz theory I learn that Enki was born
of a bull, and this is satisfying because in my writings that ended a
year ago, I had traced the dragon bloodline forward to entities
using the Taurus symbols, including Zeus, Crete, and the Taurus
mountains.
Enki is said to be the father of Dumuzi, even though Enki is
of Eridu and Dumuzi of Erech. This implies a move of the Eridu
family to Erech, which is a significant distance upstream on the
Euphrates, en route to Haran. While Inana evolves into the Semitic
Ishtar when she moves to Erech, Dumuzi gives way over time to
the next god of Erech, Gilgamesh. Note that both he and Dumuzi
have a Mash-like ending ... and that "mushushushu" can contain
either "Mash" or "Meshech."
Gilgamesh had operations in Iran, and so we find that at that
time (after 2,000 BC) a Kassite people lived in the Zagros
mountains of Iran, the same mountains from which the Guti had
originated (i.e. it seems to me that "Kassite" is a version of
"Guti"). While the Kassites are thought to be Indo-European, their
language was obscured by the fact that "Kassite bureaucracy
conducted business in Akkadian."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kassites
Akkadian was the Semite language of the Guti if I’m correct
in understanding the “kadi” of “Akkadia” as the Guti/Cutha.
Moreover, the last handful of Kassite kings were Akkadian,
wherefore my impression is that the Aryan blood in the Kassites
was partly Aramean and/or Hebrew. The Kassites became
worshipers of Marduk even though he was the son of Enki. It even
occurs to me now that Kassites became the Khazars (north-west
shore of the Caspian sea) who were Aryans and yet, as seems very
peculiar for those northern reaches, are known to have been ruled
by Hebrews.
It's also interesting that the Kassites had a "Khabiri" tribe
(see website above), and astounding, not just because that term
evokes the Hebrews (anciently, "Abiru"), but because the wicked

30
mystery schools of Egypt, overseen by the "Caucones," whom I
had pegged as the original Greek-myth writers themselves, were
called "Kabeiri" in Greek writings. I had resisted viewing those
Kabeiri as Hebrews, until now. Worse, I had suspected that the
Gauls (including the Redones) came forth from the Kabeiri, in that
the "Galli" cult came forth from the Kabeiri.
If that's not bad enough, in the Rhodope mountains of Thrace,
the goddess Rhodope had two sons, Hebros and Kikon (same as
"Caucones, apparently), as though Kabeiri-related Hebrews and
Gogi were intermarried there en route to becoming the Redone
Gauls of France ... who then became the Rus(sians).
Since the Guti are thought to have been the same as the
Kurdi, or at least of the same family, I’ll mention that, just as the
title of this chapter impies that the Guti were the founders of the
Eden cult, so the very word “garden” may have been the root of
“Kurdi” in recognition of Eden.
The Kassites had another tribe called "Kissians," and for
what it may be worth, I'll mention the Kittians here in case the two
peoples were the same. If true, then the Kassites were of Javan,
son of Japheth (Genesis 11:4).

31
ROME AS AN EXTENTION OF
TYRE AND ATLANTIS
Written 2002; upcoming chapters, if not in 2006, were written steadily afterward

There was a time when I considered the myths to be the


stories of fools, and written for fools. No longer. I now see them as
key to understanding the origin, history and Satanic culture of
Rosicrucians and other similar societies. Greek myths were
encoded historical accounts of Trojan bloodlines, bloodlines still
held sacred by modern secret-society members at the helms of
Illuminati circles.
It is very curious that an abundance of Greek-theater writings
of the Trojan-history period, expected by modern historians to
exist somewhere, are not available to them. Historians view this
situation as a "dark age" within the Troy region. But it seems
easier for me to believe that secret societies had pilfered writings,
slowly but surely and at every opportunity over the centuries, to
keep the world from knowing true Trojan history, than it is for me
to believe that the various peoples of the Greek theater went into a
long/uneventful drowse wherein they ceased writing for a few
centuries.
With most writings pilfered, the re-writing of Trojan history
is thereby made possible, and we need only to ask what sort of
sinister disease of the soul had hold of these secret societies if they
needed to go to such lengths, on top of providing the many myths,
to hide their heritage.
What the myth writers wished to conceal with encoded
language has instead been laid wide open in this day of easy-
information access, because wild illustrations in myths are no
longer very difficult to decipher with a little Internet digging. I can
even see the symbolism in Revelation as God's response to the
symbolism in the myths. For example, in the myths the Trojan line
is depicted as a dragon in a pool of Ares (at some point prior to
1000 BC). Then, after being killed, the same dragon comes to life
again in Caucasia, where it protects the Golden Fleece in a grove
of Ares, the god of war sacred to ancient Amazons, a
Meshech/Scythian peoples originating in old Aria/Eran i.e. now in
Iran. It has become my belief that the Golden Fleece was a
depiction of a sacred Trojan bloodline stationed in Phrygia. I, and

32
even some Merovingian-related secret societies who hold it dear,
call this the "dragon bloodline."
Even the prophecies of Daniel concerning the anti-Christ
seem to be Written as a reflection of the Trojan dragon line. For
example, I learned that the proto-Trojans invented metal, bronze
first and later silver and finally iron, the very metals used by
Daniel to depict the Medo-Persian, Greek and Roman empires.
Although I was able to trace the Trojans back to the Aryans of
Aria (in ancient Media), it seemed an open and shut case, in the
light of Babylon the Great (i.e. the Harlot of Revelation 17), to
associate the bloodline further to the Babylonians and their
neighbors, the Sumerians. This association comes to light in the
Guti rulers of Sumeria, who were defeated and replaced by a
Sumerian family (Ishtar and Tammuz) worshiping a sun god in the
form of a sky dragon!
The four empires mentioned in Daniel 2 and 7 were probably
ruled by one and the same bloodline. I started to view it as a God-
sanctioned bloodline to rule the earth continually... until Jesus
returns, that is. It's as if He said, "Devil, I'm going to grant you
power through men over a global empire, but after that I'll judge
you for what you accomplish with that power." I learned that the
Greeks were themselves brothers of the Trojans, but prior to
making that realization I had already learned that Trojans founded
the Romans i.e. that the first Caesars proclaimed themselves to be
of Trojan blood. Then I learned that Darius, said in the Bible
(Daniel 5:30) to be the first ruler of the Persian empire, was the
son of an Aryan (Trojans had stemmed from Aryans). What
floored me further was that the same bloodline had been a Gogi
one, and that it was indistinguishable from the Rus(sian) nation.
The coming chapters will expound on these topics.
Plato claimed to have inside information on Atlantis as
passed down through his family. As this information included the
dating of Atlantis' destruction in roughly 10,000 BC, it seems clear
that modern Rosicrucians are tied to Plato's version of the
story...and therefore possibly by blood (but if not, then by
philosophy) to Plato himself. For, the Rosicrucians also insist that
Atlantis existed some 12,000 years ago. Because I am a believer in
the literal interpretation of Genesis, I know that Atlantis did not
exist 12,000 years ago, and that Plato and friends were feeding
humanity a well-calculated falsehood, the only purpose of which
was to elevate his/their bloodline to a position of world supremacy.
If you have read the previous or subsequent chapters where I show
that the dragon bloodline was, in some historical periods, depicted
as a wolf-line (from Apollo) and a bee-line, add the following on
Plato (not his real name) to your notes: "the ancient Greeks

33
declared him to be the son of Apollo and told how, in his
infancy, bees had settled on his lips..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato
It's interesting that Plato's information came ultimately from
Egyptian priests not much more than seven or eight years after
Ezekiel wrote concerning the destruction of Tyre (598BC) in
terms suggesting a falling into the sea. Perhaps the Egyptian
wizards caught wind of Ezekiel's words against Tyre.
Plato's story supposedly comes from a "wise" pro-democracy
ruler of Athens named, Solon ("of the sun"), who, according to
Plutarch, sailed to Egypt in 590 BC and heard the Atlantis story
there, and afterward passed it on until, after more than 200 years, it
got to the ears and pen of Plato. Tyre, having been the capital of
Eastern Atlantis in that Western Atlantis was a development of
Tyrians, caused the Egyptian wizards to sport Ezekiel's words as
the submerging of Atlantis. When Solon came along, the story
may have been the highlight of an event thrown in his honor.
I think Plato was describing Western Europe well enough, in
code, as he had heard it from secret-society people(s), but decided
to convince his readers that the island/empire no longer existed,
except at the bottom of a sea; otherwsie half the world would sail
to find it for its vast wealth (that Plato described). He then
borrowed language from Ezekiel 26 and 27 to tell of that island's
sinking. I cannot determine whether the submerging of Tyre is
written by God in literal or symbolic form, but compare with the
following words of Plato (4th century BC):
"But afterwards there occurred violent earthquakes
and floods; and in a single day and night of misfortune all
your warlike men in a body sank into the earth, and the
island of Atlantis in like manner disappeared in the depths
of the sea" (Timaeus).
"For so says the Lord YHWH: 'I shall make [Tyre] a
ruined city ... when I shall brin the deep upon you and shall
cover you with great waters'" fEzekiel 26:1p9).
"All [Tyre's] men of war within you, and all your
assembly in your midst, shall fall into the heart of the seas,
in the day of your ruin. At the sounds of your sailor's cry,
the pasture lands will shake" (Ezekiel 27:27-28).
There have been historical reports of small islands falling
below sea level due to volcanic disasters, but none of these match
in size the perimeters of legendary Atlantis. The storyline in too
fantastic to be true, as for example when Poseidon had five sets of
male twins, consecutively, to form the 10 kings of the empire. To
support my contention that Plato was a secret-society man himself,

34
he immediately honors Hephaistos (at the start of his story in
Critias), the founder of the Kabeiri cult, the cult that I believe was
in charge of Greek-myth writing.
In ancient times and to this day, the religion of the fallen
Atlantean bloodline, which fell in the Trojan war, has included the
concept of restoring the Atlantean empire to world rule, and in the
interim the bloodline is depicted as being locked in the
Underworld (e.g. Osiris, Balder) until a certain hero should come
to restore it to golden-age status. It wasn't many centuries ago that
a leading Rosicrucian, Francis Bacon, wrote "The New Atlantis. "
There were multiple new Troys and new Atlantis' in the west
as follow-ups to the original in east. I can understand why Plato
would locate a new Atlantis at the opposite end of the
Mediterranean, for Trojan bloodlines dispersed upon losing the
Trojan war and settled upon various Mediterranean coasts south
and west of Italy, and even as far as Britain. Greek myth discloses
an important westward bloodline as "Hercules" ...who is made the
early symbol of the Holy-Grail line. Mythology named the Strait
of Gibraltar after Hercules. About a thousand years ago, Geoffrey
of Monmouth, whom I view as a bloodline member, claimed that
Britain was settled and named by a "Brutus," a Trojan from Italy,
and that he established proto-London literally as "New Troy."
Based at first only on the similarity of terms, it seems to me
that Tyre was the New Troy/Atlantis prior to the westward
expansion. I found that Trojans fleeing the Trojan war had settled
Tyre, wherefore it seems apparent that Tyre anbd Troy had been
named after the same entity, whatever that entity was. According
to historians, Tyre did not become a chief city until after the
Trojan war began (in about 1200 BC).
It's curious and seemingly pertinent to this personal theory of
mine that an ancient king of Tyre is likened to Satan in Ezekiel 28 ,
while the end-time anti-Christ is also likened to Satan in Isaiah 14.
Or, while Satan is depicted in Ezekiel as the ancient ruler of Tyre,
he is depicted in Daniel 7 as the ruler of the end-time Roman
empire. The Tyre-Rome comparison is again apparent in Ezekiel
27, where the destruction of Tyre is likened particularly to the
destruction of Babylon the Great (in Revelation 18). The latter has
recently evolved into the European Union and, in our future, is
destined to become allied to, and ruled by, Satan/anti-Christ.
I had never before been able to understand the significance of
the Biblical similarities between Tyre and the European world rule
of the anti-Christ. One could get the impression that God himself
is attempting to tell us that Europe became an extension of Tyre
(and therefore Troy), and will be an extension of Tyre even at the
formation and world-rule of the European Union. If it can be
shown that Rome was founded by Trojan peoples of Tyre, then the

35
questions are, do modern Rosicrucians and similar secret societies
view the EU as the New Atlantis, and will the "Image of the
Beast" denote Atlantis?? The official website of the European
Union is called, "Europa," she being a goddess who mated with the
chief Trojan line (i.e. Zeus) itself, and moreover she was a princess
of Tyre! And the new Euro (the new European currency) logo was
fashioned to look like Poseidon's trident, Poseidon being the father
not only of Atlantis, but of the Europa bloodline in Tyre! In
choosing a design for the Euro,
The eventual winner was a design allegedly created by
a team of four experts who have not, however, been
officially named."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro
Why can't we know who designed the Euro? Would it tie the
design too easily to Rosicrucian societies? It has since become
known that the current "boss" of the EU, Javier Solana, had a
mother who wrote a large book on the author of "New Atlantis ,"
Francis Bacon.
Britannica says that, "The few Trojan survivors included
Aeneas, whose descendants continued to rule the Trojans."
"Aeneas" should be understood, not as a man, but as an elite
Trojan peoples descended from an earlier peoples termed, "Tros."
Likerfugscomnlyd,thersfTojanwught
new homeland, and after many failures and troubled times, as
Roman myth reveals, the Aeneas branch of Trojans stationed
themselves in Libya and there they had a love affair with Dido, a
princess of Tyre. The historical reality seems to match this picture
quite well, for there was an historical queen Elissa, a princess of
Tyre, who moved west and founded the city of Carthage, in Libya
(814 BC).
Carthage was an extension of the Phoenician empire; the
Romans called the people of Carthage, "Poeni," derived from
"Phoenikes," and the city grew to become the seat of the Punic
"Qarthadasht," empir.ThPoncasledCrthg,
meanig,"NwCtylo-keandhrfsmto
signifying "New Tyre," in my opinion. Thus, when the Roman
myth writers portrayed Aeneas in a love affair with a princess of
Tyre, "Aeneas" must either have been depicting the historical
Elissa and her westward wave of Tyrians, or a peoples whom
because of common roots in Trojans were able to ally themselves
with Elissa's Tyrians. Indeed, note that Virgil, the author of the
Aeneas myth, had Dido say, "Trojans and Tyrians will be
treated by me without distinction."
The critical thing for all prophecy students to know is that
Virgil's myth, aside from the poetic encoding and flowery

36
illustrations, claims as the bottom line that Aeneas was the founder
of the Romans. Therefore, Atlantis became new at Tyre, then new
again at Carthage, and new again at Rome. Draw a line, therefore,
from Tyre to Rome!
In Virgil's myth, we find that, after spending some
pleasurable time in Libya with Dido, Aeneas left her hard and cold
for Rome, to the point that she killed herself in grief. But this love
affair being symbolic for some historical reality that Virgil didn't
want to spell out, I would suggest a cold and hard breaking off
with Carthage by some Trojans to form a new nation in Italy.
The legendary bird, the Phoenix, is a prime symbol of
Rosicrucianism/Freemasonry. It seems to be named after
"Phoenix," the king of Tyre (and descendant of Poseidon). Europa
was made either the daughter or wife of Phoenix, and therefore she
symbolized the same peoples as Phoenix did. It seems obvious that
the mythical resurrection of the Phoenix (bird) originally depicted
the rising of a New Troy and New Atlantis. While it is difficult to
ascertain whether "Europa" depicted the Romans in particular, the
possibility certainly exists, for the Phoenix bird was, in Christian
centuries, and still is, commonly used to symbolize the
resurrection of the Roman empire. Phoenix was assigned (by myth
writers) "Cadmus" and "Cilix" as other children (besides
Europa), and these too became the possible ancestors of the
Romans (but if not, of other European bloodlines similarly rooted
in Trojo-Tyrians).
While the New Atlantis, in the writings of sixteenth- and
seventeenth-century Rosicrucians, came to refer specifically to
America, it must have referred to Europe prior to that, in light of
the Europa myth. In this myth, Zeus becomes a white bull that
rides Europa away from Phoenicia, to Crete, where this destination
became the stepping stone to Europe by way of Troy. It didn't
dawn on me until I undertook this chapter that the white bull,
"Taurus," is a term evoking "Tyrus."
Britannica says that "The Greeks fabled this constellation
[of Taurus] to be the bull which bore Europa across the seas to
Crete and was afterward raised to the heavens by Jupiter."
The idea that comes to mind is that the people depicted by Jupiter
(i.e. probably a version of "Japheth") highly esteemed the
establishment of Europe by the Zeus-Europa (i.e. Trojan-Tyre)
bloodline.
In my research, Zeus turned out to be associated with a
tribe/branch of codeword, "Cecrops," rulers at Athens which
sailed over to Crete as the mythical "Curetes." The identification
of codeword, "Taurus," as an historical peoples, thus becomes
important. Knowing that the bull is Zeus, I know also that Taurus
depicted Trojans, yet one can then identify the proto-Trojans, for

37
"Taurus" depicted a pre-Greek and pre-Trojan peoples called
codeword, "Gorgons," whom I think were Gogi living in a place
called "Taurus," the region of the Crimea near Azov (north shore
of the Black sea). One can then connect the bull-line Gorgons to
the bull cult of Sin, the Sumerian/Akkadian moon god that was
ancestral to Ishtar, the "Great Mother" of the Dragon.
On their mythological voyage to Italy from Crete, the Aeneas
Trojans encountered difficulties at sea but were saved by Neptune,
who managed to get them to safety into Libya. Rather than being
pure fiction, this is true history in code, where "Neptune" is in this
case used to depict Atlanteans in Libya, known to historians as
Amazons or Amazon kin. "Neptune" looks like the Italian word,
"nepoto," meaning "relative/descendant." He, as god of the sea, is
easily identified as the god of Atlantis, supported by the known
fact that he is the Roman version of Poseidon.
To further connect Atlantis to Troy, we find that Poseidon
ten kings of Atlantis wasidtobulhe fTry.ist
wersaidtohvbnfPseido,atwhfrsn
Atlas, who was the first king. Yet "Atlas" became a region in north
Africa, suggesting that north Africa was the New Atlantis at one
point, and we do see the Atlas mountains in north-west Africa
acting as evidence. Moreover, Carthage was located at the eastern
end of the Atlas mountains. When Aeneas is said to have been
brought to safety into Libya by Neptune, the sea god is in this case
merely a depiction of Aeneas' fellow Trojans who had settled
Libya long before his wave of Trojans had arrived.
It is believed by some that the historical "Teresh" peoples
were the Biblical Tarshish, and while some identify the latter as
inhabitants of Tarsus in Cilicia (south Asia Minor), others identify
them as the founders of Tartessus in Spain. Both could be true,
but, the point is, the Teresh were Trojans while the Tarshish were,
according to the Bible, connected closely with Tyre, thus
providing another Troy-to-Tyre tie. Keep in mind that Tarsus was
a major city in Cilicia, that region having for its eponym, "Cilix,"
son of Phoenix!
The Bible calls Tarshish the mother of Tyre, not the other
way around. This suggests easily that Trojans at Tarshish came to
found Tyre. Trojans and some of their "Greek" cousins were
fleeing as the "Sea Peoples," as Egyptians called them. Some
invaded Egypt (1188 BC) ... some in ships, but others on foot
passed through Canaan(where Tyre was located), wherefore we
can expect that the Trojans on foot made their new home in Tyre
as they passed through. Included in the various groupings of Sea
Peoples who invaded Egypt at that time were the "Denyen" and
the "Tjeker," according to Ramesses III, who defeated them and
wrote about it.

38
The Denyen have been identified variously, some even
suggesting the Danites of Israel. The Tjekers have been traced to
the Troad (where Troy was situated) and to the Aegean-sea
islands. But when we see "Denyen" and "Tjeker" together,
knowing that Dardanus married the daughter of Teucer, suddenly
we see a resemblance of terms. Dardanus and Teucer are both
regarded as Trojan patriarchs, which is why the Trojans are
sometimes called, "Teucrians." I have not been able to decipher
whether "Teucer" was codeword for Thrace, the Togarmites, the
Tarchon Etruscans, or more than one of these choices, but
Togarmah, son of Gomer, seems the best choice judging by the
similarity of terms. That is, Troy was (tentatively speaking)
founded partly by Togarmites , and partly by the bloodline of
Dardanus.
In The Aeneid, Virgil has Dido saying this: "I myself
remember Teucer coming to Sidon, exiled from his country’s
borders, seeking a new kingdom." I don't find it hard to believe
that Virgil knew some true history wherein some Trojans had
escaped to Sidon, not far north of Tyre. Yet it's notable that Teucer
was not placed exactly in Tyre. I wonder why. Virgil made it
appear as though Dido, from Tyre, knew of the Teucrians in Sidon,
yet was herself not from Teucrians. It could be that Dido depicted
the Tros/Dardanus bloodline rather than Teucer's, for reasons to be
explained below.
Aeneas was a descendant of both Dardanus and Teucer and
thus probably depicted some of the Sea Peoples that ended up in
Phoenicia. The son of Aeneas was made "Ascanius," an apparent
codeword for Ashkenaz, brother of Togarmah. But Ascanius was
also called "Iulus/Julus," thus tying the Julian bloodline, to which
Julius Caesar belonged, to Ascanius Trojans. The third Biblical
brother, Riphath (see Genesis 10), has been said to be the root of
the term, "Europa" (interesting, but not conclusive in itself).
Now read this historical account:
The Tj eker are of uncertain origin, but they raided
Egypt repeatedly before settling in northern Canaan. They
may originally have been the Teucri, a tribe inhabiting
northwest Anatolia around Troy" (italics mine)
http://web.raex.com/~obsidian/gktrib.html
Sidon rates as northern Canaan. But there's more. In a
document dated 1570-1070 BC, there is a story told about a
robbery of gold and silver at a shipping port in Dor. The story line
is irrelevant; the point is that we find these words in the story: "I
arrived at Dor, a Tj eker town."
http://phoenicia.org/wenamun.html

39
That's a hunk a hunk of burning proof that the Tjeker
(Teucrians) Trojans settled in Canaan, for Dor was a sea port just
south of Mount Carmel in what is now northern Israel but what
may have then been southern Phoenicia.
[Update May 2006 -- It is my opinion that these Trojans of
Dor became the Dorians who soon-after conquered much of
Greece and the Aegean sea (i.e. Atlantis) but, upon the decline of
Dorian power (a few centuries later), migrated north and evolved
into the Scandinavian god, "Thorri" (and possibly "Thor" as well).
End Update]
Then there is this account:
"We know from the Amarma Letters that as Egyptian
power declined during the 12th Century BC the King of
Tyre appealed repeatedly to Pharaoh for assistance against
his rival the King of Sidon. No help was sent and Tyre fell
victim to the invasion of the Sea Peoples"
http://www.robibrad.demon.co.uk/tyre.htm.
The question is, which Sea Peoples in particular did Tyre fall
to? In another ancient list of Sea Peoples dated about 1210 BC,
where five names appear, one is "Teresh," evoking Tros but
referring to the proto-Etruscan peoples called "Tyrseni." How did
the Etruscans acquire such a name evoking Tyre so well? The
short form for "Teresh" was "Trs," and these letters are apparent
in "Etrus" (whether by coincidence or not, I do not know). In any
case, Teresh could explain how the major Phoenician city came to
be called "Tyrus" in the first place.
The Etruscans were also called, "Tyrrheno," a term
originating in the legendary (i.e. depictive) ruler, "Tirreno." Thus,
Dido princess of Tyre may have been aroto-Etruscan,
p suggesting
that the mythical co-founder of Troy, T ros, (if indeed this term is
synonymous with the Teresh) was the ancestor of the Etruscans.
This has importance in that Etruscans are pegged by some
historians as the first inhabitants of Rome (the city).
At the following website, a relief is displayed wherein six
captives are illustrated. The sixth captive is identified on the relief
as "TRS." And here's what the author of the website wrote on this
topic (brackets not mine):
"6) a TRS of the sea (in my opinion, a Trojan). If the
TRS really is a Trojan, it is strange that he looks like a
Phoenician..."
http://home-3.tiscali.nl/~meester7/engseapeoples.html
It's not strange if the Teresh settled Phoenicia. I would
suggest further that the Teresh went on to become Tyre rulers for

40
quite some time afterward, perhaps bringing forth the historical
princess Elissa and other leading Tyrians who created the western
Phoenician/Atlantean empire (800ish BC), but also the Aeneas
Romans. Previous to the Trojan invasion of Tyre, the city had been
called "Surru."
[Update May 2006 -- I'm not yet sure what "Surru" is tied to,
but "Asshur" comes to mind, as in the descendants of Dedan
(Genesis 25:3), grandson of Abraham and his second wife,
Keturah. Was Dedan the same as Dardanus so as to make the
Trojans part-Hebrew?? Was "Dido" a depiction of Dedanites?!?
The idea that comes to mind is that Dedan-based Trojans moved
into Surro, where their Dedanite ancestors had remained and were
still living, and inter-marrying with them, they formed the Tyrians
that founded a new Tyre/Troy in north Africa. The Phoenician
alphabet was Semite and for this reason Phoenicians may have
been largely rooted Dedanites of Syria.
That is, were the Trojans non-Israelite Hebrews mixed with
Teucer/Togarmite blood, and did they then marry other non-
Israelite blood in Surru??? British-Israelists say that "Dardanus" is
codeword for Danites...so as to make Trojans part Israelite, but as
Trojans pre-date Israel, I discount that theory. There is yet a third
option, that Dardanus depicted the Greek Danaans, rooted in the
mythical Danaus, this being a good theory in that the mythical
Perseus, depicting a major Danaan peoples, was placed by at least
one myth at Joppa, not far from Dor. That is, read "Dardanus" as
Dor-Danaus. It's yet possible that Danaans were of Dedan. End
Update]
The wife of Aeneas was Creusa, and I note that there was an
important Creusa associated with the Cecrops family (I'm sure
you've noted by now that "Cecrops" evokes "Gog"), she being the
daughter of Erechtheus, that latter term evoking "god of
Erech/Uruk." Erechtheus was "himself" of the Cecrops bloodline
and like Cecrops he portrayed the leadership of Athens. I believe
that Erechtheus, alternatively called "Butes," was the root of the
Stewart clan who (much later) sat on the Scottish and British
thrones (details later). There is a sect of Stewarts who call
themselves to this day, the "dragon bloodline."
When Plato told of the Western Atlanteans, he said that they
honored "Cecrops, and Erechtheus, and Erichthonius ... "
Now because an "H" is routinely inter-changeable with a "C",
it is my suspicion that "Creusa" was codeword for the Hros, an
important peoples of Caucasia that became the Rus(sians) ...but
probably started off as the Biblical Rosh, rulers of Lake Van in
Armenia. The mother of Aeneas was said to be the goddess,
Venus, she being the eponym of the Veneti, wherefore the Veneti
were, according to myth writers, related to the Romans.

41
According to Herodotus, some Illyrians in 1000 BC became
the Veneti, but Britannica tells that the Veneti language was most
closely alligned to the Etruscan language. Moreover the Veneti
became closely associated with the Romans, initially forming a
long-standing alliance for centuries. The article goes on to say that
Etruscan artwork did not only identify with Phoenicia, but with
Crete and, to my great surprise, "the Vannic [i.e. Lake Van]
kingdom of Urartu." "Dido" would seem to be the best clue for
identifying her people group; the term looks like it may refer to
Dodona, a location in north-west Greece that was especially
zealous for Zeus. On the other hand, the Taut/Thoth cult also
comes to mind. I note that a variation of the latter was "Zehuti,"
andthi(ome"Tthislf)okaugtmybe
the same as "Zeus."
It seems very implied in various myths that the Zeus peoples
in Dodona moved north into Illyrium, and then on to become the
Veneti, for in fact the Veneti are said to descend from Illyrians.
But Cadmus (son of Phoenix) was also said to become the
Illyrians, and so he being the same peoples as depicted by Europa,
it could start to appear that the Veneti were, in part anyway, Trojo-
Phoenicians en route to becoming the Romans. Indeed, it is known
that the Veneti language was Etruscan, while it is also known that
the Etruscans were related to Phoenicians.
The founding of Rome (probably by another name) from a
north-to-south Etruscan migration is to be contrasted with the
south-to-north Aeneas take-over of the city. Virgil wrote that the
Latin peoples under Aeneas founded Rome while having a military
alliance with Etruscans situated north of Rome. Note that the
father-in-law of Aeneas was codeword, "Latinus." Greek myth
has the Romans and Etruscans together stemming from codeword,
"Circe/Kirke." She depicted, not a mountain/island in Italy as
others suggest, but Circasia i.e. Caucasia! For, as she was born in
Aeaea, while her brother, Aeetes, was ruler of Aea, capital city of
Colchis (modern Georgia) in Caucasia, it would seem evident that
she depicted Caucasians, even more so since her mother was
"Perse" (i.e. codeword for Persians/Parthians, apparently). As
Circe was made the mother of Latinus, therefore, the Romans stem
from Gorgons of Caucasia/Gogasia.
The Romans/Latins are said to have removed the Etruscans
from power (about 500 BC) over the infamous city. But because
Aeneas was associated with Tyre, while also the same seems to be
true concerning the Etruscans, I tend to equate the two peoples
much more than might the typical modern historian. As I began to
suspect this equation, I figured that the Etruscans had gone so out
of favor politically by Virgil's day that he felt compelled to hush
Etruscan involvement in Rome's founding. Then, while pondering

42
the two (mythical) twins said to be responsible for founding Rome,
Romulus and Remus, I suspected that one depicted Etruscans (a
thought that must have occurred to countless others). Because
Romulus kills Remus to rule Rome alone, Remus would depict the
out-of-favor Etruscans. Then I found a debate between two men
who seem to have extensive knowledge in this area, and I would
like to share the following segment:
"I have long thought that Virgil's Aeneas represented
the arrival of the Etruscans, but it was politically
unacceptable to say so in his day. Also, the linguistic
problem of the derivation of Roma (long 'o') from Remus
(short 'e') can be resolved through Etruscan, making it
likely that Remus was Etruscan and therefore that Rome
was founded by the Etruscans"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/1917
If you've read that mythical Romulus was the founder of
Rome (753 BC), note that he was said to be a descendant of the
Aeneas peoples. According to a "prophecy" in Virgil's The Aeneid
(1stcenuryBC),hdatsofAenwuldcmtr
the world forever in a golden age of utopia, and Augustus Caesar
is said to be one of the great kings over it. The Aeneid was written
just as Augustus had become the Roman emperor so that we see
the trickery here: that specifics in the myth were tailored to glorify
that emperor. It seems inconceivable to me, therefore, that
Augustus would allow The Aeneid to claim his Trojan descent if it
were not true.
It should be said that the author of The Aeneid (Virgil) was
made the holy guide in Dante's Comedy, and that Dante has been
revealed, by his own writings, as a secret Rosicrucian writer. Thus,
while Rosicrucians are usually traced back to the Templars at the
earliest, they should be traced more than a thousand years earlier
to Virgil and his Trojan cult ... not forgetting that this cult will rule
the world when the anti-Christ comes. This explains why
European-Union boss, Javier Solana (surname means "of the
sun"), is more than likely a Rosicrucian.
Prior to Augustus, Rome was ruled by the dictator, Julius
Caesar. At a nationmaster.com article on the man, we read:
"Caesar was born in Rome to a well-known patrician family
(gens Julia) which supposedly traced its ancestry to Julus, the
son of the Trojan prince Aeneas." Augustus was the grand-
nephew of Julius Caesar, and therefore also of the Aeneas
bloodline.
This "Trojan" dynasty went on to include the next four
emperors after Augustus, up to and including Nero, wherefore
Jesus was crucified under one of them...so that this bloodline will

43
reap the punishment due it for crucifying Him. My theory that the
seven heads of the Revelation dragon depict seven Roman
emperors (Nero being the third) is thereby given some greater
merit than the reader may at first have given it.
If a distinction is made between Latins and Etruscans, it
seems clear that Virgil and these emperors were of the Latin
portion of the dragon-line (this will become interesting when I
delve into "Ladon," the dragon of Greek myth that protected the
golden apples of a sacred and mysterious garden).
Centuries later, Constantine I, the first "Christian" emperor
who wouldn't cease his worship of the pagan sun god, claimed to
be descended from Claudius II, while...
"...Claudius [II] may have been descended from the
Trojan King Ilus [i.e. Julus] and even from Dardanus, son
of Zeus and ancestor of the Trojan royal family, but these
suggestions are very likely fabricated to further ennoble
Claudius and his putative descendants, the family of
Constantine."
http://www.roman-emperors.org/claudgot.htm
On the other hand, perhaps the above claim to Trojan
ancestry was not a fabrication; perhaps some would suggest a
fabrication because they would prefer that we not know the reality.
Claudius II, according to Britannica (i.e. not to mythology), was
born (214 AD) in Dardania of Illyrium, that location founded by
the Dardani tribe of Illyrium, no doubt from Dardanus the co-
founder of Troy. It seems obvious also that Illyrium was named
after "Ilus," alternative name for Troy.
Thus, with Constantine the Great being a descendant of
Trojans, it puts a whole new spin on the nature of the Roman
Catholic Church, for Constantine was instrumental in forming that
Pagan-Christian cult. He did in historical fact worship Christ Jesus
as the Roman sun god! I would go so far as to suggest that the
Catholic Church was eventually taken over by the dragon line (i.e.
the Rosicrucians), thus explaining how that organization came to
mesh/confuse Babylonian gods with the Biblical saints. It also
explains the initial alliance that the Vatican had with the Rose-
Cross Templars. But these are not sufficient reasons to equate the
Vatican with the anti-Christ -- the end-time man -- or with end-
time Rome, for there are other dragon-line organizations, namely
Europe, and the American-British alliance... which both include the
meddling fingers of the Rothschild/Hebrew Illuminati.

44
GOG: THE ANCIENT GORGONS

It has proved too shallow to argue, as many do, that since


Rosh, Meshech and Tubal have become Russian peoples today,
end-time Gog is of the Russian people and therefore will be a
Russian ruler. Those upholding an Arab Gog wish to have some
better arguments from those of us (including myself) who hold to a
Russian Gog. The fact is, it's not easy to prove by any means that
the Meshech became Moscow while Tubal became Tobolsk.
After thousands of hours of research I netted myself hundreds
more for writing down my findings, and while to my amazement I
discovered things that prophecy students should find extremely
interesting, I also found, totally unexpectedly, that the Meshech
did become the rulers of early Moscow. But the Meshech also
became much of Europe. And according to the writer(s) of the fake
Book of Jasher (probably written by Kabbalists), the Etruscans
who founded Rome were of Tubal. Perhaps the Kabbalists knew
something that most others did not; if they were correct, then the
Latins/Romans would similarly be from Tubal. But note that
with/in Tubal there were an "Iberi" peoples, and these are likely
the non-Israelite Hebrews that I am tracing, who also became the
Martinist Rosicrucians said to originate in northern Spain and
southern France.
Historical writers, including Josephus, provide evidence to
equate ancient Tubal with the city of T'bilisi, meaning "land of
Tubal see topographic Map) This capital city of Georgia is
located in the Georgian depression (or donut-hole) between the
lesser and greater Caucasus mountain ranges ... two ranges that
form a circle, thus "Circasia." They were known to the ancients as
the "Tibarem," who had a role in the Kartli kingdom (pre-
Christian centuries) that formed the foundations of the modern
Georgians. Note how "Kartli" evokes the Kurti/Kurds said to
have derived from, or been the same as, the Guti Aryans. In
Ezekiel's day, the Meshech lived smack to the west of Tubal.
But the Tubali were not always in this location; previously
they had been in extreme western Asia Minor, in Phrygian
territory, some suggesting Bithynia in particular. Remember this
term. "Bithynia," for it was an important hub of the dragon line.
And keep in mind as I mention the "dragon line" that I am
referring not to any branch whatsoever, but to particular branches
which have ruled the world and meanwhile believed that they have
a divine right to rule.

45
A few centuries after Ezekiel, when the Armenians came to
conquer Tubal, there was noted within the Kartli kingdom a
province known to the Greeks as "Gogarene," which may have
been what the Armenians called, "Gugar." This was located in
the lesser/southern Caucasus mountain range, on its northern
slopes and therefore between the two Caucasus ranges ... where also
T'bilisi was situated. More specifically, it lay south of T'bilisi,
between the Kartli kingdom and the Armenians.
Because we can thus locate a portion of Gog's empire in
Tubal, some writers are already insinuating that out of modern
Georgia will come the Biblical Gog. In fact, some modern
Georgians refer to themselves as "Gogi."
To my amazement, I discovered the term "Gargarians" (by
Herodotus) in association with Amazons exactly where the
Meshech lived in Ezekiel's day. It would thus seem like a no-
brainer that Greek myth depicted the Gargarians as "Gorgons,"
both terms referring to the proto-Georgians. Knowing that the
ancient Gogi of Ezekiel's day lived next to the Meshech, I can't
ignore the obvious, that the Gargarians were Ezekiel's Gogi.
The term "Caucasus" itself may derive from "Gog." I think
the term should be read as "Cauc-As," the As/Aes peoples being
those proto-Trojan inventors of metal who conquered what would
later be named Asia. Note that the capital of ancient Colchis (in
what is now Georgia) was "Aes." The dragon line definitely went
through witch- and dragon-infested Colchis, as we shall see
further.
Not only did the Gogi empire mentioned by Ezekiel include
more than Meshech and Tubal, but there were multiple Gogi
empires, sometimes forming alliances in efforts to rule the world;
Revelation 20 reveals this situation still intact more than 1,000
years from now. Therefore, we had best not jump to hasty
conclusions regarding the end-time importance of Georgia as
fulfilling the role of anti-Christ/Gog.
In Ezekiel's day, the Mosch or Mesch people were situated
just to the west of Gogarene in association with the Moschian
mountains, in extreme north-eastern Turkey south of modern
Batumi and north of Erzurum.
[Update May 2006 -- Batumi, in south-west Georgia, is
interesting to me in that it might have been named after the
Buzi/Budii Medes that I am tracing to Butes of Greece, and finally
to the modern Stewarts who claim to be of the dragon bloodline.
And indeed Batumi was a Greek locality called "Batis," almost
identical to the Greek god, Butes. I hypothesize that Buz, son of
Nahor, is the root of the Butes peoples, and that they were the
original Kabbalists, and so note that there was another Batis

46
locality in north Greece, smack next to the city of Kavala. -- End
Update]
A major center inhabited by the Moschi was further to the
west, in Mazaca (in central Asia). It was in that term, "Mazaca,"
that I was able to see clearly Meshech's identity as the Amazons,
for in northern Africa the A mazons were called "Mazices."
Havingredtohqun,Iclsethai"Amzonlf
there is the root of "Meshech." And while "mushus" meant
"dragon, while the Amazons were routinely depicted as
serpents/dragons, the Meshech-Amazon equation is supported all
the more.
"Meshech" and its variations, especially "Musku," evoke the
chief city of the Muscovite Rus, "Moskva" in Russian. Because it
is known that Moscow was founded by the Varangian Rus when
they inter-married with the Slav Russians of Kiev, one could
therefore identify one or both of those Russian groups as Meshech.
There has been in use the designation of "Moscovite Rus" to
distinguish between the "Kievian Rus" of the Ukraine, the latter
group insisting that it possesses the status of indigenous Russian.
And Britannica says that Kiev was the motherland of Russia,
wherefore it is necessary in my task to learn where the Kiev Rus
originated.
On the other hand, the Varangian Rus were, by certain
indicators, descendants of the Hros peoples of Caucasia, they in
turn being, logically anyway, the Biblical "Rosh," and this would
suggest that the Moscovites were part Roshi as well as part
Meshech. My studies have led me to conclude that the Varangians
were an extension of the Redones of France, and that the Slav Rus
of Kiev were likewise a development from Redones (the Redones
would become the Ruthene/Rusyn/Rusi of France).
What is starting to sink in, though it might be wrong, is that
the Gogi peoples should be identified as multiple peoples, the
Rosh, Meshech, and Tubali included. The Gogi appear not to be a
single bloodline or clan, but rather a conglomeration of Japhetic
peoples. This becomes easier to accept as it becomes apparent that
the core Aryans of Iran, out of which came the Gorgons, were an
alliance of Japhetic peoples.
Prophecy students who wish to see a Muslim Gog rather than
a Russian one might tend to join the growing crowd claiming that
the Rosh were not a people at all, but rather a term used by Ezekiel
to merely signify "chief," as after all "Rosh" does mean "chief" (as
in "Rosh Hashana," the first/chief day of the year). This bunch tells
us that we should read Ezekiel like so: "Gog, the prince, the chief
of Meshech and Tubal," instead of "Gog, the prince of Rosh,
Meshech and Tubal." But if there did exist a people-group
resembling "Rosh" under the powers of a ruler who simultaneously

47
ruled Meshech and Tubal, then we would have reason to disagree.
I have already mentioned the Rus and the Hros, but it just so
happens that it was in Ezekiel's day that there were kings of
Urartu/Ararat (essentially Armenia) ruling from Lake Van who
styled themselves "Rusa."
It may at first glance seem as though there is no difference
between "Gog" and "Magog," since "Magog" appears to mean, and
is said by many to mean, "land of Gog." The two words thus seem
to equate as do "Canadian" and "Canada." But then perhaps not,
for "Magog" is not a term that originated from "Gog," nor can it
mean "land of Gog," because long before the Gogi existed there
was a man with the proper name, Magog, who was son of Japheth,
son of Noah (Genesis 10:2). Surely, the land of Magog was named
after this son of Japheth, but, surely, this son, Magog, was not
named after a Gogi peoples who lived prior to the Flood. The
further conclusion is that this son, Magog, did not necessarily put
forth the Gogi bloodline, but that the Gogi came from another
son(s) of Japheth who then came to live in the land of Magog.
It is known that the Scythians were just to the south of
Caucasia in 585 BC, in the year that Ezekiel had written the latter
half of his chapter 33 (from verse 21 onwards). The blood-related
Cimmerians may have been in the neighborhood to the very brink
of this period, although for a generation or two previous they were
no longer in the war records. At one point in my research, it was
good news that these two peoples seemed like the only viable
options in representing the ancient Gog of Ezekiel, but then there
developed a third option, the Lydians.
Let's back up to the neighborhood of 720 BC, more than a
century prior to Ezekiel's writings, when Urartu was invaded by
Cimmerians reportedly coming from the proto-Kievian far north,
through Caucasia into Urartu. Herodotus claimed that they were
being chased out of the far north by Royal Scythians who were in
the process of permanently replacing them on the north shores of
the Black sea.
According to cuneiform inscriptions of the Assyrians, the
Cimmerians chased out by the Royal Scythians had set up an
eastern military base in "Mannae" (Armenia), which is almost
certainly the equivalent of the Biblical "Minni" (Jer. 51:27). The
central base and capital city of Urartu was to the south at Lake Van
(near Mt. Ararat in modern east Turkey); it was named "Biaina"
initially, after the Bia tribe of Urartians (a "b" commonly modifies
to/from a "v", as also in "Tuval" to/from "Tubal"). See Urartu map
or Asia Minor map.
This entry of the Cimmerians into eastern Asia Minor must
either have brought them into conflict, or into a partnership, with
the Meshech. Britannica says that the Mushki were a major

48
Phrygian peoples who, beginning in the 12th century BC, had
moved eastward to the east side of the Halys river (central Asia
Minor). The Phrygians, keep in mind, are commonly associated by
blood with Trojans/Thracians. Plus, as Britannica continues, in the
midst of the Mushki were the "Tabal" which had at one point ruled
over 24 kingdoms.
One website says a mouthful, and I'm assuming that the
author knows what he's talking about, where we read:
"Linguistically, the Phrygians were related to the Armenians."
This is exactly the connection I am making when dissecting Greek
myth, that the Armenians were proto-Trojans and therefore an
early seat of the dragon line.
Beginning in about 1160, the Meshech had moved so far east
that they were in Assyria's face, invading and settling even down
the upper Euphrates. They were, however, along with their Gasgas
alies,puhdbckntoCai(uperHlysvgon)b
the Assyrians. Britannica reports that, by 730 BC, the Assyrians
took control of the Phrygian kingdom east of the Halys, but were
unable to conquer the west side, ruled at the time by Midas, king
of Phrygia.
The Cimmerians, when they arrived into the Pontus
(lower/sea-side Cappadocia) just as the Meshech there had been
weakened, settled down on the east of the Halys, in the city of
Sinope (this was Amazon country). I'll assume that they were
welcomed by the Meshech/Amazons, if not invited into an
alliance, because I have come across no reports of war between the
two peoples. I'm insinuating that the Cimmerians were distant
relatives of the Meshech, and that the two were Gorgons equally in
need of each other and thereby forming an alliance at this point.
Although it is commonly held that Cimmerians descended from
Gomer (son of Japheth), there may have been other sons of
Japheth among their numbers, and Meshech, the man, is also
recorded in Genesis 10 as a son of Japheth.
After the Cimmerians gave Urartu a major blow from the
north in 714, perhaps with the aid of their new allies, the Assyrians
proceeded immediately to give Urartu a major blow from the
south, killing the Urartian king, Rusa I, in the process. The
Cimmerians were repelled again in 705, by the Assyrians,
wherefore, according to Britannica, they turned back to the mouth
of the Halys river (i.e. Sinope). In 695, the Cimmerians succeeded
in quite the huge task of toppling Phrygia, something that they
could not have done alone. One could therefore conceive that the
Cimmerians had been successful with the help of Meshech.
Afterward (690ish), as a very consequence of Phrygia's fall to
the Cimmerians, the country of Lydia proper arose (adjacent to
Phrygia), a nation not known previously to the Assyrians. So over-

49
powering were the Lydians within a generation that they repelled
the Cimmerian attack and forced even the Meshech and the Tubali
to move further east ... toward Georgia. But I have not found any
information that places the Lydians themselves in
Georgia/Caucasia, even though that would seem logical for the
reason that they appear almost-certainly to have been Gogi.
The historian Pliny, who theorized that Lydia was the
Biblical Gog, shared that the Lydian kingdom was known as
"Gygea" (after Gyges), a term that could easily have stemmed
from "Gogarene/Gogar" back in Armenia ... since after all the
Phrygians were related to Armenians.
There is this from the Iliad: "Mesthles and Antiphos
commanded the Meionians, sons of Talaimenes, born to him of
the Gygaean lake." The Meionia ns were allies of the Trojans (in
1200 BC), and descendants of the god, Attis (or "Atys"); it doesn't
seem a coincidence that "Meionian" evokes Manes, father of Attis.
The Meionians must have been the proto-Lydians, for the Lydians
were likewise descended from Attis. Greek myth makes Lydia,
under the eponym of "Lydus," the "son" of Attis. Thus, if the
Lydians were Gogi, there you have in a nutshell the origin of the
Gogi, in Manes, and in the sun god of Phrygia, Attis.
Now Britannica has this to say: "...according to Herodotus'
famous and unrefuted assertion (i, 94)...an alleged dynasty
descended from Atys ... sailed to colonize Etruria (see
ETRUSCANS)." Etruria was the home of the Etruscans (in Italy),
this suggests what other reports tell us, that Rome was founded in
part by Lydians. Because the Lydians were probably from Leto,
mythical mother of Apollo, they came from the north shores of the
Black sea, explaining also why the Assyrians didn't know them.
The first ruler of the Lydians, of the Mermnan dynasty, was
the historical Gyges ... Britannica spells it "Gugu." A Mysian by
ancestry, Gyges killed the king of the previous dynasty, Sadyattes,
who was associated with the Hermes phallic cult, therefore
suggesting that the Gogi as a whole may have considered Hermes
sacred. Note the "Attis" in "Sadyattes."
This chief god of the Phrygians, also spelled, "Atti," was in
my opinion a reflection back in time to Utu, the dragon-portrayed
sun god of Babylon, and brother of Inana ("Queen of Heaven"),
also known as the wife of Tammuz, Ishtar, the universal Great
Mother of paganism, wherefore Tammuz and Ishtar together were
in my opinion the core definition of the Biblical picture of Babylon
the Great, Mother of Harlots, sitting upon the Dragon. Herodotus
wrote that "the Lydians observe nearly the same laws as the
Greeks, except that they prostitute their female offspring."
The next dynasty after Sadattes, the one started by Gyges,
was likewise of the dragon bloodline, as can be seen merely in the

50
fact that Gyges' grandson was enthroned as "Sadyattes," while his
son was king Alyattes. The latter would lay the foundation of a
Lydian empire to the point that he would become the wealthiest
man in the region if not the world.
Gyges had an enormous amount of gold, as did king Midas of
Phrygia proper whom the myth writers portrayed as the
everything-he-touched-turned-to-gold king. It is fully expected of
Gyges to have been rich if his ancestors were the Trojan inventors
of metal smelting and therefore proficient in the metal-mining
trade. I've read online that the gold and silver of Phrygia was
obtained in rivers, and while that may true to some extent, we
ought wisely to realize that Gyges and other regal owners of
precious-metal stashes were not inclined to disclose their sources,
but were rather disposed to echo a lie in order to conceal the
sources.
By the latter decade of Gyges life, becoming worried about
the power of the Cimmerians, he reluctantly formed an alliance
with the Assyrians:
"The Assyrian records of Asshurbanipal mention
Gugu of Luddu sending bound captive Gimirai warriors to
Asshurbanipal as a present and requesting Assyrian help in
forming a coalition against these peoples. Asshurpanipal
speaks of Gyges taking on the Assyrian "Yoke", meaning he
will be a tributary vassal of Assyria, in order to obtain help"
www.bibleorigins.net/PrimaryHistory562BCE.html
The point here is that the Scythians on the opposite/east side
of Asia Minor had also formed an alliance with the Assyrians,
wherefore I reasoned that the two -- Lydians and Scythians -- may
together have been the Biblical Gog of Ezekiel's day. Certainly,
the two worked together in efforts to crush the competing
Cimmerians, so that they could have Asia all to themselves. It
therefore jiggled my truth bone when I pondered the possibility
that the root of Gyges' kingdom, Mysia, was of the self-same stock
as the Royal Scythian army stationed on the other end of the Black
sea. This is attested to where we find that the Mysians likewise
stemmed from Hercules, he depicting Gorgons simply because his
ancestor, Perseus, gave birth to "Gorgophones."
Herodotus revealed the boundaries of the Royal Scythians as
Azov on the west and Thrace on the east, at the Danube river. The
Mysians were descended from the Moesi, a peoples living on the
Danube according to Strabo, whom the Greeks called "Musoi."
Mysians (surrounding Troy) were alsoBritancevlsh
called "Musoi" b^ the Greeks. While one may entertain a Meshech
connection, the Mash” of Genesis 10:23 seems a better choice,
for his brother, Hul, has been said to be the founder of Armenians.

51
Moreover, the father of both Mash and Hul was Aram, perhaps the
very linguistic root of "Armenia."
It's very interesting when we find that the monstrous
Hecatonchire were related to the Cyc lopes (Greek "Kuklopes")
and the Gigantes, and no prophecy buff should fail to see the
"Gog" in those terms, yet never have I heard anyone tell that these
giants of mythology were meant as codewords for Gogi clans (and
not very beloved ones at that). Is it that the secret-society myth
writers have so successfully passed off their encoded history as
fantasy that even prophecy students ignore the clues?
The Hecatonchire (Latin "Centimanni") were depicted with
100 hands, and it can't be a coincidence that Argus (eponym of
Argos) was a shepherd with one hundred eyes while one of the
Cyclopes was named "Arges." Thus, tie the Greek city of Argos,
with its founder, Inachus, and its goddess, Io, into the dragon
bloodline.
Just as the Gogi were depicted as one-eyed Cyclopes, so the
Apollo-related Hyperboreans lived next to the one-eyed Arimaspa
(saidHerotu),gnhaeArimspw,notuly
one-eyed, but an occult Gogi branch (the one eye depicting the sun
god, same as the all-seeing eye to this day). Note the "Ari" in that
term. Not far from the Arimaspi were the "Argippeans," a term
evoking "Argos" and/or "Arya(n)."
Greek myth uses the "one eye" symbol in various other
instances to denote the Gor ons, the three-bodied Gorgon Medusa
being yet another example. Can
it be a coincidence that the mother
of the Gorgons was "Ceto" while one of the Hecatonchire was
named "Cottu"? Another Hecatonchire was named Briareus, said
to mean "strong," but "Homer also referred to Briareus as
Aegaeon ("goatish")..."
http://gyes.exsudo.com/
The symbol of the Aegean sea, Aegeus was made a son of
Pandion (of the Cecrops line), wherefore the "Pan" in that name
should perhaps be understood as the god, Pan, the half-goat
creature called a "Satyr." According to one website outlining the
tribes of Thrace, there was a tribe called "Satrais."
w.thracinfo/e_pls.htm
And so I say that, next to the Arimaspi, at the Ural mountains
of north Russia, there lived goat-footed peoples (according to
Herodotus' report), an obvious reference to the Pan bloodline
depicted as Satyrs. Next to the goat-peoples there lived the gold-
hoarding Griphons/Griffins, peoples depicted as creatures having
the head and wings of an eagle, but with bodies of lions, thus
identifiable as the Utu peoples who worshiped the Mushussu
dragon.

52
Gyges, ruler of Lydia, was himself made (by the myth
writers) into one (of only three) Hecatonchire! Because "hecaton"
means "one hundred," we should be looking out for the root term,
"chire," when seeking to trace these peoples. And I do think that
this leads us to Cheiron/Chiron, an important Centaur. Is it a
coincidence that "Centaur" looks like a play-on-words using
"century/hundred"?
Centaurs were half-horse creatures descended from Ares and
no doubt depicting certain Thracians. They were related to the
half-goat Satyrs, the latter having formed a part of the Trojan
peoples. "Pan" in my confident opinion depicts either the
Paeonians (who lived on the Strymon river in Thrace) or the
Phoenicians (or both if the Paeoni were Phoenicians). Dionysus
was involved heavily at Thebes (Greece) with the Kabeiri cult of
transvestites that was founded by the metal god, Hephaistos.
Thebes was ruled first by the mythical Cadmus, a depiction of
Phoenicians (because his father was Phoenix). Cadmus was the
grandfather of Dionysus.
There was a magical staff wrapped in grape vines called a
"thyrsos" that was associated with Pan and acted as the symbol of
Dionysus. The thyrsos was carried by the so-called "Maenad"
womenfthirsxcul(.wopefDinysu).o
was the god of the vine, and of the wine bash and orgy, and was
related to the Lelegian king of Arcadia, Oineas, that latter term
meaning "wine." One can see the similarity between "Dionysus"
and "Oineas." A modern Dionysus cult would gather around
heavy-metal music. Pan (who reminds me of Mick Jagger and his
Goat s Head Soup) was born to an Arcadian family depicted as the
phallic god, Hermes. The Thyrsus, sometimes shown with a pine
cone at the end to denote Attis, was probably a depiction of the
penis (i.e. a sacred bloodline), for a hermes temple was a depiction
of the penis.
It s probably relevant that the Medusa was made (by myth
writers) to be born from Ceto and Phorcys, the first term evoking
"Guti," and the second term evoking "Farsi," the alternative name
of the Persians/Parthians. The following evokes the Gorgon
Medusa, and thus reveals that Dionysus was a Gorgon:
"The MAENADS also put a snake over their locks, for
Zeus crowned his son [Dionysus] with snakes when he let
him come out of his thigh."
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/MAENADS.html
The Maenads and Satyrs are likely of the Medusa branch of
Gorgons, for both the Maenads and Satyrs are portrayed as
enemies of the Perseus bloodline (i.e. the Gorgophone branch).
Moreover, the Centaurs (related to the Maenads and Satyrs) were

53
said to be offspring of Pegasus, the white-winged horse that
sprang forth from Medusa when she was killed by Perseus. The
above placement of snakes on the head of Dionysus is an excellent
example of how myth writers worked, for the Gorgon Medusa had
been depicted with snakes for hair. Wherever similarities exist
between two or more mythical pictures, kinship/alliances may be
implied.
The Maenads and the Satyrs were the epitome of Dionysus’
army by which he conquered all the way to India, and it seems
easier to identify them as Amazons and Gorgons when we find
that, albeit of many Maenads (Dionysus people groups), one was
called “Gigarto,” and another “Gorgo.” Dionysus worshiped the
spotted panther, and even dressed in a panther suit when at war,
evoking not only the Mushussu dragon of Babylon, but the Aztecs
of Mexico (“Mexico” looks like “Meshech). As Zeus, Dionysus,
Hermes, Pan and Cadmus all represent related people groups
entering and founding Europe, that continent becomes a Gogi one
by the force of the above, and yet other, arguments.
The historical (i.e. non-mythical) picture should agree with
the mythical picture. If Lydia acted as the Gog of Ezekiel’s day, it
would seem a necessary task to trace that nation, or, perhaps better
yet, to trace the Mermnan dynasty started by Gyges. It’s a
headache, but someone has to do this dirty work. I’ve already
shown that the Gogi line leads to Rome, the empire said by the
Bible to fight Christ on his Return, but what other regions of
Europe were infested by Gog?

54
THE HERCULES CIRCLE OF GOGI

The problem in the historical records is that Jews may call a


people the “Tomato Pickers,” while the Assyrians register them as
“Cabbage Lovers,” while the Greeks may call them “Skinny
Guys.” A further problem is that historians vary/conflict when
translating the names of people groups. But the tracks found in
mythology seem to be quite dependable, or at least helpful when
the issues cannot be decided otherwise. Whereas the Gogi are
difficult to find let alone trace by historical records, myth makes
the task much simpler when one knows terms by which they were
depicted. And so the myths, meant to conceal the Gogi, actually
help us to trace them.
We find that Hercules was portrayed mating with the snake-
woman (i.e. half snake) to produce three sons (i.e. main branches)
from her belly at once, one of which was “Scythes.” They were
born just north of the Crimea, wherefore the myth does not intend
to record the beginnings of the Iranian Saka (regarded as early
Scythians), but only the beginnings of the western Scythians, those
who formed in the cradle of the Russian peoples ... who were called
“Royal Scythians” by Herodotus.
The snake-woman, I conjecture, depicts a peoples belonging
to the dragon bloodline, but more particularly to the peoples who
extended from the Cecrops bloodline, for Cecrops was himself
depicted as half snake. The Parthians/Gorgons are easily identified
as being the root of that snake line, and Hercules depicts a major
Gorgon bloodline, for his ancestor, Perseus, killed the Gorgon
Medusa and then gave birth to “Gorgophone” ...an illustration
quite apparently of two Gorgon peoples that had been in mortal
conflict.
Not only do the particular terms, Perseus and Medusa, evoke
the Parthians and Medes (wherefore we can see that mythology is
an attempt to put historical events into codewords), but Perseus
mated with Andromeda (“men of Media”?) when producing
Gorgophone. The easy conclusion is that Hercules was a
Gorgophone as opposed to a Medusa Gorgon. Perhaps the Medusa
Gorgons depicted the Meionians due to a Hercules line – the
Mysians – having replaced them:
The first king of this [Hercules/Mysian] dynasty was
Agron, son of Ninus ... Candaules [i.e. Sadyattes], son of
Myrsus, was the last. The kings who reigned before Agron
sprang from Lydus, son of Atys, from whom the people of

55
the land, called previously Meionians, received the name of
Lydians” (brackets mine).
http://classics.mit.edu/Herodotus/history.1.i.html
Thus the entire Herculean line beginning with Agron was
from Atti(s) and Manes. The following quote speaks to the same
end but gives valuable information on Manes-Attis roots. Note
also the date in which Hercules replaced the Meionians, very near
the commonly-accepted date of the Trojan war (1200-1175 BC),
suggesting that this famous war was a Gorgon civil war (round
brackets not mine):
"According to the Greek researcher Herodotus of
Halicarnassus, the [Lydian] house of Gyges replaced an
older dynasty, the Heraclids, which had ruled for twenty-
two generations or 505 ryears. (This dynasty claimed to
descend from the Kuvav s escort, the god Sandon, called
Heracles by the Greeks.) Adding 680 to 505, we arrive at
1195 [BC]..."
http://www.livius.org/lu-lz/lydia/lydia.html
It was the Lydians who regarded Hercules as the sacred
Sandon. But as the Lydians were related to the Trojans, Sandon
must have been the root of the Trojans as well. And Greek myth
does reveal that the Trojans were from Cecrops. The Hercules line,
known alternatively as the Danaans and the Mycenaeans, was thus
from Trojan ancestry...even though Hercules and the Mycenaeans
opposed the Trojans in the Trojan war. This is not contradictory at
all, but merely reveals that the Greeks and Trojans were related.
Indeed, note how "Mycenae" of Greece (founded by Perseus) is
similar to "Mysia" of the Trojans. You might want to bookmark
the following website, as you're going to find it useful; it's a
navigational map of Greece and the surrounding theater:
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/MapAchaeansTrojans.html.
Apparently, the Gorgons of Media were at one time based in
an Aryan peoples living among the Babylonian sun-god line. The
mythical Gilgamesh comes to mind, as he not only built the walls
of Erech/Uruk (the Babylonian home of the sun-god cult), but he
ventured to Iran with the help of the sun god, Utu. Moreover, his
name seems to include "Mesh(ech)" in compound with "Gilga."
Indeed:
"Uruk was founded by Enmerkar, who brought the
official kingship with him from the city of Eanna. His father
Mesh-ki -ag-gasher ... "
http://www.searchspaniel.com/index.php/Uruk

56
Italics mine to show that Utu was the father of
Meshkiaggasher, which can be read either as Meshki-aggasher or
Meshkiag-gasher in order to evoke "Meshech."
[Update July 2006 -- The problem is, it can also be read as
Mash-Kiag-Gasher to evoke Mash and Gether, the latter term
being extremely important to the base of the dragon line, as we
shall see later. Gether was brother of Mash! I'll mention now that
Gether was likely the "Kether" of the Kabala Tree. The same
problem applies to “Gilgamesh,” that it may perhaps have meant
Gilga-Mash rather than Gilga-Meshech. End Update]
amesh was in Iran in search of the only survivor of the
flood,Gliasudra,"
a seemingly Aryan term meaning "god of the
waters." In other words, Gilgamesh was in Iran looking for a
Japheth bloodline. But why?
As proof that Jupiter/Zeus refers to the family of Noah, we
find that Enki/Ea charged Ziasudra to build the ark. In the Greek-
myth version of the flood, "Deucalion" was the only man to
survive, and "Deuc" too evokes "Zeus." Apparently, then, the
Romans decided to emphasize Japheth (rather than Noah) as their
oldest god, whereas the Sumerians/Akkadians could not in that
they were an Aryan-Semite mix ... who therefore had to stress Noah
instead (the father of both Japheth and Shem).
The Gilgamesh and Ishtar peoples, though at war initially,
did form an alliance eventually, and this is made evident where she
marries Enki's son, Tammuz. She then became the goddess of
Erech, a city earlier built by Nimrod (from Ham, son of Noah) but
not necessarily ruled by Hamites by this time.
Might all Gorgons/Gogi descend from Sandon. If so, we
should like to know the historical identity of Sandon, but I
confess, I'm stumped thus far, though the general region is the
dragon sun-god cult. for:
E. S. G. Robinson suggested that [Lydia's] lion-with-
sunburst was an attribute or symbol of Sandon (Sandan,
Sandas, Sandes, Santesh, Shamash), the Hittite/Babylonian
sun, storm, or warrior god who the Greeks equated with
Herakles (Hercules) and who the Lydians believed their
royal house descended from. Sardis (Sardes, Sardeis), the
capital of Lydia, may have been named after Sandon."
http://rg.ancients.info/lion/article.html
If Robinson is correct in equating Sandon with Shamash, then
Gorgons were from Utu the dragon sun god, for "Shamash" was
the Akkadian version of (the Sumerian) Utu. The Utu dragon,
otherwise known as the Mushussu dragon, had the body of a lion,
and Lydia's pre-occupation with the lion must have connected to
the same theme of importance, which I think is in "Ares," a term

57
looking like it has roots in "ari," meaning "lion." In other words,
the lion was an Aryan symbol, perhaps even a symbol depicting
Aryans themselves. Yet Daniel 7 uses it to depict Babylon, by
which I conclude that Aryans were tied in with that Babylonian
symbol. The Lydian lion (see photo of coin) had a sun on it's
forehead, between the two eyes, no doubt the all-seeing eye of
paganism, representing Shamash/Utu and other sun gods related to
him. Utu, remember, is likely Atti(s), the latter known as the
Phrygia-specific sun god and an immediate ancestor of the
Lydians.
In an article on Zeus, Britannica wrote: "Pausanias testifies
to a very old image of [Zeus] at Argos which had three [eyes],
two normally placed and the third in the middle of the
forehead.
!!
This not only implies that Zeus was a Gogi/Cyclops entity,
but that all-seeing-eye secret societies today trace back to Zeus.
It's the term "ushus" that means "snake/dragon, and if "Utu"
is a variation of "ushu," can't we see "Mushussu" as a Meshech-
Utu combination? Can we see "Shamash" as "Ushu-Mesh"? [Mash
needs to be considered too].
As yet more evidence that this cult was an Aryan-Babylonian
mix, it was depicted as "Draco," and, as a constellation, Draco was
placed by the astrologers in the very "center" of the universe -- i.e.
encircling the North Star. That should tell you that the early
astrologers/magi were of the dragon bloodline. But the north star
was made part of the Little Dipper, wherefore that Dipper is
extremely central to the dragon line. The Little Dipper was
originally a bear, which in the Bible (Daniel 7) is an animal
depicting the Medo-Persian empire.
In Greek myth, the Little Dipper was the son of Zeus, Arcas,
the eponym/symbol of Arcadia (Greece), the home of the goddess,
Atalanta, and therefore the root of Western Atlantis (I'll explain
more several chapters from now). I see that "Arcas" can modify to
"ursa" = "bear," and so we find that in one myth Zeus (or Artemis)
changed Arcas into a bear and popped him into the sky as Ursa
Minor. Therefore, Arcadia means "Bear Land." One is pressed to
inquire as to whether Arcadia ties back to Akkadia, where Semites
lived. That is, as Akkadia and Babylon were essentially the same
region, might the Biblical Babylon of Daniel 7 be referring to
Akkadia (i.e. to the Semites there), so as to connect the Babylonian
lion symbol (of Daniel 7) with those Semite, or even Hebrew,
elements?
At this website, you can see a coin (in illustration "b")
whereupon Sandon is standing on the back of a lion. The curiosity
of a snake growing out of each shoulder of the lion is on the

58
Mushussu motif found on a jar dated 2100 BC. The Mushussu
dragon is seen trailing behind a dragon god, Nin-gishzida, who is
the one with a dragon growing out of each shoulder. In that
manner he is approaching the god Enki on his throne.
This similarity of serpents growing out of shoulders can't be a
coincidence, wherefore I confidently equate the Lydian lion with
Babylonian sun-god families depicted as dragons. Notice that Nin-
gish-zida and another figure at the rear are wearing bull horns on
their heads, denoting the Taurus phallic cult ... i.e. a cult that
worshiped the Taurus bloodline. But we are now closer to
identifying Sandon, for as the lion that he stands upon must be
Nin-Gishzida, Sandon was kin to, or allied with, Nin-Gishzida .
[Update May 2006 -- I have found a variation of that god as
"Ninnghizhidda," and as "nin" means "lord," the root is
"Ghizhidda," this being the same as the god, Gizzida, he being a
partner to Tammuz (husband of the Great Mother of All Whores,
Ishtar) in Erech. This would locate Sandon in Erech. As I showed
in a previous chapter (Asshur! Guzuntight), Gizzida was a friend
of the Kabbalist peoples called "Cutha," and was in my opinion a
depiction of the Aryan Guti. That is, the Kabbalists (non-Israelite
Hebrews of Chaldee), were called by the name of Cutha/Guti
becausthydomliethGu.EndUpae]
Britannica reveals that Tammuz was called "ama-ushumgal-
anna," meaning "the heavenly dragon of the Mother," that
Mother well-known to depict Ishtar... though I think further that
she depicts her Eridu bloodline (Utu and Enki were gods of Eridu
and were later allied/related to the said gods of Erech).
At the website above you can read that both Sandon and
Perseus are honored as founders of the Cilician city of Tarsus. This
Sandon-Perseus connection allows us to settle absolutely that the
Perseus line of Gorgophones -- Mysians, Lydians and Cilicians --
were of Sandon elements. As evidence of Perseus ties to Cilicia,
Britannica tells that Cilicia was settled by the Mycenaeans (Greek
myth tells that Perseus founded the city of Mycenae).
Tarsus, the Biblical Tarshish, was south of the Halys river.
Could it be a coincidence that "The Septuagint renders Tarshish
in Isaiah 23:1 as Karkedonos (Karchedonos), which was the
Greek form of the name Carthage in North Africa."
http://custance.org/old/noah/ch2h.html
The implication is that the peoples who founded Carthage
Tarshish. It is known that Carthage was founded by alsofunde
Tyrians. And Greek myth reveals that the Tyrian, Cilix, is the
eponym, and therefore founder, of Cilicia. It is my impression that
the Trojans, when fleeing the Troy region after the Trojan war,
settled Tarsus while the rest continued further east to settle and

59
name Tyre. Note that "Karchedonus" might imply that Trojans and
Tyrians were Gorgon peoples.
The quote above, therefore, helps us to equate the Tarshish of
Isaiah 23:1 with Tarsus of Cilicia i.e. not Tartessos in Spain. It's
possible that the peoples of Tarsus founded Tartessos in Spain, in
relation to Mediterranean voyages to (and through) the "Pillars of
Hercules" (i.e. Strait of Gibraltar), and you can see that these
pillars are emphasized in illustrations "c". The fact that the two
pillars support an arch didn't escape me, and brings me to say that
"Hercules" may itself be rooted in "Arc," noting that the early
dragon bloodline in Greece, called the "Cauconians," were home
in the Greek district of Arc adia.
[Update July 2006 –I have recently found that the dragon line
traces to the Aras river in Armenia and Georgia, known also as the
Araxes, to which I trace the Hros. I would seriously consider
tracing Hercules to the proto-Rus/Rosh of this is river. End
Update]
On the one hand, the father of king Gyges' of Lydia was said
to be "Dascylus," which is no doubt an eponym for the Etruscans
proper since they (in Italy) were called "Tusci." Thus, the Gyges
Lydians were descended from Circe (i.e. Circasia/Caucasia) since
the Etruscans are revealed as such. This moreover makes it all the
more tempting to view the Gyges Lydians as an extension of the
Biblical Gog (since the Biblical Gog is commonly located in
Caucasia).
In illustration "d", Perseus holds Apollo in his outstretched
hand, while Apollo in turn holds a wolf in each hand, this showing
lineage from a certain wolf peoples to Apollo, and from Apollo to
the Perseus Gorgons, showing also that Apollo and the wolf
peoples were a depiction of Gorgons previous to Perseus. It is my
confident opinion that the wolves in Apollo's outstretched hand
depict the northern branch of Gorgons at Hyrcania/Verkana
(meaning "wolf's land"). Verkana (on the south Caspian sea) was a
city which to this day has been called "Gorgan."
Remember, then, that Apollo depicts an extension of
Hyrcanians, who were previously Parthians (as even "Perseus"
would suggest), that came to be the Taurus peoples of the Crimea,
and, eventually, the Hyperboreans in the far north of Russia.
Behold now, for "Hyperborean" literally means, "extreme
northerners." Didn't Ezekiel say that Gog was from the "far
north" ?

The lion killing the bull behind Perseus (in illustration "d")
depicts, in my opinion, the Perseus Gorgophones killing the
Medusa, for the Medusa probably represented the early Gorgons of
Taurus (it is made fairly clear in myth that the Medusa was related
to the Hy
perboreans). There was also a Taurus mountain range

60
(not by coincidence but named by the same Gorgon peoples) that
separated Cilicia from the Halys river.
Zeus and Io were both depicted as cattle, who are thus
identified as the early Medusa Gorgons. Note in mythology that
it's Zeus who gives birth to Perseus, showing that the Gorgophones
are an extension of the Medusa Gorgons depicted by Zeus. Io,
goddess of Argos (a city ruled by Perseus prior to his founding
nearby Mycenae), was probably of the Ea (also "Enki") family of
Babylon, especially as Io's father was made "Inachus," very much
like "Enki."
This may come as a shock to Greek readers, but is there not
some similarity between "Gorgo" and "Greco," and between
"Gorgon" and Grecian"? The three Medusa sisters were called
"Graeae," a term that is a near match with "Graioi," the latter
being a term that Britannica claims is the root of "Graeci" which
itself furnished "Greece."
As well as the Medusa (who had snakes for hair) and other
Gorgons being depicted as snakes, you will note that things
Gorgon come often in threes. The term "Thracian" itself appears to
mean "three," as also "Troy" does. "Scythes" was the last of
Hercules' three sons by the snake-woman of Taurus/Crimea, and
while he depicted the Royal Scythians who retained the Crimea
region as their own kingdom, another son, "Agathyrsus," was an
eponym of the Agathyrsi peoples whom Herodotus described as "a
race of men very luxurious, and very fond of wearing gold on
their persons... In other respects their customs approach
nearly to those of the Thracians" (IV.104)."
http://www.lostlanguages.com/scythian.htm
Herodotus placed the Agathyrsi on the Danube river
(IV.100), wherefore it is possible that the Moesi (who were also
settled on the Danube) were related to the Agathyrsi. The Moesi
were ancestral to the Mysians and the Lydians, all of whom I
believe may very well have been the ancient Biblical Gog. Thus,
my hunch appears true, that the Lydians under king Gyges, though
far from Caucasia, were related to the Royal Scythians (i.e. Gogi)
stationed in the Caucasus region in Ezekiel's day. Myth, at least,
connects the Agathyrsus/Moesi/Lydians to the Royal Scythians.
Moreover, the Agathyrsus tribe of Scythians can be
connected to Dionysus (of Greek myth) because he was depicted
by a rod called a "thyrsos," that rod being a symbol (as we shall
see) of the Manes-Attis body of peoples. It doesn't surprise me that
the Agathyrsos were from Manes since Hercules (who was from
Manes) is said to bring them forth. It should be said that Dionysus
was depicted as a transvestite, and that the priests of Hercules
wore female clothing. Hercules was given Thebes as his
birthplace, the capital of the Galli (transvestite) cult.

61
It's natural, while mentioning "Scythes," to focus on the
"Skythes" mentioned by Hesiod and repeated by Homer. Hesiod
claimed that "Skythes" was an alternative term for "Delas," one of
the inventors of bronze (the first metal to be invented). This means
that Hesiod viewed Delas as a Scythian, or, more likely, as a
patriarch of the Scythians ... whom as an earlier peoples, prior to
inventing metal, were probably those of the north Black sea that
historians today call "Kurgans." The historian(s) who coined that
modern term probably knew something of a Kurgan connection to
Gorgons.
I have personally resolved that "Delas" was a codeword for
the Greek island of Delos, which was the island of the great god,
Apollo (sometimes a sun god). Keep in mind as you read on that
Apollo depicted a wolf peoples and that Rome was founded by
wolf peoples. Apollo's "mother," Leto, gave birth to him when
migrating to Delos from Phrygia (i.e. where Lydia was located),
and it just can't be a coincidence that "Leto" reflects "Lydia" so
well. Therefore, while Dionysus depicted the Thracian dragon line
entering Greece, Apollo appears to depict the Lydian dragon line
entering Greece. Apollo's island was one of the Cyclade islands,
possibly named after the Gogi ... after all, Apollo was from the
Hyperboreans of the far north.
Hesiod revealed Skythes/Delas as a "Daktyloi," they being
the ancestors of both the wild Curetes and the metal-engineering
Trojans. Therefore, as Zeus was of the Curetes and Trojans, we
can add the Scythians to the list of Zeus-line peoples. A migratory
line, starting at Wolf Land (Hyrcania/Verkana), goes to Caucasia,
then north into Azov and the Crimea. It then reaches westward into
Thrace and north into Hyperborea. From Thrace it reached south
into Troy, Mysia and Lydia before entering Greece on the one
hand as Apollo, and on the other hand moving east into Tarsus of
Cilicia and as far as Tyre to form the proto-Romans. This explains
how Romans descended from Apollo and Lydia both. Meanwhile
there was a second migratory route from Caucasia, along the south
sideofthBlack,meintoacwhren
branch.
The Hyperboreans were probably related to "Boreas" since
the latter in myth was the north wind but commonly known to
depict Thrace. Boreas married into the Cecrops bloodline (when he
married Orithyia). The Cecrops family is important and will be
dealt with later.
Artemis was the twin sister of Apollo, and because they were
not depicted as standard brother and sister, the two would appear
to depict the same peoples exactly rather than two divergent tribes
from the same trunk of peoples. Many myth experts (according to
Britannica) see Apollo coming into Greece as a foreign god from

62
the far north of Russia, and along that vein we find that Artemis
depicted an Amazonian peoples on the north of the Black sea.
Artemis was worshipped at Taurus (of the Crimea), and from there
she entered Greece. Something similar must be true of Apollo.
Ancient records indicate that the Hyperboreans would bring gifts
to Delos in honor of Apollo, but this can only mean that the
Hyperboreans were related to the Apollo peoples on Delos (one of
the Cyclade islands of Greece).
"Herodotus (i. 171) tells us that Lydus was a brother of
Mysus and Car." Mythical brothers are branches of the same
trunk. Carians play a key role in this story because they were
associated with Rhodes, the island of Helios, that being a sacred
hub of the Rose Line in my opinion. Helios was the Greek version
of the Mesopotamian sun god. Note that Rhodes was likely the
home of three Cimmerian branches brought forth by the Helios
bloodline, for one of Helios' grandsons by the goddess Rhoda (she
being the eponym of Rhodes) was "Kamiros," almost exactly
what the Cimmerians of Phrygia were called in Armenian records:
"Gamir."
This is not to say that Cimmerians originated on Rhodes, but
that they, under other names, came to Rhodes. While it is possible
for the Cimmerians proper of Taurus to have been from Gomer
(son of Japheth), as virtually all Christian historians claim, they
could certainly have amalgamated with the Amazons/Meshech of
Taurus to produce peoples by other names prior to reaching
Rhodes.
Carians may be viewed as the first rulers of Atlantis i.e. the
Aegean sea, albeit as pirates. It's interesting that the Carians are
credited with the creation of the coat of arms , something dear to
Rosicrucians and other secret societies to this day.
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/GreekScience/Thuc.+1.1-23.html
The Athenian historian Thucydides wrote (website below)
that half the graves (i.e. half the inhabitants) on Delos had been
filled with Carians. They have been connected by blood to the
Lelegians who were in turn related to the Caucones, the latter two
peoples being some of the earliest immigrants into Greece.
Lelegians were Trojan allies in the Trojan War, as expected since
they descended from Attis (i.e. as had the Carians). And we read at
the above website: "Gargara in the Troad also counted as
Lelegian."
I'll bet that Gargara in the Troad was a settlement of the
Caucasian Gargarians/Gorgons, and this now reveals the origin of
the Lelegian-related Caucones. Caucasia, of course.
Britannica tells that the Mysians themselves claimed to be
kin to the Carians, while in another Britannica article (on Caria) I
learned that the Carians "claimed brotherhood with the Lydians

63
and Mysians." Still another article shared that Carians claimed to
be brothers of Etruscans, thus forming yet again a Phrygia-to-
Rome connection.
Britannica says that the Apollo cult moved westward to
Rome, and this cult must be of the proto-Lydians and their
Perseus-friendly relatives in Greece. Note that Perseus first ruled,
prior to ruling Argos, at nearby Tiryns, a term that is nearly the
exact term used for the Etruscans -- "Tyrrheni" -- a term derived
from Tyrrhenus (also "Tyrsenus") the Lydian descendant of Attis.
Thus, the founders of Rome, whether we are referring to the
Etruscans or to the Latins/Romans, descended from Attis and
Manes ... which is why the Romans and Etruscans both worshiped
Hercules.
Myth writers made Tyrsenus son of Hercules so that
Etruscans are indeed of the Hercules line. In still another version,
Tyrsenus was the son of Telephus, son of Hercules, while
Telephus, although born in Arcadia, ruled a Mysian kingdom by
the Caicus river (Tel ephus may have depicted the historical
Telepinus dynasty, last of the Old Hittite empire). Tyrsenus was
appointed another brother, Tarchon, who depicted a major
Etruscan god after which the Italian city of Tarquinia was named.
If "Tarchon" refers to the ancestors of the Turks, then the
Turks ought to be viewed as descendants of the Gogi Phrygians,
which seems to be the case in that the earliest Turks were, in
historical records, the "Kok-Turks."
We now come back to Inachus, the first ruler in Argos,
whose bloodline put forth Car. The "wife" of Inachus can dis close
to us his geography and to whom he was allied. She was Melia, of
the Meliae nymphs defined as the survivors of Uranus in his war
against Kronos. Melia's son, Amycus, was the ruler of the
Bebryces peoples, that latter term looking like it contains the early
name of the Phrygians, "Bryges." The Bebryces lived near Troy,
after all, in Bithynia to be exact, an important nation in this story
because I see it as the origin of Odin and the Germanics stemming
from him. Melia is also important as she depicts the bee-line
peoples. Etruscan myth makes Hercules the son of "Tinia," which
I view as the Thracian nation of Thynia. That is, I would root
Etruscans in Thynia.
The Inachus peoples went on from Bithynia to become the
first dragon bloodline in the Argos region. As such, we should find
the Lelegians and Cauconians among his tribes since they too were
early Greeks of the Argos region. Indeed, upon invading Asia
Minor to found their nation, Bithynia, the Bithynians first defeated
the Caucones who were already there.
Boreas (the north wind, Thrace) was named "Aquila" (eagle)
by the Romans. This lends support to those who equate the eagle

64
and the dragon symbols, for while we see the eagle as a symbol of
Thrace, we must not ignore the similarity between "Thraco" and
"Draco." One must therefore ask if the American eagle, no doubt a
product of secret societies tied to ancient Greek societies,
especially to the Cecrops bloodline that introduced Democracy,
was not also a symbol of the Thracians.
If you're wondering how Europa fits into this Lydian picture
of Roman roots, consider now Pasiphae (the daughter of Helios
and Perse, as was Circe/Kirke). She was made "wife" of Minos (of
Crete), who himself was the child of Zeus and Europa. Thus the
same Caucasian/Gogi bloodline providing the Lydians and
Romans was intermarried with the Trogo-Phoenician peoples who
spread out into all of Europe.
[Update May 2006 -- In tracing the descendants of Dedan, he
being a grandson of Abraham by his second wife Ketura, I seek
them within the important branches of the dragon line in that I
suspect them to have become the Kabbalists. The Bible mentions
three peoples by name as Dedan's descendants: Asshurites,
Letushites, and Leummites. When I asked myself what peoples
Leum(m) might have become, under the condition that Letush
became Lydus/Lydia, I could only think of wicked Lemnos, the
island (near Troy) sacred/dedicated to the wicked Hephaistos, a
land filled with Amazons and Etruscans. It has for a long time
been my impression that Hephaistos was the creator of Greek
myths, for he is reported as the founder of the Greek secret
societies, known to have deep Caucone involvement, and more
than that, his cult was called "Kabeiri," a term evoking
"Abiru/Hebrew" if not "Kabala" itself. End Update]

65
WOLF PEOPLES
Updated heavily June 2006

Some who don't believe that Apollo was born on Delos


believe that he was born in Lycia (adjacent to Lydia), or to proto-
Lycians prior to their settling Lycia, which would explain the
codeword that Apollo was known by, "Lykeios." Britannica says
that this term means "wolf-god," wherefore I should share two
things: 1) that "Cyclopes" looks like "Gog-lopes," the "lopes" part
looking like "lupo" and "lupus," the Italian and Latin words for
"wolf," and, 2) it is well known that the Cyclopes moved to Italy.
I know of the common line that "Kuklopes" means "round
eyed," for the Greek "ophis" (Strong's Concordance # 3789) means
"sharpness of vision" while "kuklos" means "cycle/round."
However, as is typical of secret societies, there could be a double
meaning involved, especially if "kuklos" derived from "Gog"
since, after all, Gog was from Circ asia.
It was Caesar Augustus who re-invigorated the Mars cult,
showing that Mars and Apollo were a depiction of the same
bloodline. On the one hand no one seems to know why "Wolves
were sacrificed to Apollo at Argos and elsewhere on the Greek
peninsula" (see website below), and on the other hand, no one
seems to know what Mars referred to, though I think that it's got to
be the Mari Parthians who branched out to Verkana ("wolf land"):
"...the Greeks and Romans, who likewise assigned Mars the
wolf as sacred animal.”
http://www.maverickscience.com/Mars/Apollo/apollo.html
But there’s even more evidence to strengthen both Gog-
Rome and Gog-Gorgon connections to the wolf. You may already
know that the twin founders of Rome, codewords “Romulus” and
“Remus,” were depicted suckling a wolf, meaning that the
Romans descended from a nation depicted as a wolf. Because the
wolf-sucking twins were revealed as Aeneas-line Trojans, the
mystery wolf-nation should be sought among Trojan entities, and
Gorgons come irresistibly to mind as the first place to check out:
“Old Persian VARKANA (“Wolf’s Land”), ancient
region located southeast of the Caspian Sea. Its capital was
Zadracarta (Astarâbâd, modern Gorgân), and it formed
part of the Median, Achaemenian (55g9-330 BC), Seleucid,
and Parthian (247 B.C.-224 A.D.) empires, either as an
independent province or joined with Parthia. In the list of

66
Persian satrapies given by the Greek historian Herodotus,
the Paricanians may have been the Hyrcanians.”
http://www.geocities.com/gorgancity/History.html
[Update June 2006 -- Very happy at the moment. An email
correspondant found a quote that verifies my linking
Romulus/Remus to Verkana. It's a statement (below) was written
by Virgil, with Dido chewing out Aeneus, the Trojan ancestor of
Romulus and Remus. Although Virgil's story is a myth, the
statement yet reveals that Virgil viewed the origin of Aeneus
peoples in Verkanian territory:
"False as thou art, and more than false, forsworn;
Not sprung from noble blood, nor goddess born:
But hewn from hardened entrails of a rock,--
And rough Hyrcanian tigers gave thee suck."
http://www.worldwideschool.org/library/books/lit/poetry/Aeneid/chap18.html
Finding Virgil's reason for using "tigers" should prove
important. As "Hyrcanian" seems very much the root of
"Hercules," while the latter was connected to the Lydian lion, the
tiger may very well be the root of the Lydian lion. In this picture,
the Romans are found rooted in a Verkanian bloodline that passes
through the Lydians, and for this reason I would view Hercules as
the Latin side of the Romans (since I view Latin roots in Lydians).
However, I am not suggesting that Hercules depicts the Latin side
versus the Trojan side, for it's becoming evident that the
Latins/Lydians were the very offshoots of Trojans...meaning that
Trojans themselves descended from the "Hyrcanian tiger." End
Update]
Update August 2006 -- Having found the root of the Ladon
dragon in Syria, specifically in the seven-headed dragon called
"Lotan," I've noted that the river cutting across the north side of
Tyre is called, to this day, the "Litani" river. This indicates to me
that Ladon-branch Trojans had been in Tyre. End Update]
Since Apollo was styled "Lykeios," let's take a look at the
Scandinavian god, Loki , the father of Fenrir , also a wolf, and
father also of Jormungand, a serpent. One can, by the way, see
"Vanir" in "Fenrir," and Loki was the leader of the Vanir gods.
The mother of Loki was the giantess, Laufey, which as "Lophey"
modifies easily into "lopi" (wolf).
http://www.deliriumsrealm.com/delirium/mythology/hel.asp
The Lelegians can also be shown to be wolf Gogi. Lelegians,
founders of Gargara of the Troad, had also been on Euboea, a large

67
Greek island near Athens, off the Cyclades, where the Gogi ruled
under the mythical Cecrops bloodline. Euboea is important
because its royal clan was the family of Zeus prior to "his"
migration to Crete, the family comprising the metal-inventing
Trojans then called "Abantes." Homer in the Iliad wrote:
"...fierce Abantes held Euboea with its cities, Khalkis,
Eretria ... Elephenor of the race of Ares was in command of
these; he was son of Khalkodon, and chief over all the
Abantes. With him they came, fleet of foot and wearing
their hair long behind..."
It is well known that the Euboeans were early metal workers
and warriors with dreams of conquering the world with their metal.
The bloodline of Ares that held-Euboea would colonize Italy and
finally rule it and the world! It would therefore be descendants of
the Euboeans who created Roman myth to be a rehash of Greek
myth. (see navigational map of Greece (bookmark for later
referrence, you'll probably need it).
It is my opinion that one of the chief Euboeans was
Hephaistos, who in the Roman world was styled "Vulcan"
("VulcntoheErsa),cifmtlh.He(
peoples he depicted) was not only among the inventors of metal,
along with the Apollo peoples of Delos, but as leader of a Greek
secret society, he was of the wild Curetes who practiced its occult
ceremonies. Among the Curetes were the "Corybantes," said to
be the founders of Troy, and I do see that this term is similar to
"Abantes," as if the term should be understood as Cor-Abantes (i.e.
the Abantes branch of Curetes).
Because he had 50 sons (merely code), a certain Lycaon (a
term rooted in "wolf") was likely of an Hecatonchire (literally
"100 hands") bloodline. Recall that one of the three Hecatonchire
was styled with the Gog-like term, "Gyges," and that the very
same term was used to depict the Lydians from whom stemmed
the Romans and Etruscans. I'll start showing here that Rome was
founded by certain descendants of Lycaon called
"Cauconians/Caucones." First, in the Hercules myth wherein he
was leading certain cattle across Europe, he came up against a
"Cacus" who lived on one of the hills of Rome called
"Aventine," a term that evokes "Abantes"! How many
coincidences can we tolerate? Surely this Cacus depicted the
Cauconians/Lelegians of Euboea.
One can follow Loki-like terms from Greece to the Vanir.
The Danes, who were likewise werewolf-honoring Vanir, stemmed
from Illyrium, just up the western coast of Greece toward north
Italy. The Lelegians had been on the Ionian island of Leucas off
that west coast of Greece. Between Leucus and the Illyrian coast

68
there was the Ionian island of Kerkyra (also "Corcyra" but now
Corfu), an apparent version of "Gargara" and, if true, named by the
Lelegians. I learned that the first Greek settlers of Kerkyra were
from Euboea ... thus pointing to the Lelegians of Euboea. Therefore,
many Italians of that time were Lelegians. Have you noticed that
"Lelegian" contains a Loki-like term?
http://www.corfu-greece.biz/corfu-history.htm
When speaking with a Greek restaurant owner, with
considerable knowledge of Greek myth, he claimed that Curetes
had settled Kerkyra. The Ares stronghold of Elis in west Greece
also held the Cauconians, and nearby (to their south) the wolf
peoples may have named "Laconia," a major Greek region whose
Spartan peoples are likewise descended from a dragon belonging
to Ares and yet related to Colchis in Caucasia.
There are some arguments made by historians that connect
Elis to the Biblical Elishah, son of Javan (Genesis 10:4). One
interesting argument is that the purple dye of Tyre originated in
sea creatures of that part of Greece (Peloponnesus) where Elis was
located, while Ezekiel 27:7 tells that Tyre's purple cloth was from
Elishah! ! The color of the dragon in Revelation is scarlet/purple
perhaps for this reason of depicting the Caucones, for I noted that
the Greek word used in Revelation for that color is "kokkinon."
TheRomanrltfsechpalotrkin
applied to it.
God does use play-on-words at times. Could it be that
Revelation 17 is attempting to depict the Caucones as the root of
both the anti-Chrst and Babylon the Great? It may moreover be
that the Caucones were named (by Greeks) after the purple of
Tyre, and that they were the same as the Phoenicians since the
latter term is rooted in "scarlet/purple."
I found on one website that "Apollodorus has the
eponymous Caucon as one of the fifty sons of Lycaon," that
latter term being a wolf term i.e. it's in no way a coincidence that
Zeus changed Lycaon into a wolf! This puts a new spin on Jesus'
words when he said that Satan is a wolf coming but to kill, steal
and destroy, for it speaks now of empire-building i.e. the blood of
war, the ruin of cities, and the sin of pillaging that empire-building
is based upon. Europe under Gogi elements has been just such a
sad story.
Lycaon's infant sacrifices and other troublesome activities
were the reason for the Greek-myth flood that wiped out mankind
(not a literal event and not referring to the Biblical Flood). Lycaon
and the Caucones must depict a wolf peoples originating outside of
Greece, and prior to Greece's existence, for Greece was founded
after that flood. Pausanias calls Zeus "Lycaean Zeus."

69
Gyges (of Lydia) was deeply fond of the Apollo Oracle, and
used it to come to power i.e. the seers who maintain the Oracle,
and prescribe the oracles, granted power to Gyges, much like a
Pope would urge all Catholics to honor Hitler as being from
Providence, if that's what the Pope desired. Now the origin of the
Apollo Oracle was in Crete, for Apollo was said to have brought
Cretan priests to the main center of the cult, Delphi (in Greece).
Now Delphi was previously called "Pythos," and as it was a place
of Poseidon worship, might "Pythos" have derived from the same
root as "Poseidon"?
Interestingly, Apollo in a certain myth killed the dragon
called "Python" when he entered Greece from Hyperborea,
meaning that he replaced the rulers in Pythos with his own
Hyperborean peoples; hence, "Delphi" must have been named by
those Hyperboreans. And I note how "Delphi" is much like the
island of Apollo, "Delos."
Certainly "Telephus" now comes to mind as a variation of
"Delphi," for he was a son of Hercules, and born in Arcadia, the
Cauconian capital. Telephus became ruler of Mysia by the Caicus
river. Thus, when Apollo brought Cretans to Pythos to take over
the city, those Cretans must have been of the Telephus bloodline,
meaning that Telephus was a Cretan peoples, evoking the
"Telchines" who were alternatively the Curetes of Crete, the whole
bunch of them from the Cecrops bloodline the ancestry of which
has been kept concealed by the myth writers. At the website
below, we can see that the first rulers of Crete were the founders of
Tegea in Arcadia, and in fact these were the descendants of
Lycaon, as was Telephus himself (not to re-mention Caucon).
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/Crete.html
Apparently, the first Cretans were Caucones, which is
important when viewing Crete as the first capital of Atlantis, for it
makes Atlantis a Gogi enterprise. Behold, the three "grandsons" of
Lycaon who migrated to Crete first of all were sons of Maera,
daughter of Atlas (he depicting the founders of Atlantis). If Rome's
founding was indeed a New Atlantis while at the same time
founded by a wolf peoples migrating through Greece, then I expect
ties between the founding of Rome and Lycaon's bloodline. That
is, when we see Romulus ans Remus sucking on the tits of a wolf,
that wolf might rightly be viewed as Lycaon.
First off, Telephus and his brother Tarchon became the
Etruscans, remember, and this explains the similarities between the
Etruscans and Cretans that historians have pointed out. I think the
migratory line would be from Crete to proto-Lydia (i.e. Troy
region) to Rome ... but between Crete and proto-Lydia there was a
proto-Etruscan settlement on Lemnos, the island sacred to

70
Hephaistos. As the Lemnos peoples were Saka and Amazons, so it
may be that the proto-Etruscans there were one or the other.
Secondly, Phylonome, the granddaughter of Lycaon, mated
with Ares to produce the twins Lycastus and Parrhasius, and they
as children, evoking Romulus and Remus (founders of Rome),
were suckled by a wolf. In keeping with my suspicions that Remus
was the one who depicted the Etruscans, I’v noted that
“Parrhasius” may undress to Par-Rhasian, for it’s known that the
Rhaetians (proto-Redones) of north Italy were from the Etruscans.
My conclusion is that the deepest Greek roots of both the
Etruscans and the Romans can be found in Lycaon, wherefore he
should lead backward to Caucasia and even further back to
Verkana.
Strabo said that the Dacians, who were Getae, were the
"Daüs" (wolves) of Attica (Athens region), and then mentioned
that the "Daae" were Scythians from Hyrcania/Verkana.
Now Leucas, the island in western Greece mentioned earlier
in relation to Kerkyra, is not to be mistaken for Leucus, the
eponym for a peoples on Crete who allied themselves temporarily
with Meda, an obvious eponym for Gorgons on Crete. Recall that
Pasiphas, daughter of Helios and Perse, and therefore a Gorgon,
was Minos' wife. Well, Meda was the wife first of Minos' son, but
then also of Leucus. It's possible that this Leucus line of Minoans
established the island of Leucas, and from there went on to
become various Europeans. This would then explain why another
myth writer decided to connect the Minoans to "Europa."
It would appear that the Gorgons of Crete are the white bull
that Zeus was portrayed as. This bull is likely a symbol of the
dragon beast of Revelation 17, since that bull carried Europa away
on his back, even as the dragon of Revelation 17 carries Babylon
the Great on his back. That is, God may have so depicted the
dragon on the harlot specifically to tie them to Zeus and Europa. Is
it a further coincidence that while the Greek myth had Zeus rape
Europa, so the Revelation account has the dragon raping Babylon?
It would appear from this argument that the dragon of Revelation
17 will stem from the Gorgons of Crete, though not from the
branch that became the Romans, but from the branch that became
the Russians (for I interpret that dragon of Revelation as end-time
Gog). It was never the purpose of this book (at the time of starting
it) to expose that Russians and Romans were the same bloodline,
for I had never even dreamt that this connection could be the
reality, yet that is exactly the conclusion insisted by the research
that is the meat of this book. Babylon the Great, shown sitting on
the seven hills of Rome, and whom is connected to Roman
emperors in that she is said to rule over all the kings of the earth,
depicted not the Romans alone, but the root of the Romans going

71
back even previous to the Minoans of Crete, even previous to the
Trojans, to the very roots of the Rus.
Helios and Perse had yet another daughter in the goddess
"Aegea," who surely depicted the Aegean-sea empire of Minos
(i.e. Atlantis). Minos had previously rid the Aegean sea of Carian
pirates and had thereby become the undisputed ruler of all it's
islands. But a certain Theseus of the Cecrops line became the ruler
of Atlantis by weakening the forces of Minos. It just can't be a
coincidence that the father of Theseus was "Aegeus."
It is said in some myth versions that Poseidon himself snuck
into the room wherein Aegeus and this daughter (Aethra) were
supposed to be mating (to produce Theseus), and that he, not
Aegeus, mated with the woman so that Theseus turned out to be a
son of Poseidon. But this is double-speak where both scenarios are
true, on the one hand to provide secret-society initiates with a
secret illustration revealing Aegeus and Theseus as the rulers of
Atlantis, for Poseidon was father of Atlantis. The other side of the
coin is that Aegeus and Theseus were of the Poseidon bloodline,
meaning that their Cecrops bloodline was likewise. There is a
reason that the ancestry of Cecrops is not given in myth, aside
from depicting him as a snake, and this connection to Atlantis may
be why.
Though the ruler of Athens, Aegeus had himself been subject
to taxation enforced by Minos, meaning simply that Minos ruled
over the Cecrops line for a time (Minos was himself partly from
the Cecrops line because that line was the white bull that produced
the Minoans). In another myth involving Theseus, a white bull
mates with Minos' wife, Pasiphas, to produce the Minotaur.
Theseus killing the Minotaur is then the story of his breaking the
power of Minos.
As well as giving birth to Aegeus, Pandion (of Cecrops) gave
birth to Lycus, who, like Theseus, was also in Crete. But Lycus
was assigned the island of Euboea as his portion to rule, which is
important because he, the symbol of Lycia, was also a wolf
peoples. For Lycia (see Lydia-Lycia Map) also claimed ownership
of Apollo, the wolf god. It was in Lycia that the goddess Lada was
worshiped, and it is thought that Leto, Apollo's mother, was
named after Lada. [I feel quite certain that Lada/Leto will prove to
be the Ladon/Lotan dragon.]
In Russian myth, Lada was the wife of Dazhbog, who was a
depiction of Helios and yet was portrayed with a canine head. This
is fine, for Helios was in truth the wolf god of Verkana, explaining
why Apollo is viewed as a wolf god but also as the Helios sun god,
since Apollo is a peoples stemming from Verkana. In Lithuanian
myth, Lada is the wife of Perkunas, that sun god being likewise a
depiction of Verkana. I note that while Dazhbog is said to mean

72
"sun god," it could be viewed as "dog god" since "daus" means
"wolf."
Leto and Lada of Greek myth seem synonymous with Ledo
and Lada of Slav-Rus myth, where in the latter the two are a
married couple and no doubt (in my mind) depictions of Lydia and
Lycia. Therefore, Lydia and Lycia were two wolf-peoples related
closely to the sun-god cult in Verkana.
As the king of Mysia, Lycus had "Dascylus" as a father --
who had been the father of king Gyges as well! Therefore, Lycus
also (along with Lydia) brought forth the Etruscans since Dascylus
was, in my strong but personal/lonely opinion, the eponym of
Tuscany (land of the Etruscans in Italy). I'd bet my best one-eyed
sunglasses that the Lycians included the Cyclopes and the
Gigantes of Crete, for a website tells that "Stories of the Cyclopes
range from Thrace to Crete to Lycia."
http://www.geocities.com/medea19777/cyclopes.html
Another means of tying the Hyperboreans to the Lydians, and
the Lydians to the Romans, is in the Roman cult of "Ludi
Apollinares." And behold, it was Caesar Augustus who fired up
this Apollo cult, meaning that he knew he was of the Apollo
bloodline. Britannica says that, As a young man, Augustus had

chosen Apollo as his own god.” Augustus eventually lifted the


Apollo cult to equal status with Jupiter i.e. Zeus. And "In 17 B.C.,
[Augustus] celebrated the Ludi Saeculares..."
"Latona" was the Roman version of Leto i.e. Lydia. "Latona"
certainly looks like the origin of the Latins, and this goes a long
way in proving that the Latins were Lydian cousins of the
Etruscans. Greek myth makes Latinus the descendant of Tros, co-
founder of Troy (i.e. the Lydians and Latins are in this way
revealed once again as Trojan descendants). But don't miss this
point, that if the Lydians were Gogi, ditto for the Romans.
Because Britannica says that Apollos' "elevation to such
great prominence goes hand in hand with Augustus'
determination to Hellenize the age," we see that the first Roman
emperor was at least a political extension of Alexander the Great
(whofervntlypmdHizaon).Ithkersbld
connection between the two rulers. It may be that the anti-Christ
will be related by blood to the Seleucids, a Greek faction
extending from Alexander, that likewise sought to Hellenize the
world. The Seleucids are depicted in Daniel 11 as runners-up to
the anti-Christ. But no one to my knowledge has been able to trace
the Seleucid bloodline to a powerhouse of the modern day. It
wouldn't surprise me if both end-time Roman leaders (i.e.
Rosicrucian Illuminatists) and end-time Gog descend from the
Seleucids.

73
Is the revived Roman empire today ruled by secret societies
who have striven to make it a democracy? No surprise, since
Theseus (of Cecrops) "is said to have organized [Athens] in
three classes: noblemen, farmers and craftsmen and was
honored as the father of democracy ... [he gathered] all of Attica
under one single government..."
http://plato-dialogues.org/tools/loc/athens.htm .

The three classes evoke the old three degrees of


Freemasonry. The first class of Nobleman is conspicuous because
we are told that "Aryan" means "noble." Immediately I am led to
think that no one could achieve Nobleman class unless he could
prove pure Aryan blood in his veins. This reminds me of a myth in
which king Minos (from Poseidon and Zeus) demanded that
Theseus prove his Poseidon bloodline.
The second class is also conspicuous because the Greek word
for "farmer" is "georgos," as though "Gorgon" may have been
secretly insinuated... but understood in that "light" only by the
initiated. A Gorgon was not a pure Aryan.
And the third degree evokes the stone masons and metal
workers, such as Hephaistos depicted as well as the builders of the
so-called "Cyclopean" stone walls... probably built by the
Cyclopean peoples.

74
RUSSIANS ARE MANES-LY
BECAUSE OF THE MEDES

Gyges of Lydia had betrayed his alliance with the Assyrians,


and in about 663 BC he sent Greekish troops (including Carians
and Ionians) even into Egypt to fight the Assyrians invading there.
Not long afterward, the Cimmerians took Sardis, the Lydian
capital, and meanwhile killed Gyges. His son, out of sheer need,
then resumed the alliance with Assyria, but before long the power
of Assyria was also broken:
"By the mid-7th century BCE, ca. 640 BCE, Assyria
has pulled out of her western empire in Canaan and
Phoenicia, and the Ejyptians, using Greek mercenaries, fill
the political vacuum.
http://www.bibleorigins.net/PrimaryHistory562BCE.html
Note the dates above, because Ezekiel was alive at that time.
It's conceivable that the Lydians and the Scythians would go on to
rule all Asia in league, as the Biblical Gog of Ezekiel 38 . But not
before the Cimmerians were weakened, who, after taking Sardis,
were at the height of their power. And so it happened afterward
that the Assyrians and Scythians together humbled the
Cimmerians, allowing Lydia to grow far.
The point needs to be made here that Gyges/Gugu appears to
have been a historical person, and if so, his name id not come into
existence as a result of a myth writer tagging the Lydians with a
code depicting a Gogi branch. However, it may be that a man,
upon becoming the ruler of the Lydians, gave himself the name
because he wanted to reflect his Gogi heritage above all else. It
may even be that God moved this man to do so as a clue for us of
Gog's ancient identity.
It is important where Britannica says that the Cimmerians
then "disappear from the stage of history but probably settled
in Cappadocia, as the Armenian name of that country, Gamir,
This supports the Ezekiel text in which the prophet suget."
places Rosh in proximity to Meshech and Tubal.
Yes, I'm suggesting that the Cimmerians were the Biblical
Rosh, and that after they were weakened sufficiently, the Lydian
Gogi arose and took over their land, the land of Meshech and the
land of Tubal, to fulfill Ezekiel 38.

75
It's necessary now that I apply a few arguments to show that
Cimmerians were the Rosh. To begin with, they had ruled at Lake
Van (capital of Urartu) over the Urartian kings that styled
themselves, "Rusa." Moreover, rather than eliminating these
kings, the Cimmerians allowed them to continue their rule, albeit
as puppets of the Cimmerians. This could indicate that
Cimmerians were closely related to the Rusa rulers. It is known
that these particular Cimmerians had come from the north shores
of the Black sea, wherefore the Rusa kings may have been from a
branch of Cimmerians who had earlier remained on the south
shores (at the time that another branch went to the north shores). It
may also be that the Rusa kings were not so-named from birth, but
that they created "Rusa" specifically as a throne name, in honor of
their Rosh heritage. Of course, this means that the Biblical Rosh
was more the Rusa kings than the Cimmerians on the north shore
of the Black sea, yet the point is that the Rusa were likewise
Cimmerian peoples.
My aim here is simply to show that Cimmerians were the
Rus(sians) of later centuries; this in itself goes far in identifying
Rosh as Cimmerians. But as I have been saying all along that the
Rus(sians) descend from Trojans, the following points are in order.
Strabo, ancient-Greek historian and geographer, equated the
Cimmerians with the Trojans, while Herodotus alluded to the
Trojans as "Kimmeri." Historians are well familiar with the
peoples called, "Thraco-Cimmerians," and a modern writer
declares: "Linguistically [Cimmerians] are usually regarded as
Thracian."
http://www.osterholm.info/swedes.html
Now as I have traced dragon-line Trojans and Thracians to
Gorgons, it stands to reason that Gorgons issued forth from
Cimmerians. There is good evidence for this view, especially in
the historical term, "Gug-Cimmerian" (i.e. Cimmerians of a Gug
branch). To show that "Cimbrians" were Gogi, Poseidonius wrote
that “the Cimbrians derived from gug and guas.”
http://www.stevequayle.com/Giants/W.Europe/W.Europe4.html
It may be that "Cimbrian" was a term for, not pre-Gog
Cimmerians, but a Cimmerian branch that stemmed from a Gogi
tribe. "Cimbri" was the origin of various regions in Europe called
"Cambri(a)," including the Welsh hub of Western Atlantis. If I am
correct, therefore, in identifying the original Greek-theater Atlantis
as the Trojan empire, the Trojans appear as Cimmerian
descendants.
I and others trace Russians back to the Redones/Ruthene of
France. I then trace the Redones back to Rhodes, where that Greek
island is the home of three mythical siblings, one being called
"Kamiros," a term very close indeed to the historical term

76
"Gamir" used for Cimmerians. In other words, if one sibling can
be identified as a Cimmerian people, all three ought to be of
Cimmerian blood.
All three siblings were named after real cities on Rhodes, but
I am not fooled so as to think that the three siblings were real
people after whom the cities were named. Rather, the three
siblings were a creation (of secret-society men) after the cities had
been in existence under those names for a long while. The
importance of the siblings, therefore, is in the names chosen for
their fathers, for in those terms, we who are wise to the scheme,
can learn the ancestry of the Cimmerians of Rhodes. The father of
all three was termed, "Kerkaphos." This evokes Kirke/Circe, the
daughter of Helios by Perse, whom, as the terms suggest, involved
a Gorgon bloodline.
However, Kerkaphos was himself made the son of Helios and
Rhoda (rather than Circe). It thereby becomes evident that while
an alliance between Helios and Circe peoples led to the Latins, and
therefore to the Lydians (not to mention Trojans), the other
alliance between Helios and Rhodes peoples led to the the
Russians. With further consideration, one concludes that the
Helios-Rhodes peoples were part of an earlier Helios-Perse
peoples.
Helios can be understood as a peoples connected to the
Sumerian sun-god cult, and Perse can be understood as the
Persians/Aryans that were likewise connected to that cult (for
which reason I suspect Perse to have depicted the Guti Aryans).
The Helios-Perse alliance (otherwise encoded as "Ares," in my
opinion) then settled the Colchis/Georgian region of the mythical
dragon-related king Aeetes, and from there they migrated to
Thrace, Corinth (in Greece) and Rhodes.
Kerkaphos, father of the Cimmerians on Rhodes, had another
sibling besides Kamiros, and this one was "Ialysos" (a real city on
the island), a term that evokes the historical Halisones/Halybes
living on both sides of the Halys river ... exactly where the
Cimmerians were gathered in Ezekiel's day! Cimmerians from the
north shores of the Black sea had, when engaging a scheme to take
over Asia, came to live with relatives on the Halys river,
suggesting that the two branches schemed in co-operation. I can
only wonder at this time whether Helios depicted the peoples who
came to name the Halys river; I have other theories because it may
be true after all that “Halys” means “salt/sea.” It may be that
“Halys” was not named after salt/sea, and I am also looking for a
Halys/Elis connection.
The third sibling was "Lindos": "In Greek mythology,
Linda was a daughter of Danaus who was worshipped on the
island of Rhodes.-Pri
ncipally, she was venerated in [the city ofJ

77
Lindos ... " That is, the peoples of the city of Lindos descended
from the Danaans (i.e. Gorgophones, remember), and this tends to
reveal that Gorgons and Danaans were both Cimmerian branches.
This Danaan-Cimmerian link becomes important where Hercules
peoples (i.e. Danaans) migrated as far west as Wales ( which
became a hub of Western Atlantis, discussed later), for the Welsh
to this day claim to descend from Cimmerians.
Unless the following similarity of terms is pure coincidence,
a mythical codeword for the Cimmerians would be the
"Chimaera" dragon, essentially a female lion having a snake for a
tail and therefore a symbol of the dragon bloodline. This creature
is comparable to the Lydian lion, but is sometimes depicted
freakishly with a goat's head growing out of its shoulder/back. The
goat, I have learned to my satisfaction (details later), depicts the
Getae branch of Thracians ... suggesting that the Getae were
offshoots of Cimmerians...if indeed the Chimaera beast depicts
Cimmerians.
As Cimmerians became Gorgons somewhere along the
migratory route from Iran to the Black sea, the Chimaera may also
depict Gorgons. As a serpent is commonly used by ancient writers
to depict Gorgons, the Chimaera's tail may just depict the Gorgons
which stemmed from Cimmerian stock, meaning also that the lion
body should depict that Cimmerian stock (in Iran?).
Recall that the Lydian lion had a sun between its eyes to
depict the sun god of Sumeria, which sun god was depicted
(elsewhere) with a dragon growing out of each shoulder. Wouldn't
the goat head growing from the Chimaera dragon's back/shoulder
depict the same (dragon-line) peoples growing out of the sun-god's
back? That is, the design peculiarity of having beasts growing out
from backs must be the peculiarity of the same peoples. Therefore
the goat on the Chimaera depicts the dragon-bloodline.
Very interesting indeed is that "goat" in the Greek tongue is
" tragos," virtually identical with "draco." If the goat can be
identified by other means as being a Thraco (i.e. Thracian)
peoples, then I think the goat symbol would thereby be a depiction
of Thrace.
Pegasus the white-winged horse came forth at the Medusa's
death. White horses were symbols of Thrace, and more generally
horses were symbols of Scythians. But as Pegasus came from the
Medusa Gorgon, it stands to reason that the white horse depicts a
branch of Gorgons. Of the Thracian king, Rhesus ("hross" means
"horse in Celt), Homer wrote: "His horses are the finest and
strongest that I have ever seen, they are whiter than snow..."
This seems like code-talk, to glorify Thracians.
[UPDATE May 2006 -- In Lithuanian myth, the mating of
Lada (probably proto-Lydia) with Perkuna (Verkana) result in

78
twin horses, suggesting that one Scythian tribe split up into two
and continued on as allies (what else can "twin" depict?). The two
horses would be identified, I can only assume, as the descendants
of Lada and Perkuna themselves (who, for one, became the
Lithuanians). One can only wonder if "Lada" is the root of
"Lithuania," therefore, and whether Lithuanians were from the
Lydian Gorgons. As Apollo's mother was called "Leto/Lada," and
as the Lithuanians lived in the far north of Russia (now on the
Baltic sea opposite Finland), might they have been of the so-called
"Hyperboreans" (= "far-northerners") that were of Apollo and his
twin sister, Artemis? If so, couldn't that identify them as the far-
north Gog of Ezekiel 38, and therefore the Scythians, if not the so-
called "Royal Scythians," of the day? That is, could it not make
them the Gog that ruled over Rosh, Meshech and Tubal?
The Lithuanians may have been, as I suspect the Lydians
might have, the Letushite tribe of Abrahamic Dedan, since after all
I am convinced that the Suebi branch of Swedes were from Sheba,
brother of Dedan, and that the Aesir branch of Swedes were from
Asshurites, a fellow-tribe of Dedan along with the Letushites
(Genesis 25:3). End Update]
[Update August 2006 – It didn’t occur to me until I found the
significance of the “Ladon/Lotan” term (in July) that the
Lituanians should prove to be a major Ladon/Lotan peoples. This
is of course very interesting since the significance of the term is in
it’s identity as the Biblical dragon. End Update].
With the aid of Pegasus (i.e. Gorgons from Medusa),
Bellerophon fought and killed the Chimaera dragon. And because
the beast is located in Lycia, a region of Asia Minor over-looking
Rhodes, I would suggest that "Chimaera" refers to the Kamiros
Cimmerians of Rhodes. I traced the Helios peoples of Rhodes to
the Medusa Gorgons in Corinth -- what I perceive as both the
Golden-Fleece and Calydonian-Boar bloodlines (details later) --
and so note that Belleraphon was a descendant of Sisyphus, the
founder of Corinth :
“Sisyphus is said to be the founder of Ephyra, a city
later called Corinth. Strange as it may seem, he is also said
to have received the kingdom of Corinth from Medea. This
is so because her father Aeetes was kin in this region
before he departed to Colchis, leavin the kingdom [of
Corinth] to Bunus, son of Hermes and Afidamea.'
http ://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/Sisyphus.html
Aeetes was a son of Helios and Perse, and the brother of
Circe, wherefore he was a depiction of Medusa Gorgons. Aeetes is
known almost solely as the king of Colchis, having an important
role in the Golden-Fleece myth, and yet prior to taking on that

79
role, he depicted the Helios-Perse peoples of Corinth. Aeetes’
daughter, Medea, was a witch and moreover is an eponym for the
Medes, and in fact her son is said to have founded the (wizard-
infested) Medes. This claim is not true of course, but what is true
is that the Medes were thought, by myth writers, to stem from
Media’s mythical ancestors, Helios and Perse.
[UPDATE may 2006 – My question is, was Helios a
depiction of the non-Israelite Hebrews that I have mentioned in
previous chapters, who mixed with Aryans (i.e. “Perse”) of Iran?
As we are seeing and will see even more, this bloodline put forth
Hermes, who was not only the ancestor of the Germanics, but of
the Gypsies (details later). My point is that it’s been shared my
many that Gypsies had Hebrew elements. Note that the earlier
name of Corinth, “Ephyra,” may be a variation of “Abiru” (i.e. a
form of “Hebrew”). End Update]
In the above quote we find that “Bunus” (ruler of Corinth)
was the son of Hermes, but as Pan was also the son of Hermes, I
think it’s safe to equate the two. Thus Pan, the half-goat-half-
human whom I think refers halfly to the Getae and halfly to the
Poeni/Phoenicians (i.e. the Europa/Cadmus bloodline), had a
station in Corinth. Hermes was born nearby, in Arcadia, land of
the Caucones!
Now I believe that the daughter of the Thracian god, Ares,
whose name was made “Harmonia,” was, like Hermes, the root of
the Germans i.e. “Germania,” and furthermore that both
Harmonia and Hermes depict, and stem from, the Armenians.
Harmonia was coupled with Cadmus (i.e. was made his wife)
when he was depicted as entering Europe and becoming a
European peoples known as the Gauls/Celts. The Rus(sians)
originated from these very peoples i.e. the Redone Gauls.
Thus, if it’s true that Armenia incorporated the Biblical Rosh,
then, when the northern Cimmerians (of Crimea) returned to
Armenia in the days of king Gyges and Ezekiel, they were distant
relatives of the Armenian Rosh.
I should mention that the Greek writers turned both
Harmonia and her husband, Cadmus, into snakes upon their
entering Europe. The two entered Europe in Illyrium, which is
why many view them as the first Celt wave across Europe that
produced the Gauls of France, for the Gauls do have their
beginnings in Illyrium (as the so-called “Hallstatt Celts”). I suspect
strongly that the Kabeiri-cult Galli were the historical Gauls. And
because the Pannonians were a tribe of Illyrians, it’s a good idea to
investigate the Pannonians...who may have been depicted by Pan.
The Rus of Rhodes became the historical (i.e. non-mythical)
Rodez Rusi (also “Ruthene”) of France, and I have furthermore
read that the Ruthene descended from a certain “Hros” of

80
Russia/Caucasia. The Varangian Rus of Sweden, whom I think
were related to the Ruthene of France, were called “Rutsi,”
somewhatvkingRds.Ihocetfina“Rds”
also came to mean “rose,” and perhaps that flower was used as a
secret-society symbol depicting the Ros/Rus ... a deception that the
Rosicrucians are apparently using to this day.
In the 555-AD book, “Church History,” by Pseudo-Zacharias
Rhetor, the above-mentioned Hros are mentioned “in connection
with some North Caucasian peoples found south of Kiev.”
http://www.stetson.edu/~psteeves/classes/pritsak.html
Yet the author quoting that statement (at the website above)
does not believe that the Hros were the Kievian Rus, saying that
"the Greek term heros (hero) is used for theigantic mates of
the Amazons. In the Syriac adaptation, this Greek term
assumed the form hros."Okay, but the gigantic mates of the
Amazons sound like the Gargarians. As the Syrians, living on the
southern side of the Black sea as they were, mentioned the Hros in
their writings, it's apparent that the Hros were on that southern side
as well. The finger again points to the Gargarians. And so why
couldn't the Gargarians have become the Kievian Rus? Perhaps I
can agree with the author in the sense that the Kiev (i.e. Slav) Rus
may have become the product of the Hros much later, after the
Ruthene return from France to Kiev.
The point to take note of is that the Hros are likely identical
to the Greek term "Hero." And I mention, therefore, the so-called
"Thracian Hero," depicted as a horseman ("hross" in Celt means
"horse")
The question then becomes, did the Gogi become the Kiev
Rus? My understanding is that The Hero and the Thracian
Horseman was Ares himself, for one can easily see the
resemblances between "Heros," "Hros," and "Ares." Thus
everything that I have previously discussed on Ares and the
Thracians can be used to trace the proto-Russians.
Harmonia is important under the topic of Hros, for as the
daughter of Ares she must have been a depiction of the Hros/Rosh.
In this picture, the Gauls/Celts (and therefore most of Europe)
appear as a Rus-Phoenician mix. This then must describe Pan,
where his goat half must depict the Rus (who were also the Getae
Thracians) that later became the Goths and Jutes, even the
bloodline of Odin. One may then trace the Russians to the Guti
Aryans, who were, my gut tells me, the deepest root of European-
Aryan (as opposed to Indian-Aryan) significance. In other words,
the Guti are the deepest Aryan root of the Rosicrucians and of the
Illuminati leaders of the European Union today. One can even
wonder if our English "god" was itself a variation of Guti/Goth,
especially as my dictionary traces it to the Old Norse word, "god."

81
Steve Quayle, whose ideas I will discuss later, shows quite
convincingly, through a treatment on Jordanes' history, that
"Comarians" of Iran, otherwise called "Saka," split up. The
break-away group ended up in Aria/Media...as the original Aryans,
I presume, and I do note that the Guti Aryans may have been in
Jordanes' secret view, since Jordanes was a Goth historian!
It is the break-away Saka whom I view as becoming both the
Gorgons and Amazons of the Black sea; perhaps the Cimmerians
of the Black sea were the other group (the main trunk) that arrived
independently and/or at some other time. The term "Saka" has
been found by modern archaeologists in an inscription pertaining
to a highly-valued ruler of the Amazonian island of Lemnos... the
island depicted as sacred to the Kabeiri cult.
A certain Markwart of the 20th century researched the
"Rosomones," mentioned by Jordanes in the 6th century, and
concluded that they were a Baltic (i.e. extreme-north) peoples of
the designation, "Hros." I could read that term as Ros-Manes,
where Manes is, in my opinion, the god depicting Armenia
(anciently "Mannae"). It seems easily deduced, though you won't
hear this from secular historians, that the far-north Rus were the
Togarmites of Ezekiel 38, who are in fact said (by the prophet) to
live in the far north, along with Gog. I say this because Togarmah
was the son of Gomer.
My English dictionary defines "manes" like so: "In ancient
Roman religion, the spirits of the dead, esp. of ancestors." The
above would then seem to me to be an apt definition of a moon
god, since Manes and other such terms referred to moon gods,
while the moon is an apt symbol for dead souls. This definition of
"manes" evokes the Russian god, Rod, a term which is said to
mean, and who was in fact, the god of (Russian) ancestors.
Although Rod and Rhoda refer to wheels and/or roads, the terms
probably carried the secondary meaning of "root."
What seems conspicuous is that the Rusa kings begin to rule
Armenia about the same time (730-40 BC) that the far-north
Cimmerians begin to become prominent in the region. The capital
of the Armenian empire was then moved from Van to Rusahinili
(named after the Rusa king, obviously), just three miles from Van.
But notice how "Rusahin," evokes the Ruthene, whom in Europe
were also called the "Rusyn."
On the modern Bug river very near Kiev there lived the
Neuri peoples, said Herodotus, and these it is believed by many
were previously the Nairi peoples, rulers at Lake Van just
previous to the arrival of the Cimmerians. In other words, what
was the relationship, if any, between the Nairi and the Rosh?
[Update May 2006 -- This month I realized that the dragon
bloodline out of Akkadia included Buzites, descendants of Nahor's

82
son, Buz. Nahor was the brother of Abraham but living in Haran,
not far to the south-west of Lake Van. The point is that while I
was, at the time of this chapter's writing, hesitant to equate the
Nairi with Nahor, I no longer am. End Update]
Therefore, it would seem that a migration of peoples from
Van moved to the Bug river to become, or to live with, the
Thracians there. But there's more, for Herodotus told that snakes
attacked the Neuri from their north and caused them to flee to the
Boudini/Budini, probably their relatives. And he wrote, "Every
Neurian once a year becomes a wolf for a few days, at the end
of which time he is restored to his proper shape" (IV.105). The
terms "serpents" and "wolves" are clearly secret-society codeword
for the Gorgons, but what is most helpful is the flight of these
Armenians to the Boudini, for I have tied the Boudini to Odin line
of Scandinavians and Merovingian Franks. [I see that "Boudini"
may be rooted in "Buzite. "]
Behold, the Halybes were alternatively called "Khaldi," and
Khaldi just happened to be the god of the Nairi, showing that the
Nairi were related to the Cimmerians (by blood) if indeed the
Ialysos of Rhodes were a Cimmerian branch stemming from, or
evolving into, the Halybes.
Rusa I built a monument to Khaldi, and that pegs the Nairi as
relatives of the Rusa kings. Khaldi then becomes the root of the
Nairi, and of the Rosh, and of the Russians, and of the Trojans,
Lydians, etc. As the Khaldi can be connected to the Chaldeans ,
who were Semites in Akkadia/Mesopotamia, it seems certain that
the Nairi were inherently Semites...and therefore likely Nahorites
(mixed with Cimmerians).
An early (some say the first) king of Armenia was Sardur,
while the capital of Lydia was Sardis. Herein is a visible link
supporting what many say, that Armenia was related closely to
regions in Phrygia (Gargara comes to mind as there was one in
Armenia and one near Troy). Sardur was known as king of the
Hurrians, and Hurrians had a capital on the Halys river (where the
Halybes lived). [ Nahor lived in Haran, a city of the Hurrians.]
Other Armenian kings styled themselves "Argishti," where
"Argi" is possibly the root of Argos (Greece) but likely a variation
of "Arya," root of "Aryan." More on this later, but note that the
father of Argishti I was Menua, evoking Manes. Then, just prior
to Rusa III, there ruled Erimena, perhaps to be read as Ari-Manes.
http://www.aristotours.com/about_turkey/van.htm
I realize that this Aryan view of the Sumerians, Babylonians
and Hittites may fly in the face of Biblical evidence wherein we
learn that Babylon and the Hittites were from Ham, but I will stick
to my position that amid the Hamites there were Meshech,
Gomarians, Madai, and perhaps other sons of Japheth, and that

83
these bonded closely together precisely due to their being amid
Hamites, and for that cause worshiped their Japhethite ancestors.
Consider this statement:
"Teisheba, one of the main deities of the Urartians, is
the Hurrian chief god Teshup the Storm-god. The wives of
these gods are Huba and Hepat respectively.”
http://www.lostlanguages.com/urartian.htm
[Update May 2006 -- I didn't know when I shared this quote
that Abrahamic Sheba existed, let alone that he was important to
the Rus line. Now I see that the god, Teisheba/Teshup, may be
referring to a Sheba bloodline, or even to the main trunk of the
(Abrahamic) Sabeans themselves, whom I think went on to
become the Swedish "Suebi." I would now add that Huba/Hepat,
the wife of Teisheba, may be inferring "Hebrew." End Update]
The Aryan Egyptians, who were the first to rule the Egyptian
empire, were Gorgons associated with Crete and for that very
reason were, because Crete was then "Caphtor," operating under
the banner of "Hept/Hotep." Therefore, note the Hurrian god
(above), Hepat, and ask if it isn't the same as "Hotep" since after
all the latter had "Hept" as a variation. The alternative of Hepat is
given as "Huba."
True, the Egyptians proper were Hamites, but blonde
mummies, among other clues, prove that their kings and queens
were at first Aryans. Note how "Pharaoh" evokes "Parthi/Persia,"
and the Farsi peoples that the latter were known as. Myth is full of
statements linking the Greeks with Egyptian rulers, and not just
any Greeks, but the dragon bloodline devoted to ancestry,
explaining why Egyptian myth parallels Greek myth.
Consider the Armenian-Hurrian god Teisheba, who, because
he was married to Hept, makes for us a connection between
Armenia and Egypt. This god furnished the name of the Armenian
capital (at Lake Van) called "Tushpa."
I don't know which came first, the term "Hephaistos" to
depict a certain peoples/place, or the Cretan city of Phaistos
(perhaps named after the former). Are they coincidences that
"Heph" looks like the root of "Caphtor" (alternative name of
Crete), and that "Caphtor" looks like it may have furnished
"Aigyptos/Egypt" itself (or vice-versa)? As the root of "Egypt"
may therefore be "Gyp(t)," don't the Gypsies come to mind who
originate in the Greek locality of Gypp?
Perhaps this cult has roots in the Greek goddess, Hebe, for
she was the daughter of Zeus and Hera, and married to Hercules.
Because the Romans called her "Juventes," she seems to depict the
same peoples as Jove i.e. Jupiter. I can also see that "Juventes"
looks like "Abantes," the name of the Euboeans under Ares'

84
command and who settled and named the Aventine hill of Rome as
the mthical "Cacus." Javan (son of Japheth) also comes to mind.
[yUpdate May 2006 -- If Hercules, a Danaan branch of
Gorgons, "married" Hebe-rews, then the assertion by some that the
Greek Danaans were of the Israelite tribe of Dan seems more
convincing. However, Dedan, brother of Sheba, was a Hebrew,
and it may have been he who became the Danaans, especially if
Hebe was the same as the Egyptian Hept, for Hept was "married"
(i.e. allied) to Teisheba . Gosh, folks, that makes a lot of sense. End
Update]
In Thrace was the Hebros valley, named after the god
"Hebros," who was the offspring of Rhodope, eponym for the
mountains of Rhodope (in Thrace). While some would think that
these were Hebrews, I'm not so easily jumping onto that wagon,
usually a British-Israel wagon. Consider the following statement:
"Loved by Apollon, Rhodope ave birth to Kikon after
whom the Kikones [or Cauconesl tribe of Thrace were
named. She married Haimos a son of Boreas and the two
initiated a cult in Thrake calling themselves Zeus and Hera.
As punishment they were metamorphosed into mountains.
Her father's stream was renamed after her son Hebros."
http://66.90.77.92/Okeanos/Strymon.htm
We can see the hint of the myth writers, telling that Boreas
and Rhodope were equivalent to the Zeus-Hera symbolism. This
shows that Zeus was indeed a depiction of Thrace (i.e. as was
Boreas), while "Hera" may now be seen as the Rhoda peoples if
indeed Rhodope is a Rhoda/Rhodes variation. This makes sense in
that "Hera" is a feminine "Hero" and may therefore depict the
Rus/Hros.
Could "Hebros" be read as "Hebe-Ros"? Could "Hebe"
modify to "Kiev," the cradle of the Slav Russians? Couldn't the
Rhodope Gogi have furnished the Russian god of ancestors, Rod,
and his wife, Rozanica? Couldn't that latter term furnish
"Ruthene"? My conclusion is that the Rusahinili branch of Rosh
(in Armenia) moved to the Rhodope mountains and deposited a
Gogi-Hebe mix of peoples there.
[Update May 2006 -- I have recently concluded that the
dragon line is a Hebrew-Russian mix, so that the above hypothesis,
"Hebe-Ros," is all the more compelling to me. End Update]
While I view all three, Rosh, Meshech and Tubal, as Gorgon
peoples, the question is, which Gogi peoples were the big-cheese
mentioned by Ezekiel (in 585ish BC)...i.e. who ruled over all three
above? Was it Alyattes, king of Lydia from about 610 to 560?
After all, he did defeat the Cimmerians and then pushed the
Meshech and Tubali toward Georgia.

85
Or was big-cheese-Gog a faction of the Scythians, hundreds
of miles east in the Mede/Caucasian theater? Herodotus claimed
that Scythians ruled 28 years over "Upper Asia." In Book One, he
said that the Halys river formed almost the entire boundary of
Lower Asia, so that in his view Upper Asia would be west of the
Halys, including Lake Van and the Caucasus mountains. During
these 28 years, we find (from Herodotus) that the Scythians had
ruled also Media. Moreover, the 28-year rule began as a result of
defeating the Medes, while it ended as a result of the Medes
revolting, wherefore the period had to come to an end prior to 614,
for it wasn't until after the 28 years that the Medes were able to
arise to the task of taking Nineveh (614-612) from the Assyrians.
What this means is that the 28-year period did not touch the
time when Ezekiel wrote chapter 38. Moreover, Herodotus
claimed that the Scythians, after the 28 years, retreated back to
their homeland in Crimea, and therefore out of Caucasia, and
never returned. This makes one hard-pressed to explain how they
could have become the Biblical Gogi in 585ish BC (although
Herodotus isn't always correct in his facts). Moreover, the
Cimmerians are no longer a power in Asia as of their defeat to
Lydia; my 1970 Britannica places that defeat between 637 and 626
BC ... although I read dates online as late as 609, which place the
event in the early reign of Alyattes.
This tends to put emphasis back on the Lydians, with
Alyattes being possibly Gog himself. If Alyattes had conquered
Asia even as far as to Syria's north, he would have been to Israel's
north as well, but by no means would he have been in the "far
north" if by that term north of the Black sea was Intended.
As you must know if you're a prophecy student, the king of
Tyre in Ezekiel 28 is identified with Satan (verses 11-18). This
prophecy was given by the Lord in 586/85 BC, the eleventh year
(26:1) of the Israeli exile into Babylon. It perhaps tells that the
Lydian army had actually been in Tyre: "Persia, Lud, and Put
were in your [Tyre's] army, men of war to you." (27:10). The
problem is, there were also "Ludites" from Ham (Genesis 10),
though I think in the above scripture, "Lud" could be referring to
Lydia instead (I do not, as others do, equate the Hamite Ludites
with Lydia).
If so, one can conjecture that Lydia's army was attempting to
free Tyre from the Assyrians who had previously conquered the
city (not to mention much of Israel as per the Israeli exile into
Assyria). This may certainly have been during the time (beginning
in 663) that Lydians became embroiled in the Egyptian theater, in
opposition to the Assyrians. As the latter part of verse 10 says that
the three peoples mentioned "hung the shield and the helmet in
you [Tyre]; they gave your splendor," it's made obvious that

86
Lud soldiers entered into Tyre as champions over the Assyrians.
Could not, therefore, the king of Tyre, described as Satan in
Ezekiel 28, be a Lydian king -- i.e. Alyattes -- even the Gog to
whom God speaks ten chapters later (38th), from whom end-time
Gog stems?
On the other hand, the Satanic king of Tyre may have been of
the Scythians, for Scythians had crossed from Asia Minor all the
way to Egypt prior to their demise.
http://www.chicagocoinclub.org/chatter/2000/Aug/ )
The beginning of the end of the Urartian empire is said to
have occurred three years after the Medes caused the fall of
Assyria in 612. At this time also the Medes had attacked Mannai.
A hard blow to Urartu came when, in 590 BC, the Medes burned
Rusahinili.
The end of Ezekiel 33, according to Ezekiel 1:2 in
conjunction with 33:21, was written during or just after the 12th
year of Jehoiachin's exile. That 12th year can be, and has been,
categorically pinned down by historians to 585 BC (the last year of
Zedekiah's reign in Judah). Therefore, I'm assuming that Ezekiel
38 was written at the earliest in 585. I note that chapter 1 through
to chapter 33 was written between the 5th and 12th year of
Jehoiachin's exile, a period of only seven years, wherefore
chapters 34-38 could have been written in 585, especially as all
five chapters deal with the same subject, end-time Israel's
restoration i.e. the Millennium. Of course, there's no telling
whether Ezekiel's sequence of cha ters is chronological.
Britannica wrote that, "In 6V2 B.C., on the fall of Assyria,
or soon after, Urartu was overthrown by a Scythian army and
incorporated in the Median empire." From other sources, we
find that the Scythians gave Urartu the fatal blow in 585. This
report, however, the details of which seem scarce online,
contradicts Herodotus when he said that the Scythians had
previously returned to Azov, never to return to the Urartu
theater,... unless the Scythians who struck Urartu in 585 were
another group altogether that Herodotus was not commenting on.
In any case, those who struck in 585 would be, in my mind, the
best option for identifying the Gog of Ezekiel's text.
The Medes had their backs to their vassals in Rusahinili when
fighting the Lydians to the west (at the Halys river) for five
subsequent years -- 590-585 -- and that allowed the Scythians to
plow through Rusahinili in 585. The five-year war at the Halys
was a stalemate, and it's possible that Lydia retained power
throughout that period along the southern coast of the Black sea all
the way to Georgia. In that case, perhaps the Lydians and the
Scythians together ruled over Rosh, Meshech and Tubal.

87
As Rosicrucians claim roots in Egypt and Phoenicia, a look at
Tyrian roots is warranted. It is said by some that Tyrians (to be
distinguished from the Canaanites of that city) originated in the
Persian gulf islands, especially the one called "Tyloi." This term
evokes the "Daktyloi" of Greece, who were the proto-Trojans,
and this squares nicely with the idea that Trojans fleeing the
Trojan war fled to Tyre (to find protection among relatives).
"Daktyloi" is said to mean "10 fingers," but, as always, secret
societies assign double meanings to their codes. The 10 fingers
may refer to the 10 kings of Atlantis (i.e. 10 sons of Poseidon).
Phoenicia became an extension of the "Punt" nation in
Egyptian realms, a term that apparently furnished
"Phoenicia/Phoenix." While Zeus and Europa are said to be king
Minos and the Minoans, where those terms evoke Manes, the first
Egyptian dynasty was ruled first of all by the historical king
Menes; note that his wife was Hept. The Egyptian god, Min, after
whom king Menes named himself (apparently), was of little doubt
the root of Minos (of Crete), that root being Manes. It's difficult to
fathom that these same terms stand as the root of the Russians.
Aryan-Egyptian kings commonly styled themselves as Min-
Hept (i.e. "Amon-Hotep" to be historically accurate). Athens was
the origin of the dragon bloodline of Crete, and the city had the
symbol of "Athena," but she was a Libyan goddess...whom the
Romans called "Min erva." The Etruscans called her "Menrva,"
bywhicImeantos AhdManeswrtof
the Etruscans (as well as of the Romans). Athena and Manes are
thus equated, an idea that's solved when we learn that Athena is
said to be named after the region of Attica, and Attica after the
god, Attis (descendant of Manes). It would therefore seem that the
Phoenicians, an extension of the Aryan-Egyptian rulers, were
likewise from Manes ... and therefore from Armenia.
Hermes, another term that I equate with Armenia, is, I have
personally discovered, the root of the Gypsies. The origin of the
Gypsies is said to be in Egypt by some, but this is
controversial ... perhaps those Egyptian Gypsies were first of all
Greeks. Let's consider the Roma group of Gypsies:
"Another interpretation claims that they acquired the
name "gypsies" from their settlement in the Greek
Peloponnesus near a village named "Gyppe" (see Burleigh
and Wippermann, 1991:331n). The people fairly
consistently call themselves Rom, or Roma.”
http://www.mtsu.edu/~baustin/gypsies.html
As for the location of Gyppe: "Modon (Methoni) ... [at] a hill
called Gyppe where many Rroma lived..."

88
Methoni belonged to the Lelegians/Leleges; the city was in
Messenia at the south-western tip of Peloponnesus. Pausanias said
that "Mothoni" was probably the daughter of Oineas/Oeneus, he
being the Lelegian king of Arcadia who was associated with the
wild Dionysus wine bash. Nicholas de Vere, an outspoken leader
of the modern dragon bloodline, claimed that the bloodline passed
through the ancient Mittani peoples of the Hurrian kingdom; I
mention this in case Methoni is an extension of the Mittani.
Assuming that the Gypsies of Methoni were Lelegians, I
would add that Lelegians were also in Asia Minor, at their city of
Pedasa, in Caria. Assuming also that Carians came to make up a
good portion of the Methoni Gypsies, then I would add that, by
their own admission (according to Britannica) Carians were
"brothers" to the Etruscans. Concluding that Gypsies were thus
related to the Etruscans, I would conclude that (even though we're
not supposed to make the Rome connection, say the historians)
certain Gypsies call themselves "Roma" in that they were the
Etruscans founders of Rome. In this sense it could be true that the
Gypsies did not become the Romans, for the Romans can be
distinguished (though slightly) from the Etruscans.
Another term denoting Gypsies is "Gitan," strongly evoking
the Getae Thracians, who were themselves commonly called the
"Getan." If that's not enough, the Goths (of ancient Sweden),
whom many say extend from the Getae, were called "Gutan."
AndsuelythGpicanbseSdvi,an
therefore as the roots of the Russians.
The Guti Aryans, whom I'm assuming were the roots of the
Gypsies (and almost all of Europe with them), were from the
Zagros mountains of Iran; Media lay just past these mountains.
Behold that Dionysus is also called "Zagreus," no doubt an
eponym of the Zagros mountains. Dionysus, being a Greek entity
but having roots in Thrace, must therefore have been of the Getae
Thracians ... and at the root of the Gitan Gypsies. This idea is
supported by the fact that Hermes (especially Pan) and Dionysus
are connected strongly by various myths and mythological
writings.
The Guti were chased away from Akkadia by king Uthegal
ofUruk,whasteblodin,frBtacspelhinm
"Utukhegal" (to be read as Utu-Khegal) and moreover has him
writing, "Inanna [i.e. Ishtar] is my support, Dumuzi, the
Heavenly dragon of the Mother, has secured my destiny."
[Update June 1st, 2006 -- It has just occurred to me, this
minute, that in conjunction with my new hypothesis wherein
Nahor and his son, Buz, furnished some major Aryan-Hebrew
peoples (e.g. Buzi Medes), that Nahor's eldest son, whom my
English Bible calls "Uz" but whose name is "Uwts" in the Hebrew

89
text, may have named the Utu sun-god peoples. What this picture
demands is that the dragon of Revelation, as well as the Great
Mother harlot that rides on its back, are Hebrew entities. Shocking
as that comes to me this minute, I realize that the Harlot is not to
be viewed as Jerusalem, as some have conjectured, for the
Hebrews of Sumeria/Akkadia were not Israelites, and especially
not Jews. End Update]

90
HYPER-GOG

In the first seven verses of Ezekiel 38, the LORD addresses


the Gog -- of Ezekiel's day -- and warns it to "be prepared" (v 7).
But in verse 8 we learn why: because "after many days...in the
latter years," the Lord will come pay Gog an important visit.
Thus, as Gog cannot exist in ancient times as well as in the latter
years if "he" were a man, the term appears to refer to a nation.
However, some would view "Gog" as a synonym for Satan,
which I find acceptable because I view Gog as the anti-Christ,
noting moreover in other prophecies (e.g. Daniel 9:26-27;
Revelation 12-13) that the anti-Christ is likened to Satan living in
both ancient and end times.
Some prophecy students are beginning to identify Magog
with Arab regions in the northern parts of the Middle
East ... modern Syria in some cases, northern Iraq in others, Turkey,
or even Chechnya and other Caucasian regions by the Caspian sea.
Thus, Gog the person is painted as a future Muslim ruler.
Moreover, among those who take that perspective while also
viewing Gog as the anti-Christ, as I do, the anti-Christ himself is
portrayed as a Muslim. Aside from prophecy groups teaching that
the Dome of the Rock is the Abomination of Desolation, etc., etc.,
there are some who stress the recent violent uprisings of Islamic
Fundamentalism, claiming by this "evidence" that Gog/anti-Christ
will be an Arab/Muslim. I happen to disagree even while
acknowledging that some Turks are in fact from Gogi blood.
The Muslim vs. Russian dispute requires serious
investigation for those who want to identify the anti-Christ long
before the arrival of the final Week's mid-point. On three
occasions, Ezekiel uses this phrase: "from the recesses of the
north." That's how Jay P. Green Sr. puts it, anyway, in his
Hebrew-interlinear translation. The King James Version uses,
"north quarters" in 38:6 and "north parts" in 38:15 and 39:2,
merely suggesting a northerly direction, while Green's phrase
indicates more specifically the "far north." Is Green correct?
I have found that Strong's dictionary defines the Hebrew
word, YEREKAH, thus: "flank; but used only figuratively, the
rear or recess." Funk and Wagnall's dictionary defines "flank" as
"3. The extreme right or left part of something; side." I
emphasize "extreme" in that dictionary definition. YEREKAH is
the feminine of YAREK which is itself defined by Strong like so:
"to be soft; the thigh (from its fleshy softness)." The butt!

91
The Hebrew language has a few words that can be translated,
"side." One of them is TSALAH, meaning "rib." I found that this
word is used in the Bible to indicate the side of something
tangible, such as the side of a man, ship, house, tabernacle, or ark.
It is not used in the Bible to indicate the side of a geographical
area. So, for example, the south side of the tabernacle itself is
written as the south TSALAH, but the southern grounds beyond
the tabernacle is written as the south YAREK. In this, too, we can
see that YAREK/YEREKAH is used to indicate the far side.
Where Isaiah 14:15 says "YEREKAH of the pit," the KJV
translates this quite poorly: "sides of the pit." The KJV also uses
"sides of the earth" and "coasts of the earth," where in both cases
the Hebrew word is YEREKAH. The translators made the same
poor choice in 1 Samuel 24:3, where it reads, "the men remained
in the sides of the cave." Is it not obvious that it should read, "the
men remained in the far ends (= rear) of the cave"? After all,
David's men were hiding from a murderer. In the same way, the
Isaiah quote should read, "far end of Sheol."
So,, the Hebrew phrase used three times by Ezekiel 38-39
means, dust as Green has it, "recesses of the north." The NIV
translates it "far north" on all three instances. Because YAREK
means a fleshy part of the body, one could very well use the street
language: "butt-end of the north"!!
On the third instance (39:2), it's specifically modern Gog that
the LORD brings to Israel from the far north. Caucasia is the land
between the Black and Caspian seas, but not north of the seas;
there are those who insist that we ought to form a box around
Caucasia and choose a people now living in that box as the people
from whom end-time Gog will originate. On the other hand, it can
be shown that the far north in Ezekiel's day was nearly as far north
as one can attain to this day, inhabited by Scythians, Greek-related
Hyperboreans, Alans, Tocharians, and Ugrics. As I've think I've
shown satisfactorily, the Hyperboreans at least, were a Gogi
eoles, but others of the far north are suspect as well
(
"Hvy erborean" means " extreme-northerner").
'fo armah, according to Ezekiel 38:6, was a part of the far
north. Pease note that to identify Togarmah as geographical
Turkey alone is too shallow. The Turks were not an entity by that
name until Christian centuries; the first of them to form a world
power-house, the Kok-Turks (or Gok Turks), were no doubt a
Gogi peoples from Khazaria (on the north shores of the Caspian
sea), and prior to that they were Huns further yet to the east, on the
borders of China.
Although the "armah" in "Togarmah" evokes Armenia, and
knowing also from historical records that Ashkenaz (brother of
Togarmah) lived in Armenia, the connection is not in my mind

92
conclusive, for Armenia in Ezekiel's day was "Minni" or
"Mannae," neither of which evoke "Togarmah." Identifying
Togarmah is very important because the land of Gog was in its
vicinity; again, both are said to have been in the far north, while
the other peoples listed were not so described:
...Gomer, and all his bands; the house of Togarmah
from the recesses of the north..." (38:6).
The problem has been that historians haven't conclusively
located ancient Togarmah, but historians didn't know about
Tocharians until the 20th century (God's late clue to us?). They
were living far to the north of both Armenia and Turkey in
Ezekiel's day, north even of the Black and Caspian seas, some of
them moving east toward China to become the red Chinese dragon
there!
Ezekiel 38:6 (above) makes it plain that, not Gomer, but
Togarmah, was at the far north, wherefore Gomer must have been
to Togarmah's south when chapter 38 was Given. Assuming what
most believe to be true, that Gomer represented the historical
Cimmerians, we must locate Gomer no further south than
Caucasia. The Cimmerians had lived in Armenia as well as the
southern shores of the Black sea, just decades prior to Ezekiel's
writing of his chapter 38. This supports a Togarmah to the north of
Caucasia, wherefore we could seek the Gogi there as well.
It's true that Gog ruled over Meshech and Tubal during the
writing of chapter 38, and while both Meshech and Tubal were
located in southern Caucasia (modern Georgia), it doesn't mean
that the Gogi were themselves in their homeland when ruling over
the two peoples. For empire builders come from afar and must at
times station themselves in conquered regions if they want to hold
on to them.
According to the history report of Herodotus, written (440
BC) less than 150 years after Ezekiel penned chapter 38, "Royal
Scythians" ruled over all other Scythians of Scythia. The
geographer-historian went on to say that Royal Scythians
themselves ruled from Crimea and just north of it, having their
eastern boundary at the Don ("Tanais") river (which pours into the
Sea of Azov). He said:
"North of the country of the Royal Scythians are the
Melanchaeni (Black-Robes), a people of quite a different
race from the Scythians. Beyond them lie marshes and a
region without inhabitants, so far as our knowledge reaches.
When one crosses the Tanais, one is no longer in Scythia;
the first region on crossing is that of the Sauromatae..."
http://herodot.georgehinge.com/hdt4.html

93
Now Herodotus did not mean by that description that the
Black Cloaks were the most northerly peoples of all, but that no
peoples lived directly north of them. Herodotus goes on to discuss
peoples that did live well north of the Black Cloaks, though to the
east of them ... that is, north of Azov, where the Sauromatae lived.
He tells of the Sauromations (or Sarmations) living (in a tree-less
land) as far as a 15-day journey to the north of Azov (see map of
ancient Russia).
He tells that north still of the Sarmations lived the Boudini.
Further north yet, apparently on the upper Tanais river, were the
Thyssagetae and the Iyrcae, one or both of which became, more
than a dozen centuries later, the Magyars migrating to, and
becoming, the Hungarians. At least, an online dictionary says that
the Iyrcae "were almost certainly the ancestors of the modern
Magyars, also called Jugra."
http://8.1911encyclopedia.org/I/IY/IYRCAE.htm
Because the Magyars are classified by modern historians as
"Ugrics," the Iyrcae can be viewed as Ugric ancestors. But
because the Hungarian language is surprisin gly similar to Siberian,
one is apt to connect the Iyrcae to the Tocharians moving east to
China/Mongolia, and with this Britannica agrees:
"It is possible that [the Tocharians] were a part of that
folk migration from the west which, according to
archaeological evidence, appears to have invaded northeast
China some time before the middle of the 1st millennium
BC. In their migration they had long contact with non-Indo-
European speakers, especially the Finno-Ugric and Altaic."
(see "Tocharian Language").
"Ugric" is known to have been synonymous with "Ogur,"
thelarofnsidbtheworf"Hungay.Ielth
both "Ugri(c)" and "Ogur" are themselves rooted in "Gogar,"
known to have been the name for the Gogi of Caucasia. As you
can see, "Gogar" looks like "Jugra," but as the Jugra were also
called Magyars, one may conjecture that the latter term is to be
understood as "Magog(ar)." Wikipedia shares the following quote
that traces these to the Magi wizards: "Hungarian tradition also
traces pre-European Magyar (Hungarian) ancestry back to the
Magi."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medes
Herodotus claimed that, to the east of the Iyrcae, lived a
branch of the Royal Scythians, and to the further east yet, on the
foothills of the Ural mountains, there were the Scythian-like
Argippeans, who were, both men and women, bald (does this
connect with modern radical Aryans shaving their heads?). To the
extreme east, crunched up against the mountains, I presume, lived

94
the Issedonians . But Herodotus couldn't tell who lived in, or east
of, the mountains. The Argippeans claimed that, in the mountains,
there lived men with the feet of goats, while the Issedonians told
that, east of the mountains, there lived one-eyed men and gold-
guarding griffins ... creatures with the heads and wings of eagles
but with the bodies of lions.
Don't discount this as nonsense. It would appear that the
peoples who made these claims, the Argippeans and the
ni were not a little soft of mind, but rather secret-society
Issedoans,
peoples from Greece, for such creatures as they described
belonged to Greek-mythology and therein depicted certain peoples
considered sacred. It was the creatures called "Satyrs" which
were portrayed with human torsos, pointed ears, and the legs of
goats. These were of the Hermes/Pan bloodline. It should also be
said that Herodotus was himself a secret-society member, and
knew exactly who these "creatures" depicted.
The griffins were portrayed with special ferocity, wherefore
the likely purpose of the Argippeans and Issedonians for telling
these stories was to keep away intruders from their gold, for many
intruders there were who would come to seek that gold. This
speaks of the dragon bloodline, Satyrs and all, who invented metal
smelting. They would continue east to Mongolia, where they
would depict themselves with the red Chinese dragon, and then
further east yet to Mexico where they would depict themselves
with eagles wings and panther bodies just like the Mushussu
dragon of Sumeria.
Britannica tells that Tocharians were associated with the
Arsi, that term derived from the Sanskrit "Arya," meaning
"Aryan." A "y" can convert to a "g" and/or a soft "c" so that: Arya
> Argi > Arsi, explaining the hard "g" of "Argippean" inter-
changing with a soft "c" so that Britannica can connect the Arsiype
(meaning "Arsi-country") to the Argippeans. If the Argi(ppeans)
were thus Tocharians, it would seem that the Greek city of Argos
was named after Togarmites, who can be viewed as Gomerians
insomuch as Togarmah was a son of Gomer.
The Argippeans were the Arsiype and therefore Aryans
proper. And the Iyrcae, having a root that looks like "Argi," would
likewise appear as Aryans (otherwise known as "Indo-
Europeans"). In other words, the non-Indo-European Ugrics were
at one time Indo-European, and it needs only to be discovered how
they became non-Indo-European speakers. The finger points to the
Orientals.
That the Boudini went west to name Buda in proto-Hungary
seems reasonable. Buda was founded by the Halstatt Celts,
otherwise known as the Illyrians, under the name "Ak Ink," which
by chance may link back to Enki, the god of Eridu and father of

95
the Great-Mother cult. The origin of the Boudini, as with the
Hungarians, was in Media: "The fifth group [of Medes] were the
"Budii" found also amongst the Black Sea Scythians as Budi-
ni..."
http://users.cwnet.com/millenia/medescyth.html
According to some, these are not to be confused with the
Buzi Medes.
The one-eyed peoples of Russia were said, by the
Issedonians, to live north of the Issedonians, and to have women
equal to their men. Thus, the one-eyed peoples, called
"Arimaspi" by Herodotus, were probably the Amazons whom
were at war with the Griffins (Greek "Gryphons"). Of all the
peoples that Herodotus mentioned, the most northerly were the
Arimaspi. This squares with Ezekiel if my hypothesis is correct
wherein the Cyclopes (" Kuk lopes") are a depiction of the Gogi.
The Arimaspians were related to the Boudini if indeed one-
eyed Odin is rooted in "Boudini." Herodotus said that "ari" means
"one" while "maspi" means "eye." But I noted that Herodotus, in
another work (Vol 1, Part 2), mentioned a Maspian tribe of
Media, so that Arimaspa might be viewed better as the Maspi of
Aria.
You will note that, just like the gold-hoarding Griphons, the
first beast of Daniel 7 is a lion having the head and wings of an
eagle. That beast is revealed by the Daniel-2 text to be the
Babylonian head of gold. I would suggest that the Gryphons
depicted the dragon, actually, for any four-legged beast having
wings would qualify as such.
It is said that the American Indians came from the Siberia-to-
Alaska passage, and the Chinese Tocharians certainly qualify.
Behold this clay sculpture of an Aztec Eagle Warrior, having the
wings of an eagle, just like the Gryphons!
Consider the Aztecs, as rich in gold as the Gryphons. Their
land was called "Mexica," evoking the Meshech, while "Texas"
Meshica evoks"Tchar.Inft,Mexioywasundbthe
tribeofAzcs.Iwuldn'thavembosilartehd
I not gotten wind of similarities between some Trojan -Egyptian
words and the Quechua language of the Incas, noting also that
"Quec" evokes "Gog" while "Inca" reflects "Enki." The Indians of
Peru were called "Moshe" and "Moshica," also evoking the
Meshech. The Gogi are clearly the link between Egyptian and
American pyramids.
The Aztecs, known alternatively as "Tenochca," lived at
Texcoco, terms in which we see additional "Gog" possibilities.
Consider also a Britannica article wherein we find that the proto-
Aztecs came as a "group of Chichimecs." Britannica says that
"Aztec" is derived from "Azlan," meaning "white land." Might that

96
be better conveyed as "land of the whites"? And of course the
Aztecs worshiped a blonde-feathered serpent... which the Mormons
very moronically identify with Jesus Christ.
One who seeks the identity of Ezekiel's Gog is prone to
investigate the Hyperboreans in that the term means "far-
northerners." Herodotus placed the Hyperboreans east of the
Adriatic sea, and told a story in which they were related very
closely to the island of Apollo, Delos. If you remember from a
previous chapter, there was a certain metal-inventor among the
Daktyloi Trojans named "Delas," who, although he himself must
have been an eponym for Delos, was given an alternative name,
"Skythes." Thus, the third son of Hercules, the youngest, who
was named "Scythes," must have represented the Hyperboreans.
Or, put it this way, that "Hyperborean" was codeword to disguise
the fact that they were Ezekiel's Gog.
It's very interesting that the peoples of both Delos and the
Hyperboreans were associated with Apollo -- Greek "Apollon" --
while the Bible tells that a certain "Apolluon" will in the last days
be an army at Armageddon, as per the 5th Trumpet of Revelation
9. I had a problem at first when I had identified Apolluon as
Scythians, because I had previously identified him as pertaining to
Revelation's Kings of the East, the enemies of the anti-Christ. But
now that I see the migration of certain Scythians (i.e. Tocharians
included) to the far-east, suddenly the picture is becoming focused.
It's a long shot, but might the Biblical alternative of Apolluon
-- "Abaddon" -- refer to the portion of Budini peoples that
migrated to the Orient? The same website that above equated the
Budii tribe of Medes with the Budini of Russia had this to say on
the same tribe:
"Budha was of the tribe 'Budha'., which was also
eastern Scythian "sakiya". The name was possibly related
to BUDIN = people in turkic/mongol...The root word may be
the recently discussed terms BAD/BAT = beat, break,
wreck, etc in Sumerian.
The Hebrew word "abad" (Strong's #6) means "to wander
away," wherefore "Abaddon" could very well mean "wanderer."
Certainly the Aryans who went as far as Mongolia and Mexico
qualify as wanderers. I realize that many define "Abaddon" as
"destroyer," but note in Strong's dictionary that "abad" (#7), while
it means "destroy," is not a Hebrew word, but a Chaldean word
(probably the same as "bad/bat" above that means "to break"). The
problem is, the Revelation text says specifically, "...whose name
in Hebrew is Abaddon" (Revelation 9:11).
If I'm correct, Apolluon should likewise denote a wanderer,
and so it is that the Greek word for "wander" is "planao" (#4105).

97
That's not a bad match. The Greek word "apoluo" (# 630) means
"to free." One website says, "The name Apollo means to dispel"
"to drive(i.etoscar/dp);nliectoarys,
away." However, it is a difficult matter, for "apollumi" (#622)
means "to destroy." I suppose the two go together, to destroy and
drive away.
I have yet to track the Gogi/Tocharians/Meshech in detail
into China, but I'll bet you my best golden skull mug that the
Kings of the East turn out to be one or more of these peoples, so
that the Lord of Heaven uses a Gogi people to destroy the Gogi
anti-Christ, who in turn destroys the European Gogi as per
Revelation 17:16. Isn't that what Ezekiel says, by the way, that
Gog's armies will turn on one another?
[Update July 5 2006 -- I would now suggest tracing Apollo to
an historical peoples that were also called something like
"Abaddon" by Hebrews. I've encountered an "Avviy" (Biblical
word) peoples who lived at Avith in Edom. Ptolemy further
enlightens us by pointing out an "Avidia" city/region in Bactriana
(east of Iran). Upon learning these things I developed the theory
that Abaddon refers to the Avviy/Avvites. In coming chapters I
trace these peoples to the Aryan Scythians of Afghanistan, and it
may not be a difficult matter to trace them to Apollo since Apollo
was the wolf-line peoples, as were the Avvites, while I have
tentatively traced the Avvites to the Dahae (meaning "dog"),
namers of Daghestan . The Biblical term for the Dahae is
"Deh ava " (Ezra 4:9).]
[Update September 2006 -- Evidence that the mythical wolf
peoples stem from homogenous terms such as
"Togarmah/Tigris/Dagon" is in the following quote on the flag of
Gagauzia: "There also exists a wolf's-head banner, reflecting the
[Gaugazian] region's Turkish ancestry."
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~dploy/stateless/gagauz.html
Other websites also root Gagauzia in Turks, and since the
background of the wolf flag is azure blue, while "kok" means
"blue," it would seem that the Gagauzi peoples were from
Kok/Gok-Turks (I root the azure color in the lapis-azuli gems
mined in Aryan Afghanistan, where Khyrgyz live to this day). The
Gagauz lived in Thrace and may therefore have been the Lydian
Gogi, as reflected by Gugu/Gyges king of Lydia, prior to
becoming the Kok-Turks. Indeed, "The word Gagauz is in origin
Gokoguz. The Turks of Turkey are descendants of a Turkic
tribe called Oguz. The Gokoguz are another tribe of Turkic
stock. The word "gok" means sky (i.e., sky blue, as used by the
Crimean Tatars and Uygurs)" (brackets not mine).
http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/md-gagau.html

98
That statement suggests that Tators, in the far north and east
of Russia to this day (i.e. exactly where the Tocharians lived),
were a Gogi branch. A fundamental Togarmah-Gog alliance
therefore existed, yet Ezekiel 38 distinguishes between the two.
The following quote supports my theory that "Dacia" is also rooted
in dog," and may therefore depict Togarmites:
"Near thebison's head [of the Moldova Arms] are
situated, not a rose and a crescent. Why such strange
design? Because, as I know, this is an astral symbol of the
sun and the moon taken from Dacian coins (Daci were
ancestors of the Moldovans and Romanians in ancient
times). Also, the octagonal star above the bison's head is the
Dacian symbol of wisdom. The three parts of the eagle's tail
represent three part of the Republic of Moldova: Gagauzia
(or Gagauz Eri as it calls itself) in the south..."
http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/md.html#his
Two points: 1) Dacians were Getae Thracians, wherefore all
their relatives -- Guti/Goths/Jutes/Edones/Germanics -- might be
considered Togarmite-branch Gomerians/Cimmeria ns. 2)
Moldova's bull symbol must ultimately connect to the Gorgon
Taurus symbol, especially in the Taurus region of Cimmerian
Azov. A Wikipedia article has a map showing Turkic-people
distrubution across Russia, which we may assume includes
Ezekiel's Togarmah (that allies itself with Gog's Israeli invasion);
the article has this to say: "At present, there are six independent
Turkic countries: Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Turkmenistan, Turkey, and Uzbekistan."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_peoples ) End Updates]

99
ROSLIN AND THE ROSE LINE

This chapter exposes the dragon bloodline more than a


thousand years after Jesus Prophesied/Ordained the destruction of
Jerusalem. It shows that the Rus were part and parcel with the
Franks in forming the Templars, and this supports my findings that
Franks and Russians were from the same stock of peoples: the
Redones. It’s up to you to decide whether the Templars came to
inhabit the city in His good will, or whether they attempting to do
their own. My mind is definitely made up.
After the first Crusader wave of Vatican-sponsored French
fighters attacked their Muslim enemies north of Palestine, they
invaded Jerusalem. Led through the city walls (1099 AD) by a
Godfrey de Bouillon (duke of Lower Lorraine), the "Christians"
slaughtered unmercifully even the Jewish inhabitants. For his
prize, De Bouillon was chosen ruler of the city, but died the next
year...if that tells you how blessed he was of God. And the Pope
who dispatched him had also died ... before hearing about the
Jerusalem victory.
The Vatican had not only proclaimed that God was forever
done with the Jews, but it also held to the doctrine of
amillennialism i.e. that the Millennial Kingdom of God was
already under way through the Vatican, and with the Pope as
Christ on earth. Therefore, Catholics, and least of all the
counterfeit-Christian Crusaders, were simply not interested in
setting up a Jewish homeland in Palestine. In fact, the Crusaders
persecuted the Jews who wished to partake in their Jerusalem
scheme.
[Update June 2006 -- Assuming that I am correct in
identifying the Rosicrucian branch of the dragon bloodline as a
mix of Rus with non-Israelite Hebrews, I can now better
understand the Crusader/Templar attempt to set up a Jerusalem-
based Millennium -- without the involvement of Europe's Israelite
Jews -- simply because the Hebrew ancestors of the Templars had
come to believe that God had destined them to fulfill the
prophecies. There are historical indicators telling that Merovingian
Franks believed themselves to be Hebrew in some way, and
perhaps I am absolutely correct in claiming that they were from the
non-Israelite Hebrews of Kabala origins. End Update]
Don't let anyone convince you, as ecumenists in the pulpits
would like to, that the Crusader leaders were Christians, for it is
Jesus Christ who defines what true Christians are, and He does not

100
consider murderers of Jews, thieves and rapists to be his saints.
The dragon bloodline at this time, while still too weak to over-
power the Vatican's grip on Europe, took on a Christian facade to
secure Vatican support in their world-rule sceme. It's likely that, at
some point, especially in the early 1300s, the Vatican caught on,
after which there was mortal conflict between the two powers.
A leader of the Crusade, Baldwin I , brother of the late
Godfrey de Bouillon, was then chosen to be the king of Jerusalem.
After Baldwin died (1118), a third brother, Eustace III, was elected
king ... but while on his way to Jerusalem to accept the title, the
Crusaders made his nephew, Baldwin II, king instead, even though
he was not entitled. I'm curious as to why this took place.
The so-called "Rose Line" has been said to be the bloodline
of Jesus Christ (via intimate relations with Mary Magdalene) that,
through the centuries, came to produce the three brothers above. I
don't believe the Jesus-and-Magdalene part of the claim, of course,
which is thought to be a claim peculiar to the Merovingians, but I
do believe that the Rose Line existed. I'm not so sure that these
French brothers had as much to do with the Line as others did,
namely the descendants of Rollo the Viking. I have not heard of
anyone attaching the Rose Line or the Rosicrucians to the
Scandinavians, which is why I view it as a Ros Line; keep in mind,
therefore, as you read this chapter, that it's my personal
theory/discovery. It's a key that led me to discover the deepest
roots of the Rosicrucians.
Two of the three brothers did not come to rule Jerusalem by
chance, but were maneuvered into position by those seeking to
found a flesh-powered Biblical Millennium. After the Crusaders
had won Jerusalem, most returned home whereas a small lot,
including the original nine Templars, held the region as though
their main purpose was to maintain it until something larger should
transpire, which thing I see as world rule. For Jerusalem was not
the only target of the Templar agenda, but there was also
Byzantine i.e. the eastern half of the Roman empire.
I see that Viking blood (i.e. the Normans) was involved in the
same Crusader agenda along with the Frenchmen. It has come to
my knowledge satisfactorily that both the Norse and the French
were descended from the same stock of Gauls that are now labeled
by historians, "La Tene Celts." These are generally regarded as
having previously been the Halstatt Celts of Illyrium.
Godfrey de Bouillon had sold Bouillon, his title there, and the
Bouillon castle, in order to finance his part in the Crusade. Talk
about wild abandon. This war and related agenda obviously meant
the sky to him. But Robert II, a Norman (and the duke of
Normandy), son of William the Conqueror and therefore a
descendant of the St. Clair or Rollo -Viking line, "pawned

101
Normandy to [his brother] Rufus so that he [Robert] could be
the leader of the first crusade" (Britannica Vol. 11, page 358).
Therefore, that Crusade was very important to both of these French
and Norman "noble" families.
Moreover, Britannica tells us that De Bouillon was not the
Crusade's primary leader, but that "Bohemund [I] was the
principal leader of the crusade" (1970; Vol. 10, page 514). Now
Bohemund I, when he joined the Crusade, "gathered a fine
Norman army" for the purpose (Vol. 3, page 855). Fifteen years
prior to the Crusade, Bohemund's Norman father, Robert
G uiscard, and Guiscard's brother, Roger I, had led a Norman
army from southern Italy against the Byzantine kingdom north of
Israel. Prior to that, they conquered the Byzantines of southern
Italy, which is why they ruled that part of Italy in the first place.
One could therefore conjecture that the ultimate Norman purpose
in the heart of the Mediterranean was to pave an eastward Norman
road to Jerusalem... and that the first Crusade (1096) was spurred
first and foremost by that Norman agenda. The rising up of the
Bouillon circle of French fighters then becomes a competitive
response to the Norman vision.
In this light, I can make a suggestion to all who perceive the
Rose Line as stemming through the Merovingian Franks (i.e. to the
De Bouillon family): that's only a part of the story, while another
part is the Scandinavian right to the Rose-Line agenda, just as
much or more than the Merovingians. Those who would buck
against this suggestion should know that the Merovingians
worshipped Odin and other gods worshiped by the Scandinavians.
That is, both peoples shared the same roots.
The Viking army settled in southern Italy had attacked the
papal powers and the Byzantine empire virtually all at once, and
this seems a strike at world rulership. Guiscard had defeated the
Vatican (105 3) but thereafter made peace with a new Pope in order
to have little to fear in Italy while waging war in Byzantine
regions. Back in the north, other Normans were active militarily
and were proving quite successful in Britain and on the French
mainland. Had the Byzantines not made an alliance with the
Varangian Rus of proto-Russia (who were themselves from
Sweden), the Scandinavians just may have conquered the world at
that time. As it turned out, the Varangian Rus fought against the
Italian Normans on behalf of the Byzantines.
Peter the Hermit , a man given overwhelming credit for
rousing the French and other Europeans to engage in the first
Jerusalem Crusade, was first in Bali (1094), southern Italy ... realm
of the Guiscard Normans. This further supports my belief that the
conquest of Israel was initially a Norman goal, joined by the
Vatican/French only after the Normans had made the first

102
plans/assaults to that end. By that time, the papal powers had
formed an alliance with the Italian Normans so that the whole
Jerusalem affair became a competition between the Popes, the
Normans and the French even while the three worked together as
one.
In an article on the Normans, Britannica shares that the
shocking slaughter in Jerusalem is explained by its similarity to
typical Viking bloodbaths. And in the early Templar period, there
were three places where the Templar-related Order of Sion had
monasteries: Palestine, France, and southern Italy. A French-
Norman alliance is therefore implied in the make-up of the original
Templars and/or the near-legendary Order of Sion. Allegedly,
monks from southern Italy (Calabria) built the monastery in
France, and they with Godfrey de Bouillon formed the Order of
Sion.
Just one generation prior to the Crusade, England had fallen
to the Norman, William the Conqueror, a St. Clair, wherefore one
could speculate with some logic that the Normans had chosen a St.
Clair to represent their Rose Line. Very interesting is that the
Dictionary of Royal Lineage, while not indicating the personalities
involved, tells that Guiscard's family was itself from the Rollo line.
In modern times, Pierre Plantard de St. Clair claimed to
have been the Order's leader until 1984. I don't know quite what to
make of that, but there you have the elite Norman name attached to
a Frenchman to this day. Something dark is shaking up there in the
land of the frogs.
Rollo, after his fathers led a series of invasions onto the
French mainland, succeeded in winning a region at the north shore
of France called, "Normandy." This land was won by the treaty,
St. Clair-sur-Epte (911), made with the French king (the "St.
Clair" part refers to Rollo). As part of this arrangement, Rollo
would become the first duke of Normandy, but in return was to
accept Christianity and moreover Christianize his pagan people
(albeit Rollo lived thereafter, and died, as a pagan). Herein begins
a mix of Catholicism with Viking paganism that, along with the
Viking drive to rule the world, was apt to create a form of
Millennialism that was pure sewage in the face of God.
With the victory of William the Conqueror over England
(1066), the rightful heir to the English throne, Edgar Aetheling,
previously hiding out under the protection of the royal court in
Hungary, was escorted back to Britain by another William St.
Clair ... the latter received from the king of Scotland the hill of
Roslin (Scotland), a hill which thereafter became a Sinclair (the
Anglicized form of "St. Clair") settlement... and hub of Scottish
Freemasonry. You may have noticed that "Roslin" and "Ros(e)

103
Line" have a distinct similarity. In referring to centuries past, a
New-Age website says:
"Of course, the spelling of the day of "Rose line" was
"Roslin."
http://www.skybusiness.com/cornucopialodge362/masonart.html
The above website echoes what others are suggesting, that
the Rose Line was the bloodline of Jesus and his mistress, Mary of
Magdala. But that's a silly idea intended to take us (and naive
Freemasons) deliberately off course. We even hear claims that the
head of Jesus is buried under the Roslin chapel ... but you
understand that this idea comes with the wicked implication that
Jesus did not truly die on the Cross nor rise to life.
If we ask why William Sinclair was granted Roslin by the
king of Scotland ( Malcolm III ), it's because Edgar's sister,
Margaret , married that king while William was her cupbearer.
And if we ask why Margaret had a cupbearer with Viking blood,
I'd say it was because Margaret herself had plenty of the same. The
question that I can't answer just yet is when the Roslin
name/village originated, either when overseen by the Sinclairs for
the first time (1070ish), or in an earlier period.
We find that William's son, Henry Sinclair , joined Godfrey
de Bouillon on the first Crusade. And De Bouillon himself had as
father, Eustace II (from Boulogne, on the French coast facing
Scandanavia), who had been married to Goda ... whose half-Viking
blood was of the Rollo/Sinclair line. That is, Goda had as mother,
Emma , daughter of Richard I, duke of Normandy (942-96),
grandson of Rollo.
Although Eustace II was married to Goda, it is reported by
historians that Godfrey de Bouillon, and his two brothers in line
for the Jerusalem throne, were born from Eustace's second wife,
Ida of Bouillon. In other words, there was apparently no Viking
blood in these three brothers. Yet, their father (Eustace II) fought
for the English crown at William the Conqueror's side. One could
therefore conjecture that strong ties between the royal Sinclairs
and the elite Bouillon family were formed at the invasion of
England (i.e. Battle of Hastings). But by that time, Guiscard was
already in Italy, and had already formed ties with the Vatican on
that front. Always keep in mind that these momentary lights were
not the heroes that they considered themselves, but beasts fit only
to be captured and punished.
Now Emma (Goda's mother) had been married to two men,
first to a king of the Anglo Saxons, Aethelred II , and, after he
died, to a Viking pirate and king of Denmark, Canute , who
conveniently "converted" to Christianity and thereafter fought
against pagan Viking enemies who were coveting parts of his
enlarged empire. Aethelred fathered king Edmund II Ironside

104
reportedly from another wife named "Aelfgifu" -- alternative
"Elgiva." But something smells like a cover up here, not just
because little is known about Elgiva, but because the first wife,
Emma, was also called "Elgiva," especially in the Anglo-Saxon
Chronicles, suggesting that the two women could have been one
and the same. If so, then Edmond Ironside was Emma's son and
therefore half Viking! And that would be the reason for the cover
up (if Christian-Viking rulers didn't want their sons to be
recognized as stemming from pagan Vikings, they could attempt
successfully to hide it).
Moreover, Canute married Aethelred's widow, Emma, but
was at first married to an Aelfgifu that is as mysterious historically
as the Aelfgifa reportedly married to Aethelred. In fact, some
historians suggest that Canute's Aelfgifu was one and the same
Aethelred's Aelfgifu ... but even if so, we can't lose sight of the fact
that both men had been married to Emma who for some confusing
reason was also known as "Aelfgifu."
What I am suggesting is that the Norman Ros(e) Line may
stem (from the Rollo dynasty) through Emma to Ironside...he
being a king who moreover married the daughter of a Danish
Viking, wherefore Ironside's son, Edward the Aetheling, was
three-quarters Viking if indeed Ironside's mother was a Viking (the
history books tell us that Edward was a Saxon). But even if Emma
was not Ironside's mother, and there was in fact another Aelgifu
who was, the latter may also have been of Viking kin (no one
seems to know the identity of her parents). If that isn't enough, the
Saxons themselves are suspect as cousins to the Rollo line
because, as many suggest, the Saxons were none other than Sacae
i.e. Scythians.
The reason that I have burdened you with some details is that
Edward the Aetheling's children were the said prince Edgar the
Aetheling and his sister, Margaret. This could be very important
because Margaret (who was in this way born with Viking blood)
became closely associated with Roslin while the first Vikings,
according to Britannica, had settled "Erethlyn' (Wales). That
word looks as though it could mean, "of Reth yyn," which looks a
lot like "Roslin" and it's ancient alternative, "Rosslyn."
In 1112, the count of Champagne (France) had sent Hugh de
Pa en ("Pagan") to Jerusalem with a letter addressed to the
(Merovingian?) king of Jerusalem, Baldwin I. Then, in Jerusalem
itself, under the oversight of Baldwin, De Payen began to unite a
small group of closely-related men in an unofficial formation of an
order of Temple Knights ... and the count of Champagne would
himself be included in that organization.
The following year, Baldwin married the daughter (Adelaide)
of a late Viking leader, Roger I (Guiscard's brother), under the

105
condition that his son, Roger II, should become king of Jerusalem
when and if Baldwin sho uld die without a child. One could
interpret this deal as Baldwin's agreement not to have children, so
as to grant the throne to the Normans. Amazingly, Baldwin,
although married to two women, was to die without children.
The Patriarch of Jerusalem (i.e. the powers of the Eastern
Orthodox Church) caused Baldwin to betray his deal with Roger II
and his mother, Adelaide. Baldwin thereby divorced her, and then
he died a year later (1118) without an heir. The Patriarch then
urged yet another betrayal, the ascension of Baldwin II (Count of
Rethel), merely Baldwin's cousin/nephew, to the Jerusalem
throne... instead of the rightful heir, Eustace III (the latter was
brother to Baldwin (I) and supposedly of the Merovingians). Now,
queen Margaret of Scotland had previously given one of her
daughters in marriage to Eustace III -- with the hope of seeing her
bloodline on the throne of Jerusalem, apparently -- but, as
described above, to no avail.
Britannica tells us that Baldwin II was chosen (over Eustace
III) because his cousin, Joscelin, persuaded the barons of
Jerusalem to so choose. I note that Joscelin was from England's
House of Courtenay, and may therefore have been acting as the
hand of the Sinclair/Norman king of England, Henry I, who,
because he had married yet another daughter of queen Margaret,
thus had a possible motive for not seeing Eustace III (who also
married a daughter of Margaret) on the Jerusalem throne.
Whatever the fledgling Templars may have thought of the
decision to crown Baldwin II instead, we find that they had such
license under him that immediately (1118) De Payen officially
formed,anwslctGMaerof,h"PKnigtse
Temple of Solomon" (i.e. the Templars). Moreover, Baldwin
fulfilled for the knights their important request to call the
Jerusalem Temple their home.
Baldwin II had partaken in the first Crusade, by the way, and
for 18 years prior to his Jerusalem election, he had been the Count
(and protector) of Edessa, north of Jerusalem and much closer to
Georgia. With king David in the midst of removing the Seljuk
Turks from Georgia, Joscelin and king Baldwin joined forces to
fight against the Muslims with the "Italian" Normans still in
support; in fact, Bohemund II (Guiscard's grandson) had married
a daughter of Baldwin II in 1126...so we see that Viking blood was
yet vying for the Jerusalem throne. In the meantime, with king
Baldwin pre-occupied in military affairs far from Jerusalem, the
Templars, while living in the "basement" of the Temple Mount,
and armed with picks and shovels, dug deep to the foundations of
the old Temple built by Solomon.

106
We don't know for certain what their secret mission was, but
Albert Pike (centuries later) claimed that they had intended to
build Ezekiel's Temple (see Ezekiel 40). If true, it reinforces the
theory wherein the Templars had a (counterfeit) Biblical
Millennium in mind. And it explains why the Templars were also
to become stone masons (as well as knights)... because they had
experience in masonry from the very start.
We do not know what the Templars found buried at the
Jerusalem Temple, but with much ado in 1126, De Payen headed
west and with passion had discussions in France with Bernard the
mystic monk of Clairvaux. Together, De Payen and Bernard drew
up plans to secure Vatican support for the Templar cause ... and
succeeded at the Council of Troyes (1128) (note how "Troyes" in
France evokes the Greek-theater Troy of the Trojans).
The monk was the nephew/cousin of one of the founders of
the Templars, Andre de Montbard, and while Montbard went on to
become a Grand Master of the Templars, Bernard would doggedly
become a Templar work horse and loyal administrator...so as to lay
the foundation for a huge Templar empire that would rule Europe
invisibly, shoulder to shoulder with the Pope. Thus, the French and
Catholic elements of the Jerusalem scheme came to greatly
overshadow the Norman elements, but only on the mainland. In
England and Scotland, the situation was different. After building
Templar support for a short duration in France, De Payen crossed
the English channel to meet king Henry I, who gave the Grand
Master blessings and gifts. Henry was the son of William (St.
Clair) the Conqueror, of Rollo blood.
Now Baldwin II died in 1131 without a son, as had Baldwin
I. Amazing. With Bohemund II, also of Rollo/Sinclair blood,
having married a daughter of Baldwin II, the Jerusalem throne
might finally have gone to the Northmen. Alas, a couple of years
before his death, Baldwin (II), apparently in opposition to the
kingship passing to Bohemund, offered the throne to Fulk V, count
of Anjou, by offering his elder daughter in marriage. Fulk
accepted her in 1129 and thus went on to become the next king.
Earlier, perhaps while anticipating that Fulk and/or his son
(Geoffrey Plantagenet) might ascend to the Jerusalem throne,
Henry I had given his daughter -- i.e. Margaret's granddaughter --
to Fulk's son. It was this marriage that created the so-called
"Plantagenet" dynasty that would go on to furnish the House of
York, depicted by a white rose and viewed tentatively by myself as
the White Rose Line. While the meaning of "Plantagenet" is said
to remain unknown, I can't help but note the "gene" in that title.
But, alas, alas, alas, the blood of the Vikings (including
Margaret's) would fail again to sit on the Jerusalem throne because

107
it was another son of Fulk V (Baldwin III) that would get the
crown.
However, Fulk's son, Geoffrey Plantagenet , would with
Henry's daughter bring forth Henry II , king of England, so that
the Viking Rose Line would continue on the throne of England to
this day. In the days of Henry VIII and his daughter, queen
Elizabeth I (died 1603), the English throne, with the help of
Rosicrucians, became the seat of God's global kingdom (not in
reality, of course, but merely in the minds of the kings/queens): the
Anglican Church. This was, of course, in opposition to the
Catholic Church. It was immediately after Elizabeth's death that
the Stewarts entered upon the English throne, in the reign of the
Scot, James I, who was of Rollo stock via the Bruce kings of
Scotland.
The Ros Line, if indeed it was a line of ruling Vikings, may
have branched out into Kiev via the Varangian Rus. The
Varangian ruler in the days of Margaret was Yaroslav, son of the
great Vladimir who had followed Rollo's lead in converting to
Christianity for merely political protection. Yaroslav had given
four, perhaps five, of his daughters to European kings, one of
whom was Harald III Hardraade of the Norwegian Vikings. Prior
to finding refuge in Hungary, Margaret was not only protected in
Kiev by Yaroslav himself, but before that by Harald III in Norway
(not to mention by Olaf II, king of Norway). Clearly, Margaret's
family was an important one to the Vikings, and it could certainly
be true that they understood she to be of the Ros Line.
If Margaret's family was important due to its Rollo blood, so
also her brother, Edgar. As heir to the English throne, he was
extremely promising in placing Rollo blood in that key position.
As it turned out, a duke of Normandy (The Conqueror), with Rollo
blood, ended up on the English throne before Edgar could,
hereafter Edgar's bloodline never did become enthroned,
anywhere. And so what was Margaret to do but to give her
daughter to Henry I in order to reinforce his Rollo blood for her
heir?
Henry died without a male heir, wherefore the male line of
Rollo comes to an end with him. But Henry's daughter produced
Henry II, etc., until, with the end of the royal Rollo line at the
death of Elizabeth I, another Ros Line, from the Varangian Rus,
namely, the Drummond clan of Scotland, took its place on the
English throne ... and has continued there to this day! The
Drummond Ros Line and its roots in the Varangian Rus is the
subject of a coming chapter, but keep in the back of your mind
until then that the pre-tribulation rapture was born in a Drummond
cult, whose founder was a major English banker from a banking
family in some cahoots with Rothschild banker(s).

108
Margaret's blood remained in Scottish kings all the way to,
but not including, the Bruce dynasty. The Drummond bloodline
entered the line of Scottish kings in the Bruce dynasty, namely,
when Annabel Drummond married Robert de Bruce III. Now the
Bruce family had been from Normandy and was also related to the
Rollo bloodline! Remember this when I say, "Drummond Ros
Line" (which I could just as rightly refer to as the "Bruce Ros
Line" and/or "Rollo Ros Line").
The son of Robert III and Annabel was king James I of
Scotland, and this dynastic line would continue through successive
James'. Because the Stuart, James VI of Scotland, ruled England
immediately after Elizabeth I (as James I of England), the
Margaret or Roslin Ros Line was replaced just then by the
Drummond Ros Line. It is no wonder that the Drummond clan
supported the Stuarts. However, Sinclairs were privy counselors to
the Scottish James' and even to Mary Queen of Scots, but in those
days, Rosicrucians had infiltrated the royal courts of many
European monarchs, not to support them, but to bring them down.
Elizabeth I welcomed Rosicrucians into her court even as her
spies, but it can be determined that these particular Rosicrucians
had been supportive of, if not related by blood to, the
Margaret/Roslin Ros Line.
Hugh de Payen, on his return home from the Jerusalem
Temple, and after visiting Henry I (of England) briefly to fill him
in on the Middle-East affair, ended his westward journey in
Scotland with his in-laws, the Sinclairs! Yes, Hugh de Payen the
Frenchman had married Catherine, a Roslin Sinclair. Was he the
glue that bonded the Normans to the French, therefore, so as to
enable a Crusader army to be mustered large enough to win
Jerusalem?
Where had De Payen's finest loyalties been as Grand Master
of the Templars, to the French or to the Normans? And was the
idea of digging below the Temple Mount and/or to build Ezekiel's
Temple -- and therefore the idea of a Utopian Millennium -- that of
the Frenchmen, or of the Norman Sinclairs? The answer to that is,
I think, to the one group that was associated with a Hebrew
organization having Millennialism as an agenda.
The Khazars of Magog come to mind, who had been ruled
by Hebrews, some of which were Millennial-minded (i.e.
Zionistic) to a militant degree. On the one hand, the Gnostic
Cathars, believed by some to have been a branch of Khazars, were
in France just then and in close association with the Templars. Yet
again, the Kabars of Hungary -- a branch of Khazars -- may have
entered Scotland with Margaret's friends so as to become tied to
the Sinclairs.

109
The Scottish house of Sinclair, although not achieving royal
status, went on to great wealth and power, even organizing the
infamous Freemason brotherhood out of stone masons
(Freemasonry was the formation of smokescreen churches i.e.
"lodges" which allowed memberships of non stone workers for use
in power-politics and social engineering). Prior to the Freemason
period, the Templars had been stone workers in building castles,
forts, and cathedrals (the cathedrals were often esoteric
monuments intended more for power-grabbing than for religious
worship).
From 1307, when the Templars in France were being chased
out of the country by a major persecution, many took shelter in
Scotland under the wings of the Roslin Sinclairs ... and the Scottish
king, Robert I de Bruce , welcomed the knights with open arms.
The first Grand Master of Masonry in Scotland was (another)
William Sinclair of Roslin Castle. His descendant, another
William Sinclair yet, laid (in 1446) the foundations of the esoteric
cathedral, Rosslyn Chapel (on the same hill as Roslin Castle). This
cathedral, every square inch of which is laced with carvings, was
built in French style, suggesting that it was indeed built by the
French Templars who had escaped to Scotland.
One particular design on the walls of the Rosslyn Chapel
matches perfectly with Freemasonry's first-degree ceremony, still
practiced today, in which a blindfolded initiate stands between two
pillars of Solomon's Temple with a noose dangling from neck,
placed there by a Templar (see website above). This carving is
what so concretely ties the Roslin Templars with the Freemasons
of later years!
The village of Roslin was built specifically to house the
masons who, over 40 years, built the Chapel. Carved in the
ceilings are stars (pentagrams) and roses, both having affinity with
Rosicrucianism, the stars depicting the cult's astrology, and the
roses its secret. In fact, the rose on the Rosicrucian rose-and-cross
logo may secretly depict the pentagram because a rose has five
petals while a pentagram has five points. Also carved throughout
are Freemasonic as well as pagan symbols, including over 100
"green men" corresponding to an unknown concept well outside
the realm of Christianity. Moreover, Hermes is depicted, which
again connects with Rosicrucianism rather than the Judaism of
Jerusalem. The building was cleverly dubbed, "The Bible in
Stone," which it is not; instead, the phrase reminds us of
pyramidology, the occult idea that certain secrets of God are
Inspired within the building's dimensions, shapes, angles, and
carvings.
The skull-and-crossbone symbol used by the Templars, also
found in the Chapel, is said to represent the bones of Mary

110
Magdalene... whom the Templars actually possessed and
worshipped, or so we are to believe. But the facts that we know are
these: 1) the skull-and-crossbone symbol was a pirate-flag symbol;
2) the Rus Vikings were pirates while pagans, especially between
800-1050; 3) the Templars reverted to piracy on the high seas after
losing Jerusalem for good; 4) the crossbones form an X-shape,
even as does the Scottish flag.
I suspect the Scottish flag to be the old pirate flag in disguise,
but without the skull. In fact, the Scottish flag, called "Andrew's
Cross," dates back to the 12th century, just one century after the
first Templars. A common line explaining the flag's origin is that
clouds in the sky formed an X-shape during a certain battle,
wherefore, we are to believe, someone recognized it as the Apostle
Andrew's cross upon which he was killed. That sounds like a load
of potatoes to me, to disguise the reality.
If indeed the Rosicrucian cross represented the crossed bones
of the pirate flag, then the rose that Rosicrucians place at the center
of their cross could represent the skull of the pirate flag ... where the
skull represents their hidden/occult mysteries. Note that "school" is
similar to "skull" and that Rosicrucians called themselves the
"Invisible College" prior to usurping most of our schools. Even the
Skull and Bones society in the United States is based at Yale. Note
also that in colleges to this day there are "degrees," evoking the
degrees of Freemasonry. And the odd black hat with the flat,
square top that proud faces wear on graduation day represents a
mortar board i.e. the mortar board used by stone masons. America
is much controlled by this cult.
While the modern cross of Rosicrucians is not like the
Scottish Cross in the form of a X -- called a "saltire" -- but is
instead upright like the cross of Christ, the early Rosicrucian cross
was a saltire, as you can see from the 16th-century Andreae
Family Crest (Johan Andreae was a leading Rosicrucian). The four
roses that surround this cross had been, much earlier, four small
crosses in the Jerusalem flag of the Templars, the very same
design used by the Church of the Lutheran Confession centuries
later. The same design is also found in the Church of the Holy
Sepulcher (in Jerusalem), and is now the central icon on the floor
of the National Cathedral in Washington DC.
Isaac Newton was a leading Rosicrucian, and so behold that
the Newton fmily crest is two bones forming a saltire cross!!
If that's not enough, the Templar flag was exactly the flag of
Georgia, the same Caucasian Georgia that assisted the Templars in
the Crusade. Do I smell a Gogi enterprise, therefore, in the
Rosicrucians?

111
WHO’S THE WHEEL DRAGON LINE?

By discovering that the Arthurian legends are take-offs from


Hercules-related myths, a connection is made between the
Arthur/Pendragon and Hercules bloodlines. Behold Greek myth
wherein Hercules, prior to mating with the half-snake woman, was
in the process of returning from a place called "Erytheia"
somewhrnt casofEurpe.
By the time that I had learned this, I had already read in
Britannica that the Vikings had settled a Welsh site called
"Erethlyn," wherefore I suspected that Hercules was in Erethlyn.
Arthurian bloodlines were associated with Wales, especially
Merlin the magician (whose name, I think, is a depiction of the
Mars bloodline). Note that Wales is to this day depicted by a red
dragon. To this I should add that the Welsh to this day claim to be
descended from Cimmerians ... not at all suggesting that I would
identify the Welsh of Merlin's day as purely Gomerians because in
such a far-reaching migration, mixing with various peoples is
expected.
I was surprised to find that the Viking settlement of Erethlyn
was in the district of "Rhos" (see map), evoking the Hros and the
Biblical Rosh, both of whom I had independently identified as
Cimmerians. In Britain, "rhos" is Celtic for "head(land)," and it's a
fact that the Biblical "Rosh" means "head/chief."
The Rosh ruled in Caucasia and Armenia, probably as the
Rusa kings of Rusahinili; recall that I linked the root of
"Rusahin ili" to the Ruthene/Rusyn of France, and that I had also
connected the Ruthene of France to the Hros of Kiev. However, I
did not find whether the Ruthene stemmed from the Hros of Kiev,
or vice versa. It may be that the Ruthene of France (of Christian
centuries) spread east to form the Hros, and west to form the
Welsh empire.
The latter, while known historically as Cumbria, became the
seat of Western Atlantis for a time; hence the Merlin/Arthur
myths. Recall that Jordanes called the Cimmerians, "Cimbri,"
wherfoCumbianAtlseohvpculiartyf
being Cimmerian. But to this it needs to be repeated that Jordanus
pegged a "Gug" as the ancestors of the Cimbri. And this squares
with my finding that Hercules, who came to Wales, was of a
Gorgon-Cimmerian bloodline, as were all the Greek Danaans
before him.

112
But in this chapter the subject is Rodez, the first Ruthene
settlement in France. "Ruthene" was the location's original name,
and "Rodez" was simply an alternative. The Ruthene people were
called "Rusi/Ruzzi." In that the Slav/Kiev Russians claim descent
from the Ruthene, the Ruthene had to be stem from the Veneti,
since the Slavs stemmed from the Veneti. Now because both the
Slavs and the Varangians descended from the Ruthene, it's no
wonder that both peoples were labeled, Rus.
If indeed the Russians are a Gogi peoples, then ditto for the
Veneti. And this is substantiated in the claim that the Veneti stem
from Lake Van, where the Gogi came to rule even over Rosh at
that location. The Veneti are very "important" in that they
contributed to Cumbrian Atlantis, as we shall see. Moreover, the
Veneti were the root of the Merovingians.
The Varangians were called "Ruotsi" (or Rutsi) by the
Finns, and in fact the very name of Sweden was Ruotsi after them,
a term reportedly rooted in the "Rodskarlar" peoples of Sweden.
The "t" in "Ruotsi" could certainly have had connection in the
Ruthene/Rodez of France.
See http://www.stetson.edu/~psteeves/classes/pritsak.html
In that the Varangians were called "Rodskarlar" i.e. with
"Rod" at it's root, it tends to prove that they and the Slavs were
from the same bloodline because Slavs worshipped the Russian
god, Rod. While the "Rod" of "Rodskarlar" may be variously
defined as "root" or "red" or even "pole," the website above (it
may not be active any longer) claimed that "Rodskarlar" is related
to the term, "rodr/roder," which looks like "rotor" i.e. a wheel.
This was a very important find for me because I had already
realized by that time that "Ruthene" was itself rooted in the Latin
"rota/roda," meaning "wheel." I might not have realized it except
that a certain website had used "roth" as a variation of rota/roda."
At that same website I also found that the Aryan "gargar"
meant chariot," and afterward I found that "gar" means wheel" so
that "gargar" actually means "wheel-wheel," or a two-wheeled
chariot/cart. In the term "gargar" I mean to denote the Gorgons,
and that when the Ruthene called themselves after the wheel, they
were making a connection with the Gorgons. In other words, I
wouldn't be surprised to find that the symbol of the Gorgons/Gogi
had become the wheel. It floored me to find that the symbol of the
Gypsies to this day is a wheel, for this Rod(a) bloodline that I am
in the midst of discussing was from the Gypsies. Note that to this
day a fast car is called a "rod."
The Kartli Georgians of Caucasia (note the similarity
between "Georgia" and "Gorgon") were also called
"Kartvelians," and it floored me some more when I realized that
the term looks rooted in "cartwheel." I entertained "Gorgon" as

113
deriving from the same root as our English "cargo," and with that
in mind note that the city of Carthage (which looks like "cartage")
in north Africa was likely a Gorgon city because it is called
"Karkedonos" in the Septuagint. When I add to these things that
Helios is the patriarch of the Gorgons while he was depicted as a
chariot wheel in the sky, I have confidence in connecting to the
Rodez of France and the Rodskarlar Varangians to the Gorgons.
It may be worth mentioning Helios wife, Circe, since that
seems to be a round term. In line with my belief that she depicted
Circasia, an alternative term for Caucasia, Jordanes wrote of the
Caucasus mountains: "then bending back into Syria with a curving
turn ... then turning back to the north...").
The sacred island of Helios was certainly not by coincidence
Rhodes, therefore, and even more telling is that his other wife in
that island was "Rhoda" = "wheel". When I later discovered
statements linking the ancestry of the Ruthene to the island of
Rhodes, I easily accepted the connection between the Rus(sians)
and Rhodes. This was a great find, for it not gave the deepest root
of the Rosicrucians thus far in my research, but in so doing it gave
me some excellent indicators as where to trace further back still.
Note that the king-pin of the Illuminati Globalist movement was,
about one century ago, Cecil Rhodes...an associate of the
Roth schilds who likewise wanted world rule!
"Rodskarlar" looks as though it has two root words that
should be read as Rodez-Kar, meaning "wheeled car(t)"...as
opposed to the sleds that Scandinavians and Scythians also used.
In fact, I have found that the Scythians were almost-certainly
named after "ski/skid." Absolutely, yes, for my dictionary (Funk
and Wagnalls) tells that our English "ski" derives from the Old
Norse "skith" meaning "snowshoe." However, the (same)
dictionary also tells that our "skid" derives from the same Old
Norse word, but in this case it's defined it as "a piece of wood" i.e.
a ski.
Further investigation showed that "Rodez," like "rodeo" and
"radius," means "round." Consider also that the Ruthene lived
near, and can be connected to, the Redones of France, terms which
both look like "rotund"...or even "redundant" (to go in circles).
The problem is that "Hros/Ros" does in no way appear to
mean "wheel." At some point, therefore, the Roda peoples of
Helios took on the name "Hros/Rus," and it would seem from
Ezekiel 38's mention of the Rosh that the term was around as early
as the seventh century BC. However, a distinction may be
necessary between "Hros" and "Rus," since "hross" is Celt for
horse while "Rus", if indeed from "Rosh," means "head/chief. I do
note that the "Hros" term was found in Kiev, on the north shore of
the Black sea, where the Thracians had long before made the horse

114
the symbol of the region. The question then becomes: to which
meaning do we attach the Welsh "Rhos" to? May I suggest the
rose, since "ros" in Celt did mean "rose."
Remember in all this that Rhodes was populated by a peoples
depicted as "Kamiros," virtually the same as "Gamir," the old
name for Cimmerians.
On this map of France, Rodez is just to the left of the top of
the red section, in the Department of Aveyron, and in fact the
Ruthene were the first inhabitants of Aveyron. Nearby was the
capital of Gergovia, belonging to the Arvenia Gauls who named
Aveyron and Auvergne. The Ruthene also lived elsewhere in the
red section (which outlines modern Languedoc/Roussillon), with
special emphasis on the most southern portion, Roussillon (also
"Rosellon" ), for it appears like "Roslin".
It seems plausible that the Ruthene bloodline was responsible
for the Merovingians, for after the Merovingian kings no longer
ruled France, the Templars -- who were reportedly formed in
support of Merovingian aspirations -- gathered at Rennes le
Chateau, which had been home to "Rhedae" peoples so that it
was also called "Rhedae le Chateau." I'm suggesting that the
Rhedae were one and the same bloodline with the Rodez/Ruthene,
but moreover that the Merovingians may have been such. If so,
Merovingians had the same root (Old Norse = "rot") as the
Russians, wherefore the Merovingians should prove to have close
relatives in the Varangians (and other Scandinavians).
Now I opened this chapter with Erethlyn of Wales in mind,
for it connects to the worshipers of Rod. The term "Ereth" and it's
many variations was very important to the dragon bloodline, and I
would suggest that it goes back to Eridu of Babylon/Sumeria, the
home of Enki and Utu the Dragon sun gods. It's interesting that
certain historians claim that the wheel was invented by Sumerians.
Behold the following, where we see that Erethlyn (of Wales) was
probably founded by the Rhedae:
"The ancient name for Rennes-le-Chateau was Aereda,
becoming later Rheddae or Rhedae, said to have been
derived from Aer Red, the Wandering Snake. Others
believe that the name came from Rheda, the Visigothic word
for chariot.
http://www.fortunecity.com/tatooine/zelazny/212/grail7.html
There you have it: "Rheda," and therefore, "Rhoda," can
mean "wheel/chariot." Either definition, "wandering snake" or
"chariot (wheel)," points to the dragon bloodline. Here's a similar
quote:

115
"The original name of Redae seems to have come from
the Arida (Arese), which gave its name Areda, Redda,
Rhedae and then Redae. This is a valley that stretches from
the Foret des Fanges to the Col Saint-Louis. Foret des
Fanges lies approximately 20 Kilometers away to the south
of Rennes-le-Chateau."
http://www.tsj.org/razes16.htm
Doesn't "Aereda" look like "Erytheia" (of Hercules myth) as
well as the "Ereth(lyn)" of Wales? 1970 Britannica makes the
assumption that Scandinavians had first of all founded
Haeredaland in Norway before founding Erethlyn under the same
name; it may have been the other way around. Here's how
Britannica put it:
"In a revision of the early part of the Anglo-Saxon
chronicle ... the first Viking invaders, mentioned under the
year 787 [AD], are said to have come from Haeredaland ,
presumably Hordaland in Norway. But in the same entry
these invaders are called Danes, and there is Celtic evidence
for the vague application of the name of Hordaland not only
to the original home of the Scandinavians (Old Irish
Hiruath , Irish Latin Hirota ) but to sites settled by them
(Middle Welsh Erethlyn )"
(Britannica. 1970; Vol. 23; "Vikings")
Note that the Norwegian location of Haeredaland is given by
writers to the domain of the Danes, for I'll be coming back to this.
Haeredaland was "Hirota" and "Hiruath" to the Irish, wherefore
one can see that Hrot may have modified to Hroth and finally to
Hros. I'll repeat that the Kiev Hros were likely symbolized by
Ares, the Thracian Horseman and Greek god of war. But to that I
also suspect some connection to the Greek god, Eros, the son of
Zeus but in some versions of Ares. The point is, Eros is the root of
our "erotic," while the Greek term was "erotos," very much like
"Erethlyn/Aereda/Hirota." It's interesting that the Slav entities,
Lado and Lada, were made gods of love, suggesting a blood
connection between Eros and Lada/Lado.
Okay, so the Aereda were the Redones. It's likely that they
had stemmed from the Rhaetians (see map of ancient Italy), said
to be an Etruscan tribe from north Italy who settled the Alps and
region to the west of the Veneti. Note that Etruscans called
themselves "Rasenna/Rasna," very much evoking the
Ruthene/Rusyn!! Reader, what that does is to make Russian
ancestors the original founders of Rome, and brothers even of the
Romans.

