0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
1K visualizzazioni7 pagine
Letter from 40 top securities lawyers in the Federal Bar Committee urging Congress to make the Securities and Exchange Commission a self-financed organization.
Letter from 40 top securities lawyers in the Federal Bar Committee urging Congress to make the Securities and Exchange Commission a self-financed organization.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Letter from 40 top securities lawyers in the Federal Bar Committee urging Congress to make the Securities and Exchange Commission a self-financed organization.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
(Updated to add signatories)
Federal Bar Associ:
Securities Law Committee
Executive Council
June 11,2010
Sen. Saxby Chambliss Rep. Judy Biggert Rep. Gregory W. Meeks
Sen. Bob Corker Rep. Leonard Boswell Rep. Dennis Moore
Sen. Mike Crapo Rep. Shelley Moore Capito Rep. Gary Peters
Sen. Christopher J. Dodd Rep. John Conyers, Jr. Rep. Collin C, Peterson
Sen, Judd Gregg Rep. Elijah Cummings Rep. Ed Royce
Sen. Tom Harkin Rep. Barney Frank Rep. Bobby L. Rush
Sen. Tim Johnson Rep. Scott Garrett Rep. Heath Shuler
. Patrick J. Leahy Rep. Sam Graves Rep. Lamar Smith
Blanche L. Lincoln Rep. Luis Gutierrez Rep. Edolphus Towns
Sen, Jack Reed Rep. Jeb Hensarling Rep. Nydia M. Veldzquez
Sen. Charles E. Schumer Rep. Darrell Issa Rep. Maxine Waters
Sen, Richard C. Shelby Rep. Paul E. Kanjorski Rep. Mel Watt
Rep. Spencer Bachus Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy Rep. Henry Waxman
Rep. Joe Barton Rep. Frank Lucas
Rep. Howard Berman Rep. Carolyn Maloney
RE: Support for Securities and Exchange Commission Self-Funding Proposal in
Financial Services Reform Legislation — H.R. 4173 (S. 3217)
Members of Congress:
We the undersigned ate senior securities law practitioners, each with decades of
experience working on Securities and Exchange Commission matters. Many of us are former
SEC senior officers, and many of us now represent or have represented private sector clients in
sophisticated matters before the SEC. We are all members of the Executive Council of the
Securities Law Committee of the Federal Bar Association
We write in our personal capacities in support of what we feel is one of the most
important parts of the financial services reform legislation presently before you — the proposal to
give the SEC the kind of self-funding presently available to many other financial services
regulators. We offer the following points for your consideration:
1, Self-funding is critical to eliminate chronic SEC under-funding, The chronic
under-funding of the SEC has severely impeded the SEC's ability to keep pace with market and
technology changes. After shrinking in size for a number of years, the SEC is only now
beginning to grow again. Meanwhile, the securities industry and corporate activities it regulates
have grown tremendously in size and sophistication over the last two decades. To cite just a fewmetrics by way of example, we saw the SEC enforcement and examination staff decline 10%
between 2004 and 2007 and its information technology initiatives plunge 50%, while at the same
time, trading volume doubled, the number of investment advisers jumped 50% and the funds
they managed grew almost 60%.
The practical result of this diminution in the SEC’s regulatory presence has been an
inability to carry out needed inspections and to follow up on numerous credible enforcement
leads ~ sometimes with tragic consequences for investors. To deal with this situation, the SE
presently needs the dollars it will take to play serious catch-up and then to keep pace with our
ever-expanding markets and with increasingly complicated new investment products and
transactions. It is also likely that the SEC will need additional resources to undertake new
responsibilities such as oversight of hedge funds and some OTC derivatives. With competing
national budget priorities, it may be difficult to find these needed resources for the SEC if itis
kept under the current appropriations model and not moved to self-funding.
2. Self-funding will enable the SEC to make needed multi-year commitments to
build the technology and other infrastructure it needs. Traders now use banks of powerful
computers to execute huge volume transactions in multiple trading venues in a fraction of a
second, and then change their positions just seconds later. Regulators cannot be expected to
keep pace with this kind of sophisticated activity using technology appropriated over a year ago
and installed within a 12-month fiscal-year window. Self-funding will allow the SEC to plan and
execute much needed technology and other infrastructure initiatives over a multi-year
continuum. By having the flexibility to plan long-term, the SEC will get the tools it needs to
effectively police our increasingly technical and sophisticated markets, and to work smart and
efficiently leverage its human capital
3. Self-funding for financial services regulators has become the usual approach and
not a novel or untried idea. Financial services regulators that have long operated on a self-
funding basis include the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(FINRA) and other self-regulatory organizations sharing responsibility for market surveillance
and enforcement activities under the Securities Exchange Act necessarily operate on a self-
funding basis. The SEC is one of the few financial services regulators funded with the
appropriations model.
4. The money for SEC self-funding would come from transaction and registration
fees that Congress has already endorsed. Congress has already determined, under the existing
annual appropriations model, that it is appropriate for SEC expenses to be borne by those whose
activities necessitate SEC regulation. In Section 31(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, Congress
directed the SEC to “collect transaction fees and assessments that are designed to recover the
costs to the Government of the supervision and regulation of securities markets and securities
professionals, and costs related to such supervision and regulation, including enforcement
activities, policy and rulemaking activities, administration, legal services, and international
regulatory activities.” Under Section 31(i), the SEC must deposit these fees into the account
providing its funding. Sections 13(e) and 14(g) similarly direct the SEC to collect certain
additional registration fees that are likewise used to fund the SEC.‘There has been no serious objection to this Congressional determination, and the amounts
assessed over the years have been miniscule relative to the transactions involved. It is important
to note that, under the self-funding proposal, SEC funding would continue to come only from the
same transaction and registration fees that Congress has already endorsed, and not from the very
substantial penalty payments the agency obtains through its enforcement program. So there
would be no possibility that the SEC would ever demand higher penalties to increase its own
funding. The billions in penalties the SEC collects through its law enforcement activities go to
harmed investors where possible and otherwise into the Treasury's general funds.
