Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Criteria
Limit state design requires the structure to satisfy two principal criteria: the ultimate limit state (ULS) and the
serviceability limit state (SLS).[1] A limit state is a set of performance criteria (e.g. vibration levels, deflection,
strength, stability, buckling, twisting, collapse) that must be met when the structure is subject to loads.[2]
Any design process involves a number of assumptions. The loads to which a structure will be subjected must be
estimated, sizes of members to check must be chosen and design criteria must be selected. All engineering design
criteria have a common goal: that of ensuring a safe structure and ensuring the functionality of the structure.
Factor Development
The load and resistance factors are determined using statistics and a pre-selected probability of failure. Variability in
the quality of construction, consistency of the construction material are accounted for in the factors. A factor of unity
(one) or less is applied to the resistances of the material, and a factor of unity or greater to the loads. These factors
can differ significantly for different materials or even between differing grades of the same material. Wood and
masonry typically have smaller factors than concrete, which in turn has smaller factors than steel. The factors applied
to resistance also account for the degree of scientific confidence in the derivation of the values - i.e. smaller values
are used when there isn't much research on the specific type of failure mode). Factors associated with loads are
normally independent on the type of material involved, but can be influenced by the type of construction.
In determining the specific magnitude of the factors, more deterministic loads (like dead loads, the weight of the
structure and permanent attachments like walls, floor treatments, ceiling finishes) are given lower factors (for
example 1.4) than highly variable loads like earthquake, wind, or live (occupancy) loads (1.6). Impact loads are
typically given higher factors still (say 2.0) in order to account for both their unpredictable magnitudes and the
dynamic nature of the loading vs. the static nature of most models. While arguably not philosophically superior to
permissible or allowable stress design, it does have the potential to produce a more consistently designed structure as
each element is intended to have the same probability of failure. In practical terms this normally results in a more
efficient structure, and as such, it can be argued that LSD is superior from a practical engineering viewpoint
• McCormac, Jack C. (2008) (Google books (preview)). Structural Steel Design (http://books.google.com/
books?id=dNatiPqlD8QC) (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780132218160.
Article Sources and Contributors 4
License
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
http:/ / creativecommons. org/ licenses/ by-sa/ 3. 0/