116
Can we not see "Ruschi" in "Etruschi." Therefore, a branch
of Veneti (from whom the Etruscans stem) became the Rhaetians
who in turn became the Redones and Ruthene. Note that a
Rhaetian language is Ladin, evoking not only Latin and Lydia, but
the Lada deity of the Slav Rus. The Etruscans called Leto
(Apollo's mother), "Lat," but it's difficult to determine on merely
the face of it whether the term refers to Latins or to Ladinia (or
both). Note too that Ladinia is between South Tyrol and the
Veneti, by which I mean to focus your attention on Tyrol...in that
it not only evokes Tyre, but is symbolized to this day with a red
phoenix (see phoenix banner). Remember, the Etruscans were
called “Tyrrheni.”
[Update June 2006 -- As I'm tracing the Buzi peoples across
Europe more than ever, having devised the theory that Buz, son of
Nahor, founded them, and as I'm watching to see if they trace to
the Merovingians and Bavarians (i.e. bee/buz-line peoples), note
that the region of Bozen is connected to South Tyrol, as for
example the phoenix banner shown in the link above includes the
Bozen name. Bozen, it is said, was initially settled by Rhaetians,
and Tyrol was ruled by Bavarians at the time that Merovingians
were ruling the French empire. End Update]
I can feel it in my bones that I am on to something here. For,
behold, there lived in the Erytheia myth (of Hercules) a three-
bodied monster who was given (by the myth writers) the name
"Geryon," a linguistically-valid variation of "Gorgon." As yet
another example of Cimmerians appearing in threes, there are the
three heads of Hecate, one of them being that of a dog...no doubt
depicting Verkana ("wolf land"), modern Gorgan. We find in the
Geryon myth that he owned a two-headed dog ... which would
translate, one could conjecture confidently, into two branches of
Gorgons. In the myth, it was the deed of Hercules to steal cattle
from Geryon and bring them back to the Greek theater. The
"cattle" were no doubt a peoples routinely depicted as "Taurus,"
andTurswothe fBlacksextywhr
the Cimmerians had lived. Moreover, the Armenians called the
Caucusus mountains by that very name (of Taurus).
But look at who it is that sends Hercules on this task; it was
the king of Mycenae, Eurystheus a codeword that is an almost
,

perfect match with "Erytheia" (where Geryon lived). If this is not a


coincidence, it may reveal that this king was of the Geryon
bloodline. According to myth, Eurystheus was, like Hercules, from
the Perseus bloodline, wherefore both Hercules and the entire
bloodline from which he and Perseus came was Gorgo-Cimmerian.
And this explains why Hercules, upon returning from Geryon's
land, mated with the half-snake woman (i.e. a Gorgon of some
sort) in the region of Taurus (near Azov) ... where the historical (i.e.

117
true-to-history) result of these two peoples mixing eventually
produced a Scythian empire (about 600 BC) on top of a declining
Cimmerian empire.
Now because the Hercules/Perseus bloodline was half
Danaan, and because the Danaans, prior to ruling in Greece, had
built cities on Rhodes, one is compelled to define the Danaans as
Rhodians; that is, the Gorgo-Cimmerians of Rhodes. It would then
follow that the peoples who founded Haeredaland (Norway) and
Erethlyn (Wales) were the British Danann (not quite the same
spelling as "Danaan"), by which I mean to suggest that Hercules
was simply a Greek-Danaan army that came to replace Geryon's
rule over western Atlantis. There is evidence that Geryon was
himself a Danaan entity and yet by another name.
The Danes now come irrepressibly to mind. The historical
(i.e. not of myth) Cimmerians in Denmark were called "Cimbri"
"Camber," afterandhevmtDanishpeul,
themselves, this reflecting perfectly the "Cimbri" (or sometimes
"Cymri") of Wales who had named their territory, "Cumber."
Britannica says that the modern Himmerland in the Danish
peninsula still bears the name of Cimmerians. There is reason to
believe that both branches were from a Cimmerian stock in proto-
Hungary (i.e. Pannonia) who named Si cambria (now Buda-Pest).
The migratory route from Pannonia would, therefore, have been
west into Veneti realms, for immediately south of the Veneti there
settled the "Umbrians," a term that smacks of "Cumbria" (see map
of Umbria).
"Pliny the Elder records that the Umbrians were said to
be the most ancient race of Italy" (Britannica). This corresponds
to pre-800 BC, for the Etruscans had arrived by then. We're clearly
dealing with the Gaul migration (i.e. "Hallstatt" Celts). The
question is, did the Cimbri of Wales originate from the Danish
branch of Cimmerians, or from the Italian branch from
Umbria/Venetia? Could the red color of the Welsh dragon indicate
Venetia, since the Tyrol symbol (north of Veneto) is a red dragon-
like phoenix, while the Anglo-Saxon dragon is depicted as a white
one?
If so, does the red color indicate the Phoenicians? I don't
think so anymore (as of June 2006), for the Phoenicians were
symbolized by the color purple/scarlet. It may be that the red
dragon was an indicator of Rod/Rhodes, and if true, it would
suggest that the white dragon was rooted in Gorgo-Cimmerians
outside of Rhodes. This is not to say that all Scandinavians were of
the white dragon; the Varangian Rus were of the Red Sun, and
therefore should be included in the red dragon lines. The political
color of Russia today is yet red.

118
Hercules was said to sail to Erytheia in the golden cup (i.e.
grail) of Helios, meaning that he was assisted in his war against
Geryon by Gorgons depicted by Helios. Or, the picture may
simply identify Hercules as those very golden-grail Gorgons.
Hercules himself wore a gold cup on his belt, and there is no doubt
in my mind that he represents a major aspect of the so-called Holy
Grail of Freemasonry...even though most Freemasons -- dummies
to the realities because their superiors feed them cow patties --
don't know it. Freemasons are taught to spread the rumor that the
Holy Grail pertains to Jesus, so as to connect the Rosicrucians to
Jesus, for this "public-relations" program plays well into their
struggle toward world rule as per the counterfeit Biblical
Millennium.
The eponym of Cilicia was made, by myth writers, "Cilix,"
atermhinL s"cale/gri.Thfotlygrai
of Freemasonry could denote Cilician bloodlines. Britannica
supports the well-established contention that Cilicia was settled by
Mycenaeans, but "Mycenaean" is an alternative term for
"Danaan"...because Perseus the Danaan founded Mycenae.
Upon defeating Geryon, Hercules brought the freed cattle
through Illyrium as far south as the Ionian sea, obviously headed
for Greece, before they got away from him and settled on the north
shores of the Black sea...in their ancient homeland of Taurus no
doubt. Hercules had "killed" (i.e. defeated in war) not only
Geryon, but his dog "Orthos," and the shepherd "Erytion," these
latter two terms once again evoking Erethlyn. And the daughter of
Geryon was named "Erythia" !
Keeping in mind that Perseus, though a Gorgon "himself,"
had fought a war with Gorgon Medusa, she being related to three
Gorgon sisters (i.e. tribes) of north Africa. And so we have this
similar report: "According to Diodorus Siculus, the hero
Heracles completely destroyed a race of woman warriors,
called the Gorgons (similar to the Amazons), in Libya."
http://www.timelessmyths.com/classical/heracles.html
The Strait of Gibraltar was not called the "Pillars of
Hercules" for nothing, rather showing that Hercules Gorgons
lived on both sides of the Strait. This very much evokes the
legends of both the Irish and Scots in which they claim descent
from Scythians crossing first from Africa to Spain, yet it would be
hasty to interpret Hercules as those Irish and Scots. Of the three
tribes of Scythians produced by the sexual encounter between
Hercules and the half-snake woman, one was "Gelonus,"
. the historical Alans and otherwise knownrepotdlyfing
by historians as a mayor tribe of Sarmations. This is significant
because the Sarmations are also called "Sauromatians" by
historical records (note that "sauros" means "lizard" in Greek),

119
which then places the Hercules-Geryon war prior to the historical
appearance of the Sarmations in about 600 BC. But as the Irish and
Scots came to Britain still later, Hercules could not have depicted
them.
In the Geryon myth, while Hercules was bringing the cattle
back to the Greek theater, he was not only taking a route through
southern France exactly where lived the Redones/Rhedae, but
afterward a certain Cacus stole some of the cattle from him (i.e.
had a military skirmish with him). This term not only evokes the
Gogi and Caucasia all at once, but Cacus lived on Mount
Aventine, one of the seven hills of Rome! The Harlot of
Revelation, though styled "Babylon the Great," is said to sit on all
seven hills (Revelation 17).
Unfortunately, I can't tell whether Cacus depicted Etruscans
or Romans, but prior to Cacus, as the myth goes, there were
"Ialybion" and "Dercynus" who attempted to steal the cattle
from Hercules. I first of all note that "Dercynus" evokes
"Tarchon," a major Etruscan tribe in Italy that may be named after
the city of Tarshish/Tarsus of Cilicia.
As for "Ialybion," he may refer to the Halybes (of the Halys
river, north of Cilicia), who were likely depicted by "Ialysos," the
son of Kerkaphos the son of Helios and Rhoda.
In Beowulf, a mythical poem filled with codewords, we find:
"Heorot, symbol of a new political order founded by a
providential king [of the Danes] (Davis 99), has been placed at
a village called Lejre."
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~cpercy/courses/1001Purnis.htm
"Heorot" evokes what the Irish called "Hirota" (i.e.
Haeredaland), and yet it was not the same location. This city was
in Denmark, in what is to this day the county of Roskilde ("kilde"
is Danish for "spring/fountain"), the latter at one time a major city
in which the Danes performed royal operations. Once again, as
Danes were connected to Haeredaland, so here at Heorot. It makes
me suspect that Danes were, not only from the British Danann, but
from the Redones. Note that the Roskilde coat of arms included
three roses.
Was there also a pre-cursor to Heorot in France, among the
Rhedae/Redone bloodline there? After all, the mythical
"Eridanus" was, surely, home to the Redones who lived on the
"Rhodanus" river (i.e. alternatively the Rhone river). I would
therefore suggest that the Danish nation can be traced through
Eridanus.
Eurystheus (the king who sent Hercules to free Geryon's
cattle) was made the son of "Sthenelus" (king of Mycenae). It's
first of all interesting that one of the Gorgon Medusa's two sisters
was labeled "Stheino." While Perseus and his mate Andromeda

120
gave birth to "Gorgophones" (at the time that the Medusa was
killed), the same couple also gave birth to Sthenelus ... indicating
that he was a distinct branch of Gorgons (i.e. to be distinguished
from the Gorgophones).
This is important in this story because Sthenelus was also
made (by myth writers) a king of Liguria, located in north Italy
(see map). Note in a quote above that Heorot "has been placed at a
village called Lejre "; that is, the two localities may have been
founded by the same peoples, by which consideration I might also
see Ligurians as co-founders of Haeredaland/Erethlyn.
It was the Ligurians that Hercules fought when he was
attacked by the two sons of Poseidon, Ialybion and Dercynus. In
other words, there was a family conflict going on from east to west
of Europe between Gorgons under the titles of Sthenelus and
Eurystheus on the one hand, and under the titles of Perseus and
Hercules on the other.
"Liguria" evokes "Lyko" and variations thereof that mean
"wolf" and pertain to Apollo. The connection of Liguria to Apollo
is supported by this statement: "[The Ligurians] honored the
Greek tradition of free state formations and preserved the
ancient Greek religious rites associated with the goddess
Artemis." Artemis was Apollo's twin sister.
The throne of Artemis was covered in wolf's hide, and
because she and the dog were fused, as well as for other reasons,
Artemis was from the same Verkana bloodline as Hecate and the
Gorgon Medusa. The people of Verkhana/Hyrcania (modern
Gorgan) were called "Hyrkanoi," "the wolves." Therefore, add
Liguria to the long list of wolf peoples, and thank the myth writers
for exposing the tracks of the Draco Line by their very use of
secret codes. Note that the German Wolf family crest uses a wheel.
To the end that Apollo and Artemis depicted the
Hyperboreans (no doubt the Gogi), we find that the son of
Sthenelus was tagged, "Cygnus/Cycnus." He too was made a
king in Liguria. Behold. In Ovid's Metamorphoses, we find this
concerning Cycnus:
"Now, though he had ruled the people and great cities
of Liguria, he left his kingdom, and filled Eridanus’s green
banks and streams...As he did so his voice vanished and
white feathers hid his hair, his long neck stretched out from
his body...So Cycnus became a new kind of bird, the swan."
http://www.auburn.edu/~downejm/Ovid/Metamorph2.htm#bktwo367
The implication of, "his voice vanished," is clear, that the
Apollo bloodline left Liguria for good and settled instead in the
valley of Eridanus. The swan represents Apollo, and in fact Apollo
was made the father of Cycnus in some myth versions. Moreover,

121
Apollo's mother Leto (i.e. Lydia) was also depicted as a swan,
suggesting that the Ligurians were, as were the Etruscans, from
Lydia.
And then there was "Leda" of Sparta who was also depicted
as a swan, and she was associated with the "Ladon" region of
Greece, while Ladon was the dragon that protected golden apples
somewhere in western Europe. It seems clear that "Ladon" refers
to the Latins, but why not also a Ladon connection to Ladinia in
northern Italy, home of the Rhaetians? Why not also a connection
to "Lado," god of the Slavs.
I don't see that the Ligurians became the Redones necessarily,
for the two may have been distinct at the time, even while earlier
related. But a Redone-Ligurian alliance/mix is certainly
expected... especially as Heorot (a Redone-based term) was located
at Lejre.
A Ligurian-Scandinavian connection is in the Ligurian
province of Savona (swan?), a term reflecting "Sviones" i.e. the
Swedes (see map showing Savona).
Ovid said that Cycnus and Sthenelus were kin to
"Phaethon," he being the son of Phoebus otherwise known as
Apollo in his capacity as sun god. In other versions, Phaethon is
the son of Helios. Phaethon could more specifically depict the
giant serpent Pythos that Apollo slew when entering Greece from
the far north; it was Gorgon versus Gorgon even then. Apollo's
mother (Leto) had as her mother "Phoebe," virtually the same as
"Phoebus." This term is said to mean "bright/full moon," evoking
the wolf, even as "bobo" (i.e. that looks like "Phoebe") means
"wolf."
Ares gave birth to Deimos and Phobos, twins, and knowing
that Apollo was Phoebus, I think you can agree with me that
Phobos was an Apollo peoples. For, while Apollo's twin sister was
Artemis, Ares' other child, Deimos, is evoked. Indeed, Artemis is
routinely connected to the Titan, Themis, and that would therefore
suggest that she ought to be understood as Ar-Themis. Having said
that, by which I mean to imply that Ares gave birth to the Gogi,
note that Ares is the father of "another" Cycnus of the Greek
theater (i.e. probably the same Cycnus peoples as those in Liguria).
Now here's the main point for those of you who have been
patient enough to wade through all of this serpent slush: Phaethon
was depicted as a peoples crashing the chariot (i.e. wheels) of the
Helios into the Eridanus river valley. It can't be a coincidence;
ridanus" (of the Redones”?) must be rooted in "wheel. E
Eridanus must therefore depict the Rhodes peoples descended
from Helios. If you don't believe that "Eridanus" means wheel,
behold the Gaul god, Mog Ruith:

122
"The one-eyed Celtic/Irish god of the sun who rides
through the sky in a shining bronze chariot, or who flies
through the sky like a bird. The word "Ruith" is possibly
derived from the Irish roth, meaning "wheel" (representing
the sun)" [italics not mine].
http://fullmoondeities.tripod.com/celtic.html
In this case, the sun god is modified to "Ruith," who must
be an eponym of the Ruthene/Ruotsi themselves, showing that
they came forth from the peoples depicted by the Greeks as
Phaethon/Apollo/Helios. The one-eyed concept of myth, being
code for Gogi in my strong opinion, was used and understood also
by the Celts, and no wonder since the Celts were the Gauls and
therefore with little doubt the extensions of the Galli cult that
invented the mythical concept in the first place (since the Galli cult
included the "Caucones/Kikons").
I noted that the kings of the Danes in the time of Beowulf
(6th century AD) were the historical Hrothgar and Hrothulf, both
evoking "Hros" but using the "th" version that furnished
"Ruthene." Indeed, see that king "Hrothkar" evokes the
Rodskarlar family in Sweden that became the Ruotsi, but who
called themselves the Varangian Rus. It's beginning to look as
though the Varangians, though from Sweden at the time that they
migrated to Kiev, were not Swedes proper, but Danes. This tends
to make me connect the Varangians more directly to the British
Danann (who were from the Redones) rather than to the Redones
of France.
Britannica says that the Rhone river in France was also
called "Rhodanus," a term evoking not only the proto-Rus, but
the "unknown" region of Eridanus. As the Redones were also
called "Rennes," it would explain the alternative name of the
Rhodanus river.
To help prove that the Danes were the founders of both
Haeredaland (Norway) and Erethlyn in Wales, Britannica
equates Haeredaland with modern Hordaland while the peoples of
Welsh Erethlyn are called "Ordovices." And "Ordo" evokes
Geryon's dog, Orthos, so that Geryon's home is not only identified
as Erethlyn, but he himself seems to depict (proto-)Danes.
Hordaland is today twinned with the capital city of Wales, Cardiff
(see Cardiff Arms).
The Ordovices of Erethlyn lived where the north-Wales
kingdom of Gwynedd (in south Mona) was situated. And behold,
Gwynedd must have been related to the Veneti, for it was earlier
called "Venedotia"!
http://www.hostkingdom.net/wales.html

123
It can't be a coincidence that Venedotia reflects "Veneti" so
well, the latter having "Venedi" as an alternative spelling. But
there's even an intermediate link between the Veneti of Italy and
the Venedotia of Wales because Gwynedd looks a lot like
"Gwenea," that latter term referring to a city in Brittany which
was also called "Vannes." I noted that in north Africa there was a
people by the name of "Guinea," a term almost-exactly
"Gwenea."
Although the Redones stemmed from the Rhaetian-Veneto
region, the extent of Redone involvement in Vannes and Gwynedd
remains foggy in my mind. There also remains the unanswered
question of whether the Ruthene -- who founded Rosellon (in
France) -- were the founders of Roslin, Scotland. Rollo the Dane
andhispeolvNrway(i.ehHdlnwas
located), and as the Rollo Vikings were St. Clairs while Roslin
was overseen by St. Clairs, Roslin can be identified as a plausible
Ruthene settlement if Rollo can be connected to the Ruthene.
The mythical mother of the Vanir gods was "Vanadis,"
wherfotVanic ohetismard
fortified concrete. Moreover, the Vanir were represented (i.e. led)
by the Scandinavian wolf god, Loki, and behold that the Vandals
are traced by historians to the Lugii/Lygii peoples who must have
been related to, if not one and the same as, the Ligurians. The
Lugii are thought to be related to the Lingones who lived in both
French and Italian Gaul, and this does evoke the Ligurians ... who
(according to myth as shown above) moved from Italian Gaul to
French/Eridanus Gaul.
But this still doesn't connect the Danes to the Redones, but
only as far as the Veneti and the Ligurians. Rollo's connection to
the Veneti is important, however, as per the previous chapter
wherein I hypothesized that Rollo and the Merovingians shared the
same root. In fact, the Merovingians were rooted in the Veneti by
their own admission.
Because the Western-Slav Rus were the result of the Vandals,
those Slavs are thus rooted in the Veneti, for which reason the
Varangian Rus are expected to be rooted in the Veneti. And it is
this that causes me to view the Varangians as Vanir and therefore
as Danir/Danes, for "Vanir" is a version of "Danir." Until I can
make a solid connection between the Veneti and the Redones,
therefore, I cannot connect the Danes to the Redones (or their
descendants, the Ruthene). Again, while the Ligurians can be
connected to the Veneti, it is not known whether the Ligurians
became the Redones, or merely went to live in their Rhodanus
territory.
It's important for me to know whether the Veneti who
founded Vannes and the Gwynedd kingdom, which I interpret as

124
Western Atlantis, were the Redones. For I am half convinced
already that Vannes was founded by Merovingians. Just because
the Merovingians were socializing and scheming in Redone-
founded cities doesn't necessitate Redone blood in the
Merovingians.
Both the Merovingians and the Arthurian legends ^^were
obsessed with the holy grail, an item that refers to a holy
bloodline i.e. their own bloodline. And so the wheels of my mind
are turning.
Take a look at the Celtic Cross and see if it doesn't remind
you of a chariot wheel.

125
THE GOATS OF HERMES
WERE NOT GOATS

Jordanes said that the Ister river was named by the "Bessi"
tribeofThacns,uwigtebnhBsiadte
goddess, Ishtar, the so-called Great Mother of the Heavenly
Dragon. How close, therefore, were the Bessi to the core of the
Sumerian dragon cult? Are we to trace the Europe-ward dragon
bloodline primarily through the Bessi and their relatives?
Indeed, among the Bessi were a Dionysus-worshiping
peoples called "Satrae," who were obviously the Satan-important
peoples depicted by the Satyr creatures of Greek myth, one of
which was Pan, son of Hermes. Indeed, indeed, for Herodotus said
that the Bessi were the priestly class among the Satrae. Plus, the
Bessi were called "mountain wolves."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessi.
As Strabo said that the Getae Thracians lived on both sides of
the Ister river, and as I suspect that the Bessi Thracians had been
of the Busae/Bese/Buzi branch of Medes, how closely related were
the Iranian ancestors of the Bessi Thracians to the Guti Iranians?
As I define the Guti/Getae as the mythical goats, should I likewise
view the Bessi as goats? Or were the Bessi depicted by yet another
animal? The bee? Yes, I think the bee.
While Pan was made a "Satyr" by the Greek myth writers, the
Scandinavian pantheon of gods included "Satr," suggesting that
certain Scandinavians were from the Hermes-Pan bloodline. It
seems apparent that the Greek-to-Scandinavia link was to some
extent through the peoples of Pannonia (now Hungary), for the
following reasons.
In the case of the Greek version of Satyrs, the creatures were
made half goat for a reason. If Pan refers to the Poeni (i.e. the
Phoenicians), couldn't the goat in him refer the Getae portion of a
Poeni-Getae alliance that had formed? I don’t think it would be at
all off the mark to suggest that a Poeni-Getae alliance produced a
new and historically-important peoples of Pannonia. Moreover, as
the Satrae branch of Thracians lived between the Nestus/Nestos
and Strymon rivers, Pan probably depicted the Paeoni(ans) of the
Strymon. Myth writers made Pannonius (symbol of Pannonia) the
son of an Illyrian tribe (Autarieus), and because his alternative
name was "Paeon," Pannonians were one and the same, the Paeoni.
The Greek-to-Scandinavian connection would in this picture
involve both a Getae-to-Goth link and a Pan-to-Van(ir) link.

126
I struggled with the similarities between "Poeni" and
"Paeoni" because the Paeoni are not regarded by all as the
Poeni/Phoenicians. That being the case, where/who are the
Phoenicians that founded Europe as per the Zeus-Europa myth? In
that it is well known that the Paeonians were very important in the
European migrations, it seems to me that they were none other
than the Europa Phoenicians. But if not, the problem yet remains
as to which of the two Pan may have depicted.
"Poeni" was a term used by Romans to speak of Phoenicians
that had founded Carthage, and Roman myth included the Trojan
ruler, Aeneas, as part of the Carthaginian make-up. Then consider
Herodotus’ statement that the Paeoni were of the Teucrian
(Togarmite?)scfjn,adoehsurt nmake
the Poeni-Paeoni equation. Moreover, in a previous chapter I gave
details of certain Teucrian Trojans fleeing Troy (in the Trojan war)
and settling in Phoenicia.
It is known that the Paeoni were related to the Mysians,
while the Mysians, settled right next door to Lydia, were relatives
of the Lydians, meaning that the Paeonians were definitely of the
dragon bloodline and quite possibly, as were the Lydians, directly
related to the Biblical Gog .
[Update August 2006 -- The Middle-Eastern root of the
Mysians, both ethnically and linguistically, is therefore important.
Late last month, I found a certain mount Masius in the Akkadian
region of Gozan to be important to the Dionysus peoples. It is said
that this mountain was named by Mash, son of Aram and brother
of Gether (Genesis 10:23). The latter name will soon be exposed
in this book to be the very basis of the dragon cult. In fact, the
mythical god, Aether (= sky) may have been none other than
Gether, and do note, therefore, that since “mushus” meant
snake/dragon, that Mash and Gether together may have been the
foundation of the phrase, Heavenly Dragon. Aether was Uranus in
Greek myth. End Update]
I realize that equating "goat" with "Goth" and “Getae” may
strike the reader a little simplistically, for which reason I’ll show
here that various foreign words for goat do reflect those people
names. The Danish goat is "ged"; the Swedish goat is "get,"; and
both the Dutch and the Norwegian goats are "geit.” Moreover, and
I don’t think that this is a coincidence, the Greek goat is "tragos,"
evokingbthTrjasd"Dco.BehltaSnskri
(i.e. quasi-Aryan) goat is "mesha” i.e. like "Meshech" [and
Mash].
see http://www.geocities.com/mprnair/
[Update June 2006 -- Remnants of websites no longer active
show these quotes: "many were converted either willingly or by
force to the Khazar religion. ... To them, the goat was a symbol

127
of the name Koza..." and "The meaning of the last name of
Miss Koza is "goat." I mention this here because I'm in the
throws of tying the dragon line to proto- Khazars (Kassites) who
lived in the Zagros mountains, and because I suspect that these
mountains were inhabited by Kassites/Guti who had everything to
do with the Hebrew/Semite region of Goza(n). End Update]
What may be still more interesting is that one version of male
"goat" in Hungarian is "bakkecske," a term that looks like
"Bacchus," the Roman alternative for Dionysus. Indeed,
according to my dictionary, the Old English ""bucca" (from which
our "buck" derives) means "he-goat"! Yet online definitions given
for "Bacchus" by myth experts say nothing of this sort, regardless
of the logic, leading me to believe that the online myth experts are
purposely deceiving their readers with false meanings of terms.
Consider also that another name for Dionysus was “Zagreus,” an
obvious clue as to the Zagros origins of the peoples he depicted,
and yet not one online myth website mentioning this term has
come out to make that connection.
Bacchus was worshipped by the Edoni(an) Thracians, and
because these Edones were made to stem from a certain "Dryas"
"Dryalus" cult, there must have been a whiletPaonrf
close Edoni-Paeoni relationship. If the Getae were the Edones, as I
believe, then this relationship should prove to be the Paeoni-Getae
alliance that Pan depicted. In this way, both Pan and Hermes were
rooted in Dryas/Dryalus. There was a Centaur by the name of
Dryalus, and because Centaurs are at times portrayed with the ears
of Satyrs, they were a peoples related to the Satrae Thracians.
Because Dryalus was depicted in war with a pine tree for a spear,
he and all other Centaurs are revealed as descendants of Attis, for
the symbol of Attis was the pine tree.
It would be a good idea for you to skim a long quote showing
that the very dragon-line peoples I have been tracing are
consistently connected to a peoples associated with the wolf. I did
not take this list of nations and subsequently decide that it was the
dragon line, but rather after discovering the dragon line myself and
finding also that it was symbolized by the wolf, I found the quote
as substantiation for my findings . The author mentions nothing
about the dragon line wherefore his treatment of the subject is not
in any consideration of my topic. The italics are mine to emphasize
the peoples that I have been tracing to the dragon, but note also
terms evoking the Danes:
"According to Strabo, the original name of the Dacians
wasdoi.AtrnpevdbyHschiunform
that daos was the Phrygian word for 'wolf.' P. Kretschmer
had explained daos by the root *dhäu, 'to press, to squeeze,
to strangle.' Among the words derived from this root we

128
may note the Lydian Kandaules, the name of the Thracian
Illyrian dhaunos (wolf), the godwargod,Knthe
Daunus, and so on. The city of Daous-dava, in Lower
Moesia, between the Danube and Mount Haemus, literally
meant 'village of wolves.' Formerly, then, the Dacians called
themselves 'wolves' or 'those who are like wolves,' who
resemble wolves. Still according to Strabo, certain nomadic
Scythians to the east of the Caspian Sea were also called
daoi. The Latin authors called them Daliae, and some Greek
historians daai. In allrobability
p their ethnic name was
derived from Iranian ( Saka) dahae, 'wolf.' But similar
names were not unusual among the Indo Europeans. South
of the Caspian Sea lay Hyrcania, that is, in Eastern Iranian
'Vehrkana, ' in Western Iranian 'Varkana,' literally the
'country of wolves' (from the Iranian root vehrka, 'wolf').
The nomadic tribes that inhabited it were called Hyrkanoi,
'the wolves,' by Greco-Latin authors. In Phrygia there was
the tribe of the Orka (Orkoi).
"We may further cite the Lycaones of Arcadia, and
Lycaonia or Lucaonia in Asia Minor, and especially the
Arcadian Zeus Lykaios and Apollo Lykagenes; the latter
surname has been explained as 'he of the she-wolf,' 'he born
of the she-wolf,' that is, born of Leto in the shape of a she-
wolf."
http://www.members.tripod.com/dacians1/dacians.htm
In J.H. Round's book, "Origin of the Stewarts," he writes
concerning "Flaad", commonly recognized as a patriarch of the
Scottish Stewarts but apparently having variable names such as
"Flanchu," a man whom Round says was "known to his Irish
kinsmen as Fleadan." He writes further:
"Fleanchus ... is the Latinised form of Flann-chu, the
Red or Ruddy Dog ... and is also a sobriquet - the
Bloodhound. This nomenclature is evidently a reminiscence
of the dog-totem or dog-divinity, etc...
"...dog-totems, arrayed in the Stewart tartan, and
feasting, with fiery visage, on pancakes in the streets of Dol
etc."
http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/sources/round/stewarts1.shtml
[Update June 2006 -- I have found (this month) that the
Stewarts trace to Khazar rulers called "kagans,” and/or perhaps to
Khazar cousins who used a similar term to describe themselves.

129
It's perhaps pertinent that "khan," a common alternative of
"kagan," resembles the Latin dog, "cano(s).”
The following quote from a website (no longer active) shares
alternatives for the two royalty titles (kagan and beg) used by
Khazar administrations: "Gyula and Kende denoting the ancient
Khazar double kingship terms..." The "kende" term matches the
"Kandaules" and "Kandaon" dog-terms mentioned in the above
quote; Kandaules was a king of Lydia/Mysia. Moreover,
Wikipedia writes (Italics mine): "Contemporary Arab historians
related that the Khagan was purely a spiritual ruler or
figurehead with limited powers, while the Bek was responsible
for administration and military affairs."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khagan_bek
This priest-definition of a kagan has significance because the
Cohen surname, to which I have rooted the Stewarts (details later),
is with very little doubt in my mind a variation of “kagan.” It can’t
be a coincidence that “cohen” means “priest,” as anyone with the
Cohen name will verify; in fact, the Biblical priest is “kahan” and
“kohen” (Strong’s #3547 and 3548 respectively). Others have
pointed out that the Khazar form of government reflects the
modern style of Illuminati-run states, where Illuminatists are the
invisible rulers pulling the strings of the visible politicians/kings.
One may then consider viewing the Bessi Thracians as the
kagans/illuminatists of the Satrae Thracians. Because I identify the
Dryas Edones as the proto- Druid priests, I would suggest that the
very concept of Illuminati is rooted in the Dryas rulers. Indeed, for
“dryas” means “oak,” which was the symbol of Zeus, who was
depicted with a third (all-seeing) eye. End Update]
The Ister river was renamed the Danube river (possibly by
the proto-Danes as they passed through Pannonia). From Thrace it
led (upstream) into Pannonia and Buda. There is solid
confirmation in the Dacians (inhabiting the region) that this
migratory route was taken by the Getae (because it is known that
the Getae and Dacians were the same peoples). The term,
“Dacian,” aside from appearing to mean, “dog people,” may stem
from Dagon, a god situated in Israel around Gath, the inhabitants
of which the Bible calls, "Gittites" (see Dacia map).
Jordanes (a Goth historian) had no bones about connecting
the Getae to the Goths, and he has the Goths migrating at one point
from "Scandza" to the Azov sea (then Lake Maeotis):
We read that on their first migration ["from Scandza")
the Goths dwelt in the land of Scythia near Lake Maeotis.
On the second migration they went to Moesia, Thrace and
Dacia..."
http://www.acs.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/jordgeti.html

130
Jordanes then goes on to say that the Goths of the
second/Thrace migration had "Zalmoxes" as their ruler, the god
that was worshiped specifically by the Getae and Dacians. I would
suggest that they ended up in Maeotis because their ancestors had
lived there; they in turn had been from Armenia long before any of
them ever entered Scandinavia. Jordanes doesn t mention the
Goth-Armenian connection outright, yet he implies it succinctly
when he copies Lucan: "They string Armenian bows with Getic
cords."
Jordanes then echoes Pompeius Trogus who wrote that the
Getae had stemmed from thearthi Pans. The Comarians of Aria
(Iran) come to mind because the Goths were responsible for
Odin’s Aesir cult. The Comarians-come-Cimmerians lived at
Azov, a sea said to be named after the "Aes/As," a metal-weilding
peoples that are equated by some with the Cimmerians themselves.
"Aes/As" is a term associated with the Manes-to-Attis bloodline,
in particular "Asies," mythical son of Cotys. Some report that the
very term "Asia" was founded in the peoples depicted by Asies.
[Update August 2006 – I’ve argued that Cotys depicted the
Getae, but it should be understood that he depicted Getae ancestors
as well, and while I have mentioned several times that they were
the Guti, I would now include the Cutha Hebrews/Semites of
Gozan and their branch in proto-Israel: the pre-Philistine Gittites
of Gath. End Update]
After discussing Amazonian women (the same ones whom
Herodotus had joined to Gargarian men in the region of Colchis
and Armenia), Jordanes asks of his own historical work, "Why
does a story which deals with the men of the Goths have so
much to say of their women?" In other words, Jordanes revealed
the Getae/Goths as descended from Amazons, the very Amazons
that Herodotus claimed sailed from the south to north shore of the
Black sea, to Azov. But the Amazons were a Meshech peoples, I
have found, and so I would not view Goths as a strictly Cimmerian
peoples, but as a Gomer-Meshech mix.
[Update August 2006 -- The question is, were the
Gargarians/Gorgons the Gomerians of that mix, the Meshech, or
likewise a Gomerian-Meshech mix? Or, were they a third peoples
altogether? I have enough "smarts" on this subject now to
confidently proclaim that the Gorgons were the foundation of the
Latin/Lydian culture/peoples, even the Ladon/Lotan dragon of
myth whom in historical terms were the Laz peoples of Colchis.
The goddess, Laz, was given Nergal as her husband, and he just
happened to be the god of the Cutha peoples ... who were the goats
of Gozan, and heavily stocked with pre-Israel Hebrew/Semite
blood. More on this later. I’ve also become smart to the idea that

131
the Eden cult was based in the Cutha-come-Edones, and that Goths
can be rooted in the Cutha(h) (of Mesopotamia). End Update]
Jordanes then says that the Getae, in the time (6th century
BC) of Cyrus (king of Persia), moved to Moesia , and in about 100
BC he has them further west in "Gothia," which the historian
defines as Dacia (i.e. not Sweden though it too was "Gothia"). The
Moesi (on the Danube) were the ancestors of the
Lydians/Mysians !
The Goths that had not partaken in the migration away from
Scandinavia, to Azov, who had remained behind in Gotland
(Sweden), were later revealed by historical writings as the
"Gautoi" and the "Geats." They are to be slightly distinguished
from the Swedes ("Sweon"), however. Tacitus said that the
Swedes lived beside the "Sitones," and that " ...Sitones resemble
the Suiones in all respects except that the Sitones have a
woman as ruler." The Sitones can be traced to the "Sithone"
branchofEdes,migtahSoneswrlik
Amazons/Meshech (at least in part).
Britannica tells that “the Jutes are the Eotens of the Anglo-
Saxon poem Beowulf.” Venantius Fortunatus called the Jutes,
"Euthiones," again evoking the Edones. Some theorists insist that
Odin came from the Goths rather than the Swedes, and I take this
position since I'm convinced that "Woden/Odin" was derived
from "Edoni/Eoten." One can see how the Swedes under the rule
of Gotland would have mixed with Goths, or how the Sitones
would have mixed with the Suiones, and therein would be
explained the worship of Odin by Swedes as well as Goths. In
other words, the Goths and Swedes came from the same
root...whatever Odin and the Aesir pantheon represented.
Pan was associated with Dionysus in Thebes, and this city
was the only continental Greek home of the Galli cult, also called
the "Kabeiri" cult of Hephaistos. Cadmus (the son of Phoenix,
and therefore a Phoenician) was king in Thebes, and, some say, its
founder. Britannica says that Hermes "is often identified
with ... Cadmilus, one of the Cabeiri." Some websites equate
Cadmilus with Cadmus. The myth writers made Cadmus king of
Thebes through the help of a dragon. Consider also that Cadmus'
wife, Harmonia, was a daughter of Aphrodite [Apiru-dite?], wife
of Hephaistos.
[Update August 2006 -- Harmonia therefore depicted Hebrew
and Semite (esp. Arameans) peoples who initiated the Kabeiri cult.
“Apiru” is an historical term referring to the non-Israelite
Hebrews of Akkadia/Mesoptamia. To indicate the Aryan side of
this dragon bloodline, Harmonia was made the daughter of Ares,
he being a depiction of the Hros/Rus of Caucasia. This means that
the Hros were mixed with the Apiru. As "Cadmus" would imply,

132
those Apiru were either the Cutha themselves, or inter-married
with the Cutha ("Cati" when in the Phoenician-Cilician theater).
End Update]
Harmonia must be the dragon itself, the teeth of which
became the rulers of Thebes, for her father was the chief dragon
that put forth the dragon that Cadmus slew.
Dionysus was the son of Semele (or " Zemelo," a
Thracian/Phrygian goddess), she being a Phoenician-Thracian mix
because she was daughter to Cadmus and Harmonia. We thus see
Hermes -- because he was associated with Dionysus -- very
closely associated with Cadmus and Harmonia, this being
important because it is generally understood that Europe was
founded by this couple, or, at least, that the Celts were founded by
them. In other words, Europe is based in Hermes and Harmonia.
“Harmonia” is essentially "Armenia," and one could equate
Hermes with Harmonia on the similarity of terms alone. Certainly,
if Hermes depicted an Armenian people in Greece, Pan, as his son,
would depict the same, albeit further on in time and mixed with
other peoples. In historical fact according to Britannica, Lake Van
was named after the "Biaina" peoples, who could have modified
over time and over geography to "Poeni." Or to "Paeoni." Or to
Pan.
We find in a myth that the mythical Prometheus was tied to
a Caucasus mountain by either Bia or Hermes, depending on the
myth writer, suggesting that Bia and Hermes were the same, even
the Bia peoples of Armenia.
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/Prometheus1.html
To support that Prometheus was a peoples that ventured to
the extreme ends of the known world (i.e. to Britain), "NASA's
nuclear power and propulsion technology development
program for the exploration of the outer planets is called
Project Prometheus" (italics mine).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus
Hermes, I deduce, depicted the Cotys migration (of
Armenians) along the south shore of the Black sea, and we see that
they arrived as far as Lydia (on the western end of Asia Minor),
for just a couple of miles from the Lydian capital (Sardis) was the
Hermus river. But this river was also called "Gadiz," similar to
"Cotys," wherefore myth does not surprise us where Cotys
brought forth "Lydus" (technically, Lydus was the son of Attis
son of Cotys), the mythical symbol of Lydia.
[Update June 2006 -- I have recently tied Gades, an Atlantean
city in western Spain, to the same family of "Cati/Katziri"
peolswhutfrKazs.Ihvemoridntf
their root in the "Cutha" Kabalists of Agade , that latter term being
an ancient form of "Akkadia/Accadia." I would not hesitate, and in

133
fact I will attempt to prove, that the same Hermes Arcadians who
founded Gadiz in Lydia were the same dragon, Ladon, found in
western Atlantis. The two regions should be understood
respectively as A-Cuthia and Ar-Cuthia, while Cadmus should be
understood as Cutha-Mus. End Update]
Some Phrygians moved to Greece on the one hand as Hermes
the goat line, and on the other as Apollo the wolf line. The Hermes
line became centered at Arcadia and the wolf line immediately to
the south in Laconia/Sparta ("Laco" means “wolf"). That these
two lines merged and intermarried is evident. For example, Leda's
daughter, Helen (of Troy), gave birth to Hermion, evoking a
branch of Hermes even though Leda was a Spartan.
The Trojan war began when Paris stole Helen from Sparta
(keep in mind that Helen was not a person but a peoples). It is
thought that the Trojans depicted by Paris, upon losing the war and
fleeing from Troy, probably partook in the Celt/Gaul migration
under discussion, and settling in France, they named the city of
Paris (and perhaps nearby Troyes).
The Romans came from both the wolf and Hermes lines
(since Romans worshipped both Mercury and Apollo). They
equated Odin with Mercury, and the same comparison is made
where "Wednesday" is named after Woden while the Latins and
the French called that same day of the week after Mercury.
[Update August 2006 -- Now that I know the root of Odin in
the Cutha, I can also root Hermes in the Cutha. That is, the Hermes
migration along the southern side of the Black sea was the
Cati/Cutha migration, even the same as that which named Cadmus,
for indeed some have equated Hermes with Cadmus. To explain
the difference in terms, I would suggest that the Armenian
(probably Aramean) side of the bloodline used “Hermes,” while
the Cutha side of the bloodline used “Cadmus.” This of course
requires that the Arameans and Cutha were either one and the
same peoples, or so strongly allied/mixed that they became a
single peoples. Keep in mind that Josephus pegged Hul, son of
Aram, as the founder of Armenia, while one may easily discover
(by means to be shown later) the root of the Kabala in “Kether,”
whicmustrefoG,Hl'bther.Consida "-
Mus" may have been formed to reflect Cutha-Mash, for Mash was
yet a third brother. I should also mention here that I have recently
(last month) traced the Kabala to the Spartans by independent
means, to be explained later. End Update]
The German historian Tacitus said that Germans worshiped
their ancestors "Tuisto" and his son "Mannus," where "Tuisto"
might once again be an allusion to Hermes, for he was "Thoth" to
the Egyptians and "Taaut/Taut" to the Phoenicians. This could
reveal that Hermes was viewed as the father of Manes, which

134
makes great sense where both gods depicted Armenia. Behold that
one of the three trunks of Mannus, according to Tacitus the
German historian, were the "Herminones." May we ask if these
Germanics were rooted in Hermion, Spartan offspring of Leda?
In “Bloodline of the Holy Grail, ' a modern book concerned
with the dragon blood of the Stewarts/Merovingians, there is this
claim: "The Sicambrian Franks, from whose female line the
Merovingians emerged, were associated with Grecian
Arcadia..." This implies that all Franks had been descencded from
Arcadia, the birthplace of Hermes. His being made born there in
no way discredits my theory that Hermes depicted Armenia
beforehand, for the gods were older than the people who
worshipped them, and the god was often an honoring of ancestors
from a previous homeland. I view the birth of Hermes in Arcadia
as indicating the chief Greek settlement of the Armenian branch
depicted by Hermes.
It is thought that "Tuisto" was the Norse god, "Ymir," that
latter term a valid variation of "Gamir," an historically-popular
designation for Gomerians/Cimmerians. Ymir was made the father
of the Vanir giant, "Aegir" (still of the Norse gods), yet this term
seems to depict the Aegean sea. Indeed, for Aegir was made the
sea god. Aside from Ymir there was a "Gymir" mountain god
(still of Norse myth) that is equated with Aegir. Moreover, Aegir
was also known as "Hler," and this is a German term said to be
relating to the Cimmerian sea of Azov, perhaps from Hul/Ul, son
of Aram (Genesis 10:23. If that's not enough, Aegir was also
"Hymir" (linguistically the same as "Gymir")...the father of the
war god, Tyr, and the husband of "Hrod." That latter term evokes
the Heorot Danes and Haeredaland, even the Aereda/Redones of
Hros roots.
The dragon of Greek myth that helped Cadmus to secure
Thebes turned up in the Golden-Fleece myth, and in fact the
dragon was the Golden-Fleece bloodline itself, namely, the Ares
Aeetes of Colchis (in Georgia) belongedblodinetwhckg
(Ares, it is well understood, was an Amazon patriarch, wherefore I
view him as a Meshech entity, at least in part).
[Remember later on tha t the Scandinavians/Germanics stem
from the elements engaged with Thebes and Aeetes, for I will later
identify the two terms as Kabalists among Aryan bedfellows.]
Upon leaving to Colchis to pick up his crown (as mythology
goes), Aeetes had left behind in Greece the sons of Hermes to
continue his business there, suggesting a close relationship
between the Aeetes peoples and Hermes. Indeed, the Golden
Fleece was depicted as the pelt of a ram, while Hermes, according
to Britannica, was known as "the ram bearer." Moreover, it is
Hermes who is shown assisting the rider of the Golden Ram when

135
the rider was in the throws of escaping to Colchis. That rider was
named "Phrixus," a term that must surely imply that certain
Phrygians were the Golden-Fleece (i.e. dragon) line.
The staff of Hermes was called by the Latin term, a
"caduceus", and so just take a look at that symbol and see if it
isn't surely a symbol of the Mushussu dragon. The caduceus is a
staff entwined by serpents, and the staff depicts the Hermes' penis,
and that of his ancestors, the "sacred" bloodline.
[Update June 23 2006 – Behold evidence that Hermes
depicted Armenian peoples, for I just learned of a people-group of
Cadusii (Greek "Cadousioi") on the south-west shores off the
Caspain sea, close indeed to Verkana (modern Gorgan) on the
south-east tip of that same sea. Armenia was on the south-west
side of the Caspian, and so there you have it, the origin of Hermes
in the Cadusi Armenians. What do we suppose "Cadus" refers to? I
say, the Cutha/Cati/Katziri Kabalists! End Update]
This symbol is probably the same as the Dionysus staff called
"thyrsos"; a look at this ancient illustration of a Dionysus
Maenad (possibly a depiction of a transvestite) reveals how the
staff was viewed as a penis. The wings at the top of the caduceus
depict the wings of the dragon, but they must also depict Atti(s)
sincethpo(adr)thepfysowa
depiction of Attis (some say that the Christmas tree derives from
Attis). This makes sense if Atti(s) was a variation of "Utu," but
Atti(s), by that particular title, was a god peculiar to Phrygia.
The wings on the boots of Hermes (Mercury to the Romans)
are therefore a symbol of the Utu-dragon bloodline. The caduceus
was twined with two ribbons, and it just so happens that the
thyrsos was topped also with vines or ivy. Thus, the ivy and the
ribbons were a depiction of the two snakes that were the symbols
of the Utu cult, the snakes probably depicting the two sacred
families (Ishtar and Tammuz) from their respective cities of Eridu
and Uruk/Erech.
The caduceus is used as a logo by the American Medical
Association, albeit with a single serpent. It is used by other
organizations as well. I found that there was also a Celtic
Caduceus, speaking to the Celt-Greek connection.
http://www.crystalinks.com/caduceus.html
It should also be mentioned that Roman Catholicism at times
depicts the Communion wafer (i.e. the "body of Christ") with
striations emanating in all directions so that the wafer, being round
as it is, appears un-coincidentally as the sun (god). That is, they
merge Christ with the sun god to this day. This polluting of Jesus
with the sun god is a common theme in secret societies, and it's a
way for the secret societies to get their dragon-based concepts
accepted by society at large. The same public-relation tactic may

136
be in play when the dragon bloodline ties itself to the blood of
Jesus and Mary Magdalene.
The Paeonians "worshiped the sun in the form of a small
round disk fixed on the top of a pole."
http://94.1911encyclopedia.org/P/PA/PAEONIA.htm
The Paeonians are thus revealed as part of the
caduceus/Hermes bloodline. The other peoples in their midst (upon
the Strymon river) are suspect as the same, especially the Edones.
The priests of the British dragon lines were the Druids. Now
it just so happens that in Greek myth there was a king
"Lycurgus/Lycourgos" in Thrace and also one in Arcadia/Sparta,
and I do think that this term depicts the same "Loki/Lykos/etc"
wolf peoples that became the Ligurians of Italy en route to their
forming the Redones of Merovingian-France importance. King
Lycurgus of Thrace was "son of Dryas ("Oak-Man")," and
"king of the Edonians, who dwell beside the river Strymon."
http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/classics/hansen/myth99di.htm
To be exact, the Edonians lived between the Nestus and
Strymon rivers, but so also did the Satrae tribe of Thracians live
between those two rivers. Again, the religious leaders among the
Satrae were the Bessi tribe of Thracians. If these were the proto-
Druids, then the Druids proper (of Britain) may have descended
from the Buzi/Busae Medes.
[Update June 2006 -- The picture developing in my mind is
that the Bessi were rooted in the Cutha since the Edones were so
rooted. As I've found the Cohens to be at the root of the dragon
line, and since the Cohens are "Jews," might the Bessi priests have
been cohens from the Hebrew, Buz, son of Nahor? Did the Cohen
surname form as a result of describing the Bessi-Hebrew priests?
If so, wouldn't the Druids stem from the same Cohen/Hebrew
root? A startling thought for those Cohens today who claim to be
from the Levites. But this is exactly the purpose of this book, to
expose the false claims of Kabala/Rosicrucian cults, that they
derive in Israelite and/or Christian elements. End Update]
Doesn't an Oak peoples in Thrace by the name of "Dryas"
evokthDruidsw,nBaekows"Mnfth
Oak." This was the sacred tree of Zeus, and Hermes was made a
son of Zeus. An ancient version of "Dryas" was "Dryad," and, in
Greek myth, "Dryad" was the designation for "Nymphs of the
Oaks."
http://www.serrestown.com/uk/istoria/i1.html
[Update June 2006 – I don’t think the Druids were named
after oak trees, but rather the oak became a symbol of the Druids
in that their “Dryas/Dryad” designation sounded like the word for
“oak.” As the Dorians are seen by some historians as
Macedonians , while there is good reason for identifying the

137
Macedonians as Mac -Edones, couldn't the Dryas peoples have
been Dorians since Dorians are said to derive from "Doris"?
Moreover, the mythical Poly dora was mother to Dryops ...so that
one could justify expanding that term to "Dori-ops."
Wouldn't this then identify the Ligurians as Dorians since
Dryas was made to give birth to Lycurgus? This fits very well with
my other theory, that the mythical Thorri of Gotland were Dorians.
I would repeat here that the ruler of Gotland following Thorri was
depicted as "Nor," a possible allusion to Nahorites.
I'm suggesting that Redones (Ligurian allies) were Nahorites
along with the mythical "Gorlois" (Carolingians) of Wales, both of
which were Tuatha-de-Danann peoples that, as the mythical Nor
and Gor, sailed to proto-Norway to found the Danes proper, who
in turn mixed with Thorri Goths/Jutes to produce the
Saxons/Pomeranians that would contribute solidly to the
Merovingian bloodline. End Update ]
Jutes are often lumped in with Saxons and Angles simply
because they shared similar territories, but I view the Jutes as
distinct, an earlier peoples in Scandinavia, even the Goths, the
fathers of the Germanics. That is, the Goths became the Swedes
from whom the Saxon and Anglo Germanics stemmed. The
Britannica statement, "the Jutes are the Eotens of the Anglo-
Saxon poem Beo wulf),” tends to confirm that the Jutes were a
Getae branch from Thrace (i.e. "Getae" easily modifies to
"Eotens"). Knowing, as Britannica puts it, that Mona (Wales) was
"a famous center of the Druid religion," and that the locality of
Great Ormos was at Mona, behold the following quote proving
both that Edonians were of the Manes (father of Cotys) line and
that Cotys depicted Getae Thracians: "Kotys: A Thracian
goddess. The cult of Kotys was worshiped by the Edonians..."
http://www.timelessmyths.com/classical/thracian.html#Kotys)
Now if the Getae and the Edonians were thereby the same
peoples, then the Getae were likewise related to Dryus/Dryad,
wherefore it's not surprising that the Druids were called
"Gutuatri"! If that's not enough, the Druid goddess was
"Eadon."
What I am suggesting is that the Stewarts were descended
from the Edonians because the Eaton surname traces itself to
Stewart blood, or vice versa. It is now significant that the Jutes
appeared in Germany/Denmark along with the appearance of the
Saxons and Angles, for an Eaton-family website says: "the family
surname of Eaton is shown in the ancient manuscripts and
cartularies as tracing their ancestry to Anglo Saxon origin."
http://www.eatongenealogy.com/blackeaton2.html
The evasiveness of the Eaton family is clear in that they don't
as much as mention possible ties to the Jutes/Eotens. The Saxons

138
didn't appear out of nowhere, but were from the Jutes, wherefore
the Eatons must have been from the Jute side of the Dane-Jute mix
that brought about the Saxons.
Because I equate the Edones with the Budini, I will consider
viewing “Bute” as a variation of “Jute.” Threfore, when the
Stewarts inter-married with the Bute family (of the Scottish island
of Bute), it was probably an Eaton-Stewart mix.
The Pollok family (also connected to the Stewarts) is found
in the records only as far back as "Fulbert the Saxon" (11 th
century), and this provides the same challenge of discovering
which, the Dane or Jute side of the Saxons, they stem from. In
either case, Druid connections are evident, for Druids had also
been the priests of the British Danann (verifying a Dane-Goth
alliance). After the Conqueror (1066), the Stewarts and Eatons
settled in/near Shropshire on what is now the Welsh border
(Eatons first settled Cheshire, adjacent to Shropshire), and the
Polloks ultimately settled facing Bute. It’s possible that these
settlements were chosen in that they had been ancient, ancestral
homelands of the respective surnames, by which I mean to suggest
that the settled locations had been Druid/Eadon/Gutuatri
territories.
It's my deduction that, when all three families (not to mention
the Veres) were in Britain prior to the Conqueror, they were not
Anglo-Saxons, but Celts. As would seem obvious, all four families
were chased out of Britain (to Normandy) by the Anglo-Saxons
(the white dragon of myth) when the latter became powerful
enough to rule most of Britain (i.e. when they over-powered the
original inhabitants of Britain, the Celts). While the families had
been mixing in Britain, it amounted to a mixing of the red and
white dragon lines, known to themselves euphemistically as the
red and white roses. This mix created the so-called "Tudor Rose"
family, a red-white rose mix. The patriarch of the Tudors, Owen
Tudor, lived on Mona, according to Britannica! However, the
island was "Anglesey" at that time, exposing the point all the
more, that white-dragon Angles came to rule/inhabit red-dragon
Mona so as to mix colors there.
[Update August 2006 -- I found a Stewart-roots website
today that finally came out with it, by saying:
“Some historians mistakenly refer to Alan [fitz Flaad,
supposedly the earlist-known Stewart] as Norman because he
was part of the Norman conquest. However Alan was Breton,
not Norman...So although the (future) Stewart line were part
of the Norman ruling class, they were a Celtic people.”
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rykbrown/principal_families.htm#The
%20Principal%20Families%20of%20the%20Balquhidder%20Stewarts End Update]

139
Later in the aforementioned Britannica article I found that
"Venantius Fortunatus (d. 609) mentions the Jute (Euthio)
beside the Dane and the Saxon..." (brackets not mine). It's not
hard to see how "Euthio" was the origin of "Othinn," the latter a
variation of "Odin"...wherefore the supreme Scandinavian
bloodline. See how the more-common "Woten" is very nearly
"Eoten." Indeed, in German myth, the Goths were from Gaut, who
has been generally regarded as Odin himself.
Now the picture of Odin being married to "Frigg" is a
picture of the proto-Jute Edonians mixing with Phryg ians. If no
one has figured that out yet, shame-shame on all. It's too easy, yet
not one website makes the connection so far as I have witnessed.
Phrixus, depicted as the Golden Fleece (i.e. Golden Hermes),
comes to mind as the root of Frigg.
Lycurgus and Dryas did not get along, and they warred
because Lycurgus detested the Dionysus cult (that Dryas was a
part of). While Loki was ruler of the Vanir/Danir sect of
Scandinavians, Odin was the ruler of the Aesir sect, and because
Scandinavian myth reports wars between the Vanir and Aesir, Loki
may have been an extension of the Lyc urgus Edones (i.e.
Ligurians), and Odin from Dionysus/Dryas Edones. As Apollo
worshipers were antagonistic to the Dionysus cult, it would argue
in favor of a Loki-Apollo connection, which has viability in that
Loki and Apollo were both depictions of wolves (i.e. the two gods
symbolized the same peoples).
The Loki sect may have been from Sparta (Greece), for there
was provided yet another mythical king Lycurgus, fashioned as a
patriarch, and therefore a symbol, of Sparta. This agrees with the
fact that the Greek Danaans were in-part Spartan.
Sparta (the goddess) was made the daughter of king Eurotas ,
"Eridanus." Sparta married and had atermhvoks
"Eurydice" for a daughter, and she in turn married the father
(Acrisius) of Danae (a root of the Danaans), wherefore Spartan
blood was the other, non-Rhodian side of the Greek Danaans. And
that, in a nutshell, is the Greek root of the Danes.
Eurotas, it should be added, was the son of Lelex, the symbol
of the Leleges , a Gogi peoples no doubt because they were related
to the Caucones. As the Golden-Fleece dragon giving birth to
certain "Sparti" belonged to Ares, it would seem evident that
Eurotas was from that Ares dragon since the goddess Sparta was
made to descend from Eurotas. In this way, it makes sense that
Eurotas depicted the Greek root of the Eridanus Redones (the
proto-Rus in France) in that Ares was the symbol of the Hros.
Ares was made to father Cyc nus/Cygnus ... the name of the
Ligurian ruler who (according to myth) moved to Eridanus! There
were two Cycnus', I’ll admit; the one from Thrace was that of

140
Ares, but "he" no doubt migrated to become (the peoples of) king
Cycnus of Liguria. Therefore, the Gogi had been in Thrace, and
must have been the Ares dragon there, wherefore the Gogi and the
Hros appear indistinguishable.
As Eurotas figures prominently in the red/Dane dragon line,
especially as he may have been named after Hirota (Norway) to
depict the very Greek line leading to that city, a look at his father
is necessary. He was Myles, whose brother (Polycaon) was
married to Messene (depicting Messenia), who was in turn made
the daughter of Triopas. Wouldn't you know it, Triopas was the
son of Helios and Rhoda, the same parents that I independently
traced the Redones to. In other words, Eurotas stems from the
proto-Russians of Rhodes (as even “Eu rotas” would hint) depicted
by code-word Polycaon, while that latter term seems to undress to
“Po-river wolf peoples.”
[Update August 2006 -- I can confidently claim at this point
that the Russians as a whole are rooted in Nahorites. I will prove
this by the end of the book. This realization shocked me of course.
I expect that the Gogi can themselves be connected Nahorite
blood. I have said elsewhere in my writings that Vladimir
Zhirinovsky (a Russian politician) has the potential to fulfill the
role of the Biblical Gog/Anti-Christ, and upon discovering that his
true father was sur-named "Eidelstein," I announced what others
also had, that Zhirinovsky (his father-in-law's surname) was half-
Jew. Now I will correct that statement and claim that he was half
non-Israelite Hebrew, explaining why he (and perhaps so many
other "Jewish" Russians) hates the Israelites and wishes for their
destruction. Is this the definition of the great tribulation of Israel:
the invasion of Israel by Nahorite Hebrews??? End Update]

141
THE LATEST BUZ ON ATLANTIS
June 2006

It is important to know that the Britons (to be distinguished


from the Angles/English) and Welsh are regarded by historians as
relatives and as P-Celts, while the Irish and Scots (also relatives)
are classified as Q-Celt Gaels. The latter are highly suspect as
originating in Africa (they used a "q/k/c" in place of a "p"), while
the P-Celts are thought to be from the Celts/Gauls of Europe. The
Q-Celt settlements in Britain began about 500 BC.
The Celts are viewed as a post-1200 BC migration from the
Greek theater, and as that timing coincides with the Trojan war, it
is expected that Trojan groups made up a good portion of the
migrants. The Celts were a Trojo-Phoenician continental
migration and are thereby to be distinguished from the Troj o-
Phoenician Sea Peoples spreading out along the shores of the
Mediterranean during the same centuries. The trick is to discover
whether the Welsh/Britons were founded in the Hercules wave of
settlers, or a pre-Hercules wave, for the pre-Hercules wave(s) were
the on final western Atlanteans.
me can deduce from the start that the original western
Atlanteans were of a sea-faring peoples, and this tends to eliminate
the Gauls if indeed they were of a continental-Celt movement. The
problem is, the Redones are classified as Gauls, and yet Redones
are rooted in Rhodes, the capital island of eastern Atlantis and
therefore inhabited by sea-faring peoples. Perhaps the Gauls are to
be distinguished from the Celts in that the Gauls came to the west
by sea, and only afterward did they move inland along rivers.
When Hercules is revealed sailing to Erethlyn (now North
Wales) in alliance with "gold cup" Helios peoples, it must have
been an alliance with the Danaans of Rhodes, since Hercules was
himself a Greek Danaan while Rhodes was an island assigned (by
myth writers) to Helios. It’s possible that the Gauls were named
after Helios, or that the two were named after the same people
group. I have been considering Hul, son of Aram.
As the Danaans of Rhodes translate to the Redones, the
coming of Hercules peoples to the west would have injected a
Redone element into the Welsh territory, but this doesn’t tell
whether the Welsh peoples were founded at that very point (so as
to be a Danaan/Redone peoples), or whether they had been there
earlier as a non-Herculean peoples. Chances are that because the

142
modern Welsh trace themselves to Cimmerians, while I have
identified the Helios-based Rhodes peoples as Cimmerians, that
the Welsh were no other than the gold-cup Hercules conquerors of
Atlantis.
My tracing the rose line of modern importance back to
Rhodes is supported where the holy grail is defined as the gold
cup (i.e. Helios blood) in which Hercules sailed to Wales, for the
rose line rpresents the red blood that fills the holy grail. This has
not to do with Jesus’ blood, but is red-dragon blood, no doubt the
blood of the Biblical dragon, especially of the two-horned beast
that appears to the world as a Lamb but speaks as a dragon.
Recalling that Plato told of a war between the western
Atlanteans and the Greeks in which the Greeks won, I would
suggest that the original Atlanteans were the sea-faring
"Fomorians" who lost to the British Danann (yes, to the Hercules
Danaans in Britain). It is said by others that the Fomorians were an
earlier branch of Danann, or in some way related. When seeking
the origin of Fomorians, consider reading the term as Fo-Mori.
Moray of Scotland comes to mind as Fomorian descendants.
Denmark was earlier Jutland, named after the Jutes/Goths,
even as southern Sweden was "Gotland" after the same non-
Danish bloodline. The Danes lived in Jutland for a while (from
300 BC, give or take a century or two) before turning it into
Denmark. What I haven't been able to learn online is whether the
Cimbri, after whom the same Danish peninsula was named
"Camber," were more Danes than Jutes, or vice versa, or even a
third peoples altogether different. A Britannica article reveals that
"Traces of the wanderings [of the Cimbri of proto-Denmark]
are found in the dedications to Mercury of the Cimbri at
Miltenburg and Heidelberg," meaning that the Cimmmerians of
Europe descend from Mercury. It is said that this god was the
Roman version of Hermes, but as there seems to be a very close
Atlantean connection between Hermes and Hercules, I would
question whether "Mercury" wasn't a variation of "Hercules," for
the same reason that the Greek Ares was alternatively Mars to the
Romans.
The Welsh root themselves in the "Cimbri," which I and
others confidently assume were the same as the Cimbri
Scandinavians. Since I find it irresistible to equate proto-Danes
with the British Danann, and because I have identified (via myth
code) the Danann as Cimmerians, I can view the Welsh Cimbri as
the proto-Danes themselves, for which reason I would include the
Danes in with the rose-line and holy-grail concept(s). But in no
way am I rooting the Danes in the Israelite tribe of Dan. I see no
compelling evidence for that connection. That the rose-line
concept was strong among the Franks suggests to me that Franks

143
were from Danaans, and I wouldn’t hesitate to connect them to the
Redone branch of Danaans. This explains why Merovingians were
in the thick of things amongst the Welsh/Bretons of Arthurian-
myth themes. Arthurian myth is Atlantean history in code, and
having to do with a late-Atlantean period.
As the rose line goes back to the Ros/Rosh/Hros Caucasians,
it is necessary to view the Welsh and Bretons as a Rus peoples.
Loki, the chief god of the Vanir, because he traces back to the
Lugii peoples, must be an extention of the Celt god, Lug, who was
half Fomorian and half Danann. Therefore it’s necessary to view
the Ligurians as a Rus peoples, as well as the Veneti peoples from
whom they stemmed. See Wales Map to locate the region of Rhos
inNorthWales.
I need to take time here to explain that writers the world
over, especially secret-society members, will often define people
terms from similar-sounding words in the local language.
Therefore, "Roslin" is not viewed as rooted in the Ros peoples, but
as "ros" meaning "headland" in the local Celt language. While at
times people groups and localities are named after their local
environment, there are many cases where the names are from
other/distant lands, and/or from previous bloodlines far removed,
especially in the case of pagans who worshiped their ancestry. One
of the most ridiculous claims is where the Bush family tells us that
they are named after a bush.
While Russians proper are not in my mind to be lumped in
with the Rosicrucian concept of Atlantis, and especially not the
New-Atlantis concept (i.e. the United States), it seems a fact that
Russians are a major sector of the Atlantean bloodline.
Rosicrucians rcognize this, and it may explain why the Rothschilds
ced such great interest in Russia as to topple her in the
Volshevic Revolution (1917). Communist Russia showed the true
colors of Rosicrucians, an atheistic iron hand. But that hand must
be softened and Christianized in the West in order to remain
influential, and that’s what’s going to bring about a lamb-like (or
Lamb-like) False Prophet that to some degree acts in conjunction
with the Biblical Gog (see Revelation 13). It is for this reason of
supporting the anti-Christ dragon that I predict an anti-Zionist
False Prophet, and this speaks of the neo-Nazi Rosicrucians , the
same that once propped up Hitler. It should be interesting to see
how this develops if I’m correct in pegging the False Prophet as an
American President or UN representative of America. My second
choice for False Prophet would be France in that it seems to be the
leading European nation acting quite openly against Zionism.
If modern Atlanteans wished to disguise their roots, they
would not use Poseidon's trident as their symbol on the Euro. The
Atlanteans are now coming out of the closet, having gained control

144
of Europe to the point that they have the confidence to so expose
themselves, and in the end times the world will be made to
worship an Image that I think will connect back to ancient
Atlantis.
[Update June 2006 -- Plato is of help when identifying the
eastern roots of the western Atlanteans. He knew the Eridanus
myth,econrigashfHelopin
Eridanus, and as I have identified Eridanus as Rhodanus (the
Rhone), the south-France valley named and settled by Redones, it's
telling that Plato included an Eridanus river as a boundry of the
Atlantis Acropolis. In his other work, Timaeus, Plato again cites
Eridanus when reminding the readers of Phaethon's wild ride in
Helios' chariot. These things imply that the peoples once in
Rhodanus (i.e. Rhodians/Redones) became the Atlanteans. But as
these refer to the Hercules peoples who conquered Atlantis, it still
doesn’t reveal the original Atlanteans.
Greek myth tells that Ligurians moved to Eridanus, and this
would reveal that the Vanir sect of Scandinavians (from the
Ligurians) had first (i.e. prior to becoming the Vanir sect) mixed
with Rhodes-based Atlanteans in the Rhodanus (i.e. Rhone) valley.
The Danes are once again revealed as a branch of Atlanteans, an
idea that is more apparent in the Danaan ancestry of Hercules. This
Atlantean theme must have been the reason that the Danes, via the
Sinclair bloodline, had been leaders in the Templar movement to
secure Jerusalem. If the False Prophet turns out to be a Dane, or
from a sept of the Sinclair surname, you’ll know why, and you’ll
have more confidence that the time has truly come. It is my very-
predictable belief that the False Prophet will attempt to convince
Christians the world over that his commercial skin code will not be
the Biblical “mark of the beast” (of Revelation 13). .
As the Crusader quest to secure Jerusalem may be viewed as
a Zionism movement, it tends to reveal that the Danes were
Hebrews, in part, by which I mean to say that Atlanteans were
Hebrews, in part. The finger on the one hand points to Nahor,
brother of Abraham, but on the other hand to Abrahamic Sheba
and Dedan.
Plato goes on to say that the Acropolis "included the Pnyx
on one side, and the Lycabettus as a boundary on the opposite
side" (Criteas). Per chance the first term may be modified to
"Vanik," and the second term's root to "Lug" and/or “Loki” = the
Lugii peoples. Might "Lycabettus" be code for a Lug-Bute
peoples? Behold that the German branch of the Bute family uses
six red roses on it's family Coat, a testament to at least six major
branches of the family (that may be Rosicrucian).
Plato's Atlantis, because he wrote as late as the fourth
century BC, must have been Britain itself; Arthurian myth would

145
so indicate. Because Plato didn't want to reveal which piece of
land he was referring to, the only decent clue he gave wase that it
was outside of a strait (most think Gibraltar) that leads to the
wide-open ocean. He also said that Atlantis was larger than Asia
(Minor) and Lybia together, but there's a question as to what
constituted Asia in his mind, and Lybia may have been rather
small in those days. Perhaps he was referring to the empire as a
whole, for Atlantean settlements must have spread north from
Gibraltar into Scandinavia.
In any case, as it’s rather queer to use Asia and Libya
togfether to reveal the size of a kingdom, I think Plato was
speaking in code, indicating that Atlantis was a kingdom founded
by dragon blood from both Asia and Libya (the eastern portion of
the Atlas mountains are in Libya). Keep in mind that “Asia” was
named by As/Aes peoples who are thought to have been
Cimmerians, and that the Helios peoples (Gorgons) on Rhodes
were Cimmerians. Calling that strait, "Pillars of Hercules," Plato
implied that Hercules peoples lived there, and indeed Hercules was
a Gorgon peoples since his ancestor, Perseus, was. Gorgons were
indeed in Lybia from early times. Myth writers made Hercules
split the mountain of Atlas in two to form the strait, clinching the
idea that, upon defeating Atlas, there formed a piece of Hurculean
Atlantis on both the Spanish and African sides. But, my point is,
with time the kingdom spread from Gibraltar (and nearby islands)
to Britain, where Britain, being the largest island, became the seat
of the empire.
You will note on the Arms of Cardiff (modern capital of
Wales) that there is a rose placed centrally, not to mention that it's
filled with animal code useful for tracing the Welsh to ancient
pagan peoples. The red dragon is placed centrally as well; it is
fitted with the feet of a bird, likely an eagle, has a lion's body, and
has fore-arms as well as wings,
having
this a special meaning. It's
an exact replica of the Mushussu Dragon Therefore, if the False
Prophet turns out to be of Welsh ancestry, you’ll know why. Or, if
you’re involved in a Rosicrucian or Hebrew-Roots organization
that stresses Welsh elements, you now know why.
The Anglo-Saxons of England, those who warred with the
Welsh and Bretons for to win over the island of Atlantis, were
labeled the "white dragon" by red-dragon members. One can
therefore suspect that the Anglo-Saxons were from the same
Cimmerian root, suggesting that the Anglo-Saxons stemmed from
the Scandinavian Cimbri. In other words, all things Cambrian were
Atlantean. The Cardiff Arms includes a white horse, likely
depicting the white-dragon line, yet the white hoof points to the
Ares/Hros/Rosh Thracians that furnished the Goths.

146
Indeed, the brutish ram (or is it a goat?) symbol on the
Cardiff Arms would depict Hermes the Ram (Pan, the half-goat
creature, was the son of Hermes, in any case) and therefore reflect
the founding of Great Ormos in North Wales. Moreover, the
astrological symbol, Aries, is a ram. As Hermes was made the
foundation of Germanics, and as the Goths were primary
Germanics, and moreover as the Goths were the Getae of Thrace,
the white hoof does indeed point to the Ares Thracians. Closer to
home, in Wales, the white horse should prove to depict the Eadon
-worshipngDud/Ee,tsrvalingh
Welsh/Breton/Atlantean origin of Edinburgh and nearby Roslin.
Tthe white horse of Cardiff has a fish tail rather than hind
quarters of a horse. This is intended to show the roots of the horse,
in a peoples depicted as fish, even the Sumerians of Eridu from
whom the mermen/mermaid concept originated. Note how "Eridu"
evokes Ereth^lyn).
I shoul mention that Britannica denies the Getae-Goth
relationship but doesn't give a reason. While there may be a lack of
credible historical documentation, in the eyes of some historians
who don’t honor Jordanes claims, to prove a Goth-Getae link, it
should also be considered that historical documents do not deny
that link, and moreover that Rosicrcuains over the centuries
probably wished to keep the world from knowing it. End Update]
[Update August 2006 -- I found this quote to support a
Goth/Getae identification of the fish-tailed horse: "The
Supporters are a marine version of the White Horse of Kent,
England, of which the City of Canterbury is the capital, said to
have been borne on the standards of the Jutes who settled in
Kent in the 5th century." See here those Supporters of the
Canterbury Arms (capital of Kent).
http://www.canterbury.nsw.gov.au/www/html/426-coat-of-arms.asp End Update]
Anglesey, named after the Angles, is a large island in
extreme north-west Wales, right beside Erethlyn. The island was
previously "Mona," evoking Manes the moon god; recall that
Hercules became the god of those Manes-rooted Phrygians. I'm
suggesting that the Hercules Rhodians were extensions of the
proto-Phrygian peoples of Manes, wherefore the Danaans must
somehow connect to Manes, and Hermes, recalling that Hermes
and Manes both refer to Armenia. The Veneti intrusion that
formed the Gwynedd kingdom (from Vannes) was likewise rooted
Armenia (Lake Van).
[Update August 2006 -- I have recently discovered the root
of Hercules in the Aras river of Armenia/Georgia, the same river
that formed the term, Ares. For that river was alternatively called,
“Araxes,” while Hercules has the alternative, “Heracles.” I am
beginning to realize that Lake Van was Nahorite country (e.g. the

147
“Nairi” of the Van region), and that Nahorites formed an alliance
with the Hros/Rosh of the Aras river, and together this Semite-
Aryan alliance contributed greatly to the basis of the Atlantis
concept (of world rule).
Let me say here in light of the statement below that I am now
considering a Hul identity for Helios, where Hul (son of Aram)
was founder of Armenia according to Josephus. End Update]
The common factor between the Rhodians and the
Armenians was simply Helios, the god of both Caucasia and
Rhodes,, the god ofpGorgons and Cimmerians everywhere. As
Helios seems rooted in^ "helix" (i.e. spiral/coil), the god
represents two dragons, or the two serpents that are commonly
found coiled around one another. Those dragon-line groups that
use a single serpent coiled around a rod/staff/penis indicate that
they had broken off relations with the second dragon people and/or
are going it alone.
As it was the British Danann who named the Isle of
Mon/Man, near Mona, one feels compelled to view Mona as a
Danaan settlement prior to the arrival of the Angles (who re-
named it). In other words, Mona was an Atlantean entity, and an
important one at that.
"Tuatha de Danann" appears to mean: the Thoth peoples
of (the line of) Dana. It sounds as though the Thoth peoples were a
Danaan branch, showing that the Danaans had not to do with the
Israelite tribe of Dan, for Thoth pre-dates Dan. Indeed, this can be
shown where the historical king Thoth was son/grandson of
Egyptian king, Menes (no doubt named after Min/Manes), and he
in turn is said to be the first king of the first Egyptian dynasty. In
that case, since the Thoth peoples already existed in the first
Egyptian dynasty, the Danaans from which the Thoth peoples
stemmed existed even before the first Egyptian dynasty, this
under-cutting those who attempt to root the Danaans in the tribe of
Dan during the Israelite stay in Egypt/Goshen. Granted, while
historians wrongly date Menes to about 3200 BC (well before the
Flood in 2350 BC), I date him in the range of 2,000 BC, which is
still prior to the formation of the tribe of Dan.
The Tuatha de Danann were named after their goddess,
Danu, whom I trace to the mother of Perseus, "Danae.” Most
view this mother as a mythical symbol of the Rhodio-Egyptian
Danaans removed to Greece. I do believe I have found the origin
of the Danaans in the Dinaites (to be read Dina-ites), found in
Ezra 4:9 as “Diynay” (Strong’s #1784), but translated wrongly in
some/most Bible versions (my Hebrew interlinear uses “the
judges” instead). The Dinaites were living in Israel eventually but
were a product of Mesopotamia; in Ezra 4:9 they are lumped in
with other Kabala-cult/dragon-line peoples, including the

148
Archevites, the peoples of Erech. More on this later, but let me
make the point here that the Dinaites, if indeed they were the
Danaans, were Gorgons.
After Perseus had killed the Gorgon Medusa, he took her
head to the land of Atlas in the far west, and since she was a three-
sister entity, her head no doubt came to be the three-bodied
Geryon monster who ruled at Eretheia, the capital of Atlantis.
This suggests that the white horse in the Cardiff Arms depicts the
white mythical horse, Pegasus, for it can't be a coincidence that
Pegasus was, according to myth, born from the Medusa at her
death. It seems clear now that the Gorgon Medusa peoples were
the same as the Pegasus Gorgons, and that these were the
Atlanteans (of Britain, at least) prior to the arrival of the Hercules
Gorgons/Danaans (to take over Eretheia).
Again, there was an historcial Erethlyn next to Mona that
must have been the mythical Eretheia. Also adjacent to Mona there
is to this day a locality called "Great Ormes (evoking Hermes),
very nearby to Rhos. The thin strait of water that separates Mona
from Erethlyn and Rhos is today called "Menai." North Wales
was a settlement of Armenians, therefore, as strange as that may
sound.
[Update June 2006 -- Plato wrote that one of Poseidon's sons
(in western Atlantis) was "Mneseus," perhaps indicating Manes.
The Rusa kings of Armenia were connected to the "Nairi,"
thougbysme Nahorit,wlesmbvtha
the Nairi became the "Neuri" in the face of Thrace. As the Neuri
lived in the midst of the Budini, who I think stemmed from
Nahor's son, Buz , it is considerable if the Budini furnished the
German Bute family that depicts itself with a Coat having six red
roses and a central gold fish.
At the following link, we can read that the Bud clan is rooted
at least as far back as "ancient Brythionic Celts of Wales ... some
say before the Norman conquest in 1066 AD." The name was
first found at Cornwall , the website adds, and for my reasons to
follow, Cornwall may have been the tip of the "island" of Atlantis.
Note that the Bud family Coat uses a gold wave, three arrows, and
a bow. The Coat reminds me of North-American Indians, and
therefore of the Picts (of Scotland).
Assuming that the Bud surname is rooted in British Atlantis,
connection to the ancient Bod family in France is possible in that
the Bod family Coat uses a ram. The German branch of the Bod
family, because it uses three gold roses, would seem connected to
the German Bute family. Years ago I had concluded that "Bute"
"body" = a shell or outer covering, as formeant"pod/bu=
example "botka" means "booth," or the Dutch "busse" means

149
"box." And so I find that the Bod surname under discussion
derives from just such a meaning as "body."
The Dutch branch of the "Bod/Bode" family uses three gold
diamonds instead of the gold roses, indicating perhaps that
diamonds secretly depict roses. I looked up the Boit surname,
because "boite" is French for "box," and behold I found the same
Coat, but with two gold diamonds and one gold rose; the Coat is
otherwise identical to the German branch of the Bod(e) family.
As all Coats above are on blue background, including the
Bute name of ancient Wales, kinship seems strongly implied all
the more. As the Stewarts were related to the Bute name, might
these rose families across Europe have been of Stewart roots, and
were they all, pray tell, from Buz, son of Nahor? Could the Bush
namesohwplyr?
I had noticed that Nahor's first son, Uwts (as the Bible spells
it), qualifies as the origin of “Utu,” the dragon sun god of
Sumeria. But on further consideration, this Uwts was too late to do
so, wherefore I tend to advance Uwts, first son of Aram, as the
founder of the Utu cult. It dawned on me, however, that Nahor
named his first-born after that same Uwts simply because Nahor
was himself meshed in with the Utu cult. I also saw that "Atlantis"
may itself have derived from "Uwts Land," especially as there
was an Aryan element in the dragon cult. It’s interesting that I had
independently viewed the Guti as the root of that Aryan element,
for “Guti” is very similar to “Utu/Uts.” End Update]
Now the Guti, originally from Caucasia before inhabiting the
Zagros mountains in Iran, ruled in Erech and/or nearby Eridu for a
century or so in very ancient times not long after the Flood.
Because they are often said to have been an Aryan peoples, they
are suspect as ancestors of the Goths. I believe that upon their
(well recorded) defeat and decline in Sumeria to the dragon sun-
god family, they came forth in Armenia as the mythical Cotys, son
of Manes, and that they had carried the dragon cult of Erech with
them to Thrace and Greece.
I learned that there were a few historical kings named Cotys
in later times who ruled Thrace, but the son of Cotys IV (yet
another Cotys) became ruler of Armenia. There were orgiastic rites
in Thrace akin to those of Dionysus and the Kabeiri cult, and these
were introduced to Thrace by the mythical Cotys. There was even
a female goddess of Thrace named "Cotys/Kotys."
Goliath was a Gittite, and he was a symbol, many believe, of
the end-time anti-Christ. Might the Gittites, therefore, have
stemmed from the Guti?
Behold that Cotys of the Greek theater and Geryon of Wales
are said to have had the same mother ( Callirrhoe), and this,
among other insights, tends to prove what myth makes fairly

150
obvious elsewhere, that Geryon was at least related to the
Danaan/Perseus bloodline, for it's well established that the Greek
Danaans were from the Manes-Cotys line.
Callirrhoe is interesting here because she was given birth by
"Tethys" the Titan, and he sounds like an allusion to
"Thoth/Hermes." In other words, Callirrhoe is depicted as
stemming from Hermes, and because she is also the mother of
Geryon, it explains why Great Ormes was a location in Geryon's
region of Erethlyn. It may be applicable here that, according to the
book, "Holy Blood, Holy Grail," a certain Society of Ormus ,
founded in Egypt, was the founding of the Rosicrucians...and by
the way it was a group attempting to merge Christianity with
paganism.
htt?
ttp://watch.pair.com/priory.html.
[update June 2006 -- I can't squeeze the details into this
chapter, but suffice it to say that I think I have found the Greek
root of Atlantis in the Kassites of the Zagros mountains (same
peoples as the Guti, I believe), and therefore in Kothar-wa-
Khasis, a craftsman god of the proto-Philistine sea shores that I
interpret as the Kothar tribe of Kassites. This god smacks of the
craftsman, Hephaistos, a depiction of Amazonian peoples
(Meshech, Tubali, Phrygians, etc.) that invented metal and went on
to furnish several major dragon-line peoples, including the
Etruscans, the Latins, Trojans, Athenians, and Khazars. I believe
the Khazars are evident in the “Kothar” term in the phrase above.
In that Hephaistos was "Vulcan" to the Romans, I suspect
that “he” depicted the Bulkan Bulgarians, who are indeed thought
to be the root of the Khazars. Hephaistos, as the
founder/representative of the Kabeiri cult, was for that reason part
Hebrew. The implication is that, not only the Kassites, but
Bulgarians, were themselves part Hebrew. The Aryan side of the
Bulgarians falls on the Togarmites in that one Khazar ruler
(Joseph) claimed in writing that Khazars descend from Togarmah.
This makes good sense where the Teucer co-founders of Trojans
were Togarmites, for Bulgaria today sits smack where Thrace used
to be. As the Bulgars were proto- Turks, it would seem evident
that Turks are indeed from Togarmah, as most insist, and yet I
would not interpret all Togarmite peoples as Turks proper. Rather,
Turks are merely one branch of Togarmites. Consider also the
Tarchon tribe of Etruscans, or other Trojan branches such as the
Franks. The oriental Tocaharians that may have furnished the
Huns, the latter being yet another proto-Turk and/or Bulgar and/or
Khazar peoples. It’s interesting that many historians see reasons to
tie Huns to Hebrew-based “Hephtalites,” for that term evokes
Hephaistos. Togarmites are one of the peoples that will invade

151
Israel in her great tribulation, when Gog and Iran attack her,
imminently.
Hephaistos' official wife, Aphrodite, had as one of her
lovers, Adonis, whom Internet websites identify as Tammuz, for
which reason she was allied/mixed with the Erech dragon cult.
Aphrodite t forth Eros, who must be a depiction of the
CaucasianAu ros
removed to Greece. I’ve already mentioned my
suspicion that Aphrodite depicted the Apiru Hebrews (of
Mesopotamia), but her putting forth Eros crystalizes my belief that
the Apiru mixed with the Armenian Hros in producing the
Thracian dragon line.
It’s no secret that Hephaistos and Aphrodite removed from
Greece to Italy (to form the Italian dragon line that Biblical
prophecy is highly concerned with). It’s hard for me to get over the
apparent fact that this dragon line was in-part Hebrew. I will now
show how I myself am from this line, for while I have some
Germanic blood, I have more Italian blood.
As Aphrodite was Venus to the Romans, she was the root of
the Veneti, and as the Veneti are known to stem from Illyrians, I
should mention here a Picenti tribe of Illyrians, a portion of which
came to live in the Italian region of Abruzzo. I had always
wondered, even before starting on the Hebrew theme of this book,
whether this region was named after Hebrews, and whether I had
Hebrew blood thereby. One website on the region's history reads:
"...at the wishes of Augustus [Caesar], Abruzzo and Molise
became the Iv region of Rome and given the name ‘Sabina et
Samnium.’"
ahttp ://www.calascio.com/abruzzohist2.htmJuvanum
WFiat's that? Abruzzo was named Sabina? Could that be
ancient Sheba, Abraham’s grandson? The Sabina pre-dated the
Romans and Latins, making them candidates for filling the shoes
of the Atlanteans. Josephus lumped them in with the Iberi, this yet
another term smacking of “Hebrew.” I’ll assume that Abruzzo was
named after the Iberi.
The Sabina were working on an empire, until the Trojans of
Rome subdued them, whereafter the two mixed to become the
dragon-line Romans. The ancient Piceni/Picentines (from
Picenum, Italy) have recently been connected to the Sabina
peoples by their common language, but also because the Piceni
called themselves, "Safini." That latter term not only modifies to
Sabini," but to "Svi/Sviones (i.e. the Swedes) and I Savona" (in
Liguria). It’s important to so distinguish the Swedes from the
Goths, where the Goths stem from Thoth/Titans and therefore
from Dedan, Sheba’s brother. This can be deduced in yet another
way, where Odin is a Goth god, leader of the Aesir gods, and
where the Asshurites were a Dedan tribe (Genesis 25:3). The

152
Letushites are also listed as a Dedan tribe, and if these formed
Lydus (i.e. the Lydians), then Latins are to be so distinguished
from the Sheba-based Sabina.
As Hercules was a Roman god (as well as Greek), we can
suspect that the Romans had Danaan blood in some way. Roman
myth traces Romans to the Trojan, Aeneus, and moreover places
him in an alliance with the mythical Dido, suggesting that Romans
were allied with Dedanites, though not necessarily Dedanites
themselves. I expect that Dedanites were in Italy, in any case.
Because Plato indicates that Atlantis under Hercules was of
Asia, it’s a small clue that indicates an Aesir/Asshurite ancestry for
the Danaans. It’s even possible that the Danaans were named after
Dedan, therefore. In that Plato based the Hercules Atlanteans in
the mythical Phaethon/Paethon , it may be that the Hercules
peoples of Italy were the Piceni, if Phaethon depicted the Piceni.
After considering this po ssible connection, I realized it’s
viability, for both Phaethon and the Piceni/Picene can be
independently rooted in the city of Opis , of Gozan. On the one
hand, Phaethon is known to be an Apollo wolf line, and I have
personally found the root of Apollo in Opis, a city named by
Avvites ... who not only worshiped the wolf, but who are the root of
the mythical bee line, for “opis/apis” means “bee” in Greek and
Latin. One may see that “Piceni” and/or “Phaethon” may
themselves be linguistically rooted in “Opis.” I realize that the
Piceni are said to be named after the woodpecker, and that this
creature is said to be a symbol of Mars, but frankly that seems to
me to be a late revision of the term made by those who didn't know
the opis/bee origin.
There was a god, Picus, who was father of the Roman
Faunus (Pan), who in turn gave birth to Latinus, wherefore Picus
looks akin to Hermes (father of Pan in Greek myth). On this
expandable/navigational map of ancient Illyrium (if not available,
see the same map here), the Picensii tribe can be seen on the south
side of the Danube, at the southern tip of Pannonia (I think Pan
depicted Pannonia). Therefore, the Italian Picenti tribe would seem
to trace back to Picus and Pan, but forward from there to the
Latins. This means that my mother could be a descendant of the
Satyrs, for she and her blood were born in Picenze (in Abruzzo).
After all, the father of Picus was Saturn!
My mother is a Masci on one side, wherefore note the
Mascianae tribe on the map, north of the Picensii, or the Moschius
river to their south-east. In that the Moesi are on the Moschius
river, the Moesi (ancestors of the Lydians) may have been
Meshech (also "Mushki").
The Masci family Coat consists of three fleur de lis
(Merovingian/Frank symbol) and two white wings, and after

153
finding that the family had connected with an Abreu family to
create the surname, Masci-Abrue, I learned that the Abreu family
Coat of the Portugese branch consists purely of five wings (the
Italian branch of the Abreu family Coat includes two upright gold
lions, and a castle).
The above link to the Abreu coat shares that versions of that
surname include "Abruzzi/Abruzzo," but also "Bruzzi," evoking
"Brusi," the old name of the Bruce kings of Scotland, Grand
Masters of the Rosicrucians. An ancient document claims that the
Brusi were of the Rollo (Sinclair) line.
The Abreu name originated in Padua, a city in Venetia
founded by the mythical Trojan, Antenor. The Merovingians
claimed to have had the very same ancestry, in Antenor. As
evidence that "Abreu" derives from the Iberi (removed to the
Spanish theater eventually), the surname is mainly in Portugal
("Port of the Gali") today, and/or on the Atlantic island of
Madeira, 360 miles due west (i.e. directly in front) of the Pillars of
Hercules. Previously, the island was named "Purple," for which
reason Phoenicians are thought to have founded it. Today,
Madeira's flag is mainly purple...and sports a red and white
Templar cross. Because Plato located the island of Atlantis "in
front" of the Gibraltar Strait, one could suppose that he had
Madeira and nearby islands in mind.
The second-most common name (today) of the Abruzzi town
of Picenze is Galeota ("of the Gali"?), and Masci is the third-most
common. The fifth-most common name is Cucci (Gogi?), and the
sixth-most common, Iovenitti. The latter surname could stem from
the nearby ancient city of Juvanum, and refer back to the sons of
Javan, son of Japheth. Indeed, for Juvanum was in the Abruzzo
province of Chieti, a term that evokes the Kittim, sons of Javan
(Gensi10:4).Rcalhowte(fkBJashrclimed
(italics mine in both quotes):
"...the children of Chittim are the Romim whodwell l
in the valley of Canopia by the river Tibreu ."
Then see this:
"SABINI, an ancient tribe of Italy, which was more
closely in touch with the Romans from theearliestt
recorded period than any otherItalic people. They dwelt
in the mountainous country east of the Tiber .""
http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/S/SA/SABINI.htmm
Therefore, if the Sabini were not the Kittim, they were close
enough for the Chieti region to have been a Kittim branch.
When I saw that the Cheiti region of "Maiella" evokedd
either Maia, elder daughter of Atlas, or Melia, goddess of honey,

154
progenitor of the Bias/Byzas peoples, I went Internet searching,
and found that the Maiella region was named after a goddess,
Maja, who came searching for her children in the Abruzzo
mountains. When I found the Italian claim that the month of May
was named after Maja, I knew that she was the Greek Maia, for
May is indeed named after her. Note that Maja evokes the Magi
Medes.
That clinches it: this region was inhabited by the Atlas
peoples, and then they disappeared so that Maja could not find
them! I wonder what the mythographers were intending when
making up that story?? Perhaps they really didn't know, or maybe
they wanted to hide the whereabouts of the Atlanteans. Note who
was among one of her children, for when Zeus mated with her, she
bore Hermes !! Maja didn't have a computer and Internet to find
her children, but I think I've found them, in Wales.
While the town of Picenze is small (1,000 inhabitants), keep
in mind that it's a feat in itself for such ancient Greek terms to
remain to this day in surnames, speaking on the past importance
that these peoples must have had. The town's fourth most-common
name, Ferrari ("of iron" i.e. metal smiths), is a well-known famous
name today. The Ferrari family Coat is a single upright gold lion. I
should add that Jerusalem itself, under the Rothschild era, uses an
upright lion as its symbol. The Russell clan uses an upright one as
well, but the Ross clan uses/used three upright lions. I found that
the Bos family Coat is an upright red lion. "Bosco" showed a
single gold lion with an eagle overhead. The Bias family Coat
includes two upright gold lions, plus two gold fleur de lis. I
couldn't find anything under "Buz," but the Boz/Bose family of
surnames uses one single black rose.
The question is, are these lions, as Rosicrucians might
suggest to the public, the lion of the tribe of Judah (i.e. Jesus), or
are the lions, as Rosicrucians might confess to their initiated ones,
the Lydian lion, a symbol of the occult’s sun god?
Italy was first settled by Euboeans/Euboians , the root of
which could be "Boi." Because the Euboeans had stemmed from
the Abantes peoples, the Euboeans were possibly the founders of
the Aventine hill of Rome. The "Bias" surname originated in the
Naples region, an area that I am pegging as a Greek bee-line
settlement of Melia’s Bias/Byzas people, the same bee line that I
am tracing across Europe to the Merovingian bees and beyond.
Melia ("honey") was a depiction of Boiotia/Boeotia . As the
Picene Italians were also settled in the Naples region, where the
Picenti mountains are found, it supports my conclusion that they
are a bee-line peoples.
[Update September 2006 -- In fact, "Picenti" may be a
variation of "Byzanti(um)." The latter were allied to the Pecheneg

155
Turks of the Khazaria outskirts, and yet Pechenegs also lived in
East Rome, accordiN ot a Wikipedia article on Pechenegs: " In the
11th Century boovânü i Lugâti't-Türk written by Mahmud
Kashgari there are two titles under the name Beçenek. The
first is 'A Turkish nation living around the country of the
Rum'. Where Rum was used by the Turks to denote Eastern
Rome."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pechenegs
Surely the Pechenegs of Rome were earlier the Picene. Their
being Turks (i.e. Togarmites) is supportive of the mythical claim
that Roman origin was in-part in "Ascanius," since Ashkenaz was
the brother of Togarmah. The Togarmites (of the Tigris river)
would be the dog peoples that Romulus and Remus suckled. The
Ashkenazi lived at the Tigris river.
The Wikipedia article tells that the Hungarian version of
"Becenek" was "Besenek," which more closely resembles the
"Bessi" Thracians so as to connect quite likely to the Buzi Medes.
This suggest a soft "c" in "Picene" and thereby makes it more
likely that it's root is "opis" (bee) and/or Opis on the Tigris. The
Italian city of Pisa comes to mind, not to mention Pisa of Elis
(Greece), where the Ladon river was situated (i.e. the probable
origin of the Latins)! ). End Updates]
The definition of "Picene/Picenti" is disputed. Some suggest
"pick/peck." But as "bee" in Dutch languages is "bij" and such,
perhaps the peoples were named after the same, as for example
picket/picas/pick refer to sharp points, shared by creatures other
than the woodpecker, the bee and wolf (fang) included. Our
"pique," in fact, means just that, "to sting, prick" (that's the
dictionary definition
[Update on the June Update, June 26 -- In a book written
purely on Picenze (of Abruzzo), I read that many of its inhabitants
came from Naples (on Italy's opposite/west coast), and this makes
sense in that the town was no doubt named after the Picenti of
Naples. However, below there is some evidence that the lost Atlas
peoples (of Maja) migrated in the other direction, from Abruzzo to
the Naples region:
"As it often happened in the past, myths supplied
for the lack of data: one of these myths tells us that
Positano was founded by Poseidon - the Latin Neptune,
the god of the sea - for the sake of the nymph Pasitea,
whom he loved. It is certain that Phoenicians and Greeks,
travelling westwards, landed in Positano, which at that
time, was inhabited by Oschi and Piceni ... "
http://www.positanonline.it/storia/storia_uk.htm

156
In Positano there is today the Poseidon Hotel, reflecting
Poseidon-Positano roots. I trace the Poseidon name and the Bias
peoples to both the Byzas Greeks (who named Byzantium) and the
Buzi/Busae Medes. But Positano is also said to be named after
"posa" = home/house, the very meaning of the Semitic,
"Bute/Beth."
Oscan was the language of the Sabina; I found just today
(June 26) that Oscan evokes Ascanius, son of the mythical
Aeneus (Trojan patriarch of the Romans), revealing now very
heavily that the Romans were none other than Oscan speakers
and/or the Sabina. Ascanius evokes the Ashkenazi Aryans of
Caucasia and Iran. The implication is that the Ashkenazi became
the Aeneus-line Trojans; after all, Ashkenaz was brother to
Togarmah, and Togarmah evokes the mythical co-founder of
Trojans: Teucer. My question has for a long time been: were the
Ashkenazi the root of the Nazis? Will the False Prophet be from
Ashkenazi blood, since he will support an anti-Israeli anti-Christ?
The most common name in Picenze today is Taddei
(variation "Tadini"), evoking Dedan. The name was "First found
in Florence, the capital of Tuscany [i.e. capital of the
Etruscans], then the capital of the kingdom of Italy." At the
link below, I found the main feature on the Taddei coat of arms to
be exactly that in the flag held by the red dragon on the Cardiff
Arms. It’s very interesting that there was a Welsh peoples called
“Votadini” (details later).
I have no solid idea as yet what the three-peak design (called
"chevrons" by heraldry buffs) of the Taddei and Cardiff coats refer
to; perhaps the same as the Aquila Coat, wherein a crowned eagle
stands upon three mountain peaks. Behold the Powys Council Coat
(Powys is a region of modern Wales); it has a similar three-peak
design, and an eagle overhead.
Notice the three words in the banner, one being "Cymry,"
anotherPwys,di"aro.Welshgndpakof
the Paradise of Powys , something definitely to look into. As the
Taddei name was first found in the capital of Tuscany, recall that
Etruscans called themselves Rasna/Rasenna, and were feasibly,
therefore, Cimmerian Rus. Or put it this way, that if I’m correct in
tracing the Welsh to the Redones, then they trace further back to
the Etruscans, for Rasna/Rasenna no doubt furnished the terms,
Rusyn/Ruthene/Rhaetians/Redones. End Update]

157
ATLANTIS FOUNDED BY
HEBREW KHAZARS
June 2006, with additions in August

Although I don't yet know how much so, the find in the
previous chapter was significant. Where Italy became a Greek
colony, I found a Taddei surname whose family crest included a
design found also on the flag held by the Cardiff Arms dragon. I
have searched many family crests and not found a third example of
the same design ... but I know it's out there somewhere.
I have wondered if the three chevron depict Cimmerians,
who were depicted in threes in various ways, as for example the
Chimera dragon having three heads, or the Gorgon Medusa having
three heads, or the Geryon monster of Wales having three bodies,
or Kerkaphos having three Rhodian (i.e. of Rhodes) sons, one of
which was "Kamiros" so that all are revealed as ancient
"Gamiri" = Cimmerians.
Those of you who have read previous chapters please
forgive m repetition, for some readers are jumping into lis topic
for the first time here. I use many brackets to "clue-in" new
readers. As I showed that the Maiella mountains (named after
Maia) in Abruzzo province (named possibly after Hebrews) is
where the Taddei name still remains today, the peoples once living
there (the Sabina) are identifiable as children of Atlas, for Maia
was the daughter of Atlas. What I am suggesting is, that while
Cimmerians were not Hebrews, yet Atlantis, based on Cimmerian
blood, is starting to appear as though it had some pagan-Hebrew
elements originating in Iran/Babylon, amongst the Comarians
there. This chapter enlarges on this Cimmero-Kabala alliance .
Having shown that the Welsh Atlanteans were descended
from Hermes, it's not surprising that Hermes was the son of Maia.
She was alternatively "Fauna" to the Romans, no doubt because
the Roman "Faunus" and "Faun" respectively refer to Pan and
Satyrs ( "...where [Faunus] does appear in Latin literature He is
more often identified as a kind of Pan"). It should be noted that
these three similar terms easily modify from "Van" (in Armenia).
http://home.tiscali.be/mauk.haemers/collegium religionis/faunus.htm
It's interesting that, according to Plutarch, a certain Solon got
home from Egypt (where he had learned the Atlantis story) and
went immediately into the presence of the king of Lydia, who at
that time was Croesus . One gets the impression that Lydia is

158
important to the Atlantis story, and who knows but that the very
term “Rosicrucian” (i.e. Rosi-Cross) may be rooted in “Croesus”
and/or the mythical “Creusa” (e.g. the wife of Aeneas). It is my
estimation that Creusa was a depiction of the “Hros,” and that the
first syllable of “Rosicrucian” likewise depicts the Hros. That is,
Aeneas (patriarchial symbol of the Romans), was allied to a
Lydian branch of Hros, this making most-excellent sense if (as
goes my personbal discovery) the Latins (with whom the Romans
were indeed mixed) stem from the Lydians. To so view the Latins
as a Rus peoples is supported by the fact that the Etruscans
(neighbors of the Latins) contributed significantly to the Russians
proper (via the Ruthene/Redones).
Historians, albeit with some reservations in that historical
evidence is less than rich, tend to trace Etruscans to Lydia, in
which case we’ve got to root them in the Lydian gods: Atti(s),
Cotys,andMe.APlubtyconedhAlatso
Athens, so one may view "Atlantis" as Atti-Lantis (Atti-Land?),
even as Attica, the province surrounding Athens and after which
Athens was named, was indeed named after Atti(s). That is, Attica
and Athens were named after the peoples that Attis depicted, and
we can be sure that these were, if not a branch of Lydians
themselves, then close relatives of the Lydians. Always keep in
mind that the Lydians, in my opinion, lead to the Biblical dragon.
The question then becomes, which historical peoples did Atti(s)
depict?
I’ve already equated Cotys and Manes with the Guti/Cutha
Mannae Armenians. And I suspect that Atti was named andthe
after the dragon sun god, Utu. I moreover suspect that Utu was
named after the firstborn son of Aram, “Uwts” (that's the way the
Hebrew text spells it, not "Uz"), and that Nahor called his
firstborn, “Uwts,” in honor of the Uwts/Utu cult. The idea that
Atti(s) was an extension of the Hebrew Kabalists, an idea that
might have neo-Nazi Aryans spitting at the page, is evident in his
mother's name, "Kybele." As pagan Arayans well know that
Kybele/Cybele was a re-naming of the Great Mother, Ishtar, it's
evident that Attis and Kybele were together an importation of
Ishtar and Utu into Asia Minor, wherefore Ishtar and Utu together
must be suspected as having Kabala roots. One gets the
impression, and in fact this is my important claim, that Phrygia
became the new stomping grounds of the Chaldean Kabalists.
Therefore, ignoring the Aryan element that was later blended
into the cult, the Atti/Utu gods translate to Arameans. The Cutha,
which I suspect were from Gether, son of Aram, can be
distinguished from their Atti tribe in that there was a distinction
made between Cotys and Atti (though not always). That is, the
distinction is simply Uwts versus his brother, Gether (Genesis

159
1023). I would therefore venture to say that their other brother,
Hul, was the Greek sun god, Helios, a very neat package indeed.
I do not yet know to what extent these Aramean tribes
contributed to the Hebrew-based Kabeiri cult of Hephaistos , but I
am pressed to define the Kabala cult as more Aramean than
Hebrew, at least at first. As it’s common knowledge that Kybele
(i.e. an Aramean entity at first) was intricately tied to the Kabeiri
cult, therein is the Aramean-Hebrew alliance at the point where the
dragon line reached Asia/Phrygia. I should entertain that the
alliance was already strong back in Mesopotamia/Armenia.
Hence, Athens was injected with both Aramean and Hebrew
elements, especially under codeword, “Hephaistos.” Incidently, it
was his wife who was given the name, “Cabeiro,” and moreover
he was given another wife, Aphrodite, wherefore he himself may
have depicted Arameans more than Hebrews. Cabeiro traces to the
Habur/Khabur river in Mesopotamia, and as those peoples were
“Apiru” in historical records, they must define Aphro(dite). There
may therefore be no distinction between the two wives; myth
writers merely chose two different terms to depict the same
peoples. I will therefore see(k) Nahorites and/or Abramites within
the Aphrodite term. And the finger points to the Abreu surname of
Abruzzo province, so that indeed the Sabina (of the Abruzzo
region) appear to have been none other than the sons of Sheba!
That’s the rudimentary evidence I’m present in defining the Taddei
surname as Sheba’s brother, Dedan.
Consider as per the following quote how the “powerful”
Nairi (also "Nahir") peoples, living north of Assyria in Armenia,
were mixed with Kurds (italics mine):
"Nairi was powerful and rivaled the Assyrian
Empire. They had many wars with the Assyrians. Also
they helped the Medes in defeating the Assyrians. The
Nairi land is the same land that the Greek Historian
Xenophon and his Army passed through in 401 B.C. and
mentioned the people there as Kurd ochi. After
Xenophone, in the 4th century B.C., the historians
referred to the Nairi land as Cord uene.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nairi_%28people%29
This suggests a Nahor-Kurd alliance that stuck so
tenaciously that modern Kurds must be viewed as part Nahorites.
Note that while Kurds today are traced to the Medes that this
distinction must be included. I have not been able to verify it, but it
is said by some that Kurds trace to the Guti. I trace the Kurds to
the Kartli/Kartvelian Georgians, the latter were definitely a part
of the main vein of the dragon bloodline (as I will show when I

160
connect them to infant-sacrificing Satanists ). The following quote
shows a good portion of the Kabala family of peoples :
"Hurrians divided into many clans and subgroups,
founding city-states, kingdoms and empires with
eponymous clan names. These included the Gutis, Kurti,
Khaldi, Mards, Mushku, Mannaeans (Mannai), Mitanni,
Urartu, Lullubi and the Kassites among others."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurd
While the Mushku, for example, refer to Aryans, Khaldi
refers to Chaldea and therefore to the Semites there. “Khaldi” (i.e.
by that very spelling) was made into a god, and it was in fact the
god of the Nairi! Some do view the Khaldi as the inventors of
metal, and while I do not hesitate to view them as the root of the
Celts, I wonder if the Greek Calydonians were named after them
as well. I can thus entertain that the Celts and Scottish Caledonians
(a Pictish tribe) were Nahorites, at least in part, this then laying the
foundation for my tracing Atlantis to Nahorites, in part.
That now brings me to a major point, since Poseidon was
made the patriarch of Atlantis by Plato. I suspect strongly that
second son of Nahor, Buz (Genesis 22:21), was depicted as
Poseidon. The third son of Nahor, Kemuel, was inadvertently
revealed by Plato as an important peoples of western Atlantis,
whom I identify as both a peoples of Camelot and the Hebrew-
based ancestry of the Khazars and Cathars ; this chapter begins to
explain.
The god Pontus depicted a peoples who moved along the
southern shores of the Black sea, from Armenia to Lydia (and
perhaps founded the Punt nation). Pontus fathered the hideous
monster, "Ceto," a variation of "Cotys" apparently. Indeed, for
Ceto was the mother of the dragon, Ladon, a depiction of the
Lydians (i.e. in the same way, the mythical Lydus was the
descendant of Cotys). Moreover, Ceto was made the mother of the
Gorgons, if that helps to prove that Lydians (and Latins) were a
Gogi peoples. If Ceto refers to the Guti, then one may view the
Guti as the base of both the Gorgons and the Latins. I suspect that
in the latter two terms there translates a Gogi-Semite alliance,
especially if I’m correct in pegging “Guti” as a derivative of
“Gether,” in which case I would view equate “Cutha” with “Guti.”
This suggests that the Guti were originally an Aramean/Semite
peoples, and only afterward did they merge with Aryans. It may
even be that the very term, “Gorgon,” specified, not Aryans alone,
but this Aryan-Kabala mix. Yes, I do believe that feels correct,
wherefore Ladon should prove to be the same.
We find that Ladon guards a garden in what must be Atlantis
(details later), wherefore "Ladon" is a symbol for Atlantis; the

161
Roman empire itself may be thus viewed as a major branch of
Atlantis. It is fast becoming my position that the Atlantis concept
passed through the Sabina to the Romans much more so than vice
versa (after some mortal bickering, the two peoples merged as
one). I will (unlike others who resist for the time being) connect
the Romans to the Roma Gypsies , and because I trace the Gypsies
to Hermes, I will view Romans as stemming from Thoth and
therefore from Dedan. As the descendants of Abraham, Sheba and
Dedan were part Aramean (i.e. the brothers qualify as part of the
Aramean-based Kabala). Moreover, it will become evident that
Sheba, at least, became a major player in the Kabala concept.
As for Nahorites, they must have injected themselves into the
Roman domain (if indeed I’m correct in pegging Poseidon as Buz),
for Poseidon/Atlas peoples were both among the Sabina and in
Naples (especially in nearby Positano), a city that may have been
named after Neptune, the Roman version of Poseidon. This being
the bee-line that I expect to trace to Merovingian Franks, note here
how “Napoleon” evokes Naples.
Plato wrote down Solon's story (supposedly), saying that the
second son of Poseidon was Gadeirus (he said the first was
Atlas). This son established a coastal region on the "island" of
Atlantis, said (by Plato/Solon) to over-look the sea in the direction
of "Gades," modern Cadiz. Because Gades had itself been
"Gadir" to the Carthaginians, the Gadeirus mentioned by Plato
must have been a second location by that name (both founded by
the same peoples). (See Cadiz crest showing the two pillars with
Hercules.)
I would suggest that Gadeirus was on the southern side of
what is now England/Wales, for Gades is south of Britain. Plato
said that, prior to having it's coasts fall into the sea, Atlantis was
originally a long peninsula connected to a mainland, and I would
expect that it still is, since I don't believe a word about the
submerging of Atlantis. Southern Britain is indeed a long
peninsula that ends with a sharp point at Cornwall, and so keep in
mind that king Arthur chased away a wolf-line peoples at
Cornwall, for the Atlanteans were a wolf-line peoples, even from
the pre-Hercules era, as per Geryon's two-headed dog ( Orthos).
Already the finger points more pointedly to the Cadusii peoples
in/beside Hyrcania/wolfland, they being a Hermes peoples (as
explained previously).
Hesiod located Erytheia (of Hercules fame) at Cadiz
because, I think, he and many others misunderstood Plato, thinking
that he was locating Atlantis at that city. I have not yet identified
my hypothetical Gadir of southern Britain, but I suspect that this
became the Eadon of Druid importance, eventually furnishing

162
Edinburgh in what is to this day the region of Lothian. Are you
with me? Lothian = Ladon !
The Caspian sea upon which lived the Cadusii was named by
Kassites. If I’m correct in guestimating that the Guti of the Zagros
mountains became the Kassites of the Zagros, the Cadusii are all
the more identifiable as a (northerly) Kassite branch. If I’m also
correct in rooting the Khazars in the Kassites, then the Cadusii
may have been the Kassite-to-Khazar link. "Gadeirus" very much
evokes Khazaria, wherefore I seek a “Gadeirus”-like peoples in
the Mesopotamian/Iranian region. In that Plato’s Gadeirus will be
shortly revealed as a Nahorite peoples, I seek a Nahorite peoples
that sound like “Gadeir.” The finger points to the Agatziri,
otherwise called “Agathyrsos,” what many historians view as the
Khazars and/or proto-Khazars. That is, read as A- Katziri and A-
Gathyrsos . In myth, these peoples were made the offspring of
Hercules, thus solidifying my view that Plato was concerned with
the Hercules-based Atlanteans, not Geryon’s Atlantis.
I can now venture to say that the Nahorites were found
among the “Abira/Habira” tribe of Kassites. One article states
that the "Khabiru" sect of the Kassites, "appear to be a class
rather than an ethic group because their personal names
reflect origins in a variety of cultures."
http://www.geocities.com/soho/lofts/2938/histcult.html
The author appears to be saying that the Hebrews were
integrated among the Kassites to the point of being Kassites
themselves. I should mention here that, if the Kassites prove not to
be the extension of the Guti, that they may have been named after
either Kesed or Chazo, two other sons of Nahor (Genesis 22:22).
Yet, to satisfy the claim of Joseph, king of the Khazars, the
Nahorites among the Kassites must have been inter-married with
Togarmites. This is incredibly interesting where the reality may be
that Nahorites are to invade end-time Israel along with Gog, for
God may arrange for some of them to survive Armageddon and
thereby contribute to the Millennial Israel. In any case, just how
much Nahorite blood exists to this day in Russia?
The Kassite connection to the far west is not unsubstantiated
by historical argumentation, for Khazars are thought by many to
have furnished the Cathars of southern France, whom as the
Gnostic friends of the Templars fit neatly into the dragon line.
However, might the Cathars have been from the Gadeirus
bloodline of Atlantis, rather than directly from the Khazars?
Surely, the Norse and French supporters of the Templars must
have been ancient Atlanteans. Not just any Atlanteans, but
Atlanteans that had somehow gotten the idea (probably from the
same source as the Khazar David-and-Solomon duo) that they

163
were destined to rule the Biblical Millennium, for which reason
they exploited everything to conquer Jerusalem.
It was the core of the movement that called themselves
“Templars.” I would venture to say that they were cohens (i.e.
priests) even the kagan riests of the Khazars, by which I mean to
imply &t they were het Stewart bloodline. Very likely Nahorites!
Plato said: ...in the direction of the continent, [the
Atlanteans] extended as far as the heights of Cithaeron." The
term "continent" here is not necessarily referring to Europe, but
rather the mainland from which the Atlantean peninsula jutted out.
The point is, "Cithaeron" reflects "Cathar" perfectly.
In a letter of response to a Hebrew diplomat in Spain, Joseph
wrote (roughly 1,000 AD) that Togarmah had ten sons, using a
ten-son theme that keeps cropping up in this story. For example,
the first Rothschild arranged five sons and five daughters; what
happened to the rest I do not know. It's not only highly unlikely
that he had five and five after only ten children, but it appears that
he was arranging ten arrows (Rothschilds depict themselves with
arrows) to depict his family, shooting for the same mythical
situation as had the Kabeiribased Daktyloi , who were depicted
as five "sons" and five "daughters." Moreover, it’s plastered all
over the Internet that “On Ogur,” a term referring to Hungary but
moreso to Bulgarians, means “ten arrows.” This theme is surely
based in Hephaistos, the Roman Vulcan (Balkan?), at the head of
the Daktyloi.
I'm not sure what to believe in Joseph's letter, for kings have
little fear in acting with political expediency first, truth second.
Three of the said ten sons of Togarmah were major people
groups: Khazar, Bulgar, and Avar. I'll take this non-literally, but
as meaning that Khazars were related by blood to Bulgarsandd
Avars. The later in my opinion were the Iberi east of Tubal, even
the wolf-line Avvites of Opis (on the Tigris in Gozan) thatforr
bee-reasons may have been of Buz/Posiedon. Might“Poseidon”"
break down to Opis-Eden and/or Buz-Eden? Avars still liveinn
Caucasia today, in what has become Daghestan (“doggland”),,
evoking the god, Dagon,, the Tigris-river god that I think wasaa
god of Nahorites. A “Tigris”" evokes“Togarmah,”" it may bethatt
Dagon depictedTogarmites,, wherefore the root of the wolf line
mayjustt be in Togarmah! I would expect that Teucer originatedonn
theTigris,s but alsoPlato’ss Atlanteans in that they, as for example,
the Welsh, were from Cimmerians (Gomer was father tobothh
Togarmah and Ashkenaz).
Nahor's son, Chazo ("Hazo" in the KJV and NIV), evokes
Poseidon's son (as listed by Plato), "Azaes." Moreover, Plato
mentioned the Atlantean river of "Asopus"; the root of that term is
essentially "Azov," the latter being the Black-sea regionfoundedd

164
by Cimmerians, not far from Khazaria's capital on the Caspian sea.
In fact, the Khazar empire spread as far as Azov.
[Update August 2006 – I have independently traced Zeus to
the Greek god, Asopus, and have tentatively understood the term
to be Assi-Opis. I have not yet traced the Assi peoples to a solid
connection, for I’m debating between the Asshurites of Dedan and
the Ashkenazi, brothers of Togarmah. End Update].
Joseph went on to say (in his letter) that he was a fake Jew,
as were all his ancestral kings going back several generations. He
claimed to be from Khazar, son of Togarmah , which would not
make him a Hebrew, but an Aryan. Yet he admitted that he was
son of Aaron, son of Benjamin, son of Menahem, etc. (i.e. all
Hebrew names). Therefore, as for his story as to how his fathers all
came to possess Hebrew names while not being Hebrews, I'd have
to conclude that he fabricated it. I think the man was covering up;
either he didn't want to establish relations with the Spanish
Hebrews, who were wishing to establish realtions with his
kingdom, and/or he didn't want Europe to know that Hebrews
actually ruled somewhere, especially as the Khazars may have
been just then plotting the invasion of Jerusalem. It is known that
when the Templars set out for Jerusalem for the first time (1096
AD), they slaughtered and otherwise persecuted Spanish Hebrews
(who may have wanted to join the Crusade). Why?
( Letter at http://www.isfsp.org/sages/letter-hasdai.html )
Joseph wasn't likely lying altogether, but was instead
expressing the Aryan/Togarmite side of his Khazar bloodline. But
because Joseph mentioned 10 sons, it is some reason to suspect
that he was a descendant of Nahor ... who had ten sons!! (Genesis
22:21-24) I don’t think, therefore, that there was a man, Khazar,
son of Togarmah.
I should point this out before I forget, that as Joseph said he
lived at the mouth of the Volga river just so to protect the Caspian
sea from northern invaders wanting to attack the Muslim villages
on the Caspian shores, so an account of the Khazars reveals that
when the Rus came down river, the Khazar ruler winked and let
them pass into the Caspian, whereupon the Rus Vikings did
exactly that: invaded and looted Muslin villages. Upon learning
this, I realized that Khazars and the Rus must have been related.
As the other half of the Trojans (aside from Teucer) was the
mythical "Dardanus," might he have been Dedan? While
"Dardanus" evokes "Tartar," the ealiest version of the term was
"Tatar," which is feasibly rooted in "Dedan." Indeed, a
Wikipedia statement regarding Tatar roots says: “The name is
derived from Ta-ta or Dada, a Mongolian tribe..." I'll assume
that Dedanites had settled Mongolia, and that they later spread out
as the Tartars proper. As Tocharians had also been in Mongolia, a

165
Dedan-Togarmite alliance, the same alliance (i.e. Dardanus-
Teucer) that had formed the Trojans, is feasible.
Have you ever wondered why Aryans have been labelled,
“Caucasians,” while Orientals are labelled “Mongoloids”? It
seems to me that the people who devised these terms were of the
dragon bloodline. I haven’t proven it yet, but all intuative
indicators suggest to me that the red Chinese dragon is a product
of the Caucasian dragon line in Mongolia. The "civilized" North-
American Indians, who are thought to originate in the Orient, used
eagles and dragons to depict themselves, and Mormons claimed
that American Indians had descended from the Jews (albeit "non-
Jewish Hebrews" is the correct way to say it). As the very wicked
leader of the Mormons (Joseph Smith) was heavily involved in
Freemasonry, one can easily determine that the secret societies
knew all along where their bloodlines had gone, worldwide.
I previously believed that Mormons were completely crazy
for making their Jew-Indian connection; this connection was
shared to some degree by the Catholic Apostolic Church that
attempted to set up twelve, pan-European Apostles of Jesus Christ.
I had believed that such secret societies were attempting to
convince the world that Gogi peoples were Hebrews in efforts to
support a Gogi World Order in the name of a Biblical Millennium
under the control of both Israel and Jesus. Now I am beginning to
realize that what the secret societies claim(ed) to be Jews/Israel are
in fact a Gogi-Hebrew mix, having no Israelite blood of
importance. This sort of Christianity is surely to produce the False
Prophet, and so beware, because the Catholic Apostolic Church is
the very one that invented and/or advanced the pre-tribulation
rapture and its Dispensationalism, as well as Latter-Rain
Christancoepfwldminato,seh
charismatic-tongues, false-prophecy and false-miracle movements,
and was heavily involved in Zionism.
It is believed that the so-called “Kazan Tators” stemmed
from the river named after Bulgarians, the Volga. The mouth of
that river was home to the Khazar kings, wherefore the Kazan
Tators appear as a Khazar branch of Dardanians, which is to say a
Khazar branch of Dedanites. Support for this view would be in
finding evidence of Sheba peoples in the same north-eastern parts
of Russia. Can you think of any? It’s known that Tatars filled
Siberia! Could the same that named Siberia have named the
Sabina of Italy?
The reality is yet more shocking, for the flag of Tatarstan is
simply a red and green mix, the very colors representing Wales.
Notice that Scottish tart ans are often green and red mixes. Notice
that the flag of Italy is the red and green of Tatarstan, but with
white between them. The flag of Ireland is a near-match to the

166
Italian flag, but see the flag of Wales to learn that it uses exactly
the three colors used by the Italian flag. What is going on here?
Red, green, and white dragon lines, I reckon. The secret societies
kept track, and that's where their invention of heraldry lays out on
the table what they hoped to disguise. I’m suggesting that at least
one of these colors on these particular flags depict Sheba and
Dedan. As the chevron on the Taddei Coat are red, I would begin
to view Dedan as the red.
I’m also suggesting that the Taddei surname in Italy was a
European branch of the Tatar-Togarmite alliance ... which is
consistent with previous conclusions wherein Romans are rooted
in Trojans and where Trojans were a Dardanus-Teucerian mix. I
will later show that the Taddei surname in Italy stems from the
mythical Tydeus, a Greek-Calydonian peoples and therefore
possibly the ancestors of the Pictish Caledonians (of Scotland). As
for Wales, I’ve considered the Tudors as the extention of
Tydeus/Taddei.
“ Sabir,” thought by some to be the same as the
"Suar/Suwar," is a term that reflects the "Svi/Sviar" that became
the Swedes. This indicates to me that Siberians and Swedes were
related (and that both must have enjoyed the cold). All of these
peoples may have been rooted in the main trunk of the ancient
Subartu (commas mine because the author neglected them so as
to create some confusion): "The inhabitants of southern
Mesopotamia called Assyria, Shubir, in Sumerian, and
Subartu in Akkadian; these names may point to a Subarean
population that was related to the Hurrians."
http://www.angelfire.com/nt/Gilgamesh/assyrian.html
The above website not only claims that Assyria was first of
all named, Shubar, but that king "Ashur-uballit was the first to
name Assyria the Land of Asshur." This contradicts the
simplistic notion held to by some, that Assyria was named by
Asshur, the Biblical son of Shem. It may be, therefore, that king
Ashur-uballit was from the Asshurites that were sons of Dedan, in
which case “Assyria” may have been named after Hebrews. In that
light, I don’t don’t what to make of Biblical prophecy when it
identifies the end-time anti-Christ as an Assyrian (e.g. Isaiah 10,
13, 30, 31). I have already identified that Assyrian as Gog, but
should I/we expect that he be an Assyrian-Hebrew as well? Some
of the biggest political names in Russia today are of Hebrew
parentage, including Primakov and Zhirinovsky, and of course it
is said by many that Communist Russia was itself founded by
“Jews.”
I would at some point station the Sheba peoples at Lake
Sevan, a lake still in Armenia today. I don’t know if they went
from there to become the Subartu, or vice versa. As Urartu (an

167
Armenian domain) was a variation of "Ararat," and as "Subartu"
seems a play-on words with "Urartu," it may be that Shebeans,
known as “Subar,” became rulers over Ararat in earning the
alternative “Subartu” title. Wikipedia shares this: "Other sources
have attributed to the Sabirs the founding of some cities on the
Caspian Sea coast of Daghestan."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabirs).
One could therein see that the Sabirs were the Shebeans who
named Sevan, for Sevan is just west of Daghestan. One can also
see that “Sabir” may devolve into “Iberi” and “Avar” (Avars still
live in Daghestan today). Sevan’s ancient name, "Gegham" sea,
was named by the Gogi, apparently, for the lake is currently in
"the eastern Armenian province of Geghark'unik.'"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sevan
Geghark is in Azerbaijan, just south of Daghestan, and this
term evokes the ancient seat of the Caucasian Gogi: Gogarene.
The capital of Geghark today is Gavar, wherein one can see, in
midstrem, the modification of "Avar" to "Kabar" (or vice versa).
The Kabars in northern Caucasia, although they were inter-married
with Bulgarians, had a high Hebrew population that ended up in
Hungary as the so-called “Ashkenazi Jews.” Kabars were smack
next to the Khazars, and it is said by others that Khazars who
ended up in Hungary and Germany were “Ashkenazi Jews.” The
Kabar region was called “Bulkar-Kabardino,” and I would
therefore suggest that the “Kabar” portion referred to the Hebrews
while the “Bulkar” portion referred to Togarmites and their
brothers, the Ashkenazi.
As the Italian dragon line is rooted in the Iberi, it may be that
the Kabeiri cult of Hephaistos was named after the Kabars. A
common alternative is "Hephaestus," where one can see a
possible Heph-Aes combination. If the Aes/Assi peoples are in
view, then the Vulcan finger points to the Indo-Iranian
Tocharians, where lived the Tocharian relatives, the Hepthalites :
"The later name Hephthal, which some sources
indicate were originally one of the 5 Yuezhi families from
Kushan, is supposed to have been a name derived from
their ruling élite"
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Hepthalites
It's the Yuezhi peoples who are collectively connected to the
Tocharians, which deceptively appears to indicate “Jews.” I would
rather peg them as the Guti/Cutha, thus explaining their “Kushan”
“Goshen” (of Egypt), itselfkingdom.whcbytearfls
known to derive from “Gozan” of Mesopotamia. "In China [the
Yuezhi] were known as Yanda ... also written Yedaiyiliduo /
Yeda..." (above website), those latter terms modifying easily to

168
"Geti." The Hephthalites called themselves simply "Uar," and this
term has been identified by many as the Avars, and this supports
my hunch that the “Heph” portion of “Hephaestus” is short for
“Av” and refers to the Avvites. If indeed the “Aes” portion refers
to the Assi, then I would point to the Avidia-branch Avites, those
in the region of Bactria, whom I think will become the Biblical
Abaddon that comes to destroy Gog’s “Assyrian” empire.
As Hephthalites came to be called "Huna," albeit "White
Huns," I would connect them to the Ugric languages that was
shared by Hungarians and Siberians. I think "Hun/Kun" qualifies
as a derivative of the “khan” version of "khagen," a term that
may just have been identical to the "Cohen" surname. This
coincides with my theory that the Stewarts, now known to be
from the Cohen surname, were from Hungary and/or the Rus. The
theory is this, that queen Margaret of Scotland was somehow a
Stewart herself, through her mother Agatha, for which reason
Margaret’s son, David I, was the first to elevate the Stewarts of
Dol, Brittany, to a position second only to the king. It may even
be that David was named after the David(s) that was the Khazar
attempting to conquer Jerusalem, and from whom I suspect the
“Star of David” Zionism symbol originated. Hungary was formed
by the Arpad dynasty, a Magyar king from Khazar regions and
migrating to Pannonia with reportedly seven Magyar and three
Kabar tribes, ten in all. Thus, Andrew was a Magyar Hun of the
Arpad dynasty, but previous to his rule there was a Khazar on the
Hngarian throne (1041-44), with a Hebrew name: Samuel Aba.
Might _ Aba _ have referred to Avvites? Avars? Kabars?
Connection of the Stewarts with Huns is made in two basic
ways: one, in that they called themselves “Alan,” while Alans are
regarded as white Huns, and two, Avars mixed with Bulgars to
produce the House of Dul, which so smacks of "Dol" ” that it
can't’be ignored. One may then investigate to find whether the
Atlantean term, “Thule,” doesn’t derive from either/both of these
Houses.
It should also be said that the money bags behind the said
Catholic Apostolic Church , the London banker, Henry
Drummond, was, as were all Drummonds, from a marriage
between king Andrew of Hungary and a daughter of the
Varangian-Rus king, Varoslav; that is, their son George was the
first Drummond. Because the Drummond clan ended up in
Drymen, Scotland, connection with the Dryas Edones (i.e. the
Druids) is possible. When Margaret was in exile with her father
(Edward the prince of England), she was in the protection of both
Varoslav and king Andrew of Hungary. Coincidence, or was
Margaret involved with the Catholic cult that brought forth pre-
tribulationism and various demonic, Christian-counterfeit

169
doctrines? It is thought that a semblence of the pre-tribulation
rapture was copied by the Catholic Apostolic Church from a
Catholic monk, and moreover the Drummonds were pro-Catholic.
Margaret was also pro-Catholic when serving as queen of
Scotland, even though her husband (Malcolm III) was not. It is
understood that the Roman Catholic church (i.e. popery) was
injected with pro-Merovingian/pro-Frank agents prior to the
Margaret period, wherefore I suspect that various popes/bishops
under the Franks had been of the Stewart bloodline. The
Drummonds later formed part of the military-based Jacobites , the
war cause of this group being specifically pro-Stewart!
Margaret had been born during her exile, and who knows but
that she may have been a daughter of someone other than Agatha’s
husband (Edward) i.e. she may have been a daughter of someone
in the Stewart bloodline. But if not, there is online proof that
Agatha’s father (a Roman emperor) was a Stewart from the
Hohen royal bloodline, where that term is known by me to be an
alternative of " Cohen," but moreover the Hohens traced (to my
greart surprise) to the Salian Franks that were the Merovingians
(details later in the chapter, "It Was a Good Day for Cohen
Salian"). This not only explains how Stewarts were Merovingians,
but reveals that Stewarts, aside from making it to the throne of
Scotland, England and finally Great Britain, were priests and rulers
of the "holy" Roman empire.
It would be hard to find a bigger dragon than this, but
underlying this beast was a Hebrew element, that of the “Cohen”
name. The fin points to Dagon-worshipping Nahorites especially,
for the miter (the long head-covering) of popery was (and still is)
is in the shape of a fish. I’ve noted that the German-branch Bute
familyusecntrhoa-fmsybl.
George Drummond came to Scotland (1055) about a decade
before Margaret and Agatha, but I can find nothing on who he
oup, though I suspect the Scottish Ross clan
became as a people gr
(i.enamdftrhsRuoe,Ickn)frit’sowhae
Ross clan had a certain Andrew as patriarch. This Ross clan
became close to (politically paired with) the Moray clan, which is
alternatively “Moravia.” If Rosicrucianism proper was rooted in
the Varangian Rus, a good possibility indeed, then Scottish
Rosicrucianism may have been the product of George himself. The
Templars arose in or within a few decades of George’s lifetime.
It isossible that the Varangians and Varoslav were named
after the Xvars (there is yet a “Varan” regioin where Avars live
today), while it is known that the Avars of Europe had distinct
Hebrew elements. Avars are, by the way, viewed as Huns, and as
goes the belief that Avars were at the root of the founding of
Moravia (of Europe), so I think that Moravia was named after

170
Merovee, myhthical progenitor of the Merovingian Franks.
Moreover, Varoslav gave another of his daughters in marriage to
Henry I of France, not to mention Hardraad III of Norway, where
both kings may have been from Nahorite and/or Abramite
Hebrews. If I’m correct here in rooting Franks in Avars –
especially the Sicambrian Franks of proto-Hungary, from where
both the Attila and Avars Huns had ruled Europe -- the Frank bee
symbol would then seem to be, at least in part, in the Avvites...if
indeed the Avars were Avvites. The Salian Franks, the other side
of the Merovingian bloodline, are tracable to the Batavi (Bat-
Avi?) peoples of the Rhine-river mouth (known to be a branch of
“Catti” !!), and to that I can only add that Sicambria was the same
city as Buda, an apparent root of both “Batavi” and the Bute name
that Stewarts married.
If I’m correct in tracing Avvites to Opis of Gozan, then one
may seek the root of the Frank Avars in the Ops/Opis cult of the
Sabina. One shouldn’t rush to identify the Opis cult as purely from
Sheba, however, because it is said that the Opis cult was founded
by a mythical Titus Tatius, a name that certainly reflects
“Taddei” and the Calydonian character, Tydeus . It may be,
therefore, that the Opis cult was both a Sheba and Dedan cult, by
which I would point out that the Gozan city of Opis was likewise.
The Vere clan (using a green dragon symbol) is a dragon-
line Merovingian bloodline that would appear to be based in
Avars. The Veres also use a blue boar symbol, and it’s pertinent
that the mythical Tydeus was depicted with a boar symbol on his
shield, wherefore he was from the Calydonian-Boar line. More on
the Calydonian Boar later.
My reasoning is that the Khazars were exactly the Getae
Thracians (since both terms are rooted in “goat”), but I would
curiously stem the Getae from the Khazars, not vice versa, albeit
not from Khazars proper (of the Caspian), but from Khazar
ancestors on the Tigris, whom I think were from Gether, son of
Aram, the same that named the Guti/Cutha, the same that was the
root of the Kabala cult (which cult inadvertently claims a root in
“Kether”). Note the ancient designation of the Khazars,
"Akatziri" or "Agathyrsus," how they undress to "Katziri" or
"Gathyrus," very reflective of the Biblical “Gether” and Plato’s
mythical "Gadeirus," the latter of whom was inadvertently
revealed (by Plato) as the third son of Nahor (details later). Is it a
coincidence that wherever the Cohen surname is found today, the
“Katz” surname is nearby (more on that later)? Even as the
Atlantean city of Gadir is known to have modified to the "r"-less
"Gades," so the same seems to have occurred in Thrace to net the
"r"-less "Cotys" and "Getae."

171
The Cutha Kabalists settled Samaria, according to Kabala
self-claims and to the Bible itself. These peoples in Israel were as
Satan moving in to cause Israel to sin grievously, and not even the
Israelites of Jesus' day wished to associate with Samaritans. I
suggest that the Cutha were the founders of Gath, from which
term comes "Gittite." The Anakites, said in the Bible to have
been giants, were left by Joshua at three cities, one of them Gath.
Goliath, a type of anti-Christ, was a Gittite. I'm suggesting that
Gath was a Kassite/Guti settlement, but ditto for Gaza, for another
of the three cities was in fact Gaza (Joshua 11:22).
I realize that these two cities were in Canaan, but they are not
revealed in the Bible as being founded by Canaanites. It's true that
Goliath was called both a Gittite and a Philistine, and that
Philistines were Hamites by birth. But where Aryan-Hebrews had
settled what later became Philistia, they may over time have
become called "Philistines" even though they were not such
initially. There is more to this Guti-Gath (or Kassite-Gath)
connection than the similarity of terms, to be shared as I go along.
It leads to the Cati peoples of Cilicia that then became the Kybele
Kabalists of Phrygia.
Note how "Kassi/Kazaro" evokes "Assi/Aesir," suggesting
on the one hand that the Kassites and Khazars were indeed the
same peoples (i.e. as much as the Assi were the Aesir), and on the
other hand that Aesir Scandinavians were rooted in the same stock
as the Khazars/Kassites. Thus I expect that the Cati, a term that I
will use to depict this bloodline universally, traces to the Aesir
cult, and indeed that is why the heart of the Aesir cult was in the
Goths. It's no secret that Scandinavia has been forwarded by some
as the true Atlantis, but it’s beginning to look as though everyone
who's bickered over the true location of Atlantis has been correct.
The “Assi” connection to “Aesir” causes me to root the terms
in the Dedanite Asshurites. I cannot say whether the Assyrians
proper were from this Dedanite tribe, but I am more certain that
the Syrian Asshurites were ... which agrees with Ezekiel 38 wherein
we read about a Sheba and Dedan existing in/near Tarsus of
Cilicia. Note that the third city, along with Gath and Gaza, was
Ashdod, what seems to be an Asshur-Dedan combination.
Knowing that the Scandinavians were Germanics, it's of interest to
me that the Italians call Germans, "Tedesco," where, because the
root is "Ted" (as in "Franc" being the root of "Francesco"), it may
identify Germanics (some, anyway) as descendants of Dedan. It’s
possible that “Tedesco” is rooted in the Taddei surname of Italy, or
in the root of Taddei. I'll give evidence later that a certain
important ruler in Brittany, whom I think was a Vere, was known
to the Welsh/Bretons as "Tad" (not the ruler's personal name, but
likely a god-like title).

172
ATLANTIS MOVES TO ISRAEL
June 2006

It may have been God's will to have Joshua leave the


peoples of Gath, Gaza, and Ashdod in the side of Israel, for His
long-range Plan. For the following reasons, these "Philistines"
seem to have become the Zeus peoples on Crete (i.e. the proto-
Trojans). Philistines worshiped Dagon, and per very large chance
the proto-Trojans of Crete, styled " Daktyloi" by the myth-code
writers, were from Dagon bloodlines, for Dagon was called by the
Greeks, "Cretan Zeus." If you don't know, Zeus was raised on
Crete by Daktyloi
"Daktyloi" was fashioned to mean "ten fingers," and these I
view as Poseidon's ten sons, who first ruled Greek Atlantis as the
Trojo-Philistines now under discussion. But as Dagon was a
Semiticod, having origins in Akkadia, Nahor's ten sons (Genesis
22:21-24 come to mind. Then, behold, I found the following
(italics not mine):
"The god Dagon first appears in ... Mari texts...An
interesting early reference to Dagon occurs in a
letter... written by Itur-Asduu an official in the court of
Mari and governor of Nahur (the Biblical city of
Nahor) ... "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagon
The contents of the letter is not pertinent here (it has to do
with Dagon appearing in a dream), but the existence of a city of
Nahor, and it's attachment to Dagon, is central. Mari was between
Ur and Haran, and Nahur must have been likewise. Many writers
place Nahur on the Habur river, also called "Khabur" and once
again smacking of the Kabeiri cult of Greek myth, which was
indeed based in the Daktyloi. Now read this (italics mine):
"The Book of Kings in the Hebrew Bible describes
Israelite captives from Samaria who settled near Guzana
(17:6,8)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khabur_River
What I mean to point out is that, centuries after the Cutha
Kabalists settled Samaria (northern Israel), they were invaded by
God via the hand of the Assyrians, and the 10 tribes of Israel who

173
sinned with the Kabalists were likewise invaded, and the whole lot
were brought back to Cuthah , surely, for "Guzana/Gozan" must
be that very term evolved over time. My interlinear version of 2
Kings 17:6 reads, "...and made [the Samaritans] live in Halah,
and in Habur by the river Gozan, and in the cities of the
Medes." Halah is placed by the Zondervan Atlas off the Tigris
river just north of Nineveh, while the same Atlas located the city
of Gozan east of Haran, and on the Habur river.
The Samaritan exile to Assyrian is treated again in 2 Kings
19:12, where we read of "the sons of Eden who were in
Telassar," As "tel" means "hill," the city was "Assar," and by
chance this was the city named after Asshur, brother of Dedan,
and/or the city of the Assi/Aesir. Moreover, as I am very interested
in tracing the Edones to the modern day, whom I have previously
traced back to Eden and forward to the Jutes/Goths/Odin, I'm
marking this, that the Edones had likely been, at least in part, the
Aes branch of Guti.
[Update August 2006 -- After writing this chapter and that
paragraph, I independently traced Zeus to the mythical Asopus,
which I moreover interpreted as Assi-Opis aside from any
consideration of this paragraph. Opis was in Gozan. End Update]
Do you see how nicely this has all fit together after all, how
Guti and Jute/Goth seem related, and how the Aesir gods of the
Goths/Jutes reflect the city of Assar, and how the Edones evoke
Odin, ruler of the Aesir, while also connecting to Eden of
Mesopotamia, even as the Aesir religion and the Kabala are
represented by a tree of life (i.e. as if in the Garden of Eden)? But
Eden had started at the Persian gulf: "The alluvial plain of
Babylonia was called Edin...on the western bank of the river."
"The river" refers to the one into which the Euphrates and Tigis
join, a short stretch leading to the Persian gulf
http://geographyofbabyloniaandassyria.quickseek.com .
Clearly, Odin was worshiped as the serpent in the garden,
and ditto for the dragon sun-god cult, but what's sad is that the
religion was based on desires formed in the hearts of Hebrews,
even Hebrews after the blood of Abraham and his brother. It is no
wonder that God hated idolatry in Israel so much. Da gon may have
been the god of the Nahorites themselves, not merely of Nahorite
allies into which Nahorites inter-married, and having moved to the
coast of Israel, Dagon (i.e. his peoples) then proceeded to Crete
(then Caphtor), where the Philistines are said by Genesis 10:13 to
have originated. As Philistines were in Israel as early as Genesis
21 and 26, their landing on Crete was yet earlier. Some equate
Philistines with the Greek “Pelasgians,” but I’m not yet of an
opinion.

174
I'm not suggesting that Zeus/Trojans were Philistines, for
Philistines are revealed (in Genesis 10) as Hamites. Rather, I'm
suggesting that Zeus/Trojans were Cutha Hebrews mixed with
Kassite-Aryan blood (Cimmerian/Togarmite/Ashkenazi), and that
when these migrated from the shores of proto-Israel to Crete,
Canaanites of the same regions followed and thus formed the
proto-Philistines. These Cretan Canaanites inevitably formed the
Hamite peoples called "Caphtorites" (mentioned in Genesis 10).
The Aryans of Crete, which Strabo identified as Daktyloi
from Rhodes, were called "Curetes," after which the term,
"Crete," was founded, apparently. The wild-bash affairs of the
Curetes have been compared to those of the Cotys -branch
Thracians, wherefore Cotys is pegged as a root of the Trojans,
which may then identify Cotys as the Korybantes proto-Trojans.
Note the “Cur” and “Kor” prefixes in those terms, especially as the
Curetes and Korybantes peoples are often equated as the same
peoples hinging around “Ida” (i.e. short for “Eden?). Cotys was
made the father of Attis, and should therefore refer to the Cutha
Hebrews more directly than the more-ancient Guti. One is pressed
to view Zeus as a creation of the Kabalists and therefore as a
counterfeit Biblical God.
[Update August 2006 -- My ex-Rosicrucian email
correspondant, Kathlene Bot , has notified me that “god” is
itself rooted in “Goth,” butTwould say much earlier in the
Guti/Cutha. Many say that “Zeus” is a variation of “theos/dios,”
and of course the Biblical God is “Theos” in the Greek New
Testament. Kathlene is convinced that the term, “Jesus,” stems
from Greek myth as a variation of “Zeus,” since the true name of
God’s Son was “Joshua” i.e. with one “s”. It’s frightening that
“Iasus,” a mythical ruler of Argos, is almost the very New -
Testament word, “Iesous” (Strong’s #2424), the term for our
“Jesus.” I conjecture in a coming chapter that Iasus was the same
as Dardanus’ brother, Iasion, mythical founder of the Kabeiri cult
at Mount Ida, and possibly a depiction of the Aes peoples.
The abominable thought is this, not that Kathlene believes
that Jesus was a fake (i.e. that he was not the true Son of YHWH),
but that the Greek New Testament, as we now have in our
possessions, is to an unknown extent a Gnostic-Christian work
wherein the Christian writers mistakenly connected Jesus to
Kabalistic concepts. Rosicrucians and other Kabalists are doing the
same to this day, but this is of little danger to my Faith, for indeed
the Gnostics were unable to altar the main story line of the New
Testament, even if they got away with injecting their slant on
certain terms. The reality is, Joshua, his Crucifixion, and His
Resurrection, is in Isaiah 53, and was there centuries before the
Greek New-Testament was meddled with. I realize that by my

175
ublishing this I will give fodder to those who wish to destroy
Phristianity, but it's better in my opinion that you deal with this
now rather than later, in the great tribulation period. You either
believe that the New-Testament writers were liars/fiends/fakes,
advancing to the ends of the Earth a Son-of-God concept that was
based merely in a man, or you believe their report on the Son to be
true. The situation doesn’t change, for the attack on this Truth by
Satan’s forces is so great that no one can have genuine Faith apart
from the power of the Spirit to empart it. If YHWH choses you,
you will have Faith and you will overcome this spiritual onslaught.
End Update]
Keeping in mind that the Edones were the Getae, the website
above tells further that Dagon was "Siton" to the Greeks, which
surely explains why the Edones were also called "Sithones,"
"Sitones" living next to the Swedes as whictendfs
Dagon descendants. The conclusion is that Edones are rooted in
Dagon.
Strabo connected the Tochari and the Assi to the
"Passianis/Pasiani," quite possibly the Buzi/Busae Medes, whom
I now suspect as Nahorites from his second son, Buz. This is
significant, for even before knowing of Buz's existence, I had
developed the theory that Poseidon descended/depicts the Buzi
Medes. This term, "Pasiani," gets me closer to "Poseidon." I will
be elated when I finally find the historical link between the Buzi
and the Guti, which up to this point I must only imagine, in that
the Buzi are in several ways root-able in the dragon bloodline.
I now have some reason to believe that the Kassites took
over the Egyptian "Ptah" cult that had in turn taken over the Guti
cult in Gath, for I found this quote snuare brackets mine to
indciate the Hurrian-Manes bloodline): "e^Egyptiangod Ptah
is given the title du .gitti 'Lord of Gath in a prism from
Lachish which has on its opposite face the name of Amenhotep
II (c. 1435–1420 BCE) [Min-Hotep]...in the Ugaritic texts Ptah
is seemingly identified instead with the craftsman god Kothar-
wa-Khasis."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El
Lachish is near Gath and the Ugaritic region (northern Syria)
is known to connect with Akkadia and other Semitic entities; the
phrase "Kothar-wa-Khasis," no matter how the various
historians decide to translate it according to various
local/irrelevant terms, smacks too much of the Khazars/Kassites
for me to view it in any other way. My point being obvious, that
my connection of Gath (and nearby Gaza) to the Kassites is
correct. I did not make the Kassite-Gath connection as a result of
finding the above quote, but rather found the quote afterward, a
most-supportive piece for what was already more than a hunch.

176
Another website (below) tells that the term, "Ka-sha-lu," is
associated with Kothar-wa-Khasis, and behold that the Philistines
of Caphtor are said by Genesis 10:14 to derive from the
"Kasluhim" (in this case from Ham). It's clear that Kothari/Kassi
peoples ended up in Egypt, and this squares with Greek myth
wherein it locates some Poseidon Aryans in north Africa, for
which reason Egypt shares a part in the Atlantean story. According
to Greek myth, the Europe-god, Phoenix, stems from Poseidon
mixing it up in Egypt, meaning that Phoenicians were an Atlantean
entity as well. Perhaps the hardest question of all is, who wasn't?
The website (below) says that "Kothar's second land is
Kaphtor." That is, while Kothar was associated with the land of
Ptah (in Egypt), he was also significant in Crete. Myth relates in
various ways that the Phoenix bloodline made a home in Crete
beforundigEp(.eRomas,CltndGric).The
question is, as the Phoenicians came to Crete as a Zeus-Phoenician
mix (i.e. Zeus-Europa), was that Zeus the same as Dagon, and, if
so, wouldn't that connect Dagon to the white bull that the myth
depicted Zeus as? As the bull was “Taurus,” while Dagon was
chief in Dor, I would identify “Dor” and its Greek version,
“Doris,” not to mention Tyrus, as a Taurus peoples. Connection of
Dor and Tyre to the Taurus mountains of Cilicia is now evident, an
important point in this story, as we shall see. It's also apparent that
Dagon referred to the Semite postion of the dragon bloodline,
while the white Taurus depicted the Aryan (Gorgon) side.
Threfore, the Aryan element -- in Atlanticism, in the Trojans, in
Egyptian-Poseidon blood, in Europe, in Russia, in India, in the
Orient, in North America -- was Kassite-Cutha.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kothar-wa-Khasis
If Gath was a Kassite entity, the Gittites must have been
primary blood contributers to Greek-theater Atlantis (usually
viewed as a Cretan and/or Rhodian empire). Let me put it this way,
that because Dagon was Cretan-Zeus to the Greeks, Dagon's
Mediterranean shore in Israel became a base of Greek Atlantis.
Moreover, the same shores become home to the chief
god/bloodline of Greek myth. It is expected by me, therefore, that
this same bloodline formed western Atlantis.
In the following quote, Dagon is revealed as the father of
Zeus, Cronus: "In the euhemeristic account of Sanchuniathon,
El (rendered Elus or called by his standard Greek counterpart
Cronus) is...the son of Sky [Uranus] and Earth [Gaia]...El is
brother to the god Bethel, to Dagon, and to an unknown god
equated with the Greek Atlas..." (square brackets mine)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_(god)
There you have a connection again of Dagon to
Atlas/Atlantis. Years ago I interpreted the castration of Uranus by

177
Cronus, and the throwing away of his testicles, as the formation
from Uranus (i.e. Eran/Iran) of the Greek region of Elis; I don't
remember how I arrived to that deduction, but the above quote
seems to clinch it where Uranus is El and Elus. To confirm that El
"In a later passage it is istheGrkgod,Cnuwfitha:
explained that El castrated Sky" (website above).
Others say that Elisha, son of Javan, founded Elis, but if
that's true, then El must refer to Elisha's descendants. This doesn't
necessarily make Cronus a descendant primarily of Javan, for
mythical sons are not always bloodline linked; they can also be
people linked, as in the United States and Canada being two sons
of England. As Uranus probably refers to Eran (old Aria and the
subsequent Iran), and Zeus to Dor and Tyre, Cronus must refer to
an intermediate peoples.
[Update August 2006 -- In later chapters, I will trace Cronus
to the proto-Satyrs of Gozan, and even to the founders of Gozan,
the mythical goats. This means that Cronus depicted the Guti and
the Getae Thracians, but also the Kothars (“koza” means “goat”). I
speculate that “Cronus” is rooted in “Cor,” hence the Curetes and
Korybantes that his son (Zeus) more-directly depicted. End
Update]
When mythographers had Cronus throwing the reproductive
organs of Uranus into Greece (Greece is assumed to be the
ballpark into which they were tossed), the idea is that Greece
became a procreation machine for reproducing Iranians/Aryans.
Cronus must be rooted in a peoples in/near the Iranian theater that,
upon defeating the Eran peoples, sent them fleeing, whereafter
they ended up in Greece. I can then begin to identify Uranus as the
Kassites/Guti, and that part of them that migrated to Greece I
would interpret as the Gorgons. These may or may not have taken
the northern route, through Caucasia and along the north shores of
the Black sea. Cronus could then depict a branch of Kassites
whom instead became the Gittites (of Gath).
The website continues: "But one of Sky's concubines who
was given to El's brother Dagon" had a son who was "called
by Sanchuniathon Demarûs or Zeus, but once called by him
Adodus, is obviously Hadad, the Ba‘al of the Ugaritic texts..."
Cronus is Dagon after all, since Dagon gives birth to Zeus.
It is important to stress here that Sanchuniathon was
reported as being the founder of hushed Phoenician writings (prior
to the Trojan war) that revealed what myths subsequently
attempted to cover up. While some historians are uncertain in what
to think of him and the ancient writers who copied from him (his
works have been lost except for what was quoted by others), he
and they just may have been telling the truth. The theory of
evolution, which modern Rosicrucians have unleashed upon the

178
world with wild success, was written within the secrets found by
Sanchuniathon, as for example he found writings claiming that the
first life forms appeared as germs, and then transformed into
intelligent forms. It's a mark of shame on modern peoples that
"intelligent life forms" are to this day spending so much time and
money advancing that same fantasy born in the mind of a wizard.
So darkened are their minds today that they will not so much as
consider our history in terms of Japheth, Shem and Ham, for these
have to do with the Biblical Flood, which to "intelligent life
forms" is beyond belief/understanding.
As Dagon was a fish below his belly, he was from the sun-
god cult of Utu, for the concept of mermen/mermaids originated in
Eridu (to which Utu belonged). Enki is at the center of Eridu, and
he is likely "Ankhiale [who] is described in the Argonautica as
the mother of the Daktyloi"
http://www.theoi.com//Georgikos/Kouretes.html
And so Dagon in Greece was disguised as "Daktyloi," the
reported meaning of which is "ten fingers/tribes," which I would
render as ten branches of Dagon, even the ten sons of Poseidon as
related by Plato. As we find the continental beginnings of the
Daktyloi in Phrygia around proto-Troy, note that there was a
mountain named Kabeiri at Pessinos ("little Pess"?), which by
chance was the Buzi/Busae/Poseidon term evolving into the
"Bessi" Thracians. If so, the Bessi (priests of the Satyrs) were the
carriers of continental Atlantis. "Atlantis" was not a political
entity, nor public, but was a secret concept (devised by the
Kabeiri).
[Update August 2006 -- Perhaps the Bessi carried Atlantis as
far forward as to the American office of President via the Bush
black boarname.It’sirghBucoatfrmse
heads, for I had (years ago) traced the Calydonian boar to
Corinth, a city that may have been founded by the same peoples
(almost-certainly the Carians) as was depicted by Cronus (i.e.
“Coronus” sounds like “Corinth”). It is expected by me, therefore,
that the Bush name traces back to the British Caledonians. End
Update]
When I checked possible similarities between Nahor's and
Poseidon's 10 sons , I learned that Plato gave us reason to doubt
that the names he was sharing were the original. He gives the list
of ten as were used in Atlantis, but he gives one name, and only
one, in the Hellenic tongue, which name happened to be the
alternative of the same Gadeirus that I’ve already mentioned, and
that I’ve tied to the root of the Kothars/Khazars. That alternative
name was "Eumelus." Compare with Nahor's third son, Kemuel,
he being an ancestor of the Israelites on the female side (i.e. the
father of Leah, Rebekah and Rachel, wives of Isaac and Jacob),

179
not at all meaning that the Eumelus/Gadeirus Atlanteans were
Israelites. But as cousins of the Israelites, the Eumelus/Gadeirus
Atlanteans would have been, in the beginning, Mesopotamian
Nahorites.
In the west, the Gadeirus peoples may have been, not only
the Cathars, but the Iberi who founded the Eber river in northern
Spain. These Iberians are commonly regarded as Tubali peoples
from Caucasia, for Josephus lumped "Tibareni" in with "Iberi"
and "Tubali." I certainly have a problem here, and would suggest a
solution wherein the Iberi were the Hebrews among the Tubali
(Tubal was son of Japheth), and that "Tibareni" appears as a
Tubal-Iberi combination.
"Tibareni" was a Latin term, and one must therefore ask if
Tiberius Caesar, the Roman ruler under which Jesus (or should I
say “Joshua”?) was crucified, wasn't just such a Hebrew-Tubali
mix. It is said that he was named after the Tiber river, but was the
Tiber named after the Tibareni? Perhaps, for it was named after
Tiberinus, a god of the Latin city of Alba Longa (near Rome).
The term "Alba" belongs to Caucasia, exactly where Tubal was, in
what is now Azerbaijan (note the "Azer" in that term, evoking
Gadeir/Khazar). This now explains how the Latins derive from
Circe (daughter of Helios), where she depicts Circasia/Caucasia.
"Tiberinus" is dragon-line important because it was the Julus
to Julius Caesar and at least four subsequent blodineag
Roman emperors, including Tiberius. In other words, the Tiberinus
Caucasians became the Romans. In that bloodline was placed the
mythical Aventius , named after the Aventine hill (not vice versa),
the home of the mythical "Cacus" was on the Aventine. This hill
may have been named after the Greek goddess Hebe, for her
Roman alternate was "Juventes." Hebe and Cacus also evoke the
gods, Hebros and Kikon, of Rhodope (Thrace). Therefore, if Hebe
and Hebros were Hebrew poples, the Latins, and therefore the
Julus-line Romans, were a Hebrew-Gogi mix.
If it seems curious to the prophecy student that I lump both
Meshech and Tubal, not to mention Rosh, into a Gogi category, it's
because I'm open to viewing Gog, not as a specific family, but as
the peoples of Caucasia/ Gogasia collectively. Therefore, the
Albians and Avars of Caucasia could be included, not to mention
the Kabars and Khazars.
Josephus wrote: "for those anciently named Iberi, and
Tyrrheni, and Sabini, are now called Romani” [i.e. Romans]. It
is for the mention of "Iberi" that some view Romans as stemming
from Tubal, but I would rather contend that the Romans had some
Hebrew blood. Note also the Sabini, possibly from Hebe’s
husband, Tei sheba , and prior to that from Abrahamic Sheba. The
Tyrrheni became the Etruscans proper, and while they were the

180
founders of Rome, the Roman dragon line may have been more
Sabina-important than Etruscan.
Aeneas, Trojan founder of the Julus-line of Romans, come
from Aphrodite and her lover, Anchises. Remember, Aphrodite
wastheoficl"(nmreyaov)fHphist,
wherefore she must have had much Kabeiri blood. Her lover,
Anchises, evokes Enki, the brother of Ishtar the Great Mother of
paganism, who was called the "Heavenly Mother of the
Dragon," or "Mother of the Heavenly Dragon." This verifies what
the Bible subtlely implies, that the dragon of Revelation depicts
the seven hills of Rome, but was moreover founded, earlier, in
Babylon the Great Mother (who was at the time of Revelation's
writing "sitting" (i.e. ruling) from the seven hills). Let's face it, the
apostle John, merely an Israelite fisherman, without a computer
and internet at his disposal, nor even a good library, couldn't have
figured all that out on his own (it's taken me years). Nor could
Revelation have been a product of dragon-line Gnostic Christians,
for Revelation exposes the destruction of the dragon line. God was
the author of Revelation, in other words, and he was responding in
myth-like code to myth writers, with an Armageddon ending of
their empire!
As it’s a popular idea that Enki founded Dagon, Anchises
may have depicted Enki worshipers in Israel. Even the Bible
(Ezekiel 8:14) reveals Hebrew women of Israel mourning for
Tammuz, Enki’s successor. Ezekiel saw this revelation in a
vision, where God had the women mourning at the north gate of
Jerusalem i.e. toward Samaria. Ezekiel was told to look north in
verse 5. But in verse 16, the wicked Israelites (still in the vision)
are shown looking to the east and bowing down to the eastern sun
(god).
When I first studied the Arms of Cardiff (modern capital of
Wales), I did not know what the horse depicted that had the tail of
a fish. Enki, ultimately, but also Dagon for the following reason:
"Dagon his name, sea-monster, upward man
And downward fish; yet had his temple high
Reared in Azotus, dreaded through the coast
Of Palestine, in Gath and Ascalon..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagon
Note the city of "Azotus," the home of Dagon. It had been
Ashdod previously. Recall the mythical codeword, "Dido," lover
of Aeneas, princess of Tyre removed to Carthage, possibly a very-
important code in that infact-sacrificing peoples were prolific in

181
the Tyrians of Carthage, which peoples were moreover depicted by
rcules, the same Hercules who founded Plato’s Atlantis. Might
He
Dido have been connected to the "dod" of Ashdod? Was "Ashdod"
an Assi-Dedan or Asshur-Dedan combo (Asshurites were a
Dedanite tribe)?
Behold. Not far from Ashdod, there was the region of
"Gaderos"; I kid you not, see Joshua 15:36. Then, the Joshua text
lists a cluster of 16 towns, including: " Boz kath ... and Geder oth,
and Beth-Dagon...and Makkedah" (15:41). There's Geder right
next to the House of Dagon, whom I’ll assume was connected to
Kemuel, son of Nahor, as hinted by Plato. I note also a Boz-town,
which makes absolute sense if Gadeirus was Kemuel, for Kemuel
was Nahor’s son immediately after Buz. I also see what sounds
like Megiddo and Macedonia : Makkedah. Recall my hypothesis
that MakEdonians and Dorians (of Greece) had become the
Scandinavian houses of Odin and of "Thorri" and/or "Thor."
Recall also that the mythical “Nor” ruled Gotland after Thorri. I
would never believe that secret societies do not know their roots
on the Israeli shores. But I can believe that some of them do not
know that their roots are in non-Israelites.
Arthurian myth suggested that a Roman-Trojan named
"Brutus" founded Britain, and this could then reveal the founders
of western Atlantis. The finger points to the Bruttii peoples of
southern Italy, relatives of the Julus (i.e. "Patrician") bloodline.
The Bruttii had been a branch of Lucani, and the Lucani had been
Samnites/Safini i.e. Sabini
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruttium
This region of Italy was also home to the Thurii (see
location), a branch of Sybari peoples from Greece, clearly
connected to the mythical Thorri and historical “Sviar" Swedes.
The Sybari evoke the infant-sacrificing Subar(tu), so that both
Dedan and Sheba are revealed as infant-killing peoples. This is
what the secret societies know but do not want you to know. Had
the secret societies any qualities worth mentioning, they wouldn't
be secretive. I despise them, and yet I know but a drop in the
bucket of their atrocities. God knows them all, however, and will
expose all. The clock is ticking, you sons of witches, so hurry up
and do what you must, this is your dark hour.

182
I TAUT I SAW A BUZI CAT
June 2006.

Plato's western Atlantis was ruled by Geryon. It only needs


to be discovered where this monster originated to discover which
peoples he derived from. I have already shown, independent of
knowing Geryon roots, that Atlantis in all regions is based in the
Kassites, who were also the Khazars. I should therefore find that
Geryon was rooted in the Kassites.
At least one myth writer saw the origin of the Khazars in the
same Hercules that founded Plato’s Atlantis, when the writer had
the “god” mate with a snake-woman to form the Agathyrsi
Thracians, otherwise called the "Akatziri." I take it, therefore, that
these terms should be understood as A-Khazars, and I do hope that
all ancients and moderns who've equated the Akatziri with the
Khazars were correct.
The snake-woman was mother also to Geryon's dog. Orthos.
Hesiod wrote: "Men say that Typhaon ... was joined in love to
her [Ekhidna], the maid with glancing eyes. So she conceived
and brought forth fierce offspring; first she bare Orthos the
hound of Geryones ... "
http://www.theoi.com/Ther/DrakainaEkhidna1.html
"Orthos" must surely have been a real peoples (the Welsh
Ordovices come to mind) of the mythical Eretheia, the home of
Geryon (Erethlyn, Wales, for those of you jumping into this book
for the first time here). It's made even more obvious that these
were wolf-line peo les, for the half-snake woman, called
"Ekhidna" (Akkadia?^ in certain writings, gave birth to other
terrible dogs. In other words, she was of the Apollo peoples, who
were Gorgons/Gogi of northern Russia eventually t expected
bu to
have developed in Mesopotamia with the wolf peoples there.
Although I did not previously know whether the Hyperboreans
stemmed from Thracians, or vice verse, the following statement
would suggest the latter: "She dwelt first in the Korykian Cave
of Delphoi, before being consigned with her consort Typhoeus
to the pit of Tartaros, beneath the land of the Arimoi."
This statement is referring to the defeat of the snake-
woman’s people, known as Python on another myth, by Apollo’s
people (it was a Gorgon vs. Gorgon war) at a Korykian region of
Delphi (Greece). But as the snake-woman was consigned upon her
defeat to "Arimoi," where this must refer to the "Arimaspi"

183
peoples mentioned by Herodotus, we can only conclude that she
ended up in north Russia where the Arimaspi were located (by
Herodotus). Behold that the mythical Tartaros, located in the
above quote exactly where the Arimaspi lived, is where also the
historical Tartars lived, thus identifying the Tartars as the worst
sort of peoples in the eyes of the myth writer(s) (Tartarus is often
equated with Hell, but this doesn t mean that Hell will be in
Russia).
This is all very interesting where I view Tartars/Tatars as an
important root of the Italians that then went on to form an
important root of the Welsh, as explained in a previous chapter. I
did not make this theory up based on the similarity between
“Tatar” and “Tudor,” and yet I do think that there is a connection
between the two, albeit with a link in an Italian peoples likewise
prefixed by “Tad.” Myth discloses that Python, under the spelling,
“Paethon/Phaethon,” rode and crashed the chariot of Helios into
Eridanus, and so I expect that the Redones were “Tators” (i.e.
Dedanites) intermediate between the Italian Tads and the Tudors.
This conclusion was made aside from the fact that some Biblical
manuscripts use “Dodanim” instead of “Rodanim” (Genesis 10:4)
to express the Rhodians (that I trace the Redones to), and this
clinches my hunch that “Redone” and “Dedan” were variations of
the same peoples.
That is, when myth makes Rhodes the island of Helios and
Rhoda, it is to be understood as the island of Phaethon and Dedan,
where the goddess Rhoda refers to Dedanites, and where the
Dedanites named the island by that name. Moreover, as the
Rhodians who became the Redones were called “Danaans,” one is
compelled to view the Dedanites as a tribe of Danaans, which is
possible from the idea that Dedan (i.e. “of Dan”) was named after
a Dan peoples, not the Israelite tribe, but the Dina-ites of
Mesopotamia, the same, no doubt, that were symbolized as
“Tinia,” chief god of the Etruscans. That is, Etruscans were
Dedanites, even as the Taddei surname was first found in Florence,
the capital of Tuscany (named after the Etruscans). It is easily
predictable that the Redones stemmed from the Rhaetian
Etruscnas.
Herodotus described the Arimaspi as one-eyed peoples, a
code for the Cyclopes, brothers of the Gigantes, and therefore code
for the Gogi. As Cycnus of Liguria moved into Eridanus (the
Rhone river valley), and since the Taddei Italians were Etruscans, I
expect that the Tads of Italy moved with the Cycnus Gogi into
Eridanus
Therefore, when Hercules mated with the snake-woman to
bring forth the Khazars, the Khazars are expected to Hebrew to the
degree that she was a Hebrew entity. But whereas I had traced

184
Nahorites to the Khazars by other methods, this myth enters
Dedanites into the Khazar fold...to the extend that she was a
Dedanite peoples. As Tators and Siberians were living in the same
general regions, Sheba may have been a part of this mythical
snake.
For the same reasons, when she gives birth to the founders of
western Atlantis -- to Geryon and his two-tribed dog -- they should
be viewed as part-Hebrew. And just as the Aryan portion of
western Atlantis is identified easily as Cimmerian, so we find:
“She was the mother of Khimaira who breathed raging
fire ... who had three heads, one of a grim-eyed lion; in her
hinderpart, a dragon; and in her middle, a goat, breathing
forth a fearful blast of blazing fire. Her did Pegasos and noble
Bellerophontes slay...” (website above).
It's not a coincidence that Geryon was assigned three bodies,
and as the Khimaera dragon is easily deciphered as certain
Cimmerians, ditto for Geryon ... meaning that Geryon may have
been the deeper root of the Welsh (i.e. deeper than the Cimmerians
depicted by Hercules). Because Pegasus (assigned to be a white
horse, usually depicting Thracians) defeated the Khimaera, while
the capital of Wales today displays a mythical white horse (with
fish-tail) as part of its ancestry, western Atlantis appears to have
been rooted most deeply in Pegasus Gorgons.
Gorgons are said to have been birthed by Ceto and Phorcus,
and so note that Phorcus was assigned a half-fish characteristic. In
attempting to identify Phorcus, I reasoned that he modifies to
"Vork," which is a good theory since Gorgons and the wolf-line
peoples originate in Verkana ("wolf land"). The fish element may
trace to Dagon, who was himself half fish but moreover his very
name may be an Indo-European term for "dog." And so it would
appear that the Atlantean Gorgons were from Dagon. "Phorcus"
should prove to depict the historical Farsi/Parsi =
Persians/Parthians, for Verkana was a Parthian settlement, and at
one time was "Perkana" or similar “Phorcus”-like variations.
As Pegasus was the offspring of the death of the Gorgon
Medusa, the Welsh would so be rooted in Medusa. The Medusa
should easily prove to be a Mede-Gorgon mix ... same as, or similar
to, Phorcus. In fact, the "killed" snake-woman popping up as
Python in Eridanus may be the same story as the "killed" Medusa
popping up as Pegasus. Phorcus' brother, Nereus, was the god of
fish/dolphins, wherefore this must be the meaning of the fish tail
presented on the white horse of the Cardiff Arms.
Recalling that I had tied Nahor to Dagon, wouldn't Nereus be
Nahor??? Does this identify Nereus' brother (Phorcus) as
Abraham? Not likely, for Phorcus would instead depict the Aryan

185
side of the Nahorites, the Persian-Gorgons who put forth the boar
line.
Nereus was the god of the Aegian sea, and therefore of Greek
Atlantis. One then has reason to view him as Poseidon himself,
which makes absolute sense if "Poseidon" derives from "Buz(ite)",
son of Nahor. Nereus is displayed as a wizard/prophet, but also
revealed as a Hecatonchire (a hunderd-handed giant related to the
Cyclopes and Gigantes) in that he is portrayed with exctly 50
daughters (a common code/theme in myth). As a Titan, he may
have been from Thoth ... and whoa, let me tell you that as I write
just now, I realize that "Titan" may be code for concealing Dedan's
involvement in the dragon line.
In the last chapter I had tied Dagon to the Israelite city of
Dor, and Dor I have tied to the Greek Dorians with a view that
they were Nahorites (for example, as my theory goes, Dorians put
forth Thorri in Gotland and his son, Nor). So, now, behold, I
realize this minute, that as he was assigned the wife, "Doris," so
she stems from Dor of Israel (it's already suspected that she depicts
the Greek Dorians).
Doris had the parents of Tethys and Ocean. Tethys (a Titan)
may be Dedan again, especially on the Israeli ocean shore. Tethys
may also be Thoth i.e. Hermes i.e. Armenians i.e. Cutha-based
Kabalists on the Israeli shore, since after all Taut was a Sidonian
entity. Keeping in mind that Atti(s) the sun-god stemmed from Utu
the sun-god, who originated in Eridu where mermen/memaids
were invented, is not the following depiction of Nereus a kick-
back to Utu, especially as he in his Attis designation founded
Attica: "The Attic vase-painters showed the draped torso of
Nereus issuing from a long coiling scaly fishlike tail "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nereus
Phorcus and Nereus were brothers of Ceto, wherefore I
would tend to see them all as Guti and/or Cutha peoples. Now
behold, for as the "Greeks" are divided into three branches of the
mythical Hellen, one was Xuthus and another Doris!! Tell me that
Xuthus was not the Cutha Kabalists. You can't, because the
coincidences are becoming too numerous, and become more
numerous yet.
"Cotys" (son of Manes), being virtually the same as
"Xuthus," identifies the latter "Greek" peoples as a Kabalist bunch
from Armenia. From Xuthus is said to have come the very-Greek
Achaeans who, because they settled in and next to Elis, were the
castrated offspring of Uranus. This sky god from Iran was also
known as "Aether," and that term modifies easily from "Gether" =
Gatzir/Kazar. Hence, Xuthus would seem to depict the Cutha
Hebrews integrated amongst the Kassites/Kazars, the same as were

186
historically called the "Abiru" tribe of Kassites. I'm not suggesting
that the Greeks were purely Hebrews, therefore.
When by the days of Herodotus the Greeks had been chased
away by the Dorians, we find the Geloni living in the midst of the
Boudini, up north of Thrace. But as the Boudini were by
Herodotus said to be integrated with the Neuri, might the Geloni
have been Neuri as well? I'm now beginning to suggest -- like a
train out of control, or like a man who's found the secret treasure
and can't stop picking up the coins because they become more
numerous with every stoop -- that the very-very-Greek "Hellen"
term can be identified as Neuri/Nahorites.
But before getting to that (grin), let me tell you what the
Greek myths reveal about Xuthus. He was married to the daughter
of the mythical Erechtheus, of the mythical Cecrop bloodline, and
Cecrop, being half snake (yes, it's true!) was inadvertently
revealed as a Gorgon/Gogi where the myth writers did their best
not to reveal Cecrops roots. But that's not even my point. The
alternative name of Erechtheus was "Butes." Wouldn't that be Buz,
son of Nahor???
But of course. The Neuri were integrated with the Boudini
because the Boudini were the Buzites, even the mythical Butes.
And so when Xuthus was depicted as married to the daughter of
Butes, it was an alliance between Buzite-Nahorites (probably from
the Buzite Medes, yes Poseidon) and Cutha Hebrews, resulting in
a very Hebrew peoples indeed...and yet possessing the Aryan
bloodlines that were integrally part of Cutha Kassites and Buzite
Medes.
It has been stated by others that the "Gelon" living amongst
the Boudini were Hellene refugees, because Herodotus revealed
the Gelon as refugees from Greece. If this Gelon-Hellen equasion
is fact, it would then appear that the Hellenes were the Galli cult of
Hephaistos, yes, the Kabeiri cult that sounds like it derives from
"Abiru/Hebrew." If it's true that the Galli/Kabeiri invented Greek
myth, then it's a no-brainer to deduce the incorporation of
themselves, within the myths, as the most important peoples. Thus,
the Hellenes, described as the most important Greeks, even the
only Greeks, are expected to be Galli and Kabeieri from that
argument alone. In time, however, other myth writers would arise
belonging to other groups, some antagonistic toward branches of
Hellenes.
It needs to be said here that never does Genesis 10:5 place
the Aryan descendants of Javan in Greece, but only in the far-
eastern Mediterranean islands/coasts near Greece. Certainly one
can imagine a Javanese migration into Greece, but might Cutha
Kassites and Buzi Medes have arrived first/together? I'm
suggesting that the Aryans didn't write the myths or create secret

187
societies, not at first anyway, but that the Hebrews did, and so we
get an historical picture of Greece that is Hebrew biased. Yet one
cannot help but understand that even the myth writers did not wish
to reveal their Hebrew elements, not too obviously, anyway, albeit
at times they may not have resisted plugging in some subtle clues.
I reason that if the Xuthus were Galli, so also the two
"brothers" of Xuthus: the Dorians and the Aeolians. For, the myth
writers were likely to include only their own cult in the three sons
of Hellen. To support this theory, aside from "Aeolus" reflecting
"Galli," Aeolus is said to put forth descendants by the same name,
including a second Aeolus that was not only a son of Poseidon, but
having a twin brother assigned by the name of Boiotus/Boeotus! !
A near match with "Butes." In other words, the Aeolians were
Buzites, sons of Nahor.
Now Boiotus was a depiction of the historical Boiotians
(often the myth writers create personalities intended to stand as the
founders of known people groups). The Boiotians were founded by
the goddess, Melia ("honey"), and so they became what I call the
"the bee-line" peoples whom were worshiped by the Merovingian
Franks. Therefore, I'm claiming with some reservation until I
verify, Merovingians were from Butes i.e. Buz.
The first Aeolus had for a son, Mimas (which sounds like the
Greek, "mimos," to copy), who was married to Melanippe (note
the "Melan" = honey-fruit) whereupon they gave birth to Aoelus
and Arne, while Arne gave birth to yet a third Aeolus, the one who
was twin with Boiotia. And so one must not only consider whether
it was the Aeolian branch of Hellenes specifically that evolved into
the Geloni among the Boudini, but whether the Geloni, as some
suggest, were the historical Alans? The Alans could thus be from
Aeolians. Not a bad-sounding theory.
The far-north "Roxolani" (an historical peoples) developed
from the Alans, but as the Roxolani are thought to be Ros-Alans, it
would speak of the Rus-Hebrew mix that I suspect was "Creusa,"
wife of Butes (i.e. I entertain "Creusa" as code for the "Hros.") But
as the Roxolani are also called the Ros-As in that the Alans and
Asi are equated, the Alans, and therefore the Aeolians, are
revealed as the Kassites...if indeed "Assi" was a variation of
"Kassi(tes)." There are multiple Creusa personalities in Greek
myth, and one may consider whether she was not the Titan,
"Crius."
To put it another way, the Assi (of Iran) were integrated with
the Iberi/Kabeiri (of Caucasia), who together became the Galli, a
term that was corrupted to "Alli" so as to take on the "Alan" end-
form (Alans are thought to originate in Caucasia). As king Arthur
has been connected to the Alans, I suspect that the Aeolians took

188
part in western Atlantis, an especially good theory if Aeolians
were the rulers of Greek Atlantis.
From this point of view in which the Hellens were of strong
Hebrew elements, it's very remarkable that the king of the third
beast of Daniel 7, Alexander the Great, was a Macedonian whose
struggle was to Hellenize the world (less than four centuries before
Jesus). It's also telling that God chose to depict him as a leopard
with wings, for this evokes the Mushussu Dragon of Eden (i.e.
Eridu).
Why a leopard body? Perhaps due to "ari," the Semitic word
for "lion," being made a depiction of the Aryans...in which case
the eagle parts could refer to the Hebrew portion of blood. Were
the spots on the leopard the so-called "ermines" on Coats of Arms,
since after all the ermines are said, by the Arms masters
themselves, to depict the furs of kings?
My suspicion is that the Galli were named after the
Halys/Halybes (who contributed to Georgian peoples in the
Caucasus) in that the latter are commonly regarded by historians as
inventors of metal while the peoples surrounding Hephaistos are
regarded as the same by myth writers. The term , "alloy" (the
mixing of molten metals) comes to mind as a term related to
"Galli," and while "fer" (iron) evokes "Farsi," "iron" evokes "Iran."
It's therefore notable that "As/Aes," the peoples under discussion,
is said to mean "metal." If true that the Asi were the Kassites, then
one would suspect that metal was invented by Kassites. The word
"metal" (not to mention "medal") itself may link back to Maat,"
the early form of "Mede." The old French for "metal" was
"metallon," says my dictionary. Should that be read as Mede-
Alloy/Mede-Alan ("medallion" comes to mind)?
My dictionary says that the old English, "gegyld" means
"association, " supporting my view that the Gogi were not a
bloodline, but an association of Caucasian peoples. My dictionary
says that "gegyld" is the root of our "guild/gild," from which
"gold" derives (our "gild" is said to mean "to coat with a thin layer
of gold").
My dictionary, under "chalybeate," tells that the Greek word
for "steel" is "chalyps/chalybos." Since the metal-inventing
Halybes are said to have been the "Khaldi," wouldn't that latter
term have been related to our "gild/gold"? But as the Galli were
rooted in the Cutha of Chaldee, wouldn't the Khaldi have been the
same Chaldean Cutha but migrated into Phrygia (where the Halys
river was located)? If so, it shows that the Hebrews had either
taken on the "Chaldee" name, or else it was foisted upon them by
others.
Note that God in Zechariah 5 places Babylon in a pot with a
metal cover, and that a pot is a cauldron, from the old French

189
"calidus," evoking "Chaldee/Khaldi." Softer metals were formed in
a hot cauldron, and perhaps the pot was so-named due to the hot
coals (old English "col") underneath it. It would therefore appear
that "Chaldee" was an Indo-European/Aryan term for the
Babylonians, perhaps named by the Guti/Kassites as per the metal-
making going on there.
[Update October 2006 -- Thanks to my tireless elf, Lorri,
who consistently sends material supportive of my writings, I was
led to the following article:
“The Kalderash are one of the largest groups within
the Roma [Gypsy] people. They were traditionally smiths
and metal workers. Their name means "cauldron
builder". Many gypsies living in Romania, have the
surname "Caldararu" which means they or their
ancestors belonged to this clan or "satra" as it is known
in their language. They typically were bronze and gold
workers, and did not make a living out of the illegal
activities for which gypsies were best recognized such as
drifting and stealing.”
http://us.f553.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?MsgId=9892_14687352_132676_1270_8
879_0_1599_28794_1832195242&Idx=54&YY=13574&inc=100&order=down&sort=date&pos
=0&view=a&head=b&box=Inbox End Update].
When molten metal became cold, it became gilded. Or take
our "shield, from the old English, "scild," as though the term arose
due to shields being coated in metal. Our "cold" derives from an
older version, "cald," evoking "Khaldi/Chaldee" once again. It's
interesting that God had shown Zechariah (chapter 1) four
"craftsmen" who come to protect/save Israel from four of her
enemies.
Latin gold was/is "dora." Could therefore the Dorians have
been from the dragon, Ladon, since Ladon was the root of the
Latin language? Aha, now dissa is starting to mayka somma sensa.
The Dorians (and possibly the Macedonians) were different from
the Greeks in that one was carrying a proto-Latin language, and
the other was more purely Indo-European. But, the question is,
were the Dorians the same as the Khaldi? After all, the Latin word
for "hot" is "caldi."
Could it be that the Latin word for "hot" was related to the
Aryan, "Chaldee/Khaldi," as per their metal-making process? Our
Aryan "hot" derives from the old English, "hat," perhaps the lid of
the cauldron, and so note that our "lid" derives from the old
English, "hlid," which seems as though it derived from "glid,"
possibly a "gild"-family term. "Gaza/Gath" may have become the
Latin, "casa" (= house), so a house is a structure having a hat/lid,
wherefore "hat" may have derived from "gat" i.e. evoking Gath.

190
And that brings me round to "Bot/Bute," said to mean
"booth/house," a small detail that may become huge for identifying
the Hebrew nature of those Aryan peoples, for "Bet(h)" also
became the Hebrew word for "house."
Understand that my use of "Latin" here is not Italy-based, but
Ladon based, the Lydians and all her peoples. "Ladon" itself may
have been an Aryan term. Might "lid" and "ladle" have derived
from Ladon? Indeed, our "ladle" derives from the old English,
"hladen." It then modifies to "gladen," which probably stems from
the idea of gliding along, or skimming, liquids. It may be the same
sense as "skid," the word from which I think the Scythians were
named; after all, myth reveals one of the first inventors of metal as
"Skythes." In other words, the Lydians (not to be confused with
the "Lud" of Genesis) and Latins were named after metal working.
Note that Ladon protected the golden apples.
All this, in case you're confused as to my point, was to say
that the Greek Galli stemmed from the Halybes (of Phrygia), and
the Halybes from the Cutha of Chaldee. That sets up my next
chapter, a most-profound discovery.
The snake-woman also gave birth to the eagle of Caucasia,
which is a symbol of the Gorgons, but no doubt also of Rome (and
the U.S.A. ?). Recall that the capital of Abruzzo (Italy) was
Aquila, meaning "eagle," which I think was orininally "gegle,"
even as the Celt word for eagle is "gogail." As the Gogi originate
in Aryan lands, the snake-woman would seem to depict a Gorgon
peoples outside of Russia, and this points to Verkana and the
entities connected to it, Akkadia to its rear/past, and Caucasia to its
front/future.
To show emphatically that the wolf-line Gorgons were
depicted by the snake-woman, she (with Typhon) was also the
mother of "the three-headed dog Cerberus' and "Scylla who
was woman above but dog below, with six dog-forms sprung
from her body..."
The parents of the snake-woman were Tartarus and Gaia. As
Gaia is perhaps a modification of "Gaja," perhaps she depicts the
Gogi, a good theory in that she with Tartarus gave birth to the
Gigantes. Herein would be a Hebrew-Gogi mix via Dedan blood
(i.e. "Tartarus" depicts the Tartars/Tators = Dedanites). Expecting
Sheba blood to be nearby, therefore, perhaps Typhon, also a son of
Tartarus and Gaia, may be modified to "Shyp hon," not all that far
from "Shebean." If true, I would suggest the Siberians are the
identity of Typhon.
It's interesting that Zhirinovsky was born in Russia's Tartar
country, east of the Caspain sea, and that he is half "Jew." Was his
father, Mr. Eidelstein, a non-Jewish Hebrew, and is this why
Zhirinovsky hates Jews so much?

191
TWINS FOUND WESTERN ATLANTIS
June 2006.

Aeolus and Boiotus killed their stepmother, Autolyte. She was


married to Metapontus, which certainly looks like Mede-Pontus (i.e. Medes
living on the Pontus). The Halys river was in Pontus, and Atti(s) was top-
dog god there. There are several mythical entities that use "auto," for
example Automedon, Automedusa, and Autolycus ("lycus" means "wolf").
Just as I expect that "auto" derives from "Utu/Atti," so I could consider
"Autolyte" to be understood as Atti-Ladon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolus
I will repeat that "Atlantis" should be understood as Atti-
Lantes (London comes to mind), and may connect to Lindos, the
city on Rhodes that was among the three sons of Kerkaphus (along
with Kamiros and Ialybos/Halybos). Lindos is said to have been
built by the Greek Danaans before they came to rule in Greece.
And so one is led to believe that the twins, Aeolus and
Boiotus, came to take over the rule of western Atlantis, where
Boiotus may have been so-named because he represented the
Poseidon peoples. If so, the Boitians become the supreme peoples
of western Atlantis, even as Poseidon is it's supremem ruler. It
may be a longshot, but "Aeolus" may have been "Atlas."
Alternatively, in order to identify Aeolus more specifically than
the Hellenes in general, Plato did quote "Elas(ippo)" as one of the
10 sons of Poseidon (where "ippo" is just a common
"horse/Thrace-denoting" suffix). The term Elas evokes Elis (of
Greece), which stemmed from the god El, brother of Dagon and
father of Zeus.
And Dagon brings me back to the topic of dogs. The snake-
woman gave birth to the dog, "Kerberos," if that helps to equate
her with wolf-line peoples. The father of that dog was Typhon, he
being the father also of the Khimaera dragon, wherefore the dogs
are revealed as Cimmerians. She with Typhon gave birth to the
dragon, Hesperios, also called "Ladon," that guarded the golden
apples (i.e. the sacred Aryan bloodline) of western Atlantis. I take
this to mean that the army of the empire was depicted by
Hesperios/Ladon ("Hesperion" may be understood as "asp" viper,
or even "vespa" = wasp/bee; aren't Aryans called "Wasps"?).
Herein is the connection between Wales and Italy that I had
suggested earlier; they were both from Ladon. Some writers made

192
Ceto and Phorcus the parents of Ladon, and this would then speak
to the Cutha-Hebrew roots of the Atlantis Aryans.
Don't discount me quickly when I now claim that Autolyte
(Atti-Ladon), when she was "killed" (defeated in war), packed her
bags and moved across Europe as far as Wales. Aeolus (the Alans)
and Boiotus (the Bute/Stewart bloodline) followed close behind,
twins all the way. I suspect that the Boiotians were the historical
Boii (e.g. Bohemians) and/or Bois that moved into France, who
may also have named Powys, Wales.
The two heads of Geryon's dog, and the Khimaerians, were
all the same Gorgon peoples. But Geryon and the army of Atlantis
(Ladon) were of another Gorgon branch, the same as was Medusa,
for his mother was also Ceto. In other words, the Welsh would
stem from a Ceto-Geryon line, I suspect, moreso than the
other/snake-woman Gorgons over whom Geryon ruled. Perhaps
the one was Autolyte, and the others the "Greek" twins. The fact
is, Wales depicted itself often with two dragons.
Now if you don't believe that Autolyte had anything to do
with western Atlantis, behold thou non-believer what Plato
conveyed (written by another author):
“Autochthon. One of the first ten kings of Atlantis.
He was son of Poseidon and Cleito 2, and twin brother of
Mneseus.”
http://www.forumancientcoins.com/cparada/GML/001ShortEntries/SEArtaceus.html

I suspect that Mneseus was the Manes bloodline, and so


Autochthon ought to be of Manes as well. As the 10 sons of
Poseidon are from the mother, Cleito, I'll tentaively view all ten as
Celts. Myth buffs tell us that "chthon" refers to the earth, and
therefore to an indigenius (though also mystical, unkown, possibly
secret-society) peoples. I would make the now-easy conclusion
(once a total riddle), especially as a vowel is begging to be
squeezed between the "ch" and the "th," that the earthy-term refers
to the Cutha and/or the Guti.
It' interesting that the Athenian god, Butes, had the
alternative name, "Erechtheus," where we can again see the "chth"
code. Following Erechtheus there was Erechthonius. As this was
the Cecrops bloodline from the half-snake peoples, perhaps all
mythical uses of "chth(on)" were codes pointing to this peoples.
Now behold that when Aeolus and Boitus had killed
Autolyte, they and their mother (Arne), "accompanied by many
friends, had to leave the kingdom and escape in a boat."
Couldn't that seemingly insignificant statement imply that they, an
entire peoplest wih allied rulers, headed off to western Atlantis?
It's interesting that the first Aeolus had rejected Arne
(because she was pregant with Aeolus and Boitus), so that she had

193
to leave. She went into the care of Metapontus, and this sounds to
me like the leaving of the Cutha from her homeland to enter the
Phrygian region. Autolyte (Ladon branch of Atti), being the wife
of Metapontus, was already in Phrygia/Pontus when the Cutha
arrived, and "she" didn't get along with them, wherefore the Cutha
"killed" her, but, in backfiring by making the surrounding peoples
despise the Cutha, the twins fled by sea. Of course they ruled in
Greece for quite some time, but from there they split into two
winds: the Gelonus-Boudini wind to Scandinavia, and the Aeolus-
Boitus wind to Britain...to become the Autochthon (i.e. Cutha
branch of Atti). Later, the two winds would meet in Norway
(Nahor's land) and form the Danes.
Now because Mneseus was the twin of Autochthon, one
could identify the two as Aeolus and Boitus themselves. "Aeolus"
may have furnished "Wales," and Mneseus may have been the
Danann god, Manannan, who is known to have founded the Isle of
Man ... very near to the island of Bute. I therefore peg the Stewarts
as a line from Boiotians, and from the Dananns. Manannan's
peoples must have lived on Mona, north Wales, smack beside
Geryon's capital, Erethlyn. Wikipedia reports that Mona was
known as the "Mother of Wales," and "Honey Isle." It was a Druid
hang-out, very Satanic. Manannan, because "he" so-closely
resembled "Danann," was possibly a Manes-Danann combo.
Note that "Wallace" is a surname rooted in "Wales," and that
"Uallis" (i.e. very near to "Aeolus") is an old version of "Wallace."
In this case, and also because the "wall" in "Cornwall" signifies
Wales, one can speculate on whether "Walter," the name used by
the first-known Stewarts, didn't mean "man of Wales."
I can't decide whether to locate the "island" of Atlantis at
Mona or as the peninsula where Cornwall sits, which leg of land
sits next to modern Wales (see map of Britain). "Cornwall" is said
to derive from Corn-Wales; note how the French term evokes
Aeolus: Cornouailles. The "Corn" is said to mean "horn," and may
simply refer to the shape of the land mass, being a sharp point.
That is, the peoples of Cornwall were purely Welsh.
Behold that continent-ward from that sharp point (see map of
Devonshire) there lived a peoples, "Dewnans," in the Cornish
tongue (from which derives "Devon"). Surely these were the
mythical Danann, and therefore peoples of the god, Manannan,
and therefore we'de expect the Autochthon (i.e. Cutha) to be
nearby. And indeed they were, in Cornwall itself, as you will soon
see. "A people of this name [Cornovii] are known, from
Roman sources, to have lived in the Outer Powys to
Shropshire area of the later Wales and England."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Cornwall

194
Shropshire was the town that Stewarts proper chose to live
in, at the Welsh-England border. Powys was/is just to the west (see
ancient Wales map), and was dubbed the Paradise of Powys. Was
this the Garden that Ladon protected??? The Powys kingdom
defined much of the Wales-based Cornovii. Was Powys a form of
"Bois"? Says one website: "Alfred Lord Tennyson's poem has
Arthur being carried down to the narrow harbour at
Boscastle, to be carried onto the barge that was to take him to
Avalon."
http://www.cornwall-calling.co.uk/legendof.htm
Was this a Bos castle (in north Cornwall) of the Buzi
peoples? Did that name survive until that day? Another website
reads, "Boscastle is our destination, and Boscastle is within
three miles of the wild sea-girt castle where Briton's fairy
prince, King Arthur, was born." (On the Wales map at the
above link, Mona is the large island north of Gwynedd.)
I suspect that certain (not all) peoples that go by "Bos"
variations are related to some (not all) who go by "Bod/t"
variations, with both being branches of Buzites, for a "z" can
modify either to a "d/t" or to an "s". I suspect that the Stewarts are
of the "Bude/Bute" variations, and that the 'term" Butler"derived
from their being stewards of rulers. A Wikipedia article shares this
(italics mine): "The Butler name is of Norman origin; it
originally meant wine steward and comes from the same root
as the modern French word for bottle, bouteille." I would
contest that assumption, suggesting that "butler" derived from
"house" = "bute." Yes just like bet/beth" in Hebrew means
"house." After all, a butter is a home-maker. The article continues:
"The Butlers arrived with the Anglo-Norman invasion in the
12th century and in 1177 Theobald FitzWalter was made the
Chief Butler of Ireland by King Henry II." The point is, the first
Stewarts, not long before Henry II, were also "fitz-Walters."
You didn't miss that hint, did you, about the "Bute" name
being Hebrew? That is, "Erechtheus" was his Greek name, but his
Bute designation must have come from the Kabalists who ruled the
Cecrops bloodline. One then has reason to believe that the
Boiotians were of Hebrew blood to some degree, or at least ruled
by Hebrews.
All reports of the Stewarts take us back to rulers of Brittany
no more than about a millenium ago. No one seems to know where
they derived prior to that (but I discovered it yesterday (June 10th,
2006); wait till you find out). The only impression given is that
they came to Britain from Normandy with William the Conqueror
in the 11th century AD. But if you read this, you'll see something
very telling:

195
Robert Stewart, who reigned as Robert II, bestowed
upon his younger son, John, the lands of Bute, Arran and
Cumbrae. The king erected the lands into a county, and
conferred the office of hereditary sheriff on his son. The
grant was confirmed by a charter in the year 1400 by
Robert III."
http://www.myclan.com/clans/Stuart_of_Bute_131/default.php
In other words, as soon as the Stewarts had found themselves
on the Scottish throne, they took to themselves the lands in and
around Bute. Why? Because the lands had belonged to ancient
proto-Stewart, very pre-Conqueror indeed, at that time a
Bute/Bude peoples. But you won't read this anywhere online; the
theory doesn't exist but here.
The Bute branch of Stewarts remains important, and were at
one time also called "Rothesay," a term smacking of the Rus
and/or Rose Line. Keep in mind that the Stewarts are said/thought
to be connected to Merovingians, and yet no one seems to know
exactly how.
Having independently traced the Bute name to Butt,
Normandy, I'll now introduce Arthur's cupbearer, "Bedivere"
("vere" in Arthurian myth may refer to the Vere-family
Merovingians, self-depicted with a green dragon, to be discussed
later). This "Bed(ivere)" fellow was identified by Geoffrey of
Monmouth (an important myth writer) as "the King and
governor of Normandy"!!
http://www.legendofkingarthur.co.uk/arthurs-knights/sir-bedivere.htm
Being mythical, the Norman king likely depicts a people
group. The Butt/Bute family of Normandy come to mind, which
use six-pointed stars on their Coat, not quite like "Star of David"
hexagrams, however. The Bute family of Germany use six red
roses and a central fish (I've yet to trace the fish to another family).
The capital of Cornwall was in times past, Bodmin, and
likewise in North Cornwall there is the town of Bude. More
coincidences? It's more than possible that the Bute family, later
responsible for naming the island, first became the Normandy
"Bed" rulers. Suspecting that Geoffrey was a Stewart himself, the
Stewarts proper must have been from this Bed fellow, wherefore
the cupbearers of Arthur were likewise the (proto-
)Stewarts/Butlers. One can assume that the Anglo-Saxons (the
white dragon) buted Arthur's peoples and the Stewarts out of
Britain, but when the Stewarts returned (from Normandy) to
Britain after 1066, they seized their ancient homeland at the first
opportunity.
When I discovered who the Stewarts had been connected to,
I couldn't help but jump out of my chair; I slammed by clenched

196
fist down into the air three or four times while in absolute ecstasy,
giving the "Yes! Yes! Yes! shout of great relief. It was very loud. I
had been waiting to find who had used the blue and silver
checkered pattern that the Stewarts adopted, and when I found that
it was the Cohen family, everything became straight in my mind. I
now have another book to write on that topic alone.
In the following quote, can we see the Halybe metal-workers
(pro
bably Aeolus and Boiotus because the timing is right)
invading/settling Atlantis (square brackets mine):
Around 1000 BC a near group of warrior like
settlers arrived in Cornwall from Europe, these were the
Celts [remeber that Plato used "Cleitus" as the mother of
Poseidon's 10 sons]. They brought with them knowledge
of forging iron into weapons. These Celts are the
ancestors of modern Cornwall. They lived in villages,
farmed, mined for tin, copper, bronze and iron, smelted
and worked the metal"
http://www.cornwall-calling.co.uk/folklore-and-legend/shorthi.htm
The Arthurian sword, Excalibur, is a term that seems to
contain "Chalyb." This is especially a good theory in that there
was a river Exe that may then allow the understanding of: Exe-
Chalyber (i.e. the Exe tribe of Chalybs). The Exe river ran through
Exeter, in Devonshire. One might then view "Exeter" as a
variation of the Greek, "Xuthus," brother of Aeolus/Wales.
Writes one website: "the British tin trade [of Cornwall]
had been largely eclipsed by the more convenient supply from
Iberia." Wouldn't it make sense that there was tin mining in both
Cornwall and Iberia if the peoples involved in both cases included
Iberi Hebrews?
It's still uncertain in my mind as to whether the Danann of
Britain were a pre-Celt peoples, or the Celts themselves, but
having "Cleito" as a clue for what their name was originally,
perhaps one can trace them to a certain peoples. The British
regions of Clyde come to mind, in North Wales, Flintshire, and in
Strathclyde. The more I learn about British geography, and of
Arthurian lore, the more meat I will add to the bones of these
theories. I've only been at this new direction for a month. [Update:
the next day; I realized that "Chlodo," the Merovingian progenitor
also known as "Clovis," may relate to the Clyde terms. End
Update]
The Roman version for the Dewnans was "Dumnonii." I
don't know how they got the "m" in there, but the term very well
reflects the co-founder of metal, according to Greek myth:
"Damnameneus." He was revealed as a Daktyloi peoples, and his
fellow co-founder, "Skythes," is an obvious depiction of the

197
Scythians. Might Damnameneus have been the Hebrew element in
the Hebrew-Scythian mix that is the dragon bloodline? Wikipedia
connects the Dumnonii to the historical Irish tribe of Fir Domnann,
and says, "In Irish mythology they make up one third of the Fir
Bolg."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fir_Domnann
What has long been considered the tomb of Arthur, in
Cornwall, is now known to be a monument to an important Greek
figure from Megara (Greece), for the inscription has been
transalted: "Here lies a son of the Megari." Can it be a
coincidence that the mythical Bias was a ruler in Megara, and that
the mythical Byzus of Megara was likely the same peoples? The
tomb is in Slaughter Bridge just north of Camelford, what some
have identified as the Camlann of Arthurian myth. Moreover, the
tomb is on the Camel river.
This is just an incredible find for me because, ever since I
realized that Plato's Gadeirus was Kemuel, son of Nahor, I started
keeping an eye out for a Welsh term looking like (the animal)
"camel." But as I wasn't expecting the term to zero in squarely on
Arthurian elements, it took me about two days to realize that
"Camelot" was just such a term!! I knew I had this mystery
uncovered at that point. That is, it can't be a coincidence: Kemuel
was Plato's Eumelus/Gadeirus.
I now I seek other similar terms, as for example,
"Gamil/Gamel," a common surname among Danes and Normans
that the Conqueror (re)established in Yorkshire (Danes had long-
before named York). This serves as some evidence that the Danes
were in fact a Danann (of Britain) branch. I'm suggesting that
Nahorites founded York, that they were the red dragon chased out
by the white-dragon Anglo-Saxons, but were later re-instated at
York with the Conqueror's success over the Anglo-Saxons. York
thereafter became the White Rose, however, and I've yet to
understand the reason.
It's interesting that while I was in the midst of writing this
chapter, an Internet correspondent and fellow dragon-line
researcher, Greenway7x, shared a much information quite on topic
which helped me significantly. Here's one of her statements that
caught my eye, keeping in mind that I had never before this month
connected Wales to Khazaria:
"Sarmatians were obsessed by their DRAGON-
totem: Originally 'Sauromatse' ["sauros" means
"serpent"], they and their horses wore scale-armor,
carried windsock 'dragon' standards and caps ... And their
RED DRAGON flag/arms was adopted by Wales.
Herodotus records that they considered themselves
offspring of Amazons and SCYTHIANS--the latter

198
considered Hercules their father and a river-snake-
goddess their mother."
Herodotus located the Sarmations (from whom the Alans
proper derived) to the north and east of Azov, precisely on the
western portion of Khazaria. One then has reason to believe that
Aeolus depicted the proto-Sarmations, and that the Alans proper
(perhaps the Geloni, also from Hercules and the snake-woman)
carried Aeolus elements into Khazaria and Caucasia, while other
"Alans" became Wales. Hercules was made central to both the
Sarmation Alans and the Welsh, showing how reasonably reliable,
if not meticulously accurate, the myth writers were.
There was also a "Gamlan River ... very near the Camlan
valley and Cader Idris, also in mid Wales." Kemuel is again
evoked, while "Cader" reflects the root of "Gadeirus." These were
relatives of the Stewarts, I am absolutely certain. As the Gamil
peoples were ousted from York by the Anglo-Saxons, so the
Stewarts were made to scoot, to Normandy. The Gamil peoples
were Nahor's Kemuelites, and the Stewarts were Nahor's
Buzites ... whom I think became, or went to live with, the Bute
name in Normandy.
To summerize, cults the world over have been trying to
convince us that the Danann were from the Hebrew tribe of Dan,
but as the Greek Danaans were said to be from Poseidon, I would
suggest that they were from Buz Hebrews. It's probably not a
coincidence that the Aeolus who was credited with the settlement
of the Aeolus islands off western Italy was made the son of
Poseidon. This is the same Aeolus who was made twin to Boiotia.
This westward Aeolus had 12 children, six sons and six
daughters, yet he is made to kill one son so that one daughter
committed suicide, the purpose of which must have been to leave
five and five, precisely the five-and-five characteristic of the ten-
fingered Daktyloi (not to re-mention the first Rothschild). But the
ten children, which of course are neither male nor female,
moreover reflect Plato's 10 "sons" of Poseidon. It's interesting that
the son who was killed was "Macar," like "Magara," and that
Helios and Rhodes also had a son by that name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolus
It needs to be said before closing here that one of Aeolus'
sons was Kerkaphos/Cercaphas, and that since Kerkaphos was the
son of Helios and Rhodes, Aeolus is identified as the Helios
bloodline in Greece. That would make Helios a Hebrew entity,
wherefore we should expect the sun-god symbol to appear on the
coats of arms of modern Kabalist families. Wait till you find which
chief Hebrew family displays the sun god on their Coat. Next
chapter.

