Traveling — A Right or a Privilege? ‘You are reading this document because you received it upon request or it was given to you by a friend. ‘This is a cover page that should also include = copy of the UCC Financing ‘Statement, a one page copy entitled “Travel Papers”, a one page document entitled Points and Authorities, a suggested “cancellation” procedure, suggested court processes and other reference material. If you do not have the full package we suggest you send # donation to 410111 Mt, Gleason Ave, Sunland, California [91040} and request the entire Travel Papers Package. Following are a number of matters to consider if you are planning to use the information in this package: 1. 10, ‘Anyone who stops you for an alleged traffic violation is acting on authority he or she assumes has been granted by the state. You, on the other hand, possess information and facts that are contrary to that assumption, They will be wary of you and will approach you making demands of you. Therefore, once you have come toa stop we suggest the following: Lock ll dors and cll up ll windows excep te drver's door window that should be rolled down about 2°-3." ‘>, Have your filed and signed UCC Financing Statement with you along with you one page ‘Travel Papers document attached to the Points and Authorities. & Stay calm, but alest, Stay seated and keep your hands visible on your lap or on the stecring wheel Let the one who stopped you speak first. Whatever is said will include or conclude with ‘a demand to see your driver's license and registration. Do not make any statement. The first words out of your mouth will’be a question, “IFT show you any such documentation will it be used against me?” ‘This is the one question you will need to repeat in response to any question or demand of you. ‘At the appropriate time (the first opportunity) slide the UCC Financing Statement and Travel Papers documents through the window opening, Hold it there until it is accepted or clearly refused. If there is anyone else with you they are to say nothing and sit quietly with their hands visible at all times. Once the documents have been accepied or clearly refused, yet the individual makes «demands or even threats, politely, but firmly demand to speak to the supervisor. ‘The individual who stopped you most likely does not have supervisory authority to let you go. If your papers have been refused, then offer them to the supervisor. Wait for their next move, Whatever itis you ask the original question, Either you will be told that you are fice to go or you will be told that a citation is going to be issued. Af they tell you that you arb free 10 go you respond, “Thank you, but I will not leave until you have gone.” Wait until all their vehicles have pulled onto the roadway, then you proceed, Ifa citation is handed to you do not refusé it, but give them every opportunity to retract it and when they demand your signature you can sign it as the Secured Party followed by UCC 1-207. ‘You will have 72 hours to cancel the contract, but study the citation carefully. Is the name under the verification statement signed or printed? Is it clearly identified? Is it the individual’s full name? Are the cliarges clearly identified? Make a note of the name and badge number of each individual who speaks to you. If they abide by the law and let you go you have won one for the Right to Travel, If they issue a citation read the rest of this document and follow its instructions. If you need additional counsel, send your questions and concerns via ¢ mail to eclok@juno.com. For information on how to obtain and file the necessary UCC documents, either contact Barton Buhiz by the ¢ mail above or write to: 10111 Mt. Gleason Ave, Sunland, California (91040)Travel Papers Warning - Actual and Constructive Notice This is Actual and Constructive notice that you are not to violate the Prerogative rights of this Sovereign Citizen Secured Party by detaining him. Please assist in his pessage without delay. Any violation of his Sovereign rights, At Law, will be remedied through Administrative UCC Remedy At Law for wespass on rights, This Sovereign Citizen Secured Party is not subject to the codes (DMY, etc.) “In common usage, tems ‘person’ (resident, individual, ete.) does not include the sovereign, and statute employing the sume will ordinarily not be construed to do so.” U.S. v United Mine Workers, 330 U.S, 258 inparamaeria, 1. "The right of citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which be has under his right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety." It includes the right in doing soto use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, ancl under the existing modes of travel includes the right to drive a horse-drawn carrioge or wagon thereon, oF to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purposes of life and business, It is not a mere privilege..." Thompson v, Smith 154 S.E. 579 inparamateria, 2, "The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a [state} Citizen, He is entitled to carry on his private business in bis own wey. