Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Columbia Pictures Industries Inc v. Bunnell Doc.

415

1 Ira P. Rothken (SBN #160029)


2 ROTHKEN LAW FIRM LLP
3 Hamilton Landing, Suite 280
3 Novato, CA 94949
4 Telephone: (415) 924-4250
Facsimile: (415) 924-2905
5
6 Kirk J. Retz (#170208)
7
LAW OFFICES OF KIRK J. RETZ, APC
21535 Hawthorne Blvd., #200
8 Torrance, CA 90503
9 Telephone: (310) 540-9800
Facsimile: (310) 540-9881
10
11 Attorneys for Defendants
Justin Bunnell, Forrest Parker, Wes
12
Parker and Valence Media, Ltd.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, ) Case No. 06-01093 FMC (JCx)
18 INC., et al. )
19 ) DEFENDANT VALENCE MEDIA,
Plaintiffs, ) LTD.’S OBJECTION TO
20 ) PLAINTIFFS’ EX-PARTE
21 vs. ) APPLICATION TO CERTIFY
) JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 54(b)
22
JUSTIN BUNNELL, et al., )
23 )
24 Defendants. )
)
25 )
26 )
27
28

Columbia Pictures et al. v. Bunnell et al.


U. S. Dist. Ct., Cent. Dist. Cal., No. CV 06-1903 FMC (JCx)
Dockets.Justia.com
1 VALENCE MEDIA, LTD., (“Valence”) objects to the Plaintiffs’ Ex-Parte
2 Application To Certify Judgment Under Rule 54(b), on the ground a petition for
3 bankruptcy was submitted in the Wycombe District Court in England on May 1,
4 2008 on behalf of English creditors to whom Valence Media, Ltd. is indebted.
5 United States counsel for Valence has not yet received the document bearing the
6 official seal of the Wycombe District Court but has received confirmation of its
7 filing from its counsel.
8 Valence objects on the ground this matter should proceed by noticed motion,
9 to provide an opportunity to fully brief the effect and status of the Valence
10 insolvency proceeding, and to allow Valence’s foreign representative the
11 opportunity to file a Chapter 15 proceeding.
12
13 Dated: May 22, 2008 Respectfully submitted,
14 ROTHKEN LAW FIRM LLP
15
16
17
Jared R. Smith, Esq.,
18 Attorneys for Defendants
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Page 1
28
Defendant Valence Media, Ltd.’s Objection To Plaintiffs’ Ex-Parte Application To Certify
Judgment Under Rule 54(b)

Columbia Pictures et al. v. Bunnell et al.


U. S. Dist. Ct., Cent. Dist. Cal., No. CV 06-1903 FMC (JCx)

Potrebbero piacerti anche