199
Some have said that Arthur depicted Alans, and if true, could
he have been Aeolus/Helios? After all, his cupbearer, Bed, would
then translate to Boiotus blood.
Even before coming to realize that alphabetic letters were
named after gods and people-groups, as have been the days of the
week and months of the year, I thought that the Greek beta referred
to Boiotia. I would now add that the Hebrew beth (same letter, our
"b") evokes the root of Butes, perhaps the Budii "Medes," so that
the Boitians may be equivalent to Butes and likewise rooted in the
Budii. One excellent proof that the Greeks were from
Hebrews/Semites is that the Greek alpha is comparable to the
Hebrew aleph, the Greek beta to the Hebrew beth, the Greek
gamma to the Hebrew gimel, the Greek delta to the Hebrew daleth,
and several more near-matches.
Have you missed that gimel evokes Gamil/Kemuel? Alpha
evokes Alba (of Caucasia), a very sacred term to the secret
societies, as indicated by its being the first letter. Omega = Magi?
Omicron = Magara?

200
CHECKS COHENSIDE WITH
STEWARTS
June 2006

Can it be another coincidence that Arthur's father was styled,


"Uther Pendragon," where "Cutha" is once again evoked? If I'm
correct in my understanding of "Atlantis" as Utu-Lantis and/or
Atti-Lantis, then Uther could so depict the Atlanteans in mid-
historical-stride. If these terms are in honor of Uts, elder son of
Nahor (Genesis 22:21), then I have discovered something well
worth my efforts. With a few hundred researchers the world over
making contributions, we could break this thing wide open!
Arthur was given (by the myth writers) two lovers, Lisanor
and Lionor (both having "nor" endings that may or may not be
meaningful), where the "Lis" term may very well refer to the entity
disguised in "Fleur de Lis." I learned from Greenway7x that the
French phrase may secretly refer to the Levi(s) surname,
wherefore "Lisanor" could do the same. Lionor, on the other hand,
speaks for itself, since the leo/lion was/is a symbol of France,
England and Scotland.
After reading Greenway7x's quote, "'Lee' is one of scores of
names Europeanized from Lêvîy," I checked out her claim. And
behold, the Levy coat of arms was, after viewing hundreds of
Coats, only the third instance of a triple chevron. As I've said, the
other two were in the Taddei family (of Italy) Coat, and on the flag
held by the red dragon of the Cardiff Arms (capital of Wales). I'll
add here that an important Brittany ruler was known to the Welsh
as "Tad," but otherwise known as Nominoe.
Behold that when I did a search on Levy-like names, I found
that the Leve/Lief/Leaf Crest included, yes, three leaves (no
surprise), but also three bees! This was the first instance of finding
any bees over hundreds of searches of Coats/Crests.
The email from Greenway (the first she had ever sent me)
suggesting that "Lis" may disguise the Levis family, came on the
same day that I had learned/discovered Stewart connection to the
Cohen clan. Was that by chance, or does God want to expose the
Merovingian blasphemy now circulating worldwide, regarding
Jesus and Magdalene?
The German Cohen Coat is nothing but blue and silver
checks, showing that the Stewarts originate from those German

201
Hebrews. The Jewish Cohen family Coat (probably from the same
German Hebrews) uses a sun-god without reservation, similar to
the Solana family (i.e. Javier Solana, visible boss of Europe at this
time and for many years previous). If the Cohens were from true
Levites, shouldn't they be ashamed to use a sun on their Coat? But
if Cohens were rooted in Kabalists, they would be expected to use
a sun god. Even the Irish branch of Cohens displays a sun, albeit
much more subdued.
The (Norman) Caen family Coat uses three gold panther
heads and includes a background of silver lattice on blue,
somewhat similar to the Cohen/Stewart blue-and-silver checks.
The Lee family of Ireland uses 3 (black) panther heads. Hmm. If
the Caens are Cohens, Lee could indeed be taken as a Levi
variation.
"Cohen" means "priest," and is used to this day by Jews
tracing their lineage to the Hebrew tribe of Levi (the priestly cast
of Israel). But we should not make that mistake. The reality is that
"Cohen" traces to Khazar blood, for Hebrew rulers of Khazaria
were "kagans." I had suspected a few years ago that "kagan" was
the same as "Cohen," and that's what floored me when I found that
the Stewarts use the same blue and silver check pattern as the
Cohen Coat, for it hit me then that Stewarts had been somehow
related to Hebrew rulers of Khazars. With that realization came the
time for me to prove my Cohen-kagan connection, and so I went
online and immediately found a website entitled,
"KAGAN/COHEN family." On that page was this (brackets not
mine!):
"Samuel's parents were... Miriam NEWMAN (it
says "Mere Sheveleva" in Russian on her passport) and
Abraham KAGAN ("KAGAN" got changed to
"COHEN" when they came over; when my dad got
married, he changed his name back to "KAGAN")."
Note the Russian origin of this "Khazar" name.
http://genealogy.imstumped.com/kagancohen.shtml
There are a slew of "Kagan/Cohen" phrases online. If that's
not enough, I've seen two websites using Cohen together with
"Katz," as for example a line on a Leonard Cohen website, "Like
many other Jews named Cohen, Katz, Kagan, etc.," The
significance here is that the Khazars were called "Akatziri"! !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard Cohen
The f house%ames.com website verifies that the Kagan
surname comes from the Hebrew surname Cohen." Or could it be
the other way around? The website goes on to say that many
Russian Hebrews changed their name to Cohen to evade military
duty.

202
The only symbol on the Jewish Katz-family Coat of Arms is
a leopard, yes a large kat. The going line, apparently, is that the
"Katz" surname derives from "Cohen Tsedek." I doubt it. Rather,
as "Katz" is commonly associated with Cohen/Kagan, and is
moreover evocative of "Akatziri," they must trace to those proto-
Khazars ... who were otherwise called "Agathyrsi" Thracians. These
were mythically sons of Hercules, and this in itself reveals the raw
Satanic nature of their cult. The cat paw points to the Cati/Cutha
Kabala, and because "Katzir" is also a Hebrew surname, the paw
points also to the Biblical Gether and/or Plato's Gadeirus (who, for
reasons given elsewhere was Kemuel, son of Nahor).
The sad thing is that DNA tests used to find the lost ten tribes
of Israel are based on similarities/matches with Cohen DNA. The
article I am sharinVo om puts it this way: "Using the genetic
markers of the hanim as a yardstick, these genetic
archaeologists are using DNA research discover historical
links to the Jewish people."
http://cohen-levi.org/dna.htm
The obvious problems are the assumptions: the Cohen-
specific marker found in over 100 Cohens are assumed to
correctly trace back to a common ancestor in about 1300 BC, with
the added assumption that this common man was Aaron (the
Levite). This could be a ploy of certain Illuminatists, to make it
appear that their Kabalist bloodline represents true Israelites (i.e. at
the exclusion of the true Israelites) and that only they should
therefore have the right to re-settle Israel (for the Biblical
Millennium). Take a look at the two hands at the top of the article
and ask if they don't look New-Age Illuminatist rather than
Israelite.
The same website then claims that modern Levites have no
common DNA marker, and yet makes no comment on the apparent
conclusion: that this finding makes a sharp distinction between
Levites and Cohens. If that's not enough, the article fails to tell
whether the Levites had markers similar to Cohens, by which
failure we can only glean that they did not. One like myself could
get the impression that the true Levites are being discredited as
being such, while the Cohens, who are not true Levites, are being
made true Levites.. That is exactly what I suspect the Illuminati to
do.
A DNA report concluded that "The paternal ancestry of
the Ashkenazi and Sephardic Levites is different, unlike the
Cohanim from the two branches..." In that the Cohens of either
Germany (Ashkenazi) or Spain (Sephardic) are from the same
root, and because it's my suspicion that certain Hebrews and/or
Cohens from Khazaria changed their names to "Levi/Levy," I will
bet my very best Texan kippah (the one with a chrome spur at the

203
rear) that a good percentage of Ashkenazi/German Levites will
prove to be from the Khazars rather than from Israelites. Give me
your best kippah, because the article continues:
"A recent study by Skorecki and colleagues
uncovered a subgroup of Ashkenazic Levites who have a
Y-chromosome pattern that is not seen in other priests, or
indeed any major Jewish group, but is common in people
around the mouth of the Volga River" [i.e. where the
Hebrew Khazars ruled!]
http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/abstracts-cohen-levite.htmi
The assumptions that one would make on those conclusions
are two: 1) that the Khazar Jews were from Israelites, and, 2) that
the Spanish Jews are directly from Israel rather than Khazar Jews.
It seems that the idea of non-Israelite Hebrews is so foreign to
everyone that it doesn't enter the picture of that article, even
though there were by far more of those Hebrews than Israelites.
Could not the Sephardic "Jews" have been from Sepharvites of
Subartu/Akkadia? Could not the Khazar "Levites" have been from
Iberians rather than from Israelites? Why must it be true that those
taking on the Levi surname were truly Levites? How many
Khazaria Hebrews took on the Cohen surname, and how many of
those in turn changed it to "Levy"?
I would point out that there are bound to be false/mistaken
public reports given by Illuminatists who control genetic-
engineering facilities, whose underlying purposes are politically
motivated. The article ends with this: "May we soon see
Kohanim at their service, Levites on their Temple platform
and Israelites at their places." A wise Christian realizes the error
in this, that Hebrews not looking for Jesus to rule Israel are hoping
to set up ... you know.
The reason that I slammed my fist down into the air three or
four times is because three or four major arteries of my work were
verified on the spot. For example, I had earlier caught a glimpse of
the possibility that Margaret, queen of Scotland, had brought in her
veins Hebrew blood to Scotland, after being in exile in Kiev (i.e.
under the protection of the Varangian Rus), and later under the
protection of king Andrew of Hungary. I didn't have the evidence,
and didn't put it in print too heavily, that I suspected her mother,
Agatha, to have been of Hebrew-Khazar blood in that her
chamberlain, Bartholomew, had a Hebrew name. There has been
mild-to-wild debate as to Agatha's ancestral origins, but now I see
that she was, though not directly from Hebrew-Khazars proper,
from the dragon bloodline that put forth both the Khazar Hebrews
and those Hebrews who took on the Cohen surname.

204
Stewarts became what they were, kings of Scotland and
England, due to David I elevating them to the office of High
Steward of Scotland (second in command). David was Margaret's
son, and therefore of Agatha's blood. Notice his Hebrew, and even
Messianic, name ... that certainly didn't come from Malcolm's
(Margaret's husband) pagan mindset. The reason that Stewarts
were so taken in by David, is, as my theory now goes, because
Stewarts, as cohens and therefore somehow tied to kagan blood,
were related to David, he also being of kagen-cohen blood (I'm not
using the capitalized version of the surname because it may not yet
have existed at the time).
I had little hope of ever finding unknown Stewart roots, but
to find them in the Khazar/Kassite dragon blood shared also by
queen Margaret is an event worthy of some celebration... not
because I like snakes, but because I am one big step closer to be
able to dangle the snakes before the public. But to simultaneously
discover that the Hebrew elements (suspected by many) in king-
Arthur myth, the (historical) Merovingians, and the Stewarts are in
Nahor, brother of Abraham, well, that lifts the work to a
remarkable level, all the thanks be to God. But to then find that
Atlantis itself is the very same bloodline, well well, it can only
mean that someone could pick this up and make it a world-wide
breakthrough, I can feel it in my internet-weary bones.
I found this quote: “Final resting place [of king Arthur]
could be Rhosesmor, Flintshire...” (website below). I note how
"Rhosesmor" is very much like "Rothesay," the original name of
the island of Butes, and later the capital city. And look also at this
quote from the same article: “One of the best known [Arthur-
related locations] is Maen Huail in Ruthin ... ” Might "Ruthin"
connect to the Ruthene/Redones (I've yet to research that
possibility)? Then this: “Arthur's final resting place is known to
most as Avalon, but Welsh texts record the name as Afallwch
and at Rhosesmor there is a hillfort known as Caerfallwch
(Fort of Afallwch) - could there be a connection?”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/northeast/guides/halloffame/historical/king_arthur.shtml
I'm suggesting that the Rhosesmor peoples of Flintshire
settled Rothesay, and that it/Bute may thus have been the island of
Avalon. Flintshire was once a part of the Clyde province, which I
must reason was founded by the peoples that Plato called "Cleito."
As he had Cleito in marriage with Poseidon, I'll assume that the
marriage depicted an alliance between the founders of Clyde and
the Nahorite peoples who named Bude/Bute. See how nice that
works?
When we talk Wales, we must also talk Gwynedd, the ruler
of which was often described as ruler of Aberffraw, a region in
Mona. The progenitor of Gwynedd proper was king Cunedda

205
(c.AD 386-c.460), which, because it meant "Kenneth," originated
in the root of Kenneth: "Coinneach." Were these terms the
beginnings of the Cohen surname?
One can see that "Gwynedd" derived from "Cunedda," or
vice versa. Which? Castlewales.com says this: “The territory was
originally known as Venedotia, a name which mutated to
Gwynedd over the next two centuries.”
http://www.castlewales.com/gwynedd.html
You might (as I do) ignore good-intentioned thinkers who
seek the definition of a man's name from word in the man's own
language that most reflects his name, as for example "counodagos"
("good lord") reflects "Cunaedda" wherefore they say that his
name derives from "good lord." I sometimes wonder if
Rosicrucians provide simpleton methods of rooting Rosicrucian-
important peoples and places, to keep us from getting on track to
the realities. If Cunedda and Gwynedd were a major Rosicrucian
root, you can bet that most writers on the topic will be
Rosicrucians.
As Vannes in Brittany was alternatively, "Gwenea," I think
the Gwynedd link to Vannes is obvious, especially as Vannes was
founded by the Veneti while "Gwynedd" is said to derive from
"Venedotia." One could thus conclude that "Cunedda" is
ultimately from “Heneti,” the Phrygian region that was in fact the
root of the Veneti. One can see the P-Celt modification to a Q-Celt
type, since "Venedotia/Veneti" is a B/P term (Vs and Bs are
interchangeable) while Cunedda/Gwynedd is the same term but
using a C/G/Q. The question that I must ask, with absolutely no
evidence to back up an affirmative answer except the fact that the
Cati-branch Kabala lived in Phrygia, is this: Was there a hard-C
variation of "Heneti," something like "Keneti," that was the
makings of the Cohen surname? It never hurts to make a theory,
and to keep one eye out for evidence that may pop out at you.
The Taddei (of Italy) connection to Wales is interesating for
me because my grandmother was half Taddei. And so behold that
as I expected some Taddei-like peoples/places in dragon-line
Wales, so I found that Cunedda lived in Manaw Gododdin, which
in Roman times was "Votadini," showing once again the P-Celt
versus Q-Celt variations. A search for "Tadini" family symbols on
houseofnames.com brings up the Taddei name (i.e. Tadini is an
official/registered Taddei variation).
[Update June 15 -- Just realized that the House of Tudor (a
Welsh entity) could be from the Tadini.
Update October 2006 -- The British dragon line that
incorporates the Cohens has been traced (by me) to Epirus;
Dodona was in Epirus (north-west Greece) and is suspect as a
major facet of the dragon cult. The black phoenix symbol of

206
Epirus is shared by Illyrium, while it's an historical fact that the
Veneti were from Illyrians. Moreover, the black phoenix symbol
belonged first of all to a Hohen surname! I've got the snake by the
tail; details later in this book. End Updates]
The Votadini ruled as far as Roslin (may not yet have had
that name), and in fact had their capital at Edinburgh, which may
have been the dragon bloodline's most cherished region since
"Eden" (i.e. Utu's Eridu region) is where the line originated. The
Edones (of Thrace) definitely come to mind, especially as I have
traced the Druids (who gathered in Mona) to the "Dryas/Dryad"
branch of Edones.
It was Cunedda's grandfather, Padarn Beisrudd, who ruled
Votadini, and he did so with Roman blessings, which is what we
might expect if he had descended from the Taddei clan of Italy
(which I think was an Etruscan family). Opinion is divided as to
whether Beisrudd was a Roman official, or a native of Scotland
placed in charge by Romans.
It is said that "Beisrudd" means "scarlet robe " because the
name sounds like such, in one language or another, but I would
also suggest Red Bees or Red Beis etc. I've noted that the
(English) Beis family Coat of Arms is virtually identical to the
Vere Coat (the Veres are known to have stemmed from the dragon
bloodline). I could easily include the Beis family into the bee-line
cult because the above link implies Beis origins in Byzantium,
which I had earlier traced to the mythical Byzas of Megara
(Greece), where moreover Bias ruled. For new readers, I trace
these peoples to Buz, son of the Biblical Nahor (Genesis 22:21).
Cunedda extended Votadini into Wales and thus established
the Gwynedd nation, no doubt a mix of his (Veneti?) peoples with
the Cimmerian/Atlantean Welsh already there. I would now
conjecture that the red dragon on the Cardiff Arms holds a flag
with the Taddei symbol for the expected reason that the modern
Welshossess
p significant roots in the Votadini.
C unedda married the daughter of a popular personality
named "Coel Hen" (a Welsh name, but never mind that it almost
sounds like "Cohen" because it could be a coincidence), said to
mean "Old Coel" (yes, king Cole). Geoffrey of Monmouth (author
of Arthurian myths) wrote that Coel's daughter gave birth to
Constantine I the Great, the first emperor to permit the flourishing
of Christianity in an anti-Christian pagan Roman empire...and yet
Constantine worshiped the sun god as Jesus Christ! This explains
why Catholicism became a Babylo-Christian mix, a mix similar to
that carried by Rosicrucian groups for centuries. Yet none did I
know until recently that Constantine' sun god belongs to the
Kabala! Yes, Catholicism was a mixing of Jesus Christ with the
dragon bloodline, a most polluted state of affairs. The great

207
wonder is not the cesspool itself, but how Catholics are blind to
this reality that Protestants see so clearly. I will add here that
queen Margaret was of the Catholic persuasion.
Others, including Henry of Huntington, likewise claimed that
Cole's daughter was Constantine's mother. If true, the self-
proclaimed 13th Apostle, Constantine I, was of proto-Stewart, and
therefore of Cohen elements. There _ s more in support of this than
my belief that Gwynedd/Welsh royal blood was rooted in Stewart
elements, and that Geoffrey was himself a Stewart or
mythographer of Stewart roots.
[Update August 2006 -- Update August 2006 -- One can
imagine that Vatican tendencies would have been to fill the Roman
church with Cohen blood, and that Agatha, a daughter of a Roman
emperor, was of Cohen blood as a result of papal power's potential
to maintain that blood on the throne of the Roman empire. I say
this because Agatha was born to an emperor of the Hohen(zollern)
family.
..that was in fact a branch of Cohens.
http://www.ancestrees.com/pedigree/2561.htm
It will be many chapters before I discuss the Hohens in
detail, and so note here a quote from that chapter: "To show some
evidence that the Hohen name was a variation of "Cohen," see that
the German Hohen Coat is a replica of the German Cohen Coat but
with red and silver checks instead of the Cohen/Stewart blue and
silver checks."
It is believed that Agatha was the daughter of Conrad II (see
website below). All four German-Salian kings (descendants of the
Salian-Frank Merovingians, by the way) -- Conrad II, Henry III,
Henry IV, and Henry V -- were Hohen(zollern)s and "Holy
Roman" emperors. Again, this should explain why Agatha's
grandson, David I, elevated Stewarts to a position in Scotland
second only to the king, in that David was himself of Stewart
elements.
http://www.angelfire.com/mi4/polcrt/Rollo.html
Obviously, if this is true, it is a sizable discovery.. End
update]
Proof for a David-Cole and a David-Cunedda connection is
in the extremely interesting report that Constantine's wife, Helena
Cole (Cole's daughter and Cunedda's wife), found pieces of
Christ's cross. The Catholic clergy and many popes were infamous
for these sorts of money-making scams...to this very day ... and so
this is not what is extremely interesting. But lo and behold that
queen Margaret claimed to have brought back from Hungary/Kiev
a piece of Christ's cross (which was supposedly the sacred item for
which Holyrood House was built by her son, David I). My theory
is now virtually verified, that Agatha and/or Margaret, centuries
after Helena, was in sexual contact with a descendant of Helena.

208
This is supported all the more by the fact that Henry Huntington
was the son of Margaret’s son, David I! Henry Huntington knew
that Helena was the daughter of Cole simply because Henry knew
that he was from Helena’s blood.
But as Helena had Cunedda as her husband, therein is how
the Cohen blood could have entered the Roman throne. If true,
Constantine was the first Cohen emperor, wherefore one may also
view him as a proto-Stewart of sorts.
Helene took on the title, "Augusta," which could certainly
reveal that she (and the Cole bloodline) was from the Roman-
Trojan blood of Caesar Augustus, the first Roman emperor (Julius
was not an official emperor). Were the Kyles and/or Stewarts from
Caesar Augustus, therefore??? Augustus was the patriarch of the
caesar (Tiberius) under whom Jesus was crucified, not likely by
chance, but by Design, so as to condemn that dragon bloodline
absolutely. The Dragon of Revelation 12, which continued to
pursue Christ even after He ascended to Heaven, is this Augustus
bloodline/cult via seven Roman emperors (yes, the dragon's seven
heads) beginning with Gaius in 37 AD.
The apparent contradiction in this chapter, that Cohens are
from both Khazar kagans and Cunedda Veneti, should vaporize if I
am correct on both counts. In order for both to be true, the Akatziri
(of Thrace) need to connect with the Veneti and/or Heneti of Asia.
As Agathyrsus was the son of Hercules while the western dragon
line was definitely from Hercules, I fully expect a connection
between Khazars proper and western Atlantis. Since the mother of
Agathyrsus was Echidna the snake-woman, the Khazars and the
western Atlanteans must both be from "she." Isn't she "Akkadia" =
the Cati? In fact, "Akkadia" is close enough to "Akatziri" that I
would consider the two one peoples.
At the McClintock family website, which family uses three
silver shells, I read: "The escallop shell is the symbol of James,
the disciple of Jesus Christ from the Bible..." Please, how does
one get that idea? The Rosicrucians didn't support the Stewarts
because they were disciples of Christ. The writer then picks up his
good senses so as to ignore the Christian-slanted "bunk" that he's
been told, and admits the reality that he must have known all
along: "...[the shell] may also be significant of James VI of
Scotland who also became King James 1 of Great Britain."
Ahh, now we're talking, suggesting that the shell was a Stewart
symbol (James was a Stewart king).
The Magdalene (surname) Coat uses nine gold shells. Hmm.
Moreover, knowing that the Eaton family is related to the
Stewarts, see that the Eden Coat used three black shells. The
German Eden Coat uses a gold griffin. Here's a key: the shell
symbol was around before any Stewart sat on British throne, for

209
the afore-mentioned writer at the McClintock family website
reveals one revealing piece of data:
“It was worn on the helmets of the Crusaders in
their war to free the Holy Land from the barbarians.”
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~mcclintock/mcclintockcoatofarms.htm
How could the shell be tied to the dragon line any better?
And see that the symbol is on the present pope's Papal Coat.
[Update August 2006 -- Just a week after publishing this
chapter, I found that the Lad-family Coat uses three black shells.
For this reason, the shell may root back to the Ladon dragon, a
depiction of the Latin-family of peoples going back to the mythical
Circe and Helios alliance. As the Mushussu Dragon of the
Sumerian sun-god cult (to which Helios must have been
connected) used a leopard's body, note the black leopard head on
the Lad Crest. Moreover, the Lad surname was first found in
Somerset (according to the above link), while "Somerset" was
originally "Sumersaeton" (= house of Sumer)!
http://britannia.com/history/somerset/somhist1.html
Knowing that Plato's Atlantis is dated by modern cults (e.g.
Edgar Cayce) to roughly 12,000 years ago, see that the website
above says: "Somerset has a prehistory going back at least as far as
11,000 bc when families lived in Gough's Cave, near Cheddar."
Dream on modern pagans, for historical records in our possession
do not go back further than 2400 BC; records prior to that were
destroyed by Noah's Flood. The sooner that you -- modern
Rosicrucians who established Evolution fantasy -- realize that
whale fossils on mountain sides did not get there by the uplift of
sea floors over millions of years of mountain formation, the less
you'll look the fool when the Truth is revealed.
Is "Cheddar" from "Gether," son of Aram, the very one I
suspect to be the beginning of the Kabala cult? As the Kabala was
the Cutha-come-Cati, note that the next sentence speaks of a
Cadbury Castle of 700 BC. Another website says: “A wealth of
local folklore links Cadbury with Camelot and Arthur.” As
Arthur is likewise thought to have been connected to the Somerset
region, while Ladon was the dragon that protected the golden
apples of western Atlantis, code-named, "Avalon," one can't ignore
the Arthur-Ladon relationship that should be true also of the
Cohens/Stewarts.
http://www.time-scapes.co.uk/Arthur%20in%20the%20Southwest/cadburycastle.html
Although "Avalon" may have been defined as "apple land"
for the sake of Ladon's apple symbol, I don't think it's a correct
translation. If the "lon" = "land," then the "Ava" does not appear to
mean "apple" at all. I would suggest we look to the Avvites from
the city of Opis on the Tigris, the city to which I have traced Opis-

210
worshiping Italians, the city that I think was origin to the Apollo
symbol. It may certainly be a coincidence that "Apollo" reflects
"apple," but I don't think it's a coincidence that "Avalon" and the
Greek version, "Apollon," are a virtual match. As Apollo was the
Phaethon sun god of Eridanus, look not for a golden apple to
represent the Arthurian peoples, but rather a Latin serpent that
makes rotten the entire garden.
At another website (below) we read that historian-author,
John Leland, wrote: "At the very south end of the church of
South-Cadbyri standeth Camallate." John Leland may very well
have known the Rosicrucian truth, for was Henry VIII's "chief
antiquarian." New-Atlantis Rosicrucians (e.g. John Dee's people)
were in the courts of Henry VIII (a Tudor king) to set up the idea
that Christ ruled on earth via English kings (i.e. the Anglican
church) rather than via the Vatican popes. Moreover, the Leland
surname would found Stanford University (California), an
American extension of 19th-century British-Rosicrucian cults.
http://www.kingarthursknights.com/theland/cadbury.asp
As those secret British cults are known to be extensions of
the "Jewish" Bavarian Illuminati, we find that Stanford is home to
the Hoover Institute, while the Hoover name was rooted in
Bavaria. The Hoover link (above) shows that the name was earlier
"Huber," very close indeed to "Iberi/Hebrew." A variation of
"Huber" is "Hubbard," the name that became infamous with
Scientology, and do know that Scientology, and it's Hubbard
founder, worked together with Stanford Research Institute.
Moreover, Scientology was the product of Aleister Crowley's
Golden-Dawn cult that was an extension of the Bavarian
Illuminati. The Crowley Coat uses a blue boar, suggesting
connection to the Vere dragon line.
As Bavaria was Franconia, know that Franconia was held by
Hohen Salians prior to the official formation (1776) of the
Bavarian Illuminati. Just as the Hohen Coat uses red and silver
(i.e. white) checks, so "red and white are regarded as state
colours (Landesfarben) of Franconia."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franconia
Somerset is next/east to Devonshire, and while Wikipedia
reports that "Devon" derives from the "Dewnans," I found that
Devonshire was granted by the Conqueror to his war supporter,
Walter de Douai, where "Douai" is known to refer to a region in
Normandy. This can't be a coincidence. Indeed, as the variation of
the Douai surname is Dewey (three gold griffin heads on Coat),
and "Doway" to the English, I would suggest that the Dewnan
founders of Devonshire were the same as the Douai of Normandy.
Wikipedia reports that the Dewnans (Tuatha de Danann?) lived in
Somerset as well as neighboring Devonshire.

211
Previous to learning of the Douai term, I had already traced
Avvites of Ois to the Dahae ("dog") that named Daghestan. Both
Avvites and ahae were reported independently as wolf-depicted
peoples. And as the dahae were Biblically the "Dehava," which
term I think is to be understood as Deh-Ava, a connection to
Avalon seems feasible. I strongly suspect Dagon roots here, and
t as I had caught glimpse of a Dagon-Nahor relationship, so the
turi were also a wolf peoples. Is that Dagon's fishtail on the
Arms of the Devon County Council.
Leland's identification of Camelot with Cadbury intrigues me
in that I view Camelot as an entity named after Kemuel, son of
Nahor, while I include Nahorites in with the Cutha Kabala. Bude
may have been named by the same that named Bodmin in
Cornwall (beside Devonshire). Proof that "bod" terms can modify
to "bos/buz" (or vice-versa) is in the Bodmin's Cornish version:
Bosvenegh. "It has been suggested that [Bodmin's] name comes
from an archaic word in the Cornish 'bod' (meaning a dwelling; the
later word is 'bos')" (round brackets not mine)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodmin
I've noted that Walter de Douai's father was Urso (= bear),
perhaps leading back to Arthur.
Tavistock comes to mind as a variation of the
Dew(nan)/Douai, for not only is Tavistock a town of Devonshire,
but it is said to be rooted in "Tau." Tavistock is today a name
associated heavily in the social-engineering sector of the
Illuminati, namely the Stanford-connected Tavistock Institute,
founded by the Rockefeller Foundation. Wikipedia reports that
Tavistock was the location of the Sherlock Holmes fiction, The
Hound of the Baskervilles, while "Tau" resembles the dog terms in
the following list (found at the website below): daoi, daos, daules,
daon, dhaunos, daunus, and daous. Daghestan is yet inhabited by
Avars, remember, so that the Avvites of Avalon/Britain likely
derive from Avar elements... which I think were the Iberians (i.e.
Hebrews) of Caucasia.
Does the reader understand that Hebrew dogs wish to rule
over us absolutely, and that these must be distinguished from true
Jews? Does the reader understand that God wishes to purge
modern Israel of the dogs? Does the reader understand that God is
raising the anti-Christ to destroy the dogs not only in Israel, but in
Britain, in Europe, and in America?
Years ago I wrote a chapter (The New Apostles) on the
fathers of Pentecostalism, and it was then that I learned that a John
Dowie was an extention of the Catholic Apostolic Church (the
same one that wanted to rule Europe in the name of Israel via their
own 12 apostles). This church was the first to introduce tongues
and false miracles, and Dowie, who claimed to be the last-days

212
Elijah, not only had the very same sort of movement going, but
called his church, "Christian Catholic Apostolic Church." Three
points: 1) "Dowie" is the Scottish form of "Douai," 2) dragon-line
Rosicrucians/Gnostics are at the foundations of charismatic
Christianity, and, 3) the pre-tribulation rapture was invented by the
Catholic Apostolic Church.
http://www.members.tripod.com/dacians1/dacians.htm End Update]
The McClintock article says that the Ulster rulers desired to,
and in fact, changed the colors of the McClintock Coat, but after
some debate the colors were restored, including the silver color of
the shells (Coat shown at link below). This shows that Coats, even
the smallest details, must be okayed by the Masters. The writer
reveals that:
“In England, Henry the V issued a writ proclaiming
that no man should assume a coat of arms unless he
possessed or ought to possess one in right of his ancestors
or by grant of some person competent to grant it. This
was a way to control and identify the use of arms in the
kingdom. Disputes concerning armorial matters were
dealt with in the Court of Chivalry, presided over by the
Constable and Marshal .... A King of Arms was created
giving the power to issue coats of arms on behalf of the
Sovereign.'
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~mcclintock/mcclintockcoatofarms.htm
Can't get much more controlling than that.
Houseofnames.com uses gold shells for the McClintocks; but it
indicates that it's the Scottish branch of the family. Wouldn't that
suggest that the Scottish branch is superior, since gold must take
the cake over silver? McClintocks first appeared in Argyllshire,
adjacent to the Stewart domains of Bute, Ayrshire, and Arran. Of
course, I wonder about Clinton connection to this family. At
another website (a primer for creating one's own Arms), we read:
There are three ways to acquire arms:
1. Inherit them.
2. Be granted them.
3. Assume them.
In the first case, you should make an attempt to
ascertain as to whether an ancestor had legitimate arms.
If there was such an ancestor, if you can prove line-of-
descent and if that line-of-descent was in the male line, it
is generally assumed you have a right to a coat-of-arms.

213
Not the same one, necessarily, but similar. The catch is,
you have to prove the line-of-descent.

214
EDOM AND AVVA
June 2006.

Nahor was inter-married with his fellow Semites, the


Arameans. Aram, son of Shem, gave birth to an "Uts" as well, and
he too was the elder son. It was this Uts' brother, Hul, whom
Josephus pegged as the founder of Armenia. Hul could have been
the god, El, and if true, his "brother" Dagon becomes a Semite,
possibly a Hebrew, peoples.
The third son of Aram was "Gether" (Genesis 10:23), I kid
you not, a term that smacks of Plato's "Gadeirus"...not to mention
Aether, the alternative name of Uranus. Assuming that Gether and
Gadeirus are to be equated, I have the problem of explaining
Gadeirus' identification as Kemuel, Nahor's son. I would suggest
that Plato gave "Eumelus" as the alternative for Gadeirus because
Kemuelites and Getherites had intermarried. If Plato knew it, then
it must have been an important mix. Serving to support the
Kemuel-Gether mix, Genesis 22:21 reveals that Kemuel named his
son, Aram (same as Gether's father).
This mix can be tied closely to the Mushussu dragon (the
sun-god line that I have been tracing to the modern day) because
Aram's son coming after Gether was "Mash." This now tones
down the Hebrew elements of the dragon line by making it more
Aramean than Hebrew, at least at the start.
It's incredibly interesting that Nahor's sons listed
immediately after Kemuel are "Kesed" and "Chazo" (those are the
Biblical spellings) , for these smack of "Kassite" and "Khazar."
The problem is that "Gether" may also modify to "Khazar," and in
fact in previous chapters I equated Plato's Gadeirus with the
historical Cathars and/or Khazars. It's moreover difficult to deduce
whether the Cutha Kabalists stemmed from Kesed or Chazo (if
either). But these matters belong to merely a fine-tuning of the
theory; the basis remains the same, that the dragon line is
connected to Nahor.
[Update June 26 2006 -- With the widely-accepted
knowledge that the Chaldeans were not Babylonians, but the
Hebrew/Semitic peoples of proto-Babylon, read Joel C. Slayton:
"Although [Chesed] occurs only once in the Bible,
this name has been associated with the people known in
the Bible as the Chaldeans. Chesed is orthographically
and phonologically related to the Kasdim (Heb kas d

215
m) ... The Old Babylonian term kasdu, which became
kaldû in Assyrian documents, is the equivalent of this
term, which the LXX translates chaldion. A connection
could be drawn between the clan of Chesed and these
Mesopotamian "Chaldeans," but to do so based on the
similarity of terms only is unadvisable" (ABD, "Chesed,"
1992).
http://www.bibleorigins.net/UrofChaldeesurfaurie.html
To the above I would add Richard S. Hess (website above):
"To Nahor, Abram's other brother, was born Kemuel, father
of Aram, and Chesed ... The Hebrew consonants of Chesed and
kas d m are identical." (ABD, "Chaldea," 1992).
The Biblical word for what Bible translators have as
"Chaldee" is Kasdiy (Strong's #3778), and we must yet allow that
the root is "Kas" and not "Kesed" since the Kasdim were cited in
records as "kas d m." At a non-English website, I found the terms
put this way: "kassiták ... A kasszu ( kassita )," where "A
Kasszu" easily forms "Agatzir" (i.e. the Khazars) of the Greek
language. It would appear more certain, therefore, that Chaldeans
stem from Kassites (i.e. known of old as "Kassi/Kashi/Kashu").
The author of the website above lacks faith and has the
Genesis account written after the eleventh century BC merely
because "Chaldean" does not appear in records until that time. He
says nothing of the Kassites and so I shall, that "Kasdim" is in
great likelihood derived from those peoples, who, though living in
the Zagros mountains, are known to have stormed into
Mesopotamia victoriously, at which time they may have found
military allies in the Hebrews already there, that leading to marital
ties.
The above website connects the Abrahamic Hebrews to the
Adam-and-Eve cult (tree, garden and all) proliferated by the Enki
peoples of Eridu, and the only question is to what extent the
Habira/Khabira portion of the Kassites found involvement in that
cult. Did they join what was at first a non-Hebrew cult, or were
they the founders of the cult? Or was it other Semites (e.g.
Arameans, Elamites, Ludites) who founded it? The Kabala proper,
"given" to the world in Christian centuries, uses a Tree of Life as
its centerpiece (but of course that which is disclosed to the public
is not the heart of the cult).
Thanks to an email friend with some Rosicrucian
background, (I've mentioned this person before, whose last name
begins with "Bot," whom I felt had contacted me by God's will to
be of key direction in my new task of tracing Buz), I was tipped
off concerning the following names pertaining to the Kabala Tree
of Life.

216
In creating ten forces, Kabalists made "Kether" the first,
smacking of "Gether," son of Aram (I had already published this
chapter before learning this, so it came well-received). Kether is
defined (by Kabalists) as a supreme crown i.e. god himself (but in
no way YHWH no matter how they would make that claim in
efforts to lure Jews). Realizing now that the Kabalists, tricky-
dickies that they were, were referred to their ancestors in those ten
forces (which they call "sephirot"), Gether appears to be in view as
supreme, suggesting that the cult began with, and/or was officiated
by, Getherites. The "K" variation evokes the Khazars.
The second force is "Chokmah" (Kokmah seems acceptable),
and may refer to the Gether-Gogi alliance (that I've been
insinuating), with the Gogi playing second-fiddle to Getherites.
The fourth force is "Chesed," which they define as mercy...but we
know better. I would tie it to Kesed, son of Nahor, although there
is another possibility. The fifth one is "Geburah," which may refer
to Rothschild ancestors, for the real surname of the Rothschilds,
"Bauer," "is derived from the High German word, "giburo ... "
http://www.themystica.com/mystica/articles/k/kabbalah.html
Geburah may be a version of "Eber," the Hebrew patriarch.
On the other hand, seeing that Freemasons put emphasis on
Solomon, I would point out two "Geber" names (i Kings 4:13, 19),
each being an official commissioned by Solomon to provide/cater
to his royal family. It's interesting that yet another official was
named "Hesed/Chesed" (v 10), not quite the same spelling as
"Kesed" (son of Nahor) but reflecting Kabala's Chesed very much.
Plus, there were two officials named "Baana," which reflects the
Kabal's third force, "Binah." I would stress the Baana of verse 12,
a ruler of Megiddo. It's interesting that immediately before Baana
comes Abinadab, a ruler in Dor and moreover married to
Solomon's daughter. What have we here, a Megiddo and Dor
relationship with Solomon? Know if you don't already that
Solomon had an alliance with Hiram, king of Tyre, and that Hiram
is esteemed by Freemasons to this day.
The Geber of verse 19 is the son of Caleb (meaning "dog") of
the Judah bloodline, a bloodline seen in more detail in 2
Chronicles 2:18-20. The Geber of verse 12 is likewise from Judah,
but married to the Manasseh bloodline (2 Chronicles 2:21-23). The
Merovingians, who claim to be from Judah, may have connected
themselves, rightly or wrongly, as might other
Kabalists/Rothschilds, to one of these Gebers. But this connection
seems like a long shot; I'm seeking other possibilities to define the
Geburah of the Kabala's tree. I think "Eber" makes good sense, as
one would almost expect him to be a part of a Hebrew cult.
Now yesterday (June 26, 2006), a few weeks after
hypothesizing that the Kassites and the Cutha together had moved

217
to Gath and various Israelite shores (e.g. Ashdod and Gaza), and
even less time after tracing them to the Cats/Khassi of Cilicia, I
caught wind of the Avvites. These I will now define as those
Kassites and/or the Cutha for the following reasons. One, the Bible
(Deut. 2:23) states that Avvites lived in "Chatseriym" (Biblical
spelling, Strong's #2699), or "Hazerim" in KJV; NIV uses
"villages" because the word is rooted in "chatser," meaning
"village. Aside from evoking "Kothar," the term reminds me
instantly of the Hebrew surname, "Catz," that is associated with
the "Cohen" name.
Technically wrong, the KJV uses "Avims" (instead of
Avvites) in the above text; the Hebrew word is #5757 -- Avviy --
the very same word translated "Avite/Avvite" elsewhere in the
KJV. Avimm (#5761) is a city mentioned in Joshua 18:23 beside
"Bethel" so as to be in its vicinity. Apparently, Avvites lived
beteen Avimm and Gaza. And that gets me to the second point:
Chatserim was near Gaza (or, as the NIV saw it, Avvite "villages"
spreadtGhnfsaz).NotehBiblca
spelling of Gaza is " 'Azzah. " Deuteronomy 2:23 says that the
Avvites of Gaza were driven out by Caphtorites (proto-Philistines
of Crete, say the historians), wherefore it could have been at that
time that the Avvites, mixed with Phoenicians, migrated to Cilicia
as the holy grail. As the holy grail concept was part and parcel
with Merovingian Franks, and as those Franks were related to Ubii
Franks, might the Ubii have been the Avviy? If so, then might all
Franks have been a fundamental extension of the Avviy and
Cutha?
The Avvites were also east of the Jordan, for a capital city of
Edom was "Avith," a term rooted (according to Strong's) in the
same word that "Avviy" is rooted: Ava (Strong's #5753, said to
mean "crooked/perverted"). But might not this term stem instead
from Eve-of-the cult i.e. the Great Mother? After all, "Edom" sure
sounds like "Adam." In fact, both Edom and Adam mean
"red/rosy," according to Strong's dictionary (#123 and 119). Esau
had defeated the Horite peoples of Edom in war, and by the will of
God had taken Edom as his own inheritance. For those who don't
know, Esau was the non-Israelite Hebrew brother of Jacob (re-
named "Israel" by God), the progenitor of the Israelites. I do not
think that Esau's bloodlines included Avvites, but even so one may
assume Esau-Avvite mixes. Was Esau blood, therefore, part of
holy-grail blood?
Point three. In Joshua 13:3, we learn that two more cities are
to be added to the three -- Gath, Gaza, and Ashdod -- that were not
invaded by Joshua so as to leave their non-Israelite inhabitants
intact. Those two are Ascelon and Ekron (from Gogar?). But the
point is, all five are revealed (in Joshua 13:3) as Avvites! ! ! I

218
couldn't have much better evidence toward my theory that these
cities were all founded by Cutha Hebrews who had mixed with
Aryans to produce Kassites, especially as Ashkenaz
Aryans/Scythians were in Iran as were the Kassites. It may be for
this Hebrew reason that Joshua left the five cities alone.
Point four. In 2 Kings 17:24, we find that Shalmaneser, the
Assyrian king, when finally defeating the ten Israelite tribes and
carrying them away to Gozan and other (non-Israelite) Hebrew
regions of Mesopotamia, brought up Mesopotamian peoples to
Israel/Samaria (whom he had also defeated in war)...to replace the
ten tribes that were being displaced. This was long after the
Avvites of Gaza had been ejected by Philistines, by which time the
Avviy were in "Khassi" of Cilicia as the "Cati" (those spellings by
Shalmaneser). Behold, in the Biblical list of those Mesopotamian
peoples (that were settled in Samaria) there were the cities of
"Cuthah" and "Avva" ! ! I almost fell off my chair. I had been
correct, that the Gath/Gaza region was settled by Euphrates-based
Hebrews/Arameans before there was an Israel (i.e. before 1500
BC). Herein is what European-Israeli and British-Israeli devotees
don't realize, that the Hebrew blood of royal Europe is not of the
lost 10 tribes, but of the Cutha and Avvites et al.
In 2 Kings 17:30, we learn that the Cutha worshiped Nergal,
while in verse 31 we see that the Avvites worshiped Nibhaz and
Tartak. The latter would seem to connect with the mythical
Dardanus of the Trojans and/or the Tartans/Tators (Dedan?). We
find mentioned immediately after the Avvites that the
"Sepharvites" (Sheba?) sacrificed (i.e. burnt to death) their
children in fires.
A Wikipedia article on Nergal says that his wife was Laz. A
Wikipedia article on Laz peoples located them in Colchis/Georgia,
and moreover claims that they settled Colchis immediately after
the mythical king Aeetes. Because Nergal was symbolized as a
lion, the Lydian lion now comes to mind, by which I mean to
suggest that the Laz peoples were proto-Lydians and therefore the
mythical Ladon dragon. As the Latins stem from the same
Lydian/Ladon entities, and as myth traces Latins (and Etruscans)
to Circe, sister of Aeetes and symbol of Circasia/Caucasia, I am
compelled to view the Latins rooted in the Laz peoples.
As Aeetes had been the co-founder of Corinth under that
name, I feel it necessary at this point to at least notify the reader
that he may have been a depiction of Horites, who not only lived
in Edom, but in Nuzi (on the steps of the Zagros mountains). I say
this only because the first son of Seir (a Horite) was "Lotan" (who
named his son "Hori," after the Horites I presume). Per chance, in
other words, the Ladon dragon was from Seir.

219
Wikipedia says that "Nergal's fiery aspect appears in
names or epithets such as ... Gibil (though this name more
properly belongs to Nusku... " (brackets not mine). Wikipedia
again, inuoting from a 1911 Britannica article, says that "A
center of sku's]
[ Nu cult in Assyria was in Harran' enerally
viewed as Nahor's home) and that the god was son Min and
brother to Ea (Enki) of Eridu (i.e. the dragon cult).
As Nuski and Nergal were fire gods, and as Nergal was the
god-specific of the city of Cutha, Hephaistos (Vulcan to Romans)
comes to mind, he being the founder of the Kabeiri (proto-Kabala)
cult. In fact, even as Hephaistos is viewed as a god of the
underworld (no doubt due to the mining of ores in conjunction
with smelting them in furnaces), ditto for Nergal. In fact, I would
trace the Greek Underworld to Nergal and his wife by the
designation, Ereshgikal, goddess of the Underworld. And speaking
of underworlds, it is highly interesting, in tracing to the root of
Rosicrucian spy systems, that: "According to Collin de Plancy
and Johann Weyer, Nergal was said to be the chief of Hell's
'secret police', and said to be 'an honorary spy in the service of
Belzebuth.’"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nergal
[Update June 29 -- It's amazing that, a day or two after
finishing this chapter, I was updating an as-yet unpublished
chapter on Merovingians that included their long-hair peculiarity;
it was just hours after opening and reading an email from
Greenway7, where I found her comment: "Satyr comes from
Hebrew sa'yîr (check Strong's re. 'hairy ones.'" She was
correct, "sa'yir" (Strong's #8163) refers to Esau's hairy body, and is
defined in Strong's dictionary as "shaggy... a he-goat." Satyrs were
half goat! Strong's even lists "satyr" as a possible definition. In
fact, the KJV uses "satyr" twice in translating sa'yir, in referring to
he-goats (Isaiah 13:21; 34:14).
I figured that somewhere in this dragon story, the non-
Israelite Hebrews from Esau might figure in. But I wanted some
solid evidence before I'd start including Esau's bloodlines in Celt
or Germanic migrations. That day (June 26) I looked into Esau,
who lived at Seir (south-east of Dead sea), and when I saw that at
one website it was spelled "Se'ir" and defined as "hairy," my chin
just dropped in amazement. In fact, "sa'yir" is #8163, while Seir is
"se'yir" # 8165 (Strong's says the latter means "rough"). I thought
about this and was troubled, for I had already identified the Satyrs
as the Getae Thracians to the point that, if I was wrong, I'd need to
make serious changes to the entire book. Fortunately, it turned out
that Seir was not of the Esau bloodline, but rather that Seir, the
patriarch, was a Horite (Genesis 36:20), and that Esau had warred
against the Horites and taken over their land, including Seir.

220
Now what? Should I tie the Getae to the Horites? One never
knows. I went searching and found this, astounding:
"Nuzi, site near Kirkuk, N Iraq. Thousands of clay
tablets unearthed there bear inscriptions said to have
been made by the Horims (or Horites) of the Bible. "
http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0836223.html
This places the Horites in the Zagros-mountain frontier (in
which mountains the Guti lived); I'll keep my eye open for Guti-
Horite connections, especially as Seir's first son was Lotan, a term
that may connect to Ladon the dragon, but then also the Etruscans
and Veneti ... from whom came the Franks. It would astound me to
find that the Merovingians (and possibly long-haired
Englishmen/Rosicrucians such as Isaac Newton) stemmed from
the (long-haired?) Seir. "Sir" (from "sire"), a good-ole English
term if ever I heard one, is the official title given to knights, and
English knighthood is absolutely connected to Templars.
[Long Update July 1 2006 -- I just learned that there was a
seven-headed dragon in Ugarit myth called "Lotan," I kid you not,
that has been called "Sir Sea" and "Sir Stream."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotan End Update]
"Seirios" was the Greek word for "scorching," and my
dictionary reports that this word was the basis of the bright star,
Sirius, but also known as the Dog Star of the Canis Major
constellation. It would be interesting to find that the wolf line
leading to the Stewarts passed through Seir, and astonishing if
Esau blood was involved. I'm suggesting that the Horites of the
Nuzi/Zagros region were a wolf-line peoples who, while having a
north-ward Caucasian branch also had a branch in Edom.
It may be for an Armageddon-scenario reason that God said,
"Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated" (Malachi 1:2), for God in
prophecy is said to set Edom to flames for all generations after
Armageddon...as a constant reminder, apparently, of its
wickedness. A major Edomite city mentioned in the Bible is
Boz rah i.e. perhaps founded by Buz, and it's tis city that Isaiah
34:6 uses in referring to the ongoing fires. In verse seven the
slaughtered Bozrites are depicted as oxen and bulls (i.e. the Taurus
cult?).
Esau's first son (Eliphaz) had married Timna (Genesis
36:12), the (literal) sister of Lotan (36:22), thus substantiating
Esau-Horite affiliations. Timna and Eliphaz gave birth to Amalek,
who produced the infamous Amalekites. Prior to the development
of the Israelite nation and the birth of Esau, the king of Elam with
the king of Shinar (a region in Mesopotamia) conquered the
Horites of Seir and the Amalekites (Genesis 14:5-7). Who were
those from Shinar? The Cutha? Were the Elamites mixed with

221
Apiru/Abira elements? Were these Avvites? Or had the Cutha and
Avvites already come to Edom in the form of the Horites
themselves?
In Deuteronomy 1:44, God depicts the Amorites as a swarm
of bees who successfully repelled Israelites at Seir. But the bees
may not have been used in His language to depict Amorites (from
Ham), but because they depicted Seir/Horites in whose land the
Israelites were situated when the war started. I'm thinking that the
Avvites who founded Avith, the capital of Edom, were the bee
peoples that spread throughout the Seir region. Avith is said (in
Genesis 36:35) to have been the city of Hadad, son of Bedad, and
as Edom had other kings named Hadad, one would connect with
the god, Hadad, who was known in Armenia as Teshub
(Sheba?).. .the god also of the Cati of Cilicia.
The god of the Avvites is revealed in 2 Kings 17:31 to be
Nibhaz. Christiananswers.net reports that this god's name means
"barker" and "dog," and is an evil demon belonging to the Zabians
(Sheba?). Apparently, this information is from a Wikipedia article
not yet released, or released but withdrawn. Thanks to Kathleen
"the Cat" I learned that this god may have been the same as
Anubis, the dog god of Egypt, and a very major deity at that,
coming prior to Osiris. It makes me for the first time develop a
Semite-Hamite picture in my mind, a people mix formed from the
Cutha's presence on the Gaza shores of Israel, where Canaanites
were plentiful. This would explain why Kothar-wa-Khasis was
also an Egyptian entity, even though it smacks of the
Kassites/Cutha. Suspecting that Anubis had been "canubis," I
looked into the etymology of "cannabis" (hemp) and found this:
"The plant name cannabis is probably of Semitic
origin, possibly Hebrew. Hebrew qeneh bosem >
qannabbos...
However, the earlier Sumerian language used the
word "kanubi", which means 'cane of two (sexes?)'. This
is possibly the source for the Semitic usage..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannibis
Cane of two? Sounds like desperation in trying to arrive to a
translation. Look at the ending of "qannabbos"? Could that be the
"Avviy"? Could the first syllable be from "Cana/Canaan"? Could
the dog god, Anubis, be a wolf-line (i.e. Gorgon) and Canaanite
mix? In assuming that the peoples became called CanAbbis,
where, after a few generations/centuries their god became Anubis,
might we not conclude that they used hemp as part of their
religious observances (or even in daily life)? No wonder they
became possessed of demons and used the ugliest symbols to

222
depict themselves. But behold what the Wikipedia article goes on
to reveal, that the Semites who used the "weed" may have been
related to Scythians (Aryans):
"The Scythian term cannabis probably derives from
a Semitic origin as well. Sara Benetowa of the Institute of
Anthropological Sciences in Warsaw is quoted in the
Book of Grass as saying:
The astonishing resemblance between the Semitic
kanbos and the Scythian cannabis lead me to suppose
that the Scythian word was of Semitic origin. These
etymological discussions run parallel to arguments drawn
from history. The Iranian Scythians were probably
related to the Medes, who were neighbors of the Semites
and could easily have assimilated the word for hemp."
Blunt translation: Hebrews and Scythians were mixed as the
dragon line, and they in Canaan about Gaza mixed it up with
Egyptians so as to pass onto them their dragon blood/cult.
Kathlene had also shared with me a hunch, that the Dehava
peoples in the Ezra-4:9 list of transplants to Samaria were related
to the Avvites (the Avvites and the Cutha were named in another
list (2 Kings 17:24) of transplants). I didn't know what to think at
first, and churning the idea around that "Dah" could mean "dog,"
because I remembered a list of (Thraco-Phrygian) dog terms with
similar spellings, I went to that list (in my Hermes chapteglaunos,
here's
the list minus the last one: daoi, daos, daules, daon,
Daunus, Daous, daoi, Daliae, and daai. The last one, most
important because it was the Aryan version, was put like this
(brackets not mine, italics mine):
"Still according to Strabo, certain nomadic
Scythians to the east of the Caspian Sea were also called
daoi. The Latin authors called them Daliae, and some
Greek historians daai. In all probability their ethnic
name was derived from Iranian (Saka) dahae, 'wolf.'"
http://www.members.tripod.com/dacians1/dacians.htm
There we are, the plausible origin of the Dehava in an Iranian
Saka peoples east of the Caspian sea. I've noted that others do not
recognize the term as meaning "wolf," even though the Dahae
lived in Verkana/Hercania (they also lived in the Aryan
Afghanistan, as did their Gorgon ancestors). It is important to note
that "Dehavite" is an erroneous translation since the Biblical word
is "Dehava," not "Dehaviy." If it were the latter, then "Dehavite"
would apply, but as it is, I would render the people: Dehava-ites.
This could allow the term to be understood as Deh-Ava/Deh-

223
Avites rather than Deha-vites, the latter no longer allowing an
Avvite interpretation but merely meaning "wolf peoples." On the
other hand, Deh-Ava can be understood as Dog-Ava/Dog-Avites.
I'm not going to push it, however. There's got to be a better way to
identify the Avvites.
There is also the opinion of several online Encycopedia that
the Dehava were the Dai/Dahi Persians mentioned by Herodotus,
which seems to be exactly the wolf peoples mentioned above. But
now read this as sent to me by Kathleen, quoting from Clarke's
Commentary:
"It is uncertain who these Avites were. The most
probable opinion seems to be that which Grotius has
suggested by observing that there are a people in
Bactriana, mentioned by Ptolemy, under the name of
Avidia ... "
Bactria was definitely east of the Caspian. "Avidia" feels
right, for in the Bible the Avvites are said to have had a city in
Edom called, "Avith." The Indo-Aryan term, Avatar, comes to
mind, as does the abyss (Greek "abussos") of Revelation 9 that is a
symbol of "Abaddon," the power of the Orient that comes to fight
the three frogs of the Dragon Beast in the Armageddon showdown.
Can we read " Abaddon" as, Of the Budii?
The Buddhists who formed the Avatar concept must have
known the New Testament, because they say a last Avatar must
come in the sky with a sword and riding on a white horse to
destroy all evil in the world, and he/they even say that he comes to
destroy "Koka and Vikoka," just as Jesus is depicted as returning
in the sky on a white horse (not a literal horse) with a sword
protruding from is mouth to kill...Gog of Magog (i.e. the anti-
Christ), in my opinion. It may be that the originator of the Avatar
concept recognized that Revelation's Abaddon (of the 5th Trumpet
plague) depicted the Avidians and thus gave Abaddon the name,
Avatar. He then recognized that Abaddon was the same as the
"kings of the east" in the 6th Trumpet and 6th Bowl, (I've made
exactly that connection), wherefore he understood that it would be
the Avatars from the east who would lead the fight against the
three frogs (Revelation 16) at Armageddon, the three frogs clearly
depicting the anti-Christ's main power base.
Knowing from other scriptures that the Messiah would return
from the east to fight in Armageddon himself, the Buddhist
wrongly equated Jesus with the Avatar/Abaddon army. Because
that last Avatar is called "Kalki" (Website below), it would seem
that the Avidians/Avvites were the Colchians. I expect that they
have since moved to the Orient.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalki

224
The Avvites are said to have worshiped Tartak as well.
While this god is also elusive, "R. Judah ... states that Tartak
was worshiped in the form of an ass. All attempts to identify
this god have thus far proved unsuccessful. No similar divinity
is found among the Babylonians or Assyrians; and an
Egyptian parallel exists only in so far as the ass was sacred to
the god Typhon and was sacrificed to him."
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=75&letter=T
That's good enough, in my opinion, to identify Tartak as the
Tartans (Persian: "Tators") and the wolf line. For the mythical
Typhon was the husband of the snake-woman, Echidna (Akkadia, I
think), and together they gave birth to many "dogs," including
Geryon's Orthos (the Ordovices, I think) of western Atlantis. She
with Typhon were consigned to Tartarus, in northern Russia (see
my chapter, "I Taut I Saw a Buzi Cat"), which can only mean that
they became/depicted the Tartars. I would therefore claim that the
Avvites also became the Dardanus side of the Trojans en route to
becoming the Franks, or at least the Abii Franks, and the dog-
deifying Stewarts.
http://www.christiananswers.net/dictionary/nibhaz.html End Update]
My email correspondent, Greenway7, had suggested that
Hephaistos' "Kabeiri" was related to "copper/Cyprus," and so note
the following piece: "...the old Sumerian craft-word ta/ibira,
'copper worker'..." (website below). There we have it, copper is
based on the old Sumerian term, "Ibira," which I think must be the
Habira/Khabira tribe/sector of Kassites. The article later says that
"copper-smith" in Sumerian, "tabira," may have been borrowed
from the proto-Hurrian "tabiri," terms which Josephus tied to the
Iberi of Tubal (in Georgia/Armenia), smack next to Colchis and
possibly a district of Laz. I should then add that the author's
"proto-Hurrians" were Subartu, which may have named the
Siberians. Thus the Siberians and the Tatars were the east-moving
Avvites and Separvites that may very well supply the end-time
Abaddon. These northern Russians were an Apollo peoples,
thereby explaining why Abaddon's alternative name is Given as
"Apolluon" in that same Revelation-9 text. Apollo, with his twin
sister, was chief of the wolf peoples.
http://idcs0100.lib.iup.edu/WestCivI/new_page_85.htm
It's time to stop and think about Nahor again, because he may
have put forth the Neuri, who were implied by Herodotus to have
been wolf-worshipers. And so looking at "Nibhaz" and "Anubis,"
different versions of the same wolf god, can we see a "Buz" in
both terms? The Hebrew words for hemp were (as seen in
Wikipedia quotes above) "qeneh bosem" and "kanbos." As I trace
Buz, son of Nahor, to the Busae Medes, might those hemp terms,
which I'm assuming were people-group terms to begin with, apply

225
to Buz? Could the Avvites have been a branch of Buzi/Busae
Medes that mixed with Canaanites in the Gaza strip? After all, the
Biblical term, "Avith," and the historical, "Avidia," could be
understood as, Of the Buzi/Budii. Perhaps this is desperation on
my part. I have an eraser if needed.
The Laz are thought by some to belong to Cartvelians, and
these lived in conjunction with Tubal, but were more-likely
peoples of Azerbaijan. Might "Azer" be rooted in Hazerim, the
Avvite city near Gaza, or in the same entity which founded
Hazerim? Might "baij an" be “bij” = bee?
Nergal (husband of Laz) can be connected to the Tigress-
Zagros region in the following piece found on the lapis lazuli
cylinder seal of Zardamu: " Zardamu, Sun-God of his land;
beloved of Nergal, hisod ... Tammuz; strong ing, king of
Karahar and king of the Four Parts, spouse ofIs't ar." Karahar
was a city/region on the upper Diya_la in the face of the Zagros
range. Might Zardamu be understood as Dar-Dumuzi? In any case,
we see Nergal connected to Dumuzi, which then connects the
Cutha to the same Dumuzi-Ishtar dragon pantheon, but now I want
to suggest the historical roots of that pantheon in Aryan
Afghanistan. For as "Azar" evokes azure (i.e. the color blue), a
term that is said to derives from "lapis lazuli," so this gem was
mined in Aryan Afghanistan. The point is, "lazuli" must be related
to "Laz."
What does that mean? I could begin to think that the Laz
peoples were gem miners in Afghanistan, explaining why there is a
Mari (modern Mary) there but also on the Euphrates just
downstream from Kabala Strip. But if "azure" derives from the
Azer Aryans, then one sees a Cutha-Azer mix which would then
define the Kassites, explaining also why the same mix became the
Khazars.
As "kok/gok" has come to mean 'blue," one then has reason
for connecting the Gogarene-Gogi, of the
Tubal/Azerbaijan/Armenia region, to the Laz peoples, especially
as there were lakes and rivers (e.g. Kokcha/Gokchu river) named
after Kok/Gog in Afghanistan (note that "chu" means "dog" since I
peg these peoples to be the wolf-line Gorgons who founded
Verkana. In Azerbaijan there were/are the highlands of Cukali and
Kuk es.
It seems a no-brainer to deduce that the Verkana Gorgons at
the south-east shore of the Caspian moved around the tip of the sea
and were meanwhile joined to the Cutha at that point so as to form
the Cadusii peoples on the south-west side. From there they moved
further north along that same sea, where Azerbaijan is located to
this day, previously called Albany ("white land"). At that point
they became the Gogi who named the Gogarene province. And so

226
I would now add that Nergal's wife, Eresh kig al, evokes those Gogi
people, perhaps even the Hros/Rosh branch of Gogi.
Now I bring back the Dahae/Dehava dog-peoples to the fore,
who, although they were recorded from the 6th century BC
onwards, lived in the same region. But as they named
Dahestan/Daghestan, which was essentially the same region as
Azerbaijan/Albany, wouldn't they have previously been the Avars
= Avviy = Avatars? Click this map repeatedly on the Caspian sea,
and you shall see.
In a poem wherein Nergal marries Ereshkigal, a "Kakka" is
Anu's messenger. In that story, Nergal is made to paint the throne
of Anu, among other colors, "with blue glaze as a substitute for
lapis lazuli."
http://www.gatewaystobabylon.com/myths/texts/classic/ereshner1.htm
It's conceivable that these Aryans took on the bee nickname
because of their mining operations (i.e. the mines being the hives).
Might "hive" originate in "Hebe," or more specifically, "Iberi"?
Couldn't the French bee, "abielle," be a version of "ibiri? Couldn't
the Ubii Franks be a bee people?
Behold, weeks after developing the Cutha-Kassite theory, I
find this statement: "Some have conjectured that the 'Cutheans'
were identical with the 'Cossaeans'" (webite below). The
Cossaeans are said by others to be the Kassites by another name,
and so there you have it, I'm not crazy after all.
http://www.factbites.com/topics/Cuthah
There are several cities named "Hazar" in Israel, but one
called "Hazor" that caught my eye when I learned that it was the
leader of many nations that came out to fight Joshua's Israelites
when they were first taking the Holy Land (Joshua 11:10). I then
checked the spelling, and found that it was "Chatser" (#2674),
being rooted in the same as "Chatserim" (the Avvite city). -- End
Update]
What if Utu (the sun god of Eridu), and therefore Atlantis,
were named, not after Nahor's son, Uts, but after Aram's son by the
same name? After all, Aram's son was born first by a span of about
a century. But, then, as Nahor gave his elder son the same name, it
shows probable blood ties to the Uts Arameans. Gosh, could it be
that the two coiled serpents of the Mushussu dragon were Uts and
Uts Incorporated? Not likely, but it's worth a thought.
Another problem is that the Cutha may have derived from
Gether? If so, then the Kabalists were Arameans, not Hebrews.
Moreover, the Hebrew elements that I proposed for Greece (i.e.
Xuthus) and Atlantis likewise become Aramean. And if Gether
was Aether/Uranus, then indeed the Greeks appear quite Aramean.
The only Hebrew element that would then remain in the Greeks,
and by no means a small element, would be the Kabeiri of

227
Hephaistos ... which would trace to the Habira tribe of Kassites.
These should prove to include Nahorites from Kesed and/or
Chazo.
However, if we're willing to view the Greek Boiotians as an
extension of Buz, son of Nahor, then the twin of Boiotus, Aeolus,
should likewise be a Nahorite/Hebrew bloodline. In that case,
since Aeolus was the "brother" of Xuthus, the Cutha Kabalists
would appear as Nahorites/Hebrews after all. This is to say that the
Cutha may not have been from Gether, and that both the Greeks
and Atlanteans had Hebrew elements, not Aramean. Then again, as
Nahorites were mixed with Arameans, we should expect the sons
of Aram to be a significant part of the dragon lines.
Because Khazar rulers came to style themselves "Aaron" and
other lofty terms found in Israelite Holy Writ, I would identify
them as Hebrews over-taking the Togarmite portion of the
Khazars. But if it seems unlikely that a relatively small group of
Hebrews could overtake a large mass of Togarmites, then the
solution could be that Khazars consisted also of a large mass of
Hebrew-like peoples, the Arameans.
A Chazo-Gether mix easily founds the ancient name,
"Kazaro," and moreover evokes the Kothar-wa-Khasis introduced
earlier (that pertained to the shores of Israel). A Chazo-Gether mix
would then explain the Gadeirus-Eumelus equation set forth by
Plato, albeit it would be more accurately a Kemuel-Gether mix
(Kemuel was Chazo's brother). Uther, (Arthur's "father") may
prove to be code for Gether rather than the Cutha.
For those entering this book at this chapter, my theory up to
this point is that Kemuel named Camelot, and that the mythical
Uther Pendragon was a depiction of the Cutha dragon line
migrated to Britain. But let me now introduce some new things
regarding Arthur's mother (Ygerna), who was made (by the myth
writer(s)) the wife of a Cornwall ruler, "Gorlois." As the myth has
Uther being transformed to look just like Gorlois, the simple
meaning is that Uther and Gorlois were one and the same stock of
peoples, two branches of the same tribe that is, and this squares
with Scandinavian myth where Nor (I think Nahorites) and Gor are
two, and yet the same, rulers of Gotland. Full-blown mythology
grew out of Scandinavia likely because Nahorite occultists came to
rule and propagate there; I'm suggesting that Nahorite rulers
carried their encoded myths wherever they went.
Put it this way, that Geoffrey (the myth writer) decided to
depict Arthur as the son of Ygerna (Gogarene peoples?) and a
Gorlois-like peoples. If I'm correct about the Gorlois-Gor equation,
then Arthur was the same as Nor(way), which then pegs code word
"Arthur" more specifically as Nahor's son, Kemuel, the latter being
not only the founder of Camelot, but more specifically the

228
Gamil/Camel families of Colchester and York (mentioned
previously).
It is known that Arthur and the Merovingians were
associated if not related. "Gorlois," being easily deciphered as a
French entity, would appear to depict the Carol(ingian) Franks, the
very same that co-ruled Merovingian France but later, in the
throws of betraying Merovingian rulers, immediately set up the
Frank dynasty that also ruled the Vatican-based "Holy" Roman
empire. The Geoffrey myth suggests that, prior to the rise of the
Merovingians proper, the proto-Merovingians in Britain (i.e.
Uther) were victorious over the Gorlois/Carolingians...and went on
the mix with a peoples depicted as "Ygerna." To trace Uther and
Arthur to earlier times, it may be pertinent that the Cornwall
region was a Danann stronghold.

229
COHANIM CATS
IN THE BUZ-UM OF NAHOR

The Greek peoples under "Aeolus" (whom I think named


Wales and Corn-Wales) were assigned a "son," Sisyphus, co-ruler
of Corinth with Aeetes; I show later that Sisyphus depicted the
Greek root of the boar line that connect to Merovingians. I made
the boar connection to Sisyphus independent of Sisyphus having
the mythical Meropes ("bee-eater") for a wife, where she may be
the root of Merovee (mythical founder of the Merovingians). Now
(June 2006), a couples of years later, I have possibly discovered
the Mesopotamian origin of the boar line in another son assigned
to Aeolus, as we shall see below.
The sons of Aeolus by Enarete could reveal that she depicted
Elamites, for a Wikipedia article claims that "The Elamites called
their country Haltamti (in later Elamite, Atamti)..." Not only
does the latter version evoke Enarete's important son, Athamas,
but Sisyphus (also her son) evokes the Elam capital, Susa. Another
important son of Enarete was Salmoneus, and he evokes
"Shalmaneser," who, while being part of an Assyrian dynasty, may
have been named after a previous deity/ruler/peoples to which
Salmoneus was also connected; the terms appear as the Semitic,
"shalom," especially since the "eser" ending is known to be a
suffix (supposedly referring to "Esarra"). It's also interesting that
the Semitic version of the Utu/Sumerian sun-god was "Shamash,"
and that a "Simash" dynasty arose in Elam. The dragon line should
therefore be considered a Hebrew/Aramean/Elamite snake mated
with various Aryans, especially Cimmerians and Scythians (the
latter may be fundamentally off-shoots of Gomer).
^ On the Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser ^II, the king claims to
be the
" noble offspring of Tiglath-Adar. Tiglath" appears to
denote the deity that named the Tigris river (upon which was
Assyria), and since the Tigris was anciently the Idigna/Idigina
(according to a Wikipedia article), Dagon comes to mind. But
"Tigris" very much evokes the root of "Togarmah," wherefore the
river may at first have been named after him, explaining why his
brother's tribe, Ashkenaz, lived between the river and the Zagros
range (situated parallel with the river). "Dagon" may then be
viewed as a modification of "Togarmah," being modified as (i.e.
after) the river's name became Idigna.
It's the "Adar" term that concerns me most, for the god by
that name would appear to have been responsible for the Jewish

230
month of Adar ... meaning that Adar was a Semitic god, which then
stands as evidence that Assyrian kings of that period were Semites,
and perhaps even Abrahamic Asshurites (from Dedan). On the
Obelisk, Shalmaneser praised, and therefore showed that he was
rooted in, “Adar, the terrible, (Lord) of the spirits of heaven
and the spirits of earth, the exceeding strong god.”
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Assyria/Inscra01.html
Wouldn't this be Aether, the sky god? Could this sky god not
be Gether, son of Aram, and therefore the Gadeirus of Plato? If so,
then Shalmaneser and Salmoneus could be considered, at least in
part, Arameans...so that all the children of Enarete may be viewed
likewise. One might then be tempted to view their father, Aeolus,
as an Aramean, but it may be otherwise, that Enarete had the
Aramean blood, while Aeolus had the Hebrew blood. Elam, by the
way, was Aram's elder brother (Genesis 10:22).
Enarete may just have been what Tacitus (later) introduced
as the "Earth Mother" by the name of "Nerthus." Tacitus tied
Nerthus to the Saxons tribes of Reudigni (Redones?), Angli
(Angles), Eudoses (Eotens/Jutes/Edones), and Suarines (Svi,
Sviar/Swedes). But included in Tacitus' list were the Auiones, and
per chance this peoples traced back to what Shalmaneser called the
"Kahuians," to be discussed below and to be tied tentatively to the
Cohens.
What I'm suggesting is that the Saxons tie back to the
Elamites depicted by Enarete/Nerthus, and because the Great
Mother, Ishtar, was one of the first names to be viewed as Earth
Mother, she, Ishtar, may have been in part Elamite. It would also
be apparent that Nerthus was the same as Uranus' wife, Gaia, for in
fact Gaia was defined precisely as Mother Earth. Therefore, if
Uranus was Gether, Gaia may just have represented the Nahorites
tied to him. The moment I made that hypotheses, I checked the
Genesis list of Nahor's sons (22:21-24) to see if any could equate
to Gaia, and, lo, he had a son by the name of "Gaham."
There's perhaps no use seeking a people group from which
Nerthus was named, for she appears to have been named after
"earth." This term may derive from Eridu, which was "Urdu" to
the Sumerians, and "Orthos" to Geryon. One could conjecture that
"Gaia" derived from the Semitic "goy" (nation), but I would
suggest the reverse, that non-Jewish nations were called "goy" by
Israelites (and/or other monotheistic Semites) because all nations
worshiped Gaia. Note the similarity, and the possible implication
thereof, between "goiim" (plural of goy) and "Gaham."
Elam was the elder son of Shem, and yet Josephus claimed:
"...the Elamites, the ancestors of the Persians" (Antiquities of
the Jews 1:6)"
http://www.onelang.com/encyclopedia/index.php/Elamite_Empire

231
Say what? Weren't Persians Aryans? Yes, but what Josephus
knew, as did the Merovingians, was that certain Semites of
Mesopotamia had been meshed with Aryans. It is known that Elam
over-came Akkadia for some time, and that the Kassites and
Elamites shared regions. As the Kissians were identified as Susi, it
verifies that Susa was a Kassite domain at times. I would suggest
that when Sisyphus was made the husband of Enarete, it depicted a
Kassite-Elamite mix (but with Kabala blood buried in the Kassites.
Another son of Enarete was Perieres, who, because his son
was Aphareus, was likely a depiction of the Elamite branch that
put forth the Farsi/Parsi/Persians (often a capital A denotes "of").
And Perieres may just be The Boar for various reasons; for one,
the bear symbol conspicuously follows the boar symbol, while the
bear is a depiction of the Persians. For two, Perieres' son seems
like the founder of Corinth, for the city was at first "Ephyra," very
close to "Aphareus." The following quote of Shalmaneser probably
exposes the historical identity of Perieres as the Burirans (square
brackets mine):
“Up to the borders of the country of the Armenians
I went. Fifty of their cities I threw down, dug up (and)
burned with fire. To the country of Guzani I went down
[where Hebrews lived]. The tribute of Upu of the country
of the Guzanians, of the country of the Mannians, of the
country of the Buririans, of the country of the
Kharranians, of the country of the Sasganians, of the
country of the Andians, (and) of the country of the
Kharkhanians.”
Gozan, remember, is where the 10 tribes of the Israelites
were settled when Shalmaneser's dynasty took them from Israel. It
was in the land of the Cutha, and in a moment we will find the
Cutha named by Shalmaneser himself. Notice how "Gozan"
evokes "Goshen" of Egypt. Might Gozan, therefore, have been a
settlement of Abraham's ancestors (i.e. including Eber) who put
forth the Israelite branch of Hebrews? It certainly seems that way,
and that the first Israelites brought the Gozan name not only to
Israel, but to Egypt. Where in Israel? Don't know yet; I don't want
to mention Gaza.
The Buririans are mentioned with the Sasganians, wherefore
I wouldn't hesitate to identify the latter with the mythical Sisyphus,
the one to whom I traced the Boar Line even before having the
above data/quote to substantiate it. One of the three Hecatonchire
was named Briareus, and he may just have been the
Buririans/Perieres peoples. Because this Hecotonchire was noted
as a goat, I will suggest a tie to Gozan (i.e. becaue I think “Goza”
= goat).

232
The "Kharranians" likely refer to the Aryan region of
Eranians/Iranians; the term is a good candidate for furnishing
"Uranus." Theseeoples
p are mentioned (above) in relation to the
Aryan bedrock of Andia (India) and Kharkhan (now Kyrgyzstan of
Tajikstan). The Gorgons, I am certain, originate in these Afghan
regions.
I've had a chapter prepared for years now on that topic, to be
online soon I hope, but for now let me share what I recently read. I
don't know whether the argumentation in a certain paragraph
(website below) is accurate, where the author attempts to tie the
Kyrgyz to Turks rather than Aryans, but he equated the term
"Aguz/Okus" with "Gok," where Aguz was Turanian (an Altaic
langauge group). While that author and others define "Gok" as
"sky/blue," I would of course equate it with (Aryan) Gog. The
paragraph ends with: "Thus the Sumerian King titled
ENSHAKUSHANNA and his people were Sun-God (OGUZ-
KAGAN) followers." Brackets not mine. Those brackets in his
mind read as Gok-Kagan, a very supportive term for those who
believe that the Khazars were Gogi. Altaics are connected to the
Kyrgyz/Gorgon Aryans, and so the Haltamti (Elamites) come to
mind as the Alt aic root.
http://www.compmore.net/~tntr/tur1.htmll
The Taurus bull (which I had connected to Gorgons
independent of the argument here) should prove to be integralwithh
the Turanians, as even that term implies, but also due to the
Turanians being rooted at the Oxus (modern Amu) river in Aryan
Afghanistan. Mari was to one side of the Oxus river, and do note
with highlighter that Mari was earlier "Merv," very much like
"Merovee" so that indeed the Mary of Merovingian tradition isnott
Mary Magdalene, but Mari (also called"Mary"!),, no doubt the
land after whom the god of war, Ares/Mars was named. Mari is
"looked upon as the ancient Paradise, the cradle of the Aryan
families of mankind..."
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Mervy
The Turanians included the Finno-Ugrics(Magyar/Magii
Medes are included there, so why not also the Budi andBuzii
Medes?), and were thus no doubt the mythical Hyperboreans ("far-
northerners"), a term rooted in "Boreas (the mythical northwindd
and therefore no doubt tied to Aeolus, the Wind god).Couldn'tt
Boreas be the Boar? It was to these Mari Aryans that theCuthaa
must have been hooked, for in the Cutha region on the Euphrates
sat another city of Mari, a city that knew Nahor peoples.Noww
behold yet another boar-like term that is stated alongside Cutha:
“Too th egreat fortresses I went. Sacrifices in
Babylon, Borsippa, (and) Cuthah I made. Thanksgivings

233
to the great gods I offered up. To the country of Kaldu I
descended. Their cities I captured...”
Ignore the "ippa" horse-suffix and view the term as "Bors."
At one website (below), I found this definition: "Boreas The
North Wind. He is the Kassite god Buriash."
http://www.grazian-archive.com/quantavolution/QuantaHTML/plaintext/ka.txt
The title of a previous chapter, I Taut I Saw a Buzi Cat, may
not have made much sense then, but it refers to the Buzi having a
part in the Khazar empire, which empire was called "Katziri." I
went on to show that the Cohen family, self-proclaimed to be from
Israelite Levites/priests, were instead Khazar (i.e. khagen)
Hebrews, especially as the "Katz" surname is to this day associated
with the Cohen name, not to mention that "khan" is a widely-used
variation of "khagen." In the following Black-Obelisk quote,
Shalmaneser mentions the "Cati" alongside what appears to be a
possible Cohen root, the "Kahuians" ("Kagu/Gagu?):
“In my 25th campaign the Euphrates at its flood I
crossed. The tribute of the Kings of the Hittites, all of
them, I received. The country of Amanus I traversed. To
the cities of Cati of the country of the Kahuians I
descended...”
Amanus refers to north-western Syria, wherefore the country
of the Kahuians would appear to be in that general area. I should
say that some internet translations of the Black Obelisk use "Kaue"
instead.
Now I did a Coat-of-Arms search for "Kahuia," and
immediately drew the "Kahoon/Kalhoun/Calquhoun" surname. At
the website below, there are a list of many names/septs that derive
from this Scottish family, the first listed being "Cowan/Cowen"!!
This cannot be a cosmic coincidence. Moreover, thou unbeliever,
you, the "History of the Calquhoun Clan" website (below) reports,
“Cohen is another form of the name.”
www.rampantscotland.com/clans/blclanCalquhoun.htm
Do you recall the MacClintock surname mentioned in the
previous chapter, the one that was connected to the Stewarts? It
too, I just learned, is listed as a sept of the Calquhoun family. One
could then theorize that "Clin(tock)" was at one time "Calhoun."
TheClintoamwcesindapobly
CalhounTown ... meaning that the Clintons may be branches of the
Cohen Stewarts.
http://www.electricscotland.com/webclans/atoc/colquho.html
The Calhoun Coat of Arms is an inverted (i.e. saltire) cross
of the Sinclairs (from the Rollo Vikings, the Norman kings of
England). Does this not show that the Sinclairs were Cohanim, and
by that fact explain why the Sinclairs were up-and-front in the

234
quest to secure Jerusalem as per the Crusades? Could we not
identify the whole lot of Templar founders as Cohanim, since their
pre-occupation was the Temple treasure and, reportedly, to re-
build the Temple.
The so-called "obscure" Calquhoun name is thought to have
"hound" (i.e. dog) as the root. Wouldn't that tie the Cohens, there
and elsewhere, not to mention the Kahuians, to the wolf line of
Verkhana? In fact, as both Kilpatrick/Kirkpatrick are said to be
Calquhoun septs, where the "Kil" of the one name would conform
to the Calquhoun name, one is left to ponder if the "Kirk" of the
other name, said to mean "church," isn't instead the early form of
"Kil" and "Calq"...so that "Kirk" ties back to such Gorgon
localities as Colchis and Verkhana ("wolf land"). Indeed,
Verkhana was later Hercania, easily modified to "Kerkania." The
Kirk-to-Kil change is reflected in the Verk-to-Colch change.
See in the following quote that "Khazzi" was in the land of
the Cati:
“In my 26th year for the seventh time the country of
the Amanus I traversed. For the fourth time to the cities
of Cati of the country of the Kahuians I went. The city of
Tanacun, the strong city of Tulca I approached...To the
country of Lamena I went...To the city of Khazzi I went.
My feet they took. Silver (and) gold, their tribute, I
received. Cirri, the brother of Cati to the sovereignty
over them I set.”
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Assyria/Inscra01.html
Unfortunately, no Internet website discloses the locations of
Tanacun, Tulca, or Lamena. But safe to say, the Cati and the
Kahuians were in the same country as the Khassi. Gaza comes to
mind, as do the Kassites and the Khazars. As the "Agatziri" (i.e.
Khazar) term may have referred to the Cati, so the Khazzi may
have been a Khazar-related peoples. The Cirri that is said by
Shalmaneser to be "the brother of Cati" would appear to be Nergal
(the god specific to the Cutha back in Mesopotamia) by his other
name, "Nusku," "who is hardly to be distinguished, from a
certain time on, from a god Girru - formerly read Gibil."
(italics mine)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nusku
I can't find the reason online, but one Internet translation uses
"Tarzi" instead of "Khazzi." The two terms are not very similar.
This would be a good place to assert my expectation that Stewart-
related Illuminatists disguise their roots in the Khazars. As Cati
and Khazzi are dead give-aways, which in turn have the potential
to reveal their relationship to Khazar-based Cohens (a very
shocking relationship), it may be that the Cohen-based

235
Illuminatists have chosen "Tarzi" in place of "Khazzi," this having
some justification (but not nearly enough to satisfy integrity) since
Tarzi (i.e. Tarsus) was a major city in Khazzi.
And look. The same translation that uses "Tarzi" instead of
"Khazzi" uses "Hatti" instead of "Cati." That may seem reasonable
enough, in a liberal translation, but if the actual translation uses a
hard "C", then perhaps the Hatti are not be inferred. There is
another, more-likely option for the identity of the Cati; I'll get to it
in fairly short order, and you may then see all the more why such a
term needs to be disguised in historic writings, or why writings
that use it need to be pilfered from the public domain.
Tarsus was the capital of a region named "Kizzuwatna," and
this must surely be the Khazzi mentioned by Shalmaneser. The
website in which I learned this information also says: “The
famous Hittite queen Puduhepa ... was a priestess in
Kizzuwatna.” That queen's name was a throne name, to be
understood as Ptah-Hept. Hept was a peoples of Armenian
Teisheba (Abrahamic Sheba in my opinion; see my previous
writings), and Ptah was related to the Kothar-wa-Khasis honored
in Gath (Israel) and in the Ugaritic region of (north-west) Syria. It
therefore becomes fairly convincing that the Khasis portion of that
phrase refers to Khazzi/Kizzuwatna.
A Wikipedia article on a Quwe region of eastern Cilicia (i.e.
in the face of north-west Syria) has this to "Quwê – also
spelled Que, Kue, Qeve, Coa, Kuêskeveh and – was an
Assyrian vassal state or province at various times from the 9th
century BC to shortly after the death of Ashurbanipal around
627 BCE in the lowlands of eastern Cilicia, and the name of its
capital city, tentatively identified with Adana, in modern
Turkey." Quwe must be the Kahu mentioned by Shalmaneser.
Because this region is identified in the quote with modern
Adana, with "Edene" being an historical alternative, I must
research whether there are any ties to the Edones of Thrace. Are
you with me? I'm wondering if the Kothar-wa-Khasis from Gath
didn't migrate with peoples of Dor to Adana in Cilicia, and then to
Thrace as the Edones/Getae and Dorians, where the Edones later
settled Macedonia, prior to Macedonia being routed by the
Dorians. I'm wondering if those Israeli-shore peoples were the
Cohanim, not necessarily of the Israelite Levites, but non-Levite
pagan priesthoods serving and promoting Akkadian-based
religions amongst Israelites, as for example Dagon and El/Baal.
Having been religious figures in Israel, the pagan priests could for
that reason have developed the Cohen title ... since the Levites are
in fact called "cohens" (i.e. "priests") throughout the Bible.
[Update June 16 -- Today I searched to find if the Auians
mentioned by Tacitus may have been Cohens. I found this

236
statement: "Schütte remarks [the Auiones] are mentioned in
Widsith as Eowan." That certainly looks as though it could
modify to "Cowan." As I have traced half the Merovingian blood
to the Saxons, perhaps the Stewarts were from the Auiones. Or, to
put it another way, perhaps the Auians became the Cohens of
Germany who to this day use the blue and silver checks on their
Coat, the same checks used by the Stewarts on their Coat. Take
lightly those who define "Auian" as "island peoples," as this is a
too-simplistic approach for making people-identifications.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auiones -- End Update]
There is a Kozan in the Adana region that evokes Gozan of
the Euphrates river. Kozan was at one time Sis, and so one
wonders if this was not the Cilician root of Sisyphus. Kozan was
on the "Kirkgen" river, evoking the Kirkpatrick sept of the
(Scottish) Cowan/Calhoun family. Adana/Quwa was on the
Seyhoun river, that having the same ending as "Calhoun," by
which I mean to suggest multiple "---houns" in that region.
I'm wondering if the Cowans/Cohens of Adana were, in
centuries prior to the Shalmaneser period, the Hermes (i.e.
Armenian) bloodline. I say this because the Quwe/Adana peoples
honored the Armenian god (Teisheba/Tesup). Kizzuwatna is a term
belonging to the Hermes period, and the Akkadian king of very
early times, Sargon, claimed to have been in Cilician mountains,
wherefore the Hebrew Akkadians may have followed along...en
route to founding Arcadia in Greece, the city that was made (by
the myth writers) the birthplace of Hermes.
The historical evidence for an Akkadia-Arcadia connection is
weak at best, and yet many view it as fact. A Wikipedia article on
Akkadia, which by the way equates it with ancient Agade, tells
that the Septuagint version of Akkad was "Archad." My position is
that, regardless of whether or not Arcadia was named after
Akkadia, the dragon-line connection between the two is hard fact.
Now consider the following quote from a website author seeking
the same secret-society secrets as myself:
"Though some disagree, Akkadia seems to be
synonymous with Agade, the Sumerian capital associated
with the empire's most well-known leader, Sargon the
Great .... One indication that Agade and Akkadia may be
one and the same is that the sea-faring men of ancient
Phoenicia were referred to alternately as “Gads”, or
“Kads” ... According to the Sumeriologist L.A. Waddell,
the term “Gad” mutated and was preserved in the name
of the Goths. The term “Kad” mutated to “Catti”, which
was the title given to royalty in ancient Britain. Also, the
word “Catti” was the source for many place names in
Europe ... They are to be found from the mid-east to

237
Spain, and from North Africa to Scotland. Of interest in
regard to this word “cat” or “catti” is that we had heard
of it before, from a very strange figure who was staying at
the same hotel as us in Rennes-le-Chateau.
The man was in the process of translating what he
claimed was the oldest book in the world, a history of
Atlantis. He was a linguist who claimed to have
discovered the primordial language of mankind...We
quizzed him at length about the roots of words central to
our research. When we asked him where the word
“Cathar” came from, he explained that it referred to a
people descended from “the Cats” and “the Ari”, or
“Aryans.” He was vague as to who exactly “the Cats”
were, but said that their name figured in the place-names
of countless cities and regions, such as Catalonia, Cadiz,
and Caithness.... The word “Kad” in fact shows up
repeatedly in ancient place-names. Along the Phoenician
coast at the time of the kingdoms of David and Solomon,
there were no less than three cities all named “Kadesh.”
The term “Gad” shows up repeatedly as well. On either
side of the Straights of Gibraltar, there were once two
cities both named “Agadir”, the most famous of which is
sometimes referred to as “Gades.” At the time,
remember, those Straights were known as the “Firth of
the Gads.” So our research would seem to confirm what
we were told by the mysterious stranger at Rennes-le-
Chateau. We wished we could have learned more from
him about this people he called “the Cats”, but
unfortunately our mutual language barrier prevented it...
http://www.thevesselofgod.com/thatwhichhasfallen.html
Stunning. It leads me to believe that Akkadia was named by
the same who named Agadir, Plato's Gadeirus. Was that the
Biblical Gether, son of Aram? Apparently, then, Atlantis was
based on the Cats of Akkadia. As secret societies do repeatedly,
they chose to depict themselves by animals/things that sound like
their people groups, which may be the reason for the leopards and
lions depicting many dragon-line peoples. Arcadia itself was
named after the bear, but this evokes not Akkadia so much as the
Persians to whom the (Hebrew/Semitic) Akkadians were tied by
blood. Homer said that Troy itself was founded by certain
Arcadians, making sense where Troy is viewed as a capital of
Greek Atlantis.
It would appear that the Cats were the Hebrew Cohanim. I
would agree with the piece above where the Cats are the root of

238
the Goths, and of course I would include the Getae/Edone
Thracians. And where the piece speaks on Israelite/Phoenician
cities named after the Cats, it didn't include Gath/Gaza, though I
think this is a key location that reveals the root of the Cats in the
Kassite Khazars/Katziri. From Gath, the Cats spread to the
Phoenicians, by which I mean to point out, in case the reader gets
that impression, that the Cats were not Phoenician originally.
The reason that Poseidon Greeks from north Africa came to
the Israeli coast to thereby found the Phoenicians is that some of
Poseidon's ancestors were still on the Israeli coast. But this was so
long prior to the Mosaic period that the Bible gives little if any
record of such Aryans in Israeli confines. The best that I can do is
assume that the Aryans came along with Nahorites and Abrahamic
Shebeans and Dedanites. But in so assuming, I lump these
Hebrews in with the Poseidon peoples, as one dog wagging a
dragon's tail.
When I had named the chapter, "I Taut I Saw a Buzi Cat,"
Taut referred to Thoth/Hermes, and he I do not think was rooted in
Poseidon nor the Buzi. In being the son of the mythical Maia,
Hermes was likely from the Ma i/Magi Medes, neighbors to the
Buzi Medes. But being a son of^Zeus, Hermes was connected to
Dagon worshipers, who were Semites of Akkadia that likely
included Nahor bloodlines of various sorts. To what extent the
Poseidon migration paralleled or fused with the Hermes migration
I am not yet certain. I should be an expert at this myth-busting
work by the time I am able to discern that correctly.
I named the Buzi-Cat chapter a couple of days before finding
the Black Obelisk inscription regarding the Cati, but also a few
days before finding the above quote on the Cads/Cats. I had, and
still have, no hard evidence for a Katziri-Buz connection. I've yet
to solidly connect the Bute/Bude or the bee-line peoples of western
Europe to the Atlanteans; these are only a strong hunches at the
moment. I've yet to connect Buzi Medes or Nahorites to the
Khazars with more than a hunch.
But hunches are formed when certain pieces of information
deep within us begin to settle into our internal "computers" where
deductions are formed that egg our foggy minds on along certain
lines of clearer understanding. I have had this mechanism work
well for me throughout the writing on this topic; time and time
again I found information that verified hunches, quite often on the
same day/hour that hunches were formed. I often feel Led due to
the number of occurrences, and the striking nature of what I
find/learn. My hunch now is that somewhere someone has
information on the Buzites that, upon being published online and
being found, will verify in concrete what theories I have herein
shared with you. It's a good thing I can still admit that I'm not an

239
expert in these topics, or it might sound as though I'm boasting a
little on myself.
The following follows the above paragraph by a few hours.
Due to some information at the following website, I think I
have realized a hunch wherein that the Guti were strictly the Cutha
Kabalists, at first, and only afterward did they become Aryan
speakers, when merging with Medes:
"After the fall of Nineveh [the Guti] coalesced with
the Medes, and ... became gradually Aryanized ... "
http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/K/KU/KURDISTAN_PROV_.htm
This view satisfies a nagging, that the Cutha and the Guti
were one. Moreover, it satisfies those whom have not agreed with
others that see the Guti as Aryans. Everybody's right if they
weren't, and then were, Aryans (by marriage to the Medes). But
THE BIG QUESTION is, which Medes did the Cutha coalesce
with???
The website points out that the Guti much later put forth a
Saspirian branch, a term that looks like a Sisyphus-Aphareus mix,
the two founders of Corinth. I'm not of course suggesting that the
Saspirians were named after the mythical Sisyphus and Aphareus,
but rather the reverse. That is, the Greek founders of Corinth were
codes to depict a Guti-Elamite mix, or, better yet, a Guti-Persian
mix. But because Sisyphus and Aphareus were made "children" of
Aeolus and Enarete, where Enarete and Aphareus represent the
Elamite entity, Aeolus is again revealed as the Guti entity ... that is,
the Cutha Kabalists. And because Boiotus was made Aeolus' twin,
it would indeed appear that the Buzi Medes are those with whom
the Guti coalesced.
Because the Saspirians are mentioned next to the Colchians
in Herodotus' geography, I've got to add that the mythical king of
Colchis was regarded as a co-founder of Corinth, wherefore he
suddenly crystallizes in my mind as a Cutha entity. Indeed,
because his name was Aeetes, virtually the same as the Phrygian
sun god, Attis, my conclusion is, not only that Corinth was
founded by the Utu sun-god line, but that the line was
fundamentally Cutha in blood type.
Just as the Assyrians called the Guti, "Kardu/Kurdi," which
seems like a K version of Eridu ("Urdu" to the Sumerians), so the
Guti and Cutha seem like a G/C version of Utu, god of Eridu. It
was just a base-less hunch some four years ago that the Guti were
an Aryan second-party contribution to the non-Aryan Utu dragon
line, but now it seems far worse, that the Guti were a Hebrew basis
of the dragon line, and that it was they who mixed with Aryans so
that Aryans to this day trace their pagan lines to the same dragon.
Yes, this view sits well with my internal hunch assessor.

240
SHEBA AND DEDAN IN GREECE

The slaying of the dragon by Cadmus was in relation to his


becoming the founder of Thebes, and serving as proof that the
name of this city was rooted in Abrahamic Sheba is the fact that it
was the capital of Boeotia (i.e. a region possibly named after
Buzites, sons of Nahor). This may seem like a long-shot, but recall
that I had deciphered the odd Greek term, "Chthon" as the Cutha
Kabalists; so now read this: "The sons of Chthonius replaced the
descendants of Cadmus on the throne of Thebes for many
years."
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/SPARTI.html
The Chthonians took the Thebes throne when the son of
Cadmus died, that son, Polydorus, evoking the Dorians of Israel
since Cadmus was from Tyre (not far from Dor). In other words, I
would suggest that Cadmus depicted the Cati/Kahuians mixed with
the Trojan Sea Peoples (this mix may have defined the
Phoenicians wholly) that started out from the Israeli coastal strip
from Gath to Tyre, but then moved to the Khassi region of Cilicia,
and then to the Kabeiri region of Pessinos (near Troy) before
entering Greece at Thebes.
It is in the same Cadmus myth that his brother, Cilix, is said
to stop at Cilicia and name the country after himself, which of
course is non-historically. The reality is that some of Cadmus'
peoples who were migrating to Thebes had remained at Cilicia,
and these would be the Cati of Khassi that myth writers only
afterward depicted as Cilix. Were the Cati, therefore, of the Holy
Calyx/Grail line?
The Cati peoples depicted by Cadmus had not stopped at
Cilicia, and, as the myth goes, Cadmus went seeking Europa in
Boeotia. Europa was made his sister for the obvious reason that
Cadmus' migration went further than Thebes and Boeotia, into
Europe. In harmony with Zeus' appearance to Europa as a white
bull and removing her to Crete, the historical reality of Cadmus
seeking her in Boeotia translates to a Phoenician migration from
Crete to the Boeotia region. I'll bet you my best dodo bird that this
branch of Phoenicians had gone to the Zeus-crazy region of
Dodona in north-west Greece (facing the heel of Italy), the gate to
Illyrium and eastern Italy. I'm keeping an eye out in case this
migration defines that of Abrahamic Dedan to eastern Italy, where
the Taddei name is found to this day in Abruzzo province.

241
Dodona was in the country of "Epirus," that term evoking
Aphareus, son of Perieres, son of Enarete. This is important
because I identified her as Nerthus, the Earth Mother, while that
Mother was central in Dodona. Keep in mind that she depicts the
Creation story wherein Adam is made from the dirt, and that the
term, "chthon" is commonly used to denote a mysterious peoples
whose origins are old/unknown enough to warrant an origin from
the ground, for "chthon" means "earth" in Greek. That's a bunch of
bahooey; my conclusion is that the chthon term defines the same
as worshiped Earth Mother: the Kabalists.
I've noted that and "Perieres" and "Ferrari" are similar
enough to make a short comment, that the Taddei family was close
to the Ferrari family; my grandmother had a Taddei and a Ferrari
for her parents. As I am tracing these families to Wales, I'll now
mention that Plato named "Ampheres" as one of the ten sons of
Poseidon in Atlantis/Wales, a term closely resembling Perieres'
son, Aphareus. Plato also named "Diaprepres," very similar to the
Perieres himself. It almost appears as though Plato was randomly
sticking in an odd letter here, and an off-the-wall suffix/prefix
there, to keep us off track. Plato made the twin of Diaprepres,
"Azaes," perhaps referring to the Assi/Kassite peoples of Iran.
Behold that the Dorian invasion of Greece began from
Epirus! This coincides with my theory that the Greek Dorians were
from Dor, Israel, and moved with Kassite-based Gittites (of Gath)
and other Dagon- worshiping "Cats" to Dodona. To support this
position further, “the 5th-century historian Thucydides, [said]
the Epirotes were 'barbarians.' The only Epirotes re arded as
Greek were the Aeacidae, who were members of the Molossian
royal house.” That is, the Epirotes were regarded as non-Greeks,
as were the Dorians; it was the Kabalists themselves which
included Dorians in the three branches of Hellen, but others
disagreed. Those who disagree must yet come to terms that
Hebrews were an integral part of the Greeks. Indeed, behold that
after the Molossians ceased to rule in Epirus, the "Chaones"
followed!!! Others say that the Chaonians also ruled the region
before the Molossians came to power.
http://members.fortunecity.com/fstav1/1821/fort1821/suli.html
I can't prove (yet, anyway) that the Chaonians were the
Cohen Cats (i.e. Cati/Khassi), but it sure seems compelling.
Doesn't "Epirus" smack of "Abiru/Apiru," after all??? This is
astounding, for Abruzzo was named after the Abreu surname. It
makes possible that the mythical "Aphirius" (son of Enarete)
depicted the same Abiru Hebrews; recall my suggestion that
Aphirius depicted a Persian-Hebrew mix in Mesopotamia, in that
he and his father (Perieres) depicted Elamites who put forth the
Persians (that became attached to the (Hebrew) dragon sun god).

242
At the time of making that suggestion (a couple of days ago), I had
not yet seen how "Aphirius" evokes "Apiru." Nor did I trace the
Cohen Cats to Dodona because I had pre-concluded that Epirus
evoked "Apiru."
I had never before understood Dodona's importance in the
dragon line, but suddenly it appears central to my own bloodline.
These Dodoni are those that I suspect evolved into the Taddei and
the Tadini (Tudors?) of Wales; perhaps the two are diverging
branches of the Dodoni. Recall that Aeneas (Trojan ruler) had
relations with a mythical "Dido." I just learned (yesterday) that
Aeneas had come to Epirus before founding the Romans:
"Buthrotos (or Buthrotum) was a city in Epirus
where Helenus, the Trojan seer, built a replica of Troy.
Aeneas landed there and Helenus foretold his future."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truva
If I was correct in identifying Aphareus as the founder of
Corinth under its previous name (Ephyra), it's not surprising that:
"In 800 B.C. the Corinthians founded colonies in the area [of
Epirus]" (website below). And if "Aphareus" is an "Apiru" term
in disguise, the Kabalists would become the founders of proto-
Corinth, suggesting also that the Merovingian boar line refers to
the Kabalists. Might "boar" have derived from a syllable in
"Abiru"?
http://members.fortunecity.com/fstav1/1821/fort1821/suli.html
[Update July 3 -- Kathleen the Kat (an assistant to this new
Hebrew-based work for a couple of weeks now) shared a verse
from the KJV that my Hebrew interlinear (by Greene) seems to
mutilate by translating some of the people groups as non-people
terms (i.e. judges, emissaries, consuls, officials, and perhaps the
most important people-group (Dehavites) of all, it translates as
"that is."). The verse, Ezra 4:9, reveals a list of peoples that the
Assyrian king transplanted into Samaria when he deported
Israelites to the Kabala Strip in Mesopotamia. One of those are the
Apharsites, and another are the Apharsekites/Apharsathkites,
either one evoking the mythical Aphareus. Both the Elamites and
the Shusankites (of Susa, I presume) are included in the list. The
NIV translates the A harsites as "Persia." Thanks Kathleen for this
support. End Update
I would venture to claim that in the Dodoni are the roots of
both the Saxons (because they worshipped Nerthus) and the
Welsh. That is, herein are the roots of both the red and white
dragon lines. It would appear that the Chaonians were/became
largely Dedanite at this point in their European migration. The
Chaonians had the country of Chaonia named after them. A
mythical figure, Chaon, was invented, and made the brother of the

243
above-mentioned seer, Helenus...no doubt codeword to depict a
branch of the Hellenes. Which branch? It agrees with my previous
theory (only a few days old) that the Aeolian Hellenes were west-
moving Kabalists that founded western Atlantis.
Recall that Aeolus and Boiotus (twins) founded Atlantis
together, and so now see that Helenus founded the Epirus city of
Buthrotos, intended as a new Troy. As Atlantis is fundamentally a
Troy entity, it would appear that the same who founded Buthrotos
went to found a new Troy in Britain, which, we might suspect, was
named similar to Buthrotos. Bude in Cornwall comes to mind, as
does the island of Bute. Buthrotos evokes the mythical Butes,
priest of Poseidon but also king of Sicily, thus showing the Bute
jump from rus to Italy. Bute was known either as
Erechtheus/EreEZhonius
c himself, or his twin:
"According to Apollodorus, Erechtheus II had a twin
brother named Butes who married Erechtheus' daughter
Chthonia . Erechth eus was father by his wife Pra xithea of
several daughters: ... Oreithyia, Chthonia, and Merope ... "
(italics mine to emphasize Chthon and Cutha terms, at times
buried/hidden in the codes)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erechtheus
There we have another Merope term, but note too
"Oreithyia," since the Atlanteans made Erethlyn (Wales) a capital.
Now behold that Oreithyia and Boreas (of Thrace) gave birth to
"Chione." Coincidence??? Another Chione (i.e. the same peoples
elsewhere) was made a daughter of Daedalion. Dedanites? Taddei?
Dodoni? The father of Daedalion was styled, "Hesperos," and that
of course refers to the Hesperide garden in Atlantis. His daughter
Chione gave birth to Autolycus, having the "Auto" prefix that, as I
showed previously, refers to Atlanteans. Autolycus appears in
myth as a Hercules branch, and, as Hercules stole cattle from
Geryon (in Erethlyn), so Autolycus was depicted as stealing cattle.
In Greek mythology, Geryon (Geryones, Geyron),
son of Chrysaor and Callirhoe, was a fearsome titan who
dwelt on the island Erytheia of the mythic Hesperides in
the far west of the Mediterranean"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geryon
I would now point out that yet another Chione was made the
daughter of Callirhoe so that in every way Chione (the Chaonians
of Epirus, I assume, and the Cohens leading to the Stewarts, I
suspect) was associated closely with western Atlantis. And so
when we learn that Butes was a priest of Poseidon, we must ask if
he a Cohen of Poseidon?
Poseidon with Chione gave birth to Eumolpus, who evokes
the Cats depicted by Plato's "Gadeirus" since he was assigned (also

244
by Plato) the Greek name of "Eumelus." Aside from his being in
Ethiopia where there was yet another Merops, Eumolpus moved to
Eleusis (Greece) where he "became one of the first priests
[Cohanim?] of Demeter and one of the founders of the
Eleusinian Mysteries. He initiated Heracles into the
mysteries."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eumolpus
It is clear that these influential mysteries, akin to
Freemasonic themes and ceremonies, were a Gorgon/Gogi
invention based in Ladon (i.e. proto-Latin) peoples. The priest-
infested ceremonies and celebrations occurred in the month of
Boedromion, a name peculiar to Attic/Athenian calendar,
wherefore the month seems rooted in Butes, the High Priest of
Athens. Pigs were slaughtered at the days-long events, wherefore
if these were Hebrew-based celebrations, the sheer blasphemy is
noted. Might the Rosicrucian boar symbol have depicted the
Hebrew Kabalists for just such an unkosher attribute that they
gladly accepted?
"Boedromion was the first month of the Attic
calendar. It contained the Eleusinian mysteries, which
lasted from the 15th to 21st days of that month."
http://explanation-guide.info/meaning/Boedromion.htmi
The Attic calendar had it's first month six months away from
the first month used by the rest of the world. Instead of being in
mid-winter, Boedromion was in mid-summer, exactly a reflection
of the Hebrew calendar wherein the first month, Tishri, is in
September (see rear of Strong's Concordance for details). And
because the Bible makes it clear that the Feast of Tabernacles was
from the 15th to the 21 st of Tishri, one cannot help but connect the
above quote to that Hebrew feast. And that's why the slaughter of
pigs during the Eleusian celebrations must have been intended as
deliberate blasphemies against the God of Israel.
Please do not fail to see that the Israelite feast was also called
"Feast of Booths." I'll bet my snake-skin galoshes that "Butes"
means "booth" for that reason. Note too that the Attic calendar
started the first day of the month at the new moon, as does the
Hebrew calendar in the Bible and to this day.
As I've said, Atti(s) named the Attica province that housed
Athens, and because this sun god is depicted in myth as having
castrated himself, it is thought that he represented a transvestite
cult (which the Romans called "Galli"). When Attis went to
Pessinos (the Kabeiri-infested town) to marry the princess there,
the king of Pessinos also castrated himself (i.e. joined the Attis
cult). Wikipedia claims that these mythical castration events were

245
fore-runners to "the self-castrating corybantes who devoted
themselves to Cybele."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attis
These Corybantes were the Daktyloi (mentioned previously),
the very Zeus-proper peoples who became the Trojans proper, and
as we can see that they were Cybele worshipers, even as Cybele
was both mother and wife of Attis, so the whole lot of them are
revealed as Hebrews of the Kabala cult, for "Cybele" was also
"Kybele." In that case, the castrations were not literal, but rather a
depiction of circumcision. No? I think yes, for circumcision was a
Hebrew phenomenon. The hermaphrodite (both male not female)
entity that Kybele evolved into upon being raped by Zeus --
Agdistis -- appears to have a "testis" (a Latin word) buried within
it. I can also see a "Gadis."
At the above Attis website, one can learn that Attis was
connected to the Phrygian Cap (also "Liberty Cap"); there is a
statue of Attis wearing one. While it doesn't look fully like the
modern bowl-shaped Hebrew kippa, wouldn't it have been the
precursor to it? One can actually trace the dragon bloodline by
noting which peoples wore it:
"The Phrygian cap can also be seen on the Trajan's
Column carvings, worn by the Dacians, and on the Arch
of Septimius Severus worn by the Parthians. The
Macedonian, Thracian, Dacian and 12th century Norman
military helmets had a forward peaked top design
resembling the Phrygian cap."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrygian_cap
This is very well for my tracing of the dragon because the
Cap connects the Getae Thracians (later the Dacians) to the
Parthians (Gorgons originally), through to what I claim were
MakEdones, and finally to the Norse Normans. All of the above
are therefore suspected as having Kabala-Hebrew elements. But
what's shocking is that the Phrygian Cap is "the official seals of
the United States Army and the United States Senate."
(website above). See the Senate seal. My off-the-wall theory is that
the Phrygian Cap was a priestly head-covering originating in the
Cohens of Kabala. Says the Italian Jew to me: Kippah you ideas to
yourself!
Noah, I won't. Lookie here at another person who wore the
Phrygian cap; Marianne, symbol of France:
"Marianne is a symbol of the French Republic. She
is an allegorical figure of liberty and the Republic and
first appeared at the time of the French Revolution. The

246
earliest representations of Marianne are of a woman
wearing a Phrygian cap."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France
What does that mean to you have been hood-winked into
believing that the Merovingians worshipped Mary Magdalene?
Doesn't it show what should be obvious, that the Franks who
started that hoax were deceivers and low-down snakes, who
worshipped instead another Mary, from the Trojans?
Helenus, founder of Buthrotor ("round booth"?), was made
son of Priam (a Trojan ruler), and this squares with the fact that the
Merovingians trace themselves to Trojans. In fact, the mythical
Chaon can be viewed as a proto-Merovingian peoples if only
someone could prove that Merovee derives from the mythical
term, Merops, for Priam's first wife was the daughter of Merops
("bee eater"), king of a region (Percote) near Troy (Kabeiri and
Pessinos were also near Troy). Have you noticed that the Molossi
peoples appear as molasses, defined by my dictionary as "honey-
like"?
Helenus came from a line formed by Dardanus and his wife,
Batea; she has the alternative identity of Arisbe, which happens to
be the first wife of Priam; that is, Batea/Arisbe was the daughter of
Merops...for which reason I will tentatively view she and the Batea
peoples as proto-Merovingians. Recall that I had identified
Dardanus as a Tartar/Tatar branch and therefore as Dedanites.
Since there is no mention of Chaon as a son of Priam's second
wife, Hecuba (Jacob?), it may be that Chaon was the son of
Arisbe/Batea.
The brother of Helenus (by the same parents) was
"Cassandra," which could translate to "men of Cass" i.e. Kassites,
or, more specifically, the Cati of Cilicia. Remembering that the
Calhoun surname has been modified to "Cowan," and seeing now
that "Calhoun" is similar to "Helen," might Helenus have depicted
the Chaonians (of Epirus), whom we can suspect were from the
Kahuians from that Khassi part of Cilicia that was home to the
Cati? It may be that Chaon was made the brother of Helenus for
that very reason, that Helenus himself was a Chaonian.
The wife of Helenus was Andromache, a daughter of King
Eetion of Thebe (not Thebes). Thebe was in Asia Minor near Troy,
but in a province named "Cilicia" ! !
One account says that Hercules named Thebe after Thebes;
the two cities may have been variations of "Sheba," for as Sheba
named the Svi (Swedes), while Odin was from the Edones, so we
see that the king of Thebe was styled, "Eetion," a Getae/Edone
clue if ever I saw one. As the peoples there were called Cilicians, it
seems certain that they were the Cati/Khassi (Cassandra?) from

247
greater Cilicia. And as Thebe was in the region of Pessinos and
Kabeiri, it seems certain also that Helenus was connected to the
Kabalists.
Tammuz/Dumuzi was brought to Greece as "Adonis," and he
was part-time lover with Hephaistos' wife, Aphrodite, which, if
you look carefully, translates to Abru-dite. It's interesting also that
Hecuba's father was Dymas. Hecuba, which sounds like "Jacob,"
was the wife possibly of Abraham's descendants, for if we place a
vowel on her husband's name, Priam, we get "Apriam." Whether
these were in some way Israelites or not I cannot say right now,
but if I'm correct, the Trojans were Abraham's offspring. So I'll
suggest again that Thebe, near Troy, was named after Abraham's
granddaughter, Sheba.
Eetion was the father also of Podes, which evokes both the
Podas (i.e. Po) river, where I expect that the Chaonians moved to,
since after all the Merovingians were from the Veneti and the
Ligurians on that river. Just as I expect that these same peoples
made their way to Abruzzo as well, so a Wikipedia article says that
“Another Eetion, also mentioned in the Iliad, ruled over the
island of Imbros.” While Imbros was off the coast of Troy, the
term evokes Umbria, a province beside Abruzzo. Indeed, just as
Lemnos was off the coast of Troy and near Imbros, so we see that
Etruscans, who lived on Lemnos, ended up smack beside the
Umbrians of Italy.
A certain Neoptolemus, who, because he was also known as
"Pyrrhus," may have been a branch of Aphareus = "Abiru." This
Neoptolemus stole Helenus and his sister (Andromache) from
Thebe, taking them to Epirus to be his slaves. The Dodoni of
Epirus, which may have been some of those stolen from Thebe,
can now be viewed more credibly as Sheba's brother, Dedan. This
same Neoptolemus term, in the real world, “was the father of
Molossus and ancestor of Olympias, the mother of Alexander
the Great," the first/primary king of Daniel 7's third globalist
beast.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoptolemus
Was Helenus (as a Sheba and Dedan mix) the same as
Herodotus' Geloni, who were Greek refugees that built the city of
Helonus/Gelonus in the midst of the Budini (in the Ukraine), and
lived there not only with the Budini but with the Neuri? I have a
hunch that the whole lot became settled in Scandinavia, to produce
Odin, the Aesir, and the Norwegians. Consider that the Batavians
of Germany came forth from the Catti (also of Germany).
Wouldn't the Catti (also "Chatti") have been the Holy Grail line
from Cilicia though to Helenus in Epirus? Well if Helenus was
codeword for the Geloni, wherefore he/they moved to live with the
Budini, wouldn't the Geloni have been the Holy Grail Cati? If so,

248
then surely the Batavians coming forth from the Catti were the
Budini migrated to Germany with the Geloni. And it just so
happens that the Catti were integrated with the Merovingians,
claimants to the Holy Grail. Wikipedia puts it this way: "The
Chatti ... were incorporated in the kingdom of Clovis I..."
(website below).
As I would confidently connect the Cati of Cilicia to the
Khassi of Cilicia, so note the following quote concerning the Catti
of Germany that equates the Catti and Khassi terms:
"Many historians are of the opinion that the
Chasuarii were the same as the people called the
Chattuarii mentioned by several authors."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatti
The question is, did the same Cats enter Scandinavia long
before they became the Catti and Batavians, or did they go to
Britain as the Bude of Cornwall?
There was a ruler of Jerusalem, Abdi-Heba, whose "Abdi"
portion may have been more-correctly "Abudi." He ruled under the
powers of Egypt, indicating that the period in view was quite early,
earlier than the Judges of Israel, in the period of the Jebusites
(inhabitants of Jerusalem). In a letter written to Pharaoh
(unidentified), Abdi-Heba requests Pharaoh's support against a
certain Labaya, complaining that “...the deed (i.e. title] of the
sons of Labaya, who have given [i.e. deeded] the land of
[Egyptian-controlled Canaan] to the 'Apiru.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdi-Heba
What's that? Labaya had deeded the land of Canaan to the
Apiru? Were these the Israelites of/after Joshua? I can't say yet. It
may have been the Chaldee Kabalists in Israel who settled Cilicia
and then Thebe of Phrygia. Doesn't the "p" version of "Abiru"
remind us of the "Epirus" region, after all?
Labaya was accused, in various other letters to Pharaoh, of
using "Apiru" fighters to invade Megiddo. The "p" spelling also
appears in Labaya's letter of response (to Pharaoh), where he
denies all accusations. The king of Megiddo (Biridya) had sent
letter to Pharaoh asking for only 100 fighters to fend Labaya off,
indicating (to us) how small Labaya's forces were, and suggesting
a period during, or shortly after, Abraham.
I haven't read the book of Judges over to see if Egypt had
invaded Israel during the time of the Judges, but I checked with
Strong's Concordance just now and found no mentions of either
Egypt or Pharaoh that would indicate an invasion (Egypt seems
very invisible after God's ten plagues against her). Therefore this
scenario regarding the Apiru, if it isn't in relation to the coming of

249
Joshua, which I don't think it is, must concern the Chaldean
Hebrews.
You can take my word for it, or you can read the article at
the website below: the Apiru and Abiru of historical records are
almost always those of Chaldee/Mesopotamia, and even when
Apiru are cited in Israel/Canaan, they may yet be the Chaldeans as
opposed to Israelites proper. The website makes this clear, and
gives one example where king Amenhotep II (of Egypt) takes over
36,000 Hurrian, and 3,600 Apiru , prisoners from Palestine. They
appear to me like dragon-line "Cats" living in Israel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habiru
Labaya was moreover accused of war designs against Gezer
(north of Gath), a term that smacks of Gether/Khazar. Remember,
the Kassite-Abiru mix I spoke of was known as Kothar-wa-Khasis.
The website above tells of a certain AS.GAZ logogram found
abundantly in Sumerian and Hittite (i.e. pre-Israelite) records, and
yet no one has understood/discovered (says the website) why that
term was used to represent the Apiru. Might the GAZ portion have
furnished Gath, Gaza, Gezer, and other localities that came to be
inhabited by Canaanites and later Philistines? Did GAZ have roots
in "Gozar," "Khaz(ar)", "Cutha"? Did the GAZ put forth the Getae
Thracians, the Gades/Gadir of Atlantis, the Cati and Khassi of
Cilicia, the Catti of Germany?
What about the Celts, that are not only reflected in Plato's
"Cleito," mother of all western Atlanteans, but in "Chaldee"???
Know that Chaldee is defined as that part of Babylon that was
home to Semites/Hebrews. How did the Semites come to be
represented by that term? I would say it had to do with the Galli
term that came to denote members of the Kabeiri. It's certainly a
tenable theory in that "Gaul" and "Celt" became inter-changeable
terms. If that makes the Gauls rooted in the Galli, so be it. It may
explain why France was/is so femme and "gay."
A good clue as to the identification of the AS portion is in
the use of ASG.GAZ by the Akkadians. Problem is, I haven't a
clue what that good clue means, but I'll keep it in mind. [Update,
next morning. Yesterday "Asgard" came to mind, but I didn't want
to print it; no proof. Today, in re-reading here, As(h)kenazi seems
a much better choice; but might not the mythical Asgard have been
referring to the Askenazi? I have been wondering for quite some
time if the city of Ashkelon/Ascalon between Gath and Gaza was
part of the Kothar-wa-Khasis settlements]. Note what is said to be
a Hebrew-Meshech alliance that seems pertinent to the Cat
peoples:
“An inscription on a statue found at Alalakh in
southeastern Anatolia, the Mitanni prince Idrimi of
Aleppo (who lived from about 1500 BC to 1450 BC), tells

250
that, after his family had been forced to flee to Emar, he
left them and joined the 'Hapiru people' in 'Ammija in
the land of Canaan'. The Hapiru recognized him as the
'son of their overlord' and 'gathered around him;' they
are said to include 'natives of Halab, of the country of
Mushki, people from the country of Nihi...” (Habiru
website above). Inscription at
http://www.geocities.com/farfarer2001/alalakh/idrimi_inscription.htm
Was Nihi named after Nahor?
In the inscription, king Idrimi claims “Teshub, the lord of
the sky,” to be his god. He came to rule a "Mukish" region (that
the above website translated "Mushki") at Mount Hazi. Hazi was
“on the northern coast of S ria, called Hazi in Hittite, Mons
Casi us in Latin” (italics mine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadad
This Hazi region, in other words, evokes the Cati of Khassi
in Cilicia, as though the Teshub worshipers of Hazi (10 miles
north of Ugarit) moved just around the Mediterranean bend to
Khassi. Teshup was related to the god, "hd," which is
“theoretically vocalized as Haddu,” says Wikipedia, but
“usually normalized as Hadad in translations and discussions.”
This is probably due to the associations of hd (could just as well be
"Hada/Hadi") with the Akkadian Adad, he, like Teshub, being an
integral part of the dragon sun-god pantheon (back in Sumeria).
Not only does "Hada/Hadi" evoke "Cutha", "Gadi/Cati", etc., but
Dedan is again brought to bear in “The name Adad and various
alternate forsmand bynames (Dadu, Bir, Dadda) ... ” (brackets
not mine)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adad
Now, then, with Teshub and Hadad being closely paired in
northern Syria, but also back in Armenia and Mesopotamia,
wouldn't they be a recollection of Sheba and Dedan? Is it a
coincidence that Teshub's wife was "Hebat," what could easily be
a modification of "Sheba"? If it was such a modification, the ruler
of Jerusalem, Abdi-Heba, may just have been from Sheba, as that
throne name is thought to be the same as Hebat.
The father of Teshub was "Kumarbi." If it is linguistically
acceptable to change the "arbi" portion to "abri," then, if a reversal
had been affected to net Kum-Abri, the original term would have
been Abri-kum = Abraham. After all, Sheba was Abraham's
(literal) grandson. I understand that such a reversal of syllables had
been effected commonly, especially if myth writers wanted to keep
secrets.
The point here is that proto-Israel had been inhabited by
Hebrews long before the Israelites of Goshen arrived, and the

251
finger points to a region between Jerusalem and the
Mediterranean. Yet these had been a wicked bunch in God's eyes,
so much so that they are not at all represented among Israelites.
They were the dragon in Israel, and they no doubt furnished the
Samaritans, the Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes, and became
meshed with many pagan/ungodly rulers of the Kings period.

252
MY CALYDONIAN BOAR HUNT

When Geoffrey of Monmouth, in his "Vita Merlini,"


described Merlin's wife, Guendoloena, as a cow, he, as a writer of
encoded myth was (she'll be happier to know) probably signifying
the Taurus Gorgons. He wasn't being rude in that he also described
her as The Virgin (maybe she was a case of how Russians describe
their women: strong like bull, good looking like street car).
Is it a coincidence that Daphne of Greek myth desired to be a
perpetual virgin while her father was Tiresias, a name wherein we
see "Taurus" virtually spelled out? The descendants of Daphne
coincide well with the British Celts, as this chapter will show. It
might even be important that between Liguria (north Italy) and the
Ruthene of France there is a region called "Dauphine."
"Guendoloena" is in this chapter a term depicting Venetian
descendants removed to the Gwynedd kingdom of Wales.
As sexual relations in myth depict alliances between peoples
that permit intermarriages, "virgin" may depict a peoples unwilling
to mix with others...in order to keep their bloodline "pure," as per
the "holy grail" blood, which has nothing to do with Jesus but
more with Snake blood.
Recalling that Ladon ruled the golden apples of the
Hesperides, note that Apollo, while in love with Daphne, had her
swim in the Ladon river in order to obtain her romances. This
identifies Daphne with the Ladon peoples, and because the Ladon
river was in Arcadia, the finger points to the Hermes bloodline.
Therefore, the Ladon peoples of the Hesperides should be
identified as the same.
Recall that Hermes was from the Manes line, and that Attis
(grandson of Manes) was depicted by a pine tree. Can it be a
coincidence that Daphne's other father, Peneus, turned Daphne into
a laurel tree, while my dictionary defines a laurel as "an evergreen
tree"? Peneus, a peoples on the river by the same name in northern
Greece (Thessaly), should therefore be viewed as a Hermes
bloodline. If that's the Holy Grail, it's no wonder it's been kept
secret through the centuries, just like I'd want to conceal my most-
embarrassing moment.
Apollo, who loved Daphne (i.e. who wanted an alliance with
the Hermes peoples of Greece), depicted Gorgon wolf peoples
settled in Hermes' Arcadia, and also south of Arcadia in Laconia
(Sparta). Daphne peoples settled in Locris, yet another "wolf"
term, wherefore she may likewise have been a wolf-line peoples.

253
On the north side of the Hermus river (Lydia) there was the city of
Hyrcanis, meaning "wolf land" and no doubt a colony of the
Gorgons from Verkana (on the Caspian sea) ... which was
alternatively "Hyrcania." In other words, the Apollo-Daphne affair
was a meeting of Gorgons from the north shores of the Black sea
with Gorgons coming across to Greece off to its south.
Because Tiresias and Peneus are both depicted as Daphne's
father, Tiresias is thus identified as some portion of the Peneus
peoples depicted by a pine tree. As "Tiresias" was made to evoke
"Taurus," he would represent the peoples (possibly Tiras, son of
Japheth) associated with the bull cult of Dionysus/Thebes. In fact,
Tiresias, as a seer/priest of Dionysus, convinced Cadmus to honor
Dionysus (the descendants of Cadmus would resist Dionysus). In
other words, the Tiresias-Cadmus alliance was one and the same
the Cadmus-Hermes alliance, and very similar to, if not the same
as, the Cadmus-Harmonia marriage. This in a nutshell was proto-
Europe.
Tiresias is said to descend from a peoples depicted by the
teeth of the Ares dragon (that Cadmus killed), which teeth later
became the dragon of Colchis that protected the Golden Fleece.
Recall that I had identified this dragon as the Hermes bloodline.
Well, the snake-entwined magic staff of Hermes, the "caduceus,"
was the creation of Tiresias himself! It enabled Tiresias to convert
into a woman and back again into a man, this having some sort of
secret meaning connected to the term, "Hermaphrodites."
"Tiresias' staff, complete with serpents, was later passed on to
Hermes..."
http://drblayney.com/Asclepius.html
[Update June 2006 -- I'm much "smarter" now to the
illustrations set forth by the myth wizards. Knowing now that
"Aphrodite" was code for "Abiru," and that Hermes was code for
Armenia, I think the secret meaning of the two snakes (of the
caduceus) is a Hebrew-Aryan mix. Only one of the two snakes was
depicted as male, logically (I don't know which yet), and the idea
of a man being able to turn into a woman (or vice versa) had to do
with the utter fusing of the Hebrews with Aryans so that any
person from that line could be one or the other at any time. End
Update]
So when we see Daphne swimming in Arcadia's Ladon river,
she depicts a Hermes line there, and Apollo come to swim with her
is the north-shore Armenians come late to make an alliance. It's
probably not a coincidence that, in her resisting Apollo, she
wanted to be allied rather to Dionysus. Keep in mind here that the
Galli/Kabeiri cult was the same type as that of Dionysus.
The Greek home of Dionysus was the Cyclade island of
Naxos, and Naxos was earlier "Dia." That Diana and Dionysus

254
depicted the Danes is not hard to imagine, and so I expect to find
connections between Dionysus and the Danaans of Argos. As we
saw that the Danes were the Rus, so myth discloses that it was
"Eros" (much like "Hros") who made Daphne resist Apollo's
love/alliance.
[Update June 2006 -- I would like to clarify. I do not think
that Dionysus was involved in the Veneti-to-Britain migration that
was the root of the Danes proper, even though Dionysus peoples
may have been a Thrace-based root of the Danes. I now view
Dionysus as the migration of Edones to Sweden direct, without
going through Britain. I note that the island he was made to
represent , Naxos, evokes the Biblical spelling of Nahor, "Nachor."
For this and other reasons I tend to view Dionysus as the Neuri-
Boudini migration to Sweden and Norway, keeping in mind that
the Neuri are thought (by some) to have been proto-Rus peoples of
the Slav type, albeit from whom possibly/logically the Varangian
Rus derived at least in part. I've only just realized that "Caledonia"
may be understood as Cal-Edonia. End Update]
The wife of Daphne's father (Peneus) was Creusa, which I
think is yet another variation of "Hros." If all true, then Daphne
depicted the Hros to a large degree, or shall I say she depicted
intermarriages between the Hros and Peneus (Pan?) peoples, the
Hros being from the north shores of the Black sea but not the same
as Apollo, for Daphne rejected Apollo. As I've explained
elsewhere, Apollo was a Gog and/or Togarmite peoples. The Rus
were likely the Rosh peoples of Lake Van (Armenia), where lived
the Nairi (almost the same as "Neuri").
Now Eros was the Roman form of Cupid, but the mother of
Cupid was (the Roman) Venus, the eponym, in my opinion, of the
Veneti. This supports my belief that the Veneti became the Ruotsi
Vikings and Redone/Ruthene Rus of Gaul. Venus was herself the
Italian form of Aphrodite, and Aphrodite was the wife of
Hephaistos, the progenitor of the Kabeiri cult.
Myth tells further that Daphne, after being turned into a pine
tree, was shipped over to Crete to become Pasiphae, the latter
being the daughter of Helios and Perse (the sun-royal couple who
also gave birth to Circe of Latin and Etruscan fame/root). This
more-assuredly equates Daphne as a Hermes line because Helios
and Perse also gave birth to Aeetes, he known to be of the Hermes
line.
[Update June 2006 -- Believing now that the Phrygian sun
god, Attis, was the very embodiment of the Kabeiri cult, and
therefore a Kabala-Hebrew entity, Daphne must have become
married into the same since Attis was the pine tree. Note the
illustration, that she was not a pine tree to begin with, but rather

255
was changed into one i.e. converted/married to the Kabala-
worshiping peoples.
While writing the above I had a hunch that the dragon-
infested Vatican made December 25th the birthday of Christ to
match the Hanukkah holiday (also "Channukah") of the Jews on
the 25th of their month, Kislev. I reasoned that the Vatican made it
in December because that's when Kislev usually falls. Knowing
also that December 25th has been cited as the birthday of the sun
god, and seeing that the pine tree is used at Christmas, I easily saw
Attis as that sun god, especially now that I view Attis as a Hebrew
entity. And so knowing what I do now, I saw immediately that
"Channukah" starts with what might be "Cohen." This gave me a
hunch that Hanukkah was a Khazar celebration, and so I went
Internet searching for evidence; I couldn't find any obvious Khazar
elements in the Maccabees, after whom the holiday was
supposedly named. But within minutes I came across the following
line: "Hanukkah or Chanukkah ben Obadiah was a Khazar
ruler..."
hl://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanukkah %28Khazar%29
I then found that an African American_who said "Jesus was
psychotic," created a Chanukkah version of his own to give Blacks
an alternative to Christmas; he named it Kwanza/Kwaanza, where
the "Cowan" name is readily visible. End Update]
Creusa (of the Cecrops bloodline) was made the ancestor of
the "Ion" Ionians of Athens. The husband of Creusa (in bringing
forth these particular Ionians) was Xuthus, which may per chance
be a variation of "Ceto/Getae." Hermes raised Ion to health under
Apollo's supervision, suggesting that Ion was what Daphne wasn't,
a Hermes-Apollo alliance.
Tiresias was blind, wherefore consider "Dafni" of Sicilian
myth, a male child of "Ermes" who was "Educated in the sound
of the bagpipe from the Pan god." Clearly, "Ermes" is Hermes,
father of Pan, and because we find that Dafni was himself blinded
by the gods, there must be an equation here between he and
Daphne, daughter of the blind Tiresias. This places the Virgin
(Daphne) in Sicily ... and apparently in bagpipe Ireland/Scotland as
well...in the vicinity of Merlin's Virgin wife.
Now the Virgin was also Diana, who in the form of the moon
was in love with Endymion, the ancestor of Greek Calydon. It
can't be a coincidence that, in Geoffrey's story, Merlin was in love
with the land of "Caledon" in southern Scotland. This suggests that
Merlin was from, or in love with, the Endymion bloodline, and
indeed Endymion was from Thessaly on the Peneus river
wherefore he appears as the Daphne peoples. Endymion became
the first or second ruler of Elis, and I note that there is another
river by the name of "Peneus" flowing through Elis.

256
Geoffrey mentioned "The Boar of Brittany, under the
protection of an antique oak, takes away the moon...", a code-
studded statement that oozes the Calydonian boar of Greece as
well as the Golden Fleece (which was also protected on an oak in
Colchis). I suppose if we could identify that Greek boar, we would
also identify the Boar of Brittany. As the Golden Fleece line was
Aeetes, king of both Corinth and Colchis, I expect the boar line to
come from the same, but also from Hermes because Aeetes was
connected to him. In fact, the mythical Calydon was made
granddaughter of Hyrmina, an apparent version of either Hermes
or Harmonia.
In Greek myth, Artemis sends a boar to afflict Oeneus, king
of Calydon, a descendant of Endymion. And so that's clue number
one, that the boar was an Artemis peoples opposed (but not
necessarily unrelated) to the Calydonians. Artemis was Apollo's
twin sister, meaning that the boar originated at one time off the
north shores of the Black sea.
Speaking off the top of me head, the Boar of Brittany might
haf been the enemy of the Brit Caledonians, and therefore an
sworen evil enemy of me darlin Merlin, as even Geoffrey's lingo
makes clear, aye, where he says it "takes away the moon i.e. the
Virgin."
The mother of Oeneus was Euryte, yet another term evoking
"Eurotas/Eridanus" and Erethlyn in Wales (Merlin lived in Wales).
Because "Merlin" depicts a Welsh peoples, I think the Gwynedd
Venetodia, a blood connection between they and the Endymion-
Euryte line is feasible and worth exploring.
The mythical Aetolius was the founder of Greek Calydon.
The Curetes that were closely related to Zeus, and who practiced
the Kabeiri cult, were in Aetolia, and no doubt spread into
Calydon. Sweet Merlin the magician was likely one of these
slithering snakes. The Calydon-to-Caledon migration can be traced
across Italy, and I do note how Aetolia evokes "Italia." See firstly
that the Calydonian peoples depicted as the daughter of Oeneus
(Methoni) were the inhabitants of Methoni, the purported origin of
the Gypsies, who are called variously "Gitani", "Cigani," and
"Roma." The Cigani term denotes northern Italy.
The Spartan peoples depicted as "Leda" (an Artemis/Apollo
peoples) came forth from Thestius, he being a Curete from
Aetolia. Zeus, who was raised by Curetes and therefore likely a
Curete himself, came onto Leda as a swan to produce her twins
(Caster and Pollux), suggesting that the swan -- and the twins --
depict Curetes. These Greek swans removed to northern Italy.
Whenever Zeus mates with a "woman," his name can be
interchanged with many alternative terms when the myth writer
wants to be more geographically/ethnically specific, but they must

257
tie back to Zeus as their father in one way or another. It is
sometimes said that, instead of Zeus, it was Cycnus of Liguria
(north Italy) who mated with Leda to produce those said twins,
since Cycnus was depicted as a swan. That would make Caster and
Pollux a Gaul peoples of northern Italy. How did they end up in
Scotland? One foot after the other, and lot's of killing all the way.
My heroes!
In light of the Curetes of Calydon, could it be a coincidence
that in Scotland there lived the Cruithen/Cruithne? The Romans
not only called the Cruithne, "Picts," but "Caledonians"!!
Castor and Pollux were listed as being in on the boar hunt,
but they were also on the Argo ship to retrieve the Fleece. The
boar was first shot by Atalanta, an Amazon of Arcadia who had
also been on the Argo ship to retrieve the Fleece from Colchis. But
the myth writer reveals that the Boar was actually shot through by
Meleager, a Calydonian, the son of Oeneus. Meleager was also on
the Argo ship, and I have read that it was he who killed king
Aeetes in Colchis so as to allow Jason to sail away cleanly with the
Golden Fleece. So why the similarities between the Fleece and
Boar myths?
My thinking is, that the Boar depicted an Aeetes branch back
in Greece, revealed by at least one myth writer as a Hermes
peoples in Corinth, and that this branch attacked the alliance of
nations on the mythical Argo after they had returned to Greece
from killing Aeetes. I hope that I can now show that this is based
on more than merely my imagination no matter how logical.
Here's what myth reveals. The Aeetes kingdom in Greece
was that of Corinth. Aeetes had left that kingdom to Bunus, son of
Hermes, and that appears as a variation of "Pan." Now "pig/swine"
in Greek is "choiros," and per chance "Corinth" was named after a
pig/boar. I read online that "Corinth" means "immoral" and
"satiated," two words where "pig" can substitute. Thus it could be
that the Hermes line in Corinth attacked the Calydonians upon
their return.
Indeed, for Jason, upon that return with his new wife, Medea
(daughter of Aeetes), settles with her in Corinth. Not surprising,
since Corinthians at that time were as related to Medea as they
were to her father. Jason decides that he wants to re-marry (i.e.
form alliances) with the princess of Corinth, sometimes named
Creusa, and Medea is forced to flee the city (the historical reason
not decipherable), which she does do on a chariot belonging to
Helios (her grandfather), a chariot pulled by winged dragons. That
v
symbolismTs crucial, for it came to be, and still is, the symbol of
ales.
She kills the children of Jason before leaving (i.e. she leaves
due to loosing a mortal war with Calydonians and their royal-

258
Corinthian allies). Thus, the boar would seem to depict Corinthian
peoples loyal to Hermes, Medea (a witch) and Aeetes.
Tydeus, son of Oeneus, was depicted with a shield having
upon it a boar symbol. It could in this way seem that the boar (i.e.
Aeetes, etc.) was a Calydonian peoples and that the Calydonian-
Boar war was a family affair (between two Corinthian factions).
[Update June 2006 -- I have since realized that the first
founder of Corinth was Aphareus, since the city was at first called
"Ephyra." I have tentatively concluded that those terms mean
"Abiru." To support this Hebrew view, Aeetes was likely Attis,
whose wife was made "Kybele, an obvious code for "Kabala." It
could therefore be that the Ep yra Corinthians fought a (losing)
war with the up-coming Calydoans ni who chased them out of the
city. The city may have been named after the swine because the
Kabalists had slaughtered pigs on their feast days. End Update]
And so the Calydonian descendants of Oeneus (perhaps
Gypsies included) were scattered and had to remove elsewhere.
The region south of the Po river (Italy), immediately to the south
of the Veneti, was named "Romagna," evoking the Gypsies in their
"Roma" designation." Next to (west of) Romagna, and likewise on
the Po river, was the Duchy of Modena (also "Mutina"), and that
term reflects "Modon," the variation of "Methoni."
Cycnus/Cygnus and his father Sthenelus were major powers
on the upper Po river. In fact, the Illuminatists even made Cycnus
into a constellation, called by his name. It is depicted as a swan,
but alternatively called the "Northern Cross." It's interesting that,
upon seeing a picture of the constellation for the first time, it
immediately reminded me of the routes taken by the Gorgons,
where the crux/center of the cross is the Po river region. I saw the
horizontal bar of the cross as a line from Thrace to Britain, with
the Po in the middle, and the other bar as a vertical line from
Denmark to Rome (also with the Po in the middle). I wouldn't be
sharing this if it were not for the names of the stars in that
constellation. At one extreme end of one line, the star was named
"Deneb," and at the opposite end, the so-called beak of the swan,
the star is called "Albireo" ("Albi rules"?). It is a fact that the
Romans were at first, before they could be called Romans, settled
near Rome at Alba.
http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/the_universe/Constellations/summer/cygnus.html&edu=high
Not convinced that secret-society fingers are at work here?
Behold, the central star in this constellation has been called "Sadr,"
an obvious reference to the Satyrs -- of the Hermes line. The
reason that the Illuminatists don't disclose these fun-and-game
secrets is that they would be ashamed if we were to discover their
roots. Yet they wish to rule over us.

259
To appease their own consciences, and meanwhile to get the
world to honor their kind, they raise their Rosicrucian peoples to
the skies. Shakespeare would have been unheard of if he were not
a Rosicrucian; the Merlin myth would have been the trash that it
deserves to be. Newton's impossible law of gravity, that all mass
attracts all mass, would never have found its way to the textbooks,
if he had not been a Rosicrucian. Atlantis would not be the
mystery that it is. Evolution would not now be the basis upon
which ungodliness festers. Technology would not be threatening
the wholesome life that God intended for us. And there would be
no Da Vinci code spreading world wide at this moment if
Rosicrucians didn't use their machinations to raise their own kind
to the skies. They have been doing this ever since they created the
constellations to depict their own families. Smart asses, they must
imagine that they rule the universe, so great is their pride. Come
Lord Jesus, and put them in their place in a single Day.
It occurred to me that the Rosicrucian cross may be a version
of the Northern Cross. If the rose on the center of the Rosicrucian
cross depicts the Sadr star on the center of the Northern Cross,
then the rose depicts, apparently, the Satyrs, a Getae peoples. But
as the center of the cross cuts through northern Italy, why couldn't
the rose depict Cycnus himself, since after all the Northern Cross
is the Cycnus constellation? The Gypsies were called, not only the
"Roma," but the "Cigani," a near match with "Cygnus," wherefore
the rose may also be viewed as Gypsies, especially as Gypsies
were also the Gitani.
But since the Ligurians became the Redones, who were the
proto-Rus, wouldn't "Rosicrucian" be named, not after the rose,
but after the Rus/Ros? The Northern Cross thus becomes a Rus
and Gogi symbol for their Europe-wide migrations. I'm not
suggesting that Europe is fundamentally a Russian entity. It all
depends on whom we ask; I'm suggesting that if we ask a
Rosicrucian, he will say that Europe is mainly Russian world, by
which I mean to say that Rosicrucians were rooted in the Rus from
long ago.
[Update June 2006 -- I knew that I was going in a direction
that no one else (that I had read) had gone when declaring the
Rosicrucians to be rooted in the Rus, and I am thrilled to now
announce, after thousands and thousands of hours of work, that the
Rosicrucians are a Khazar-Hebrew mix, the Khazars having been
indeed a Rus peoples, contrary to those who insist on Turkish
roots. Togarmites were in the far north of Russia (e.g. Tocharians),
and it is very narrow indeed to confine them to the Turks alone (I
need to be correct, anyway, because I can't stand the thought of
another thousand hours of work :) End Update]

260
While the Celtic cross was a four-spoked wheel, the Roma
Gypsies to this day depict themselves with a 16-spoked wheel,
suggesting perhaps a lineage from the wheel peoples i.e. Helios
out of Rhodes (the Ruthene and other Rus were also connected to
Helios and Rhodes). The 16 spokes may depict 16 major families
held in honor.
Now the brother of Danaus (symbol of the Greek Danaans)
was Aigyptos, an obvious symbol of Egypt. One of the sons of
Aigyptos was "Sthenelus," same name as the father of Cycnus.
Aigyptos (with his wife Gorgo) also bore Oeneus, the father of
Mothoni, eponym of Methoni, the Greek origin of the Gypsies.
Thus the Gypsies were directly related to the Danaans! ! And so the
Gypsies, as the name implies, are somewhat rooted in Egypt after
all, but went on to become the Redones (of France), for Danaans
were in Rhodes before ruling Greece.
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/DANAIDS.html
"Aigyptos" must be a reference to the Ionian (i.e. Aryan)
rulers of Egypt, not the Egyptians from Ham. I do note that one of
his sons was Hermus! And another son is called "Pandion," who in
Greek myth was a major player of the Cecrops bloodline that I am
tracing to Cycnus. As even "Cecrops" denotes the Gogi, in my
opinion, so we find that the first Messenians were Lelegians, the
latter being a Gogi peoples related to the mythical "Caucon"
(probably the same as "Kikon," son of Rhodope, and brother of
Hebros).
West of Modena was Liguria, ruled by Sthenelus prior to
Cycnus, and Liguria also became Sardinia, evoking Sardis of
Lydia (Latins and Etruscans were both from Lydia). In fact, Sardis
was said to be founded by Sardo, son of a Sthenelus. That can't be
a coincidence. It shows that northern Italy was a New Lydia, and
that Latins were related to the Ligurians.
A part of Romagna province became "Castrocaro,"
"probably it comes from Celtic Kaster-Kar," say a couple of
websites. This evokes Castor, son of Leda, twin brother of Pollux;
that latter term sure does look like "Po-Lug" and therefore the
possible origin of the Bologna peoples (of northern Italy). "Pollux"
was the Roman version of the Greek "Polydeuces," which looks
like it has the root of Po-Leda, or better yet, Po-Laodicea; there
was a Laodicea near Sardis in the Lycus river valley. Another
Laodicea (anciently "Ladik") was further east in the province of
Lycaonia. These things, along with the fact that Castor and Pollux
were a Roman cult, support my hunch that "Pollux" derives from
"Po-Lug" or "Po-Lyc" i.e. the wolf peoples (of the Po river?).
But these peoples can be traced to France. For example,
while Terme is a location associated with Castrocaro in north Italy,
there is in France the town of Castres in the Department of Tarn.

261
Coincidence? The Tarn capital, Albi, not far east of Toulouse, is
smack-dab where the Ruthene had settled. This was Cathar
country, by the way. Map at:
http://encarta.msn.com/map_701516960/Tarn_(department).html
Tarn was formed over parts of Languedoc. Note how that
term evokes the Lingones, even though the Lingones were
associated with Langres in north-eastern France (the city of
Lingones was re-named "Langres"). Is it a coincidence that
Languedoc in southern France is associated with Toulouse while
Langres in northern France has Toul nearby? Troyes was a region
in Langres. The city of Troyes is between the cities of Langres and
Paris, the latter city thought to be named by Trojans depicted by
codeword, "Paris" [I think Hebrew-Persians, in Troy, or more
specifically, of Perieres, son of Enarete and brother to Aphareus
the Abiru].
Thus, the northern Toul area may have been settled by
northern migrants following the Rhine river to Leyden, that city
named, according to some, after the Danaan god, "Lug," who is at
times equated with Loki.
Knowing that the Veneti moved into Brittany, per chance
"Toul" was the same as "Dol," Brittany (where the Stewarts served
prior to serving as stewards of Scottish kings).
Now I have been tracing the dragon bloodline back to the Bia
peoples that came to found Lake Van in Armenia. That's what
"Hermes" is all about in my mind. Amazingly, the son of a Greek-
myth figure, "Bias," was Talaus, and the mother of Talaus was
Pero, which evokes the Pyrenees mountains (Toulouse was on the
foothills of that range). Talaus, like Castor and Pollux, had been on
the Argo ship to retrieve the Golden Fleece! I'm suggesting that
these terms were depictions of Greek Calydonians and therefore of
proto-Caledonians, headed to Scotland to meet their fate according
to Merlin myth, at the hands of the Boar of Brittany. There is even
the city of Bias on the French-Atlantic coast, due west of
Toulouse.
With interest I have been discussing my work on the dragon
bloodline by email for well over two years with a member of the
Pollock family, she having a terrible gene-defective disease
(porphyria) common to the Merovingians, Stewarts, and the
British royal line, thought to be due to their incestuous
relationships. It was she, totally oblivious to my studies on Pollux
and the Calydonian boar hunt, who informed me that the Pollock-
family symbol was a wild boar. My only reaction then, and for a
long time after, was "Hmm." But later this symbol became a key in
tracing Merovingian movements and roots, and I'll share my
findings in up-coming chapters. Suffice it for now to give a few
details.

262
To make it as plain as I can that the Calydonians became the
Redones/Rus before landing in Scotland as the Caledonian Picts,
read this first and then I'll add to it:
"It has long been acknowledged that the ancient
Indian [of India] war-god Rudra bears a striking
resemblance to the Homeric Apollo. The original basis
behind their similarity, however, remains a mystery."
http://www.maverickscience.com/Mars/Apollo/apollo.html.
The basis of the similarity is this, that Apollo is the wolf line
that crashed the Helios chariot into the Eridanus valley (Rhone
river, France), while the peoples of Eridanus were the proto-Rus
whose god was Rod. As I have said again and again that these
proto-Rus were the Rhedae/Redones who became various
Scandinavians, so we find that the son of Rudra was "Skanda"
(Scandinavia was long ago called "Scandza").
Note that "Rudra" looks like "rotor/wheel." In fact, the
Varangian Rus were said at one website to have descended from
an entity spelled "rudr." And the patron god of the Gauls, probably
the same as the Rudra bloodline, was Rudianos, which looks like
"radian" (circle). Let's go on to identifying the Rod peoples as the
Calydonian boars:
"As Rudra was regarded as a 'boar of heaven,' so
too was Apollo viewed as a 'boar.' As Apollo was depicted
as an aniconic pillar (as Agyieus), the same was true of
Rudra. As Apollo was associated with the mouse in his
name of Smintheus, so too did a mouse form the special
attendant of Rudra."
http://www.maverickscience.com/Mars/Apollo/apollo.html
We find these same symbols in a Welsh myth wherein a
white boar lives alone in an empty castle having nothing but a gold
container at it's center, and belonging to a mystery king who would
send mice to eat the fields of a south-Welsh peoples (Dyfed) that
had jilted him. The dukes of York would come to depict
themselves as white boars.
A white boar is revealed in the Welsh Mabinogian myths as
Gwawl, son of Clud. The latter depicted perhaps the Firth of
Clyde, or Clwyd in north-east Wales. Gwawl is portrayed as an
empty golden-grail kingdom in south-west Wales, wherefore he
may have depicted the same as the boar chased out to sea by
Arthur. I should repeat that Plato named Ampheres as one of the
ten sons of Poseidon and Cleito, where I think Cleito refers to
Clwyd. This "Ampheres" term smacks of Aphareus, founder of
proto-Corinth. Interesting indeed. Plato also mentioned

263
"Diaprepres"...that aside from the "Dia" prefix is similar to
Aphareus' father, Perieres. The "per/pher" in these terms, if they're
Indo-European terms, could furnish the boar symbol.
Note that when the mythical Math of the Gwynedd nation
(north Wales) turned a boar into a human, he was called
"Hyddwn," which I think is the same as "Eadon."
Gwawl was empty (in part, anyway) because Rhiannon had
jilted him though he wanted to marry her. Rhiannon trapped him in
a bag (put him on ice, as they say) and instead married the Dyfed
kingdom (also in south-west Wales). While allied to Dyfed, she
gave birth to (i.e. she became) "Pryderi," which appears
conspicuous as a Pretani/Breton peoples in Wales. That is,
Rhiannon depicted the Irish Cruithne/Parthalons then removed to
Britain. These must have been the Curetes of Calydon that became
the Caledonian branch of Picts.
Afterward, Pryderi married Rhiannon to Manawydan (son of
Llyr), who was Manannan (king of the Danann), or rather the
remnants of Irish Manannan then removed to Wales and living
amongst the Pretani of Wales. "Rhiannon" may have been a term
chosen by the myth writers in that she was a Riada peoples of
Ireland married to Manannan.
I don't know the significance as I've yet to research it, but
Camilla (formerly Parker Bowles) created a coat of arms recently:
"It features a white boar on blue background from the crest of
her war hero father Major Bruce Shand."
http://www.royalarchive.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1029&Itemid=2
In myth, king Arthur chased a boar peoples (Torc Triath) out
to sea from Cornwall. Has that boar returned to Cornwall? For
Camilla, wouldn't you know it, has just become the duchess of
Cornwall. "Triath" looks like it could be a variation of "Druid."
Other families using the boar symbol are the Parnells, the
Purcells, the Pierces, and the Pearsons; note the "par/pur/pier/pear"
roots of those names, that they evoke "bar" = "boar."

264
THE GOLDEN APPLES OF IDUN

Odin's wife Frigg must be an eponym of Phrygia, as must be


the case with the Scandinavian goddess Freya with her brother
Frey. The latter two are the root of "Friday," wherefore behold that
Friday is "Venerdi" in Italian, "Vendredi" in French, "Veneris" in
Latin, and "Viernes" in Spanish, terms somewhat evoking the
Veneti/Venedi but better-yet the "Vanir." It's to no surprise that the
Freya is a version of the goddess Venus. yet the accurate
alternative version for Freya is "Vanadis," a term almost precisely
that of "Veneti/Venedi." And so the deduction is that the Veneti
had something to do with Phrygia.
Not coincidentally, Freya is from the Vanir pantheon of
Scandinavian gods, instead of the Aesir pantheon/bloodline. One
can then conclude that (the Roman) Venus is the root of the Vanir
pantheon, which in the very least tells us that the Vanir gods
stemmed from the Veneti peoples. But one can also see that the
Vanir must have the same root as the Romans, for if Italians
worshiped Venus, it's because the Italians were her descendants.
And while the Veneti are thus pegged as the root of the Italians,
they can be traced also to Greece and Phrygia, especially to the
Lydian family of peoples (in Phrygia).
The same Phrygians appear to have formed the Celts of
Britain. As the early name of the Phrygians, according even to
Britannica, was "Bryges," so we find in Britain a Celtic goddess,
Brigit ("Caridwen" in Wales). I found that she "is connected with
wolves," as are the Vanir and the Romans integrally. This reveals
(to me, anyway) that all three peoples, the Italians, the Celts, and
the Vanir, were from Ligurians and their ancestors. While this
takes me back to the mythical "Lycurgus" term associated with
both the Edones and Spartans, it doesn't quite land me in Phrygia.
Liguria was connected by myth writers to the term, "Cygnus," but
even he traces back only to Thrace, albeit it is generally accepted
that Phrygians stemmed from Thracians.
[Update June 2006 -- As this chapter is placed after the one
that only began to trace the boar symbol to Greece, I would now
mention that the Latin "porcus" looks like "Phryxus," he being the
depiction of certain Phrygians impo rtant to the Golden-Fleece
myth. I'm not suggesting that "Phryxus" meant "pig," but rather
that, as Latin was forming from the Ladon/Lydian peoples, their
word for a pig derived from the Phrygians associated with pigs.

265
As I mentioned in that chapter, the Calydonians important to
the boar hunt, and whom I think were a part of the boar line, were
also on the Argo ship to retrieve the Fleece (from Colchis), which
Fleece depicted the Phryxus peoples simply because it was he who
rode to Colchis on the golden ram from which the fleece was taken
and then granted to Aeetes. One could certainly envision a
Calydon-Phryxus blood connection, supporting my discovery that
the Phrygians were the boar peoples.
In reality, this code means that a migration of certain
Phrygians to Colchis occurred, and the myth writer was probably
one of them since he portrayed them as "golden" (implying either
Aryan or noble elements). Since the ram was Hermes, we can also
know that the Phryxus Phrygians were among those who named
the Hermus river near the Lydian capital (Sardis). But who were
tZ The Halybes, said to have the alternative designation,
ldi," are suspect because I just realized that "Calydon" and
"Khaldi" are near matches. This points to the Kabeiri/Kybele cult,
the Cutha Hebrews, from Chaldee. End Update].
At first, when connecting Odin to the Boudini (living well
north of the Black sea), I had not much more than the similarity of
terms as the basis for doing so. This hypothesis then led me to
consider that Odin was rooted also in the Bithynians (beside
Phrygia and Lydia), as it seems to me a good theory that the
Boudini were the same peoples as the Bithyni. It is common
opinion that the Bithynians were of the Thyni of Thrace (over-
looking the Bithyni of Phrygia). Apparently, in reflecting
"Thynia," Odin was also known as "Othinn". With these things in
mind, consider that the Etruscan version of Zeus was "Tinia," and
that since Etruscans are commonly rooted in the Lydians, Thynia
and Bithynia are indeed suspect as the identity of Tinia.
In Strabo's Geography (Book VII, chapter 3), he tells that the
Bithynians and Thynians were of the "Brigians," by that term
referring to the Phrygians. But the term used serves well to tie the
Brigit-worshiping Celts to the Thyni...if we can make the same tie
my other corroborative means. If so, it would begin to appear as
though Celts and Scandinavians had the same Thracian root, for
which reason we could entertain a Celt-to-Scandinavian lineage.
This is what I expect, that the Redone Gauls (same as Celts)
became the Varangian Rus (of Sweden).
[Update June 2006 -- Phryxus/Phrixes was the son of
Athamas, who I view as a branch of Elamites for various reason,
one being their calling themselves "Atamti." But there was a
mythical Rhodian styled "Althaemenes" who reflects the
alternative term by which the Elamites called themselves:
"Elamites called their country Haltamti (in later Elamite,
Atamti) ... " (Wikipedia, italics mine).

266
Suddenly Athamas and Althaemenes are revealed as the
same, Elamite peoples, and knowing from Josephus that Elamites
produced the Persians, while the Persians are depicted in Daniel 7
as a ram, a viable theory develops here, that Hermes was of the
Persians and that he became allied to Phryxus, he being likewise
from Persian elements... since his father (Athamas) depicted the
Elamite-come-Persians.
As Althaemenes is credited with the founding/building of
Cretinia on Rhodes, he seems to be a Curete (as were some
Calydonians). But the historical Cruithne/Cruithen of Britain also
come to mind as being rooted in Althaemenes. The peoples
depicted by Phryxus should be viewed as part of the same
bloodline, but inhabiting Greece.
It should be obvious now to anyone with a mind to grasp
these matters, that Phryxus was of the dragon (peoples) "killed" by
Cadmus, the teeth of which were removed to Colchis. The Golden
Phryxus was released from Colchis by Jason, and brought back to
Corinth (where Jason settled on his return). The peoples Phryxus
had depicted were likely the same as the first founders of Corinth
when the city was known as "Ephyra" (note similarity between
Ephyra and Phrixes). I think the city's founder was Aphareus, son
of Perieres brother of Athamas (i.e. Phryxus comes out as the
cousin of the city's founder so that we could expect Phryxus to
have contributed to the city's founding peoples).
I can now continue with my story, written a couple of years
ago, after reminding you that Aphareus and Ephyra evoke the
Abiru of the Kassites removed from Chaldee to Kabeiri-infested
Phrygia, settled on the Halys but also near Lydia and Troy. End
Update]
As I said that "Woden/Woten" derived from "Eoten" i.e. the
Jutes, while the Jutes were from the Edonians of Thrace, a further
conclusion is that the Thyni were related to the Edonians. One can
drop the capital from "Edoni(ans)" to net "Doni," which then
evokes, not only "Thyni," but the Cottian patriarch, Donus. The
Cottians were Ligurians, and were thus the wolf/dragon line
midway across Europe, and they lived on the same river (the Po)
as the Veneti.
[Update June 2006 -- Can't help but connect the Cottians to
the Cati of Cilicia, whom I think were the Abiru removed to the
Halys river and then to the Lydian region. End Update]
Paflagonia, beside Phrygia, is said to be one hypothetical
origin of the Veneti, or, more specifically, the "Heneti" peoples of
Paflagonia. Greek myth/legend tells that, after the Trojans lost the
Trojan war, Antenor (of Troy) migrated with the Heneti of
Paflagonia, first to Thrace, then to the Illyrian/Adriatic sea coast,

267
and finally to northern Italy where they founded Padua, a locality
said by some to be the very first Greek settlement in northern Italy.
Pedasa was a Lelegian (i.e. Gogi) city that finds relationship
with the Greek city of Pedusa, also a Lelegian community. Quite
possibly, these Gogi moved to the Po river (north Italy) in that its
ancient name was the "Padus" river. And of course "Pedasa"
evokes "Pedua."
Gargara of the Troad was a Lelegian settlement, no doubt a
settlement of the Gargarians of Caucasia and/or of the Armenians
at Gargar (modern Gerger). Gargara in the Troad is located at the
foot of Mount Ida; early members of the Kabeiri cult were called
"Idaeans" after that mountain. The Curetes of Attica -- the
protectors of the secrets of Atlantis -- became Idaeans living at
Mount Ida of Crete. Couldn't the golden apples be associated with
Ida of Troy, even as they can be associated with the (Edonian)
region of "Idonus"???
The wife of the chief Etruscan god, Tinia, was Uni. She
evokes the Celtic "Danu" because Danu was also called "Anu,
though I don't think it's a coincidence that there was another Anu,
the chief god of Sumeria.
It's not likely a coincidence that pagan Scandinavians viewed
their bloodline as a sacred tree i.e. the Tree of Life. To show how
the Aesir sect had utter contempt for God's most-passionate
concern -- sin -- it had created the fanciful idea that they could stay
forever young (as Adam would have been apart from sin) if only
they could eat the golden apples of "Idun." Understand that as the
apple is the symbol of sin to Christians, it becomes "golden" to the
Scandinavian cult.
Although Idun seems to be referring to Eden, an online
variation is "Ithun," wherefore Odin/Othin and Thyni are evoked.
The Thyni connection to the Edones is now irresistible. These
peoples were willingly the sons of Satan, and so Satan used them
to rule the world. No doubt Satan's spirits gave them extraordinary
magical, political, and intelligencia powers as incentives/wages for
their being used, and these led to their technological breakthroughs
that now cover the earth as a counterfeit Utopia/Heaven.
[Update June 2006 -- The root of "Dumuzi/Tammuz" may
have been from "Adam." See that "Adam" converts well to
"Atamti," the term Elamites used for themselves. This would make
the mythical Athamus (and Phryxus) an extension of what was
once considered Eden, and moreover tie him to the Edones. I
suspect that since the Edones were the Getae, that Athamas
connected with the Guti peoples of Elam/Persia. The question
thereby becomes crucial as to whether the Guti were, or included,
the Cutha Kabalists. Perhaps the Cutha derived their name by
forming an alliance with the Guti, and perhaps the Guti were the

268
same as the Kassites (who in fact had incorporated an Abiru tribe)
since after all they both lived in the Zagros mountains.
Because Tammuz removed to Greece was styled, "Adonis"
(simply "lord"), I would consider that it might have been his name
also in Sumeria. The term is so close to "Eden" that I would make
the following assessment. That the sun-god cult fashioned
themselves as proud Edenites, proud of Adam's decision to rebel
with the serpent. The term " Edenite" (by whatever variation it
used, probably "Edoni") then came to signify the rulers/lords of
Eden. Hence: Adoni. Note that Adonis in Greece was part-time
lover of Hephaistos' wife, Aphrodite, an "Abiru" term in my
opinion. End Update]
Idun was made "the wife of Bragi, god of poetry, and
originally a member of the Vanir."
http://www.indexlistus.de/keyword/Aesir.php
It's not likely a coincidence that the afore-mentioned Brigit
was the Celtic goddess of poetry, as Bragi was the god of poetry,
with both terms looking like "Bryges" the early name of the
Phrygians. The Bithynians had lived along the Strymon river; the
Satrae, Bessi, Paeoni, and Edonians were other Thracian tribes at
that same river. So behold: "Eadon" was the Celtic Muse of Poets!
Eadon was the god of the Druids, if that tells you how wonderful
Satan Incorporated has been to us.
Antenor's wife, said to be "Theano," was also the name of
one of Danaus' 50 daughters. That is, Theano was a Danaan,
wherefore the term "Danaan" may not be rooted in Dan, as so
many insist, but in Theon/Dio/Dia (meaning "god"), as for
example Diana and Dionysus. In any case, Antenor and Theano
would appear to depict a Troj an-Danaan migration that was the
foundation of the Veneti, explaining in a nutshell why the British
Danann (i.e. Celts) and Norse Danes (i.e. Vanir) can be traced to
the Veneti.
This map of the Veneti shows that legend ties its peoples to
the Heneti in Paflagonia, exactly where Bithynia was located. It
was Homer, for one, who had the Paflagonians descending from
the "Heneti." It's important, in light of an Illyrian goddess called
"Ana" that coincides with the Celt goddess by nearly the same
name, that there was also an Illyrian tribe called "Heneti"; I'm
implying that Ana was carried to northern Illyrium by the Heneti
of Paflagonia; this must have been part of the founding of Venetia.
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/001ShortEntries/SGEmathia.html
Note that Thynia (modern Kefken) was on the west side of
the Sangrius (sounds like the Latin "sanguis" = "blood") river, that
river situated between the Phrygians and the Paflagonians ... which
places Thynia in Phrygia. I found that the Phrygian sun god, Attis,
was in one version made to be born from the god of the Sangrius

269
river, and then raised by a goat. But because Attis was otherwise
said to be born from Cotys, it suggests quite strongly that the
peoples depicted by Cotys -- the Get ae/Edonians -- defined that
Attis-allied goat (Old English "gat"). Now the Sangarius was also
called the "Krka," evoking the feminine of "Gorgo(n)."
[Update June 2006 -- Because I have recently traced the Attis
bloodline to the historical Cati of Cilicia, the Cati are easily
identified as the root of the mythical codeword, Cotys, while the
Getae Thracians can be viewed as Cotys' offspring. As I theorize
that the holy grail -- a blood-filled chalice (Latin "calix") -- was
rooted in Cilicia because the country was assigned the mythical
codeword, "Cilix," so I would now suggest that the Sangrius river
referred to the "holy" blood of the Cati (the Cutha?) End Update]
Behold. In Paflagonia there was the city of Ery thini! Surely,
and especially because the Paflagonians became the Veneti on the
Po, that city was the root of the mythical Eridanus, the historical
Rhodanus river valley filled with Ligurian Gogi of the upper Po.
At the mouth of the Eridanus (modern Rhone) was the European
origin of the Aeredae/Redones, from Rhodes, who likely moved
inland as the Ruthene and east into Liguria as the Rhaetians.
Erythini (of Paflagonia) must have been the root of the
Rhodians/Redones, therefore, and they in turn of the two
Danann/Dane settlements, Erethlyn (Wales) and Haeredaland
(Norway). Behold that Homer listed the "Rhatotes" among the
Paflagonians, a term seemingly meaning "wheel."
[Update June 2006 -- Since the Erythini (of Paflagonia) must
have branched out into the island of Rhodes in order to become the
root of the Redones, it crosses my mind that they were the
mythical Althaemenes peoples who built Cretinia, for that city is
an almost-exact match with "Erythini." The latter term even better
reflects the British "Cruithen" than does "Cretinia." End Update]
I have traced the dragon line back to king Eurotas of Sparta,
and as his father was styled, "Myles" -- looking a lot like
"milo/melo" meaning "apple" -- it could begin to appear that
Eurotas, Erythini, Eridanus, Erethlyn, Haeredaland, etc. were all
settled by the golden-apple bloodline.
To keep the Gogi element pertinent and in perspective here,
Strabo said:
"At any rate, the poet tells us that [the Cauconians]
came to Troy as allies of the Trojans. But he does not say
whence they come, though they seem to have come from
Paphlagonia; for in Paphlagonia there is a people called
Cauconiatae whose territory borders on that of the
Mariandyni, who are themselves Paphlagonians."
http://www.groupsrv.com/science/viewtopic.php?t=1528&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=30

270
The Cauconians mentioned in this quote are often among the
first peoples in Greece. While "Mariandyni" and "Erythini" don't
look similar, one can't help but read one as "Mari-Dini and the
other as Ares-Tini, noting that Mari and Aria were both located in
Aryan Iran, and that Mars and Ares are often regarded as the same
god of war. I also see that "Eridu" of Sumeria is much like
"Erythini," suggesting that Eridu was possibly "Eridanu" at one
point, perhaps to be understood as Aria of Anu. But even if not,
the "eri" of "Eridu" may yet signify Aryan participation in
Sumeria's sun-god cult.
I can see that variations of "Getae" may have meant "white,"
for "white" may have been "guite," even as "William" was
"Guilliam." My dictionary says that Old English for "white" was
"hwit," which in Germanic languages becomes "gwit/guit," very
near to "Guti" indeed. Were goats named after the color white?
Quite often in various languages, milk and white are the same
words.
[Update June 2006 -- I found this quote: "...the word goat in
Hebrew is aet or aets, which has a slight gutteral sound, and is
close to English." One could speculate that the Guti were named
after the goat, but that the same can be said of Uts, the Semite son
of Aram (or perhaps Uts son of Nahor). If I am correct in tying Uts
to Utu the dragon sun god, then it may no longer be of wonder that
the Greek goat is a tras.""go In other words, an Aryan-Hebrew
peoples of Eridu, though named after Uts/goat, came to depict
themselves as the dragon of Eden, and later there evolved the hard
"Gut(i)" alternative to describe them. In time, this evolved into
"Cutha." This would explain those who root "Khazar" in "goat."
End Update]
I want to mention here that the Ishtar Babylonians considered
"Mata" (an old word for Media) their Underworld, and for this
reason I would tend to view the Greek-myth underworld as
likewise depicting Media. The Underworld is merely the root of
the dragon-line, for which reason it was depicted in Scandinavian
myth as the root system of their Family Tree. Note that the Greeks
made "Hades" the ruler of their Underworld, a term that easily
modifies from "Guti/Cotys/Attis/Utu." Note that the wife of Hades
was "Persephone" (evoking Persia). What is amazing is that the
Celts of Britain retained this very concept, for the Welsh god of
the underworld was "Arawn," evoking "Eran" (old name of Iran).
And the ruler of the Underworld according to the Danann of
Ireland was "Madir," evoking the Medes.
The mythical Pelops is especially important because he ruled
in Paflagonia...at Enete, that latter term known to be a variation of
"Heneti"! It can't be a coincidence that Pelops married
"Hippodamia" while Antenor had for a son (in Thrace),

271
"Iphidamas" (remembering that Antenor was the one who led the
Heneti to Venetia). This reveals Pelops as the Heneti peoples
themselves, and focusing on the "Dam" peoples that are left stark
naked before us after we remove the "hippo" horse-prefix, we find
that the Heneti may have been mixed with Tammuz/Dumuzi, even
as Hippodamia is known to have been an Amazonian people.
The Pelops line, as we shall see, was very closely associated
with golden lambs, wherefore I suspect Pelops to be a part of the
Golden Fleece line ... since the Fleece was the pelt of a ram i.e. a
sheep. As the Fleece was of Hermes, there definitely needs to be a
connection made between Pelops and Hermes. It indeed seems
fairly obvious that Pelops blood enterin g Greece is the same as
Hermes blood entering Greece, albeit at different times. When the
father of Pelops (ruler in Phrygia/Lydia) cut him into pieces, it was
Hermes (who was already in Greece) who helped Pelops come
back to life (in Greece).
Now it just so happens that Pelops had Pittheus for a son,
that term evoking Phaethon, the rider of Helios' chariot that
crashed into Eridanus. I say this because the myth writers granted
Pelops a winged chariot, no doubt for the very purpose of making
a Pelops-to-Eridanus (or Pittheus-to-Phaethon) connection.
Moreover, the winged chariot was granted to him by Poseidon, the
symbol of Atlantis. To show further that the Pelops line was
connected to Atlantis, he was the son of Dione, daughter of Atlas
(he being the symbol of Atlantis). Hermes was also the son of a
daughter of Atlas, wherefore Hermes and Pelops were regarded as
two similar, Atlantean tribes. Pittheus had a daughter who was
married to Theseus of the Cecrops line. Theseus would become the
ruler of eastern/Greek Atlantis.
A certain Endymion, very important in this story, was made
the father of Aetolus the founder of Calydon. Aetolus routed and
dispersed the family of Apollo and his mate, Phthia, she being the
half-snake woman (otherwise known as Ekhidna) that gave birth to
many western-Atlantis peoples. Might these defeated Apollo-
Phthia peoples have then become the Ligurians who crashed into
Eridanus , since, after all, the driver, Phaethon, was also viewed as
Apollo? Couldn't "Bithyni" derive from a python i.e. Phaethon?
The Po river has it's source in the Cottian Alps. The Cottian
(Italian "Cotti") peoples were Celts from the mountains at
Dauphine (evokes the goddess by that name). Their god/father,
Cottius, had "Donus" as his father. See how at one website we can
read: "Cottus was the name of the ancestors of the Cottians,
who worshiped the orgiastic Cato, a worship originating in
Thrace." This "Catytto" (also " otytto") was of the goddess,
Cotys/Kotys. One can therefore imagine that these were the
Curetes en route to Britain.

272
[Update June 2006 -- I would suggest that these Cotys
worshipers named Gades in Spain, a capital city of western
Atlantis. I would also suggest that they may have become the
Votadini of Wales, otherwise known as the "Gododdin," for isn't
"Cotytto" a near match with that latter variation? End Update]
In Greek myth, Uranus and Gaia had, along with the three
Cyclopes (whom I am convinced depict the Gogi), three
"Hecatoncheires," these also being depicted as monsters but,
behold, where one was named "Cottus" and another "Gyges", this
being yet more evidence that the Cottians were Gogi The
Hecatoncheires were depicted as monsters having 100 hands and
therefore I render them as armies/priesthoods each having 50 men.
Thus when we read that the Danaans came from a man who had 50
daughters, and that his brother (Aigyptus) had 50 sons, we're likely
dealing with peoples known to have armies/priesthoods with
Hecatoncheires elements.
To add support to my belief that Hecatoncheires and
Cyclopes were a Gogi peoples, Apollodorus said that Caucon
(eponym of the Caucones) was one of the fifty sons of Lycaon.
And, "It is during the reign of Polycaon [son of Lelex] that
Caucon brought the rites of the Great Goddesses from Eleusis
to Messenia."
Therefore, the Caucones were at the center of those rites or
so-called "Eleusinian Mysteries," secrets so important that the
initiates were to keep them hush at the pain of death. It may be that
the very Greek myths now open to all were the deep secrets then
held.
Now behold that "Idun/Edone/Eden" evokes Athena
(Egyptian "Aten") and her city Athens. Because Atti(s) was a code
devised to reflect Attica (the Athens region) -- in that myth writers
knew Athens to be founded by Attis worshippers -- suddenly Atti
itself becomes part of the Eden family of terms. If Atti(s) is the
root of Atlantis, then Atlantis is simply an alternative term for the
Garden of Eden, symbol of whatever paradise men choose to
envision. Ladon (who was made to protect it) is thus Satan in more
than a lose way, literally; which is astonishing since the Satan-
dragon in Revelation 17 is revealed sitting on the throne of the
(seven) Latin hills of Rome. Ladon, moreover, was a multi-headed
dragon.
From a visible/worldly point of view, the Satan-dragon of the
end times must be of the same Edoni bloodline extended to the
modern day, but the branches of these peoples are so numerous
that I wouldn't know where to begin choosing. I need a good clue
from Above. Perhaps it's hidden in the Bible.
Ladon's mother, the Black-sea monster, Ceto, gave birth to
the Hesperide daughters, Arethusa and Erytheia ... meaning that the

273
Hesperides themselves are Gorgon peoples related to (i.e. "sisters"
of) Ladon. A Hercules myth placed Erytheia in the far west, surely
in Erethlyn, Wales.
It was the same king in Greece, Eurystheus (not
coincidentally), who sent his relative, Hercules, to steal both the
cattle of Erethlyn and the golden apples. When Hercules stole the
apples, the meaning was perhaps the same as his stealing the cattle.
That is, a Hercules branch of peoples freed their Gorgon allies
living under the rule of the Erethlyn king(s).
The golden apples make their first appearance in Greek myth
at the wedding of Hera to Zeus. The Apple bloodline, as I see it,
was depicted by Endymion -- the ancestor of the Calydonians --
who fell in love with Hera, at which point Zeus turned her into
Nephele, the mother of the Golden Fleece line.
The husband of Nephele by which the Fleece Line came
about was the brother of Endymion's mother, and that mother was
"Calyce," very similar to "Cilix," what I view as the Holy
Grail/Chalice. Endymion was said to be the symbol of Mount
Latmus at Miletus, where "Miletus" may be rooted in "milo" =
"apple." For, the meaning of the myth wherein the moon goddess
asks Zeus to give Endymion eternal life now makes sense in light
of the golden apples of Idun being the key to eternal youth.
The Irish and Scots, who chased the Danaans from Ireland,
both claim to be descended from peoples of Miletus! In fact, they
have in their legends, the god/patriarch, Milesius, who in fact is
acknowledged as connecting with Miletus. It could be that the Irish
and Scots were old relatives of the Danaans, and that is how they
got this idea to attack that particular location (of Ireland) for to
become rulers themselves i.e. probably a family squabble.
In Greek myth, Atalanta (the Calydonian who shot the boar)
wanted to be a virgin, but Melanion wanted to marry her...so note
first of all that his name starts nearly with "milo" = "apple" (the
Latin apple is "melo"). Secondly, Melanion had the following
strategy to seduce Atalanta: he threw golden apples before her! He
succeeded in mating with her, whereupon the two became lions.
The lions that depict Britain come to mind.
This story tends to support that Melanion is the Golden
Apple line. And behold, Melanion was a descendant of king
Lycurgus of Arcadia! Recall that a mythical king Lycourgos was
king of the Edonians, and that the golden apples of Idun (of
Scandinavian myth) are likely referring to a family of certain
Edonians. King Lycurgus of Arcadia may simply be a codeword
for Edonians in Arcadia.
Behold. Melanion's sister was married to king Eurystheus
(the king who sent Hercules to steal the apples in the far west). As
Melanion was himself married to Atalanta, his Apple line was

274
viewed by the secret-society myth writers as representing Atlantis.
Moreover we see that among the wives of Danaus (symbol of the
Greek Danaans) was Europe (not quite "Europa" but likely the
same concept) and Atlantia, wherefore the myth writers saw the
Danaans as founders of Europe and western Atlantis. It thus looks
solidly as though western Atlanteans included the Danann of
Britain.
Strabo listed the following among Paflagonian names: Manes
and Biasas. Would that latter term denote the Bia peoples of Lake
Van since Manes was surely a depiction of Armenia. If so, then
my hunch is possibly correct where the Bia were more correctly
"Bias" as the innate/singular form. These must be the Bias peoples
who were involved with Bithynia. The mythical Bias was brother
to Melampus, yet another apple term, apparently.
[Update June 2006 -- Bias and Byzas/Buzas were both
Megara-based peoples. As Buzas is known to be the "founder" (i.e.
merely the codeword/symbol) of Byzantium, note that this city
evokes nearby Bithynia. For a few years I have been suggesting
lightly but steadily that Poseidon stems from the Buzi Medes,
never knowing until today that the above-mentioned Buzas was
made (by the myth writers) the son of Poseidon!
Recall the what has been previously thought to be king
Arthur's tomb in Cornwall, near the town of Bude, has turned out
to be the grave of an important Megarian.
The goddess, Io, has been given the credit for founding the
Bosphorus strait, which in the real world means that the peoples
she depicted settled the shores of that strait. The other reality is
that the strait was named after the Buzas peoples, as the name
would imply; as it turns out, Io was the "grandmother" of Buzas,
meaning that I have just learned of her roots in a Buzas
peoples ... I'll bet my prize beehive on a caduceus pole that she was
from Buz, son of Nahor.
Buzas was credited with founding Bosphorium on the
Bosphorus coast. As "Bos" evokes the Busae Medes, the Io-ians
would stem from the same. As Io's father, Inachus, evokes Enki,
also known as Ea, I would have to seriously investigate whether
the Enki line of Eridu was mixed with Buzi Medes/Nahorites]

275
SHEBA CONQUERS KYBELE
June 2006

I would like to share with you how fantastic the information


in this chapter came to me on the evening of June 20th. I had "sort
of" believed that Sheba and Dedan (grandsons of Abraham,
Genesis 25) had much to do with both the Kabala and
Scandinavian peoples, but when the information herein came to be,
I realized how shallow was that belief until then. As it began to
sink in, I went out to my porch; I looked up into the sky, and
talked to God, "Are you showing this to me? Have you shown this
to anyone else, or am I the first person ever to know? Is the anti-
Christ going to come through Sheba?"
I didn't get an answer, as I normally do not, immediately. But
in time I expect one. I felt dread as I realized what I had been
Shown, something that mankind is not supposed to have known in
the past, something that He kept hidden all these centuries. And I
realized that I didn't know hardly any of the story.
I told God that I was humbled to be the agent though which
to announce to the world what He obviously wanted told. I
determined to start a new chapter in the morning, it's now just after
six a.m. I realized that it was just last night that I had finished
updating and editing a chapter on Scandinavian ties to the Kabala
region of Phrygia, and so this revelation on Sheba coming just
after uploading that chapter to my website seems perfectly timed,
which is why I am placing this chapter immediately after it.
Last evening, I was searching houseofnames.com for any
evidence to support my case that the Kabeiri were Kabalists. I
searched the "Cabeiro" surname first of all, and lo I was given a
list of alternatives/septs including: Caballero, Caballe, Caballeria,
Caballo, Cavallo, Cavallon, and more. I realize that these terms
look like "cavallo," the Latin word for horse ("caballo" in
Spanish), meaning that it may have nothing to do with the Kabala.
I found it interesting, however, that the website's explanation on
the family roots tells that the surnames listed are based on knight
servitude. That of course evoked the Templars. I thought to
myself, surely the Latin horse was not named after the Kabalists.
I had considered putting in print several years ago that
"Kabala" may refer to "cavalo" = horse, but decided against it.

276
Now I've changed my mind. For, since when does "cabeiro" mean
"horse"? Or, why does a search on "Cabeiro/Cabero" bring up a
list of horse names? Are they truly rooted in the Latin for "horse,"
or is that a coincidence? Did the Kabala term mean horse in
Akkadia, long before Latin was founded? And that's where I left
the issue.
I then went searching other avenues. I came across an
interesting website sharing that king Eetion of Thebe (not to be
confused with Thebes) was tied to the Kaberi cult. It was a good
avenue to explore further, since this king was new to me and since
I had known nothing previously of the city he ruled until a few
days ago when I wrote the chapter "Sheba and Dedan in Greece."
[I have since added information to the end of that chapter that
harmonizes with the theme here].
The first thing I learned was that Eetion was identified with
Iasion. I had come across that name before many times but knew
no significance as per my story. But then I found that Iasion was
the very brother of Dardanus, co-founder of Troy. I have no idea
how such an important detail could have escaped me in the past,
but as I had already published my theory (I emphasize "theory")
that Dardanus was Dedan, Iasion was definitely of great interest.
And behold, I learned immediately that Iasion was the leader
of the Kabeiri cult in the island of Samothrace, where Dardanus
lived before founding the proto-Trojans:
"...[Zeus] instructed [Iasion] in the initiatory rites of
the mysteries [of Samothrake], which had existed on the
island since ancient times but was at that time, so to
speak, put in his hands; it is not lawful, however, for any
but the initiated to hear about the mysteries. And Iasion
is reputed to have been the first to initiate strangers into
them and by this means to bring the initiatory rite to high
esteem."
http://www.theoi.com/Georgikos/Iasion.html
So wrote Diodorus Siculus, who appears to be an initiate
himself. Upon reading more of the above website, I learned that
the Kabeiri cult was taken to the Troy region by Dardanus himself,
when Iasion was defeated in battle (to a Zeus peoples) back on the
island. As the two were brothers, sons of the same parents (the
mother was a daughter of Atlas, thus making them Atlanteans),
they each depicted the same stalk of peoples. And since Iasion is
identified as Attis at times, I would view "Iasion," and his "Eetion"
alternative, most-definitely as codewords depicting Hebrew-
Kabala elements.
"Iasi" easily modifies to "Hazi" (historical alternative,
"Casi"), the region in Syria that was home to Epiru-Aryans (e.g.