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty tothe state or his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open. hiis door to investigation, so far as it may incriminate kim, He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of hs life and propery, ..He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass on their rights." Hale y, Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1905) inparamatcria. 3."The right to travel is part ofthe Liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent y. Dulles 357 U.S. 116,125 inparamateria. is not a mere privilege but a common and 4, "The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transport ed.” Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 337 Il fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprive 200, 169 Ne 22, 66 ALR JUR (Irst) Highways, See. 163 inparamateria, 5. "The Motor Vehicle Act is not unconstitutional as making an arbitrary and unwarranted classification, in that it requires professional chauffeurs, or drivers of motor vehicles for hire, to pay an annual license, but exempts all other operators of such vehicles from tax and regulation, [In the Matter of Application of Stork (1914), 167 Cal, 294,295] 6. "(the Motor Vehicle Act classifies) drivers of automobiles into two clesses, one professional chauffeurs, and requiring them to obtain a license, and pay an annual license fee of $2,00, the other embracing all athers, who are not required to secure license or pay license fee, is sound classification, and not arbitrary, $0 as to constitute special legislation.” Ex Parte Stork, 167 Cal 294, The Supreme Court of California Feb, 24, 1914 - footnote inparamateria, Further confirmed in Beamon v. DMV (1960), 180. App.2d 200, 4 - Cal, Rpter. 396 This statement is hereby submitted upon demand of a "driver's license," registration or proof of insurance, and therefore is part of the official record of any ensuing action and must be introduced as evidence in said action. It is noted that willful suppression of evidence is a felony, any cause for ection may result in Administrative UCC Remedy and even action At Law, Aéseveration I declare under the penalty of perjury of the Laws of God, that I amn one witness and my Sovereign Lord, Jesus the Christ, bears Witness with me that this is truth to the best of my knowledge and belief and that a true and correct copy was served on the officer identified hereon. ‘The Scriptures say, "In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established.” (Il Corinthians 13:1) ee Oflicer received copy Badge No. Seal, Date: Republic Citizen at Law as Secured PartyPoints and Authorities ‘The Bill of Rights ARTICLE IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated...” ARTICLE V “No person. ..shall be compelled in eny criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.” [Crim. No. 1843. In Bank, - February 24, 1914) “In the Matter of the Application of CHARLES STORK, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Ip, - Classification of Drivers of Motor Vehicles - Whether Reasonable. - The Motor Vehicle Act (Stats, 1913, p. 639) is not unconstitutional as making an arbitrary and unwarranted classification, in that it requires professional chauffeurs, or drivers of motor vehicles for hire, to pay an annual license tax, but exempts all other operators of such vehicles from such tax and regulation.” he legislature,..has made an arbitrary classification whereby chauffeurs or drivers of motor vehicles for hire are required to pay a license, while all other drivers of vehicles are classes as ‘operators’ and are not required to secure a license or pay a license fee.” “The argument of the peril attending the public at the hands of the unlicensed operator driving his ‘own car is not without foree, but it can only successfully be presented to the legislative department and not to the courts.” “In conclusion it may be said that while on reason we hold the classification to sound...no case where any court of last resort has taken a contrary view has been called to our attention.. “In the latter case [In the Matter of Application of Stosk (1914), 167 Cal. 294, 295], upholding the validity of a statute requiring chauffeurs to pay a license fee but exempting all other (operators) from payment, states in respect to the difference between the two classes (p.296)...” Beamon v. Dept. OF ‘Motor Vehicles (1960), 180 Cal, App. 2d 200, 4 Cal. Rptr. 396. “It is not the type of vehicle, but the peculiar nature of the business conducted upon and over the public highways, that justifies the classification of the statute for licensing purposes.” In Re Schmolke (1926), 199 Cal. 42, 47.Dealing with Traffic Tickets Everything is by contract, All courts are corporations and operate by contract. Everything offered to you either verbally or in writing is a new offer