0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
30 visualizzazioni5 pagine
International Finance Corporation to the Detroit International Bridge Corporation indicating serious concerns with the numbers MDOT is using to justify HB 4691.
International Finance Corporation to the Detroit International Bridge Corporation indicating serious concerns with the numbers MDOT is using to justify HB 4691.
International Finance Corporation to the Detroit International Bridge Corporation indicating serious concerns with the numbers MDOT is using to justify HB 4691.
ICF
INTERNATIONAL
MEMORANDUM
To:
From: Jeffrey Ang-Olson and Nita Bhave, ICF Intemational
Date: May 17, 2010
Re: RIC Traffic Forecasts ~ Summary of Major Faults
‘This memo summarizes key shortcomings of the DRIC traffic forecasts.
Past Forecasts Were Way Off
‘The DRIC travel forecests to date have grossly overestimated both automobile and truck crossings at the
Michigan-Ontario border.
29000000
+4000 000
6.000.000
+4000 .000
s20m.000
+10.000.00
3000000
+4900,000
2.900,00 |
°
2004
09 0 fn
: ageSee == =4
f . 4 |
Frontier Traffic - EIS vs. Actual
EIS - Autos
= 38%
EIS - Trucks
2008 2008 2007 008 2008
630 Sues Suite400— Secramentn,CA $5814— 916-737.3000-— 916-737-300 fx — wow fi comTraffic Forecasts for Toll Facilities are Notoriously Bad
Forecasts for proposed new toll facilities consistently overestimate traffic volumes and toll revenue. A
study by JP Morgan compared projections against actual toll revenue for 22 new USS. tall roads. In 19 of
the 22 cases, the actual toll revenue was less than projected, based on the first two to five years of
operation, On average, toll revenue was only about 60% of projected revenue for these 22 facilities.
‘Actual Toll Revenue as a Percentage of Projected Revenue
ay 18 am
ates Groeney-VA
pice OK
“raenileComectr- 80
Senge
‘Orenla- FL
Corr Feria Grn S17
Sen Josqun iA
coat Fea reson Sout
Gran Pale ge FL
cre 0K
Seninae-FL
Sem Howton -1%
cerita Peta Greaney Hoch F=
ura. Tay
George en Epes -TX : . = = 12%
George 0 8
om oe OTM
Source: JP Morgan, Municipal Credit Mor
+, “Startup tll roads: Separating winners from losers.” May 10, 2002.
TGF intemationa z May 17, 2070,Latest MDOT Forecasts Are Unreal
MDOT's latest forecasts for traffic across the frontier assume significantly higher growth rates than in the
EJS. MDOT now believes auto traffic will grow 95% between now and 2035, while the EIS assumed just
35% growth over this period. Commercial traffic is now expected to triple by 2035, compared toa
doubling forecast in the EIS.
Frontier Auto Traffic Forecast Growth Rate Frontior Truck Traffic - Forecast Growth Rate
ae
os os
SSLLESLLLSLL LS | |PLKLLLS SLPS POLL
eee aes
MDOT Forecasts for Same-Day Auto Crossings Are Faulty
‘The largest component of frontier traffic is same-day work trips. Previous forecasts had assumed these
‘rips would prow in proportion to employment in the SEMCOG or Windsor-Samia area. The latest
MDOT forecast departs from that method and assumes same-day work trips will grow in proportion to
‘employment for all of Michigan and Ontario. This is an unrealistic basis for forecasting same-day work
‘rips, and it results in a much higher growth rate than using SEMCOG employment.
Michigan + Ontario
Source: Exhibit 8, Appendix C — Corridor Growih Assessment, Preliminary Results ofthe Comprehensive Traffic
and Toll Revenue Study for the Detroit River International Crossing Project Forecast Refresh and Update: Traffic~
Only Suaumary, Prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, Prepared for Michigan DOT, February 2010.
TOF International 3 : Way 17, 2010MDOT Forecasts for Trucks Crossings Are Overly Optimistic
DOT's latest forecasts predict a sharp increase in commercial vehicle crossings over the next six years
(10.2% annual growth), followed by strong annual growth (3.1%) between 2015 and 2025. Given the
shrinking ofthe North American automobile industry and decline in other manufzcturing in the region,
‘such a sharp rebound in commercial vehicle crossings appears unsealistc.
Indexed Forecast Corridor Growth for Commercial Vehicle Crossings
i PERE GEER SEER ELE
| wo
‘Source: Exhibit 18, Appendix C~ Corridor Growth Assessment, Preliminary Results ofthe Comprehensive Traffic
and Toll Revenue Study for the Detroit River Intemational Crossing Project Forecast Refresh and Update: Trafic-
‘Only Summary, Prepares by Wilbur Smith Associates, Prepared for Michigan DOT, February 2010.
(One reason for the overly optimistic truck crossing forecast is a change in methodology. In 2004,
‘utomobile-related trade accounted for about 43% of truck crossings. So because this sector isso crucial,
the previous traffic studies used a separate forecast of automotive commodities. The latest MDOT
forecasts do not break out automotive commodities, and therefore ignore the trends in this key industry.
‘The internal peer review of the latest MDOT forecasts points this out, noting: “The economic projection
for the DRIC Refresh aggregated all of the commodity groups, and as such the automotive sector was
‘assumed to grow in line with the rest of the American economy”.
" jatemal Peer Review ofthe Comprehensive Traffic and Toll Revenue Study forthe Detroit River Intemational
Crossing Projet Forecast Refresh end Update, Appendix D, Prepared by IBI Group for Wilbur Smith Associates,
February 2010.
IGF inematonal a Tay 17, 2010MDOT Overstates the Job Retention Impacts of DRIC
MDOT’s May 1, 2010 Report to the Michigan Legislature claims the DRIC will “help retain 25,000 jobs
in Michigan”, This jobs figure is pulled from an old report for MDOT by HLB that relies on traffic
forecast developed in 2002. The report assumes that, without the DRIC, bridge traffie congestion will
10W significantly and lead to job losses in Michigan. However, the traffic forecasts used to estimate
congestion are now widely off the mark. Moreover, the report does not consider the potential for
“Ambassador Bridge expansion to relieve congestion
TGF itematonal 3 May 17, 2010