277
king Idrimi mentioned in my Sheba and Dedan chapter) that I
think furnished the Cati/Khassi of Cilicia who were the ones who
founded a second Cilicia at Thebe.
I had known that the Kabeiri cult was at times designated
that of the Great Mother (referring to Cybele/Kybele), but never
before did the theory strike me as it did then, that the Kabalist root
of the cult was absolute truth, and that the move of Akkadian
"Ishtar" to Phrygia was the exporting of a Hebrew product. I can't
tell you how this makes the wheels of my mind turn. This is not a
little important, since Ishtar is found in Revelation 17 as "Babylon
the Great Mother of Abominations."
"Iasion" is the one from whom the so-called "Corybantes"
Daktyloi came forth, they being proto-Trojans (and "brothers" of
Curete Daktyloi). It's probable that "Corybantes" is an "r" variation
of "Halybe," since, after all, both the Halybes and the Daktyloi are
independently credited with the discovery of metal-making; the
Halybes are credited by modern historians, and the Daktyloi by
myth writers! What this may reveal is that the Cilician Cati
became the Halybes as well as, or en route to, settling the new
Cilicia near Troy.
Keep in mind that th Halybes are alternatively identified
(today, by historians) as "Khaldi," a term that smacks of
"Chaldee," the Hebrew regions of Babylon. And as goes my
Hercules-strong hunch that these terms are the root of "Celt," so
the Halybes, living on the Halys as they were, named the Galli
Kabeiri and the Gauls. As the Halybes are said by some to have
founded Colchis, note how Eetion evokes the mythical founder of
Colchis, Aeetes. This helps to make a connection between the
Kabala and the boar-line Corinthians. Might Corinth have been
named after the same who named Corybantes? Homer wrote:
"...them h relates, the Mother of the Gods, well
pleased with [Sa rno-Thrace], settled in it ... also her own
sons, who are known by the name of Corybantes - who
their father was is handed down in their rites as a matter
not to be divulged; and she established the mysteries
which are now celebrated on the island and ordained by
law that the sacred area should enjoy the right of
sanctuary."
http://www.myrine.at/Amazons/texts_e.html
If her father was Abraham, via Sheba, wouldn't that be
sufficient reason to keep it secretive, if the Kabala decided to tie
itself instead/deceptively to Israelites as grounds to rule the world
in what they hoped to bring forth, the Biblical Millennium? The
"holy phallus" below would depict the Great Mother's father:

278
"The Kabeiroi were said to have had a third
brother, who the pair murdered for some unknown
reason. They also recovered the holy phallus of the
Samothrakian Dionysos and established it in the shrine of
the Mysteries. The Dionysos of the Mysteries may have
been the Attis-like consort of Demeter-Kybele, named
Iasion, or the young god Zagreus..."
http://www.theoi.com/Georgikos/Kabeiroi.html
Most everytime that I came upon the story of Dionysus (in
the past), I gagged and read with reluctance, or didn't read at all.
But suddenly, as it appeared that Iasion, Dionysus, Attis, and
Eetion were all terms used to describe the third Kabeiri "brother"
(Hephaistos and his wife, Cabeiro, had three sons), my attitude has
changed. I know that there are mountains of material on Dionysus
that I haven't yet begun to interpret in light of his Hebrew
elements.
Note that we should add "Zagreus" to the above terms, which
smacks of the Zagros mountains where the Kassites lived with
their Abiru allies. As Zagreus is said to have been slaughtered and
yet reborn as Dionysus, it well appears that certain Kassites and/or
the Abiru moved out of their Iranian frontier to Phrygia, where
Dionysus then depicted them. What could be more relevant to my
story???
It's interesting that Zagreus was cut into pieces with a knife
by Titans (Dedanites?), this having the meaning that a single
peoples was scattered in many directions so as to make many
branches (and such were the Apiru as per historical documents,
clinging to various peoples/rulers wherever they found
acceptance). And so I went to a website explaining Zagreus, and
when I came across the phrase written by Strabo, "...Aeskhines'
mother and Aeskhines himself...", my mind focused in because I
had been looking for such a term to describe the Ashkenazi
Hebrews of Iran, for it was in Iran that the Ashkenazi Aryans
lived, and so I expected that the proto-Kabala Hebrews had mixed
with them there. Ashkenaz was the literal brother of Togarmah,
and they were literal sons of Gomer (Genesis 10:3), for we can't
compare the literal approach of the Bible to the non-literal
approach of mythology.
I also noticed the spelling of "Aeskhines," starting with
"Aes" as it does, and wondered if the Aesir pantheon of
Scandinavia wasn't from this very Hebrew-Aryan mix. I was about
to be proven correct within minutes, for immediately afterward, in
the same Strabo sentence, there was this that caught my eye :
"...when [Aeskhines' mother] conducted initiations, that
[Aeskhines] joined her in leading the Dionysiac march, and

279
that many a time he cried out 'evoe saboe,' and 'hyes attes,
attes hyes'; for these words are in the ritual of Sabazios
Zagreos] and the Mother... - Strabo, Geography 10.3.18"
^
Zagreos brackets not mine).
http://www.theoi.com/Georgikos/Zagreus.html
I stared at that cry. What did it mean. I went searching online
to find the meaning because it wasn't given in the article. I couldn't
find the translation. But as I stared at the phrase, knowing that
"attes" was Attis, it hit me like a ton of bullion that "saboe" was
Kybele! And when I saw that Zagreus was the same as Sabazios, it
was like when a man searches for pecans under a pecan tree,
months after harvest when nuts are scarce, and when he sees one
and stoops to pick it up, he looks forward and sees two more, and
as he picks them up he looks slightly to the side and sees four
more. Then he looks up and sees that he is directly under a pay-
load branch that had held its fruit for an extra-ordinary span of
time.
For my new project, terms like "Saboe" and "Sabazios" were
golden, for they are easily discernible as Sheba terms. Kybele was
Sheba, or so I thought at first. In reading on, I realized that the
Kybele cult was instead taken over by Sheba Hebrews. However,
this does not exclude the possibility that the Kybele cult had itself
been founded by an earlier wave of Shebeans into Phrygia, though
Dedanites (from northern Syria/Asshur) may have been superior at
first.
I went immediately to an article on Sabazios, and learned
that the term is to be likely understood as Saba-Zeus or Saba-Dios,
and that the Romans viewed it as the cult of "Jupiter Sabazius."
The website went on to point out that it was Jews in particular who
were attached to Jupiter Sabazius. For example, Jews of Rome
were expelled for propagating that cult. The website author shares
that moderns do not know the reason that Romans singled out the
u
Jews asertainingt o the cult. I also read the following at the same
site: "Plrch(
ta Symposium". iv. 6) maintained that the Jews
worshipped Dionysus, and that the day of Sabbath was a
festival of Sabazius."
http://bvio.ngic.re.kr/Bvio/index.php/Sabazios
That's when it started to hit me: ancients knew that Kybele
was a Hebrew entity. So why don't we have the same view today?
Because, the Galli-Kabeiri cult contributed much to the blood of
Gauls, Romans, Celts, Germanics, Russians, and others who didn't
wish to know their Hebrew roots but instead emphasized the
Aryan side of their Thracian/Phrygian blood.
But before learning the above near the end of the article, I
learned what was near the start:

280
"Though the Greeks associated Phrygian Sabazios
with Zeus, representations of him, even into Roman
times, show him always on horseback, as a nomadic
horseman god, wielding his characteristic staff of power."
I realized I may have been correct in my deduction made
earlier that evening, that Kabalists had been closely connected to
the horse. In fact, the way in which the article went on the describe
the horseman, it is fairly evident that it is referring to THE
Horseman of Thrace, especially since the wife of Hephaistos,
styled "Cabeiro," was said to be a Thracian. The Thracian
Horseman is thought to be Ares, the (I think, Amazonian) dragon.
The article then connected the Sabazios horseman to the
Macedonians, and that squared with my theory that Macedonians
were Edoni, for my theory is that the peoples who founded the
Kabeiri cult, from the Guti of Iran, became the Edoni/Getae of
Thrace.
After the article revealed that Kybele was the Lunar Bull, it
said, "Sabazios' relations with [Kybele] may be surmised in the
way that his horse places a hoof on the head of the bull." That
implies a take-over of the Kybele cult by Shebeans. But behold the
following similar theme: "The iconic image of the god or hero
on horseback battling the chthonic serpent, on which his horse
tramples, appears on Celtic votive columns..." If I'm correct in
interpreting the "chthon" term as the Cutha Hebrews from
Chaldee, the statement would appear to depict the Kybele cult
over-taken by the Shebean horseman.
The article goes on to show Sabazios ties to the Lydians and
their kin, and so here we are again at the root of the Etruscans (to
be read as "of the Ruski") who founded the Redones, but also at
the root of their "brothers," the Latins. That is, Sheba is that root. I
knew I was in for a shocker when I was first Made Aware (i.e.
from Above) that Nahor had something to do with the dragon line,
but for all of western Europe to be from the loins of Abraham, it
put a whole new perspective on God's "many nations" prophecy.
Something tells me that Eastern Europe, known throughout the
ages as Byzantium, is predominantly from Buz, son of Nahor
(brother of Abraham). Zowie, if this doesn't send a shiver down
your spine, just to think of it. In support of the Nahorite Buzi
becoming eastern Europe, the historical Neuri, who lived with the
Boudini, are thought to have formed the Slavs!
And so I now have a huge area, that of Dionysus, to explore
for key words linking back to Iranian/Akkadian Hebrews, for:
"Much later, the Greek encyclopedia Sudas (10th Century
CE?) flatly states 'Sabazios...is the same as Dionysos. He
acquired this form of address from the rite pertaining to him;
for the barbarians call the bacchic cry 'sabazein.' Hence some

281
of the Greeks too follow suit and call the cry 'sabasmos';
thereby Dionysos [becomes] Sabazios" (dots and brackets not
mine).
Recall that Dionysus was especially associated with the
Greek city of Thebes, and that I had theorized this city to be
named after Sheba. That theory now has some teeth. But it also
gives added teeth to the theory that the city of Eetion, Thebe, was
founded by the same Shebeans. Recall that the peoples of Thebe,
under mythical codenames "Helenus" and "Andromache," were
taken as slaves to Epirus (sounds like "Abiru"), where Dodona was
located, that being, not only a major Zeus hang-out that turned into
a major worship center, but a term conspicuously reflecting
"Dedan."
And since Eetion is said to be the same as Iasion, while
Iasion was the brother of Dardanus (co-founder of Trojans) and
father of the Corybantes (i.e. proto-Trojans), are the Trojans not
founded on Sheba and Dedan blood? Indeed, but as the other half
of the Trojans was codeword, "Teucer," that being an obvious
description of Togarmah, were not the Trojans also from Ashkenaz
blood, since Ashkenaz was Togarmah's brother? I'm suggesting
that modern Ashkenaz "Jews" are from Trojan blood, and if some
wish to contend that Ashkenazi Jews are from the Khazars, that's
fine since Khazars were from the Bulgaria/Thracian region and
therefore from Trojan blood.
. But, lo, my tiny fellow earthling without a hope in Tartarus
of changing the situation, the Trojans founded the Julus family of
Julius Caesar, so that we've got to conclude the most dire of
scenarios: that the end-time Roman empire -- ruled by the anti-
Christ dragon -- is an Abrahamic entity... albeit mixed with
Togarmite-Gomerian blood. The son of Aeneus (mythical founder
of the Romans) was made "Ascanius," and thanks to my email
correspondant, Greenway7, who notified me that Ascanius might
depict the historical Oscans of Italy, I learned that the Oscan
language was spoken by the Sabina of Italy!! Incredible, for it is
from to the Sabina that trace the red triple-chevron symbol on the
flag held by the Welsh dragon used on the Cardiff Arms.
Remember, that symbol was of the Taddei (Dedan?) surname of
Abruzzo, and so read this (brackets mine): "Oscan is believed to
have been spoken in Samnium [major Sabina branch],
Campania, Lucania and Abruzzo in southern Italy."
Wikipedia says: "Oscan, the language of the Osci, is in the
Sabellic branch of the Italic language family ... and includes
Umbrian, Latin and Faliscan."
Wikipedia also tells that the major deity of the Sabina was
Quiritis/Curitis, which smacks of the co-founders of the Kybele-
Kabala cult, the Curete Daktyloi. This Sabina version of the cult is

282
said to go back to Romulus, mythical founder of Rome and of the
Aeneus-Ascanius bloodline.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juno Quiritis
[Update July 5 2006 -- I had already known that Julius
Caesar had been of the Patrician bloodline, and suspected that this
was the sacred/dragon element in the line, but what I just learned
today is that "patricians descended from the Sabines taken into
the early Roman state." This means that a thorough investigation
of the comings into Italy of the Sabines is in order. End Update]
The chevron is said by heraldry buffs to depict the roof of a
house, implying a family or people group, as even a mountain
would depict a people-group. The Hebrew word, "gag" (Strong's
#1406) is defined by Strong's dictionary as "a roof." "Gog" is said
to mean "high," wherefore the term came to mean "sky" and, from
that, "blue." Might the triple-chevron depict three, red-line Gogi
peoples?
Have you got your Jesus boots on yet to keep you dry in the
coming storm? Take your Friggian Caps off, Freemasons, and put
on the Helmet of Salvation, for the hail cometh. Throw your Red
Shields away, Rothschilds, for the dragon will betray you at your
Achilles Heel, where the shield over your heart won't do you any
good. Put round your arm the Shield of Faith, and call it
Everlasting Gold. Throw the dirty Ram's pelt to the flames, and
dress with the Spirit of the One True God, so crisp and clean and
true-blue, a sure help in time of need. Step on that Snake's head
before he bites again, and purify your veins of his venom with the
Waters of Jesus. But if you won't, then prepare to bow down and
kiss His feet at the evil cloud of Armageddon hanging pregnant
over your schemes.
A thought occurred to me, that when Gog with his radical
Muslim fighters engage Israel in warfare, the Europeans will send
in their own forces to cover Israel's mountains, under UN edict,
these being the Togarmites and Gomerians of Ezekiel 38, and as a
result the Israelis will be triggered to fight not only against the
Gog-Muslim invaders, but against the UN "Goy" stepping foot in
their sacred land. But near the midway point of the seven-year
"Week," the Israeli leaders will start to flee the country, so that the
military will break down significantly, and the country henceforth
becomes largely desolate, with the UN attempting to sort the mess
out, until Someone else steps in to sort it out, His way.
As I've suggested that "Hephaistos" is rooted in
"Hebe/Hept," should I interpret "Hebe" as Eve i.e. the Adam-and-
Eve cult of Sumeria? I'm not yet convinced, although it's a
common theory, that "Great Mother" is referring especially to Eve.
It could better refer to the founders of the Eden cult on this side of
the Flood. Inana and Ishtar, the early/original Great-Mother terms,

283
were viewed, not as Mother Earth, but as Ladies/Queens of the
Sky. The dragon cult of Tammuz then removed her to the
Underground, and so I assume that she at that point became the
inklings of the Mother-Earth concept. But even so, Mother Earth is
not necessarily to be equated with Eve, but more with what even
some Christians call, Mother Nature.
One can see, however, that the Eden cult wouldn't have
resisted using the term, "Eve," to depict themselves. I probably
won't agree with others that equate Eve with Hebe, wife of
Hercules, unless a better case can be made than the similarity of
terms. I might more easily agree if it were not for the fact that
Hebe also evokes Hebrews. Hercules married to Hebrews is a deal
that one could argue and prove through multiple means. For
example, Hercules was one of the gods initiated into the Kabeiri
cult. I will connect Hebe to Hept in that the latter was an Armenian
entity, while Hebe, as with most other early Greek gods, likely
traced to Armenia.
There was a mythical Sumerian queen, Kubau ("Kabuba"
elsewhere), and it is to she that some connect the Kybele cult,
although I would reason that Kybele, if indeed there is a
connection, should be connected more to whatever that mythical
queen was named after.
"Hephaistos," apparently a version of "Hepat," would then
make his half of the Kabeiri peoples the Armenian entity that was
Hepat. I should add that the Kabuba cult had been heavy in
Carchemish, in the Nahor region (between the two rivers) that lay
between Gozan and Carchemish.
Going back again to the Kabeiri shouting of, "evoe saboe,"
and "'hyes attes," we might translate "evoe," as do many websites,
as Eve, but this may not be correct, for a witchcraft website
(entitled "Wiccan Pentagram Ritual") exposes this line: "IO
EVOE HERTHA ('Blessed be Hertha')..." That is, "evoe"
means "bless." Hyes" means "high/uplifted/great."
http://members.tripod.com/~onespiritx/ritual29.htm
I had wondered why two different men at least a century
apart would name their two sons, Sheba and Dedan. But seeing the
similarity between "Sheba" and "Hebe,"I immediately scanned
"Dedan" to see if that name could refer to Adam. What do you
think, since after all a capital "D" may denote "of"? Or might
"Dedan" be understood as, Of Eden? Could those who named their
sons Sheba and Dedan have been part of the Eden cult? Was it
Abraham, or his wife, Keturah, who so named those sons? I don't
think it was Abraham.
Gosh, just when I thought I had more than enough questions
to answer, up comes "Keturah" and hits me, as I write, between the
eyes. Doesn't that term look like "Khazar/Gether/Gadeirus."

284
Coincidences, I'm sure, said the weary writer, but I'll keep it in
mind.
The Kybele peoples and/or cult came to be ruled by a Horse-
worshipping peoples long before the Latin language was
established as we know it today, and so it may just be that the
Latin "horse" came to be "cavallo/caballo" for just that horse-tie to
Kybele's Kabala cult. As Kybele is said to have been born in/near
Mount Ida of Troy, note that this was in the Lydian vicinity, where
Latin developed (since Lydians are part of the Latin and Etruscan
root).
As Kybele was the mother of Zeus (no surprise since Curete
Daktyloi are said to have raised Zeus), Zeus himself could be
rooted in Sheba. Yet the possibility is that Kybele was not at first a
Shebean entity. Will keep my third eye on the look-out for Kybele
roots in Chaldee. Consider this:
"Blavatsky describes the kabiri as the seven divine
titans ... whom the Egyptians and Phoenicians called
kabiri, the Greeks titans..."
http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Kabiri_Kabeiri_Kabeiroi_Kaba
rim_Kabirim_Kabiria/id/108250
If the Titans turn out to be Dedanites, then the original
Kabeiri were from Dedan. It then would make for pure logic that
they were over-ruled by Sheba. Consider this online quote:
"During the war against the Titans, Tethys raised Rhea as her
god-child."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electra
Tethys, a Titan, would most-likely depict Dedan if the Titans
as a whole depicted Dedanites. As Rhea was the Greek version of
Kybele, the secret meaning behind the above statement is that
Kybele was at first Dedanite. The above Theosophy website, and
Blavatsky (a leader of occult Theosophy), root it in "gibbor/geber"
= "might".
As I was searching Bert roots (the next day), I found that the
Buhr surname "a low German variant of "Bauer," which just
happens to be the true surname of the ("Jewish") Rothschilds
(before the first Rothschild, Mayer, changed it). The point is, the
piece (website below) says that Bauer "is derived from the High
German word, "giburo ... " That is almost-exactly the
"gibbor/geber" term that the Theosophist site claims as the root of
the Kabeiri!! What's more, one could easily derive "boar" from
Buhr/Bauer. Therefore, all secret societies stemming from
Rothschilds are suspect as modern Kabeiri cults. Unfortunately,
the Coat of Arms of the Buhr family could not be shown.
http://www.houseofnames.com/coatofarms_details.asp?sId=&s=buhr

285
The three sons of Hephaestus by Cabeiro were said to be
Axieros, Axiokersa, and Axiokersos. I would tentatively interpret
the "Axi(o)" prefix as I interpret "Iasi(on)": as depicting the Hazi
region of Ugarit (Gogar?) Syria. But there may be yet another
meaning. The Happy Oneness website (Theosophists are the nutty-
of-the-nutty Globalists) suggest that "The kabiri are equivalent
to ... Sanat- kumara, Sananda, Sanaka, and Sanatana...bringers
of illumination and prosperity." I mention this because Lydia
and the Hercules bloodline were connected to the elusive god,
Sandin. As Sandin was depicted as the Lydian lion, with a sun-
burst on it's forehead depicting the sun-god as the third-seeing eye
of satanic illumination, we can trace the Kabeiri by following the
lion symbol...to Rome, France and Britain.
Obviously, "Kers," named in two of the Kabeiri brothers,
must denote the root and/or to stem of the Kabeiri cult. As I would
interpret "Axieros as Axi-Hros (i.e. the Russian root), wouldn't
"Kersa" and "Kersos" mean "horse (peoples)," since after all
"hross" is Celt for "horse"? The mythical "Creusa" comes to mind,
at the root of the Romans and many other peoples.
Okay, maybe the myth writers weren't as smart as their dogs
thought they were. Maybe we shouldn't lick up to them, killers and
creators of weapon and chariot technology, still the same-old-
same-old taking place in both Russian and American military cults
today. The False Prophet will make the world worship military
might, the fire from the sky. It's Kabeiri Might in your face, but it's
the spit of God in their face. Understand. Make your choice; on
whose side will you be?
Britannica tells that Kent, today a chief Freemason/Illuminati
haven in Britain, was founded by the Jutes (i.e. Eotens). In
Beowulf, we find the origin of Kent by men having codewords
"Hengest" (meaning "horse") and "Horsa" (also meaning horse).
The mythical Centaurs come to mind, especially as the Greek term
is "Kent auros." The Centaurs were depicted as half human, half
horse. Thus the Edoni and the Eetion Kabalists appear to have
been depicted by Centaurs, born of Apollo and Stilbe, she being
the daughter of Peneus (father of Daphne) and therefore having
Calydonian elements. "Bede himself tells us that Hengest and
Horsa, and the royal families of many English nations as well,
were descended from Voden"
www.woden.org/tribes.html
Wouldn't that be the historical Budini? Could the Budini be a
part of the Biblical Abaddon, the one who causes a nuclear
explosion in Revelation's 5th Trumpet (chapter 9), out of which
come battle-ready "locusts" depicted as both horses and lions i.e.
possibly to indicate the symbols of the Trojan-related peoples.
Indeed, the locusts are depicted also with "woman's hair," which

286
may not merely refer to long-haired men, but more in particular to
a peoples associated with homosexual/transvestite elements.
Abaddon is also identified (in Revelation 9:11) as "Apolluon," and
an angel from the "Abusso." I realize that we in English translate
that as "Abyss," and interpret it as a deep pit, but might it also be
code for the Buzi/Busae Medes (Buz, son of Nahor?). Note that the
Greek word for the "pit" created by the falling bomb is NOT
"Abusso," so that we shouldn't imagine the Abaddon demon
coming forth from that crater.
As I interpret these locusts as the Chinese fighters seen also
in the 6th Trumpet and 6th Bowl, trained as they now are to rush
into nuclear explosions (to finish off any survivors) with special
suits and gas masks that makes them appear as locusts -- I kid you
not, I've seen them on a television report -- might the Budini have
also branched out into China, as the red dragon there? You betcha.
For as the Budini are said to stem from the Budi Medes, so the
Buddha religion is thought to stem from the same, as any
Theosophist worth his happy beads will tell us. Perhaps it's just
evidence of a Budini link between India and Sweden that the:
"The Global Oneness Commitment is an eight-year
project with the goal of uniting people around the globe
to...transform the planet thru an increase in spiritual
awareness... The project is synchronised with the twin
Venus Transits of 2004 and 2012 ... The eight -year project
is initiated by the Global Oneness Foundation based in
Stockholm, Sweden, in association with the Times
Foundation based in Delhi, India."
The timing of this Project may be co-ordinated with
European Illuminatists whom suspect have established (as I speak)
a European-Community plan to usher in the skincode system in
2013/14, for the European Union has a seven-year finance-based
project about to begin (January 2007) and ending at the end of
2013, while British officials have announced that they want
mandatory ID cards by 2013. I moreover pegged 2013, wholly
independently, as the start of the last 1260 days, the 3.5 year
period in which Globalism brings the world to its utter destruction
even while re-conditioning their promise to supply us with Utopian
prosperity and security.
Let me share the following mystic teaching that is typical of
Kabala (from a Kabala website):
"The first feast is that of the Great Mother; the
second that of the Holy King; and the third that of the
Most Holy Ancient One, the Concealed with all
Concealments .... The same is the Concealed Supernal
Wisdom, the synthesis of all the rest. And this is called

287
ODN, Eden, or the supernal Paradise, concealed with all
occultations. And it is the Brain of the Most Holy Ancient
One, and that Brain is expanded on every side. Therefore
is it extended into Eden, or another Paradise, and from
this is Eden or Paradise formed forth. And when this
Head, which is concealed in the Head of the Ancient One,
which is not known, extendeth a certain frontal
formation, which is formed for brilliance, then flasheth
forth the Lightning of His Brain. And it is formed forth
and illuminated with many Lights. And it produceth and
designeth (a certain effect) in this Light (otherwise, in this
opening), in this Forehead, whereon is inscribed a certain
Light, which is called RTzVN, Ratzon, Grace. And that
Grace is extended backward into the beard, even unto
that place where it can remain in the beard, and it is
called the Supernal, ChSD, Chesed, Mercy. And when
this Grace is uncovered, all the Lords of Judgment
behold It, and are turned aside."
http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/kabbalah/chapter%20III%20%20hla.htm
That on the surface may make for great poetry, but
underlying is the desire of demons to penetrate our minds with
Satanic illumination leading to action in the world that sets up his
empire. Note that all thought is to be attuned to Eden's
wisdom/knowledge i.e. the dragon sun-god cult.
For me, I prefer the simplicity and openness of Jesus'
teachings, a glass of cold water for the hot worker, a tip for the
hard worker, a reprimand for the non-worker, grace only for the
one who honors the Giver of Grace. Very practical, just, and non-
mystical. Dependable. Non-corrosive in the Spirit. Water rather
than fire, calm rather than confusion, truth rather than rabbit trails
to imaginary realities. The stuff of life, the true Purpose of Eden,
the real Eden, the coming Eden, the Second Eden, in Jesus Christ
alone, the Second Adam.

288
WHO'S THE LEDA OF THE PACK?
June 2006

Let me entertain that Merovee was from the mythical


Merope, said to mean "bee this" or "bee that." And let the reader
decide if the theory is worth further investigation/considration.
We find that Orion, who got involved with the Kabeiri cult
on Lemnos, was mixing with Merope on the island of Chios. He
and she had a war, and he escaped to Lemnos, where he found the
third eye of Helios, the occult "wisdom" and demonic intelligence.
That is what the sun god represents, did you know? The sun god is
not appreciated by the Kabala for the crops that it could grow.
Kabala is hard-core wickedness, mixing Biblical truth with
serpentine slosh.
The father of Orion was Hyrai, and so these terms must
depict a dragon-line peoples reflecting those terms;
Ares/Aria/Aryan comes to mind. But where then is the Hebrew
element of the Orion bloodline? In Hephaistos, of course. As
Merovingians are said to derive from a bee symbol, the following
should be of interest:
"Hyrai is a plural form: its name once had evoked
the place of 'the sisters of the beehive.' According to
Hesychios, the Cretan word hyron meant 'swarm of bees'
or 'beehive' (Kerenyi 1976 pp42-3). Through his
"beehive" birthplace Orion is linked to Potnia...who was
herself sometimes called "the pure Mother Bee" ... bees
functioned as emblems of other embodiments of the
Great Mother: Cybele, Rhea the Earth Mother, and the
archaic Artemis as honored at Ephesus. Pindar
remembered that the Pythian pre-Olympic priestess of
Delphi remained "the Delphic bee" long after Apollo had
usurped the ancient oracle and shrine. The Homeric
Hymn to Apollo acknowledges that Apollo's gift of
prophecy first came to him from three bee-maidens."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_%28mythology%29
In other words, the bee/honey line was from the dragon cult
of Sumeria, but taken to the far-north by Apollo Gogi and Artemis
Amazons, who then connected/mixed in Thrace with the Ares
dragon, who in turn put forth Harmonia-based Amazons into

289
Greece, who mixed with Hephaistos (explaining why Amazons are
known to have covered his Lemnos island), and Hephaistos then
became the Ephesus Amazons, for which reason I would view the
first Ephesians as heavy in Hebrew blood. Yes, indeed, does not
"Hephaistos" reflect "Ephesus" almost perfectly?
The Ares bee peoples also came to Boiotia, where Thebes
(Sheba?) was it's capital, suggesting that Boiotia was named after
the bee, a good theory since the goddess, Melia ("honey"), ruled
Boiotia in the nation's infancy. Moreover, Hyrai, the "bee
sumthin'r-other," and his bee-thingie son Orion, are said to have
been born in Boiotia. Thebes was infested with Dionysus Kabeiri,
and Orion (son of Atlas) had married, Merope (daughter of Atlas),
wife of "WineMan" (Chios was/is a wine making island). The
WineMan, Oenopion, was made son of Dionysus (the Drunk). It
can be ascertained that Oenopion was a peoples connected to the
Calydonians, for they were ruled by Oeneus (also meaning "wine-
guy ").
The wife of Dionysus (i.e. the mother of WineMan) was
made "Ariadne," where one can readily spot Aria/Ares (if not also
"Dion"), explaining why WineMan's daughter was Merope ("bee-
sumthing"). In short, Orion and Merope were two bee-line peoples
merging on Chios, one from Ares of Thrace and/or from the
Calydonians, and the other from Boiotia.
How do these bee peoples connect with the Merovingians of
France? For one, by the mythical fact (not an oxymoron) that
Orion, in separating from Meropes and her father, moved to
Apollo's island, Delos, and there mixed it up with Eos, called
"Rhododactyloi." Some would have you believe that this term
means "rose-fingered," but a wiser deduction is that Eos depicted
the Daktyloi/Curetes of Rhodes, since after all Eos was made the
sister of Helios, while Rhodes was the island dedicated by myth
writers to Helios. As the sister of Helios, Eos was from
Caucasia/Colchis, which region I would peg as the bee-hive from
which the Apollo bees came forth, meaning that Eos was also a
bee peoples.
It was the peoples of Rhodes who formed the Redones of
France. Myth would thereby suggest that those Rhodians went
through Delos en route to France, which explains why Liguria and
Rhodanus/Eridanus were regions crashed by Apollo.
In case the Titans were Dedanites, I should mention that
Orion and Eos were both Titans. Moreover, Eos had a love affair
with "Tithonus." He was depicted as being very old, and could for
that reason depict Dedan himself. Tithonus was turned into a
cicada/cricket, a play-on-words since the Greek cricket is a
"tettix/tzitzi."

290
Kidnapping Tithonus, Eos had also kidnapped Cephalus and
Clitus. The latter no doubt refers to Celts and the Greek/Thebean
migration to western Europe, and Cephalus was not only the son of
Hermes but married to the daughter of Butes. Cephalus was
therefore the same peoples generally as depicted by Pan, and
because "cephalus" in Greek means "head," the myth writers saw
him as chief among the western waves. In the same way, Bute
means "house," and signifies the masters.
Behold that Eos and Cephalus were given the child,
Phaethon, the son of Helios who drove his sky-chariot (i.e. the
sun-god bloodline) into Eridanus (the Rhodanus/Rhone river
valley, France). That would make Eos and Cephalus the
(historical) Redones. Interestingly, but not surprising, Merope is
also made the mother of Phaethon. The father of Phaethon (or
"Phaeton") is made "Clymenus" when the mother is Merope, and
as he was a king of Boiotia, wouldn't it again imply that Boiotia
was named after the bee peoples? Is this not the Holy Grail
bloodline, and were they not Celts/Gauls?
I would suggest that "Clymenus" was a depiction of the
Galli/Gauls, since after all Phaethon was raised by the
Galli/Kabeiri cult of Aphrodite (Apiru-dite?), wife of Hephaistos.
As well as Merope, the mother of Phaethon was also "Clymene," a
term that was used for the wife of Merops (king in Ethiopia), the
mother of Atalanta, and the mother of Atlas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clymene
Clitus (i.e. proto-Celts) and Dryas fought a war in Thrace,
which is interesting in that Dryas was, in my opinion, the depiction
of the Druids. It is widely known that Druids and Celts were
closely associated. The war was said to be for the prize of
Sithone's daughter, and since Sithone was a king of Thrace, he
obviously depicted the Edones, since Edones had a Sithone branch.
Dryas was the father of Lycurgus (proto-Ligurians?), king of the
Edones. Clitus won the war, meaning that Sithones mixed with
Celts, and for this reason I must view the Sitones of western
Europe as a Celt-Edone mix. In fact, "Sitone" appears as a soft-
capital variation of "Getae/Getone."
As the Eatons were connected to the Stewarts, so just now I
suspected a Seaton-family connection. It turns out that
houseofnames.com tells that the same David I (king of Scotland)
who made the Stewarts "High" rulers also gave the Seatons lands
in East Lothian (not far from Roslin, Scotland). The Seaton-family
Coat uses three (red) crescents (on gold background), which are
similar to the three cornucopias on both the Pollock and Bert
Coats. The Pollock boar is the same as the Vere boar, and so
behold that the Seaton-family Crest uses a winged green dragon (a
griffin, actually), even as the Veres use a winged green dragon.

291
Now prepare yourself because I've got to use a "dirty" word.
I had been scanning many designs trying to learn the people-
connections of the symbols, and the crescent tentatively depicted
Celts simply because I had seen the crescent on a Celt website. I
shared this by email to a member of the Rose clan in these words:
"The French Rose clan uses crescents for symbols, and I'm still
trying to learn what they represent. My best guess is the Celts."
He responded thus: "I apologize for being indelicate. But I'll
tell it to you straight. I'm in medical school here, so I've lost any
sense of propriety. The crescent represents a female intact hymen.
An unruptured posterior vaginal membrane which covers the
intoritus, it is broken and bleeds upon the first sexual penetration.
Virginity."
I didn't know what to make of that and responded that the
crescent is typically a symbol of the moon (god). But now that I
have connected the Celts to Plato's "Cleito" and to Greek myth's
"Clitus," I can see how vaginal parts may have become symbols of
the Celts, and also many stories told and made up concerning those
parts. The point is, he and I may both be correct, that the crescent
on Coats of Arms depict the Celts, who were then typified as the
clitoris, and from that the hymen. The Greek is "kleitorus," a near-
match with "Cleito."
It's interesting that a sept of Seaton is "Sayton." Can we
suppose that the Sithones/Sitones were named after Satan rather
than after "Getones"? Clitus and the proto-Druids were warring
over Pallene, which term was made one of Saturn's moons by the
moderns who typically name the cosmic bodies after the Greek
gods et al. One could learn much in regards to ancient family ties
just by studying what names the planets are given for their moons.
Titan is a moon of Saturn as well, the largest moon. Other moons
assigned to Saturn are Pan, Atlas, Hyperion (father of Helios),
Rhea (i.e. Kybele), Tethys, Mimas (father of the Aeolus who
founded western Atlantis, in my opinion), Phoebe (mother of
Lydia and grandmother of Apollo and Artemis), and Dione
(mother of Aphrodite). The problem is, what Greek entity did
Saturn refer to? The Sithones?
Recall that Zagreus (Dionysus while depicting the Abiru
tribe of Kassites in the Zagros mountains, Iran), was cut into
pieces with a knife by Titans, and that I had surmised this to mean
that the Abiru were scattered into many branches. And as I
surmised that the Titans were Dedanites, so now see that "Tethys,"
the Titan, was assigned thousands of children with her husband.
Ocean. Note how the following few are central to my story here:
Asia (the Aesir), Circe (Latins and Etruscans), Doris (Dorians and
possibly founders of Gotland), Melia (Boiotia, Bithynia), Merope
(Merovingians), Rhode (Redones), Clitunno (Celts), Callirhoe

292
(mother of snake-woman, the Geloni, and western Atlanteans), and
Electra (mother of Dardanus, Iasion, Trojans, and Kabeiri cult).
One could start to believe that Orion (and his Merope blood)
was a part of the Redones, but I can easily tie him to western
Atlantis to boot (or should I say, "to Bute"?). As evidence, Orion
(son of Atlas) was also given Poseidon as a father, with Euryale as
the mother. She means "far-roaming," or so they say, and no
wonder since she is one of the three Gorgon-Medusa sisters. Recall
that I had independently tied the Welsh to the Gorgon Medusa, and
that I identified the Welsh as the first western Atlanteans. My task
is to tie the Redones to the Welsh and/or other British Atlanteans.
Artemis, the symbol of France if indeed the Statue of Liberty
is of she, was in love with Orion. That speaks volumes in
connecting him with the Franks, who, we shall see, were viewed as
roamers. "In art, she was typically portrayed with a crescent
moon above her head '"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis
What do you think this means: “Artemis killed any of her
companions who lost their virginity Doesn't it reveal that the
”?

myth writers understood certain peoples (whom she was made to


depict) to be snobs, not mixing with others? Perhaps they sought to
keep their bloodlines pure from other bloodlines, which would
then imply that they viewed their own as sacred. Isn't that the
essence of the holy grail concept, that the grail is filled with certain
holy blood?
Atalanta, the symbol of western Atlantis, in my opinion, was
raised by Artemis; mythographers had Artemis give her a bear to
suckle (showing that Artemis, depicted as a boar, was likewise
depicted as a bear). Two centaurs, which creatures I think depict
proto-Jutes (i.e. Getae Thracians) that became the founders of Kent
(England), upon conflicting with the bear peoples depicted by
Atalanta, were killed by her mate, Meleager, major symbol of the
Calydonians. Atalanta and Meleager both killed the Calydonian
Boar.
One of the centaurs was "Hylaeus," a term referring also to
"a genus of bees," according to a Wikipedia article. I'm not sure
why that term was related to bees. The other centaur was Rheacus.
It seems to me that since Meleager kills a half-dozen people in
relation to the killing of the boar, that this was the myth writers'
way of concealing who the boar depicted. I had already come to
the conclusion independently (i.e. from other reasoning) that the
Jutes were a major boar line; this tends to confirm it. It may also
confirm what I suspected, that the boar line closely parallels the
bee line.
Two others killed by Meleager after the boar was killed were
Eurypylos and Iphicles. Eurypylos (ignore the "wide-ranging"

293
Eury prefix and read as "Pylos") was one of "the two brothers
[who] ruled over the Fortunate Islands"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycus
The other was Lycus = "wolf," and he was brother to
Chimaerus (see website above), an obvious reference to the
Khimaera dragon, the Cimmerians that founded Wales. Indeed, the
Fortunate Islands were said to be the western-most portion of
Europe and for that reason thought to be the Canary islands. But
wouldn't Britain also qualify?
Where are the Phoenicians in this migration, or codeword
"Europa" and Cadmus"? Well, Eurypylos, in the capacity as king
of Kos, was son of Poseidon and Astypalaea, the daughter of
Phoenix (and therefore sister of Cadmus and Europa). Kos was just
3 miles off the coast of Budrum (not sure if that's going to prove
significant but thought I'd jot it down anyway).
Eurypylos (and his brothers) had for their mother, Celaeno,
perhaps code for the "Geloni." If the Geloni were Alans as many
affirm, then these brothers lead to the Alans and king-Arthur
peoples, possibly also the fitz-Alan Stewarts, explaining why both
the Stewarts and Arthurian peoples were depicted as dragons.
Moreover, as they both claim Holy-Grail status, it again suggests
that the Geloni/Catti (alternatively, the Geloni-Catti mix) were the
Holy Grail line.
The brothers had yet another one, Nycteus (king of Thebes),
and he was assigned two fathers, Poseidon and Hyrieus. As the
latter term reflects "Hyrai" ("bee-sumthing'r other), and as
"Nycteus" evokes "nectar," couldn't "Poseidon" be, as I have been
saying all along, a depiction of the Buz peoples? I realize it may
sound childish to depict a Buz peoples as a bee line, but one never
knows; perhaps our "buzz" in describing the sound of a bee was
somehow created in very ancient times to reflect Buz (son of
Nahor). That is, Buz may be at the bottom of the bee line. In any
case, with Nycteus and the terms that surround him, we see once
again that Thebes was a bee-line entity, without doubt due to
Dionysus presence there, who, you remember, was from the
Zagros mountains in Iran; the Buzi Medes could not have been far
off. Wikipedia says that the Buzi term is Aryan (i.e. like our
English): "The Busae group [of Medes] is thought to derive
from the Persian term buza ... "
http ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medes
Here's an interesting quote Wikipedia quote: "Lycus, also
called Zabatus or Zaba, a river of Assyria, a tributary of the
Tigris, now called the Great Zab." Could that river have been
named by the Shebeans? Lycas was also styled son of Dascylus,
code for the Etruscans of Tuscany (north-west Italy), no doubt
being himself code for Ligurians.

294
Hyrieus and Lycus took under their wings a certain infamous
Laius, styled the king of Thebes, but described in pedophilic terms
(I am sometimes leery of evil characterizations such as this, and it
may be that non-Hebrew writers were falsely maligning the
Hebrew blood in their midst). Laius didn't get along with a branch
of his own peoples, i.e. his "son" Oedipus, and so we find that he
went to find alliance with Merope, queen of Corinth.
As Merope's alternative identity, Peri boea, also insinuates
bees, take note, and suspect that this Thebes-Corinthian alliance
furnished Merovingians and the western Europeans from whom
they stemmed. Note too the "Peri" prefix on Meropes' alternative
identity, that it evokes Perieres, what I suspect is the Persian root
of the boar line. As I have previously identified the boar line of
Greece to be in Corinth, so we see that Periboea is queen of
Corinth.
The name assigned to Meropes' husband (king of Corinth)
was Polybus; ignore the "poly" prefix and read as Bus, possibly
suggesting that the Buzi Hebrews had then taken the rulership of
Corinth, and since Merope was assigned his queen's name, "Buz"
again comes out looking like it refers to bees. The same name,
Polybus, was made also king of Egyptian Thebes.
Oedipus "killed" Laius (i.e. defeated him in war and took his
throne), and "married" his own mother, Jocasta/Epikaste; ignore
the prefixes and read as Cast, possibly Castor brother of Pollux.
She and her Thebean family lost a large war (so-called "Seven
Against Thebes") and were forced to move away. I live near
Castroville, Texas, and it is known (verification is online) that the
people there are Alsatians of the French-German border region
(see location of Alsace).
It may instantly reveal that Caster depicted Alsations, and I
do note that the Boii peoples (founders of Bohemia, for one) lived
where Alsace is now located (on the Rhine), who were possibly
the bee peoples from Boiotia en route to Wales. May I suggest an
Alan-Saka mix since the Sequani (proto-Saxons?) Gauls lived in
the Alsace region (see Gaul map). "The 1st form was a Latin
one: Alesacius, hence the French name "Alsace" ... the original
name of Alsace is much older than the appellations "France"
or "Deutschland."
http://mapage.noos.fr/ephil/uk alsa1.htm
Plato made Elas(ippos) and Nfestor twin brothers of western
Atlantis, and while "Elas" reflects Alesacius quite well, "Mestor"
doesn't sorely corrupt "Castor." As you can see on the map, the
Lingones lived in proximity to Alsace, who are suspect as
Ligurians, but in any case keep in mind that Castor depicted
Cycnus-based Ligurians in that he was the child of Leda the swan.

295
I may as well say up-front here that I'm considering whether
to view (Eury)Pylos as the Pollock family, since that family uses a
boar with an arrow shot through it on their Crest/Coat. Let's face it,
that symbol has a high chance of being linked to the Calydonian
boar. But I am more suspect of yet another one killed by Meleager,
Plexippus, for he evokes "Pollok" much more (ignore the "ippus"
horse suffix and read as "Plek"). He was made brother of Althaea,
and she was the mother of Melanippe, she in turn the mother of
Aeolus and Boiotus, the twins who I say (see previous chapters)
founded Wales (i.e. western Atlantis). But Althaea was also the
mother of Meleager, so that she is quite the mother of western
Atlantis. Stick a capital "C" on her name and we would have the
makings of "Cleito."
You don't need to remember these terms as though you were
preparing for an exam; just catch the drift. This Althaea, mother of
Wales, was the sister of Leda, (Eury)pylos, and Plex(ippus) so that
the latter three are likewise progenitors of far-west clans.
Eurypylos evokes the Poles, called "Polack." Leda is revealed in
myth to be a depiction of the swan peoples, which are most-
definitely the Ligurians, and possibly the Svions i.e. the Swedes
that were almost identical (said Herodotus) to the Sitones. But as
Leda gave birth to Pollux, gosh, would he not be the same as her
brother, Plex(ippus) and possibly Pylos? The significance here is
my old but as-yet unproven hunch that the Polloks stemmed from
Pollux. Now I find that Plex and Pylos were two of the six boar
peoples shot through by Atalanta and Meleager.
Therefore, I'm convinced: the Polloks are from Leda and
Althaea, and they (Polloks) were in western Atlantis i.e. Wales,
which would explain why they settled on the Welsh border when
crossing with the Conqueror, and then moved up to Renfrew (north
border of Ayrshire) to the Bute vicinity.
"Peter de Polloc. According to 'Early Pollock
Charters': Witnessed a charter granted by King William
the Lion, confirming the churches of Bute to the Abbey of
Paisley...
Robert de Polloc. He is said to have been a
companion of Walter FitzAlan, the Steward of Scotland,
founder of what was to become the Royal House of
Stewart. According to 'Early Pollock Charters':
Witnessed a charter granted by Walter Fitz Alan
founding the Monastery of Paisley and dated 1160.
Witnessed a charter granted by King William the Lion
confirming the Kirks of Bute to the Abbey of Paisley and
dated after 1165..."

296
http://www.pollock.4mg.com/Fulbert.html
One website entitled "Castors and Pollocks" (website below)
has a feature on twentieth-century artist, Jackson Pollock, and then
jumps immediately into a short outline on Leda, Caster and Pollux,
as though he knows something that Pollocks don't seem to know,
that the Pollock family stem from those mythical terms. Otherwise,
he's been reading my material on the same. I don't know of anyone
else who makes that connection.
http://content.perspicuity.com/?q=node/3
Leda was also the mother of Helen of Troy, who, because
she was mixing with Paris (ruler of Trojans), should be
investigated as to whether the Leda-branch peoples that Helen
depicted co-founded Paris, France, and regions nearby. Helen's
twin sister, Clytemnestra, must be Plato's Mneseus, son of Cleito
and Poseidon over in western Atlantis, who I think depicted Manes
(ancestor of Atti(s) and Lydia), a theory supported by Plato's
naming of Mneseus' the twin brother, "Autochthon," which I think
should be understood as Atti-Cutha i.e. the Kybele cult of Lydia.
One could equate Helen with the Helenus of Thebe who I
think depicted the Kybele Sabazios (Shebeans) cult, but that in the
European theater translated to the Geloni (Alans, say some) and
(what I suspect was) their branch, the Catti. The Suebi Germanics
also come to mind. Since Helenus' city of Thebe was near Troy, it
would explain why Paris and Helen had an "affair" (if Helen and
Helenus depicted the same peoples).
The Greeks who thought they owned Helen fought the
Trojan war over her being "stolen" by Paris, but this is mere fancy
to encode the true reason for the war. Helen must have been a
peoples that lived not only in the Troy region but removed to
Sparta, explaining how she could have had a relationship with
Paris. Many peoples from Greek Helen were removed and brought
(or went willingly) to the Troy Helen. As her mother (Leda)
descended from Perieres (husband of Gorgophone) and Bateia,
which in my mind makes her the same as depict the boar and the
bear, Medes, Iphicles, also shot through my Meleager, was Plex's
half brother, having a different mother, Leucippe. It just so
happens that there is a Leucippe that was made mother to Cleito!
Surely Plato was referring to this very Cleito when he cited her as
the mother of Atlantis, wherefore a mother of western Atlantis is
also Leuc(ippe) (Lug and Loki come to mind). Another Leucippe
(I think depicting the same peoples but in other situations/times)
was a daughter of Megara; recall king Arthur's tomb in Cornwall
(next to Wales), that it turned out to be the tomb of a Megarian.
Megara was a princess of Thebes and therefore possibly depicted
Sheba. If so, then Cleito and Leucippe might also have depicted
Shebeans. The horse endings may just connect with the Kabala,

297
since Kybele had been over-taken by Shebeans. Leucippe was also
brother to Aphareus, who I think depicted the Apiru of Epirus,
meaning that Leucippe depicts the same Hebrews.
The parents of Leucippe and Aphareus was Perieres and
Gorgophone (i.e. Persians and Gorgons in Greece), and
Gorgophone was born, according to one version, in Joppa (Israel),
between Dor and Gath. And that could explain how their son,
Aphareus, could depict Hebrews...of the Kassi/Gazi/Cati/Cutha
Kabala. Indeed, the mother of Gorgophone was tagged,
"Anrdromeda," and anyone who knows that "andros" is Greek for
"men" should have no problem identifying her as Men of Media.
As Perseus is said to have mated with Andromeda in Joppa to
produce Gorgophone, wouldn't Perseau and/or Andromeda refer to
the Kassite Medes in Israel???
Surely these Hebrew Cats are depicted by the caduceus staff
of Hermes, in turn depicting the historical Cadusii peoples next to
the Gorgons of Verkana. They are the "holy grail," in other words,
a Gorgon-Hebrew mix. Aeolus is imbedded in this line because he
was father of Perieres. Also, Aeolus was the holy-grail line in
Greece, the Gorgon-Hebrew mix.
Leda (and therefore the Ligurians) was the holy-grail line
because her father (Tyndareus) was the son of Gorgophone.
Perieres and Bateia were also made the parents of Tyndareus (see
website below), showing that Gorgophone is the same peoples as
Bateia, she being the daughter of Teucer (co-founder of Trojans).
Bateia/Batea is then revealed, with a little investigation, as the
mythical Butes peoples of the Cecrops (i.e. Gorgon) line. Batea
was the wife of Dardanus, other co-founder of Troy, making
Batea/Butes the mother of the Trojans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyndareus
And so Helen, Castor and Pollux were also of the (wicked)
holy grail (as were the Ligurians, therefore). But as the three were
from Batea, Helen too was a Trojan, explaining why Paris and she
were allied.

298
SATAN'S VIA DELLA ROSE

The path of the Vanir dragon line to Scotland was likely by


way of the Rhine river, extending from the Alps to the
Netherlands. The city of Leyden/Leiden (in the Netherlands) is
said to have been named after the Celt god, Lug (evoking "wolf"
but also the Ligurians), though it would appear that it could have
been named after Ladon (the dragon) as well. Lug has been
equated by others with the Scandinavian Loki, and for various
other reasons should be viewed as a Vanir/Danir peoples.
In reflecting Ladon, we find, just off the Rhine river,
Ludenscheid, then north of that toward Denmark is
Ludinghausen ... very near Venne (to be distinguished from Vannes
in Brittany). Legden is north of that, with Ladbergen to the east.
The Rhine itself turns into the Lek river, and the latter flows into
Rotterdam, a term that looks like "rotor" and the "rudr" term that
one website said were the ancestors of the Ruotsi Rus of Sweden.
Leiden is near (north of) Rotterdam, itself very near the Hague i.e.
The International Court of Justice. Perhaps it's a shot in the dark,
but "Hague" looks like it may have derived from "Gog."
Britannica (in an article on Apollo) tells that "some have
located the Hyperboreans, and the Apollo-worshipers dwelling
on the blessed isle of Heloxias as well, on the Frisian North sea
coast and on Helgoland, whence amber was brought to
Greece." I don't think that the Frisian coast was Hyperborea, but
rather a settlement of the Hyperboreans (from north Russia), after
they had crashed the chariot of Helios in Eridanus. Helgoland was
an island off the coast (at the mouth of the Elbe), and on a 20th-
century map, the term is "Heligoland." Like "Heloxias," the term
seems rooted in Helios. Apollo and Helios were often merged as
one, and both were patriarches of wolf peoples. Thus the proto-
Danes look as though they settled big-time in what became Frisian
territory before jumping on ships to Britain to become the wolf-
people Celts and Danann.
When I discovered that "kikker" in Dutch means "frog," I
was more than a little interested. I had been seeking the meaning
of the three spirits like frogs that come out of the mouth of the
dragon, the mouth of the anti-Christ (Gog), and the mouth of the
False Prophet, as recorded in Revelation 16:13. Obviously, the
frogs are not literal but must be representations of some power
houses, belonging to the end-time Romans who will charge out
against the Oriental "Kings of the East."

299
Verse 14 identifies the frogs as those doing miraculous signs
(possibly the same fire from the sky as performed earlier by the
False Prophet) for the purpose of gathering the kings of the world
on the side of the anti-Christ, against the Kings of the East ... when
the latter come to Israel (probably to spoil the Western hold now
forming on the Middle East). The Revelation text calls this war,
"Armageddon."
As you must know, the non-flattering term, "frog," refers
commonly to the French, but add to this that the Dutch language is
a dialect of the Franks. It's interesting that Dutch came into being
about the time of the Merovingian loss of power. Ignoring what is
commonly held to be the meaning of "Dutch," it may even be that
it was a version of "Dacia," the latter peoples known to have been
the Getae on their westward migration. Long ago the language of
the Dutch was called "Theodisca," and per chance we may have a
"Dacia" in that phrase.
In Greek, a frog is a "batrachos," where "trachos" looks like
the root. Strong's concordance didn't know the origin of
"batrachos," but I do see that it is similar to "Thraco" (i.e.
Thrace) ...not to mention the Greek "tragos" a goat. With that in
mind, let me say that the Kikon were likely the Getae of Thrace,
whom were likened to a goat, that became the Goths.
Because "kikkon" is a frog in Dutch, a consideration of
Kikon (eponym of the Kikones) seems called for, who (in myth)
was the son of Rhodopa, the latter being a Thracian peoples in
Kikonia/Ciconia, on the Strymon river ... where also the Edonians
(i.e. Druids and proto-Jutes) lived. Rhodopa's other son was
Hebros, and he may depict the Iberians who lived to the south of
the Redones, on the Ebro river in northern Spain. Many suggest
that the Iberians of the Ebro were Hebrews, but I would counter
strongly that they were a Gogi dragon-line peoples wherefore to
identify them as God's program is not flattering to Him.
Historians tell very commonly that the Dutch come from the
Batavians (that term created by the Romans), but that the
Batavians were a branch of the Chattians/Catti who lived in Hesse,
Germany. Compare the Catti, then, with the afore-mentioned
Cotti(ans) who lived as a branch of Ligurians around the French-
Italian border. Hence, if I'm right in connecting the sun god, Lug,
to the Ligurians, the Catti would appear to be a part of Lug. And
being the Celt sun god, wouldn't he be the same as the Helios line
in Eridanus, even the Helios-Rhodes line? The Catti are very
important to this discussion because they were to the Salian Franks
while these Franks became the Merovingians: "The Salian
Franks formed, with the Nether-Saxons and the Frisians, the
foundation for early Dutch culture and society."
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Salian_Franks

300
As we saw that the Ligurians were depicted as a swan, so
"swan" is itself reflective of "Sviones," the early name of Sweden.
I found an interesting comment: "Furthermore, to resurrect the
extinct Southern vernacular expression, to 'swan,' means to
swear, to promise." It just so happens that "swear," derived from
the Old English "swerian," looks a lot like the other early name for
Sweden, "Svere."
To swear a blood oath comes to mind. But "swan" also
evokes Savona, a chief city in Liguria, thus supporting the Liguria-
to-Sweden connection. Lake Seven comes to mind, as it was (and
still is) in Armenia. The lake was in ancient times called "Gokcha"
(according to Britannica)! It's very amazing that there was a
Gokchu river in Aryan lands (extreme north-west Afghanistan)
where the "Comarians" lived and whom I view as the first Gogi. I
in fact tie the Gorgons of that river to the Verkana ("wolf land")
and the Caucasian Gorgons ... who became the Hyperboreans.
Later in Sweden (800ish AD), the Varangian Rus started to
form themselves into a powerhouse, and note that Britannica gives
the following early version of their name: "Varyagi." Couldn't that
be "Vargagi" i.e. the War Gogi? Indeed, "Varangian" looks like
War-Angles, and the Angles were named after "angle/hook," while
several variations of "Gog" mean "hook"...which is probably why
the LORD used "hook" in Exekiel 38 to depict his bringing of Gog
to end-time Israel.
Those of you who do not equate Moscow with Gog, keep in
mind that the Varangians went on to co-found Moscow. And if the
Varangians were thus a Mushki/Meshech peoples, it supports what
I suggest, that the Meshech were a faction of a Gogi corporation of
merchants... that I think formed as a Japheth-blood conglomerate
that took on the name "Gorgon."
Lake Sevan discharges to create the Razdan river, also called
the Zanga. The latter term looks like the Latin and French
"sangue" = blood, the term often used to denote the Rose Line of
France. But the Old French for "vein" was "vena," wherefore the
"van" in "Sevan" (and perhaps also Lake Van) may have meant the
same, explaining why the lake's river was named "Zanga." Now
see what Britannica had to say:
"...the valley of Sangarius, which is mentioned by
Homer as the scene of the earliest Phrygian advances,
certainly contains one of their oldest and most important
capitals (Gordium) ... The Phrygians first appear clearly in
history in the Assyrian royal annals under the name of
Mushki ... the Mushki are mentioned by the Assyrians
together with Tabal ... north of the Taurus range; they
correspond to Meschech and Tubal ... "

301
The Taurus range above is not the Azov/Crimea region, but
the Taurus mountains between Cilicia and the Halys river, the
capital region of the Hatti. In another Britannica article, the
Calycadnus river in Cilicia is given the local name, "Goksu," yet
another reason to equate the Taurus peoples with the Gogi. Strabo
wrote (Book VII, Chap. 3) that the "Taurisci" peoples are called
also "Ligurisci," and if the latter were the Ligurians, then I will
mention again here that the mythical ruler of the Ligurians was
Cycnus. The Veneti originated on the Sangarius, and note how
both "Venice" and "Venus" evoke "vena" = "vein."
But what I'm getting at is the meaning of "Biaini" (read as
Bia-ini) from which the city, Van, was named. The root "Bia"
modifies easily to "via," and the latter could indeed come to refer
to blood, for it derived from the French "vie" meaning "life." And
that brings me to the Greek "bios" (# 979 in Strong's Greek
dictionary), meaning "life." That word in turn brought about the
Greek word, "bia" (#970), defined in Strong's as "vital activity."
"Vital" then connects to "vita" = "life."
To pagans, a good life was to go "to and fro," and wisdom
was learned not from God but on the trail, visiting cities, hashing
things out with philosophers. By now you know that
"Rhoda/Rhodes" is a term I view as meaning "wheel" and
therefore the root of "road." I'll bet my best hub caps that "wheel"
was itself drawn out from "via."
Note that Dick van Dyke means Dick son/blood/vein of
Dyke. Our "vanilla" derives from "vaina," meaning
"pod/seed/womb." A vein is like a road and like a snake, and this
is how the snake came to depict the sacred bloodline, by denoting
different paths taken by the tribes. Indeed, our "track" (Old French
"trac") evokes Draco. And "trek" is from the Old German
"trechan" that looks much like "dragon." In Greek, "wheel" is
"trochos" (from which we get out "truck"), and it derives from the
Greek, "trecho" from which we get out "trek." Our word "path" is
the Greek "tribos" (our "tributary"), which must also have meant
"tribe" (as in a branch) and therefore "bloodline." Thus, a
bloodline was likened by the Greeks unto a road, or winding
snake.
Having said all that, I would add that "baino" (very close to
"Biaini") in Greek means "to walk" (see #939 ). A similar Greek
word, "baion" (#902) means "branch," and therefore "tribe."
Technically, the Greek "tribos" means "rub" and refers to the rut
put into the path by the wheel. "Rut" is itself from "route," but the
Old Norse and English "rot" = our "root" seems applicable here as
it's in the sense of ancestor. Indeed, the Russian god "Rod" was
specifically the God of Ancestors. Thus, the goddess

302
"Rhoda/Rhodes" that means "wheel" and "road" came to mean
ancestral root, or radical.
"Valley," from the French "vallis," evokes "wheel," and
though a valley is the place where a river, like a vein, snakes
along, a highway (or via) was in old days created naturally
following a valley. My dictionary says that "way" is from the Old
English "weg," evoking a wagon. Strabo used the phrase, "wagon-
dwelling Scythians and Sarmations." The name "Wayne" means
"wagon," and from that name we can derive "vein" as in a via for
blood. I mean to suggest again that Bia/Van meant
road/wheel/truck but also bloodline. Might "Beowulf" mean "the
Bia wolf"?
I found that a dragon type called "Amphisbaena" "has two
heads, one in the front of the body, and one at the tip of its
tail...It is usually portrayed as having a scaly body, feathered
wings, and feet of a rooster."
http://www.michaellc.com/The Library_3.html
That very much evokes the Mu_shussu Dragon with it's single
body yet having two heads, shown beside two leapard-like dragons
having bird-like feet and feathered wings. But as the term
"Amphisbaena" is to be read as Amphis-Baena (pronounced "bee-
nah"), is it somehow an allusion to the Bia city of Biaini (Lake
Van)? If so, the Bia peoples were descended from the Mushussu
cult. But now see that "Amphi-" (as in an amphitheater) means
"around" (according to my dictionary). As the "around" feature in
the Mushussu dragon would appear to be it's coiling, might
"Amphisbaena" mean "coiled around the Biaini"?
Note that "Gorgon" evokes "cargo" and thereby "car."
Indeed, for a "gargar" was a cart/chariot, where "gar" meant
"wheel" so that "gargar" meant "double wheeled vehicle." So,
when I see "caravan" (probably corrupted from "cargovan"), it
evokes both Gorgon and the Bia/Van peoples. That is, perhaps our
"van" derives (very indirectly) from the Bia peoples, if indeed
"Bia" meant "via." Consider the Kartli peoples, who were the
Kokheti (i.e. Colchians) of Georgia (Gorgia?), who are called
"Kartvelians" (cartwheelers).
The pressing theme in this exercise is that of traveling
merchants, as in the Gypsies. A vender (evoking "Wend/Van") is
not only a merchant, but the term is from the same root (French
"venum") as our "venal" which refers to "a corrupted salesman."
And "merchant" itself derives from Old French "mercari ," which
evokes Mercury, the Roman version of Hermes, the bloodline from
which the Roma/Cigani Gypsies were from! And Hermes is
probably an eponym for Armenia!! And if you think I'm too-
stretched to suggest that our "roam" derives from the Roma

303
Gypsies, my dictionary has that word derived from Old English,
"romen."
The Greek word for "merchant" is "emporos" (Strong's
#1713), the root (poros) of which means "a way; means," which is
itself derived from "poreuomai" meaning "to traverse; travel."
Mercury is perhaps depicted with wings on his ankles for that
reason. And I do think that "traverse" well describes the Gorgons
who crossed the world. There is a term, "Ouroboros," which is a
snake in the shape of a circle encircling the earth. As I've said
elsewhere, the symbol of the Roma Gypsies is to this day a 16-
spoked wheel. The Gypsy Line rules! But not forever.
The Biblical Mark of the Beast, what I call a "skincode
commerical system," comes to mind, for what belongs to the
dragon bloodline is a peoples bent on overcoming all power
structures in the world through their out-spread commerce. This is
the theme also when God describes the wealthy (but destroyed)
Babylon the Great in Revelation 18. And what about the associated
"image of the beast." Won't it be round?
Funny that someone emailed me once and said he saw the
image of the beast somewhere, as a 6-pin wheel. He had not read
this chapter, or anything like it, as it wasn't yet written. I have seen
the same basic design at store check-out stands, where a UPC
scanner is beneath dark glass in the shape of six spokes from a
central point. It makes no sense that the scanner should be under
glass in that shape, yet perhaps it's a conditioner for what design is
yet to come in the Image of the Beast.
Roscher documented that the cults of Apollo and
Mars were fundamentally analogous. Roscher pointed to
a host of features shared in common between the two
gods, including the following: (1) each was associated
with the first month of the year...(3) each was regarded as
a patron of migrations and founder of cities; (4) each was
associated with colonizing ventures as exemplified by the
Latin ver sacrum rite."
http://www.maverickscience.com/Mars/Apollo/apollo.html
The first month was in ancient times March. Rod (the
ancester god) was also worshiped in March. And couldn't we
include Hermes into that pattern of travel, since Hermes is in fact
called, not only the god of trade, but god of land travel?
Our "trade" derives from Old German "track," and an
alternative meaning for our "truck" is "to barter." But behold. The
Greek "tribos" (Strong's #5147), meaning "path," is from the base
of "tragos" (#5131) meaning goat i.e. the symbol of the Getae from
Thrace. Hence if the Trojans were of the Draco tribe/line, so also

304
the Romans (because they were from Trojans)... whom the Bible
depicts as Babylon the Great ruled over by the Dragon.
Our word "path" may derive from the Greek "pathos," itself
meaning "suffering," for "travel" is said (by my dictionary) to
derive from "travail," itself from "three" combined with "palus"
(stake). Though "Pallas" is not visibly related to travel, he was god
and symbol of the phallic cult, so that the stake implied is the
penis, denoting a bloodline. A hermes was a penis temple built
with a square cross-section and a pyramid top; the Washingtom
Monument is an excellent example. It is also called an "obelisc," a
term that my dictionary says is derived from the Greek and Latin
"obelos," which is obviously from "palus." I would venture to
suggest that "travel" and "tribos" (the latter means "path") are the
same since a "v" and a "b" often interchange.
Now as it seems fairly obvious that "tribos" i.e. path also
came to mean "tribe" (from the Latin "tribus") which is often
substituted for "branch," so we see that our "tree" comes from the
Old English "treow," which may have derived from a hypothetical
"treob" that nonetheless smacks of "tribos".
Why "travel" is named after three stakes, I do not know, but I
always wondered why "tree" sounded like "three." Perhaps now I
know, because "tribos" means three of "bos." I also know that "bo"
means "land. I also know that Gorgons/Cimmerians were depicted
in threes. "Troy" is said to derive from "three." Poseidon's trident
was a three-pronged fish hook or spear; it's now the symbol of the
European Union, as can be seen in the Euro logo, shaped like a
trident.
As I was wondering where "Angle" may have derived,
specifically in an effort to find a connection to Gog, I suddenly
remembered that variations of "Gog" meant "hook." For example,
"gega/geka", "kuka" in Chechen, "gaga" in Turk, and "chakkah" in
Hebrew (Strong's #2443), all mean "hook." My dictionary defines
"jig" as a fish hook, while "gig" is likewise defined as "an
arrangement of fishooks."
However, I didn't want to connect the Angles to Gog on that
bases alone, yet I found on a website that the Angles derive their
name from "ongul ‘fishing hook’ hence ‘bend’""
http://www.gwp.enta.net/wa ist.html
^

If you're a prophecy buff, you know that the LORD will


"hook" Gog when turning him around toward Israel. This is not to
say that the Angles will produce the anti-Christ, but that the
Angles were part of the far-north Gogi. But one thing does strike
me, that the Vere clan said to be in charge of the official Dragon
Line today, is from the Angles.
Geoffrey of Monmouth, in his Merlin myth, had both a red
and a white dragon. He disclosed that the red one symbolized the

305
Britons, which he rooted in Trojan-blood Romans, while the white
dragon represented the Anglo-Saxons. The Angles crushed the
Welsh eventually. Britannica says that "Anglesey" (formerly
Mona) means "the island of the Angles." Not far from Anglesey,
in the county of Denbigh, there are now the Hiraethog Moorlands
as surviving pieces of Erethlyn. But the Welsh to this day continue
to call themselves "Cymri," and yet depict themselves after a red
dragon.
See flag of Wales, a red dragon yet with what appear to be
the legs and claws of an eagle and a lion's body, very similar
indeed to the Mushussu dragon of the Babylonian sun god,
Utu/Tammuz, from which the dragon bloodline originates.
http://www.data-wales.co.uk/flag.htm
The website above says that the Romans who invaded Wales
had sported the dragon, and that they in turn had borrowed the
symbol from the Parthians, which comes as no surprise ... ever since
I learned that the Romans were descended from the Trojans, who
were themselves a Parthian bloodline. The website also says that
"the red dragon became the symbol of the Welsh nation
through its adoption by the Tudor ancestors of king Henry
VII," and it just so happens that Owen Tudor, the progenitor of
the royal Tudors, was, according to Britannica, from the island of
Mona (then re-named "Anglesey").
The Tudors were those royals who merged the red and white
roses, Lancaster and York, after their War of the Roses. The two
Houses were related by blood, but the red and white peculiarities, I
suspect, have to do with whom the kings married, or their vision of
the past i.e. whom they chose to honor most within their bloodline.
If the red and white dragons depict the same elements as depicted
by the red and white roses, then, first off, the rose of the
Rosicrucian cross depicts a dragon. The red dragon being clearly
the Veneti branch in Vannes/Gwenea (Brittany), they also become
the Gauls of southern France. The white dragon may therefore be
the non-Veneti, non-Danaan wave, from the Getae, who became
the Goths, Jutes, Saxons, Angles, Swedes... including, if you'll
forgive me, the Frogs.
The Odin line is indeed a Europe-wide entity. Might the
people at NATO have been thinking alon this line, fully aware,
when they devised this NATO-OTAN lo ,
M
Condolessa Rice, as Secretary of ^te under Bush, was in
Paris recently (Feb 2005) reminding the French of their common
origin in Democracy. The political purpose which Rice had was
obvious, to show American (i.e. Bush's) acceptance of the trans-
Atlantic unity now being sought by Europe as a vehicle toward
implementing Globalism. While the Bush administration is not
exactly expending itself on behalf of the trans-Atlantic unity (at

306
least not visibly), I believe that the False Prophet will soon be in
charge, from Washington, of this same effort, even now called
"Atlanticism."
Now in the next chapter I am going to show how Atlantis is
fundamentally an Alan entity, and just as "Etruscan" may mean "of
the Rus(ki)," so "Atalanta," a version attributed to the goddess by
that spelling, may mean "of the Alan land." If true, then the root,
"Land of Alan," is "Alanta," a term that smacks, perhaps
coincidentally, perhaps not, of "Holland." I'll give my theory that
"Hellen," said to be the Greek patriach, depicted the ancestry of
the Alans.
I have a little room here to tell concisely (without lengthy
explanations to support my case) the path of Zeus into Europe. I
start by saying that Zeus depicted the Curetes, which I will explain
more later, and that he is the chief God of Greece only because the
Curetes write the bulk of the myths. Makes sense, does it not?
Thus the Curetes were the secret society. They became the Trojans
and Thracians and allies of Trojans depicted by Hermes and
Harmonia.
In one myth version, Zeus is from Uranus, no doubt
depicting Iran. Yet Uranus can be shown to become the Elis
Amazons and the founders of Argos, and the Telchines otherwise
known as the Curetes i.e. Trojans.
In another myth version, Zeus entered Greece via the
Cecrops line (rulers of Athens) by myth writers wanting to stress
his Gogi roots (in Armenia and Iran), and his station at Athens,
capital of Greece. He was depicted as a snake-man in this version.
In another version, he is Harmonia, daughter of Ares the dragon,
who marries Cadmus, where Cadmus, as the brother of Europa, is
the same peoples as Europa (but migrated to Greece), wherefore
Cadmus and Harmonia are the same as Zeus and Europa mating
and entering Europe. That is why it is said that Cadmus and
Harmonia entered Illyrium (to start the westward Gaul migration)
as snakes (Harmonia and Cadmus were said to give birth to
"Illyrius, " the eponym of Illyrium). To support the Harmonia-Zeus
equation, her father Ares was given birth by Zeus.
In another version of Illyrius' birth, he was the son of the
Cyclopes, Polyphemus, and I do think that the Cyclopes and
Cecrops depict the same (Gogi) peoples. This version goes on to
claim that the Celts and Gauls were one and the same, the
Illyrians, because Polyphemus (with his mate Galatea) "had the
sons Celtus, Illyrius and Galas."
http://www.forumi.zeriyt.com/index.php/topic,14905.0.html
But because Polyphemus is an alternative father of Illyrius,
the other father, Cadmus, comes out looking like a member of the
Cyclopes. Even as Cadmus is from Poseidon, so Polyphemus is

307
given Poseidon as his direct father. The Illyrians were a peoples
who painted/tattooed their bodies,
Myth also tells that the Cecrops line produced Tros, co-
founder of Troy. But there is also a marriage between the Cecrops
line and Tereus, son of Ares, that term no doubt referring to the
same Tros (looks like "three") peoples. Thus the Trojans were
brothers of the Greeks.
Harmonia was the ancestry of the Spartans because the
Spartans come from the Ares dragons that Cadmus first killed but
then allied himself to, meaning that the dragon was Harmonia. The
fact that the same dragon arose also in Colchis helps to show that
Harmonia does depict nearby Armenia, and the Gogi both there
and in Colchis. It's hard for me to say at this time whether the
Spartans were Harmonia only, or she with Cadmus allied. But she
depicts the same as Hermes in Arcadia: Trojans, Thracians,
Phrygians, and multiple other allies.
In another myth version, Zeus is of Hellen, general symbol of
Greece, but made that way, I believe, by the Alans who wanted to
stress their own ancestry. It has occurred to me that since the Alans
were called "Gelonus" in myth, that they were the outcroppings of
the Galli-cult bloodline, meaning that "Hellen" was codeword for
that cult. The Cecrops line of Zeus no doubt provided the goddess,
Io (symbol of Argos), even as the Cecrops line prroduced Ion
through "mariage" with Aeolus, son of Hellen. Ion was the symbol
of the Ionians, and Io must have been the same. I say that the Zeus
line went through Io because he turned her into a white cow, which
was the symbol also of Zeus, that symbol no doubt referring to the
Aryan Cimmerians of Taurus/Azov from whence the Thracians i.e.
Ares came.
Now the white bull that was Zeus mated with Europa, she
being a Phoenician/Tyrian peoples on Crete, and likewise in the
Hellen version of myth, we see that Cretheus, from Aeolus and
Hellen, depicted Crete wherefore it's no surprise that he was
married to Tyro. That is, Cetheus and Tyro are the same peoples as
Europa, and the Hellen/Aeolus line that produced Cretheus must
depict the Curetes, same as Zeus. The Aeolus-Tyro mix, same as
Zeus and Europa, was called "Mino/Minoans." Note that Tyro
gave birth to the family of Jason (of the Argonauts), and that in
this myth version, the people of Jason were called Minyae, no
doubt same as the Minoans.
The Minoans are said to have formed Europe, and since the
same (Minoan) mix of peoples are again Harmonia married to
Cadmus, we thus have the migratory route of the Minoans off of
Crete and toward Europe, with the Thebes (in Greece) cult of
Cadmus being intermediate, even as the Curetes (of Crete) had
formed a cult identical to the Theban cult (Kabieri/Galli). This cult

308
was Satanism and paganism to its core, the origin of the myth
craft, and no doubt the underlying world-vision of the Gaul
migration. There was yet another path from Crete, to Rhodes, and
we see that the sister of Cretheus, Macar, was said to be the
daughter of Rhoda and Helios.
Now many peoples settled their island of Rhodes, but as in
this case it was Cretheus (from Aeolus) who did so, the myth was
written by the Alans who wished to stress their line. Yet the
settling of Rhodes in other myth/legend versions has it landed by
Curetes. Thus, once again, we see that Cretheus and the Curetes
were one and the same, meaning that the Curetes/Zeus and the
Hellen-Aeolus line were the same peoples. This explains why
Salmoneus is known in mythology as the one who comically
imitated Zeus, for he was from Aeolus, and was even the brother
of Cretheus so that he too was a Curete. Salmoneus can be
likewise shown to be the same as Zeus where he (Salmoneus) was
made father of Tyro, she depicting the Minoans in Greece. But
note that he was father of Tyro by Aleus (king of Arcadia), yet
another allusion to the Alans so that the Minoans were in part
Alans.
Thus where Harmonia depicted the Hellen-Aeolus line, and
where she became the Spartans, the Aeolus line produces the
Thracian portion of the Danaan bloodline, wherefore we expect the
Danaans to have been proto-Alans, and therefore we expect the
historical Alans proper to come forth from the Danaans, this being
the case through Hercules when he was said to produce the
Gelonus. This is an important point since the Stewarts were Alans.
Hercules is most definitely an expression of the westward
migration. Just as Harmonia and Cadmus, same as Hermes and
Pan, formed the Veneti, who became the Danes, so we see that
Hercules was a Danaan who must have been at the root of the
Danes. And since these Greeks migrants are likened to proto-Alans
on the one hand and Cimmerians on the other, it is necessary for
the Alans proper to stem from Cimmerians, which is what we see
when Hercules mates with a woman half snake in Azov/Crimea to
produce the Gelonus Scythians.
To show that I have been on the right track when connecting
the Danes to the Trojans, we read:
"Widukind of the tenth century, who entertained a
warm affection from his Saxon people, was, however, of
the opinion that [the Saxons] had come across the sea
[from Scandinavia to Europe] and mentions various
accounts as to this origin; they were thought to be
descended from the Danes and Norwegians, or were
regarded as the remnants of the army of Alexander the
Great which had scattered in all directions. Whether it

309
would be possible to trace a connection between this
Macedonian origin and Trojan descent need not here be
discussed... [later he writes] but it is clear that
distinguished Gauls, more especially, and their successors
the Franks traced their origin from Troy"
www.woden.org/tribes.html
The report that the Franks came from Troy specifically may
be misguided, but I do think that the Franks can be traced to the
Trojan elements, espeically the Getae.
Keep in mind as you consider the value/reliability of
mythology, for providing true history, that the myth writers were
writing in restrictive code (in case the material got out to the
public) and were therefore not attempting to popularize elaborately
their own peculiar views of history. It was an in-house work and
therefore overseen with much scrutiny by peers and elders of the
craft. It would have been a self-destructive work if they were
allowing themselves to be deceived by their own historical
conclusions.
In yet another myth version where the Gogi writers depicted
themselves under the cover of "Hyperborean," a Thrace-to-Sparta
migration, similar or equal to (I don't know which) the one
engaging both Zeus and Harmonia, is illustrated by the twins,
Apollo and Artemis. In the same way, the Armenia-to-Greece
Hermes migration along the southern shore of the Black is similar
or equal to the Pelops invasion into Greece. Where Pelops is
portrayed in Phrygia as cut up into little pieces (by his father
Tantalus) prior to entering Greece, so we see that the Phrygians
were a multitude of allies ... Lydians, Moesi, Mysians, Thyni,
Bithyni, Phrygian proper, Getae, Edonians, and others. See that
"Tantalus" itself is rooted in "many," for "tanta/tantus" is
Italian/Latin for "many/much," as in our English "tantamount").
That should reveal to you in a vivid way that Tantalus was
not an historical person, but merely a code to tell a secret story
line: he was among many allies yet never able to unite them, and
was thus like a thirsty ruler who had water just before his tongue
but could never quite reach it.
Now when I speak of the Curetes I am referring to the more-
common name, Trojan. The counterpart of the Curetes were the
Corybantes, they being the settlers of Mount Ida at Troy (the
Curetes settled Mount Ida in Crete).
The CORYBANTES are represented as a kind of
inspired people, subject to Bacchic [i.e. Dionysus] frenzy,
and inspiring terror at the celebration of the sacred rites
by means of war-dances, noise, cymbals, drums, and
arms. They have been called attendants of Rhea [Zeus'

310
mother] ... and guardians of Dionysus...It is also told that
the CORYBANTES came from Colchis...It
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/CORYBANTES.htmi
Thus Europe was founded primarily by occult Trojan (in turn
Cimmerian/Iranian) and Phoenician blood (that later put forth the
Alans). This wave produced the Herminone and Ingaevone sectors
of Germanics, the Herminones (root "Hermin/Irmin") worshiping
"Zia," an obvious allusion to Zeus (who produced Hermes), while
the Ingaevones (root Inga/Anga") worshiped the Vanir gods, a
less-obvious allusion to the Thracian-Egyptian (or Thracian-
Gypsy) mix that were the Danaans. By Thracian-Egyptian mix I
am referring to Harmonia/Zeus mixing with the Danaus peoples
from Egypt, and this we see when Zeus came upon Danae (to mate
with her) as a golden shower...to produce Perseus and the
Danaans.
The other wave of European migration, distinguished from
the first because it did not pass through the Veneti nor was it from
Egyptian elements, was likewise from the Thracians, this time
from the Getae and related tribes, this forming the third sector of
Germanics, the Istvaeones (root "Ist"), who worshipped Odin. The
Saxons, Jutes, Angles and therefore the Dutch, having been
classified as Ingaevones, took part, not in this wave, but in Veneti
wave (i.e. the Gauls), and this is attested to by Widukind in the
quote above where he traces the Saxons to the Danes of
Scandinavia.

311
MERLIN:
PRIEST OF WESTERN ATLANTIS

Consider three characters in the Geoffrey of Monmouth's


"Vita Merlini": there was Gwenddoleu, Gwenddydd (Merlin's
sister), and Rhydderch. The first two must depict the Gwynedd
Celts; Gwynedd was the strongest kingdom of all Wales at one
point, located in North Wales.
The third term is a variation of "Rodri/Roderick," said to
mean "red" and yet it looks to me like the dragon-line codeword,
"wheel" (e.g. Rodez, Rudr), belonging to the Rus of France and
Scandinavia... who worshiped Rod, the god of ancestors. I tend to
view Rhydderch as descended from the Redones of France, who
eventually settled in Brittany (on the west European coast facing
Britain).
Because Merlin's wife was named, "Guendoloena," it can
indicate that he was of the Gwenea peoples who named Vannes,
Brittany, a dragon-line peoples who then moved to Wales to
become the Gwynedd kingdom. "Guendoloena" seems to have
been fashioned by Geoffrey to mean "Gwenedd Line," even as I
view "Merlin" as referring to the Mars Line. It is an historical
(non-mythical) assessment that Vannes (Brittany) was founded and
named by the Veneti, and that the city was also called "Gwenea."
This descent from the Veneti would make Merlin a descendant of
Mars, for the Veneti and other Italians from them were from that
god.
Merlin is more-assuredly connected to the Gwynedda in that
his sister (i.e. a fellow tribe) is identified as "Ganieda." She turns
out to be the queen of king Rhydderch. He is the king of the
Cumbrians (Cymbri) in this story, and Merlin is his ally. Merlin, a
magician, may depict the Druid priesthood in its entirety, or at
least the part of the priesthood loyal to Rhyderch.
To substantiate that a peoples from Brittany are here
involved, Geoffrey referred to the fighters of Merlin as the
"Britons." And in fact the Cumbrians are said to be one stock with
the Britons. One website had this to say (brackets not mine): "The
name Cambri (Cymry), now applied to the Welsh, was
formerly used of the Britons of Strathclyde and Cumberland -
'Y Gogledd'. The kingdom of Rhydderch was in this region"
http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/eng/vm/vmeng.htm
Okay, so Rhydderch was of Cimmerian blood stationed near
the modern English-Scottish border. Merlin lived in south Wales.

312
Merlin's wife depicted north Wales since that is where the
Gwynedd kingdom stood, meaning possibly that Merlin was not of
the Gwynedda (bloodline), but merely allied to them.
In tune with my theory that in Wales we are dealing with an
early Gogi peoples, I found that the Welsh "worked extensive
copper mines, the remains of which can still be seen in such
places as the Great Orme (Pen y Gogarth) Llandudno,
Gwynedd."
http://www.britannia.com/wales/whist1.html
Brackets not mine. Llandudno is right on the Great-Ormos-
Head peninsula near Rhos-on-the-Sea. But as you can see, the two
names evoking Hermes and the Rus, but Great Ormes was at one
time "Gogarth." I read elsewhere that "A Norse presence is
indicated by the modern English name for Pen y Gogarth,
which derives from Horma Heva, "the Great Serpent."
://www.heneb.co.uk/GAT site/hlc creuddyn/cr2000.htm
torma" seems yet a better allusion to Hermes than
"Ormes." This place of the Great Serpent is where Erethlyn was
located. Now consider what Herodotus said, in his Book 5, of the
Thracians, that "they worship only Ares and Dionysus and
Artemis. Their kings, however, apart from the rest of the
people, worship Hermes more than all gods, and swear by him
alone; and they say that they are descended from Hermes."
That sounds as though the kings kept to a secret society. It's
interesting indeed that the region of Pen y Gogarth there was
Bangor (still there today), which, whether or not it was named
after "Van," must have been the origin of Bangor, Maine. What's
interesting is that Bangor (Wales) is situated on the Menai strait
overlooking the island of Mona, terms that evoke not only Manes
and Armenia, as I've said so many times thus far, but now also
Maine in the United States!! Surely this can't be a coincidence.
Now the term "Llandudno is interesting when undressed of
it's "Lland," for there remains only an "Udno" at that point, which
to me looks like Edone/Idun," the lands of the Thyni of Thrace and
the Edonians of Thrace, the peoples who put forth Odin (whom the
Romans said was Mercury/Hermes) on one hand, and the Druids
on the other.
Geoffrey says that the king Rhydderch "made war on
Gwenddoleu, who ruled the realm of Scotland," thus indicating
that some branches of the Gwynedda had moved from North
Wales to Scotland by the middle of the first millennium AD. And
they came to be at war with their Welsh counterparts who were
allied to Geoffrey's codeword, "Rhydderch."
Although the men of Gwenddoleu are called the "Scots," the
term used by Geoffrey to describe them does not allow me to view
them as the Scots proper who stemmed from the Irish proper. For

313
"Gwenddoleu" suggests an obvious origin in the Gwynedd
kingdom...which was of the Britonic, so-called "P-Celt" branch,
while the Irish/Scots were of the "Q-Celt" Gaels.
In another work, the Britonic enemies of Gwenddoleu were
"Percival" ("Peredur" in Welsh) and his twin brother,
Gworgi/Gorgi, thus possibly exposing them as
Gorgons/Gogi ... which makes sense since they were Cimmerians.
The said battle was at modern Arthuret in English Cambria, in
north England near the modern Scottish border; the twins ruled
from Ebrauc just in or beside York. Now I mention Ebrauc
because it was in pre-Roman times "Brigantia" (named after the
Brigantians) evoking the ancient name of the Phrygians, Bryges,
who were the Apple/Dragon/Rose/Grail/Fleece line. When the
Romans arrived, they found the king of Brigantian to be Venutius,
perhaps named in honor/memory of their Veneti descendants.
Now Rhydderch's wife was "Languoreth," perhaps the root
of the Lancaster settlement that was also in those parts, but
possibly stretching back to Languedoc and/or Langres in France.
The latter, "Langres," looks like a perfect match with
"Languoreth." Langres, because it was in north France, would
appear to me to refer to the particular Redones that became the
Danes, wherefore Rhydderch's wife appears as the Danann who
had long-before escaped their homes in Ireland to re-settle in
uroto-Scotland and Wales. As the Danann came to rule Erethlyn,
rmes, Rhos, and Mona, Rhydderch, from the Redones of
southern France, was allied to his Danann kin who had been in
Wales ahead of him.
It's interesting that Strathclyde, the throne of Rhydderch, is in
Lanark-shire (S.W. Scotland) today. To the east of Strathclyde
was Manaw Gododdin, and to the south was the island of Manaw
(Isle of Man). It seems an easy conclusion that "Manow" derived
from the same origin as "Mona." At the following website we
learn that the Isle of Man (also "Mon") was named by the Danann,
and in particular after the Danaan ruler, Manannan. That these
Danaans were the Hermes- and Apollo-related Gogi that I have
been refering to, we find this quote where the brackets are not
mine:
The connection of Lug (an Irish divinity,
corresponding partly to Hermes, partly to Apollo) with
Manannan and [the Isle of] Man, is said to have been a
close one, as will be seen from the following account of
him ... Lug is thus described: 'Like to the setting sun was
the splendour of his countenance and his forehead; and
they were not able to look in his face from the greatness
of its splendour. And he was Lugh Lanch-fada ... ' Lug was

314
famous for his mighty blows, and his sear became one of
the treasures of the Tutha Dé Danaun.
http://www.isle-of-man.com/manxnotebook/fulltext/folklore/ch01.htm
"Tutha" evokes king Thoth of Egypt, he being the Egyptian
variation of Hermes, whose father was king Menes (no doubt after
the Phrygian god, Manes). The people of the Isle of Man became
known as "Manx," a variation of "Mans." But do note that the sun
god, Lug, a variation of "Loki," must mean "wolf." And as he was
named "Lanch," a possible connection with Languedoc/Langres
(i.e. the Lingones) is possible, especially as "Lug" itself may
derive from the Ligurians ... who are said by some to have been
related to the Lingones.
Boetius said that Manannan "was the establisher and
cultivator of religion after the manner of the Egyptians.--He
caused great stones to be placed in the form of a circle."
http://www.sacred-texts.com/pag/idr/idr09.htm
Like Mona, the Isle of Mon was a chief center for the Druids,
and as the Druids were associated with the Danann of Ireland, the
conclusion seems clear enough, that the Druids (originating in the
Edones/Getae of Thrace) carried the Egyptian religion to Britain
when the Getae became intermarried with to the Egypt-based
Danaans of Argos. I might add that the Great Pyramid was in Giza ,
a term reflecting Cotys, son of Manes, or better yet, Ceto the
mother of the Hesperides, terms which I believe came to refer to
the Getae.
Manannan was himself a sorceror, and it had been said by
ancient writers that he made one man look like a hundred, that
picture evoking the giant stone statues ("megaliths") that line some
shores of Britain, incluing Mon and North Wales. On the east coast
of Mon there is even the locality of Ramses. Nearby is Glen Mona,
and very close to that is the archeaolical site of Cashtel, where was
a heap of stones in the shape of a cone used as tombs and thus
evoking the Egyptian pyramids.
Manannan (perhaps a play-on-words with "Danann") was
ousted from Ireland by the Irish proper. Manannan then settled the
Isle of Man and his peoples must have went on to the Scottish
mainland ahead of the Scots proper, but at a location near north
Wales. This would strongly suggest that Manannan went on to
found Mona. Yet Rhos, Erethlyn, Great Ormes, Bangor, etc., were
likely settled long before by friendly Danaan relatives... explaining
why the Danann were in the first place fleeing there when losing
their war with the Irish. The two-headed wolf, Orthos, that
belonged to Geryon of Erethlyn, may have depicted those Danann
relatives, for example the Fomorians and Fir-Bolgs. I do not now

315
believe that either dog head could have depicted the Danaan
because I think Hercules depicted the Danaan (who killed the dog).
The website below tells that monuments of the Cashtel type
were found also in Bute and Arran, islands in the Firth of Clyde
(west of Glasgow). This reveals that Bute and Arran, not to
mention the entire region of Clyde, were (long before Rhydderch
and Merlin) Danann settlements. To verify what I have been
saying all along, that the Danaans find ancestry in Media, note that
"Arran" evokes "Eran/Aryan" of Media. Indeed, Ayr and Ayrshire
are coastal regions over-looking Arran, and those terms evoke
Ares, and Aria his origin in Media.
It can't be another coincidence that, north of Arran, there is
the region of Argyll, evoking Argos, and that further north yet
there is the island of Iona, evoking Io, goddess of Argos. When
combining these points, it tells that the first peoples on Britain
were from the Greeks. Bute, an important name to the Steward
bloodline, is in Argyll, but while Argyll may belong to the Scots
proper, the Stewarts (under another name, fo course), may have
lived on the island prior to the Scots, as part of the Danann
peoples, or something similar.
What was an astounding find for me is that the Rose clan of
Scotland originated in Ayrshire before moving far north to Ross-
Shire (see Ayrshire map) and Ross-Shire region. It tends to seal
what I suspected, that the Roses of Scotland were an integral part
of the Dragon/Rose line. In fact, just like the Danann, it is said by
others, including some Roses, that the Rose clan originated in
Ireland.
Have you heard of the Rose DNA Reconstruction Project,
formed in 2001 to identify true Roses? At a Rose-family website,
^

we read: The Rose Family Association DNA project is the 2nd


largest DNA study with Family Tree DNA and is one of the
largest such projects in the world!"
We are dealing with western Atlantis here, which was called
"Hespera" by Siculus. Atlantis has been identified by some as Sao
Tome off west Africa, in the Gulf of Guinea. While I think this is
not correct, note that this island was populated by Gorgons, and
that "Guinea" evokes Gwenea (Vannes) in Brittany. Thus it could
seem that Western Atlantis, though once in the hands of the
Geryon peoples, came to be identified with the kingdom of the
Gwenea/Gwynedd peoples who took it over. The golden apples,
according to Greek myth, are found in Hesperia/Hesperides,
wherefore I would suggest that this "garden" is to be found among
the Gwenea-Gwynedd kingdom. I assume that the Gwenea peoples
came to Wales to rule Atlantis, and therefore when they settled
Erethlyn they settled the very heart of Atlantis... which must also
be the apple garden.

316
The Merovingian Franks have been fitted into the holy-grail
lore of king-Arthur, but I may now have the key in making the
connection: that the Merovingians were (possibly) the founders of
Vannes/Gwenea. For Britannica says that "Another people called
Veneti were a Celtic tribe of the Morbihan district in modern
Brittany..." It was the Morbihan who founded Vannes/Gwenea! !
I can't find the origin of the term, "Morbihan," but it sure
does look as though "Merovech/Merovee" (progenitor of the
Merovingians) qualifies, especially with the common "v" to "b"
switch. We can easily find a "Bia" or "Biaina" in the "bihan"
portion of "Morbihan" so that perhaps it should be read as Mor-
Bihan, "mor" possibly meaning "sea" as the "Mer(o)" in "Merovi"
suggests. That would render the name as "The Bia/Van by the
Sea." Interesting along this argument is that historical variations of
"Merovech" include "Meroveus/Merovee"...which modify to my
hypothetical "Merobeus/Merobee."
Now just as there were Gorgons in Guinea, and Gorgons
throughout the dragon bloodline, so Geoffrey (of Monmouth)
depicted the rulers of a certain "Fortunate Isle" as women, an
apparent inferrence to Amazons. Moreover, the island itself is an
inferrence to Avalon, the "apple orchard," for Geoffrey calls it "the
island of apples." I imagine that this place must have been the
capital of Western Atlantis at one point, and the finger points to
north Wales in Erethlyn...since that is where (the monster) Geryon
ruled, and where Ladon, an apparent synonym of Geryon,
protected the apples. Of course, the kingdom was known as
"Atlantis", not in historical reality, but only secretively... among the
brotherhood/bloodline stemming from Atlas and Poseidon that
ruled the region.
The "apple garden," being an island, was quite possibly
Mona because Erethlyn faced it. This would not only make Mona
part of the island of Atlantis, but part of the legendary "Thule" of
the Scandinavians, often likened to Atlantis. To this I would add
that "Thule" looks like "Toul" and "Toulouse" of France, and these
terms may have affinity with "Dol" of Brittany, where ruled the
Stewarts and Alans.
Aside from Erytheia and Arethusa, another Hesperide
daughter was "Hesperia," the same name as the island of Atlantis.
The first two daughters would suggest two tribes of Erethlyn, and
could thus depict the same as Geryon's two-headed dog, named
"Orthos" (by the Greek myth writers).
Hercules was the only one ever to find the apples of the
Hesperides, yet he couldn't find the apples without the help of
Atlas. This clue reveals that the bloodline of Atlas was ruling in
Hespera. That no one could find Erethlyn but Hercules means that

317
the "Atlanteans" (i.e. Geryon) lived there in peace ... until Hercules
came to make war with them.
Geoffrey uses "Gades" and "Gorgades" in the same breath,
showing that he knew the Getae to have been Gorgons. He
compared the Gorgades to the Griffens of Greek myth when he
said that the Gorgades were woman with the bodies of goats. True
to Greek myth, the Getae were thus evoked by his secret code,
"goat." Geoffrey obviously viewed the Getae as Amazons, which,
while depicted in myth as a female-only peoples, were more likely
the transvestites and homosexuals of the Galli/Kabeiri cult
(Dionysus was a transvestite). In between the mention of Gades
and Gorgades, he mentions Hesperides.
The region around Ayrshire -- belonging once to the Danann
of Ireland -- was much later taken over by the Britons under
Rhydderch. In the course of time, he attacked the Gwynedd branch
in Scotland, who may certainly have become allied to the Scots
proper, explaining why Geoffrey calls them Scots. In fact, this
alliance to the Scots may be the reason that it was detested by its
Welsh-branch counterpart, in that the Welsh branch was allied to
the remnants of the Danann ... who had been previously chased out
of Ireland by the proto-Scots.
The Scots had entered Scotland from the extreme north west,
far from the Danann in and near Wales, and while it is predictable
that they were not welcome by the Danann into southern regions,
they eventually found an alliance with some Gwynedd peoples,
and this may have been the underlying cause of the war.
After the battle, Merlin retreats from society into the
Caledonian woods, in grief for his dead brothers, and laments to
God that 19 apple trees which used to give comfort are no longer
producing fruit. It's evident that the apple trees depict the losers in
the war, and that there were counted 19 distinct peoples in all
among the Scottish-Gwynedd fighters. This is a vivid revelation
identifying the Apple line as the Gwenea/Veneti!
In Geoffrey's account, there is also "a wolf from " the sea
that drives out the peoples of Cornwall (extreme south-western tip
of Britain). Earlier in the poem, as Merlin lamented the fall of the
19 apple trees, he also lamented a wolf of the Caledon forest that
could no longer feed itself and was turning old and frail, as though
the wolf depicted the defeated Gwynedds themselves. Very
interesting along this line is that Merlin has been identified as
"Lalockin" (Llallogan in Welsh), the twin of his sister
Gwenddydd. That is, it is said that Geoffrey, in writing his story,
copied a story about Lalockin (also "Lailoken"), and we can easily
see the "Loki" (wolf) in that name, although it may refer more
specifically to Lug.

318
Lalockin may have derived from the Leleges, especially in
view of the Welsh version, "Llallogan." In fact, "Lalockin" may be
a play on words for "Leleg's Kin." The Lelegians were, remember,
the Cauconians/Gogi of the Greek theater, and deeply involved in
the secret societies of the dragon line i.e. likely its priests. When
you see the hooded Ku Klux Klan, have you ever noticed the
resemblance to the Druids? And if you've always known that "Ku
Klux" has no comprehensible meaning, note how easily an
intelligible Kuk Lux Klan is derived with the change of only one
letter: the Gog Wolf Clan.
Acoetes (priest of Dionysus), an Etruscan (technically a
Tyrrhenian/Lydian) by blood, was therefore definitely from
Manes. Indeed, he claims to be from the Meionians, no doubt
named after Manes. The Meionians are known to have become the
Lydians, and now note that the capital of Lydia, Sardis, was also
known as Thymbra, apparently a variation of "Cimbri" and
therefore the root of "Cambria." It should also be noted that the
Lydians and Mysians were relatives while the Mysians were
connected to the Meosi peoples at the mouth of the Danube, a term
that looks like "mushu" = "dragon." The occult/ritualistic Getae
were also at the mouth of the Danube, and as they were from
Cotys (son of Manes), it could seem that the priest "Acoetes" was
simply a version of "Cotys."
I found that "Acoetes is known for being the father of
Laocoon," and it can't be a coincidence that Laocoon/Lacoon was
from (Greek) Calydon, and that his name, like "Loki," appears as
"wolf." If Merlin's original name, Lalockin, is not rooted in Leleg,
then perhaps in Laocoon.
Now Loki had a child by the name of "Fenrir" that was a
wolf, and I think we can say with utmost accuracy that this term
refers to the Vanir...so that the Vanir in totality are revealed as a
wolf peoples. Loki's mother was Laufey, and this term alternates
as "Lauphey" and then modifies to a hypothetical Lupi/Lupo
meaning "wolf" in Latin languages.
Now one (note, not all) of the nine sisters who ruled over the
apple island is named "Tyronoe," evoking Tyro of Greek myth, the
descendants of which produced at least two peoples pertinent to
my point here, one, Calydon's wife, Aeolia, and two, Jason of the
Golden Fleece, himself descended from Aeolus. The father of
Aeolus was Hellen, and he also evokes the term "Alan," by which
I mean to say that Alans originated as the Greeks, for "Hellen" (as
in "Hellenism") is a term specific to the founding Greeks. Another
of the three sons of Hellen was Xuthus, and he seems to me a
variation of Cotys i.e. the Manes line entering Greece. Commonly
reiterated, the Ionians came from Xuthus. Keep in mind here that
Hellen must depict the Manes line if he gave birth to Cotys,

319
wherefore the Alans are here revealed as another Manes line that
entered Greece.
In the Argos family tree of Pausanias, the sixth generation
after Argus produced "Gelanor," a mythical term that sounds a lot
like the Gelonus stemming from Hercules. I would definitely
equate the two terms because the Danann took the throne of Argos
during the rule of Gelanor, meaning that the peoples depicted by
"Gelanor" had to flee Greece at that time, explaining why
Herodotus reported that the "Geloni" were "anciently Greeks" and
fleeing war to make their home amid the Boudini.
If I am correct in rooting the Alans to the Greeks, and
moreover since Aeolia was Calydon's wife, it indicates that the
Alans proper of Britain were related by blood to Scottish
Caledon ... wherefore we should find Alans in Caledon i.e. southern
Scotland. Behold Arthur, wounded at Camallan, is taken to
Fortunate Isle to recover. Camallan was north of the Firth of Forth
i.e. in Scotland...on the Allan river!!
Yet "Arthur" itself seems like a variation of "Ereth," that oft-
repeated and very-sacred word, and therefore he was not likely an
historical man, but rather an eponym for Erethlyn ... the hub of
Atlantis and the protectorate of the Hesperides/Avalon Apple
Garden. Arthur defeated all the peoples surrounding his core
kingdom and thus developed an empire. He must have been the
outflow of Hercules peoples who had defeated Geryon (in
Erethlyn).
Now Hercules, as I have mentioned previously, was of
Cimmerian blood. When he returned from Erethlyn to the far east
(800-600 BC), he mated with a half-snake woman near Azov, and
behold she brought forth the "Gelonus" Scythians who many
interpret as (Sarmation) Alans proper. Thus goes the myth that
explains the origin of the Sarmation Alans, the Alans proper.
Among these were the "Geloni" that Herodotus tied back to
Greece, even though they were found in the Russian far
north ... near the Hyperboreans.
The Hercules myth thus makes it obvious that the proto-Dane
bloodline ventured, prior to the formation of the Danes proper (i.e.
of Denmark), on an eastward migration through France and Italy
and into Macedonia, where it forked off, one fork going as fas as
Azov/Crimea.
The Gelonus (of north Russia) were living amongst the
Boudini, according to Herodotus; the latter may have been from
the Bithyni (of Asia), a peoples known to be from the Thyni (also
from Asia, on the Bithyni border). The Boudini were blue-eyed
Aryans; the Gelonus were darker, and no wonder since they were
from Greece. Yet they lived together. It may be that the Gelonus
were the southern fork of the said Hercules migrants, while the

320
Boudini were the northern fork, by which I mean to say that the
Boudini were Alans.
Herodotus wrote that an "Iyrcae" peoples lived smack beside
the Boudini and the Gelonus. The Iyrcae may have named "York"
in Britain, and one can see that both terms may derive from
"Gorg(on)" There is a similarity between "Iyrcae" and the Gorgon
city of "Verkana" (= "wolf's land"). The Great Dane breed of dog,
previously called the "Alano," serves as some evidence that the
Alans lived among the Iyrcae, for the Iyrcae were known for breed
large hunting dogs. These peoples may have become the wolf
people precisely on that score.
I could easily believe that the Iyrcae were a branch of
Hyperboreans (also a wolf peoples) since Herodotus placed the
Hyperboreans in the same general area of north Russia. The Ros-
Alans, or "Roxolani," who also lived in north Russia, are perhaps
proof that the Rus (i.e. the Danes i.e. Hercules) put forth the Alans
proper (i.e. Sarmations) of Russia. It is often said that the
Sarmations and the Slav Rus are one and the same, which now
makes sense since the Slavs are also from the Redones/Rodez. The
Redones were not the Hercules peoples (who migrated from
Gwynedd to Azov), but the Geryon cattle that, symbolically
speaking, Hercules brought along. That is, two peoples migrated
together, one the Greek Danaans, and two the Redones. The
conclusion is that these two became the Alans i.e. the Slavs.
Because the Slavs are descended directly from the Vandals,
and they in turn from the Veneti, it tends to show the migratory
route that Hercules took from Britain to Russia. It must have
forked off northward at Italy as he was passing through, to the land
then settled by them, where they themselves became the Vandals.
The Vandals are known to descend from the historical Lugii
peoples, and this must be the peoples depicted by the god, Lug,
who had been a ruler of the Danann of Ireland i.e. of the Hercules
peoples. Thus, the Lugii may not have put forth Lug in Ireland, but
rather Lug from Ireland/Wales put forth the Lugii when passing
eastward through France and Italy.
Knowing now that these Lug-Hercules migrants originated
from what would much later become Gwynedd, note how
"Wend/Vand" is similar to "Gwynedd." It may thus be that the
Gwynedd originated in the Vandals, meaning also that the Gwenea
of Brittany (from whom the Gwynedda descended) may have been
from the Vandals. On the other hand, "Gwynedd" may not derive
from "Wend/Vand," but from the Venedi. My hunch is that
Gwenea/Vannes was founded by the Vandal branch of Veneti,
rather than directly from the Veneti, since I believe that Gwenea
was founded by Merovingians and Stewarts, whom were Alans.

321
This all tends to show that Atlantis belonged to the
Rus(sians) of Europe, and therefore to Rosh. It's interesting that
the Ros-Alans are/were also called "Aes-Alans." A chief god of
the Aesir was Balder, whom I have noted evolves easily to/from
Valder = Walter, the name used by the earliest-known Stewarts (of
Dol). Perhaps the Stewarts took that name in memory of Balder.
He was known by the variation, "Baeldaeg," looking very much
like Baal-Dog. The Stewarts did honor a dog diety.
In Geoffrey's fantastical "History of Britain" (1136), Arthur's
wife, Guinevere ("Gwenhwyfar" in Welsh) must efer to the
Gwynedd kingdom, but because that term is devoid of a "d"
(wheras other like terms used the "d"), she may have directly
depicted the Gwenea of Brittany.

322
THESE BUTES WERE MADE FOR...
STEWARTS
June 2006

Just to recap from the previous chapter in case you're here


directly from a search engine, nearly the first rulers (dukes) of
Brittany proper were named "Alan/Alain." Although these men
ruled starting in 877 AD, we find that Alans had been in Brittany
long before:
The Alans, originally a steppe people of the Scythian
type, after serving as cavalry units in the forces of the
[Attila] Huns, the Romans, and the Goths, had ended up
settling in what is now Brittany (then Armorica) not too
long before the arrival of the Bretons (500 AD), and their
presence there can be traced historically not only through
personal names (e.g. "Gaor") but also through place
names (compounds including the elements "Alan" or
"Alain") "(brackets not mine).
http://www.johnjemerson.com/anecdote.htm
Now the Stewarts of Dol, Brittany, who later came to ascend
both the Scottish and British thrones, and whom are regarded
today as being a dragon bloodline by certain keepers of the dragon
bloodline, were called sons of Alan while in Brittany:
"Mr. J. H. Round discovered the real parentage of
Flaald [i.e. the Stewart ancestor in Dol] in the charters of
St. Florent de Saumur. These show that he was the son of
Alan, the dapifer [i.e. Steward] of Dol, on the borders of
Brittany, and was present at the dedication of Monmouth
Priory in 1101 or 1102"
http://www.asiawrite.co.nz/lestrange/library/records/chap01.html
Because the early Stewarts were thus associated with
Monmouth, while Geoffrey of Monmouth was alive, a possible
family connection between them is made possible. If that
connection was the reality, then the Merlin story (Vita Merlini)
that Geoffrey wrote (touched on in a previous chapter and at "My
Calydonian Boar Hunt") must be secretly based on Stewart family
roots. This Merlin-Stewart connection is now easily explained in
that Merlin was revealed by Geoffrey to be a priest of the

323
Gwynedd peoples of Wales ... which people, by a stroke of internet-
searching luck, I was able to trace to the Gwenea peoples... of
Brittany. That stroke came after tracing the dragon line to the
Veneti, whereafter I then learned that the Veneti had founded
Vannes, but that it was also called "Gwenea." The dukes
(essentially kings under an emperor) of Brittany named Alan/Alain
were also counts of Vannes... meaning that Stewart blood may have
ruled Vannes.
Moreover, the Stewart-Merovingian connection that some
have made becomes apparent if the Morbihan peoples, who
founded Vannes, were the Merovingians (note how "Morbihan"
modifies to "Morbigan/Morvigan"). This descent, if true, gives us
an idea of which direction the Merovingian royals went after being
de-throned in France. But to follow the Merovingians to the
present day, we merely follow the Stewarts, by whatever names
they happen to belong to.
J.H. Round told that Alan, steward of Dol, had a son, Alan,
also steward of Dol, who himself had yet another son by the name
of Alan. It turned out that the ancestor of the Stewarts of Scotland
was Flaald, the brother of the second Alan. And Flaald himself had
a son, yet another Alan, wherefore the latter is known as Alan fitz
Flaald ("fitz" means "son of")...the fourth steward of the count of
Dol. But don't eliminate the possibility that the count of Dol may
himself have been of the Stewart family. Indeed, behold that those
who hold to this version of Stewart roots trace these "Alan/Alain"
names to such counts of Dol as "Rivallon" and "Salonionas,"
where again we can see "Alan" within their names.
Now it may seem like I am not worthy of your consideration
here when I tie the Stewarts to the Alan Huns, king Arthur, and
Odin all in one stroke. But look here that others have done quite
the same:
"Among those [Stewart] ancestors who are in the
realm of legend, some researchers claim to include:
"Old" King Cole, King of Colchester (yes, the
"merry old soul")
King Llyr, King Of The Britons (Shakespeare's
King Lear)
Odin the All-Father, god of the Norse
Attilla the Hun
King Aviragus of the Bretons (claimed by a few
Welsh historians to be the historical King Arthur)

324
(The Most Ancient Stewart Ancestors)
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rykbrown/stewart_of_ardvorlich.htm
I do not believe that the Stewarts were related to Atilla the
Hun, but rather the Alan Huns who allied themselves with Attila.
Yet it's interesting that Atilla was from the House of Dulo while
the Stewarts ruled in Dol. It may certainly be that Attila was
himself a Gelonus Scythian, explaining why Alan Huns became
his primary allies during his westward drive. As I have mentioned,
the House of Dol may be evident also in "Toul" and "Toulouse"
(France). The legendary "Thule" also comes to mind.
But the dragon line seems also to be in the St. Clair family of
William the Conqueror, for the count of Brittany, Alan the Red
(Rufs),whoaneptAlIofBriany,wscle
advisor of William the Conqueror and commander of his Brittany
forces. Alan the Red became the first Norman earl of Richmond:
"[Richmond] was created for military purposes. Not
so much as defence against the Scots but rather as an
offensive instrument for suppression, conquest and
colonisation of Yorkshire... The [Richmond] estate was
held by Alan [the Red]'s descendants for most of the next
three centuries... Alan Rufus had the full confidence of
William. He immediately established himself as absolute
ruler and ruthlessly stamped out any pockets of Saxon
resistance"
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/parade/hq69/Pages/hist_ric.html
Now York represented the White Rose, yet nearby in
Lancaster there was also the Red Rose. After the three said
centuries, when the earldom of Richmond passed away from the
Red Alans, it passed to John of Gaunt. Add to this that the War of
the Roses began as a result of a dispute over legitimacy rights to
the English royal line, with the two factions being the line of John
of Gaunt, duke of Lancaster, and the line of Edmund Langley,
duke of York. Thus John of Gaunt just happened to be the first
duke of Lancaster donning a Red Rose, so that Lancaster may have
become the Red Rose by connection to Red-Alan Richmond (this
could reveal that John of Gaunt was a Stewart).
Now the Rodez were a Rus peoples and this would explain
the origin of "Ros(e) Line" applied to the Merovingians and their
ilk. I found that the Stewarts were closely connected to the "Le
Strange" family. As only one example of several, Ruald Le
Strange was a witness for the land deed of Alan fitz Flaald. "Le
Strange" simply denotes that the holders of the name were
foreigners to both Britain and Normandy. One gets the impression

325
that some Stewarts were disguising their true name, but as the
name "Le Stranges" smacks of Frenchmen, don't the Merovingians
come to mind?
Alan fitz Flaald, who became much favored by Henry I,
appears as a steward of Dol in about the year that Henry was
crowned (1100), and was then Sheriff of Shropshire (in England)
beginning in 1101. This suggests that some Stewarts and Le
Stranges began to sail from Dol to England beginning at about that
time; Britannica reports that Alan's two younger sons held land in
Britain. Now the years 1100 and 1101 followed immediately after
the Crusader victory over Jerusalem (1099), possibly suggesting
that Alan fitz Flaald had joined the Crusaders and was fresh back
from the fighting when taking his reward, the Sheriff's job in
England. After all, Alan's father's brother had joined the Crusade,
not to mention king Henry's brother (Duke Robert of Normandy)
and a Henry Sinclair who married the daughter of the Templar
Grand Master. We are definitely talking the Ros(e) Line here,
especially if it is correct to connect the Merovingians to the
Jerusalem Crusade.
Keep in mind here that Henry I was the son of William the
Conqueror, and therefore a St. Clair from the Rollo-Viking line,
and that in William's days the St. Clairs established themselves in
Roslin (Scotland). A certain Sinclair who was made (by the king
of Scotland) the protector of Roslin was the cup-bearer for the
king's queen, Margaret. Henry I married that queen's daughter. I
scratch my chin thinking that Margaret was herself related to the
St. Clairs. But how?
According to Britannica, the locality of Haeredaland was in
Norway. Recall also from the similarity with "Haereda(land)" that
these communities were likely related to the Aereda peoples,
otherwise known as the Redones of France... Thus it's possible that
the Rollo Vikings were descended from the Danish branch of
Aereda.
We may view the Redones proper (i.e. of France) as red
Danes.ThyfoudRinBrtaydes-lChauin
eastern France. Recall that the Rhone river, likely named after the
Redones due to the similarity between "Rhone" and "Rennes," was
"Eridanus" (looks like "Aereda" and "Redones"), the location
where Cycnus, the king of Liguria, came to crash the chariot
wheel(s) of Helios. The Celt god (i.e. of proto-Britain), Lug, who
may thus have depicted Liguria, was said to be a darker-skinned
(i.e. red) peoples than the Danann in the midst of whom he lived.
Recall that Hercules, after defeating the Danann of Erethlyn,
and having brought some of them back to the Greek theater, mated
with a woman half snake, half human when bringing forth the
Gelonus Scythians. Recall that in one myth, he mated with this

326
woman at Azov, and that, according to the other myth, the peoples
(depicted as cattle) which he was leading to Greece escaped just
north of Greece and fled to Taurus/Azov. Thus, the Gelonus (said
to be the Alans) had been in part Erethlyn Danann, and in part
Black-sea Danaans (from Hercules). But do note that the Erethlyn
Danann are thus depicted as the half snake woman, this picture
being, not only the symbol for the dragon line, but for the Alans.
To this I should re-mention that at least one internet writer,
who respected himself an expert on linguistics, derived "Alan"
from "ilan" = "snake"! To that I would add that an historical
variation of "Geloni" (Herodotus' version of "Gelonus") is "Gilon,"
and that a dragon yet alive to this day is the Gila monster. Note too
that "guile" means "deceipt." Not finished: an alternate English
word for "river/creek," which in many languages is also their word
for "snake," is "kill" (from Dutch "kille").
I'll mention it again here that the Alans are regarded either as
the Sarmations themselves, or as a major Sarmation tribe,
wherefore it's revealing that an alternative spelling, "Sauromatian,"
starts with "sauros," the Greek word for "lizard," as you should
know if you know your dinosaurus endings.
Recall too that Herodotus rooted the ancient Geloni in
Greece, and that the progenitors of the Greeks, Hellen and his son
Aeolus, may have been a codewords for Alan ancestry. Then
remember that Cecrops was the first ruler of Athens, and that he
was depicted as half snake, half human, suggesting now (as a new
point) that Cecrops was the representation of the said Alan
ancestry. Thus, the Alans are also revealed as a Gogi people if
indeed Cecrops depicted the Gogi.
Now, Butes was a ruler of Athens, and he was of the Cecrops
bloodline. Like the Athena cult which he served, Butes was leader
of the Erechtheum cult, named after Erechtheus. Erechtheus, like
Butes, was the child of Pandion and Zeuxippe, meaning that the
two depicted roughly the same peoples, and in fact Erechtheus and
Butes are often equated as the same "person." Erechtheus was
likewise depicted as half snake!
Butes/Erechtheus gave birth to Orithyia, a term like
"Ereth(lyn)" to which I trace the dragon line in Wales. That dragon
line, under the Danann of Britain, when founding Erethlyn, also
founded regions on the west coast of Scotland, exactly where the
island of Bute was located. Therefore, I now turn to the close
associations between the Stewarts and the Bute name:
"Attractions on [the island of Bute] include the neo-
Gothic Mount Stuart House."
John Stuart, third Earl of Bute, became Prime Minister. But
why beat around the Bute? Here's the ham:

327
"Bute is the ancestral home of the Stuart Kings of
Scotland. The 800 year old ruin of Rothesay castle (left)
was built by a hereditary High Steward of Scotland from
which the surname Stewart, and later Stuart was
derived."
http://www.isle-of-bute.com/history.htm
What can we make of the term, "Rothesay"? Put it this way,
that if Scotland were to become independent of the United
Kingdom, the Duke of Rothesay would become it's king: "The
dukedom [of Rothesay] was first conferred on David Stuart,
the son of Robert III, King of Scots, in 1398. After his death,
his brother James [I, king of Scotland] received the dukedom.
Thereafter, the heir-apparent to the Scottish Crown held the
dukedom."
http://www.masterliness.com/a/Duke.of.Rothesay.htm
The Stewarts retained the dukedom until the James-Stewart
kings (of the UK) were deposed in 1689. Although the current
Duke of Rothesay is Prince Charles of Wales, with little Stewart
blood so far as I know, yet Camilla Parker Bowles may have more
as she was the Duchess of Rothesay, and this may explain why
Charles rejected Diana for her (i.e. Diana wasn't the right blood for
the Big Agenda). All the earls of Bute were Stuarts, and the fourth
one created the Marquis of Bute (1796). There have been seven
marquesses of Bute, the last, John Colum Crichton -Stuart (b.
1958) is still living. The Crichton family crest is a green, fire-
breathing dragon.
The Crichton name was in ancient times "Kreitton" and
"Crechtune," evoking the "Cruithne/Cruithin" peoples, ancient
peoples of Scotland who were associated with megaliths and
therefore probably related to the Danann. Indeed, the Danann had
in their midst a military leader called "Creidne, the artificer."
Perhaps the Cruithne were the military arm of the Danaan.
One website reports a story with myth-like undertones where
a Druid (from Ulster Ireland) was from "the land of the
Cruithne, near the river called Conchobar in Crích Rois." This
statement may reveal that Crichtons who lived on the Crich river
were a Cruithne tribe, yet the similarity between
"Crichton/Kreitton" and "Cruithin" would suggest that Crichtons
were the Cruithne.
http://www.shee-eire.com/Magic&Mythology/Myths/Kings-Queens/The-Birth-
of-Conchobarv2/Page1.htm
I have already mentioned why I believe the Cruithin could be
the Cretans of Zeus, called Curetes. I have already mentioned that
early Zeus was himself, according to Britannica, depicted as half
snake, and that he was the Curetes branch of the Cecrops line, the

328
Curetes being also a peoples who (under the name "Telchines")
later conquered the island of Rhodes. If indeed the Curetes became
the Cruithin (of Britain), then Butes of the Cecrops line was
ancestral to the Cruithin ... and therefore, as I am now theorizing,
ancestral to the Crichtons, Butes, and Stewarts.
It should also be said that the Curetes were depicted by the
white bull that Zeus became when mating with Europa to produce
king Mino (eponym of the Minoans), the first ruler of Atlantis...by
which I mean the islands and coasts of the Aegean sea. The
Curetes thus become the Greek seat of the Dragon riding on the
back of Babylon the Great. The Curetes became the Trojans if that
helps you to see how powerful they became. The Curete bloodline
was therefore found in Julius Caesar, Augustus Caesar, and the
following emperors up until Nero (though possibly beyond him).
This is why Geoffrey of Monmouth could tie the Britons of
Cambria to "Brutus" (eponym of the Britons) whom he revealed as
a Trojan-bloodline Roman. But in that case, the Britons were
Curetes and therefore, or so I theorize, descended from the
Cruithne! !
It sometimes is suggested that "Britain" derived from:
Cruithne > Pretani > Britain. The "C" to "P" modification is a
result of the P-Celt versus Q-Celt language, such as "pen" and
"can" both meaning "head," or "mac" and "map" both meaning
"son." But I think that "Britain" derived like so -- Cruit > Bridd >
Brit -- because "bridd" (according to my dictionary) is the Old
English for "bird."
Now Conchobar was king in Ulster, a city even now depicted
a red hexagram see Ulster flag. With this in mind we fmd that
tj ugh was seen again in Ireland at the time Conchubar and
the Men of the Red Branch went following white birds
southward to the Boinn at the time of Cuchulain’s birth." That
sounds like myth terminology, secret code. Conchobar was of the
Red Branch, to be differentiated from the "white birds."
The phrase may have been used because someone knew that
the proto -Britons were commonly depicted as birds. Note that
"Cuchu" of "Cuchulain" looks like "cuckoo" (from Old French
"cucu"), wherefore I would not view him as an historical person,
but as code for unidentified historical peoples. I have found other
words where "Gog variations refer to birds, for example "cock"
and "chick." Note also cackle and gaggle. Amazingly, the Gaelic
word, "gugail/gogail" means "clucking/cackling of poultry." And
"eagle" (from Old French "egel") may itself be a Gog-variation. It
may be relevant that the Greeks called Ireland, "Ogygia."
In a previous chapter I showed how "Tutankhamun" and
"Tutankhaten were the same person (King Tut), but where he
worshiped Aten (Athena) in one part of his reign but then turned to

329
Min/Manes, as is made obvious in the italics above. As the first
root of each title is obviously "Titan/Thoth," there remains the
"kh" in each case that precedes the names of the gods. And so
when we come to the Babylonian god who ruled Erech after
Tammuz, Utukhegal, we see "utu" as the first root followed by the
same "kh" but ending with "egal," as though Egal was the god of
Utu. This is significant because it takes us back prior to Tammaz
and Ishtar, and possibly prior to Anu ... perhaps to an giant/eagle
diety as a play-on-words for "Gog."
It was Utu (an histiorical king, I think) who changed
Tammuz into a dragon i.e. allowed him to adopt the dragon cult,
probably my marriage. This means that the dragon cult is rooted
more deeply in Utu's bloodline than in Tammuz. Utukhegal gave
Tammuz this title: "Ama-Ushumgal-Anna," meaning "The
Heavenly Dragon of the Mother" ("ushumgal" means "great
dragon"; "anna" means heaven). Now as "ushu" in this case meant
"dragon/serpent," I would ask you to note that the term reflects
"Utu" itself. The Mother is clearly Ishtar (looks like "ushus") by
her heavenly Sumerian version, "Inanna," whom (I am convinced)
Revelation 17:5 points to when giving, in capital letters, the
following title: "BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF
HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
No wonder the Mother-worshipping pagans hated us, and still hate
us. They like to portary her as a Virgin Madonna.
The Greek word for "GREAT" (in Revelation) is
"MEGALE," the same as the "mgal" in "ushumgal." I can see that
the "egal" in "Utukhegal" may simply mean "great," therefore, so
that the name means "great dragon" as does "ushumgal." Yet just
as we have a "Gog" in "Cyclopes" and "Gigantes," so "Gog" must
have meant "Great Big." Hence, "Egal" may be derived in
"Gogal," meaning "eagle" in some Celtic tongues (note also the
Old English "egal" and the Latin "aquila") ... the "eagle" being the
largest bird in the sky. It has been said that "Caucasia" means
"High Asia" i.e. Upper Asia. And "high" itself looks like it's rooted
in "Gog."
Britannica tells (in an article on Vikings) that the Irish
distinguished between "dark foreigners" and "fair foreigners," and
that the fair ones were equated with "men of Lochlann."Lochlann
was Norway. Thus the dark foreigners may have been Lug and his
Fomorian peoples, and er p chance Lug depicted Liguria ... the
ancestral home of the Red ones.
The Boii peoples of Europe come to mind, the ones who
lived in northern Italy but later founded Bohemia (Strabo wrote it,
"Boihaemum"). Moray in Scotland has been called "Moravia,"
which in Europe was a nation beside Bohemia, thus opening the
possibility that the Morays were the red Boii/Boinn branch. The

330
Rose Clan of Ayr (near Bute) would escape to Moray where they
shared land with the Ross clan ... who named Ross-Shire adjacent to
Moray. It's now interesting that the Boii are thought by some to
have become the Boiarii, who are in turn the root of the Bavarians,
for the Rothschilds (Shield of the Red?) started up in their region
with the Bavarian Illuminati.
Now king MacBeth was ruler in Moray, and a certain
Malcolm MacBeth (though known by other names and said by
some to have been an imposter attempting to usurp the Moray
throne) became instead the first earl of Ross. With that in mind, I
turn to a comprehensive 12-volume work by Robert Eyton (19th
century), where he concluded that the Stewarts were rooted in a
certain Fleance, son of Bancho/Banquo, who fled king Macbeth
and married the daughter of a prince of north Wales (where
Erethlyn was located). Their child was, supposedly, Walter, the
first steward of the Scottish kings beginning with Malcolm III.
This version of Stewart roots is at odds with that of Mr.
Round, where he has this same Walter born from an Alan ruler in
Brittany. The leading Rosicrucian, William Shakespeare, had
related Bancho to the Stewarts, and perhaps Robert Eyton trusted
the famous poet and took the same view. The reality may be that
the Walter (son of Fleance) in Eyton's case may have been a
Stewart of some prominence though not the one who served at the
throne of Malcolm III.
As we see the Stewarts meshed to that throne, either
Malcolm III or his queen, Margaret, may have been of the same
stock of blood as the Stewarts. It's very interesting that Margaret
had been in the company of the Varangian Rus (from the
Rodskarlar peoples) way over in Galicia/Kiev. It therefore
becomes significant to this story that Margaret's son, the king
David I who succeeded to the throne of Malcolm III, was the
creator of Halyrood House, at first called "Halyrod," a term that I
think (ignoring the Christ's-Cross-is-the-Rod story that I think is a
fabrications to hide the true origin of the term) refers to the
Russian god Rod, and therefore depicts a Holy-Rod bloodline... i.e.
that of his own and of his mother's. While the ethnicity of
Margaret's mother is wildly disputed by historians, she, Agatha,
appears to me as a Rus(sian)...i.e. of the Holy Rod.
The Boii of northern Italy may have been the descendants of
the Bia(ini) that had earlier established Lake Van in Armenia.
With that in mind, it's no surprise that Gwenea was "Vannes," a
term reflecting Lake Van. It then becomes interesting that Galicia,
home of the Varangian Rus at one point at the very time that
Margaret was in the company and protection of the Rus king, was
called "Red Rus"...and that Galicia was next to Moravia! It begins
to appear that the Slavs (a proto-Russian peoples) of Moravia,

331
Bohemia, Kiev, and Galicia -- knowing also that Slavs claim to
descend from the Ruthene -- were the Ros(e) Line of Rod in that
east-European theater.
Yet the Russian-based Slavs may have been regarded as the
white Russians while the Varangians somehow came to be the Red
Rus, perhaps by a play on words from "Rod/Rodez/Redones/etc."
Moreover, it is known that Slavs descended from the Veneti on a
northern migration -- with a migratory line from the Veneti to the
Vandles to the Slavs -- while on the other hand we have a
migratory line from the Veneti to the Redones to the Varangians.
And that may be the difference between White Ros and Red Ros,
Slavs versus Varangians, so that Moscow, formed by both peoples
while intermarried, was a "pink" city.
Upon being ruled by the Communists, Moscow was
"painted" red, and while we may suppose that this was to give the
greater honor to their Varangian side, it may have been in honor of
the occult sector of the House of Rothschild ("Red Shield"), for the
Golden Dawn Rothschilds were the ones who instigated and
controlled the takeover of Russia by the Communists. And as the
Rothschilds, though Jews, have been deeply involved in Christian
organizations of the Rosicrucian kind, not to mention deeply
Satanic organizations such as Golden Dawn, it has occurred to me
that they were Jews who at some point married into the dragon
bloodline. The red hexagram that is the symbol of the Rothschild
family may depict the same as the red hexagram that is the symbol
of Ireland. The Rothschilds came to rule Europe financially, and
therefore politically from an invisible standpoint.
Although the Crich river was in Ireland, we find Crichton
Castle near Edinbh/Roslin
urg (Scotland).
King James III (a Stewart) gave the Crichton estates to Sir
John Ramsey, who was then made Lord Bothwell. I think
"Bothwell" derives from the same source as "Bute," for there was a
Ricardi de Boteville and a Roger de Bodevill in the 13th century,
the names of which later modified to "Bothwell." As we might
have guessed, the Bothwell name's earliest known origins are in
Clyde on the Lanarkshire river (near Glasgow), near/where the
Rose clan was situated prior to moving to Ross-Shire.
see http://www.bothwell.cx/origin.shtml
Says another website: "There are many distant relations
[of the Crichtons] known mainly from the Buddo/Crichton
side." Apparently, "Buddo" was a variation of "Bute," for even in
the quote below we see a heavy Bute-Crichton relationship, not to
mention a Bute-Stewart (the French version "Stuart" is used)
relationship:
The Marquess [of Bute] holds the subsidiary titles of
Earl of Dumfries (Peerage of Scotland, 1633), Earl of

332
Bute (Peerage of Scotland, 1703), Earl of Windsor
Peerage of Great Britain, 1796), Viscount of Ayr
Peerage of Scotland, 1622), Viscount of Kingarth
Peerage of Scotland, 1703), Viscount Mountjoy, of the
i sle of- Wight (Peerage of Great Britain, 1796), Lord
Crichton of Sanquhar (Peerage of Scotland, 1488), Lord
Sanquhar (Peerage of Scotland, 1622), Lord Crichton of
Sanquhar and Cumnock (Peerage of Scotland, 1633),
Lord Mount Stuart, Cumra and Inchmar nock (Peerage
of Scotland, 1703), Baron Mount Stuart, of Wortley in the
County of York (Peerage of Great Britain, 1761, though
created for the wife of the 3rd Earl and not merged with
the Earldom until 1794), and Baron Cardiff, of Cardiff
Castle (Peerage of Great Britain, 1776), and is a Baronet
of Nova Scotia, styled "of Bute".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_of_Bute
Within these titles there must be an assortment of
brotherhoods, and in fact virtually the entire list may be one Bute
brotherhood. Note that Windsor is included. Might "Windsor"
stem from "Wend," the alternative name of the Vandals?
Let's go back to the Cecrops bloodline and discuss
Erichthonius, the third king of Athens, immediately after Cranaus.
Some view Erichthonius the same as Erechtheus (i.e. Butes), not
only due to the similarity of terms, but because both had a son
named Pandion. Behold, amazing is the resemblence between
"Erichthonius" and "Crichton." This now explains the close
relationship, in Britain, between the Bute and Crichton families.
It's of course possible that secret societies to this day know that the
two families are tied in Greek myth... wherefore they would feed us
cow patties about these Greek figures, to mislead us.
Can it be a coincidence that Erichthonius was the son of
Dardanus and Batia? Wouldn't Butes be from Batia, therefore,
who was the daughter of Teucer? Erichthoneus, as you can see,
was the son of both the Dardanus and Teucer clans that made up
the Trojans, a link going back to the two families (Erichthoneus
gave birth to Tros, who named Troy).
Perhaps "Erichthonius" should be viewed as Erech-Thyni,
Erech being the city of the dragon sun god, which of course Zeus
was...and "Thyni" being the genetic root of Athenians. Indeed, as
the ruler after Cranaus, Erichthonius becomes Zeus himself if
indeed Cranuas is an alternative version of Cronos (Zeus' father).
The alternative, "Erechtheus," looks like "god of Erech." Pandion,
son of both Ericthonius and Erechtheus, now becomes the Curetes.
You heard me say that the Curetes (from the Cecrops line) became
the Trojans, and so behold now that Erichthonius gave birth to

333
Tros, founder of Troy. Now his other son, Pandion, was "married"
to the daughter of Tereus, ruler of Thrace and son of the dragon,
Ares, but I think this "Tereus" is the same as Tros, meaning that
the Tros portion of the Trojans was from the Ares/Thracian
dragon.
I have pointed out that "saurus" is Greek for "lizard," and yet
there is according to my dictionary, another Greek term for lizard
k okodilos." Aside from "kroko" ingevok
"Gorgon/Greco,r
doesn't it evoke "Crich"? Yes, "Crich" evokes a creek, yet a creek
is similar to a snake in its winding. My dictionary defines a "crick"
as a turn or twist.
Now per chance the Po river, from whence is the fork-in-the-
road of the serpent line, was named after the Athenian ruler, Butes,
for the river was at first called, "Padus." And as the Veneti of the
Po came from the Danube river and likely from the city of
Sicambria upon that river -- since after all the dragon line in
Britain was in Cambria -- isn't it curious that Sicambria was also
"Buda"? Thus might the Padus river have been named after the
same entity that named that city?
Our "pod" and "bud" come to mind, where a pod is a
seed/capsule, often a bud. "Bud" derives from the Middle English,
"budde," and my dictionary does not know the origin of "pod,"
though it could be from "bud." A boot is a capsule for the foot, and
it derives from Old French, "bote." And a booth is also a capsule,
from Middle English "bothe." Then there is "bottle." The Old
French "boute" is a cask/keg. And of course there is the "pot." The
Dutch "busse" is a box. Might "Bese" and "Butes" mean a
seed/egg?
Now behold. Erichthoneus is said to be the child of
Hephaestus, the latter being the progenitor of the wicked
Galli/Kabeiri cult in and around Athens. When the life of
Erichthonius was threatened in his infancy, the goddess Athena
(i.e. the people of Athens and therefore a portion of the Cecrops
peoples), is said to hide him (keep in mind that this is Butes) in a
box!! That can't be a coincidence. The box must depict an a bode
protecinghbld,frAtenahgvEicoust
three daughters (i.e. tribes) of Cecrops to guard. This evokes the
mythical picture in which Erichthonius was depicted as a snake
with a man's head, and had two snakes gaurding him.
That picture also evokes the Hermes caduceus, which is a
rod/pallus depicting the Phrygian sun god, Attis (and therefore
Athens), entwined by two serpents. Indeed, Athena and the god
Pallas are interchangeable, Athena having killed Pallas but then
taking his place. It is concievable that "Athena" is a modification
of "Adonai." To support the idea that the Hermes caduceus was a
symbol looking back to the Mushussu dragon of Utu and Tammuz

334
(Babylon), the Canaanite designation "Tammuz-Adon" became
shortened by the Greeks to "Adonis." Thus, where Adonis was
Athena, she was the cult of Tammuz and Ishtar in Greece. But also
in Libya, where she is said to have been born, implying that she
depicted Ionians (i.e. Aryans) of north Africa, even the Amazons
there who were called Tamazighen." Note how Tunisia, at a tip of
modern Libya, evokes "Adonis," especially by the Etruscan
version, "Atunis."
Perhaps the golden apples of Idun refer all the way back to
Tammuz, therefore, in his Adonis designation. Yes, that makes
sense as the apples refer inextricably to Eden.
Perhaps the constellation, Bootes, is relevant, known as the
Bear Keeper. The bear in astology depicts Persia/Media. It's a little
interesting that both bear constellations are called "dippers," as in
long-handled capsules/pots. It's not inconcievible that Butes (of
Athens) depicted the Boudini, therefore, who in turn came from
the Bese/Buzi Medes. Remember, the Little Dipper is at the
"center of the universe" i.e. at the North Star, and is encircled by
Draco. The Latin "ursa" (a bear) may stem from Ares, he depicting
Aria in Media.
Recall that the Bute clan of Scotland was made into the
prefix, "Buddo." In this way, the Stewarts, tied so closely to the
Bute family, may have been from the Boudini peoples of far-north
Russia. If I am correct in connecting the Boudini to the Bithynians
(who were in turn the Thyni), then the Boudini were the dragon
line of Odin, and yet another people of the golden apples of Idun.
For that to be true, it is necessary for the Boudini to have been in
Athens, and aside from "Thyni" likely referring to Athens, it just
so happens that the Boudini lived fused with the Geloni, who were
from Greece, according to Herodotus.
It's even possible that "Bute" could have derived from "Jute,"
or vice versa, though I won't entertain it without some
linguistic/historical basis. In any case, just as the Eaton family can
be hypothetically rooted in the Jutes by the Jutes' historical name,
"Eoten, " so the Stewarts, said to be related to the Eatons, could
stem from the Jutes/Goths. The Goths, who produced the
Germanics, must have produced the Franks and therefore the
Merovingians (progenitors of the French proper), and as the
Merovingians founded Vannes, in my opinion, under the name
"Morbihan" , they were the Stewarts and the Stewarts were Goths
whoruledatVns!Rchquoealrdyt:
"Attractions on [the island of Bute] include the neo-
Gothic Mount Stuart House" (Italics mine).
I found at a website, where the Bese/Buzi Medes are said to
mean "buzzard, that there was a fellow Mede tribe of Magi, and

335
these became the historical Magyar Huns i.e. proto-Hungarians
and proto-Finns. They may have been the Biblical Magi (Greek
text, "Magoi"). It's not a stretch to suppose that "Magoi" is a
variation of "Magog" since after all the Medes proper, as is widely
accepted, came from Magog's brother, Madai. Britannica says:
"the Moors called the Vikings Madjus. " Recall that another
name for "Varangian" (again according to Britannica) was
"Varyagi," which I can see modified to "War-Gogi" since "var"
means "war."
Recalling that the Bessi Thracians were in Pannnonia (proto-
Hungary), and that they named the Danube the "Ister" river, one
could concieve that the city of Buda (now Budapest) was named
after the Bessi (where one understands that a "z" modifies at times
to/from a "d", as in "Zeus" versus "Deos/Theos"). One can also
concieve that the Magyars moved from far-north Russia, when
founding Hungary, to live with their fellows, the Boudini, who had
preceded them on this very migratoty route long before. Do note
that Magyars were in far-north Russia, for they may have been the
Gog sect mentioned by Ezekiel: Gog of Magog. Not jumping too
quickly to conclusions, I don't necessarily identify the anti-Christ
as an Hungarian, but rather note that the Magyars may have been
the so-called Hyperboreans (not far from the Boudini).
Now as the Bessi were Thracians, it's very interesting to
mention another myth, wherein a "Boutes" (probably same as the
Butes bloodline) was brother to king Lycugus of Thrace,
remembering also that this was king of the Edonians (who I say
became the Eatons/Jutes and therefore the Goths). Now it is
concievable that the Druids, priests originating from the Edonians,
were the Magi/Magyar/Magog sect of Medes. This Gogi theme
may then extend to what I see as the Kuk Lux Klan, in that this
Klan may be a Druid society, and where the "Lux" may refer to
Lycugus as well as Lug...by which I mean to say that there is a
Clan line from Lycugus to Liguria to Lug.
Boutes was driven out of Thrace when attempting to usurp
Lycugus's throne. He then married a Maenad, a peoples belonging
specifically to the Thracian cult-figure, Dionysus, to whom were
fused Pan and other Satyrs. That speaks of a Phoenician element
entering the Boutes line, and indeed the Curetes, which Butes
depicted, were married to Europa, the Phoenicians of Crete.
Butes was the patriarch of the noble Butadai family of
Athens, more commonly called the "Eteobutad(ai)." Now
Herodotus said that a certain historical Lycurgus, son of
Aristolaides, (not to be confused, or so they say, with Lycurgus of
Sparta) was an Eteobutad. I also learned that the Eteobatadai
included the Philaidae from "Philaeus" the son of the mythical
Ajax (of Salamis). Now Ajax was, on his mother's side, a

336
descendant of Pelops, and on his father's side of Zeus with Aegina,
she being from Ladon/Peneus (or "Peneius"). Recall from a
previous chapter that Peneus, father of Daphne, was at the root of
the Calydonians. It just so happens that Lycurgus of Sparta stems
from Hercules and his third wife, a princess of Calydon. Hmmm,
this is interesting, especially since this Lycurgus of Sparta appears
as a mythical figure rather than an historical one (i.e. the mythical
one could be an illustration of the historical one).
Keep in mind that myth allows the Lycurgus of Sparta to be
an extension of the Edones of Thrace because they were also ruled
by a king Lycurgus. The Edones became (in my opinion) the
Eotens/Jutes.
It's a little interesting that "Ajax" was "Aias" because the
latter variation evokes the Aes(ir). The root of "Aegina" itself may
be a variation of "Aes."
Aegina was the eponym of the island of Aegina, an island
that had been previously called "Oenone," a term meaning "wine"
just like "Oeneus," he being a mythical king of Calydon. Now the
island of Oenone was obviously settled and founded by Trojans
because Oenone was the goddess of Mount Ida (at the foot of
which Troy was built). Thus it's easily understood that the peoples
depicted by "Oenone" were Corybantes, and thus directly related
to the Curetes of Crete ... who came from the Cecrops line. It should
also be said that Oenone was paired with Paris (of Troy), and that
the Trojan war began when "she" was betrayed by Paris in his
having a relationship with a Spartan peoples depicted by "Helen."
Thus the Bute dragon line, from Erechtheus/Erichthonius (of
Cecrops) who put forth Tros the first settlers of Troy, is a very
important Trojan line. Behold, Alexander the Great, the king of the
third beast of Daniel 7, was, like Ajax, from Zeus and Aegina, for
"Alexander the Great traced his ancestry (through his mother)
to Aeacus," the latter being, not only king of Aegina, but the son
of Zeus and Aegina. I also learned that Aeacus "helped Poseidon
and Apollo to build the walls of Troy."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeacus
This helps to substantiate what I've read elsewhere, that
Alexander the Great came from the same Trojan bloodline as
Julius and Augustus Caesar, thus supporting my theory that the
four beasts of Daniel 7, and therefore Babylon the Great, are based
on the dragon bloodline (from the Babylonian sun gods).
Knowing now that the Bute dragon line went through Ajax to
the Eteo-Butadae (meaning "True Butadae" ) family of Greece,
might we find that the line continues to the British Caledonians i.e.
to the British Rose Line? Might the Stewart/Merovingian
bloodline, then, have been from the Greek Calydonians?

337
As the Batavians apparently stemmed from the Bætva (root
"Bat"), we may have in them the Bute bloodline of Christian
centuries. The Batavians are said to be ancestors of, for one, the
Dutch, but why not also the Merovingians since the Dutch are said
to stem from Frank elements? More on this in coming chapters.
By the way, as Britain will be the topic in the coming
chapters, you can find a navigational map of Britain at the website
below (just click to enter navigational mode), or you can start at
the Isle of Bute if you wish. I would bookmark the URL below for
future referrence if you plan on reading my material further:
http://uk2.multimap.com/map/home.cgi?client=public&lang=&advanced=&db=GB

338
HALF THE DANE IN EDONI...

In a 12th-century (AD) "Chronicle of Leire," a certain King


Ypper (of Uppsala, now Sweden) had three sons, Dan, Nori and
Ostren, the progenitors of Denmark, Norway and Sweden. I think
when an otherwise complicated history comes to us in such
simple-written terms that the names presented are more mythical
(i.e. codewords) than historical. Speaking on the Chronicle,
Wikipedia (under "Dan") had this to say:
“Dan apparently first ruled in Zealand [an island
off of Denmark] for the Chronicle states that it was when
Dan had saved his people from an attack by the Emperor
Augustus that the Jutes and the men of Fyn and Scania
also accepted him as king, whence the resultant expanded
country of Denmark was named after him. Dan's wife
was named Dana and his son was named Ro.”
This quote gives us the timing of this particular Dan, near the
birth of Christ. It also suggests that Dan, because he was married
to Dana, was intermarried with the Celts of Britain ... who had
worshiped the goddess Dana. Denmark, said to be named after this
Dan, in being Jutland previously, had been ruled by the Getae of
Thrace, and I think that "Danp," while at first glance appearing to
depict the same as Dan and Dana, refers instead to a totally
different peoples, the said Getae-come-Jutes ... who were part of the
Dane make-up. This would explain the marriage of Danp to Dana,
to be viewed as two different peoples becoming allied and mixed.
However, according to a work by Arngrim Jonsson in 1597,
it wasn't Danp who married Dana (as in another work), but a
certain Rig, who was made a god (i.e. he extended back from
Scandinavia to a certain royal peoples of the distant past). In this
version, Dana is revealed as the daughter of "Danp" (same word),
this being a variation of the older term, "Danpr." He thus appears
to be a Scandinavian peoples extending from the DniFeer river of
Thrace, which is why I suspect him to depict the tae-come-
Goths. The apparent problem clears up if Rig was made the father
or son of Danp, for that would reveal the two as the same Gothic
peoples, either one of which could be made into Dana's "husband."
I don't think there's a problem with Rig being the husband of
Dana, for Rig appears to depict the Rugii of Norway, and he could
very well have been allied to the Danann who had migrated (from
Britain) into Scandinavia. It is said in Jonsson's work that Rig "left
as his heir his son by Dana, called Dan or Danum, all of whose

339
subjects were called Danes" (see website above). Fine. Perfect. A
Jute-Danann alliance bringing forth the Danes proper, yet the
common reader wouldn't arrive to that conclusion.
But I'm not the common reader; I'm one who wants to
uncover and trace the dragon line, who has spent thousands of
hours on the quest, and I have seen good reasons to believe that the
Danann hooked up with Scandinavia to become the Ingaevonic
German tribes. This connection is in one clue alone, where the
Anglos and Saxons -- Ingaevones -- are depicted as a white
dragon, wherefore they must be related to the red dragon. That red
one, I have found, depicted the Danann and their various relatives
in Britain.
Rig, known to be the same as the god, Heimdal, is thereby
(just like Heimdal) depicted as a ram. While this evokes Hermes,
the "ram bearer," a Rig-to-Ares connection is stronger because the
constellation, Aries, was made the ram. Ares was the ruler of
Thrace, yet by his name it can be determined that he depicted Aria
peoples in Iran/Media who became the Gorgons en route to
Thrace. In the same way, Heimdal is rooted by many in Indo-
European (i.e. Aryan) Iran/Media. Yet he was also a protector-god
(i.e. gaurd) of Asgard. Safe to say, Asgard can be identified with
Gorgons on the north shore of the Black sea, at Azov (northern tip
of Caucasia), because the historical Aes/As peoples are so defined
(often as Cimmerians), the founders of Azov (the Azov sea was
also named "Maeotis" after the Medes).
To thus connect Rig to the Aes Cimmerians/Scythians is
dandy, for indeed he was a member of the Aesir pantheon of gods.
"Danp," I think, referred to, and stemmed from, the same
peoples...by which I (and the myth writers) mean to say that Danp
and Rig are the same peoples but one coming after the other in
history, and at a different location along their migratory route
toward Scandinavia.
A god always depicts a peoples in the strict sense, by which I
mean to say at the end of the migration route. Strictly, Rig
depicted the Rugi(i) of Norway, or so it would appear. The Rugi
were from proto-Russia, and this evokes the Roxolani ... who did
live on the Dnieper. If Rig's ancestry so much as depicted the
"Rox" portion of those peoples, it needs to be understood that
"Roxolani" is read by historians as Ros-Alans and Aes-Alans, thus
equating the Aes peoples with the Ros. That is, Rig comes out
looking like the Ros/Rus.
Might he depict the Biblical Rosh who had moved from Lake
Van (more precisely, from the city of Rusahinili/Rusakhini three
miles from Lake Van) to the north shores of the Black sea? It
certainly is amazing that some historians connect Rig to the
Boii/Boi of central Europe, for Van was named by a Bia peoples.

340
On the modern Bug river (beside the Dnieper) there lived the
Neuri peoples, said Herodotus, and these it is believed by many
were previously the Nairi, rulers at Lake Van (the lake was at one
time the "Nairi Sea"). Both the Nueri and the Roxolani were
independently reported as being so far north that historians knew
no peoples to their north; might the Nueri have been the Rox
portion of the Roxolani?
It would seem shallow for me to suggest that "Nori," shown
at the top of this page as the eponym of Norway, was also an
allusion to the Nueri, for most view Norway, and therefore "Nori,"
as being named after "north." But one never knows, for in fact Rig
settled Nor
way, and, as I will show in this chapter, it seems to me
quite solid to locate the original capital of the mythical Vanaheim
(Van(ir) Home) in Norway.
But behold this. Nairi was a region south-west of Lake Van
(on the east side of the Tigris), and between Nairi and Lake Van
there was a region called "Ereshtuni," that term looking a lot like
"Hrosh."
see map at http://www.tacentral.com/erebuni/urartu.asp
The map shows the spelling, "Bai(nili)," which is closer to
"Boi(i)" than the more-common usage, " Bia(ini)." This is
important to mention because I am thinking to trace the Bia to the
Boii (and then to the Merovingians and Bavarian Illuminati),
though some readers may not be open to that connection due to the
vowel arrangments not being quite right.
Problem: in the Yngling Saga, Rig is not the husband of
Dana, but her father. I must chalk this up to technical error and
move on, for it would make the Roxolani and/or the Rugi(ans) the
ancestors of the Danann, an impossibility in my mind. One thing
that we can determine is that the author of the Yngling Saga
viewed the Rugi as being very close to the Danann, so close as to
equate their bloodlines.
I haven't yet presented much evidence to show the Dana-to-
Danann equation; I'm merely assuming that connection from the
fact that the Danann worshiped a Dana. But on top of that I'm
suspecting that the similarity of terms between "Danann" and
"Dane" require the Danann to be a part of Dane ancestry.
Moreover, as Rig was an Aesir, while the Danes were Vanir, we
need a Vanir element to be part of Dane ancestry. As I define
"Vanir" as stemming from "Veneti" i.e. the Gaul migration
(westward) across Europe, the Danann fit that picture.
Some think that the Greek Danaans became the Danes and
afterward the Danann of Ireland, but I say it must be the other way
around, for the Danes were formed after the Danann got to Ireland.
The Rugi lived at what is now Rogaland in Norway, which
borders Hordaland (ancient Haeredaland), wherefore if the Rugi

341
were allied to these neighbors -- the Aereda founders of
Haeredaland -- then a Vanir-Rig alliance is evident, for the Aereda
were Redone Gauls. No matter how you want to cook this
pancake, the fact seems to be that Rig moved in to live beside a
peoples that had previously been the Redone Gauls ... who had
worshipped the god, Rod, he being a god typically of the pagan
Russians.
Rogaland and Hordaland may therefore have been a Rosh-
Rus affair. I had indeed read that the Redones had stemmed from a
"Hros" peoples of Caucasia, but who also lived on the north of the
Black sea, which inevitably leads me to believe that the Rox were
also descendants of the Hros. Put it this way, that the Hros put
forth two branches, one to become the Redones, and another to
become the Rox, and that the two met in Norway simply because
they were distantly related (often, one branch losing their country
in war flees to live (i.e. begs to live) beside a related peoples).
The Aereda I have identified (see previous chapters)
satisfactorily as the mythical Geryon, the Fir-Bolgs, who were
defeated by the mythical Hercules when he came to Britain, and he
at that point in history depicted the mythical Danann. However, it
is known that the Fir-Bolg were relatives of the Danann, wherefore
both the Fir-Bolg and the Danann are to be viewed as
Aereda/Redones.
In Christian centuries, the peoples of Haeredaland were
called, according to Jordanes, "Arochi," similar indeed to "Rugi"
(not to mention "Roxolani"). I would tend to view the Arochi as
the Rig peoples, yet not necessarily the founders of Haeredaland.
We find that the Rugi and the Arochi, in the time of Jordanes, were
ruled by Rodwulf/Roduulf, evoking the Redones (at that time, they
were "Rodez/Ruthene") ... who indeed descended directly from the
Ligurians i.e. a wolf peoples. The Liguria-Dane connection is
much larger than anyone seems to suspect, even though Loki is the
leader of Vanir gods, while he in turn is equated with Lug, a
warrior-captain of the Danaan.
The Crichtons were involved with the Bute clan, and
therefore with the Stewarts, for the Butes and Stewarts go hand in
hand. As I am examining the possibilty of tracing the Bute clan to
Butes of the mythical Cecrops line, let me now show evidence of a
connection between the Redone god, Rod, and Cecrops. As I
mentioned, Rod is a version of the (east) Indian god, Rudra, and so
read this concerning a type of dragon called "Naga":
PHYSIOLOGY: These are pseudo-dragons who are
usually portrayed as having a human head and
serpentine body, and no wings.

342
HISTORY: The history of these creatures seem to
come from India..."
http://www.michaellc.com/The_Library_3.html
Cecrops was depicted as a man with a snake for a body (and
without wings), wherefore he was from the Naga-type dragon of
the Indo-Europians ... who also had Rudra as their god. Just as one
can conclude that Zeus came out of the Cecrops line because he
too (in the most-ancient times) was depicted as a man with a snake
for a body, so we find that Zeus is considered to be the same as
"Dyas" of India. Thus, Cecrops, Zeus, and Rod all originate in an
Indo-European root ...just like Ares and Rig.
As Ares was from Zeus in Zeus' (non-strict) Indo-European
setting, it's no wonder that Ares was depicted as the dragon, and
later I'll show that Cecrops was from Ares, no surprise, and that
Zeus, strictly speaking now, depicted a (Trojan) peoples stemming
from the Cecrops line. The point is, Rig was only one dragon line
from Rudra, and the Redones the other. I suspect that the two lines
meeting in Scandinavia was depicted with the circular serpent
(called "Ouroboros") with tail in mouth, a symbol of the dragon-
line world rule.
We find in the Yngling Saga that Danp had "Drott" as a
daughter. The latter is a term that evokes "Dryad/Dryas")," the
mythical progenitor of the Edonians of Thrace. Thus "Drott" is a
term referring quite likely to Druid royalty (not a new idea). As
explained earlier, I believe the Edoni became the Jutes because
Jutes were called "Eotens," wherefore Drott should be so viewed,
or at least stemming from the Jutes.
If all this is correct, the Danes proper come out looking like
Edonians, and therefore a branch of Jutes. But only on the side of
Rig/Danp/Drott. This result of defining the Dane as a Danann-
Edonian mix squares with my previous conclusion, that the Danes
were a Danann-Jute mix (squares are good). That Drott and Rig
should be equated as the same peoples squares with Dryas (i.e.
Drott) having been a son of Ares (as was Rig).
If the Danes were formed from the Danann, we'd expect that
the Danes and their Jute allies would come visit and then live
among the Danann. And so we find a Danann goddess, Eadon. She
was commonly paired, but not quite equated, with Brigit,
wherefore if I be right in identifying Brigit as the Thracians-come-
Bryges (i.e. the Phrygians), then it seems fairly probable from this
angle that the Bryges were an Eadon i.e. Edonian branch. At the
least, a Danann-Jute alliance is implied yet again by Eadon's
presence among Danann gods.
"Drott" is a mythical term to depict a people called,
"Drottinn," a Yngvi federation of peoples. No, Yngvi is not a

343
Japanese sausage, but the mythical ancestor of the Danes. In the
opinion of some (including mine), though not all agree, "Yngvi" is
a term not quite equating with, but putting forth, the Angles. I
think that the myth writer used the term specifically to show the
roots of the Angles. But because the Danes trace themselves to the
Yngvi as well, I can use Yngvi lore for my purposes here.
Sometimes, when there is a dispute over lineage, two or more
sides may be correct, by which I mean to say that the Angles and
other such Germanics were probably a mix; from a Yngvi mash.
Does this mean that the Yngvi were sausages after all? Well, yeah,
that's one way of putting it, as in ground boar from the grinder of
civil war spitting out many links from the same Yngvi meat hook.
The following quote ties the fightin' Danes to the fightin'
Angles as "brothers": “Saxo Grammaticus in his Gesta
Danorum presents three different Danish monarchs named
Dan ... Saxo begins his history with two brothers named Dan
and Angul ... ” (Wikipedia). There you have it: as Danes
themselves claim to be rooted in the Ynglings, a Dane-Anglo
connection seems certain if indeed the Angles also stem from the
Yngvi. The Danes and the Angles would square it off for centuries
over who would get to rule England, but the sausage links who
stemmed from Yngvi are not my concern here; rather, I want to
focus on the boar itself: Frey. Is is said that Yngvi and Frey were
one, or at least inter-married allies.
This reasoning so far is very valuable. For one thing, it tells
what was once a mystery to me, the origin of Rollo the Dane. I
now know that his bloodline was a Yngvi-Edonian mix, and this
then defines the Sinclair blood of the Norman-English
throne... considered sacred by the Templars. Ahh, but as the
Normans were from Rollo, while he was a Dane, the Danes did
finally wrestle England from the Anglo-Saxons. And in those royal
Danes was the Rose Line that the Frank/Merovingian Rosicrucians
wanted to hog all to themselves. Finally, after the Merovingians
had lost all power, they joined the Danes, in the Templar thrust to
rule the kingdom of Jesus Christ on earth. Unfortunately, Jesus did
not consider them kosher enough to act as His representatives.
The Yngvi-Drott alliance is the same as the Dana-Rig
alliance, meaning that the Yngvi (and therefore Frey) were the
Danann. Or put it this way, that the Danann allied to Rig in
Norway then moved to Sweden to become the Yngvi.
Now the origin of the term "drott" is interesting, as it appears
to be a derivation of "dragon": " [drott] in Old Saxon [is]:
drohtin, Old English: dryhten, Old High German: truhtin. The
word comes from Proto-Germanic druhtinaz and is derived
from druhti- meaning "war band"...In Gothic appears the

344
verb driugan meaning "to do military service". In Old English
dréo an and in Icelandic dry la..."
Tttp://en.wikipedia.org/wc-/
Drott
The terms above that resemble "dragon" also resemble
"Trojan/Thracian," and as I've mentioned elsewhere, the Edonian
progenitor, "Dryad/Dryas" appears as a variation of "Troad and
"Troy." That the Edonians were involved in Britain is implied
where Dryas was a lord of Greek Calydon, for the Caledonians of
Britain are thereby indicated in turn. That the Edonians were from
the dragon sun god, Tammuz, may be evident (among other
things) in the similarity between "Edoni" and "Adoni," the latter
being Tammuz to the Greeks.
Drott was married to Domar of the Yngling House, and here
I might view "Domar" as an allusion to the bloodline of "Damuzi,"
the Babylonian form of "Tammuz." Remember that Damuzi had
Ishtar for a wife, and she had Enki for a father, "Enki" looking like
"Yngvi." Yngvi was not an historical peoples/person, but a
mythical codeword created by a ruler(s) who, I'll assume, wanted
to connect his royal line in Sweden to the Enki-Tammuz root of
the sun-god.
The son of Yngvi married codeword, "Skadi," an obvious
allusion to Scythians. Skadi was known as the Ski Goddess, and
behold that our word "ski," as well as our word, "skid," comes
from the Old Norse, "skith," meaning "piece of wood" and
"snowshoe" (all this according to my dictionary). It would
apparently suggest that Scythians were named after sleds, meaning
also that they were by force of that definition a northerly peoples.
But as "skith" is an Old Norse term, the Scythians here (depicted
by "Skadi") are not those still living north of the Black sea, but
those migrated into Scandinavia. I think, therefore, that the
marriage of Yngvi to Skadi is essentially the alliance of the
Danaan to Ares/Rig/Danp/Drott ... west-side (of Europe) dragon
blood to east-side dragon blood ... same as Vanir to Aesir
blood ... same as Gaul to Goth blood.
Jordanes said that the Dani trace themselves to the stock of
Suetidi; that is, to the Swedes, and therefore without any question
to the Yngvi Swedes. The Swedes were also known as "Heruli"
(from which our "earl" derives), wherefore when we see Rig's
"son" code-worded as "Rig-Jarl," the "Jarl" part also being a
version of "earl," it would appear that "Jarl" was added to Rig to
show Rig's Heruli ancestry/connection.
As the Ares bloodline was the Manes bloodline out of
Armenia, we come to the Ingaevone tribe (descendants of "Ingo")
of Germanics, whom in German myth were from the god, Mannus.
The Ingaevones were probably of the same blood as the Yngvi (not
a new idea), and are commonly said to have become the Jutes,

345
Angles, Saxons, Frisians, Dutch (all Gothic sausages)... but why
not also the Danes proper? In an Old-English poem, we read: "Ing
was first amidst the East Danes," yet the East Danes were
revealed elsewhere as the Geats and therefore of the Gothic fold.
The problem is, Ing was, in being related to Yngvi, a Vanir,
whereas the Getae-come-Goths brought forth the Aesir (no doubt
explaining why some do not equate the Yngvi with the Ingaevones
even though those terms are an almost-exact match). But why
argue either/or; why not view the Ingaevones as an Yngvi-Goth
mix, the same mix under discussion? Then everyone's right. I
would suggest further that the East Danes were the so-called
Jotars, defined as Danes who mixed it up with Goths in Jutland.
The question is, were Jutes a Dane-Goth mix? Or should Jutes be
viewed as pure Goths aside from their mixing with Danes?
I would think that "Danp," in the strict sense, depicted the
"East Danes" who, though "Geats," can be viewed as proto-Danes.
If I'm not mistaken, it was in the Yngling Saga that Danp was
made the husband of Dana in producing the Danes.
According to Nennius, "we find Mannus corrupted to
Alanus and Ingio/Inguio, his son, to Neugio. Here the three
sons of Neugio are named as Boganus, Vandalus, and Saxo --
from whom came the peoples of the Bogari, the Vandals, and
the Saxons and Tarincgi."
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/i/in/ingaevones.htm
Thus Nennius included Vandals (yet another semi-Gothic
group) in with the Ingaevones, and while I don't agree with much
of his tracings of the peoples, I think he has the Saxon-Vandal
connection correct, and this may be explained by his being related
to those peoples...wherefore he had better information on that
score. He was from Gwynedd, Wales, a kingdom built by peoples
from Vannes (Brittany), for Vannes was Gwenea, and "Gwynedd"
a variation of "Gwenea." And Vannes was a settlement of the
Veneti. But Vandals stemmed also (in part) from the Veneti,
meaning that the Vandals were, so to speak, cousins of Nennius. I
see the Saxons putting forth the Vandals and the Vandals
producing half of the Merovingian bloodline, but I'll get to that
later.
There are others who tie the Germanics to the Alans, though
how that came about seems foggy. It is known that the Vandals
were closely allied to Alans, and I have my own theory. I believe
that the proto-Vandals (on their Veneti side only) were the
Danaan/Fir-Bolg of northern Italy who went on (eastward) to
produce, in proto-Russia (600ish BC), an eastern branch, the Alans
(the "Gelonus"). If Nennius is correct in making the Vandals, and
all other Germanics, the offspring of Alans, then Alans had to
come west to Scandinavia, wherefore it could appear that the Alan

346
root (in Russia) was, at least in part, the Roxolani, even Rig ... who
intermarried with the Yngvi to produce the Ingaevones. I think I
can agree with that.
As I say that the Ingaevones produced the Danes, so now I
want to show evidence that Rollo the Dane descended from the
Yngvi (can I get a patent on this discovery, or has someone beat
me to it?). Rollo's father was Ragnvald the Wise, jarl/earl of More.
Ragnvald's father was Ivarsson (jarl of More), and his father in
turn was Ivar, of course, while his father was Halfdan II, the son of
Hild (born 700ish), daughter of Erik of Westfold, the son of
Agnar.
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/jamesdow/s017/f242028.htm
But behold, for there was an Erik of the Yngling house, the
grandson of Drott, and he was the son of Agne (first/second
century AD), wherefore the Agnar (seventh century) of the Rollo
line, who begot Erik, was surely from the Agne-Erik
Ynglings...because Agnar and Erik were, surely, named in honor
of (their ancestors), Agne and Erik.
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/a/ag/agne.
htm
It's true that Erik (son of Agne) was of a Swedish family (in
Uppsala), but in another work (by Saxo Grammaticus) Erik is said
to be from Norway. No problem, people move about. In that work,
he is Ericus Disertus and has "Ragnus the Champion" as his father,
but I do see that "Ragnus" is a variation of "Agne." No problem.
But "Ragnus" sure does evoke "Rig." It's very interesting that
Ericus' descendant, a certain Erik the Eloquent, had a half-brother
named "Roller/Rollerus," as that evokes Rollo the Dane's
ancestors.
Because the mother of Ericus was recorded as "Skjalf,"
Ericus is said by some to be the progenitor of the so-called
"Scylfing" branch of Ynglings. These are regarded as the Swedes,
whereas certain descendants of the Scylfings, namely the
Scyldings from Skjold, are regarded as the Danes. Erik the
Eloquent descended from Skjold and was therefore a Dane,
wherefore Rollo comes out looking like a Dane.
In the Aetartolur, an old-Norse work, the Scylfings/Swedes
originate in Hordaland (Norway)!! In the same work, the
Scyldings/Danes, also from Norway, are sons of a "Skelfir," he
being thought to be an eponym of the Scylfing/Swede house. Here
Erik the Eloquent, of the Dane house, puts forth a grandson, Vikar,
who was king of Hordaland.
This origin of Danes off the European mainland is a
difficulty for those who expect their origin in Denmark, but I'm
ready to now say that the proto-Danes, as red-line peoples of
Britain, sailed to and settled Norway, and only after merging with

347
the Goths/Jutes of Sweden did they move to Jutland/Denmark
where they were labelled "Jotars."
It would seem that the peoples that the Danes mixed it up
with in Haeredaland were none other than the peoples depicted by
Geryon, who were there long before, and that leads me again to
identify Geryon as Cimmerians, those who had named Jutland
"Cambria." As it's clear that the Greek myth writers identified
Geryon as a Gorgon, the Cimmerians and Gorgons must have been
one and the same.
It's important to now say that Erik the Eloquent, a Dane of
Haeredaland, was called an "Ylfing," which is to say a "Wolfing"
= Wolf Clan, and this would then identify the Danes as stemming
from Lug of Ireland, since after all Lug was a ruling Danann
peoples there. It seems obvious that Loki, the Scandinavian wolf
god, a Vanir leader, was this same Lug who put forth the Danes.
The island of Vanaheim (= Van(ir) Home) must have been
headquartered by the Vanir at Norway, the original home of the
Danes (the peoples at one time thought Scandinavia to be an
island, which it is not quite). It is said that the land of Vanaheim
was Ymir's body floating on water, this meaning that the Vanir,
who do not descend from Ymir, came to live on the land once
inhabited by the Gamir = Cimmerians. Frey was, after all, married
to the giantess, Gerd, and she was the daughter of Gymir.
Therefore Frey became allied to Cimmerians, which is to say a
Geryon-Frey alliance.
In this picture the Swedes proper (the Scylfings) were
likewise Vanir (at the start, anyway), and the Aesir turn out to be
the Goths/Jutes who were in proto-Sweden (Gotaland) ahead of the
Swedes. Odin, therefore, was the ancestral symbol of the
Jutes/Eotens, not of the Swedes. Indeed, whereas in the Chronicle
of Leire we find "Nori" as an eponym of Norway and "Dan" as an
eponym of Denmark, the eponym of Sweden is "Ostren," a term
that the myth writer may very well have borrowed from
"Ostrogoth."
In Codeword Land, two-headed giants called "Ettins" had
relations with Cimmerians of the Black sea and are possibly the
Thrace-to-Scandinavia connection, even Rig, for as we can see,
"Ettin" is an obvious allusion to the Edonians/Eotens/Jutes. The
question is, what did the two heads depict?
In certain writings, the term "Yngvi-Frey" is found, which
some may view as Yngvi and Frey depicting the very same
peoples. It may be otherwise viewed as an alliance of two distinct
peoples. The Frey-Cimmerian alliance? The Cimmerians do bring
us back to Enki (and keep in mind here that I believe the
Cimmerians of Iran then became associated with the Rosh at Lake
Van), wherefore Vanaheim may have been named by the

348
Cimmerians, not the Danes. But, then, were not the Danes/Vanir
themselves named after Lake Van? I think quite possibly.
But weren't the Danes named after the Danann? No. There
were no such peoples. It's a mythical term that must have been
created by myth writers to show the ancestry of the Danes in the
Danaan of Greece. Yet it also shows that the Danaans were in
Britain, and that these were proto-Danes. In other words, the proto-
Danes were the historical Bolgs and other such related Thracians-
come-Gauls, including the Ligurians represented by Lug. I'm
identifying the Bolgs as the Ligurian peoples of Bologne, Italy,
who then settled Boulogne on the Frank coast over-looking
England, before sailing to Britain as the mythical Danann.
When these Thracians (by that time mixed with Geryon's
Cimmerians) got to Norway, they merged with the Vanir cult of
the Cimmerians there, and somehow became "Danir." I suspect
easily that since the British Cimmerians depicted by Geryon had
been of the same family as Hercules, they had been Greek
Danaans and had retained "Dan" for centuries as a sacred, but not
civil, name for themselves. This was made obvious by their having
"Dana" as their goddess. Hence, they were called both Vanir and
Danir, the rhyming being coincidental.
To what extent the Cimmerians of Scandinavia were depicted
by Rig, I do not know. Rig may have depicted them wholly, or Rig
may have (as the Roxolani) moved in with them. If he depicted
them wholly, he couldn't have been the Roxolani, for the
Cimmerians were in Scandinavia even before the birth of the
Roxolani. However, Rig may have been the Rox portion of that
name, the Rox being the most ancient Cimmerian branch into
Scandinavia, and then followed later by the Roxolani.
It's all-too possible that the Arochi peoples in Hordeland,
and/or the Rugii next door in Rogaland, descended from the Rosh,
for "Rosh" could certainly modify to "Rochi/Rugi," especially if
the Rosh had become the Roxolani. One wonders how the
Varangian Rus, from Sweden, came forth from the mix of peoples,
but it is widely thought that they were remnants of Biblical Rosh.
Frey had a long beard, evoking Enki the sun god who was
likewise depicted conspicuously with a long beard. Frey was in
fact a sun god pulled in a chariot by a golden boar, and while this
connects him to Helios of Eridanus i.e. the Redone Gauls, it
moreover connects him to a peoples depicted by a boar. Recall
from a previous chapter that I tentatively identified the Boar of
Brittany (mentioned by Geoffrey of Monmouth in his Merlin
myth) as the Pollok family. The Polloks, a branch of
Merovingians, used a boar for their family symbol.
And there were other Merovingians that likewise used the
boar to depict themselves, namely the Vere clan, which has to this

349
day organizations claiming to be official protectorates of the
dragon bloodline. Note the city in Hordal and wherein the
Scylfings ruled: " ...Skelfir was king of Vörs..." (modern Voss).
http://www.whatis.tv/Scylfing.html
I found that the Veres ruled Brittany (to be discussed later),
and that proto-Merovingians founded Vannes, Brittany, so that the
Veres should prove to be the Boar of Brittany. The Stewarts would
apparently fit the mould of boars, which in those times was
considered a good symbol, of might (the might of war). I couldn't
call that "good," however, as I would depict "might" with one
word, "JESUS." There's power in that name when you honor Him;
when you love him, you'll have Him when you need Him, a greater
power at the tip of your tongue you cannot hope to possess (though
of course the power is not yours to trigger at will).
I found this: "The Motto for the Stewart de Rothsay Coat
of Arms is 'Avito viret honore', which means 'He flourishes
through the honour of his ancestors.'" The dragon line was all
about the worship and continuation of ancestral designs for this
planet, namely rule under Satanic forces. If that sounds a little
sensational, then hear someone (Bill Cooper) who says the same
without mentioning Satan: "The fact that all the royal families
of Europe were, and indeed still are, interrelated is something
that is accepted and well known. But what was the origin of
these families (or rather this original family) who have always
insisted that they were set above the common herd and entitled
to rule their fellow man by a sort of divine right, a claim that
cost Charles I of England, and the royal families of France and
Russia, their very lives"
http://www.ldolphin.org/cooper/ch8.html
The same author then asks, "So, were Baath, Iobaath,
Izrau and Ezra the original stock from which the later royal
families of Europe are descended?" These four were quoted as
being the progenitors of Ireland/Britain, and moreover said to be
sons of Magog, son of Japheth. I don't quite believe it put that way,
but yes something very close as I think the Irish were Gogi.
Perhaps that's how the people who put that genealogy together
envisioned their people from Magog, as he and Gog seem to go
hand and hand in Ezekiel 38 ... though I think the connection is
more Gog to the land of Magog (i.e. proto-Russia) than strictly to
the blood of Magog.
The genealogy at the website above, by Nennius the Welsh
historian, if you care to view it, is obviously too simplictic and
therefore erroneous at parts, but it does attempt to show the
various European peoples tucked together as families, and may at
points be an accurate guide. Another genealogy, of early Ireland
only, and given by the same author, can be seen at website below

350
(or view it here). Note "Baath" in the latter genealogy; could "he"
depict the Butes bloodline?
http://www.ldolphin.org/cooper/ch8.html
The four names above are found in both genealogies,
suggesting perhaps that secret-society dopes (I'm being
descriptive, not rude) were copying one another from time to time,
out of the store of secret writings within their reach, each having
his own version of papa's sacred roots (O thou mighty Zeus you
cannot so much as hear poor Nennius while in your rotten grave,
let alone guide his desperate thoughts! Translation: call on the
Living God).
Nennius has the four names stemming from Javan (Greeks)
yet forming the Germans, while the other genealogy has the four
names forming the Irish tribes. This "contradiction" squares with
my findings wherein the Irish tribes (from Greeks) end up in
Sweden to become the Danes and various Germanics. You can see
(in the genealogy) how Nennius divides Mannus into three
German tribes, the Vandals and Saxons coming forth from
Neugio/Nugue. Wonderful on that score, but Nennius must have
been on dope when he made the Romans come forth from the
Germans! Either that, or he didn't have the internet at his disposal.
The Jutes founded the Kent family/region of England, and as
I speculated earlier that this was a bloodline from the
Centaurs/Kentaurs of Thrace, note that astrologers placed the
famous star, Rigil, in the constellation of Centaurus... meaning that
the god, Rig, and his bloodline, may likewise have stemmed from
the Centaurs. Centaurs (half horse, half human) were a peoples
who valued/worshiped horses, even as the first two Kent kings,
likely mythical names, meant "horse." The Kent Arms has a white
horse at the center. The Thracians were depicted by the white
horse. Note that while the Lydians were at first Meonians, "The
Jutes of the [Hampshire, England] mainland appear to have
been known as the 'Meonwaras' [meaning "Meon peoples"]
whose name is preserved in Stoke Meon, and East and West
Meon ... "
http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:kQ6Nxbk5pDYJ:home.earthlink.net/~apend
ragn/GreatOakKindred/library/teutonicsett.pdf+ubii+franks&hl=en&lr=lang_en
"Rigil Kent," as this star is sometimes called, is also "Alpha
Centuari," the star closest to the Earth, or so say the
astronomers...whom are now so occult-oriented that they are not to
be trusted any longer for sharing facts. For example, the Danann
were said to have the capability of going back and forth in time,
and to go from world to world, the very teaching -- i.e. worm
holes, multiple dimesions, black holes, etc. -- now being put
forward by modern "scienctific" astronomy. It needs to be

351
understood that modern astronomy was founded, and has been
therefore controlled, by Rosicrucians of the Royal Society.
It is they who expanded the universe to unimaginable size
merely for to make their theory of evolution seem more likely in
your mind than Creationism. I have looked at photos of galaxies,
and there is no convincing me that they are such, for they look
rather like single stars that have exploded their "guts," so to speak,
outwardly. There is no way to prove that the foggy material seen in
a "galaxy" represents billions of stars, though of course the
astronomers will convince you of their detecting individual stars.
Impossible to say, for that "individual star" may be nothing but a
small segment of one star's "guts." I think modern astronomy is
deeply guilty of sensationalism.
As Rosicrucians were astrologers descended from astrologers
going way back to the craft of very ancient times, expect modern
astronomical "facts" to align with sacred astrological tenets. As
any thinking man can understand, it is impossible to calculate the
distance to the stars, or even the relative distances; modern
astronomy bases the relative distances on theory, and can
manipulate as it pleases. It may very well be that Rigil has been
made the star closest to the earth for the reason that Royal-Society
blokes were closest to the god, Rig. That's how the earliest ancient
astronomers worked, placing themselves in the heavens at the most
sacred location(s).
Rosicrucians and their ilk have generally been the most
vigorous in the exploration of philosophy, sciences, and new lands,
but that in itself is not reason enough to give them a thumbs-up.
What about their infiltration of governments, and their murders in
their quest for power over us? They who infiltrate religions to set
one side against another to the point of war, and then blame all
wars on religions, are snakes in the grass, and they'll bite you too
when in their interests.

352
...AND HALF THE DANE IN DANANN

In the previous chapter I followed Scandinavian mythical


terms leading me to see the half the root of the Dane in "Rig," he
depicting Edonians of Thrace migrated to Scandinavia. But as the
Dane is known to derive from the Yngvi branch of Scandinavians,
this root too needs to be addressed. Not only does it seem apparent
merely on the surface that this Dane portion is from the Danann,
but by tracing Frey to the Danann one then makes a Danann-to-
Yngvi connection because Frey was called "Yngvi-Frey." In
making that connection, I'll also show the roots of the Redones in
certain Greeks, and at the same time verify what I have so far
presented mainly as a presumption, that the Redones were from the
island of Rhodes and were therefore the so-called Rose Line.
As the Danann were involved with the mythical monster,
Geryon, identifying him is in order because the Yngvi may have
stemmed from some of his parts. If Geryon roots match the roots
claimed for the various tribes of Britain, then one can assume that
Geryon, in being depicted as a three-bodied creature, depicted
three of those tribes. As his name implies, Geryon was a Gorgon,
and moreover as Greek myth implies, he was a Greek Gorgon
related to Hercules and king Eurystheus. And so I seek three
Greek-Gorgon tribes with one being the Fir-Bolgs (whom
Hercules defeated), plus a fourth one that was enslaved to one of
the three, and then also a fifth one, that being the Danann who
came as Hercules to defeat the three, and to release the fourth.
Historical writers shared that Parthalons came to Ireland,
almost as the first to arrive, from a Greek king. They were then
followed by their offspring, the Nemedians, and the Nemedians,
losing a war to Fomorians, then migrated back to Greece where
they became slaves. After some years, some of the enslaved
Nemedians returned to Ireland as the Fir-Bolg, after which came
the Danann their relatives. Therefore, we have four related
peoples, the Parthalons, the Nemedians, the Fir-Bolg and the
Danann, all Greeks migrated to Ireland. But there were also the
Fomorians, and I have read that they too were related, though
some do not think so. As I can connect them to Gogi, I think the
blood connection to Gorgons is made well enough.
It has been reported that when the Danann took Ireland from
the Fir-Bolgs, the two spoke the same language. This is important
because the Fir-Bolg and the Danann seem to have moved
together, to Belgica and proto-France, the realm of the

353
Merovingians. But if I can also connect the Fir-Bolg and/or
Danann to the Yngvi, and therefore to the Danes that sprang forth
from Yngvi, then the Danes and Merovingians were in that way
related, explaining why the initial Templar movement was a Dane-
Frank partnership.
The obvious thing to do is to look for the particular Greeks
that the Parthalons came from, and this would tend to reveal who
the Fir-Bolg and the Danann were from. "In Greek mythology,
Porthaon (sometimes called Parthaon) was King of Calydon
and father of Oeneus...of Aetolus son of Endymion." (brackets
not mine).
http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Mythology/Porthaon.html
The above list of names represent the founders of Greek
Calydon. Surely the Irish Parthalons (a term not historical but
created by men in secret societies never thinking that we'd make
the connections) were from Parthaon, king of Calydon, since the
Parthalons are said (by the myth writers) to move from Ireland to
Scotland where after Scotland consisted of the historical
Caledonia. Aside from discovering, in this way, the root of British
Caledonia in Greek Calydon, we find that the root of mysterious
and illusive Avalon ("apple (is)land") is also discovered, for
Endymion (in the list above), as we saw in a previous chapter, was
the mythical symbol of the Apple line...so that no doubt Avalon is
related to his Greek-Calydon bloodline.
I had connected the Apple line to the Edonians due to the
Norse-myth phrase, "golden apples of Idun." The Edonians were
from Dryas/Dryad, the son of Ares. Well, Parthaon, as a son of
Ares, was the "brother" of Dryas, by which is meant a fellow
Thracian tribe. Aside from making the said Irish tribes distant
relatives of Rig (for Rig was father of Drott, she being a depiction
of Dryad), the connection to Ares and Thrace verifies that the
tribes were authentic dragon lines if by "dragon line" is strictly
meant Ares and/or Thrace, which in this book it generally is.
The Aesir whom Rig depicted may have originated in Aes,
the capital of Colchis, wherefore Aes may have been the illusive
(and mythical) Asgard. I'll show that Aes was at least associated
with the Calydonian Boar because it's king, Aeetes, was a founder
of the boar peoples. Myth made it plain that Aeetes, though not a
son of Ares, was the ancestor of Thracian-based (i.e. not Media-
based) Ares. That is, because Ares depicted Medes that moved to
Thrace, he can depict both peoples, but Aeetes intermediate
between that Mede-to-Thrace migration, as even "Medea," the
name of Aeetes' daughter, would serve to verify. In that picture,
Aeetes (and Medea) can be viewed as the ancestor of Thracian-
based Ares. Azov, because it is intermediate between Colchis and
Thrace, can also be viewed as an Asgard/Aesir center.

354
To connect Aeetes to Ares, the Golden-Fleece myth had the
Fleece located in Aes, protected there by the dragon of Ares, by
which it is meant to say, I'm sure, that the peoples of Aeetes were
related to Ares, and may therefore be viewed as part of the dragon
line. As Colchis was in what was/became Georgia, Aeetes may
also be viewed as a Gorgon/Gogi.
Frey was symbolized by a boar! That makes a Frey-to-Aeetes
connection, making Frey part of the dragon line. If Frey can be
connected to the Irish tribes described above, they too become part
of the Calydonian Boar...which should not be mistaken for the
rulers of Calydon that had to kill the boar, though the two factions
may certainly have been from the same bloodline. In reverse, if the
Irish tribes can be identified as part of the Calydonia Boar, then the
boar by which Frey was depicted is revealed as the Calydonian
Boar. It's a good think I don't drink much, or I'd never be able to
keep track of this winding beast.
On the one hand, some months ago (it's now September
2005), I traced the Calydonian Boar to the peoples of Medea,
princess of Colchis, but without making a hard connection to Aes,
the city of her father, Aeetes. At that time I had placed emphasis
on Corinth as being the origin of the boar, Corinth being the city
where Medea (and Jason) came to live after she and Jason stole the
Fleece from Aeetes. One could get the impression that the Fleece
depicted the Corinthians which Aeetes had taken prisoner, and that
Jason's fob was to release them and bring themback to Corinth.
But that s another story.
More recently, yesterday in fact, I traced Frey and the
Merovingians in quite an amazing find (to be discussed later) to
the frog-goddess of Egypt, Keket (note the "Kek"), she being a
version of the Greek Hecate, the three-headed witch depicting
Gorgons on the north shore of the Black sea. "She" (no doubt as
the Gogi) was Medea's goddess and therefore her ancestor, thus
supporting a tracing of the boar-line once again to the doorstep of
Medea. But if Frey was in this way an extension of Gorgons,
wouldn't we view him as an extension of the Irish Gorgons,
especially as those Gorgons were depicted as the three-bodied
Geryon?
If anyone needs proof that the three heads of Hecate depict
Gorgons, consider the so-called "Gorgon Medusa," who was
depicted as three old hags by her enemies, the Perseus
Gorgophones. Hercules was himself a Gorgon, for he was a
descendant of Perseus and therefore a Gorgophone. That makes
the Danaan a Gorgophone sect.
The co-called Four Masters (of the 17th century AD), two of
whom claimed to be named, Cucogry O'Clery and Cucogry
O'Duigenan, were likely Gorgon/Gogi secret-society writers. They

355
told their mythical version of Irish roots, wherein we find that the
Fomorians came into Ireland with their leader, Cical
Grigenchosach, son of Goll. These terms may translate to Gog
GreekCossack, son of Gaul (if I'm correct, the Four Masters were
amateurs at this codeword game). Interestingly, "The term
[Cossack] is first mentioned in a Ruthenian document..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cossack
The term "Cical," like "Cecil," may have to do with the eyes,
and may therefore be alluding to the one-eyed giants, Cyclopes.
The name, "Cecil," in fact means "blind," and that evokes Tiresius
(patriarch of the Greek Calydonians), who was in fact made blind
by Greek myth writers. Taking all these things into consideration,
the Fomorians seem to be portrayed as a Gogi peoples connected
to the Slav branch of Rus(sians) stemming from the Ruthene
Gauls ... even as the Cossacks are associated with the Ukraine and
southern parts of Russia, while the Slavs claim to descend from the
Ruthene. If all this is correct, then the Fomorians in Ireland (who
were early at war with the Parthalons) were likewise from the
Redones.
The sun god, Lug (a wolf peoples?), was, symbolically
speaking, a relative of Manannan the ruler of the Danann.
Consider how the following quote parallels Perseus defeating the
Gorgon Medusa: "Lugh defeated the Fomorian champion
Balor, who had a poisonous eye, with a mirror-like shield and
beheaded him." Balor of the Evil Eye could kill a man by merely
looking at him. Perseus too, who was not permitted to look at the
Medusa lest he die at her sight, used a mirror to find her, and then
cut off her head.
So, the Balor story, and in fact the entire Tuatha de Danann
story, is mythical history, but we yet learn by the parallel to the
Greek myth that the Fomorians must have been Medusa-line
Gorgons, while the Tuatha de Danann, like Perseus, were Danaan
Gorgophones. Indeed, even as the Medusa Gorgons were depicted
as three hags sharing one eye among them, so the Fomorians were
depicted with one eye! The Medusa Gorgons were the same as
Hecate, the same also as Artemis, Scythians on/off the north shore
of the Black sea. These were depicted in old times as the Taurus.
Lug was the son of Balor's daughter, and so half
Fomorian/Taurus. And so we find in the story of Lug's birth that
Balor stole a magical cow from a certain Kian, and this resulted in
Lug's birth with Kian as his non-Fomorian father. Lug was born on
Tory island, where the Fomorians lived, where also the magic cow
was taken, and this term of course evokes Troy. The Fomorians
can therefore be suspected as Trojan descendants, and the same
can be said of the Danaan.

356
The stolen cow was likely a Gorgon peoples in their midst,
which points easily to the Danann, for Kian was a Danann. The
stealing of the cow is a depiction of a conflict where the
Fomorians took Danaan prisoners. This caused the Fomorians to
split, some of them becoming partners of the Danaan branch; that
faction was depicted as "Lug," and because he is the hero, the
myth was written by Lug followers/worshipers. Because the Lug
Fomorians went onto the side of the Danaan to the point of doing
battle with those whom they betrayed, the implied level of passion
tends to show that the two sides were kin.
Although I don't take it too seriously, it has occurred to me
that "Fomorian" may have derived from "Gomerian/Cymry" by a
linguistic twist of its capital letter, in which case they may have
been Teucrian-sect Trojans, for "Teucer" evokes Togarmah, son of
Gomer.
In any case, Fomorians appear as Trojans as per their home
in Tory, and the related Danaan may therefore have been Tros-sect
Trojans, even as Tros stemmed from historical Dar danus. This
would then connect the Danaan both to the historical Dardanus
tribe of Illyrians and to the Trojan leader, Antenor (descendant of
Tros), the founder of the Veneti. This all makes sense in that the
Illyrians founded the Veneti, but not before the Illyrians came
from Thrace!
As a variation of "Fomorian" is "Formorian," the Fomorians
may have been an hypothetical For-Mor/Fir-Mor, by which I mean
to say that the Fir-Bolgs may have been a branch of For-Mors. My
hypothetical is not wild, for the Fomorians are known to have been
sea peoples. Both a Fir-Bolg and a Danann connection to them is
supported by the additional variation, "Fir Domnann," that the
Fomorians were at times called. The latter variation is unto the sea
goddess, Domna, although she is also called "Donn," which seems
to me a variation of Dana, the Danann goddess.
Okay, big deal, these Irish tribes that killed one another were
brothers, what else is new when it comes to dragons? All the better
for the human race that they didn't unite and form an empire? Or
did they? Did they get smart? Will they ever be able to get along
and form the New World Order? Maybe not. Maybe as they are in
the throws of trying again, Jesus will come to say, "Hello. I'm
here. Time's up." Why do we all imagine that this New World
Order will be something else? It will be the same old same old, but
with electronic "magic" that we are not to glory in.
The Fir-Bolg have been identified as the historical
Erainn/Iberni peoples of Ireland. Proof that the Fir-Bolg were a
Danann tribe comes from the Eriann-Danann connection wherein
on the one hand Ireland was named after a Danann tribe, and on

357
the other hand by the Erainn, suggesting that the Erainn were that
Danann tribe.
Apparently, the following view is widely accepted:
"According to the historical scheme proposed by T.F.
Q'Rahilly, the Builg are identical with or a sub-group of the
Érainn or Iverni ... they spoke a P-Celtic language known as
Ivernic."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builg
The Erainn "have also been referred to as the Men apii...In
Connacht the tribes of the Ui Maine and the Conmaicne are
often claimed as their ancestors" (three italics mine). The
Menapii are revealed (elsewhere) as the peoples on the Isle of
Man, that isle founded by the ruler of the Danann, Manannan. It
would appear quite stark that the Danann were in Connacht, and
this is attested to by the existence there of the Fir-Domnann.
The following quote simply cannot be correct if by "Dal
Riata" is meant the Irish/Scots proper i.e. the Gaels: "In east
Ulster, [the Erainn] were said to descend as the tribes of the
Dál Riata" (website above). I cannot see how the Erainn can be
any of the P-Celt tribes and yet descend from the Gaels when the
Gaels came to Ireland after the Fir-Bolg, and after the Danaan.
However, if "Riata" can be connected instead to the "rota" =
"wheel" that the Aereda/Redone Gauls were named after, then I
would agree fully that the Erainn stemmed from Riata peoples.
And this is the point of this chapter, for it makes a further
connection to the Scandinavian realm of Rig and his involvement
in the Yngvi-Rig alliance that formed the Danes proper. For, the
Redone Gauls had also founded Haeredaland (Norway), the place
that would also become home to the Rugii/Arochi peoples.
Consider the following statement from an article claiming
that Celts were never in Ireland: “Berbers and Basques average
32%, Irish and Scots 29% and the Norwegian islanders 17%.
There were never any Celts among these people.” What the writer
doesn't realize is that the Norwegians were from the Lug-Danaan
Celts.
The same website having the above quote also claims that:
"The Cruithin (Cruithne) of Ireland are often noted as the
Irish tribes of the Dál nAraide" Surely the "Dal Riata" that
formed the Erainn are the same as the "Dal nAraide" that were the
Cruithne. I think you could agree with me that "Araide" is
equivalent to "Aereda," so that whether the author knows it or not,
he is connecting both the Gaels and the Fir-Bolg/Danann to the
Aereda/Redone Gauls. The terms "Dal Riata" and "Dal nAraide"
make it fairly certain in my mind that the Cruithne and the Erainn
are to be included as parts of Geryon's three bodies, for he was

358
said to live in Erytheia while his two-headed dog was dubbed
Orthos.
King Arthur comes to mind, and while some suggest that his
name derives from "ortos" = "bear," I would suggest otherwise,
that "Arthur" is to be connected to Aereda/Erethlyn elements in
Britain. These terms can appropriately have the secondary
meaning of "red," even while I'm certain that they derived from
"wheel." I'll bet my best horse whip that "rota/roda" was named
after "red" because men would come home with blood-red chariot
wheels.
To understand the Greek roots of the Redones, it's helpful to
look at the Dal Riada Gaels who introduced in Britain a different
version (Q-Celt) of the P-Celt language spoken by the rest of the
inhabitants. The Gaels are usually rooted in Spain in a number of
colonies of the trade-happy city, Miletus (of Asia Minor). After
realizing not long ago that Frey, Frigg and Frenchmen might be
part of the frogs of Revelation 16, and that they originated in
"Phrygia," I was stunned to learn that Plato likened Miletus (near
Phrygia) to a mother frog giving birth to many frogs around the
Mediterranean "pond." That is, the frogs were the 90 coastal cities
that stemmed from Miletus.
Plato, being a secret-society bloke with inside info on
western Atlantis, must have used "frog" for the very theory that I
had concluded after much devotion on the subject, that "frog"
came to refer to Thracian tribes (including Phrygians) which
moved to the fringes of Europe (explanation in a coming chapter).
Then, as soon as I thought that the lily of the Fleur de Lis may
have been named after the frog on it's lily pad, and moreover I at
the same time imagined that the Fleur de Lis looks a bit like a
frog's head and its legs (from a top view), I found this quote:
"According to some legends, it is known that at the time of the
baptism of Clovis, king of the Francs, the frogs on the flag
changed into Fleur-de-Lis. It became the emblem of French
royalty."
http://allaboutfrogs.org/weird/general/frenchfrogs.html
Clovis was a Merovingian king, the big king who created the
first French empire. And so read this (at the same website):
"According to a history book called 'Holy Blood Holy Grail,'
the earliest Frankish kings (Clovis I) used both bees and frogs
on their royal robes" (brackets not mine). Moreover, "The fleur-
de-lis' origins with French monarchs stems from the baptismal
lily used in the crowning of King Clovis I. To further enhance
its mystique, a legend eventually sprang up that a vial [grail?]
of oil descended from heaven to anoint and sanctify Clovis as
King. The thus "anointed" Kings of France later maintained

359
that their authority was directly from God, without the
mediation of either the Emperor or the Pope."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleur-de-lis
Yeah, right. It's the same old game of the Merovingians, to
tie themselves to God and to Christ in order to find public
acceptance, meanwhile their symbols were in honor of the dragon
line. Same game played by Freemasons to this day.
But the Merovingians are not the topic here, nor really the
city of Miletus so much, but the root of the Dal Riada, at the
mouth of the Rhone river, at the city of Massalia (modern
Marseilles). Bede wrote of a certain king of the Irish Scots,
"Reuda," and said that his men founded Dal Riada in western
Scotland and named after their king, but the similarity of his name
to "Redone" causes me to think that Bede was echoing a myth so
that "Reuda" should be understood as an eponym for a people and
not a literal king. Bede at that point in his writings needs to be
taken with caution, for he has the obvious error of having the Picts
come to Ireland (from Thrace) after the Irish and Bretons are
already there. I think the other version, where Picts derive from
Cruithne, is the correct view. But, then, as the Cruithne put forth
the Bretons, the Bretons and Picts were either "brothers," or
"father and son" (non-literally speaking).
I suspect that the Irish/Scot Gaels were mixing it up with
Redones (at Massalia) prior to settling Ireland. Massalia was a
Greek colony founded in 600ish BC, and some have said that the
Gael language originated at/near here. As the Book of Invasions
has the Gaels originating from Miletus but called "Feni" when
entering Ireland, it may be that they took the route from Massalia
to Vannes, Brittany, which at that time may have been called
"Feni." If so, the Miletus "Scythians" were in part Redone blood
from Vannes.
Now the Rhone was the mythical Eridanus, in my very
strong opinion, original home of the Redones, and as I suspect that
"Eridanus" was the root of "Aereda" and "Haeredaland," so I
suspect that the dragon line under discussion, to which I now
include the Merovingians, was rooted in the Redones of Eridanus.
As I had mentioned previously that Greek myth tells of
Ligurians moving to Eridanus, so we find in historical writings
that the "Initial leader [of Massalia married a Ligurian
princess" (portergaud.edu web site below, thus creating from the
very start a Ligurian-Redone alliance. Up until now I have
mentioned this connection between Eridanus and the Redones,
without historical evidence, as a connection to Rhodes, the island
of Helios, for it was said in myth that the chariot of Helios was
crashed into Eridanus, and so I imagined that the Helios peoples
that came to live in Eridanus were from Rhodes, who then became

360
called "Aereda/Redones/Rodez" after Rhodes. The term
"Eridanus" then became a term, after the facts, to describe the
Aereda peoples there. But now I want to share an historical proof
of what was only a water-tight theory, but still a theory...though
upon which my entire Illuminati writings were based. I knew I'd
come across it eventually.
Massalia was founded more specifically by Phocaeans, of the
city Phocaea, one of the 12 cities in the Paniones federation (that
included also Miletus). It had been my theory that these Paniones
were also the Paeoni, and Pannoans
Poeni, ni that became the Gaul
migration over Europe's land mass (as opposed to the sea-faring
migrations of the same peoples), and that therefore the Paniones
also became the Veneti and then the Ligurians. To be sure that the
Massalia colonists included the Redones, it is said that, "Within a
century after [Massalia's] establishment, it established its own
colonies at... [among other locations listed] Rhode (Rosa)"
(brackets not mine).
http://www.portergaud.edu/cmcarver/gcol.html
It's very telling that the author included "Rosa" as an
alternative term for "Rhode," for the island of Rhodes was also
called "Rose." It appears therefore that the Redones did originate
in Rhodes. While I've yet to verify it, surely the Rhode mentioned
above, in south France, must have been the city of "Rodez" known
to be founded by the Ruthene, they also being called the "Rodez."
The Ruthene in turn must have been the "Ruteni" Gauls that
are found, on this map of Gaul, in southern France. This region
was also where the Templar haunt, Rennes le Chateau, was
located, thus making a connection to the Redones at Rennes,
Brittany (on the English Channel), and this connection from one
side of France to the other is made at the portergaud website
above: "Massalia anchored a trade route, which followed the
Rhone and Saone to the Seine Valley and eventually to the
English Channel."
To show that the Danaan were from the Redones of the
Rhone and elsewhere, we read: "As early as 500 BC, Hecateus of
Miletus identified the "Keltoi," having come from the
headwaters of the Danube, the Rhine, and the Rhone rivers, as
the mythological and legendary people known as the Tuatha
de Danann."
http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc02/pap1030/p1030.htm
By "Keltoi," Hecatus was referring to the Gauls ... who would
become the Celts of Britain. Historians classify the Danann and
other Greek tribes as pre-Celts, but I disagree, although it all
depends on how one defines "Celt." It is agreed that Gauls became
Celts, but if I can show that the Redone Gauls became the Danann,
then they were not pre-Celts at all, but early Celts.

361
As one can easily figure, the Rhine was named after the same
root as was named the Rhone, and for that reason the Rhine was
founded by the Redones of Eridanus, who had named two cities
"Rennes" (i.e. similar to "Rhine/Rhone"). Not yet sure where that
term comes from but possibly the same as "Erainn," the historical
name of the Fir-Bolgs and Danann. Or, from the Danann
settlement of Magh Rein.
"Further downstream in what is now Normandy, the
Seine was known as Rodo, or Roto, which is a traditional
Celtic name for rivers, and is also the original name of the
Rhône River (see Rhône article for further explanations). This
is proved by the name of Rouen, which was Rotomagos in
Gaulish..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seine
Well, I couldn't resist going to the Rhone website, and here
you have it:
The word "Rhône" comes from Latin Rhodanus,
which itself comes from ancient Greek...Rhodanos, which
is the Greek rendering...as heard by the Greeks living in
the colony of Massalia (Marseilles). The Celtic name of
the river, something like Rodo or Roto, literally "that
which rolls", or "that which runs" ... from the Proto-Indo-
European root *ret- ("to run, roll"), which gave the word
rota ("wheel") in Latin, from which is derived "rotate"
and "to roll" in English. (brackets not mine)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rh%C3%B4ne_River
What I cannot understand is why it is said that no one knows
for certain where the mythical Eridanus is located, when the
Massalia Greeks themselves called their river "Rhodanus." It was
made clear at both websites that the Celts named many rivers all
over western Europe by the same "roto" name, and yet not once
did the articles share that these Celts were the Redones/Ruteni
Gauls. It seems to be that the Redones were a large fraction of the
Gauls and that they therefore put forth many tribes by other names.
So the Redones moved north on the Rhine, which led to what
is now Holland, where the frog became called a "kikkon," though I
can't find any other nation who calls it that. And I note that
Holland was a French "product," possibly "Gaulland." The
migration of Redones as far north as Holland explains why
Redones were recorded as a peoples in Belgica, and in some cases
viewed as a Belgae tribe, meaning that the Belgae, and therefore
the Fir-Bolgs, were Redone branches (not vice versa).
As certain Vikings were, along with Merovingians, a part of
the Templar thrust to rule Jerusalem, it's logical that these
particular Vikings stemmed from the Redones of Eridanus to

362
found Haeredaland, and that they were, as per Norse myth, later
allied to Rig in putting forth the Yngvi Swedes and Danes. That is,
the Redones put forth the Danish Vikings and therefore Rollo the
Dane and dragon-sacred St. Clair blood. But the Varangian-Rus
Vikings (who became the Muscovites) must also have been of this
north-Redone fold since the south-Redone fold, the Ruthene also
called "Rusi," were likewise a Rus peoples.
Evidence of the northern fold is in the term used by Tacitus
(first century AD), "Reudigni." These were a people of the north-
German coast, at Rostock, just to the east of Denmark, living
alongside the Longobards and the "Angli," said Tacitus. It is
known that the Longobards came from Sweden, but the same
would be true of the Angli since they derived along with the
Danes, from the Yngvi. These neighboring relatives listed by
Tacitus may very well have been the rising of the Ingaevone
Germans in Europe.
Although Scottish legend ties Dal Riada peoples (i.e. the
Gaels) to Miletus "Greeks," wouldn't it be logical to view the
Milesians as the ancestors of the south-France Redones, since
"Riada/Riata" certainly evokes "Rhoda/Ruteni." Without question,
then, every Irish tribe mentioned here thus far, including the Gaels,
appear descended from Redones. There were other Gauls besides
Redones, but if the myths take me to the Redones time and time
again, it must be because the myth writers were connected to them.
To put it another way, myth writers were by nature dragon-line
devotees and therefore, since the Redones are a large part of the
line, it is only expected to find the dragon peoples touching on the
Redones. And being in love with symbols, these writers used
many.
Now others online caution their readers not to confuse
Phocaea on the Asian coast (near Try) with the Phocis region of
Greece, but I can't resist the connection and will go with it as fact
because it's a perfect piece in this puzzle. Phocis was related
royally to Corinth, which is why I'll identify the Phocaeans as
boars. The mythical eponym of Phocis, "Phocus," was made the
son of "Oryntus," which appears as a version of "Corinth." Oryntus
was in turn the son of "Sisyphus," ruler of Corinth. Sisyphus is
sometimes considered the founder of Corinth, and yet roughly the
same status is given to Aeetes, for Aeetes too was king of early
Corinth (prior to being king of Colchis). Thus I would equate
Sisyphus and Aeetes as depicting the same early Corinthian
bloodline, even the boar line. But I would not necessarily view (or
rule out) the Colchians or the Medes (Medea's offspring) as boar
lines, for as the Greek "choiros" (Strong's #5519) means "swine,"
the boar line may be restricted to Corinth, including of course the
Phocis peoples who were a branch of royal Corinthians.