of contract, All tickets are offers of contract. All contracts can be accepted or rejected. Within a 72-hour period under Regulation Z of the Truth in Lending Act you can reject an offer of contract, This includes rescinding contracts that you accepted and for Whatever reason have changed your mind about accepting. ‘There is no license to practice law. You grant attorneys (and anyone else) license when you allow them to practice — either verbally or through paper work you hire a lawyer or you take as gospel what a ” police officer tells you. Ifyou receive a traffic ticket, you must decide to accept it or reject it. Hf you aecept it, you must appear within the time appointed by the Traftic Court or pay the ticket. Ifyou do not accept it, then within 72 hours, you can reject it. If you want to challenge the ticket in cour, you can file a truth affidavit against the police officer placing the affidavit into public record. A challenge is also an acceptance of the contract, Accepting the Contract: If you accept the contract, then make the payment within the time prescribed. Rejecting the Contract: The rejection must be done within the 72 hour time period, 1, Write the following (preferably in red) at an angle on the ticket: Date Received: Date Rejected: i ‘Your offer of contract is hereby rejected and retumed to you unsigned in full accord with Regulation Z Truth in Lending. Any further correspondence from the Signers, Agents, Heirs or Assigns MUST be signed under the Penalty of Perjury. If you are representing Me or assuming you represent Me, you are hereby FIRED! Fiction’s Name Here By: __Upper/Lower Real Man’s Name Here With the power of Attorney in Fact 2. Make at least 3 copies of this rejected offer of contract. 3. Take it to the court clerk and hand it to them with a Power of Attomey attached, 4. Ifyou wish, you can tear the rejected contract in half and hand it to them also with a Power of Attomey. 5. On the same day also fax the rejected contract and your Power of Attomey to the clerk of the court and send a hard copy via certilied mail. 6. Always keep a copy for your records with any certified mailing info. Challenging the Contract: Tf you are still within the time allowed on the ticket and you want to challenge the ticket in court, call and get a hearing date, then file a truth affidavit against the police officer placing the affidavit into public record, Tell the clerk to place a certified copy of your affidavit into the case file record so the Judge will have it and also get a certified copy for you to carry into court and hand to the prosecuting attorney. Keep a copy for yourself! (Standard Affidavit follows:)‘TRUTH ARFIDAVIT IN THE NATURE OF SUPPLEMENTAL RULES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND MARITIME CLAIMS RULES C(6) Day Month, 2002 merce, ever stated in Truth, 1, the Power of Attorney in Faet, a National, a Private Person, a Living Soul Creditor, Claimant, and Secured Party and NOT a STATUTORY PERSON upon the land Texas,» Republic in the county called do hereby solemly declare, say, and state. (1) Secured Party is competent for stating the matters set forth inerewithy @Q) Seared Party has personal knowledge about the fuets stated herein; (@) Everything stated fa this TRUTIY AFFIDAVIT ts the Truth, the Whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth und all stated is rue, correct, complete, and not Imisleading, NO THIRD PARTIES ALLOWED. PLAIN STAI UT THE FACTS: (a) For Resolving a Matter it must be expressed (b) In Commerce Truth is Sovereign; (c) Truth is expressed inthe Affidavit Form; (0) Au Unrebutted Affidavit stands as Truth in Commerce; (2) An Unrebutted Affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce; () A Truth Affidavit, under Commercial Lavy, ean only be satisfied by a Rebuttal about the Truth AfMdavit, by payment, by agreement, by resolution by a jury according by the rules for Common Law. ALAWEUL CONTRACT has (1) Offers 2) Consideration; (8) Acceptance by all Parties for the Contract ands (4) The ‘Signatures by all Parties involved with the Contract, Only the partes signing the Contract can participate In the discussion of the ‘Contract, ull disclosure about the CONTRACT is imperative, List here the actual events. The following is an example: 1. On April 10, 2002 at about 2:00 pum. Officer Busy Body stopped Me on the highway without My permission ot @ contract, Officer Busy Body stopped Me without a contract in violation of My Right to Travel Officer Busy Body without a contract forced Me to show identification and proof of insurance, license and registration and violated My Right to Privacy. Officer Busy Body made many legal determinations without a license to practice law, Officer Busy Body did not have and did not show his ID card verifying him to bea registered policeman, Officer Busy Body, abseat his hat, was out of uniform and therefore masquerading as a policeman Officer Busy Body approached my private conveyance with