The proposal presently under consideration would have the SEC submit an annual budget
to Congress, just as other self-funded financial services regulators must prepare a budget.
Congress would, of course, continue to have the same oversight over the SEC that it has over all
of the other self-funded financial services regulators.
* * *
The havoc caused by the recent financial crisis clearly shows that adequate funding for
the SEC is critical for the protection of investors and the public interest. We recognize the
serious budget constraints facing our nation, but self-funding for the SEC would not require
“new money.” Rather, the funds would come from fair transaction and registration assessments
Congress has previously endorsed — deployed through the self-funding mechanism that has
worked well for other regulators. When viewed from this perspective, we submit, the decision in
favor of self-funding becomes an easy one. Investors lose when the SEC must struggle to sustain
operations on a subsistence basis and when the SEC must limit its field of vision to a single
appropriations year.
To empower the SEC to effectively deliver on its statutory mandate of investor
protection, we the undersigned respectfully urge you to retain the proposal for SEC self-funding
in the financial services reform legislation before you. If you or your staff have any questions
about the points we have raised, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact us through Giovanni Prezioso at 202.974.1650 or gprezioso@cgsh.com, or through.
Stephen Crimmins at 202.778.9440 or stephen.crimmins@klgates.com.
Thank you for your consideration of this submission,
Very truly yours,
Giovanni P. Prezioso, Outgoing Council Chair
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
(former SEC General Counsel)
Stephen J. Crimmins, Incoming Council Chair
K&L Gates LLP
(former Deputy Chief Litigation Counsel,
SEC Enforcement Division)Diane E. Ambler
K&L Gates LLP
William R. Baker III
Latham & Watkins LLP
(former Associate Director, SEC Enforcement Division)
Brandon Becker
Executive Vice President and
Chief Legal Officer, TIAA-CREF
(former Director, SEC Market Regulation Division)
Alan L. Beller
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
(former Director SEC Corporation Finance Di
Paul R. Berger
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
(former Associate Director,
EC Enforcement Division)
Alan J. Berkeley
K&L Gates LLP
Gregory S. Bruch
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
(former Assistant Director, SEC Enforcement Division)
Martha Cochran
Amold & Porter LLP
(former Chief Counsel and Staff Director,
US. Senate Subcommittee on Securities)
Robert L.D. Colby
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
(former Deputy Director,
SEC Trading and Markets Division)
James R. Doty
Baker Botts LLP
(former SEC General Counsel)
Martin Dunn
O’Melveney & Myers LLP
(former Deputy Director and Acting Director,
SEC Corporation Finance Division)Meyer Eisenberg
Senior Research Scholar and Lecturer-in-Law,
Columbia University School of Law
(former SEC Deputy General Counsel,
Acting Director of Investment Management Division
and Executive Assistant to the Chairman)
Ralph C. Ferrara
Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP
(former SEC General Counsel)
‘Matthew P. Fink
Independent Director, Oppenheimer Funds
(former President, Investment Company Institute)
Robert J. Haft
Professor, Georgetown University Law Center
(former SEC Special Counsel)
Michael Halloran
Haynes and Boone, LLP
(former Counselor to the SEC Chairman)
John J. Huber
Latham & Watkins LLP
former Director, SEC Corporation Finance Division)
Dixie L. Johnson
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Andrew M. Klein
Schiff Hardin LLP
(former Director, SEC Market Regulation Division)
Dennis J. Lehr
Hogan Lovells LLP
Michael D. Mann
Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP
(former Director, SEC Office of International Affairs)
David B.H. Martin
Covington & Burling LLP
(former Director, SEC Corporation Finance Division)Paul Mason
(former Assistant Director,
SEC Trading and Markets Division)
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dort LLP
(former Director, SEC Enforcement Division)
Herbert E. Milstein
Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
(former Chief Enforcement Attorney
SEC Investment Management Division)
Allan S. Mostoff
Dechert LLP
President, Mutual Fund Directors Forum
(former Director, SEC Investment Management Division)
Annette L. Nazareth
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
(former SEC Commissioner and former Director,
SEC Trading and Markets Division)
‘Thomas C. Newkirk
Jenner & Block LLP
(former Associate Director and Chief Litigation Counsel,
SEC Enforcement Division)
John F. Olson
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Richard M. Phillips
K&L Gates LLP
(former Assistant to the SEC Chairman,
Assistant General Counsel, and Staff Director of SEC
Corporate Disclosure and Investment Company Studies)
Paul F. Roye
Senior Vice President,
Capital Research and Management Company
(former Director, Investment Management Division)
David Silver
(former President, Investment Company Institute)Marianne K. Smythe
(former Director, SEC Investment Management Division)
Richard H. Walker
General Counsel, Deutsche Bank AG
(former SEC General Counsel,
Director of SEC Enforcement Di
Director of SEC New York Office)
ision, and
Consuela Washington
(former Chief Counsel for Commerce, Trade, and
Consumer Protection, U.S. House Committee on
Energy and Commerce, and Special Counsel,
SEC Corporation Finance Division)
Harry J. Weiss
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
(former Associate Director, SEC Enforcement Division)
John W. White
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
(former Director, SEC Corporation Finance Division)
Susan Ferris Wyderko
Executive Director, Mutual Fund Directors Forum
(former Director, SEC Office of Investor Education and
Assistance, and Acting Director, SEC Investment
Management Division)