363
But, then, the Phocaeans (of Asia) were also a branch of
Corinthians, and ditto for the Phocaean settlement at Massalia.
One then wonders where the boar line went from there. Thus far I
have only two boar lines, the Vere Merovingians and the Polloks,
also said to have been Merovingians. Yet there were other British
families that used a boar to depict themselves, but I've yet to make
this a research project.
Endymion, the Apple-line symbol of Greek Calydon, was a
distinct symbol of Miletus, which is a good reason for wondering
whether Miletus was populated by Calydonians prior to being
defeated by the Ionians. The Calydonians of the city would then
translate to the Apple line that came to live at Avalon. In Britain,
the Miletus Calydonians may have been distinguished from those
of Calydon. Indeed, the latter became the Pretani (and therefore all
the other Greek-Irish tribes up to the Danaan), and there is good
reason to believe that the Miletus Calydons became the Irish-Scots
proper (that defeated the Danaan and all others). In other words,
the first wave of Calydons were the P-Celts, and the second wave,
mixed with Miletus Ionians, were Q-Celts.
The Four Masters claimed that one of the chiefs of the
Parthalons was "Rudhraidhe," a term that looks like Rod-Aereda.
As the Masters were speaking in code, there was no such man, but
rather it reveals what they believed, that the Parthalons were from
the Redones. More specifically, from the Redones who founded
Haeredaland. Therefore this is important because it reveals that
Caledonians moved to Sweden to form the Yngvi, and in turn it
reveals the British root of the Templar-forming Danes.
Remember from the top of the chapter that the use of
"Parthalon" was no doubt an allusion to Parthaon, king of
Calydon. Therefore, the Parthalons were a Calydon-Redone mix,
that is, partly from Calydon and partly from the island of
Rhodes/Rose. Therefore, the Parthalons were a Rose line. Note
that "Parthaon" is better than "Parthalon" for depicting the
historical "Pretani," meaning that the Bretons stemmed from
Parthaon of Greek Calydon. It's not a wonder, then, that Parthaon's
grandson, Meleager, married the symbol of Western Atlantis,
Atalanta.
The two of them, Meleager and Atalanta, killed (i.e. defeated
in war) the Calydonian Boar, but the remnants of that boar peoples
came to the west as well, to become the Boar of Brittany, even the
Vere Merovingians and the Pollok clan. This doesn't necessarily
mean that the Merovingians were the boars, for it could be that the
boar lines married into the Merovingians. More research is needed.
But I can tell you this right now, that the boar line was connected
to Aeetes peoples, they becoming the Gogi of Colchis/Georgia,
and the peoples of Colchis are thought to derive in part from the

364
historical Halybes (on the Halys river), they being a branch of
Rhodians from Helios and his wife, Rhoda!
The Cruithne-come-Picts put forth the Caledonii tribe(s). If it
be true that the Parthalons were from Parthaon of Greek Cayldon,
then it would be further from the truth to suggest that the Caledonii
tribe was merely one among many Pictish tribes, and closer to the
truth when contending that the Caledonii tribe was chief and
ancestral to all Pictish tribes. As the Picts chose their rulers on
their female sides, they come across as Amazons, and speaking of
Amazons, the Arcadian goddess, Atalanta, was certainly a symbol
of Amazonian women.
Yes, Atalanta was a symbol of Arcadians, and that would
make the Bretons, the Cruithne, and the Picts a Calydon-Arcadian
mix, which is to say a Calydon-Atlantis mix. Hermes and Pan were
born in Arcadia, if that helps to connect the Pretani, Cruithne and
Picts to Hermes. The mother of Hermes, Maia, was the first-born
(in Arcadia) of Atlas' seven daughters, and therefore she and
Hermes were symbols of Atlantis... meaning that Arcadia was also
a symbol of Atlantis, explaining why the region was also depicted
by the goddess, Atalanta. Add to all this that "Documents survive
which show that the ancestors of the Merovingians were
connected with Arcadia's royal house."
http://www.halexandria.org/dward216.htm
Arcadia was so sacred that it's eponym, Arcas, was the man
turned into a bear for to become Ursa Minor (the Little Dipper), a
constellation placed by the dragon line at the "center" of the
universe and meanwhile encircled by the constellation, Draco.
Arcadia was clearly an extension of Sparta, Sparta being from the
"Sparti" that were the teeth of the Ares dragon, the same dragon
that was the Aeetes people in Colchis. None of this is surprising as
Ares was from Media, depicted in the Bible (Daniel 7) as a bear.
As Arcadia and Atlantis were rooted in Medea, we are not
surprised at the terms depicting the Bretons, "Parthalon" and
"Parthaon."
Yet I still resist viewing "Arthur" as the "ortos" = "bear" that
others say he was, even when the Merovingians claimed to stem
from Spartans. I will soon show my position, that Arthur was not a
Merovingian people, as others believe, but merely allied to them.
Frey, because he was depicted as a boar, would stem from
the Phocaea-Redone mix of Gauls. This mix then defines the
Swedes, Danes, Angles, Saxons, and other Ingaevones ... that is, on
one side (the other side was Rig, also from Ares). In short, the
Ingaevones were boars, but of the white dragon due to
intermarriage with Rig, the pure Aryans from Ares.
The implication, if indeed the Danann were half the
Yngvi/Danes, that they too were boars. Indeed, the Danaan were at

365
Massalia, the city established by the Phocaeans, for that city was
inhabited first (i.e. prior to the Phocaeans) by Aryan Egyptians,
who, because they are revealed in myth, must have been the Greek
Danaans known, from myth, to be from two Egyptian brothers,
Danaus and Egyptus.
As Yngvi descendants and the Danaan can be identified as
boars on independent grounds, it tends to support a Dane descent
from the Danann.

366
FRANKLY, SCARLET,
YOU CAN GO TO ROTTERDAM
2004

A form of Illuminati from Britain, Rosicrucian in type, found


its way into high-powered American politics via a band of men
who raised Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic Party. Evidence
suggests that Scottish secret societies, or, more particularly those
in support of Stewart bloodlines, were at work under Jefferson.
The French rulers of the time supported American
Independence; the Statue of Liberty was a gift from France
intended to be offered exactly one century after 1776 in
celebration of Independence. The sculpture was under the
authority of Frédéric-Auguste Bartholdi, and he, many websites
claim, was a Freemason. No surprise. The French flag is red, white
and blue vertical bars; note the French-government symbol. Note
too the all-seeing eye on the French Declaration.
Clearly, the Liberty sculpture has nothing to do with the
Light of Christ or his freedom from sin, but was no doubt the
Great-Mother goddess, probably in the form of Artemis, for
Artemis had at times been depicted holding a torch (and a couple
of snakes in the other hand). Artemis was an Amazon-warrior
goddess, and a symbol of the Hyperboreans, whom I trace to
Gogi/Gorgon peoples north of the Black sea. "She" was heavily
involved with Thrace, but also Taurus in the Azov region of the
Cimmerians, prior to moving into Greece.
Amazons were a type of peoples whose women were stout,
tough, and probably engaged very little in attractive appearances.
It is well known that Amazons were in north Africa (these were
depicted in myth as very hideous to the sight), but I found an
amazing thing on one website: that African Amazons, known to
historians as "Amazighen," were also called "Tamazighen" as the
feminine version. Add to this that the Babylonian version of
"Tammuz" was "Dumuzi." Might these terms be rooted in "dame"?
I don't agree with those who portray(ed) Amazons as male-
despising, woman-only peoples, as that must be merely mythical
code to highlight the leadership roles that women played
then ... perhaps smacking of the iron-rod, male-despising sector of
modern feminism.

367
My dictionary says that "dame" is from the Latin "domina,"
and this is interesting since " Sunday" (in Latin) is "Dominica,"
from "dominus" meaning "ruler/lord." The Latins didn't name
Sunday the "Lord's Day" after Jesus, but after their lord, the Sun
God, whom in their eyes had dominion" over all the earth. But
how did "ruler" stem from a word that means "woman"?? Are we
to assume that certain men of certain peoples became wimpy, or so
slack as to force women to do their man-work ... until the women
just up and decided to rule over the lazy bums? Or were Amazons
depicted as women because Amazons were the same as the
mythical transvestites, the Galli of Kabeiri cult?
The city of Ephesus (in Asia Minor) was founded by
Amazons, and as we can find in Acts 19, Artemis was still the
main god(dess) of that city when Paul built a church there. In fact,
Paul found himself in trouble with worshipers of Artemis, and I
can only conclude that God had sent Paul there to do battle with
the dragon bloodline, for in his letter to the Ephesians, the apostle
wrote that God kept His own secret mystery "in order that,
through the Church, the manifold wisdom of God might now
[in Paul's day] be made known to the rulers and the
authorities in the heavenlies ... " (Ephesians 3:10). The Church --
God's "secret society" endowed with true wisdom/illumination --
was moving in on Satan's beastly dominion. And tomorrow's
headline: "Fire-breathing dragon slain silly by the charge of an
angry Lamb."
The Statue of Liberty holding the torch of illumination has
importance to the secret societies that wrought it, in that it
represents their heritage, even their peculiar Gogi bloodline. It has
occurred to me that Freemasonic concerns in Gogi blood could
explain the real reason that the capital "G" is found in the center of
some Freemasonic versions of the compass-and-square symbol.
It is known that Freemasonry was in support of the Stewart
kings of Britain, and I note that the American Independence
movement came just after the Stewarts were no longer on the
throne of Britain. The Scottish-based support given to Thomas
Jefferson is explained by the fact that the royal Stewart bloodline
had sat as kings of Scotland prior to ascending the English throne.
Moreover, the Stewart supporters known as "Jacobites," while
originating in Scotland, had been in France in the 18th century so
that they likely defined the French support for American
Independence. It is not likely a coincidence that the French
Revolution, similar to the Independence movement in America and
coming just one generation later, was supported/led by "Jacobins,"
not quite "Jacobite," but close enough.
What I'm trying to say is that the royal Stewarts were from
Amazonian/Gorgon blood (not necessarily from the African

368
branches), and they secretly knew it! They are conditioned by their
elders to believe that their bloodline has right to supreme dominion
on earth.
The modern book, "Bloodline of the Holy Grail," is a far-
reaching attempt to get the Stewart bloodline back on the throne of
Britain, claiming that a certain Michael Stewart is the rightful heir
to the throne. I can't ignore that the author of the book, Laurence
Gardner (a modern Jacobite), is/was a leader of the so-called
"Imperial and Royal Court of the Dragon Sovereignty." Now he
claims that the dragon bloodline of which he speaks originated in
Sumeria, and that no doubt implies openly that he roots it in Utu,
whose throne ended up in Erech where Tammuz and his wife
Ishtar (later Artemis) took over.
It is commonly stated by the Gardner types that the bloodline
originated as an Aryan species on the planet Mars, but I think this
sort of talk is secret-society codeword for the city and region of
ancient Mari in Iran, near and adjacent to Aria the ancient origin of
the Aryans.
[Update June 2006 -- My Zondervan Bible Atlas has
"Ashkenaz" written across this region (page 45), evoking the so-
called Ashkenazi "Jews" said to derive from Khazaria. Were the
Hebrews of Aria and Mari, therefore, those who came to rule
Khazaria, whom as rulers would call themselves "Kagans"? Is that
the root of the Stewarts, then, whom I now know derived from the
Cohen clan, a clan that uses "Kagan" as a sept/variant surname to
this day? It's interesting that there was another Mari on the
Euphrates river, a major Dagon center, it being a part of what I'll
call the "Kabala Strip" leading upstream to Nahorite Haran and
nearby Gozan. Note now the current France Coat of Arms, how
one could easily mistaken it for Hebrew Torah. End Update^ary,"
It's a little interesting that the region of Mari is today "
because the marriage between Jesus and Mary Magdalene that
these secret societies boast of may be codeword (i.e. rabbit
trails/false information merely for public consumption) for the
marriage of Mari Aryans to Kabalists. Bloodline of the Holy Grail
is not the only book promoting the ridiculous Jesus and Magdalene
affair, but it does show that blue-blood Stewarts are a part of that
scam, no doubt because it was through royal Stewart supporters
that the Anglican Church, the supposed True Church of Jesus
Christ with a Stewart ruler on His worldly throne, came to be.
I would say that the "holy grail" refers in truth to the
Poseidon-Phoenix family. Note that Phoenix, mythical
ruler/representation of Phoenicia, had Cilix (known symbol of
Cilicians) as one son, while my dictionary says that "chalice" (i.e.
a cup/grail) is rooted in the Latin, "calix." This striking similarity
further implies that the Phoenix line was Latin, albeit pre-Roman

369
Latin from the peoples depicted as the dragon, Ladon. The Lydian
lion symbol now comes to mind, as the lion symbol of both Rome
and Britain. Because the Lydians worshiped Hercules (as did the
Romans later), Calix holy-grail blood included the Gorgon peoples
depicted by Perseus, rulers of Argos. But they were more-
specifically the Gorgophone offspring of Perseus, who are shown
by myth to have been in the Joppa region of Israel, in what may
have been, or what as a result of the Gorgophones became,
Phoenicia. Indeed, it sits right with me that Phoenicians were
Gorgophone-branch Gorgons among Canaanites!
My hunch, therefore, is that the proto-Stewarts (and other
dragon bloodlines) passed through Cilicia, and then furnished the
Perseus Gorgons that branched out to found western Atlanteans.
At one website I found that the true inspiration for Holy-
Bloodline books (such as that of Gardner's) has been Nicholas de
Vere von Drakenberg (still living), he being the Sovereign Grand
Master of the "Imperial and Royal Dragon Court and Order," and
author of "The Dragon Legacy." De Vere says,
"From the age of seven onwards my father told me
about our ancestry, an ancestry steeped in royal blood
and most significantly of all, in what is termed Royal
Witchcraft, which is a major, ancient, draconian, druidic
facet continuing within the later history of the Dragon
tradition and within the Vere family...
"I trace my lineage back in an unbroken bloodline
to the imperial prince Milo de Vere, Count of Anjou in
740 A.D., son of Princess Milouziana of the Scythians.
She was recorded throughout France as being the Elven,
Dragon Princess of the Scottish Picts, and her Grandson,
Milo II, derived his Merovingian descent through his
father's marital alliance with the imperial house of
Charlene...
"In brief, the recorded Dragon lineage starts with
the Annunaki [children of Anu, supreme god of Sumeria]
and descends through the proto-Scythians, the Sumerians
in one branch and the early Egyptians in another; the
Phoenicians, the Mittani, back to the Scythians again
through marital alliance, along to the "Tuatha de
Danann" and the Fir Bolg; down through their Arch-
Druidic, Priest-Princely families, to the Royal Picts of
Scotland and the high kings of the Horse Lords of Dal
Riada; through to the Elven dynasty of Pendragon and
Avallon del Acqs, and down to a few pure bred families
today...

370
"Anciently Dragon blood, the blood of the gods, is
the true source of divine right kingship. To say that
Dragons are the rightful rulers of the world's
governments today might raise some contention. Perhaps
it would be more realistic to suggest that they may well be
the rightful rulers of the world's governments in the
future."
http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/author/devere/kingdom.html
Don't assume that De Vere is being up front on any matter
because he must be devoted much more to his family agenda. It
may even be that Milo de Vere (740 AD) was invented (myth
style) to depict an historical ruler (or set of rulers) by another
name, and I'm guessing Ingelger (about 845-888), for he with his
father, Fulk I, are recognized as the first rulers of Anjou.
As Gardner supports the Stewarts for Dragon-bloodline
superiority, while De Vere supports the Veres, one can only
conclude that the two families were at one time connected by
marriage. It is said online that the Veres were from Brittany -- as
were the Stewarts -- and that the Veres came over to England with
William the Conqueror -- as did the Stewarts.
The Veres became the first Earls of Oxford, and retained the
seat for several hundred years (until 1702). The 13th earl of
Oxford, a Vere, was the chief of the Red Rose party (i.e.
Lancaster) in the war of the Roses, and generally the Veres were
hard-core supporters of the Lancaster House.
At the website below it is shown that the De Vere star (now
having five points), on the oldest Vere coat of arms, was a six-
pointed star in the shape of the hexagram, the very star that was
symbol also to the Rothschilds...and quite possibly a symbol
common to the Zionist movement of the Templars. Indeed, the son
(Aubrey II de Vere) of the first Vere in England was at the First
Crusade to "liberate" Jerusalem.
http://www.baronage.co.uk/1999/herart01.html#Anchor-49575
I'm not saying that the Vere family is necessarily supreme
among dragon bloodlines so as to one day produce the False
Prophet, but rather I'm showing that there have in fact been dragon
bloodlines disguised as Christian entities attempting to set up a
false Biblical Millennium with Israel/Jerusalem at it's center. The
game is still on. To facilitate this counterfeit agenda, the false idea
is being spread that the bloodline originates in Jesus. David Icke
says that Jesus was a fictional character, and for other reasons
"caution" is the word when reading his wild claims, yet I wouldn't
say it any different than he did when he wrote:
"I have most strongly contended in my own books
and talks that this claim about the bloodline of 'Jesus' is a

371
diversion from the fact that the 'Holy Grail' or
Merovingian bloodline is a key reptilian bloodline from
which vast numbers of people in royal, political,
economic, religious, and military power today, genetically
descend. It is the desire to maintain this reptilian genetic
structure which has led to the obsessive interbreeding for
aeons to the present day of the 'elite' families.
Sir Laurence [Gardner] himself calls these 'Holy
Grail' bloodlines the 'dragon' bloodlines'...
Sir Laurence claims that the dragon bloodline,
which he connects to the House of Stewart, has the right
to the British throne."
Icke promotes the ridiculous idea that Evolution has
produced, in subterranean regions, human-like creatures that are
part lizard part human ... the offspring of which have come to live in
our society not only as working peoples but as those who rule over
us with a secret agenda, the Merovingians and Stewarts included.
These lizard people are said to shape-shift at times, especially
during Satanic rituals, so as to starkly produce reptilian physical
features.
But shape-shifting is a concept found in Greek myth, and as
both Zeus and Cecrops were among the half human, half snake
personalities, it's not difficult to connect the modern dragon
bloodline to them. This explains why both the American and
French Revolutions were fashioned upon Democracy, for
Democracy was, as is well known, founded in Athens by the
Cecrops bloodline.
Perhaps those prophecy educators who portray the Europe-
based kingdom of the anti-Christ as a coming dictatorship need to
re-assess their view and envisage a democratic vein running
through their term, "dictatorship." There is no doubt in my mind
that certain factions of the dragon bloodline today wish to be
dictatorial, but, as it would even now appear, most Illuminatists
have learned from recent history that dictatorships won't work
anymore without monarchs (they themselves eradicated/weakened
monarchs through democracy), meaning that the Globalists are
evolving more-clever methods to convince the masses that the
Globalist agenda is the best course of action on their behalf. It's
called "politics as usual," and the peoples have tolerated it in trust
that the leaders have some semblance of angelic wings.
Most people don't realize this, but it is International Law to
this day that kings and queens still hold absolute power over
politicians. There are those who feel that there is an Illuminati plot
to one day use monarchical power (via tight strings attached to

372
them) to effect a Global dictatorship. But I would say that those
strings have long been in use under Democratic facades, and that
the future tribulation period won't be much different than it is now,
except that it will use "emergency measures" in forcing Christians
to return to the work-force and other normal posts when one day
we decide that we cannot contribute any longer to the global
dragon agenda, that decision being the Will of God for us.
It is legal in International Law for a king to sell a country; it
has already been done. The Grimaldis bought Monaco centuries
ago, for example. This law is no doubt very appreciated and
perhaps exploited by super-rich Illuminatists, who may be buying
nations under the table, paying monarchs off to do their bidding, as
they buy politicians. How do we know that the Rothschilds have
not bought Britain from the Royal family? Might not the Illuminati
have set up Swiss bank accounts for various of their special
purposes, including the concealing of payments to
monarchs/politicians?
I suspect that the genes of "sacred" bloodline members are
being manipulated by Illuminati lunatics bent on creating creatures
found in Greek myths that long ago were fundamental symbols of
the dragon bloodline, such as Centaurs, Satyrs, and Dragons.
Perhaps the Illuminatists have aspirations of releasing these breeds
in coming decades, but to hide the fact that they are products of
their gene-altering labs, some Illuminati agents are now attempting
to convince the public that the creatures evolved naturally in caves
right here on Earth.
De Vere said, "Later the Dragon Court was manifest in
the 'Thirteen Covens of Mid-Lothian'..." Midlothian (of
Scotland) is the region where we find Roslin Institute, a major
player on the world stage for genetic engineering. Dolly the sheep
was cloned at Roslin Institute.
Other shape-shifting preachers claim the origin of the dragon
bloodline to be on other planets, especially Venus and Mars. My
research led me to conclude that the Stewarts were from both
Venus and Mars, not the planets, but the historical peoples
depicted by those terms; Ve nus was the Roman version of
Artemis.
I don't think it's a coincidence that I (prior to knowing
anything of Merovingian roots) had traced the proto-Merovingians
to Poland in merely an afternoon of conjecturing, only to discover
that very evening that the Merovingians are thought to originate in
Pomerania, a region of what would become western Poland. In
western Pomerania (Germany) there developed Mecklenburg
(today, "Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania") that uses a service
flag consisting only of a crowned black bull and a red winged
dragon, symbols that evoke the Gorgon bull cult i.e. the Great

373
Mother. Indeed, Nerthus, the Mother named below, was depicted
by cows.
It may be totally unrelated, but I'll mention it anyway, that
the Pollok clan was early connected to, and to a significant degree
became, the Maxwell clan. That is, might "Max(well)" allude to
the founders/namers of Mecklenburg since the Maxwells were
previously the Maccus clan (once in a while there's going to be a
name beginning with "Mac" that doesn't mean "son of"). If
Mecklenburg was founded by Polish peoples, then of course one
could see how the relatives of Maccus could derive the Pollok
name.
A chief city of Mecklenburg is Rostock (see Mecklenburg-
Pomerania Coat with the Rostock griffin). Rostock is precisely
where Ptolemy (the astrologer) located some of the Earth-Mother
worshipers, mentioned by Tacitus (first century AD) like so:
"After [beyond] the Langobardi come [lived] the
Reudigni, Auiones, Angli, Varini, Eudoses, Suarines and
Nuithones ... There is nothing remarkable about any of
these tribes unless it be the common worship of Nerthus,
that is Earth Mother." (this quote common on the
internet).
As the Veres are said to be Angles, I feel compelled to point
out that Tacitus located the Angli side-by-side with the Varni,
technically the "Varini." The Varni were in north-western
Pomerania, at the mouth of the Warnow river, on the sea shore
near modern Rostock. The other Nerthus-based tribes were not far
away.
While some websites claim that the Varni were a relatively
insignificant peoples, yet, in contradiction, Pliny the Elder divided
Germanics into five groups, one being the Varni. There is little
online information on the Verni/Werni, but recall that the Vere
dragon is a Wyvern species. One website makes this common
calculation: "...presumably [the Werni] were clients of the
Saxons, the dominant Germanic people of the region in the
time specified."
http://www.hostkingdom.net/Teutons.html
Other websites that mention (very briefly) this list of peoples
state flatly that they were Saxon tribes, wherefore I'm prepared to
view the Salian Franks as part Saxon (i.e. a Saxon-Veneti mix).
Note that an alternative of the above-mentioned "Auions"
(technically, "Avions") is "Abions," which may have become the
Abii/Ubii Franks on the north end of the Rhine. One could thus
reach the conclusion that these Earth-Mother tribes of Saxons as a
whole became the Franks, but that may be jumping the gun. The

374
question that lingers is how the Saxons married Veneti to produce
the Franks.
The Eudoses tribe (mentioned by Tacitus) might have been
the Eduens/Aedui peoples, known founders of the Bibracte capital,
in Autun (France). I'm seeking evidence to show that the Bibracte
empire stemmed from Bebryces, a Boii nation of Bithynia. Recall
that the mythical king Merops (meaning "bee-eater") of Ethiopia
was "grandfather" of queen Aedon of Thebes, and that Thebes
(capital of Boiotia) was founded by Boii peoples under the
codeword/goddess "Melia" (meaning "honey"). What we have here
is a Sheba-Edone / Sheba-Getae / Sheba-Goth mix that must have
become the Suebi Germanics, for which reason I would expect the
Suebi to have a major part in Merovingian genes.
Geoffrey of Monmouth (author of Arthurian myth), in his
code-studded writings, portrayed Anglo-Saxons as a white dragon
(supporting the possibility that Saxons, in being connected by
blood to the red dragon, were so connected to both the Welsh and
Merovingians). It may be that the Saxons were white due to the
Goth blood in the Suebi, by which I mean to hypothesize that
Saxons stemmed from the Suebi.
The Poles call themselves "Polska," a term said to be derived
from "Polanie," the early name of Poland. As you can see,
"Poland" should be read as Po-Land rather than Pol-Land, so that
the Po river in Italy is evoked. This is agreeable to what Jordanes
told us, that the Veneti (who lived at the mouth of the Po) were in
proto-Poland as the "Venethi." Having made that connection, one
can hardly avoid noticing the similarity between "Polska" and
"Bologne, especially as "Polska" derives from the Russian,
"Polyi," a term that modifies to "Polgi."
One then has reason to believe that the Polgi were roughly
the same peoples as the Bolgs of western Europe. I wouldn't view
the one stemming from the other, however, but rather that the
Bolgs and Poles were two different branches of Veneti.
Because I have reason to believe that the Polish branch was a
proto-Merovingian line, I tend to suspect that the Bolgs also had
much to do with putting forth Merovingians. The Polish branch,
which more-specifically seems to be ancestral to the Sicambrian
Franks, may not have put forth the Salian Franks. That is, the
Salians may have been only indirectly related to the Sicambrians
as per the Bolgs and Poles not being connected except as two
diverging branches of Veneti.
I'm suggesting that both Frank groups were from the Boii
who named Bologne, who also became the Poles. The modern
Pollock clan, anciently "Pollok," is said to this day to have been a
Merovingian peoples. As you must know, Poles are also called
"Polocks" (one "l"), yet the Pollock family reports nothing of their

375
origins in Poland, nor from Pollux; these ideas are purely mine,
and I include them here as theories that may help to identify the
migratory and genetic paths taken by proto-Merovingians.
The first-known Pollok was called a Saxon, and Saxons may
have been the peoples who, in mixing with the Venethi, gave birth
in proto-Poland to the Wends, known more-popularly as the
Vandals (Wends/Vandals are believed by some to have stemmed
from Veneti). I suspect that Vandals, or something quite similar,
became the Sicambrian Franks. It's interesting that Wends are
known to have moved to Texas, and near where I live there are not
only many German-built towns, but the town of Castroville that
was founded by Alsatians (lived on the French-German border). I
have wondered if they were not part of the Wend migration to
these parts, the point being that the earliest-known version of
"Alsace" was "Alesacius," which may be understood as Alan-
Sica(mbria). It never hurts to jot down a possibility in case it pans
out. I had previously mentioned that the Alsatians may be from the
mythical Castor, twin brother of Pollux.
How can an historical peoples be named after a mythical
god? They're not. Rather, the gods are named after historical
peoples, sometimes openly, as in Perseus, at other times to conceal
a people group. My conclusion is that there must have been a
peoples named "Castorites," or something very similar, for
Castroville to have been so named. In a moment, I will tell my
theory.
I don't know how closely the Pollok clan, which represented
itself with a boar as early as the twelfth century, was genetically
connected to the blue-boar Veres. Nor do I know if their boar
symbols depicted Frey, the Bolgs, or the Gauls, for all three had
used the boar as their symbol. I did conclude that the Picts (ruled
by the Veres) were a Bolg peoples (they being from the Gauls),
and that Bolgs mixed with Goths to produce the Frey boars, who
in turn produced the Saxons. That's a lot of boar peoples, and this
may be the reason that families often use three boars to depict
themselves on coats of arms. "The Sicambrians, ancestors of the
Franks, were known as the "people of the Bear" for their
worship of the bear-goddess Arduina."
http://www.crystalinks.com/rennes.html
Arduina was the Gaul boar goddess, yet it does seem that
wherever the boar (Old English "bar") goes, the bear (Old English
"bera") goes. The Sicambrian half of the Merovingians was
therefore a Gaul bloodline, not Germanic (or fully-Germanic,
anyway).
The father of Tuisto -- he being a progenitor of all three
Germanic tribes mentioned by Tacitus -- was Buri, and his father

376
in turn was Bor, son of Odin. I would connect these to the mythical
Boreus of the Haemus valley (Thrace), where lived the Boii.
The Germans "Herminones" were distinguished by Tacitus
from the "Ingaevone" branch of Germanics. Germanics as a whole
are a puzzling lot, and not simply because they speak funny
English. Some were pure Goths (i.e. of Edone stock), others Goths
mixed with Gauls/Celts (i.e. of Veneti stock), and still others
mixed with non-Gaul Veneti stock (e.g. the Wends ... who may
have named Windsor). Some Germans recoil at the thought of
being half Italian, and would rather not view such groups as
Germanics, but blame the old Aryan Gomers living in cold trees
who couldn't resist thin-necked and refined senoritas from warm
and friendly Mediterranean air.
The Belgae of Belgica (facing Britain) are said to have been
Gauls. But it would seem evident that a Bolg-Goth mix produced,
or in any case came to define, the Belgae. For, the Belgae were
long ago classified more Germanic than Celt. Today, the very-
French-sounding city of Bouillon (once in the possession of the
first Templar king of Jerusalem) is in Belgium, and the city of
Boulogne, now in north-west France, was possibly a part of
Belgica when built. I naturally see an early Frank-Belgae
connection, but this doesn't necessarily mean that Franks stemmed
from Belgae initially.
The Franks are classified as "Istaevone" Germanics, and my
personal definition of that term is an Ishtar-worshiping peoples, in
contrast with the Hermes-worshiping Herminones. Hermes was an
Armenian/Gorgon (i.e. Aryan) entity, and Ishtar an
Akkadian/Semite one. The conclusion is that the two had mixed
while migrating together, but each retained their own "gods" as per
their original bloodlines. This view then places significant Semitic
blood in the early Franks, explaining why the first Franks, the
Merovingians, pointed to Hebrew origins.
I view the Franks as a Veneti-Goth mix on their Sicambrian
side. Though Franks rooted themselves in the Veneti, they could
not have been Veneti alone, for the Veneti were not strictly
Germanics while the Franks were so classified. The question is,
were Franks a branch of Germanics from the Vandals, or
Germanics from the Belgae, or both, or neither?
It is said that Germans proper today were from the Suebi, and
while some might argue that such were the pure Germanics, I
would add a monkey wrench by claiming that the Suebi (and their
Longobard and Marcomanni tribes) were to a significant extent
Phrygian worshipers of Ishtar as per the Kybele-based
Saba(zios)...who were themselves rooted in Abrahamic Sheba. If I
am correct in suggesting that an Istaevone Frank is defined as an

377
Ishtar-recalling peoples, it would seem feasible that Franks
stemmed from the Suebi.
Istaevones are defined as Rhine-river Germans, and so see on
the Gaul map that both the Suebi and Marcomanni are shown off
the east bank of the Rhine (river not shown). There is a good
possibility that "Ista" refers to the Ister (now the Danube) river, but
it's also a good possibility that it was named by Ishtar-worshipping
peoples. The river is said to be from the god, Istros, who in turn
was a son of Tethys (like "Thoth" = Hermes) the Titan, who (I
think) may have depicted a Hermes-Dedan mix. And this is where
Castor comes in. Doesn't Castro(ville) evoke "Ister"? There's no
use telling me that Istros was a Thracian god while Castor was
Spartan, for the Istros Thracians may have moved to Sparta. In
fact, I would suggest that Castor and Istros both were recollections
of Ishtar, for indeed Leda (mother of Castor) can be cannot
logically to Leto (the Lydians), where the Ishtar cult was
worshiped as Kybele.
As Merovingians were connected to Redone Gauls in
particular, the question is, when did they connect? After the Franks
became Merovingians? Or were the Franks formed in the first
place by a Redone bloodline? Redones may not have come by way
of Venetia, but by sea to the mouth of the Rhodanus/Rhone river.
It's made very apparent my Greek myth and historical records that
the peoples of Rhodanus mixed with Ligurians, and as the
Ligurians lived on the upper Po, they would be easily pegged as
the Veneti-rooted Gauls who furnished Frank blood. But the
Franks arose long after Ligurians settled the Po, and so Ligurians
need to be traced westward and identified by their other names
developed over the centuries. I should remind the reader that the
Merovingian Rose Line (from Rhodes) was through the Redones,
while the Merovingian Holy-Grail line (from mythical Cilix i.e.
Cilicia) was through the Ligurians (rooted in Leda of Sparta, who
in turn was from the Cati of Cilicia).
A certain Pharamon, king of Gaul, is said to be an ancestor
of Clovis, the latter being a prime Merovingian patriarch. It's
interesting that Clovis' mythical arms included one with three
toads that were "changed upon his conversion to Azure three
fleurs-de-lys or" (azure is a blue shade and "or" means "gold").
http://www2.kumc.edu/itc/staff/rknight/Arthur.htm
Does this mean that wherever we see the Fleur de Lis, it is to
be viewed as three frogs? My definition of "frogs" as Thracian
peoples comes from means independent of the fact that Istaevones
were also called "Thracones" and "Strathones" (from "Satyr"?).
The website above also says that "according to French
Arthurian legends," Pharamon was "a knight of the Round
Table." What's that? Frenchmen in Arthur's roundtable? Hmm,

378
that would connect Merovingians to Brittany/Cambria elements,
and my guess is the Redones of Rennes, and/or of Vannes, act as
the link. The Fir Bolgs may have co-founded this Rennes (of
proto-Brittany, not to be confused with Rennes le Chateau)
because, in Ireland, the Bolgs were called "Araine."
I'm suggesting that the Bolgs had been Bologne-based
Veneti/Ligurians who founded the Atlantis kingdom that king
Arthur came to rule, keeping in mind from a previous chapter that
Helen of Troy and her twin sister (Clytemnestra) formed some of
those Holy-Grail Atlanteans (Plato's Mneseus' and his twin
brother, Autochthon) so that Helen's brother, Pollux, may very
well have been the root of the Bolgs. As I believe that "chthon"
refers to the Cutha Kabalists, and "Auto" to Atti(s) the sun god of
the Kabala cult, the Bolgs would appear quite (non-Israelite)
Hebrew indeed.
One can easily deduce that the same who founded Rennes
also named the Rhine and Rhone rivers, who, because both those
rivers were at first called "Roto/Rodo," were founded by
Redone/Ruteni Gauls. The mouth of the Rhine is today Rotterdam.
The Fir Bolg, therefore, if indeed "Bolg" denotes the Boii of
Bologne, must have been a Boii-Redone mix out of Rennes ... i.e. if
the Bolg of Britain, the Arain, were the same who named
Rennes/Rhine/Rhone. In fact, as the Boii (founders of Bohemia)
were previously on the Ister river, and then on the Rhine (see Gaul
map), the Belgica Redones (not shown on the map) downstream on
the Rhine could translate, not only to a Boii-Redone mix, but to
the founding of the Istaevones. The Boii are important here
because I am tracing them from Boiotia to Atlantis. It's a very
small sail from the mouth of the Rhine, or from the Belgica coast,
to Britain.
Nicholas de Vere claims family roots in the Mittani (of Asia
Minor). It makes for perfect logic in my mind that the Mittani
formed the Hermes-based peoples of Methone, Greece. Moreover,
near Bologne sits Modena, and as certain the Gypsies were called
"Roma," so Modena is in the province of Romagna. There is
thereby a Greek-Danaan connection to Modena of Italy, as I will
show below, which then roots the British Danann in Modena as
well.
However, it should be safe to suggest that the Greek Danaans
settled other parts of northern Italy en route to forming the
Danann, and since I have identified the Bolgs as a Danann branch,
Bologne seems a Danaan colony as well.
The Danaans are to be distinguished from the Leda Holy-
Grail line; since the Danaans were from Rhodes, they represent the
Rose Line ... that became the Rus and therefore the Ruthene
Redones. Are you with me? The Rhodians who sailed and landed

379
at the mouth of the Rhodonus river went straight east to the Po
river to mix with Rhodes-based Danaans there, and in the
meantime could have mixed with the Boii of Bologne, who,
because they were from the bee lines (not to mention the holy-grail
line), must have furnished the bee-worshiping Merovingians. I
would also stress that the Veneti in proto-France, proto-Brittany
and proto-Normandy (i.e. all Gauls) should be considered a Boii-
Danaan mix to a significant degree, who in turn mixed with the
Redones.
From website below you may see Hermes temples found in
pagan Poland with their penis-tops in case you don't believe that
those temples depicted such; the Washingtom Monument (and
other obelisks) has been disguised with a pyramid-shaped top
which, while it originally denoted Poseidon-Egyptian roots, may
not in the case of the United States. The obvious fact is that the
structures denote a sacred Hermes line which also made it to
Poseidon-based Egyptian rulers, and it would seem that the top
depicts Danaans (Hercules, for one). For it just so happens that the
mythical Egyptus went to live in Methone (Greece). Who was
Egyptus? Just the brother of Danaus, the progenitor of the Greek
Danaans...and therefore a patriarch of the (Red) Rose line.
http://freepages.history.rootsweb.com/~koby/political/chapter_01/01earlypoland.html.
Hermes, in depicting Armenia, was of Togarmite blood,
while Rhodians of the Danaan type were of Cimmerian/Gomarian
blood, wherefore we can see why the two could connect, as
Togarmah was the son of Gomer. The Rose Line is thus identified
as a Cimmerian one. How did the Rose Line get to Poland? The
answer could be in the similarity between the "Polanie" region of
Poland, and "Bologne," which would then make the Poles a Boii
peoples, at least in part.
This may be an advanced read for some, but for others I'm
just an amateur. I'm merely setting up the problems here, not
answering them fully or at all. Give me time to become an expert
at this topic yet.

380
MEROVINGIANS ARE FROM
PO-LAND

We see that the Pomeranian Coat of Arms is covered in


dragons/griffins of differing colors no doubt depicting various
dragon branches. The Pomeranian Arms includes exactly the
Rosicrucian X-shaped (saltire) cross with four roses that was part
of this Andreae family Coat and Crest (note what looks like
Winnie the Pooh (i.e. a bear) between the wings of the Crest
(before seeing this design, I had theorized that Winnie the Pooh
depicted the bee-line Veneti of the Po river). Clearly, Rosicrucians
were connected to Pomeranians!
Johann Andreae (1586-1654) is known to have been a chief
Rosicrucian, and as a man of the theater is thought by some to
have been connected to Shakespeare, the latter in turn said by
some to have been Edward de Vere, earl of Oxford. The Andreae
crest is akin to the Templar flag of Jerusalem, except that the latter
used four crosses (to appease/deceive Christianity) rather than four
roses. This same Templar flag was the flag of Georgia (in
Caucasia), used to this day; Georgians to this day are called
"Gogi"!
See flag at http://www.mapsofworld.com/flags/georgia-flag.html
In connecting the dots, I would venture to claim that
Merovingians were (and knew that they were) a Gogi peoples, for
which reason they felt destined for, and therefore entitled to, the
earth's throne, as per Revelation 20. Franks did not only stem from
the Pomeranians (by whatever name they used when Franks were
forming), but from the Veneti, but rather than seeing a
Pomeranian-Veneti mix, I see the Veneti becoming the
Pomeranians (German-Polish border) .
Pomeranians can be well-enough identified with the white-
dragon Saxons (see my (previous, for now) chapter, "Frankly,
Scarlet, You Can Go to Rotterdam"), which in my mind dictates
Veneti blood in the Saxons. I'm suggesting that the Pomeranians
mixed with the Saxons groups cited by Tacitus, especially as
Ptolemy located these Saxons at and around Rostock in northern
Pomerania! But I don't think the Pomeranians had Veneti-proper
blood from north Italy, but rather Jordanes' so-called "Venethi," a
Veneti branch removed to Poland.
As Franks were Germanics, the Veneti must have mixed with
Germanics before becoming the Franks, and although Saxons were

381
Germanics, fine and dandy, what people-element was it that made
them so? A Pomerania website reads: "In prehistoric times
Pomerania was settled by migrants from Scandinavia, called
the Rugians"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pomerania
The god, Rig, surely depicted the Rugians, of Rogaland,
Norway, a region bordered on Haeredaland. And Haeredaland was,
surely, a settlement of the Aereda/Redones. The Rugii left Norway
to settle Rugen, a large Baltic island just east of Rostock off the
coast of western Pomerania. It may even be that these mixed with
the Venethi (proto-Pomeranians) to produce the Saxons and
Pomeranians, who were the proto-Franks. And the Redones of
Haeredaland may have come along with the Ruggi to the Rostock
region so that their Rus blood was included in the dragon mix.
I have previously shown my conclusion that the Rig-Redone
mix amounted to the formation of the Yngvi/Ingaevone branch of
Swedes/Germanics, and I would now add that Saxons are said to
stem from Ingaevones (who I and others define as Angle-based).
According to Pliny, the Ingaevones were made up of Teutons,
Cimbri (i.e. Cimmerians), and "Chauci." Were the latter Gogi?
Now thanks to my email correspondent, Greenway7, the idea
was planted (or re-planted) into my mind, due to the similarity of
terms, that the Varangian Rus and Franks were the same peoples.
As I have for a long time been of the opinion that the Redones
furnished the Varangians, and suspecting that Merovingians
Franks were tied closely to Redones, a Varangian-to-Frank descent
seems plausible, even though the term "Frank" appears in records
before "Varangian." I'm suggesting that the Franks originated in
the Rus of Sweden, the latter of which went on to be named
"Varangi." Why Britannica did not mention this Frank-Varang
possibility in an article dealing on the origin of Varangians I
simply cannot fathom, except if it's true what I suspect, that
Encyclopedia were invented by the Illuminati to spread knowledge
to the masses as the Illuminatists see it, or as the Illuminati doesn't
want us to see it. As Britain was filled with Illuminatists,
Britannica is suspect.
On the first-century expandable map of Europe (at the
website below), we can see the peoples reported by Tacitus. The
locations on this map of the various people-names may not
necessarily be perfect, as Tacitus was only general in his locating
them. While the Varini and Eudoses are located in northern
Jutland, Ptolemy located the Varini at Rostock just west of Rugen
(where "Nuitones" is found). This is important, for a peoples at
Rostock can be connected more solidly to Pomerania, and
therefore to the Franks, while continuing to make the case that
Germanic Franks were, like the Varangians, a Rus peoples (is that

382
why France, Germany and Russia all opposed George Bush in his
move into Iraq i.e. were those three nations planning their own
Globalism at odds with the Republican Globalist agenda?).
Behold, Saxons lived predominantly where the word, "Reudingni"
is found on the map (Redones/Ruthene, I must presume).
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/smartboard/shop/tacitusc/germany/map.htm
In mentioning Rostock along with the Rugii, I should
mention that someone believes the Rugi name "was frequently
misapplied in Latin sources to Rus of the 10th and 11th
centuries"
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Rugians
Whether or not the Rus-Rugi equation was misapplied would
depend on whom one asks. If it's true that the Rugi were Roxolani,
I would uphold it. While mainland Rugi were said to live between
the Oder and Vistula rivers (of Poland), the city of Wroclaw
(Breslau) was on the Oder. Assuming that the root is "Wro," it
modifies to "Vro," evoking Tad ar Vro, more-commonly known as
Nominoe, king of Brittany. As Nominoe's ancestry is unknown,
identifying him in this way as a Vere and/or peoples of Wroxester
(Worcester, England) seems important enough. It seized me that he
descended from Milouziana, a mythical character of Vere
mythology (to be touched upon in coming chapters), depicting a
holy-grail peoples of Britain/Avalon that came over to Vere-region
Normandy and then became rulers of Anjou. This character was
otherwise "Melusine," a woman having a fishtail or snake's body
below the waste.
Recall that the earldoms of Oxford (originally "Oxanforda")
and Worcester united at one point, in par ticular during the
Shakespeare era, and then know that Tacitus included, in northern
Europe, a peoples called "Oxonae." Some websites repeat one
another is claiming that Oxonae is a "fabulous" i.e. non-real
place/peoples, but as no reason is given, I wonder if some are
trying to hide something important. See here an online quote:
"Oxfordshire (abbreviated Oxon, from Latin Oxonia..." In
light of that, why would an Oxonae peoples be unreal? The fact is
that when one zeroes in on Oxford, one zeroes in on Satan's
domain (the Yale of England), and we're not supposed to focus on
it. See that the Wroclaw Arms uses the same quadrant colors as the
Vere Coat.
It seems very important that "Wroc" modifies to "Bres," for
one could hypothesize that "Wroxester" was rooted in the same
term that brought about "Bruce/Brusi" of Scotland, Grand Masters
of the Rosicrucians.
Update September 2006 -- I have since learned that the
Bruces lived in Brus, Normandy, alternatively "Brix." I have also
traced them back to Brescia of north Italy, alternatively "Brexia,"

383
thought to be named after the Cenomani Celts, although I would
suggest the brother-tribe of the Cenomani: the Eburovices. I'll
expound on this in coming chapters, but will tip you off here that I
expect Bres, Brescia, and Bruce ancestry in the Hebrews/Cohens
of Epirus and Chaonia (north-west Greece). As "Bres" can be
alternatively "Brex," so "Wroc/Worc" can be "Vers," which brings
to mind another Polish city, Warsaw. The flag of Warsaw is
simply the reverse of the flag of Wroclaw. Plus, the Arms of
Warsaw has a woman with a green fishtail!
I will also add that, as per my tracing the Bruces to Abruzzo,
the latter known to be anciently "Aprutium" (terms the like of
which could have furnished "Brittany" and/or "Britain"), see that
"The first fortified settlements on the site of today's Warsaw were
Bródno."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw End Update]
Knowing that the anti-Christ will be Ezekiel's Gog who
seizes the power structures of Iraq in league with Saddam's fallen
loyalists and their ilk (will he free Saddam from prison?), it may
very well prove to be that modern Merovingian-blood Gogi will be
in his support, even unto his invasion of the Middle East and
finally Israel as per Daniel 11:21-31. Are you catching my drift?
As the False Prophet must surely be an American leader in that he
will make fire come down from the sky -- like nobody else can, I
assume -- and as he uses this "wonder" in efforts to make the
world honor the anti-Christ, it seems impossible for the False
Prophet to be a patriotic American. But an anti-American "pinko"
type fits the prophecy excellently. You did notice that France,
Germany and Russia were not the only ones to oppose the Bush
entry into Iraq; the Democrats in the USA did as well, as they
opposed the Vietnam war (because that war was against
Communism's spread?). Bill Clinton was then in Russia supporting
an end to the Vietnam war, and so how do we know that his
sentiments have changed since then? I would suggest the
possibility that the loudest voices among the Democrats calling for
an American pull-out from Iraq are those who meet secretly with
Illuminati circles supporting Com munist and/or anti-American
interests, and who have their orders from the Top of the Pyramid
to so oppose the war publicly and with passion.
Bavarians (anciently "Baioari") "replaced, or perhaps are
simply another phase of, the previous inhabitants - the
Rugians."
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Bavarii
That is, the Rugians that were in Pomerania were also in
proto-Bavaria. This jibes with another statement, that the Rugians
were connected to the Boii, for it is thought by some, and the
above website agrees, that the Boii named the Bavarians. Could a

384
Rugii-Boii mix have formed the Merovingian Franks, and were the
Boii responsible for the bee symbol which the Merovingian kings
honored to their graves? See what thefreedictionary.com goes on
to say:
"By the 6th c. AD we see evidence of the foundation
of a Bavarian Stem-duchy whose leading men were
related to the ruling [Merovingian] Franks."
Could this explain why, even a millennium later, the
Bavarian Illuminati was at the head of the French Revolution (to
return France to paganism)? While Mayer Rothschild (a Jew)
became involved with this Illuminati, it was not at first his, nor a
Jewish, organization, but that of the Hesse-Cassel rulers, one of
which was William IX whom Mayer served. But perhaps that
William had Kabala-Hebrew blood, even as I suspect the same in
Rothschild veins.
Note now that the capital of the Ubii was Cassel of the
German state of Hesse. I'm not rushing to make a Boii-Ubii
connection; just see on the map of Gaul that the Ubii were parked
beside the Marcomanni, who are known to have been a Suebi
branch, and see the Suebi parked in turn beside the Marcomanni.
One needs to discover if and how the Catti, who named Hesse, or
how the Khassi who may have named Cassel, may have been
closely related to the Ubii. Could the latter term be short for
"Suebi"?
As the Marcomanni and the Quadi are considered to be the
same peoples, it should prove to be true that the Quadi became the
Catti, wherefore the Catti should have been Suebi as the Quadi are
known to have been. I have shown by evidence convincing enough
to myself that the Cati and Khassi (of Cilicia) were from Sheba
and the Kybele-related god/goddess, Sabazios. The likely Catti
connection to Catalonia of Spain may be evidence that the
Sephardic "Jews" of Spain were from the Catti/Suebi. I suspect
that the same Sephardic "Jews," albeit of German regions, were
behind the Bavarian Illuminati. Consider first this quote: "...the
Marcomanni and the Quadi, two Germanic tribes who would
become the Bavarians."
http://www.geocities.com/historyofaustria/history.html
Secondly, the Bavarian Illuminati was founded by a Hebrew,
Adam Weishaupt; it's common knowledge that he had the secret
codename, "Sparticus"!! Those exclamation marks are for the
theory that I present, that the Molech-worshiping Sepharvites were
the Subartu of Akkadia that became the dragon-line Sparti and/or
Spartans of Greece.

385
As I view the Belgae and Bolgs as a western branch of the
Boii peoples said to have named Bologne (Italy), might the Morini
Gauls of Belgae have been related to the Ubii in that the Morini
were next to the Menapii Gauls. That is, could we read those latter
peoples as Men Ubii? Or is that stretching it? I'll get back to this
possibility later.
The Morini lived at the mouth of the Rhine -- where lived
also the Salian Franks -- a region called variously
Frisia/Rotterdam/Batavia depending on who ruled when. The
above website says that Franks originated from the Frisians, and
while this side-steps earlier origins in Pomeranians, the point is
that the Merovingians appear to be the Morini.
[Update September 2006 -- If "Bres" can be alternatively
"Brex," then "Phrixes," the rider of the golden ram that produced
the golden fleece bloodline, can modify to "Frisi." In that I just
found that Brixen of north Italy (South Tyrol), a satellite of Brixia
of north Italy, was ruled by Saben/Sabiona rulers of Padua (in
Venetia), anciently Patavium, I would suggest that the Frisians and
Batavians were Sheba peoples from these very Brixians and
Patavians. South Tyrol was ruled by the "Bajovari" (= Baioari =
Bavarians) during the rule of Merovingian kings, wherefore one
can suspect that the Bavarians were likewise from Sheba. If so,
then I would add to the Sheba fold tha Bavarian tribe of
Baiocasse/Bajocasse (that named Bayeux), also called the
"Badocasse" so as to evoke the Patavi/Batavi. End Update]
One can see that "Morini" is "Pomerania" without the "Po,"
which could then define "Pomerania" as Po peoples on the
sea/marine. As the Po river was also " Padus, the foition-based
Boii come to mind as those for whom the river was named. These
were definitely bee-line peoples. I'm suggesting that "Po" was just
another version of "Boii," and indeed the variant, "Bomerania,"
might be Boii-Morania?
It's not a far cry from "Moravia" to "Merania/Morini," and
since Moravia was smack beside Bohemia, while the Bohemians
are known to have been founded by Boii, one could begin to
entertain a Boii element in the Moravians. Perhaps a "v"
(commonly used as a "u") is an upside down "n" for a reason, in
that the two letters were interchangeable.
It's now worth entertaining the so-called "Siling Vandals"
(from Silesia, Poland) as relatives of Salian Franks, especially as
Sicambrian Franks stemmed from that very branch of Vandals.
Silesia is adjacent to Pomerania. The Polanie inhabited northern
Silesia (see Poland location) showing Lower Silesia, in north-west
Silesia), and these, remember, I entertain as the Boii who named
Bologne. In other words, the Pomeranians were Polanie-on-the-
sea, and the Salian Franks stemmed from those (proto-

386
)Pomeranians who named Silesia. The origin of "Salian" is
disputed, some suggesting that it refers to the Sala/Isala river, a
tributary of the Rhine in Frisia; others suggesting that it's from
"sal" = "salt/sea." But how do we know that the Sala river wasn't
named after Silesia?
Keep in mind that the Pollok clan needs to fit into this picture
at least as early as Clovis, one of the first Merovingian kings...if
it's true, as some in that family say, that they were connected to
that king. At this point in this chapter/theory, it seems a reasonable
claim in light of their name. That is, if the Polloks (now "Pollock")
had been Poles, while it's known that the first-known Pollok was a
Saxon, a Pole-Saxon mix is expected ... the very same mix that
appears to have formed the Merovingians. And since the Polanie
were Po-based Veneti, therein is the Veneti-and-Trojan (i.e.
Antenor) element that Merovingians claimed to be from.
It's of Pollock interest that the Block/Bloch surname of
Germany was first in Pomerania. The Blake surname of England
uses the same gold birds (pigeons/doves?) used by the Ford Coat,
but also a green griffin head on its Crest, evoking the green Vere
dragon (I feel sure that Polloks and Veres were related also for
their both using the boar symbol). I mention the Ford Coat in
conjunction with the Pollocks because "Ford" seems a plausible
variation of "Bert/Bard." Note the dog on the Ford Coat, which I
suspect may depict Stewarts or other wolf-line. The Irish Ford
Coat uses two of the gold birds, but also two red roses on suns, and
a gold rose in the Coat's center.
In support of the Ford-Bert connection, the French Fort Coat
uses the same gold birds as the Ford Coat. The English Fort Coat
uses one bee in the Chief, and a red dragon on the Crest with tilted
cross (do I see two gold "stars of David" on that dragon?).
The Blake surname in Ireland has the se pts of
"Caddell/Caddle" (i.e. the Catti?) and uses what appears to be a red
Rosicrucian saltire cross with four silver diamonds around it's
center. I trace the diamond symbol to the Kyle/Cole surname (from
King Cole of the dragon bloodline), wherefore it's interesting that
the Blake's were first in Devonshire, Cornwall, the haunt roughly
of king Arthur and Bude entities.
The Cornwall surname/Coat uses three similar birds but
precisely those of the John Coat, where I suspect "John" is a
variation of "Cohn/Cohen." Both the Johns of Wales and of
England use those same birds. While the English Johns use a gold
hatchets/tomahawks on their Crest, the Welsh Johns use black
tomahawks (on their Crest), in both cases the tomahawks are
crossed, forming a saltire. But behold that the Betan/Bedan Coat
uses three blue tomahawks. Connection with the Bude Coat of
Wales, which I would assume was the Bude family of Cornwall,

387
seems plausible since that family uses three arrows and a bow.
Why the use of Indian symbols I do not yet know. Perhaps a
Pictish connection by marriage (the Veres come to mind). The
Bude Coat, as mentioned elsewhere, connects to the Rothschild
arrow.
Vandals lived as far east as Poland's Vistula river, as early as
the first century AD. Contact there with the Rugii must have been
unavoidable, yet shouldn't we ask if the Vandals were given birth
when Rugii mixed with the Veneti, since after all Jordanes located
his so-called "Venethi" on the Vistula while others claim that
Vandals had Veneti as their ancestors? It's hard in this case to
make much of a distinction between Vandals and Franks. That is,
while Vandals were a Veneti-Ruggi mix, Franks were a Veneti-
Saxon mix, yet Saxons stemmed from the Ruggi.
If I'm correct in tracing the Pollocks to the Bert clan, then let
Pollocks note that Clovis descended from Marcomer/Marcomir,
whose mother was Ildegonde of the Lombards. Clovis then
married a Lombard, Ildegonde's daughter. Furthermore, Clovis'
father married Blesinde, daughter of princess Blesinde of the
Suevi/Suebi. The Lombards are said to have been a branch of
Suebi, wherefore the Pollocks should prove to be from Abrahamic
Sheba. With the Lombards/Suebi in mind, see that "The
Lombards, or Langobards originated in and above northern
Silesia (now western Poland) as part of the Suebi." (brackets
not mine)
http://www.kessler-web.co.uk/History/KingListsEurope/ItalyLombards.htm
That makes Lombards a Swedish peoples, as is widely
accepted, for the Suebi were first in Sweden. They were no doubt
the Svi/Sviones by a similar name, and quite possibly the
Swedish/Rig elements that formed the Germanic side of the
Saxons. "Longobard" is said to mean "long beard," and so it's a
long way from Bert, said to derive from "bright" (Old English
"beorht") to Bard = beard. Perhaps it's worth mentioning that, to
Kabalists, the light of illumination filled the beard; so said Albert
Pike, renowned occultist (who attempted to convince us that the
Biblical God was essentially the same as various dragon-line
gods):
And when this Head [a man's head], which is
concealed in the Head of the Ancient One, which is not
known... [blah, blah blah], then flasheth forth the
Lightning of His Brain. And it is formed forth and
illuminated with many Lights. And it produceth and
designeth ... [blah, blah, blah] a certain Light, which is
called RTzVN, Ratzon, Grace. And that Grace is
extended backward into the beard, even unto that place

388
where it can remain in the beard, and it is called the
Supernal..." [blah, blah, baloney!]
Long beards may in some cases be a priestly caste, esteemed
as the peoples' illumination. It's from that perspective possible that
the Cohens of Stewart roots were Longobards, in which case the
illusive roots of the Suebi should trace back to khagen-Khazar
stock (i.e. the priest-rulers of the Khazars) and therefore to a
Togarmite-Semite mix. Definitely, most definitely, the proto-
Druids of the Edones must figure into these Cohen priests. The
German Bart Coat uses a bearded man's face; the man has blue
eyes, unmistakable Aryan symbol. The surname was first found in
Bavaria. But the English Coban Crest (Variation of "Cohen"?) also
uses a bearded man. The English Cobin Coat uses a green griffin
on a green background, same as the Pollok background.
There was a Scandinavian myth (in the Edda compilation)
wherein the Vinili are so named for their long beards, by which we
can no more than assume that the Vinili were the Longobards. I
would add that, in the said myth, the Vandals and Vinili were at
war with one another so that they were not precisely the same
peoples, yet the myth makes it somewhat plausible that the two
were related, for one appears as belonging to Odin's camp and the
other in the camp of his "wife," Frigg. As "Vinili" refers
(apparently) to long strings such as vines, I might interpret the
term as long-hairs as well as long beards. By the sounds of many
websites, it was compulsory for Merovingians to grow long hair,
and so the myth may just pertain to a Longobard-Merovingian
connection ... while simultaneously revealing Merovingian-Vandal
relations.
Pliny claimed that the Suebi were of the Herminone branch
of Germanics. Nennius placed the Lombards under the same
category, but listed Vandals and Saxons under the Ingeavone
branch. The Herminones were defined, by Nennius, as Goths.
Vandals and Saxons were Goths. But the contradictions disappear
when we realize that Vandals and Saxons were a mix and therefore
only half Gothic. The other half (I think) was Dane, and I do think
it's consistent to define Ingaevones as a Dane-Goth mix (or Dane-
Rugii mix i.e. the Rugii were Goths). The Franks were therefore,
as my personal conclusion, a Veneti-Dane-Rugii mix (same as a
Veneti-Saxon mix).
Poles are also called "Lech" because settlers of Lechia
becamhifprtoPlanei.Wud'thsrme
, the Lugii that he likely depicted, and/or the
from the god, Lug
Ligurians that he likewise likely depicted? Indeed, Vandals are
said to stem from both Veneti and Lugii. "Roman-era writers
report this [Vandal] area as being occupied by

389
Lugians ... Certainly, however, the undisputedly Slavic-
speaking Venedi were later found exactly here."
a ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Przeworsk culture
ile Poles are classified as Slavs, Polish legend roots Poles
in "Lech," who saw a white eagle against a red sky between the
Vistula and the Oder, and settled there with that red-and-white
symbol as his own. His brothers, Rus and Czech, moved to the
south; Rus here depicts the Slavs who would later become a
portion of the first Moscovites (hence the red color of Moscow?).
The Polish flag today is red and white; could these colors mixed
depict the Saxon and north-Italy dragon lines mingling to produce
also Britain, Canada, and the United States?
Moray of Scotland is also called "Moravia," and European
Moravia is thought to have been formed by a remnant of Avars
when the Avar empire was brought down in 795 AD. On this map,
Moravia (yellow border) is attached to Silesia (orange border)
(where the Vandals lived), and see how similar "Moravia" is to
"Merovee," the latter term being the quasi-mythical progenitor (i.e.
eponym) of the Merovingians. And so read this:
"In 796, in the Annales Alamanici, one can find an
excerpt saying...'Pepin went to the region of the Vandals,
which Vandals did come out to oppose him'. In Annales
Sangallenses, the same raid (however, put in 795) is
summarised in one short message ... 'The Vandals were
destroyed'"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandals
The importance of these statements is in their referring to the
end of the Avar empire ,showing that European Avars (as
distinguished from Russian Avars) were Vandal-integrated or
Vandal allies. One can speculate that the Merovingian empire, in
the throws of falling as it was to Pepin's powers, had joined the
Avars and Vandals against Pepin but in losing formed Moravia i.e.
as the remnants of the Merovingian empire, by which I mean to
say that Merovingian rulers retreated to Moravia. It's important, if
this be true, that the Avars are also viewed (as through some
historical fog) to be the founders of Moravia. One must then
entertain, not only a Merovingian-Avar equation, but a
Merovingian tie to Moray of Scotland (and possibly the Ross clan
that was partnered with Moray). In this way, the Vere clan may
just be named after the Avars. One might also investigate whether
Morafounders were from the Morini of the Belgae coast.
TUpdate June 29 -- The Avites now come to mind as the
Avars, not just due to the similarity of terms, but because the
Cutha were in Caucasia as the Laz peoples, and so why not the
Avites who were living in conjunction with the Cutha back in

390
Mesopotamia? The root of "Avite" (Avva) may be a short-form of
"Abira" (sect of Kassites), a term that appears modified to "Iberi,"
the Caucasian peoples who lived in/beside the Azerbaijan region
where lived the Avars, who in my opinion were the Avars (e.g.
"Iberi" modifies to "Avar."). As the Avvites named their Gaza city,
Chatserim, might they not have become the Khazars (just to the
north of Avars)? Remember that Khazars were Trojans while the
Avvites worshiped Tartak, whom I suspect represented the same
people-group as the mythical Dardanus, co-founder of Trojans. If
the question is, therefore, where into the Saxon-Veneti mix (that
defines Merovingians) do the Avars enter, I would suggest the
Veneti sector, for the Veneti were founded by mythical Antenor, a
Trojan ruler. End Update]
On this map of Bohemia, the red border is Bohemia, founded
by the Boii, but later, during the founding of Moravia, it became
the home of the "Cechy" (i.e. the Czechs). Were the Cechy a Gogi
peoples? If so, ditto perhaps for Cechy's mythical "brothers," Rus
and Lech. Indeed, Greek myth depicts Liguria as
"Cycnus/Cygnus," and of course there is wide support for a Gog-
Russia equation.
According to Tacitus (first century AD), Silesia was
inhabited by Lugii and "Silingi" Slavs. The people of Silesia were
called "Slonsk," a term that easily modifies to "Slovski," but in any
case it is known that Silesians were Slavs, for which reason I'll tie
Silesians to the Ruthene (Rus/Rusyn) for the simple reason that
Slavs root themselves in the Ruthene (Ruthenians live in Poland to
this day, derived from Ukranian Slavs. ). Because the Slavs were
renown for their wolf-deity celebrations, I would suggest that the
evasive origin of "Slav," the term, is in "caleb/kaleb," the
Semitic/Hebrew for "dog" (Strong's #3611). Keep in mind that
Slavs are thought by some to have been the Neuri (i.e. Nahorites).
Even if there is no connection between "Siling" and "Salian,"
yet Franks are known to emerge from Silesia, and this now makes
the Franks a Rus-Germanic (same as Rus-Saxon) mix. It then
becomes feasible that the Varangian Rus owe their existence to the
Franks, which is logical on the surface where "Frank" and
"Varang" seem similar enough. Believing as I do that Varangians
emerged from a northern branch of Ruthene, I would then view
those particular Ruthene as the Franks. That is, the Ruthene were
the Veneti peoples who mixed with Saxons in producing Franks,
which then leads me to suspect that the Rhaetians of north Italy
were those Veneti-based Ruthene.
That may sound like a contradiction because I have the
Saxons mixing with the Pomeranians to produce the Franks. But
because the Rhaetians were Redones from Eridanus, and because
myth tells that Ligurians mixed with Redones in Eridanus, a

391
Bologne-Redone mix is my tentative conclusion for defining the
Pomeranians.
It's known that Siling Vandals split up to form the "Asding"
Vandals of Hungary, even as it's kn own that the Sicambrian
Franks lived in both Silesia and Hungary in the same period that
the Vandals had occupied both regions. Deciding that they were
going to take all of Europe, as is the fundamental mission of the
dragon line, the Vandals formed the Alan-Vandal alliance that was
a rudimentary part of this quest. According to Goth legend, an
ambitious Gothic peoples in proto-Poland urged their Gothic
cousins in Scandinavia to assist them in invasions to their south
i.e. into Hungary. Jordanes (a Goth historian) wrote about this
southward migration of Scandinavian Goths, saying that they
ended up as far as Russia. Couldn't this have been the beginning of
the Avar empire, which did in fact stretch deep into Russia?
The appearance of the Avar empire came on the heels of the
disintegration of, and mirrored, the Hun empire (across northern
Europe). As Alans had joined the Huns in their bid to set up a
global kingdom, so Alans joined the Vandals when they and other
Goths picked apart various strongholds of the Roman empire.
We're now in Christian centuries, and the dragon bloodline in
Russia no longer went by such terms as "Cimmerian" and
"Scythian." Scythians had evolved Huns and then Alans,
wherefore Alans were the snakes of the dragon bloodline. These
are the Geloni that I say had been the Cati of Cilicia that Greek
myth represented as "Helenus."
For that reason, I will interpret the Istaevone Catti/Chatti,
those who were central in forming the Frank power structures, to
be the same Alan/Cati Kabalists among whom were the proto-
Stewarts. Tacitus reported that the Batavi were that branch of Catti
which moved to the mouth of the Rhine. This is where the Morini
lived and where Salian Franks originated. Roughly the last we hear
of "Batavi" is at the very time in which the Salian Franks are first
mentioned, the middle of the third century AD. Indeed, the Batavi
are thought by many to have become the Dutch and the Franks
(who I think are among the three frogs of Revelation 16 that
partake in, and even cause, Armageddon).
Since I trace the Stewarts to the Cohen surname and tie that
surname to the Cati and therefore Catti peoples, but as I also
suspected (years ago) that the Stewarts traced to a Bute-like term,
"Batavi" would seem to qualify very well. And so do take a look
and compare the similarity between the Batencourt Coat of Arms
and that of the German-Cohen Coat.
I see that the checks in one part of the Pomeranian Coat of
Arms are blue and gold, suggesting that Pomeranians were
ruled/influenced at one time by the Betancourt family. The

392
Batencourt name was first found in Artois, a region of France just
inland from Boulogne (France, not Italy, but a connection seems
feasible), just south of the Rhine's mouth. Bethune was a central
city in Artois, wherefore I'm assuming that the Batencourt surname
formed from that city's name, or vice versa. As the Bute surname
that I am tracing across Europe means "house," in my opinion, so
we see that Bethune is rooted in house (i.e. Hebrew/Semitic word
for house = beth/bet). I have little doubt that this name is rooted in
the Batavi peoples.
Batencourt connection to the Baten/Baden surname seems
likely, and so recall from above that the Baten Coat (with
tomahawks) was similar to the John Coat, and that John I figure is
a variation of "Cohn/Cohen." I'm suggesting that the
Batencourts/Bethune peoples were Cohens i.e. proto-Stewarts,
explaining why the Stewarts of Scotland, as soon as they ascended
the throne for the first time with Robert Bruce II, seized the Bute-
Arran islands of Scotland.
The Bait/Beith Coat is from Pictish ancestry and uses a green
griffin. All of this in combination is the best evidence I have found
thus far to connect the Bute (i.e. mythical Butes) name to the
western Atlanteans, and to the royal-Vere Picts.
Burgundians, who were Franks (see Nibelung/Niflung lore),
are viewed as a Vandal peoples, for indeed Burgundians too came
from Scandinavia and then lived in Poland. "Varang" versus
"Burgund" is interesting. Like the Asding Vandals, Burgundians
were likewise in Hungary...so that I'd view the two as one.
"About the year 373, or 374, the Burgundians rose
from their seats upon the Vistula, with an army of eighty
thousand men to invade Gallia; and being opposed,
seated themselves upon the northern side of the Rhine
over against Mentz."
http://www.historicist.com/newton/p1c5.htm.
The Vandals and Alans entered Gaul (407 AD), crossing the
Rhine at Mainz, and pushed against certain Franks. Salian Franks
lived on that west side of the Rhine prior to this Vandal invasion.
The Vandals were deflected into Spain in 409 (retain these dates in
your mind for just a few paragraphs). The following year, other
Goths managed to conquer the city of Rome, and were granted by
the Romans a piece of Gaul as a peace offering.
Burgundians had used Roman power for their own ends, and
after the sack of Rome in 410, the Burgundian king (Gundahar) set
up his own buddy (Jovinius) to be the Roman emperor. This
allowed the Burgundians to settle in masses on Frank territory (i.e.
the west side of the Rhine). But while the Burgundians were
eventually crushed by others who came to rule Rome, the

393
Merovingian Franks survived (on the west side) and built the heart
of their empire there.
On the other/German side of the Rhine, Marcomer, destined
to become a progenitor of Merovingian Franks, crossed and
attempted with fellow captains to defeat the Salian Franks, but he
and they lost the conflict and retreated back to the German side.
This war was, apparently, in 409, for Marcomer was killed in a
battle, while his son (Pharamond/Faramund) took the king's
position in 409. It may thereby appear that the Marcomer Franks
were partnered with the Vandals, known to have come against
west-side Franks in 407. As historical reports tell us that Alans
came to the rescue of the Vandals at that time, I'm open to viewing
Marcomer' troops alternatively as those Alans.
This is important for those who agree with me that the
Stewarts of Brittany were Alans. It places the proto-Stewarts in
Hungary (i.e. as Sicambrian Franks), the very location that queen
Margaret of Scotland "hung out" during part of her time in exile. It
has recently become a solid theory of mine that Margaret's mother
(Agatha) was of the Stewart bloodline, explaining why Margaret's
son made the Stewarts-proper great in his Scot kingdom. It has
also been my theory for some years, without evidence, that Agatha
was a Khazar. Knowing now that Stewarts descend from Cohens,
and that Cohens were likely Khazar khagens, might the
Burgundians and/or Sicambrian Franks and/or Asding Vandals
have incorporated the Cohens (i.e. proto-Stewarts)? I'd bet 110
blue and silver checkers on that one.
It's perhaps a bull's eye shot when I add that the Morini Coat
of Italy uses the blue and silver colors in stripes, and a blue Fleur
de Lis on its Chief; the Morini surname is said to originate in
Venice/Venetia. The Spanish Marino uses the same blue and silver
stripes/banners, but in wavy fashion. To that I need to add that the
Marino and Mari Coats of Italy use the same black diagonal design
in slightly different manners, showing kinship, which may be
important in that I root the Merovingians in Mari/Mary, the name
of two (possibly related ) cities, one on the Kabala-Strip Euphrates
and one in Aryan Afghanistan.
While Marcomer and Pharamond are thought to be legendary
by some, yet Childeric I (ruled from 458), who is thought to stem
from Marcomer, is known to be an historical Merovingian. The
Sicambrian Franks were major, and the Salians minor, players at
this time, for the line of Frank kings had been through the
Sicambrians, explaining why Pharamund (i.e. the Sicambrian) had
been the first king of the Salians. With the son of Marcomer
becoming the first Salian king, it suggests that Marcomer married
a Salian noble.
http://www.kessler-web.co.uk/History/KingListsEurope/FranceFranks.ht

394
Now Sicambrian is now Budapest, two cities incorporated,
with Buda on one side of the Danube/Ister and Pest on the other.
The Budapest Seal today uses two griffins (dragon with eagle parts
and lion parts), and an off-plumb cross (a Freemasonic symbol).
The Budapest flag uses the above-mentioned blue and gold, but
also red. I would suggest that the Batavi were the founders of
Buda, and that they were previously the Budini moving west with
the Neuri The Geloni were a part of the Budini, said Herodotus,
and so therein you have the makings of the Salian Franks, for the
Batavi were on the Rhine's mouth long before the Sicambrian
Franks mixed with the Salians. The Salians, therefore, should
prove to be related to Odin in keeping with my view of Odin as a
symbol of the Budini.
Names of the mythical rulers of the Salians (if indeed they be
mythical) are sufficiently the same as the names of Sicambrian
rulers that I am easily convinced that the two branches come from
the same Vandal stock. In the list of Sicambrian Franks found at
the hostkingdom.net website below, there is an Antenor IV (63-69
AD), suggesting three other Antenors belonging possibly to the
same bloodline. This implies connection to the mythical Antenor
attributed to the founding of the Veneti ... when Antenor brought
with him "Heneti" Paflagonians to Venetia. To put it another way,
the Franks knew that they were a Veneti people, for which reason
they traced themselves to the mythical Antenor. One would
therefore be prone to identify the Budini-come-Batavians as those
Veneti bloodlines, and the Padus (i.e. Po) river would seem to
align nicely with that river, since it is essentially the same as
"Bud(ini). Yes, these were the Boiotians that I would suggest were
also called by a short-form, Boii/Po.

395
FROGS FROM THE
DRAGON'S THROAT

The Telchines of Crete (going by other names as well) settled


the island of Helios, Rhodes, wherefore I see the Helios-Rhoda
Rose Line rooted in Telchines:
"In the classical records of the post catastrophe
period the Telchines tend to play an important part
which link them to myths involving Atlantis. This race of
artificers, artists and magicians, connected with the sea at
every stage in their history were entrusted by Rhea [i.e.
Kybele] with the upbringing of [Zeus]."
http://www.brainyencyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/t/te/telchines.html
It is well known that Telchines were Curetes of Crete, and so
I wonder if they were not also the Cruithne/Cruithin of Britain
(who became the Picts and Bretons). The Telchines were definitely
proto-Trojans, which may provide the license for me to suggest
that the "l" was originally an "r" so that "Telchine" was something
more like "Trogan" at one point. Having independently concluded
that the various early Irish tribes were from Trojans, I suspect now
from the Telchines in particular who had been the Rhodians and
then the Redones (of Gaul) en route to settling Britain.
The Telchines originate in Greece with the rulers of Argos,
and it was from Argos that the Aryan Egyptians are rooted. For the
white-cow goddess of Argos, Io, went to Egypt, where she became
Egyptian Atlantis, the origin of the Egyptian myths that parallel
Greek myths. From Egyptian Atlantis sprang up Poseidon and
Athenian bloodlines that would return to Greece to rule various
locations, especially Thebes and Athens, both cities related to the
Kabeiri cult of Hephaestus, he himself being a Greek-Egypt link.
But before returning to Greece, the Poseidon Egyptians settled
Phoenicia.
[Update June 30 2006 -- This was very early. The Poseidon
peoples from Egypt would become, in my opinion, mixed with
Kassites/Cutha Kabalists (non-Israelites) before returning to
Greece as the Cecrops/Hephaistos/Athena bloodline(s) that came
to rule Athens. The mythical marriage of Andromeda to Perseus
located in Joppa (north maritime Israel) in one myth version,
would signify a marriage to the same Kabalists, I believe, forming
the "Gorgophones" that came to settle Sparta ... who would go on to

396
become the Ligurians and western Europeans (see my previous
writings). Perseus' in part depicted the (Persian) Kassites (my
personal opinion), and in part the Io bloodline that came to rule
Argos (widely accepted), explained below.
Whether the Phoenician and Gorgophone migrations were
two waves at differing times, or part of the same wave, I do not yet
know. The Israelites were not yet formed at these times, for one
would think that if they had gone to Greece as rulers there,
Scripture would have made mention of it. Greenway7 supplied me
with the knowledge that "The 'Prieure documents' claim that
the Arcadians [beside Sparta] were descended from
Benjamites (see Waite's New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry)
driven out of Palestine (ori. of Spartan relationship claimed
in Maccabees?) by their felow Israelites for idolatry" (round
brackets not mine). I think this claim is either sincerely erroneous,
or part of an ongoing deception by the cults to convince the world
that Europe is based in Israelites, and therefore has God-
sanctioned title to the world throne.
Today I found the Kabala root in Lot, son of Abraham's and
Nahor's brother, Haran (Genesis 11:27). For from Lot and his
younger daughter as mother, Ben-Ammi was born (Genesis
19:38). The Kabalists must know this, for which reason they said
they are from Benjamin, a very similar term used to deceive us.
Ben-Ammi was the father of the Ammonites (says Genesis 19:38).
And that's how I came to know that Lot is the root of Kabala. For
the human-sacrifice god, Molech, is said in 1 Kings 11:7 to be
"the idol of the sons of Ammon," while Molech is revealed in 2
Kings 17:31 as the god of the Sepharvites, where it says that the
Sepharvites worshiped Adram melech and Anammelech . To prove
Molech ties to the Sepharvites, 2 Kings 17:31 tells that they
burned their children in fires. To tie Kabala to the Sepharvites, the
Kabala tree of life consists of ten "sephirot." What I'm claiming is
that Lot's gods (as seen in Genesis), representing his ancestors,
traced to the Sepharvites. It's a probability, therefore, that the
entire household of Terah (Abraham's father) were Sepharvites.
God called Abraham out of that Satanic peoples. End Update]
There was a myth disclosing an important secret, telling that
Egyptians under the name "Nannos" had been at the mouth of the
Rhone (i.e. Eridanus) river prior to the arrival of Phocaeans who
built their city of Massalia near that mouth (see website below for
verification). As the myth goes, the Egyptians and Phocaeans
merged on a friendly basis. As Nannos' daughter was encoded,
"Gyptis," the story must pertain to two Egyptian brothers of Greek
myth, Danaus and Egyptus (to new readers, Danaus was the root of
the Greek Danaans (including Perseus and Hercules) and therefore
the root of the British Danann).

397
It appears fairly obvious that this alliance put forth the
Redone-family of peoples (from Rhodes) who would go on to be
the red-dragon tribes of Britain, for Greek myth tells that Danaus
stopped at Rhodes prior to sailing on to rule Argos.
[Update June 30 2006 -- The question is, had the Danaans
first been on the Israeli shores as the Gorgophones, since after all
the British Danann were Gorgons? This is now staggering as I ask
this question and simultaneously discover a most-important key,
even as I write. I have just discovered that the Kabalistic Avvites
(Biblical "Avviy") connect to both the Hephaistos "Greeks" and
the Danaans. Behold, the father of Perseus was Acrisius, whose
wife Ocalea must have been a Kabala peoples in that Acrisius'
wife was otherwise made "Aglaea" (similar spelling)... who was
made the very wife of Hephaistos! Clearly, these Ocalea/Aglaea
terms chosen to name his wife must refer to Hephaistos' Kabeiri
cult in which members were called "Galli."
But that is hardly what I'm so excited about, because the
father of Acrisius was Abas, and while I've known that for some
time, I wasn't able to connect him to the historical Avviy since I
didn't know the Avviy existed until a week ago! ! This is incredee-
bl-bl-ble. It's the Avviy-Greek connection so fast, so neat, so
strong. (For those jumping in at this chapter, the Bible (2 Kings
17:24) placed the Avviy in conjunction with the Kabalist Cutha of
Chaldea).
Okay, so Abas was the symbol of the Greek city of Abae,
and so I will now view that city as an Avviy city ... that is root to
the Ubii Franks. Wonderful. I can dig it. But get ready those of
you who have been following this story, because I've got more.
The city of Abae was in Phocis! The Phocaeans are those who
followed the Danaans to the mouth of the Rhone. Phocis was next
to Boiotia, and so the Bude/Bude name may have come to Britain
amongst Phocaean migrations.
There's more. The mother of Abas was made Hypermnestra;
ignore the "Hyper" prefix (meaning "far-off") and see that what
remains is very near to Plato's Mneseos, twin of Autochthon (i.e.
Auto-Cutha/Atti-Cutha), whom he located in western Atlantis.
Abas' father (Lynceus) was made a descendant of the above-
mentioned Egyptus. The sister of Hypermnestra was Leda, the
swan symbol of Sparta that put forth the swan-depicted Ligurians.
I should also mention that Abas was used as the name of a
friend of Perseus, as well as two friends of Aeneas (mythical
founder of Rome), one a Trojan and one an Etruscan...possibly
implying that Trojans and Etruscans (not to mention Perseus)
derived to some extent from Avviy blood! End Update]
This figure of Greek myth, Nannos, must have been the
Egyptian frog god, Nun, who was depicted holding a ship over his

398
head with both hands, with a sun disc/god included in the picture.
That is, Nun represented the Egyptian sea-faring peoples (Egyptian
Atlantis) who put forth the "frogs" that Atlantean writer, Plato,
defined as cities all around the Mediterranean "pond." As the
Phocaeans were said to be one of the first sea-faring peoples, they
and their city of Massalia would seem to be a part of Nun's frog
fold.
Nun was equated with Hapi, the bull god, and Merovingians,
whose symbol, among others, was the frog, were said in myth to
derive from a sea bull. I have a feeling that this bull pertained to
the Po-river Boii who became the Pomeranians, which term I
dissect to Po-Merania i.e. Po-on-the-sea. The Boii named the
Italian city of Bologne, and it could be that Po/Padus river was
named by Boii/Boiotia peoples. In a coming chapter, I'm going to
show how Bologne and similar terms (e.g. bullion, Bolg) came to
mean, or were derived from, "bull." The French city of Boulogne-
on-the-Sea was smack where, or just south of, the Merovingian
habitation at the mouth of the Rhine.
Now "Apis" was a ruler in early Argos, the oldest city in
Greece, and in fact the Argolis was then called "Apia" (Bull
Land?) after him; the next king of the region was Argus, symbol
Argos of course. Apis was a tyrant and for that reason was
rejected; he ended up in Egypt as Hape/Hapi, this then paralleling
the myth wherein Io (goddess of Argos) ended up in Egypt as a
white cow. Indeed, they were the same peoples, for Apis was the
son of Phoroneus, and Phoroneus was, like Io, the offspring of
Inachus (Argos was anciently "Inarchus"). Hapi was depicted in
Egypt as a red cow, not at all meaning that "he" was not the same
as the Io peoples, for what was white (skin) to the Greeks became,
over time, red (skin) to the Egyptians.
[Update June 30 -- Time out! Look at that term, "Apis." Does
it not evoke "Ubii? Does it not smack of "Abas," and might it
perhaps be a short form of "Apiru," the term by which the Kabalist
Hebrews were known in historical documents? Might "Abas"be
short for "Abiru" or "Abira," the latter historical term referring to
the tribe of Kassites that were surely the Kabalist Hebrews? If true,
then "Avviy" was itself a variation of "Apiru/Abira." This would
suggest that the bull symbol represented the Hebrews/Kabala. The
Merovingian sea bull is then identified as the half- fish god,
Dagon, who was worshiped on the Israeli shores precisely where
the Avviy were living. Dog-gone! End Update]
[Update July 3 -- Last night Kathleen, "the Nazarene Kat," a
former Rosicrucian, finally got through to me with an email that I
at first made little importance of. But when she wrote back, with
exclamation marks, if I recall rightly, and said that the Appian
Way, the Roman road to Greece, was named after bees, I perked

399
up. My problem now is that the Ubii may stem from either the
Apis-bull symbol, or the Appi-bee symbol. End Update.]
The mythical figures, Medea (the Calydonian Boar) and
Parthaon (a Calydonian king) evoke the Medes who are known to
have become Parthians, who in turn are known to have become
Gorgons. These are expected to have become the Caledonian Picts
of Scotland, and peoples elsewhere in Europe previous to that.
"Parthalon," the term used to represent the first Irish civilization,
and "Ireland" itself said to be derived from "Iran," squares with
"Parthaon" and "Medea." These were the original Welsh as well,
depicted as "Geryon."
When this red dragon merged with Rig up in Scandinavia to
produce the Yngvi/Ingaevones, the forth-coming peoples -- in
particular the Saxons and Angles -- were regarded as the white
dragon by Geoffrey of Monmouth. The Yngvi were also called
"Yngvi-Frey," and so that tends to make the Yngvi a frog line if
indeed "Frey" was a version of "frog." Frey was, in fact, depicted
with the symbol common to all frogs: the ship/ocean.
There is a little sign that Frey extended from a mix of
Hercules-Helios peoples (i.e. the British Danann) who came to
defeat Geryon, for Frey was given (by Scandinavian myth writers)
a magic boat that could change size and even fit into his pocket.
This seems to be an allusion to the Greek myth wherein Hercules,
when he came to fight Geryon, was assisted by Helios in his
providing Hercules with a ship in the shape of a golden cup/grail.
Hercules had carried on his belt a golden cup, which could then be
viewed as the Helios ship, but small enough to fit into his pocket.
An important Hercules-to-Frey (i.e. Danann-to-Frey) connection is
the reality because the Fir-Bolg, as the Belgae, did indeed worship
Frey, while the Fir-Bolg were British-Danann blood by another
name.
Who but the Redones could better translate to the golden
Helios cup/peoples that sailed Hercules to Britain? Doesn't this
reveal that the Holy-Grail bloodline was a Redone entity? The
meaning of the mythical picture is that the Redones were allied
with Hercules in his sea invasion of Geryon's British empire. And
this alliance is roughly the same alliance of the other myth, where
Nannos (the Greek Danaans and therefore Hercules) became allied
to the Phocaeans, for it was the Phocaeans with the Rhodians who
founded a city of Rhode near Massalia.
The driver who crashed Helios' chariot into Eridanus
(probably at Massalia) was "Phaethon." He has got to be a play on
words for "Pythos," the latter term being the serpent that Apollo
killed in Delphi, capital city of Phocis! ! Surely the meaning is that
the Pythos-peoples of Phocis (in Greece) became the Phocaea (in
Asia) who crashed Helios Rhodians into Eridanus. That being true,

400
the Phocaea must have been related to the Rhodes peoples, even as
it seems in these myths that the Redones and the Phocaeans of
France are one and the same.
[Update June 30 -- Now I understand which people they both
were. The Avviy left Israel's shores, landed at Rhodes, then went
to Greece to become Abas, who settled Avviy in northern Phocis
(i.e. at Abae), who then became the wizards/diviners of Delphi,
even the Pythos/Phaethon serpent, who then lost a war to Apollo-
depicted Hyperboreans so as to end up in Massalia. End Update]
The next point is that, since the Corinth-based rulers of
Phocis were the Corinthian boar line (see (a) previous chapter), the
Redones were boars. This agrees with the story of Medea wherein
she was depicted as a noble of Corinth (i.e. the boar line of
Corinth) but, defeated in war, drove the chariot of Helios away,
pulled by dragons (same as Phaethon, I must assume). Corinthian
boars therefore ended up in Rhodanus, via the frog of Massalia.
The Mediterranean frogs were said by Plato to be colonies of
Miletus (coastal Asia), and my conclusions are similar, that the
frogs originated in Thrace and more generally became the
Phrygians (not far from Miletus).
Britannica wrote: "...two Hyperborean maidens, Opis and
Arge, accompanied Apollo and Artemis to the island of Delos,
where the maidens died and were buried." As Apis was the
ruler of Argos, and followed by Argus the ruler of Argos, it's clear
as glass that Inachus (mythical founder of Argos) descended from
Hyperboreans ("far-northerners:), which, if they were the Biblical
Gog, allows us to trace Gog easily via the descendants of Inachus,
including first and foremost the Argos peoples.
[Update June 30 -- If "Apis" depicted the Kabala, then Argos
must have depicted the Aryan element that was a fundamental part
of the Kabala cult. Indeed, "Argos" looks merely to be a variation
of "Aryan." End Update]
Clearly, Apis, and therefore Hapi, and therefore Nun the frog
god, were from Apollo and his twin sister Artemis. The Greek
Calydonians were avid worshipers of Artemis, and in fact the
Calydonian Boar was sent by Artemis to Calydon because the
Calydonians were no longer being faithful to her. Therefore, it's no
surprise that, in the Nannos myth, the Phocaeans way over in
Massalia are revealed specifically as stemming from Artemis. That
would then make the Redones a bloodline from Artemis. One can't
help but identify the boar symbol as she herself, the Gogi
Hyperboreans.
This would be a good place to re-mention the three frogs
coming out of the mouths of the Dragon, the Beast, and the False
Prophet, to prepare the world's rulers for Armageddon. I had
hypothesized that the frogs included the bloodline of the Franks

401
and the Dutch because those peoples were from one stock, and
because the Franks are nicknamed "frogs" to this day. But the
Belgians too, not far from the Dutch, were of Frankish elements.
Nearby were the Frisians, per chance derived from Frey since they
were devoted both to Frey and Freya. "Frey/Frigg" easily modifies
to "frog" (Old English "frogga").
Have we not seen already that the French today are willing to
snub their noses openly at the Americans, meaning that the French
have their own plans to lead Globalism? As it is clear from
Revelation that the frogs support the anti-Christ and the False
Prophet, could we conclude that the French will play the leading
role in elevating the Russian Gog to the position of Rome-ruling
anti-Christ? I think the French would like nothing more than an
alliance with a Russian who invades the Middle East with the
express purpose of ejecting American Middle-East interests. For,
the French along with Russia opposed President Bush precisely
due to lucrative contracts between they and Saddam Hussein, as
the contracts were made void by Bush's Iraqi invasion.
I'll bet my best lamb's horn coat hangers that the false
Prophet will be a Democrat American allied to the French cause of
ousting Americans from Iraq. That is, the next American President
could be the False Prophet. But if not, the one after that.
If Germany, who also opposed Bush along with France and
Russia, joins the French and Russians in supporting a future
Russian ruler in Iraq (possibly under UN authority), the Germans
might just be, as is so often claimed, the Gomer peoples (allies of
end-time Gog) mentioned in Ezekiel 38. I am not, however,
identifying the three frogs as France, Germany and Russia; I am
merely speculating.
"Toad" comes from the Old English "teda," while the Italians
call Germans, "Tedesco," the root there being "Ted" (not
"Tedesc") as for example the root of the Italian "Francesco" is
"Frank." In German, a toad is a "krote," suggesting that the quasi-
derogatory slang denoting a German ("Crout") refers not to
sauerkraut/cabbage, but to a toad. Note " tadpole."
Toad in Hungarian is "varangy or varangyos béka ['beka'
means 'frog']", evoking the Varangian Rus; might they have
called themselves after the toad? Hard to believe, unless the
toad/frog was a symbol of sea peoples. Toad in Italian is "rospo"
[like Rus] and "rascasse is some kind of sea toad in french"
(online quote). Doesn't "ruscasse" evoke "Ruski"?
"Rana" = frog in Latin and other Latin languages, evoking
"Rennes," and the Rhine and Rhone rivers, founded by Redones (I
think the terms derive from "reign/rule"). "Frog in Danish is
fr • ", says another website, looking like the makings of
"Frey/Frigg." If that's not enough, "unke means toad in

402
German", and that looks like "Ang" but also "Enki," the sea god
of Sumeria from whom mythical mermaids and mermen were
created.
Nominoe, first king of Brittany, a Merovingian I figure, was
" Tad ar Vro Combine that with a family crest appearing on a
.”

Vere-information website having three, yes three, frogs!! Hmm.


http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/dragons/esp_sociopol_dragondescent2.htm
The father of Helios was "Hyperion," which I read as
"Hyper-Ion" and signifying far-off/fringe Ionians (before they
came to Greece). The identification of "Io" as an Argos goddess
reveals that the Hyper-Ionians became the founders of Argos when
they arrived to Greece. In leaving Greece centuries afterward, the
Ionians, it is well-known, became the so-called "Sea Peoples." Io
may be the same as Eos, Helios' sister. Eos's descendants were
depicted as the four winds, implying far-off peoples such as the
Franks. The east wind was Eurus/Euros, probably the Hros/Rus of
Caucasia. The north wind was Boreas, and so I wouldn't hesitate to
equate "Hyperborean" with Hyperion.
[Update June 30 -- I haven't been able to attempt an
identification of the west wind until now. It was tagged,
"Zephyros." We find mentioned immediately after the Avvites (2
Kings 17:31) that the "Sepharvites" sacrificedT. e. burnt to death)
their children in fires. In the Kabala Tree of ife,there are ten
forces called "sephirot," and this now ties the Kabala to those
child-killing... bastards! I identify the ten forces as ten ancient
peoples to which the cult was attached. The first, "Kether," I
identify as Gether, son of Aram (Genesis 10). I deal with this in
another chapter. End Update]
Eos (said to mean "dawn") was called "rhodo-daktyloi,"
wherefore I would suggest that she was a proto-Trojan peoples
who populated Rhodes, the wicked Telchines, by no means worthy
of the dawn, but such are witches that they portray whores as
virgins, Satanists as good, Christians as bad, morals as chains, sin
as bliss.
Co-founder of the Trojans was Teucer, and he is said in myth
to stem from Scamander. Doesn't "Scamander" evoke
"salamander," that being an amphibian, as is the frog? That may
sound like a stretch, but I mention it only because the father of
Scamander was Oceanus, that being the Mediterranean around
which all the frogs were founded.
I suggest, even as I've traced both the Varangians and the
Franks to the Redones, that "Frank" is the same as "Varang," and
that "Frank" therefore means "toad," as does "varangy" in
Hungarian. "Varangi" may then be dissected to "War-Angi," for a
German toad is an "unke." This may mean that the Yngvi/Angles

403
were named after the frog, and this fits since the Ingaevones were
defined specifically by Tacitus as coastal peoples.
It may be that the frog was named after an old form of our
modern "fringe," as that means "extremity/border," for frogs live
on the border between water and land; the Franks may have been
so-called for being on the fringe of the world (in relation to
Thrace/Greece). "Fringe" in German is "franse"; in Norwegian,
"frynse"; in Spanish, "franja"; in Swedish, "frans." Some say that
"Franks" were named after "free." Okay, free from those in the
center; the Franks were a "fringe party," leaving behind the family
and going it all alone.
Didn't I say that the Angles were named after "angle." Yes,
but this may have been more from the idea of "corner," as with the
phrase, "four corners of the world," which is better interpreted,
"four ends of the world." Like the four-winds concept. The
Denmark region was, prior to the discovery of America, a north-
west corner of the world.
Now Phrygians came to be viewed as a large brotherhood
greatly divided, as the mythical king of Phrygia, "Tantalus"
("tanta" = "many") would suggest, for in myth he cut his son,
"Pelops," into many pieces. And so "fragment" and "fraction"
come to mind as they are apparent variations of "Phrygia." Our
"fraction" derives from the Old French "fractus," and that term is
from "franges" = "to break." Can you see that if a peoples franges
away from a main body, it goes to live on the fringes, and this is
what the Phrygians did, they broke from Thrace, and from one
another, and went to live on the fringes, not just to France, but to
Scandinavia. But even that wasn't far-enough away, for Greenland
came next, then Nova Scotia, then the "Land of the Free." Has
freedom paid good dividends to Franks and Americans, or is it
their misery in disguise?
"Brigit" and the early form of "Phrygian" ("Bryges/Brigian")
meant "quarrel," even as a "brigade" refers to war and derives from
"brigare" = "to fight." Consider then the war ship, the frigate,
simlartoFg(Odn'wfe).rmFignatulyqre
about Frey, who was also called Freyr, and see now that our
English "fray" is from the Latin "fricare" and the French "frayer"
both meaning "to rub" = "friction." I am reminded of the mythical
variation of "Frey" = "Fricco."
But there is another meaning for these friction-related terms,
that of sexual intercourse, just as the root of our "fruit" is the
French/Latin "fructus," suggesting "fruit of the womb." If ever you
heard the phrase, "O frigg," or, "that rotten friggin...", well, you
know what I mean. If I'm not mistaken, "freca" in Italian is slang
for, "to copulate," though technically it means "to rub," same as
the French/Latin "fricare."

404
Thus, if Frey/Freyr meant "friction," the idea would seem to
be to "rub the wrong way" and therefore to cause civil wars that
divide brothers so that one or the other goes to live on the fringe.
Certainly the French and Scandinavians were Trojans/Thracians,
wherefore the mother of the frogs must be Thrace. For indeed a
frog in Greek is a "ba trachos" (# 944 Strong's Greek dictionary,
origin uncertain).
What is Ba-Thrace? "Away from Thrace"? Perhaps "branch
of Thrace," for the Greek "baion" means "twig/branch" "as going
out far" (# 902 Strong's).
In Egypt, the frog goddess is "Heket," a muthical magician
who is the same as the Greek witch, Hecate. The latter depicts, to
the best of my ability to discern thus far, Gorgons on the north
shore of the Black sea. It has always been my hunch that she
should be read, "Kekate/Chekate," in reflection of "Gog." The
witch, Medea, was made to worship Hecate, meaning that Medea
and Hecate were the same peoples in different eras. Therefore
Hecate depicted Aryans since Medea depicted Medes (it could be
that Gorgons were proto-Medes-proper). Therefore, the Revelation
frogs will be Aryans, not Egyptians, but not necessarily Medes
proper (i.e. the modern Kurds).
Strabo connected Hecate to the Kabeiri (i.e. Kabala) cult. As
"hex" is term derived from this witch-goddess, who was also a
symbol of the star(s) (e.g. connected to Asterius, etc.,), might the
hexagram so-called "star of David," symbol of the Templars and
other secret societies prior to they, have been a symbol of Hecate?
That could mean that the Israeli flag having that hexagram as it's
only symbol may be a Gogi flag!!
The frogs of Revelation are used as symbols for three
unclean spirits said to perform miraculous signs, as though
indicating peoples possessed by demons performing the magic
arts. But as they have the power to call kings the world over to
Armageddon, they are political animals, not merely your average
hare-in-hat magician. God may have used symbols in Revelation
not so much to speak to us in our ignorance of mythical symbols,
but to the secret-society peoples/pagans who use and worship
those symbols, as warnings to them that they are terribly on the
losing side. God is not going to destroy these types without fair
warning.
The underlying idea in both Hecate and Heket is that they are
exceedingly ancient, as for example Heket is viewed as the
midwife for the sun god, a peoples (or "mother") even earlier than
Ishtar the Great Mother. Knowing that the myth-writing Egyptians
were from the Greeks, we expect their mother to be the mother
also of the Greeks, and so that mother of both peoples would be
the Greek "Hecate." She was quite possibly named after the Greek

405
term, "hagia" = "holy," but I think "hagia" too derived from "Gogi"
since "gog" means "high."
The Egyptian frog god, Nun, was represented by four frogs
and four corresponding snakes, one frog of which is "Kek" while
his corresponding snake is "Kauket." If that's not enough, the
Mayans, who I am convinced are, like the Aztecs, a Gogi peoples,
had a rain god called "Chac," who was associated with four men or
winds called "Chacs" (to the Zapoteca tribe, Chac was "Cocijo").
The Chacs partook in human sacrifices for fertility purposes (sheer
lunatics). It just so happens that the frog was part of that ritual, as a
mystic vehicle for obtaining rain...which brings to mind
"Rainfroi," the codeword created by some Vere-family members to
depict the royal Vere bloodline at Anjou. Remember that one
German word for "toad" is "anku" i.e. like "Anjou."
In Dutch, the word for "frog" is "kikker/kikvors"!
There's a saying that when the frog croaks, it rains. And
croaking brings me to the dragon-depicted Crichtons who lived on
the Crich river in Ireland. Might "Crich" have meant "frog" since a
frog came to "croak." Indeed, the Greek "krokodilos" means, not
necessarily "crocodile," but a lizard in general. And couldn't it also
be true that our English "crick/creek" was named after the frog,
since frogs and creeks are found together? Consider that "frog"
may be a variation of "brook" (Old English "broc") since any "b"
may be modified to a "v" and that to a " f. As the sound of a frog is
also said to be a "ribbet," see how that reflects "river."
"Crick/creek" may have derived from "crook" since creeks
are crooked. "Crook" means "a bend or curve" and is from the Old
Norse, "krokr," which evokes the frog's croak as well as a
krokodilos. As a frog is not a turn or bend, it makes better sense
that it was named after the brook i.e. that may be of the family of
words that derived Bryges/Phrygia. Our word "break" can mean a
turn or bend in a straight line, but can also mean a complete
separation as I think was inherent in "Bryges" so as to produce the
fringe peoples called Franks, Varangi, and Brigit Celts.
"Creek" (Middle English "creke") evokes "Greek/Greco"
which I think was a version of "Gorgon." As I said elsewhere,
"Gorgon" was named after "gargar" = "wheels", very similar to
"crook" = bend/curve. The serpent is the symbol of the curve, but
when in the shape of a fully-round circle (i.e. as the Illuminatists
have it in providing themselves their globalist symbol), it may be a
symbol of Gorgons. I would assert that "Greece" was named after
the lizard, "kroko(dilos)" since Thrace was named after "draco."
[Update July 2000 -- I have in the past few days identified
the root of the dragon line in the Horites, and I tentatively formed
a theory that they became the Carites/Carians of continental
Rhodes and the Curetes of Rhodes ("Rhodes" means "wheel" in

406
Aryan). It may be, therefore, that as "Car" seems rooted in "gar" =
wheel/bend (in Semitic), that the Horites were rooted in the same
term (and therefore of some Semitic stock). That is, "Hor" is more
properly viewed as "Car," that helping me/us to trace their
migrations. End Update]
I say that the Crichtons were Curetes from the Greek theater
and that they named the Cruithin of Britain. "Cruithin" seems a Q-
Celt version of "Pretani," and indeed the Pretani stemmed from the
Cruithin, which then reveals that the Britons/Bretons (and
therefore the Welsh) had been of the Cruithne/Curete branch of
Cimmerians. If we convert "Crichton" to P-Celt we find
"Brookton," having the same meaning as "crick/creek."
[Update July 2006 -- As I had connected the Crichtons and
the Veres because both use green dragons to depict themselves
(see Vere Coat of Arms), so now I find that the English Brook-
family Crest uses a blue beaver while the Oxford Coat uses a green
beaver (Oxford was a Vere organization for centuries). Moreover,
as I am trying to trace the shell/mollusk symbol on Coats, note that
the Brook surname used three gold shells (the highest color on
Coats). I'll mention that "mollusk' is similar to the human-sacrifice
god/religion, "Moloch/Molech," though the latter term may have
derived from the same root as derived the Greek "meilikhios"
(Latin "mellaceus") meaning molasses/honey.
The Scottish Abbey/Aba Coat uses three shells as well, and a
black griffin/dragon head on its Crest. I'm seeking evidence that
the Abba/Abbey clan is named after the same as "appi," meaning
bee (as per Appian Way being named after bees). I'm also
wondering if that clan is from the Avviy/Avvites who lived in
conjunction with the Molech-worshiping Sepharvites. I'm
wondering if that clan is from the Ubii Franks.
Note in the Crichton link above that they use a blue lion on
their Coat, which I think is a Stewart/Kyle symbol. The Crichtons,
that website reveals, were in Midlothian, from where the Stewarts
lived and ruled Scotland (Edinburgh and Roslin were in
Midlothian). The Croak/Crok Coat uses two swan heads/necks
coming out of a crescent symbol to a round red ring (depicting
Greece), and the surname is said to originate in Shropshire, the
post-Conqueror origin also of the Stewarts! This begins to reveal
that Stewarts are from the Ligurian and Pollux-Caster swan, and I
would definitely tie the Pollock surname to the Croaks/Crocs.
The Croaks/Crocs are a Scottish family, but the
Crichs/Cricks are possibly the English counterpart, and they use a
certain type of cross-symbol that I see regularly. It is a golden
three-pronged cross with the fourth prong being of a different
nature, perhaps representing a sword. The Croaks/Crocs were

407
royals, as can be deduced by the crown on the lions head (in the
Crest); the lion is holding one of those crosses. End Update]
As the Mayans viewed their sun god, not only as a serpent in
the ski, but as a two-headed serpent in the sky, might they have
been descendants of the Vere clan, since after all the Veres also
depicted themselves as a two-headed dragon? Plus, the same
Picts/Cruithne to which the Veres were connected are thought to
have become some of the American Indians? I learned that
Freemasons of the past were busy studying the Indian languages
for to make connections to British/European groups. Take a look at
this Gorgon icon and tell if it doesn't remind you of certain
American Indians, especially the Aztecs.
[Update July 2006 -- As the Picts are known most of all for
their painted bodies, I would suggest a connection to the Bessi
Thracians, who tattooed their bodies. I would also suggest that the
Bessi were front and center in the Poseidon/Busae/Buzi peoples
that founded western Atlantis, even from Buz, son of Nahor. I seek
evidence to prove that the Bessi, who were the priests of the Satyr
tribe of Thracians, were "cohens," for if true, the Bessi were the
root of the Stewarts in that the Stewart Coat uses the same blue-
and-silver checks as does the Cohen Coat. I found only yesterday
(July 2) that the Parke/Park Coat uses the same Stewart blue-and-
silver check symbol, with same gold background. I wondered at
that point if "Park" derived from "verk/bark" meaning
"wolf"...since Stewarts worshiped a dog deity in the past. I also
noted the three red stags on the Park Coat that links the family to
the Kyles (from king Cole, they say, who I think depicted the
descendants of Kemuel/Camel, son of Nahor).
If it's true that the Satyrs trace back to Seir (of Edom), as
ectured in other chapter (inc
luding the next one), then the Picts
cV
athe Stewarts would stem from Horites, for Seir was himself a
Horite. And that agrees with the Horite-Curete equation that
brought about the Crichtons. I hope to lift the remaining fog, Lord
willing. If I suddenly disappear from the Internet, assume that they
got me, for if these things are true and they feel threatened, I could
become a target. I am wise to not place my surname or location
online, I hope you don't mind. End Update]
Doesn't "Cruithne" evoke "crout" and "krote" = a toad? If
that connection is the reality, then Germanics (called both
"Tedesco" and "Crout") could be from the Cruithne. There was a
certain mythical Iasion who lived in the island of Samo-Thrace. He
was the brother of Dardanus, grandfather of Troy's co-founder,
Tros. Dardanus was the son of one of Atlas' daughters, by which
the myth writers meant to show Troy's relationship to Atlantis.
Dardanus left Samo-Thrace and met up with Teucer's family,
which was ruling near Ida, the region where Troy was built.

408
Dardanus with Teucer's daughter gave birth to Erichthonius, the
ancestor (in my tentative opinion) of the Cruithne and the Crichton
clan, since "Erichton" may modify to "Crichton." The peoples that
Dardanus belonged to were Corybantes, and they are known to
have been extensions of the Curetes. [Update: I think the "Cory"
portion of the word may equate with Hori(tes).]
The sister of Dardanus' mother (Electra) was Merope, and
that term modifies easily to "Merovee." Erichthonius is said to
have been adopted by the Cecrops rulers (at Athens), but that is a
mythical concept similar to the marriage concept depicting royal
alliances, which would therefore amount to Cecrops ancestry for
the Dardanian-Trojan patriarchs.
Boreas and Erichthonius peoples intermarried to produce a
multitude of branches. Tros was born to Erichthonius, and Antenor
to Tros, and from Antenor the Trojans became the Gaul migration
that became the Veneti and Ligurians.
[Update July 2006 -- Note that the Stewart Crest (atop the
helmet) uses a swan, the symbol of the Cygnus-based Ligurians!
But as the swan traces to the mythical Leda, who by other means I
discovered to be the holy grail line, the Stewarts are of that
"sacred" line. End Update]
If we ask why a peoples would want to depict themselves
with something so unattractive as a toad or frog, consider the
Green man of Roslin (much uglier), or other such gargoyles (e.g.
on Gothic Cathedrals) and pathetic faces carved into totem poles.
I'm only half-sure that it must be a coincidence that "totem pole"
looks like "tadpole"; look at this online quote -- at a Scott- Fray
websit:
"Heket, the midwife goddess, through her totem the
frog, and Hecate, keeper of the gate between life and
death, also speak to our ability to change states. She
beckons us to create a radically new life out of the body of
the old ... She squats, froglike, akin to Ireland's Sheila-na-
Gig [!!]...she gives birth to thousands of pearls of new life.
These eggs, like any woman's, become the tadpole in the
womb, which the Egyptians recognized as a manifestation
of the fetus during its first growth...
"In many parts of Greece, Rome, and Hellenized
Egypt, archaeologists have found terracotta lamps upon
which are painted the sigil of the squatting frog, bearing
the inscription 'I am the resurrection' ... Later, tombs of
Coptic Christians featured the carving of a frog alongside
the Coptic cross..."
http://www.scottfray.com/clientdemos/HeketArticle/Heket.htm

409
"Coptic" refers to Egyptians, but as you can see, it must be
rooted in "Caphtor." The Coptic Christians had obviously been
lulled into the occult, even as Christians celebrate the Easter egg, a
symbol of the Redone god, Rod. You can see above the egg-to-
frog connection, the frog becoming a symbol of the womb,
Phrygia likely being that womb. Scott Fray even has a picture of a
frog on it's back, like a woman inviting sex. It has not escaped
some that the Fleur de Lis, which some say was at first a frog (it
does appear as the top-view of a squatting frog), is a picture of
sexual intercourse. Because Rod, the ancestor god, is connected to
a witch, Baba Yaga (probably "Gaga"), it connects him (and the
Rus) more-assuredly to Hecate.
I sense that "Baba" meant "abba/ancestor" (or technically,
"mother"), even as "Nun" (the frog god) looks like "nono" =
"grandfather." Couldn't "dad" and even "Tad" (de Vere) derive
from something like "teda," the Old English for "toad"...in that the
toad/frog depicted ancestors (to the occult, that is). In that case,
"Frey/Frigg" may likewise carry the meaning of
"father/progenitor," especially as "freca" means "to copulate."
Although I know not what this picture of the Celtic Cross
represents, it too appears on a website discussing the Veres. It is
essentially a Brigit wheel with four spokes, and a rose at the hub,
with dragons coming forth from both sides of the rose ... signifying
two major dragon lines but stemming from one Ros clan. I take it
this is a Rosicrucian cross. There are in some cases Rosicrucian
crosses that use a circle round the center of the cross. Christianity
has been polluted by these Satanists, as were the Jews polluted by
the Pharisees. If you like many equate Catholicism with
Christianity, you ought to know that Catholicism was stacked at
the highest levels with Rosicrucians and Rosicrucian sympathizers
for merely the reason that Rosicrucians ruled the Roman empire at
many junctions of history.
The circle/wheel is nothing but a serpent in this case, with
tail in it's mouth, called an "Ouroboros" dragon, this representing
the global/universal reach of the Gorgon bloodline, or that the
universe belongs by right to Gorgons. The Ourobos was "First
discovered in Egypt, and later in Greece, it is the symbol of the
universe. A similar dragon is his Norse cousin the Midgard
Serpent [of Loki] whose huge body circles the entire world."
http://www.michaellc.com/The_Library_3.html
The mythical Asgard and Midgard terms may have depicted
the Kurds (ancient Hurrians), and may therefore be differentiated
as Assi Kurds verses Mede Kurds.
The following piece on Mary Magdalene (the reported/false
idol of the Merovingians) is upsetting, be warned. Myrina,
Amazon queen of Lemnos, the island of Hephaistos, comes to

410
mind [and do note the apparent connection of the Merovingians to
Dagon the fish god, whose center of worship was in Mari of the
Euphrates river, part of what I now call Kabala Strip. I'm
suggesting that the holy grail line is from Kabala-related Mari]:
"Mary Magdalene is sometimes shown with a fish
tail as Marina ... Mary is the patron saint of hairdressers,
perfumiers, gardeners and prostitutes.
An association between Mary Magdalene and the
sea grew up, as it did with the Holy Grail which,
according to the Nag Hammadi Codices, Magdalene took
with her to France after the Crucifixion. The Chalice also
represented the uterus to the cultists (as does the
horseshoe), and the wine the menstrual blood. Tantric
and alchemical texts refer to menstrual blood by a
number of colourful names including Star Fire, Gold of
the Gods, and Vehicle of Light."
http://uk.geocities.com/lucath/mermaids.html
That Satanic depravity doesn't surprise me; it was common
among the Templars and other such Rosicrucian groups, such as
that of Zorzi, founder of the Moravian Evangelicals. It reminds me
of Babylon the Great when depicted with a gold cup filled with the
filth of her adulteries. Would modern "Merovingians" be attaching
Babylon the Great to Jesus, as his mistress? No doubt. They revel
in such impishness. Fools, immature men of sick mind; they rule
our world with an air of respectability, and in the evenings they
gather to become fiends, giving themselves over to the grossest
and twisted sexual acts.
The same perversion was central to the Kabeiri cult, and as
this cult was centered at the island of Samo-Thrace, note now that
"Samo" is the root of "sammakko," the Finnish version of "frog."
Not only that, but the Hebrew soft "c" is called "cawmek," but
spelled by one code-wielding Kabalist (whom I'll quote in the next
chapter) as "Sammekh." As nutty as it might seem for me to tie
that Hebrew letter to Samo-Thrace, the next chapter may perhaps
enlighten you, where I show that Hebrew letters were used as
codes for dragon-line people groups.
It can't be a coincidence that Samo-Thrace was in the Aegean
district of "Ebros," that being easily a modification of "Kabeiros."
Not only was Ireland called by variations of "Heber," but the
Romans called it "Hiberia," evoking Iberia in Spain. If indeed the
Iberi(ans) of Spain apply to the Samo-Thraki cult, and if true that
the Iberians originate in the Tubal region of Georgia, where also
Gog ruled, then the Kabeiri cult is likely a Gogi cult, and as we
can see that it lingers to this day, it will apparently survive

411
Armageddon, go underground as is the nature of a dragon, and
arise again at the end of the Millennium as per Revelation 20 to
once more challenge to powers of the One True God.
As I mentioned elsewhere, Hebros was the brother of Kikon,
and the two were sons of Rhodope. Samo-Thrace's city of
Samothraki was also called "Kamariotissa," evoking the
"Kamiros" (Cimmerians, I'm sure) of the island of Rhodes. Hecate
was a goddess specific to Samo-Thrace, and she was there
worshiped as her dog manifestation, for she was a three-bodied
goddess (one being the wolf), and this now explains why Troy and
the Troad (no doubt the same as "Dryas/Dryad/Druid"), appear as
the number "three." It could therefore appear that Revelation 16
uses three frogs for alluding to the line of Hekate, or the three
peoples who made up the Trojans.
[Update July 2006 -- As well as the dog, another of Hekate's
bodies was the horse, which, while one easily makes a connection
to Pegasus and the Thracians, I have recently recognized as the
Kabala symbol. Bluntly, Kabala was an Ares-Hebrew/Ares-Cutha
mix, and Ares was the same as Gog, both originating from the
Aras/Araxes (Hros/Rox(olani)?) river in Armenia. In fact, some
say that the Cutha originated at the Aras river. The Iberi of that
region come to mind.]

412
KABALA IS BABYLON THE HOR
July 2006

Kabalists write to one another in secret code that makes for


perfect logic, but the by-products of those writings are sheer
lunacy for those naive members who don't realize that what they're
trying to learn or figure out on the metaphysical plane is nothing,
zero, less than zero, merely code for dragon-bloodline history. The
energy that exists in this religion is real, which may or may not
manifest to you, but it's as destructive as the Satan who rules over
the dragon bloodline. "Energy" and "knowledge" (wholly
unpredictable) is obtained by Illuminatists in return for advancing
that bloodline in either spiritual or political domains.
To follow this chapter, one needs to have a good
understanding of the people groups that I will mention, most of
which are described in some detail in my previous chapters. I'll
now give a short review of my discoveries over just the past week.
First, I wrote this piece in an update in the ' Edom and Avva"
chapter:
"In creating ten forces, Kabalists made "Kether"
the first, smacking of "Gether," son of Aram. Kether is
defined (by Kabalists) as a supreme crown i.e. god
himself (but in no way YHWH no matter how they would
make that claim in efforts to lure Jews). Realizing now
that the Kabalists, tricky-dickies that they were, were
referred to their ancestors in those ten forces (which they
call "sephirot") , Gether appears to be in view as
supreme, suggesting that the cult began with, and/or was
officiated by, Getherites. The "K" variation evokes the
Khazars.
The second force is "Chokmah" (Kokmah seems
acceptable), and may refer to the Gether-Gogi alliance
(that I've been insinuating), with the Gogi playing
second-fiddle to Getherites.
Beware, dragon bloodline, for there are a few determined
ones (aside from myself) nibbling away at your veil. That is, there
are a few readers of my material sending in some key things that I
missed. For example, Lorri wrote in and suggested that I look into
the Chabad-Lubavitch branch of Judaism, and that caused me to

413
learn that these "Jews" are almost-certainly an important sect of
the Kabala. A Wikipedia article tells that:
"Chabad...is one of the largest branches of Hasidic
Judaism and one of the largest Jewish Orthodox movements
worldwide, especially in the United States and Israel. Chabad
is a Hebrew acronym for 'Chochmah, Binah, Da'at' ('Wisdom,
Understanding, Knowledge')."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lubavitch
It's not just the "Chochmah" term that should make us
suspicious, but Binah just happens to be the third force of the
Kabala tree! And look at what Wikipedia says about the origin of
the term, "Hasidic": "Hasidic Judaism (also Chassidic,
etc ... from the Hebrew root word chesed meaning 'loving
kindness.'"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasidic Judaism
Chesed/Kesed just happens to be the fourth force of the
Kabala tree!! Perhaps it ties to Kesed, son of Nahor. If I am correct
when I suggest that Kabalists do not trace back to Israeli tribes,
then these Hasidic/Orthodox "Jews" may prove to be incorrect
when they claim "to extend in an unbroken chain back to
Moses and the giving of the Torah on Mount Sinai."
The question is, are they more than incorrect? Are these the
imposters, and do the upper levels know it? I must look into
whether the founders of Chabad Hasidism trace back to the Ladon
dragon, for they were from Lithuania; the founder (Rabbi Shneur
Zalman) was himself from Liadi of neighboring Belarus? Amd
why do their Torah she-bi-khsav ("Written Law") and Torah she-
ba'alpeh ("Oral Law") both reflect "Sheba"?
'In the Edom and Avva chapter, I also wrote this: "The fifth
force is "Geburah," which may refer to Rothschild ancestors,
for the real surname of the Rothschilds, 'Bauer,' 'is derived
from the High German word, "giburo ... '"
The Kabalists don't tell anyone that Kether refers to Gether,
but rather define the term as some sky-high virtue, food for the
soul and life to the body. It's a carrot on a stick to keep one's
interest, to make idiots out of the entire human race if they can.
Yesterday I wrote this (in another chapter):
"I haven't been able to attempt an identification of
the [mythical] west wind until now. It was tagged,
" Zephyros." We find mentioned immediately after the
Avvites (2 Kings 17:31) that the "Sepharvites" sacrificed
their children in fires. In the Kabala Tree of Life, there
are ten forces called "sephirot," and this now ties the
Kabala to those child-killing ... nice guys? I identify the ten
forces as ten ancient peoples to which the cult was

414
attached. The first, "Kether," I identify as Gether, son of
Aram (Genesis 10)."
It should seem obvious in the west-wind connection to the
Sepharvites that it was they who moved west into Europe as the
primary Kabalists. Later in the day I added this update in the
"Frogs from the Dragon's Throat" chapter:
"Today I found the Kabala root in Lot, son of
Abraham's and Nahor's brother, Haran (Genesis 11:27).
For from Lot and his younger daughter as mother, Ben-
Ammi was born (Genesis 19:38). The Kabalists must
know this, for which reason they said they are from
Benjamin, a very similar term used to deceive us. Ben-
Ammi was the father of the Ammonites (says Genesis
19:38). And that's how I came to know that Lot is the
root of Kabala. For the human-sacrifice god, Molech, is
said in 1 Kings 11:7 to be "the idol of the sons of
Ammon," while Molech is revealed in 2 Kings 17:31 as
the god of the Sepharvites, where it says that the
Sepharvites worshiped Adrammelech and Anammelech .
To prove Molech ties to the Sepharvites, 2 Kings 17:31
tells that they burned their children in fires. To tie
Kabala to the Sepharvites, the Kabala tree of life consists
of ten "sephirot." What I'm claiming is that Lot's
ancestors traced to the Sepharvites. It's a probability,
therefore, that the entire household of Terah (Abraham's
father) were Sepharvites. God called Abraham out of that
Satanic peoples."
This morning upon waking I realized that "sephirot" and the
Sepharvites became, in the Greek theater, Sparta and/or the Sparti,
the latter being depicted in myth as the teeth of the Ares dragon
slain in/near Thebes of Boiotia. Another potential discovery of
only yesterday is that the mythical Abas, and his city of Abae,
were Avviy/Avvites elements who had lived in conjunction with
the Sepharvites both in Akkadia and Samaria (Israel). Greek myth
tells that the Abas bloodline married Spartans through Danae's
mother, Eurydice, daughter of Lacedaemon the husband of Sparta.
That is, the son of Abas, Acrisius, married (mixed with) Danae, a
part-Danaan part-Spartan bloodline.
Lacedaemon is to be understood as Lace-Demon, or
Laconian-Demon, where Laconia was founded by Pelasgians ... I
think Pel-Asgi = Pel-Ashknazi. I'm keeping an eye out to prove
that so-called "Askenazi Jews" are from the dragon-line Askenazi
Aryans of Mesopotamia/Iran ... a branch of which moved to Greece
to become the basis of Sparta. In keeping with my findings that
Sepharvites had first been the Ares dragon (of Thrace) prior to

415
becoming the Spartans, so we find that Lacedaemon had
Taygete/Taygeti as mother, where I would read that term as a
Getae-Thracian branch. Moreover, Zeus was made the father of
Lacedaemon, and Zeus I have traced either to Sepharvites, to
Avvites, or both (details elsewhere).
To reveal concisely that Kabalists attempt to deceive by
making themselves appear attached to Israel, Aryeh Kaplan, in his
book, The Bahir, wrote the following (and by the way all square
brackets henceforth are mine):
"What are the Ten Saying [i.e. the ten sephirot]?
The first is the Highest Crown. lessed and praised be its
name and its people. Who are its people? They are
Israel"
http://www.psyche.com/psyche/qbl/formative_sephirot.html
In reality, the first sephirot is by their own admission,
"Kether," a term by no means indicating Israel, but rather Gether,
son of Aram.
The Bahir is a middle-ages version of Kabala that evolved
from an earlier version known (to Kabalists) as "Sepher Yetsira,"
which I think is an obvious reference to a Sepharvite-Gatziri mix
of peoples, where "Gatziri" is a term known by historians (e.g.
"Agatziri") to denote the Khazars. It is my growing opinion that
Gether's descendants furnished the Khazars. I'm assuming now
with confidence, having realized this just now as I write, that the
Sepharvites and "sephirot" refer to the historical Subartu. "There
was a city called Syphera, near the Euphrates," says Adam
Clarke's Commentary, and one can see how the peoples of that city
would have been called "Subartu."
The Kabala tree of life uses not only 10 sephirot people-
group codes/terms, but individual letters of the Hebrew alphabet to
further codify those people groups. For example, the first sephirot
is represented by the letter a, called "aleph" by Hebrews. Upon
learning this, I saw that some Hebrew letters sound like dragon-
line people groups: e.g. "s" = "siyn" and sounds like Sin, the moon
god and father of Ishtar; "sh" is "sheen" and evokes Shinar. I
wondered if those letters were not so named, as for example days
of the week, months, and even planets, moons, comets, and stars
are named after the same dragon-line people groups.
When I saw that the first sephirot was named after aleph, I
saw Halybes in that letter, for the Kabalists I have previously
traced to the Halybes. My impression, therefore, is that Getherites
became the Halybes, and if so, then whenever the Kabalists write
their works, the Gether-Halybe connection should at some points
become evident . Look at the following written by a Kabalist:

416
"The earliest layer of mystical thought in the Bahir
is the Sefer Yetsira, found in the identification of the first
sefirot with the letter Aleph, and reflected in the qualities
Keter 'Eliyon and Makhshavah." (psyche.com website
above)
What that means to the initiated is that the Sepharvite-Gatziri
alliance started off as an Halybe-Getherite mix, or that the
Getherites became the Halybes. In either case, it seems obvious
that the Getherites named the Gatziri, and that these were supreme
in the eyes of the Kabalists who formed the above-mentioned Sefir
Yetsira. Along with Getherites, the above quote adds what appears
to be Makh-Sheba peoples as a portion of the supreme peoples.
Now behold how the coded writings create insanity for the naive
follower of Kabala (brackets not mine):
"Reading [the sephirot] in their formative semantics
-- Kaf-Tav-Raysh: Kaf, physical support for Tav (cosmic
resistance) in the Universe (Raysh) (the first step of
manifestation is to provide a container for Aleph's
opposite, Tav: the end is in the beginning and the
beginning is in the end) -- is more helpful but still not as
important to know as its number: Aleph, Echad and
One." (website above)
Kaf may be code for Cappa(docia) because tav and raysh
appear to denote the Biblical Tubal and Rosh that in fact lived
beside one another in Cappadocia, with the Halybes to the west of
them. Where it says that kaf is the "physical support for tav," I
would suggest that the Tubal peoples were assisted, or based in,
the peoples living in kaf, which I would identify as Meshech since
they were a major Cappadocian people (some say the founders of
Cappadocia), mightier than Tubal, yet related to Tubal. Note the
term, "Echad," how it evokes the Greek-myth snake-woman,
Echidna," which I had identified as Akkadia. And now that I
mention it, couldn't her husband, Typhon, be code for Tubal? After
all, Typhon ended up in Tartarus (a Tartar region I'm assuming),
where Herodotus located the Arimaspa, and that couldn't be far off
from Tobolski (in western Siberia).
See in the quote that the Rosh are viewed as "the universe,"
which must be meant the entire realm of the dragon line, and/or
that the Rosh inhabited the entire realm. As we read that tav and
aleph are opposites, one at the end and the other at the beginning,
it would appear that Tubal and the Halybes are at opposite ends of
the "universe," wherefore the universe would be revealed roughly
as the Halys river on the west (where the Halybes were centered)
and Caucasia/Armenia on the east (where Tubal was located). This
viewing of the Rosh as the universe supports my finding that

417
Rosicrucians are based in the Rus/Ros. So far, so good, so let's
read more serpentine slosh from the same article:
"The Sephirot 1 through 9 mirror the archetypal
structural cycle of the autiot 1 through 9, which ends with
the formation of a primitive cell or structure (Tayt)
capable of containing/carrying Aleph. This is mirrored in
the existent (Yod) female (Sammekh) cell of Yod-
Sammekh-Waw-Dalet, Yesod, which propagates (Waw)
physical existence (Dalet) at the 9th Sephira. The
Sephirot carry the cycle one step further [to the 10th] into
actual manifestation, with the 10th Sephirot, Aleph's
partner in creation, Yod/10, existence."
Lets undress that nonsense to see what it really means. It's
saying that the first nine people groups of the Subartu/Sepharvites
(who did in fact live in Akkadia and Armenia) had as an end-
product it's very own kingdom, "Tayt," capable of including the
Halybes, which kingdom is itself depicted as the tenth sephirot.
Thoth/Taut comes to mind as that kingdom, Hermes that is, a
depiction of Armenia ... but stretching to Phrygia as the Hittite
empire. "Yesod" not only looks like "Kassite/Kasdu," but is
revealed in other statements as the same, in that Kassites are
alluded to as the 9th sephirot, as we shall see below.
A similar version of this history (I'm still interpreting the
above quote) is in the 9th sephirot, Yesod, evolving into the letter,
yod (y), where yod is code for the 10th sephirot, the kingdom of
Armenia. And so if Yesod depicts the Kassites, yod could depict
the Guti since they and the Kassites were likely the same peoples.
The letter, vav, may depict the Avvites, wherefore the statement,
"Yesod, which propagates (Waw) physical existence (Dalet) at the
9th Sephira," can be interpreted as Kassites propagating with
Avvites to form the kingdom that existed immediately prior to the
next/10th Subartu kingdom, that 10th being the yod/Guti kingdom.
This means that the Hittite empire was a Guti-based one, as even
the similarity of terms could suggest, known in Greek myth as
"Cotys" and putting forth the Getae/Edone Thracians.
Where it reads, "...female (Sammekh) cell of Yod-
Sammekh-Waw-Dalet, Yesod, which propagates (Waw)
physical existence (Dalet) at the 9th Sephira," the "Sammekh"
term is the Hebrew letter "Cawmek" (soft "c"), which I would
interpret as the peoples in Kabala Land (perhaps the Shammash
(sun god) worshipers = Shem/Semites in my opinion) who
furnished the proto-Trojans/Kabeiri of Samo -Thrace. The sentence
could be deciphered as meaning this: the Shammash-worshipping
Kabala were a spiritual/priestly caste/cult of the Yesod/Kassites

418
(or Yesod/Kasdu), which together put forth the physical/political
goods, the Malkut empire.
The Kabalists identify their 10th Kingdom as "Malkut,"
which the author being quoted portrays as “ another
Kaf/container for the transmuted energy of Kaf-Tav-Raysh,
Kether. With Tav, Malkut and Shekinah resist the cosmic
energy of Aleph to the point of being Aleph Malkut is thus
.”

revealed in partnership with Shekinah, and as another kaf =


Cappadocia people group that has received the "transmuted"
political/military powers of Cappadocia, Tubal and Rosh...which
all together define the Getherite Kingdom (one wonders if "Guti"
wasn't a short form of "Gether"). In translating it further, Malkut
and Shekinah, along with Tubal, resist the Halybes until they rule
the Halybes. Thus, the Thoth kingdom did come to include the
Halybes.
I think I see Molech/Moloch in "Malkut."
The article goes on reveal that the Malkut kingdom was
second and built on top of the first Chokmah kingdom:
"...Malkut is the second Mem since Hhokmah ... The
Yetziratic formation of the 9th Sephira is wedded to the
biological process of material reality [i.e. wedded to
Malkut]: sealed by the Waw/Union of the 9th-10th
sephirot, Spirit and matter interlock. "
http://www.psyche.com/psyche/lex/zohar/malkut.html
I can see therein that the "Yetziratic formation," identified
my myself as tribal alliances of Khazars, evolved into the Malkut
kingdom. But not the Khazars proper on the north shore of the
Caspian sea, but the Kassites who, as proto-Khazars, were called
by a term similar to "Khazar" (e.g. Yetzir, Gether, Gader, Kothar).
These peoples are now depicted as "Spirit" (gods/ancestors) and
"matter" (descendants). This following quote verifies the Gether-
to-Malkut evolution; I'll let it go longer than I need to for the
purpose at hand, to show you just how much you need to keep
your kids out of this cesspool of lunacy:
"When considering the Sephirot, it is important to
keep the double flow in mind: not only the emanation
from infinite expansive (spiritual) energy (Kether), but
the return interplay and physical supports from the
infinite compressive (material) energy (Malkut).
Hhockmah, for instance, must be understood not just as
receiving the structuralizing energy of Keter, but as a
simultaneous endogenous response by the unstructured
substance of creation: the autiot of the Hebrew alphabet

419
are the imprint of God's Will on the unstructured energy
(void) of His creation."
There you go, Getherites were the "spiritual" lunatic priests,
and their "material" kingdom became Chokmah and later Malkut.
"This is the Kingdom, the 10th sephira of actual
existence ...completing the circuit of Aleph-Tav and returning it
through Shem -El, the left: a deep secret, apparently." Here's
what's apparent, that the Semites on the left/west side of the
Euphrates were a part of the circuit of that Hebrew-Aryan
Kingdom. The same author at another page put it this way:
"...where Aleph [Halybes] completes the circuit with Tav
[Tubal] and loops it with Shem-El of the left."
Wouldn't that deep secret merely be that Molech-worshiping
Kabalists lived in Edom, Moab, Ammon, and on the Israeli coast,
as the Avvites ? Why is that an important piece of history not to be
revealed to the world? Because these became the holy-grail Cati
making up much of royal-blood Europe, who more recently, as
Illuminatists, have been trying to convince us that they are
Israelites when in fact they were from Avvites, Sepharvites,
Khazars ... the worst kind of rotting pagan grime mixed arrogantly
with YHWH THE PURE THE MEEK THE GOOD.
Immediately after writing about Shem-el the deep secret, the
author says:
"The exile of Shekinah may be found in
contemporary c/k/qabala, where the feet of the six don't
reach the ground, and Malkut has no planet.
One day, the Moon will be higher than the Sun, and
Venus will be in her proper place."
The impression there is that "Shekinah" refers to Kabalists of
Israel, that they are "in exile" i.e. without a kingdom anymore, for
which reason the author also adds, "Malkut has no planet." Then
he says that the moon, probably Manes/Sin the dragon-line moon
god, will be higher than a certain sun god who now rules the
world, at which time Venus (the Enete/Heneti of Phrygia) will be
"in her place"...the throne of the world, I presume, is meant. That
clarifies that the Rosicrucians are a Rus bloodline(s) from Venus,
the Veneti.
Now behold what one small chart reveals to us. It's about a
third of the way down the website page at the link below. It first of
all has the Yetzira term in conjunction with the Yesod term, this
solidifying in my mind that the Yesod sephirot refers to Kassites.
Beside those terms it reads, "Foundation." The chart then has a
Briah term in conjunction with Tipheret, and these together smack
of the Iberi and Tiberi quoted by Josephus as being in/near the

420
land of Tubal. Then the chart has Assiah in conjunction with
Malkut, and I would interpret the first as the Assi from whom the
Scandinavian Aesir stem. This is very enlightening, if true,
because it would then make the Scandinavians Amalekites, for
isn't that what "Malkut" stands for???
This result here was not contrived to fit my very recent
conclusion, that the Horites may be at the root of the European
dragon line. In fact, I did not see the Amalekite-Malkut equation
until I had wondered many times what Malkut may refer to, until I
was more than half way through this chapter, and in fact not more
than 10 seconds before I wrote it down in the above paragraph;
that's how it usually seems to go, that as I write, wondering what a
mystery term may represent, the answer eventually pops into my
mind and supports my previous writings.
Surely the Kabalists know that the Hittite empire was based
on Amalekite elements. There is a little problem in identifying the
bloodline of the Amalekites, for there was an Amalek who was
from an Esau-Horite mix (Genesis 36:12 and 22), and yet Genesis
14:7 mentions Amalekites in the time of Abraham before Esau was
born. The chapter-14 text doesn't actually refer to Amalekites, but
only to the "territory of Amalekites." But as the Esau's son
(Eliphaz) had married a Horite woman to produce the above-
mentioned Amalek, it may be that this name was from Horite
tradition/heritage, by which I mean to say that the Amalekites,
even if they had been named by a previous Amalek, were Horites
anyway.
Horites were spread from at least as far east as Nuzi (east of
the Tigris), and as far west as Edom. I have been hypothesizing
that Lotan, son of Seir, was Ladon the mythical dragon that
depicted Lydians , Latins, the Welsh/Bretons of western Atlantis,
and all others who stemmed from them.
I just went searching for pertinent data on the Amalekites and
found yet another astounding key, not more than five minutes old,
that:
"Lotan is the seven-headed sea serpent or dragon of
Ugaritic myths."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotan
From whom did this mythical creature get it's name?Ugaritic
was a region in Syria passed through by the Kothar-wa-Khasis
(after leaving Israel) to settle as the Cati in Khassi of Cilicia. I'm
not necessarily saying that Lotan depicted the Cati, but that they
were, in the least, in contact with them, for the Cati worshipped
Hadad, while Lotan and Hadad fought wars. My main point is this,
that since God described the Beast of Revelation 12, 13 and 17 as
one who sits on seven hills of Rome, but also as one with seven

421
heads, might the True God of Israel have been alluding to Lotan,
since after all the Latins have been on the seven hills of Rome
since at least 1000-800 BC? But if this Lotan dragon is a depiction
of Lotan, son of Seir, and moreover is the Ladon of Greek myth,
then whoa, the Latins were Horites.
The Horites were already a people when Abraham was in
Israel (Genesis 14:6). The Flood had been less than 300 years prior
to Abraham, wherefore the peoples of the world were few in
number indeed when the Seir gave birth to Lotan. Esau's wife was
Lotan's sister (Genesis 36:22). I have no idea where this is taking
me, but I don't think I've yet arrived to the bottom of the deep well.
The Bible does not say that the Horites were Canaanites, as
some assume. What I would at this early point suggest is that
Horites were a Guti branch who mixed with certain/various
Semites, including the Sepharvites, to produce the Kassite empire
that evolved into the Aryan "Hittite empire" (not the Biblical
Hittites) that has been wrongly named. That empire, according to
my reading of the Kabala codes as identified in this chapter, was a
Malkut/Amalekite one. As the Aryan Hittite empire has been
alternatively called "Hurrian," I would suggest that Hurrians and
Horites were synonymous, especially as the Hurrian empire was an
early one dating back to the days of Abraham (and the Guti).
Whether or not the Hurrians/Horites named Haran, the city that
Nahor remained in, I still do not know.
An early city of the Hurrians was Kassara, a Kassite/Khazar-
sounding name if ever I heard one. It's first-known king was
Pithana. Per chance the Python of Greek myth depicted this king's
dynasty removed to Greece, which would then place Kassites in
Delphi (Phocis region), where Python was "slain" by Apollo. The
point is that the mythical king Abas, who founded the city of Abae
in Phocis, is, theoretically speaking at this point, a depiction of the
Avviy/Avvites. That is, the Avvites and Kassites moved together
to Phocis.
While Kussara has not been pin-pointed, it is located (I
presume from a list of cities in which it is found) in south-east
Turkey. In that list was also Nese, a city ruled by Anittas, son of
Pithana. This could mean that "Anittas" was so named after a Nese
entity, and that may just have been the Horite city of Nuzi! That is,
the Nuzi Horites became the Hurrian/"Hittite" empire. Makes
much sense. But wouldn't this empire have been what Kabala calls
"Malkut"? Indeed, it makes so much sense.
And so behold that Python of Greek myth was no doubt
Phaethon, son of Helios, who drove a certain dragon-line peoples
into Eridanus (i.e. a Redone valley). And since I identified the
Redones as Cimmerians from Rhodes, I would suggest that the
Horites were Cimmerians. That is, the Redones were from the

422
Horites, in which case, since Redones were from Rosh, the Horites
also put forth the Rosh. And as Gog was ruler over the Rosh, I
would suggest that Gogi were likewise Horites.
The last king of the Old Hittite empire was Telepinus
(1500ish BC), wherefore his dynasty may have moved to Mysia in
that the mythical Telephus came to rule there. But it should be said
that Telephus was made (by myth writers) to be born in Arcadia,
suggesting that Telepinus was of the Hermes bloodline whose
royals came first to Arcadia prior to ruling at Mysia. My point is
that Mysia was proto-Lydia, wherefore the explanation of how
Telephus in Arcadia (in Greece) came to rule Mysia (in Asia
Minor) is that Mysia must at some point have become ruled by
Lotan-based Horites; Telephus, if he depicted Telepinus, had been
of the Hurrian/Horite fold.
There is a definite connection between the two Hurrian
kings, Telepinus and Pithana, or should I say between the mythical
Telephus and Python, for as Python is widely known to be
synonymous with the city of Delphi, so "Telephus" appears as a
version of "Delphi." As online articles reveal that Delphi was at
first called "Pythos," the obvious fact now comes out into the
open, that the city (Greek home of divination) was founded by
Hurrians of the Kabala kind.
I should also mention that Hattusa was the Hurrian capital at
one point, and that an alternative spelling is "Chattusa," as though
perhaps founded by the same who became the Cati of Cilicia, even
the holy grail line. After all, the first rulers of Hattusa were called
"Hatti" in historical documents. I think that the same who became
the Cati named Akkadia. I think they were the Cutha, who lived in
conjunction with, or nearby, the Avvites and child-killing
Sepharvites (2 Kings 17:24-31). I think the Kabala is traced to all
of the above. Those who ruled Hattusa secondly have been
wrongly labeled "Hittites" after the city's name, but I would
suggest that they were a Hurrian branch, and that Hurrians were
founded by the Cutha of Haran, which Cutha were a Kabala-Guti
mix. Many of the Greek-myth characters must stem from the
Hurrians, if not the major players themselves.
My larger point should be obvious to readers familiar with
my previous topics, that it would be the Hurrians who became the
Hermes bloodline that became most/much of virgin Europe: the
Celts, Gauls, and Germanics (sad that the virgin had to be raped by
such Satanic peoples bent on greedy conquest). But to equate the
Hurrians with the Cutha places a new light on the topic. There's a
Hebrew snake involved with CATI stamped upon its forehead, that
slithers right into the holes of Greece's mythology writers, and out
again with RUS stamped upon its forehead!!

423
If the Horites evolved into the Redones, as I am only now
suspecting (I doubt that anyone could possibly have suggested the
same, for it seems like such a huge and unlikely jump across the
world), then the Horites are required to have passed through
Rhodes. Behold, that wicked Curetes were on Rhodes. Couldn't
"Horite" modify to "Curete"? A city on Rhodes is to this day
Ialysos, which I have already traced to the Halybes, at and/or
downstream from Hattusa. Will keep an eye out for Horite-Curete
connections.
This is all so new I feel overwhelmed. What am I to make of
the Hermes line being from Amalekites? In the Bible, Amalekites
are arch-enemies of early Israel, and YHWH (though slow-to-
anger and full of mercy) wanted more than their women and
children annihilated, even their livestock. It would seem that since
Lot's Ammonite descendants are Said to have been innate to
Molech (Strong's says that Molech was the chief Ammonite god),
that somehow Amalekites had mixed deeply with Ammonites...if
my eyes are not deceiving me when I see "Molech" derived from
"Amalekite" (the Biblical-Hebrew form is "Molek."
Moreover, it could reveal (if Lot himself was a Molech
worshiper) that Lot's mother (and/or wife) had Amalekite blood.
Note that Lot's daughters did what we might expect of Amalekites,
got him drunk and on the same night slept with him (without his
knowing) to produce the two sons who became the Ammonites
and Moabites (Genesis 19:30-38). This, though shocking, is by no
means an impossible story.
To trace Amalekites to Greece and Europe, therefore, I
would trace the Hurrians/Hermes to Pan and his fellow Satyrs.
This is where it becomes new/tricky to me now that I suspect
"Satyr" to be rooted in "Se'ir" (see previous chapters). In keeping
firm to my theory that the (half-goat) Satyrs were a depiction of
the Getae, I expect a Seir/Horite/Amalekite connection to the
Getae. And since the Getae were the Edones, I now suspect that
Mesopotamian Eden, and the dragon sun-god cult that created the
Eden concept/cult, were Horites. This is excellent progress for me
in about one week since Greenway7 alerted me to the Seir-Satyr
equation.
Keep in mind that the central star on the Cygnus
constellation (depicting Liguria), also called the Northern Cross,
has been named "Sadr," and that a star on the center of a cross
evokes the rose of Rosicrucianism (also placed on the center of
their cross), another deep "secret" so concealed over the centuries
that modern Rosicrucians probably don't know what the rose refers
to. I say it refers to Satyrs, the Getae, and the Eden cult worshiping
the serpent (i.e. Satan) that took mankind hostage, and that to this
day rules over us on a foundation of endless bloodshed. I had

424
wondered previously if the red rose didn't depict Esau/Edom, but
didn't want to say for sheer lack of a scintilla of evidence. Now I
think I may have a log's worth, or maybe even a lumber yard.
Recall the name of my chapter, "Edom and Avva," how it so aptly
describes the Eden cult and zeroes in on it's Israeli-based
geography and bloodlines.
An Amalekite connection to the Boii peoples is now possible
in that the California-based Bohemian Club, an Illuminati haunt
mainly for Republican politicians (Presidents included) and
corporation officials, uses an owl idol before which it conducts
human sacrifices (mock or real I do not know), and that owl is
regarded as, and named, "Moloch"! Related data is plentiful
online. I'm not suggesting that most of those who attend the Grove
are Boii peoples, but that the creator(s) of the Club named it
"Bohemian" because he knew that the Boii had been Molech-
worshipers. That creator was Joseph Redding, and his associate,
Ambrose Bierce, wrote "The Devil's Dictionary"...wherein we find
the definition of "Christian" to be "One who follows the teachings
of Christ in so far as they are not inconsistent with a life of sin."
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/organisations/Bohemian_Grove_symbolism.htm
It's possible that Joseph Redding was of the Boii-bloodline
(since the nation of Bohemia was founded by Boii peoples). There
is also the possibility that the Grove was named after the lose term,
"Bohemian," meaning a "wild/liberal individual."
I've repeated in other chapters several times that I equate the
Boii with the Boiotians, and that I trace the Boiotians back to the
Budii and/or Buzi Medes, but forward to the Bessi Thracians who
were the priests (cohenO) of the Satyr tribe of Thracians. I will
mention here that all three, the Bush, the Booth, and the Redding
Coats of Arms use three black boars. The Bush and Booth
surnames were both found in records for the first time in
Berkshire.
My task now is to connect the Cutha, the Avviy, and the
Sepharvites to the Budii/Buzi Medes. I've already connected these
Kabalists to certain Medes, the Guti-come-Kassites that is, but so
far no link to the Budii/Buzi except by connecting the Kabala to
Poseidon. The problem may be in that the Budii and Buzi terms
were late, quoted by Herodotus in the 5th century BC, meaning
that previously these Mede tribes may have gone by other names,
but where to find that information, that is the problem.
To serve as further evidence that the Bute term I am tracing
across Europe means, "body/house/booth," the Kabala author I
have quoted in this chapter has this to say of bayt, the Hebrew
letter "b": "Bayt/body."
http://www.psyche.com/psyche/lex/zohar/gevurah.html

425
Might that Hebrew letter have been named after the Budii
Medes with whom the early dragon-line Semites made an alliance?
Because "beth/bet' is "house" in Semitic (i.e. not Aryan), the Budii
Medes, though Aryans, thus appear partnered with Semites (in an
astrology/sorcery-based relationship). The Budii may even have
been the root of terms such as Python/Phaethon and the historical
king Pithana, especially as the city of Pythos (I think named after a
king Pithana) was smack beside (or perhaps in those days, smack
in) Boiotia. Or even better, the Budii may have been named after
an old Aryan form of "python."
Since Boiotia had been Cadmeis previously -- founded by
certain Phoenicians depicted by "Cadmus," wherefore the Cati
come to mind -- the dragon that Cadmus slew must have been the
Boiotian peoples arising to power but for the moment subdued.
Since we know the dragon belonged to Ares and was moreover in
Colchis, these Boiotians must have been the Laz peoples of
Colchis, which peoples nicely convert to "Ladon/Laton." That
would make the Boiotian dragon a Seir-Horite peoples, wherefore
the Boiotians were Horites. The Horites may thus have been Budii
Medes (if the Boiotians do derive from the Budii).
As "Sparti" came forth from the slain dragon, it's now
obvious that the Sepharvites were among the Cati-Boiotian
fighters, on side with the Boiotians, but afterward forming an
alliance with Cadmus, as goes the myth, in founding Thebes. As I
had previously translated "Thebes" as "Sheba," the Sepharvites are
now identified as the same; in fact, the Sepharvites are now
revealed as the very founders/namers of Thebes, explaining why
Thebes was the only continental den of the Kabeiri cult (all other
dens were on Aegean islands). Thus, Thebes was a Sepharvite-
Cati-Boiotia entity. I tell you that I had never attached the Cati to
Cadmus until three seconds prior to writing it in the above
paragraph! I know when something makes enough sense to be fact,
and this has got to be fact, historical fact.
I'm holding to my theory that the Cati were from Gaza and
Gath and that they were therefore the Avviy/Avvites of those
cities, explaining why the city of Abae is in Phocis smack beside
Boiotia. Apparently, then, the Horite Kabala came to Greece by
also by ship, from Mediterranean Israel, to Rhodes as the Curetes
and Danaans, to Crete as the same Curetes, to Lemnos as
Hephaistos, to Samo-Thrace as Dardanus, and to Troy as the
Corybantes branch of Curetes. Couldn't "Corybantes" also derive
from "Hor(ite)"? The Curetes were still on Philistine shores in
Ezekiel's day, apparently, for the prophet names them "Kerethites"
in 27:16. {Thanks Kathlene for that reminder}.
I always have it in the back of my mind that the Carite
pirates, first rulers of the Aegean sea, may have been Horites, and

426
so why not jot that down too? Carites were from Caria on
continental Rhodes, and in Greek myth are labeled, "Car" (might
they have been the Curetes?). As "gar" means "wheel" in Semitic,
might the Horites have been named after wheel/chariot (chariot is
"gargar."). Indeed, I am tracing Gorgons as the Europe-wide
dragon line, wherefore wouldn't the Horites have been Gorgons,
perhaps named after the chariot? Indeed, for the Laz peoples (a
Horite branch in this theory) are said to be of the historical
Kartvelians, where that term would seem to mean, "cartwheel."
I had written in this chapter something that I removed, but
will now re-admit. I had said that I traced the Curetes to the green
dragon of Britain, simply because I traced them to the Cruithin
peoples of Britain, from whom I suspect came the Crichton family
who use a green dragon to depict themselves (as do the Veres). I
just learned that our English term "malachite" refers to a green
copper carbonate; the term derives from the Greek "malache," said
by my dictionary to be "so called because of its color." I'm
suggesting that the Amalekites may have become depicted with the
green color by a play-on-words.
I know that "tiberi" meant copper, and Tiberians were a
Tubali-Iberi (i.e. Aryan-Hebrew) people mix of the Hurrian
empire. And behold what just occurred to me, that the island of
Cyprus, said to be named after the same term (something like
"cupros") that furnished our "copper," may have been a variation
of "Hebros/Hapiru." Hesiod and Homer wrote about copper
mining/smelting conducted in Cyprus by the Curetes/Daktyloi!
Just got an email from Kathleen "the Kat," which led me to
the following addendum (wikipedia quote below). Those of you
who have made it thus far in this chapter, and who have wanted to
know the original homeland of the Rosh, the following is
enlightening, and moreover reveals the homeland of the Horites, I
think:
The Kura-Araxes culture sometimes known also as
the Early Transcaucasian culture was an important
Chalcolithic (copper-stone age) and bronze age
culture... their name (given by modern archaeologists)
comes from the Kura and Araxes river valleys where they
developed. The territory they inhabited is located in
modern Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and
Iran."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kura-Araxes_culture
Because the Araxes is also the Aras river, and because it's the
chief river of Armenia, I would not hesitate to claim that this was
home to the Hros, and that (the war god) "Ares" is a mythical term
denoting this valley. The Kura valley may therefore have been the

427
nest of the Horites, for as Rosicrucians and other Kabala groups
consider Ros to be a part of their origins (though they don't say so
outright), and as I have now traced Kabalists to Horites, it doesn't
surprise me to find the two people as neighbors and therefore
likely as brother tribes.
Some say that the Cutha were on, or even originated from,
the Aras river. Some confuse the Cutha with Cush.
A few years ago I had shot out into the dark and translated
two of the three codes in the secret society called, "Phi Beta
Kappa," as Boiotia and Cappadocia. I removed that idea from my
"Rosicrucian Utopia" chapter because of my uncertainty. It now
looks as though I was correct. It is thought by some that Thomas
Jefferson started that group.
In Latin, "gignere" means to "beget." I learned this in my
dictionary; "gegnere" is the derivation of "progenitor," suggesting
also that our "gene" (and its Greek form, "genea") is, although
devoid of a second "g", likewise derived from "gegnere." Indeed,
my dictionary tells that the suffix, "-geny, is from the Greek gen-
, stem of gegnesthai to become."
This would now explain why terms such as
"cock/chick/cucu" and even "egg" itself appear rooted in "gog."
But as you can see that "Easter egg" is rooted in Ishtar, the Gogi
(and the worshipers of Rod) stem from Ishtar, the Great Mother of
the occult and the Bible's Babylon the Great.
Hecate was a symbol of the Taurus Gorgons, and she is said
at times to have given birth to Circe (eponym of
Circasia/Caucasia), she in turn being not only the mother of
Gorgons, but of the Romans who would rule the world under the
power of the Revelation-12 dragon ... who in turn is the "prince" of
Daniel 9:26-27. That Roman prince is associated with
"abominations," even as Babylon the Great is said to be the
"mother of abominations." Yet the occult depicts her as a virgin.
Take your pick as to who you're going to believe.

428
VERE'S THE HAM?

The Veres claim to stem from the Mittani, who were


Hurrians on the south side of the Black sea, and so my natural
reaction is to peg them as the Hermes line out of Armenia. I say
that to set up the next thought that the Mittani may have been the
peoples who founded Methone (Greece) and it's environs,
Messene, where formed Greek-Egyptian peoples (i.e. including
Gypsies from Hermes) who partook in the Gaul migration, namely
the Danaans.
The Veres, as with other Merovingians, were intimately
involved with the Templars. Some of the Templars worshiped
Baphomet, a goat deity, showing that at least some Templars
traced back to Pan (son of Hermes) and therefore the Getae-Pan
alliance that became the Gaul migration. Nicholas de Vere
confessed that his bloodline traces back to the Baphomet
worshipers, and those who so trace themselves took part, I think,
in the land route to Gaul, as opposed to those who sailed by sea. At
this time I don't have much of an historical clue as to which route
the Veres took, but one can, if the way is known, follow the path
taken by the mythical boar.
From the Mittani in Asia, the Vere family is said (by
Nicholas de Vere) to take a huge jump to the Danaan of Britain.
The particular Scythians that are part of that jump are left
unidentified. In other words, Nicholas skips over the Greek
theater, so my job here to fill in the gap the best I can. As the
Veres depicted themselves with a boar, I am tempted to view their
bloodline stemming from the peoples of Corinth.
Problem: I recently learned that the Pollock boar has an
arrow through the shoulder so that the family might depict those
who killed the Calydonian Boar, the royal Calydonians. As the
Pollock boar is yet alive with the arrow through it, perhaps the
family is from Atalanta, who was made to shoot the boar first, but
to leave it alive for Meleager to kill. To tie the Pollock clan to
Stewarts (the fitz-Alans), one Pollock website writes:
"The earliest known Pollocks ... came to Scotland
with Walter FitzAlan, about the year 1147; which Walter
was a son of Alan Fitz Flaald, and a brother of William
FitzAlan, sheriff of Shropshire.
"There can be no doubt but that the Pollock Crest -
a wild Boar, passant, struck through with a dart

429
[common arrow] - began as a badge, before the
introduction of Crests, for there is a cast of a seal in the
British Museum, which was used by Robert de Polloc,
grandson of Fulbert, showing this boar with dart which
they date about 1200. "
http://www.railwayancestors.fsnet.co.uk/prices.html
Let's entertain the idea that the Pollok clan of about 1200 AD
knew their roots in the Caledonians of Scotland, and that these
peoples had been regarded as a settlement of Greek Calydonians.
As the Veres were from the Picts, while the Caledonians are
considered a Pict tribe, a Pollok-Vere equation/marriage seems
likely at some point in time.
[Update June 2006 -- When we compare the Bert family Coat
of Arms to that of the Pollock Coat, we see that both use the three
cornucopia (there you can see the boar shot through, in the Crest
on the helmet. The boar appears brown). The Berts are said (by the
website) to be named after "Bartholomew," and that the names
derive from Anglo-Saxons of Britain long before the Conqueror.
The Bert name derives first of all in Devonshire, Cornwall, which
was in red-dragon Cimmerian country.
Devonshire was named after the "Dewnann," which must
have been the Danann. Why would the Berts settle there in what
might have been the original Danaan settlement? I'm suggesting
that the Berts knew their relationship to the old Danann of
Devonshire, and that the Veres were from those same Danann,
perhaps even the Bert family itself since "Vere" and "Bert" are
very similar. The Danaan, as rulers of western Atlantis, settled
Ireland, then returned to northern Scotland (inter-married with
others) as the Picts, but then settled Norway in forming the Dane
side of the Saxons and Angles, from whom came the Veres and the
Berts, and also the Stewarts. End Update]
I've traced the Danann in part to the Aryan Egyptians at the
French coast of Massalia/Marseilles (see Via Della Rose chapter),
who were in turn from the mythical brothers Danaus and Aigyptus.
Aigyptus went first to live at Messene, according to the Greek
writings, and, according to Pausanias, Messene was made the
daughter of Triopas, he being the son of Helios and Rhoda! If that
weren't enough, it turns out that Danaus was a peoples living on
Rhodes. In short, the Danaan-Rhodians became the Redones at
Massalia.
You can bet your prize boar that the Messenes were
somehow connected to the Rose-Line island of Rhodes. In fact,
while the daughter of Triopas was the founding peoples . of
Messene, Triopas' son was a founding ruler at Rhodes. But dust
wait till you find out where Triopas' son was from. I would suggest

430
that Triopas depicted the three grandchildren of Helios and Rhoda:
Kamiros, Lindos and Ialysos.
What does the rose line have to do with the boar line? The
boar line came from Artemis on the north shore of the Black sea.
The boars were therefore Hyperboreans and the Boreans/Thracians
of Ares. In Atlantis (the Aegean sea), it gave birth to the rose line
(a Cimmerian bloodline). I had suspected a Danaan-Rhodes
connection, but never in my greatest expectations did I think the
Danaans would be from Rhodes.
The Roman emperor Diocletian had executed Arrius Aper
and then boasted that he had killed a boar, for "Aper" meant
"boar." Others think that the boar symbol originated in "Eboricum"
(Roman version of "York") because "Ebor" looks like "boar." I
wonder, then, if "Boreus" (and therefore "Hyperborean") was
rooted in "boar." What about "Hyperion, father of Helios? Should
that term be read as Boar-Ionions? The goddess of Argos, Io, did
come to Argos (Greece) from the Hyperboreans, for myth records
that the founders of Argos were Opis and Arge from the
Hyperboreans. Boars, the animals, are prolific in Russia to this
day. Warriors of northern Europe crested their helmets and their
swords with the boar's image, and "war/var" (Vere?) may have
been a term derived from "boar" (Old English "bar").
Danaus had fled Aigyptus and stopped at Rhodes prior to
moving on to rule Argos. That's myth, so it wasn't a stop-over for a
drink at the local marina, but rather it was a mixing of peoples
over a drawn-out period. In fact, myth had Danaus building the
city of Lindos (inhabited to this day) on Rhodes. As Lindos was
one of three sons of Kerkaphos (or "Cercaphus"), the Greek
Danaans were from Kerkaphos' father, Helios, and therefore from
Hyperion, which fits in that myth reveals the Danaans rooted in Io.
The Egyptians that wrought the Danaans were thereby Aryan-
Egyptian rulers. Kerkaphos no doubt depicted Gorgons (proto-
Parthians). Therein is how the British Danann should be counted
as part of the Rose Line, and why that line ought to be viewed as a
Gorgon-Egyptian one.
Thus Rhodians can be viewed as the Danaans themselves,
explaining also why the offspring of Hercules came to rule the
island. With that in mind, recall that Hercules invaded Britain in
the golden grail-ship of Helios, suggesting that it was the Danaans
from Mycenae (a city twinned with Argos) that invaded Britain
(successfully). These were the land-route Danaan; there were yet
the sea-route Rhodians/Danaan that joined the invasion... depicted
by the ship of Helios in alliance with Hercules. Holy-Grail lore
therefore goes as far back as the writing of that particular myth.
Note also that the mother of Danaus was Anchinoe, yet another
term evoking Enki (and the Yngvi/Ingaevones?) of Eridu.

431
Pausanius had Triopas Ving birth to an "Agenor," and
because Triopas was son of lio and s Rhoda, Agenor's son,
Phoenix, became a Rose-Line codeword. As Pausanius was
focusing on the founders of Argos and their descendants, the Rose
Line is thereby identified as the first rulers of Argos ... from which
the Danaans of Egypt stemmed. The Veres are thus a Rose Line
family.
Perhaps the Merovingians were misled by the erroneous
claims that Danaus was the tribe of Dan itself, explaining why
Merovingians themselves claimed to be connected to Israel. This
to me is more the trick of the devil (i.e. of the dragon-line
Illuminatists) to make us believe that that their sacred pagan
bloodlines are based in God's plan to establish the Biblical
Millennium. You will find that it's the cults (e.g. Armstrongism,
Irvingism) of Illuminati stripes that propagate the idea that
Denmark and Britain were founded by Dan and other Jews; other
globalist Illuminatists are trying, as we speak, to connect the
Merovingians to Jesus blood itself.
The bottom line seems to be that the Greek Danaans were a
major root of the Redone Gauls, the "Aereda" (that term sure does
look like "Eridu"). This is further evidence that the British Danann
stemmed from the Redones, and the latter are to be lumped into the
Rose-Line cult. Moreover, it suggests a Vere connection to the
Gauls of northern Italy ... who became the French Gauls. In the
following quote I see a mixing of the sea-faring Danaans and the
land-trekking Danaan of northern Italy: "The initial [Phocaean]
leader [of Massalia] married a Ligurian princess"
http://www.portergaud.edu/cmcarver/gcol.html
After connecting the Veres to both Boulogne (France) and
Bologne (Italy) based in a Vere-Bolg connection that I deduced, I
n
came across this quote from an article on Vere histo : "Many
Flemish families were settled [at Ver in the Cotenti , and the
early adoption of their quartered coat, gules and or, hints at a
de Vere connection with Boulogne."
http://www.baronage.co.uk/bphtm-02/moa-11.html
[Update July 2006 -- It's perhaps Cutha-pertinent that the
Cuthbert Coat uses the same Vere colors, gules and or (red and
gold), with nothing but a blue serpent in the Coat's Chief (top third
of the Coat). End Update ]
Pollux depicted not the Calydonian Boar, but one of the crew
aboard the Argo ship that was involved in hunting and "killing"
that boar. This agrees with the Pollok family likewise not being the
Calydonian Boar because the family depicted itself (as early as
1200) with a boar shot through with an arrow. As Ligurians
depicted the wolf line, ditto for Pollux who depicted Ligurians; I
am tempted to view "Pollux" (a Roman term, not Greek) as Po-

432
Loki/Po-Lugi (Ligurians were on the Po river). "Bologne" might
likewise be read as "Po-Lugi" (though I have another theory).
The Lugii are thought to have been the Lingones previously
(see map of Gaul, click map to enlarge), at the tip of the Sienne
river. An article on the Lugii says (italics mine), "The Buri , who
according to Ptolemy were part of the Lugians...
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Lugii
The same article says that (italics mine) "Klaudius
Ptolemeus [Ptolemy] mentions the Lugi Omani, the Lugi
Diduni and the Lugi Buri located on or near the upper
Vistula." The Vistula was in Poland, which I read as PoLand
rather than PolLand.
[Update July 2006 -- Could the Lugi Diduni have been from
Dedan and/or from the Taddei surname that I am tracing to
Wales/Cornwall? End Update]
The Lugi Buri lived in Silesia, Poland, near/at the location
where Merovingians would originate. They were of a Marcomanni
federation, which in turn was a Suebi peoples (from Sweden). It is
the opinion of others that the Buri were not the Lugii, but rather
from Sweden (connection with Frey therefore possible),
whereupon coming down to Poland they mixed with the Lugii. The
question is, did they mix with the Lugii because they had
previously stemmed from the Lugii? That the boar was sacred to
the Gauls is known from Arduinna, the "Gaulish (Celtic) goddess
of the moon, hunting, and forests. She was very popular in the
Ardennes, to which she gave her name. She is accompanied by
a boar, her sacred animal. The Romans equated her with their
Diana"
http://www.pantheon.org/articles/a/arduinna.html
Diana was Artemis (the boar originated in Artemis,
remember). It would appear that Ardenne should be read as Ar-
Diana where Diana may be an allusion to the Danaan? Ardenne
was where the word "Belgica" appears on this map of Gaul, on the
border of Belgica and Lugdunensis (later Luxembourg), in the
thick of Merovingian territory. It's a little interesting that a hog
sacrificed to Arduinna had a symbolic apple stuck into its mouth,
the apple perhaps being a symbol of the Apple Line and/or
Avalon. We find that in Arthurian legend the name of England is
"Logres," evoking the Ligurians and the god, Lug, who likely
depicted the Lugii peoples that named Lugdunensis.
The Veres came to live where the "Venellii" appear (in
Armorica) on the Gaul map. A peoples of Scandinavian myth
called "Vinili" have been identified as Lom bards/Longobards, and
I do have reasons to think that these Bards, who were definitely a
part of Merovingian make-up, were the Pollok Berts.

433
Now behold (I always use that old-theatrical word to make
sure you're listening): Perseus and Andromeda gave birth to
Gorgophone and Sthenelus. Gorgophone then gave birth to
Tyndareus who gave birth to Pollux. Because Pollux' mother was
Leda the Swan, while king Cycnus of Liguria was depicted as a
swan, we can identify Cycnus-Ligurians as Leda/Pollux peoples,
which is then verified in that the father of Cycnus was given the
name "Sthenelus"...meaning that Ligurians also stemmed from
Sthenelus, brother of Gorgophone.
Moreover, the Merovingians themselves claimed to descend
from both Antenor-Trojans and Spartans. The easy way for them
to have known that is by knowing their connection to both the
Veneti and the Pollux peoples, for the Veneti are known to stem
from Antenor, and Pollux from Sparta. Convinced by these details
that the Pollok clan fits well into the history of the proto-
Merovingians as it pertains to Lombards, Vandals and Poland, I
don't tend to agree with the first-given meaning of "Pollok" in the
sentence below, but thoroughly agree with the rest of the sentence:
"The name Pollok is a place-name; it has been
attributed to a Celtic origin, for its syllables translated
may mean "little hill" or "little pool", but it might be
Scandinavian and mean "head of Lok", or it might even
go back to Roman times, when there were many Temples
to Pollux..."
http://www.railwayancestors.fsnet.co.uk/prices.html
If it's possible for "Pollok" to mean "Head of Lok," why not
"Head of Lug" since Pollux depicted Ligurians? I do believe,
however, that Ligurians were the root of the Scandinavian Loki.
The online comment that Fulbert (earliest-known Pollok)
"claimed descent from Clovis" could make the Polloks more
Merovingian that the Veres since the Veres appear to have married
into the Merovingians (rather than stemmed from them). The
following statement (by Alex Pollock) connects the boar to Clovis:
“Fulbert came to England with Empress Maud
about 1138. He was rich, for his sons built three castles,
which could hardly have been done immediately out of
the estates granted to them by Walter Fitz Alan. He
brought the boar badge with him, which was a French
royal badge going back to Clovis.”
http://www.clanpollock.com/History/beginning.html
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. The boar goes back to
the Franks. The problem is, I don't yet know what sort of boar the
Merovingians used...to see if it matched the Pollok boar shot

434
through with an arrow. But the Merovingian ruler, Dago bert,
comes forcefully to mind. Dog-Bert? The Vere boar was blue, as
was the boar of Edward III:
“Richard's famous heraldic badge or device of a
white boar with gold tusks and bristles has been the
subject of much speculation as to its origin.
"...the lordships and badges pertaining to the Duke
of York and includes a blue boar for Edward III. Possibly
as a descendant, Richard inherited this, but as a younger
son had to difference it in some way and so in the
symbolism so dear to the fifteenth century, changed the
color to white to represent purity of heart and loyalty.”
http://www.r3.org/rnt1991/deadlyboar.html
Purity of heart my stinking foot! Take a look at the boar of
Richard III and see how it evokes the Ouroboros (round snake with
tail in mouth), as well as incorporating the twining-serpent symbol
that was a Hermes symbol as well as that of the Mushussu dragon
(sun god of Babylon). As this symbol devised for/by Richard III
had a rose (five petals) acting as the sun --in fact it is called "Boar
and Rose-en-Soleil" -- the Rosicrucian rose is thereby revealed as
the sun god, and this then reveals what the all-seeing eye is, the
Rose Line: Helios and Rhoda.
Could "Edward" the boar king modify to "EdBard/EdBert"?
A quick perusal of the website above reveals that the boar
was a symbol of honor to the House of York ("Pork"?). Perhaps
the boar was blue to denote blue (royal) blood, but the change to
white was clearly to reflect the White Rose of York, for the War of
Roses took place under the reigns of Edward IV, Richard III (both
Plantagenets), and Edward V. The Veres were in support of the
Red Rose Lancastrians, and it may be that Veres used a blue boar
even then, which, if so, connects them to Edward III. Behold, the
Rose-clan Coat of Scotland uses a red boar! And the French Rose
Coat uses three gold roses on red background, and two gold stars,
the same as the Vere star (also gold). It's the German Rose clan
that uses three red roses, very interesting indeed.
See the rose symbols of both York and Lancaster. Then see
that on the day that Henry VII (Tudor) was made king, he adopted
a red-dragon symbol, keeping in mind that Owen Tudor was from
Wales (i.e. the Welsh dragon is also red). Henry Tudor had killed
Richard III and while this led to the end of the War of Roses,
Henry took on a red rose as his symbol. Both Houses used a Fleur
de Lis as symbols; was this indicating a tie to the Merovingians
specifically? Henry V of Lancaster used a swan as well as the
Fleur de Lis.

435
One may see the Rose Line more vividly as part of the Gaul
migration into Liguria where Rhoda can be connected to Cadmus
and Harmonia, these two being the symbol of that migration. The
daughter of Cadmus and Harmonia, Ino, is inconspicuously
revealed as a peoples from Rhodes, for just as Ino was said to
jump into the sea to become the goddess, Leucothea, so, earlier,
Halia, the mother of Rhoda, was said to jump into the sea to
become Leucothea. The myth writer(s) had therefore painted Ino
in such a way as to identify her unmistakably (for those who had
possession of the myths) as the Halia Telchines of Rhodes. So you
can take this to the bank, that Cadmus and/or Harmonia depicted
Telchines, but especially Ino. Therefore the Gaul migration (or at
least the part important to Rosicrucians/Illuminatists) was of
Telchine-Rhodes blood.
[Update July 2006 -- During the writing of a coming chapter,
the Telchines turned out to be the Danaans themselves, connected
closely to Cadmus, where the latter turned out to be a depiction of
Cutha/Cati peoples on the Israeli ocean shore. End Update]
The Telchines themselves were a branch of Argives/Aryans,
but are also viewed as Curetes from Crete, who raised Poseidon as
a boy on Rhodes (just as the Curetes raised Zeus on Crete). Thus
Rhodes, being a symbol of Poseidon, was as much a symbol of
Atlantis as Crete became it's capital. The Greek-to-Egypt
connection of Poseidon is via the Telchines and Io, their mythical
"wife."
The Sthenelus that was Gorgophone's brother had king
Eurystheus (a Danaan) for a son, this being the Mycenaean king
who sent Hercules on his Twelve Labors, one of which was to
fetch Geryon's cattle. Because this tells that Geryon depicted the
bloodline of Eurystheus, it means to me that the Geryon bloodline
was put forth by the other Sthenelus (i.e. whom I see as an
extension of the first), the king of Liguria... which is just what I
have been saying all along, that Ligurians put forth the early
British tribes, Parthalons, the Danann, Fir-Bolgs, etc.
Put it this way, that the myth writers, knowing that Geryon
was of the same bloodline as Eurystheus, and knowing also that
Geryon stemmed from Ligurians, gave the Ligurians the codeword
"Sthenelus" precisely because Eurystheus was son of Sthenelus.
To trace Ligurians further to Aryan-Gogi blood, we find that
Eurystheus was half the descendant of Pelops, he being the Golden
Fleece line ... the white-dragon Ares-Hermes-Aeetes bloodline that
would immediately ascend Eurystheus' throne after him (through
Atreus, son of Pelops).
Pollok connection to the Greek Danaans could be in this
statement concerning Pollok roots: "...E. A. Langslow Cock

436
wrote 'there are quite good reasons for the Clovis descent but
also for descent from the Pharaoh’s of Egypt'"
http://www.railwayancestors.fsnet.co.uk/prices.html
As the Greek-to-Egypt connection is via Rhodes, a look at
Triopas (son of Helios and Rhoda) is in order. :
"Triopas (three holes) the god is represented with a
wooden statue which has three holes, two for the eyes and
a third hole in the middle of the forehead."
http://www.druansha.com/owl/issue3/3Owl5.htm
This is how Zeus was depicted, in his earliest times, with
three eyes. Therefore, Illuminati circles which to this day depict
themselves with the all-seeing eye, are likely from Triopas i.e. the
Argives. Just as I began to suspect that Triopas was of the Cecrops
line, I found that his son was named "Erysichthon," which looks
like a variation of Erechtheus/Erichthonius (of the Cecrops line).
In fact, "There was another Erysichthon, the son of King
Cecrops I of Athens"!
http://www.mlahanas.de/Greeks/Mythology/Erysichthon.html
[Update July 2006 -- I have recently found that Ares and the
Cutha were an alliance tracing back to the Aras river in
Armenia/Caucasia, after which I suspect "Hros/Rosh" derives. I
had also unmasked "Chthon" as codeword referring to the Cutha.
But now, in re-reading this chapter, I suddenly see that
"Erichthonius" and "Erysichthon" could be understood as Hrox-
Cutha and Hrosi-Cutha respectively. The "Rox" version is
warranted because the Aras river was also called the "Araxes."
Clearly, Cecrops refers to these Caucasian peoples, especially as
Gogar/Gogarene was a province right there on the Armenian/Tubal
border. As I have recently found that "opis" means "bee," Cecrops
and Triopas would both utilize that code, so that we may
understand them to mean Cecro-Opis and Tri-Opis -- i.e. Gogar-
Bee and Three-Bees respectively. End Update]
It's hard to believe that two different myth writers created
that same name independently. It's clear to me that the two
(Erichthonius and Erysichthon) were one and the same, wherefore
Triopas can be viewed as the Cecrops people, even Cecrops
himself. Just as Triopas was assigned the father, Phoroneus, who
was also viewed as Kronos, so Cecrops was followed on the throne
(because Erysichthon was already dead i.e. defeated in war) by a
"Cranaus." This seems important because I have traced the
Stewarts and the Crichtons tentatively to Erechtheus/Butes and
Erichthonius respectively, though some think the two kings were
one and the same. Erechtheus was the same as Butes, and with that
in mind note that the Lugii were (according to Strabo) related
and/or allied to the Butones.

437
As Phoroneus was the progenitor of the Argives, the popular
Kronos who was the father of both Zeus and Poseidon was thereby
the progenitor of the Argives. And Hesiod wrote that Phoroneus,
with Hekateros (no doubt an allusion to the frog goddess, Hecate),
gave birth to the Curetes -- they being both the ones who brought
Zeus up as an infant and the proto-Trojans -- wherefore Zeus-
proper peoples and Trojans stem from Argives. Therefore, we
expect the Cecrops line to stem from Argives as well. In that case,
it is expected that the Stewarts and Crichtons ought to be in Britain
where Argives settled, and we do see that the Isle of Bute is in
Argyll, that being the location roughly where the Cruithne crossed
over to Scotland.
The boar line seems to be associated with the far north, and
not with Rhodes and the related red lines of Aryan-Phoenicia and
Aryan-Egypt. If the Goths were boars, then also the Jutes, and
therefore Kent, and therefore Godfrey de Bouillon, for Godfrey
descended from the kings of Kent. If it's true that Godfrey was of
the Merovingian bloodline, and that the Vere line put forth
Godfrey, then that could explain how the Merovingians and Veres
both came to use the boar as their symbol.
To verify that the British Danann were a Calydonian-Boar
line, the myth writer(s) painted this picture: "[Manannan] gave
immortality to the gods through his swine, which returned to
life when killed; those who ate of the swine never died."
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9050438
To connect the early British red tribes (i.e. Geryon) to Gaul,
we have this: "Figures of boars appeared on British and
Gaulish altars. In Irish myth there are divine, magical and
prophetic boars..."
And, "Twrch Trywth was a king turned into a boar who
was chased by Arthur and his warriors across Ireland, Wales
and Cornwall, where it disappeared into the sea ... Druids called
themselves boars."
http://www.isle-of-skye.org.uk/celtic-encyclopaedia/celt b2b.htm

438
VERE-Y INTERESTINK

The Veres were dukes of Anjou and counts of Angiers (not


to mention earls of Oxford for centuries). According to the website
below, the Veres were related to the Plantagenets of Anjou:
"The Plantagenets were themselves a junior branch
of the House of Anjou, whose senior branch was the
House of Vere [whose] ancestry was jointly Pictish and
Merovingian descending from the ancient Grail House of
Scythia"
http://watch.pair.com/false-christ.html
This information, I think, derives more from the claims made
by some Veres than from historical records, and when in my right
mind do I believe what a dragon says? Yet in this case, I'll give the
claims the benefit of the doubt and see where they lead.
Now a citizen of Anjou is an "Angevin," a term very near to
"Yngvi/Ingaevone," and this alongside associations with Angiers
(modern Angers, just north of Anjou) coincides with the so-called
Anglo -Norman roots of the Veres. However, it's possible that
Anjou was not founded by Veres, and moreover I've yet to learn
where the clan entered the Anglo bloodline. My suspicions are at
Roslin, Scotland, where the Angles controlled territory about the
time that some Pictish Veres jumped the sea to Anjou.
Prior to knowing noth ing of the Veres, my feelers had
indicated that the modern Crichton family, for a few reasons
including that their ancient name was "Kreitton," were either the
founders of the historic Cruithne (or "Cruithin"), or a major
Cruithne tribe devoted to Cruithne heritage. I found that both the
Crichtons and the Veres depict themselves with green dragons,
perhaps due to the Vere root being in royal Picts who were
themselves rooted in the Cruithne. And so it is that I connect the
two families very closely, each being a candidate for putting forth
the False Prophet (this doesn't make everyone in those families
evil or of the devil, of course).
See below what Nicholas de Vere has made public, he being
the Sovereign Grand Master of the "Imperial and Royal Dragon
Court and Order," and author of "The Dragon Legacy." Note that
his "gods" were merely into witchcraft as their most-cherished
occupation, and for that reason his ilk are to be viewed as children
who have yet to grow up and make the right choices in life:

439
"From the age of seven onwards my father told me
about our ancestry, an ancestry steeped in royal blood
and most significantly of all, in what is termed Royal
Witchcraft... [oh what a nice daddy to start teaching his
son all the low-down at such a tender age]
"I trace my [Vere] lineage back in an unbroken
bloodline to the imperial prince Milo de Vere, Count of
Anjou in 740 A.D., son of Princess Milouziana of the
Scythians. She was recorded throughout France as being
the Elven, Dragon Princess of the Scottish Picts, and her
Grandson, Milo II [son of Milo de Vere], derived his
Merovingian descent through his father's marital alliance
with the imperial house of Charlene...
"In brief, the recorded Dragon lineage starts with
the Annunaki [children of Anu, supreme god of Sumeria]
and descends through the proto-Scythians, the Sumerians
in one branch and the early Egyptians in another; the
Phoenicians, the Mittani, back to the Scythians again
through marital alliance, along to the "Tuatha de
Danann" and the Fir Bolg; down through their Arch-
Druidic, Priest-Princely families, to the Royal Picts of
Scotland and the high kings of the Horse Lords of Dal
Riada; through to the Elven dynasty of Pendragon and
Avallon del Acqs, and down to a few pure bred families
today."
http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/mykingdom.html
Nicholas de Vere places "Tuatha de Danaan" in quotation
marks when telling that his bloodline went though those peoples,
as though he knows they were not historical, suggesting what I
believe, that the Fir-Bolg, mentioned immediately afterward in his
same breath, were the real/historical version of the Danann. In
short, the Veres and the Bolgs were one. Fir-Bolgs were no doubt
the historical "Builgs/Belgae" of Ireland and Wales, though I think
also the Belgae founders of Bologne/Boulogne on/near the Belgica
coast, not far from where the Veres settled (in Manch, Normandy).
In myth, Manannan (king/symbol of the Danann) was the son
of king Llyr, who was himself the son of the Danann goddess,
Dana/Danu, and her mate, Beli. While "Beli" seems an allusion to
Baal by the Druid version, "Bel," it may also refer to Belos/Belus,
the father of Danaus (progenitor of the Danaans). I also learned
that "...the name Beli may be derived from Bolgios..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beli

440
Consider the pagan festival of Imbolc, celebrated unto the
Danann goddess Brigit. The term is to be read, and is often spelled,
"Im-Bolc," thus evoking "Bolg." Again, the mythical Danann turn
out to be Bolgs. And yet there were historical terms evoking
"Danann." I would suggest that the Greek Danaans founded
Bologne/Bolg-like localities that became major Danaan entities.
The "Dal Riada" that Nicholas mentions as part of his royal
bloodline became the first Scots proper, but that doesn't mean that
"Riada," as a term, originated with the Scots proper. Danann myth
tells that, toward the end of Danann history in Ireland, some of
their numbers merged with the Irish proper in north-east Ireland,
wherefore the Scots who came forth from the Irish High Kings
would have been in part Danaan; that is, in part Fir Bolg.
As I said, the Danann were given (by myth writers) a leader
called "Creidne the artificer," which to me reveals that the
Cruithne were an integral part of the Fir-Bolg. The Cruithne were
in fact in north-east Ireland, and were therefore/probably the Fir-
Bolg remnants who merged with the Irish ... that together become
the Scots (the Builgs, in south-east Ireland, may have remained
pure from Irish blood). This mixing of Cruithne with Irish blood
explains why the Cruithne, a non-Gaelic peoples, were yet also
called "Dál nAraide" (a Gaelic title). So, the royal Veres that
Nicholas places in the Danaan/Bolg fold should have worked
themselves to north-east Ireland, and intermarried there with the
Irish.
I feel that "Riada," especially the "Araide" version above, is
rooted in "Redone/Aereda," whereas the Irish were from Miletus.
It leads me to believe that the Dal Riada Gaels were more Redone
Gauls than Milesian Greeks. After all, Gaels did speak a Celt
language (spoken by the Gauls).
I do not know to what extent, if at all, the Cruithne-come-
Picts had been from the Cruithne-Irish mix. But I do know that the
Cruithne were the mythical Parthalons (Pretani) who moved from
Ireland to Scotland to name the Bretons. Therefore, as the Cruithne
moved to Scotland to become the Picts, the Picts and Bretons were
two branches from the same stock, and they in turn were related to
some degree to the Scots. No surprise. The Welsh, though related
to the Bretons, may have been the Danaanolgs /B that did not enter
Ireland at all, but remained in place where they are to this day.
Once in Scotland, the Vere bloodline came into contact with
king-Arthur rulers in Welsh/Cornish regions. Arthur was allied
with peoples partially from Gwenea, Brittany, as the name of
Arthur's wife would suggest. In fact, that wife was Guinevere, a
mythical codeword that looks like Gwenea-Vere. I don't think this
is a coincidence. In Welsh, the "vere" ending is "far ," and as the
"Fir" in "Fir Bolg" was a mythical addition to the historical Bolg

441
peoples, I adventure to say that the myth writer(s) used "Fir" for
secretly attaching the royal Veres to the Bolg i.e. the Veres were
Bolgs. Then, when another myth writer(s) conjured up "Guine-
Vere/Far," the ending was likewise a depiction of the Vere Bolgs,
which is why I'll view the Picts as a Bolg product.
Arthur was not necessarily an historical king but, like
Guinevere, the representation of a bloodline. As Arthur's "wife"
was partially from the Gwenea Veneti (Brittany), it's not surprising
that the Veres lived in the Manche region of Normandy, very close
to Brittany. I would suggest that "Manche" could be a variation of
"Manx," the latter being a variation of the "Isle of Man," founded
by Manannan.
As it's known that the founders of Gwenea/Vannes were the
Morbihan branch of Veneti, I'm assuming that proto-Merovingians
were these Veneti, and if so, the Gwynedd kingdom was indeed
founded by proto-Merovingians. As the Arthur myth is dated when
France was ruled by Merovingians, I'll view Guinevere as a
Merovingian alliance with the Veres. If I'm wrong, the world will
yet turn, but whose fault would it be, anyway, since dragon-line
myth writers have not only confused the facts, but robbed the
historical realities from us. Says one article on the Merovingians:
"The period of [Merovingian] ascendancy coincides
with the period of King Arthur...It is probably the most
impenetrable period of what are now called the Dark
Ages. Interestingly, most scholars agree that it is readily
apparent that someone deliberately obscured this age.
Almost everything has been lost, or censored..."
http://www.halexandria.org/dward216.htm
As the Gwenea peoples founded Gwynedd (the north-Wales
peoples to which Merlin was related/allied), Merlin begins to look,
at the least, a Merovingian-supporting peoples (the Merovingians
were in fact in Britain). Surely Guinevere did depict the Veneti of
Gwenea, for the latter surely were the "Venedotia" of Wales who
are known to have founded the Gwynedd nation. Therefore Arthur
was indeed married to the Morbihan Veneti, not at all meaning that
Arthur himself depicted them.
Arthur depicted the Trojan-Roman bloodline of Constantine
I, who was from the mythical Aeneas/Romulus bloodline i.e.
Trojan founders of the Romans. Thus when Arthur's father was
said (by Geoffrey of Monmouth) to be "Pendragon," the dragon
was referring to the Roman dragon line, and since "Pen" means
"chief," Geoffrey viewed the Roman dragon line as supreme. As
Geoffrey went on to say that Britain was founded by the Trojan-
Roman figure, "Brutus," he being from Aeneas, it would seem to
reveal that Geoffrey's Arthur was, in the stricter sense, a Breton.

442
This in turn meant that the Bretons were connected to the
Trojan Romans, and since the Bretons are known otherwise to
have been Cruithne, and prior to that the Fir-Bolgs, one needs to
connect the Fir-Bolg to Romans. A viable link is in Ligurian
Bologne (north Italy), possibly explaining why Geoffrey called
England "Logres." The Liguria-Roman link is also implied by
Romulus (mythical symbol of the Romans), who was depicted
suckling a wolf; Ligurians are easily identified as a "loki" = wolf
peoples.
The Vere-Arthur alliance would translate to a Pict-Breton
one. All together, the Arthur-Guinevere alliance was a Pict-
Breton-Merovingian alliance, all allied against the Anglo-Saxon
white dragon.
It's no secret that when the Rosicrucians under John Dee
infiltrated the English royal courts, the Venetians were among
them. At one web site I found someone sharing why he thought
that the poet, Edward de Vere, 17th earl of Oxford, was acting
under the pseudonym of "William Shakespeare," since politicians
were not respected if they were poets of the theater. The author
shared that the Oxford badge/crest used a shaking spear. Nicholas
de Vere said that this Edward de Vere was close to John Dee, a
"prominent member" of Dee's "School of Night," so that indeed
the Rosicrucian rose-line cult included the Veres.
Nicholas went on to boast that the Veres never once, though
they were continually stewards of the English kings, attempted to
seize the throne. This is unbelievable, of course, unless the Veres
insisted on never seizing the throne as a means to rule invisibly,
moving the kings and other rulers as they saw fit, which is exactly
what the Illuminati tends to do. Nicholas admitted as much when
he said: "In any event the monarchical system in Britain is, to
the greatest extent, impotent, and so if one wanted real
political power, the last place one would find it would be on the
throne of England. We have no need for thrones or crowns to
remind us of who we are."
http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/mykingdom.html
Nicholas uses the term "Elvin" to describe both the Picts and
the Pendragon family of Arthur, which I think is a term referring to
"Alba," the previous name of Scotland. It's also interesting that
"Elvin" looks like "elf" while the Danaan were depicted as fairies
(Nicholas tries to convince us that elves, fairies and dragons were
a unique and special genetic branch of the evolved human race).
Note further that "fairy" may be codeword for " Fir Bolg," or vice
versa. At a Weir (variation of "Vere") website, when discussing
the Aubrey de Vere rulers of Anjou, we read: "Aubrey comes
from the Teutonic name Alberic, or 'elf-ruler.'"
http://www.bannistersandkin.ca/Weir/pafn01.htm

443
I deduce these things to mean that the Veres were kings in
Alba. The clan (which may have gone by "Vere" while yet in
Britain) was no doubt involved in the wars of king Arthur. Indeed,
according to the priest and author, Sabine Baring-Gould (1834-
1924), Milo's mother, Milouziana (or "Melusine"), had been in
Avalon and had then fled from it to settle in Angiers. The question
is, did she flee to Avalon along with the wounded-in-battle king
Arthur (for he had then fled to Avalon), or did she pursue him to
Avalon as his enemy, only to be chased out to Angiers as a result?
[Update August 2006 -- An email correspondant, Lorri,
alerted me to a mythical Melusine, a mermaid in some cases, but
in at least one version being a dragon's tail below the waist. She
was raised in Avalon or other island off of Scotland, but then
removed to Lusignan, west-central France. It may be that this
Melusine was a depiction of the Vere Milouziana, or that
Milouziana was a non-real person depicting the Scottish peoples
depicted by Melusine. As Lusignan is near Poitiers, and as the
latter was founded by the Pictone Gauls (according to a Wikipedia
article on Poitiers), it would seem that Milouziana indeed depicted
a Pict-Scot people. It's not a coincidence that the color of
Melusine's snakey tail was made blue and white (website below),
as these are the colors of the Lusignan Arms.
http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/celt/tfm/tfm178.htm
A critical theme in the myth -- in agreement with my
findings that the serpent/dragon symbol refers to the Hebrews
among Aryans -- is that Melusine's husband promised never to see
her on Saturday, for on that day she turned into a dragon ... i.e. we
can expect that Satanic spirits caused the dragon line to be most
profane (ceremonial or otherwise) on the Sabbath. After her
husband took a peek one Saturday to discover her secret, he
rebuked her before an audience, saying: "Out of my sight, thou
pernicious snake and odious serpent! thou contaminator of my
race." This is of course the same sort of thing spoken against the
"Jews" of Europe all the more into the modern era.
After being ousted from Lusignan, Melusine retreated, it was
said, to Sassenage in the French region of Rodano-Alps, which we
can presume was the place where her distant kin were then living.
Behold that the Arms of Rodano-Alps uses a dolphin. It was this
same Lorri who had reminded me, days earlier, that the dolphin
symbol depicted the city of Delphi, Greece, for which reason I
added a section on that topic in a chapter that I was then writing
(published on the same day (today) that I opened her email
introducing fish-tail Melusine to me). In that chapter, I had written
that Delphi was previously "Pythos," and that the city was depicted
by the mythical Python, who was also called "Echidna," the snake

444
woman! Plus, I also wrote in that chapter that Python was the same
as Phaethon who crashed into the Redone valley!!
Thanks to Lorri, therefore, I now see that the Redones do
connect to the Picts and the Veres. In the two chapters that I was
writing when she emailed me (published on the same day, today,
August 28), I had traced the dragon line to king Somerled (thanks
to a tip in an email from another email correspondent, Robin),
patriarch of the MacDonalds, anciently "MacDonnell," and so see
that the Irish-branch MacDonnells use a green dolphin with red
fins, even as the Rodano-Alps dolphin is blue with red fins.
Moreover, note that the English-branch MacDonnells use a white
lion with red claws, while there is a white lion on red background
on the arms of the Rodano-Alps (red is the color of the Irish-Scots,
called "Dalriada" (= DalRedone?).
It's not surprising that the Somerled bloodline traces back to
Ireland through the Picts. A main topic of those chapters is to trace
to the Irish Cohens (they're entitled, "From Molech to the Bruce-
Stewarts," and "The Cohens of Ireland"). It has been my claim that
the Cohens were behind the Templars, and so note here that Guy
de Lusignan became king of Templar Jerusalem, but lost the city
to the Muslims in 1187.
Update October 2006 -- Lorri did it again. On the topic of
the first known Veres of England, the Veres that became earls of
Oxford, she first pointed out that they were called "Sanglier," and
then shared a website on the creatures known as "sanglier," they
being boars! End Updates]
Could it be that the Veres were the traitor, Modred (or
"Mordred"), who took to himself the willing Guinevere,
whereafter Arthur felt compelled to hunt her down dead? His dogs
kiledhrnPctoy,imderhsScotlan,we
north of Arthur's base in Celliwig, Cornwall. Modred was married
to Guinevere's sister, who essentially had been given the same
codeda n me using the "Guine" root but with a different ending,
"fach ...which may have been a weakly-imaginative means of
connecting "her" to "Mero vech " (variation of "Merovee").
But "Elfin" may also depict Alpin, king of a western section
of Alba: Dal Riada. He was the son of a Scot king and a Pict
princess, by which vehicle he and his heirs (MacAlpins) unified
the Scots and Picts ... and (between 830-840) became the first rulers
of Alban, also called Scotia by the dal Riada, thus exposing them
as Scythians. Irish myth makes it clear that "Scota" depicted a
Scythian peoples passing through Egypt.
It was said in the Scandinavian work, the Gesta Denorum,
that Erik the Eloquent, a Dane-proper progenitor, was of the
"Ylfing" (or "Wolfing" = "wolf clan") family of Gotland rulers.
Moreover, "Alfheim" (Alf-Home) was the palace of Frey, also

445
called the country of elves. This therefore exposes the Frey-Alba
connection... which may be viewed as a Frey-Vere connection,
especially as both Frey and Vere were depicted by boars. I would
suggest that the wolf line of Lug put forth the "Elvin Princess,"
Milouziana, and therefore also her Vere ancestors in Alba, and
later the Loki Vanir/Danes. "Werewolf/Verewolf" comes to mind
as a symbol of the Veres.
"The Dragon Motif [of the Veres] turns up later on
the seal of Hugh de Vere in 1200 ad whilst the Blue Boar;
a Druidic caste badge also called Le Solitaire, was derived
from Melusine's husband's family, hence the Blue Boar
and "Harpy" or wouivre supporters in the Vere Arms."
http://genforum.genealogy.com/vere/messages/236.html
"Wouivre" is the Celtic word for "spirit/life" (note the French
"vivere"), but essentially came to denote the spirit of Satan ruling
the world, or even the "veins of the dragon," and from that the
term came to mean anything that snakes along, though it surely
referred specifically to the dragon bloodline itself. For, from
"wouivre" must derive the "Wyver/Wyvern" breed of occult
dragons that the Veres use for their dragon symbol.
I think I've already mentioned that the Druids, because they
descended from the Getae/Edonians who became the Eatons/Jutes,
were the "Eadon" branch among the Danann (i.e. Fir-Bolgs), and
this root in the Goths is supported by the fact that Druids were also
called "Gutiari." This all tends to support my claim that the boar
symbol finds a deeper root in Artemis-come-Getae. "Artemis" is
likely the ancestry of the Celt boar goddess, Arduinna," and of
course "Arthur" seems to have an identical linguistic root.
The points here are: that the blue boar was probably not after
blue blood, but rather the other way around, that "blue blood"
became a term to connect with the blue boar of Druidism i.e. the
Getae/Edone bloodline. Note that while the Greek Calydonians
were from Artemis, that and the British variation, "Caledonian,"
has an "Edonian" within it. The Dragon-loving Veres stem from
the Druids, no surprise. Therefore, the blue boar that came to be a
symbol of Edward III (House of York/Pork) was a secret symbol
of Edward's genetic connections to the Druids, something that
could not have been advertised openly in a Christian society. But
as we're not a Christian-strict society any longer, Vere can come
out and start bragging openly of such evil connections.
I found the following statement to be helpful: "Vero Nihil
Verius (nothing truer than truth) is the [Vere] family motto
granted by Queen Elizabeth I. The family crest was already
the Blue Boar." "Blue blood" (i.e. royal blood) is a phrase that
comes to mind. In other words, the English throne consisted of

446
Vere blood prior to Elizabeth I, contrary to what Nicholas de Vere
says when boasting that the noble Veres of Oxford were merely
honorable stewards of the throne but never once attempted to seize
the throne for themselves.
Note that Avalon was part of the apple theme of mythology
while "milo" is Greek for "apple." This, aside from verifying what
I and others realize -- that neither Milouziana nor her son Milo I
were historical figures but merely codeword -- might suggest
Vere-bloodline connection to the Ionian city of Miletus (i.e.
through the Irish that they had married in forming the Picts).
[Update July 2006 -- If the Picts were from the Picenti, then
the Picenti were from Calydonian boars, and that would suggest
that "pig," the derivation of which is unknown by my dictionary,
may have derived from "Pic." End Update]
I had traced the Greek apple line to Miletus, especially to the
mythical Endymion. The Miletus connection is made
independently through the history that the Scots claim for
themselves, from Scythians of Miletus. The apple line ought to go
back to Greek Calydon since Endymion was a progenitor of
Calydon.
The Scandinavian-myth "golden apples of Idun" were, I
believe, the Thracians of Thyni (same as Edoni?), and may
therefore go back to Melia (honey/bee line), a depiction of
Bithynians (relatives of Thynians). Because I believe that "Woten"
derived from "Bithyni," I'll bet my three-story tree house that
Odin's wife, Frigg (i.e. "Phrygia"), connected to Melia. That
Uranus became Bithynians is revealed where Melia was the
offspring of Uranus after he lost a war with Kronos. Elis is where
Uranus was pushed back to, by the victorious Kronos, wherefore
note that Endymion was ruler of Elis prior to putting forth the first
Calydonians.
The golden apples of Idun (a Scandinavian entity) need to be
distinguished from the rose line, for golden apples depict Aryan
blood. The rose line was Aryan-Egyptian blood, wherefore it may
be expected that Avalon's apples were red or red-gold.
When Arthur was king of Celliwig in Cornwall, he was also
king of Mynyw , but for other reasons I've identified Avalon
tentatively as the north-Wales island of Mona ... that I suspect was
founded by Manannan when he fled there (500ish BC), for the
nearby Isle of Man/Manx (see map) is known to be named by
Manannan. Mona's re-naming to "Anglesey" reveals Angle
intervention in that island. Could the Vere royals have thus
adopted their Angle blood? Owen Tudor i.e. the "pink" bloodline
that ended the War of the Roses, was born on Anglesey (according
to Britannica).