his band on his gan and forced me under threat, duress and coercion to sign his offer of contract (Cause No. 02-555555), NOTICE TO PRINCIPLES IS NOTICE TO AGENTS AND NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPLES. ‘This document was prepared by Place Real Man's Name Here, PLACE FICTION'S NAME HERE, GRANTOR DEBTOR'S SIGNATURE ‘Real Man’s Name Here, Creditor ‘Secured Party, Attomey in Fact, With the Autograph Wines Wines ‘Real Man's Name Here, Creditor state of Texas 1 1] s county of 1 Place Real Man's Name Here, known by Me or mage known by proper identification swom and subscribed; THEREFORE, Nowy Seal My Notary ExpiresCourts By Contract ‘The original intent and purpose of all courts was to elicit justice from the decisions rendered. There were civil courts and criminal courts created to deal with separate areas of jurisdiction. Criminal acts as well as civil disputes were tried in common law courts. Common law is ¢ trial by jury with the jury establishing the law of the case and the punishment. The judge in a common law trial wes simply in the courtroom to make sure the proper papers were presented to the jury. The jury had all of the power in the courtroom and no common law decision could ever be overtumed by the judge or by another court. All other courts were to be inferior to the common law court — including the Supreme Court. The courts allowed by the constitutions dealt mainly with contracts and commerce among corporations or disputes between - living souls and corporations. State courts are the only courts that have criminal jurisdiction over erimes committed by living souls against other living souls and they only have jurisdiction over the inhabitants of their state. This is why Title 42 cases do riot work in Federal Court as only state courts can try a criminal case. Federal courts were never given the power to try criminal eases involving any of the people of the states except: ‘reason, sedition and counterfeiting the coin of the U.S. Other than those three crimes, federal jurisdiction is only good within U.S. territories and possessions, United States territories and possessions do not include the 50 sovereign republics. There are only five crimes that the federal corporate government can take eriminal ‘ction against and these crimes “are restricted to federal reservations over which the Federal Government has exclusive jurisdiction.” These five are: espionage, sabotage, interference with the mails, destruction of federal property or frauds on the federal government. Federal courts assume criminal jurisdiction when the magistrate asks the defendant at the arraignment if the defendant understands the charges against him or, “Do you stand under the charges against you?” and the defendant answers yes, The magistrate is asking, “Are you accepting the charges?” Always say NO because this is an offer of contract from the court to place you under criminal jurisdiction, Charges and complaints are always against corporations in contract violations. Living souls or nationals cannot contract with a corporation. Living souls or nationals can only bring claims against each other and these claims are to be tried in common law courts. Unfortunately, the court systems began changing in 1926, With the creation of rules, regulations and codes that were signed by the Congress, the President and the B.A.R. (British Accredited Regency), the BAR was creating its own private administrative procedures for corporations. Thus, the BAR supplanted the judicial system. Remember — rules, regulations and codes are NOT law, they are an abrogation of the law and only corporations are subject to them, In 1946, the Administrative Procedures Act forever changed the course of government for the American people, Roosevelt called it the fourth branch of government. This act brought all branches of government and ‘municipalities (except for the counties) under administrative codes, rules and regulations. ‘This in reality established each branch and municipality (which are mere corporations) as an independent nation with each having their own codes, rules and regulations. All corporations make up their own rules. Laws are established by the legislature through the passage of bills signed into law by the legislature and the governor/president. ‘These laws must not abrogate the rights of the people or the supretne law of the land ~ the Constitution. In 1973, everything about the court changed. The charge and the intent were brought together thereby negating the right to plead innocent. Now the only pleas are guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. The other vital change was that gold fringe and other accoutrements were added to the flag. These additions desecrated the flag thereby changing it from the American flag of peace into another flag altogether. The flag advertises the law that the court uses. Now the courts are using & foreign flag and we can only conjecture that itis a flag of commerce.