447
If Veres did not connect with Angles of Anglesey, there were
Angles all around the Roslin/Edinburgh region to which the Veres
may have become allied (see map of early Scotland). That's not to
say that Roslin and Edinburgh were founded by those Angles, for
it seems that, Edinburgh at least, was founded by the Edoni among
the Danann. That is, the Eadons depicted by the Danann goddess,
Eadon.
Vere connection to Angles of Britain seems certain because
the said priest (Sabine Baring-Gould) reported that Milouziana
fled Avalon to live in Angiers . This location was not far from the
Vere settlement of Manche. Apparently, there were ties between
Manx and Anjou, and indeed Anjou was in the province of Maine,
and Maine was based in the city of Le Mans. This then reveals that
the Manannan branch of Danann (the chief branch, I presume) had
been allied to certain Angles, and it points rather to Mona than to
Roslin.
[Update July 2006 -- Then again, Roslin and Edinburgh are
in the region of Lothian, which may have been depicted by Ladon,
the dragon that protected the Atlantean garden called Hesperion,
the same that held the golden apples. Lothian is the Scottish
"Lowden" and the Gaelic "Lodainn," said to be named after the
mythical King Loth/Lot (see Lothian location).
Lot is thought to descend from the Belgic tribe of
Catuvellauni, which I would immediately understand as Cati-
Avellauni in which was derived "Avalon." Lot was at first Arthur's
enemy, but in later times, while subdued, Lot decided to form an
alliance. The capital of the Catuvellauni was Verlamion (later
"Verulamium") , evoking the Veres. The first-known historical
king of the Catuvellauni was Cassivellaunus, and the two terms
together evoke the Cati who lived in Khassi of Cilicia, who I think
became the Catti that named Hesse (Germany) and Cassel. It is
extremely interesting that I had traced the cati to the seven-headed
dragon of Syria, Lotan, which I think became the Greek dragon,
Ladon, so named in respect of a British peoples by that name ... that
no doubt stemmed from the Ladon peoples of Greece, even Lydia
and the Latins.
Because Geoffrey of Monmouth used "Cassi belanus," it
appears that Avalon has the variation of "Abalon." Since "belanus"
evokes the Belos/Belus terms mentioned earlier (mythical
ancestors of the Greek Danaans), it's possible that Avalon was a
Danann entity. This coincides with the Cati of Cilicia being a
Danaan bloodline according to my independent research (see up-
coming chapter, "Proto-Greeks from Pre-Israelite Israel," and the
chapter after that, "Opis Stinger of Death"). Avalon can be
connected more closely to home in the Celtic god, Belenus, who
has the alternative version, "Belus," according to the website

448
below, which moreover tells that this god was worshipped as far
away as Adriatic Italy. A British variation was "Belatu-Cadros,"
yet another Cati-like term.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belenus
Cassibelanus' brother was Lud, and their father was Heli, a
mythical term for the Welsh patriarch, Beli Mawr (Mars?), whose
"Beli" portion is thought to derive from a Bolg-like term. Lud and
Lot are thought by some to be the same. Lud is credited for
naming "London," but that doesn't seem quite right. Recall that the
Danaans had founded Lindos on Rhodes, and that I view "Atlantis"
as At-Lantis. As these rulers were kings of the Brits, I would root
them, the Britons and the Welsh together, in the Bolgs/Belgae. End
Update]
There are no websites that reveal Milo I, or a Milon of
Angleria, in historical records. The few websites that do mention
the man may be the victims of a Vere-family hoax. Yet, I do
believe that Milo depicted a line of real Pictish rulers who came to
Anjou as per the Milouziana story. Nicholas says that Milo began
ruling Anjou in 740, and while Alpin , king of Dal Riada in about
835 was a century too late, and besides he was Scottish not Pictish,
there was a Pict king named Alpin (website below) who ruled 726-
728...so that codeword "Milo" may have been his kin (perhaps
even his son).
As very little is known about Alpin, king of Dal Riada, it
may even be that the Pictish Alpin was his ancestor. If true, then
the Scottish Alpin may very well have been of Vere blood. As
Nicholas claims in one breath, his bloodline came through "...to
the Royal Picts of Scotland and the high kings of the Horse
Lords of Dal Riada ... "
http://www.duriefamily.com/scotshistory/picts.htm
The father of Milo de Vere is quoted as "Rainfroi," which as
a codeword I interpret as Rain-Frey and for that reason too I'll tie
the Veres to Yngvi-Frey. "Rainfroi" might be read as Rennes-Frey
or Erainn-Frey, but there was also a king Rhain of certain Welsh
territories, including Dyfed, whose kingdom became known as
"Rhainwg." Dyfed was, remember, the south-Wales city to which
the mythical "Rhiannon" was married, she then marrying
Manannan (though using the "Manawydan" version) in the end.
As little is known of the ancestors of the historical Tertulle,
count of Anjou starting in 820, Milo and Rainfroi may have been
invented by the Veres to depict Tertulle's immediate ancestors.
Some peg Tertullo's father as Tortulf (probably "Tortwulf"), but
that's as far back as is known, which lands us near Milo's rule over
Anjou (said to begin in 740). To substantiate that "Rainfroi" is
code for Rennes, we find that Tortullo's clan was ruler over
Rennes, for indeed his son, Ingelger (another Yng/Angle word),

449
was officially over Rennes (co-capital of Brittany along with
Gwenea/Vannes):
"Under one of the sons of Robert the Strong, Anjou
was entrusted to a certain Ingelger, who became the
founder of the first Angevin dynasty."
http://www.hfac.uh.edu/gbrown/philosophers/leibniz/BritannicaPages/Anjou/Anjou.html

Ingelger was viscount of Angiers, and this squares with


Milouziana coming to Angiers prior to 740 i.e. my theory is that
she then put forth the immediate ancestors of Ingelger; he died in
888.
Previously, a count of Vannes became the king of Brittany,
beginning in 841. I'll bet you a boar tusk that he was a Vere. His
throne-name was Nominoe, and he was a vassal (a willing servant-
ruler) of Louis I of France, the Roman Emperor. When Louis died,
Nominoe declared Brittany independent and became it's king:
"To Breton nationalists he is known as Tad ar Vro,
or ‘father of the country.’"
http://www.bannistersandkin.ca/Weir/pafn01.htm
Apparently, "Tad" has been translated "Dad" while "Vro" has
been translated "Country." But, really, shouldn't the phrase be
read, "Tad de Vere"? Yes, without doubt, meaning that the Veres
had ruled all of Brittany as well as Anjou, wherefore these Veres
were a significant Merovingian power in the aftermath of
Merovingian de-thronement (in 751). We might imagine that the
fallen Merovingians then rallied round the Veres of Brittany.
[Update July 2006 -- Because I suspect that the Taddei
surname of Italy was an important one that made up a significant
portion of the Welsh, as touched upon in other chapters, I would
enter here that this Tad de Vere may have been a Taddei
descendant. I define "Tad" as "toad," and identify Franks as the
frogs of Revelation 16 that are associated with the Biblical dragon,
even the anti-Christ and False Prophet. End Update]
Now Vere-family websites report that, via Guy Blanc Barbe
(White Beard) de Vere was born Godfroi/Godfrey de Bouillon (the
first Templar king of Jerusalem). Whatever you wish to make of
that, it is a fact that Ingelger gave birth to Fulk I the Red, and that
Fulk V (count of Anjou) befriended the Templars and became king
of Jerusalem (1131); his blood retained that throne for quite a
while (though of course we know that Jesus did not accept/admire
that throne; He is forever king of Jerusalem).
Was "Fulk" a variation of "Bolg"? I know that in the early
Templar period, about the time that (or shortly after) Fulk V was
Jerusalem king, a certain group of Hebrew Khazars under

450
pseudonyms "David" and "Solomon" (father and son) devised and
attempted to carry out an invasion of Jerusalem for to place
themselves on the throne of Israel, as per the re-establishment of
the Biblical Millennium. Well, the non-Hebrew Khazars are
known to be Bulgars. The obvious point here is that the Bolgs and
Bulgars were the same stock of peoples. Were the Templars a Bolg
peoples who allied themselves with Khazar Bulgars in their quest
to take Jerusalem?
Why all the emphasis on Godfrey de Bouillon and so little
emphasis on the bloodline of Fulk V? After all, the son of Fulk V
was Geoffrey IV Plantagenet, count of Anjou. And Fulk had
married a Sinclair when he married the daughter of Henry I, for
that king was from Rollo St. Clair. The son of Geoffrey
Plantagenet was Henry II of England, and this branch of the
dragon line sat on the throne of England for a long time to come.
Extremist Rosicrucians infiltrated this dynasty deeply in the court
of Henry VIII, and they set up a counterfeit church of Christ, the
Anglican Church, en route to forming their New Atlantis.
The Anglicans then tried to set up a rulership over Jerusalem,
and succeeded (in 1842) for a stretch to the point of officially
seating their own people as Bishops of Jerusalem. There is
evidence that they were in the meantime allied in this quest with
Rothschild Illuminatists in both Britain and Germany, who used
the same hexagram symbol for themselves that the David-and-
Solomon team of Khazars had used centuries earlier. That symbol
is now the Israeli flag.
Doesn't something about all this stink? Even a Freemasonic-
like thinker, who welcomes the New World Order now being
formed under Merovingian features, was able to grasp the
following:
"This dual current, being associated with both the
Heavenly and the Infernal, with both Jesus and Jehovah,
Satan and Lucifer, is something that has marked the
history of the Merovingian dynasty, as well as all of the
other Grail families, and the entire Grail story itself. It is
at the heart of the secret spiritual doctrine symbolized by
the Grail. This symbolism hits you immediately when you
walk in the door of the church at Rennes-le Chateau and
see those opposing statues of the demon Asmodeus and
Jesus Christ staring at the same black and white
chequered floor, which itself symbolizes the balance of
good and evil."
http://www.21stcenturyradio.com/merovingian-twyman.htm
If Ingelger was a Vere, ditto the Fulks, and ditto the
Plantagenet dynasty, meaning that Nicholas de Vere is telling the

451
truth when connecting the Veres to the mysterious name,
Plantagenet. But was he telling the truth when claiming the Veres
to be of a senior branch at Anjou? I don't know, but egotism will
certainly make such a statement.
And when do I ever believe that a dragon necessarily speaks
the truth? This is the reason that the Veres, and other devotees of
the dragon, will never achieve power over the globe for any
meaningful duration, for peoples will not tolerate liars forever, and
the kingdom built on lies crumbles. Those who keep secrets are by
that alone proven liars, and it's no surprise if liars claim to be
truthful, for what profit would lying be if no one believed the liar?
Nicholas de Vere claims that "Vere" means "verita" =
"truth." Rather, our Bible tells the truth when it says that the
dragon will "throw truth to the ground" (Daniel 8:12).

452
BUZI AS A BEE

What's amazing for someone like me who suspects an


Illuminati tie to pre-tribulationism is that Geoffrey Plantagenet
was the great-grandson of queen Margaret of Scotland, while
Godfrey de Bouillon was Margaret's grandson through her other
daughter. One could begin to suspect that the Rose Line was from
Margaret or her husband, Malcolm III, or both.
The blood of Malcolm III, being that of the MacAlpins,
would therefore be a Vere line, and while this puts the boar line (of
the Druids) through Malcolm, yet the Veres, as Pict royals, were
also of Rose-Line Caledonians (for Caledonians were Picts).
A key to understanding Rosicrucian/Vere loyalties is in
Macbeth, the villain in Shakespeare's play (Shakespeare was a
Rosicrucian). On the other hand, Malcolm III was (in the play) the
nice guy to whom the throne rightly belonged. Yet both Macbeth
and Malcolm III were from daughters of Malcolm II. My
conclusion is that the rose-line had chosen to be loyal to the line of
Malcolm III for the blood of his father, Duncan, the other nice
fellow for whom an audience feels stricken (he was murdered by
Macbeth). The father of Macbeth was Findlàech (mac Ruadri),
ruler of Moray, and he must be the reason that Rosicrucians
rejected Macbeth.
So who was Duncan? The son of Crinan the abbot, son of a
Duncan, son of another Duncan, son of Duncan (oh, such a
wonderful name) the priest of Dull (not such a wonderful name),
and this final Duncan (music to my ears) was "descended from
the Priests of Dull from c. 850, the family of Tir Conaill; 5th
century descent from Niall High King of Ireland"
http://www.pa.uky.edu/~shapere/dkbingham/d0001/g0000025.html#I16944
All right, so Duncan was from the High Kings of Ireland,
defined as the Apple-Line Milesians who first established the
Gaels in Ireland, but mixed in Boar-Line Gaul with the Rose-Line
Redones, and in Spain with the Iberians, and in Egypt with red-
Gorgons. I think to the Neo-Nazi Rosicrucians that spells
something worse than "mut," but let's not breath a word to the red-
rose Rosicrucians, for they too like to consider themselves pure in
some way.
Macbeth, ruler of Moray, on the other hand, though also
from the high kings of Ireland, was from the Loarn clan (from
kings of Dal Riada) that was nearly wiped out by the Picts in the
early eighth century. This would explain why the Veres (and

453
Rosicrucians/Shakespeare) who were Picts before they married the
Scot royals, didn't like the Macbeth family. It would therefore
appear that the Rosicrucians were for the Pictish side in Kenneth
MacAlpin's genes rather than the Dal Riata (Scot) side, suggesting
that the Pictish princess (i.e. MacAlpin's mother) whom Alpin
married was a Vere gal.
Later, even Kenneth himself suppressed the Loarns, yet they
moved north to Moray (Scotland) and from there considered
themselves kings of Scotland. I have a suspicion that during the
200-year "disappearance" of the Loarn clan, they mixed it up in
Moray with European Moravians, as Moray was/is also called
"Moravia." As it's said that Moravia was named just as the Avar
empire folded, it is thought by some that Moravia was an Avar
entity. Note the similarities between "Avar" and "Vere," and
"Moravia" and "Merovee" (the latter was progenitor of the
Merovingians).
Because Merovingian power folded in 751 and shortly
thereafter, while Moravia was formed just at the turn of the
century, one could get the impression that Merovingians named
Moravia. It is said that Moravia was named after the Morava river,
but, the question is, what named the river? I can't find it. I suspect
that Merovee, possibly a mythical term as some suggest, may have
been a variation of the mythical Merope, the sister of Dardanus'
mother. Dardanus gave birth to Erichthonius and the Tros Trojans;
Merovingians claimed descent from Tros Trojans.
Not long after considering hard whether or not to print my
theory that "Merovee" was a version of "Mer(o)-Bia," and that the
bee symbol of the Merovingians was thus produced from
"Bia/Obia," I made the Merope-Merovee connection tentatively
until I should find evidence for it, and finally, tonight actually
(October 11, 2005), as I write, I learned that "Merope" means "bee
eater." If that's not enough, there was another Merope (not
necessarily a different peoples but likely the same) who married
the founder of the boar line, that is the founder of Corinth:
Sisyphus.
see http://www.mugglenet.com/books/name origins.shtml
There are other definitions of "Merope" given online, one
being "bee mask." I then found that the White Throated Bee Eater
(a bird) is called "Merops albicollis." That settles it. But what
could "bee-eater" mean? Wouldn't "honey-eater" make more sense,
as in a bear? I noticed that Merope and Sisyphus gave birth to
"Glaucus" (king of Corinth), and while this term is said to mean
"shiny" or "bluish-green" doesn't it look like "glucose" (Greek
"glykys" = "sweet")? Glaucus
Then, knowing that the Greek for "honey" is "meli/melita," I
found out that Sisyphus honored Meli certes. The latter was the son

454
of Ino with whom she threw herself into the sea when the myth
writer was insinuating that she was the peoples of Halia, the
mother of Rhoda, thus revealing a Rose-Line alliance with Boar-
Line Sisyphus of Corinth.
My problem now is in deciding whether I was correct in
viewing "Miletus" as the Apple (Greek "milo") Line since
"meli/melitus" means "honey." This may allow Miletus to be a bee
symbol, especially as a bee in Greek is "melissa"...something to
keep in mind. Yet "melo" in Latin and French means "melon."
Milo I de Vere, because I have found the variations, "Milon" and
"Maelo," would still appear to allude to the Apple Line. A bee in
French is "abeille," similar to "apple," and perhaps the significance
in both terms is Apollo.
I haven't been able to find how "Merope" means "bee eater,"
as there are multiple definitions given for "op." But I did find that
the Bee family crest is akin to the Vere family crest, and that the
Bee crest uses a Fleur de Lis design in the three crowns. Note how
the Bee crest has a red-and-yellow check design, virtually the same
as the Vere crest.
Because Merope married Sisyphus, while Aeetes has been
pegged (along with Sisyphus) as a fo under of Corinth, it looks like
Merope and Aeetes are one and the same, "Aeetes" being used
when referring to the same peoples ruling at the throne of Colchis.
This Merope-Aeetes equation has teeth since both were children of
Helios. Aeetes is also revealed as Melicertes, for when Ino threw
herself into the sea, Melicertes was brought by a dolphin to
Corinth and placed under a pine tree, the pine being the symbol of
Attis (same as "Aeetes" I'm sure). Sisyphus found Melicertes
under the pine and brought him to Corinth. Therefore, if the
Merovingians were from Merope, then the Franks were not only
from Trojans and Hecate-rooted Spartans, but from Caucasia prior
to that.
Enter Sumerian drawings here. beeSumer
TemplarCrossSumer.png also the fleur de lis on enki drawing.
http://www.thevesselofgod.com/sumerianorigins.html
Why a dolphin. My dictionary tells that "porpoise" derives
from the French and Latin "porcus pisces. lit., ho fish.”
"Dolp" Ti
hinitself was "delphis" in Greek, evoking Delphi, t e very-
occult capital of Phocis! That exclamation mark is there because
Phocis was a boar-line realm in that it stemmed from the early
rulers of Corinth. Perhaps this suggests that mermaids and mermen
are to be viewed as boar-line peoples, as for example a certain
Glaucus (same name as the king of Corinth) had his legs turned
into a fish tail.
Remember, Attis became almost-exclusively a Phrygian god,
and was moreover the root of the Trojans and of Hercules, but as

455
Attis was son of Manes, the bloodline went back to Armenia (in
Caucasia not far from Colchis). Indeed, Glaucus had been desired
by Circe (Circasia/Caucasia), the sister of Aeetes, if that helps to
connect Corinth to Caucasia. All this, then, if indeed it connected
later to Moravia/Moray/Merovee, looks like the root of Malcolm
III.
Unfortunately, the blood type of Margaret's mother (Agatha)
is not known with certainty. Margaret's father was an Anglo-Saxon
who goes back to the Kent boar line so that she would be more a
Calydonian-Boar than a Rose-Line Calydonian. It's interesting that
Margaret was born while living among the Varangian Rus, for
"Varangian" evokes the Vere clan on two scores, the "Var," and
the "Angian." Perhaps another coincidence. Yet recall from the
previous chapter that the Vere line went into Sweden to put forth
part of the Yngvi-Frey Ingaevones. Well, the Varangians were
from Sweden.
My findings have been that the Vere line in Sweden was the
Fir-Bolg branch of Lug/Loki that brought their goddess "Dana"
with them so as to name themselves "Danes/Danir." But not before
mixing genes with Rig, whom (in a previous chapter) I identified
as the Rox/Rus from Rosh. To what extent the Varangians were
connected to Rig I do not know, but as they were called "Ruotsi," I
see a direct connection with the Ruthene/Rodez (of France). The
latter were also called "Rusi" in France, and moreover are
connected to Rhodes, wherefore they and the Varangians should
prove to be a Rose (and therefore red) line peoples. I'll assume so.
I've know for quite some time, and yet don't know what to
make of it, that Avars yet live today on the Caspian sea (in
Daghestan, beside Tubal), at a place called "Varan," that term
looking a lot like "Varangian." We know that the Varangians, as
Vikings, carved dragons on the ends of their ships, and even as
"varangy" and "varangyos béka" ["beka" means "frog"] means
"toad" in Hungarian, so I found that "varan" means "lizard," as for
example "The Komodo Dragon ( Varanus komodoensis) is The
largest Lizard in The world" (italics mine, brackets not mine).
encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Varanidae
In a John Taylor Arms (1887-1953) painting of a Viking
dragon ship (website below), the sail has a green dragon
superimposed on a red sun, and in fact the Varangian Rus leader
was styled, "Red Sun," indicating red-dragon-line ancestry. Again,
that would make an Ireland-to-Scandinavia connection, and/or a
Redone-to-Scandinavia connection.
http://www.centaurgalleries.com/Main/Item.cfm?ItemNo=05725
There are many types of dragons around the world, but see
that the green Vere dragon matches perfectly with the so-called

456
"Wivern" dragon, and of course note that "Vere" seems possibly a
part of that term:
PHYSIOLOGY: These [Wiverns] are dragons
which have two wings, but only two legs. Sometimes
shown as having claws on the wings, acting like another
pair of "hands". The Wyvern is sometimes depicted as
having a razor sharp stinger filled with poison on the end
of its tail.
HISTORY: The history of the wyvern seems to
come from Europe. The history of this dragon is not so
clear...Wyvern's have been depicted in heraldry on
shields and banners for hundreds of years, and is
considered a sign of strength to those who bear the
symbol. One of the more famous wyverns is Vermithrax
in the movie DragonSlayer."
http://www.michaellc.com/The_Library_3.html
I found this online: "Wivern or Wyver," which brings the
term closer to "Vere." At another website I found that "Wiver" is
an "Old North French" word meaning "viper."
It's perhaps indicative of the Picts, who chose rulers based on
female lines, that "Gold and green dragons are Female. Bronze,
brown and blue are Male.” (website above).
When Margaret's father escaped his enemies in England, he
went to live with the Varangian Rus of Galicia/Kiev (Galicia was
known as "Red Rus"), and later with the new king of Hungary,
Andrew, who himself had (prior to becoming king) been protected
by the same Varangian ruler that was protecting Margret's father.
Therefore, close relationships seem evident between the
Varangians, Margaret, and the Andrew fold of Hungarians. Indeed,
it is believed by some that Margaret's mother (Agatha) was born to
royal Hungarians (same bloodline as Andrew). If true, that would
make Margaret part Hungarian.
But the fact that Margaret's Anglo-Saxon father was with the
Varangians in the first place would suggest that her bloodline was
thereby connected to those Rus ... i.e. that the Varangians and
Anglo-Saxons came from the same stock. Couldn't it seem that the
Varangians took that name from the Vere-Anglo alliance in
Scotland, when this alliance moved into Sweden. It may be that
this alliance was formed when the Angles were controlling
Lothian, at which point they may also have been controlling Roslin
in Midlothian. In this way, the Varangians would be a Rose line if
"Roslin" indeed means "Rose-line." I had called the Varangians a
"Ros Line" years ago but in no way could I find a connection to
Roslin, until now.

457
What I'm implying is that the Rus are connected to Rhodes.
That connection is solid through the Redones, the progenitors of
the Scandinavian Rus as well as the Slav Rus. The Varangian Rus
mixed it up in Kiev (modern Ukraine) with the Slav Rus
(themselves from the Ruthene), which is why the Varangian king
became called "Yuroslay." The historical fact that the Slav Rus are
said to have called on the Varangian Rus (while they were yet in
Sweden) to come help them in a dispute tells further that the two
Rus peoples were related.
This leads me to believe that a third branch of Rus, the
Biblical/Caucasian Rosh, must likewise be connected to Rhodes,
and my hunch is that "Rhoda" herself depicted the Rosh ("Rod"
somehow evolved to "Ros," likely with a "Roth" intermediate).
Could the Avars of Varan have been the Rosh? If so, the
Moravians, if indeed they were Avars as is sometimes suggested,
would have been Rosh, but if so the founders of Moray are
suspect.
It is said that "dagh" means "mountain," and yet because our
"dog" derives from "daga," might Daghestan have been the
extension of nearby Verkana (meaning "wolf land"), the Gorgon
city from which I claim the wolf-line originated. It had been my
impression that Verkana (or "Verkhana"), now the city of Gorgan,
was the root of Georgia, where Colchis was located, suggesting
that Corinth, and therefore the boar line, consisted of Medusa (i.e.
Mede) Gorgons ... who had been Comarians in Media.
To the north of Varan/Daghestan, the Avars became the
Kavars/Kabars (of Balkar-Kabardino) when mixing it up with the
neighboring Khazars. The Khazars (not including their Jewish
rulers) were Bulgars, wherefore connection with the Fir-Bolgs is
possible. The Khazars were disclosed in a document, written by a
Jewish-Khazar ruler, to be Togarmites (sons of Gomer). I would
suggest that "Togarmah" was the origin of "Dag" (i.e. "dog") and
therefore the origin of the wolf line. Therefore, the Trojan co-
founder, Teucer, if indeed he was a symbol for Togarmah, was the
wolf-line element in the Trojans.
The Latin "canis" (our "canine") may have derived from
"Tarchon" (descendant of Attis), the eponym of a Lydian peoples
who put forth the Tarquini branch of Etruscans (and possibly the
Kok-Turks as well). The point is, "Tarchon" likewise evokes
"Togarmah." But as Etruscans have also been pegged as Tubali,
note that Varan was right next door to Tubal, which itself was on
the Armenia border where also the province of Gogarene was
located. And as the Etruscans called themselves "Rasenna/Rasna,"
the Avars/Tubali may very well have been the Biblical Rosh!
The Iberi who became the Irish are said to be from the Iberi
of Spain, who in turn are said to be from the Iberi (sons of Japheth)

458
of Tubal, and one would then surmise that "Avar" stemmed from
"Iberi." But note that "ebor" means "boar" so that "Iberi" and
"Avar" could likewise mean "boar"! Then note that the mythical
Rhodope gave birth to Heber and Kikon, wherefore the Irish and
Scots, named early after Heber, were not only from Caucasia, not
only from Rhodes, but from the Thracian region of Rhodope. The
Heberide islands in north-west Scotland, come to mind.
Is it a coincidence that "hive" seems a variation of
"Iber/Heber" and that a bee in French is an "abeille" (the "r" often
modifies to an "l")? In other words, as play on words, the Iberi
could either have gone by the codeword "boar" or "bee." But also a
bear (Old English "bera"). It's interesting that a bee-hive in French
is a "ruche," evoking the Rox/Ros.
Behold, the region between Varan and Tubal was "Alban,"
and therefore I have little doubt that this was the origin of the
Elvin peoples (and Alba/Scotland of the Alpin rulers) which
Nicholas de Vere cites with pride as being part of his Scythian
bloodline. As these peoples were from Medea, it is possible that
the Mittani, that Nicholas claims was also a part of his bloodline,
were Medes out of Armenia, for Medes were then called "Mata"
(evoking the occult "Maat").
Apparently, the Iberi/Avars became the Hebers of Rhodope,
who then became the Illyrians (in the Gaul migration) that founded
(European) Albania (facing east-Italy), that then put forth the
Veneti, Etruscans, Ligurians, and the Boii (bee?) who named
Bologne and Bohemia (anciently "Boihaemum"). The Boi family
crest uses two gold stars identical to the Vere star, and has a
central bull/ox, evoking Oxford (founded by the Veres).
[Update August 2006 -- Just found that the English
Buy/Boy/Bouie Coat uses three bees on blue background, very
close to the Leve/Leaf Coat. End Update]
Bohemia was virtually one with Moravia. Then we find the
Boii on the Rhine en route to possibly becoming the Franks; north
of the Boii (still on the Rhine) were the Ubii (looks like "bee") that
may have been a part of the Menapii (peoples of the Isle of Man).
The Menapii were also located in north-east Ireland (beside Boinn)
and among the Morini in Belgica. The following code-studded
statement associated the Irish wolf line (Lug) with red and white
branches of Aryans, but also with what may have been the
Vanir/Bia bees:
"Lugh was seen again in Ireland at the time
Conchubar and the Men of the Red Branch went
following white birds southward to the Boinn at the time
of Cuchulain’s birth."

459
In German, "biene" means "bee," and this term evokes the
Biaini that were the founders of Lake Van (Armenia). I trace the
Biblical Rosh to Lake Van (though not necessarily to the Bia
bloodline). I'm thinking that the Kabeiri cult was also
"Heberi/Iberi" and that it was, as a secret society, viewed as a bee
hive. The Irish were also called "Iverni."
"Iberi" and "Avar" seem possibly connected to Verkana, as
for example "Varan" may have been a corrupted version of
"Verkana." "Vere" may then mean "wolf" so that "werewolf" may
be a mythical symbol devised to depict Vere- and other wolf-line
peoples. It's all too-possible that "Vere" was at first "Verk," even
as one website gave reason to believe that the town of Worcester
derived from "Vere." At another website, determined to prove that
Shakespeare was Edward de Vere (17th Earl of Oxford, we read
that the earldoms of Oxford and Worcestor were allied in that
theatrical cause:
Now the Blue Boar was, of course, the cognizance of
the Earls of Oxford, who had a house in Aldgate and had
kept players since 1492. The performance of A Sackful of
News - the only known performance of a play at the
"Bores Head without Aldgate" occurred in the time of
John de Vere 16th Earl of Oxford, and it was his son,
Edward 17th Earl, whose servants together with those of
the Earl of Worcester were licensed to play at the Boar's
Head (Whitechapel) in 1602."
http://www.sourcetext.com/sourcebook/library/bowen/25worcester.htm
The "Bore's Head" above should read like the other 16
instances of "Boar's Head" found in the article (i.e. the author
printed wrongly). He writes that the Boar's Head Tavern was next
door to the Blue Boar Inn.
Now in the first century AD, the town was called Worcester
was at "Wroxester," and was at one time a Welsh entity called,
"Paradise of Powys." Could the "Wrox" be a variation of "verk" =
"wolf""? The city became "a village in the county of Shropshire,
England...It is located on the site of the Roman city of
Viroconium."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wroxeter
How many coincidences can I bear? Surely, "Viroconium,"
in Shropshire, where the Merovingian Stewarts would (later) live,
was a proto-Merovingian city controlled by Veres. But note that
the root seems to be "Viroc," as in "wolf." This suggests that Veres
(i.e. under that name) were in Britain as early as the first century
AD, long before the Conqueror came with Stewarts, Eatons and
Polloks in 1066.

460
Or did they come that late? Isn't it possible that those
families, since they were Saxons (or near to it), were in England
long before the Conqueror, and that they sided with him against
the so-called Anglo-Saxon English kings (seems to me the kings
were mostly of Angle blood)? I'm thinking that the Isle of Bute
(then called "Rothesay") was inhabited by Stewarts under another
name, possibly "Bute" and "Rose" or variations thereof (e.g.
"Roth/Rothes/Rothsay"). My main evidence for this is that
Stewarts were close to the Eatons, while the latter seem to be none
other than the Eadon boars and possibly mainline Druids i.e. that
were in Britain long before the Conqueror.
This, if true, means that the Stewarts and Eatons were not Q-
Celt Gaels, but the P-Celt Riata/Redones who mingled with the
Gaelic High Kings of Ireland, who together became the Scots of
the Clyde and Dal Riada, who in that region named Arran, Bute,
Argyll and Ayrshire after the Greek Aryans: Ares, Argos, Uranus,
and Bute/Erechtheus (of the Cecrops bloodline).
I'm suggesting that the Stewarts and Eatons were branches of
the mythical Danann Rose/Rhodes Line, the Fir-Bolg that is, and
that they were therefore a Vere-Pict branch. I suspect that the
Eadons were depicted by the white bore of the Welsh Mabinogian
myths, and by the Torc Triath boar whom Arthur chased out of
Cornwall into the sea, whom the Merlin myths called "wolf of the
sea."
I have reason to believe that "Fir" meant "wolf" even as
"Vere" may have been "Verk" at first. I discovered also that "firec"
and other variations came to mean "sea," in that the sea was fierce
(i.ebothsandwlfrethsam odin
"fierce"). In that way, "Fir Bolg" could be viewed either as Sea
Bolg or as Wolf Bolg. But it's also interesting that the term "Vere"
may have connected with "war," as that too is fierce, and of course
"war" modified to "bar," the Old English for "boar," yet another
fierce thing. In fact, those who use boars to depict themselves
today will tell that it is a symbol of ferocity (note the "feroc" =
"wolf" in that last term).
I'm also thinking that these families of the Clyde moved to
and named Edinburgh and Roslin, and, as is known, some Roses
also moved up north to live near the Rosses and Morays (deep into
Pict-land), and at that time had relations with the Vere fold. It may
be that these northern Roses, who were not the Rosses (some
websites claim), were Rosicrucian progenitors... who fought
against the Laorn clan that would later put forth the Shakespeare-
hated Macbeth of Moray-and-Ross. As the Veres would become
the Rosicrucians (and possibly Shakespeare himself), it seems that
the Roses were intimately tied to the Veres of Pictland, for the
Roses were likely the reason for the term, "Rosicrucian," and of

461
course the rose at the center of the Rosicrucian cross would depict
that clan. It is important if I'm correct in equating "Rose" with the
Rus, for that would require a Rose-clan connection to the
Redones/Aereda, which I think exists in the Rose-clan connection
to the Riada/Araida.
The Pict-Rose alliance seems to be the essence of the Pict-
Scot alliance under the Alpin rulers, and together they renamed
Caledonia, "Alba," and they were the Elvin rulers who also
founded the mythical Alfheim, the home of Frey.
It may sound crazy to tie Saxons to Picts, but here's how
simply it worked. The Vere-Picts were Fir-Bolgs who became half
of the Yngli (the other half was Jute) who put forth the Danes,
Angles and Saxons. In Normandy, Saxons (i.e. the Stewarts,
Polloks, etc) became allied to the Rollo-Viking Danes, and it is
furthermore known that these Danes of Normandy married nobles
at Anjou ... who were Veres! Thus, the Dane branch of Veres
married the Anjou branch of Veres, which I think became the Vere
two-headed dragon. But even if there is another explanation for the
two heads on one dragon, I am certain -- CERTAIN -- that the
Dane Veres marrying the Anjou Veres became the Templar
movement itself. This was THE Holy Grail cause, a Satanic
peoples -- in very truth communicating (for the cause) with
demons and with Satan himself -- attempting to rule the world in
the name of Jesus Christ, in place of Jesus Christ.
This must be the backdrop to the end-time "Great
Tribulation" period, and to great war, Armageddon, at which time,
the Bible fore-tells us, the rulers of the world will actually fight
against Jesus even when they see him visibly returning. This is
because an enormous amount of work has been placed in the quest
to rule the world under a perfect Satanic system (based on the
greed of its rulers and their manipulation/control of the working
masses, all working diligently/gladly for their profits).
Now some might view Shropshire as a white-dragon town
since the Saxons were depicted as a white dragon. But the town
belonged first to the red dragon, which then became the white
dragon upon spawning the Ingaevones (Saxons, Angles, Danes,
etc) from the Yngvi-Frey (half Jutes). Clearly, the Jutes/Goths
(depicted also as a white boar) were regarded as the white dragon
that made the red dragon white.
Does "Shrop" mean Something-Bee? After all, aside from
the "op" in "Merop" meaning "bee," honey may qualify as a
sirop/syrup. It must be sheer coincidence, because I agree that
"Shrop" means "shrub," even as the Saxon name given to the city
(7th century) was "Scrobbesbyrig," which seems rooted in "scrub"
(my dictionary tells that "scrub"(land) derives from "shrub"). But
the town
s thenwarenamed "Salop" and so the "op" remains! May

462
I ask if "Salop" and "Merop" mean the same think, Sea Bee? For
dust as "sea" and "salt" in Greek is one word, "hali," so "sel/sal" (=
'salt"; Old-English "sealt") meant "sea."
Moreover, "Salop" derived from "Salopesberia," and while
some online sites suggest unconvincingly that the latter was a
variant of the Saxon, "Scrobbesbyrig," other websites claim that
Salopesberia was named by "Anglo-French" peoples; that to me
sounds like the Vere/Merovingian dragon line. Yet it's interesting
that the Saxons had lived in the city earlier than the arrival of the
Conqueror, because the Polloks and Eytons, and I think also the
Stewarts, claim to descend from Saxons.
Note that Hungarian honey is "mez," evoking "Mata/Media"
(all-important because Hungarians were from the Medes); Polish
honey is "miod."
Could all this be the origin of the Aryan "WASP," an
acronym (according to my dictionary) for "White Anglo-Saxon
Protestant." Were the Medes likened to honey due to the gold
color? Was Madai, son of Japheth, from whom the Medes are said
to come, a blue-eyed blonde? And yet the Medes, as revealed by
myth, were also "frogs," as per the frog goddess and witch, Hecate,
ancestor of the witch, Medea, eponym of the Medes and no doubt
connected to the Magi/Magyar Medes ("magic" derives from the
Magi).
It's interesting that the Merovingians were connected to the
Macons of France, as that term may connect to the Magyars/Magi,
and even to the Mycones of the Greek Theater. The Merovingian
Illuminati called themselves "Freres Macons." Note that "Magyar"
easily modifies to "Magogars," especially as Gogi peoples were
called "Gogars." The proto-Hungarian Magyars did live, after all,
in far-north Russia.
If Salop was a Sea-Bee/Merovee town as I'm beginning to
suspect, then it doesn't surprise me that it was located near
Gwynedd (Wales), since Gwynedd was founded by the Morbihan
Veneti that had founded Gwenea (Brittany). ( See Shropshire
location near Welsh border).
Caucasian Alba (or Albania) was what became Azerbaijan
(Azer-Baijan), and I note that the "baijan" in that term reminds me
of the Morbihan (Mor-Bihan/Bigan). In Dutch (a Frank dialect), a
bee is a "bij," suggesting that the French "abeille" may have been
rooted in "abej." Indeed, for a bee in Spanish is "abeja." On the
Caspian coast of Azerbaijan was the city of Baku, and so I note
that in Polish, a bee is a "bak." To that I would invoke our "wax"
(Old English "weax") and "wick" (Old English "weoce"), for wax
and honey seem synonymous enough. Therefore, "Merovech," a
variation of "Merovee," may very well have been a version of Sea
Bee.

463
But if "Merovee" is to be viewed as "Merobee," one must
then wonder if "Europa" is somehow closely related to the term, or
if "Europe" means Something Bee. In Greek myth, "eury" means
"wide-range" (recall Eurystheus being a Greek king but also
Geryon in Britain) so that "Europa" may mean a wide-spread bee
line -- i.e. Europe is made up of bee peoples ... from Merope?
Pelops (pale-skin bees?) comes to mind, the root of the Golden
Fleece (the pelt of a sheep evoking pale-skins = Aryans), for his
son, Atreus, who I am now suspecting as one of the False Prophet's
lamb-like horns, married "Aerope," who seems to be a variation of
Europa.
Not far along the Severn river from Worcestor was
Gloucestor, and this place seems named after Glaucus, mythical
king of Corinth, because his name is said to mean "shine" while
the early named of Gloucestor was "Caer Glow" and
"Gleawecastre" (see online Encyclopedia). And this explains why
Worcestor was Boar Country, Vere Boar Country. But then why
not also nearby Shropshire?
When Margaret was grown, she returned to Britain with
some of her mother's clan coming along, Hungarians. But the
Drummonds also came, and they were in part from king Andrew
of Hungary, and in part from Yuroslav, king of the Varangians. I
had suspected that the Ross clan was of Drummond blood since
the Ross clan is to this day called "Children of Andrew." But other
websites tell that the Ross clan was in Scotland prior to the coming
of the first Drummonds. However, if I am correct in connecting
Moray with Moravians, couldn't the Ross clan, since after all it had
been paired with Moray, have been connected to (or even founded
by) Rus peoples in the Moravia region, namely, the adjacent land
of Galicia, also called "Red Rus" after the Varangians?
I imagine that the progenitor of the Drummond clan, George,
son of King Andrew and his Varangian wife, came to settle in the
Ross clan, and for that reason it was later renamed, "Children of
Andrew" (I don't believe for a minute that the clan, nor Scotland as
a whole, was named after the Apostle Andrew, as claimed). Pre-
tribulationism would later come from the Catholic Apostolic
Church (not Roman-Catholic) -- of a powerful Drummond banker,
Henry -- a cult of Illuminati color that sought to run Europe as a
Christian-Israelite entity.
The Rus were pagan worshipers of Rod, and so I point out
that Margaret's son (by Malcolm III), king David I, built a shrine
unto his mother, called "Halyrod House" (now "Holyrood"), which
I think was unto Rod. And that makes me suspect that Margaret's
mother was from Rod, even the Ruthene-based Slavs known to
have worshiped Rod. As Margaret's mother had made a Hungarian
noble (Bartholomew, progenitor of the Leslie clan) her

464
chamberlain, it possibly exposes Margaret's Hungarian blood.
However, just as Andrew had married a Varangian princess, so
Margaret's mother may have been the child of an Hungarian king
and his Russian mate (not necessarily his wife).
There is also evidence that Khazars were in the Hungarian
courts, as the Hungarian king prior to Andrew, Samuel Aba, was a
Khazar. These European Khazar s may then have become the
gnostic Cathars of France (the good pals of the Templars), as some
researchers connect the Cathars to Khazars.
The Hungarian kings had often married Polish wives, and
Merovingians had been rooted in the Sicambrian Franks of
Hungary, who were in turn from Poland (I do suspect that these
were the origin of the Pollok-clan Merovingians). Therefore, when
the Hungarians (after 10th century) began to marry Poles, I'll bet
by best jar of killer-bee honey that they were connecting with what
were previously the proto-Merovingians (in this way may
Margaret have had some Pollok-Merovingian blood).
Hungarians were bees! For Old-English honey was "hunig,"
and other Germanic tribes had a similar term. It's a fact that
Hungarians were in part from the On-Ogur Bolgs/Turks. That is,
the Kabars (Khazar-Avars) that were a portion of the founders of
Hungary were On-Ogurs; the other portion, the majority, were
Magi/Magyar Huns (loyal to Attila's world-rule agenda), from
whom king Andrew derived. It should also be said that the first
Hungarians/Magyars moved into Avar territory (the Avars had
previously ruled from proto-Hungary). I'm not yet ready to suggest
that our "buzz" derives from the Buzi Medes who were closely
associated with the Magi, but I'm leaning.
"On-Ogur" is said to mean "ten arrows" and therefore "ten
tribes," but I don't trust the deductions of those who don't define
names along mythological/ancestral lines, for mythology/ancestry
was the light and life of paganism, and in fact "Bia" meant "life-
force," as even Strong's Dictionary (#970) will disclose where it
tells that "bia" is related to "bioo" (pronounced bee-o o, says
Strong's), the latter meaning "life." But, says Strong's, "bia" means
"violence" especially, wherefore the term "violence" itself would
appear to stem from "bia." Our "violate" derives from the French
"vis" (according to my dictionary), meaning "force" just like the
Greek "bia." Therefore, "vis," as it must stem from the French
"vie" and the Greek "bioo" (both mean "life"), I take it that the
French bee, "abielle," derives from the idea of, not "life," but
"force/violence."

465
BIAS WILL BE BOIIS

It's interesting that, while I hope to be following the Bia


peoples of Lake Van to the Veneti and they in turn to the Vannes
of Brittany, the Vanir of Denmark, and the Vandals of Poland, I
am inevitably keeping one eye on the Boii peoples of Europe, who
became the "Boiohaemum" (Bohemians). And so note that the
Greek "haima" (our prefix "hemo-") means "blood," wherefore
"Bohemia appears to mean Boii-Blood. The question is, to what
extent did this blood enter the Merovingian Illuminati?
Although it is discredited by some that the Boii became the
Bavarians (Latin "Baioari"), it seems difficult to deny that the
Baioari were of the Baiocasse (House of the Baio). The Baiocasses
were the Celtic peoples of Bayeau, in Normandy, and they were
also called, "Bajocasse," a term that looks a lot like the Dutch "bij"
and Spanish "abija" = "bee." The Veres lived in Ver, near Bayeau.
Now as I had conjectured that the Bessi Thracians stemmed from
the Buzi Medes, note now that "The Bessin is an area in
Normandy, France, corresponding to the territory of the
Bajocasse tribe of Celts who also gave their name to the city of
Bayeux, central town of the Bessin" (online encyclopedia).
Okay, so it looks fairly certain that the Bavarians, and
therefore possibly the Bavarian Illuminati, were from the Bessi
Thracians. And if "bij" = "bee" had derived from "byz/buz" =
"bee", then we could connect the Bessi to a Buz peoples of their
past, which of course speaks of the Buzi in Media. Yet there were
a peoples with a "Buz" name also in Greece, who seem to have
been one and the same with the mythical "Bias."
There were at least three Bias', perhaps all depicting the same
peoples. One was made the brother of the seer, Melampus ("meli"
means "honey"). Another was born in Priene, just north of Miletus
("melita" means "honey"). The other we will meet shortly, also
connected to a honey line.
Just so that you know we're dealing with the Zeus-Europe
migration across Europe, Bias and Melampus were sons of
Amythaon, and he in turn a son of Cretheus, who was the white-
bull (i.e. Zeus) line of Crete. Just as Cretan Zeus mated with
Europa, princess of Tyre, so Cretheus was married to "Tyro" in
producing Amythaon (and Aeson, father of Jason). Yet another
version of Cretan Zeus was "Asterius," for we find him to be, not
only the king of Crete, and not only a son of Cretheus' daughter,
but the husband of Europa.

466
We then find another Asterius, son of Minos (i.e. the same
white-Taurus Asterius peoples but now a red-Aryan line); he lived
in Colchis and was moreover made father of Miletus, the eponym
of Miletus the city. One could get the impression that Miletus (and
the entire Pan-Ionian federation) is to be included as part of the
boar line (I suspect that the boar became a symbol of Ionians).
I wouldn't hesitate, then, in connecting the Taurus Gorgons
to the Buzi Medes, and in turn I'm connecting the Merovingians to
the same ... what became known as the bee/honey-line branch of
Taurus Gorgons.
It's known that the Sicambrian Franks joined the Salian
Franks to form the Merovingian empire; the Sicambrian branch is
suspect (by me) as a bee line since the city of Sicambria (in
Hungary) had been renamed "Buda." The question is, were the
Celts who renamed the city (about 100 BC) the proto-Franks?
Just one year before Childerik I (partly from Sicambrians)
became the first-known historical king of the Merovingians, a new
Roman emperor was crowned due to the political strings of Flavius
Aspar, a very powerful force in the Byz antine Empire. It was the
first time that Constantinople was involved in electing an emperor;
note not only that "Byzantine" evokes "Buzi," but know that this
new emperor was Leo (Aspar's top military man), from the Bessi
Thracins.Itemlkfyair,.ethBsnd
Byzantine peoples were related.
Byzantion (Latin "Byzantium") was founded by the mythical
Byzas/Buzas. Constantine the Great named it the New Rome (soon
to become Constantinople), and so I figure that Constantine was
somehow connected to the ancestors of the city, which is a fine
deduction since other claims revealed him as a Trojan descendant.
I hold that the city was founded by Bithynians, not only because
that term is almost exactly "Byzantion," but because Bithynia was
right there on the doorstep of the city.
In Greek myth ve early Bithynia was depicted by "Melia,"
a term that is the Greek r"'ymeli" = "honey"; Melia is said by some to
mean exactly that, wherefore I'm convinced that Bithynians were a
bee-line peoples from Melia's husband, Inachus, the progenitor of
the Argives. But her father was Phoroneus, the same one who put
forth Io and the (Ionian) Danaan of Rhodes...so that I expect Melia
to have depicted a Rose-Line peoples who were in part the
demonic Telchines (same as Curetes, proto-Trojans,
Dionysis/Kabeiri cult, Galli, etc.).
It can't be a coincidence that Byzas was from Megara, as was
Bias the king of Megara. And Bias was the son of Lelex, who
himself was from the Ionian Egyptians, just like the Danaans.
Recall that Perseus, a symbol of the Danaan, married Andromeda,
a Lelegian peoples in Ethiopia. The two became one peoples, the

467
Gorgophones and then the Sthenelus Ligurians (north Italy on the
Po river). This then reveals that the Bias peoples were somehow
involved in that migration to Italy, and the finger points to the
Boii.
It can't be a coincidence that Melia was the direct progenitor,
and therefore a symbol, of Boeotia, which in the Greek is
"Boiotia." This was a region north of Athens and having Kabieri-
infested Thebes as its capital. It became the haunt of the Golden-
Fleece line and was home to the Minyae. The latter appear as
Aes(ir) Gorgons because "Jason" in Greek is "Iason" while his
father was made "Aeson." As the Aesir in Scandinavia were
Goths, it suggests to me that the Minyae were, at least in-part,
Getae Thracians.
There was a mythical Meliboea ("honey-bee" and/or Honey-
Boi) that may have depicted Melia in her role as a Boeotian
peoples. Meliboea and her husband Pelasgus were the parents of
Lycaon, the founder of Arcadia, which was itself named after
"Arcas" = bear.
Yet Melia was also a "nymph" of the Bithynian city of
Bebreces. As the Phrygians were called "Bryges," perhaps
"Bebreces" is to be understood as a Boi branch of Phrygians,
which to myth writers was Boi/Bee-Phrygia when reduced to play
on words ... which is why they called the mother of these Phrygians,
"honey." As Bithynians were also called "Thyni," perhaps
"Bithynia" is to be understood as Boi-Thyni. In this way also, i.e.
as with "Miletus" meaning both honey or apple, the Thyni, whom I
think were the Golden Apples of Idun, were also depicted as bees.
Perhaps Bebreces is to be connected to Bibracte in central
France, where a Gaul empire grew up among its people, the
"Eduens/Aedui" (I haven't yet sought for connections to the
Edonians and/or the Eotens/Jutes). In/near the Bibracte kingdom
was the chief city of the Boii, Gorgobina. The ending, "bina,"
probably refers to those so-called "Boian" peoples ... who are to be
distinguished from the Aeduans of the city, Auten.
I can see how "Bavaria" derived from the "Bibra" of
"Bibracte," which, if it was the case, may then verify that
"Bebreces" should be understood as Bai/Bia/Boi-Phrygia. In that
case, "Bavaria" should be understood as "Bai-Varia.
Melia's son, Amykos/Amycus (evokes "Amythaon"), was the
first ruler of Bebreces, and because he would have a boxing match
with everyone who visited his kingdom, he must have put forth the
Pollux Spartans, for Pollux was said to be boxer (a
meaningless/incomprehensible detail to me, until I learned that
Amycus was a boxer). Therefore Pollux (in his Greek version,
"Polydeuces") was of the Melia bee line, which is to say from the

468
Boiotians. Notice how "Boiotian" is similar to "Boudini," the latter
consisting of blonde peoples.
The father of Amycus was made Poseidon, whom I have
suspected, merely from his name, to have been a symbol of the
Buzi Medes. And while I had also been comfortable with the idea
that the proto-Hungarian city of Buda was founded by Poseidon, as
per the Boudini/Bithynians, so now it turns out that "Megara" must
be the same as "Magyar," the Hungarians proper. This must mean
that the Magyars, coming late in history to Hungary (ninth century
AD), moved there because their kin, the Byzas-Megara Greeks,
had already moved and lived there... probably the Bessi Thracians.
[Update June 2006 -- I didn't know when I wrote this that Byzas
was the very son of Poseidon.] I would moreover tie them all back
to the mythical Butes, ruler of Athens. Indeed my intuition proved
good here, for in Virgil's Aeneid we read, "...Gigantic Butes, of
th' Amycian stock..."
www.worldwideschool.org/library/
books/lit/poetry/Aeneid/chap23 .html
That is, Butes, and therefore the Cecrops line, was from the
Bebreces peoples. Moreover, Pollux was from Butes.
Because Bias was made the son of red-Aryan Lelex, Bias did
not depict the pure-Aryan Ionians (from Phoroneus, Inachus, etc)
that had founded Megara. The city originated in Aryans depicted
also as "Uranus," an allusion to Eran/Iran even as the children of
Uranus were called "Erinyes." Of the three Erinyes, one was
"Magaira." I don't think it's a coincidence that king Nisus of
Megara was depicted with a lock of red hair hidden away in his
white hair, and that the red hair was the source of his power.
When Bias became king of Megara (now a suburb of
Athens), he was killed to pave the way for Pandion II, of the
Athenian Cecrops line, to take his throne. This was the Pandion
from whom Democracy would form, the Democracy that was the
French and American Revolutions, which has been pegged by
many writers as a Satanic movement of the Bavarian Illuminati. A
certain mythical Hyperion (no doubt the extension of the sun god,
Hyperion)...
"...is said to have been the last king of Megara.
After him the Megarians decided to abandon monarchy,
and be ruled by elected magistrates. The Megarians are
also said to have asked the oracle at Delphi in what way
they could be prosperous. The oracle then replied that
they would fare well if they took counsel with the
majority. They thought that by 'majority' the oracle
meant the dead, so they built a council chamber so that
the grave of their heroes was within it."

469
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/Megara.html
In other words, the myth writer was acknowledging that the
founders of Democracy were inquiring of demons and honoring
the heritage of their ancestors when making political decisions for
"the majority."
The problem is, the Franks were Trojans, and the Pandion
Megarians were anti-Trojans in the Trojan war. Therefore it seems
to me that the Franks stem from the peoples depicted by Bias, who
was ousted from Megara by forces loyal to Pandion II. Since this
Pandion ruled after, and was the son of, Erechtheus (the latter
being the same as Butes), couldn't Bias, in light of his "Byzas"
variation, have been Butes himself? To support this "s" to "t"
modification, the Bessin region of Normandy was inhabited by the
Baiocasse/Bajocasse Celts, and yet Pliny called them
"Bodiocasses."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bajocasses
[Update Aust gu 2006 -- When searching the
house'ofnames.com for " Bessin," the "Beeston/Beeson" surname
(of Cheshire) comes up, as if "Bessin" is an official/registered
sept/variation. If so, then see that the Beeston Coat uses six bees.
End Update]
Were the Merovingians from Bias/Butes, and were the latter
the Bessi who became the Boii? It is said that the Franks came up
the Danube to the Rhine, and both the the Bessi and the Boii did
live on the Danube. It is moreover known that the Boii had moved
to Gaul and then back again to the Danube when becoming the
Bohemians. Might the Franks proper have been from those Boii of
Gaul long before they were known as Franks, and might the Boii
who became the Bohemians have become the Franks?
The ancient Bessi homeland had ranged from the territory of
the Moesi to Rhodope, and they lived in the land of "Haemus
(meaning "blood" remember). Now compare that homeland with
"Boiohaemum " and you might feel compelled as I am to equate the
Bessi with the Boii, in which case we'd need to explain why the
" s " was dropped to form "Boii." The same loss of an "s" may have
occurred in "Byzas/Buzas" becoming "Bias." The same
modification is evident, I'll assume, where "buz" became our
"bee," or where "bij" became the Scandinavian "bi."
To verify the Boii-Bessi equation, the Bessin region of
Normandy was inhabited by the Baiocasse/Bajocasse, while those
peoples appear to be named after "bij" = "bee." Therefore, those
who claim(ed) that the Boii produced the Baioari (Bavarians) are
in my mind correct.
The visible founder of the Bavarian Illuminati used the
pseudonym, Sparticus (another leader, Xavier Zwack, used the
pseudonym, Danaus). The Merovingians, too, claimed to have

470
roots in Sparta, and while I had already suspected those Spartan
roots in Pollux, I now see that Pollux was earlier the honey line of
Melia, that is, the Boiotians. It can't be a coincidence that Lelex
became the founder of Laconia (later called "Sparta"), wherefore
his son, Bias, may be viewed as a Spartan. Evidence that Boiotia
was a bee-line nation is in this: "The bees which accompany the
figure of Trophonius were sacred because they led the first
envoys from Bœtia to the site of the oracle."
http://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/sta/sta14.htm
As I said that the Po river, anciently the Padus, was likely
named by the Lelegians of Pedasa, so "Byzas/Buzas" (likely
Lelegians) evokes "Padus" and "Pedasa." The question is then
whether "Bologne" should be understood as Boi-Logne.
Another means by which to root the Merovingians in Megara
is in its extension from boar-line peoples, for "In historical times,
Megara was early a dependency of Corinth...Megara then
fought a war of independence with Corinth, and afterwards
founded (c. 667 BC) Byzantium, as well as Chalcedon."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megara
Indeed, Megara, as a mythical person, was made the daughter
of Creon, king of Corinth. This Creon also gave birth to Creusa
(Jason's wife) whom I think depicts the Hrus. In keeping with my
theory that the Rus were from Rhodes/Rhoda, we find that Ino,
after throwing herself into the sea (with her honey-son,
Melicertes), is said to have washed up to shore at Megara:
"According to the Megarians, the corpse of Ino was cast
up on their coast ... They also claim that they were the first to
name her Leucothea, and to offer her sacrifice every year"
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/Megara.html
This reveals that the Megarians (those descended from Lelex,
that is) were also descendants of Halia, mother of Rhoda, for Halia
had also thrown herself into the sea to become Leucothea.
Creon also gave birth to Glauce, evoking Glaucus, son of
Merope, queen of Corinth, and these may have become the peoples
who founded Gloucester (England), near Wroxester (yes, I'm
suggesting that the same Corinthian Hros who founded Wroxester
founder Gloucester). Recall from the previous chapter that
Wroxester/Worcester had some close associations with the royal
Vere clan.
Now, there was another mythical Creon (king of Thebes),
probably the same peoples as the king of Cornith, and we find he
was the father of Haemon/Haimon. This then suggests that the
Bessi in Haemon, and the Boiohaemum (Bohemians) (and
therefore the Boii who may have become the Merovingians, not to
mention the Baioari), stemmed from Corinthian boars. I should
also mention that Boreus, the so-called north wind, lived in

471
Haemon, and that "Boreas" may actually be the origin of the boar
concept applied to these peoples. And that brings us to the blue-
boar Veres.
Nicholas de Vere claims to stem from the Mittani, who were
Hurrians on the south side of the Black sea, and so my natural
reaction is to peg them as the Hermes line out of Armenia. I say
that to set up the next thought, that the Mittani may have been the
Bia Armenians... who founded Methone (Greece) and it's environs,
Messenia. It is known that Messenia was founded by Lelegians,
and moreover the son of Lelex was made its ruler, explaining why
Greek-Egyptian peoples came to live there later under Danaus'
brother.
From the Mittani in Asia, the Vere family is said (by
Nicholas de Vere) to take a huge jump to the Danann of Britain.
The particular Scythians that are part of that jump are left
unidentified. In other words, Nicholas skips over the Greek
theater. But as the Veres depicted themselves with a boar, I am
tempted to view their bloodline stemming from the peoples of
Corinth.
I've traced the Danann in part to the Aryan Egyptians at
Massalia/Marseilles (see previous chapter), who were in turn from
the mythical brothers Danaus and Aegyptus. However, these same
peoples (or at least Aegyptus) went to live at Messene, according
to the Greek writings. And, according to Pausanias, the eponym,
"Messene," was made the daughter of Triopas, he being the son of
Helios and Rhoda!
You can bet your prize boar that the Messenes were
somehow connected to the Rose-Line island of Rhodes. In fact,
while the daughter of Triopas was the founding peoples of
Messene, Triopas' son was a founding ruler at Rhodes. But just
wait till you find out where his son was from. Keep in mind that
since Messenia was founded by a son of Lelex, Triopas must have
been a proto-Lelegian.
What does the rose line have to do with the boar line? Well,
aside from their fighting at least one civil war, the boar line came
first, from Artemis on the north shore of the Black sea. In Atlantis
(the Aegian sea) it gave birth to the Rose Line. But who would
have guessed that the Rose Line was rooted in the Greek Danaans?
I mean, I had suspected a Danaan-to-Rhodes connection, but never
in my expectations did I think the Danaans would turn out to be
from Rhodes as the very Rose Line itself, or so it seems.
Danaus had fled Aegyptus and stopped at Rhodes prior to
conquering Argos. That was myth, so it wasn't a stop-over for a
drink at the local marina, but rather it was a mixing of peoples
over a drawn-out period. In fact, myth had Danaus building the
city of Lindus (inhabited to this day) on Rhodes. As Lindus was

472
one of three sons of Kerkaphos (or "Cercaphus"), the Greek
Danaans define at least one of those sons. Therefore, the Danaans
were from Rhoda and Helios, for Helios was father to Kerkaphos.
Therein is how the British Danann should be counted as part of the
Rose Line.
Thus Rhodians can be viewed as the Danaans themselves,
explaining also why the offspring of Hercules came to rule the
island. ^th that in mind, recall that Hercules invaded Britain in
the golden grail-ship of Helios, suggesting that he, depicting
Danaans descended from Mycenae, invaded Britain along with the
Rose-Line Danaans of Rhodes (i.e. the Redone bloodline). Holy-
Grail lore therefore goes as far back as the writing of that
particular myth. Note also that the mother of Danaus was
Anchinoe, yet another term evoking Enki of Eridu.
It should be said that Rhoda depicted peoples other than
those on Rhodes, and even those she gave birth to on Rhodes
spread out off the island. As I'm about to show, she gave birth with
Helios also to Calydonians. The better symbol of Rhodes (the
island) is her son, Kerkaphos, for he gave birth to three sons each
of whom are to this day a city on Rhodes. Of course, he did not
really give birth to the peoples who built those cities, but rather the
myth writers wrote after the cities were founded/named, and they
wrote as though these mythical peoples founded the cities. But
when the writers decided to use "Kerkaphos" as the term to depict
all three cities, there was a reason, and it's up to me (and/or you) us
to discover the reason.
I say the term refers to Gorgons, especially to the
"Gorgophones" that Perseus put forth. It's very interesting that the
Gorgophones were put forth by Perseus and Andromeda, while in
one myth version, or at least in its interpretation by some,
Andromeda was in Joppa when mating with Perseus, Joppa being a
location in north Israel where the Israeli tribe of Dan lived. The
problem is, the writer(s) of that myth may have made the same
mistake as is made to this day: equating the Danaans with the tribe
of Dan. This misconception may have caused an ancient writer to
claim that the tribe of Dan, after the 400 years spent in Egypt,
came to Egypt with some Egyptians (i.e. Aegyptus), and then
conquered Argos en route to building Mycenae six miles away.
In other myth versions, Andromeda is in Ethiopia, not Joppa,
when Perseus comes to her rescue. And do note that the Danaan
side of the two, Perseus, in no way evokes Hebrews, but rather the
Persians, even as Andro meda seems to. Similarly, their
Gorgophone offspring evoke the Parthians who put forth the
Gorgons. Moreover, Gorgophone, is said to be of Lelegian
descent.

473
Certainly little else in the popular myths seem to make the
Israeli connection, but rather Danaus is said to stem from Ionions
(are you willing to equate the Ionians with the tribe of Dan?!).
Moreover, the Egyptian Ionians are said by Greek myth to rule
eventually at Tyre (i.e. through the Phoenix line: the siblings
Cadmus, Europa, and Cilix), which is not far north of Joppa, so
that one could wrongly equate Danaus with the tribe of Dan.
Pausanius had Triopas giving birth to an "Agenor," and as
Pausanius was at the time focusing on the founders of Argos and
their descendants, it connects Danaans loosely to king Agenor who
is commonly made the father of king Phoenix. It may be true that
the Phoenix line of Ionians mated with some members of the tribe
of Dan, but that's not reason enough to view the line as the tribe
Dan.
I will grant this however, that if the Phoenix line did form an
alliance with the tribe of Dan, that the myth writer(s) may have
created the term "Danaus" on account of that mixing of genes,
wherefore, at the most, Danaus can be viewed as having part
Danite blood ... that over the centuries in the Greek and European
theaters diminished until, by the time of the Merovingians, there
was little Israelite blood left.
Perhaps the Merovingians were misled by the erroneous
claims that Danaus was the tribe of Dan itself, explaining why
Merovingians themselves claimed to be connected to Israel. But
even if Danaus had some Danite blood, God did not view the
mixed peoples, in Greece and in Europe, as true Israelites, so let's
not make much of it, as though it's God's grand plan to form an
Israelite kingdom within Europe, and especially not to the point
that some take it, claiming that virtually all Europeans and/or all
European descendants are Israelites.
This to me is more the trick of the devil (i.e. the dragon-line
Illuminatists), to make us believe that that their sacred pagan
bloodlines are based in God's plan to establish the Biblical
Millennium. You will find that it's the cults (e.g. Armstrongism,
Irvingism), easily connected to the Illuminati, that propagate the
idea that Denmark and Britain were founded by Dan and other
Jews; other globalist Illuminatists are trying, as we speak, to
connect the Merovingians to Jesus' blood itself!
But in the list of the Israeli twelve tribes, found in Revelation
7:5-8, Dan was omitted by God! Yes, some Bible-believers predict
that the tribe of Dan will put forth the anti-Christ for this reason. If
there is truth to this argument, I would suggest the False Prophet
instead. Christians mistakenly claim that the anti-Christ will come
as a counterfeit Christ mainly due to the Illuminati attempting to
put forth just such a world leader, but it's the False Prophet, who is
depicted by God as having two horns like a lamb (i.e. like Jesus)

474
that we should view as the Christ-like Illuminatist world ruler. Am
I right?
The bottom line seems to be that the Danaans were a major
root of the Redone Gauls, the "Aereda" who settled "Haeredaland"
(and those terms sure do look like "Eridu"). This is further
evidence that the British Danann stemmed from the Redones, and
this then serves to trace the bloodline of the Veres.
I don't know for certain how the proto-Veres entered the
Danann bloodline, whether by way of the sea route to Massalia, or
by way of the land route to north Italy. In any case, the royals of
Liguria married the boar-line Phocaeans at Massalia to produce the
Danann. Yes, the "Initial [Phocaean] leader [of Massalia]
married a Ligurian princess"
http://www.portergaud.edu/cmcarver/gcol.html
Any talk of northern Italy should include Pollux, who
depicted not the Calydonian Boar, but one of the crew aboard the
Argo ship that was involved in "killing" (defeating) that boar. My
guess is that the proto-Veres were in northern Italy as the
Pollux/Boii peoples. The Merovingians, at least, in tracing
themselves to Antenor Trojans, had to pass through Venetia.
As Ligurians depicted the wolf line, I am tempted to view
"Pollux" (a Roman term, not Greek) as Po-Loki/Po-Lugi
(Ligurians were on/off the Po river). I keep a theory wherein the
Pollok clan stemmed from Bologne to the "Polonie/Polock" tribe
of Vandals. But I also connect Bologne to the Lugii tribe of Gauls,
for the Lugii became the Vandals.Now behold: Perseus and
Andromeda gave birth to the Danaan peoples of codeword
"Gorgophone" (i.e. Greek Gorgons) and "Sthenelus." Gorgophone
then gave birth to Tundareus who gave birth to Pollux, wherefore
Pollux is a Danaan. Because Pollux' mother was Leda the Swan,
while king Cycnus of Liguria was depicted as a swan, we can
identify Cycnus as Leda peoples i.e. same as Pollux (i.e. Pollux
became Ligurians), which makes sense because the father of
Cycnus was given the name "Sthenelus," which must mean that
Ligurians also stemmed from Sthenelus, brother of Gorgophone.
Therefore, view Ligurians not only as Danaans and Rose-
Line peoples, but as Gorgons, by which I mean to say Gogi, as the
term " Cyc nus" would suggest (meaning that the myth writers knew
the Gogi nature of Ligurians. These must be the Scythians that
Nicholas de Vere didn't talk about when explaining the jump of his
bloodline from the Mittani to the Danann of Britain.
The Sthenelaus that was Gorgophone's brother had for a son,
king Eurystheus (a Danaan), this being the Mycenean king who
sent Hercules on his Twelve Labors, one of which was to fetch
Geryon's cattle. Because this tells that Geryon depicted the
bloodline of Eurystheus, it means to me that the Geryon bloodline

475
was put forth by the other Sthenelus (i.e. whom I see as an
extension of the first), the king of Liguria... which is just what I
have been saying all along, that Ligurians put forth the early
British tribes, Parthalons, the Danann, Fir-Bolgs, etc.
Put it this way, that the myth writers, knowing that Geryon
was of the same bloodline as Eurystheus, and knowing also that
Geryon stemmed from Ligurians, gave the Ligurians the codeword
"Sthenelus" because Eurystheus was son of Sthenelus.
It turns out that Eurystheus was the descendant of Pelops, he
being the Golden Fleece line, the line that would immediately
ascend Eurystheus' throne after him (through Atreus, son of
Pelops), and the line that I think is most likely to furnish the False
Prophet.
If the boar line was incorporated into the Vere and Pollok
bloodlines for the first time at Massalia, then the Vere line too
(prior to British entry) finds connection with the Luggi, explaining
how, much later, the god Lug of the Fir-Bolgs was part of the Picts
(i.e. the Veres) before becoming Loki the chief god of the Danes.
Bologne was originally "Bononia" (Boi-nonia), as it was was
named by the Boii of northern Italy, I entertain the city with a
Boii-Lug understanding, or, at the least, Boii-Logne ("logne" may
mean a number of things).
It's interesting that the god, Rig, he being half of the Yngvi
federation, is thought to derive from the Boii of northern Italy.
This supports the theory that Wroxester was founded by the Boii,
and in turn may serve to reveal that the Veres were from the Boii.
Recall that the root "Wrox" was "Viroc," and that next to the Rugii
in Rugaland (Norway) their lived (in Haeredaland) the Arochi.
Might "Viroc" and "Arochi" have been the same Rus/Rosh/Hros
peoples?
I have a sense that Wroxester (in south Britain) is to be
connected to Roxburgh (central Britain), and that the two are
important centers of Arthurian myth:
"King Arthur's mythical kingdom of Camelot may
have been located in Scotland according to new research
by a Scottish author [Alastair Moffat]...[who] radically
relocates the fabled castle to Roxburghshire ... the book
centres Camelot on Roxburgh Castle."
http://www.macbraveheart.freeserve.co.uk/html/people/king_arthur/at_roxburgh.htm

476
PROTO-GREEKS
FROM PRE-ISRAELITE ISRAEL
July 2006

In this chapter I am going to give the history of Argos'


founding from various non-Israelite peoples in Israel, but based on
personal mythical interpretations. You'll need to be the judge as to
whether I'm interpreting well. The storyline of this chapter
borrows from the mythical genealogies at the following website.
http://www.timelessmyths.com/classical/argolis.html
Greece was founded by multiple mythical characters, and
each version should be dissected for what it's worth. In one
version, Inachus was the first peoples of the Argolis (region), who
founded the twin cities of Argos and Mycenae. From the peoples
in which Inachus depicted there came forth the Carians settled at
nearby Megara, which I would suggest reading as Me-Cara.
Because the mother of Car was Cerdo, it's clear that the Carians
were made an Inachus-Cerdo mix.
I will therefore keep in mind that the Kurds (and/or Guti)
ought to figure into the Carians. The Kurds were Hurrians and so
I'm already giving birth to another realization, that Kurds too were
Horites. All of the above, in other words -- Carians, Kurds,
Hurrians -- are variations of "Hor(ite)." They were the Armenia-to-
Greece empire formed by the proto-Kabala, even the founders of
Athens/Attica as described in another chapter on Hephaistos and
Attis/Kybele.
Yes, I'm quite certain, Greece was a Horite entity. And even
"Graea," the term said to be the root of "Greece," where "Gra" is
the root, may have been a Hor(a) variation. Couldn't the Horites
have been Gorgons (proto-Parthians) since the latter were
fundamental to Greece's foundation? As "Geryon" would imply,
the root of "Gorgon" may at first have been "Hori/Gori," and only
afterwards did the "y/i" modify to a "g". Hera (Zeus' wife) is
suspect as Horite peoples, which is a monumental discovery if
true, occurring here as I write, because for years I haven't had the
slightest clue as to which peoples she could depict.
The Inachus peoples furnished a tribe/alliance depicted as
Apis/Apia, and I'll assume tentatively that these were the
Avviy/Avvites from Israel. Because Inachus was made "married"
to Melia ("honey"), I will also entertain -- especially upon learning

477
that the Appian Way (Roman road to Greece) was named after
bees -- that Apis/Apia was code for a peoples depicted by the bee
secret code. Apis peoples were such wicked tyrants that they had
to be ousted from power by a fellow bloodline, but as they were
unseated by Telchines, they themselves revealed as a sorcerous
peoples, one wonders concerning the nature of the Apians. The
myth writers attempt to disassociate Argus from Apis, for to
glorify Argus peoples, but in reality they were the bee-line
peoples, as we shall see.
On the very same day that I wrote the paragraph above, I
found a message on my answering machine from Kathleen, who
said that I need to check the dictionary under "Apian." And there it
was, that our English "apiarian" and "apiarist" relate to bees and
beekeepers, and that they are rooted in the Greek word, "apis,"
meaning "bee" (singular). Now I understand how
"Meropes/Merops" is said to mean "bee eater" or "bee something-
else." An online dictionary (etymonline.com says: "...from apis
"bee," a mystery word unrelated to any similar words in other
I.E. [Indo-European] languages." That is, this particular Greek
word for bee is from another language, and I would suggest from
the makings of the Ugric (proto-Hungarian) and/or Altaic (oriental
Aryan) languages...that may just have been an Aryan-Semitic mix
as per the Aryan-Semitic mix that was the dragon-line Kabala.
Thanks again Kathleen, my Hungarian-Hebrew friend whose
surname begins with "Bot." She was the one who alerted me to the
fact that Appian/Apian Way was named after bees. This long stone
road was started and overseen by the Roman Patrician, Appius
Claudius Caecus, but the question is, where did his name come
from? Did it connect to the Apis peoples of Greece on the
rear/past, and to the Frank bees to the front/future? Did the
mythologists cleverly but foolishly leave bee crumbs that we can
follow in tracing the dragon's footsteps? Will these crumbs now
reveal the inhumane nature of these peoples ever-seeking to
destroy others that they might rule, peoples to this day that seek to
convince us that those who so conquered and destroyed are to be
honored and served?
Inachus also put forth the Telchines under code words
Telegonus, Telchus, and Thelxion. The Inachus branch under
codeword "Io" (his daughter) were allied to the Telchines and
together they ruled Egypt, this being the meaning of Io's marriage
to Telegonus, king of Egypt. As the Io peoples will be shortly
revealed as the mythical Aphareus, where he depicts the historical
Apharsites (found also in the Bible), thought by the NIV and many
others to depict the Persians, we can now begin to reveal Inachus
as a Persian branch of some sort, though I think possibly the
Elamites (proto-Persians according to Josephus). The Elamites

478
shared territory east of Mesopotamia with Kassites/Guti of the
Zagros mountain regions.
For that reason and the following, I would suggest that
Inachus was the same as Dionysus/Zagreus in that the latter is
probably to be understood as Dio-Naxos simply because Naxos
was his island. Inachus I would view as I-Naxos, meaning that the
myth writers may not have been as clever as they thought they
were being. If I am correct in equating Inachus with Dionysus, it
explains why Dionysus was a bee-line peoples of the island of
Chios, where his daughter there was Merope. Moreover, if I'm
correct, an Inachus branch should furnish a Maenad peoples that
were sacred to Dionysus, but also Satyrs, and indeed they do.
As I trace Inachus to Aphareus-Persians in Israel, keep in
mind that Aphareus, who must have depicted the historical
Apharsi/Aparni, may just have been the Apiru-Persian mix that I
define as the dragon cult. I'm going to share ideas in another
chapter from the website of a scholarly writer who equates the
Apharsi with the Hebrew-striped Avars and meanwhile traces the
Avars to the Dehava, the latter found in conjunction with the
Apharsites within the Ezra-4:9 list of anti-Israeli peoples living in
Israel.
Inachus put forth "Argus," and I would suggest that these are
the Biblical Archevites, also found in Ezra 4:9 in conjunction with
the Apharsites. The Archevites are moreover revealed by reputable
sources (e.g. Strong's) as the peoples of Erech (early home of the
dragon cult). It is not a small announcement to identify Argives as
the carriers of the Tammuz/Ishtar cult of Erech ... keeping in mind
that the island of Bute in Scotland is in conjunction with Argyll.
The mythical Aphareus gave birth to Lynceus, and while
there are two such names in mythology, I would view them as the
same peoples but at two different times/situations. The Lynceus
that is not technically the son of Aphareus was the son of
Egyptus/Aigyptus, meaning that Aigyptus and Aphareus can be
equated, serving also to reveal that Aphareus became a Greek
peoples in one branch and in another the Aryan rulers of
Egypt ... the same rulers roughly as depicted by Io, Inachus'
"daughter."
As Egyptus was made the brother of Danaus (i.e. the Greek
Danaans), the two may very well depict the Dinaites found in the
same Ezra-4:9 list of anti-Israeli peoples ... who were all living in
Israel along with the Cutha and Avvites. True, they are said by the
Bible (2 Kings 17:24) to have come to Israel during the Assyrian
exile of Israelites, but it's thereby possible that they had settled
Samaria (northern Israel) in centuries prior, even before the
Israelites had been a nation. This mention of the Dinaites is
something to really think about for those who have committed

479
themselves to tracing Europeans to the Israelite tribe of Dan, or
that Danaus depicted the tribe of Dan. I sense that the Dina-ites
were the same as Tinia/Thyni (of Thrace/Phrygia), sacred root of
the Etruscans, Scandinavians, Germanics, and Celts/Britons. As
the Thyni were the Bithyni/Budini, I will connect the Dina-ites to
Bute of Argyll, even as I had previously connected the Greek
Danaans and British Danann to Bute.
We find that Lynceus was assigned the son, Abas, a term that
I am strongly tempted to equate with the Avvites. Abas is then
assigned twins, Acrisius and Proetus. Whereas the latter seemed
elusive, a more common variation was "Proteus," which caused me
to entertain Pro-Zeus and find that it clicks. For one reason, Zeus
is ordinarily made the father of Perseus, and yet the author of "The
Greek Myths," Robert Graves, "notes that in the earliest version
Proteus is Perseus' father."
www.johnpratt.com/items/astronomy/myths/perseus.html
Secondly, Proteus is made the son of either Poseidon or
Nereus with Doris, and quite often when there is a double
parentage, both should be regarded as possibly true. As Nereus
was the fish god, he equates with Dagon...and then Doris would
equate with the city of Dor (Israeli coast north of Joppa) where
Dagon was worshiped. But as Zeus was equated with Dagon
himself by a Phoenician whistle blower (Sanchuniathon) who
found documents telling what the mythical secrets were, it again
identifies Proteus as the Zeus line ... prior to the Zeus-proper
peoples of Crete. This tells us that Zeus depicted a Dor(is) peoples
(makes sense for a peoples also depicted as "Taurus") but mixed
with codeword "Nereus." Nahorites? However, this doesn't tell us
who the Dor inhabitants were; they may or may not have been
Avvites. I suspect that the inhabitants were the same that named
Tyrus.
"Acrisius" I would then suspect to be Ekron, one of five
cities (south of Joppa) in which the Bible says were left to the
Avvites when Joshua conquered Israel (Joshua 13:3). The
deduction thus far in this reasoning is that the Avvites were from
the (historical) Apharsites. Keep in mind that ProZeus was made
the twin of Acrisius, so that whatever we determine for Acrisius'
identity, the near-same ought to be true of the Zeus line to Crete.
If one can connect the Apharsites to the Dehava (also
"Dahae") using historical documents, one could have support for a
Dehava-Avvite connection, which is extremely important in that
Dehava (founders of Daghestan) was in Avar country (Avars live
there to this day), for "Avar" and "Apharsite" are a near-perfect
match, especially as the Avars are known to have had distinct
Hebrew elements so as to identify them as the Iberi. That is, the
Avars were Abars/Iberi that then modify to "Aphar."

480
While Zeus was made the husband of Danae, Acrisius (a
Danaan from that alliance) was assigned "Danae" as a daughter,
wherefore Acrisius is really the (Pro)Zeus line in its continuation.
Moreover, the Dina-ites are thus tentatively connected to Ekron
and/or the Gaza-branch Avvites (ignore that Ekron, Gaza. etc.
were Philistine cities, for the Avvites at this point had not yet been
conquered by the Philistines, who were yet in Caphtor/Crete at this
time). Because Zeus official wife, Hera, depicts the Horites in my
mind, I would add to this picture a Horite peoples that were allied
to Dor/Zeus peoples. Zeus was made to mate with Danae to
produce Perseus, and this translates to the same as a ProZeus
alliance with Acrisius i.e. a Dor alliance with Ekron to produce the
rulers of Mycenae.
I'm not making a Danae-Dahae equation, by the way, even as
Ezra distinguishes between the Dina-ites and the Dehava. If I'm
correct in pegging the Dina-ites as the Thyni/Bithyni/Budini, then
they were of Buz, son of Nahor, even as the Neuri lived among the
Budini. This would imply that the Budii Medes were either the
same as the Busae/Buzi Medes even though Herodotus
distinguished the two, or that the Budini were not from the Budii,
but rather had acquired its "d" from Buz > Bud.
The Buzi may have been at the heart of the Eden cult of
Mesopotamia, later the Edones of Thrace but possibly also the
Edones of Megiddo(n) (near Dor). Assuming with some logic that
"Utu" (the dragon sun god of Eden) was a Sumerian form of
"Adam," the first-born of Nahor may have been named after
Adam, for this son's name, as spelled by the Bible, was "Uts"
(Genesis 22:21).
"Buz," we may conjecture in light of the sacred bee line,
came to mean "bee." But as a hive is described by occultists as an
empire, we subjects being the bees that provide honey/taxes for the
royals, where an empire is also a House, it's of no surpri se that
"beth/bet/bute" came to mean "house" (Old English "hus" no doubt
from "pos" = house). As Positano, a Naples-region city said to be
named after Poseidon, is said to be named after "posa" = house, I
would suggest that "Poseidon" means "House of Eden" while at
the same time indicating the house of the Busae/Buzi Medes.
Zeus was raised by bees on Crete, which symbol potentially
ties to either Buz or the Avvites, or both, and this would then
explain why Pro-Zeus (i.e. Proteus) was given birth by Poseidon as
well (as Nereus). Because Nereus was a fish-like god-of-the-sea --
i.e. very much like Poseidon himself -- it suggests a close
relationship between the two, which would be the obvious case if
Nereus depicted, as I suspect, Nahorites. The question then
becomes: was "Nahor: broken into two syllables such that he came
to be called "Hor" and "Horites"? That may seem like a stretch, but

481
if Horites were Hurrians, and if Hurrians were named after Haran,
the city in which Nahor lived, the stretch is shortened.
Perseus was made to mate with Andromeda in Joppa, and as
this city was on the Israeli ocean shore just to the north of the
Gaza-to-Gath Avvite strip, I wonder if "Joppa" wasn't a variation
of "Avviy" (the Biblical term for Avvites). Joppa is said by some
to be named after Jupiter (or Japheth). As I'm about to identify
Apollo as an Avvite branch, I can begin to view Avvites as the
founders of the Jupiter cult, especially as I'm about to connect the
bee line to the first Romans.
Under this line of reasoning wherein Joppa (also "Jaffa") is
an Avviy city, the Avvites come out looking like "Iavva," which of
course evokes Javan, son of Japheth. It would then make for
exceptional logic that "Io" was a short form for the Avvites in that
"Ionian" has been said by many historians to be a variation
somehow of "Javan." Keep in mind that Io was, like Zeus,
depicted as a white Taurus (Aryans of Dor?), and that he and she
were made to mate. That is, ProZeus was an ally of the Joppa
Avvites, wherefore an ethic mix developed that gave ProZeus
some Avvite blood. But as Io was made to name the Bosphorus
strait, it's clear that she depicted the Busae/Buzi bee line, thus
equating Avvites with Buz. More evidence of this equation is
forthcoming.
I'll mention here, as is appropriate, that "Joppa is also the
name shared by a number of villages in Scotland; one on the
outskirts of Edinburgh, another on the outskirts of Ayr." Ayr
over-looks the island of Bute, and of course Edinburgh seems
named after Eden! That's the fast-man's way of connecting the
dragon line to Scotland.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joppa
Recall that I identified the Avidia/Avith variation of "Avviy"
with the "Avatar" destroyer of Indo-Aryan myth. Couldn't
"Jupiter" furnish "Avatar"? If so, then the Biblical Abaddon may
just be the Jupiter bloodline, even the Avvites, which then makes
the Coming of Jesus to destroy and replace the Dragon all the
more gigantic.
Prior to mating/mixing with Andromeda, Perseus had saved
her from a sea monster that was brought against the kingdom of
her parents. That sea monster was revealed as the kingdom of
Nereus, for Andromeda's kingdom had raised itself in pride above
the Nereids (suggesting family ties) to earn the attack of the
"monster." Might the Nereids (Nereus' bloodline/kingdom) have
been the Nairi of Lake Van since Nereus was the son of Pontus (a
Black-sea coastal land near Armenia)? As Nereus was the father of
ProTeus, it would seem that Zeus was rooted in the Nairi-
Nahorites, even the Bia peoples who named Lake Van..who just

482
may have been from Buz. Is it possible that "Bia" and "Buz"
became "dia/dio/dios/teus/zeus"?
It can't be a coincidence that Nereus had 50 children, as had
Danaus, as had Aegyptus, as had Caucon (probably same as
"Kikon"). This number 50, I think, is code for the Hecatonchire
("100 hands"), which in turn (in my opinion) is code for a Gogi
peoples. One (of only three) Cyclopes (monsters virtually the same
as Hecatonchire) was "Arges." We're going to identify Arge in a
few paragraphs as the Hyperborean peoples ... that founded Argos
and the Argos bee line, which included a certain Bias. One
Hecatonchire (there were only three) was named "Gyges," and
another "Cottus," the Cati/Cutha Kabalists, I assume. A third was
Briareus, while the father of Aphareus was Perieres! Are you with
me? The Kabala was a Cutha-Gogi mix from the
Perieres/Apharsite Elamites.
When Perseus and Andro-Meda mated, they (both Zeus
bloodlines) give birth to Gorgophone, perfectly expected in that
both Perseus and Andro-Meda depict Iranians. I can't help but see
that both depicted Gorgons, which would then disclose that
Aphareus was himself a depiction of Gorgons. Indeed,
Gorgophone was made the mother of Aphareus, this then possibly
placing Aphareus peoples in Israel if not Joppa. I would tend to
view the Perseus peoples as evolving into the Aphareus peoples,
and it may be in Israel that the Apharsites got their Apiru-like
name...when Persians mingled with Apiru. The Apharsites then
kept two homes, one in Israel and one back in Iran.
Acrisius put Danae and Perseus into a chest and floated them
off to sea, meaning that they left Israel by sea, in this case during
warfare with Acrisius and while losing the war. We might view
Perseus here as Aphareus and Gorgophone going to Greece, but
we cannot fail to view him as the Zeus peoples; that is, the Pro-
Zeus peoples settling Crete on the way to establish Zeus
proper...who was surrounded in myth by Curetes of Crete.
Meanwhile the Danaan ancestors of Perseus (i.e. from
Danaus), whom I'm assuming were Dina-ites from Ekron, had
been in Rhodes en route to ruling Argos. When Perseus arrived to
Greece, I deduce that he settled with the Danaan rulers of Argos,
for Perseus is made the founder of the twin city of Argos,
Mycenae. There is no question but that Zeus was allied to Danaans
at this point, which is precisely the picture in his mating with
Danae. As Perseus is a Gorgon/Persian peoples, while
Danaus/Danae was Africanized, I would view Zeus as the Gorgon
portion of the Zeus-Danae alliance. That is, Zeus comes out
looking like Aphareus/Abar/Avvite/Iberi/Apiru = Kabala Hebrew
peoples!

483
I would suggest that Danaus uprooted proto-Phoenicians
from the Argos area, because Agenor (from Argus) depicted proto-
Phoenicians. Agenor (Kagan?) was made father of Argus
Panoptes, who killed Echidna (the Akkadians), wherefore one
could surmise that Akkadians (the Cutha/Cati Kabala) were ruling
Argos at some point with the Argus line in proto-Phoenicia vying
for power. Note that "Panoptes" translates to Pan-Op-ites "all the
bee tribes." Indeed, as Apollo also killed the Echidna serpent (also
known as Python), it reveals Apollo as the Argus peoples, a solid
fact that becomes more apparent when we learn that a certain Arge
and Opis came to Apollo s island (in Greece) from the far-north
Hyperboreans (that Apollo depicted).
As the Cyclopes were from Tartarus (as was Echidna), and
were likewise killed by Apollo, Python/Echidna were the Cyclopes
Gogi. It therefore stands to reason that Argus Panoptes (i.e.
Apollo) was a Cyclopes peoples and therefore likely from the
Cyclopes tribe of Arges. I would now suggest that "Cyclopes"
should be read as Cycl-Opis, what the term likely means to the
initiated. And behold that Hera gave birth to Arge so that these
Gogi would trace to Horites if indeed Hera depicted Horites. If the
Horites were the Curetes, then of course the Curetes were Gogi.
Just as the Curetes were the root of the Trojans, so the Cyclopes
from Tartarus would configure to Dardanus, a co-founding Trojan
bloodline. As Trojans stem from Ares, so he too may have been an
Horite peoples in that Hera gave him birth (with Zeus). The
Horites thus appear as the Hros/Rosh of Aras/Araxes river, where
some say the Cutha lived. Gog, in Ezekiel 38, is revealed as the
ruler of the Rosh.
Agenor was assigned the son, Krotopos, who in turn gave
birth to Sthenelus the swan line. The latter term, at one time a
difficulty, is now easily deciphered as the Sithone branch of
Edones, wherefore my previous Sithone-Sidon connection now
seems viable (for Sidon was in Phoenicia). I would suggest that
"Krotopos is a Horite term i.e. Hor-topos. Mount Hor, north of
Byblos (in Phoenicia), comes to mind. Byblos was "Gebal" (like
French "abielle" = bee) to the locals, and is today Jubay (much like
Avviy or its hypothetical "Iavviy").
I had reasoned that the Phoenicians migrated together (or
roughly at the same time) with the Kothar-was-Khasis of the
Gath/Gaza region, to Cilicia, and that the Cati/Khassi peoples of
Cilicia then settled a new Cilicia in Phrygia, where they set up
their sun god, Attis, and their goddess Kybele, under codename
Eetion/Iasion, king of Thebe. Well, one can now conclude further
that, from Phrygia, the Cati (probably the Katz surname to this
day) settled Argos, but as they ultimately named Attica/Athens
after Attis, I conclude that their being ousted from Argos by the

484
Sidon branch of Argus is what caused a Cati re-settlement in
Athens, identified in myth as Aphrodite = Apiru-dite. In the
meantime the Cati were growing in Thrace as the
Getae/Edones ... while the Sithone branch of Edones I can only
interpret as the Argus bloodline from Sidon (rather than the one
from Gath).
It is known that Athens was settled by the Cecrops bloodline
(depicted as half serpent), and it may be that Athens is where the
Kabala joined the Gogi. But the two may have joined previously,
for example as the Hebros-Kikon mix that was in Rhodope
(Thrace). In any case, both the Kybele Kabala and Cecrops came
to rule Athens. Which of the two depicted the Cecrops snake-
portion is a toss-up; perhaps both in that the two fused together
were the Utu dragon line itself.
Because a part of Athens was called "Acropia" after the
Cecrops name, the mythical Cecrops could have been a reflection
of Ekron. That is, Athens was settled specifically by the Kabala-
Gorgon mix that were in Ekron. Cecrops would thereby trace back
to Acrisius, if indeed the latter depicted Ekron's inhabitants.
Serving as evidence that the Kabala were in Argos, Iasus is
said to give birth to Io, she being the goddess specific of Argos.
Iasus appears to be the same as Iasion, the latter of which depicted
the same Kabala peoples as Dardanus, a peoples about proto-Troy
in Phrygia (whom I would define as Typhon, "husband" of
Echidna, probably the Tubali who lived in conjunction with the
Iberi/Avars). That is, Iasion proto-Trojans came to Argos as the Io
Kabala. This then reveals that the Aryan Egyptian rulers as per Io
were the same as Hephaistos (Hebrew father of Kabala and
husband of Aphrodite), who was in fact intimately wrapped up in
Egyptian myth.
These Kabala Egyptians were the ones who furnished
Agenor/Phoenix in Phoenicia, according to at least one other myth,
but what no myth claims is that the same Egyptians also furnished
the Danaans in/near the Ekron region, for this is the big secret,
reveals (inadvertently) one online Kabalist, that the Kabala was in
Israel. As YHWH Himself does not reveal this in the Bible
outright, He too wanted to keep it a secret throughout most of
history... though He does give hint when equating a king of Tyre as
Satan himself. God would have reason to keep this a secret in that
He gave the dragon bloodline the right to rule the Earth until the
Appointed Time of its destruction, to prove to us all that a world
governed by Satan will produce countless evils (which the dragon
line blames on Him). It will likely turn out that ProZeus was
Satan's main line, even as "Dor" is perhaps the same as Tyre's
earlier name, Tsur. Keep in mind that the Dorians were, along with
the Cutha/Xuthus, made one of three main Hellenistic branches,

485
suggesting a distinction to be made between the Cati and the
Dorians. As the third Hellenistic group were the Aeolians, Gelanor
(introduced below) comes to mind.
When Danaus (know to have been a descendant of Io) came
to Greece, he was the Ekron-based Kabala cult coming to rule
Argos again, after the city had been taken for a term by the
Phoenician-based Kabala. If you wonder why almost all mythical
characters can be traced to the Kabala, it's because the Kabala
wrote the myths, stressing mainly their own movements. Sthenelus
(a depiction of the Sidon branch) gave birth to Gelanor, who must
have been the historical Gelonus/Geloni that later settled with the
Budini and Neuri north of Greece.
Because a mythical Sthenelus was also made king of Liguria,
it verifies that the Ligurians -- the holy grail line -- were from the
Sithone/Sidon/Phoenician branch of Kabala. This bloodline is the
Freemasonic phoenix symbol. The Getae Thracians, on the other
hand, the main stump of Edones, I would trace back to the Gaza-
region branch of Kabala, for the (pre-Philistine) inhabitants of
nearby Gath were "Gittites" after that city's name.
Th
e question now becomes whether or not the Satyrs were
named after the Sithones? I had traced them to the Getae because
Satrys were half goat. Perhaps their other half was the Sithone
branch. Pan, a Satyr, could therefore depict the Phoenicia-based
Kabala, the Sithones, suggesting very neatly that his father,
Hermes, was the Taut (alternative of "Thoth") peoples who settled
Sidon prior to coming to Arcadia (beside Argos). It's easy to figure
that the Taut peoples were the Egyptian Kabala ruled by the
historical king Thoth of Egypt. Since Greek myth places Agenor in
Sidon as an Io peoples originating in Egypt, a Taut-Agenor near-
equation seems likely. If Taut/Thoth depicted Dedanites (of
Abraham, I'm assuming, not Dedan of Arabia), then we ought to
view the Satrys as Dedanites.
One of the Cyclopes was named "Steropes, and I think this
converts to Satyr-Opis. The remaining Cyclopes, Brontes, I haven't
yet identified with even a stab.
While it would seem tidy to connect Arcadia to Akkadia, I
would suggest a better Arcadia connection to the Archevites (of
Erech). That is, the dragon cult of Erech was in Arcadia before the
Hermes line arrived to take over. As the Arcadian region west of
Argos is said to have been founded by Pelasgians, note that this
term can be understood as Pel-Asgi, evoking the Ashkenaz of Iran
that settled Ashkelon (on the Israeli sea coast just north of Gaza).
What's startling is that the Apiru of Akkadian and Hurrian/Hittite
records, yes the Hebrews, were logogrammed as "ASG-GAZ."
This is an incredible revelation for those tracing Ashkenazi
"Jews," for we now see that they were Kabala non-Jews meshed

486
with Ashkenazi (son of Togarmah) Aryans, and living at Gaza and
Ascalon in proto-Israel.
When Danaus arrived to Argos, he is said to have expelled
Gelanor...a depiction of Sithone Edones remember, since he was
son of Sthenelus. If Gelanor depicts the Geloni who much later
fled war to take refuge with the Budini and Neuri, then, if the latter
were Nahorites and Buzites, it shows kinship between they and
Gelanor Sithones, thus hardening my theory that the Budini had
been Edones. This then supports the view that the Eden cult was
honored by Nahor, and in fact carried by Nahor, if not devised by
Nahor and/or his fathers. Buz peoples (later the bee line) then
become equivalent to the Eden cult.
Gelanor may translate to the holy grail line out of Phoenicia,
if I'm correct in defining the holy grail as the mythical Cilix, son of
Phoenix, who depicted the Kabala cult in Cilicia. As Agenor is
said in one myth version to give birth to Phoenix, and as another
Agenor gives birth to Sthenelus, Sthenelus and Phoenix may
depict the same peoples precisely, explaining why Europa was the
daughter of Phoenix while Sthenelus was mythical symbol of
Liguria, the center of all Europe.
I'm assuming that the Cilician holy grail were the Cati,
otherwise depicted as Cadmus, brother of Cilix (and Europa).
Gelanor should equate with Cilix/Cadmus/Europa, the holy grail
line(s). It's premature at this point to decipher Gelanor as the
historical Alans, and I think the Galli/Gauls are a much better
interpretation, even as the Gauls are defined by historians as the
Celts or northern Italy (where Liguria was located) and France
(where the Redones were spinning their wheels). The Gelanor holy
grail line was not the same as the Danaan line which ousted
Gelanor from Argos. The Danaan line furnished the British
Danaan and Bolgs, the Celts proper as distinguished from the
Gauls.
Lynceus (from Egyptus) reminds me of "lynx," a wild cat.
He may have been a peoples that became the Lingones of Gaul,
who are said to have become the Lugii. Lynceus ruled Argos after
Danaus, followed by Abas and Acrisius. Proteus (twin of Acrisius)
ruled Tirrns near Argos, a term that solidly evokes the Etruscanss
by theirr Tyrrheni"? designation, which was inadvertentlyrevealedd
to me by Greenway7 as a possible versionof "Tarragon," whichh
theback/sidee of her cereal box claimed was a version of "Dragon."
The cereal was not, I repeat not, theoriginal Grape Nut. As the
Etruscan version of Zeus was "Tinia," expect Zeus to have
furnished the Thyni andBithyni/Budini..
Lynceus was the son of Aphareus, I remind you,andd
Aphareus' brother was created, "Leucippus"; ignoring the horse (or
kitten)) suffix, we are left with Leuci, the name of anhistoricall

487
peoples exactly, smack to the north of the Lingones! Both
Aphareus and Leucippus were sons of Gorgophone so that indeed:
1) Gauls were Gorgons, 2) Gelanor depicted Gauls, and, 3) the
"nor" ending may suitably depict Nahor Gauls who became the
Scandinavian Nor, mythical founder of Norway. The Nahorites
turn up further north-west as the Catti-branch Batavians (in
Netherlands); could that be Bat-Avi? As Nor and Gor ruled
Norway together, might the second refer to Horites/Hurrians
named after Haran, the city in which Nahor lived? But I look now
at whether "Netherland" could not have been originally Nahorland.
I'll also suggest that Lynceus/Lingones became the red rose
Lancastrians (England).
Two mornings separated by not many days I awoke hearing,
on each occasion, a single word echo in my mind that led to key
connections. I can't recall the first just now but the second word
was Sparta ... that almost instantly led me to make the Sparti-
Sepharvite/sephiroth connection while still in a drowse. It felt as
though the Lord was communicating to me something He wants us
all to know. A third occasion occurred July 9th, and the word was
"Al Qaida." I had no idea what this term could have to do with
Greek myth, but within five minutes I realized, to my amazement,
that it was essentially equivalent to "Cati." I trust this "voice" I
have been hearing, and I think the modern Al Qaida is therefore
connected to the Cati.
This made me wonder whether the online conspiracy reports
concerning a sinister Bush-family connection to Osama bin Laden
may have any truth, and just as I wrote this sentence I realized that
"Laden" is essentially the spelling of the mythical Ladon dragon!
So I went to the houseofnames.com to see if I could connect the
Bush surname to Cati peoples. I found that the surname was also
"Bos," evoking the Poseidon/bee line, but when I found that
another variation was "Buski," which means "bush" in Norman.
After some contemplation, I found three black boar heads on the
Booth Coat; the English Bush Coat uses three black boars!!
A day or two after finding that, I found that the Redding Coat
is exactly that of the Booth Coat. Joseph Redding was the first
President and priest of the Bohemian-Grove club, and the creator
of the club's Molech-like human-sacrifice ceremony.
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/organisations/Bohemian_Grove_symbolism.htm
The Bush Coat uses a goat's head on the Crest, which may
connect to the bee peoples that raised Zeus (details in the coming
chapter). I do note the central Fleur de Lis on the Bush Coat, and
the two gold spread Phoenix. A spread phoenix is found in the
Chief of the Bosco/Busci/Bosio Coat of Lombardy (north Italy).
Wikipedia says that "Qaida" is a Mujahidden movement,
where the latter term is rooted in " qaideen." The article says that

488
Al Qaida is a resurgence of ancient "Ghazi" holy war, the goal of
which was to establish Muslim/Turk world rule. The earliest Ghazi
movement was Iranian, rooted in the Sassanid empire of Afghan-
Aryan regions, and was an offshoot of the Seleucid and Parthian
empires. In this way one could view Al Qaida as the neo-Seleucid
empire of Daniel 11 and Revelation 13:2, kingdoms ruled by the
anti-Christ. The Ghazi were characterized by a plundering
lifestyle, akin to how I perceive the aggressive dragon line rulers
who for their bully-wickedness and utter lack of consciences came
to rule much of the earth. The Ghazi evolved into the Ottoman
Turks who were cousins of the Khazars.
^ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghazi * warriors
Osman I was the first Ottoman Turk ruler. He and successive
rulers used "Gazi" in their throne names, but were also known as
"Khans," the short form for "Khagen." Ottomans were themselves
offshoots of Kok/Gok-Turks, what I suspect were a Gogi peoples
even as were the Khazars. The "Gazi" designation may have root
in the Gath/Gaza Kabala, for the Kothar-wa-Khasis ruled there,
and evolved into the Khazars (as goes my view).
A future Gogi leader leading Al Qaida and Saddam loyalists
to power in the Middle East is what I believed to be (before I even
started this dragon-line section of my book) the Biblical anti-
Christ. I had, before starting this section, rooted the "Star of
David" in Khazar Zionists of the Templar period, and so this
would reveal that the Kabala was an integral part of the Khazars.
The same may be true of the entire Muslim religion; it may have
been a creation of Kabala branches mixing with Turks/Muslims.
George Bush Jr. has said that the Muslim religion is "a great
religion."
I have here some room to add some insight that the world
should know. It is the belief of many Christians that the present
age started in about 2350 BC, at the end of the year-long Flood,
and that all records prior to the Flood have been destroyed.
Evolutionists/atheists/pagans wish to add as much time as possible
to 2350 BC in order to cause the world to deny the veracity of the
Flood. And so they have added several centuries to recorded
history, but in any instances where they speak of man much more
older than 3,000 BC, there are no written documents to support
their claim.
King Menes of Egypt is timed by secular "experts" at
3200ish BC; the lists begin at that time with Narmer, father of
Menes. It is obvious, however, that Egyptian king lists have much
repetition, and there's no doubt in my mind that "experts" know it
but disregard their own dishonesty. When I spent merely an hour
seeking some repetition, I found it! Depending on who is giving
the data, the first dynasty list is roughly as follows:

489
Menes, Djer, Athothis, Teti/Ati, Djet, Merbapin,
Semerkhet ... (and later) Sneferka.
These kings are the same as those below, listed (by
Britannica) for the end of the fifth dynasty and start of the sixth
(approx. 2400-2200 BC according to Britannica):
Menkauhor, Djedkare, Isesi, Unas, Teti, Userkare
(Phiops), Pepe I Meryre...(and later) Neferkare
(Britannica "Egypt" 1970).
It's common knowledge that Menes was also called "Aha,"
wherefore it is easy to see that Menkauhor is a Menes-Aha
combination.
Djer easily modifies to Djedkare.
Athothis easily equates with Isesi because a "th" modifies to
an "s"
Sometimes Djer is viewed as Uenephes (see website below),
which easily equates to Unas.
And Merbapin, when flipped to "Bapin-Mer," easily
becomes "Pepi Meryre."
A few generations later, Sneferka is named as a first-dynasty
possibility, who must have been the same as Neferkare of the sixth
dynasty.
I can't help but pity the impoverished historians who made
that blunder. The serious question is, how many other kings have
been repeated twice, or even three times, by our worshipful
Egyptologists? See
http://www.nemo.nu/ibisportal/0egyptintro/2egypt/index.htm
I would move Menes to about 2200 BC at the earliest, and
would suggest that he was from the Aryan Ionians, even from the
Poseidon Buzi Medes, sons of Nahor. This may be why the
Pollocks are said to be rooted in Egyptians, for I have a feeling
that I have found Stewart roots in Nahorites of western Europe.
Menes was likely named in honor of Manes/Mannai, a region not
far from Cutha-infested Gozan, the peoples most despised by
YHWH, the ones whom He in vain begged Israel not to connect
with.

490
WHERE ART THOU,
OPIS' STINGER OF DEATH?
July 2006

During the period in which the proto-Greek Avvites, from


the non-Israelite ocean shores of Israel, were colonizing Argos
regions, Sepharvites from Mesopotamia (same as Subartu, I
reckon) had settled Thebes on mainland Greece. I say this because
the "Sparti" (i.e looks like Sephar/Subar) are the ones recorded in
myth to have settled the city, after war with the mythical codeword
" Cadmus," whom I interpret as the Cati holy grail line from the
Israelite sea shores, including the Phoenician shores.
This alliance was the Cati mingling with the Ares dragon (it
reminds me of Britain's interchanging of the lion and dragon
symbols). To this day the Kabala honors the "sephiroth," revealing
to me that the Kabala and the Sparti were one. As Harmonia
(probably Armenia) was the daughter of Ares who was made wife
of Cadmus, I would also identify Harmonia as that same
Sepharvite/Sparti Kabala. Harmonia was also made the sister of
Dardanus wherefore she configures to Trojans. That is, view
Trojans (and therefore Romans) as in-part Sepharvite Kabalists
who founded Sparta and/or neo-Sparta.
Did the Sepharvites also pass through Israel before
colonizing Greece, as had the Avvites? Myth says that only five
Sparti remained of the Ares dragon after the war with Cadmus, and
while it'srobably
p a long shot it evokes the five cities in Israel,
mentioned in the Bible, that were home to the Avvites -- Ekron,
Gaza, Ascalon, Gath, and Ashdod.
One can for other reasons, in any case, suppose that the Cati
were named after the non-Philistine Gittites of Gath, that they
moved north, not necessarily to mix with, but to create what would
become known as the Phoenicians proper (i.e. to become the
"Phoenix" of Greek myth). They then passed through Ugaritic
Syria into Cilicia (where the Cati proper lived); then founded
Thebe (no "s") in the Troy region, where they set up their
Kybele/Sabazios cult; then they named Thebes after their
Saba/Sheba designation. As they became the Sparti in the process,
one must conclude that Sepharvites were the root of the holy-grail
line depicted by Leda the Spartan.

491
As you can see, the holy grail has nothing to do with Jesus,
but is the gold cup seen in the hand of Babylon the Great Mother
of Harlots (Revelation 17:4), filled with the blood of her murders
and ceaseless conquests to the point that she ruled the kings of all
the earth (verse 188). This is the thorn-among-paradise reward that
mankind is being granted for failing Him, where He remains aloof
in the term called "history," when Satan has his horned way with
most, except for those for whom YHWH wishes to intervene and
protect, to grow and enlighten, to strengthen and mature, to save
and to glorify, upon the backdrop of shame and disgrace for the
rest, the regrets and the tears, the pain and the torment, and sting of
death.
We find that Sthenelus removed the Danaans from the throne
of Mycenae, and he at this time would translate to the same as his
"son," Gelanor, the Sithone/Sidonian peoples who had previously
lost Argos to Danaus. One can therefore surmise that the Gelanor
Sidonians, in the interim, became the founders of Thebes by that
name, and that they were therefore the same stock as the
Cati/Cadmus of proto-Thebes, "Cadmeia." And so when we see
Sthenelus back on the Argive throne, its the Cati back on...to be
distinguished from the Sepharvites whom Cadmus "killed" (i.e.
over-powered).
The Avvites and Sepharvites of Mesopotamia are mentioned
side-by-side in 2 Kings 17:31, making it possible, as I'm
suggesting here, that they migrated together, or at least one
following the other, to Greece. I view this migration long before
the Philistine from Caphtor/Crete came to remove the Avvites
from the Gaza region. I would suggest that it goes back to the
period of the historical Labaya, when Egyptian kings had the upper
hand in Israel (i.e. before Israel was formed). It's worthy of
mention that I tried to identify Labaya, as have countless others,
unsuccessfully, yet now that I am developing these chapters on
Avvites of Gaza, I see that Labaya may have been named after the
"Avviy" term used by the Old Testament.
baya was frustrated by Abdi-Heba, king of Jerusalem on
La
behalf of the Egyptians, whom I identified tentatively (in my
Sheba and Dedan chapter) as an A-Budii bloodline but mixed with
Tesheb/Sheba (the mythical Teshub was married to Hebat).
Labaya was a pro-Apiru power that sought to conquer the interior
Gath/Gaza region (including Gezer) and Megiddo, and I'm going
to take a stab and suggest that he or his Avvite descendant(s)
merely lived as citizens in the Gaza coasts, but eventually
succeeded against Pharaoh so as to form the Avvite kingdom there.
Assuming that Abdi-Heba represented the Sepharvites, I'll add that
websites suggest an alliance between Labaya and Abdi-Heba even
though they were at first vying for power in the region. I suggest

492
that they got together and over-threw the Egyptian powers (of the
region) when YHWH decimated the Egyptians at the Red Sea.
I should mention that the mythical Hera gave birth to "Hebe"
(Hercules' wife), and that this may identify Abdi-Heba as a Horite
peoples...if Hera so depictes Horites. If not, it's certain that she
depicts the Aryan peoples of the Aras/Araxes valley, for Hera gave
birth to Ares and he (and she) must have depicted that valley (a
Rosh/Hros peoples, I'm fairly convinced). It is said that the Cutha
lived in that valley. Diodorus Siculus placed Scythian origins in
the Araxes valley, and so now I see a "Cutha" in "Scythian." Don't
you?
Again, Joshua reports that the up-coming Israelites left the
five Avvite cities alone when over-powering most of the
Canaanites. Judges 1:27 then reveals that the Israelites did not
drive out the inhabitants of Megiddo or nearby Dor, recalling from
another chapter that I had tied these to the Macedonians and
Dorians (of Greece). A further point to make here is that the Apiru
are to be distinguished from Sheba if indeed Abdi-Heba
represented the Sheba Hebrews, for Abdi-Heba complained by
letter to the Egyptian king that Labaya had deeded Canaanite
regions to the Apiru. As I identified the Dor inhabitants as Zeus in
the previous chapter, it would seem that Labaya's Apiru were the
Zeus peoples left intact next to the Israelites. Modern Kabalists
wish to convince us that their god is YHWH, but you should know
better, that Zeus was not YHWH, for YHWH was never rooted in
Sepharvites nor any other Chaldean bloodlines, but rather was
opposed to all bloodlines/gods.
There is a question as to whether the Avvites were also part
of the Kabala root, and if so, how extensively/importantly? I traced
the Stewarts to the Cohens without doubt, but the question is, were
Cohens a part of the Avvites, or of the Sepharvites? It is known
that the Katz surname is tied closely to the Cohen surname to this
day. But who made up the fundamental portions of the Cati: the
Avvites or Sepharvites? Avvites, I think, for they worshiped dogs.
One mythical son of Sthenelus was Gelanor, king of Argos,
and who knows but that he depicted the Alans, as say some.
Another son of Sthenelus was Eurystheus/Eury-Stheus (Eury =
wide), and he belonged to a Europe-wide Sithone/Satyr peoples, as
even Sthenelus would be used as a symbol of Liguria. As this
Europe-wide peoples were the Celts and Gauls -- brother-peoples
known to have been pagans to the core of their cores -- they were
of the holy, I repeat HOLY, grail line. Yet today this line having
cruel and inhuman rulers is being connected to the Lamb-like Son
of the Mighty and Magnificent, but Meek, YHWH.
It was under Eurystheus that Hercules went to Erethlyn,
Wales, to war with Geryon the Gorgon "monster" (of the Medusa-

493
Gorgon branch that was typically at war with the Danaan
Gorgons). This means that there was an alliance between the
Eurystheus Cati and the Danaans (Hercules was the depiction of
the Danaan and Danann bloodline during this period). If you didn't
read the previous chapter, the Danaans here are viewed as being
from the Dina-ites of the Avvite/Sepharvite fold mentioned in Ezra
4:9. Some Bible translations don't include all the peoples in that
list, but the KJV does; the NIV leaves out the Dinaites, the
Apharsites, and the Dehava; the latter are "Dahae" = "wolf"
peoples of the Avar/Daghestan region, and therefore Avvites in my
opinion. Do you think there is a reason that these peoples were left
out by the NIV?
Assuming that the Apharsites were the Sepharvites, it would
agree with others who've considered that "Subartu" was a version
of "Abiru." In other words, as a capital "S" may or may not be
used, I noted that south of Dor/Megiddo there is the city of Hepher
while east of Megiddo there was a city of Sepphoris (or
"Saffuriya") just 4 miles north-west of Nazareth (maps 30 and 21
in Zondervan's Bible Atlas). I would definitely root the Kabbala in
Sepphoris:
"Josephus called Sepphoris 'the ornament of all
Galilee.' Herod Antipas chose this site in 4 B.C. as the
capital of his government... The people of SNAD], horis
supported Vespasian in the Jewish Revolt [of
surrendering to the Romans and thus preventing the
destruction of the city (War III.2.4). They even minted
coins in honor of Vespasian as the “peace maker."
http://www.bibleplaces.com/sepphoris.htm
What a shocker. But, then, the Roman emperors were of the
dragon bloodline, as were the Kabalists, and moreover the
Kabalists were not Israelites by blood. With cruel Herod (the
Great) ruling in Sepphoris, one wonders if he wasn't of the same
bloodline. Coins of this city, for one, were engraved with images
of the Hermes caduceus. Catholic tradition, no surprise, placed the
parents of Mary, mother of Jesus, in Sepphoris (a possibility but
likely a self-serving claim made by dragon-line members). Reports
are now spreading that Jesus grew up in that city. The Templars
came and made their defenses here, using the city as their fortress.
Since Perseus is said to have lost Mycenae to Proteus, and
since Sthenelus took the Argos throne rather than the sons of
Perseus, a Proteus-Sthenelus (i.e. Zeus-Sthenelus) equation seems
possible. However, it looks more like an alliance because the wife
ofPrteuswagd,"Shnboe.Asrfat(I)w
Lycian king, it reveals that the Sidonians (i.e. Sthen) had settled
Lycia before entering Greece. And as Proteus was married to these

494
Lycian peoples, Zeus peoples must have been in Lycia as well,
which then allows us to make the Proteus-Crete connection
because Lycians were on Crete. Since Avvites were wolf
worshipers while "lyko" means "wolf," perhaps Lycia was named
by its Avvite inhabitants.
I note that Mount Hor north of Sidon was at the city of
Batruna, and that the Sthenelus peoples in Lycia were tagged,
"Iobates" (Io-Bates, I assume). With a Proteus-Sthenelus alliance
in Lycia, and under the assumption that the Sidonians were
Horites, the possibility arises that the Sidonians became the
Carians (adjacent to Lycia). Could the Greek Butes name
originate, therefore, in the Horites? Were the Budini a Horite
peoples? When the historical Geloni sought refuge among the
Budini, were they the mythical Gelanor, son of Sthenelus, and
therefore Sidon-region Horites? This is an important question if
the Satrys were named after Seir (a Horite peoples in Edom) and
after the Sithones.
We find that Proteus was allied to Bellerophon, who can be
deciphered as a Medusa-Gorgon peoples in that he was allied to
(or symbolized with) the Pegasus horse that is a known Medusa
branch. Bellerophon was opposed to the Rhodes Cimmerians (i.e.
those who would become the Redones), for he fought and killed
the Chimaera dragon in Lycia.
The Rhodes Cimmerians -- the Rose Line -- were the
Danaans for various reasons, one being that Danaus was given two
daughters, Rhodia and Rhode, the very wife (Rhoda) of Helios, we
can only assume, who was "grandmother" to three major
Cimmerian cities of Rhodes, including Lindos. The Danaans,
because they were from Telegonus of Egypt (Io's husband), had
been the Telchines there and therefore settled with the Telchines of
Rhodes. Since the Danaans are said to have built the city of
Lindos, it was apparently a Telchine city. One is led to equate the
Telchines with the Rhodes Cimmerians from Helios and Rhoda.
Or, more specifically, Rhoda depicted the Danaan Telchines that
were allied to the Helios Cimmerians. This is the red dragon that
became Wales and the Redones.
Because Telegonus also put forth the Agenor-Phoenix
Phoenicians, these can also be placed in the Telchine camp, and
because Telchines worshipped Hera, I'm going to view the original
Phoenicians as Horites (mixed with Hamites of Egypt, I would
imagine). Other Horites not engaged in Egypt could conform to the
Curetes of Rhodes. Myth tells that the Curetes of Crete ousted the
Carians from Rhodes, but it's yet possible that these were two
fighting' Horite cousins.
Because another myth tells that Zeus was raised by Curetes
on Crete, one could rush to conclusions that Zeus depicted the

495
Horites; there is yet the possibility that he depicted Avvites
supported by Horites. Then again, it was said that Zeus was raised
by bees, and this could mean that he was allied to Avvites but was
not a depiction of Avvites. With further thought I would tie him to
the Sepharvites simply because he is the chief god, and the
Kabalists, who wrote the myths and made him the chief god, tie
themselves most of all to the sephirot/Sepharvites.
It is said that the infant/boy Zeus was fed by bees and by the
goat, Amalthea. The goat horn of Amalthea became the
cornucopia, wherefore the Stewarts, who are symbolized by
cornucopia, may just know that they derive from the peoples on
Crete depicted by Zeus and/or Amalthea.
Bellerophon was from Corinth and therefore configures to
the Hermes/Aeetes bloodline, revealing that Hermes was of the
Medusa Gorgons as was Aeetes. These characters were the holy
grail line at Thebes, also the Ares dragon and the golden fleece,
but it was wicked and not at all golden. The Chimaera dragon was
then a second dragon line, in competition with the Ares dragon. As
Belarus means "White Rus," so Bellerophon could depict Aryans,
as does Ares, and as does Hermes and Aeetes, explaining why
Bellerophon was connected to the white Pegasus horse. I therefore
suspect that Saxons stem from the Ares dragon, and that
Merovingians were in part from that dragon. Bellerophon's father
was Glaucus, he son of Corinthian queen Meropes. Note that
"glucose" = Greek "glykys" = sweet.
But the Chimaera dragon is a red one, and therefore the one
that founded the Welsh/Britons. Being from the Danaan/Telchines
of Rhodes, the red dragon furnished the Danes and the Redones
and therefore likely the red portion of Merovingians.
Forbid that I would condemn anyone for being from the
dragon line, or else I would condemn myself. Rather, I speak
against the rulers and propagators of the cult, who feel that their
blood is somehow superior, sacred, deserving of world rule, and
incapable of being content/satisfied with subservient roles.
Geryon was of the Medusa Gorgons and therefore of the
white dragon, and if Hermes was likewise of the white dragon,
then Great Ormos beside Erethlyn was of the Geryon empire. The
red Welsh must have been from Hercules, the Danaan who
conquered Geryon. Note that Danaus was given "Atlanteia"
(website below) for a wife (with such daughters as Rhode, Rhodia,
Medousa, and Gorge), which wife I think refers to the Hercules
Danann finding some alliance with the Geryon Atlanteans. As
Hercules was kin to Gorgophone (victors over/descendants of
Gorgon Medusa), we might define the red dragon as such
(Gorgophones). Greece was founded by Graea, while the Medusa
was depicted as "Graeae," wherefore Perseus (and the Danaans)

496
coming to Greece was a second wave of Gorgons that conquered
the first, red victorious over white.
http://www.theoi.com/Nymphe/NympheAtlanteiaPhoibe.html
What of the Ladon/Lotan dragon? I noticed that flowing by
Tyre into the Mediterranean there is the Litani river. Hardly much
evidence in itself of a connection to Lotan. But Lotan was a
Ugarit-specific dragon not far north of Tyre. Plus, Lotan was the
son of Seir, a Horite, and perhaps Lotan's son, Hori, named Mount
Hor still closer to Tyre. Could we then begin to view this dragon
as the white one? It was, after all, protecting the garden of Geryon.
I suppose I'll have to place Latins under the white-dragon
category, if, that is, they did not marry with red-dragon
counterparts.
The war between Thebes and Argos was one between the
Ares-Hermes line in Thebes and the Tydeus boar line. That is,
Tydeus is shown in myth with a boar symbol on his shield. He was
the first to invade Thebes, successfully. I'm wondering if the
peoples depicted by "Tydeus" furnished the historical Taddei
surname in Italy that I am trying to trace to triple-red chevron
symbol of Wales and the Hebrew/Bavarian Illuminati. Note that
Tydeus was killed by Melanippus (ignore ippus suffix and read as
Melan), a possible depiction of Celts who founded Milan (northern
Italy).
In these times, the Proteus kingdom was ruled by the Bias
and Melampus (brothers) bloodlines, still a Proteus (ProZeus/Dor)
bloodline, and Tydeus had married into the Bias bloodline so that
if Tydeus furnished the Taddei surname, the Bias peoples would
have followed to Italy ... and may have been both the Apollo and
Jupiter roots that Romans tied themselves to. More specifically,
Tydeus married the daughter of Bias' grandson, Adrastus, which
evokes the Adriatic sea that separates Italy from the Illyro-Grecian
world. With that in mind, see that (brackets not mine, italic mine):
"In Greek mythology, Melisseus ("bee-man"), the
father of the nymphs Adrasteia and Ide who nursed the
infant Zeus on Crete, was the eldest and leader of the
nine Kuretes of Crete"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melisseus
There is more evidence below that the Tydeus migration to
Italy included a peoples descended from the bees of Crete, and that
the Welsh/Britons are from them as well. And the bee peoples of
Crete are suspect as the Bias peoples allied to Tydeus. I would add
that if Tydeus did become the Taddei Italians and Tudor Welsh,
the Calydonian boar ought to be viewed as a red dragon line i.e.
from the Telchines/Danaans.

497
Gorgophone was given Oebalus for a husband, who sounds
like he might have been the same as Eubulus of Crete, father of
Britomartis. I recall that Geoffrey of Monmouth made Brutus the
founder of the Bretons/Britons, and, correct me if I'm wrong, was
the one who named Merlin, "Myrddin," the two points together
evoking Brito-martis. I say this because the Merlin/Arthur peoples
were connected by writers to the holy grail, while Gorgophone
with Oebalus gave birth to Tyndareus, father of Leda the swan, the
proto-Ligurian grail line. I suggest that Oebalus depicted the
Phoenician city of Gebal (Byblos) and that Eubulus referred to the
same citizens removed to Crete, probably the Cretans (prior to
Europa/Minoans) under Amalthea and her bee-father king of
Crete, Melisseus/Melissus. But this story just never ends, for
Kabala/Kybele is evoked in both Gebal and Oebalus/Eubulus, even
as Manes, the father-peoples of the Attis-Kybele cult, would
translate to the Mino/Minoans. And who knows but that Oebalas
and Eubulus were not Apis codes.
Talaus, who could have depicted peoples destined to name
Toulouse, France, was the son of either Poly bus or Bias, wherefore
the two, Bus and Bias, were likely the same peoples, by which I
mean to point out that Bias depicted a "Bus" peoples and therefore
possibly the Posa/Poseidon peoples who named Positano.
I now want to trace the Patricians of Italy from Tydeus. The
first Roman emperors were from the Patrician bloodline, a sacred
line that I just learned was rooted in the Sabina rather than the
Romans, and that it entered the Romans only when they mixed
with Sabina rulers. The Romans were Trojans, and the Sabina
would appear to stem from the anti-Trojan Greek faction. In the
war between Argos and Thebes (i.e. between Tydeus and Ares),
we have what can be considered phase one of the (upcoming)
Trojan war, with Thebes, supported by Hermes, playing the Trojan
part.
One can also view the Trojans as the Kybele-Kabala; keep in
mind here as we discuss the Sabina that Kybele was also known as
Saba(zios). The Greeks (i.e. Athens) were likewise a Kybele
peoples that warred with their Trojan cousins; this may have been
a Dedan versus Sheba war if I'm correct in identifying Kybele as
Dedan originally but later over-taken by Sheba (see a previous
chapter for details). Recall also that I'm hypothesizing that the
Tydeus/Taddei peoples referred to Dedan.
Going back to the beginnings of Greece, to the Cutha under
codeword Xuthus (son of Hellen), we find that his daughter,
Diomede, would conform nicely as ancestral to (i.e. same peoples
as) Diomedes, son of Tydeus. Therefore view the Tydeus name
and the Sabina as Cutha Kabalists from Cutha in Akkadia, but
probably also as the Gath/Gittite/Cati holy grail line. Diomedes

498
was the second-greatest Greek warrior in the Trojan war, and was
depicted as plunging his spear into Ares himself. Thus the Tydeus-
Diomedes peoples were important Greeks, though I define Greeks
as a Cutha-Gorgon mix.
Diomede (daughter of Xuthus) gave birth to Actor, king of
Opis in Phocis (keep in mind for a moment that Phocaeans played
a role in the Rhodanus/Eridanus ethnico). Actor gave birth to
Menoetius, king of Opis. And before going on to reveal a pack of
bees, I want to say that this term, Menoetius, reminds me of
"Maenad," the sacred women/transvestites of Dionysus, that latter
of which was not only a bee peoples, but a pine-cone (i.e. Attis)
worshiping peoples, as was Menoetius if he is to be understood as
Mena-Attis.
Could we read "Opis" as "apis" = bee? Indeed, for Menoetius
was also a son of Clymene (Cly-Mene), while she depicted, for
one, the "wife" of Merops ("sumthing bee"?), king of Ethi opia
Ethiopia" is like the suffix on (Ethi-be?).Nowprfixn"
Meno-Etius. As another mythical Clymene (same peoples) was the
mother of Atalanta, while she depicted the Erytheia empire first
ruled by Geryon (Erethlyn, Wales), so we find that another
Menoetius (same peoples) was depicted as a shepherd of Geryon's
Erytheia! Yet another Clymene was mother of Phaethon, the
Python peoples of Phocis that crashed into Eridanus. If that's not
enough, another Clymene was mother of Diomedes himself, while
the Clymene that was mother of Menoetius was also mother of
Epimetheus and Prometheus , where the "medes" root of
"Diomedes" is apparent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clymene
You're not studying for an exam. Just know that these
peoples were all bee-related and that myth writers must have had
one honey of a headache keeping their history straight in this
manner.
The Clymene that was mother of Menoetius was also mother
of Atlas, and because Atlas gave birth to Maia/Maja, and also
because I think "Atlantis" is to be understood as At-Lantis, where
"At" refers both to Utu and Atti(s), so I will identify Maia as the
Magi Medes, which then off-the-cuff makes Atlas ancestor of the
Medes and of the Kabala. As Utu may have been a Sumerian form
of "Adam," so I might root Edom in Utu. Menoetius should
perhaps be understood as Meno-Attis (Manes was the
"grandfather" of Attis).
But there's another angle, well after the Sumerian period, for
Maja was the goddess of the Abruzzo region of Italy, and perhaps
also other eastern parts of Italy. She is said by those Italians to
have come into their region to look for her Atlas-line children,
which is a story that should prove to mean that they had been

499
there, but had moved away to an unknown location. In this way
"Atlas" should prove to be the term that named "Italos/Italy. I'm
thinking that Atlas and Aetolia (of Greece) are synonymous, the
root of "Italy." And so we find that Tydeus, with the boar symbol
on his shield, was a Calydonian (son of Oeneus king of Calydon),
but that Calydonians were attached royally to Aetolia. The
Tydeus-Italian connection becomes quite solid, but also note that
Leda (proto-Italians) was daughter of a king of Aetolia.
Behold that while Hephaistos was Vulcan in Italy, showing a
move to Italy, and while his wife was Aphrodite (which I view as
the Apiru of Chaldea), Vulcan's wife was Maia, revealing that
Abruzzo (and the Abreu surname at its root) was named after the
same Apiru peoples depicted by Aphrodite. Aphrodite was Cabero
in that Cabero was the wife of Hephaistos as well (i.e. Cabiro =
Aphro), meaning that Maia depicted the Kabeiri/Kabala cult in
Italy.
The Tydeus-Italian connection becomes quite solid below,
but also note that Leda (proto-Italians) was daughter of a king of
Aetolia.
Put it another way, that Atlas was considered the first
peoples of Arcadia, and since the first Arcadians were the
Pelasgians by other reports, one can equate Atlas with Pelasgians,
who I think should be understood as Pel-Asgi i.e. the Ashkenaz.
Then note that Aeneas (founder of Romans) was given Ascanius as
a son.
Menoetius (king of Opus the Bee-Town remember) was the
father of Patroclus, and I'm here exploring whether he was the root
of the Patricians, because I see logic in it. A link from the
Menoetius-Patroclus family to the Sabina would clinch that theory.
What if Opis named the Appian Way???
I'm also wondering if Opus wasn't connected to Apis, the
tyrant of Argos depicting the bee line. The first thing to point out
is that Arge and Opis were made two virgins coming to Delos
(Apollo's island off of Greece) from the Hyperboreans, and this --
unless it's a cosmic-size coincidence -- in a nutshell gives the far-
north origin of Argus and Apis ... roughly the first rulers of Argos.
Multiple points come to mind. One, that these two depict
proto-Apollo and proto-Artemis peoples that became the Python of
Phocis (later Delphi), which was later "killed" by Apollo (i.e.
when the Apollo wave came down). It's notable here that Hera
supported Python, wherefore Python may have depicted Horites if
Hera did. Two, the bee line is hereby rooted in the wolf and boar
lines that were the Hyperboreans, the Gogi of the far north, that is.
Three, since the Gogi/Gorgons depicted themselves with the
Taurus bull, it could explain why Apis became the bull-cult
symbol. My hunch is this, that "apis" derived from the same root

500
as "apex," a point. It could therefore refer to the bull horn, or to the
bee stringer.
Of theories there are no end. It may just be that the bee line is
thought by occultists to be the apex of the Freemasonic pyramid.
Just as Arge could refer to an arch (as in "Archevites"), where
"arch" refers to top/high/chief, so Apis may carry the meaning of
top/chief...the eye in the pyramid... watching us ... controlling how
we live, how we think, how we behave... culture-creating, social-
engineering, fallible Illuminatists have much of your life in their
hands, and I don't think they care a bahoola for you or your
progress or your benefits. What if, just as "delos" means
"clear/illumination," that "Atlas" = "adelos" = unclear = hidden =
secret? Should our rulers keep such secrets from us? This is not
sedition; this is fair play; give us our pay, our due, the truth, or get
off the royal toilet and give someone else the chance to do it right.
I nominate Yahshua. Do I have a seconder?
Let's back up to the time of Apis and Argus. Argus was of
the Apis bloodline, and so let's view Argus as the bee line's
continuation. Behold, Argus married Evadne, what looks like
"Avith" and "Avidia," terms describing the Avvites of Edom and
Bactria respectively. Evadne was the daughter of Strymon and
Neaira, and while the Edones lived on the Strymon, note that the
river appears named after the Satyrs. And what can we say about
"Neairi"? Was it Nahor, since the Bessi Thracians were priests of
the Satyrs? After all, Buz was Nahor's son whom I am tracing to
the very dregs of the bee line. Are you with me? Evadne -- the
Avvites in Thrace -- was the daughter of -- i.e. the same peoples as
-- Nahor and Buz! ! ! This explains why Nahor and the Avvites
were both wolf worshipers!! But there's more.
Argus had Ecabasus for a son, which may be understood as
Ec-Abas, a term depictingthe Avvites (Biblical "Avviy") under
codename "Abas," whose bloodline would soon (under his "son,"
Acrisius) marry into the Danaan bloodline. Another son was
Epidaurus, possibly E i-Dor or even Apis-Dor (i.e. Dor, Israel).
Another son yet was Cri assus, perhaps the same as the Acrisius
(Ekron) peoples.
Now behold, the more that I promised. There was a city of
Opis on the Tigris river!! Yes, it was the Akkadian "Upi" or
"Upija." This was a fantastic find. I raised my hand to the LORD
in gratitude, for this was the den of Apollo, the Avvites, merely the
dogs but signalling the light at the end of the tunnel for this book
(or perhaps a second book). A day or two after making this find,
Kathleen emailed and shared this verse from Isaiah 7:18:
"The Lord shall hiss ... for the bee that is in Assyria."

501
The Biblical spelling "Avviy" is a fair match at best with
"Upija," but that's just for starters. The Spanish bee is an "abija"!!
The French bee, an "abielle." As we can see that "Upi" is a bee
word (as per "opis"), and that "Upija" evokes "bij," the
Hungarian/Magyar bee, it would seem that the unknown root of
the Greek bee, "apis," is in the Opis region of Gozan. Yes, for
Shalmaneser II wrote thus on his Black Obelisk:
"To the country of Guzani I went down. The tribute
of Upu of the country of the Guzanians, of the country of
the Mannians, of the country of the Buririans ... "
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/Assyria/Inscra01.html
There we go, Upu was in Guzan/Gozan, the location that the
Israelites were consigned to, at their Assyrian exile (2 Kings 17:6),
and there we see the Mannae (Armenians) originating in that
Assyrian region, but also what I think is the origin of the boar line,
Buririan, what was probably the Perieres of Greek myth, father of
Aphareus and husband of Gorgophone. Gozan was on the
Khabur/Habur river (tributary of the Euphrates), if that helps to
connect this region with the Hebrews and to show a possible
Aphareus-Apiru equation. The Gozan and Habur regions were not
named by Israelites, but by the non-Israelite Hebrews/Semites
living there even before Israel was a nation. To be clear, the
Kabala homeland spread from the Euphrates to Opis on the Tigris,
a region named: Between Two Rivers i.e. Mesopotamia.
I am making this discovery as I write, and it fits, that the
origin of Apollo is in Opis and therefore "Apollo" is rooted in
"bee." Note that "obelisk" is "obelos" in Greek, meaning a sharp
stake. "Apollo" therefore seems to mean something sharp and
long. In Revelation 9:5, Apolluon (also revealed in verse 11 as
"Abaddon"...that I identified this past week as Avvites/"Avidians")
is said to rule a locust-like army having weapons that "sting" like
scorpions (v 5)...so as to make men wish they could die. One
website defines Apollo as "to dispel," and an online dictionary
says the same: "to drive away." So behold what Strong's
dictionary (#4651) says of "skorpizo," a variation of "skorpios":
"through the idea of penetrating; to dissipate i.e. put to
flight... disperse abroad, scatter."
Amazing, not only would this definition identify Apollo as a
scorpion/bee, but it should also reveal the meaning of "Avviy" (if
I'm correct in equating Avvites with Apollo/Opis) as a sharp
stinger and perhaps also sharp tooth. As the Greek "meli" (honey)
is interchageable with the Greek "milo" (apple) and/or the Greek
"melan" (sweet fruit), it's possible that Avalon, said to mean
"Apple Land," was an Avviy (bee) land. Doesn't "Avalon" reflect
"obelos," "abielle," and "Apollo" rather well? As Bude was a city

502
in Cornwall at the very minimum near to Arthur's hometown,
might Avalon have been a Batavi settlement (i.e. the Batavians of
Holland)?
Opis/Upu was the hometown of both Apollo and the Avviy,
the same peoples; the Apollo branch went into the Caucasus as the
Dahae/Dehava ("dog peoples"), and then into proto-Russia as the
Boreans (boars?), while the Avviy took a route south of the Black
sea as the Cati/Cutha. They both met in Thrace and Greece, the
Cati may have been Echidna (Akkadian), same as Python in Greek
myth, who was killed when Apollo arrived later.
To my cyclops- sized surprise I found Ops, "a fertility deity
and earth-goddess in Roman mythology of Sabine origin. Her
husband was Saturn, the bountiful monarch of the Golden
Age. Just as Saturn was identified with the Greek deity
Cronus, Ops was identified with Rhea, Cronus' wife."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ops
Take the following statement as one example (square
brackets not mine): “ After Opis [Rhea] had borne Jove [Zeus]
by Saturn [Kronos] ... ”
http://www.theoi.com/Georgikos/Kouretes.html
Pending on whether Rhae did depict Rhagae, I'd have to say
that peoples of Opis-on-the-Tigris were one with peoples in
Rhagae. The importance is underscored where Rhae is known to
have been the very same as Kybele, and so I can only conclude
that the Sheba-based Kabala has roots on the Tigris.
Note that Ops "generally holds a scepter or a corn spike as
her main attributes," this "scepter/spike" reflecting a sharp
"In Latin obelisk/tngraf.Adhol,tunbeivr:
writings of the time, the singular nominative (Ops) is not used;
only the form Opis is attested by classical authors" (website
above). I can beelieve; I beelieved even before I read this that Ops
was Opis.
I had just been reading an article on the founder of the Ops
cult, Titus/Tatius, a mythical king of the Sabina, who, after the
Aeneas Trojans (rulers of Rome at the time) stole their Sabine
women, went down to punish the Romans by invading their city.
But, as the myth goes, which I think conveys an obvious truth, the
Romans and Sabines settled together and mixed. The Patrician bee
line belonging firstly to the Sabina then found it's "appian way" to
Julius Caesar's veins. But I had my best moment of glory yet
when, at the end of the article, at almost the moment of leaving the
article, I focused on "Tatius" and realized that it was the makings
of "Taddei"!! A Tydeus to Tatius to Taddei progression is what I
imagine.
I had already known at that point that the Picene tribe of
Sabina had been in Naples, and that "Pic" likely meant, "sharp

503
stake/stinger," likely the same as "bij," and I also knew that my
mother was born and raised in Picenze (Abruzzo province), and
that some townspeople there had come from Naples, and that my
grandmother was a Taddei, and I already knew that Atlas peoples
had been in Abruzzo province, and that Poseidon peoples had been
in Naples (named after Neptune elements?), and I had already
written in my "Latest Buz on Atlantis" chapter that the Bias/Byzas
peoples had likely come through Naples, but what I didn't know
until today, even Taddei Day, was that the Appian Way, the real
one made of stones, went bee-line straight to Naples (before
turning north toward Rome).
Aside from discovering that I have bee-type blood, I now
know that I've got to follow the bees to Wales. So here is what I
found, yet another surname having the red triple chevron symbol
on its Coat, and this time it's the Dutch Hall surname. I didn't
understand the significance of the surname until I found that the
German Gall surname meant "foreigner, stranger," the very
definition said to be of "Wales," this supporting my view that
Wales was named after the Gauls I.e. Galli Kabalists. Apparently,
the Taddei symbol/surname connects to Wales via the Gall
surname, a theory supported where the German Gall Coat uses
three red (diagonal) stripes evoking the triple red chevron, and
moreover uses a chicken/rooster, as do both the French and Italian
Galli/Gall surname.
Wikipedia says that "Dutch" derives from "theodisk," which
looks a lot like "Tydeus" and "Tatius." Suddenly, in one fell
swoop, I am into French bee territory, for the French derive from
the Dutch. And behold that the Taddei Coat of Arms is exactly like
the coat of arms of the Dutch-branch Bergs. Whatever the term
may have come to mean today, it was likely rooted in "verk" =
"wolf," and so see that the English Todd Coat uses three red wolf
heads (on green background). Then see that the Tott/Toth Coat of
Germany uses a swan, as does the Stewart Crest, a symbol of
Liguria and it's off-shoot peoples. The Wikipedia article goes on to
say that "Theodisk survives as tedesco ("German") in modern
Italian" (brackets not mine).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch language
I recall making the argument that „Tedesco" has "Ted" as a
root rather than "Tadesc," because "Francesco" has Frank" as a
root rather than "Francesc." That is, "esco" and "isk" appear as
suffixes akin to our "ite." "Theodisk" should probably not be
translated as per a near-match to any Dutch/German words, if for
example it derives from Taddei/Tatius/Tydeus. As Tatius was
given the alternative, "Titan," that would seem like an appropriate
choice for defining these terms. Ultimately the chances are that
they root back to Thoth/Taut, possibly even Dedan.

504
While the first recorded signs of the Taddei surname were in
Florence, so "Legend say that it was Titus Tatius who
introduced the cult of Flora to Rome, during the reign of
Romulus." Did the cult of Flora name Florence? A Wikipedia
article implies that Julius Caesar gave the city that name, but
doesn't tell the reason.
As Latins define "Ops" to mean "riches, goods, abundance,
gifts, munificence, plenty" (website above), the Horn of Plenty
comes to mind, and indeed the cornucopia was also the symbol of
Ops, wherefore a descent from the Cretan goat, Amalthea, seems
the obvious conclusion. Midway between this connection I would
place Pan, the half-goat Satyr, even as the god of Ops was Saturn.
As Saturn depicted the Sidonians/Sithones, it supports my
observations that Pan depicted Phoenicians-come-Pannonians; Pan
may have been a depiction of Illyrians in general since Pannonians
were an Illyrian tribe. The Sabina are thought to derive from
Illyrians.
It may be the Pollock-family Coat of Arms uses three
cornucopia for the simple reason that the family chiefs know
themselves to be rooted in Ops and/or Amalthea. To verify that
Pollocks are related to the Stewarts: "Cornucopia is also known
as 'the horn of plenty' and it is the emblem of the Stewards."
http://ancienthistory.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www3.tky.3we
b.ne.jp/%7Ejafarr/The%2520Cornocopia.html
That is, the Pollocks and Stewarts together are a bee line
peoples, and with great chances derive from the same root as
Sabina Italians. I would suggest from the Veneti, who were
definitely Illyrians beforehand (Merovingians were likewise from
Veneti). We are told that "cornucopia" is to be read Cornu-Copia
(Horn of Plenty), but could it be understood as Cornish-Bee to the
initiated?
Wouldn't "Clovis" (one of the first historical kings of the
Merovingains) be read as Cl-Opis? What about the mythical
Merovee/Merovech = MerOpis?
If "Ops" refers to an entity back in Mesopotamia, it's not
correct to seek a Latin term to define it. If an English surname was
of Shoobigi origin in, say, Africa, how wrong would it be for
English speakers to define that family name as "big shoe, probably
people with big feet"? The houseofnames.com website makes so
many ridiculous claims like this that I wonder if it isn't a
Freemasonic organization. For example, it says that the Bush
surname was named after a bush that they lived beside.
"Ops" may mean "power and wealth and greedy filthy
grubby warfare and pillage, rape and tumult-loving massacre"...but
it started out as a Buzy-bee with the wrong dreams, and was
overcome by the Dark Dream Master. The shimmer of your gold is

505
blinding your eyes, Mr. Rothschild. Give us back our honey, for
no one should be as wealthy as your family; your prices are too
high, thou clever thief.
Behold three/four bee lines to which Menoetius was
"married":
"Menoetius was a member of the Argonauts in his
youth. He had made at least four marriages. All four of
his wives were identified as the "mother" of Patroclus in
different
versions ... Periopis ... Polymele ... Sthenele ... Philomela"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patroclus
If Petroclus, son of Menoetius, is hypothesized as the root of
the Patricians, and if evidence is thereby required to prove that his
wife/children were in Italy, the Opis cult of the Sabini is the great-
mother of all Evidence. But look yet at Menoetius' first wife, Peri-
Opis! She was “a daughter of Pheres, founder of Pherae,” who
was son of Cretheus, the latter being obviously allied to
Phoenicians since his wives were made Sidero and Tyro.
The second wife, Poly-Mele ("Poly-Honey"), “ was a
daughter of Peleus, King of Phthia,” the bloodline that may have
crashed into Eridanus. The third wife, Sthenele -- the Sithone
Edones -- were likely depicted by Satyrs, and perhaps Satrys were
named after the Sithones, since after all the term could easily
modify to "Satan/Saturn." Ezekiel 28 depicts a king of Tyre as
Satan himself. Sthenele was clearly the Sthenelus peoples that
founded Liguria; Sthenelus had been of the Argus bee line
(because Argus was from Apis blood).
The fourth wife, Philo-Mela, "might be related to her
namesake daughter of Pandion I, King of Athens and
Zeuxippe." As we are definitely in Italy at this point, might not
Pandion have been code for the Veneti, and/or the Wends/Vandals
of Poland since they derived from the Veneti? Couldn't Poly-Mele
and Philo-Mela refer to proto-Polish peoples and/or to the Pollock
surname? Pollux was "Polydeuces" in Greece, renamed "Pollux"
by the Latins. Might Poly-Deuc be the same as Zeux(ippe)? And
might I have been wrong about defining "ippe/ippi" as a horse
prefix/suffix (after hippos = horse)? Might it instead be code for
apis/opis = bee? Might "Deuc" refer to the Dacians (previously
Getae) who stem from Amalthea, the goat horn of plenty? The
Getae, remember, were the root of the Jutes-Eotens and therefore
likely of the Eaton surname.
Zeuxippe was also the mother of Erechtheus and Butes,
though some say the latter two were one and the same. If Poly-
Deuc was the same as Zeuxippe, then Pollux and the Bute peoples
were one and the same.

506
CODES OF ARMS
July 2006

Mayer Rothschild had changed his surname from "Bauer,"


said to mean "farmer," but doesn't that look like "Baver(ia)"? Did
"RedShield" refer to Mayer's boss, prince William IX of Hesse-
Cassel, the guts behind the Bavarian Illuminati? And did the Catti
who named "Hesse," and/or the Khassi from Cilicia who may have
named "Cassel," have everything to do with that Illuminati? In
other words, was the Illuminati a Cutha-Kabala organization?
What could be more logical?
Mayer moved from his Red-Shield home to another house on
the street called the "Green Shield," and this now evokes red
dragon versus green dragon, the latter depicting the Veres and
Crichtons. I'm suggesting that when Mayer re-named his home, he
had lost interest with his Hesse-Cassel boss, for indeed it is
reported that he took a good sum of money from him and that
Mayer's son, Nathan, entered Britain and with it became
fabulously wealthy quite overnight. Britannica (1970) supports this
claim under a Rothschild article. A Rothschild-Vere/Crichton
alliance is therefore possible.
I see that in "Bavaria" the term "Babar" is apparent. Babar is
a cartoon elephant who wears a green suit while his wife, Celeste
(an astrology term if ever I heard one), is in red. Babar, in the
original novel wherein he was created, was a French symbol who
brought French civilization/illumination to Africa. It is known that
the Rothschild Illuminati, along with Cecil Rhodes (after whom
Rhodesia was named), were involved corporately and politically in
multiple African regions.
I had wondered why the Oxford Coat of Arms (of the Veres)
had used an elephant as a prominent symbol; perhaps Babar was
intended to represent just whatever that Oxford elephant truly
depicts. I note that the Republican Party depicts itself with an
elephant, and that the Bohemian Grove, an Illuminati cult, is a
Republican cult at its core. It is known that Bohemia was founded
by the Boii, and the same Boii are thought by some to have named
Bavaria, but as I root the Boii in Boiotia, the same peoples likely
named Batavia and the Bute/Bude name of Britain.
I suspect that Batavia is to be understood as Bat-Avvite. The
Batavi (from Buz) were likely a major branch of Nahorite peoples
who worshipped the wolf and perhaps named Netherlands. Could

507
the Democrats, who use an ass to depict themselves, find roots in
the ass- and wolf-worshiping Avvites??? The wolf-worshiping
Stewarts come to mind since I've tentatively tied them to the Butes
surname. Does it not make sense that Stewarts should be tied to
Apollo, an old wolf peoples that I have recently tied to the ancient
Avvite homeland of Opis (Assyria), if the Stewarts were also the
Cohen/Kagan Khazars? After all, Apollo depicted the
Hyperboreans of the far north (proto-Russia) while the Khazars
were in far-north Russia.
Babar's cousin was named "Arthur." Coincidence? Or is that
a picture of the Merovingians of France coupled with their British
cousins ruled by king Arthur? I hope you don't think I'm too crazy
for mentioning Babar in this way, because I also want to bring up
Winnie the Pooh, as those terms resemble "Veneti/Vannes" and
the Po river. What is a pooh, anyway? The fact is, Winnie is a
honey-loving bear, and in conjunction with my findings that
wherever the boar symbol is found, the bear symbol seems to tag
along, so we find (in the cartoon) that Winnie's pal is Piglet. And
what of the bouncy Tigger? The Catz? What of the owl? The owl
used by the Bohemian Grove as their chief symbol (called
"Moloch"), to which the politicians burn human sacrifices
(whether dummies or real humans no one can know because no
one is able to see the ceremony up close).
Recall that immediately after the mention of Avvites in 2
Kings 17:31, we find stated that the "Sepharvites" sacrificed their
children in fire. I found recently that Utu (dragon sun god of
Eridu) had the alternative name, "Babbar"! !
See http://killeenroos.com/1/SUMEGODS.htm
Less recently, I realized the significance in the vicious green
beaver on the Oxford coat of arms, it standing opposite the
elephant. For as secret societies use animals to depict aspects of
their lineage, choosing those that sound like the people groups they
wish to depict, so I saw that "beaver" modifies to "beaber," this
term not only reflecting Babbar, but Bebryces, a Boii region in
Bithynia.
In June (2006), on the same day (24th) that I connected the
Bauer surname (true name of the Rothschilds before Mayer
Rothschild changed it) to the Kabeiri cult, I found that the
Beuer/Bewer/Bawer Coat of Arms uses a black beaver with a
crown! One cannot use a crown on a Coat unless one has ruled
somewhere.
This German beaver family is found as the Beaver surname
in England, for that English family uses the same black beaver on
its Crest (see top of helmet) as well as on its Coat. Note that the
website traces the English Beavers to multiple Beauvoir locations
in Normandy. I am beginning to sense that the Veres are rooted in

508
this term, since "Beuer" easily modifies to "Vere." Were Veres a
Rothschild branch extended from the Bauer surname??? Wouldn't
the Green Shield of Mayer connect to the green beaver on the
Oxford Coat?
The Beavers of Britain are said to have been found first in
Berkshire; I have reason to believe that "Berg(er)" is related to the
Rothschild Illuminati because the Berg/Burg family Coat of
Holland (a haven for international-banker "Jews") uses the three
red chevron that I had connected tentatively to that Illuminati. The
Vergas Coat of Spain is exactly the same, even as that name
modifies to Bergas. There may be a Berg-Bert connection because
"Bert" means "bright," from the Old English "beorht" from which
a hypothetical beorg(t) may produce "Berg."
The Bower/Beauer/Boar surname in Scotland uses bows and
arrows on its coat, while the Rothschild Coat uses a single arrow.
The background on the Scottish Bower/Beauer uses a green
background, which may be a symbol of the green beaver used by
the Oxford Coat, or, alternatively, the beaver was made green to
denote whatever the green color represents among the secret
societies. The Pollock Coat has a green background. The (Scottish)
Bower/Beauer surname is said on the website to be of
"Strathclyde-Breton" origin, and the Pollocks lived in Strathclyde.
Secondly, the Pollock family uses a boar on its crest shot
through with an arrow. Not only does the arrow possibly indicate
the Bower and Bauer families, but "boar" itself would nicely
depict them. Were the Rothschilds Calydonian boars? The German
Bower surname uses a green background as well on its Coat,
indicating a possible link to the Scot Bowers, and, not surprisingly,
septs of the German Bowers include "Bauer," but also "Buhr."
The Aberdeen surname (first in Aberdeen, Scotland) uses
three gold pentagrams (with a sun (god) in a hand on it's Crest). I
had already searched Berdeen/Barton, seeing that the family used
three red boar heads. That could certainly make a connection to the
Bert/Pollocks. The Scottish Bard surname is from Strathclyde-
Breton origin as well (as are the Pollocks), and it uses a gold boar
(Pollocks use a brown one signifying less importance; gold always
being superior to other colors)... meaning that Pollocks may have
been Bards, virtually the same as "Bert" in sound but having a far
different meaning. It's possible that certain occult Bards changed
their name to Bert = Illumination. The Bards first lived in
Lanarkshire, smack beside the Pollocks in Renfrew!! The
exclamation marks are warranted because the Pollocks themselves
do not realize/publish that they could be from Bards.
The Bard Crest has a green griffin head, as does the Leslie
clan, and the Leslie clan (also of Aberdeen) was founded by a
Bartholomew...he being from Hungary along with his queen

509
Agatha; the two of them (I think) were Khazars and related to the
first-known Stewarts. The Leslie clan furnished the chiefs (i.e.
Earls) of Ross and of Rothes, wherefore it is possible that the
island of Rothesey/Butes was named after these Leslies. The 21st
Earl of Rothes is alive today and is head of the Clan Leslie
Society.
Pollocks had married Leslies, and my Pollock email
correspondent tells me that Leslies fraudulently claim ownership
of Rothes, and that it was first a Pollok entity, as for example a
Pollock was appointed to built Rothes castle. Note that the Leslie
Coat uses three horseshoes, and that "typical features used in
Polish heraldry include horseshoes, arrows, Maltese crosses..."
A Maltese cross, known to be a military symbol of the Templars
since the first Crusade, is one made with four arrow heads (heads
that are commonly seen on coats of arms). May I suggest as a
possibility that Polish (or part-Polish) nobles came to Britain with
Bartholemew, which furnished the Polloks and were then depicted
as the horseshoe on the Leslie Coat? It's even possible that one of
Batholemew's parents was Polish, since noble Hungarians had
been marrying Polish nobles at that time (11th century). The first-
known Pollock (Fulbert the Saxon) was born in Shropshire in
1075, my correspondant tells me, which is less than a decade after
Bartholemew arrived to Scotland.
The Italian Bert Coat also uses a griffin, though white (i.e.
silver, second-most important color). Its' the French Bader Coat
that uses a (old griffm (on blue background) and a single gold
pentagramhat may be the so-called Vere Star). The German
Bader Coat uses three blue pentagrams that are used also by the
Dutch Hall Coat wherein I found yet another example of the red
triple chevron.
The English Berts use three (black) cornucopias as do the
Pollocks (in silver). The Bert Crest uses a hand holding a green
ring, the green ring probably depicting the same as the green on
the Pollock-Coat background.
The Bull surname of England uses three gold rings and three
gold bull heads. The French Boyer (sounds like "Bauer" and could
be same as Baber/Beaver) uses a silver bull entirely. The Oxford
Coat uses a red bull; the French Beard/Beart/Bear (probably same
as "Bard") use a red bull entirely as well. As "Bert" is said to be
short form for "Bartholomew," so the Bartons of Germany are so
said to derive from the same long-form.
The English Attis/Addison/Edison name was first found in
Dumbarton, Scotland, and it uses three gold rings as well (as does
the English Bull family). The Kabala sun god, Attis, was
connected to the bull cult. The Attis Coat uses three gold leopard
heads, or so they seem to be, on its Chief, but may be griffin heads

510
(a griffin had a lion/leopard body). The Attis Crest uses a white
unicorn which may connect to Thrace and/or to the Kabala
("caballa/cavalla" is Latin for "horse"). [Update I found that the
Kather/Kother Coat uses two full-blown unicorns!]
I started to look at "B", "F", and "V" variations of "Bert," and
found that the Dutch Voort Coat uses three red rings on gold
background, albeit most variations of the name were Vorst-like. I
then found that the Dutch Borst Coat uses three arrows on red
background, the arrows pointed exactly as the single arrow on the
red Rothschild Coat. At anothr website, I found that the Vorst Coat
is three red chevron on gold field. background. Variations of
"Rothschild" are: Rothenstein, Roddenstein, Rodstein, Rotstein,
Rothernmaler, etc., telling that Rothschilds became surnames with
"stein" endings, but also "maler" endings.
The German Stein family uses a silver goat on red
background that might depict Getae/Edones, or perhaps the
Khazars since "koth" is said to mean "goat"? The Dutch Steins use
a large red rose over a large red eight-pointed star; the Butes of
Germany use six red roses. But behold the Italian Batti/Boto Coat
uses three red eight-pointed stars!! If there's a connection between
the Butes and the Rothschilds, it may be that Stewarts and
Rothschilds are related; perhaps Rothschild kin/ancestors were the
Batavians of Rotterdam, Holland, even the Merovingians who had
settled at the same mouth of the Rhine. It's worth investigating.
I'll mention that the Perger Coat uses a single large eight-
pointed star, that surname perhaps related to Berger.
A few hours after writing that paragraph, I found that the
Dutch Bout/Boutes Coat uses a red single arrow!! with gold tip, on
gold background, pointing in the same direction as the Rothschild
arrow. The Butter family Crest -- similar to Bute/Bude -- uses an
arm holding a bow and arrow, the same symbol used by the
Scottish Boar/Bower family. The Rothschild Coat uses one gold
arrow on red background, but also two gold eight-pointed stars!!!!
I had NO IDEA WHATSOEVER when I started tracing the Butes
-- thanks to a Pollock email correspondent for that -- that it would
connect to Rothschild elements; I was gunning for Stewart
connections only, but now it appears that all of the above seem
related.
The Russian who I think would make an excellent fit for
anti-Christ, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, had a true father whose
surname was Eidelstein ! Don't tell me dat Zhirinovsky is a
Rothschild, I vud probobly starrt tu tink dat der vas sum ciertin
kind uuv coonspeerasey tayking plase. The Eidelstein Coat uses a
bow and arrow on one side and a spread phoenix on the other. The
Eidelstein surname was first found in Bohemia.

511
It has occurred to me that "Stein" may have been created in
honor of the "Sthenelus/Sithones" Phoenicians. One never knows;
it would explain the phoenix symbol. The Sithones were the
Satyrs, remember, whose priests were the Bessi Thracians, who
tattooed themselves and perhaps had Indian-like weapons. Satyrs
were half goats, and the German Steins, as you saw above, use a
goat on their Coat. The English Stone Coat also uses a spread
phoenix.
I checked out some Gog-like terms. The Coke Coat uses
three spread phoenix...as does the French Boubers/Bubert Coat
(i.e. like Babar). The German and Swiss Kock/Kochen Coat use
three gold hexagrams (i.e. "stars of David") on blue banner,
evoking Israel (and perhaps the Rothschilds who put Israel on the
map). I know that the Star of David is rooted in a certain messianic
David (not in king David) figure of the Khazars (during the
Templar era). Because the "Kochen" name evokes "Kagan," the
Khazar rulers do come to mind. The Kock/Kochen surname is said
to originate in Bavaria.
The rooster symbol on Coats may depict the same, Gog. A
minute after writing that, I found that the English Cock/Koke Coat
uses three red roosters, on a background made of red and silver
diamonds. This then connects to the German/Swiss Cock/Cochen
family that use red diamonds on silver background. Moreover, the
Coch/Koke checks are of the same size as the Stewart and Cohen
blue and silver checks. The Choen/Cown Crest uses hand holding
one arrow in the same direction as the Rothschild arrow.
The Katz surname often closely associated with the Cohens
uses three silver Stars of David on blue background. The Katz
name was first found in the dragon land of
Mecklenburg/Pomerania. The Hebrew Katz Coat uses a
lion/panther. The Gatz surname was first found in the same region,
but the Gatz Coat uses ten suns/balls arranged in a pyramid.
The German Albert/Albright Coat uses an eight-pointed star
(as do the German Steins and various Bute-like surnames); the
English Albert Coat uses a gold griffin. Italian Alberts (first in
Venice) use a silver ring at the center of their Coat (tied to four
chains). Recall the green ring used by the Berts of Britain. The
Italian Berts (i.e. "Berto") use a silver griffin, suggesting that the
Bertos stemmed from the Albertos. The French Bussy/Bussi Coat
uses three red spread phoenix; this name first found in Normandy.
Perhaps there's a Bert/Pollock connection to the Scottish
Brother/Broder Coat which uses three gold griffin heads and three
silver diamonds on a gold background; I've read that it's against
the rules of Heraldry to use two metals, silver and gold, one
overtop of the other, suggesting that this Coat is very old or held
by powerful people. The name is first found in records in

512
Oxfordshire. Perhaps all/many other griffin symbols stem from
this Broder/Brother surname. I had once theorized that Britain was
named after "brother," as in a brotherhood, but I think I removed
that from a chapter for other theories that were equally viable.
The Brother/Broder Crest uses a dog holding a staff on the
Crest; the three silver diamonds on the Coat depict, as do
diamonds in general -- and this is according to a Kyle website --
"coal." I took that odd meaning as a subtle hint for the Old King
Cole to whom the Kyle family traces itself. The Kyles, who admit
online to being relatives of Stewarts, were first found in Ayrshire,
which faces out to sea to the island of Bute. Now the English Bude
Coat uses a gold griffin head. Recall that the Bude term made it's
entry into Britain in Cornwall, in the neighborhood of king
Arthur's home.
The Welsh Bude Coat uses a gold bow and gold
arrow... suggesting possibly that all other bows and arrows are
from the Bude bloodline. The Welsh Budes moreover use a gold
seven-pointed star (don't know the significance of seven points).
The English Bute family uses four gold stars having six-points (not
quite the "Star of David" pentagrams).
I've taken note that the entire French Batancourt/Betancourt
Coat uses blue and gold checks in the same size as the Stewart
blue and silver checks. This surname was first found in Artois,
close to the mouth of the Rhine where Batavi lived. The French
Budrie/Bodris Coat is nothing but blue and silver horizontal
stripes; first recorded in Normandy. The Kyles used a blue lion for
what I suspected was a link to the Stewart name, and so behold my
finding just now that the English Albany-family Coat is a blue
lion. The Stewarts were connected to Albany, and behold that the
Albany name was first found in Shropshire, where the Stewarts
settled first of all (before moving to Scotland).
The Scottish Alban/Alpin Coat uses a pine tree, which was
the symbol of Attis; the website says that "Albion" derives from
"Alpin," the name of Scottish and Pictish rulers of Alba (early
name of Scotland). The Alban surnames were first found in
Argyllshire, and that's in the eye-shot of the Bute island. The
Veres claim to stem from Elvin, a term that I identify with Alpin.
Behold the Alvi/Elvi/Elfy Coat uses a gold boar entirely ; this must
be the head of the Boar clans! The Veres use a blue boar. But
where does the name originate? The website only says that they
were first found in Oxfordshire, where the Veres ruled for
centuries.
The German Elis/Elizer Coat uses two gold rings. Recall that
three gold rings were used by the Bull and Attis names, that the
Voort name used three red rings, the Bert name one green ring ,
and the Albert name one silver ring. Can we now make a

513
connection between "Albert" and Aeolus/Elis of Greece? After all,
rings are a symbol of Greece ... I realized last week upon pondering
the meaning of the rings, as for example the five-ring logo of the
Olympic games. No sooner had I asked that question that I found
the "Alice" surname to derive from the German-French "Aalis"
and "Aliz," evoking "Aeolus" very much. As you can see at the
link, the English Alis-like names use the same five-crescent Coat
as the English Elis-like names. The blonde-haired Aryan in the
Crest is of obvious meaning, and because she is naked, it seems a
symbol of Greece (or, she may be a mermaid). Could the five
crescents be the same as the five Greek rings?
Now behold. The Polish Alex Coat (a very Greek name) uses
three gold eight-pointed stars (on blue background), so that the
Albert name (which uses one silver star) would seem to derive
from Alex", not vice versa. The French Alex Coat uses a red
spread phoenix with crown.
A few minutes later I turned up three more gold rings in the
English Lady Coat, while seeking the roots of Leda/Leto of
Greece!! Note the mountain in the design (as per Mount
Olympus?). Knowing that Leda was depicted as a swan, note how
the Light/Lyte/Lite Coat uses three silver swans!
As was my theory that the Swan represented the Sviones (i.e.
the Swedes) as in the name "Sven," so the following website says:
"Viking settlers in Scotland were the first people to use the name
Swan. The Swan Coat uses two silver swans and replaces the third
with a lion. There is also a heart in the Coat's center, with a dog in
the Crest, which I think depicts the wolf line since the Ligurians
were depicted by both the swan and wolf. The Greco Coat (of
Tuscany, Italy, i.e. the Etruscans, neighbors of Ligurians) turned
up blue and gold wolf symbol, which may just link to the Stewarts
for its blue color and the fact that Stewarts used dog deities in old
days. I suspect that the dog/wolf in Coats symbolizes more than a
love for dogs, but rather the wolf line from Greece and/or Russia.
The Stone family (of interest because "stein" means stone) uses a
dog on its Crest as well. The Burton Coat (i.e. like Bert) uses three
gold dog heads. The Alison Coat uses three black dogs but a black
griffin head on the Crest; the name was first found in Lanarkshire,
beside Renfrew.
The red heart in the Swan Coat may connect to the four red
hearts used of the Butter/Buttar Coat. Note that the Buttar cross is
a black one, evoking the Sinclair cross, the Sinclairs having been
Scandinavian Vikings (who made it to the throne of England as per
the Conqueror). Note the rooster on the Sinclair Crest. The English
Bat Coat uses an inverted Sinclair Cross, and can't be a
coincidence that Bat and Butter are both Sinclair-type crosses.
Never mind the four black bats as they constitute a name-specific

514
symbol; it's the number four that counts for anything, and the
positioning around the cross so that it evokes the Templar flag, the
flag of Georgia (Caucasia), and the Rosicrucian cross of the
Andreaes. The Bat family uses a wolf on the Crest, that being yet
another Sinclair link to the Stewarts. I really do think that these
names belong to Nahorites. And then see that the Scottish
Cohoon/Cahoon Coat (probbaly the same as "Cohen") uses the
same inverted Sinclair cross.
I checked some Leda-specific terms, including her son
Caster. The English Caster Coat uses a gold dog and two gold
spheres. Because Leda gave birth to her children in eggs, I checked
the Egg surname and found that the German Egg Coat uses three
spheres, two blue ones on one side and a silver one on the other.
The English Egg/Edge Coat uses a silver spread phoenix. Do
Leda's eggs depict those of a Phoenix/Eagle? A good theory.
The spheres must depict suns because the German Rhoda
Coat displays three red balls, knowing that Helios and Rhoda were
married. Note the color, red, and not gold, not necessarily because
the family using gold suns is superior/older, but perhaps due to the
Rhodian bloodline representing Rus/Ruthene and the red dragon in
general. I see that this Coat's single chevron is red.
The Sabart/Savard Coat uses three gold spheres/suns, and the
very same Coat is used by many Bert-prefixed names. The natural
thing to do was to check Vard-like names; the Varde Coat uses
blue and gold checks (of the Stewart type), while in the Crest we
see a blue lion inside a crown. The other blue and gold checks
belonged to the Batencourt name of the Batavia region, which I
think connects to the Bute name. The English Savard Coat uses
three gold boars on a wavy black banner (and three black
leopards). The Savards lived at Oxford and Bedford.
A search for the Sun surname brought up the Sinclair
cross/family!! That would suggest that "Sinclair" may not derive
from SaintClair, but from SunClair. The English Rhodes Crest
uses the Sinclair cross but red in color, along with four spheres.
This alone could tie the Sinclairs to Rhodes and the Redones.
Knowing that Cecil Rhodes had pledged his entire fortune on
creating what is now the One World Government, I looked up the
boss of the European Union, Javier Solana, and verified what I had
suspected, that his name refers to the sun god, for the Solana
family crest is just one big yellow sun, smiling.
Knowing that Johan Andreae was a leading Rosicrucian,
look see that the Scottish Anderson Coat (the surname derives
from "Andreas") uses a red inverted Sinclair cross with two blue
boar heads.
A search for "Sunny" brought up the Sunning/Sunin Coat
with three gold suns; the name was first found in Berkshire,

515
recalling that Berk is a red triple-chevron name. Was the sun-god
line living in Berkshire, home of the Windsor Castle? The Windsor
name pulled up information telling that it derived from William
fitzOtho, son of Adel bert (Pollocks take note), Duke of Lom bardy.
The Windsor Coat displays a Scottish (saltire) cross. The German
Wend/Wentscher Crest uses a blue lion, and the English Wends
use a silver griffin.

516
BEWARE THE GLOBAL-FLEECE JOB

The king of Megara, Lelex (the Lelegian peoples), was


progenitor/founder of Laconia (Sparta), but some say that it was
his son, Polycaon, who was the first king of Sparta. The first
mythical king of Arcadia (on the Spartan border) was Lycaon, but
he must have been the same as (i.e. ancestors of) Po lycaon, for
Lycaon, aside from evoking "Laconia," was made the son of
Pelasgus, while Pelasgians and Lelegians are often equated...as
founders of Arcadia and its environs. Perhaps Polycaon refers to
caon peoples removed to the Po river (Italy), for indeed the
juls of northern Italy were a wolf-line peoples while "Lycaon"
mans "wolf."
[Update July 2006 -- In keeping with my finding that Sparta
refers to the Sepharvites who sacrificed their children to Molech (2
Kings 17:31), so we have the following quote to substantiate it:
"King Lycaon, who ruled Arcadia with his fifty
sons, was said to continue the practice of human sacrifice
when other parts of Greece had abolished it as barbaric.
One variation of the story has King Lycaon offering Zeus
the sacrifice of a young boy, which angered Zeus so much
he promptly changed Lycaon into a wolf and struck his
house down with lightning, killing all his fifty sons.
http://www.dibonsmith.com/lup_con.htm
From this one may deduce that Zeus was not from the
Sepharvites, or that the myth writer was deliberately and secretly
connecting Zeus to Sepharvite sacrifices but covering up for him
in the meantime. On the other hand, Lycaon is being openly
revealed as a Sepharvite or Sepharvite-like peoples. It seems a
possibility that his father, Pelasgus (Pel-Asgi?) depicted the
Ashkenaz Kabala back in Mesopotamia/Iran that may have been
allied to the Sepharvites. End Update]
Cadmus first defeated and then became allied with the Sparti
teeth of the dragon who together inhabited Thebes, a Boiotian
capital filled with Rose-Line Curetes and their "heavy-metal"
Kabeiri cult. The Sparti may not have been the Lycaon Spartans,
but a new wave of Sparta-invading immigrants, who can be
viewed as Cadmus-Harmonia Thebeans for sure, but also the
Rose-Line Curetes.
Rose-Line Rhodians depicted by Ino, Cadmus' daughter,
came to despise the dragon, and it fled to Aeetes in Colchis. It's

517
escape from Ino's forces was depicted as the flying, golden-fleece
ram of Hermes, revealing the dragon as a peoples in Corinth, the
city of which was previously co-founded by Aeetes. In another
myth we find Aeetes' daughter fleeing Corinth in a chariot pulled
by dragons, which is a picture of the Ares dragon fleeing the city
when losing a war to Jason and his Corinthian allies. It strikes me
that the Aeetes Corinthians were Kuretes, even as there were
Colchian-Rhodian associations. (Evidence that Ino depicted
Rhodians is in my chapter, Vere's the Ham?).
It makes for some good logic to so identify the Ares dragon
as Corinthians on the one hand and Megarians on the other, for
Megarians sprang forth from Corinthian rulers.
[Update July 2006 -- In keeping with my recent theory that
this dragon line was a Horite peoples, and that the Curetes were
essentially the same as the Carians -- both Horites in the Greek
Theater -- so we find that Megara (Me-Cara?) was at first called
"Caria" after its founder, the mythical Car (i.e. the Carians).
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/Megara.html
There is a striking resemblance between Corinthian, Carian,
and Hurrian, as there is between Horite and Curete. I suspect
Horites to have evolved into the Hurrians, so that perhaps they
were Nahorites (i.e. of Haran). Nahor, you see, may have been
named Na-Hor, after the Horites to which his father (Terah)
belonged (after all, Terah's other son was named Haran). Greek
myth makes Corinthos a Helios peoples, as were the Curetes.
Myth had Poseidon and Hera battling it out over Argos,
which in my mind translates to a Buzi war against the Horites; the
Horites won and therefore came to rule Argos at that early time.
The Buzi had to settle somewhere else, we may assume. The
husband of Sparta, Lacedaemon, gave birth to the Charites, said to
mean "grace" to the naive public, when most-likely Lace-Demon
(Laconia-Demon) was a Curete peoples in that the Greek for
"Charites" is "Xarites." One of the Charites was named
"Charis/Karis."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleta
All were mothered by Eurynome, daughter of king Nisus of
Megara, wherefore they were very-likely Carian rulers of Megara
or proto-Megara. I see that Nisus may have been the root of
DioNysus, and Dionysus was indeed a Curetes or Curetes-
associated people. This then explains how Dionysus was a bee-line
peoples since Car was of the same Phoroneus peoples who
produced the Apis-Argus bee line.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurynome
Nisus had Scylla as a daughter, and she was also known as a
fish-tail peoples, daughter of the fish-tail god, Phorcys (whom I
assume was the same as Phoroneus the bee line, something to

518
consider in that Merovingians claim to have stemmed from a sea
monster). This supports my hunch that "Phoroneus" is to be
understood as Boar-oneus, for "Phorcys" means "sea pi^/pork,"
according to my dictionary wherein it roots our "porpoise' in the
Latin "por = "hog fish" (that's the 1etionary defmition). In
other words, Nisus and the Carians wered; thagon worshipers and
therefore ofto Nahor
my if I am correct in root Dagon to Nahorites;
Phorcys was brother of Nereus, husband Doris (Dor, Israel?, a
Dagon haunt).
Perhaps I'm correct in identifying Dagon as a dog peoples
since Scylla was turned into a sea monster (between Greece and
Italy) with six dog heads and/or twelve dog legs. Clearly she
depicted six wolf-line tribes from Israeli shores that took to ocean-
faring as did the Phoenicians. I'm curious as to whether Scylla's
mother, Abrotes, became the Abbruzzo province.
It was after I had traced the boar line to Corinth that I learned
that "choiros" meant "swine." And so see now that Europs' father
founded a city that would become Telchinia, the home of the
Telchines, obviously, later to become Sicyon (about 10 miles
north-west of Corinth), a city that Homer called, "Eury choros"
(wide-spread Corinthians, I assume).
http://www.sikyon.com/Sicyon/shistory1 eg.html
It may be relevant that prior to being Sicyon, the city was
also called "Mycone," for the Merovingian Illuminati called
themselves "Freres Macons." I keep wondering if this is the true
origin of the term, "Mason." There is a Macon region in France.
The above website goes on to say that the Sicyon "territory
in archaic times was called Asopia." As the god, Asopus, was of
two regions, both Sicyon and Thebes (in Boiotia), and moreover as
Asopus (As-Opis?) had Ismene for a daughter that is said to be
essentially the same as Melia, then Sicyon was populated by Melia
Boii peoples at the very start. Indeed, for Sicyon was called
"Aigialeia" first of all, where the god of that city (by the same
name) was made the son of Melia. See map of Corinth/Sicyon.
Keep your mind's chin up because a major breakthrough is
coming right ahead, the root of Zeus himself in the Melia Boii.
We're going to discuss Aerope and Europa of Crete in this chapter,
so know that the son of Aigialeia ("goat sumthing") was Europs
i.e. consider tracing Europa and Aerope to Europs Boii peoples.
Moreover, Aerope and Europa are going to be associated with
Aegisthus and Aegius i.e. consider tracing these goat-depicted
peoples to the Aigialeia Boii...and know that Zeus was raised on
Crete by both a goat and a bee!! That can't be a coincidence.
That is, Zeus was himself a Boii peoples, from the Europs
branch, so that when he had an affair with Europa, he was forming
an alliance on Crete with a branch of his own peoples. My

519
conclusion is that Europa was a Boii branch in Phoenicia, while
the Aigialeia-Europs branch were her ancestors in proto-Sicyon.
This aligns well with my theory wherein Phoenicians were named
after the Bia that named Lake Van (i.e. Van = Phoen), anciently
"Biaini" and evoking the ancient "Poeni" designation of the
Phoenicians.
This would then trace Zeus to the Bia of Lake Van. The
immediate problem now is to reconcile this trace to my previous
tracing of Zeus to the Avvites and/or the Sepharvites. The Bia may
have been an Avviy branch, not only because the two terms are
similar, but because the Aigialeia bloodline ruled a (Greek) region
ruled also by the god, Asopus, who may just be rendered an As-
Opis mix. That is, Asopus depicted the (historical) Assi peoples
mixed with, or living in, the city of Opis on the Tigris, to which
city I have traced the Avvites.
The Assi smack of the Biblical Asshurites (Genesis 25:3), a
tribe of Abrahamic Dedan , even as Zeus was specially famous in
Dodona of north-west Greece. The Assi have been identified by
many as Cimmerians, even as Cimmerians lived at Azov, which
locality should prove to be the identity of the god, Asopus. The
Assi were lumped in with Tochari, no doubt the Togarmites
(Togarmah was son of Gomer = Cimmerians). The Assi lived in
conjunction with the Saka, and that should prove to be the term
that named Sicyon (very close to "Saxon," likewise thought to be
named after the Saka; were the Saxons from Sicyon?).
But if the Assi were from Dedanite Asshurites, then they
could not have been Cimmerians, which is yet possible, for there
may have been a Cimmerian-Asshurite alliance in that I define the
dragon line as an Aryan-Hebrew mix. Remember that I identified
the Aryans of this dragon line as the Hros/Rosh of the Aras river,
but I also identified the Rosh as Cimmerians of Lake Van and
Mannae prior to knowing that Rosh was based in Aras or that the
Rosh of Aras were the dragon line Aryans. So it fits, that the Assi
are not the Aryans, but the Semites/Hebrews of Kabala strips. This
view is in keeping with my defining the Aesir pantheon of gods as
a Cimmerian one, but also of the Kabala. End Update]
The golden ram was ridden to Colchis by a
"Phrixes/Phryxus," he being an obvious eponym of Phrygians, as
is made more obvious where the Hellespont was made Phryxus'
sister. In fact, the myth makes it clear that the war was lost in a
battle on the Hellespont, i.e. when the sister, Helle, fell from the
flying/fleeing ram and died in the Hellespont.
The identity of the Fleece Line as Phrygians is key for
identifying it more specifically, and when that is done, we will also
have the ancestors of the Corinthians and Megarians (i.e. of the

520
boar line) ... since the ram and the dragon are one and the same
bloodline.
Hermes, a late-comer to Greece, was in Phrygia prior to
being "born" in Arcadia. Pelops came from a Phrygian peoples that
ruled from Sipylus on the Hermus river. Moreover, Pelops was
supported by Hermes when coming into Greece. Pelops came to
rule Elis, next-door to Arcadia, so that the two appear as brother
tribes or allies. Pelops erected the first Hermes temple in the land
that came to be called after him, Peloponnesus. Thus Pelops was
the part of the fleece line that, instead of fleeing to Colchis,
remained in Phrygia and eventually re-couped sufficiently to
conquer Elis. To show that Phrygia under Pelops was in fact in
trouble at the time, myth depicted him as cut up into many pieces
(of Phggian peo les).
pdate Ju^y 2006 -- I must say here that Hermes and
Harmonia are one and the same, the Ares dragon that settled
Thebes with the Cadmus/Cati, and therefore Hermes depicted the
Sparti, wherefore the founding of Sparta under that name occurred
in conjunction with Hermes being "born" (i.e. settling) in adjacent
Arcadia. These were a wave of Armenians, then, to be
distinguished from the previous Cati wave of non-Israelite
Hebrews, Avvites, and Sepharvites from the ocean shores of proto-
Israel. I've wondered whether Arcadia should be understood as Ar-
Cati, and if so, the myth writers may be throwing us off when
claiming that it was named after "arcas" = bear.
Since Ares traces back to the Aras valley in Armenia, I
would identify the second wave as the Biblical Hros/Rosh. Aras I
would view as the location of the Biblical Gog's throne, for Gog
was "prince of Rosh" according to Ezekiel 38, a phrase that sounds
as though Gog was the leading Rosh branch rather than conquerors
of Rosh. In this way, Hermes, the Ares dragon, and Pelops, were
proto-Rus Gogi destined to populate Europe, and therefore not
necessarily bringing forth end-time Gog, but likely bringing forth
the False Prophet. As I tend to identify the False Prophet as a
British-Rosicrucian entity (including American-extension
Illuminatists), note that Pelops' brother was "Broteas," perhaps a
Greek-Italian peoples by the same name who became the Bretons.
End-time Gog could stem from various other branches that
came out of Aras. It seems that the Kabala were mixed with the
Hermes-line Rus/Gogi of the Greek theater, as per the Cadmus-
Harmonia marriage (where the Kabala are the same as
Cutha/Cati/Cadmus), yet I suspect a Kabala/Gogi mix even earlier,
back in Aras itself. I'm seeking evidence for this early alliance.
End Update]
I'm even surer that Pelops was part of the fleece line because
he gave birth to two sons, Atreus and Thyestes, who ascended the

521
Mycenaean throne through the powers of a golden lamb amid their
own flock of sheep. A ram is a sheep. Was God, therefore, when
connecting the False Prophet (in Revelation 13) to two horns like a
lamb (that spoke as a dragon) making a connection to the Atreus-
Thyestes branches of the Pelops bloodline... that in the end times
would come forth as a counterfeit-Christian (i.e. Rosicrucian)
entity? This makes a lot of sense in multiple ways.
Britannica, in an article on "Orchomenos," says that a "tomb
known as 'the treasury of Minyas' (theeonymous ancestor of
the Minyae) at the foot of [Orchomenos) is comparable with
the 'treasury of Atreus' at Mycenae... (round brackets not
mine). This is important because Jason of the Argo ship was
revealed as a Minyae. As Jason went to retrieve the golden fleece
from Colchis, I am led to think that he depicted fleece kin and
therefore a branch of the Pelops/Atreus "golden-lamb" peoples. If
true, it supports my suspicions that high-level secret societies
named "JASON" (all caps), active today in high-tech, government-
supported, military-space programs, will have much to do with
putting forth the False Prophet's fire from the sky.
The connection of Jason to the city of Argos is neatly
depicted in the name of his ship. Jason's family, through
Melampus, came to rule part of the Argos region with the
Danaans ... and see that the brother of Melampus, who shared this
rule, was Bias, the same name of the king of Megara who had been
ousted from Megara. It makes much sense that the ousted
Megarians fled to their Phrygia kin and ended up forming Caria
just south of Phrygia. Or, the Megarians may have been the
Carians as well as the Pelops Phrygians themselves.
[Having just found the root of the Kabala in Opis on the
Tigris river, I have been able to decipher many bee- terms simply
because "opis/apis" means "bee" in Greek. All mythical terms
ending with "ops" are suspect as a codeword for the bee line.
Pelops may therefore be understood as Pel-Opis, and so we see the
"Pel" prefix again as I showed it in Pel-Asgi. The city of Opis was
in the very face of the Ashkenaz Aryans]
Bias (king of Megara) is revealed as a Fleece-Line peoples
because he was son of Lelex, while Lelex had been a surviving
remnant of the dragon slain by Cadmus. As this remnant of the
dragon ended up in Colchis to protect the Golden Fleece, not only
are the fleece and the dragon revealed as the same bloodline, but it
seems even more persuasive that the Fleece included Megarians.
This is important in many ways, one of which is that the Bias (or
Byzas/Buzas) Megarians founded Byzantium, what became the
Eastern Roman Empire.
[This serves as evidence that the fleece line was made up of
Nahorites, for Buz was the son of Nahor. As Corinth was at first

522
named "Ephyra," it would appear that the historical "Apiru" that
named it were Nahorites. Moreover, it may reveal that the Apiru
were specifically Nahorites, not Abramites. On the other hand, the
Cati founders of Thebes, and of Kybele-Sabazios, were Sheba-
branch Abramites ]

Unfortunately, a Bias-Pelops blood connection is hard to


make solidly because the ancestry of the Pelops line was hidden, in
that his father (Tantalus) was made the son of Zeus (i.e. not very
specific). But as Byzantium was at the doorstep into Bithynia, and
as Byzantium (at first "Byzantion") evokes "Bithynia," note that
Tantalus ruled from proto-Lydia, which may at the time have been
a part of Bithynia. A daughter of Tantalus was Niobe, queen of
Thebes, meaning that Pelops-blood peoples also settled Thebes
and married its rulers.
[If Pelops is indeed Pel-Opis, then a connection to
Bias/Byzas seems even more evident. And if Zeus does turn out to
be an Avvite peoples, whom I rooted in Opis (on the Tigris), then
Pelops, in being made a son of Zeus, was of the Avvite/Opis bee
line. I've yet to find historical connection from Buz, son of Nahor,
to Opis, but the possibility is certainly there.]
The Pelops line became the enemy of the Trojans, especially
in the Trojan war, but this doesn't necessarily mean that Pelops
was not related to the Trojans. There were two women named
Electra, one was the mother of Dardanus and therefore the mother
of the Trojans, and the other was the great-granddaughter of
Pelops. It's thereby possible that the two Electras were the same
peoples, and that Electra was an ancestor of the Pelops line. This
first Electra was also, according to Diodorus Siculus (5.48.2), the
mother of Harmonia, wherefore Electra is essentially the Ares
Thracians ... who in fact did put forth the Trojans. This makes the
Trojans and the Sparti two branches of Ares. It may therefore be
that Electra depicted Sepharvites ... while Pelops depicted an
Avvite-Sepharvite mix. (I wonder if the electron, the source of all
energy and motion in all the material universe, wasn't named after
Electra, since I'm sure that scientists who created the modern
atomic theory were in large part Rosicrucians who, like the
astronomers, name much after their ancient bloodlines e.g. atom =
Adam, ion = Ionians, positive = Poseidon, negative =
nagi/serpent).
One obvious clue for Pelops' ancestry is that his mother,
Dione, was a daughter of Atlas (explaining why his helper was
Hermes, as he was the son of Atlas' daughter, Maia). Atlas was, as
was Zeus, a Trojan entity. Note that Poseidon (father of Atlas) was
made the (homosexual) lover of Pelops. If I'm correct in pegging
Poseidon as the Buzi Medes, it could thereby be that Pelops was at
the least a very close ally with Nahorite Buzites. If the question is,

523
what causes Pelops to turn against his own Trojan ancestors, I
would say it was the same as what caused the other "Greeks" to
turn against their own Trojan ancestors. A family squabble over
supremacy. When the Trojans became allied to the Sparti (i.e.
Helen), the Greeks rebelled for fear of being swallowed up by
Trojan power. Aside from a Trojan base developing in Sparta,
Arcadia became the Greek seat of Trojan Atlantis.
While the Arcadians under codeword "Arcas" were glorified
as the Little Dipper (Ursa Minor) placed at the "center" of the
universe (i.e. north star), Ursa Major must have been created later,
therefore, but must have depicted the same peoples. Indeed, Ursa
Major was equated with Callisto, Arcas' mother, and she was the
daughter of Lycaon (the wolf), founder of Arcadia. The heart of
the astrology cult was for this reason Arcadia, and because
Arcadians connect with Atlantis/Troy, we find that the "center" of
the universe was at first the Draco constellation, named after
Thrace no doubt.
[In keeping with my theory that Arcadia was named as Ar-
Cati, see that Callisto evokes the Galli of the Kabala cult.]
Consider that, in an early myth version, Arcas was, instead of
Ursa Minor, the constellation Bootes, which is found in
conjunction with Ursa Major so that it (Bootes) is regarded as the
Bear Watchman. The brightest star in the Bootes constellation is
Arcturus, meaning "keeper of the bear." "Boötes was considered
to be Atlas by some ancient Greek legends, as well as those in
other early Mediterranean cultures...'
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/b/bo/bo%C3%B6tes.htm
[Update June 2006 -- Did Plato make Atlas the chief king of
western Atlantis with Bootes in his mind, and were Bude of
Cornwall and Butes of Argyll (Scotland) considered the chief
locations in British Atlantis? Was Arthur, said by many to be
named after the bear, a depiction of the Bude peoples of his times
(early Christian centuries)? Were Bude and Butes Arcadian
settlements? Was Corn-Wales named after Corinth? Why was
there a boar peoples (in Arthurian myth) located in Cornwall?
Why was Great Ormos in north Wales beside Rhos? Wouldn't this
land connected like so to the golden fleece line be the origin of the
end-time False Prophet?
Assuming that Bootes and the Greek Butes (of the Cecrops
bloodline) were the same Rosh-Gogi peoples, see that both terms
mean "ox/bull" to the ancients. Behold that both the French and
Greek cow is "bos," as in our "bison." And the Portuguese for "ox"
is "boi"! Could this allow a Butes-Boiotus-Buzas equation? Could
this explain why Arthur's tomb (near Bude, Cornwall) turned out
to be the tomb of a Megarian? Remember, too, that I had
connected Kemuel, third son of Nahor (after Buz the second) to

524
Camelot, and Nahor's first son, Uts, to Atlas. It may be that Atlas
became a term depicting the Nahorites in general, since other of
Nahor's sons would have been prone to band around the Uts tribe.]
Since the bear in Scripture (Daniel 7) depicts the Medes and
Persians, does it make sense that the Byzas/Buzas branch of
Megarians were from the Buzi/Bosae Medes? More specifically,
Bootes must have depicted the Boiotians and therefore the Boii of
Europe, for Butes was said (by Virgil) to be of "Amycian stock"
i.e. from Amycus, son of Melia, she being the progenitor of
Boiotians. As Amycus was the founder of the Bebryces nation, I
have a feeling that they became the Bibracte Gauls (see location of
Auten, capital of Bibracte).
Behold, when Arcas was out hunting and came across his
mother in the form of a bear, he was with his two hounds which
are now in the sky as the constellation, Canis Venatici. Is that the
Veneti I see in that term? Remember, I trace the Veneti, and
several other "Van" terms, to the Bia peoples of Lake Van
(Armenia). Suddenly, it may not seem so far-fetched to suggest
that the Po river, anciently the Padus, was named after
Byzas/Butes. And I may be right also when I figure that the Bia of
Lake Van were at some time or another, "Bias."
[I'm now ready to declare that the historical Rusa kings of
Urartu/Lake Van were the mythical Ares and Hermes peoples,
even the Biblical Gogi-Rosh, and that somehow
"Buzi/Bosae/Buza" became "Rusi/Rosa/Rusa." If that makes the
Russians Nahorites, so be it. Note the current Russian President's
name: Putin]
Consider also that stars in Canis Venatici include Chara
(Caria?) and Asterion; the latter was king of Crete and husband of
Europa, and was therefore the peoples depicted by the Zeus bull.
In other words, Asterion (Ishtar?) was a bull peoples from Media
the bear that put forth Butes the bull of Cecrops which in turn put
forth the Zeus bull of Crete.
[Update June 2006 -- Megarians may have been named after
Magi Medes, an idea that works well with the witch of Colchis,
Medea, being both a depiction of sorcerous Medes and
Corinthians. Medea was Aeetes' daughter (co-founder of Corinth),
and Megarians were, remember, from Corinthians. There is a way
to reconcile this Megara-Magi equation with the theory that
Megarians were from Buzi Medes. For as inhabitants of Megara
(i.e. under it's Caria name) were first of all Carians, then, if
Carians were Horites, they may have been Nahorites and therefore
Buzites (since in this theory Horites were Nahorites). Then, the
Magi Medes moved in and conquered Caria, renaming it Megara.
As Megara was said to be ruled first by the mythical
Lelex/Polycaon, these terms should prove to depict Magi Medes.

525
I have a feeling that Aeetes was the Uts-branch Nahorites or
Uts-branch Arameans, and that the Magi Medes were the
Magogians (from Magog, son of Japheth). It could be that while
the Medes started out as a peoples under one name, for example,
Madai, brother of Magog, that they came to be a mix of all/some
Japhethites. I am considering whether the Medes were named
instead after Medan or Midian, both sons of Abraham and his wife
Keturah (Genesis 25:2). Or perhaps Keturah was herself a Mede
and named her sons after them.
I should mention here that Midian had Abida for a son, who
may have been the patriarch of the Avvites since they were called
both "Avith" and "Avidia." If this Abida/Avvite equation is reality,
then Avvites did not stem from the Buzi, as I have at times
theorized. Perhaps the Abida peoples put forth the Budii Medes. I
have enough keys now that I should be able to figure this out
correctly before the natural end of my life. The question is, which
did Cecrops Butes and the Cornwall Bude come from, the Buzi or
Budii.
I will stick to my Megarian connection to Buzi, but view
Megarians as a Buzi-Magi mix, not necessarily always seeing eye-
to-eye. Perhaps the same mix applies to Corinthians as per their
civil war, Jason versus his wife, Medea... which could then reveal
Jason as a Buzi Mede if indeed Medea was a Magi Mede. This mix
would then define the boar line, and I think Cornwall was the
Corinthian-boar nation, and it's city of Bude was more-likely a
Buzi town in that Cornwall was a Nahorite entity. Arthur may
have been a Megarian because he fought against the boar of
Cornwall, and in fact he chased the boar out to sea. End Update]
Bootes, in yet another myth version concerning him, was
considered to be Icarus (i.e. like "Car"). Romans and others
viewed Ursa Major as a cart/chariot, which may indeed serve to
show that Carians were depicted by Icarus (Bootes) and the Chara
star of Bootes' hound. The mythical Car may have been the earliest
example of the Greek wheel symbol (Greek "gargar" =
wheel/chariot).
[Okay, so I can now verify/solidify my theory. Assuming
that Carites were Horites and Horites were Nahorites, then Bootes
would translate to Buzi, not the Budii. If Bootes was Butes (of
Cecrops), then Butes became Bude in Cornwall, and thus this
Bude was not named after the Budii, but the Buzi (i.e. as I
suspected).]
One myth writer decided to depict some Corinthian-based
refugees in Colchis as fleeing on a golden ram, who, when they
returned to Corinth, were depicted by another myth writer as the
Calydonian Boar. These then became the Gaul migration called
"Aerope/Europa." Atreus (of the golden lamb line) was made

526
married to Aerope, you see, who was the daughter of a Minos-
descended king of Crete. Europa was the mother of Minos so that
Aerope would well describe the Europa peoples that actually
entered Europe. "Atreus" evokes the Adriatic sea, or the Illyrian
portion of that migration. When Atreus' brother, Thyestes, had an
affair with Aerope, a quarrel broke out with Atreus so that the two
split up (into distinct branches); it would be interesting to find out
who these branches were in historical terms.
Atreus with Aerope were "married" to Helen (of
Sparta/Troy), and Helen's family (e.g. Pollux and Castor) put forth
the Ligurians and other such north Italian Gauls. Helen's mother
was Leda, and so now recall that Pelops, the father of Atreus and
Thyestes, had been king in proto-Lydia. You see? Atreus and
Thyestes were Lydians by blood, and they put forth their son
Menelaus who married Helen, another Leda-Lydian peoples.
Therefore the said two branches may have become the Etruscans
for one (known to originate in Lydia), and the Latins for two, both
coming to live side-by-side with proto-Rome between them. Keep
in mind that the Etruscans were probably Ruski (they called
themselves "Rasna/Rasenna") and therefore can be connected to
the Rhaetians (north Italy) and the Rusyn/Ruthene/Redones/Rus.
[Update June 2006 -- Because Eridanus was crashed into by
Apollo peoples, Pelops may be a version of "Apollo," in which
case Pelops (and probably all Lydians) were Avvites from Opis, if
indeed I am correct in rooting Apollo in Opis. But "Pelops" also
evokes "apple" and "Avalon" and therefore connecting with the
golden apples that Ladon protected in the Atlantean garden, which
some say was Avalon.
Do you see the light in my eyes? I've just now realized (as I
edit this chapter) that while the Ligurians were of the Leda-
Lydians (I've known this part for years), the Redones of Pelops
Lydians. Wow, that is an excellent key for tracing the fleece line to
the modern Rosicrucian cults. Myth says the Ligurians moved into
Eridanus, the Rhodanus (modern Rhone) valley of the Redones,
showing that Pelops and the Leda swan became allied at that point.
I will bet you one buzi-bushel of golden apples that these
became the Ladon dragon that founded Lothian, Scotland? I'll bet
you two bushels of checkered blue and white apples that the
Stewarts (using a swan symbol) and Cohens were of the Leda
swans, and that the Sinclairs (who settled Roslin in Midlothian)
were of the Pelops fleece line. And because the Stewarts seized the
island of Bute (in Argyll), I'll bet yet a basket of bull's eyes that
Butes of Cecrops (i.e. of Gog) became both the Leda swan line and
the Pelops fleece line; that is, Butes furnished Lydians, for indeed
Lydians were ruled first of all by Dascylus (Tuscany/Etruscans)
and then by his son, Gyges = Gog. End Update]

527
So because these two fighting brothers, Atreus and Thestes,
were the golden fleece, they were also the Ares/Rus dragon, which
then corresponds to the Biblical dragon that rules Rome prior to
the coming of Jesus, the Rock and the Sword that smashes and
slices them to bits, as was the fate of Pelops in past times ... acting
as the forerunner of Armageddon. Do you see? The False Prophet
will represent the Roman beast of Lydia and Troy (Troy furnished
the Romans proper).
The two-horned Fleece line put forth Europe but also the
Russians, and this must then explain why the False Prophet will
ally himself with a Russian anti-Christ. I'm not saying that the two
horns will be a Europe-Russian combination, for I think the horns
will be an America-England (Illuminati) combo ... that allies itself
to the Russian anti-Christ, who will soon enter Iraq as a diplomatic
shark, against the will of the Iraqi people, and while siding openly
and insincerely with the False Prophet, he will side secretly (for as
long as he can, anyway) with the old Saddam loyalists and bring
them back to significant power in Iraq.
The king of Troy, Paris, who "stole" Helen (so as to set off
the Trojan war that set off the Gaul migration), is said to have
formed the Parisii peoples who founded the French city after their
name. Says one website: "The Romano-British Parisii tribe of
East Yorkshire and Humberside in Britain is traditionally seen
as being comprised of emigrants from the tribe of the same
name based in Gaul."
That is, the York Paris peoples were the same as the French
Paris peoples. I'm pegging Parisii of Yorkshire as a boar-line
peoples, not only because York was at that time named
"Eboricum," where "Ebor" meant "boar," but because the "Par" in
"Paris" seems to mean the same (Old-English boar = "bar"). In
fact, I would go so far as to suggest that Eboricum was named (by
the Romans) after the Parisii inhabitants of Yorkshire. Paris was
not far from Bibracte.
Thyestes had Aegisthus for a son, and the two of them
together evoke Theseus (founder of Democracy) and his father
Aegius, both of the Cecrops line i.e. from Butes! ! This would
suggest that Pelops, Atreus and Thyestes (and the Etruscans and
Latins) were from Butes. Theseus and Aegius (and therefore
Thyestes and Aegisthus) together came to overthrow Minos in
Crete so as to take over the rule Greek Atlantis (i.e. the Aegian-sea
empire). I would go so far as to say that when Thyestes had an
affair with Aerope, it was the same as Zeus and Europa, even as
"Thyestes" evokes "Dyas," the Indo-Iranian name of Zeus.
It is important to stress that both golden-lamb brothers were
associated with the capital of the Minyae, Orchomenos; Thyestes
was even given a son named, "Orchomenos." The Zeus-Europa

528
relationship put forth the the mythical Minos i.e. Minoans in Crete.
That is, note the similarity between "Minyae" and "Minoan." At
first I thought that the Minyae stemmed from the Minoans, but
couldn't it be the other way? Orchomenos should then be
understood as Orcho-Menos, and perhaps Arca(dia)-Menos. Or,
perhaps Archevite-Manes, where Archevites were Erech/Uruk
inhabitants. In other words, the Minyae may have founded Arcadia
wherefore they were the Pelasgians/Pel-Asgi (who were known to
have founded Arcadia), and that would then make the Minoans the
same. That is, the Europa portion of the Minoans would translate
to an Arcadia-Menos/Archevite-Menos mix, which then reveals
that the Phoenicians were the same. The Menos portion may refer
to Mannae/Armenia. Mannae was in the Kabala land of Gozan, not
far from Opis, and so consider viewing Europa as Eur-Opis
("eury" means wide-spread).
It is very interesting that the sister of Aerope was Clymene,
who doubled as Merope/Mer-Opis. Clymene was the mother of
Phaethon, the latter being a symbol of Helios but more importantly
the one said to crash the chariot of Helios into Eridanus. Therefore
you can bet your best golden hub caps that the Redones were
connected somehow to Clymene/Merope.
Cly-Menes was married to Merops, king of Ethiopia. They
had a son, Pandareus, who in turn gave birth to Aedon, a jueen of
Thebes (in Greece, not Thebes in Egypt). Now note that ' Aedon"
is almost exactly "Auten/Autun," the capital of Bibracte and home
of the (historical) Eduens/Aedui peoples.
Itylus was revealed in another myth as the son of the
Thracian king Tereus (of Ares) and of Procne. In light of Aedon
being the daughter of Pandareus, it cannot be a double-coincidence
that Procne was the daughter of Pandion and that she gave birth to
Itys while Aedon gave birth to Itylus. In other words, and it is
verified online, Procne was the same as Aedon. The main
significance is that Pandion was of the Cecrops line, and in fact it
was Pandion with Zeuxippe that brought forth Procne, while it was
the same Pandion and Zeuxippe that gave birth to Butes! Therefore
Aedon/Procne and Butes were the same bloodline.
There is yet more significance, in that Merops of Ethiopia
(Mer-Opis of Ethi-opis) must be the same as Tereus of Thrace
(apparently Thracians successfully invaded Ethiopia).
[Update June 2006 -- This verifies what I had found by other
means, that the bee-line came into Greece from Thrace.
As for Aedon giving birth to Itylus, it sounds as though she
depicts the mother of Italics/Italians. I had previously wondered
but didn't want to publish it that Pandion was a depiction of the
Veneti and/or the Wends/Vandals that stem from the Veneti. I had
traced the Franks to the Vandals (while Franks trace themselves to

529
the Veneti), so it makes sense now that there should be an Aedon-
to-Veneti-to-Aeton migratory path, wherefore Itylus/Itys refers to
the Veneti, and/or the Attis Phrygians who became the Veneti.
Indeed, for the Veneti are traced to the Heneti of Paflagonia,
in/beside ancient Phrygia. But now behold that when Pelops ruled
the Lydians and Phrygians, he ruled from the city/region of
"Enete."
This is hard to follow, I realize. It means that Aedon peoples
(probably Edones) were the same as Pelops peoples in Enete i.e.
that Pelops-Enete was proto-Itylus/proto-Veneti, and that these
were all the Attis-Kybele Kabala. Indeed, Aedon was made
married to a king of Thebes, that being a major Kybele-Kabala
city. It's the same story - - the Gaul migration -- over and over
again told in many variations and using many symbols, as though
impish children were playing games on the human race, seeking to
remain secretive with their history lest we see their filth. Peoples
worthy of honor let their good works be known in the light.
The husband of Aedon was made Zethus, and because Aedon
had a branch in Ethiopia, it makes for good ground to identify
Zethus as the Egyptian Set, even the Satyrs were indeed Edones.
End Update]
[Update October 2006 -- Found a website using this: "Also it
is said that the Aith-Opes or Ethiopian..." I found the same term
elsewhere but defined "faery-faced," something I'll ignore as
personal fancy. End Update]
It is obvious that "Clymene" should be understood as Cly-
Menes, just as Minos' grandson, Althaemenes, should be
understood as Althae-Menes. These terms must, as must "Minos"
itself, allude to the god, Min/Manes. Connection with the historical
Egyptian king, Menes, seems well apparent. Note also Helen's
husband, Menelaus, that he was said to have been in Egypt after
the Trojan war.
Althaemenes was brother of Aerope and Clymene, and he is
credited with founding the city of Cretinia in Rhodes...which
evokes both the Curetes and the Cruithin of Britain. That now
identifies Aerope (and Europe) as a Curete peoples of Crete;
Aerope was the daughter of Catreus of Crete. That italicized
portion is because Cadmus had depicted the Cati while he was
Europa's brother, meaning that Europa/Aerope was also a
Cati/Cutha peoples.
[Update June 2006 -- Phryxus/Phrixes was the son of
Athamas, and he in turn was made a descendant of Aeolus. I've
now got to repeat that Aeolus' twin brother was made Boiotus, the
mythical depiction of the historical Boeotia (I traced the twins to
the founding of Wales and Cornwall). Phrixes, thereby revealed as
a Boeotian peoples, becomes suspect as Bute/Buzi branch.

530
As shown previously, Elamites called themselves, "Atamti,"
having a root that is a near-match to the root of "Athamus." The
Boeotians must have been part Elamite, therefore. But now behold,
for the above-mentioned Althaemenes must depict the same
Elamite peoples as Athamus and Phryxus, for Wikipedia reports
that "Elamites called their country Haltamti (in later Elamite,
Atamti) ... " It can't be a coincidence: Althaemenes depicts
"Haltamti" and Athamus depicts "Atamti." Therefore, Curetes and
the golden fleece line stem from Elamites. End Update]
The Minyae were offspring of Aeolus and an unknown wife.
But as Aeolus and his unknown wife gave birth to Kerkaphos (a
city on Rhodes), whom in another myth was revealed as the son of
Helios and Rhoda, two major revelations are made, that Aeolus
was indeed Helios (as can be suspected from yet other
considerations), and that the unknown wife was Rhoda.
[It's consistent to identify Helios as the Halybes, for one, or
the Ialysos peoples of Rhodes; both they and the Halybes were
inhabitants on the Halys river. That is, Helios was the Hurrian
empire, and the Sepharvites at the root of that empire.]
That Aeolus was Helios is made clear in yet another way,
where Aeolus is made father of Sisyphus, founder of Corinth. In
another version, Aeetes was founder of Corinth, and it is known
that he was a son of Helios.
Finally, though I had suspected it, I found a statement to
corroborate it: "...the so-called Minyans. This little known
people, whose origin was Kolchis..."
http://www.sikyon.com/Thebes/history eg.html
The Colchians that Jason returned witli to Greece, when he
also came back with the Fleece, were allied to him for a short
while, as they were depicted as his wife, Medea. In rebelling
against Jason, they, as the Calydonian Boar, arose also against the
Calydonians (who were on Jason's Argo ship). The Boar, losing
the war, fled Corinth in the dragon-pulled chariot of Helios, and
returned to Colchis, afterwhich they became the Medes proper, the
ones who conquered the Babylonian empire (therefore, if the myth
writer(s) was correct, the second beast of Daniel 7 was rooted in
Colchis and in Ares). This is one of several examples where the
boar and the bear represented one and the same peoples (Medes
are depicted as bears in Daniel 7).
Now here's the rub: "The 'Prieure documents' claim that
the Arcadians were descended from Benjamites driven out of
Palestine by their fellow Israelites for idolatry." I've done a lot
of research into Greek mythology, and nothing that I have come
across would leave me to believe that Israel plays much or any part
in the dragon line. I'll have an open mind, but I would also warn
that we shouldn't fall for an Illuminati trick that seeks to make Gog

531
look like an Israelite and/or Christian entity...to get the support
from Jews and/or Christians in the building of Gogi Globalism.
The "Jewish" element in Septimania was no doubt from
Khazar royalty if it's true that the Cathars of the region were
Khazars. But the rulers of Khazaria were hardly Israelites in their
religious observances, and the Cathars, anyway, were Christian
gnostics ... and for this reason it's not surprising that they would
introduce as truth any imaginary picture that popped into their
minds, for gnostics are false prophets, dreamers, mystics...we have
a lot of these ego-types around today, all over the internet.
I've stated elsewhere that the mythical Britomartis of
tame
Crete the Bretons in that Merlin was said to be "Myrddin,"
so now see that the Catreus of Crete (mother of Aerope) may be
entertained as the root of the Cathars. It doesn't hurt for me to jot
this down.]

532
THE BIJ, THE BAD BULLS,
AND THE BOLGY

Mentz/Metz is south of Mosul on this Rhine map, due west of


Mainz. The river Main runs into Mainz, and Mannheim is just
upstream on the Rhine. For this reason I suspect that the Rhine was
home to the Cottians (previously in the Alps), descendants of
Cotys, son of Manes. That is, the Cotti were Getae and thus of
Goth blood, wherefore they are contenders for Merovingian roots.
I equate the Cotti with the Chatti/Catti who did in fact live on
the Rhine, and whom by others are said to be closely related to the
Franks. The Chatti were ancestors of the Batavians, whom I
suspect are the ancestors of the Bute clan, to which the Stewarts
are closely associated to this day. The Batavians are said to be
direct ancestors of the Dutch, but the Dutch were a Frank peoples.
It's interesting that the Issel river (which is said to name the Salian
Franks) is in Dutch territory. It is said that the Salians in particular
formed the Dutch: "The Salian Franks formed, with the Nether-
Saxons and the Frisians, the foundation for early Dutch
culture and society"
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Salian_Franks
The well-known fact that the Salians lived on the sea shore is
good reason to entertain "Merovee" as meaning Sea Boi, or even
Sea-Ubii since Franks were related to the Ubii peoples on the
Rhine river. Homer wrote that the "Mysi" i.e. Mysians became the
"Abii," whom (Homer said) were Sarmations (and therefore
Alans).
[Update July 2006 -- Mysians were proto-Lydians, meaning
that Mysians, and therefore the Abii, were of the Pelops golden-
fleece line and/or the Leda-Lydian swan line. The Abii may have
been the mythical Abas/Abae (of Phocis) that I entertain as the
Avvites in Greece. The city of Abae was in Phocis, and so read
this (End Update)]:
"It is said that the Turkish city of Eregli (ancient
Bebryces) was founded by Megarians. Cassius Dio, in his
Roman history's Book XIII, tells of a sea of Bebryces,
which he said was also called the "sea of Narbonenses."
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/13.html

533
"The founding city of Narbonenses, Massalia
(modern day Marseilles), was settled by the Phocaeans
around 600 BC."
http://www.usd.edu/~clehmann/pir/gallia.htm
What's that? Bebryces was a Megarian entity? Interesting,
since both Megarians and Phocaeans were Corinthian descendants,
who were themselves the Ares dragon ... the white dragon.
Massalia was at the mouth of the Rhone (ancient Rhodanus)
on the Mediterranean, wherefore that was the sea of Bebryces.
That is, the Bebryces Greeks must have become the Narbonenses
Gauls. So recall from the previous chapter my Bebryces
connection to Bibracte, where the latter was located around its
(French) capital city, Auten/Autun; recall also my connection of
Auten to the mythical Aedon of the Butes bloodline (of Cecrops),
and keep in mind that I hope to connect these "b*b*r" terms to the
green beaver symbol on the Vere/Oxford Coat of Arms, which I
think included the Bauer (i.e. Rothschild) surname. Autun is just
south of Avallon, just west of Beaune, and just north of Macon.
You can see the Aedui on the Gaul map, beside the Mandubii
(Mand-Ubii?).
(See map of Narbonenses).
[Ahhh, dear me, I just realized while re-reading/editing this
paragraph above that Aut(en)" is likely the same as "Avith" and
"Avidia," two historical versions of the Biblical "Avviy." And as I
have already connected the Avviy to Avalon in Britain, surely this
French Avallon is the sister-region of the British one.]
The question is to what extent the Phocaeans mixed with the
Redones (the red dragon) before founding the city of Narbonne
(named after Narbonenses) more than 100 miles westward in
Languedoc-Roussillon? That latter term was "Rosellon" to the
Spanish. The Ruthene did in fact live in Languedoc-Roussillon, at
Rodez, in the province of Aveyron.
[Update July 2006 -- Do you see an "Avviy" (Biblical
spelling of "Avvite") in Aveyron? And see the city of Severat le
Chateau just to the east of Rodez, evoking the Kabala "sephirot"
and the Sepharvites.
Recall that I had connected the Avvites closely to the seven-
headed Lotan dragon of Syria (which per chance might furnish the
False Prophet and Biblical-dragon empire). Remember we're
dealing with frogs here, the symbols of all three Revelation beasts.
Recall that I had traced the Greek Ladon dragon (probably the
same as the (white) Lotan dragon) to Lothian, where Roslin was
located. This would suggest that the Ruthene named Roslin as they
had named Rosellon, explaining why the Sinclairs, a Rus-Viking
peoples, came to settle Roslin. And as Edinburgh is just six miles

534
from Roslin, recall the Celt goddess was "Aedon," just like the
Aedon of Greek myth, and that these terms likely depicted the
Edones who named Edinburgh. As this Lothian region gave rise to
the mythical Lot (who the mytholo ers then (deceptively) sa
founded Lothian), see that Severot de Cha
teau is on the Lot river!
This now connects Lotan/Ladon to the Sepharvites, and to the
Bohemian Grove (California) which continues to honor, to this
day, the Sepharvite god, Molech. End Update]
Narbonne was named after Narbo Martius, and I have been
looking for just such a name for to discover the real roots for the
Martinist Rosicrucians (I don't much trust explanations from
Rosicrucians themselves), said to originate in southern France.
Narbonne became the capital of Septimania, and Septimania (same
as Languedoc) is where the Jesus-Magdalene heresy flourished,
and where the first Templars gathered.
[Update June 2006 -- It is said that Septimania was not a
Merovingian-proper nation, but rather belonged to certain Goths,
but as "Sept" has the makings of "sephirot," I would entertain a
Goth-Merovingian mix to define Septimania.
It is my opinion that the Edones were Getae who became the
historical "Eotens" (i.e Jutes), and were therefore Goths. Yes, I'm
suggesting that the mythical Aedon depicted the Goths of
Septimania. I think that these Goths took the continental route by
way of Venetia/Etruscans (i.e. they were not the sea-faring
Phocaeans), as per my previous explanation that the mythical
Aedon gave birth to Itylus = Italy, and to the Veneti more
specifically in that she was a daughter of Pandion. End Update]
In keeping with my theory that the Getae were the Satyr
goats (Satyr Thracians living amongst the Edones on the Strymon
river), Templars worshiped Baphomet, a goat god. It's interesting
that the kings of Kent (from "Centaur"?) were Jutes, and that
Godfrey de Bouillon came forth from kings of Kent intermarried
with the Anglo-Saxon kings. I'm suggesting that Godfrey was
surrounded by Jute Templars from the mythical Aedon, and that
Merovee had been named after her husband, Merops (Mer-Opis =
sea bee), who was also king Tereus of Thrace.
See on this zoom-able Roussillon map that Narbonne was
just next to Beziers, and do note how that term evokes
"Byzas/Bias." You can see Rodez to the north, and Marseilles to
the east; Rennes-le-Chateau (i.e. ancient Aereda), not shown, was
just to the west of Narbonne, and south of Carcassonne. This
suggests strongly that some Redones of the Rhodanus moved with
the Bebryces Greeks to the Narbonne sea shore. I would also
suggest that the Narbonne (Nar-Bonne?) Bebryces founded Bonn,
and that "Bonn" is a Boi term, as when the Bia peoples named Van
(Armenia).

535
Narbonne was "situated where the Via Domitia connected
to the Via Aquitania, which lead toward the Atlantic..." To this
I would add that the Boii city of Boiatium was in Aquitaine...on
the Atlantic. But the Bebryces (Boi-Bryges?) Greeks must have
moved north as well, into central France, to become the Bibracte
empire; we find that Boii peoples (e.g. of Gorgobina) did live
amongst the Bibracte. The Gorgobina may have been Gauls of
Gergovia.
The Merovingian king, Dagobert II, married Giselle of Razes
h century AD), and this latter term was the region surrounding
R7tedae(-le-Chateau). Dagobert's son, Sigisbert IV, then became
Duke of Razes and Count of the Rhedae. And there you have
Merovingian involvement with the Rose Line. The Rod cult that
these peoples worshiped included a female personality called
"Roza," evoking Razes.
Terms like "Rosellon" should perhaps be understood as
Rotellon, as in "rotelli" = "wheel." This would explain why
Rosicrucian crosses are sometimes encircled, as in a Celtic cross,
so that it appears as a wheel with four spokes (see here such a
chariot wheel). It may be that "Roslin" and "Rothesay" are "roto"
words linking back to the Rodez/Ruteni Gauls. Rothesay was the
first name of the Island of Bute (Scotland), and it may just be that
the island was an old Redone hang-out long before the Stewarts
proper came to Scotland. The Stewarts, having been Merovingians
and therefore having Redone blood, seized the island as their own
as soon as there was a Stewart on the throne of Scotland. (see Gaul
map).
I now wish to entertain a connection of the peoples under
discussion to Cornwall/Wales. First let me say that, in support of
my hunch that "Boii" was at one time "Bogi" (because I expect
that "bij" (= "bee") derived from something like "Bogi"), the
Russians call the Boii nation of Bohemia, "Bogemiya." Plus,
modern Lamothe (in Aquitaine) was an old Boii city that the
Romans named "Boiatium," and yet the modern form, "Biganos,"
shows the "g" form that I suspected of Boii terms.
It is said that the Belgae of Europe stemmed (in the second
and first century BC) to become the Belgae of south Wales. I
would add that the Fir Bolgs had been in Wales long before, for
they were Geryon's Gorgons, and as they were in Erethlyn, Wales
(i.e. like "Aereda"), I would moreover add that the Fir Bolgs were,
at least in part, Redones. I tend to think that the "l" in "Bolg"
derived from "Bologne/Boulogne," since it's known that Bologne
(Italy) was founded by the Boii.
Now Geryon's people were depicted in the myth as cattle,
and this in turn referred to Taurus, which, in light of Geryon being
depicted as a monster, probably carried the idea of "giant

536
(people)," for "bull" comes from the idea of "bulk," says my
dictionary, even as a "bull market" refers to increasing prices.
"Torus" is Latin for "swelling."
Note the similarity between "bullock" (Old English "bulluc")
and "Bulgar/Bolg." Could Bologne, though not named after a bull,
have been depicted by the bull as a play-on-words? Or is it
possible that "Boii" became "Boille" (pronounced "buiy") in
France, as in Godfrey de Bouillon?
"Torso" and "Taurus" are linguistically related, carrying the
idea of bulk. But "torso" comes from the Greek, "thyrsos,"
meaning "stalk/trunk," and for that reason the so-called "thyrsos"
of Dionysus was a symbol of a stalk/trunk i.e. ancestors (it
depicted Attis of the Manes bloodline). Thus "Thrace" must have
meant "bloodline-stalk," and for that reason "Draco" (from
"Thrace/Thraco) meant the same thing. Perhaps the "Angus" breed
of cattle may find origin in a term that brought about "Anglo."
Note that a bull is a symbol of anger/fury.
I've read that the Angles were named after "angle." It's
interesting that the French and Latin "angulus" (corner/angle) is
similar to the French and Latin "avunculus," meaning "mother's
brother" i.e. uncle; the term should be read as "av-unculus," which
strikes me as being quite the same as "angulus." Now "culo" in
Italian means "butt," and that brings the idea of "bull" back since
the round bulk of a bull by which it's named is it's (large) butt.
This is not to say that an uncle is a large butt, at least not my uncle,
but that "unculus" appears to mean "from the loins of" i.e. "from
the stalk/womb of." And so "uncle" is very much like "Angle"
perhaps because the Angles were named after the idea of relatives;
I would imagine that they were named by their tribal cousins.
Now the term "angulus" (angle/corner) would apply because
the loin area is where our bodies bend. My dictionary defines a
loin as "between the lower ribs and the hipbone," which happens
to be the location of the unborn child/bloodline. In Latin "loin" is
"lumbus," which sounds like "lumber" = "trunk/stalk." Indeed, our
English word, "lumbar" (from "lumbus") means "pertaining to the
loins."
This exercise was part of a period of several hours with my
face in the dictionary trying to find a connection between "Bolg"
and "Bologne," so that I was paralyzed to find that the Old-French
words for "loin" were "loigne" and "logne," for they may just be
the intent in "Bologne." Could we therefore read the word as Boi-
Stalk?
As "loin" was from "lumbus," I was struck by yet another
finding, that the dictionary's definition of "lumber" included:
"Var[iation] of Lombardi in obs. [obsolete] sense of 'money-
lender, pawnshop,' hence stored articles." This seemed amazing

537
because I was tracking the Lombards at the time in an effort to
connect them solidly to the Vandals (and the Vandals to the
Merovingians), while at the same time suspecting that Bologne,
Italy, was connected to Boulogne, France, the latter being the
count-dom of Godfrey de Bouillon's father.
[Update Augsut 2006 -- Consider this quote: "The swan was
then [11th century AD], as it is still, the central heraldic mark
of the arms of Boulogne. For the swan legend (in spite of
Lohengrin) seems to have originated at the castle of Bouillon,
which was the inheritance of Eustace II’s second son, Godfrey
of Bouillon."
http://amg 1 .net/scotland/flemfam.htm End quote]
Gold "bullion" is from the French "bouillir" = "to boil,"
which is somewhat understandable since gold is melted to make
bullion blocks. I may now understand what I couldn't at first, why
"Bouillon" (the city) derived from the very same French word
(above) that means "to boil." But surely "Bouillon" does not mean
Hot/Bubbly Land. Wouldn't "bull" be a better root for both gold
bullion and Bouillon, especially as bull is a money-term used in
the stock market?
But I am torn over the possibilities. On the one hand
"Bouillon" could mean "bee" (French "abeille"); on another hand
"bull"; on another "gold bars"; on another Boi Land. It is said that
the tomb of a Merovingian king contained a golden bull's head and
gold bees. Were the Rosicrucians so silly that they would honor
animal pictures? Was this a child's game? Are there not better
things to honor than animals representing grandfathers? It is true
what God has said, that He will make the wise of this world fools?
With the French word for bee, the Ubii peoples come to
mind, and I do know that Mysia, where lived the Abii, was a land
in particular having gold. It would be even worse if men should
worship gold, for what is the fate of one who gives his soul to it
when the gold is no longer there? I think of multi-millionaires
going broke jumping off of high-rise towers, thinking they have
nothing to live for anymore after giving themselves over to the sins
that only ample money can buy.
I think I am beginning to understand that the bee and the bull
were together objects of Frank worship because both, merely as
play-on-words, came to depict Bolougne and/or Bouillon. Note
that "apis" meant "bull" to Egyptian and Greek myth writers, and
yet in Latin "apis" (Italian "ape") means "bee." In Dutch, a bee is a
"bij" while in Polish a bee is a "bak"; both "Mor bijan" and
" Morbik an" are valid variations of the historical Morbihan peoples
(see location of Morbihan). And so it seems feasible that the
Merovingians were from the Morbihan Veneti who founded
Vannes, Brittany.

538
"Bue" in Italian and "boi" in Portuguese are not a bee, but an
ox. And while a Polish bee is a "bak," a Polish bull is a "byk," but
also a "wolek" evoking "bullock" (and Bolg). "Bison" ("bos" in
French and Greek) may have derived from the Bessi Thracians
and/or the Bias/Byzas Megarians and/or the Buzi/Bosae Medes.
There is a word in my English dictionary that is exactly like
the city, "Bouillon." It means soup, and like the gold bars, it too is
said to derive from the French "bouil" = "boil." Everyone is
familiar with beef bouillon, and even as "bouillon" looks rooted in
"bull," see how it modifies to "bovillon," knowing also that
"bovi/bovine" (the root of "beef") refers to cow things.
The question then is, does the word "boil" itself derive from
the Boii? That is, were the Boii the inventors of metal, as even the
Telchines are said to be, as even the proto-Trojans are said to be,
as even the Minyae (i.e. Boiotians) are thought to be? The Minyae
were named after their unique gray pottery, called "Minyan,"
meaning that they were experts in the use of the kiln. The
inventors of metal were said to be from Eu boia (next to Boiotia),
who then moved to Chalcidice (in the neighborhood of the
Paeoni), but the Megarians (i.e. the Buzas) that founded
zantium are likewise said to have moved to Chalcidice.
V ouldn't that explain why these peoples were rich, why there was
a Minyan Treasury, and why gold blocks are called after the word,
"boil"? Assuming that the Boii were in fact something like "Boil,"
such Greek pertinent terms as Pelops (Pel-Opis), Pelasgians (Pel-
Asgi), and Bel/Baal come to mind.
See also how "buffalo" (a cow family) comes from the Greek
"boubalos" (French "bubale") which can easily modify to
"Bouvalos" (i.e. very similar to "Bouillon/Bovillon"). The
"bubale/boubalos" may per chance be related to "Bebryces" and
"Bibracte." In any case, read this about the Duchy of Bouillon:
"Built as a fortress in the early 11th c., it was ceded by the
famous crusader Godefroy de Bouillon to the bishops of Liége,
who owned it until 1678. From 1678 to 1795, it was an
independent and sovereign territory under the La Tour
family..."
http://www.heraldica.org/topics/france/bouillon.htm#la%20tour
Liege may have something to do with Liguria, but the point
is how "Tour" evokes the Taurus. Tourney, it should be added,
was the seat of Salian Franks.
It may very well be that "Taurus" and "bull" has meant
"wealth" for a long time, for my dictionary tells that "cattle"
derives from the Latin "capitale" meaning "capital/wealth." Note
that gold in certain languages is "dor/dora," an apparent variation
of "tora/taurus." Consider now that Babylon in Revelation is

539
likened to a money-making machine, and that "boubalos" (=
"buffalo") is very close indeed to "Babylon."
[Update June 2006 -- I'll bet you my golden bull-horn towel
hooks that the Chaldean Illuminati -- the Kabala -- named
"Babylon." "Kabala" is "caballa" = horse, after all, a term very
much like "boubalos" = buffalo.
After Greenway7 tipped me off about certain oxen called
"aurochs" that may be connected to the Araxes river (where I think
Ares/Hros/Gog originates), I did a quick search, and found that the
species was honored by various pagan peoples. In the quote below
(italics mine), I got the impression immediately that the ancient
Taurus cult -- still with us today and desiring to be honored by the
world -- had various cow-names for various Taurus branches:
"The aurochs (Bos primigenius) is an extinct
European mammal of the Bovidae family... alternative
plural forms are aurochsen or urus . The animal's original
scientific name Bos imigenius translated the German
term Auerochse r o froc hs, literally
:"primeval ox", or
"proto-ox" ... Taxonomists who consider domesticated
cattle a subspecies of the wild Aurochs should use B.
primigenius taurus."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurochs
Doesn't "urus" and "urochs" depict the Aras/Araxes valley,
and might the author of this article have known it? Why is this
species considered the "prima" and "proto" Taurus? Is this
Rosicrucian code for the Hros peoples of that valley? Are the
migratory paths of this species, as outlined in the article, the
migratory paths of the Hros? The article mentions a "Javan cattle,"
that they do not descend from the aurochs. Hmm, I'm suspicious.
Then, we read: "At one time there existed three aurochs
subspecies," one in India, one in north Africa, and one in Indo-
Europe!! This so much sounds like the Aryans, does it not? And
might the number three found so often in pagan symbolism depict
just those three major branches of Aryans?
If that's not enough, the article claims that "Domestication
of the aurochs began in the southern Caucasus and northern
Mesopotamia," exactly where Aras/Araxes is located on the one
hand, and exactly the bed of the Kabala dragon cult on the other
hand. As "urus" looks so much like "Taurus," might the two terms
have been synonymous, and might "urus" have been Uruk, since
the earliest bull cult (of Sin) was in that city? If true, it connects
Archevites to the Taurus cult, and may serve to reveal both Io and
Zeus roots in Uruk, not a major surprise, anyway. End Update]
"Business" looks rooted in "bison." My dictionary says
"business" is from the Old English "bysignis," and that "bysig"

540
means our modern "busy." But perhaps business stems from the
ox, the sale of cattle for easy money. See how "bysig," or "Byzas,"
evokes VISA, a modern symbol of big-business. Might the Image
of the Beast include a bison or other form of bull, perhaps bull
horns? As the Global Beast has been called by God, "Babylon the
Great," remember that this Great-Mother stupidity was depicted by
pagans as a bull. I don't "stupid" is a strong-enough term to do
justice.
After Zeus turned Io into a white cow, Poseidon mated with
her to produce the Egyptian king, "Epaphos." I'm suggesting that
some "p*p" terms, like some "b*b" terms, meant "bull." We have
all heard the phrase, "bull's eye," and so note that the center of the
eye is called a "pupil." Then know that, as a mythical story with a
meaning that no one seems to understand, the last Merovingian
king was killed when Pepin speared him, right in his eye! The
meaning seems to be two-fold, perhaps threefold: 1) that
Merovingians were viewed as bulls, 2) that Pepin meant "pupil"
(Pepin was a Merovingian); and, 3) that Merovingians were
symbolized by spears, even as the Veres are said to be depicted by
a shaking spear.
The Merovingians originated from a "quinotaur," a sea bull,
according to Merovingian myth. "Merovech" translates to Sea
Bull, apparently, since "vech" modifies to "bech," while those
terms mean "bull" in certain languages e.g. Polish "byk" or Italian
"vacca." These two languages are important, for the Franks
descended, I think, from a mixof Poles and Italians. Note that our
"buck" is defined as the male of animals, so that "Merovech"
would mean Sea Bull rather than Sea Cow. And speaking of bucks,
isn't that a money term too? The bull is a symbol of sin, the very
sin that Jesus can to save us from, the lust of the eyes.
Because Oxford (England) is not on the ocean, it's strange,
but now not incomprehensible, that there is a red ox standing on
water in the Oxford arms. They say that the cow is on the Thames
river, but I don't buy that because Oxford was ruled by Vere
Merovingians for several centuries. A red rose is held by a
lion/panther above the red ox; the cat is supposed to be dotted with
Fleur de Lis. The green beaver with a lion's body may reveal
something of the true nature of the Vere dragon. Both the beaver
and the elephant have chains dangling from their necks, very odd
indeed, but apt for an Illuminati peoples who pride themselves in
the god of Control.
Now a pupil is also a student, but "pupil" derives from
"pupus" = "boy." Can it be a coincidence that "boy" derives from
Middle English "boi"? It may be that the meaning behind a boy is
one in fetters to his father, for "boia" in Latin means "fetter/chain."
Might "boia" have been the chain that tied a cow to its post, and

541
might bull terms have derived from father terms, as for example
"baba/papa"? Even the Hebrew "abba" seems near to "apis" (bee or
bull). The Dutch grandfather is an "opa," like "opis" = bee. And
"Butes" (referring to a bull) is similar to "pater" the derivation of
"father." I'm suggesting that Gorgons worshiped bulls in
worshiping their fathers, even as some east Indians worship cows
to this day as their ancestors. This is Satanic Aryanism, and it
leads to stupidity. I'm calling all readers to not worship the Roman
beast and what the Bible calls the "Image of the Beast" that will
soon be revealed as a Globalist symbol. Or else become a fool, it's
up to you; if you don't care for your reputation or your life, why
should I? Certainly God is going to let you choose, and He warns
that anyone who worships the Image of the Beast will be forever
lost from eternal life.
I'm also suggesting that the bee was a symbol for
lordship/fatherhood/household/etc. The king bee, that is.
Remembering that Tydeus was of the Appian-Way bee line
(of the Italian Opis cult), and was the Calydonian fighter with a
boar symbol upon his shield, see that his mother was Peri boea, a
boar-bee combination. In the myth, he meets up and fights with
Oedipus [Oed-Opis?], he having a shield with a lion symbol.
Moreover, Oedipus just happens to be the step-son of Periboea, for
she was married to his father, Polybus (read as either Poly-Bus).
Now it just so happens that the Latin and Greek "bus" means "ox,"
as for example "Bosphorus means 'ford of the ox.'"
http://www.ptr.co.nz/turkey/istanbul1.htm
Hmm, might Oxford (originally "Oxanforda") stem from the
Bosphorus, where Byzantium was built? It is said in myth that the
Bosphorus (technically "Bosporos") strait was named by Io when
she as a white cow crossed it, suggesting that Io Argives had to do
with founding proto-Byzantium on the Bosphorus. In Egypt, she
became the red cow, known also as Hapi. But in Egypt, Isis was
made the mother of this bull god, meaning that Isis was Io, which
duo with wide agreement are also interpreted as Ishtar. Note that
Byzantium became Istanbul, which seems to be Ishtar-Bull.
It can't be a coincidence that in Oxford, the Thames river is
called the Isis. Nor can it be a coincidence that Oxford is one
member of the ISIS group of schools. Moreover, when in the
1800s the Anglican Church attempted to rule Jerusalem (in
conjunction with the Illuminati, in my opinion), it was Christ
Church, at Oxford, that lead the way. More on this Jerusalem
Bishopric in forthcoming chapters.
Boulogne, France, was on the coast facing England (see
map); it was in ancient Belgica. As Liguria was closely associated
with Bologne, Italy, so Belgica was adjacent to Lugdunensis. I
learned that this region was named by the Romans a lter the god,

542
Lug, suggesting that Romans, when they arrived and conquered,
found the peoples there to be descended from Lug. The Luggi
Gauls are pegged, but is it possible that the French "logne" (our
"loin") was the meaning behind the god, Lug? Is it a coincidence
that "Lug" looks like "log" (Middle English "logge") and that a
loin/torso is a log/trunk/stalk? Therefore, if "Bologne" should be
understood as Boi-Log, doesn't the "Fir" in "Fir Bolg" translate to
"fir/pine" all the more?
Yet, recall that I had tied "wolf" to "fir" because wolves and
pines go together, and to support this I shared that there are two
kinds of barks, the skin of trees and the bark of a dog,
remembering that "verk" = wolf. The same word for pine/fur was
also the word for wolf, I figure, realizing too that "fierce" was
rooted in "fir" so as to equate with the wolf. "Bologne" may thus
be viewed either as Boi-Clan or Boi-Wolf; and "Fir Bolg" may
thus be understood as Wolf Clan Of Boi.
Le Mans was in Lugdunensis, albeit the province covered
much of proto-France; from the ocean shore facing England, it
reached inland as far as the modern city of Lyons in the Rhone-
river region. In fact, Lyons was at that time called "Lugdumim,"
and it was the capital of the Gauls. The Luggi lived in that region.
Assuming that Lug was also Liguria, Lug was then the swan line
depicted by Cygnus, king of Liguria (that would make Lug a Gogi
peoples). Now behold a related swan:
Milo I de Vere was Count of Anjou, (hence eldest
son of Melusine/Milouziana de Scythes/Maelasanu: The
Elven, Dragon Princess, niece of the Swan Princess
Morgan La Fey de Avallon del Acqs)" (brackets not
mine, italics mine).
Page 450 'The Royal Genealogies' Dr. James
Anderson, D.D., M.A
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/dragons/esp_sociopol_dragondescent2.htm
If the Veres were thus of Lug, and if both "Lug" and "Vere"
mean "wolf," why couldn't we view "Fir Bolg" as Vere Bolg,
especially as it can be shown by other means that the Vere-Picts
(to which Milouziana belonged) were Fir Bolgs?
The Belgae of Wales had for its capital Venta Belgarum, a
term that evokes the Veneti and/or the Vandals. This capital might
have been the root of the Gwynedd kingdom, for that kingdom was
formed by the "Venedotia" peoples, who must have been
connected to the Veneti of Armorica/Brittany. Julius Caesar said
that Armorica included the tribes of Redones, Veneti, and Venelli.
Caesar said further:

543
"These Veneti exercise by far the most extensive
authority over all the sea-coast in those districts, for they
have numerous ships, in which it is their custom to sail to
Britain, and they excel the rest in the theory and practice
of navigation."
http://www.roman-britain.org/tribes/belgae.htm
Though the Templars were organized officially about 1100
AD, note the early dating of 400 for an organization of Gaul
Knights, which I would view as proto-Templars: "Following the
Division of [the Roman] Empire c.AD395, the province of
Belgica was divided in two, both regions coming under the
direct control of the Ma aster e uitum Galliarum or the
'Master of the Knights of Gaul'" (same website above, which
has nothing to say of Merovingians or Templars, but is merely an
article on Belgica history).
The Morini tribe of Belgica was, like Boulogne, situated
where Europe was closest to Britain. The Morini settled Britain
mostly in Kent, the part of Britain closest to Europe. This is a little
interesting because Godfrey de Bouillon would stem from the
kings of Kent. Kent would name "Canterbury," which would
become the heart of the Anglican church.
The first division was Belgica Prima, centered on the coast
just south of Boulogne, from Amiens on the Somme river to
Picardi at its mouth. To the east of the Morini (and bordering
them) in Flanders were the Menapii, the remnant of Manannan
Danann from Ireland's Connacht region. As the ancient Fomorians
were in and around Connacht, might they have become the
Morini? As an alternative was "Formorian" (with an "r"), might
they have been the Fir-Morini?? The European capital of the
Menapii was Cassel (to be distinguished from Cassel, Germany).
To the west of the Morini was the Nervii tribe of Belgae, the
capital of which is now Bavai (see map of Cassel location)
Due east of the Boulogne coastal region is the city of Bonn
(on the Rhine), which may have been named after the Boi:
"Sometime between 205 and 184 BCE, T. Maccius Plautus
refers to the Boii in his work, Captivi. 'But now he is not a
Sicilian--he is a Boian; he has got a Boian woman.'"
ImediatlyohnrfBisCloge,thcfy
Ubii. The Boii lived due south of the Ubii on the Rhine (see map
of Gaul).
"Boian" evokes MorBihan.
The Menapii in north-east Ireland were east of a
region called "Boyne." "Pliny, in a list of names of
islands stated by him to lie between Ireland and Britain,
mentions Mann, under the name Monapia ... The modern

544
S. David's in Pembrokeshire was anciently called
Menevia...The names Monapia, Monavia, Mevania,
Menavia, Manavia, Menapia, and Menevia, are all
apparently modifications of the same word"
http://www.isle-of-man.com/manxnotebook/manxsoc/msvol30/ch06.htm
There you have it, the term must not be read as Menav-i or
Menab-i because it's rooted in the island of Mann and/or the island
of Mona. Therefore, especially as "Menavii" is indeed a valid
variation of "Menapii," my hypothetical Mena-Bia or Men-Ubii is
a plausible description of term. When the term is read as Men-
Apii, it evokes Apis/Hapi the bull but also Apis the bee. As Men-
Abii it evokes the bee.
The Salian Franks attacked the Ubii in Cologne and made it
their capital. Why? Were these Salians previously Ubi themselves?
Note this statement: "...just as the Sigambri, the Salii, and the
Ubii came to be classed as Franks."
http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:kQ6Nxbk5pDYJ:home.earthlink.net/~apendra
gn/GreatOakKindred/library/teutonicsett.pdf+ubii+franks&hl=en&lr=lang_en
That's the Merovingians in a nutshell, the Sicambrian Franks,
the Salian Franks, and the Ubii Franks. But the question remains,
were the Ubii the Abii? If the Ubii were connected to Manes, I
would think so, even as Manes was the root of the Mysians, while
the Mysians consisted of the Abii. And so note that the Ubii were
on the Rhine in the vicinity of Maine and Mentz.
Behold Strabo speaks of the Abii of Thrace : "And mingled
with [the Abii] are also the Celtic tribes - the Boii, the
Scordisci, and the Taurisci. However ... the Taurisci are called
also "Ligurisci" and "Tauristae."
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Strabo/7C*.html
Notice that the word used is "mingled," not merely living
nearby to one another. Two points, the Abii lived among the Boii
in Thrace, even as the Ubii and the Boii lived near each other in
France. And the Taurisci, a bull peoples on the Danube, sound like
they're the proto-Ligurians, wherefore the Boii among the Taurisci
were likely the Boii that had founded Bologne (next to Liguria). I
feel that the Taurisci are thus identified as the Pollux migration to
Liguria, since Pollux became the Ligurians.
Eratosthenes put the following peoples together in one
breath: "The Ethiopians, the Ligurians, and also the
Scythians." What could Ethiopians have to do with Ligurians?
[I think the Ligurians were from king Tereus of Thrace,
because I found he to be the same as Merops, king of Ethiopia.
Doesn't "Tereus" evoke the Taurus bull? I think he'll prove to be
the proto-Tros peoples that founded Troy, meaning that "Troy" is
rooted in "bull" if "Tros" was.]

545
The Morini settled in Kent were joined by the Jutes, for it is
known that Kent was settled by Jutes. They also settled
Hampshire, where the Meon peoples lived. The Meonians were
ancestors of Lydians (the sun god, Attis, was ruler of the Meonians
and father of Lydus). Leo Diaconus, as late as the 10th century
AD, called the peoples of Thrace (by that time the Bulgarians),
Meonians.
http://www.google.ca/search?q=cache:qZ4m-
vnqHkMJ:www.hf.uio.no/east/Medd/PDF/Medd77.pdf+ruzzi+ruotsi&hl=en
If the Bulgarians were Meonians, why couldn't the Fir Bolg
and the Belgae also have been Meonians/Lydians? This places
Lydians in extreme western Europe.
As Manes was ancestral to Attis, can we read "Menapii " as
the Meon-Apii and/or Manes-Apii? After all, a common
alternative of "Meoni" is "Maeoni."
If the Bulgarians were Meonians, why couldn't the Fir Bolg
and the Belgae also have been Meonians/Lydians? This places
Lydians in extreme western Europe. And just as Lydians are
mythically descended from Kybele, so "Herodotus, in a passage
(vii. 77) speaks of 'Cabelees the Maeonians.'"
http://www.lhhpaleo.religionstatistics.net/LHH%20anadolun.html

546
CHILD SACRIFICES TO
THE KING BEE
July 2006

The material in this chapter fills one with sad reflection. It is


necessary to include this material here because it shows that Saturn
and Molech are one and the same, and because I am tracing the
Rosicrucian dragon line to the founders of the Molech cult.
I use Wikipedia quite a bit because I find that it often has
longer treatments on subjects than other online encyclopedia,
though I realize that the organization was founded, as the name
would imply, by Wicca-branch witches and/or the like. This shows
in a nutshell how our spiritual opponents are in the game of
educating the world their way, not God's way. It's what makes us
the true Light of the world, if we expose their errors. I wonder if
witches are told about the origins of witchcraft in cults like
Molech. The writer of the Molech article I am about to quote from
shows a typical anti-Bible position when it says: “...just Jewish
legends which raised reasonable doubt about what was said
about Moloch.” The Bible is being referred to in the phrase,
"Jewish legends."
I owe the Zeus-Molech connection to Greenway7, for she
emailed me the following link:
"The 12th century rabbi Rashi, commenting on
Jeremiah 7.31 stated:
'Tophet is Moloch, which was made of brass; and
they heated him from his lower parts; and his hands
being stretched out, and made hot, they put the child
between his hands, and it was burnt; when it vehemently
cried out; but the priests beat a drum, that the father
might not hear the voice of his son, and his heart might
not be moved.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milcom
As soon as I read this, I recognized that the myth writers had
been portraying the infant Zeus as Molech himself when they
wrote that Curetes banged their metal weapons on shields, etc., to
keep Zeus' father, Cronus, from hearing the infant weep. I can't tell
you how it pains me to think that these myth writers knew exactly

547
what they were proudly covering up with this story: that the Zeus
peoples on Crete were initiated into the Molech cult with infant
sacrifices.
Let no one say that YHWH is anything comparable to these
demonic people; let anyone who wishes to connect YHWH to the
dragon bloodline of Abraham, Nahor, Laban, etc., think hard on
this fact, that YHWH is vehemently opposed to Molech. For
example, in the Jeremiah-7 passage cited above:
"[The sons of Judah] have built the high places of
Topheth in the valley of the son of Hinnom to burn their
sons and their daughters in the fire... Therefore behold
the days will come, says YHWH ... the bodies of this people
will be food for the birds of the sky, and for the beasts of
the land...""
Praise YHWH that a good God rules our universe; there is
hope for all witches, if they recognize that have been led down a
demented path by their spiritual guides, whom YHWH will
destroy as He destroys all who snub their noses at the abundance
of time that He gives the wicked to repent. In Isaiah 30:30-33,
YHWH uses "Tophteh" as a descriptive term for His fire on the
coming (end-time) Day of the LORD that destroys "Assyria," that
latter term being His codeword (in v 31) for the anti-Christ dragon
that I am tracing to ancient days.
The Wikipedia article above on Milcom/Molech continues to
say that the Phoenician city of Carthage (North Africa) was a chief
Molech-worshiping center:
"Cleitarchus, Diodorus Siculus and Plutarch all
mention burning of children as an offering to Cronus or
Saturn, that is to Ba‘al Hammon, the chief god of
Carthage... Paul G. Mosca in his thesis (described below)
translates Cleitarchus' paraphrase of a scholia to Plato's
Republic as:
'There stands in their midst a bronze statue of
Kronos, its hands extended over a bronze brazier, the
flames of which engulf the child. When the flames fall
upon the body, the limbs contract and the open mouth
seems almost to be laughing until the contracted body
slips quietly into the brazier. Thus it is that the 'grin' is
known as 'sardonic laughter,' since they die laughing...'"
If you need a minute to swallow this, I understand. I don't
need to tell you that only a demented soul would consider the
infant's reaction, to the searing heat, laughter. But who were these
demons with human faces? Look at the abundance of terms that we
have for tracing them: Topheth, Molech. Milcom, Cronus, Saturn,

548
Ba'al Hammon. The latter "Hammon" designation was of primary
importance to Carthage, but is the same Baal of Phoenicia. I never
knew until now, 27 years after being introduced to Baal (from
reading the Bible), that various terms tacked onto "Baal" simply
refer to various branches of the Molech cult.
It is much accepted that Saturn and Cronus were one and the
same, and so I would point to the Satyr Thracians as a certainty for
identifying the roots of that cult, but also to the Carians as merely
my tentative identification of "Cronus." But there is a deeper root
than both the Satyrs and the Carians, and I wish to lift the skirts of
the Mesopotamian Kabala, that all may see the filth kept hidden
for centuries clinging to these mentally-ill Semites. Now, in the so-
called "age of reason," perhaps there is hope for those yet stained
by this deceptive organization.
As Cronus was Zeus' father, it would make the peoples
depicted by Zeus a major part of the Molech cult. Of course. And
yet I am learning of this only now. Has anyone ever connected
Zeus to Molech? Why not? How have we been so duped? How do
myth experts possibly evade this reality during their learnings, and
when they find it, why don't they announce it to us? Why is Zeus
portrayed as a good god, akin to YHWH? Do myth experts enjoy
deceiving even themselves? What sort of people do this, to deny
the obvious realities and instead pass off fantasies? The myths
were not fantasies, for they speak clearly of a wicked peoples,
always the same peoples, wanderers yet rulers by bloodshed and
spoil, destroyers of their own kin for the sake of power and wealth.
Myth writers used symbolism that tied Zeus to Molech, the
most obvious one in portraying Zeus as a bull, a depiction of the
bronze (sometimes iron) statue of Molech having a bull's head. But
Molech was depicted with other animals in other places: “...the
demon Baal was in grimoire tradition said to appear in the
forms of a man, cat, toad, or combinations thereof"
http://www.factbites.com/topics/Baal
The particular Cretan peoples that Zeus depicted were chief
carriers of the cult. How should we react when Republican elites
(including Presidents) gather annually for a drunken bash at the
Bohemian Grove in California where this Molech cult is
celebrated? This is not a political shot on my part because I oppose
the Democrats (for their anti-Christian positions). But, the question
is, just how much are Republicans letting Christianity down, and
how much have they themselves taken on the nature of the False
Prophet?
Ba'al Hammon was specific to mount Hazi/Casi in Syria,
which I suspect was the homeland of the Cati/Cutha prior to their
move to Khassi of Cilicia. This was the Ba'al of the Bible that
YHWH vehemently opposed, and yet there persist to be enemies

549
of YHWH who write thus: "Hadad was the son of El, who had
once been the primary god of the Canaanite pantheon, and
whose name was also used interchangeably with that of the
Hebrew god, Yahweh”
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baal Hammon
M WH is not to be connected to Baal simply because
YHWH was called "el" at times, for that term simply meant "god"
and did not necessarily specify any particular deity, least of all the
El of the dragon bloodline. It is moreover understandable that
YHWH should, at times, refer to Himself by some terms used by
the dragon bloodline, as when He claims to be the "true god," or
the "only god." The dragon cult was, after all, a counterfeit-
YHWH cult. Therefore, when the dragon cult dressed itself with
qualities/virtues that rightly belonged to YHWH, YHWH would in
turn re-claim those qualities. Did the dragon cult claim to be the
messiah of the human race, and did "messiah" derive from
"mushus" (= dragon/serpent) as I read on one website? Strong's
Concordance says that "messiah" is rooted in "mashach (#4886),"
and this is interesting as per my suspicion that "mushus" was
rooted in "Meshech." It doesn't matter what the origin of the word
is, YHWH would in any case charge that He is the true
Messiah ... but do we then say that for this reason He was an
extension of the dragon cult and/or the Aryan Meshech? Never did
He depict himself as a dragon/serpent; never did he connect
Himself with a human bloodline/cult.
Mount Hazi has been identified as the Biblical mount
Zephon, but very likely the founders of this city (by that name)
were from Zaphon, which, as seen in Zondervan's Bible Atlas (8th
printing ), was on the east side of the Jordan in what was the land
of Ammon ... the very nation (from the blood of Lot and his
unknown wife) that the Bible says was the chief carrier of Molech!
This map refers to a pre-Israelite era, for it's map #7 entitled,
"Land of Canaan," whereas it's not until Map #9 that we find the
title, "Coming of the Israelites." This permits the city's people to
have been non-Israelite Hebrews. Strong's defines "Zaphon"
(#6828) as "hidden, dark." I define it as perverted, unworthy to
rule, traitorous, mere weeds among the wheat.
The Wikipedia article goes on to say that, in some cases,
Molech's "tapering hands reached down to the ground; three black
stones bordered by yellow circles represented three eyeballs on his
brow." Zeus was also depicted with a third eye. And how does it
make Americans feel that this third eye of Molech appears on the
dollar bill? Isn't it time to remove it by the will of the majority?
Isn't it time for Americans to reject and force underground this
third-eye cult that so brazenly rules much of America? Too late.
They have the power structures in their hands. You have one hope

550
alone: tie yourself to God and wait for Jesus to come burn them
alive during his loud noises in the sky, and sing for joy as they
burn, for look here at who we are dealing with:
"This Moloch finds particular pleasure in making
mothers weep; for he specialists in stealing their
children...It is likely that the motif of stealing children
was inspired by the traditional understanding that babies
were sacrificed to Moloch."
The abduction of infants/children by Satanic cults goes on to
this day. These are not people to be feared. Have no fear for they
are like animals about to be trapped, they walk about not knowing
the destruction hanging over them. They exploit society for their
own gain. Apostates of the worst kind, they have lost connection
with the Head, and have turned to become the most demonic kinds
of spiritualists. Never being straight/true, they lead into false ideas
otherwise know as insanity. While on that road myself, I found
that with YHWH there is a sound mind and a wholesome life. His
mercy knows no bounds, and any demonic soul whatsoever, if
he/she repents, will find His support toward that much better road
(unless they have committed the unpardonable sin).
"In 1921 Otto Eissfeldt, excavating in
Carthage... uncovered was a sanctuary to the goddess
Tanit comprising a cemetery with thousands of burned
bodies of animal and of human infants, dating from the
8th century BC down to the destruction of Carthage in
146 BC. Eissfeldt identified the site as a tophet, using a
Hebrew word of previously unknown meaning connected
to the burning in some Biblical passages. Most of the
children's bodies appeared to be those of newborns, but
some were older, up to about six years of age."
Tanit was the wife (i.e. the ally) of Baal Hammon (I've yet to
identify her as an historical peoples; perhaps the Danaan). The
Bible uses "Topheth" for a location within a mile of Jerusalem, in
the valley of Hinnom. How could such insane religious
observances be conducted so closely to His city; why did YHWH
permit them there? Does it indicate a test for Israelites wherein
God allowed the Kabala cult to creep in and practice its
deprivations within eye-shot of His city? Or was it YHWH's way
of showing the Israelites most-graphically the demonic direction
that His pagan adversaries had taken? Let it be a lesson for all, that
giving your mind and life to spirits will take you to exactly that
place, and worse. The Jews gave in and failed the test. Somehow,
they were convinced that burning infants could net them grace and
charities from a dumb statue of a bull-god that didn't exist except
as Satan and his torment-enducing spirits.

551
Strong's Concordance says that "Topheth" (38612) derives
from the primary root, "taphaph" (38608)," meaning, "to drum."
It's now obvious to me why that term came to signify Molech, for
this definition evokes the loud drummings made by
Curetes/Kabeiri during their wild bashes. In other words, there was
more going on than a lot of wine drinking and orgiastic
perversions; human sacrifices were a typical part of those bashes.
That's what the myths didn't reveal openly, but what the myth
writers knew. This now ties the Curetes to Cronus/Saturn, but as
yet it doesn't tell us where Cronus originated first of all.
You might wish to ponder why modern astronomy has
chosen Saturn to depict the most beautiful planet, the one with the
halo/crown? Will you believe me when I say that modern
astronomy was founded and controlled by an extension of ancient
astrology ... Rosicrucians married to European power structures and
thereby securing for themselves a sure vehicle to pollute the mind
of society by such fantasies as cosmic and biological evolution. I
have wondered whether the red spot on so-called "Jupiter" isn't a
depiction, made by YHWH, to represent the spear wound in His
Son. It is my opinion that everything created by God, especially
the cosmic bodies, depict Jesus Christ and His plan for humanity.
The stars depict the true Israelites, not, as the Kabala would have
it, their non-Israelite, part-Aryan bloodlines.
According to another website "The sacrifice of children, as
,

we have seen, had its origin among the Canaanites and the
Phoenicians" (website below). It is an error, in my opinion, to
root Molech/Baal in the Canaanites. Rather, the above quote
smacks of the Cutha Kabala in Gath , Gaza, Ashkelon, and other
parts of Canaan -- the Avvites, that is, and the Sepharvites -- who
then evolved into the Cadmus Phoenicians and the Cati all around
the northern Levant (the Levant is the Mediterranean coast from
Egypt to Greece). I suspect that the Cohen surname grew out of the
Cati peoples; it doesn't matter that Levites are called "cohens (=
priests) in the Bible, for this in itself doesn't prove that Levites
ever started to give themselves the "Cohen" surname. What a
shock for those Hebrews today who go by this surname, if what I
suspect turns out to be true, that it derives from priests of Molech
rather than from Levites. It of course doesn't matter when one is
converted to Jesus the true Savior, for blood is only blood, and a
surname is only a surname
http://www.whitedragon.org.uk/articles/juvenile.htm
My suspicions are that Molech ("mlk" in ancient records)
tied to the Amalekites. As I conjectured that "Amalek/Molech"
derives from the Greek "meli" = honey, or better yet, from the
Greek "meilikhios" = molasses, so now I want to say what
occurred to me only yesterday, that "koning," the old version of

552
"king," evokes "hunig," the Old English term for "honey." It's as if
a king was named after a bee and we don't know it. This is
important because the very word "mlk/molech" was the same as
for "king."
[Update September 2006 -- Lorri, an email correspondent
helping me in this project, emailed me the following:
The Honaker Family
By Charles Ray Harper
In the Aargan Canton [Switzerland] there is a
Honegger family of the old Swablan Nobility named Von
Hoheneck... Honegger is German extract, meaning -
sweet as honey.
http://www.putnampost.com/morephist.htm
Point one: the Cohen/Hohen name may shorten to
"Con/Hon" so that "koning" (king) may be a "cohen" derivative
(i.e. the latter being the oldest term). Our "queen" derives from the
old-English, "cwen." Point two: The "Swabian Nobility" being
inferred were the Hohens. Point three: "cohen," not the surname
but the ancient Semite term meaning "priest," somehow provided
Aryan terms for "honey," suggesting that the Semite priests were
from a honey/bee cult; I would not hesitate to point the finger at
the Molech cult of the Sepharvites.
The English Connick Coat may be a Hohen branch in that it
uses the red and silver Hohen colors, with red griffins/phoenix
galore. The Brandenburg Arms uses a red phoenix (Hohens ruled
Brandenburg). The English Honick Coat uses a black phoenix, as
does the Hohenstaufen Coat.
In October, Lorri emailed the Hungarian version of "honey"
= "honing," even closer to "koning" than 'honig."End Updates]
Recall that all ten forces of the Kabala tree are called
"sephirot(h)," a term that is almost-certainly a codeword for the
Molech-worshiping Sepharvites, and recall also that the tenth force
(the grand result of all nine) is called "Malkut." How insane are
these Kabalists to promote secretly their Molech cult without
notifying it membership of the fact, for isn't it obvious that Malkut
is Molech," perhaps even the "Melqart" variation? Melkart was the
Molech branch of Tyre.
The article (link below) goes on to show that the "qart"
portion was also rendered, "car," which may signify the Carians,
who certainly appear qualified to have named "Carthage." It's clear
from the term alone that Mel kart was the Molech of Carthage. In
fact, I'm prepared to view the origin of "mlk" (in describing the
cult) in the term "Melkart." When used in the Levant, the "kart"

553
portion was left out (for obvious reason in that it specified
Carthage) so as to shrink into "mlk."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melqart
I would suggest that Melkart was understood as Meli-Kart,
the Honey of Carthage. Perhaps the Kartvelians/Kartli of ancient
Georgia were the origin of the Carians, for connections (some
historical) between Carians and Colchis are to be found. There
may also be a connection to Haran in that it's Latin name is
"Carrhae," though I've yet to find how old that term is, whether it's
old enough to furnish Car of Greek myth. In any case, Haran was
also "Charran," and then there's this:
"Harran is famous for its traditional 'beehive'
adobe houses, constructed entirely without wood. The
design of these is thought to have been unchanged for at
least 3,000 years."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harran
Organized Kabala (of the modern era) didn't want to use the
exact version, "Melkart," for obvious reason in revealing a clear
connection to this hideous god, and instead used "Malkut" so as to
have recourse in denying the connection. But in their zeal to
deceive their membership while laughing behind their backs, they
went too far by using that term in conjunction with "sephirot."
Letchworth Garden City (England) was a Socialistic
experiment that failed. No one could own property, everything was
rented, and the government was the father-provider of the peoples.
The root of this Fabian-like and/or Fabian connected movement
was in Marxism, and before that in Adam Weishaupt (from whom
Marx copied and advanced). Weishaupt was the visible founder of
the Bavarian Illuminati, and so reports of Rothschild involvement
in the British socialist movements, or the report that "Jews" were
at their root, is logical.
The Arms of Letchworth Urban District Counsel uses an owl
on the Crest, which is so conspicuously the symbol of the
Illuminati-like Bohemian Grove (California) that I did some
(minor) investigation. At the Grove, Molech sacrifices are
conducted (to this day), where Molech is a giant owl. I already
knew that a founder of the Grove was Joseph Redding, and that the
Redding Coat uses three black boar heads. I've already come to
believe that the boar symbol refers to Hebrews, but then I found a
visible founder of the Fabian Society, Edith Nesbit, that the Nesbit
Coat uses three black boar heads. This may or may not be a
coincidence.
The "Jewish" Marx Coat uses red and silver checks, which
may be the Hohen checks. William Morris was a leader in the
Socialistic movements of Britain, and so I've noted that the Irish

554
Morris Coat uses a black lion on gold background, the symbol of
the Hohen(staufen)s. Is it a coincidence that the Welsh Morris
Coat uses a gold lion on red background, the very symbol on the
German and English Marx Coats?

555
THE HORUS-ICRUCIAN ROSE
IN AKKADIA
July 2006

In the previous chapter, Melkart, the Molech-god specific of


Carthage was introduced. The website below suggests that Melqart
was the Greek Melicertes, son of Ino and Athamas. This makes
much sense beyond the similarity of terms and needs to be milked
for all of the truth obtainable.
For, you see, Ino was the daughter of Cadmus i.e. the Cati in
Greece! And Athamas was son of Aeolus and therefore a peoples
in western Atlantis. Moreover, Athamas was the father of Phrixus,
the representative of the golden fleece line, which was also the
Ares dragon, the Sparti that I interpret as the Sepharvites who
became allied to Cadmus in founding Thebes. This is right down
Kabala alley, in other words, right down the field of Molech (for
Sepharvites were Molech-honoring peoples).
Melicertes was identified in myth as an Aryan peoples
settling Corinth with Sisyphus, co-founder of Corinth (perhaps
Sisyphus was a depiction of Susa). Melicertes was therefore
indeed the white dragon of Ares, for he must be the same as
Aeetes the other co-founder of Corinth (and protector of the
golden fleece in Colchis). For this reason Melicertes and Aeetes
may just have depicted the (historical) Kartli/Kartvelian
Georgians, even as the term breaks down to Meli-Certas = Honey-
Kart(li), very similar indeed to Mel-Kart of Carthage. The Kurds
(of Hurrian ancestry) come to mind. The following statement may
reveal that "Kartli" was originally "Karchi" : "The Septuagint
renders Tarshish in Isaiah 23:1 as Karkedonos (Karchedonos),
which was the Greek form of the name Carthage in North Africa."
http://custance.org/old/noah/ch2h.html
In this picture, where Melqart was an Aeetes peoples of
Caucasia, I would not hesitate to identify the god as Attis merely
on my impression that Aeetes was Attis, wherefore Melkart was
also the god of Attis' mother and wife, Kybele of the Kabeiri-
Kabala cult (in Phrygia and Athens). That makes perfect sense all
around.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melqart
A Kartli province remains to this day in Georgia, "also
known as Iberia," says Wikipedia, and by now you know that I

556
read "Iberia" as the Abira Hebrews of the ancient Kassite nation,
those who nested along the Habiru river in Akkadia/Mesopotamia
but spread out to form the Hurrian kingdom. It's a no-brainer
therefore to understand that Hebrews mixed with Tubali and
Meshech peoples of the Kartvelian kingdom, but also with the
Rosh and Gogi there, in the Aras valley. The capital of Georgia
remains to this day, Tubal(isi). I'll mention here that a main city of
the Hurrian empire, Haran, was known also as "Carrhea," which
easily modifies to "Georgia." And the Satanically-wicked Joseph
Stalin was born in Gori, Georgia, a term that yet smacks of
"Hori(tes)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kartli
I don't know how else to say it differently, so I'll repeat that
the Georgians were a Gogi peoples mixed with Satanic-Hebrew
elements, and that these were the root of the Khazars that
furnished the so-called "Ashkenazi Jews" of eastern Europe. It was
these that were given to Hitler without mercy. There will be many
more given to the great tribulation of Israel, dead ahead. There is
hope for them in only one thing, the True Messiah, let that be
clearly understood, for the Rothschilds are nothing but a false
hope, and have led these "Jews" (i.e. they are not Jews) back to
Israel only to toil ceaselessly against the Arabs, and finally to
suffer at the hands of a Gog-Muslim alliance that is probably
forming as I write. Revelation 7 and 14 clearly say that it will be,
not non-Jewish Kabala blood, but Israelites -- from the twelve
tribes of Israel -- who will be sealed from the great tribulation
disasters.
Apparently, if there is a tie between the Kartvelians (today
called "Sakartvelo" and evoking the Saka Scythians) and Carthage,
then the Tyrians that founded Carthage were Kartvelians. Recall
that the myth writer, Virgil, had mythical codeword, "Dido," act as
the Tyrian queen who founded Carthage. I have already speculated
that Dido depicted the Dodona region that was crucial to Zeus
worship, which region was in the "Apiru"-like region of north-
west Greece: Epirus. I have already speculated that Dodona and
Dido both referred to Dedan, grandson of Abraham, and so I'm
willing to view the Carthaginians and their share of the western-
Atlantis empire as Dedanites. I wonder if these became the Tudor
Rose.
It is well documented online that Melkart of Tyre was the
mythical Hercules, he being independently identified as a
depiction of Gorgons that established a new western Atlantis over
the Geryon Atlanteans. Recall that Hercules sailed to Atlantis in a
ship of Helios; that's got to be the Melkart Tyrians/Carthaginians.
To show that Hercules was a Dedanite, one merely needs to show
that Zeus was such, for Hercules was made the son of Zeus. That

557
Zeus was honored at Dodona begins to make the Zeus-Dedan
connection, but there is more, a Dedan identification of Zeus'
father, Cronus/Saturn, the god to which the Molech/Melkart child
sacrifices were offered. Let me now share a slightly-modified
version (for clarity) of what I wrote to Greenway7 recently (it's
now July 20, 2006):
"It's possible that the Egyptian Set(h) is found in
Greek myth, so I entertained Zethus recently. His wife
was Aedon, the daughter of Merops of Ethiopia. Hmm.
Plus, Zethus built the walls of Thebes... Anything Thebes
is suspect as being a dark Kabala entity. Zethus had a
twin that helps to identify him; that twin was Amphion,
son of Zeus and Antiope (Anti-Opis?), Amazon queen of
Thebes. I traced Zeus only yesterday to the god, Asopus
(I read it as As-Opis) in my updated
www.tribwatch.com/fleece.htm chapter, and so note that
Antiope stems from the Asopus bloodline. It turns out
that Asopus was the same as the bee and goat symbols
that brought Zeus up on Crete, wherefore I identify the
all-evasive Zeus peoples as Asopus, quite a success,
finally. I (off-the-wall) trace As-Opis to an Assi-Opis mix
of peoples, where Opis/Upi was an Avvite city on the
Tigris...Note how "Zeth" is like "Zeus"...If the Egyptians
made Set to be a demonic figure, the bad guy, and if he
does refer to Zeus, then it could be that Egyptian Aryans
were antagonistic toward the Zeus peoples, preferring
Osiris and Horus over him.
I have found that almost always the mythical terms
used to depict a people group sound like their historical
names, so I seek a Set/Seth/Zeth-like people group, and
maybe even "Det/Deth." I would take "Thoth" to task.
Find out who Thoth was and you may discover who Set
was. I say Thoth was Dedan, the Titans, Tydeus of
Calydon who I think became Tatius of the Sabina-Italian
Ops/Opis cult (Sabina may be Sheba, brother of Dedan),
Tuisto of the Germanics, and maybe even the Tudors.
Osiris would then be a similar peoples, perhaps even the
Asshurites, a tribe of Dedan. I ha
ve identified the Assi as
the Asshurites themselves (not the Assyrians), and so
read "Osiris" as Asshur-is. That makes a lot of sense
beyond the linguistic similarity. I think I will publish it,
having devised the theory right here as I write to you!"
What do you think about Osiris = Asshur and Set(h) = Zeus?
While equating Set with Satyrs, I'm about to give my best shot at
showing how Satyrs were rooted in Gozan, a kingdom in which we

558
find the city of Opis ... and in this way Set and Zeus may certainly
equate. However, I am not so certain that the Osiris-Asshur
equation can be maintained, for there is a better theory, that Osiris
is to be understood as O-Seir-is. For Horus was made the son of
Osiris while Horus seems certainly to be a depiction of Horites,
and Seir, the man, was a Horite (Genesis 36:20).
On the other hand, it is possible that Seir was from the
Asshur tribe of Dedan (found in Genesis 25:3). Although it is
thought that "Syria" was named after the Asshurites that lived in
proto-Syria, perhaps "Syria" derived from "Seir" itself...which
represented those very Asshurites of Syria! In order for me to
make the Seir-Asshur connection, it's necessary that Dedan was
himself from an Horite bloodline. In fact, I'm ready to announce
that Abraham himself was from the Horite nation, since I am ready
to tie the blood of Abraham (but not his heart) to the Molech-
Kabala cult.
You might say to me that Abraham could not be a Horite
since the Bible reveals Israelites as a mix of Arameans and
Hebrews. But I would reply that if I'm correct in tracing the
Kabala cult to Horites, then Horites were of Gether, son of Aram
(Genesis 11:23). For the Kabala has revealed to us inadvertently
that they are rooted in Gether, for the first sephirot-force of the
Kabala Tree was made "Kether"!! Are you with me? Horites were
from Gether the Aramean. And for this chapter don't forget that
Josephus made Gether's brother, Hul, the founder of Armenia, for I
am about to connect the Satyrs to Lake Van of Armenia (I've yet to
identify Hul as a people group that sounds like his name, although
the Galli come to mind). Who knows but that the elder brother of
Hul and Gether, Uts, wasn't Utu of Eridu, the dragon sun-god cult
at the very base of the Kabala organizations?
Horus is the one destined to raise Osiris from the realm of
death so as to begin the Golden Age. As Rothschild and other
"Golden Dawn" Illuminati cults can thus be connected to Horus,
we easily decipher that these Globalists ruling over us today are
end-time Horites.
Zeus was officially married to Hera, remember, and I would
equate her with Horus. Indeed, a Wikipedia article (below) says
that "Horus" is a term "representing the Egyptian Heru/Har."
The Zeus-Hera marriage should prove to depict a Gozan-Horite
alliance, and while Horites were Arameans and not Hebrews, I
suspect that Zeus peoples were the Hebrew portion of the Kabala.
It's my task to prove a Hebrew element in the Goza peoples that
named Gozan, and as you can see that "Goza" evokes the goat
peoples, Set, if indeed he depicted goat-footed Satyrs, would again
equate with Zeus (who was raised on Crete by goat peoples, no
doubt Satyrs).

559
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horus
The Horus website above has the audacity to mention a
Horus-Jesus connection simply because Horus involves a
resurrection and/or a so-called "virgin birth" (from a whore
goddess). Myths are so countless that there are bound to be
comparisons somewhere with most Biblical topics. The good news
is that most people will realize the brainless attitude by which
occult thinkers govern themselves, who instead of focusing on the
words of Jesus himself in order to define his
nature/business/origins, focus on the words of other occultists who
have an agenda to downgrade the Son of God to the realm of mere
myth and so effectively murder Him from our minds.
Did Jesus ever honor anything Egyptian? No, but he was
concerned with Israel alone. The resurrection and virgin birth of
Jesus was prophesied by Isaiah (chapters 7 and 53) seven centuries
before Jesus was born, and Isaiah himself prophesied against
Egypt and called its rulers various unflattering terms. I think the
light bulbs need replacing of the so-called "illuminated" occult that
comes up with all sorts of strange "wisdom" that the majority
recognizes as nonsense. Like, uh, get a life, and get off the
spiritual dope!
Horus was ruler of Upper/Interior Egypt while Set was ruler
of Lower/Mediterranean Egypt. Horus won a war against Set and
so united the two Egypts, which in historical records took place
under king Mene and his son, Thoth (whom I identify as the
Mannae/Manes and Hermes Armenians). This is how it is possible
for Horus and Osiris to depict Asshurites, for if Thoth referred to
Titans, and Titans to Dedan, then the possibility of an Osiris-
Asshur connection exists.
As I would identify Set as Satyrs/Saturn, I am open to
identifying Set as a Seir peoples as long as I'm open to making a
"Se'yir/Seir" equation with "Satyr." In that picture, both Set and
Osiris are Seir-branch Horites, consistent with Horus = Hor(ite). If
Zeus = Set, then Zeus may likewise depict a Seir/Satyr branch, and
moreover this branch would have founded Opis if indeed Zeus
traces to Opis (as was my recent discovery as per Zeus roots in As-
Opis). In other words, it should prove to be true that Opis -- the
bee-line city that furnished the Romans and the seven heads of the
Revelation beast -- was a Seir-Horite center.
The Horus website above mentions the cornucopia as Horus'
symbol. This was the symbol of the goat peoples who raised Zeus
on Crete, but also a symbol of the Ops/Opis cult of the Sabina
Italians. This is strong evidence that Zeus was from Opis, and
behold that the Roman Ops was made the mother of the Roman
Jupiter.
http://www.gallica.co.uk/romans/myths.htm

560
Julius Caesar, and all forthcoming Roman emperors up until
Nero, were all of "sacred" Patrician blood, which was itself of the
Opis-Sabina bloodline. The next three emperors after Nero were
not of this bloodline, and they (Galba, Otho, and Vitellius), all
dying in 69 AD, are the three uprooted kings of Daniel 7, uprooted
by Satan himself... probably because they were not of Sabina
blood. After these three there ruled Vespasian as Roman emperor,
and he was of the Sabina bloodline: "[Vespasian] was born in
Falacrina, in the Sabine country near Reate. His father, Titus
Flavius Sabinus ... "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vespasian
The next two Emperors (Titus and Domitian) were sons of
Vespasian and so also of Sabina blood. The next emperor, and the
seventh head/king, whom Revelation said would rule a short time,
was Nerva, of the Julian/Patrician bloodline. Immediately after
Nerva, Roman emperors became "good." Thus the evil/Satanic
rulers, the seven mentioned in Revelation 17, were Gaius,
Claudius, Nero, Vespasian, Titus, Domitian and Nerva. All of the
dragon bloodline, you see? For those prophecy educators who
equate Daniel's 10 - 3 kings with Revelation's 10 horns, I think you
are mistaken. I think the 10 - 3 kings are the seven heads of the
dragon, and so now see that the mythical Lotan dragon of Syria
was portrayed with seven heads, while the son of Seir was Lotan! !
(Genesis 36:20)
Let me get back to Athamas of the golden-fleece/Ares-
dragon line. Because Nephele, wife of Athamas, was turned into
Hera in one myth, one can surmise that the two women were one
and the same, Horite peoples. Recall that Athamas is identified (in
this my theory) as the Atamti peoples, more commonly known as
Elamites (cousins of Arameans, Genesis 10:22). With Hera and
Nephele being equated, one can then wonder if Athamas and Zeus
were not also an equation, which if true makes Zeus an Elamite
peoples. Susa, the Elamite capital, comes irresistibly to mind as the
Zeus peoples.
During the same email (July 16/06) to Greenway7, I
stumbled over the origin of Dionysus (son of Zeus) to the very
city:
"I have lately translated Dionysus as Dio-Nysus and
therefore as king Nisus [of Megara], who, because he had
fish-tail Scyllus as a daughter, she being of the Phorcys
fish-tail peoples, represented the Dagon
peoples... Ultimately, I trace Dagon back to the Tig ris-
river god, and just to the east of that river lay the Zagros
mountains from where Dionysus as Zagreus lived. And
having traced Dionysus to the Horites by other methods,
guess what city lay east of the Tigris, in the face of the

561
Zagros, that was a Horite city? Nuzi!! That is, Dio-Nysus
is Dio-Nuzi!! Just figured this out as I wrote to you, I kid
you not. Remember, you're the reason I started to include
Horites into my story, and I have since equated them with
Curetes and Carians. Dionysus was a Curete-branch
Horite, and this now allows a Seir connection to the
Satyrs, his buddies."
It's almost unbelievable that an article saying the following
does not connect Dionysus to Nuzi: "Nysa was a mythical place
in Greek mythology where the young god Dionysus was
raised." Has no one made the Zagreus-Zagros connection? If so,
then why is it that I read that no-one knows the identity of Nysa?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nysa
A Wikipedia article on Dionysus uses the utter stupidity of
suggesting that Jesus stemmed from Dionysus because Jesus made
water into wine and because Jesus supposedly encouraged
cannibalism (as had Dionysus) when He said that we should eat
His flesh and drink His blood. Such nonsense, please, is making
idiots out of the Illuminati occult, just as YHWH said that He
would make them fools. Jesus admitted to speaking in a figurative
way when directing us to eat his flesh, meaning that we should
focus and depend on his Crucifixion for forgiveness's of sins, or
else be damned forever. Never trust a secular article when it makes
pagan connections to Biblical themes, for anti-Bible writers will
use any similarities between paganism and the Word to make such
connections. Another such connection views the scape goat of the
Old Testament as Satyrs merely due to the fact that the scape goat
was, yes, a goat. I suppose that everyone who raises goats is
secretly a Satyr.
The same article is helpful, however, where it says that
"Herodotus uses the names Osiris and Dionysus
interchangeably and Plutarch identifies them as the same,
while the name was anciently thought to oriate gin from the
place Nysa, in Egypt (now Ethiopia)." Nysa of gypt may have
been a Nuzi settlement, but my point here is that Osiris must have
depicted the Nuzi peoples in some way, suggesting that the Nuzi
Horites moved to Edom, where they gave birth to the Biblical man,
Seir, and his Seir nation. From that standpoint we can imagine a
move further west into Egypt to establish the Osiris cult. But the
same peoples also moved into Greece as the Satyr Thracians, and
later became the Sea Peoples that furnished Tyre and Carthage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dionysus
To support my Athamas-Zeus equation (or near equation),
Athamas and his second wife, Ino (the Cati-mus peoples) were
made to raise Dionysus (son of Zeus) to adulthood (in Nysa, we
must presume). I would interpret this as an Elamite-Cati mix of

562
peoples removed to Greece and taking under its wings a fledgling
Nuzi peoples i.e. late-comers to Greece. Dionysus should also be
understood as Dio-Naxos (since his island was Naxos, Greece),
wherefore there is a Nuzi to Naxos link i.e. the founders of Naxos
were from the city of Nuzi. Couldn't Nysa, therefore, have been
Naxos...in the Cyclade island group where also was located Delos,
the island of Apollo/Opis? A Wikipedia article says that the Horite
city of Nuzi “was founded by the Hurrians around 1500 BC,”
this supporting my hunch (and of many historians throughout the
ages) that Hurrians and Horites were the same.
I have wondered if "Seir" didn't name Tyre since the Semitic
name of the city was Tsur/Surru. I do see a "Tyre" in "Satyr,"
perhaps indicating that "Satyr" developed out of "Seir" after all,
after the Tsur term modified to "Tyre." This is perfect, for it places
Saturn/Satan in Tyre, in support of the Ezekiel-28 passage in
which a king of Tyre is likened to Satan himself. In other words,
the Satyrs were not merely fanciful worshipers of Satan, but
represented in a literal way Satan's rule on earth. They were the
scarlet dragon of Revelation, tied to the scarlet whore of Babylon.
As such I can only conclude that Satyrs were of the same Opis
bloodline that furnished the seven heads of the dragon, the Sabina
emperors. This Satyr-Opis connection becomes more obvious as
we find the Satyr nest in Gozan, the kingdom that held the city of
Opis.
It's a fact that Saturn had much honor in Tyre. Plus, Greek
myth made Athamas, or nearly so, the founder of Tyre, for it was
the brother of Athamas, Salmoneus, who was made to give birth to
Tyro. Salmoneus was made equal to Zeus in one comical myth, as
though the two depicted the same peoples. Therefore I'm fairly
certain at this point that Zeus was himself from Enarete (as was
Athamas and Salmoneus), an Elamite peoples. My problem then
becomes the finding of an Elamite connection to the Avvite,
Asshurite, and/or Sepharvite peoples that I think Zeus also
depicted.
Opis is thought to be directly across the river from Seleucia,
the first capital of the Seleucid empire that was a copy of the end-
time empire of the anti-Christ. Interestingly, Opis/Seleucia was
just 20 miles south of modern Baghdad where Gog (the anti-
Christ) will come to rule prior to successfully invading the Middle
East. I should add here that Alexander the Great, from whom the
Seleucids stemmed, was a descendant of Epirus (Dodoni/Dedan?)
rulers.
Opis became Ctesiphon, the latter named by Kassites. Note
how the term seems to be Catesiphon. Some say that the Biblical
location of Casiphia is the same cit , in which case it already had
that name in Ezra's time (Ezra 8:17^, about 500 BC. I've read that

563
the Caspian sea was a version of this city's name. Note that the
Susa region on this map of Babylon is called "Cissia," also named
after the Kassites. For newcomers to this book, I equate the
Kassites with the Cutha-come-Cati Kabalists; that is, the Kassites
were an Aryan-Semite mix, and it may be that Zeus was just that
very mix (the Elamites were Semites). I suspect that the Aryan
elements were in the Ashkenazi Cimmerians who lived in/near
Nuzi. Less than 100 miles due east of the city of Asshur (on the
Tigris river), Nuzi was located on the map underneath the "M" of
"Media".
Nuzi was south-east of modern Kirkuk, which is itself on the
Khasa river. I wouldn't hesitate to entertain a Kirkuk (Kharka)
connection to the Gorgons. Nuzi is the modern Yorghan Tepe! The
city, when previously named "Gazur," was an Akkadian domain,
by which I mean to say that it was in Cutha hands and may even
have been built by the Cutha.
Assuming that Zeus was a depiction of Susa, which certainly
has striking similarity with his name, I can re-tackle my former
identification of Zeus as Asopus = Assi-Opis, and entertain that
the Assi portion was fundamental to Susa; a problem remains in
finding which of the two "Assi" referred to, the Ashkenazi or the
Asshurites. In either case, I would suggest that "Assi" and "Kassi"
were the same, supporting a Susa-Assi equation if indeed "Susa"
was named after the Kassites (with a soft K).
As Satyrs and Dionysus were practically equated, it seems
obvious now that "Satyr/Saturn" depicted a Nuzi peoples (as was
Dionysus) or Nuzi ally. As "koth" and "gut" both mean "goat," I
am pressed to make a Guti/Kassite (i.e. they were the same
peoples) connection to the Satyr/Saturn term, and the land of
Gozan seems to me where the goat hoof should be pointing. That
is, Gozan was a Guti/Kassite realm.
Safe to say, therefore, that Cronus, who was Saturn to
Romans, must have depicted the Satyr peoples of the Gozan
region.WthZusdpcSa,nwithCrousgvb
Zeus, Gozan must have given birth to Susa (i.e. Susa was a Goza
settlement)... which tends to reveal Goza and Susa as Kassite
entities in their earliest times, prior to the Elamite takeover; this
sequence is in keeping with a Wikipedia article that speaks of a
"proto-Elamite period" ruled by a peoples from the "Iranian
plateau." That sounds like the Guti.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ElamiteEmTire
As Seleucia was named by the Seleucids (300ish BC), one
can assume that it, a city on the west side of the Tigris, was
previously a part of Opis on the east side. Now having come this
far in finding Opis to be central to the dragon cult, look at what I
found during the writing of this paragraph:

564
"The ancients had a notion that when Saturn
devoured his own children, his wife Ops deceived him by
substituting a large stone in lieu of one of his sons, which
stone was called Abadir. But Ops and Opis, represented
here as a feminine, was the serpent deity, and Abadir is
the same personage under a different
denomination ... Some regard Abadon, or, as it is
mentioned in the Book of the Revelation, Abaddon, to
have been the name of the same Ophite god."
http://www.antiqillum.com/texts/bg/Qadosh/qadosh055.htm
Five quick points. One, I was wrong to assume that I was the
first to find the Biblical Abaddon rooted in Opis. Two, the writer
of the above article does not seem to know that "Abidar" and
"Ophite" refer to the Avviy/Avith/Avidia peoples. Three, Saturn's
wife was Opis itself. Four, the writer is referring to Cronus
swallowing his children for fear that they would come to rule his
empire, wherefore Ops is the same as Rhea/Kybele, by which I
mean to point out that Opis became the city of the Great Mother by
the time of Cronus' importance. Five, As Cronus' ally was Opis, it
explains how Opis came to be part of the Gozan empire, even
though the heart of Gozan was significantly far from Opis.
It's a little interesting that Nuzi was earlier, "Gazur," for this
suggests that it was previously a Goza domain. As Gozan is hereby
being identified as the nest of Cronus, perhaps it was at one time
something like, "Koronia," named after the Horites but reflecting
"Cronus." In astronomy, "coronia" is a crown-like circle, as for
example the ring of brilliant light around the sun during a solar
eclipse, or the ring of Saturn, things that in reality depict the glory
of YHWH and of His Son who created these phenomena. Satan is
an impoverished thief, wishing for YHWH's glory upon himself
(and the dire consequences that accompany it), and no less can be
said of the Kabala who acted as Satan's very fingers on Earth, and
who continue to behave as a counterfeit-YHWH entity.
The writer of the article cited above also says that the
peoples of Opis, or rather the term, "Abadir," "signifies the
serpent god Orus." That's Horus, a term rooted in "hora" (= sun
in Egyptian) and therefore no doubt connecting with "corona." If
indeed Cronus was a Gozan domain, one can then entertain Giza
of Egypt -- the location of the Great Pyramid and Great Sphinx --
as a Goza domain. Horus would then connect with Giza.
Now behold. Giza overlooked the city of Memphis, and
Memphis "was founded...by Menes of Tanis, who united the
two kingdoms of Egypt" And "Tanis ... was also in the area of
Goshen, where Joseph settled his family in Egypt, though long
before Tanis was ever built."

565
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memphis%2C Egypt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanis%2 C t
Get it? Gozan was a Hebrew region inEMadia that named
Goshen in Egypt, wherein was the Giza (or "Gizeh") plateau.
Clearly, this region of Egypt was a Kabala-Hebrew region long
before the first Israelites arrived...to stay there with their relatives,
we can presume. The Wikipedia article says that Tanis was earlier
"Zoan," and so note that Zoan is mentioned side by side with
Hebron in Numbers 13:22, suggesting that Hebron (not far south
of Jerusalem), as the name implies, was a Kabala-Hebrew town.
Numbers 13:22 verifies that Hebron and Zoan were already built
before Israelites possessed Israel.
The question then becomes, did the Kabala rulers of Egypt
build the Great and other pyramids? I say yes! This was definitely
a proto-Rosicrucian haven, for Rosicrucians honor this very Egypt.
And was the Pharaoh of Moses' day of Kabala blood? I say yes, he
was of the dragon bloodline which YHWH gave the right to rule
on earth in the name of Satan.
If true that Horus was an Abidar peoples, then the Avvites
were themselves Horites (if Horus = Horites). The writer goes on
to verify my recent deduction, that Apollo was from Opis (square
brackets mine):
"One of these stones, which Saturn was supposed to
have swallowed instead of a child, stood, according to
Pausanias, at Delphi" [the city of Apollo]...it was for a
long time a custom to offer children at the altar of Saturn
[in Delphi]; but in process of time they removed it, and in
its room erected a stone pillar ... This stone which they
thus substituted [for infant sacrifices] was called Ab-
Adar, from the deity represented by it."
It's the "Adar" portion that interests me, for this was the god
of king Shalmaneser, the Semite, and also the name of the last
Hebrew month. Hence, Adar, an Avvite term, was adopted by
Hebrews in connection with Opis ... that carried over into
Abrahamic Israel. The point here being, not to connect YHWH to
Opis, but that Kabala Hebrews were living in Opis.
It could be that the mythical Salmoneus, depicting the
peoples after which the throne name, Shalmaneser, was later
derived, was a Salmon-like peoples near/in Opis. Shalmaneser
through that bloodline became king of Assyria, and Opis was in
Assyria. Salmoneus in Greece was the depiction of Salmonia of
Elis, and so I note that near Nuzi there is today an Iraqi province
called "Sulaymaniyah"..."Silêmanî" in Kurdish (Kurds claim to be
modern Hurrians). See this province east of Kirkuk on this
expandable modern map of Iraq. The same map is available here,

566
but with a better zoom feature providing yet more locations for
those of you wanting to study this matter.
Note also Hal Abjah (i.e. like "Ubija" = Opis) at the head
waters of the Diyala river, the same river that at its mouth held
Opis itself (marked as Ctesiphon on this map). I am led to believe
that Opis was more than a city at the river's mouth, but a region all
along the river. As the Apollo peoples of north Russia were
revealed by myth writers as "Opis" and "Arge," both Apollo and
the founders of Argos must have had their nest in the Opis valley.
And now see that this Diyala valley was part of the Hurrian
domain:
"Hurrians migrated from the Transcaucasian area
and settled eastward of the Tigris River and in the Zagros
mountain region, from the headwaters of the Diyala to
the Upper Khabur region -- the so-called 'Hurrian
ledge'."
http://www.factbites.com/topics/Hurrians
That Hurrian Ledge arched across Gozan to the Habur river!
Keep in mind that Shalmaneser II said that Opis was itself in or
next to the land of Gozan, and we may rest assured that the Habur
river valley (flowing west into the Euphrates) was home to (i.e. so
that Opis may have been likewise). Consider this statement that
extends Gozan into the northern/upper Habur river: "The 'river of
Gozan' (1 Chr. 5:26) is probably the upper part of the [Habur]
river flowing through the province of Gozan, now Kizzel-
Ozan."
http://www.christiananswers.net/dictionary/gozan.html
Another Wikipedia article says this:
"The Hurrians or Khurrites ... probably originated
in the Caucasus and entered from the north, but this is
not certain. Their known homeland was centered in
Subar, the Khabur River valley..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurrians
There you have the bedrock of the mythical Sparti in the
Habur valley. There you have the bedrock of the mythical
Subar/Sparti in the Habur valley. Note that in this region may have
been the origin of mythical Circe, root of Latins and Etruscans, for
“The River Chaboras falls into the Euphrates at Circesium.”
http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node id=1405710
The Spartan dragon line in Greece has links to Armenia, I
suspect that the mythical Cronus -- a Gozan peoples -- was, or
became, connected tmythical Haro Mannae/Armenia. To support
this case, it is known that Molech was identified also as Hadad,

567
where that latter god was synonymous with Tesheb/Teshup, a
Hurrian god but stationed in Armenia. Moreover, the Wikipedia
article above on the Hurrians claims that the Hurrian language was
both an Akkadian one and a proto-Urartian one, where Urartian
was in turn a language of Lake Van in Armenia. In other words,
the Bia peoples who founded Van were more than likely from
Hurrians/Horites. "Russian scholars have also argued that
Hurrian and Urartian were both part of the Na 'avanj-
Dagestan branch of the Northeast Caucasian language family
http //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Euphratean).
:

Dagestan was named after the wolf peoples, the


"Dahae/Dehava" of Avvite/Ophite blood. Dagestan was not far
from the Aras river valley (see Error! Hyperlink reference not
valid.; Dagestan is to the right of T'bilisi). Look at how close Van
is to this river. To solidify my belief of years ago that Lake Van
was a Rosh domain (explained in previous chapters), keep reading.
See here what the Wikipedia article above also writes:
"The Khabur River valley became the heart of the
Hurrian lands for a millennium. The first known Hurrian
kingdom emerged around the city of Urkesh at the end of
the third millennium BC. The end of the Akkadian
Empire enabled the Hurrians to gain control of the
area ... there has been growing support for the theory that
the Habiru may have been Hurrian speakers."
Two points. One, Urkesh appears to be the mythical Arcas
after whom Arcadia was said to be named, and in support of an
Arcadia-Erech connection, Urkesh does seem like a variation of
Uruk/Erech. Two, the conquering of Akkadia (the Cutha) by the
Hurrians (Ares) was probably the start of the Cutha-Ares alliance
depicted in myth as the Cadmus-Harmonia marriage in Greece.
It weighs upon me now that "Hurrian" and "Aryan" are one
and the same, and that the Cutha-Ares alliance is the same as the
Kabala-Aryan/Kabala-Gogi alliance that I have been referring to
throughout this book. I don't yet know whether this alliance should
be differentiated from the Kabala-Kassite alliance; it may be that
the Cutha-Ares alliance became the Kassites themselves, where
"Kassi" is merely a variation of "Cutha/Guti" and where their land
was Gozan. If so, then Saturn, the Satyrs, Hermes, Pan, and the
Griffins were of Kassites of the Gozan region. That would be the
goat-land to which we can trace places as far off as the historical
Gotland. The heartland and capital of Gozan would be found using
the following clues (brackets not mine):
"As early as Bochart (Gegraphica Sacra, Caen,
1646) Gozan was correctly identified with the Gauzanitis
of Ptolemy, situated between the Chaboras (the modern

568
Khabur, Biblical "Habor") and the Saocoras, which can
no longer be identified. The modern name of Gauzanitis
is Kaushan. The Assyrian literature gives numerous
references to a city Guzana...An Assyrian geographical
list mentions Guzana and Nasibina side by side (II
Rawlinson, 53, 43a) and it has been inferred (by Alfred
Jeremias, Das Alte Testament im Lichte des alten
Orients, Leipsic, 1906, p. 545, note 1) that Guzana and
Nasibina (i.e., Nisibis) are the same place."
http://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc05/htm/v.i.ii.htm
Just so you can get your bearings, Zondervan's Atlas shows
the city of Gozan below the "E" of "TURKEY" on this map of
Syria, roughly at the Turkish border. Zondervan shows Nisibis a
significant distance to the right of the "Y" (but still to the west of
the Tigris). Herein was the heart of Gozan, not in Babylonia, but in
what is now Turkey and Syria. And yet Gozan, as a
region/kingdom, spread to Opis, south of Babylon and Baghdad.
YHWH will soon use the anti-Christ to pillage these very
Mesopotamian regions, for the anti-Christ will be a hammer in His
hand to re-pay/destroy His enemies.
Strabo placed the Mygdones near Nisibis, but then also west
toward the Euphrates so as to cover the Gozan region to some
degree: " ...and the Mygdonians in the neighbourhood of
Nisibis, as far as the Zeugma of the Euphrates..."
http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Strabo/16A*.html
Could these have been the founders of Megiddo by that
name? It is widely believed that the Mygdones were the
Macedonians, and perhaps Strabo had it backward when he
claimed that Macedonians furnished the Mygdones of
Mesopotamia. As Strabo claimed the Mygdones to have been a
Thraco-Edone tribe, they were definitely an important part of the
European dragon bloodline...that should be investigated further as
to Mesopotamian blood type. Strabo associates the Mygdones with
mount Masius (north-east side of Nisibis), and Bochart identified
that mountain's name with Mash (website below), brother of
Gether, wherefore we may just have a major root of the Kabala
therein. After all, Nisibis was in the Habur-river watershed. Nisibis
may certainly have been related to Nuzi; indeed, Myconus was a
Cyclade island beside Naxos, as though the Mygdones and Nuzi
peoples under "Dionysus" migrated together to Greece!
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc01.iii.i.aram arameans.html
The difference between Subartu and Akkad ia would be in the
difference between the derivatives of their names: Sheba versus
Cutha, I assume. I would equate the Goza kingdom with the
Akkadian empire since I root both in "Goza." I will bet my best

569
guda cheese cake that Nebuchadnezzar II, the first king of the first
Babylon-the-Great empire (Daniel 7), was a Cutha bloodline, for
the "Nebu" prefix refers to a deity (Nebo) so that only
" Chadnezzar" remains. The Akkadian version was "Nabû-
kudurri," perhaps rooted in long-standing variations of "Gether"
(son of Aram), the base of the Kabala cult.
The Gozan empire should prove to be the root of Gaza and
Gath, where the proto-Cati lived that then became the Cadmus
founders of Thebes, and because "Thebes" itself seems to be a
reflection of "Subar," I'm tempted to view the Cutha as Shebeans.
It's interesting to attempt to find the political dividing line between
Dedan and Sheba, if in fact there was one. The nest of Assyria was
between the two Zab rivers (seen on this modern map of Iraq,
wherefore that land too may have been named after Sheba (not
necessarily meaning that Assyria was a Sheba entity).
The location of Cuthah, the city/region, is disputed. Websites
cite Tell Ibrahim about 15 miles northeast of Babylon. As best as I
can tell on a map showing "Kutha" on the west side of the Tigris, it
was smack across the river from Opis. To solidify my findings that
there was a Cutha-Ares alliance, and that it involved Abrahamic
peoples, read this (brackets not mine):
From the contract tablets found by Rassam at Tel-
Ibrahim it appears that the ancient name of Cuthah was
Gudua or Kuta...In it was a sanctuary dedicated to Ibrahim
(Abraham). Both the city and its great temple, the later
dedicated to Nergal, appear to date back to Sumerian
times ... Nergal (Heb. nereghal, a Babylonian deity of
destruction and disaster, associated with the planet Mars..."
http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterFour/AbramNergalAndBabylon.htm
I've yet to read the evidence that this temple dedicated to
"Ibrahim" was to the Biblical Abraham, but it's possible in that he
became many nations. Contrary to what we all may have assumed,
those many nations may not have been (so much, anyway) those
from Isaac (i.e. Ishmael/Arabs), but from Abraham's wife,
Keturah. It could be that Nergal, although it was the god of the
Cutha, was more likely the god of the Rus Aryans with whom the
Cutha were inter-married (i.e. wherefore the Cutha took it on as
their own god). Nergal, if he was the Roman Mars himself, can be
suspected to have become the Rus at the Aras river so as to
become Ares to the Greeks.
Connection of the Shinar Gadua/Kuta with a Cuthah in
Chaldea is possible in that “Neubauer says that [Cuthah] is the
name of a country near Kurdistan.” That is, in what is now
northern Iraq, where Chaldea sat, and where the Gozan/Habur
Hebrews lived.

570
As I believe that the mythical Harmonia depicted Armenia, it
may be that Armenia itself was named after "Hor(ite)," to be
understood as Hor-Mannae. As Aryans were from the Hari river of
Afghanistan (after which I claim both Aryans and Ares were
named), the same may be true of Horites. Harmonia was made (by
myth writers) the daughter of Ares/Hros, and so now behold what
occurred to me yesterday morning (July 22) to show, for one, that
Ares was a Horite peoples.
I had Horus on the brain as I slept on the night that I had
mentioned him in this chapter. I came to a semi-consciousness two
or three times during the night with Horus heavy on my brain, as
though I were still at work during sleep attempting to understand
his identity. Finally, at the very moment/second of waking, the
word "Hros" popped into my mind. I felt as though blinded until
that point, not knowing how I and others could be so dull as not to
connect Horus to the Hros. How easy is that connection now as it
appears in print? This event was the fourth occasion in one month
that a word popped into my mind at waking time to reveal an
important connection between a mythical term and an historical
peoples.
I give credit to Him, and I think He wants me to tell you that
it's He who wants you to know these things, meaning that these
things will serve an important service to the Church in time. One
thing that comes to mind is our knowing just who our enemies will
be in the end times, but I have a feeling and a hope that this
information will create doubt in, and so dislodge, many right-hand
men of the Illuminati so as to weaken the global empire during the
tribulation...to our benefit.
So there you go, Horus (and the Aryan Egyptians) depicted
the proto-Russians, even the Biblical Rosh, and took part in
becoming the Rhodians-come-Ruthene Europeans. To put it
another way, Horus was Ares, from the Aras river in Caucasia;
wherefore the Hurrians that are said to originate in Caucasia in the
above quote must have been from the Aras valley (Armenia and
Georgia).
This valley was also Harmonia, daughter of Ares, who
" married" the Cutha settled in Greece (i.e. Cadmus) to form the
Spartans. As I identified the latter as Sepharvites removed to
Greece, one can only conclude that the Ares peoples -- the Hros --
were Sepharvites back in Mesopotamia, and this makes absolute
sense in that those Sepharvites were likely the Subar(tu) that are
known to have been the proto-Hurrians. This is the "glorious" root
of the Kabala, the child-killing Sepharvites.
The Sumerians called the Subartu, "Shubir," and this
designation was referring to the city/region of Asshur. This
indicates to me that early Assyria was conquered by Sheba, and

571
yes I'm implying that Sheba was the root of the
Shubir/Sepharvites.
I now understand something of one difficult Biblical story
that I couldn't understand before. When you first read that YHWH
asked Abraham to sacrifice his son to a fire, weren't you given
pause? One knows that YHWH would never want such a thing,
and more to the point, there is no record of Abraham complaining
about that evil request. He just did as YHWH asked, as though it
were perfectly common to him. And that's the point, that it was
indeed common to Abraham, because he lived amongst a dragon-
line peoples who practiced just that abomination.
Let me tell you what I think was going on in the mind of
YHWH. He was wishing to take a man from the child-killing
peoples, and to make a nation of His own from him, but He didn't
want His own nation to sacrifice children to Him, so he decided to
teach this lesson to Abraham by first asking him to sacrifice Isaac
to Him. Then at the moment of the killing of the child, YHWH
intervened and substituted an animal in place of Isaac, thus
teaching Abraham the lesson, and the new way of making
sacrifices to Him, not by human blood.
Yes, Israel was a branch of the dragon line (so far as blood
counts for anything), but in no way does this make YHWH a
branch of the dragon line. This is the crucial distinction that we
must make, but moreover we must know that blood counts for
nothing; it's what a person believes and honors that means all. The
dragon line counted blood as everything, and moreover had a
insane belief system, honoring, as will the anti-Christ, precious
gems etc. and supreme power obtained by military invasions
(Daniel 11:36-38).
I should close this chapter by citing that Cronus was a Titan
and that this term may have been referring to Dedan, by which I
mean to say that Cronus was not from Sheba, as were the Subars. I
would therefore define Horites as both Sheba and Dedan. But I
have not forgotten that Nahor's sons must also have played a part
in the Horite/Hurrian make-up. As I place Zeus into the Dedan
camp as per Zeus' honor in Dodona, I would locate Dedanites
along the eastern side of the Tigris Opis to Susa. I've got some
more work to do here before saying much more.
The website below inadvertently tells me that Nuzi (also on
the east of the Tigris) was a Sheba domain: "The northwestern
sanctuary [in Nuzi] seems to have been dedicated to Ishtar-
Shawushka... The other sanctuary may have belonged to
Teshup." Couldn't we read "Shawushka" as Shabush-ka,
especially as Kybele (Ishtar in Phrygia) was also "Sabazios?
http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~semitic/hsm/NFNuziTablets.htm

572
As Kybele was the wife of Cronus, I would suggest that she
was an Opis peoples since Ops is also said to be the wife of
Cronus. Her "Rhea" designation was a mystery to me until I saw
Rhagae (to the east of Nuzi) on this ancient map of Iraq. Upon
checking, I found that alternative names of the ancient city, used
by Wikipedia, are "Ray" and "Rey." I see the makings of
"Araxes"( alternative name of the Aras river) in "Rhagae." If true,
the wife of Cronus was the Hros.
Having made that deduction, it leads to the possibly identity
of Hercules as the Araxes river as well, especially the "Herakles"
alternative.

573
VEINS OF BLACK COLE
August 2006

There is a theory online that traces the (otherwise Celtic)


king Cole/Coel to the “ancient and prominent Roman Coelius
Clan” (website below), and that Cole himself (400ish) therefore
represented the last vestiges of Romans in Britain. This aligns with
a tracing of the Welsh/Celts back to northern Italy, and especially
to the Etruscans, this in turn supporting a Rhaetian/Redone root for
the Welsh and Bretons. It moreover has the potential to explain
why the Taddei coat of arms uses a red triple-chevron symbol held
by the red dragon of Wales on the Cardiff Arms.
As an example of the Roman Coelius clan in Britain, which
became a military cult, there was the military leader, Marcus
Roscius Coelius of the 1 st century. The importance of this clan is
underscored where one of the seven hills of Rome was Caelius
Hill, that term being a common variation of “Coelius.” See the J.
K. Kyle Coat (from website below), using the title, "Caelitus
Vires." Could this be the Cleito, wife of Poseidon, that Plato made
the mother of Western Atlantis? The gold cup in the Crest, because
it has a pipe behind it, where that pipe is said (on the website) to
depict king Cole, suggests that the holy-grail cult traces to the
"Cael" and/or "Caelt" terms. See that “The Coelius Gens name is
assumed to have been derived from the Etruscan named
Caeles Vivenna (aka Caeles Vibenna), aeneral and founder
of an Etruscan city on the Caelian Hill (see Tacitus, Annals,
iv.65).”
http://www.kylesociety.org/Kyle_OldKingCole.htm#Caelius%20Mons
The Coelius that is thought to be king Cole was Roman on
his mother’s side, for his father was Tasciovanus, a name tracing
back to the Celts/Welsh of pre-Roman times. However, in that
“Tascio” evokes Tuscany (the country of the Etruscans), it
suggests that these particlular Welsh/Bretons, if not all, were from
Etruscans.
So support a Taddei-to-Tudor link, know first that “Tudor” is
thought to derive from “Theodor,” and secondly that the Roman
commander in Britain prior to Coelius, Magnus Maximus, had
Theodosius for his father, whose father in turn was Theodosius the
Great, an emperor of Rome. The Tudor name is Welsh, and is said
to definitely go back to Llywelyn the Great, prince of Wales
(crowned 1195), but the possibility exists that it traces to the

574
Votadini/Goddodin Welsh. The leader of the Votadini, Cunedda
(5 thcentury), “founded a dynastic clan from which Welsh
nobility has claimed their ancestry for centuries afterward.
Tradition holds that Cunedda originated from the territory of
Manau Gododdin, the region around what is now modern
Edinburgh.”
http://www.bardsongpress.com/cunedda.htm
It may even be that the Votadini and/or Cunedda were
Edones who named Edinburgh, in which case the term could be
correctly understood as Vot-Edoni rather than Vo-Taddei. In any
case, my feelers tell me that the Romans of the empire (post-63
BC) were interested in Britain because the Celts there had been
more-ancient Romans of sorts i.e. the original founders of Rome,
the Etruscans. I’m thinking that the Welsh/Celts stemmed in-part
from the Etruscans who named Caelius Hill, so that when the same
Coelians later came to Britain under the empire’s forces, they
merged with their ancient/Celtic kin, which mix then defines the
king-Cole i.e. Kyle bloodline.
The question still is, where do the Stewarts enter the Kyle
bloodline; do they go back to the Etruscan founders of Caelius
Hill? While those founders may per chance have been the root of
the Gaels, it doesn't disqualify their involvement in the foundation
of the earlier Celts. I would venture to say that the Gaels were
from the Galli-branch Kabeiri of Miletus (Gaels are known to stem
from Miletus), but that earlier the same Galli had founded Caelius
Hill ... who then became, along with other Etruscans, the Gauls
(Gauls and Celts are almost equated). If I am correct in rooting the
Celts in the Khaldi and/or Chaldeans, then they were the Halybes
of the Halys river, for Halybes are equated (by others) with the
Khaldi. These Halys-river dragons (i.e. the Subartu/Hurrian
Kabala) must then have become the Ialysos of Rhodes, and their
Rhodian brothers, the Lindos Danaans (probably named
London) ... who ultimately became the Redone-branch of Etruscans,
which may have been the founding branch (sorry for the repititon
but there may be new readers entering this book at this chapter).
The website above shows a coin of the Roman consul, C
Coelius Caldus, saying that there is a boar’s head under his chin,
suggesting to me a tracing back to the mythical Tydeus (the Greek-
Calydonian depicted in myth with a boar on his shield) but also a
tracing forward to the blue boar of the Veres and to the arrow-
pierced boar of the Pollocks (anciently “Pollok”). The Veres, by
their own admission, were rulers of Caledonian Picts (Scotland),
wherefore the Vere boar must link back to Caledonians. I suspect
that in that capacity as Caledonians, the Veres were in part proto-
Polloks.

575
Put it this way, that as Kyles lived in Ayrshire (Scotland),
very close indeed to the Pollocks in Renfrewshire, I see all three
surnames rooted in Caledonians, for as that term is likely Cal-
Edonian, I will understand it as Cole-Edones and/or Coelius-
Edones. That is, the Kyles were either Caledonians, or at least the
“Cal” portion of the Caledonians (in Greece, “Calydon” might
have been understood as Galli-Edone/Galli-Eden).
That the Polloks ended up living near Ayrshire when
entering Britain with the Conqueror suggests that this was their
ancestral home (prior to being removed from Britain, I reckon, by
the white-dragon Anglo-Saxons). It appears now that they went to
live beside the Kyles due to previous relations with them. I’ve
hesitated thus far to say the following, but it doesn’t hurt to jot it
down in case it turns out to be true, that “Coelius” may have been
a Q-Celt-type version of the Italian god, “Pollux,” which in turn
may have been the root of “Pollok.” It is fairly certain in my mind
(as per Leda being Pollux's mother) that this god depicted Po-river
Ligurians (Leda was the mother of Ligurians).
And knowing that the Pollock coat of arms uses three
cornucopia, let me now remind you that “Tydeus” was the Greek
term that I suspect was the mythical Tatius of the Italian
cornucopia cult, which cult was based in the goddess Flora i.e. the
capital of Tuscany: Florence. Is it a coincidence that the
Taddei/Taddao/Tadini name was first found in Florence, says
houseofnames.com?
The Tasciovanas term (e.g. the father of the historical
Coelius thought to be king Cole) is important under a ruler (1st
century) of the same name, who ruled what I would say was the
Catti dragon line that named Hesse-Cassel, Germany (i.e. “Catti”
evolved into “Hesse”). Either that, or it is one coincidence, for the
Celts under Tasciovanus were the “Catuvellauni,” but also
deemed “Cassivellaunus/Cassi.” In one sentence, Julius Caesar
placed the Cassi next to the Bibroci, which then evoke the Bibracte
kingdom of France, which kingdom I will later trace to bee-line
Edones of France. Tasciovanus was either the son of, or ally to,
Addedomaros (root = Added or Ded), who is important to the Cole
line in that he ruled from the same city that was the origin of king
Cole: Camulodunum (some say this was Camelot). Moreover,
Addedomaros invoked the war god after which that city was
named, Camulos (I think this was Kemuel, son of Nahor; details
elsewhere).
Addadomaros ruled the peoples called Trinovantes; were
these from Torino/Turin of the Po river? Turin is the capital of
Piedmont (extreme north-west of Italy), and I have wondered if
this region was not named after the people that were mythically the
Phaethon of the Eridanus river. Indeed, for as Greek myth has the

576
Ligurians under codewords “Sthenelus” and “Cycnus”
(Sithones/Satan and Gog) moving into Eridanus (the
Rhodanus/Rhone), so Wikipedia reports that Turin was named
after a “Ligurian-Celt” peoples, called “Taurini.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taurini
I find it strange that someone (as does Wikipedia) could root
“Turin” in “tau” (= “mountain” in Celt) while then rooting the
Latin version of the city, “Torino,” in the bull and Taurini peoples.
Is it not obvious that whatever “Turin” sounds like in Celt is
totally unrelated to the origin of the word, since the word is a
carry-over from the Greek-Taurus peoples? Recall that Etruscans
were called “Tyrrheni,” if that helps to make the connection.
King Cole was from Colchester (extreme-east England), a
town that was "Camulodunum" to the Bretons. It was a town
founded by the Camul peoples, and as the town was named after
the god, Camulus, this was a peoples important and ancient
enough to have their own god, which god I think traces back to
Nahor’s third son, Kemuel. Colchester itself may have been named
after dragon-line Colchis, which was indeed related to the
Calydonians (since Corinthians were Calydonians while the
mythical ruler of Colchis (Aeetes) was co-founder of Corinth; see
my chapter, My Calydonian Boar Hunt). If so, the Kyles, and the
Coelius surname, are rooted in Colchis! The earliest-known origin
of the Gamil family (still with us today) is York, a city named after
“boar”! Moreover, it was the city from which king Cole ruled.
It appears, therefore, that the Gamils of Colchester came to
York with Cole, and that they had been the peoples who founded
Camelot, in Cornwall (if Camelot was not Camulodunum itself).
Proof that the Gamils were Nahorites is in the Latin version of
“York,” that being “Eboricum,” a Hebrew-like term. But as that
term was rooted in “boar,” it seems evident that the boar-symbol
origin is in Hebrews (of the dragon line).
I am wondering if the Hamilton surname is a variation of the
Gamil/Camel name. The German Camel family (originally from
Bohemia) uses a gold griffin on its Coat, as does the Scottish
Hamil Coat. The French Hamils use a green griffin/dragon, and
since both branches of Hamils were first recorded in Normandy,
connection to the green-dragon Veres (of Normandy) is feasible,
especially as Veres also use a blue boar, and even-more so because
the Eburovices Celts (suspected by many to have named York)
were situated in Normandy!
Now the lands of Kyle in Ayrshire were named after king-
Cole elements, according even to Kyle-family claims, and
moreover, Kyle coats of arms have in the past included the blue-
and-white Stewart/Cohen checks ... meaning that Kyles and
Stewarts mixed blood (there is no other way for a family to use the

577
symbols of another family unless one is descended from the other).
Says a Wikipedia article (round brackets not mine, square brackets
mine):
"'Kyle Stewart,' lands held by the Fitzalan's since
the 11th century (the future Stewart Kings of
Scotland)... Even today, HRH Prince Charles [of Wales]
retains the title “Lord of Kyle” passed down to him
through the Stewart Kings.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyle%2C_Ayrshire
Keep in mind here that Kyles were on the west Scottish coast
facing Arran and Bute (see Ayrshire map), the islands that the first
Stewart king seized upon ascending the throne (almost a thousand
years after king Cole).
The Kyles have traditionally used candlesticks on their Coat,
but this, while seemingly a Christian theme, refers to Illuminati
elements, as the Kyle candles are typically black or on black
background; the serpent on the Kyle family crest would suggest
the same. Note that the serpent is entwined around the spine of an
anchor, as when serpents are coiled around staffs to indicate
dragon-sun-god bloodlines (from Helios/helix), and that the anchor
also evokes a Christian cross. The Arms of Edinburgh use the
same anchor design, but with a rope in coil formation around it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyle%2C_Ayrshire
It's interesting that an alternative name of Kyle was "Coila"
(website below says so). Kyle crests also used gold cups implying
the holy-grail theme (which does not necessarily have anything to
do with Jesus, for Illuminatists repeatedly claim Christian themes
when in truth they are Satanic). At the kylesocietu.org website we
read: "...the candlesticks are a symbol relatively unique to the
Kyles."
The Cole surname is traced to Cornwall (pre-1066), and we
find that today the Coat and Crest is a black bull. Note this quote
by a Kyle-family website, where we find the term "Illuminati"
admitted on the page:
"The arms of the District of Kyle is marked by a
checkered pattern of blue and silver squares against a
gold background. These arms are taken from a seal of
Alan, High Steward of Scotland (1177-1204), and it is
shown on a charter dated at Melrose in 1190. The shield
depicts the familiar fess chequy of the Stewarts, a blue-
and-white checkered band across the middle. These
arms ... are still used to this day in the 2nd and 3rd
quarters of the coat-of-arms of Prince Charles as Duke of
Rothesay.

578
http://www.kylesociety.org/Kyle_CoatofArms.htm
The Stewart symbol is merely a blue and silver band across
the middle of the Coat ("silver" and "white" are the same), while
the Cohen Coat is entirely of blue and silver checks, wherefore one
can conclude that the Stewarts derive from Cohens, not vice versa,
but from Cohens at least as far back as Alan the High Steward.
And so now we know the real reason that the Royal Family claims
Hebrew roots, not for roots in king David and the tribe of Judah, as
prince Charles claims, but for roots in Khazar kagans.
It's the Scottish branch of the Stewarts that uses the blue and
silver checks. The blue of Coats is "azure" to the Coat masters, and
this color derives from blue gems found abundantly in Aryan
Afghanistan, the ancient region of the Gorgons. Moreover, it is
said that "Kok/Gok" means "blue" and/or “celestial.” It’s therefore
interesting that “Ceolius” is said to derive from “celestial.”
Consider this inclusion of the Bute surname:
"The [blue and silver] Chequered Band is the Bute
connection and it represents the Stewart family. It was
found on the arms of both Bute County Council and
Rothesay Town Council."
http://www.argyll-
bute.gov.uk/content/councillorsareamap/convener/abccoatofarms?s=30172&a=1
The English Rothes Coat uses three griffin heads, while the
Crest uses a crowned dog that I think depicts the royal Stewarts. If
so, there may be no distinction betwen Rothes and Stewarts, by
which I mean to say that the Stewarts proper were from the Rothes
clan, probably of Celtic-era Rothesey. This smacks of Rus
ancestry, and aligns with their root in Khazar elements.
The German Kiel family Coat uses a griffin (a dragon with
eagle parts) dancing with a lion, and a black hexagram, a sheer
Illuminati/Rosicrucian-Zionist symbol. The Kiels are originally
from Baden, Germany, and that city sure does evoke "Bute."
On the kylesociety.com website above, I read the following
definitions of certain symbols:
The Lion (red) is the royal banner of Scotland. The
white lion is used by the MacDowall Clan...
The Red Welsh Dragon --- the people living in Kyle
at the time of Old King Cole spoke a P-Celtic Language
closest to Welsh...
The Gryphon -- Old King Cole might have been
Roman (the animal is half Roman Imperial Eagle) mixed
with Scots (the Lion half).

579
http://www.kylesociety.org/Kyle_CoatofArms.htm
Hmm, perhaps this definition of the griffin is not quite right,
since the griffin goes back much earlier than Rome, to the coiled
Sumerian Mushussu dragon. Note that the author doesn't define the
red dragon except to imply that it refers to the Kyles themselves!
Since I root the Kyles in Colchis, where the Golden Fleece was the
Ares dragon, the Kyles appear as a red version of the Golden
Fleece. There is modern evidence that the Kennedy family traces
back to the golden fleece, and before this chapter is out I will show
some possible Kennedy (and Clinton) links to the Kyles.
Take a look of the Coat of Merioneth, a Welsh region (see
map) founded by Meirion, son of Cunedda (see website below). It
has two wicked red dragons/griffins, their wings studded with
pentagrams. Centrally there is a huge red sun (likely red-dragon
important), and three rather harmless, out-of-place looking
goats/rams, I can't tell which (perhaps intended that way to denote
both Hermes and his son, Pan), but you will see a ram/goat also the
Cardiff Arms. For reasons to be explained, the two red dragons,
likely two Cimbri factions, may have been a Cole-Cunedda
alliance by marriage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List oflaces
_ named
_ after eople
The two red griffins are again found on the Denbigh Arms,
the capital of which is Ruthin, noting that Varangians were red-
sun/red-dragon peoples stemming from the Ruthene. Could it be
that the Varangians were rooted in the Ruthin of Wales? The
Denbigh Crest uses the single griffin but holding two keys, again
representing two families/kingdoms. Denbighshire is in North
Wales (see map) bordering Shropshire (first home of the post-1066
Stewarts, but likely the home of proto-Stewarts in ages past). I
don’t know how to read the Welsh version of Denbigh, "Sir
Ddinbych," whether the "Ddin" is to be read as "D(vowel)din" so
that it may possibly be rooted in "Dedan/Tadini." If so, this
becomes a good candidate for the Taddei (triple-chevron) trace to
Wales.
The blue and silver Stewart checks may be identified with
the South-Ayrshire design (at website below) featuring a blue
porpoise, a blue lion, and the blue and silver checks. The North
Ayrshire Coat uses a blue lion (rare) with crown. A porpoise in
Greek myth is literally a sea pig, wherefor the blue boar that is a
feature of the Vere family may depict Stewart relations. As
Camilla Parker Bowles has used a white boar on blue background,
but with a blue horse next to it, on her Duchess of Cornwall Coat,
it too may depict Stewart roots. The English Bush Coat uses three
black boars, and yes I have known for a long time that the name
reflects "Buz." The Bush Crest uses a ram.

580
It's pertinent that Camilla's husband, Andrew Parker Bowls,
was descended from a mother having the surname, Trafford, for
that family uses a single red griffin on its Coat. A certain "Miss
Swinnerton-Dyer" attended his christening, and, yes, with a name
like that, it was easy to guess that the surname was represented by
a boar, a black one in fact, on the Crest, and a black cross to boot,
on the Coat ... which evokes the (black) Sinclair cross. When he
divorced Camilla, Andrew married a Pittman, a family using a
two-headed red phoenix, an Illuminati symbol. Andrew was the
Governor of Rhodesia, a nation founded by the Illuminatist
Rhodes family. Put two and two together, but this must be barely
scratching the surface.
It's important that the kylesociety.org website reveals that,
"The Stag Head -- used on several old Kyle Arms," for that symbol
re-occurs in many other Coats. The Scottish-branch Rothes Coat
and Crest uses it, for example, and it's the main feature (on black
background) of the the Parker Coat and Crest. The Bowles' use
three black boar heads (and three gold shells on a black chevron).
If that's not enough, Camilla's maiden name, Shand, uses a white
boar head on a blue background. That's just too many boars to be a
coincidence. Accidentally, I spelled "Parke" instead of "Parker"
and got the following Parke Coat with the Stewart blue and silver
checks as well as three red stag heads!! The Parks are an ancient
Strathclyde-Briton family.
Notice how "Camilla" reflects "Camel." She's also the
Duchess of Rothesay, by the way. The Coat of her mother's
surname, Cubitt, uses a blue lion. Interestingly, it is said at the
Cubitt link (above) that the name is a version of "Jacob," which of
course would refer to the Ja cobites and to James I, the first Stewart
king of England. Yes, it should have been a no-brainer from the
start, that the blue depicts the "Blue Blood" of English royalty.
This is what Rosicrucians lived, spied, and warred for.
http://www.kylesociety.org/Kyle_CoatofArms.htm
At the above Kyle website, the writer implies that a black
diamond depicts "coal," but if that seems strange, I would suggest
that he meant to disguise "Cole." And so I found that the Camel
family of Germany used a gold griffin on black background, and a
silver diamond. It may therefore be that the diamond refers to
Camel elements, and that when the Kyle of Colchester married the
incoming Camels that re-named the city, Camulodunum, the Kyles
took the diamond on as a black one, their favorite color.
This now tends to verify what I had suspected, that
"Grimaldi" is a veriation of Camelot-like terms, for the Grimaldi
Coat uses red and silver diamonds. Moreover, these red and silver
diamonds appear on the Hohen-family plaque (technically the
Prussian Arms), situated smack beside the red and silver Hohen

581
checks. I've yet to determine whether the anchor to the right of the
Hohen checks, and the stag to the right of the anchor, are Kyle
symbols.
To the right of the stag, one can see the red triple-chevron
symbol! Above the chevron, the two keys can be seen that are on
the Denbigh Arms The keys are found on the present pope's Papal
Coat, and while we are told that these represent the Biblical keys
of Peter into the Kingdon of Heaven, we ought not to be so naive
in light of the other symbols, all of pagan elements. It is said that it
depicts a fish. The keys are also found on the Vaucluse Arms.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaucluse
Coats of Arms are Freemasonic inventions, and are closely
guarded and controlled by Illuminatists, who are not going to
reveal to us what the particulars truly mean of Illuminati-important
symbols. So see that the Choen/Cown Coat uses three stag heads
on black background, while the Crest uses what I think is the
Strongbownian arrow symbol. "Strongbow" is a term denoting
Richard de Clare, and so see that the Clare Crest uses a stag's head.
The point is, a Kyle connection to the Cohens needs to be
entertained.
Coats of Arms are Freemasonic inventions, and are closely
guarded and controlled by Illuminatists, who are not going to
reveal to us what the particulars truly mean of Illuminati-important
symbols.
Recalling from the previous chapter that I had traced the
shell symbol to the Stewarts, see now that the Bowles family used
three shells, and ditto for the Mar family which entered the
Scottish throne about the same time as the first Stewart i.e. Isabel
Mar married Robert Bruce I, and their daughter produced the first
Stewart king (Robert Bruce II). But Mars had entered the Stewart
clan earlier; the 3rd High Steward (Walter Stewart) was the son of
Alesta of Mar.
It's my suspicion that the mythical figure, Merlin, whom
Geoffrey of Monmouth revealed as a Caledonian of sorts (details
later), was of the Mar clan (Scotland). I'll jot down that peoples of
Abruzzo province included the "Marsi" region/peoples, and that it
wouldn't be surprising if these trace to the god of war by the same
name.
In that a houseofnames.com search for "Brussi" pops up the
Abruzzo surname, a consideration of Bruce origins in this part of
Italy is warranted. Geoffrey of Monmouth rooted the
Bretons/Welsh in a certain Brutus, a Roman-Trojan, not a real
person but depicting an Italian peoples, apparently the
Brutii/Bruttii, a term very similar to "Abruzzi" and "Brusi/Brussi."
Therefore, the Grandmasters of Freemasonry, the Bruce kings of
Scotland, may just be named after the same Hebrew (probably

582
Iberian/Avar) elements that named the Abruzzo province and the
Bretons.
The above link to the Abruzzo surname tells that some of the
first American settlers carrying the name were “Abreu.” I kid you
not that I wrote much of my chapters on this subject, over 2 1/2
years, while renting a portion of an Abreu household, never
knowing anything of Abreu connections to my bloodline, or with
the dragon line. I had sensed that the manners/behavior/lifestyle of
the woman of the house matched that of certain relatives of mine. I
kid you not that God has in that way and others convinced me that
exposing the dragon bloodline is with His full support.
The Brutii worshiped Thetis, a fish-depicted peoples from
the mythical Nereus fish-people which I have previously equated
with Dagon of the proto-Israeli sea shore, especially Dor, and for
which reason I suspect were Nahorites. Thetis was from Tethys the
Titan, and perhaps these terms relate to “Taddei” and/or “Dedan.”
Behold that Thetis was the mother of Achilles/Achilleus, who just
may be the identification of “Coelius/Cole/Kyle.” Moreover,
Thetis was made the wife of Peleus, ruler of Pythia, the root of
Phaethon of the Eridanus river. Peleus was one of the Calydonian-
boar hunters, and therefore a western-Atlantean and golden-fleece
peoples as typically depicted the rest of the hunters (including
Atalanta). One could therefore conjecture that “Brutus” (as
Barutus) was rooted in the “boar” spelling of the day, and that
Brutii Celts were founders of York/Eboricum and possibly at the
root of all Breton boar lines.
Because Thetis cared for Hephaistos on the Amazonian
island of Lemnos (where Jason of the Argonauts “visited” en route
to re-claim the golden fleece), the Thetis peoples are revealed
quite-certainly as Amazons, as Atalanta (synmol of western
Atlantis) herself depicted. Lemnos was probably named after
Kabalistic Hebrews in that it was the island made sacred to
Hephaistos, suggesting Hebrew-Amazon alliances on the island.
Now Genesis 25:3 tells that Dedan had “Leummites” as
descendants, which I would confidently identify as the founders of
Lemnos (for more reasons that the similarity of temrs), perhaps
revealing that Hepahistos himself was predominantly a Dedanite
of that tribe. This squares with a Dedanite identification of
“Thetis” itself, and may serve to reveal that other Thet-like terms
refer to Dedanites. Recall that Etruscans are themselves rooted in
Lydus/Lydians, and that Dedan also put forth the “Letushites.”
Now Hephaistos was Vulcan in Italy but located in southern
Italy along with his Cyclopes (Gogi) helpers. The point is, the
Brutti ruled Calabria, in the toe of Italy, and so I would expect a
close relationship between the Kyles and the Bruce kings if indeed
these southern Italians were at their roots. I'm of course imagining

583
that some of the Brittii ended up in Abruzzo, having named it, but
then crossed over into France as part of the Celt wave. The Brusse
family of France was from Languedoc, Cathar country, and they
have plenty of Fleur de Lis on their Coat, but also one red rose.
They use a blue lion symbol, which was used by the Kyles!!
The “excalibur” of Arthurian myth may be related to
“Calabria,” but as I had previously identified “excalibur” in the
Halybes (root of the Khaldi/Celts), so now I will postulate that
Calabria was founded by Halybes, who, as the inventors of metal,
fit nicely into the Hepahistos-Cyclopes metal-smith theme.
Moreover, as the metal inventors were concerned primarily with
making weapons by which they could rule the world, the Excalibur
sword fits nicely into an Halybes theme. I’ll re-mention that my
dictionary defines the Greek “chalybos” (under our “chalybeate”)
as “steel.” I have in a previous chapter identified Excalibur as the
Halybes of Exeter, Cornwall, that being in the Devonshire region
named after the Danaans/Danann. This squares with my view that
the Halybes were Danaans of the Rhodian city of Ialysos. Note
how “Ialysos/Halys” may to “Caelius.”
The Q-Celt versionmodif^eleus”
of “ (father of Achilles) may
itself modify to “Coelius,” but note that he was ruler of Pythia
(Greece) via “Myrmidons,” the possible branch of Mars peoples
and therefore a possible root of the Breton Mar clan. The term
certainly evokes “mar” (= sea) in keeping with the fish-tail theme
of Thetis (“haly” is Greek for “sea”). As the above term should
therefore be understood as Mar-Midon, the Methoni of Greece and
the Modena region of northern Italy comes to mind, especially as
Pythia was the root of Phaethon. In keeping with my Phaethon-
Piedmont equasion, the Abreu name was first found in Piedmont.
Therefore, if "Abreu" was at short-form for "Abruzzi" (= "of the
Brutti"), the Abreu name in Piedmont represents the Bruttii in
Piedmont ... who then filled Eridanus and moved yet westward to
become the Bretons.
These were the continental-Hercules peoples coming to
uproot Geryon, even the Helios-based Redones, conquerors of
western Atlantis, and even as I had independently rooted these
Atlanteans in Aeolus of Greece, so that term also evokes
"Caelius."
At the first website below you can read that Achilles was
turned into a woman, this being in my impression a (common)
mythical tactic to depict Amazons. You can also read that his
name was changed to Pyrrha and that he had a son, Pyrrhus-
Neoptolemus, terms that relate to Epirus, the location of Dodona
(i.e. evoking Dedanite Hebrews). Behold this finding at the second
webiste listed below: “Pyrrhus Neoptolemy, son of Achilles, had
three sons ... Molossius, Pictus and Pergamon.”

584
http://members.tripod.com/romeartlover/Schiro.html
http://www.mirditaonline.net/xmb/viewthread.php?fid=81 &tid=350&action=printable
What’s that? Achilles brought forth Pictus? This tends to
verify that “Achilles” was at the root of the “Cal” of “Calydon,” by
which I mean to say that the Galli peoples (depicted in myth as
transvestites) depicted by Achilles named the Cal-Edonians that
then became the Picts. I would suggest that the “Cal” is the same
as the Gauls, therefore, and I do see that “Wales” itself may be a
version of “Gaul.” At the following website, you can read that
Achilles was depicted with a slave girl called, “Briseis,” which
may prove to be the Cole-Breton alliance.
In keeping with the migration of the Scottish Picts from
Ireland, the Dewnans (Romans called them "Dumnonii") that
founded Devonshire (Cornwall) were also the Fir Domnann of
Connacht, Ireland. The largest island in Connacht is Achill.
Coincidence? Then see the following statement: "The Damnoni
settled in the lands of Ayrshire, Renfrewshire, Lanarkshire..."
http://www.templum.freeserve.co.uk/history/celts/damnoni.htm
Moreover, the Galway county (southern Connacht) may be
named by the same people as named the Galloway in which
Carrick was situated.
As Achilles regards that part of myth which includes Paris
(the Parisii) and Troy, the Gauls that founded Paris and Troyes (of
proto-France) are indeed center stage. His son, Neoptolemus, by
his alternative _ Pyrrhus, _ may just apply to Paris, and likely
depicted that portion of Epirus peoples (I think the Iberi) who
named the Pyrenees mountains (separating France from Spain). I
have a feeling that Geoffrey of Monmouth’s “Myrddin” term, to
describe Merlin, is rooted in Achilles’ peoples, the Myrmidons,
and moreover that the Martinist Rosicrucians (said to originate in
northern Spain and southern France) were of the “Myrddin”
codeword ... which could be Myr-Dedan.
Moreover, the martin and ermine symbols of France and
Brittany must refer to these very peoples, especially as
Neoptolemos married “Hermione” (daughter of Helen of Troy).
That is, the ermine symbol of Brittany, a major symbol on coats of
arms (found on the Kerry Coat, for example), is rooted in Helen,
who was herself the daughter of Leda, the swan symbol (used by
Stewarts) that became the Ladon-based Ligurians. In fact, Achilles
“killed” (i.e. defeated in war) codeword, “Cycnus,” which Gogi
code was the swan symbol of Liguria.
As I conjectured in a previous chapter that Helen and
Helenus were the same peoples in two different locations, so we
find that the mother of Neoptolemos (Andromache) was “wife” to
Helenus. These terms must refer to the Gelonus that lived among
the Budini, and must on the one hand be the founders of Bute,

585
Scotland, but also the Alan Huns that ultimatley produced the
Alan-Stewarts (i.e. the Stewarts proper) of Dol, Brittany. If this
roots the Stewarts in Ladon, what I see as the Biblical dragon, it's
not because I planned it that way, I assure you.
Look now at the closeness between the Kyles and the royal
Bruces. The Bruce kings were first of Carrick, though not native to
it. Carrick was a region next/south to the Ayrshire lands of Kyle,
and in keeping with a Kyle root in Caledonia (i.e. Picts), so
Carrick "was peopled most probably by descendants of the
Picts" (website below). I'm going to show that the Bruces were
from the Eburovices, and probably named after them. I'm also
going to suggest that the Heber root of the Irish-Picts-come-Irish-
Scots, and therefore the root of the Kyle Irish-come-Kyle-Scots,
were from an earlier wave of Eburovices, the Iberians. That is, the
Kyles and Bruces were distanft cousins. In keeping with a Galli
origin of the Caledonians, we find that there was a Galway in
Connacht (Ireland), and that Carrick is the northern part of
Galloway, Scotland (see see Galloway map and Ayrshire map).
Ayrshire was therefore a Scottish hub of the Hebrew dragon line.
The Galloway-surname Coat uses a blue lion on silver
background

586
THE COHENS OF IRELAND
Or

The Danann Are Now In the Hamburger Business

August 2006

I have been in contact with a porphyria victim (Robin)


seeking the roots of the disease, which she has found in Rollo and
his wife, Poppa of Bayeux, a city in the region of Bessin, which
region I suspect was named after the Bessi Thracians, priests
(proto-Cohens?) of the wicked Satrae Thracians that were depicted
in myth as Satyrs. Bayeux itself was named after the Baiocasse
Celts, which I figure must have been the proto-Bavarians in that
"Bavaria" derived from "Baioari."
When Robin wrote this to me, "From Rollo and Poppa we
descend to Michael le Fleming...", I immediately checked the
Fleming Coat to find that it uses a blue and silver so-called "fur,"
which strikes me as a variation of the Stewart/Cohen checks. But
the Fleming coat uses red and gold checks in the so-called "chief"
(top one third of the coat), and I must conclude that red and gold
checks are yet another branch of Cohens (third I've found so far).
Fortunately, I had come across these checks before and had saved
the name to which they belonged, so behold that the Baring Coat
uses red and gold checks, but because they are throughout the
Coat, it signifies in my mind that Flemings were a branch of
Barings, not vice versa. The importance here is that "Fleming" is
the root of the quasi-nation of Flanders and may therefore connect
with the Salian Franks (originating at mouth of the Rhine,
Netherlands) who became the Hohen emperors (using red and
white checks throughout their Coat ).

The Baring banking family of Britain is often connected to


Illuminati activity. When I read this at encyclopedia.com: "Sir
Francis [Baring], a close associate of William Pitt the Younger...",
I found that the Coat of William Pitt used a band of (as does the
Pitt family to this day) blue and silver checks. Per chance this
name traces back to Phaethon, the son of Helios, in that the Pitt
coat uses three gold spheres that may depict three branches of the
sun god. The Pitt name was first found in Devonshire (according
to houseofnames.com , which locality is central to this discussion.

587
It should be said that the woman who introduced me to
Robin, the porphyria victim (my Pollock correspondent) that I had
been writing to for years previous, believes (with many others) that
the disease traces to Merovingians, meaning that we are, for
different reasons, seeking to trace the same bloodline. We had not
had significant discussions for a couple of years when, on the day
that I was in the midst of tracing the Phaethon dragon to the Kyles
of Ayrshire, which was the same day that I wrote for the first time,
and only briefly, on the Danaans of Somerset/Devonshire, Robin
was introduced to me. On that same day (August 20), Robin
mentioned that she traced the disease to Somerled (II), ruler of
Ayrshire. I wrote back mentioning that I suspected Somerled ties
to Somerset.
When I looked into the matter, it first struck me that there
wasn't likely a Somerled-Somerset connection because Somerled
was from Ireland while Somerset was in Cornwall. But as I
continued to read an article on Somerled, I found that he was the
progenitor of the Donald/MacDonald clan, which spelling was at
first "Domhnall." That's when I realized that the Donalds had been
the Danann of Ireland called "Domnann"! You can see how it
came as a shock to me because I had by then rooted the Domnann
in the Dumnoni of Devonshire/Somerset!!
So, I figure that Somerled was a term honoring a Somer
entity/peoples that was rooted in Somerset elements, and of course
"Domnall/Donald" was a term honoring the Domnann Irish. In
short, Somerled was a Domnann-branch Danann, and to prove this
further, his grandfather was Gil-A domnan . As Somerled was also a
Viking name, and because there is other evidence that causes the
historians to root him partly in Viking blood, I would venture to
assert that his ancestry was in the Danes who had stemmed from
the Somerset Danann.
Further reading showed that Somerled (died 1164) not only
became the king of Ayrshire and Morven, but of Bute and Arran
(not to mention much else on western Scotland). One website said
that Somerled was killed by Stewarts of Renfrew (not identified by
the author), and other websites say that he was killed by Malcolm
IV, king of Scotland, a descendant of David I. It just so happens
that the leading Stewarts of Renfrew were what David himself
made the High Stewards of Scotland. This now explains why, as
soon as a Renfrew Stewart later took the Scottish throne (as Robert
Bruce II), he seized Bute, Arran and Ayrshire for the Stewart
name. My question had for years previous been: were the pre-
Conqueror peoples of Bute the ancestors of the royal Stewarts?
Thanks to Robin's input, I have found that indeed they were, to be
explained later in this chapter.

588
The point I want to make first is that the Somerled's Irish
blood can be identified as Breton, for the Dumnoni of Cornwall
were Bretons. At the website below, we can learn that the first
peoples of Ireland were from Caucasia. The second peoples, the
Parthalons (a mythic term), translates to the historical Pretani =
Bretons. The third peoples, the Fomorians of Tory Island, may
have been what were later called "Pomeranians," who depict
themselves to this day by dragon symbols.
http://dedanaan.com/untilled-fields-of-irish-history/early-peoples-of-ancient-ireland/
At the website above, we learn that the chief peoples of
Parthalon were encoded, "Eber," but Parthalon was given yet
another son, "Rudrraidhe" (Rudr-Areada/Rudr-Redones?). As
these are mythical terms, they depict people groups, and it's
interesting that one online author had written (article no longer
online) that the Varangian Rus were based in a Swedish family
called, "Rudr/Rud'r." In other words, the Parthalons (i.e. Bretons)
appear once again as a Hebrew-Rus mix, but ruled by the Hebrew
portion. The Varangians were those Rus that went later to live in
Kiev, near the Khazars that were likewise a Hebrew-Rus peoples
ruled by the Hebrew portion.
The Rus were the ones who eventually brought the Khazar
empire down, at which time the Khazar cohens/kagans sought
refuge in Hungary/Germany (as "Ashkenazi Jews"), and these
represented (as goes my theory) the non-Bute side of the royal
Stewarts. The Varangians and their Breton ancestors should
therefore be viewed as distant dragon-line cousins of the Khazar-
based Stewarts, so that the royal Stewarts descend from two
dragon lines.
David I may be viewed as the closest thing to a Stewart
without being a Stewart proper, for he was from queen Agatha (on
his mother's side), who was in turn the daughter of the Hohen
emperor, Conrad II. Hohen-branch Cohens descend from Salian-
branch Merovingians (online genealogies verify this, and I'll share
them later), but this line did not produce the Stewarts-proper of
Dol/Scotland... since those Stewarts are from the blue-and-silver
checked Cohens (again, Hohens used red and silver checks).
A branch of Parthalons called "Nemedians" lost a war to the
Fomorians (of Tory Island), and "escaped to Britan with their
chief, Britan, while two otherroups returned to Ireland ... as
the Firbolgs and Tuatha de Dan ann." The writer(s) of this
mythical story may not have realized that Bretons/Danann were
already in Cornwall/Wales, for which reason he was seemingly
rooting the Bretons (i.e. via "Britan") in the Nemedian-branch
Parthalons of Ireland. In any case, we do see that Parthalons and
Danann were both Bretons, and that Fir Bolgs were likewise.

589
The writer (as do many others) identifies the Fir Bolgs as
Menapii Gauls of Belgica (now Belgium). As the Menapii have
been identified historically as inhabitants of the Isle of Man
(probably tracing back to the island's founders), it could be, and in
fact I'm about to show, that Somerled (ruler of the Isle of Man)
was a Fir-Bolg Danann. The writer tells that the Fir Bolgs of Green
Island moved to Mayo county in Connacht, which is where the Fir
Domnann lived, thus verifying that the Somerled/Donald peoples
were just those Fir Bolgs. Somerled was actually from Donegal
(extreme north-west Ireland), but this was smack beside Connacht
to its south (Tory Island is in Donegal). It should be added that
“The Fomorians were given the province of Connacht, and
were allowed to marry some of the Tuatha de Danann."
http://www.skell.org/explore/text/celtdeityT.html
The writer includes a third Fir tribe along with the Bolgs and
Domnann, the Fir Galian, evoking Galway of Connacht but
possibly tracing back through the Gauls (historically, "Gali") to the
Galli-branch Kabala cult. Note that the writer places the Fir Bolg
in Ulster, and that the Ulster flag is a "star-of-David" design. Keep
in mind that Khazars, to whom I trace the star, were of the Bulgar
family of peoples.
The writer claims that the chief of the Fir Bolg was a son of
Erc, and this I would definitely view as the myth writer's belief
that Hercules was at the root of these peoples. If correct, Hercules
was a depiction of the Bolg-branch of Danaan, to be distinguished
somewhat from the Tuatha branch. The latter was of
Thoth/Hermes (I say), stationed therefore at Great Ormos, Wales.
It could therefore be that Geryon and his dog, Ortho (who were of
Erethlyn near Great Ormos) was of the Tuatha branch.
I can now root the Taddei/Tatius terms of Sabina Italy (and
their Quirinal Hill of Rome) to the Tuatha Danann (for which
reason I would trace the Curetes, Carians, and Corinthians to
Thoth/Hermes). The Coelius founders of Caelian Hill (of Rome),
on the other hand, I would view as the root of the Fir Bolg, for the
root of the Somerleds/Donalds (who were Fir Bolgs) was in a
"Colla" term: "The Clan Donald... Members of the Clan Colla
left Ulster in early times and settled in Argyle..." (website
below). Another conclusion, therefore, is that Greek Calydonians
and Scottish Caledonians (Picts) should be viewed as Bolgs.
Wouldn't the Colla-branch Danann have been the
Coles/Kyles in Ireland, especially as an alternative name of Kyle
was "Coila," by which I mean to identify Somerled as a Kyle
bloodline? In fact, the district of Kyle was called "Coila Province."
http://members.tripod.com/bob_newcumnock/pontmaps/kyle.html
Somerled (with his wife, Sabina) had a son, Gillecolum,
reflecting the "Colla" term twice. It's therefore interesting that

590
Wikipedia uses "Mael Coluim" to denote Malcolm III, father of
David I. I would therefore view David as Hohen on his mother's
side, and Kyle on his father's side. Both Somerled and his son,
Ranald, named one of their sons, "Alexander," but
houseofnames.com claims that the name was first imported to
Scotland when queen Margaret (David's mother) brought it from
Hungary. Margaret's son, Alexander I (ruled just before David),
had a son named Máel Coluim (Malcolm) who married the sister
of Somerled. This doesn't prove that Malcolm III was a Kyle of the
Somerled line, but it increases the possibility.
Both the Somerled and Donald coats of arms are red and
gold, the colors of Scotland. The Ranald Coat uses the same
designs and colors, but what's extremely interesting is that Ranald
gave birth to Donald, patriarch of the Donalds and MacDonalds,
while those names together evoke Ronald MacDonald with the
red and gold clown suit!! I don't think it's a coincidence.
http://www.geocities.com/judys-space/Vol1/macdonal.htm#Gille%20Bride
Could the terms in the following quote be Irish for "Cohen":
"The Clan Donald is known as the Clan Cholla or Siol Chuinn.
Descended from the Conn of a hundred fights High King of
Ireland..."?
http://www.drobrock.com/genealogy/4726.html
"Conn" is said to mean "hound." He was from Connacht,
thus supporting a Domnann origin. In the third century AD, the
descendants of Conn were yet "Cola."
Somerled's son, Angus, was ruler of Bute and Arran. He had
a son, Seuman, whose daughter Jean married Alexander, fourth
High Steward of Scotland. Alexander' son, James, was fifth High
Steward. James' son, Walter, was sixth, and he married the
daughter of Robert Bruce II to produce the first Stewart king of
Scotland, throne name = Robert Bruce II. Thus the royal Stewarts
descended from Somerled's son, Angus, ruler of Bute and Arran.
This is why the first Stewart king seized Bute, Arran and Ayrshire
when he as king had the opportunity, for the people there had been
his kin.
Somerled is often made the progenitor of the Macdonald
clan, anciently "MacDonnell," from "Clann Domhnaill."
Technically, the first MacDonald was Donald's first son, Angus
Mor (whose mother was Margaret Stewart).
I soon learned that Ruari/Rory, son of Ranald, put forth the
Rory surname, and when I saw that the Rorys use a crowned blue
lion on a silver background, I suspected strongly that this was the
origin of the blue and silver Stewart checks. I then found that
"The original lands ofClan Rueri were in Butte."
http://members.aol.com/Tripmcl/MCCRORY.htmlt

591
A day later, I found solid but not absolute evidence that royal
Stewarts descended from Rory, even though royal Stewarts
descended from Angus, Rory's brother: "Alexander Stewart...He
married Jean MACRORY of Bute."
http://www.geocities.com/janet ariciu/ScottishStewart.html
This was the Jean of the Angusline, mentioned above as the
daughter of Seuman, son of Angus. Yet, she is many times
mentioned online as Jean MacRory. In fact, Angus himself is said
to be "Angus MacRory." I haven't been able to find an explanation
for this inconsistency. The problem is, even the family trees
showing the lineage of "Angus MacRory" link him to Somerled,
and yet Somerled is not shown as a MacRory in those trees, nor is
the mother of Angus shown as a Rory. For example, see the tree at:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/jamesdow/s068/f350160.htm
Now see that the modern symbol of Jerusalem is a blue lion
on silver background. Can this be evidence for Stewart/Rory
importance? Why a blue Star of David on the Israeli flag? If the
Rothschilds did found modern Israel, why not a red lion and a red
Star of David? Could it be that the Stewarts/Rories of Britain's
Zionism movement had more power than the Rothschilds of the
Zionism movement?
In recalling (previous chapter) that the kylesociety.org
website claimed the white lion to be the symbol of the
MacDowells so know that the Dowells are said to be from
,

Somerled's brother, Dubhghall. This name is the origin of the


MacDougals which use the white lion, as well as the black
,

Donald ship, on their Coat. Note that the lion in both surnames is
on a silver background/field. What's interesting is that
houseofnames.com shows "Doull/Doul/Duil/Doule as variations of
"Dowell," evoking Dol, Brittany, where the proto-Stewarts had
been stewards in pre-Conqueror times.
http://www.geocities.com/judys-space/Vol1/macdonal.htm#Seuman
There is a blue lion on North Ayrshire Arms It has the .

(gold) crown and sword as does the blue lion of the Rory Coat.
Therefore, the Rory clan came to rule Ayrshire. But, the question
is, were these Rorys the royal Stewarts that took Ayrshire? The
North Ayrshire Arm also uses the Donald ship, and a leopard head,
while the blue lion holds a fleur de lis. I have yet to trace the
leopard head to a single, original surname. Readers that can help
me to identify symbols, my email address is at end of the Table of
Contents.
To prove again that the Donalds (and therefore the Somerled
dynasty as a whole) descend from Kyles, you can see that the
Donald ship (called the "Black Galley"), because of it's shape, is
an anchor in disguise, as for example the Kyles use on an old Kyle
family crest The same anchor symbol, with serpent entwined, is
.

592
used to this day, as you can see at the houseofnames.com The .

serpent entwined around the cross-shaped shaft of the anchor must


depict the same ancestral bloodline as the red phoenix placed over
the cross-shaped mast of the Macdonald ship. The phoenix in that
case somewhat obscures the cross-shaped mast, and so see that
mast without phoenix on the North Ayrshire Arms .

I must say, however, that while other dragon line families


make no bones about displaying the fact, the Kyle family has been
"shy," and it would appear that they have taken that bent to feign
Christian roots instead. I would now conjecture that the rose
placed centrally on the Rosicrucian cross is the same design under
discussion. It's also clear to me that these symbols represent the
Rus-Hebrew alliance that is the dragon line.
The "black shakefork" on the North Ayrshire Arms is said to
represent be the "Cunningham district" (north part of Ayr), which I
verified at houseofnames.com . But as the Cunningham Cres uses
a unicorn, it may be yet another Somerled/Donald symbol. I know
that the Irish MacDaniel Coat uses the Donald ship while the
Crest uses a red unicorn ("MacDaniel" is an official sept of
"MacDonald"). The Scottish Daniel Coat uses the black Kyle
diamonds, and sports the white unicorn on its Crest. My thinking
is that "Cunningham" was the settlement of that part of the Donald
clan that honored its ancestor, "Conn." On the East Ayrshire Arms,
the black shakefork of the Cunnings is the large and central
feature, but it appears in the quartered coat of the District of Kyle
as well.
The Stewart checks are in another quarter of this coat, but the
article doesn't say that they represent the Stewarts, but rather reads
thus: "This checkered pattern, representing the District of
Kyle, appears on the arms of Ayrshire..." That is, it's as though
there is no difference between the Stewarts and the Kyles, by
which I mean to imply again that the Stewarts proper, and those of
Dol, were proto-MacDonalds (i.e. the Colla = Cole/Kyle). In the
top-left quarter we see the Castle Tioram, the seat of the Ranald-
branch Donalds. In another quarter, there is "a red chevron on
silver for the Carrick district."
Carrick (Ayrshire, Scotland) evokes the Bruces, and so we
find that the Bruce Coat uses a blue lion on silver background in
the coat's chief. However, their non-Stewart side, that of the Brusi
of Annandale, were of red and gold colors, for the original
Ayrshire Arms "showed a red cross and in a chief on gold, the
arms of Bruce, Lord of Annandale." In other words, the
original Ayrshire Arms was essentially a Bruce Coat. The Arms
added two lyres, thus exposing Irish roots (lyres depict Ireland).
The Bruce Coat is centrally a red saltire cross, while the website
says: "a red cross for Ireland."

593
There was a second Carrick in Donegal (Ireland), near
Connacht, which may have been the home of the proto-Bruces. All
this perhaps argues more strongly for Bruce ancestry in the
Donald/Kyle bloodline, which would then make the Bruces
themselves a Cohen bloodline if the Donalds/Kyles were.
It may even be that the red English cross is in honor of Irish-
Scot roots rather than Anglo-Saxon roots, for indeed the English
also use a red lion that is the symbol of Scotland/Wales/Bretons
(Anglo-Saxons were the white dragon). This suggests that the
English-respected entity among the Irish-Scots was in their
ton/Celt/Danann side rather than in their Gael side (the English
Bre
in early-Templar times used a white cross, but then changed it to
red). What is ironic is that the Scots came to honor their Anglo-
Saxon side if indeed I am correct in identifying the white saltire of
the Scottish flag as such.
The South Ayrshire Arms uses the Stewart checks, a blue
lion, and a blue porpoise, and the red chevron of Carrick. The East
Ayrshire Coat uses a white and blue lion (the MacDowell and the
Rory clans respectively). There is also a black diamond that the
website identifies as "coal" (no capital, as though we are being led
to believe that it depicts charcoal rather than king Cole i.e. the
Kyle family does not want to reveal that the diamond depicts king
Cole). But what is important to me are the black and gold checks
in the middle of the coat, said to be "lifted from the arms of the
Boyds family of Kilmarnock" (Boyds were Earls of Kilmarnock)
http://www.kylesociety.org/Kyle_CoatofArms.htm
It was while going through the kylesociety.org website again,
just a couple of days ago to gather information for this chapter,
that I realized the Bute meaning of "Boyd." Then, last night
(August 24), I found a website (arguing against the traditional (and
too-simplistic) derivation of "Boyd" from "blonde") that said the
same:
"It has been observed that the Gaelic word BOID is a
genetive place-name, meaning "of Bute." It seems the family
came to be called 'Boyd' from the Isle of Bute."
http://www.geocities.com/janet_ariciu/ScottishStewart.html
The Boyd checks are red and white (silver) today (on blue
background), and who knows but that the red and silver Hohen
checks derive from the Bute/Boyd-branch Somerleds. In fact, since
the Stewarts apparently borrowed from the Cohen design, not vice
versa, the blue and silver Cohen checks must likewise derive from
the Bute Somerleds (the Rorys). I'm thinking to link the Cohens
and Hohens to the ancestors of Cunnings/Cunns (of Cunningham).
I see that the Cunn Coat uses what appear to be three hounds,
evoking king Conn, and that a variation of "Cunn" is "Queen,"
even as "Queen" was a variation of the "Cuinn" descendants of

594
Conn. Red versus white is common in Irish lore, and one only
needs to identify the blue of Ireland to identify the Cohens there.
Curiously, houseofnames.com roots "Cunn" is "Suibhne,"
and then shows variations of this name to be "Sween/Swan." The
term appears to be a variation of Suebi (a major branch of
Swedes), and as is my theory, the term is rooted in Sheba,
grandson of Abraham, and in the Italian Sabina. Note (near the top
of the website below) that Somerled was first married to "Sabina"
(before re-marrying). The Chaonians of Epirus which I traced to
the Abruzzo region of the Sabina peoples, and then to the
Cenomani and Eburo(vices) Gauls, I would now trace to king
Conn ... known to have had "Heber" ancestors! While Heber (also
Iberian and therefore possibly from the Eburovices) was patriarch
of the Gaels, it is known that Gaels married Irish Celts to form the
DalRiada (that became the Scots).
http://www.geocities.com/judys-space/Vol1/macdonal.htm#Seuman
[Update -- A few days after publishing this chapter, I came
across the Italian city of Brescia in a totally unrelated research
project, and going to the link, I found that it had for its Arms a
blue lion with red claws, which made me read up on the history of
the city. Fortunately, Wikipedia had the ancient histopry, which
said this:
"Brixia is the Latin name of the modern city of Brescia in
Northern Italy. Its location was first settled in the 7th century B.C.
by a tribe of Gauls (themselves part of the Celts), which were the
original inhabitants... The name of the tribe was Cœnomani, and
the name of the city comes from their language"!!! (exclamation
marks mine).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brixia
What's incredible is that the city that the Bruces are traced to,
in Normany, is Bres, alternatively "Brix"!!! The Bruces were
Hebrews from Epirus! And if I'm right about Chaonians being
Cohens, then the blue-and-white-checkered Cohens were probably
from the Bruces, or vice versa. There was another city northern
Italy (South Tyrol), by the name of Brixen, that the following
website says was possibly founded by St. Cassian (4th century),
bishop of Brescia. The article then reveals that “ The diocese [of
Brixen] received many grants from the [Salian/Hohen]
German emperors." The article then says that Frederick I
(Barbarossa), a Hohenstaufen emperor, placed the umbrella of the
empire over the bishopric of Brixen, and together they deposed
pope Gregory VII as part of the Investiture Controversy wherein
the Salian emperors insisted on choosing church leaders (in
opposition to the will of the Gregorian popes). The point is, there
seems to have been a close relationship between the
Salians/Hohens and the proto-Bruces.

595
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02793d.htm
To support my theory that the Bruces originated in the
"Abruzzo" term, or vice versa, the article has this to say: "The
Diocese of Brixen is the continuation of that of Saben-
Sabiona ... The first Bishop of Saben vouched for by
history... appears as suffragan of the Patriarch of Aquileia. 9
Add to this that Abruzzo was in Aquila province of Sabina
territory. It's true that Aquila was not the same geography as
Aquileia, but the latter was in Padua while the houseofnames.com
tells that the Abreu/Abruzzo/Brussi surname was first found in
Padua. The ancient name of this Venetian city was Patavium,
which may be the root of the Batavian (tribe of Catti) of the Rhine
river that I suspect were the Salian Franks of that very region. Are
you with me? The Patavians (of Veneto) were the proto-Bruces
and also the Salian Franks that furnished one Frank side of the
Merovingians and later the Franconian/Salian Cohens/Hohens!
Virgil made Chaon, mythical symbol of the Chaonians, son
of Priam, king of Troy, which is apparently another "Apiru" term
(i.e. as is "Epirus" itself), if not a codeword for "Abraham."
Understand that before I had seen the similarity between "Priam"
and "Abraham," I had already identified Helenus, son of Priam, as
a Sheba peoples. Therefore, I will stick to the view that Helenus
and Chaon depicted branches of Abraham's non-Israelite
grandsons (Sheba and Dedan) by his wife, Keturah (Genesis 25:3).
Rosicrucians are not Israel, not Judah, not David, not Jesus,
but the Kabala of Epirus, living in Greece long before the Israelites
went into exile. And behold what Wikipedia says: "Little else is
known of the Chaonians, except that the men wore white kilts
(which are still used to this day..." (brackets not mine).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himar%C3%AB End Update]
The original Ayrshire Arms (that was a near-copy of the
Bruce Coat) is found on a Kilmarnoch website (below), wherefore
it now seems evident that the red color of the Bruces ties to the red
of the Boyds (to the red of the Donalds, apparently). But as the
Bruce Coat used red and gold colors (instead of the Boyd red and
silver), the Bruces may connect back to the red and gold checks of
the Baring- and Fleming-branch Cohens. Indeed, while the Irish
Fleming Coat uses the red and gold checks, the English Fleming
Coat uses a red chevron, which is also the Carrick-Arms symbol
http://freespace.virgin.net/kilmarnock.org.uk/kilmarnock.html
Here is what I see. The Cohens of Ireland became the Celt
rulers of Bute, Scotland, but afterward parked themselves at the
mouth of the Rhine (around Rotterdam, Netherlands), either as, or
with, the Batavi there. The red-and-gold Cohens became the
Flemings of Flanders. The blue-and-white Cohens spread from
Flanders to Flaad, first-known progenitor of the Stewarts proper.

596
The red-and-silver Cohens became the Salian Franks and later the
Salian Germans that became the Hohens. As it's well known that
the Netherlands were filled with "international bankers" of
Rosicrucian/Illuminati stripes, some of them "Jewish," perhaps
(but not necessarily) the Barings bankers originate there.
My suspicions that the Cohens were Druids (and proto-
Druids -- the Dryas/Dryad peoples -- as far back as the Bessi
Thracians) are supported where the Cohens are identified as Celts.
The Drummonds also became major bankers of London, and so
note that they first lived in Drymen.
The kylesociety.org website exposes four "very rough
drafts of different ideas for [Kyle] shield designs." These show
Kyle roots in the Breton Celts. One draft has red dragon on green
background (in the chief), signifying Wales. Another uses a gold
griffin on blue background. Another uses blue and silver Stewart
checks in chief. A fourth has a white lion outlined in red (on blue
background) in the coat's chief, depicting the MacDowells
(Dougal, son of Somerled). Recall that "The district or ancient
kingdom of Kyle was said to take its name from Coel Hen
[king Cole] the head of a Dark Age British [i.e. Breton]
dynasty..."
http://members.tripod.com/bob_newcumnock/pontmaps/kyle.html
I am considering a tracing of the king-Cole Kyles to Flanders
simply because the pipe that the kylesociety.org website claims to
be a symbol of king Cole appears in the mouth of a black (a
favorite Kyle color) lion -- with red claws -- that is the symbol of
Flanders! The lion can be seen at the Wikipedia article on Flanders
below, or by clicking this red-clawed lion .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flanders
Because the English Maxwell Coat uses a black double-
headed phoenix with red claws, with a black saltire cross as part of
the design. I would venture to identify the Maxwells as a Kyle
bloodline. This is important for my Pollock email correspondent in
that she knows Maxwells to be virtually the same as the first-
recorded Polloks. Note that the Maxwell Crest (above link) uses a
stag, an old Kyle symbol. There is yet more support in the fact that
the Doon Coat uses two headed phoenix, while the kylesociety
website tells that the Doon valley symbol (on the East Ayrshire
Coat is a fir tree; the Fir Bolg and Fir Domnann come to mind, as
)

do the Veres ... the blue-boar peoples that I'm sure are related to the
boar-sporting Pollocks.
Other websites (e.g. below) call the East-Ayrshire fir a pine
tree (same thing). The point is, isn't that a fir/pine tree in the
Maxwell Crest I do believe so. Moreover, the website below
???

shows the white and blue East-Ayrshire lion with red claws.
http://www.heraldry-scotland.co.uk/area_councils/gallery.asp?ID=104

597
Now those who do not know that these symbols relate to the
dragon line will define the fir tree as a symbol of forestry. Look at
the Loudoun Coat and see that it is centrally a large pine tree.
Then look at the variations of that surname and note the "Lothian"
is the first one listed (the god of Lothian was Lot). This now more
than likely traces back to the Ladon peoples. Indeed, for the
daughter of the Greek-myth Ladon (a river in Greece) was
Daphne, and she had as symbol (i.e. she was turned into) a laurel
tree, that being defined as an evergreen tree. The dog beside the
bottom of the pine tree (in the Lothian Coat) may be a benign
depiction of Apollo since Daphne and Apollo had something
going.
The black diamond beside the pine tree in the East-Ayrshire
Arms is called a "lozenge" (apparently very benign) by the
heraldry masters, and when I looked the term up in my dictionary,
it mentioned that it was a heraldry term and rooted it in the French
and Latin, "lapis, -idis stone." That doesn't make sense, unless we
view "lozenge' as secret code for the lapis lazuli gem ... that was a
gem of the ancient Gorgons ... who I think became the Laz peoples
of Caucasia, the very peoples that I root the Ladon dragon in! The
pine tree was sacred to the sun god, Atti(s), from whom the god
Lydus stemmed, the symbol of Lydia.
At the kylesociety page, we can see an old-looking winged
lion that I think depicts Old Cole himself. The lion is shown with a
gold cup that I think refers to the holy-grail line connecting back to
the Latin and Lydian lion, even the Ladon dragon itself. The
website admits that the wings of this old lion refers to "King
Cole's Roman connection." To this I'll now add that north East
Ayrshire is called Kilmarnoch and Loudoun. Wikipedia reports
that Loudoun was named after the god, Lug, who was half
Fomorian and half Danann and therefore depicted a Fomorian-
Danann alliance of Ireland. It is known that this alliance founded
the Isle of Man, but it can be assumed that they moved to other
regions of western Scotland. Of course, I root Lug in the Ligurian
dragon line... essentially the Ladon dragon that furnished the
Etruscans and Latins.
The wings of the lion are the same as the wings of the
dragon, and denote the sun god, which is no doubt why the Kyle
website places a big, bright sun smack beside the lion with chalice.
The "Rosi-Cross" theme of Rosicrucians may just be the same as
the emblem of count Dracula's Order of the Dragon: "Its emblem
was a dragon, wings extended, hanging on a cross."
http://vampires.monstrous.com/dracula.htm
I haven't been able to verify it as yet, but the kylesociety
website asserts that the blue and silver checks originated in "a seal
of Alan, High Steward of Scotland (1177-1204)." On his father's

598
side there was heavy Hesdin blood, and so note that the Hesdin
Coat includes three blue boar heads, on silver background, and a
red chevron. What's more, on Alan's maternal line was the Molle
surname, while the Scottish Molle Coat uses one central blue boar
head on silver background, and a red phoenix on the Crest.

599
FROM MOLECH
TO THE BRUCE-STEWARTS
August 2006

Although I have been led to believe that the first Stewart to


make it to the Scottish throne was Robert Bruce II, the website
below tells that Robert Bruce I was a Stewart on his mother's side,
and Wikipedia tells the same. I didn't know this before, but
knowing now, and that Robert Bruce I was the grandmaster of
Freemasonry, I would conjecture that Freemasonry comes from his
Stewart side. It happened this way: the second earl of Carrick
(Neil) was grandson to the 2nd High Steward of Scotland (yes, a
Stewart proper). Neil/Niall then married the daughter of the 3rd
High Stewar(t), and with her had a daughter, Marjorie, who
married Robert de Brus. With him, Marjorie "brought into this
world five sons and five daughters, of whom the most famous
son was to become King Robert [Bruce] I, 4th Earl of
Carrick."
http://www.baronage.co.uk/bphtm-03/bruce-01.html
Five sons and five daughters? Is that theme cropping up
again? If you have read my previous writings, you will know that I
suspect that combination to be contrived by the parental murder of
some children in order to net five and five. If you think this is
unthinkable, know if you don't already, that this dragon bloodline
is rooted in the infant-sacrificing Sepharvites/Subartu, worshipers
of Molech. Recall my finding that “Pyrrhus Neoptolemy, son of
Achilles, had three sons ... Molossius, Pictus and Pergamon”
(website below).
I made that finding just weeks after rooting
"Molech/Moloch" in the Greek term, "mellaceus" (= honeylike),
which is our "molasses" (details in coming chapters), and so note
that the son of Neoptolemus (with Andromache) was Molossus ! As
Molossus was the brother of Pictus, it just may be that the latter
means, "pectin," not "painted." This all evokes the drink of the
gods, "ambrosia," and I'll bet you that this term secretly refers to
the blood/flesh of sacrificed victims.
Because the mythical Leda, a depiction of the Ladon dragon
peoples themselves, was a Spartan, where that latter term is
essentially "Subartu," a link is expected between Sparta and the

600
Ligurians (north Italy) which Leda depicted. It is my belief that I
am writing this book (i.e. revealing the dragon bloodline) because
I am in a position to recognize the Sparta-to-Liguria link via
Abruzzo, while then connecting it to the Bruce-Stewarts. My
dictionary says that "ambrosia" derives from "brotos" (sounds like
the Latin for "broth"), and ignoring how others define the term, it
sounds to me like the makings of "Abruzzo." The mythical king of
Megara, Nisus, which I suspect was a Dio nysus branch, had
Abrote for a wife, and this latter term may refer to both the drink
of the gods and to the founders of Abruzzo, a region that was
earlier "Aprutium"! I have seen one website that also uses
"Brutium."
If you are familiar with mythology, you will likely know that
Dionysus and Oeneus can both be ascertained as virtually one and
the same "wine" symbol. While it is reported to the public that the
two characters loved wine and wine making, I would suggest that
to the initiated the wine refers to blood (drinking). Knowing now
that Aeneas was allied (i.e. married) to the Sabina, I would have to
conclude that the Oeneus-Abrote marriage referred to the same
peoples that came to Italy as the Aeneas-Sabina alliance, for not
only was Abruzzo a Sabina region, but Oeneus was king of
Aetolia, virtually the same as "Italia." Moreover, Oeneus was the
father of Tydeus, which explains why the patriarch of the Sabina
was "Tatius."
The god of the Sabina was Quirinus. My personal deduction
is that he was Cronus. To support my identification of Cronus as
both Carians and Corinthians, it's known that Megara was a
Corinthian domain, and that it was eventually settled by the
mythical Car, symbol of the Carians. Therefore, the migration of
the Megarian allies, the mythical Abrote, may be viewed as being
in mid-stream to Abruzzo when in Epirus. Because the goddess
Maja was in Abruzzo (as per the Maiella mountains), I would
suggest that she referred to these Carian Megarians. But as Maja
was the daughter of Atlas, I would suggest further that Carian
Megarians were Aetolians (for "Aetolia" and "Atlas" seem the
same). While Tydeus/Tatius (i.e. the Sabina peoples) was son of an
Aetolian king, Wikipedia reports that Aetolians were Curetes. And
so we find that the Sabina peoples of Quirinus were called
"Quirites." These were dragon-important peoples, for they settled
and named one of the seven hills of Rome: Quirinal Hill. Include
this in your picture of Babylon the Great, for Revelation 17 says
that she sits on the seven hills of Rome.
Put it this way, that since Curetes raised Zeus up on Crete,
they were the original Cronus-based peoples that evolved into the
Carians and Corinthians. And as Cronus was the Molech of
Carthage, enter the mythical Dido of Carthage. She can now

601
connect viably to Dodona of Epirus, since Cronus-peoples passed
through that region. As her lover was Aeneas, it now makes more
sense that he was a branch of Oeneus, king of Aetolia. Dido may
even have depicted the same bloodline as was depicted by the
similar term, Tydeus (son of Oeneus), meaning that one Dodona
branch went to settle Carthage while one went to found that Tatius
Sabina.
Or put it this way, that the Oeneus-Tydeus father-son
relationship depicted the same peoples (but of different eras) as the
Aeneas-Dido love affair. For this to be true, it would require that
Oeneus was somehow royal-Tyrian by blood, for Dido was
portrayed as a princess of Tyre, and so see that Oeneus'
grandfather was made "Agenor," a royal-Phoenician mythical
term! One could therefore say that Tyre sat on one of the hills of
Rome, explaining why language describing Old-Testament Tyre is
distinctly comparable to language describing Babylon the Great.
Molossus was the symbol of the peoples of Molosse in
Epirus. Where myth says that Molossus took over the rule of
Epirus when king Helenus died, it means that the Molossians
defeated the Helenus peoples in war, and it may have been this
defeat that sent them, as the Geloni of Herodotus, to live among
the Budini. In this way (if indeed Helenus depicted the proto-
Stewarts) were the Stewarts related to the Bute name (of
Rothesay). I have a feeling that these were the same peoples as the
twins, Aeolus and Boiotus, albeit the latter two were the sea-faring
branch while the Geloni and Budini went continental.
It's no secret that Alans were famous for their large dogs, the
Alano breed, but the same can be said of the Molossians: "...the
Molosse tribe, famous for his watchdogs (a huge dog is still
called in French a molosse" (brackets not mine). We then need to
add into this picture the Neuri, also living amongst the Budini,
who were said (by Herodotus) to have been a wolf-worshiping
peoples. And as the Neuri have been connected to the Slav Rus
(also wolf-worshiping peoples), perhaps they furnished the Rothes
of Rothesay. I have wondered if "Epirus" didn't have the "s" on
"Apiru" to reflect the Hebrew-Rus alliance that I have discovered
in multiple other ways to be the very definition of the dragon
bloodline.
This now makes Chaonia (sounds like "hound"), an Epirus
region just next-west to Molosse see map all the more intriguing
( ),

as a possible proto-Cohen settlement... that should have branched


out into Europe by similar-sounding terms. The Cahoun surname
of Britain comes to mind immediately in that it means Cal-Hound.
The houseofnames.com link (below) shares other "l" versions of
"Cahoun," and moreover says that the name derives from "coil,"
virtually the same derivation as furnished "Cole/Coel." Note that

602
the Cahoun/Calhoun Crest uses a (red) stag's head (the symbol
used by the Kyles)! The Coat uses a wavy black saltire, what
seems to be a disguised version of the cross-bones symbol of
pirates/Templars. It's moreover an inverted Sinclair cross
(Sinclairs were Templars from Roslin, Scotland). Another thing
that comes with "Chaon" and "Cohen" is the codeword,
"quinotaur," the half-bull, half fish origin of the Merovingians.
Perhaps Calydonians should be split into two basic groups,
the hunters and the hunted. The hunters of the boar can be viewed
as those using packs of dogs to fight the boar, and therefore as the
wolf-line Calydonians such as the Calhouns would appear to be.
The English Rothes Crest uses a crowned dog and may thereby
reveal a Rothes-Stewart relationship. As the Scottish-branch
Rothes use a stag on their Coat and Crest, I would root the Rothes
-- and the Kyles, Calhouns, and Caledonians -- in Epirus, and then
ask: who was mythical Molossus' brother, Pictus, as an historical
peoples (besides the Picts)?
Andromache (mother of Molossus) was the daughter of
Eetion, ruler of Troy-region Cilicia, and identical to Iasius (brother
of Dardanus), a founder of the Kabeiri cult ... and therefore
depicting the Daktyloi. This is all the more reason to view
"Molossus" as a Molech symbol, for the Daktyloi were the Curetes
who brought Zeus up on Crete (Curetes were in fact Molech
worshipers, and I've noticed that "Curete" may have furnished
"Carthage" itself). See now that the Daktyloi were depicted in
myth as five sons and five daughters. In that the first Rothschild (a
Hebrew) also had five sons and five daughters, did he become part
of this bloodline and then arrange those numbers? Possibly so, for
he worked for the prince of Hesse-Cassel. Note that Danaus had 50
daughters while Aigyptus had 50 sons. These being the Rhodians,
note that "Rothes" appears to be a version of "Rhodes."
Two days after making the Abruzzo-Molosse connection, I
was speaking to my parents concerning Abruzzo, and she, not
knowing anything about the Molosse topic, mentioned Molise.
When I asked where it was located, I was told that is was
immediately south of Abruzzo! ! Then I learned that the two
regions were one until split in 1963. The pre-Roman peoples of
Molise were bull-worshiping Samnites (Molech was fashioned as a
bull), a branch of the Sabini. To show further connection to the
Molech cult, a Molise-history website connects Spartans to
Molise: "Samnites got their Greek origin from the Spartans as
asserted by the historians Strabone, Plutarc and Dionysious of
Alicarnassus."
http://xoomer.alice.it/davmonac/sanniti/smpeople.html
As my assertion has been that the Sepharvites (of
Mesopotamia) became the Spartans, it now seems apparent that

603
Spartans became the Kabala-Hebrews of Epirus. One can then root
the Sabini as a whole in Spartans of Epirus. It may be a
coincidence but I'll mention it anyway, that the main
Samnite/Sabini tribes included the Carricini (evoking Carrick).
The Spartan connection to Carrick (Scotland) is made otherwise in
that Carrick may trace to Carrick of Ireland, the Gaelic peoples of
which derived from Heber, and they in turn from Iberians of Spain,
while the "Jews" of Spain are (to this day) called Sephardic."
It was Alexander's purpose to advance Hellenism worldwide.
Perhaps Helenus was merely a later version of what peoples were
depicted earlier by "Hellen." As the latter was made father to, not
only Aeolus and Dor, but to "Xuthus" (who I think depicted the
Cutha in Greece but also the proto-Catti of Hesse), Hellen was the
Kabala cult in Greece, and therefore likely named after "Galli."
I'm saying that the Picts/Caledonians/Kyles/etc. of Scotland
were rooted in Hellen, and that they were therefore a branch of
what the Bible calls: Babylon the Great Harlot. For that harlot
depicted the four beasts of Daniel 7, and Alexander was the third
one. The mother of Alexander was a Molossian (which is why
Alexander is rooted in Achilles)! Israel, after Alexander, came
under the wrath of the Hellens when the Seleucids invaded her. I
would suggest that end-time Gog, because he is made an extension
of the Seleucids in Daniel's chapters, 8 and 11, will be of Hellen
blood, perhaps explaining why Revelation 13:2 says that he will be
Greek-like.
How else can we explain the following statement except to
connect the Revelation beast (and harlot) to a sacred Abruzzo
bloodline(s): "Octavianus Augustus, the first Roman emperor,
transformed the Abruzzi territory into the “Regal Quarter."
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=it&u=http://www.abruzzohe
ritage.com/magazine/2002_02/0202_c.htm&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=4&ct=res
ult&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dpretutii%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D
Again, the Patrician bloodline (that was sacred to the first
Roman emperors) was a Sabini bloodline. This bloodline is the
Biblical dragon, which dragon I have rooted in Ladon. As I have
rooted Ladon in the Laz peoples (of Caucasia), note that smack
beside Abruzzo is the region of Lazio! Just as I trace Ladon/Laz to
the Latins, so a version of "Lazio" became "Latium" see location (

of Latium ).

That part of Latium that is north of Abruzzo is Rieti (Latin =


"Reatia"), and may have been proto-Rhaetians/Redones, even as
Rhaetia ("Raeti in Latin) is in Ladin of northern Italy! At an
Italian-language website, the Ladin language is said to be "Rhaeto-
Romansh."As I'm suggesting that the Chaonians of Epirus were
among these peoples as proto-Cohens/Stewarts, so read this: "The
Romans themselves recognised a strong ethnic homogeneity

604
among the neighbouring peoples like the Veneti, Cenomani,
Rhaetians..." See this Gaul map showing the Cenomani removed
to France andsituated next to the Redones. The following website
shows the similarities between coins of the Baiocasse (founders of
Bayeux), Redones and Cenomani; all coins have a horse with
something underneath; the Redones use a wheel underneath.
http://www.writer2001.com/others.htm
There were two other Aulerci peoples besides the Cenomani,
and one were the Eburovices, which some connect to the Eboricum
term that was "York." Indeed, the city of the Eburovices was (and
still is) Evreux (Normandy), and this city's peoples were called
"Ebroicum/Ebroicien." I can agree with those who view these
peoples as Hebrews since I am ready to equate the Cenomani as
Cohens. We are in Vere/Merovingian country here with these
peoples, and I trace the Bruces to them.
Just as the Sabina were identified as Iberi, so the Iberi
founded the "Cat" region of the French-Spanish border (on the
Mediterranean); the Spanish side is Catalonia, and the French side
is Catalon. The Ebro river that runs through Catalonia is
conspicuous, for it is "Ebros" in Greek and "Iberus" in Latin.
Catalon is in the department of Rousillon (Rosellon), ancient home
of the Ruthene see location of Catalon and this now tends to
( ),

root Lothian (Scotland), the region holding Roslin, in the Laetani


"Before the arrival of the Romans, the peolsfCatni:
plains surrounding what is now defined as Barcelona were
populated by peaceful, agrarian people known as the Laetani."
http://www.sidestep.com/travel-
guides/text/europe/spain/barcelona?destId=FR45&narrativeId=FR0045020044
Keep in mind that Iberians became the Irish before the Irish
mixed with older Redones (already in Ireland) to became the
Scots. The website below shows the early Carrick Coat which
included three triplets of certain crosses, called "crosslets fitchée,"
surrounding a single, red chevron. The Kennedy Coat is a virtual
match! Plus, the above link tells that the Kennedy name was first
found in Ayrshire. Note the dolphin as the Kennedy Crest, and in
the Irish (Mac)Donnell Coat The Clinton Coat uses the same
.

crosses (six of them), and they are an integral Donald/Macdonald


symbol (i.e. from Somerled's Ireland).
http://www.baronage.co.uk/bphtm-03/bruce-01.html
It's interesting that the other Democrat President of our
generation was a "Car" name: Carter. The houseofnames.com tells
that this name derived from "cart," but I would point to the
Kartli/Kartvelian Georgians, who were of the (historical) Laz
peoples of Colchis. The Molech cult was insanely huge in
Carthage. The mythical Car (depicting the Carians of Megara,
Greece) is traced easily to the Corinthians, wherefore I would

605
identify Cronus (Zeus' father) as both Carians and Corinthians.
Cronus was Saturn to the Romans, and Saturn was the Molech of
Carthage (and Tyre). That’s how Zeus becomes the Molech cult.
I'm not suggesting, of course, that people with the Carter surname
are infant killers, but I am wondering if Carrick wasn't an
extension of the Carthage cult, which cult is known to have been
of the Hercules peoples that founded western Atlantis. I would
therefore tie the gold cup of Hercules to the blood sacrifices of that
cult.
As you may have guessed, these honey-like terms reveal that
we are dealing with the bee symbol of the dragon bloodline. It may
be relevant that the Kerry Crest (another “Car” term, apparently)
uses a beehive, while the first Kerrys were found in
Montgomeryshire (root = "Gomer"), smack next to Shropshire. As
I root the bee-line in Buz, son of Nahor, I'll keep my eye out for
evidence showing the Shropshire region as a Nahorite/Poseidon
stronghold (remember, Plato made Poseidon the chief patriarch of
western Atlantis).
I found what houseofnames.com claims to be the Italian
Curtis Coat it uses a double-dragon symbol (also inversionf
;

red) that very much evokes the Welsh design. I learned this upon
finding that "Lionel Curtis founded the Royal Institute of
International Affairs in June 1919. A year later its sister
organisation the Council of Foreign Relations was formed in
America. It is perhaps in such organisations that the legacy of
the round table still lives on." The Roundtable, the article also
says, was "designed to promulgate the idea of the formation of
a Federal World Government, based on the unification of the
British Empire and the United States of America." Is that the
two-horned False Prophet that speaks like a dragon?
The "Jewish" Illuminati may be distinguished from the
Roundtable even though the two merged to some degree in
forming the League of Nations. If the Roundtable does trace back
to Arthurian blood, then Nahorite elements are suspected by me.
Cecil Rhodes, who wanted make all of Africa a British colony,
became a principle leader in the Roundtable.
The Dutch Burgh family Coat uses the red triple-chevron
symbol. What blows me away, aside from my own relatives using
this symbol, is that I had married into the Dutch Burger surname!!
These may have been the very Burghs of England that moved to
Ireland and, as rulers of Connacht and Ulster, married into the
royal Stewarts. Jill de Burgh married High Steward, James Stewart
(of the Bute/Rory i.e. blue lion line) to produce the sixth High
Steward, Walter, he in turn being the father of Robert Bruce II.
If you begin at the genealogical website below, where Jill's
father (Walter de Burgh) is found, and if you click his father's lion,

606
and continue to click on the male line, you will end up at
Charlemagne, king of the Franks, and in going further back you
will reach Clovis, king of the Merovingians, the same one who
produced, in another line, the Franco-Germanic Hohen emperors.
Therefore, the royal Stewarts were of the Merovingian dragon line,
but in competition with the Franco-Germanic Merovingians...
where the two may just become, in the end times, the pro-Israeli
Rosicrucians versus the anti-Israeli Rosicrucians, as for example
the Hitler versus Rothschild war of WWII.
http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/cgi-
bin/igm.cgi?op=REG&db=millstr288&id=I125777
I should add that Pergamon, the mythical brother of Pictus,
may have produced the Dutch Burgs/Bergs and/or French
Burghs/Bourgs, even as the modern version of the city is
"Bergama."
The dolphin (Greek = "delphis") symbol is likely a depiction
of Delphi, a Greek cult-city that was earlier Pythos and therefore
the root of the mythical Phaethon depicting the Redones of the
Rhone river. As the Irish-branch MacDonnells (same as
"MacDonald") use the dolphin symbol, the Irish dragon line is
suspect as being rooted in Phaethon ... which in the real world
evokes Piedmont of north Italy. These terms probably go way back
to the founders of the Po river, the "Padus" originally (and further
backet to the Lelegians, perhaps, whose city was Pedasa).
TU^date -- "To obtain Priests for his new [Delphi] cult,
Apollo ecame a Dolphin...”
http://www.goddess.org/vortices/notes/delphi.html End Update]
While seeking the meaning of “Pict” under the dictionary
definition of “pectin,” I saw a roof design on the next page (the
roof of the Supreme Court Building in Washington). The design
was under the definition of “pediment,” and since I am seeking the
derivation of the triple-chevron symbol, where a chevron is said to
be a depiction of a roof, I wondered whether the chevron didn't
derive, and specifically refer to, Piedmont. “Pediment” is defined
in my dictionary as “A broad triangular part above a portico or
door.”
But as was my hunch that the chevron depicted the pyramid,
so the definition tells that “pediment” was earlier “periment,”
where the latter was said (by the dictionary) to be the same as
“pyramid.” My dictionary roots “piedmont” in the same “pedis” (=
foot) as formed “pediment.”
I developed a theory when I saw that the red triple-chevron
was used by Letchworth Garden City. This city was a Socialistic
experiment that failed. No one could own property, everything was
rented, and the government was the father-provider of the peoples.
This so smacks of the Fabian (i.e. Socialist) secret societies created

607
by the Rhodes-Rothschild circle of Illuminatists that the triple-
chevron might be their pet symbol, suggesting affinity with the red
dragon of Wales and/or Taddei elements. I would suggest ties to
the entity depicted by the red of the Welsh and Italian flags (versus
their green color), though I do know that the first Rothschild
(Mayer) changed or added to his Red-Shield symbol, for he later
used "Green Shield" to depict his home.
The symbol connects more-assuredly to Hebrews in that the
French Levi Coat uses a triple-chevron symbol, albeit in this case
black chevrons on gold background, the colors of Flanders and
neighboring Louvain/Leuven. I even found a red triple chevron on
silver background as the Italian Leuven/Leuvel Coat and this is
,

important in that the royal Bruces are traced back to the rulers of
Louvain (modern Leuven)! One must keep in mind that since
Cohens had passed themselves off as Levites, that the Levi
surname in France may have originated in Cohens who changed
their names to Levi (to net respectability that would not otherwise
come to them if they revealed the truth, that they were of the
Khazar Hebrews).
To support a Hebrew basis for the triple-chevron symbol, a
genealogy website says that Taddei is the plural of Taddeo, and
that Taddeo "represents an Aramaic form Thaddai, which is
probably of Hebrew origin..." Moreover, before recognizing that
the symbol belonged to Hebrews, I had learned that it was rife in
Dutch surnames. I have the feeling, therefore, that it became an
Illuminati symbol in this way, where Rosicrucians and/or
international bankers of Holland had used it. The Dutch Berg
Coat uses the red chevron on a gold background, and as we saw in
the previous chapter, these are the colors of the Baring bankers and
of the roots of Flanders itself, the Flemings.
I would suggest that the triple-chevron symbol depicts three
Egyptian-line peoples that moved to Piedmont and then to Celtic
Wales. The finger points sharply to the mythical Danaus of Rhodes
and his brother Aigyptus of Methoni (Greece), the latter no doubt
forming Modena of north-west Italy. Danaus and Aigyptus were
from their father, Belus, while the Celts worshiped a Belus/Bel.
Moreover, Danaus and Aigyptus are known to have been from Io,
a white-cow (Aryan) peoples that may be the root of the Taurini
founders of Turin, Piedmont. The three Helios-descended cities of
Rhodes may just be at the heart of the triple chevron, where the
Welsh Cymri could then derive specifically from the city of
Kamiros, London from Lindos, and the Kyles from Ialysos.
One of my mother’s parents was a Masci
(Meshech/Mushki?), first found in Piedmont. I was reading up on
the Bruces, and found that "the third Robert of Bruce also
known as Robert le Meschin" (website below). The similarity to

608
"Masci" is striking. As I had only theorized that "Brusi" derived in
the Abreu/Abruzzo terms, this appeared as some possible support,
for I knew that there had formed an "Masci-Abreu" surname,
showing an alliance between the two families. Because I suspected
that Evreux (Normandy), named by the Eburovices, was named by
the Abreu peoples, and because the Meschin(es) were also from
Normandy, I started looking for Meschin ties to Evreux ... which
would serve to clinch the Brusi name as an Abreu one, and thereby
tie the Bruces back to the Sabina dragon
http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1427203
I found that Hugh de Kevelioc (6th Earl of Chester) was a
"de Meschines" (website below) who married (1169) the daughter
of Simon III (Montford), earl of Evereux (website below). This
was verification enough to connect the Meschin to Evreux, but I
also noted that "Kevelioc" appears as a caballo = kabala term
http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~cousin/html/p106.htm#i6940
Previous earls of Chester (Cheshire, England) were "le
meschin" back to the fourth earl, who was himself the son of
"Viscount De Bayeux Ranulf de Meschines."
http://www.renderplus.com/hartgen/htm/de-bayeux.htm
Look at the similarities between the Masci and western-
Abreu Coats. The Italian Abreu Coat uses a castle. Then see that
the progenitor of the Bruce surname is thought to have been
Robert of Bruges, the castellan (castle-master) of Bruges, and that
the Bruges Crest uses a castle (the Bruges Coat consists of three
silver griffin heads (signifying the dragon line) on red
background). Notice the "Bruzi" alternative of the Abruzzi
surname at the above link.
As a surname, "Meschin" was first found in Shropshire, and
was related to other families using sea shells on their Coats. One
website says, "Arnulf de Hesdin (now Stewart and Graham)"
(brackets not mine). Others do not make this Arnulf the progenitor
of the Grahams, but the point is, the Graham Coat uses three gold
shells in its so-called "chief," wherefore I would suggest that the
Meschines were Grahams of a sort that moved with the first
Stewarts to Shropshire (before they moved from there to
Renfrew/Ayr). It's interesting that my mother is both a Masci and a
Grimaldi, and that both surnames were first recorded in Piedmont.
I keep seeing evidence that the Lord has chosen me to do this work
because I am able thereby to root these royal snakes in the now
obscure and sparsely-populated region of Abruzzo (my mother's
town of birth), something that may not have occurred to anyone
else. The importance of Abruzzo is a link back to Epirus, from
which point one may trace the dragon easily to specific Greeks and
proto-Greeks.

609
As "Bruges/Brugg" is said to derive from "Brygga" (website
below), the Celt goddess, Brigid, comes to mind, not to mention
the "Bryges" variation of the Phrygians, whom in myth were
depicted by the golden-fleece rider, Phryxus/Phrixes. These terms
may connect with the ancient "Breg" terms of northern Ireland.
http://www.trabel.com/brugge/bruges-history.htm
Now read the following, where the town of the Bruces in
Normandy evokes Phrixes and Evreux:
“The family of Bruce originated from the town of
Brus, modern Brix ... and was founded by one particular
Norman knight by the name of Robert who came across
to England in the wake of the conquest of 1066 and was
granted some manors in Yorkshire by William I [the
Conqueror].”
http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1427203
I would suggest that the "Bruges" term is a variation of
Bryges and/or Evreux, the latter derived from the
"Ebroicum/Ebroicien" version of "Eburovices." But behold that the
first Bruce to cross over to England went to live in York, even as
it's suspected that York (Eboricum) was named by the Ebroicum
(of Evreux). Even as the English boar symbol is said to stem from
"Eboricum" (York), so Brigid (the goddess) is connected to "Torc
Triath, king of boars." Moreover, "Brigit or Brighit ("exalted
one") was the daughter of Dagda (and therefore one of the
Tuatha Dé Danann) and wife of Bres of the Fomorians"
(brackets not mine, italics mine, and do know that there was also a
mythical Bres belonging to the Danann).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigid
From York, the Bruce-proper family moved to Annandale,
when the Bruces be-friended Malcolm III and his son, David I. As
a result of Bruce associations with the Scot throne, Bruces ended
up in Carrick (Ayrshire) to mix with Kyles and Stewarts. What I
would therefore claim is that peoples who were essentially the
same as the Bruces, under mythical code-word, "Bres," were in
Ireland long before the Bruces proper enter history, and yet the
two met in Carrick to produce an important dragon-line entity,
perhaps even the golden-fleece line that was important to such big
names as J.F. Kennedy (and no doubt other Kennedys). As I
showed that the Irish line went from Heber to Conn to Connacht to
Kenneth Alpine (king of the Picts), the Kennedy name (first found
in Ayrshire) may just be a Cohen-derived one. As evidence, recall
that I traced the Cutha to the Catti that became "Hesse" (of Hesse-
Cassel). So now see that the Kennedy Coat and Crest is virtually
identical with the Scottish-branch Cassel Coat and Crest.
Remember, the "fitchée" crosses of these coats is a typical

610
MacDonald/MacDonnell and Carrick symbol. For example, see the
MacDonald Clan Crest here.
I do wonder if "Hesdin" wasn't connected to the
Hesse/Hessen term. The Hesdin Coat uses blue-boar heads on
silver background, these being the Stewart and Cohen colors, but
also the red chevron symbol of Carrick (red chevrons in other
countries may not depict Carrick or Carrick elements). The Hesse
Coat is a large yellow sun god, evoking the English Hast/Haste
Coat with a red sun god. The re's even a "Jewish" Hesse Coat
sporting a dragon with sword.
Just as I found that the Ayrshire and Bute dragon line
branched out to Flanders, so Bruges was in Flanders. And just as
the "international bankers" of Holland are pegged as the money-
guts of the Illuminati, so "In the 14th century Bruges turned also
into an international financial and trading center" (trabel.com
website above). One might consider adding Burgundy to the
Bruges and/or Eburoicum family. Behold that the English
Burges/Burgess Coat uses red and white checks, the Hohen
symbol. Recall that the one Merovingian line became the Hohens
and the other the Burghs of England and Ireland (who contributed
to royal-Stewart blood).
To support a connection between the Taddei triple-chevron
(in red) symbol and the same symbol (in red) of the Dutch Burgs ,

even though they are not of the same country, the Burges Coat
uses three-fingered cross tips (in the chief), seen in the Taddei
Coat which cross-type Ip have yet to root in an original
,

user... although it may root in Clovis in that the fingers appear to be


fleur de lis. The Bouillon Coat uses it, in silver on red background
-- Hohen colors -- and exactly the colors in the chief of the Taddei
coat. (Bouillon is famous due to Godfrey de Bouillon, first
Templar king of Jerusalem).
Robert de Bruges (progenitor of the Bruces) was the son of
Lambert I of Louvain, modern Leuven in Belgic-Flanders. The
Louvain Coat uses a blue lion on gold background, even as the
Burges chief (above) has blue crosses on gold background.
Lambert of Louvain was in turn the son of Reginar III, Count of
Hainaut/Hainault. This city was in Belgium too; see that the
Hainaut Coat is a replica of the Flanders black lion with red pipe
depicting king Cole. The Hainault surname uses the same black
lion. "Hain" is very close to "Hohen/Cohen," by the way. But note
that "Hainaut" is nearly "Kenned(y)." A Scot-Flemish website
confirms that the Bruces were from this ancestry when it writes:
"the counts of Louvain (now Bruce)." The Bruce symbol was
thereby a lion, but, as writes the website: "Robert de Bruce
very properly gave up the Louvain lion to Jocelyn de Louvain,
a senior son of the family, when that prince married the

611
heiress to the Percys; and the saltire, in the colours of
Boulogne, became the mark of Bruce" (a red saltire on gold
background).
http://amg1.net/scotland/flemfam.htm
Having come to understand that the Bruce name derived
from "Aprutium" (Abruzzo), I rolled Pruti-like surnames over in
my head and immediately thought of "Pratt" as a viable alternative.
Upon checking, I found that the Belgium-branch Pratt Coat is
exactly the red saltire on gold background that is the Bruce Coat!
The English-branch Pratt Coat, aside from evoking a Kyle design,
uses innocent little birds (doves, I think) that I often come across
but as yet haven't rooted to a single entity/family. I've known that
the English Blakes use the birds, and that the Irish Blake Coat uses
four diamonds around a red saltire cross (Rosicrucian style). I've
suspected that "Blake" might be a variation of "Pollok"; being
certain that the Polloks stem from Berts, I would suggest that Brut-
and Bert-type names were interchangeable, even as Bridgit (the
Celt Goddess) is said to have "Bright" as an alternative ("bert" is
said to mean "bright").
One can then wonder if "Bert" wasn't a "Brody" variation in
that both use the red Carrick chevron. Having evidence that
"Bruce" was a variation of "Brut," might the Berts and Bruces
have been related accordingly? Was "Lambert" a Bruce term, since
after all the Bruces-proper descend from Lambert I?
In line with Bruce roots in the Eburoicum, the Cheney Coat
also uses the little birds (used by the Pratts, Fords, and Forts), and
this surname might just stem from the Cenomani (Cohen?) Celts,
in that the Cheneys were first recorded in Normandy. Wouldn't it
be something if the Bush clan was from Buz, son of the Hebrew,
Nahor?
Evidence that Brussels (Belgium) was a Bruce entity is in
this Wikipedia statement: "In 1041 the [fledgling] county of
Brussels was taken over by Lambert I of Leuven." Brussels
was central to the formation of the European Union. In fact, the
Western European Union had it's beginnings in the Treaty of
Brussels (1948). Brussels is to this day the seat of the European
Union. "The Treaty of Brussels was signed by the United
Kingdom, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands
on March 17, 1948" (Website below).
Aside from Britain, one could view these first-member
nations as comprising the three frogs that will support Gog one day
(Revelation 16); it's very tempting to view the 10 founding
nations, as depicted on the Western EU flag, as the 10 kings whom
at Armageddon give their support to the beast (Revelation 17), an
idea I have opposed in that I view the beast as a Russian slated to
destroy Europe. I can modify my view, however, for Revelation 17

612
says that the 10 kings will destroy the harlot, which may be
referring to Rome and not all of Europe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western European Union
The point is, "Brussels," also "Bruxells," although said to
derive from "brook," may instead have derived from Brix/Brus and
therefore the Eburoicum peoples after which the Bruces were
named. As they were the ones who named Evreux, so see that
"The names of all other municipalities in the Brussels-Capital
Region are also of Dutch origin, except for Evere, which is of
Celtic origin."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brussels
Aside from reflecting the Vere name, this Evere region
certainly evokes the Evreux Celts. The ramifications, if I am
correct in all this, is that the end-time enemies of Jesus Christ will
be based in the global-politico establishment overseen by a
Kabala-Hebrew cult. It was this cult that Hitler despised, and I am
now beginning to see that it was worthy of being despised, not
because it was Jewish, or Hebrew, but because it has been devoted
to the Dragon. I am not, of course, excusing/justifying the
concentration camps, or implying that all Hebrews who died at
Hitler's hands were of the Kabala cult, or even that they were all
non-Israelite Hebrews.
The granddaughter of Lambert I of Louvain married Eustace
I of Boulogne, and they had for a son, Eustace II, father of
Godfrey de Bouillon. Therefore, one line from Lambert led to the
Bruces, and another to the first Templar king of Jerusalem. This is
now becoming very good evidence that Cohens were behind the
Templar movement. As the Templar cross was red on white, it
would seem better to say that it was a Hohen movement, even as
Hohens (as rulers of Prussia) were behind the Jerusalem Bishopric,
starting in 1842, that was an integral part of the start of modern
Zionism. The Prussian flag uses a black phoenix, the symbol also
of the Hohenstaufens, and of Epirus as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussia
Amazing, that Prussia (Latin = "Borussia") may have been
named after the same peoples that named "Brusi/Bruce," evident in
the Old Prussian version, "Prusa." At the website above you can
see the Prussian Arms, what I view as the Hohen-family plague.
Can you see it? The Hohens and Cohens were from the Cenomani
because the Bruces were the Eburovices/Eburoicum. A larger
Prussian Arms is at:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Preussen.jpg
The Prussia taken over by the Hohens is New Prussia, said to
have borrowed the name of, but not descended from, the Old (i.e.
true) Prussians. But if the Hohens were Bruces, then I would beg
to disagree, since the Bruces should have stemmed from the Old

613
Prussians. In Wikipedia article on Old Prussia, the Lithuanian
version of "Prussia" is "Prusai," very close indeed to "Brusi" (and
"Epirus"). Moreover, the Latin version is said to have been
"Pruteni," a term so close to "Pretani," the Cruithen tribe of Ireland
that furnished the Bretons, that I would now claim to be bang-on
(to my own surprise) when rooting "Britain" to the Brusi/Aprutium
Italians.
Behold also that "Bartians (Barthi, Barti) is an extinct
tribe of Prussians in the land of Barta/Bartia ... [called] "Prousi
i Bartove." Therein should be the relationship between Berts and
Bruces. The "Bartove" term is an alternative of "Bartholemew,"
and houseofnames.com reports that the Bert clan (of Britain) was
named after a(n unidenfied) Bartholemew. There may have been a
Polish branch of Barti Prussians that in Britain became the Pollok
clan. The Wikipedia article on Old Prussia tells that Prussians were
Lithuanians, and this conforms with my findings that we are
dealing with the Laz/Ladon dragon line. This is supported where
the Italian Bert(o) Coat uses nothing but a large griffin.
As this tends to verify a Pollok connection to the Bruces (i.e.
the Bert branch of ruces), note that the English Brech Coat uses
three gold cornucopia!! Both the Berts and Pollock Coats use three
cornucopia. In g with the Saxon ancestry of the first-
recorded Pollock keRTulbert
the Saxon"), the Brechs were from
Anglo-Saxon ancestry, according to houseofnames.com , which
also tells that "Brech" derives from "Braec," not only a feasible
alternative of "Bruce" and "Evreux," but what evokes "Hebraic."
Moreover, I finally found another yellow saltire (aside from the
one used by the Pollocks), and it belongs to the Bryces of
Scotland! If that's not enough the Bryce Coat is a near-replica of
the Bruce Coat, but with the colors revesed. The Bryce Coat may
be a Rosicrucian-style design, where the four pentagrams depict
the four roses on the Rosicrucian saltire (or the four crosses on the
Templar flag).
The Bryce surname was first found in Morayshire, and
because Moray became paired with Ross-shire, see that the green
ring on the Bert Crest is also on the Crest of the Ross-family Coat.
Bert connection to the Barti of Prussia can be paralleled with my
theory that the Andrew at the root of the Ross clan was Andrew,
king of Hungary. Also parallelling this picture is that Moray was a
version of European Moravia, next to Hungary. Behold that the
Moray-family Crest is a green mermaid, no doubt the mythical
Melusine and Milouziana of Vere ancestry. Melusine was given
magic rings as her attributes! It's a good thing that I had recorded
the surname of another family that uses the same mermaid, the
Bebel/Babel family of Germany.

614
The Bebel family was first found in Wurttemburg, and so it
is that modern Baden-Wurttemburg is essentially Hohen-land
Swabia. The Baden flag uses gold and red, the Vere colors. The
Wurttemburg Arms uses the three black lions of the Hohenstaufen
Arms. The Baden-Wurttemburg Arms uses the lions as well, and
on the chief can be seen th Franconian Rake, the black and silver
checks of the Brandenburg Hohenzollerns, and a stag. I think that
since the name, Swabia, survived as the Baden-Wurttemburg area,
that the Hohens were of Sheba (grandson of Abraham and his
wife, Keturah; Genesis 25:3). Let me remind you that Sabazios
was "Saboi", and that, as the founder of the Phrygians, he also
incorporated the peoples depicted by Kybele, high goddess of the
Phrygians. And so now look at the lions and rings attributed to
Kybele.
Then look at the inscription at the bottom of her throne,
where her alternative name, Kybeb, is given, evoking the Bebel
family. Recall also that the Oxford Arms, where Oxford was for
centuries a Vere-ruled domain, uses a green beaver that I
suggested depicts Baber/Bavar/Bauer/Beaver-type
surnames/peoples, as even Babar the green elephant does. I've
already said that Enki, the god of Sumeria, was not the origin of
mermaids, but was called "Babbar." Kybele, in being a version of
Ishtar, was Enki's sister/daughter. Plus, the dragon-line Veres (e.g.
Nicholas de Vere) openly claim to root back to the Sumerian gods.
The point is, the Berts and Rosses, in using the green rings,
show that they stem from Veres, wherefore the same can be said of
the Pollocks. The red ox on the Oxford Coat configures to the
Oxonae Saxons, as I've already pointed out.
The website below says that Walter the Fleming is "now
Seton." It's interesting that a variation of that name is "Sayton,"
that the Seton/Sayton Crest is a green dragon, and that the name
was first recorded in Lothian, what I think was the homeland of a
peoples depicted by Ladon/Lotan, and what I view as the Biblical
dragon line leading to the lamb-like False Prophet. The Sithone
branch of Edones definitely comes to mind as the proto-Setons that
once held Lothian, and Sithones were Svi = Suebi = Sheba.
As I have traced the noble Crichton family of Britain from
the mythical Erichthonius/Erechtheus (king of Athens) that is said
to have been either twin of (the mythical) Butes or Butes himself
(details later), and as I traced the Crichtons further to the Cruithin
of Ireland (details later), we should perhaps expect some Crichton
involvement in the Bute-Cohen bloodline: "...a fitting home for a
family that as the Crichton-Stuarts were soon to add the
Marquis of Bute to their collection of titles"
(memberstripod.com website above).

615
The Rory branch of Somerled , rulers of Bute, use a blue
lion on silver background (probably connected to the blue lion of
Leuven). And so see now that:
"The Creighton arms, although never fully
researched, remains a silver shield with a rampant blue
lion displaying red talons, teeth and tongue. The
Creighton crest is a standing green dragon, wings
unfurled, spouting fire from its mouth. These base units
of the family arms have remained constant since the time
of the Norman Conquest of 1066, or before."
http://www.geocities.com/creighton_ca/Banners.html
As these Crichton symbols pre-date the birth of Rory, son of
Ranald, son of Somerled, the symbols probably stem from the
Scots/Irish. Consider that Brigid (the goddess) was mother to
Creidhne, an obvious depiction of the Cruithne/Cruithin,
obviously, wherefore one or the other, or both, the blue lion and
green dragon, may depict the Cruithne. Because the blue lion
appears also in Leuven, it appears that the peoples depicted by
"Brigit" were the same as the Bruges region of Flanders, even as
Bruges was early, "Brygga." As Rory's mother is unknown, it may
be that she was of the blue lion that came to depict the MacRorys.
The blue lion seems to have been the predominant Crichton
symbol, even as it's used on the Marquis of Bute Arms.
The website above also shares this important point:
"Out of all of the Scottish families who carry the
right to an official coat of arms, only those of Stewart,
Bruce, Creighton (Crichton), Lyon, Ross, Maitland,
Cumming, Lundin, Middleton, Vans and Young bear a
rampant lion in either their arms or family crest. All have
direct family, marital or service ties to one of the early
royal houses of Scotland, or England."
The Ross clan uses a silver lion on red. The Lyons Coat
uses a green lion. That's interesting/novel. But it's the Van name
that I am most interested in, because it is the root, apparently, of
the gold and red checks...in that the entire Coat is nothing but
those checks. This is comparable to the Hohen and Cohen coats!!
"Van" is the alternative of "Vaux," and so note the English
Vaux/Van Coat . This name is from Normandy, and is apparently
a variation of Evereux, according to the Wells website below,
which website has this to say:
“This early a branch of Vaux is found in Provence,
and then allied to most of the Sovereigns of Europe ... the
most illustrious family of Vaux, a potent race...as early as

616
794, and recognized as one of the most illustrious in
history”
http://www.geocities.com/lhumphrey.geo/coljwel.htm
Provence is the Italian-French border, home of the ancient
Ligurians. See the dolphin that is a main symbol on the Arms and
Flag of the French region of Provence-Alps Note what appears to
.

be Stewart checks as the water under the red phoenix, and also
consider how this phoenix, sitting on three hills, evokes the
Province of Aquila Arms the capital of Abruzzo. It may be a
,

coincidence, but the black eagle that is the City of Aquila Arms
reflects the same as in the Vaux Crest What is probably not a
.

coincidence is that the red and gold stripes of the Provence-Alps


Arms are the Vaux colors.
The Vaux term was used in Normandy, but was also "Baux,"
evolving to "Vance" in Ireland. As I conjectured that "Morbihan"
was probably "MorBigan" at one point, it may be that the
Vaux/Baux peoples were somehow related in that the Morbihan
founded Vannes (Brittany). A Vance website has some key
revelations that reveal the Baux of southern France as Rosicrucians
of the Septimanian kind. Septimanians were in-part Goths living in
France, and the idea that Jesus married Mary Magdalene originates
in Septimania:
"Historians of France and England are reasonably
certain the Vances are descendants of the Baltic Goth
tribes of northern Europe ... The Vances descend from a
Baltic Goth family who overtook an ancient fortress in
southern France after they [conquered Rome temporarily
in 410] ... The de Bauxs were feudal overlords owning
seventy-nine villages and towns, mostly located along the
Rhone River from Marseille north to near Lyon. One
author says of them
'The Princes of Les Baux were a barbaric race, ...
with wild mountain blood in their veins. Their association
with Christianity was certainly not of a very intimate
kind. They were a blind, bloodstained race, believing in
violence and retaliation...'"
http://matsonfamily.net/WelchAncestry/family_vance.htm
And yet they thought of themselves as Christians, but were
obviously of a slippery, Gnostic kind:
"The de Bauxs also claim descendancy from the
Magi King, Balthazar, one of the wise men following the
star to Bethlehem upon the birth of Jesus. To make sure
everyone understood their relationship to Balthazar and

617
the birth of Jesus, the de Bauxs carried the symbol of the
star of Bethlehem on the arms and armor they bore in
tournaments as well as in battle. It was also on their coins
and in wall hangings decorating their castle."
Wouldn't that be the Rosicrucian star? Wouldn't these
peoples have made false claims in efforts to elevate themselves in
the eyes of others? And, yes, a Wikipedia article on Septimania,
having links to previous Goth rulers of the region, shows that they
descended from the Goths who sacked Rome in 410. It's also
telling that one Vere website, in giving possible origins of "the
Vere star," wherein one could make a Vere-Vaux connection, has
this to say: "Alternately the single silver star on the Vere arms
may represent the Star seen by the Magi, as described in the
Gospels."
http://www.earlofoxford.com/eo00.htm
The Goth wave into the west contributed to the makings of
the Merovingian Franks, and included the Sicambrian and
Burgundian Franks from Bude, Hungary. The Goth ruler of
Septimania married the daughter of Clovis, and in coming years
the two peoples formed further alliances.
My point here is to connect the red and gold checks (of
Vaux/Baux) to Rosicrucians/Merovingians and therefore to
Hebrew elements, for I am of the opinion that the checks belong to
yet other of the Cohen family of names. It may be that all Cohen
families were of Goth elements, even as the Stewarts claim descent
from Anglo-Saxons. The Edones come to mind, of course, as these
are the ones I have been tracing across Europe, the ones who I
identify as the Hebrew-Rus peoples, the ones who ruled Lothian,
the Druids, etc. In fact, the houseofnames.com website reports that
the Vaux/Van clan was recorded first of all in East Lothian. I
would look to the Vaux name to account for much of
Rosicrucianism. See location of Septimania in of Languedoc-
Roussillon, the ancient homeland of the Redones and Catalonian
Iberians. Wikipedia gives a concise version of the holy-grail hoax,
and I'll exclude some parts to make it even shorter:
“The area of Septimania started showing up in
popular culture after the publication of the 1982
pseudohistorical book Holy Blood Holy Grail and the
later fame around the related 2003 bestselling novel, The
Da Vinci Code... In Holy Blood Holy Grail, the claim was
made that as part of the territory disputes around
Septimania in the 8th century, a small Jewish kingdom
was established by Charles Martel's son Pippin the
Younger ... The installed ruler was allegedly a man named
Aymery, who, when received into the ranks of Frankish

618
nobility, took the name Theodoric, or Thierry ... with the
book claiming that he was possibly of Merovingian
descent, or may have been a native of Baghdad who was
descended from Babylonian Jews during the Babylonian
captivity...
The book further stated that Theodoric was
recognized by both Pepin and the caliph of Baghdad as
'the seed of the royal house of David', and married a
woman named Alda, who was an aunt to
Charlemagne ... Theodoric ruled the principality, and this
crown was later given to his son, William of Gellone...
The reason for the book's claims, was an attempt to
prove a blood link between the House of David and
Frankish royalty, specifically the Merovingians, as a way
of showing that the Merovingians were the descendants of
a bloodline starting with the child of Jesus and Mary
Magdalene. However, it was later shown that many of the
medieval documents which the book's authors had relied
upon for research, were actually forgeries which had
been produced as part of the Priory of Sion
hoax http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septimania ).
If the tracing by some of Godfrey de Bouillon back to
William of Gellone is accurate, then because the Bouillon cross is
identical to the Taddei cross, it may be that the Theodoric above
(Gellone's father) was from the Taddei-family of surnames,
especially as "Taddei" has been interpreted by some as a variation
of "Theodore." Moreover, "Tudor" is said to be a variation of
"Theodore."
The sort of reported things that were taking place were from
the elite of the elites: "Guilhem founded a Benedictine
monastery in the valley of Gellone. Charlemagne helped to get
it off to a good start by donating a holy relic, a chunk of the
True Cross."
http://www.ruecaterine.com/Booklet/Dark.html
It's interesting that the Marquis of Baux (Provence) is today a
Title possessed by the Grimaldi rulers of Monaco. I have been
wondering whether the red and silver diamonds that are the
Grimaldi symbol aren't a variation of the Hohen squares. I would
venture to say, yes. That makes me a Hohen in part, but who
cares? It's the blood of Jesus that counts for anything in anyone,
which blood is not a physical liquid, but the Act upon the Cross
done in my stead. If I have that blood, I also have eyes, and a life
within, unknown to those who don't. If I have that blood, I will

619
escape death. Anyone who honors Jesus may have the same.
Anyone who honors the dragon bloodline will not escape death.
Do not be deceived, that bloodline is not from Israel.
For further reading tying the Rhone-Redones to the particular
Picts that became the French Veres see the Update now midway
through my "Vere-v Interestink" chapter.

620
IT WAS A GOOD DAY
FOR COHEN SALIAN
July 2006

Nicholas de Vere admits what I have been claiming in this


book, that the Illuminati wants us to believe that it has a right to
rule the world in the name of God and of the Israeli/Biblical
Millennium: "The Dragons - and in the King James Version of the
Holy Bible - the Daughters of the Owl (Lilith), are therefore -
according to Isaiah - the true children of God; "A Chosen
Generation, a Royal Priesthood, an Holy Nation, a Peculiar
People..." "Astaroth is Ishtar, who was a draconian relation of
Lilith the dragon queen, the ancestral grandmother of the
Tuadha de Danaan ... "
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/organisations/Bohemian_Grove_symbolism.htm
In Isaiah 34:15, the Hebrew for "owl" is "liylyth/lilith," but
there was also a mythical Lilith that Vere refers to, a demonic
character that was an infant thief. I have a theory that many
children are abducted even today for human-sacrifice purposes,
and by now you may have read that the Bohemian Grove conducts
human sacrifices (whether using real persons or dummies is not
known) before an owl called "Moloch." The latter was a god
(mentioned also in the Bible) to which parents sacrificed their own
children.
You will note that Nicholas attaches Lilith to the Danann
peoples from which the Veres stem. Recall from a previous
chapter (Vere-y Interestink) that I had suggested a Vere connection
to the Celt mythical character, Lot/Lud, founder of Lothian (where
Edinburgh/Roslin is found), and that I pegged this character as the
Greek Ladon dragon. Recall also that I had connected Ladon to the
seven-headed Lotan dragon of Syria, and that Lotan was the name
of a literal son of Seir (Genesis 36:20). All this is to now say that
these terms may all root in Lot (Abraham's nephew), whom God
found to be righteous enough to save from Sodom's destruction.
However, Lot's descendants, the Ammonites, were those who
worshipped Molech, but as the Sepharvites are said to have
sacrificed their children to the fire (2 Kings 17:31), it is reason to

621
view Lot's ancestors as the Sepharvites, these peoples being the
basis of the Kabala and Rosicrucian dragon cult.
The mythical Lot/Lud was a Breton/Welsh peoples, and so
note that the Welsh called Nominoe, "Tad de Vro," which I think
means "Tad of Vere," especially as Nominoe came to rule Vere
domains in Brittany and Anjou. Note that Nicholas uses a
"Tuadha" spelling above, instead of the common "Tuatha de
Danann," possible revealing that Nominoe/Tad was of Danann
ancestry. And of course I can't help but re-mention the Taddei
surname of Italy that I am tracing to Wales, for it could now
appear that the Taddei name evolved into "Tuatha." This could
then reveal that the red triple chevron symbol was a Danaan
symbol, possibly referring to the mythical Triopas, and/or the three
Rhodian cities under Kerkaphos ancestry.
It is the belief of some that the Veres were successful
Merovingians after the Merovingian dynasty came to a
close ... when the "Holy" Roman empire went into the hands of
Merovingian traitors, the Carolingian Franks. Not long afterward,
the Roman empire went into the hands of the Salian Dynasty, "a
dynasty of Germanic kings, also known as the Frankish
dynasty after the family's origin and role as dukes of
Franconia." This was a continuation of the Salian Franks, and
appears to have been a Vere dynasty for the following reasons, and
if true, then the Veres were rulers in Franconia... this having special
meaning to me if I am correct in connecting my own bloodline to
Franconia.
All the kings of the German Salian dynasty were Roman
emperors. The dynasty was founded by Werner of Worms, this
evoking the Vere breed of dragons known as "wyvern." I found
that the Worm Crest is a green wyvern dragon with two front feet.
Is it also a coincidence that the Vere dragon is green? The above
link says that "Worm" is German for "snake/dragon." I can't make
out the animal on the Worm Coat.
Werner's son was Conrad the Red, whose grandson in turn
was pope Gregory V, a fine example of the dragon line installing
their own blood on the papal throne. The page that displays the
Conrad Coat says that the name drives from "kuehn im rat," but
as often happens, the definitions given by the houseofnames.com
are considered by me as ridiculous, definitions that I think were
created and publicized by family leaders to keep us in the dark. As
you can see by the many Conrad variations (e.g. Konrad, Konrath,
Konrat), the "kuehn im rat,"phrase is probably translated Red
Cohenim. This will become more apparent below, but note also the
red background in the Conrad Coat.
The Werner Coat uses six red roses, as does the German
Bute Coat .

622
Now look at this statement: "The four Salian kings -
Conrad II, Henry III, Henry IV, and Henry V - who ruled the
Holy Roman Empire as kings from 1024 to 1125."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salian
Because the first Hohenstauffen emperor was Conrad III
(succeeded Henry V), grandson of Henry IV above, the Salian
emperors are suspected by me to have be en Cohens/Hohens of
some sort. Note the blue and white checkered pattern on the rooves
of houses in this 13th century painting of Conrad III suggesting
,

that an alliance with the Cohens existed at that time.


The Salians stem from the so-called "Conradines" beginning
with Conrad, father of Conrad I, duke of Franconia. The sister of
the latter gave birth to Conrad the Red and the Salian dynasty. In
that the Conrad name was taken by the forthcoming Hohen
emperor, Conrad III, wouldn't that imply that the Salians were
related to the Hohens, if not Hohens themselves. Indeed, this coat
of Conrad II (a Salian) used red checks on the roof, while red
checks are a Hohen symbol. See a genealogical chart of the Salian
dynasty The Salian dynasty goes back through the male line of
.

Werner of Worms to Rudolph of Franconia (born 820ish).


Some say that Agatha of Germany/ Hungary, the mother of
queen Margaret of Scotland, was the niece of Henry III, and/or the
wife of Conrad II, and/or the wife of king Stephen of Hungary.
There is a high probability, therefore, that Margaret was of
Salian/Franconian genes, and also a Vere if the Salians were
Veres. Because Margaret's son (David I of Scotland) made the
Stewart family great, and because I have found that Stewarts were
from the Cohen surname, I suspect that Margaret was a Stewart
herself, from the Franconian kings. Henry V, the last Salian
emperor, married Margaret's granddaughter, the daughter of Henry
I (of England) the Sinclair.
After the last Salian king died, there arose from that
bloodline the Hohenstaufen, who, because they were named after
their Swabian castle, Staufen," can be viewed more simply as
"Hohens." Wouldn't that be a version of "Cohen"??? Some
Hohenstaufens became emperors of Germany, and others dukes of
Swabia. The German version of "Swabia" is "Schwaben,"
linguistically rooted in "Suebi," and so I will repeat that these
terms are possibly rooted in Sheba, grandson of Abraham. Note
that the German region of Baden was in Swabia, and that the
German Bute name using six red roses may be related to that
region's name, and that these may have been the Budini and Neuri,
from Abraham's nephew and brother, Buz and his father, Nahor.
(see Hohenstaufen Coat )

When the last Hohenstaufen was gone, a power struggle


arose between another Hohen family (the Hohenzollerns), the

623
Habsburgs, and the rulers of Baden. Note that the Baden-town
Coat uses Vere colors. I suspect that the future German-royal
promoters ("Illuminated Despots") of the Age of Illumination were
forming in these parts; eastern Swabia is where Bavaria and the
Bavarian Illuminati would form. On this map of Baden-
Wurttemburg, what remains of Swabia is in pink; Bavaria is the
non-colored region to the east.
Hohenzollerns ruled from Zollern castle on the summit of a
mountain. They originated in the city of Hechingen at the foot of
the mountain. This was merely the pro-Catholic Hohenzollern
branch (and therefore not the proto-Rosicrucian branch). The non-
Catholic Franconian branch came to rule Brandenburg (1415) ,
which in turn created Prussia, which in turn created the German
empire (1871). "Zollern" derives from Tassilo von Zolorin. "The
accepted origin of the counts of Zollern is that they are derived
from the Burchardinger dynasty. Burkhard I (until 1061)"
(website above).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hohenzollern
The German Burkhard Coat uses a Negroid head on the
crest, a symbol of the Moors, and a Moor head appears on the
present Pope's Papal Coat ... that also uses a boar! What is that, Mr.
Pope? Why do you wear red shoes? Note the two keys as the papal
symbol, that it was the main symbol on the coat of Gregory V
whileasoprngAmfPusia,whcIloeyt
Hohen-family plaque in that the black phoenix that is the central
feature of the Coat is the Hohenstaufen Arms, while the red
phoenix on a red and white background that is the Brandenburg
is the second-most important. The third-most important Coat Arms
is the black-and-silver quadrant Coat (situated just above the red
and silver checks), created by the Hohenzollern, Frederick I
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg
The above website tells that Frederick II Hohenzollern
created for the duchy of Pomerania a red griffin on white
background symbol, which can be seen on the Pomeranian plaque,
it having some distinct style similarities with the Hohen plaque,
especially the two men that evoke a naked Adam in Eden. While
black and white checks are reknown as a Freemasonic symbol, so
we can see (on the Pomerania plaque) the Rosicrucian cross
surrounded by four roses. A new element is here seen, gold and
blue checks, that I have yet to identify ... but will assume that they
belong to yet another Cohen branch. Other symbols of these
plaques are revealed at the website above. A larger/expandable
version of the Prussian/Hohen plaque is available at
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Preussen.jpg
Note also the shell symbol (on the Papal Coat) that I want
badly to identify. The shell appears to depict a kept secret, since

624
it's closed. It obviously has nothing to do with Jesus. I should also
mention that the papal cap (seen in the Coat) is thought by some to
be a fish-head, as in depicting a fish line. The fish design is more
obvious in a side view of the cap, because the cap is as-though
sliced in two so as to form a fish's open mouth. As Catholic
bishops wear this fish-hat, it's pertinent that my dictionary roots
"bishop" in "biscop," where that seems very much to be a variation
of "pesce/pisces." Houseofnames.com says that surnames like
Pesce/Pescara were first found in Venice.
To show some evidence that the Hohen name was a variation
of "Cohen," see that the German Hohen Coat is a replica of the
German Cohen Coat but with red and silver checks instead of the
Cohen/Stewart blue and silver checks.
The formation of Brandenburg-Prussia in the hands of the
Hohenzollerns was a major breakthrough in the dragon-infested
Pomeranian region ( see map and Coats of Prussia ). "The
Margrave of Brandenburg held the ceremonial title of Arch-
Chamberlain of the [Roman] Empire. From 1417 on, the title
was vested in the House of Hohenzollern" (see red phoenix on
the Electors of Brandenburg Coat ).
http://en.wikipedia.or /wiki/Elector of Brandenburg
Shortly after ward (in 1442), the house of Hohenzollern
united with the house of Macklenburg, the latter being by ethnicity
of the Wend branch of Obotrites/Obodrites (German and Polish
versions respectively were "Abodriten" and "Obodryci"), which
just may have been the Butes bloodline as "Butes" means
"house/abode." Indeed, the Hungarian and Slavic versions were
"Bodrog" and "Bodrici."
As Wends were Slavs, while some say the Slavs derived
from the Neuri, the Obodrites may just have been of Buz, son of
Nahor. The Avvites come to mind in the Abod/Obod root of the
terms, especially as Avvites, like the Neuri, worshiped wolves. I
think I'm making, not only a Nahor to Avvite link, but an Avvite
link to the Vandals/Wends, and of course to the house of
Macklenburg. It now seems irresistible to connect the Obodrites
became the Batavians (I read that as Bat-Avi) that I had, previous
to creating this chapter, interpreted as both Buz-branch Avvites
and proto-Salian/proto-Merovingian Franks. See that the
Mechlenburg flag uses a crowned bull, and recall that the Oxford
Coat used a red bull when Oxford was ruled by Veres. The griffin
on the Mechlenburg flag depicts Rostock.
The Hohenzollern who joined Brandenburg to (the ducal)
Prussia was John Sigismund, and so when I checked the
Sigismund Coat I found three six -pointed stars (not quite the
common "stars of David"), remembering that the Vere five-pointed
(pentagram) star was initially a six-pointed one. The Sigismund

625
Crest uses a single arrow (the Rothschilds?), and two
cornucopia... positioned as the horns of the arrow so that the arrow
depicts a horned animal. Recall from another chapter that heraldry
connected the Rothschilds to the Bute name, and so now see that
the English Bute Coat also uses the same six-pointed stars (in
gold), and a horse on the Crest.
The German Bute Coat uses six red roses but also a central
fish. So now look at the Irish Keen Coat and see a fish, a horse,
and three six-pointed stars. The Kane/Cain Coat has three fish (on
green background). The Werner Crest using two wings with a
pentagram between them has got to show Werner kinship with the
Brent surname in that the Brent Crest uses the same two wings in
the same position but with a wyvern dragon-head between them
instead of the pentagram. We can know the dragon head is of a
wyvern-type dragon because the Brent Coat shows a wyvern
dragon fully (defined as a winged dragon with only two feet
(birdlike) and a pointed tail. Clearly, the Veres were part of the
Werner Salian (i.e. Franconian) dynasty, and I would say that
Veres continued up to the Brandenburg branch of Hohenzollerns
(descendants of Werner) since it appears that "Brent" furnished
"Brandenburg." Do you see an owl head in the Brand Crest ?

Behold that the German Branden Coat uses just two wings
on red background, and that these are the very two wings on the
red Masci Coat My mother is a Masci! Then look at this
.

Franconia Coat and compare to the Grimaldi Coat and the


Monaco Arms (Monaco is owned/ruled by Grimaldis, and my
mother is a Grimaldi). Moreover, look first at the Scottish Weir
Coat and statements to see that the Weir name is a version of
"Vere" (note the gold boar on the crest), and then see the red and
silver diamonds also in the Irish Weir Coat !!
I'm not done because my grandmother was a Taddei, and as
the Berger Coat of Holland uses the same red triple chevron
design (on gold background) as the Taddei Coat, so now look at
the German Berger page and read that "the Berger family
emerged as Brandenburg-Prussia" ! I can't quite understand that
statement unless it means that the Hohens were in reality Bergers,
which would then connect the Cohens somehow to the Berger (and
perhaps to the Taddei) red triple chevron. Note that the
Berger/Burger Coat of Germany is similar, using three red
horizontal stipes on a gold background, showing kinship to the
Dutch Bergers.
The English Burger page says that the surname derived
from the German Bergers, and as you can see the English Coat
uses a gold spread phoenix with three arrow heads. On the
Bergman page we read that the family lived between
,

Brandenburg and Prussia, and who knows but that the "Burg"

626
ending on "Brandenburg" is from the Berg family. I've noted that
the Bergman Crest uses a black wolf! The Swedish Bergman
Coat uses an eight-spoke wheel, which appears on the Hohen
plaque. Were these the wheel-line Redones/Rus, since the wheel
line was depicted by Apollo and was therefore also the wolf line?
The Bergman Coat also uses a single arrow (in the blue field), a
symbol of the Rothschilds and their kin.
In the lower right of the Hohen plaque is the red triple
chevron symbol, and above it is a white cross very much like the
one on the Taddei Coat To the left are the red and white Hohen
.

checks, next to the red and white Grimaldi diamonds. The red
hearts next to the red checks are found on the Buttar/Butter Coat .

Just as the hearts of the Buttar Coat are surrounding a black cross,
so there we see it above the red checks in the plaque. The red bull
is above the black cross. See the ermine design (signifying
Brittany) in the lining of the drapery. See that the drapery is
covering two horns, of the devil I'm sure, but quite likely that of
the bull, Molech.
During Mayer Rothschild's lifetime (the first Rothschild), the
king of Prussia was the "illuminated" Frederick II the Great, and
he was, yes, still a Brandenburg Hohenzollern. This line attempted
and succeeded, in 1840, of installing a Bishop of Jerusalem office.
However, it was an effort in conjunction with English royalty, and
under the supervision of the Anglican church. It had been my
opinion, covered in a coming chapter (The Jews' Society), that the
Rothschilds were involved in this plot, since Rothschilds
simultaneously re-settled Israel during that Prussia-England
Bishopric effort, thus putting in motion the modern-Zionist wheels
that put Israel on the map with a Kabala "Star of David" as its flag.
Mayer served another Frederick, landgrave/ruler of Hesse-
Cassel, and he traces down through rulers of Hesse and into the
dukes of Brabant, and earlier yet to Henry III of Leuven (1085/86 -
1095). I saw that "Leuven" might be a version of "Levi," and so I
checked out the Leuven Coat of Arms, and my jaw dropped when I
saw that the Italian Leuven Coat was the red triple chevron (on
silver background)! And the German Leuven Coat uses two
wings alone!! Apparently, the Leuven family was related to the
Branden (and Masci) family that likely named Brandenburg. It's
interesting that the "the title "Duke of Brabant" was created by
the German Emperor Frederick Barbarossa in favor of Henry
I, son of Godfrey III of Leuven."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke of Brabant
Barbarossa was a Hohen staufen, Tor which reason the
Leuvens and the Brabant rulers may have been Cohen/Stewart-
family members. The French Brabant Coat uses two cornucopia;
the surname traces to the Brabant rulers, says the link above.

627
Cornucopia trace back to the Sabina Italians, and my feelers tell
me that this pack of names under consideration are connected to
the Bruce name that stems from Abruzzo (of Sabina territory). The
English Brabant Coat uses three white roses on a red
banner/background, but a red rose on its Crest; the English branch
also traces to the Brabant rulers.
Henry II of Brabant and Leuven then traces back to the
counts of Hainault (I've been following the family tree at the
website below). "The counts of Hainault had several historical
connections with the counts of Flanders and Holland." Note the
city of Bergen in this map of Hainault for the Dutch Berg(er)
,

surname uses the red triple-chevron. The Hainault family was first
found in Belgium, and as the Bruce (Brusi) kings trace to Lambert
I of Louvain (Leuven), might they have named the Belgian capital,
Brussels? Might they have named Prussia too?
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~jamesdow/s092/f035025.htm
Within an hour of writing the above paragraph, I found that
the Flanders Coat uses the triple-chevron symbol!! See the
symbol at the Hainault website below (the second-listed website).
This important, for the chevron are black ("sable") on gold ("Or"),
the very design of the French Levi Coat ! I read that the duchess
!

of Flanders, Margaret, used a Coat of "Chevronny or and sable."


"Chevronny" is defined at the third website as multiple chevrons.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count of Hainaut
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_II_of_Flanders
http://www.aragon10.free-online.co.uk/dictionary/Chevronny.htm
Armed with this knowledge of what the multiple-chevron
symbol is called, finally, I can do some pin-pointed searches. I
found that one heraldry-correct phrase for the triple chevron is:
"Or, three chevrons gules" (where "gules" is "red" and "Or" is
the gold "field" i.e. background). The following is for your better
understanding:
"You asked whether 'Chevronelly gules and Or' is
an appropriate set of arms for a man in 13th century
Scotland. Here's what we've found.
In an earlier letter, we explained that heraldic arms
were used in Scotland in your period only by Norman
settlers, so we'll focus on that culture...If you try to
register this design with the SCA College of Arms, you
may find that it is too similar to the historical arms of the
English family Clare, Earls of Gloucester, 'Or, three
chevrons gules'. If you do, we'd be happy to help you
choose a different design that avoids conflicts... [In the
footnote we read the following]: "A field chevronelly has
partial chevrons cut off by the top of the field...as far as

628
we know three chevrons and chevronelly were not
considered equivalent by period heralds. Indeed, it is
significant that the Clare arms were changed from
chevronny to three chevrons."
http://www.panix.com/~gabriel/public-bin/showfinal.cgi/2221.txt
Apparently, the multiple-chevron symbol is important
enough to identify certain (important) families (important to pago-
heraldry, that is) that one can't use that symbol today merely out of
fancy. Here's an example of Chevronny .

Take a look at the red triple-chevron on gold Clare Coat ,

and then ask if the Clares were related to the Claros that were later
the Sinclairs? The above link does not make any Clare connection
to the Sinclairs, but one never knows. The Italian Claro Coat
uses a single sun, and the page says that the (Italian) Claro name
derives from "clear," as does the Norman Claro name (that became
the Sinclairs).
Theuestion then is, is there absolutely no connection
between a Family using three red chevron on a gold field and a
family (i.e. the Taddei) using three red chevron on a blue field? If
there is a connection, do the Taddei descend from the Clare/Rollo
Normans, or vice versa?
The first-recorded Clare dates only to the 11th century. And
in the single following sentence I believe there is the explanation
for the red-chevron-on-gold-field connection between the Clares
and the Burgs: "Edward I’s daughter, Joan of Acre, married
Gilbert "the Red, and it was their son, yet another Gilbert,
who was killed in 1314. His sister, Elizabeth de Burgh,
inherited the Clare lands, and her granddaughter married
Lionel of Clarence, son of Edward III." Behold that the
Clarence Coat uses two red chevron on gold field. But this
symbol also belongs to the Laren/Laurin/etc. surname that is
evident in "Clarence." One of the major septs of MacLaren are the
MacRorys of Bute from whom the royal Stewarts (in-part)
descend. The MacRorys were from the Irish-Scots.
One Richard de Clare who invaded Ireland was nicknamed
"Strongbow." The Clare family, though settled in Suffolk
(England), were ruling also in the Welsh Marches, defined loosely
as the border regions between Wales and England, especially
Shropshire and sometimes Flintshire. Clare the Strongbow was a
power in this border region. Some of the Welsh archers who joined
him in the invasion of Ireland came to be surnamed "Walsh," and
so see that the Irish Walsh Coat uses three arrow heads (about a
single red chevron), and that all the arrow symbols connected to
the Rothschild families that I cite in another chapter ("Codes of
Arms") probably trace to the Strongbownian Clares! I see that the

629
Walsh/Welsh Crest uses a swan shot through by an arrow, the
Swan being a Stewart symbol.
The largest MacLaren septs are the Pattersons, named after
"Patrick," and this of course evokes the patron "saint" of Ireland
(Patrick), who I think may trace back to the Patricians of the
Sabina dragon bloodline. In that the Patterson Coat and Crest
use swans, a tie with Liguria is feasible, especially Savona, which
appears to be a variation of Sabina. That is, the swan symbol is a
Sabina symbol. The Irish Patterson Coat uses a green lion, which
I found to be the symbol of the Lyon surname. Houseofnames.com
tells that the Lyon surname of Britain is from Lyons-la-Foret (in
Eure, Normandy). This green lion may be entertained as the green
dragon belonging to the Veres and Crichtons. Another sept of the
MacLarens is the Wright surname, the Scottish branch using the
Stewart blue and silver checks, and the English branch using the
blue and silver stripes of the Lusignan Arms .

Lusignan (western France) was the domain of the mythical


Melusine, the snake-woman (probably having a green serpent tail),
whom I suspect was the mythical Milouziana of Vere-roots (i.e.
Pict-root) importance (see my chapter, Vere-Y Interestink, for
details). Melusine's mother was made, "Pressina" (of Scotland),
which evokes Bres (of Brigit-related Celt myth), whom I think
refers to the proto-Brusi/Bruces. In fact, "Pressina" evokes Epirus,
the Greek location that I trace the Bruces (and Picts) to. It's also
possible to derive "Vere" from "Pres/Bres."
I was happy to find that Melusine's husband belonged to a
mountain called, Brandelois (website below), for that term
alongside "Pressina" evokes Brandenburg-Prussia ... the kingdom
formed and ruled by the Hohens! In other words, the Melusine
myth was invented by someone(s) who knew that the Hohens of
Brandenburg-Prussia traced back to the Vere Melusine peoples of
Pictish Scotland. It is almost irresistible, therefore, to find Hohen
roots in the Irish peoples at the roots of the Picts. As I mentioned
in the previous chapter that the Cohen name was in the Conn terms
of Ireland, so the Irish-branch Coyne/Cohen surname was first
found in Connacht, and is said to derive from the Gaelic,
"Caoine/Chaoine."
The Lady of the Lake, a mythical character of Avalon that
has been identified by some as Melusine, should prove to be the
Milouziana Veres. The Lady adopted Lancelot as a boy, wherefore
there was a Lancelot-Vere alliance. As the Lady has been
identified further with Thetis, the fish-woman of Greek myth and
mother of Achilles, it's easy for me to identify the Lady (and the
Veres) as the Epirus peoples furnished by Achilles. As she was the
protector of the Excalibur sword, she lived in the midst of the
dragon line from the Halys river, who I tend to identify as Helios,

630
or, in the real world, the Halybes/Khaldi = Celts. In a coming
chapter I share that the Bruces from Epirus became the Cenomani
and Eburovices Celts that named Brescia/Brixia of north Italy.
With so much emphasis on Laz/Ladon terms, and especially
as the god of Lothian (Scotland) was Lot, I suddenly realize that
the English mythical codeword, "Lancelot," should be understood
as Lance-Lot (I found that others are way ahead of me on this).
Red-rose Lancaster/Lancashire comes to mind.
The Coyne/Cohen Coat uses the so-called "ermine"
background, the symbol of Vannes, Brittany, and also other parts
of Brittany. But the Coat also uses the Stewart blue and silver
colors; the Stewarts were rulers in Brittany before working under
the royal Scots. Since the German Cohens use the blue and silver
Stewart checks, it's fairly clear that the Irish Cohens had been the
Stewarts of Brittany.
When the Templars had to chose a king for Jerusalem upon
successfully conquering the city (1099), the choices were Godfrey
de Bouillon and Raymond de Saint-Giles. And so behold the
English Giles Coat using three swans (in the Chief portion of the
Coat) and four gold cups (holy grails?) around a cross. That design
is essentially identical to the Templar flag using four small crosses
around a large central cross, or the Rosicrucian cross of the
Andreaes family surrounded by four roses.
Note the Scottish Anderson Coat using two blue boar heads
and two pentagrams in the same fashion (around a Sinclair-like
Scottish Cross), and therefore connecting very likely to the Vere
blue boar and Vere pentagram. The Anderson surname is said at
the above link to derive from the Greek "Andreas." Do consider
that "Flanders" is perhaps to be understood as Fil-Anders (son of
Anders), and that the Scottish flag, called "Andrew's Cross," is not
named after the apostle of Jesus as claimed, but the same Anders
that is the root of the blue-boar Anderson and/or Flanders term. I
would suggest king Andrew of Hungary, whom queen Margaret of
Scotland lived with in her and his exile; Andrew was in exile
because Samuel Aba (a Khazar) was then ruling Hungary (Aba =
Avvite???).
I just found that the white cross mentioned earlier, found on
the Hohen/Brandenburg plaque, is the only symbol on the
Bouillon Coat (with red background)!! In fact, the Bouillon cross
is exactly that in the Taddei Coat. Why does the Taddei Coat have
two such crosses, and which family used the symbol first of all.
Note that each end of the cross evokes a Fleur de Lis. The link
roots the Bouillon surname in Auvergne, today Aveyron (Avviy-
Ron???). "...according to a thirteenth-century chronicler,
[Godfrey] was born at Baisy, in Brabant; see Haigneré,
Mémoires lus à la Sorbonne, Paris, 1868, 213"

631
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06624b.htm
Could "Bowles" (as per the husband of Camilla Parker
Bowles) be a version of Bouillon (variations are Bouille/Bouile).
The Bowles Crest uses the two wings used by the Brents and
Werners, but with a black boar head between them. The Bowles
Coat uses three black boars like the Bush/Booth Coats.
The same bloodline (the one who Mayer Rothschild served)
traces further back to the counts of Massgua (could that be the
origin of the Masci surname)? Gainfroi of Massgua married
Theidlindis (of Blois), who traces further back to the "Bert"
Merovingians of Austrasia: Dagobert and his father Sigisbert ... and
then back to Clovis and the mythical Merovee! This was the line
that Mayer Bauer served, under whom he became the first
Rothschild, and under whom he partook in the public formation of
the Bavarian Illuminati, the Illuminati that formed the United
States of America, that gave America her eagle symbol, and many
other Kabala/Gogi/dragon symbols.
That's why America is ruled to a great extent by a few
"Jews," but they are not Jews; they are dragon-line Hebrews who
got into the Christian game to use us for our money, and to distort
our doctrines simultaneously, as the devil got into Judaism via the
Pharisees installed by king Herod of Sepphoris (Samaria). America
is thereby a twisted-Christian country, a perfect breeding ground
for to give birth to the dragon-speaker False Prophet.
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/jamesdow/s073/f560414.htm
Our "king" derives from "koning," which looks like a
"Cohen" variation. Was Europe (i.e. the Roman Empire divided by
clay and iron) ruled by Cohen blood?? If so, expect a Cohen False
Prophet, and perhaps also a Russian Cohen to act as the anti-
Christ. These persons are spelled like so: NOT JEWISH, NOT
ISRAELITE, BUT DRAGON HEBREW

632
WHO PICT GREEN FOR LOTHIAN?
September 2006

Just as it was beginning to appear as though Britain was, to a


large degree, a Cohen-ruled land, I started to research the Grimaldi
family, seeking evidence that it's red and silver diamond pattern
was an alternative to the red and silver Hohen checks. I had good
reason to suspect a family connection because both the checks and
diamonds appear side by side on the Hohen-family plaque
(technically the Prussian Arms).
During this investigation, I was shocked to learn that the very
flag of England was borrowed from Genoa -- in fact, it was a
replica of the Genoan flag:
"The flag of Genoa is the St. George's flag, a red cross on
a white field, exactly the same of England. The flag of Genoa
was adopted by England and the City of London in 1190..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genoa
To what extent early England was related to the Grimaldis, I
do not know, but it is a fact that Genoa was ruled by Grimaldis:
"The House of Grimaldi is associated with the history of the
Republic of Genoa and of the Principality of Monaco" (see the
Arms of Monaco and Grimaldi Coat ).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House of Grimaldi
Why is this fact not made known_on_most
websites sharing
English-flag origins? Is it unimportant? Are the English ashamed
of Genoa? The crucial importance so far as this book goes is that
Genoa was Liguria. I had been making the claims that the British
Celts stemmed from Liguria; that Liguria is the swan symbol used
by Stewarts and some of their septs; that Liguria is the root of the
Irish/Danaan god, Lug; that Liguria stems from the mythical Leda
(the symbol of the Ladon dragon); and that Liguria was founded
by Gogi peoples who removed to Britain. Only after making those
assertions did I find that the very English flag was borrowed from
Genoa. See the griffins representing Genoa .

The symbol of Genoa consists also of Grimaldi monks


concealing swords under their robes. Is it truly Christianity when
the sword is made its proud symbol? The dragon/griffin, in a
secondary way, is also a proud symbol of victory in war, the
coming to power via bloodshed. These were not defenders of their
lands, but attackers, not happy to melt into a society and be content
with being a positive contribution; like cultists, they had to rule

633
and be looked up to, and to have free access to the goods of all
others, as when a cultist desires and seeks the women of his cult,
married or not.
After realizing years ago that the British Celts were Gorgons
and Gogi from Georgia, I could not ignore the possibility that the
English flag was given "George" as a pet name to secretly indicate
those very peoples (Georgian peoples to this day call themselves
"Gogi"). Consider that the patron saint of Freemasonry is St.
Alban, a real person just like other patron saints, but that his name
just happens to be the early name of Britain so that Freemasons
can value that ancestry rather than Christianity whenever they use
the term:
“St. Alban, the first patron of Britain's medieval
stonemasons ... A gold saltire on a blue field
represents... Freemasonry's most ancient traditions and
further alludes to Alban...”
http://www.magnolialodge.org/blazon.php
The article goes on to say that the blue color is the
"traditional masonic blue. As I think the "G" on the Masonic
compass and square logo refers to Gog, so I have also come to
learn that "kok/gok" means "blue." Those of you who are learned
in ancient history know that the "Alba" term (meaning white
(skin)) stems from Caucasia. Consider this quote that not only
connects England to Georgia, but to the Templars:
"The 'five-cross flag' [of Georgia] has been used
since at least the 13th century. The central element of the
flag is St. George's cross (still used as the national flag of
England), who is the patron saint of Georgia. According
to the Georgian scholar Giorgi Gabeskiria, the four extra
crosses were probably added during the reign of George
V of Georgia... Around that time, the new [five-cross]
design was adopted as a variant of the Jerusalem cross, a
symbol used by crusaders in the Holy Land, which
likewise used a large central cross with four smaller
"crosslets" in the four quadrants. The crosses are said to
have represented the five Holy Wounds of Christ..."
Oh ya, the wounds of Jesus, sure. Snakes know no honor,
and the Freemasons at the root of English royalty were so pathetic
in blood-stained acts that they could only alleviate their guilt by
feigning brotherhood with Jesus, as though thinking that Jesus
tolerated their acts of war in the name of the holy Kingdom of God
on earth. The fact is, England was a Gogi nation, but with a strong
element of Kabala Hebrew blood that wanted to take Israel unto
itself.

634
Did Jesus suffer five wounds so that Templars could seize
the world by bloodshed, cunning, financial control, empire-hood,
and heavy taxation? Is that what Jesus commanded, to kill our
enemies ruthlessly; to grow in riches by expanding our borders in
holy war, to make the Cross a symbol of a Rosicrucian sword?
Sounds just like the extremist Muslims of today, and I do think
that God is bringing them on to pay the West back as she deserves.
If you're a Christian and this offends you, then whose side
are you on? Do you have the illusion that America and/or Britain
is God's nation? Have you not understood that the so-called
"Christian-base" of these countries has been built with
Freemasonic bricks? The end-result was predictable. These nations
have not become sinful today by chance; their leaders have made it
that way by design. America's leaders (with some exceptions) were
sinful from the very start, yet over much history their sinful ways
were suppressed because they needed to feign Christianity and/or
high standards on par with Christian principles, fearing loss of
political power otherwise. The same is done to this day, yet the
leaders have learned to promote sin via social-engineering organs
that appear disconnected to the political leadership. In other words,
the leaders are behind the schemes, but act as though they can do
nothing to curb the tide of porn, abortion, etc.
There are several clues that connect George to the Russian
theater, including this: "Moscow has probably more sculptures
of St. George slaying the dragon than any other city."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._George
Let's face it, George did not become re-known just because
he killed a large lizard. In the "report," the dragon had been daily
eating the children of a certain kingdom, and George saved the
king's daughter when by lot it became her turn to be sacrificed.
Obviously, this is a mythical story, and smacks of a Molech
(infant-sacrificing) cult. Indeed, as Molech sacrifices were rife in
Carthage (in ancient Libya), so we find that the dragon and the
princess were located at the city of Selene in Libya. Selene was the
moon goddess, sister of Helios. As I interpret Helios as the
Gorgons of the Halys river that populated Rhodes with the same, I
would view the Molech cult of Libya as belonging to a Helios-
Gorgon peoples, and having some Rhodian colors, which cult
thereby translates to the rose line of Rosicrucianism.
Note that Selene may have been named after the Latin "salt,"
for the Halys river was named after the Greek "haly" = sea/salt.
The reason that she is given a Latin name is forthcoming. In other
words, Selene depicted that Halys-branch Helios peoples,
wherefore she was the Excalibur sword (symbol of the Halybes)
coming to Britain. But not before moving across the
Mediterranean to western Italy, Aeneas style. That is, as Aeneas

635
was placed in Carthage prior to forming the Romans (in
conjunction with an alliance with the Latins), the Selene peoples of
Carthage likely moved to western Italy in the same way (prior to
the Aeneas wave, that is), and I would venture to say this wave
was the one that formed the Latins of Italy in the first place. This is
in keeping with Latin origins in Caucasia, for it is known that
Colchians and Halybes were the same peoples.
The identification of the Selene dragon as the Latins is
evidenced by Selene's associated with Mount Latmus. This
location was in the Miletus environs, a city (of Asia Minor) that
was origin to the Irish Gaels ... which is not to say that Gaels are to
be identified necessarily as the Selene dragon, for she may have
been a wave of Miletus peoples that came to Libya earlier than the
Gaels. I identify Selene as the Picts, for she was in love at Mount
Latmus with Endymion, the progenitor of the Greek Calydonians.
The myth of St. George thus serves to reveal that the Pictish
Caledonians came to Britain by way of Carthage, which
perspective would greatly support my theory made otherwise, that
Picts were a fundamental Molech-worshipin4 peoples. As Molech
was a furnace topped with a bull head, so `The art of the Picts
suggests the presence of a bull cult at Burghead, Moray. A cave at
Covesea suggests the existence of human sacrifice...”
http://www.geocities.com/mariamnephilemon/names/europa/picts.html
The website above inadvertently adds more support for an
Endymion/Greek-Calydon connection when saying that the "tribal
name [of the Picts in Orkney] was perhaps Orcoi or Orci, meaning
'Boar People.'" It then says that among Pict tribes were the
Cornavii and Damnonii, for which reason we can assume a
connection back to the Danann (i.e. Dumnonii) of Atlantean
Cornwall (who became the Fir-Domnann i.e. proto MacDonalds of
Ireland). While the Cornavii are located in northeast Scotand on-
shore of Orkney, the Cornovii are known to have been in
Shropshire and other Welsh-border regions, and had as one of their
cities Viroconium (Wroxester) ... what I suspect were Vere and/or
Bruce entities. Also mentioned are the Votadini, who became the
peoples of Pictish king, Cunedda, who ruled in Lothian..
While I was writing this chapter, a certain Sinclair that had
just then contacted me online, a Mason, insisted that Lothian
(Scotland) derived from the Picts. Therefore, I am more impressed
to entertain Pict and Lothian origins from Miletus and Latmus. As
Endymion depicted a peoples of Elis prior to moving to Latmus, it
makes me assert that the dragon-line peoples who named the
Ladon river in Elis were related to founders of Latmus, and that
Miletus was inhabited with the same.
Because myth writers revealed a strong Selene-Endymion
alliance, the two peoples are suspect as having moved together to

636
north Africa. Though the Irish and Scots claim that their ancestors
from Miletus came by way of north Africa, I would yet resist
identifying Gaels as the Selene-Endymion alliance. Instead, I
would view the alliance as the north-African Gorgons that
contributed to the early inhabitants of western Atlantis.
As I was in the throws of trying to understand whether
Lothian was founded by Latins of Italy or Latmus peoples from
Libya, I came across an ancient report by Apollonius Rhodius
(below) that indicated the latter, for I view the mythical Ladon
dragon, situated in the Hesperide apple garden (some say this was
Avalon), as the Lothian peoples:
"They [the Argonauts] found the sacred plot where,
till the day before, the serpent Ladon, a son of the Libyan
soil, had kept watch over the golden apples in the Garden
of Atlas."
http://www.theoi.com/Ther/DrakonHesperios.html
There is a myth version where the Argo ship sails, not only
to Colchis, but by Scandinavia and Britain, and across the entire
length of the Mediterranean. This never happened, of course, but
the meaning seems clear enough, that the peoples depicted by the
Argo crew settled the coastlines of Scandinavia, Britain, and who
knows where else. Argyll (Scotland) definitely comes to mind as
one of their major settlements, where the island of Bute is located.
Frisia also comes to mind as a variation of "Phrixus," the rider of
the golden fleece. Place-names using "Brix/Bres" also come to
mind (i.e. the Bruces and proto-Bruces going back to Epirus). One
may then ask if the Argonauts were not the "frogs" all around the
Mediterranean pond.
Remember, the Argonauts are revealed as Calydonians (who
hunted the Calydonian boar), for which reason I identify
Argonauts as proto-Picts. On board the Argo were Atalantis and
Meleager, the two who "killed" the boar. I had tried several times
previous to understand what "Meleager" depicted, but failed. I did,
however, come to believe to my satisfaction that he was made
father of Parthenopeus because he was a depiction of the
Parthalons of Ireland ... who then became the Pretani/Bretons. There
was "another" Atalantis of Greek myth, the father (Schoeneus) of
whom was the son of Athamas, the father of Phrixus, wherefore
one could view the Phrixus people as becoming the Atlanteans. I'll
also mention that "Schoeneus" could have depicted the Sequani at
the head of the Rhine... leading to the Frisians at the river's mouth?
As the Argonauts were said to be Minyans, might they have
been the Minoans of Crete ... and therefore the Britomartis and/or
Curetes of Crete? It seems logical to me that the Curetes became
the Cruithin of Ireland, and as some say that "Cruithin" was Q-Celt

637
for "Pretani," it just may be that they were the Britomartis branch
of Curetes. It's conceivable that "Parthalon" changed to "Cruithin"
with the coming to Ireland of the (Q-Celt) Gaels, but then changed
back to P-Celt "Pretani" on the main British island.
Could it be that "Minyae" modified to "Manx"? Could the
ship symbol of the MacDonalds be the argo ship...since the
MacDonalds stemmed from Irish Danann while those Danann fled
Ireland and founded Manx (i.e. the Isle of Man)...on the same side
of Scotland as Argyll? I strongly suspect ties to the Menapii, who
were not only the peoples of Manx, but also of north-east Ireland
(where the MacDonalds/Danann were) and the mouth of the Rhine
where the Frisians were!! This may then suggest that the Minyae,
and Orchomenos (Greece) where they lived, were ancestral to the
Menapii. The Orkney islands come to mind, especially as they
were anciently "Orkos." That term is said to mean "boar" in
Gaelic.
It was a theory of mine that the term should be viewed as
Men-Bee or Men-Boi or Men-Boiotia, and so note that
Orchomenos was in Boiotia. This supports my viewing the island
of Bute as Boitia-founded, and moreover adds to my suspicion that
"Bute" was a version of "Buz(ite)" (sons of Nahor). If it can be
shown that the Argonuats were Hros, it could explain why Bute
was earlier "Rothesey."
As Frisians are said by many to have been the ancestors of
the Salian side of Merovingians, therein (in the Menapii) may be
the holy golden bees of Clovis and forthcoming French kings ... the
same as the golden fleece. But not before passing through the bee
regions of Italy as the Poseidon/Atlas peoples, especially at
Positano and nearby Naples (the Appianee /B Way led to Naples).
It may be that Napoleon, who used gold bees prolifically as his
symbol, was named after Naples elements.
Based on the quote above by Apollonius Rhodius, it seems
that the Selene-Endymion alliance was a wave of Calydonians
arriving before the Argonaut wave, that set up Lothian first of all,
to be followed by Argyll and Bute to Lothian's west. As Ladon
was positioned in the "garden of Atlas," one could equate the
Lothians with Atlas and thus place the Picts under the Atlas-
branch Atlantis. This once again shows Pict origins from north-
African Aryans, for Atlas definitely came by way of Libya.
Keep in mind by belief that Poseidon and Atlas were Buzites,
from Nahor. I explained in another chapter that one of Poseidon's
10 sons included Kemuel, third son of Nahor (Nahor had ten sons
too: Genesis 22:20-24). May we ask why the famous city of
Camelot was so termed, by those who knew something, for
signifying the god Lot, symbol of Lothian? Does this connect
Nahor to Lothians? To Latmus? The same question may be asked

638
of "Lancelot," which them connects the Excalibur sword to Lot as
well, suggesting what seems feasible enough, that Latmus was a
Halybes settlement. The Bible makes it clear that Molech worship
was the product of Lot's Ammonite descendants, and as Lot was
Nahor's nephew, it's feasible that Nahorites contributed to the cult.
I therefore find it irresistible to make a Lot-to-Lot link, which may
have been the Latmus-to-Lothian link.
It was only when I got to writing this chapter that I saw a
possible Miletus link to "Meleager." But I realized almost instantly
that Meleager was more likely a depiction of Molech. An hour
later, I saw that the Carthage version of "Molech" was even better,
that being "Melkart" (i.e an almost-perfect match with
"Meleager."). Is this why a hearth of fire is the theme of
Meleager's infancy?
A Rhodes connection to Latmus is expected in that Latmus
was in continental Rhodes. Latmus," by the way, may mean
simply, "Lat dragon," in that "mushu" meant "dragon." The
crescent symbol that I come across on the heraldry of dragon-line
families may now root back to Latmus' moon goddess, showing
that St. George did not kill the dragon after all.
St. George, in becoming a symbol of the Genoans, might just
have depicted the Latin branch (of Latmus)... which had a military
skirmish with, and "killed," their Libyan draco-Gorgon
counterpart. Romans came to despise the Molech cult of Carthage,
and perhaps this is the victory cry of the St. George myth: the
Italian dragon superseding the Libyan dragon. There were many
Georges in history to choose from for using as a depiction of
Georgians in Italy, but the one used was an officer under emperor
Diocletian, wherefore it seems suspicious that this emperor was
from Illyrian blood and king of Moesia see location of Moesia as
(

northern border of Thrace) ... the nation ancestral to the Mysians


and Lydians! I'm suggesting that St. George was "a particular
favourite of his Emperor" (website below) for being of the same
blood. This hardly speaks of a saint, for Diocletian advanced
persecution against Christians. I'm thinking that the story of
George's martyrdom at the hands of Diocletian was fabricated to
make George wildly acceptable to Christendom, a typical tactic of
Rosicrucians to disguise their pagan roots.
http://www.royalsocietyofstgeorge.com/historyofstgeorge.htm
The proto-Picts are suspected by me to have lived in the
Miletus/Caria region because his brother, Pergamon, was the
symbol of a city not far to the north, in Mysia! (See map of
Revelation's seven churches After addressing the churches in
).

two Amazon cities (Ephesus and Smyrna), Jesus addresses


Pergamo, saying "I know where you live, where the throne of
Satan is" (2:13). He then says to Pergamo, "You also have those

639
holding to the similar teachings of the Nicolaitans," a peoples
that Jesus says he hates. Wouldn't "Nicolaitan" (Greek =
"Nikolaiton") be Nico-Lad(on)??? If so, could George have been
one of the Nico-Ladon peoples, since he was made to die a martyr
(by a beheading) in Nicomedia (of Bithynia)?
One website suggests that the "lait" in the term refers to
"laity," but I dunno. My belief that the term should be understood
as Nico-Ladon led me to take notice of another one of the seven
churches, that of Laodicea. While Wikipedia reports that this city
was named after the wife of a king, I see that her name, Laodice,
evokes "Lazica," the land of the Caucasian Laz peoples. Another
letter of Revelation was addressed to Sardis, capital of Lydia.
Pollux was "Polydeuces" (Po-Laodicea?) to the Greeks, and while
the Romans may have changed it to depict the Lugii of th Po river,
it may have originally referred to the Laodiceans who removed to
the Po.
As I was undergoing this part of my investigation, I was
looking for a city that could be the mythical Pictus, and I was
surprised to find that Laodicea (and its surrounding region) was
called Pacatiana. I can't find the origin of the term, or whether it
goes back to pre-Christian times. As the third brother of Pictus and
Pergamon was Molosse, it's interesting that another letter of
Revelation was addressed to Colosse. (Help yourself to BC map
of Asia = 1 megabyte.)
I found an interesting statement in a British-Israeli website
while it was in the throws of equating Spartans with
Jews/Israelites: “Also in Josephus' Antiquities 14:10:22 we read
that the ancestors of the city of PERGAMUS were always
FRIENDS to the JEWS even in the time of Abraham” (I'm not
going to share the website's URL because it ridiculously connects
Israel to everything Satanic and to Greek myth (e.g. Cronus =
Judah), underscoring the importance of this book in combating that
too-common idea). The problem in the above statement is, there
were no Jews, nor Israelites, in the time of Abraham. But there
were Hebrews of Chaldea and Shinar, Abraham being only one.
Does it not make sense that those Hebrews were the dragon cult
who were not merely on friendly terms with Pergamum, but were
the Pergamums themselves? Correct me if I'm wrong, but are not
"Berg" names aften "Jewish" names?
Derived from "dios-Cletos," Diocletian may have been from
the same (Celt?) peoples as depicted by the mythical Cleito,
mother of western Atlantis (At-Lindos?) and wife of Poseidon.
The first son of Cleito and Poseidon was Atlas, a depiction (I've
come to think) of Aetolians removed to Britain. Indeed, Endymion
was the father of Aetolius (symbol of Aetolia), and Aetolius was
ruler of Elis! Surely this was Ladon, even as Ladon was said to be

640
in the "garden of Atlas." Atlas in Britain should therefore prove to
connect with the Ladon peoples of Elis ... but via Italia.
Is it a coincidence that the name of this Christian-killing
emperor is so similar to "Cleodolinda," the name given to the
mythical princess of Libyan Selene (the one about to be sacrificed
to Molech)? It suggests that she depicted a branch of the same
peoples as Diocletian... which can explain why the one who killed
Selene's dragon was made an arm of that emperor. The "linda" part
of "Cleodolinda" may refer to the Lindos branch of Rhodes, and
she may therefore be a depiction of the Celts who named At lantis
and/orL,expligwhyLondartkiusgheS.
George cross of Genoa as a symbol of England.
Logically, St. George could have been valued by the English,
the Genoans, Georgians and Russians because he depicted their
ancestors. We can surmise that he, a knight by the way, depicted a
gnostic/pago-Christian peoples in that the Templars/Crusaders
honored him by wearing his colors and cross. But as his parents
were placed in Cappadocia, he could very well have depicted a
peoples of the Caucasus.
I don't know if it's real or mythical, but St. George is said to
have been born in Lydda (also "Lod" and, in Hebrew, "Ludd"), an
Israeli city about 10 miles south-east of Joppa. Apparently, there
were Ladon peoples in Israel long before the Templars
arrived...meaning that the Crusades may have been the primary
responsibility of Israelite-branch Ladon peoples. The Litani river,
remember, was just a few miles north of 'Tyre, not far from Lydda.
The article above tells that “the lance with which St George slew
the dragon was called Ascalon, named after the city of
Ashkelon in [modern Israel]”. Rosicrucian myth says that St.
George appeared, angel-style, at the Crusade to support the troops.
Because the Vatican supported this Jerusalem war, I can
investigate the possibility of whether the pope of the time was
from a Ladon bloodline. Popes were often installed by emperors,
for when an emperor wants the support of the Christian masses, he
makes his pope acquire that support, as for example Hitler's
government made the pope announce that Hitler was from
"Providence." This is why it is vital for Vatican agents to convince
continually their (very naive) Christian members that the pope
speaks the will of God more than any other human by far.
At the time of the Crusade (1096), the Salian king, Henry IV,
a Cohen of some sort in my opinion, was emperor. He married
Agnes of Poitou, which seems conspicuous in that Poitou had been
founded by Pictones. Remember, I view the priests of the Molech
cult as the "Jews" who came to use "Cohen" as a surname. "Henri"
may itself be a "Conrad" version, and I think it means "red cohen."
Henry III and Henry IV were from Conrad II, the Salian emperor

641
immediately before them. Not only had these emperors the
opportunity to install their own popes, but they insisted upon it.
You've heard that Catholic clergy were infamous for
purchasing their clerical offices (i.e. simony). Well, when pope
Gregory VII started to oppose this infestation, and the clerics who
had been guilty, Henry IV sided with the guilty. At the Synod at
Brixen (1080), he appointed his own (anti)pope (one of those who
had been ousted by Gregory), Guibert of Ravenna (anti-throne
name, Clement III), who crowned Henry the emperor (after Henry
had been excommunicated/dethroned by Gregory). These
established the Archbishopric of Ravenna in opposition to the
Archbishopric of Rome, but do see what sort of sword-wielding
pope Clement was, if this picture tells anything (he's in the middle
next to Henry VI). Thus, when the modern dragons attempt to lay
the blame for simony on Christians, even as they attempt to lay the
blame for most wars on Christians, know that the blame belongs to
the dragon line that forced its way into the "Church."
Clement was the anti-pope during the Crusade (died in
1100), but the Templars (as well as the Normans in southern Italy)
opposed him, and supported pope Urban II instead, who continued
Gregory's reforms against Henry. But when Urban II called for the
Crusade (1095), wasn't he speaking on behalf of the political
powers that held him on his papal throne? Do we imagine that an
anti-pope is Satanic while a pope is Christ-like? Were they not
both of the dragon lines, dragon line verses dragon line? The other
pope Clement III (in the next century, the one considered to be the
"real" pope, versus "anti-pope") said this:
"...just as the moon derives its light from the sun . .
.so too the royal power [of Rome] derives the splendor of
its dignity from the pontifical authority."
http://www.xenos.org/essays/waldo6.htm
Ask yourself if a true Christian leader/bishop (on par with the
12 Apostles) would compare the Roman empire (of Satan) to the
moon upon which Jesus and his Father shine? Clearly, in the mind
of Clement III, Christ ruled on earth via a union of the Vatican
with the Roman emperor. Note that in the papal statement above
may be the definition of sun god versus moon god, where the
moon god refers to a political rulership, while the cohens were the
superior and spiritual leadership.
Assuming that I'm correct in not viewing the true St. George
(of Freemasonry) as the one who supported Diocletian, I conclude,
judging by the name of George's sword, that he was known by the
myth writer(s) to be an Ashkelon peoples. It's possible that the
peoples of this port city (south of Lydda) were descendants of the
Tigris-river Ashkenazi scythians ... whom I suspect merged with

642
Tigris-river Abira-branch Hebrews to produce the Cutha of proto-
Israel's Mediterranean shores (long before the Assyrian exile of
Israel).
In case I didn't make myself clear in previous chapters, or for
those who haven't read them, let me repeat: the Mediterranean
shore of Israel was the homeland of Satan himself, of even the
Zeus/Molech cult, whose branches moved to become the Kabala
cult of Kybele, in Phrygia, Lydia, and continental Rhodes (same as
Caria), which region encompassed the cities that are addressed in
the seven letters of Revelation. This was counterfeit Israel, a
Dagon peoples from the Tigris, and because the Tigris-river
Ashkenazi are thought to have originated in Caucasia, it is another
reason to seek the deepest St. George roots in Georgia. Jesus chose
hard-ball Paul to go into the heart of Satan's Phrygian kingdom,
the same kingdom that had previously wormed its way into Israel's
history to corrupt Christ's bedrock. It was now the turn of Jesus
(through Paul) to press his way into Satan's domain.
The dragon was yet in Israel during the time of Jesus, as the
Pharisees et al. In the seven letters, Jesus says twice (2:9 and 3:9)
that the Pharisees were lying when claiming to be Jews. This is the
true ancestry of Freemasons falsely claiming roots in Judah and
David. Consider that "The Freemasons consider St. George one
of their primary patron saints. The United Grand Lodge of
England holds its annual festival on a day as near as possible
to St. George's Day" (website above). The "Christian" halo
around his head is the sun god, therefore, and Freemasons know it.
George was assigned this Maltese Cross (a Templar symbol)
by the Russian military, but what did George, the servant of
Diocletian, have to do with Russia? Nothing. Russia wasn't even a
nation in Diocletian's time. The true George (the one honored by
initiated Freemasons/Rosicrucians) was not the said servant of
Diocletian, but some other entity merely of the emperor's
bloodline, a Rus bloodline, explaining why Rosicrucians use him
as a symbol. As St. Alban may be honored secretly as Alba, and
the ermine symbol may be honored secretly as Hermes, or the
cross may be honored secretly as a sword, or the rose on the cross
secretly as the Rus and/or the war god, Ares, so George may be
honored secretly as the Georgians. The Hebrew side of George
would thereby point to the Iberi of Georgia.
Recall that I had identified Catalonia and Catalan (on the
French-Spanish border) as Cutha-Hebrew entities, wherefore see
that "On the Iberian peninsula [Spain], George also came to be
considered as patron to the Crown of Catalonia and Aragon."
It's not my idea only that the Caucasian Iberi became the Iberians
of Spain. And it's not my idea only that the Iberians of Spain
founded the Irish proper.

643
I'm going to suggest that the pre-Gael Irish developed from
the Italian Patrician cult (a Sabina bloodline but shared by the
Romans). That is, I suspect that the Patricians were depicted by
Ireland's "patron saint," Patrick. I'm suggesting here that St.
Patrick, like St. Andrew and St. George, is a disguising symbol of
what "Patrick" really means, created by those who were feigning
esteem for the Vatican. I'm also suggesting that the red cross of
Patrick depicted the same red-dragon peoples depicted by St.
George. It's curious that while the St. Patrick cross is red, he is
celebrated to this day with green colors, leading me to connect him
to the green-dragon of Ireland, the same that furnished the green
dragon of the Veres, wherefore the finger points to the proto-Picts.
I'm seeing a Patrick-Pict alliance rather than an equation. Since it
doesn't escape us that "Vere" may have derived from "vert" =
green, I'll add that “Ammianus Marcellinus (4th century) describes
the Picts as divided into two groups, the 'Dicalydones' and
'Verturiones.'”
http://www.tylwythteg.com/pict1.html
The Vere Picts were depicted by Milouziana/Melusine, and
thanks to a tip from an email correspondent, Lorri, I think I may be
able to report to you the Hebrew root of this snake-woman
(sometimes a fish-woman). Lorri left a link to this map of
Mesopotamia . As the Veres claim to come from the Mittani, a
Hurrian peoples centered between the Habur and Euphrates river
(same as Chaldea), see that in the Mittani empire there were the
regions that Lori pointed out, "the Meluiani, Meli & Melidu."
I've got a inkling that Melusine (a version of "Molech"?) was the
green dragon.
Here's an interesting phrase in a Wikipedia article ("List of
Dragons"): "The Green Dragon of Mordiford, of Herefordshire
folklore." Herefordshire is on the Welsh-English border,
next/south to Shropshire. Might Mordi(ford) have been the seat of
Arthur's enemy, Mordred (or Modred)? Note that Mordred's sons,
Melehan and Melou, evoke Milouziana? Behold this statement that
agrees with the Vere-family claim that Milouziana was a Pict:
"According to legend, Arthur's last battle was fought against
Modred, the son of Lot the King of the Picts. Modred was
therefore a Pict."
http://www.legendofkingarthur.com/camlann.htm
That's yet another Pict link to Lot/Lothian.
I'm not only ready to claim that Melusine came by way of
Carthage, but that the Calydonians that she was in real life were
the Kabala Chaldee > Khaldi > Celts > Cleito Atlanteans >
Caledonian Picts. Somewhere in this line I smell the green color of
the dragon. As the Bretons/Welsh, on whose side were Merlin and
Arthur, were also Celts, one could venture to see that they, as the

644
red dragon, were from the same stalk as the green dragon Picts.
See now that the flag of Libya today is nothing but green.
Mordred was associated with Camlann. The website above
continues to say: "The full name for the legendary version
[Camllan] should be the battle of Camallan, which means the
crooked Allan. The battle fought by Arthur and the Picts was
fought somewhere near the river Allan..." (website above).
Although I'm not convinced fully of this view, as the root of
"Camlann" may have been "Camel," not "Cam," I will mention
that the Allan-river region of Scotland begins at the tip of the
Firth of Forth, just around the corner from Lothian (Scottish =
"Lowden"; Gaelic = "Lodainn"). That could be the reason that the
name modified to "Camelot." There were other cities that may be
viewed as having been named by the Camel/Gamil/Hamil(ton)
peoples, including Cameldunum (now Colechester).
In any case, it looks like a myth writer gave "Lot" as the
father of Mordred because he knew that the Mordred peoples were
from ancient Lothians: "[Lothian] takes its name from the semi-
legendary Brythonic King Loth or Lot..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lothian
In the same way, Italy uses red and green, but as yet I have
not been able to identify who's who. But what I can see in the
modern flag of Liguria is that the Republican party (United States)
traces back to Liguria, for isn't that symbol on the flag's red
portion (the Republican color) an elephant (the Republican
symbol)? And are not those four stars on the elephant close enough
to Stars of David, explaining why Republicans (especially so-
called "neo-Cons") are pro-Zionist? Are those stars not
surrounding a red St. George cross, Rosicrucian-cross style?
Georgia-flag style? Templar-cross style?
I would suggest that Liguria traces back predominantly to the
red dragon of the Patricians, and forward to the red-dragon Brits
and then to the Republicans. Here's the elephant that is the
Republican logo .

645
THE RED IRISH HAND IN ABKHAZIA
September 2006

Just as it was beginning to appear as though Britain was, to a


large degree, a Cohen-ruled land, I started to research the Grimaldi
family, seeking evidence that it's red and silver diamond pattern
was an alternative to the red and silver Hohen checks. I had good
reason to suspect a family connection because both the checks and
diamonds appear side by side on the Hohen-family plaque
(technically the Prussian Arms).
During this investigation, I was shocked to learn that the very
flag of England was borrowed from Genoa -- in fact, it was a
replica of the Genoan flag:
"The flag of Genoa is the St. George's flag, a red
cross on a white field, exactly the same of England. The
flag of Genoa was adopted by England and the City of
London in 1190..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genoa
To what extent early England was related to the Grimaldis, I
do not know, but it is a fact that Genoa was ruled by Grimaldis:
"The House of Grimaldi is associated with the history of the
Republic of Genoa and of the Principality of Monaco" (see the
Arms of Monaco and Grimaldi Coat).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House of Grimaldi
Why is this fact not made known_on_most
websites sharing
English-flag origins? Is it unimportant? Are the English ashamed
of Genoa? The crucial importance so far as this book goes is that
Genoa was Liguria. I had been making the claims that the British
Celts stemmed from Liguria; that Liguria is the swan symbol used
by Stewarts and some of their septs; that Liguria is the root of the
Irish/Danaan god, Lug; that Liguria stems from the mythical Leda
(the symbol of the Ladon dragon); and that Liguria was founded
by Gogi peoples who removed to Britain. Only after making those
assertions did I find that the very English flag was borrowed from
Genoa. See the griffins representing Genoa .
The symbol of Genoa consists also of Grimaldi monks
concealing swords under their robes. Is it truly Christianity when
the sword is made its proud symbol? The dragon/griffin, in a
secondary way, is also a proud symbol of victory in war, the

646
coming to power via bloodshed. These were not defenders of their
lands, but attackers, not happy to melt into a society and be content
with being a positive contribution; like cultists, they had to rule
and be looked up to, and to have free access to the goods of all
others, as when a cultist desires and seeks the women of his cult,
married or not.
After realizing years ago that the British Celts were Gorgons
and Gogi from Georgia, I could not ignore the possibility that the
English flag was given "George" as a pet name to secretly indicate
those very peoples (Georgian peoples to this day call themselves
"Gogi"). Consider that the patron saint of Freemasonry is St.
Alban, a real person just like other patron saints, but that his name
just happens to be the early name of Britain so that Freemasons
can value that ancestry rather than Christianity whenever they use
the term:
“St. Alban, the first patron of Britain's medieval
stonemasons ... A gold saltire on a blue field
represents... Freemasonry's most ancient traditions and
further alludes to Alban...”
http://www.magnolialodge.org/blazon.php
The article goes on to say that the blue color is the
"traditional masonic blue. As I think the "G" on the Masonic
compass and square logo refers to Gog, so I have also come to
learn that "kok/gok" means "blue." Those of you who are learned
in ancient history know that the "Alba" term (meaning white
(skin)) stems from Caucasia. Consider this quote that not only
connects England to Georgia, but to the Templars:
"The 'five-cross flag' [of Georgia] has been used
since at least the 13th century. The central element of the
flag is St. George's cross (still used as the national flag of
England), who is the patron saint of Georgia. According
to the Georgian scholar Giorgi Gabeskiria, the four extra
crosses were probably added during the reign of George
V of Georgia... Around that time, the new [five-cross]
design was adopted as a variant of the Jerusalem cross, a
symbol used by crusaders in the Holy Land, which
likewise used a large central cross with four smaller
"crosslets" in the four quadrants. The crosses are said to
have represented the five Holy Wounds of Christ..."
Oh ya, the wounds of Jesus, sure. Snakes know no honor,
and the Freemasons at the root of English royalty were so pathetic
in blood-stained acts that they could only alleviate their guilt by
feigning brotherhood with Jesus, as though thinking that Jesus
tolerated their acts of war in the name of the holy Kingdom of God

647
on earth. The fact is, England was a Gogi nation, but with a strong
element of Kabala Hebrew blood that wanted to take Israel unto
itself.
Did Jesus suffer five wounds so that Templars could seize
the world by bloodshed, cunning, financial control, empire-hood,
and heavy taxation? Is that what Jesus commanded, to kill our
enemies ruthlessly; to grow in riches by expanding our borders in
holy war, to make the Cross a symbol of a Rosicrucian sword?
Sounds just like the extremist Muslims of today, and I do think
that God is bringing them on to pay the West back as she deserves.
If you're a Christian and this offends you, then whose side
are you on? Do you have the illusion that America and/or Britain
is God's nation? Have you not understood that the so-called
"Christian-base" of these countries has been built with
Freemasonic bricks? The end-result was predictable. These nations
have not become sinful today by chance; their leaders have made it
that way by design. America's leaders (with some exceptions) were
sinful from the very start, yet over much history their sinful ways
were suppressed because they needed to feign Christianity and/or
high standards on par with Christian principles, fearing loss of
political power otherwise. The same is done to this day, yet the
leaders have learned to promote sin via social-engineering organs
that appear disconnected to the political leadership. In other words,
the leaders are behind the schemes, but act as though they can do
nothing to curb the tide of porn, abortion, etc.
America has been nothing but the constant quest to push
Christian principles to the side, and to slip in sin insidiously, to the
secret (but now open) gloating of the majority. God is not
preparing to pour burning debris upon them for nothing; it's a
necessary evil so that sin, which is always harmful to a society,
does not win the day. The sinners stand on individual rights and
ignore the good of society in the meantime. Therefore, God will
claim His individual right.
Can't we see that America is worse by far than the Israel that
God Himself had crushed in 70 AD? Would the women of Israel
have performed the basest of acts, naked before camera-men,
merely to make some fast money? Would the Pharisees of Israel
have tolerated such things? Would the Jews have sold porn mags
along with food at their roadside fruit markets? Wouldn't they have
been stoned to death by the leaders of their society, the leaders that
Jesus condemned for other evils? Adultery was against the law in
old Israel; today in America the leaders don't dare enforce such a
law; and they allow media to freely advance those very lifestyles.
This is the fruit of freedom, allowing Satan to produce his fruit
freely, and to smear it even on those who oppose it. Violence will
be the result, for the cause of sin is selfishness.

648
Treat lightly honor for America. Slacken love of Britain.
Consider Canada a lost cause. Be a model citizen, and do no harm,
but don't join the patriotic bandwagon, for Jesus does not respect
political boundaries. And frown on Globalism in the name of
Democracy, for the democratic process is so susceptible to being
controlled by dragon-line members that there is no hope of
success, and no hope of a cure ... because the majority will not
allow Christian values to become central, and they will only
promise us lies to obtain your votes.
This is why priority for the Christian should placed on the
true Israel to come, a humble people, filled with this world's lame,
weak, and sick Jews ... but healed and made to jump like calves
released from the stall. No bulls of Bashan will be there; no large
ships for trading. Simplicity will prevail, and satisfy; calm and
peace will be with the breeze. Fear and anxiety will be shut tight
away. Everyone will trust everyone, and no one will steal from or
lie to the other. And the Ruler will love to be social. Isn't that love
for one another, to be social, to mix, to accept one another, to be a
brother?
We know our society has gone cold in this matter. Sin causes
us to desire the wives of our own friends, of our own brothers, and
that can only destroy social interaction. The man hungry for
money will also be hungry for your wife, and he will also lie, and
scheme, and defile social interaction. A sinner will not truly want
to know you, and he does not like to come into the light for fear of
being seen for what he is. His friends are therefore sinners, and
they plod each other on to sin all the more, and honor their
sinfulness as though they had the true light. We live in a black-
light society, the real fruit of the "Christian" dragon bloodline.
Finally, the dragon is taking off his sheep's wool, and exposing
himself for the hairy wolf that he truly is. Do not let your eyes look
upon the sins of his sons; do not watch it. This is his strategy to
make us fall, to make us desire his fruits. Despise porn, and those
who make it; they are an animalistic bunch, and the leaders of our
countries will be held responsible for giving them their freedom to
corrupt the whole, make no mistake. This is the decade wherein
that the dragon bloodline has the agenda to openly promote
homosexuality successfully, the very culture of the dragon
bloodline.
Dragons force you to remain in their workforce that they
might have your taxes. They crowd you into their cities that they
might have more taxes per acre of land, and they allow housing
prices to soar that they might collect higher property taxes. They
do not hold down the prices of goods because they own the largest
corporations. As soon as the public starts to save some money, up
go the prices to take it away. That is capitalism, the American

649
Drama, a chasing after the wind, for even when one does make
money, he is not filled. He becomes a dragon, and uses the money
for harm, for the American Sham is just so, to make us all dragons.
What is this I see, Christians supporting America? If Jesus held the
Pharisees responsible for decorating the tombs of the murdered
prophets, will he not also hold us responsible for praising the
sinful land? Who is more filled and yet more greedy than
America?
Yah is calling to you, Freedom Frogs, whistling to you,
Mohammed the Slasher, luring you on, Arrogant Gog, and making
you furious together against Counterfeit Zionism. Israel will not
stand before the tall legs of her merciless invaders, but faults will
develop in the European Union over this. The powerful Rothschild
will anger, strain at his wheel, and Europe will become a festering
sore. Muslim rocks are all over the Rothschild road to Globalism,
and even some of his larger snakes are in rebellion on the roadside;
some of the fatter frogs croak the song of anti-Zionists, and Gog
will find opportunity to vent wrath on Rothschild, and learn that he
likes it, and will come again to vent all the more, striking Israel
itself, and loving it, finding pleasure, finding power from Above to
do it harm. Freemasons are splitting in the dust of this feud, taking
sides, Aryans versus Rothschild, the resumption of World War II.
The United Nations go limp, and dread, desperate for a solution, as
the limo rolls toward the cliff without brakes. God is their solution,
but they will have none of it; they will worship the Dragon instead,
their weapons of war, and put all their marbles in his strength, for
disillusionment concerning the goodness and existence of Christ
will be great. They will be required to pay with their lives, and to
leave their kingdoms to the Brilliance of the Son.
Run, George, to soothe your bickering branches in the West;
appease your Russian brother, made fragile by the West and
wanting retribution; seduce your garden in Lazio for support. Mice
divide the Union. Your wolves howl and spew foam at arising
Selene, for she rises in vengeance behind the billowing clouds of
your strife. What's the matter, can't you glue your clay to your iron
sword? Is your Excalibur useless? Half of you is unwilling, ever
complaining against you, ever unsatisfied to play second-fiddle to
your Globalist dreams. Will you now force them to worship you?
You don't even love anyone, George, and you spy on them to keep
them in line, yet you expect them to get happily in line to fulfill
your dreams. Pitiful situation, George, for your lance is not able to
drive away your dragon brothers now, for they are boars charging
the legs of your holy horse, to make you fall, to make the sun upon
your head roll away from you. Who could love a snake that
chomps down on the dreams of others, and sucks their very blood?
You could have chosen YHWH, the god of Abraham, but instead

650
you chose the prostitutes of Babylon, pleasures under the sacred
oaks, and your waggling worm carried you away, and rotted your
soul.
There are several clues that connect George to the Russian
theater, including this: "Moscow has probably more sculptures
of St. George slaying the dragon than any other city."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St . George
Let's face it George did not become re-known just because
he killed a large lizard. In the "report," the dragon had been daily
eating the children of a certain kingdom, and George saved the
king's daughter when by lot it became her turn to be sacrificed.
Obviously, this is a mythical story, and smacks of a Molech
(infant-sacrificing) cult. Indeed, as Molech sacrifices were rife in
Carthage (in ancient Libya), so we find that the dragon and the
princess were located at the city of Selene in Libya. Selene, by the
way, was the moon goddess, sister of Helios. As I interpret Helios
as the Gorgons of the Halys river that populated Rhodes with the
same, I would view the Molech cult of Libya as a Rhodian-Gorgon
cult, which cult thereby translates to the Rose Line of
Rosicrucianism.
Selene is moreover associated with Mount Latmus at
Miletus that city (of Asia Minor) being the origin of the Irish
,

Gaels. This is not to say that Gaels are to be identified necessarily


as the Selene dragon, for she/it may have been a wave of Miletus
peoples that came to Libya earlier than the Gaels. Selene was in
love at Mount Latmus with Endymion, and as the latter mythical
character was from Elis, it makes me assert that the dragon-line
peoples who named the Ladon river in Elis were related to
founders of Latmus. Because myth writers revealed a strong
Selene-Endymion alliance, the two peoples are suspect as having
moved together to north Africa.
Though the Irish and Scots claim that their ancestors from
Miletus came by way of north Africa, I would yet resist identifying
Gaels as the Selene-Endymion alliance. Instead, I would view the
alliance as the north-African Gorgons that contributed to the early
inhabitants of western Atlantis. Endymion was the progenitor of
the Greek Calydonians, which may serve to reveal that the Pictish
Caledonians came by way of Carthage. This would support my
theory made otherwise, that Picts were a fundamental Molech-
worshiping peoples.
As I was in the throws of trying to understand whether
Lothian (what I view as Ladon's golden-apple garden in Alba) was
founded by Latins or Latmus peoples from Libya, I came across an
ancient report by Apollonius Rhodius:
"They [the Argonauts] found the sacred plot where,
till the day before, the serpent Ladon, a son of the Libyan

651
soil, had kept watch over the golden apples in the Garden
of Atlas."
http://www.theoi.com/Ther/DrakonHesperios.html
There is a myth version where the Argo ship sails across
Scandinavia and Britain, and across the entire length of the
Mediterranean. This never happened, of course, but the meaning
seems clear enough, that the peoples depicted by the crew and the
ship's name settled the coastlines of Scandinavia, Britain, and who
knows where else ... but Argyll (Scotland) definitely comes to mind
as one of their major settlements, where the island of Bute is
located. Frisia also comes to mind as a variation of "Phrixus," the
rider of the golden fleece. Place-names using "Brix" also come to
mind, and one may then ask if the Argonauts were not the "frogs"
all around the Mediterranean pond.
Remember, the Argonauts are the Calydonians who hunted
the Calydonian boar, for which reason I would identify Argonauts
as the proto-Picts. On board the Argo were Atalantis and
Meleager, the two who killed the boar. I had tried several times
previous to understand what "Meleager" depicted, but failed. I did,
however, figure out that he was made father of Parthenopeus
because he was a depiction of the Parthalons of Ireland ... who then
became the Pretani/Bretons.
As the Argonauts were said to be Minyans, might they have
been the Minoans of Crete ... and therefore the Britomartis and/or
Curetes of Crete? It seems logical to me that the Curetes became
the Cruithin of Ireland, and as some say that "Cruithin" was Q-Celt
for "Pretani," it just may be that they were the Britomartis branch
of Curetes. It's conceivable that "Parthalon" changed to "Cruithin"
with the coming to Ireland of the Gaels, but then changed back to
P-Celt "Pretani" on the main British island.
It seems that the Selene-Endymion alliance was a wave of
Calydonians that arrived before the Argonaut wave, that set up
Lothian first of all, to be followed by Argyll and Bute to Lothian's
west. As Ladon was positioned in the "garden of Atlas," one would
have to equate Atlantis, the Lothians, and the Argonauts. I think
that their Atlas brothers from Italy -- the Latins -- joined them by a
continental route, wherefore I still don't know for certain which
group named Lothian. But what I think I will bank on is the
coming of Ladon from Carthage, and that St. George might just
have depicted the Latins who had a military skirmish with his
Libyan draco-Gorgon counterpart.
It was only when I got to writing this chapter that I saw a
possible Miletus link to "Meleager." But I realized almost instantly
that Meleager was more likely a depiction of Molech. An hour
later, I saw that the Carthage version of "Molech" was even better,

652
that being "Melkart." What do you think? Is this why a hearth of
fire is the major theme of Meleager's infancy?
Romans despised the Molech cult of Carthage, and perhaps
this is the basis of the St. George myth, where George depicted a
Roman entity. He was said to be an officer under emperor
Diocletian, wherefore it seems suspicious that this emperor was
from Illyrian blood, and king of Moesia see location of Moesia as
(

northern border of Thrace) ... the nation ancestral to the Mysians


and Lydians. I'm suggesting that George was "a particular
favourite of his Emperor" (website below) for being of the same
basic blood. I'm thinking that the story of George's martyrdom at
the hands of Diocletian was fabricated to make George wildly
acceptable to Christiandom.
http://www.royalsocietyofstgeorge.com/historyofstgeorge.htm
The proto-Picts are suspected by me to have lived in the
Miletus/Caria region because his brother, Pergamon, was the
symbol of a city not far to the north, in Mysia! (See map of
Revelation's seven churches After addressing the churches in
).

two Amazon cities (Ephesus and Smyrna), Jesus addresses


Pergamo, saying "I know where you live, where the throne of
Satan is" (2:13). He then says to Pergamo, "You also have those
holding to the similar teachings of the Nicolaitans," a peoples
that Jesus says he hates. Wouldn't "Nicolaitan" (Greek =
"Nikolaiton") be Nico-Lad(on)??? If so, could George have been
one of the Nico-Ladon peoples, since he was made to die a martyr
(by a beheading) in Nicomedia (of Bithynia)?
One website suggests that the "lait" in the term refers to
"laity," but I dunno. My belief that the term should be understood
as Nico-Ladon led me to take notice of another one of the seven
churches, that of Laodicea. While Wikipedia reports that this city
was named after the wife of a king, I see that her name, Laodice,
evokes "Lazica," the land of the Caucasian Laz peoples. Another
letter of Revelation was addressed to Sardis, capital of Lydia.
Pollux was "Polydeuces" (Po-Laodicea?) to the Greeks, and while
the Romans may have changed it to depict the Lugii of th Po river,
it may have originally referred to the Laodiceans who removed to
the Po.
As I was undergoing this part of my investigation, I was
looking for a city that could be the mythical Pictus, and I was
surprised to find that Laodicea (and its surrounding region) was
called Pacatiana. I can't find the origin of the term, or whether it
goes back to pre-Christian times. As the third brother of Pictus and
Pergamon was Molosse, it's interesting that another letter of
Revelation was addressed to Colosse. (Help yourself to BC map
of Asia = 1 megabyte.)

653
Derived from "dios-Cletos," Diocletian may have been from
the same (Celt?) peoples as depicted by the mythical Cleito,
mother of western Atlantis (At-Lindos?) and wife of Poseidon.
The first son of Cleito and Poseidon was Atlas, a depiction (I've
come to think) of Aetolians. Endymion was the father of Aetolius
(symbol of Aetolia), and Aetolius was ruler of Elis! Atlas in
Britain should therefore prove to connect with the Ladon/Lothian
peoples of Elis.
Is it a coincidence that the name of this Christian-killing
emperor is so similar to "Cleodolinda," the name given to the
mythical princess of Libyan Selene (the one about to be sacrificed
to Molech)? It suggests that she depicted a branch of the same
peoples as Diocletian... which can explain why the one who killed
Selene's dragon was made an arm of that emperor. The "linda" part
of "Cleodolinda" may refer to the Lindos branch of Rhodes, and
she may therefore be a depiction of the Celts who named At lantis
and/orL,expligwhyLondartkiusgheS.
George cross of Genoa as a symbol of England.
Logically, St. George could have been valued by the English,
the Genoans, Georgians and Russians because he depicted their
ancestors. We can surmise that he, a knight by the way, depicted a
gnostic/pago-Christian peoples in that the Templars/Crusaders
honored him by wearing his colors and cross. But as his parents
were placed in Cappadocia, he could very well have depicted a
peoples of the Caucasus. I suspect that George himself was a
dragon-line peoples ... sparring with another dragon-line peoples.
St. George was born in Lydda (also "Lod" and, in Hebrew,
"Ludd"), an Israeli city about 10 miles south-east of Joppa.
Apparently, there were Ladon peoples in Israel long before the
Templars arrived. The Litani river, remember, was just a few miles
north of Tyre, not far from Lydda. The article above tells that “the
lance with which St George slew the dragon was called
Ascalon, named after the city of Ashkelon in [modern Israel]”.
One can only conclude that George was known by the myth
writer(s) to be an Ashkelon peoples. It's possible that, at the timing
of the myth's events, the peoples of this port city (south of Lydda)
were still descendants of the Tigris-river Ashkenazi scythians
whom I suspect merged with Tigris-river Abira-branch Hebrews
(long before the Assyrian exile of Israel) to produce the Cutha of
proto-Israel's Mediterranean shores. If I haven't made myself clear
in previous chapters, let me be so now: the Mediterranean shore of
Israel was the homeland of Satan himself, even the Zeus/Molech
cult, whose branches removed to become the Kabala cult of
Kybele, in Phrygia, Lydia, and continental Rhodes (same as
Caria), which region encompassed the cities that are addressed in
the seven letters of Revelation. Jesus chose hard-ball Paul to go

654
into the heart of Satan's kingdom, a part-Hebrew kingdom from
Israel's shores. This was counterfeit Israel, a Dagon peoples from
the Tigris, and because the Tigris-river Ashkenazi are thought to
have originated in Caucasia, it is another reason to seek the
deepest St. George roots in Georgia.
Consider that "The Freemasons consider St. George one of
their primary patron saints. The United Grand Lodge of
England holds its annual festival on a day as near as possible
to St. George's Day" (website above). The "Christian" halo
around his head is the sun god, therefore, and Freemasons know it.
George was assigned this Maltese Cross (a Templar symbol)
by the Russian military, but what did George, the servant of
Diocletian, have to do with Russia? Nothing. The true George (the
one honored by initiated Freemasons/Rosicrucians) was not the
said servant of Diocletian, but some other entity merely of the
emperor's bloodline, a Rus bloodline, explaining why Rosicrucians
use him as a symbol. As St. Alban may be honored secretly as
Alba, and the ermine symbol may be honored secretly as Hermes,
or the cross may be honored secretly as a sword, or the rose on the
cross secretly as the Rus and/or the war god, Ares, so George may
be honored secretly as the Georgians. The Hebrew side of George
would thereby point to the Iberi of Georgia.
Recall that I had identified Catalonia and Catalan (on the
French-Spanish border) as Cutha-Hebrew entities, wherefore see
that "On the Iberian peninsula [Spain], George also came to be
considered as patron to the Crown of Catalonia and Aragon."
It's not my idea only that the Caucasian Iberi became the Iberians
of Spain. And it's not my idea only that the Iberians of Spain
founded the Irish proper.
Have you ever wondered what the red hand on the flag of
northern Ireland refers to, being placed over the "star of David"
as it is? The origin is deliberately kept from us, for it is a near-
perfect match with the hand on the flag of Abkhazia .

Who-what-where? Abkhazia, in north Caucasia, of ancient


Georgia ... Colchis to be exact. There are various theories on the
origin of Ireland's red hand, and the one I chose before knowing
about the red hand of Abkhazia was this one: "The story of the
Red Hand of Ulster reputedly dates to the arrival of Heremon,
Heber and Ir - sons of King Milesius of Spain."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Ulster
I view "Heber" as a mythical term, even as Milesius is
known to be a mythical term to denote the city of Miletus. Could
"Heremon" depict the Arameans, since the Kabala was an
Aramean-Hebrew mix? Does "Ir" refer to Ur of the
Chaldeans/Khaldi? What is clear is that Heber, in depicting the
Iberians of Spain, depicts Iberians of Miletus. One needs only to

655
find how Iberians of Caucasia came to live in Miletus, and the red-
hand link back to Abkhazia is the magic key that Irish and Scot
Freemasons do not want us to know.
Take a look at a expandable map (3.5 megabytes) of the
Abkhazia region and see Iberia smack next to it. And note
Gogarene (also "Gugark") in southern Iberia...no doubt the seat of
Gog in Ezekiel's day, when they were rulers of the Rosh. As you
can see, Gogarene is situated next to Kokhia, which is itself next to
Kakhia, all within Iberian realms in this pre-Christian map. The
Gog-Hebrew alliance that I have been insinuating throughout this
book is thereby made feasible. "Kokhia" evokes the eggs of Leda,
her children, that is, especially Helen of Troy and Pollux (I think
Helen was Helenus, the Geloni Hebrews of Epirus).
This is the dragon, even the root of Biblical dragon.
However, keep in mind my belief, that while this alliance connects
to the Roman dragon of Revelation, a non-Roman branch will
become the end-time anti-Christ/Gog. The Roman branch refers to
the Harlot of Revelation 17 that will ride on Gog's back; she is
from the dragon cult of Babylon and, in short, is identified by me
as the entire statue of Daniel 2. Her blood moves south from
Caucasia into Mesopotamia, becomes the Babylonian ruler,
Nebuchadnezzar, then the Medes and Greeks, and finally the
Sabina Patricians that mixed with Romans and Latins in furnishing
Julius Caesar. I suspect that St. Patrick, patron saint of Ireland, is
just this Patrician portion of the Harlot, to be distinguished only
slightly from the George branch coming to Britain as the Lothians.
Note that "patron" (father) is the root of "Patrician."
On the map of Abkhazia, T'bilisi (a city known to be named
after Tubal) would be on the river very close to (just south of)
Mtskheta, the latter now in Kartli province and once the capital of
the Iberians. While Kartli and Iberia were located in the same
geography, the two must be distinguished as peoples. The Kartli
trace themselves to the god, Kartlos, son of Togarmah ("Thorgom"
in Armenian and "Thargamos" in Georgian, says Wikipedia).
While others don't agree, I would insist that the Iberians were
Hebrews, for in this way the bed of the Hebrew-Gogi and/or
Hebrew-Rus mix that I identify as the dragon line of the Greco-
Trojan theater is neatly exposed. The Tubali peoples are yet a third
group, neither Hebrew nor Togarmite (Tubal was Gomer's brother,
and Gomer was Togarmah's father). I envision all three living
together in a Gogi empire, without borders, and together becoming
the Khazars proper.
The Aras river (unmarked), where the Rosh lived, is seen
south of Gogarene. The lake seen under "Gogharena" is Sevan
(anciently "Gegham" sea), what I think was named after Sheba,
and therefore after the Sibar founders of Subartu, even the Molech-

656
worshiping Sepharvites. Today, the eastern region of Abkhazia is
Svaneti, the root of which certainly looks like "Sevan." Then read
this:
"The iconic image of [Sabazios] on horseback
battling the chthonic serpent, on which his horse
tramples, appears on Celtic votive columns, and with the
coming of Christianity it was easily transformed into the
image of Saint George and the dragon."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabazios
It can't be a coincidence that Albania can be seen on the map
snack nest to Iberia (i.e. surely various peoples of Britain were
from this region). But there's more. The city on the Abkhazia coast
which on the map is marked, "Dioscurius" (named after Pollux and
Castor, sons of Leda i.e. the Ladon dragon peoples), was the most-
remote settlement of the Miletians. The reality is now obvious, that
the peoples of this city and region were the proto-Irish, in that the
Irish and Scots to this day claim that Heber and Milesius were
their Scythian ancestors from Miletus. That is, certain Iberi of
Abkhazia moved to Miletus because Miletus had a colony in their
region, and then they sailed off to Spain to become the Iberians
there. And that's how the so-called "Sephardic Jews" (Sepharvites
from Sevan, I'm now more sure than ever) find themselves in
Spain to this day. A common theory is that this Georgian region
was root also to the mysterious Basques (of Spain).
It seems certain that among these peoples the "star of David"
was created (i.e. wherefore it appears on the Ulster flag).
Remember, the Templars, when they sought to conquer Jerusalem,
used the Galilean city of Sepphoris as their station (and in fact they
claim that Jesus was born there -- it figures), this serving as
evidence for a Sepharvite ancestry of the core Templars. It may
even be that Galilee took it's name after the Galli-branch
Kabalists... who may have founded Sepphoris. Realizing that it was
these peoples who became the Thracian dragon and the Kabala of
Phrygia, note "the Gali district of eastern Abkhazia."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South Caucasian languages
Gali is a town associated with the Nfargaluri (also
"Megralian") language, which evokes ancient Margiana (capital,
Mari/Mary), the region in Aryan Afghan that I think is the basis of
the Merovingian-Mary cult. "Megrelian is one of the South
Caucasian or Kartvelian languages. It is closely related to Laz,
from which it has differentiated mostly in the last 500 years."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megrelian language
On this map of Lazica (small file), one can see that the
nation covered what was exactly Abkhazia. It is this (proto-
Khazar?) peoples that I would peg as the founders of the Latins. I

657
think it's established in the minds of many that both "Czar" was a
cognate of "Khazar," but, then, where did the earlier term,
"Caesar," come from, if not from a Khazar-like term? The
mythical "Circe" from whom Latinus (symbol of Latins) was made
descended, being viewed as a "wife" of Helios by myth writers,
should prove to correspond to "Gorgon/Georgia." Abkhazia's
ancient region of what is now Gali may have furnished "Heli(os)."
In the statement, "Strabo identifies the tribe of Halysones
with the ancient west-Georgian (Colchian) tribe of Halybes (or
Khalib/Khaldi)" (brackets not mine), one may also tie Helios to
the Halysones and thereby to the city/people of Ialysos on Rhodes
(the island of Helios). In this way, the Redone Gauls may connect
back to the Georgian Gali. While this term may be the earliest
form of "Gaul" ("Gali" to the Romans), "Khaldi" may be viewed
as the earliest form of "Celt." To thus connect the Celts/Gauls to
Gog and/or Rosh/Tubal/Meshech is indeed feasible.
The entire north border of Lithuania is Latvia; two of
Latvia's major people groups were the Latgali and Zemgali. Note
the sun god on Latvia's Arms Is the azure blue in the background
.

of the sun really the sky, or does it depict the Laz Caucasians?
Note also the red and white colors associated with the red lion and
silver griffin, as these are the colors of the Rus red and white
dragons. Belarus (White Russia) is situated smack next to
Lithuania.
I would identify the Irish "Conn" terms as stemming from
Laz elements in that "Chan" is actually an alternative to this day of
the Laz peoples!! As I root the Laz peoples in Afghanistan, I
would even suggest that the "Chani" term furnished Af-Ghani. I
would of course identify the Chani as the cohens/kagans of
Georgia, and therefore trace the various Cohen branches (including
the Stewarts) of Europe back to these Ladon-dragon peoples. In
that I tied the Picts to Molech, the cult of the cohens I must
presume, behold that the Afghans, known earlier as the Pushtans,
were quite possibly descended from the same stalk that furnished
the Picts:
“The Greek historian Herodotus first mentioned a
people called Pactyan living on the eastern frontier of the
Persian Satrapy Arachosia as early as the 1st millennium
BCE...
In addition, the Rig-Veda mentions a tribe called the
Pakthas (in the region of Pakhat) as inhabiting present-
day Afghanistan...”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pashtun

658
The "Pactyan" version evokes the Pictones, and the
"Pakthas" evokes the mythical Pictus. In fact, Poseidon is also
evoked when we see that it was likely one or both of the terms
above that modified to "Pushtan." Not only did the Pushtan
(Aryans, by the way) have a Freemasonic-like religion adhering to
the Mosaic Law, but "according to the Encyclopaedia of Islam,
the Theory of Pashtun descent from Israelites is traced to
Maghzan-e-Afghani who compiled a history..." However, DNA
studies does not find Israelite roots in the Pashtun, and this
supports my suspicion, that they go back to the earliest dragon-line
root of Hebrews of Chaldea/Khaldi. I should mention here that the
Pictones founded Poitiers of Poitou province (France), which may
root back to Poti/Phasis of Georgia.
In that the Basques are rooted back to Caucasia, I'll suggest a
logical hypothetical, that they were the Pactyan removed to
Caucasia...for the reason given in this question: "Were [Picts]
descendants of the ancient Basque people of northern Spain
once known to Rome as Pictones ?
http://members.tripod.com/~Halfmoon/
But even if the Pactyan were not proto-Basque Caucasians,
the Picts can yet trace to Caucasia as per Basque origins there.
Those who dismiss Basque origins in Caucasia trace them to north
Africa, and yet both positions can be true since these particular
Caucasians came to the west over north Africa. Aside from known
Basque connection to the Iberi, the following statement seems
highly enlightening in connecting to the Iberi of Ireland: "The
earliest record we have of the word 'Pict' describing a group of
people in Britain comes from a poem by Eumenius dated A.D.
297, which mentions the 'Picti' along with the 'Hiberni.'"
http://www.tylwythteg.com/pict1.html
Upon seeking the linguistic root of the Basques, I learned
that "Eusk" is more accurately their name. From the latter came
"Gascon(y)," and with that version "Cossack" came to mind, a
peoples north of the Black sea. There may or may not be anything
to this, and I should also mention that the Kosack-family Coat uses
a "star of David" and a crescent.
Nergal, the fire-god of the Cutha (Kabala of Akkadia),
married the mythical Laz, showing that Nergal had also been in
Caucasia. Caucasian Nergal (Ner-Gali?) must have depicted the
Georgian Iberi allied to Aryan peoples of Georgia. As Nergal had
Ereshkigal as a wife, it suggests an alliance with the Hrosh, exactly
what I have been claiming all along, that the dragon bloodline is
Hebrew-Rus.
Nergal was symbolized with a lion, wherefore it is now
clearer in my mind that the Cutha contributed in becoming the
Lydian lion, the Latin/Roman lion, and finally the lion of Britain.

659
This suggests that the British lion originated in the peoples who
named Lothian, the god Lot. Surely, Nergal's other "wife," Laz,
migrated her winding way with him through Lydia, north Africa,
then western/Latin Italy to Britain, to become the Lothians. They
didn't stop there, but landed also in Norway as the god, Nor, which
indeed evokes Nergal. I won't repeat here that I'm viewing these
Atlanteans with one eye largely as Nahorite Hebrews.
As the Cruithne came from Ireland to Scotland via the
extreme north, the Hebride islands off the north-east Scotland
come irresistibly to mind as Iberi strongholds. One of the Cruithne
tribes was "Cat/Cait," which named Caithness (website below).
Because another Cruithne tribe was Fife, as far south as the Firth
of Forth, the Cruithne kingdom was identical to Pict realms. Yet
the two peoples should be distinguished to some degree, even if
two tribes of the same stock.
http://www.leopardmag.co.uk/feats/17/nechtan-high-king-of-picts
Both Megralian and Laz languages are placed under the Zan
umbrella, a term that may have been connected to the mysterious
god, Sandon, who was himself depicted as a lion. Sandon and
Hercules were made identical perhaps for the reason that the
eoples depicted by them both were Hros of the Araxes
p(alternative for "Aras") river. But as Sandon was worshiped as a
lion in Cilicia, where the Cati lived -- in Khassi of Cilicia to be
exact -- it certainly evokes the Nergal Cutha and the AbKhazi. The
same Sandon was also worshipped in Lydia, fully expected if the
Laz furnished Lydians.
The Abkhazi call themselves, "Apsua/Apsny," where per
chance the root refers to the Apollo-line Opis peoples (Avvites of
the Tigris river that became the Iberi/Avars ). Note the alternative
"Adygey" term in the following quote that evokes the Tigris river
(anciently the Idigna/Idigina) and therefore the Togarmites there:
"According to Georgian scholars, the Abkhaz are
the descendants of North Caucasian tribes (Adygey,
Apsua), who migrated to Abkhazia from the north of the
Caucasus Mountains and merged there with the existing
Georgian population."
As the Khazar kings were called "bek/beg," could
"Abkhazia" have been A-Bekhazia, and then afterward shortened
to "Khazaro"? Note Bekhyria on the map of Abkhazia As Batumi
.

was a city in this region, perhaps the Catti tribe of Batavi, near
Rotterdam (Holland), were just from these Georgians. After all,
the Catuvellauni Belgians were the same as the Ceno(manni). If
you realize as I do that the Catuvellauni were Catti from Wallonia
(Belgium), and if you realize that this region was named after the
Geloni, you might agree with me that Holland was named after the

660
same Geloni. Then, if you agree with me that the colors of
Wallonia (and other parts of Belgium and Holland) were made red
and gold because they were of the Baux branch of Cohens, perhaps
you will have more reason to consider a root in Bekhyria. Recall
that the Batavi lived exactly where lived the Salians ... that became
the Merovingians and Hohens.
There is a "Bat" language-classification of Georgia. If the
Rhine-river Batavi of were from Bekhyria's Bat peoples, then the
latter must have been Catti as much as were the Batavi. And
because the Catuvellauni were Cenomanni ("Cenimagni"
according to Julius Caesar), the Bat Caucasians begin to look like
the Chani (alternative name of the Lazi). In this case, Lothian may
have been founded by the same, or nearly the same, as those who
founded Bute (Scotland), and perhaps also Bude of Cornwall. It's
interesting that the Cenomagni were the Iceni Magni (website
below), and therefore the Iceni (of Britain), who were ruled by an
infamous Boudicca. I will view the Iceni as the cohen/katz
Hebrews, and I do see that Dragonby, in the Iceni domain, existed
since prior to 500 BC.
http://www.roman-britain.org/tribes/iceni.htm
As I explained earlier in this chapter, the founders of Lothian
and Bute were the Calydonians/Argonauts. Look at what I wrote
recently in my Code of Arms chapter:
"The Welsh Budes moreover use a gold seven-pointed
star (don't know the significance of seven points)."
I now find that Adzharia/Ajaria has-Batumi for its capital
while the flag of Adjaria uses seven-pointed gold stars. The
modern flag of Adjaria is not the same, but you can find the flag
with seven seven-pointed stars at:
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~dploy/stateless/adzharia.html
Not far north of Batumi was the port city of Phasis (modern
Poti), and up the Phasis river many miles -- 25 past
miles Vani --
was located Aea, the location of the golden fleece, a city also
called Kutaisa (as it is to this day). If in the latter we modify the
hard "K" to "Hetaisa," we fairly cleanly derive the mythical
"Aeetes," ruler of Aea and possessor of the fleece before the
Argonauts "killed" him and took it away. Because it's known that
the Laz peoples took over Colchis after the Colchians depicted by
Aeetes went down, might not the Argonauts have been Laz
peoples in Greece come to free fellow Laz peoples under Aeetes'
grip? Might not the fleece itself have depicted Laz Greeks (I'm
thinking Peneus/Daphne), in other words, that fled to Aeetes only
to fall under his wrath at some point? Daphne was made the
daughter of Ladon in some myth version(s), though in other
versions she was the daughter of Peneus (the Peneus and Ladon
rivers were side-by-side in Elis).

661
The Scottish Lothian-family Coat being an evergreen, is
,

the symbol of Daphne. The evergreen was also the symbol of Attis
(Kybele's son), the line of which furnished Lydia. Coincidence? I
don't think so.
As the golden fleece was a ram's pelt, see this bracelet from
5th century BC Vani, having two heads of a ram/goat. The golden
fleece depicted the rider of the ram, Phrixes, a depiction of several
western Europeans, in my opinion, including Frigg, wife of Odin.
As I had identified Odin/Woten as the Budini, I would now go
further back to the Bat Caucasians. The Vanir Scandinavians
(counterparts of Odin) would now be identifiable as the founders
of Vani. The mythical "Vangard" and "Asgard" should prove to
have been Vani-Kartli and As-Kartli...or Van-Kurds/As-Kurds. In
keeping with the Goth origin of Odin, it may be that Kutaisa was
named after the Guti/Gutis branch of Kurds. Since Aeetes was
revealed as the co-founder of Corinth, that city must have been co-
founded by Guti. On the other hand, the Cal-Edonians look like a
Guti (i.e. Guti > Getae > Edoni) mix with the Caucasian Gali. (see
Gali on map of Abkhazia ).

As the Guti were both Medes and Cutha Hebrews, the


apparent contradiction disappears when the Buzi and/or Budii
Medes are identified as Buz, son of Nahor. Moreover, the daughter
of Aeetes, Medea, was obviously a Mede peoples. As she returned
to Greece with the Argonauts, wouldn't she have been the freed
fleece peoples, and therefore the Bat-Lazi?
Pitsunda (north Abkhazia) was earlier Pityus (see Caucasian
map), what therefore may have become the Apollo Hyperboreans
that furnished Pythos in Greece, and therefore be came the
Phaethon (son of Apollo) dragon of the Rhone river, France.
Apollo was changed into a dolphin at the so-called "Apollo
Oracle" in the city of Delphi (previously Pythos), for obvious
reason ("delphi" is a Greek dolphin), but Daphne was also in
Delphi participating in this pathetic/psychotic cult, and so behold
that "dauphine" is a French dolphin (see dolphin on the flag of
Dauphine To this add the apparent fact that the Apollo Oracle
).

was founded by goats:


"It is said that goats found the ancient oracle; because of this
the Delphians even today use goats for consulting the oracle."
http://www.grazian-archive.com/quantavolution/QuantaHTML/plaintext/ka.txt
Remember the utter stupidity of modern witchcraft when it
connects Jesus to Dionysus, for as they derive their "wisdom" and
their guidance from the behavior of goats, imaginary visions seen
in crystals, dreams or mental pictures, the shapes of smoke or
clouds -- after taking drugs on many occassions -- they are hardly
in a position to speak on such matters, requiring intelligence, as the
topic of Jesus. When connections between Jesus and mythical

662
characters are made, in other words, don't assume that the writer of
the article is anything but deluded and moronic. I will not repent
from speaking these harsh words. Witches are sluts in virgins'
clothing, counterparts of male satyrs. Avoid them like the plague.
Lucky for them that God has permitted them to breathe another
day; unlucky for them that each new day brings added Wrath. Let
me be clear on how I feel about pagan oracles that seek to lump
Jesus in with the “holy sex” of temple sluts spread on temple
platforms and receiving the filth of unholy men time and time
again as a form of religion. These are the types now forcing
pornography into our homes, for the children as well as the
parents, that we might become like them. They will be wiped away
from the face of this Creation.
The Dauphine settlements were on the Rhone, as can be seen
by the Arms of Provence-Alpes located on the mouth of the
Rhone (see location of Provence-Alpes The former province of
).

Dauphine was in the northern sections of Provence-Alpes, still on


the Rhone, wherefore the Daphne-branch Ladon peoples were
essentially one and the same with the Phaethon dragon line,
meaning also that Ladon and Pythos (not to mention Echidna the
snake-women, a version of Pythos) were one and the same. It may
be that the Phasis river, now called Rioni, may have had a similar
name millennia ago, after which the Rhone, the Rhine, and Rennes
were named. "Phasis" is itself a viable version of "Pythos."
As I stated earlier that the dolphin on heraldry depicts the
Delphi bloodline, I must caution you by adding this Wikipedia
quote: "In heraldry, a dolphin device displayed on a shield
denotes the oldest son of a family; a crest device displayed
denotes the second oldest." However this statement appears on a
Dauphin website (below), wherefore it may be true only of the
dauphin bloodline, of which Guy VIII of Vienne was the first to
use the dolphin symbol.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dauphin
Guy descended from counts of Forez (website below), and so
see that the Arms of Forez is nothing but a dolphin. Forez was
located in what is now Loire using nothing but a dolphin. Loire is
,

in the same general area as was Dauphine. Because Apollo loved


Daphne while she rejected him, there may be a slight difference in
France between the Apollo (Lug wolf line) and Dauphine peoples.
I am reminded that the wolf line goes back to the Caucasian Dahae
(later Daghestan), which term, because it is Biblically "Dehava,"
may have been the identity of "Daphne." It now strikes me as I
write that Daphne was Typhon, the husband of Echidna, the two of
which gave birth to multiple wolf peoples, including Geryon's dog
(Ortho), historically the Ordovices of Wales (in my guess-timate).
http://worldroots.com/cgi-bin/gasteldb?@I17344@

663
I had noticed that "Daphne" looks like it may have named
Devon(shire). That led me to suspect that she depicted the Danann
(or "Dewnan") that named Devonshire, which makes sense in that
the Greek Danaans of the Redones are hard to differentiate. As I
had previously traced the Dewnan (also Dumnonii) to the Fir
Domnann of Connacht (Ireland) and finally to the Domnalls -- i.e.
the first Donnells/Donalds proper-- behold that the Irish Donnell
Coat uses a dolphin while an alternative Irish Donnell Coat uses
the hand symbol. In this way, because Typhon/Daphne can be
identified as the Tartars (Dardanus?), the Tartars and Welsh are
related, just as I had theorized in an earlier chapter when I pointed
out the identical colors of their flags. In this way, the Danaans
were not of the Israeli tribe of Dan, but of the Tartars...or Tators
(Dedan?). I also mentioned in that chapter (Atlantis Founded by
Hebrew-Khazars) that Italy uses the same colors (white, green and
red). The difference between Apollo and Daphne, therefore, looks
like the difference between the Hyperboreans and what became the
Tatars.
It may be that while Apollo came to France by way of north
Italy, Daphne came by way of Latmus of Miletus (continental
Rhodes), then became the Rhodian Danaan (who built Lindos),
who sailed to Libya as the Ladon peoples there ... that went on to
settle the apple garden of Atlantis (I concluded independently that
the original Atlantis was in Cornwall and Wales). As the Merlin
myth seemed to equate Daphne with the moon goddess, Daphne
could be the same as the Selene dragon of Libya.
Freemasonic lunatics with extra-sensory wisdom miles above
the rest of us have taken the dragon-line myths concerning Aea,
Colchis, and have incorporated Jesus into them, as for example the
holy grail finding its way to that city/region, and then finding its
way, via Joseph of Arimathea, to Arthur's round table. Says one
website concerning Gelati, near Aea: "The bringing of the Grail
to Georgia is a fact and I assume Gelati must have been where
it was brought to rest."
http://rustaveli.tripod.com/sakartvelo/literature/Gelati.html
It should be clear to those of us with less-gifted insight that
the holy grail refers to dragon blood, and I could from the above
statement alone entertain that it was/is the bloodline of the Galli.
Wikipedia reports that the Grail story was created first by Robert
de Boron, wherein Joseph brought the blood to Glastenbury -- in
Somerset.
http://www.houseofnames.com/xq/asp/s.blake/Origin.EN/sId./qx/coatofarms_details.htm
"This [holy-grail story] was the inspiration for William
Blake's mystical hymn Jerusalem." The Blake Coat uses a
green griffin. The Blakes were first recorded in Devonshire (long
before the Baux proper arrived to Britain). The Berts had also

664
started off in Devonshire, and I do see that "Blake" is a viable
alternative of "Pollok," a theory I'll present here because I believe
the first recorded Polloks was from the Bert clan. Also keep in
mind that Pollux people were in the Laz territory of Abkhazia.
Bekhyria is now the Rize Province, capital city, Rize (earlier
"Rhisos"). "The province is home to a community of Laz
people." In fact, it is part of what was Lazistan (Lazona in
Laz ... Chaneti in Georgian)... comprising the Laz or Lazuri-
speaking population."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazistan
The "Lazona" version evokes Ladon, and the "Lazuri" term
evokes "lapis-lazuli," the azure-blue gem of Aryan Afghanistan
that I think could be associated with the roots of the Laz peoples.
My dictionary defines "azure" as "sky blue," and by implication,
the sky, exactly the meanings of "gog/kok"! When I learned that
sky blue was a color often seen on Scandinavian flags, especially
the flag of Finland I realized with further thought that the Finns
,

might have been the Vani Georgians, and that the term, Finno-
Ugric" could be a Vani-Gogi combination. As the Finno-Ugrics
provided the Magyars, Magog is also evoked.
The Gali of Abkhazia may have become the Geloni that are
known to have lived among the Budini. If it's true that the Geloni
were Alans, then the Gali may thereby have furnished the
Sarmations. One can see "Sarmathia" to the north of Abkhazia,
which at one time was "Sauromatia," meaning Lizard-Matia (they
probably named Lake Meotis (Azov) upon which they lived). It's
interesting that Pityus is on the extreme north of Abkhazia, where
the Sarmation lands begin. It seems likely that the Meoti, and
therefore the Sar-Mati, were what Medea, witch-daughter of
Aeetes, depicted...in which case Aeetes comes out looking either
like an Amazon-Mede or Gargarian-Mede people (I would lean
heavily toward the latter).
Are you with me? The Gargarians mixed with Amazons so
that the myth writers could make the Sarmation product the
"daughter" of Aeetes. As Medea's goddess was Hecate, while she
in turn was the frog goddess, the frogs of the west, and possibly
also the Armageddon-causing "frogs" that come from the mouth of
the Revelation beasts (Revelation 16), appear as Alan Huns of
France, Normandy, Holland, etc.
One can therefore investigate to see if the Sarmations, and
the Alan Huns that were their major tribe, were of these dragon-
line Georgians. Herodotus said that Sarmations were part
Gargarians, part Thermodon Amazons; these particular Amazons
lived near Bekhyria/Rhisos, and were said to inhabit "Aretias," a
term that evokes Ereth(lyn), Rhodes, and, most interesting, Rieti of
Italy in Lazio (i.e. Latium) province and Raetia to its north in

665
Ladin, Italy! One could get the impression that Aretias was of the
very Laz peoples who named Rhisos (from "Rus"?), which, if it
was Rizos at one ancient point, may have been depicted by Helios'
wife, Rhodos. It's also interesting that the Argo ship stopped at
Lemnos to mate with Amazons there, before reaching Colchis, as
though the fleece depicted Amazonian peoples.
It's moreover intriguing that Lemnos was the island of
Hephaistos while the fleece was up the Phasis river at Aea/Kutaisa.
In any case, I'm convinced that the Laz peoples were Amazons,
and also believing that they were the Meshech on the Moschi
mountains (lesser Caucasus range), I've got to entertain their being
a Meshech-Gargarian alliance that became the Ruthene and
Varangian Rus. The flagRuthene.gif Ruthene flag uses blue and
gold, in keeping with a Gogi interpretation of the blue. The flag
also uses a red bear, in keeping with the founding of the Russian
Bear by the Varangians. The bear also evokes urso = Ereth(lyn) =
Arthur. It's interesting that the Rise provincial region included
Artan, and that next to Erethlyn was/is Rhos, an unusual "h"
variation of "Ros/Rus" that evokes "Rhisos." This now makes it
easier for some to believe, who may have scoffed when first
reading it, that the Excalibur sword refers to the Halybes in Exeter,
Devonshire.
See the regional map of Lazona where its major city was
,

Atina (next to Rhisos). I'll mention briefly that this Atina may have
been what Odin depicted (as well as depicting Batumi to its north).
While Bithyni may have been an extension of Batumi and/or the
Budini, neighboring Thyni may have been an extension of Atina.
Some websites link Atina to the term, "Athens," which was
ruled by the half-serpent Cecrops bloodline, feasibly depicting
Gogar (Gogarene) but also Echidna. As the mythical Butes was of
the Cecrops bloodline, he would be identified with
Batumi... anciently "Batis"!
If it's true that Rhodes was founded by peoples of Rhisos,
then the Danaans of Rhodes may have been from Atina, this
corresponding with a (theoretical) Danaan root in the Biblical
"Diynay" (i.e. Dina-ites, Ezra 4:9; see Hebrew text and Strong's
#1784, as some English versions do not translate this term as a
people group). One can now swallow the idea that the Rhodian-
branch Halybes (Ialysos) were the Dumnoni (also "Dewnan") that
founded Devonshire. Are you with me? I'm saying that Arthur's
Excalibur sword was a people from Rhisos, and likely Rhos of
Wales...while Arthur himself depicted neighboring Ereth(lyn). As
Excalibur depicted the right to rule Britain, it may be that these
were the first British settlements of the dragon bloodline, which
supports my theory that western Atlantis began at Erethlyn ... with
Geryon (the three-tribed Gorgon/Georgian people) and Ortho

666
(Arthur?) his two-headed dog. It's interesting that the Hebrew,
"caleb" (Strong's #3611), means "dog," and that the Excalibur
sword had two handles.
Wikipedia reports that "in Welsh, the sword was called
Caledfwlch." Wouldn't that be the Khaldi, the alternative term to
denote the Halybes? And wouldn't the similarity with the Hebrew,
"caleb," reveal that these were all a Hebrew people? The Welsh
version was adopted from a magical sword of Ireland, called
"Caladbolg" and belonging to Fergus mac Róich, king of Ulster
(remember, the Ulster flag uses the red hand of Abkhazia, and a
Zionist star of David). Pitifully, someone has defined "Caladbolg"
as "'hard belly", or possibly 'hard lightning.'"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fergus_mac_R%C3%B3ich
Fergus Mac Roich was an ally of Connacht, and of
CuChulain (Hound of Chulain), and "Fergus" itself may be a
version of "verk" = wolf. I have reasoned that, since the Laz
peoples spoke and created proto-Latin, the "cano/chien" terms that
mean "dog" somehow derived from "cohen/khan," even as I feel
that the Indo-European "dog" stems from the allies of the Laz, the
(Aryan) Togarmites. Remember, the "kagan/khan" term is quite
restricted to Turks/Bulgars, and these were Togarmites.
I expect, therefore, that the dog terms of Ireland were of
Togarmite-Laz origin, and I will even suggest that the Q-Celt
language was a product of the Caucasians that formed the (Gaelic)
Irish proper. Leto, the mother of Apollo, and symbol of Lydia, was
a wolf peoples...so that the Laz must have been as well. I trace
Apollo roots to Opis on the Tigris (another "dog" term, probably
created by Togarmites), and Opis was the home of the wolf-
worshipers, the Avvites, suggesting a Laz connection back to
Avvites. The following tends to verify my Laz-to-Latin theory:
"Laz and Chan are synonymous ethnic terms, Chan
is the term often used in Georgian histographical
sources... Presently, there are plans of creating a writing
system for Laz on the basis of the Latin script."
http://www.ling.lu.se/projects/Megrelian/Megrelian.html

667
WELL ALBI DAMNED
September 2006

When I learned that an offshoot(s) of Armstrongism (British


Israelism) hinted at ties with the Waldensian sect of apostolic
"successionists," and then found that connections with Cathars were hinted
at, I started investigating. When I found that the sect is said by many (not
all) to be named after "vaux" = "valley," the topic became this chapter. For I
was at that very time wanting to discover the roots of the Vaux/Baux cult of
Septimania that advanced/invented the Jesus-and-Magdalene heresy ... the
cult that I had come to believe was in particular a Cohen-Kabala cult.
Waldensians definitely trace to Peter Waldo (11th century) of Lyons.
Some claim that "Waldo" derived from "Vaux" modifying to
"Vaudois/Vaudes" and finally to the Latin "Valdus." It is intriguing that the
home in which the early Waldensians are connected was in Piedmont (north
Italy). See that where the Vaux lived, in southern France, is stamped
"Vaudois" on this map of Cathar movements .

As Rosicrucians had played a significant role in the Protestant


Reformation, they would naturally trace themselves back to the
Waldensians, for the latter are regarded by many as the seeds of the
Reformation. But Waldensian doctrines, based on some online reading, do
not appear twisted so as to connect with Rosicrucianism. Aside from
holding to some Catholic doctrines in a Biblically-acceptable fashion,
Waldensians do not appear heretical at all...as do the Cathars. However, it
may be that one or more heretics came out of the Waldensians that then led
to Rosicrucianism proper. Among the beliefs of Cathars was that Satan is
the Old Testament God. Keep in mind that Cathars were a Christian cult
(following a perverted view of Jesus).
Apart from turning up some solid heresy in Waldensians, I had only
one recourse for making a Waldensian-Cathar connection: if Freemasonic
writings trace their roots both to Cathars and Waldensians. Soon I was
finding articles that made just that connection. I should add that the
evangelism at the heart of the Waldensians, and their fervent thirst for
drinking up Scripture, are not in themselves proof of true-Church
authenticity, for cults (e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses, the Moravian Church, and
the Pharisees) can include both evangelism and intense Bible reading.
Waldensians claimed to be the unbroken line back to the 12 Apostles,
yet some trace Waldensian history (previous to Waldo) to the Arian cult,
which movement was a spiritual disease fundamental to Goth Christians.
The Vaux cult of Septimania was Gothic-Christian (see expandable map of

668
Europe showing Goth movement into southern France). As one website
puts it: "...the Goths were evangelized primarily by the Arians."
http://www.saintpatrickdc.org/ss/1207.htm.
My first clue telling that Waldensians could have been beloved of
Freemasonry was the following, written by one who views Arianism as
Bible truth:
"On the 23rd of August [475 AD], an end was put to all
[Catholic-led] persecution of the Novatians in Italy, by the
subjection of that [Roman] kingdom to the Goths, whose laws
breathed the purest spirit of equal and universal
liberty... Claude, bishop of Turin, was a Spaniard, Arian, and
Catholic, yet he loudly proclaimed his view of truth, in
opposition to the errors of the times. All these were
incorporated into the churches of Italy, and were now known
by the term Paterines ... "
http://www.woodstocknation.org/Egginkbendanann.htm#eggink ).
The writer is in love with the equality and liberty principles that are
the marks of Freemasonry, and traces the true Church from Novatians to
Waldensians. The "purest" Goths he speaks of, who conquered Rome in the
fifth century, became the Vaux cult of Septimania. He says of Claude,
bishop of Turin, that he was both an Arian (not to be confused with
"Aryan") and a Catholic, showing the struggle that then existed as to who
would rule over the Roman church, Arians or non-Arians. Turin is in
Piedmont and evokes the Waldensians there. Here is evidence that some
Waldensians were made Arians...at which time they were no longer
Waldensians, in my opinion.
Arians were so-called after Arius, the one who advanced the idea that
Jesus was a creation rather than God in the flesh. This is a neat way of
distinguishing true from false Christians, for false believers are unable to
grasp what is simple to true believers, that Jesus was God in the flesh. It
should be said that Arius may have been so named in honor of a draco-
Aryan entity.
Some trace Waldensians to bishop Ambrose (4th century), who was
made a bishop without having been a Christian previously. He had been
following in the political steps of his father, a prefect of Rome, having
control of extreme western Europe. I found it phenomenal that:
There is a legend that as an infant, a swarm of bees
settled on [Abrose's] face while he lay in his cradle,
leaving behind a drop of honey. His father considered this
a sign of his future eloquence and honeyed-tongue. For
this reason, bees and beehives often appear in the saint's
symbology. Ambrose was destined to follow his father's
career... Praetor Anicius Probus first gave him a place in
the council and then about 372 made him consular
prefect of Liguria and Emilia, with headquarters at
Milan."

669
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambrose_of_Milan
Surely, this myth is indication that we are dealing with the bee sector
of the dragon bloodline in Italy. Abrose's father had the same name, evoking
"abrosius," the drink of the gods, but what I think may be code for
"Abruzzo" and other such Aryan-Hebrews from Epirus. Note that "Milan"
and "Emilia" both evoke "honey/sweet."
How many know that Augustine (died 430) was a product of
Ambrose? How many know that Augustine was in Carthage (Molech's
favorite city) at age 17? What was he doing there? Learning how to "spin"
language. Learning how to move the hearts of men. Learning the art of
subtle truth-distortion and being politically influential by so doing. He was
not only learning Manichaeism, the religion of the dragon bloodline, but was
a pupil of Platonism, remembering that Plato had been the secret-society
creator of the western-Atlantis myth. Is it a coincidence that Ambrose was
also advancing Platonian thought? Says Wikipedia: "Ambrose was a
master of rhetoric like Augustine himself..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_of_Hippo
Whether Augustine became a true Christian or not is not the point
here. It could appear that, early in his life, he was of the dragon bloodline
and being primed for life-long devotion to it, in the way that Christian
missionaries prepare their sons for life-long service to Jesus. How do we
explain the pre-destination doctrine of Augustine (that Calvinists much later
adopted)? What does this teaching do to the quality of our Faith except to
make us soft/unproductive, and to give the false hope that we are saved no
matter what we do, leading first to small sins and later to huge ones?
It is conspicuous that Waldensians, many centuries after Augustine,
became Calvinists, for the distinguishing feature of Calvinism is pre-
destination. It teaches that prior to our birth, God has already chosen us
either for Hell or Heaven, and that our will/choice on the matter of salvation
is thereby irrelevant. The apostle Paul, in a "what if," mentioned in passing
that God, as God, had the right to use this method of salvation, but in no
way did Paul say that God chose that method.
Another website connecting Waldensians of Piedmont to Novatians
makes such a blunder that I must correct it. It states that "pope"
Novatian/Novatius (founder of the movement) was an apostle of the true
Church but that his opponent, "pope" Cornelius, was the foundation of the
Vatican. This is an unfair statement, for "popes" of those days (i.e. bishops
of Rome) lived prior to the formation of the counterfeit Catholic church.
Certainly, if it's true that Cornelius died for his Faith, and if he believed that
Jesus was God in the flesh (as reported), then we had better hold our tongues
in condemning him. Moreover, if it proves to be true that Cornelius was the
rightful bishop, then the oft-repeated charge that Novatian was a self-
appointed bishop may be true.
http://www.homestead.com/prosites-hobarker/savior2.html
It's true that Novatians later opposed the Catholic church, but that in
itself is not proof of True-Church authenticity. The Catholic church also

670
persecuted Cathars and Arians, neither of which for that reason alone were
the true Church. But having said that, I find no written record that Novatian
held to false doctrine (aside possibly from his reluctance to immediately
forgive those who had denounced the Name of Jesus under severe Roman
persecution). Yet why do I sense that Freemasons trace to Novatians and
Waldensians for serpentine reasons? Ellen G. White (founder of the Seventh
Day Adventists, a cult in my opinion), had some elevating things to say
about the Vaudois (i.e. Waldensians) and the Albigenses, which she lumped
together as one brotherhood.
The homestead.com website above traces them to the Albigenses (of
southern France), a major sect of Cathars. The writer shows love of the
Albigenses by saying concerning them: "a civilization in advance of that
in other countries." The website uses the phrase, "friends of God," to
define the true Church (that is being traced there), as though he knows of
their leading to the Quakers (who I think were a break-away sect of
Rosicrucians proper) and/or of their stemming from the Bogomils (some
define "Bogomil" as "friends of God."). One website says that Bogomils
"rejected water-baptism, like the modern Quakers; they declared the
Lord’s Supper to be the sacrifice of demons..."
http://www.reformedreader.org/history/vedder/ch06.htm
Apparently, Quakers and other gnostics thought too highly of
themselves to declare the old man sunk and the new man risen. After all,
having so-called "inner light," Quakers and Rosicrucians are a superior class
of humans. Gnostics see endless mysteries laid between the lines of
Scripture that only they can fish out, and if that's not enough, they derive
many other extra-Biblical truths from their own gifted imaginations. Where
would Christianity be without them? Less confused.
Evidence that Cathars and/or Vaux were Goths is in Cathar
associations with the Bogomils, the latter having origins in Bulgarian
gnostics. That is, as Goths originated in the Getae Thracians that lived in
what became Bulgaria, I'm suggesting that Bogomils furnished Vaux Goths
of Septimania. Perhaps the "Baux" version (of "Vaux") derived from
"Bogomil" itself. As the origin of the latter term is not known for certain, I
can enter my own possibility, that it stemmed from the Khazar/Gogi king-
term, "bek/beg." The question is, what could the "mil" ending refer to?
Melia = honey? Is it another coincidence that "bek/beg" looks like "bij,"
Dutch for "bee"? Might "Bogomil" mean "honey king"? Why were
Bogomils in Bosnia, named after the Bosna river, itself possibly named after
Buzites? Might "Boi" and "Bog" be synonymous?
Bogomils believed like Mormons that Jesus and Satan were brothers
at first, and like the Jehovah's Witnesses that Jesus was Michael the
archangel. These ideas are similar enough in their unreal extremism to
compare with Vaux doctrines. As I suspect that theVaux, whose colors were
red and gold, were the root of the red and gold of certain Dutch
regions/peoples, especially Flanders and their Fleming founders, so I found
that the quasi-monastic mystics called "Beguins" were at "Mechlin as early

671
as 1207, at Brussels in 1245, at Louvain in 1234, at Bruges in 1244, and
by the close of the century there was hardly a commune in the
Netherlands without its Beguinage."
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02389c.htm
As the origin of "Beguin" is also uncertain, a link to the Bogomils is
possible. But what stands out is that the regions above conform to those of
the Bruces. The Beguins were an all-female organization; their male
counterparts, the Beghards, conducted some of their religious services in the
nude ... thus smacking of homosexuality. Haven't we all wondered whether
monastics were such largely for their hiding away and practicing sexual sin,
or whether Satan led them into isolation to make them uneffective for
Christ ... and meanwhile placing homosexual spirits in their midsts? There
definitely existed in Rosicrucian cults a "spiritual sexuality" devolving into
the most pathetic of sexual conduct, now being witnessed as child
molestation among the clergy but with worse things yet to be revealed, I'm
sure.
Is it a coincidence that while the origin of the Beghards "is not
known, however they appeared at Louvain in 1220... ? The Bruces trace
"

back to the rulers of Louvain (Robert de Bruges, 11th-century progenitor of


the Bruces, was the son of Lambert I of Louvain). My point here is not in
particular to make a Bruce-Beghard connection (unless evidence for it
shows up), but to make a connection between the Beghards/Beguins and the
Aryan-Hebrews to which (I think) the Bruces belonged.
As I have not only connected the Vaux to a branch of Cohens, and the
Bruces to another Cohen branch, my conclusion is that I am dealing with
Hebrews that turned Christian, albeit a twisted form ... and who knows but
that these may have been maranos (Vatican-forced converts). Evoking the
Templars who persecuted the Jews of western Europe, there were maranos
"devoid of any real affection for Judaism, and indifferent to every form
of religion, gladly embraced the opportunity of exchanging their
oppressed condition as Jews for the brilliant careers opened to them by
the acceptance of Christianity. They simulated the Christian faith when
it was to their advantage, and mocked at Jews and Judaism."
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=169&letter=M
When one takes on Christianity apart from the choosing of God,
where the Holy Spirit in that life will not appear, it gives birth to distorted
Christianity. The monastics certainly went down a crooked path, some of
them behaving quite demonically, as for example the "flagellants" who
whipped themselves to draw blood. The goal of distorted Christians always
becomes some manner of sinfulness in the name of God, but where the sin is
viewed as ideal/purity/spiritual. In some cases, as in pantheism, God is
murdered altogether (i.e. the creation itself in viewed as God). In that world
view, it becomes open season for sinfulness, and this always leads to a
"waste-land" society that becomes so disillusioned (because the grand
realities it expected don't turn up) and incapable that it falls apart. What
concerns us in these days is that such mystics are yet with us among

672
charismatic movements, who practice witchcraft in the name of "miracles"
of God. What concerns me here is that the Beghards might be shown to be
of Hohen blood in this quote:
“...Gregory XI [14th century] who associated the
Flagellants with other heretical groups, notably the
Beghards...In German they claimed they could resurrect
emperor Frederick II.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flagellant
Apparently, these mystics honored Frederick II (13th century), known
to have been a Hohen(staufen). It's possible that he was honored, not for his
Hohen blood, but for his Norman mother, daughter of Roger II of Sicily
(who belonged to an important Templar-associated bloodline seeking the
Jerusalem throne). It may even be that the Sicilian Normans were a Cohen
branch...in that I suspect the Templars themselves to have been so.
This would be a good place to expound a little on the nature of
Rosicrucian Christianity as it developed into the Illuminati. Wikipedia
articles share the following (brackets not mine):
"Beghards were also influenced by the pantheism of
a mystical sect, the Brethren of the Free Spirit ... The
beginnings of medieval pantheistic Christian theology lie
in the early 13th century... Fourteen followers of Amalric
began to preach that 'all things are One, because
whatever is, is God.' They believed that after an age of
the Father (the Patriarchal Ae) g and an age of the Son
(Christianity), a new age of the Holy Spirit was at
hand ... They rejected the Christian concepts of creation
and redemption, saying that since all was God, there
could be no sin, and any action whatsoever was
permitted. They taught the 'Freedom of the Spirit' in the
sense that the human soul, like God, was considered
beyond and above the concepts of Good and Evil ... They
also referred to themselves as illuminati."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brethren_of_the_Free_Spirit
While it's a fact that " Vaux" modified to " Vallibus" and "Welles," it's
my personal theory (perhaps shared by others) that it was also the root of the
Walloon region of Belgium. I'm repeating this here because "Wallonia" has
a striking similarity with "Walden(sian)." A Waldensian-Wallonia
connection can be strengthened if the Waldensians were Bogomils from
Bulgaria, and if Bulgaria is related to Belgium. As Flanders was beside
Wallonia, it's interesting that among the first-known Stewarts were the
names, Walter and Flaad. As Stewarts (blue and white Cohens) tended to be
pro-Catholic, so a major criticism of the Waldensians, especially in the years
which saw the first Stewarts, is that they retained Catholic doctrines too

673
closely for comfort. There were pro-Catholic and anti-Catholic houses of
Hohens (red and white Cohens).
I keep seeing the rooster crop up in coats of arms; it's the Sinclair
Crest The Sinclair clan ruled as Rosicrucian leaders in Scotland about the
.

same time as the Bruces were prominent Robert Bruce I was grandmaster of
Rosicrucians). I had reasoned that since "kok" is the root term of the
Bulgarian "egg," that "cock" is a "Gog"-derived word. Therefore, consider
this from an article on the French city of Lyons (anciently Lugdunum):
"Lug's 'totem' was a cockerel (rooster), hence the Modern French
association with 'le coq'."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyon
Wow. I had been wondering how to connect the cock symbol to Gog
for years, and now that I've learned that it was a symbol of Lug, I have my
means. For Lug must be the Celt symbol of the Lugii/Ligurians, while the
Greek symbol of Liguria was Cycnus/Cygnus. Although I had viewed
"Cycnus" as Ladon-based Caucones, the alternative, "Cygnus," has become
a part of my Cohen theme in that it appears to be a form of "kagan." That
term connects to Bulgarians and other Togarmites, who were the root of the
wolf symbol, a symbol also of the Stewarts. The fact that "cygnus" means
"swan" (in Greek and Latin) while Stewarts also use a swan symbol seems
to clinch the Stewart-Cygnus connection. Therefore, while "Lug" itself
means "wolf," his symbol was the egg/rooster due to connection with the
Gogi of Liguria.
The Sinclairs can thus be traced to those Ligurian Gogi, but more
immediately to the Lug-Danann Celts of Britain ... who were ousted from
Ireland and retreated to the European mainland, where they named
Lugdunum, which was not only the city of Lyons, but a large region that
later became Ardennen/Ardennes (mainly on Meuse river), and finally
Luxembourg. These regions are in what is to this day Wallonia, and so see
that the symbol of Wallonia is the rooster seen in the Sinclair Crest!! The
origin of the term, Wallonia, is uncertain, but as its rooster is red on gold
background, it could certainly be that it's a version of "Wells" and/or
"Vallibus." The Wells-family Coat uses the same color scheme, a red lion
on gold background, as well as the black Hohen lion on the Crest.
The question now is, did the Waldensians move to Lyons and to
Wallonia, and name the latter, because they were distant relatives of the Lug
peoples who had previously settled those areas? Recall that I had traced the
Lug peoples to the Bolgs/Belgians/Bulgarians (long before I knew anything
about Waldensians and Bogomils). Because Lug represented the Tuatha de
Danann, he became the red and gold colors of the MacDonalds. Behold the
prominent city in Ardennes, Liege, and that the Bishopric of Liege flag
uses red and gold stripes, and three red cornucopia on gold background (also
three green lions). A link back to the Sabina-Italian cornucopia cult is likely,
and this is supported where the Walloon language was Romanish.
The Pollock Coat uses three cornucopia, so I'll repeat here the
similarity between "Pollok" and "Lug/Liege," and re-echo my theory

674
wherein the Leda-based Gogi peoples of codeword, Pollux (Leda's son),
may be understood as Po(-river)-Lug/Loki ... which in the real world may
have been Bologne (south of the Po river, between the Sabina and the
Ligurians). The Cygnus Gogi, remember, were a mix of Leda and Zeus
coming upon her in the form of a swan (she gave birth to Pollux in an egg!).
Find what the swan symbol of Greek myth referred to, and you might
not only find which people-group Zeus referred to, but the non-Ladon root
of the Ligurians (and forthcoming Ligurian-based Celts). I would suggest
Cygnus, son of Ares. I would also suggest Leto (not Leda), for she, while in
the form of a swan, gave birth to Apollo and Artemis -- from eggs --
wherefore she and they connect to Leda and her children. They were the
same peoples, in other words, but at different times and geographies. They
were the wolf line from northern Russia, and I think the swan has no more
meaning than to indicate the "Caucone" peoples merely because the Greek
for swan happened to be similar: "kuknos." So always remember, the
esteemed swan symbol, soft and nice, traces back to the Gogi, what the
Bible says will furnish the end-time anti-Christ for the purpose of setting up
Armageddon.
Having known that the Cenomanni of Normandy were the same as the
Catuvellauni Celts of Belgium, I expected to find, in Belgium, the brother-
tribe of the Cenomanni: the Eburoicum/Eburovices. To my amazement,
Lorri, not knowing that I was just then seeking Eburoicum in
Belgium/Wallonia, emailed me Strabo's list of Belgian Celts, which list
included the Eburones!! See the Eburovices and Eburones on this
expandable ancient map of France and see that the Eburones were at the
,

mouth of the Rhine, where Merovingians originated. I would strongly


suggest, therefore, that the Hebrew elements of the Merovingians (and
perhaps the Vaux as well) were in Eburo-peoples.
I don't know if the Catuvellauni (of south England) were the same as
the Catalauni seen in south Belgium, but it seems the likely reason that
historians trace the Catuvellaunus to Belgium. I see that the Catalauni are
located (see map above) next to the Parisii, who I think were the same as the
Eburoicum that founded York. In keeping with my Bruges connection to the
Bruces/Epirus/Eburoicum, Wikipedia writes: "Prior to the Roman
invasion of Britannia, the area now covered by Yorkshire was mostly in
the territory of the Brigantes ...A tribe of the Brigantes, the Parisii..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Yorkshire
Again, these peoples tie back to the golden-fleece rider,
Phrixes/Phryxus, he being a depiction of the Kabala Bryges/Phrygians, but
becoming (in my guess-timation) the Frisians at the mouth of the Rhine. It
becomes clear that they became the Trojans ruled by Paris and Priam
(Abraham?) that upon losing the Trojan war became the Franks.
As the Vaux surname modified to "Wells" and "Vallibus" in Britain,
all thought (probably erroneously) to have meant "valley," and seeing that
the English "Vale/Veil" surname is said (at houseofnames.com ) to mean
"valley," the latter may just be a Vaux branch. As some evidence, therefore,

675
of a Vaux-Cohen link, note the six black phoenix (a Hohen, Epirus, and
Illyrian symbol) on the English Vale/Veil Coat .

Why do you suppose I connect the phoenix symbol to the Cati/Cutha?


Because Cadmus (= Cati-Serpent) was the son of Phoenix, and moreover
Cadmus was the brother of Cilix = Cilicia where the Cati and Kahu(ians)
lived. In Greek myth, Cadmus became a serpent when entering Europe, and
he gave birth to a son, Illyrius ... which must be the reason that Illyrium uses
a phoenix symbol. From Illyrius came Pannonius/Paeon, which must have
been Pan the goat/Satyr. Being a peoples of Thebes, Cadmus became, in my
opinion, the Sheba peoples of Italy, the Sabina ... and the cornucopia symbol
of the Sabina, being the horn of a goat, must have depicted the Pan
Satyrs ... that were among the Sabina.
At the freepages website below, "Worely" is said to derive from the
Whalley family the latter (holy to the Conqueror) being suspect as a branch
,

of Vaux. The Worely Coat uses three cornucopia, wherefore connection


with the Berts and Pollocks is suspect. To put it another way, the Polloks
and Berts may thus connect with the Vaux Cohens. There are several
purported standard bearers of William the Conqueror, and houseofnames (at
the Whalley link above) echoes the following claim: "The Domesday Book
( compiled in 1086 by William the Conqueror ), the Ragman Rolls, the
Wace poem, the Honour Roll of the Battel Abbey, The Curia Regis,
Pipe Rolls, the Falaise Roll ... etc., etc., shows the first record of the name
Worley... descended from Wyamarus Whalley ...the Standard Bearer at
the Battle of Hastings."
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~colinworley/
On the other hand, Williams' standard bearer was Rollo's grandson,
Toustain/Thurston, who can be tied to Hohens in that he was of Grimaldi
blood "According to [Mr. Stacey Grimaldi], Crispinus, Baron of Bec,
:

was the son of Crispina, daughter of Rollo, by Grimaldus, Prince of


Monaco... Crispinus had five sons, one of whom, Rollo, was the father of
Goisfrid de Bec or Marescal, and Toustain Fitz Rou, the standard-
bearer at Hastings." Is it a coincidence that "Bec" may be a variation of
"Baux/Vaux"?
I should mention here that Toustain's brother, Guido I, was "Prince of
Monaco... ancestor of the GRIMALDIS, Sovereign Princes of Monaco."
These red-and-white-diamond Grimaldis likely represent the first (and
perhaps the only) contact of Hohen blood with the Rollo-to-Conqueror
Sinclair line. As black was a common Hohen color (e.g. black lion, black
phoenix), so note the black Sinclair cross on silver background. See that
the black on silver Worely chevron is a reflection of the Sinclair Cross, and
that the Whalley Coat is likewise black (fish/whales) on silver. As the
Hohen lion was black on gold background, recall the black lion of Flanders
(on gold background), and see that the English Flanders-family Coat uses
black stars on silver in the coat's Chief.
Bec is in Normandy. Since one website says, "our familiar beck is bec
in Normandy," I have reason to inspect the English Bech Coat which uses
,

676
the same black stars (pentagrams) on silver background. The Coat also uses
the same white cross on red background used on this expandable
Prussian/Hohen plaque ... where the black Hohen lion on gold can also be
seen. I feel that I'm dealing with Cohen elements all the more in the Bech
surname because the Bech Crest is a swan. Note the black rooster in the
plaque, the family of which I have yet to identify.
The Bech cross is found on the plague directly above the red triple
chevron symbol, and to the right of the Grimaldi red and white diamonds. I
mention the red triple chevron because it was the Taddei symbol that I am
hoping to tie to Lothian and/or Wales and/or the Tuatha de Danann, and
because "...Robert de Todeni, who served as William the Conqueror's
Standard Bearer during the Battle of Hastings..."
The Clare family used the red triple chevron, and while I've said
previously that an online article differentiated between Clares and
Sinclairs/Claros, Lorri sent me an webpage (below) that shows the Clares
stemming (illegitimately) from the Sinclair, Richard II, duke of Normandy.
Richards great grandson (Richard Fitz Gilbert) came with the Conqueror
(who was also from the loins of Richard II) and was immediately wealthy.
Did the triple chevron belong to the Claros, therefore, at that early time?
http://www.todmar.net/ancestry/clare_main.htm
How many standard bearers canthere be for that same battle? Could
they all have been from Cohen elements? Knowing that the Stewarts (blue
and white Cohens) were rulers of Albany, read this: "Interestingly, Robert
[de Todeni's] descendants were surnamed Albini, and were members of
one of the most powerful of medieval England's noble families ...When
the last male Albini heir died in 1247, Belvoir Castle passed through
marriage to Robert de Ros and his heirs."
http://www.castlegate.net/CASTLES/BELVOIR/
Let me begin by pointing out the Spanish Ros Coat it being a black
,

double-headed phoenix, the symbol of Epirus, neighboring Illyrium ... and


Albania (Illyrium became Albania). It wouldn't be a great surprise to find a
link between Albania and Pictish Alba, or that Albi of France, the city that
named the Albigenses Cathars, was a part of these peoples. The Ros clan tie
to Illyrium becomes stronger because that nation is revealed in Greek myth
as a stem from the two snakes, Harmonia and Cadmus, they depicting the
Rus-Cutha mix that defines the dragon bloodline in a nutshell. Harmonia
was made daughter of Ares = Hros! Might these two peoples be the two-
headed eagle? Lorri found a wealth of information disclosing heraldry
identities, including this:
Under the Emperors of the house of Hohenstaufen
(1138-1254), the eagle became the accepted symbol of the
rulers of Germany, and through a series of
embellishments was turned from a simple one-headed
bird (black on a gold shield) into the glorious two-headed
creature that became the symbol of the Holy Roman
Empire."

677
http://imperialcollegeofprincesandcounts.com/_wsn/page18.html
Another website claims that:
"The two-headed eagle appears on the coat of arms
of following countries:

Albania
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Republika Srpska
Byzantine Empire
Russian Federation
Russian Empire
http://moesia.en.infoax.com/en/two-headed+eagle

I'm not biting too hard, therefore, when I read that the two eagle heads
referred specifically to a Byzantium-Rome combo that made up the Empire,
for the occult eagle symbol pre-dates Rome and appears in this list to be of
the Thracian limbs. As the two-headed eagle is also the symbol of Serbia
(serpa = serpent?), the claw points to the Goths/Getae of that ancient region.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the two-headed eagle is the symbol both
of Bosnia and Byzantium, since the same linguistic root is apparent in both
terms. We're talking proto-Slav Rus here, very very obviously, Nahorites
and Buzites included. The way in which Romans may use the same symbol
is in the Rus blood of most Italians; more specifically, via the Moesi of what
is now Serbia, for as the Moesi were the proto-Lydians, they must also have
been proto-Latins.
If this makes the Moesi carriers of the Ladon dragon, it supports my
view that the Meons of Britain were from the proto-Lydian Meoni.
Unless Epirus and Albania were somehow important regions of the
Holy Roman empire (not likely, see out-of-the-way location of Albania I ),

would conclude that the black two-headed phoenix was at first a symbol of
Epirus, and later taken on by the Holy Roman empire when the dragon
bloodline of Epirus (i.e. the Cohens/Hohens) came to rule Europe.
So, yes, the Cohen and Hohen Hebrews are to be traced to Epirus (no
doubt to Chaonia). But as Albania (smack next to Chaonia) also came to use
the "glorious" (= a disillusioned writer) two-headed symbol, I conclude that
the same power-sucking, flesh-destroying, conscience-devoid dragon
clotline moved north into what is now Albania. And that could be the root of
Albi and Alba (and perhaps even ElfHome in Scandinavia).
It dawned on me, therefore (thanks Lorri if I'm correct) that the Picts
of Epirus, having been elusive thus far -- though they ought to be there
along with Molossus (the mythical brother of Pictus) -- were among those

678
that eventually named Albania. An hypothetical Alba tribe of Illyrians, that
is.
Well, in doing a search I found that there was in fact an "Albanoi"
tribe of Illyrians thought to have named Albania. Then, on an online
navigational map of ancient Illyrium I found "Albocensii! What excellent
,

timing, Lorri! ! I might not have found this so soon had she not led me to
take another look at Albania. It reveals so very easily what had never
entered my mind before, what I mentioned to Lorri just last night, that the
Albi of France were rooted in Illyrians. Moreover, it verifies what I had
come to suspect, that Cathars centered in the Albigenses cult were
Cutha/Cati Hebrews from Epirus. (If map above is not available, see the
same one here )

The Albocensii are at the top-left of the map, significantly north of the
Albini tribe thought to have named Albania, however. As my mother is a
Masci on one side, I will also point out the Mascianae tribe east of the
Albocensii. One can see the Picensii tribe to the south-east of the Albocensii
(my mother was born in the town of Picenze (Abruzzo, Italy). Further to the
east are the Rhatacensii and the Caucoensii ... who no doubt became the
Rhaetians/Redones and the Ligurian Cygnus ... the Rus side of the dragon
bloodline! This was Python-Apollo, the swan and the wolf line, the Ladon
eggs of Leto and Leda, that crashed the sun-god bloodline into mythical
Eridanus (the Rhodanus = Rhone valley).
None of this proves that the Albanoi and/or Albigenses ancestors
connect with the Picts, but it may only be a matter of time, for Lorri
revealed that the Albanians were matrilinear, as were the Picts. I'll discuss
this in the next chapter.
Houseofnames.com says that the Spanish "Ros" derives from the rose.
I imagine this family to be a major symbol of the Hebrew-Rus alliance that
was Rosicrucianism proper. Both the Scottish and English Ros(s) Crests use
a green ring, and both Coats use three white lions on red background. This
means that the two are the same family, and houseofnames verifies that this
is the Ross clan from an Andrew ("Anrias") patriarch, the same that formed
Ross-shire that coupled with Morayshire. This clan is moreover said to be
rooted (perhaps on one side only) in the O'Beolan family of Ireland,
wherefore I suspect strongly that the hand holding the green ring (in the
Ross Crest) refers to the O'Beolans, more-so because I have felt (on instinct
alone) that a hand holding an object is a symbol of Irish-ness.
The green ring is important here because the Bert Crest uses it too.
As I trace Berts and Pollocks back to the Sabina cult of eastern Italy, they
must go back further to Epirus. Molise in the Sabina region was the Molosse
region of Epirus; and the region north of Molise, Aprutium/Abruzzo, was
named after Epirus itself. My mother was born in Abruzzo, and that's the
single reason that I have come this far on this topic, meanwhile discovering
that Abruzzo-Epirus is a key for unraveling the west-Europe dragon
cult... something I learned when tracing the Bruce kings to Abruzzo
elements.

679
As the Bruces were related to Meschin, my mother's Masci side may
apply. As her other side is Grimaldi, it eggs me on to discovering Hohen
roots. As the half-Grimaldi ancestor (Crispin) of the Conqueror's standard
bearer (Toustain, a ruler of Bec) may have had something to do with
forming the red and gold checks, found to this day as the symbol of the
Vaux name (i.e. a third type of Cohens), it eggs me on.
What eggs me all the more is that Robin, upon my asking her if she
knew anything about Bec, wrote back and showed that her very own Tuttle
and Welles surnames (that she is independently trying to trace into distant
history) were connected to Bec:
"John you are gonna love this! This is the line from
Crispin and our mystery link between Tuttle Otis and
Welles:
Le Bec-Hellouin
'For a time the [Bec] abbey had a priory in South
London, which gave its name to the neighborhood there
of Tooting Bec'
The abbot of Bec was also a can. of Wells, as
preb[endary] of Cleeve, see documents of 1199, Bec Docs.
nos. 23, 27, 38, and M. M. Morgan, English Lands of the
Abbey of Bec (Oxford, 1946), pp. 142-3."
http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=34358
Robin had previously traced both the Tuttle and Welles surnames to
Bec, before she knew me. She related these things to me just a few weeks
ago, when I could not see the significance. I now see that she was
introduced to me by my Pollock correspondent for just this reason of filling
in an important dragon-line blank. Remember, "Wells" is a version of
"Vaux." I can't find online whether the "Hellouin" term connects to these
peoples, but it sure does look like a version of "Geloni/Wallonia," and of
course the mythical Helen that I have connected (theoretically) to the
Geloni ...being also the mythical Helenus of Epirus!
Moreover, Robin told me (a few weeks ago) that another of her
parental surnames was Fleming, and it was this that caused me to later
discover the red and gold Vaux checks, for the Irish Fleming Coat uses
them. As the Flemings were founders of Flanders, and Wallonia is situated
next to Flanders, Wallonia is very-likely connected to Wells elements of the
Vaux. Keep in mind my certainty that we're dealing with the mythical
Argonauts here, who were the proto-MacDonald Danann of Ireland and yet
also the/some Belgics. The red phoenix of the MacDonald/Donnel Coat is
likely the red Hohen phoenix (of Brandenburg), while the ship on the
phoenix is likely the Argo.

680
Just a couple of days after finding the Fleming checks, I found that
the Baring Coat was fully the same checks. At that time I could not
understand why "Becking/Beckering" was said (by houseofnames; see
above link) to be a variation of "Baring," but I now see it!! Those
exclamation marks are due to the possibility that the red and gold checks
belong majorly to the founders of Bec (by that name). I suspect that "Bec"
traces to the Khazar/Bulgarian king-term, "beg/bek"...which may have been
a bee-king term.
It's interesting that the Irish Flemings are the ones to use those
checks, for who knows but that I may be correct in tracing those checks to
red and gold MacDonald elements i.e. to the "Conn" terms of Ireland. As the
MacDonalds were from the Domnann peoples of Ireland, see on the ancient
Illyrium map above that smack next to the Albani there is Epidamnia (Epi-
Damnia). The Hellouin Coat is very close to the Clare Coat and both use
,

the red and gold colors.


This is all the more interesting to me because the Tuttle surname may
just connect to the red triple chevron of the Taddei side of my father. Early
rulers/abbots of Bec were from the Claros/Clares, which likewise used the
symbol. In looking into the Tooting-Bec term, I found that it was an English
region "named after Bec Abbey in Northern France," and that, prior to
Bec's involvement, "Tooting has been settled since pre-Saxon times, and
its name means 'the dwelling of the sons of Totas.'"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tooting
Who were the Totas peoples? All I could find was a non-English
Wikipedia article on "Totas," which in English is "Thoth," this translating to
the Hermes bloodline in Britain.
http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totas
In a previous chapter, I had entertained Tuisto, chief god of
Germanics, as Thoth, in that Tuisto brought forth Mannus and Hermin
(Mannaens and Armenians, I think, the gods Manes and Hermes). Could,
therefore, Toustain (grandson of Crispin) have been named after Tuisto?
Remember, as it may be critical, that those who used "Todeni" were of the
Albini surname.

681
MOLECH IS SICK,
CAT-SCAN REVEALS
October 2006

Assuming that Picts furnished Lothians and that the latter


were the Ladon dragon of Greece come to western Altlantis, the
Picts ought to trace back to Echidna because she was made (by
myth writers) Ladon's mother. As she was also the mother of the
Nemian lion, she is suspect for depicting the same-old sacred lion
of the dragon bloodline... even the lion symbol of Britain. How
interesting would it be, therefore, to identify that lion as an
historical peoples? And how sick and far from the truth were those
peoples for continually depicting themselves with various animals,
most sacred of which was the Eden serpent?
For new readers, I seek the devil- dragon cult in the Cati sect
of the Kabala, not only because Echidna's mother was Ceto, but
because "Echidna" itself seems to be a variation of
"Akkadia"...wherein the Cadi/Cati term originates (in my opinion).
Evidence that early British peoples stemmed from Echidna is in
the fact that she was married to Hercules, the conqueror of western
Atlantis associated with the Lydian lion.
Hercules had "killed" the Nemian lion, but then wore its fur,
meaning that he was a peoples who fought a war with the peoples
depicted by the lion, but in living amongst them for that reason,
the two peoples became one. This event was early, the so-called
First Labor, wherefore it was prior to the conquering of Atlantis,
by which I mean to say that the Nemian lion was essentially
Hercules, when Hercules came to Britain. Or, more exactly, it had
evolved into the Lydian lion (i.e. depicting Lydian peoples) but
mixed with the Danaan blood of Hercules. It is known that the
Hercules bloodline entered the Lydian peoples at the Mysians,
who were proto-Lydians, wherefore the Mysians and Moesi
become candidates for being represented by the Nemian lion.
See on this navigational map of ancient Illyrium (if not
available, see the same map here) that the Moesi were near the
Adriatic sea just north of Epirus (in what is now Serbia), and that
Dacians (= Getae Thracians) were parked in their kingdom. As
Jordanes revealed Amazons to be a portion of his Gothic peoples,
and because I identified Amazons as Meshech, note that the Daci-

682
branch Getae lived on the Moschius river. But as the Moesi also
lived on that river, might they not have been Meshech as well?
Because I had identified the Nergal lion symbol as belonging to
the Caucasian Hros, I can see that the Moesi and/or Dacian Goths
were of the same Meshech-Rus peoples that founded Moscow.
Which portion of these Thracians, therefore, will side with
end-time Gog in attacking Israel (as per Ezekiel 38)? Will their
western branches play a part? I don't know. What I do know is that
the three frogs of Revelation 16 unite with the anti-Christ for
Armageddon (but it doesn't necessarily mean that they will
contribute earlier to his invasion of Israel). As I surmised those
frogs to be French-Dutch rulers of the dragon bloodline, while I
see resemblances between "Dacia" and "Dutch," and "Holland"
and "Alan," it's worth mentioning here.
Remember, Amazons married Gargarians (= Gorgons /
Georgians) in furnishing the Rus, but this mix was also deemed the
Sauromatians/Alans, an important point when later I touch on the
Hebrew tincture of mythical codewords, Helen and Helenus. As
more evidence that the Sauromatians/Alans were a Hros peoples
who became Spartans, "sauros" is "lizard/snake" in Greek,
wherefore follow that snake to Ares of Thrace, he being the Hros
dragon/serpent giving birth to the Sparti, explaining why Helen
was a Spartan branch of people.
If I'm correct, then the Alans were as Sepharvite/Subardic as
I claim the Spartans to have been, and moreover Alan rudiments
become the basis of the Sabina Italians and all the western
Europeans stemming from them (e.g. the Suebi). The first Franks
trace back to Suebi elements, wherefore the Dutch did likewise,
and so consider again my claim that the golden fleece, because its
rider was Phrixus, became the Frisians (north Holland). Put that
claim beside the mythical fact that "Helle" was the twin sister of
(i.e. same peoples as) Phrixus, and Holland pops to mind.
The Arms of Friesland and Arms of Netherlands use two
gold lions (on blue background), a point that becomes more
important by this chapter's end. The Arms of the Dutch use a gold
lion on red, or a red lion on gold (website below).
http://www.answers.com/topic/gouda-arms-of-dutch-
republounty-holland-kingdom-the-netherlands j^g
The entire Greek family under codeord w Hellen" ought
likewise to have been from the first floors of Sauromatia (same as
"Sarmatia"), and as Georgians played a part in making up half the
Sauromatians, expect the Laz Georgians to have been central, for
the Nergal lion married mythical Laz. It bears repeating here that
Xuthus was a son/branch of Hellen, a term smacking of the Cutha
Kabala.

683
As Nergal is known to have been the god of the Cutha, how
does the Hebrew portion of the Cutha play into the Moesi and/or
Dacian picture? As part of the Dacian Goths, naturally, which is
why I expect that the Cutha ended up in the Normandy-
Netherland-Belgium coastal strip as the gold lion symbol. In short,
the Nergal lion = the Goths, a Hebrew-Rus mix that conforms to
the Gauls and Germanics. Shouldn't roughly the same apply when
the lion reaches Celtic Britain?
At times, the lion symbol is viewed (to this day) as a leopard.
Dionysus (depicting Curetes) was made to dress in leopard's fur
when doing battle ... meaning that the Curetes were the ones
depicted as a lion. The Curetes then point to the Kartvelians/Kartli,
who were the Laz (i.e. proto-Ladon) of Georgia/Abkhazia.
Okay, so it fits, meaning that I have learned the keys to
unlocking this mystery. Evidence that I am on the right track is in
the Arms of Kurdistan, using a black eagle (holding the sun god),
the symbol used also by Epirus/Albania//Hohens. Assuming that
the Kurds were anciently the Curetes/Kartli, this again ties the
Cohen family of surnames to Molech. In that the eagle was a
symbol also of Romans, see that the Kurdish flag is evocative of
the Italian flag. The Lydian lion had a sun planted on it's snout,
and of course by now you know that the sun god of Sumeria was
depicted as a dragon with a leopard body and eagle parts. To these
things add the fact that the Romans also used a lion to depict
themselves, and realize here, at least, that this lion does not go
back to the tribe of Judah or any other Israeli blood, but to Nergal
of the Cutha, and to the Laz/Ladon peoples that Nergal was inter-
married (if not under sacred-covenant) with.
Ladon is revealed in myth as mythical Daphne, depicted by
orpoise symbols across Europe especially the Dauphine region of
f rance. ..up the Rhone river an(f leading to the Rhine. How "she"
arrived to the Rhone, by continent or by sea, is yet a toss up, but
the porpoise symbol would suggest a sea route. As "porpoise" is
literally "sea pig," it squares with my previous findings wherein
the Ladon bloodline was depicted with a boar (i.e. Artemis the
Amazon), and then becoming the Caledonian Picts via the Selene-
Endymion alliance at Latmus. It's possible that these north
Africans (Gorgons, I'm sure) became the Latins at roughly the
same time that they settled the mouth of the Rhone (not later than
about 1000 BC).
Recall that I had drawn a connection between Molosse and
Molech (purely on similarity of terms, but with a strong intuitive
feeling of being correct). Recall that I had identified the Zeus bull
of Crete as a Molech cult, and that Zeus worshipers (Curetes)
moved especially to Dodona in Epirus, a region that I think was
named after Dedan, even as I think the Sabina were named after

684
his brother, Sheba. Recall that the cornucopia cult of the Sabina
was earlier on Crete, as the goat peoples who raised Zeus to
adulthood, and that these were the same as the honey/bee-people
symbolized by Melissa, who depicted the same Curetes as did the
Curete leader, Melisseus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melisseus
This is not difficult; the goat peoples were Curetes that were
deemed Satyrs in Europe, and as they are, surely, named after
Saturn, it verifies that they were the Molech cult in that Saturn is
known to be Molech by another name, as was Cronus, Zeus'
"father." Can we not suspect that the Curetes depicted by
Melisseus were founders of Molosse...in that Zeus worshipers
moved to Epirus? This not only supports my view that Molossians
were named after molasses (Greek "mellaceus"), but it traces
Molech-worshiping Curetes to the Sabine region of Molise.
That the Picts were Curetes is already established in my
mind, but by attempting to trace Picts back to Crete, one can
discover other Curete peoples by other names. As Curetes moved
to Rhodes and lived with the Carians already there (I think Curetes
and Carians were named after the same stalk: Cronus), the
Redones of France (initially on the Rhone) are suspect as Curetes-
come-Picts, especially as Picts are routinely traced back to both
Cruithen and Dal-Riada Irish. What I am seeing is a Curete
movement from Sabina Italy into Gaul, and another Curete
movement by sea...up the Rhone to meet the westward continental
Sabina wave. Distinguishing the two at this point is a fog in my
mind, and it may be that they came together back in Rieta province
of Latium (Italian = "Lazio"). I am juggling what I know thus far
to see if the green color/dragon of Italy doesn't fall on the Sabina
wave of Curetes, in that the Rhodes wave ought to correspond to
the red color/dragon. I've noted that the eagle on the Latium Coat
is white.
I didn't have evidence when starting this chapter that the
Sabina retained Molech worship, which thing was expected if the
Sabina were from the Molech cult of Epirus, and if I was correct in
the first place when tracing the Sabina to Epirus. But before
finishing the chapter, I found some whopping evidence, huge
because it also connects Molech to the Suebi, a very important
point indeed. First, let me show evidence for what I have been
claiming on merely an educated guess-timate: that the Suebi
stemmed from the Sabina. This evidence (below) is solid in that
the major Sabina tribe was the Samnian, while Tacitus reported
that:
"The oldest and noblest of the Suebi, so it is said,
are the Semnones, and the justice of this claim is
confirmed by a religious rite ... The sacrifice in public of a

685
human victim ... They dwell in a hundred country districts
and, in virtue of their magnitude, count themselves chief
of all the Suebi."
http://www.ourcivilisation.com/smartboard/shop/tacitusc/germany/chap1.htm#Semnones

The implication is that the Sabina also conducted human


sacrifices. The importance of Suebi inclusion in the Molech
bloodline is that they were alternatively, "Swabians," and Swabia
th-west Germany) came to be the kingdom from which the
tens arose!!
"Swabia consists of much of the present-day state of
Baden-Württemberg (specifically, historical
Württemberg and the Hohenzollerische Lande), as well
as the Bavarian administrative region of Swabia"
(brackets not mine).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swabia
I'm not going to suggest that the Hohens performed human
sacrifices, yet anyway, but will insist that Hohens were of the
Molech bloodline.
Sometimes gems come in a roll. Immediately after entering
the above, I did a search on Semnones, and found this, albeit not
without a loud reaction:
"[The Suebi] central tribe was called the Semnones
and was based in Brandenburg, where they had a shrine
central to all Suebi."
http://www.slitherine.com/Legion/Campaign_2.htm
Why the loud reaction? Because the Hohens were rulers in
Brandenburg! They are, therefore, highly suspect as a Sheba
peoples ... and somewhat suspect as members of the Samnite branch
of Sabina. Brandenburg became Prussia, remember, so that what
blood applies to Brandenburg applies to Prussia. As I've shown
earlier, such terms as "Prussia" and "Brussels" likely stem from the
Bruces, and they in turn from Abruzzo, smack beside Molise.
Moreover, the website above adds this:
"Tacitus has [the Suebi] comprising Hermandurii,
Marcomanni, Quadi and others." It's the Quadi (also
"Coadui") that I would have you focus on. Aside from
their likely being the Catti that became Hesse (Germany),
they may have been at the roots of the Bohemian and/or
Bavarian Illuminati, for "After about 400 CE the old
cremation burials typical of Suevians like the Quadi
disappear in Bohemia. The Quadi are among the mixture
of peoples that evolved into the Bavarians."

686
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadi
It's still foggy in my mind as to what role the Hohens played
in the Bavarian Illuminati, whether for it or against it, or its
creators. One thing I already know is that they trace back in an
unbroken genealogical line to Merovingian kings. This is then
important in that the bee symbol of the Merovingians should trace
through their Suebi blood back to the Sabina bee cult (Opis). Is it a
coincidence that the capital of the Samnites was Bojano (in
Molise), while a Dutch bee is "bij," or did the Bojano end up in the
Netherlands (where also the Merovingians are said to originate) as
the bee-line cult? Is it another coincidence that, while I view the
Sabina as Sepharvites, and that "Spain" was alternatively "Sphen"
and thereby named after the Sephardic "Jews," the bee in Spanish
is "abeja"? Or couldn't "Bojano" have meant "bee people"?
If it's true (as stated) that "Marcomanni" means "men of the
border," they were likely the Quadi, as they were mentioned
alongside the Quadi as though related. They settled Silesia (the
very region that I traced Salian Franks/Merovingians to), and so
read this: "All of Silesia was inherited by Brandenbur ... [later]
most of Silesia was seized by King Frederick the Great of
Prussia." Frederick was a Hohen(zollern)!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silesia
British-Israeli websites claim what at first glance seems
feasible, that the Semnones were of the Israeli tribe of Simeon.
But, aside from the similarity of terms, no further evidence is
given/available. I have a different theory, for a common version of
"Semnone" was "Semoni," and this would seem to stem from the
Italian god: Semo Sancus. Wikipedia reports (website below) that
the temple to this god was on the Quirinal Hill, which was not only
a Sabina hill, but of the Quirites (no doubt the Curetes) branch of
Sabina. The article goes on to say that "Sancus was said to have
one son, the Sabine hero Sabus."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semo_Sancus_Dius_Fidius
Sabus was simply a mythical symbol of the Sabines. If,
thereby, the Semoni tribe of Suebi were from the Semo Sabina,
one can then trace both "Semnone" and "Samnite", not to the
Israeli tribe of Simeon, but to "Semo"...where the root has no "n"
as does "Simeon," but rather attaches an "n" only as a suffix, as in
"Americani" or "Sabina."
Like I said, sometimes gems come in rolls, for immediately
after entering the above paragraph, I did a search on Sabus, and
found verification for my educated guess-timate that the Sabina
were from the Spartans:

687
"In the second century BC, Cato, Cn. Gellius and
Sempronius Tuditanus, claimed that a Spartan named
Sabus was the eponymous founder of the Sabines."
http://www.apaclassics.org/AnnualMeeting/05mtg/abstracts/farney.html
I found yet another gem at the website below that reveals
Semo as the father of Sabus (Sheba?). But that's not the gem I'm
speaking of. It's this:
Picus
A demigod, son of Cronos, living on the Aventine
hill. Kind of divinity that might be likened to the
SATYRS or PANS. He is said to have used powerful
drugs and practised clever incantations and to have
traversed Italy playing the same tricks as the Idaean
DACTYLS. Circe loved him, and being refused,
transformed him into a bird (a woodpecker). Picus is
father (by Canens) of Faunus." (brackets not mine)
http://homepage.mac.com/cparada/GML/OtherDeities.html
Nothing could connect the Picts to Molech as this can, IF
Picus depicted the Picts. He may not have. But what seems certain
is that Picus was ancestral to the Latins and therefore was the
westward continuation of the mythical lion of Akkadia/Echidna.
Picus "is mentioned by Virgil in the Aeneid as being the father
of Faunus, who in turn fathered Latinus."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picus
There is little doubt that Picus depicted the Picensii tribe of
Illyrians, that then became the Picene/Picenti of Naples and
Abruzzo. I won't re-explain here why these terms can refer to a bee
stinger as well as to a woodpecker's beak, but will repeat that the
father of Picus was Saturn. As other myth versions have Circe for
the grandmother/mother of Latinus, I would equate her with
Canens, the mother of Picus-come-Latinus in Roman myth.
Behold that Latmus (near Miletus) was beside the city of Caunus
(in Caria), symbolized by the mythical Kaunos, son of Miletus.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the Curetes are sometimes
numbered nine (rather than ten), and that Merlin myth had nine
sisters (all witches) that ruled over the British apple garden of
Ladon. Therefore, when modern writers yet attempt to portray
these mysteries with glamour, know that the reality is sluttish
(sorry, I don't know of a more-accurate term to use) and everything
harmful to society. Do we think that secret societies kept secrets
for nothing; isn't it obvious from this alone that they performed
disgusting things...in their covens and in their "bee hives"?

688
If your view of a witch is the sweet Samantha Stevens (of
Bewitched), then you are apt to be deceived by cultists today; it's
not a coincidence that both Dick York and Dick Sargeant (the two
who played her husband) were both homosexuals. These are the
same peoples who have come to convince the world that
homosexuality is not disgusting, and the way in which they have
done so is to make everyone perform disgusting acts ... from an
early age, if possible, whether parents like it or not, whether
parents know it or not.
These are the people who should be tormented, and they will
be, mark God's words. These are the peoples whom God wants to
expose and lay bare for all to see, that the world will never again
revert to what they do. They have been allowed "out of the closet"
that the world may see what they do, and to test the rest, that those
who go over to their ways be condemned with them. Behold, even
non-Christians are lamenting the sick development in the media.
I am not suggesting that sexual desires are in themselves
sinful, but control yourself; put away internet porn. I'm not saying
that you're a goat if attractive bodies and certain sexual acts turn
you on. But I am saying that these acts performed for public
display is worthy of severe punishment, especially as it fuels
obsessive behavior/desire in married people and young children
alike, increasing rates of divorce, rape, and you know the rest. If
you're single and must fantasize, don't disgust God by enjoying the
disgusting things seen in pornography. They are snakes who creep
into government positions just to have the ability of corrupting
society.
Do not accept them; do not become comfortable with them;
do not let them get away with it. Protect your children. Complain
to media outlets by phone (letters can get tossed), yell in their ears,
scream, let them shake in your presence, for they know that what
they do is wrong. Where are the church leaders? Too divided to be
of any influence? How can all this take place with so many church
leaders, unless church leaders aren't at all concerned? Exercise
your right to be angry. This justifies anger. What if God lumps you
in with them for your being happy in their society? Are you happy
in Sodom? Is America blessed? Have you fallen for that line?
Would you say that Sodom was blessed?
I'll bet you a bucket of sulfur down your throat, Freemason,
that the peoples of Sodom were the same as those who started the
Molech cult. Understand that Armageddon is Sodom's destruction
on a grand scale. What shall we say to God on that score, that He
needs "anger management"? God is allowing you the power for a
dark hour, Illuminatists, but after that, open your mouth wide to
buckets of sulfur. Swallow it, and let it burn. Call out for mercy,

689
but your screeches will be ignored. You know the end of the story;
our beginning, our honey, your fire in your belly.
As the Molech cult was also in Carthage, Cyrene in eastern
Libya was likely named after peoples that had in the first place
been depicted by Cronus. Doesn't "Cyrene" evoke "green" (Old
English "grene")? The Libyan flag is, after all, nothing (i.e. no
symbols) but green. This has importance in that I had found the
Picts to be depicted by green, leading me to advance them as the
green dragon and/or green lion symbols. A couple of hours after
making the Cyrene-green connection for the first time, I found that
C ene "stood on the boundary of the Green Mountains
(I Jebel Akhaar)."
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04591b.htm
I'm not suggesting that "Cronus" meant "green," but that
"green" was formed from Cronus elements after they had come to
be depicted by that color. In that the malachite gem is so called
due to its green color, might Molech have been painted green for
that reason? And might the cult have used all sorts of terms as
"Green mountains, Green island, Greenland, Greenman, etc.?
Green island belonged to the Tory Fir Bolgs of Ireland; Greenland
was a Sinclair domain; the Greenman was a Roslin-Sinclair
mystery.
"The ancient citizens of Caunus were known for
their sickness and poor health. A harp player named
Stratonicus, known for his sharp tongue, commented
after a visit with the green-skinned residents...it is now
assumed that malaria caused the city's health problems."
http://www.bodrum-bodrum.com/html/history/caunus.htm
"Malaria" and "malachite" have the same root: "mala" =
"sick/bad." Gangrene also comes to mind (note: Gan-grene). It is
said that "malachite" derives from the Greek "malache" (=
mallow-green), which itself derives from the moloukhia plant, a
Middle-Eastern food. When I checked "mallow," I found that the
mallow species of plants included althaea, the name of the
goat/bee peoples who raised Zeus, and callirhoe, the important
name among Greek Calydonians.
Althaea was the mother of Meleager (what I think is a
Molech term), who, because he was made father of Parthenopeus,
became the Parthalons of Britain i.e. the Pretani/Bretons = the
Cruithne. Surely this must mean that the Caledonian Picts stem
from the Parthalons, for Meleager was ruler of Greek Calydon.
Moreover, a "Parthaon" was a Calydon king, father of Oeneus,
while Meleager was the son of Oeneus. The latter term is said to
mean "wine," but suspected to depict fermented honey and/or the

690
honey-wine mix that was central to the orgiastic rituals and
spiritual gnosis of the Curetes.
This would be a good place to re-mention Aeolus, the twin of
Boitius, the two who became the western Atlanteans, but not
before landing in western Italy i.e. in the Tyrrhenian sea. The
leader of the nine sisters of the apple garden was Tyronoe, and the
name of Calydon's wife was Aeolia! Let's not be naive, for the
father of Aeolus was Hellen (to be distinguished from Helen of
Troy but probably depicting the same Helenus Hebrews of Epirus),
while the brother of Aeolus was Xuthus (a symbol of the Cutha
Kabala, I am convinced). In that case, could we equate the
Chaonians of Epirus with Caunus of Caria? Why was
Bodrus/Budrus very near to Caunus while:
"Buthrotos (or Buthrotum) was a city in Epirus
where Helenus, the Trojan seer, built a replica of Troy.
Aeneas landed there and Helenus foretold his future"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truva
There is one statement repeated many times online, that
Cyrene was named after "Kyre." Assuming that this is correct, I
would add that the term should trace back to the Carians ... mythical
Car of the Argos (Aryan?) peoples. I'm convinced that Car is the
Helios wheel (the Semitic "gar" = wheel), and therefore the island
of Rhodes/Rhoda = the Latin wheel, but I'm wondering if "Car"
doesn't trace back to Hari of Afghanistan, the term that furnishes
"Aryan." After all, "Carian" is an acceptable alternative of
"Aryan," as is "Hurrian." Recall that "Pakthas" referred to an
Afghan peoples. Were these the Hari-come-Carians-come-Curetes-
come-Cruithne/Picts?
Readers of previous chapters may know by now that "ari" is,
to this day, Hebrew for lion. Clearly, this lion is not Judah, but the
Rus Aryans. How did "Argos" form from "Ari"? Note that the
Greek "Argolis" (region surrounding Argos) and the Scottish
"Argyll" region evoke Hercules. That is, I think Argos derives
from the same valley as depicted by Hera and Hercules/Heracles:
the Aras river (Caucasia) that was alternatively "Araxes."
Is it a coincidence that Latmus and Miletus, not to mention
continental Rhodes, were in Caria? Connection of Latmus to Lydia
may be in thios statement: "The Lydians are described as a
kindred people of the Carians and Mysians, and all three are
said to have had one common ancestor as well as one common
language and religion. (Herod. i. 171.)"
http://www.lhhpaleo.religionstatistics.net/LHH%20anadolun.html
Latmus was at first "Heraclia," wherefore do know that
Molech had yet another name: "Hercules." This now verifies that
the Molech cult removed to western Atlantis with the Hercules

691
wave of Gorgons. If you're a Freemason and you've been duped
into thinking that the Freemasonic pillars are sacred for Solomon's
honor, you're the fool of your superiors, and they despise you in
that they lie to you. The pillars depict the so-called "pillars of
Hercules," but the Dragon is attempting to take Israel to itself by
tying all things dragon-line to Israel, and to Jesus if possible.
The god of Cyrene, Ammon, should prove to be a Cronus
branch, for Ammon evokes the Biblical fact that the Molech cult
started with the descendants of Lot's son, Ammon. Yes, for
Molech is said, in 1 Kings 11:7, to be "the idol of the sons of
Ammon." It is extremely logical to root the Ladon dragon to this
Biblical person, Lot, therefore, and yet I resist, for there is another
option, namely Lotan son of Seir, the Horite (Hari?). Patience,
until the truth pops out.
I'm assuming that Pictus peoples were in Epirus along with
the Molossians. The Molech connection between Epirus and
Carthage/Cyrene can perhaps be made best through the mythical
Dido, a queen of Tyre (where Molech/Hercules worship was rife)
removed permanently to Carthage on the one hand, and yet
resembling "Dodona" (of Epirus), the place highly sacred to Zeus.
But there is yet another method, in that Alexander the Great was a
descendant of an historical ruler (Neoptolemus) of Epirus, while
the god "Ammon became famous because Alexander the Great
claimed to be his son."
http://www.livius.org/am-ao/ammon/ammon.htm
The Ammon god is shown with ram's/goat's horns at the
above website. As Ammon was equated with Zeus, while Zeus in
his cradle was depicted with a goat peoples, the horns of Ammon
should prove to be goat horns i.e. cornucopia = the Curetes. This
drags Hermes, the sexually-deviant ram (i.e. the golden fleece),
who had goatish Pan as a son, into the Molech cult.
You can see Alexander with Ammon's goat/ram horns at that
website, and I would again stress goat horns (versus ram's horns)
because Daniel 8:5-9 depicts Alexander as a goat. Are you with
me? Alexander was Satyr blood ruling the earth with God's
sanctioning... until Jesus should come to destroy his Greek
kingdom.
In evoking sacrifices to Molech, I've read that the Greeks
after Alexander, those of the Seleucids -- from whom the anti-
Christ will stem -- fried Israelites to death on heated metal
platforms. Neo-Nazi type Freemasonic Aryans would see similar
things re-occur today, but none do they know that they are
persecuting their own kin in the dragon bloodline, for most "Jews"
are just so, the very Aryan-Hebrew bloodline that created
Freemasonry and the Ku Klux Klan in the first place.

692
Alexander traced himself, as you can read at the website
above, to Perseus and Hercules. In the Daniel prophecy, Alexander
the goat attacks and conquers a two-horned ram, the ram being the
Medio-Persian empire (I wonder if the ram = the Aryans while the
goat = the Hebrews). Daniel 8:9 says that the end-time anti-Christ
comes from one of the four horns that grew out of Alexander's
horn. Expect the anti-Christ, therefore, to be a goat-line/Satyr
people, and expect him to receive the punishment worthy of
Molech sinners, for as they burned people alive in the fire, so
Revelation 19 reveals that Jesus will throw the anti-Christ alive
intoafreslgh'cda"ke.
Perfect reward, Lord YHWH! ! Cleanse this planet of these
types, and do not forget those who murder their own children in
the womb without so much as one tear, especially abortionist
doctors who do so for a reward in easy money. Hands hang limp,
says the Bible, like women in labor, at the sight of
Armageddon...when the world realizes its awful mistake. The sad
thing is that this world would not now be what it is if there were
not women numerous enough to join sinful men in their "sexual
revolution." Isn't it odd that this revolution started at the same time
as feminism, when feminism complained that men were sinful?
Rather than be examples of what men should have become like,
the feminists jumped into their sin-pool with both feet. In other
words, feminists were not opposed to sinful, adulterous men (e.g.
staying late at the office), but jealous of them. And so after women
went out to work, the cost of housing doubled (because families
could afford more for housing) so that two incomes are now
needed to pay for the house that only one spouse was able to afford
previously. Is that progress, or a crying shame?
The Ammon website also writes: "In the fifth century, the
Greek researcher Herodotus of Halicarnassus stated in his
Histories that the Lydian king Croesus (560-546) had offered
sacrifices to Ammon." That's pertinent where some have traced
ancient Gog, of Ezekiel's day -- the Gog addressed by YHWH in
Ezekiel 38 -- to the Lydian king, Aly attes II, the king prior to
Croesus. Remember that Lydus (the mythical symbol of Lydia)
was from the line of Kybele and Attis, and thus from the Kabala
cult. As Cotys was the father of Attis, the Cutha -- the Cati of
Cilicia (even Cadmus) that moved to Phrygian Cilicia -- are
revealed as the root of the Kabala. The phoenix symbol belongs to
these, the Cati, so that the Laz-Rus dragon is a phoenix-lion
alliance.
Seeing that the Laz peoples of Lazica may have become the
Laodiceans, was the "Pacatiana" term of Laodicea, not only the
root of "Pict/Pictone," but to be understood as Pa-Cati? If I'm
correct in identifying the Cati with Cadmus, then the Cutha Kabala

693
was in Tyre, wherefore the Litani river a few miles north of Tyre is
where they must have lived. Might Ezekiel 28, where it speaks of
Satan as a king of Tyre (Ithobaal III, I think), be referring to the
Ladon bloodline there? There is no doubt that the Tyre of Ezekiel
27 is comparable to Babylon the Great of Revelation 17, while the
king of Tyre in chapter 28 conforms to the "king of the north" of
Daniel 1 1 ... for in both cases the kings in claim to be God (28:2)
and honor precious stones (28:13); compare with Daniel 11:36-38.
Note that the end of the king of Tyre is said to be in a fire
while everyone is watching (v 18), as when pagans stood round
and watched burning human sacrifices to Molech. The greatest and
repeated charge that God makes against Tyre and her king in those
chapters is against their money-lust, evoking the modern Illuminati
that has become unimaginably wealthy by trade. This is the
Illuminati phoenix, the symbol of greatness of wealth, of empire-
hood, and the mythical Phoenix, father of Cadmus and ruler of
Tyre. It's not of any wonder that there is not enough money to go
around, for the phoenix has horded it, and the dragon protects the
gold in his cave ... but in the end it will go to the humble of the
Lord, says His Law, when the Knight comes on his "white horse"
to slay the dragon. No, it won't be Arthur, nor Ares, for His name
is Meek fitz Truth, and it is by those qualities that he will hold the
Sword of Heaven in His hands. By the fruit of his tongue will the
Word slay the nations, for he has been watching what they do/plan
in secret.
As the founder of Lydia proper was the mythical
Gugu/Gyges who ruled (7th century BC) about the time that
Ezekiel was born, I'd entertain a Tyre-Lydia connection. In fact,
Ezekiel 27:10 places Lydian soldiers in Tyre helping to fend off
Assyrian invaders. What I did not understand previously, that the
Ezekiel text places "Lydia" next to "Put ," I now understand, for
Put was a Libyan peoples while Lydians came to live smack beside
Libya.
Recall that Zeus and Cronus trace to the Israeli shore where
Dagon was worshiped, especially in the city of Dor. Then read that
Cyrene "was founded early in the seventh century B.C. by a
Dorian colony from Thera..." (a Cyclade island off the coast of
Greece). Also keep in mind that Dorians of Greece were likely
Edones along with Macedonians (Alexander was a Macedonian)
and for that reason a connect to the Satyr Edonians is all-too
feasible. Also keep in mind that "Macedonian" may be a variation
of Megiddo(n) i.e. the expected location of Armageddon (Dor and
Megiddo are very near to each other).
The website giving the above quote connects Lydians to
Libya, saying that Cyrene "was the chief town of the Lydian
region between Egypt and Carthage." Is that the Ladon dragon of

694
north Africa ... that became the Picts and Lothian? Is that Latmus
removed to Libya?
The Marcomanni and Quadi "descended from the noble
line of Maroboduus and Tudrus, the Tudric line apparently
kings among theuadi..." I say this in case a reader can help me
make a Tudric-TuTr connection. After all, Tudors were stewards
of the Gwynedd rulers, while Tydeus (a Greek Calydonian) was
the brother of Meleager. That is, the Tudors may have been from
the Pretani/Bretons that furnished the Caledonian Picts, even as
Meleager became the Pretani. The Tudors trace themselves to king
Arthur, and the Pretani were definitely fundamental to Arthur's
Welsh/Cornwallish home base.
To help me trace the Tudors to times earlier than otherwise
possible, I have found the ancient Tudor Coat in an article
claiming that it later became the Coat of the John Yonge family
(see website below), thus proving that the Yonges stemmed from
Tudors. This Yonge Coat was originally that of earl Tudor Trevor,
and because he lived in the 10th century, its gold lion on black and
silver background might have been the fore-runner to the English
lions, also gold. As the following website states that England's
gold lions were of the Arms of Normandy, it makes possible that
the Tudor lion was also in honor of Normandy, or some part of
Normandy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_England
As Normans were of Rollo-Sinclair Vikings, one might
assume that the gold lions were their symbol. Apparently not.
What struck me as incredible is that, while having some (though
little) reason to tie the Rollo line back to the Sabina, it was only
afterward, upon my realizing right here that the Normans used a
gold lion on red, that I re-discovered the Italian Abreu Coat using a
gold lion on red!
The Abreu surname, remember, derives the Abruzzo region
of Italy, in Sabina country, and this then recalls my hunch that the
Tydeus boars became the mythical Sabina ruler, Tatius...who then
furnished the Tudors. I now suspect that the Tudors should
descend from Bruces, if I am correct in tracing Bruces back to the
Abreu/Abruzzo terms. To show how the gold lion on red found in
the Abreu Coat may connect to the Bruces and the British, there is
an alternative view (not necessarily contradictory) on the origin of
England's lion symbol that includes Louvain, the origin of the
Bruces proper:
"Three lions have stood in the Royal Arms of
England since the reign of Richard I. The First Lion: The
Lion of Justice – Henry I (1069-1135) used a single lion as
a badge ... The Second Lion: - It has been suggested that
the second lion came into the arms through Henry I’s

695
marriage with Adeliza, daughter of Godfrey of Louvain,
whose coat of arms also bore a lion. Thus from his
grandfather, Henry II (1133-1189) inherited two gold
lions on red. The Third Lion...it is thought that Henry II
added the third when he married Eleanor of Aquitaine,
whose arms are known to have been a single gold lion on
red."
http://www.gbtse.com/LIons%20of%20England%20info.html
Aquitaine was "Akitania" to the Basques, evoking "Akatziri,"
noting also that Basques had origins in Abkhazia. But the big point
is that the gold-lion-on-red-field of Italy likely became the gold-
lion-on-red-field of Louvain. Abruzzo pre-dates the Normans and
Bruces-proper by centuries, so that the direction of the gold lion
was likely from Italy to France, not vice versa.
It is thought that the Bavarian Illuminati was at the root of
Communism, and now that I see Hohen fingers in Bavaria, let me
re-quote from a previous chapter as is pertinent here:
William Morris was a leader in the Socialistic movements of
Britain, and so I've noted that the Irish Morris Coat uses a black
lion on gold background, the symbol of the Hohen(staufen)s. Is it a
coincidence that the Welsh Morris Coat uses a gold lion on red
background, the very symbol on the German and English Marx
Coats?
Marx, like the founder of the Bavarian Illuminati (Adam
Weishaupt), was "Jewish." The "Jewish" Marx Coat uses red and
silver checks, which may be the Hohen checks. Let me repeat here
that Weishaupt's secret alias was "Sparticus."
I think I have found a forth kind of Cohen, using blue and
gold checks, for the Dutch Nassau Coat is covered with them, but
also has a gold lion superimposed upon them. It turns out that the
gold lion on blue that is symbol to the Netherlands is the Nassau
lion on blue.
http://www.ngw.nl/int/dld/n/nassau.htm
The importance of the Nassau bloodline in the make-up of
the Netherlands is as follows: “The kings and queens of the
Netherlands are descendants of Otto [of Nassau].'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coat _of arms of the Netherlands
I can see that I've just added to my tas Es in the requirement
to trace the Nassau bloodline, but I'm out of room here. As it
should lead to Cohens and/or Hohens, read this: "Prince of
Orange is a title of nobility, originally associated with the
principality of Orange in southern France [on the Rhone]. It
may be carried by members of the House of Orange-Nassau
and the House of Hohenzollern." In keeping with my tracing of

696
the Hohens to the Curete/Satyr goat/cornucopia cult, see that the
Arms of Orange uses a cornucopia in its chief.
Check out the gold lion in the Crest of Bologne, and the blue
background in the Coat. Coincidence, or not?

END OF PART ONE

Part One and Part Two can be obtained at LULU Publishing,


either in paperback or as a PDF download. To access this book,
type its title in the search box at the Lulu home page:

http://www.lulu.com .

If that fails, there is a free online version, currently at:


http://www.tribwatch.com/ladon.htm

697

Potrebbero piacerti anche