Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
working - making very good progress and being super efficient. Because we had clear rules
and instructions so our team would be classed as a formal team. We all worked together in
order to complete the specific task and cooperated without any issues as everyone was very
cooperative and came into the task with a good mindset.
In comparison to other teams, I think our team seemed to be the most organized and
cooperative. I think this was because all the members of my team had a great method of
communication. We had all spoken and made sure that everyone was clear with their role asking questions if there was any clarification needed. All members of the team had great
communication skills, were able to carry out their individual tasks effectively and efficiently. As
the members of my team were all quite friendly with each other, they were comfortable enough
to share ideas and communicate without hesitation.
I think together as a team we had experienced a full process of tuckman's theory. We started off
forming - we had established a leader role in the team (me), we had started talking about what
it was we wanted to achieve, making sure we all had the same aims and expectations. The next
stage we went through was storming - we had definitely as a group experiencing this point
except for the fact that our activity was so short therefore there was not really any opportunity
for any team rivalry. Cliques were definitely formed as it was clear who was getting along the
most and who wasnt in a group of 10. At this point I had also assigned the roles for each of my
team members and we had all, as a group, re established the goals and aims making sure
everyone was clear of them and understood. We had then gone through the norming stage
where agreements were made on who was fulfilling what role - making sure everyone was
happy with their roles. The team had kind of come together at this point as pretty much
everyone was working well with each other and the group was more in unison as the goals and
objectives were clear. We had then began actually working - the performing stage. At this point
the team was very efficient, making great progress and being very successful and productive
when working - people were fulfilling their roles to a high standard, working together in order to
achieve the best possible outcome to build these classrooms. After our time was up we had
went through the final stage, the adjourning stage - the group breaks up as we had completed
all the transporting of the soil that we needed - all the tasks were completed. I think the only
room for improvement that we could have done would be by not using 2 people to transport one
bag, and using 1 person per bag instead. I wish i would have done this at the time because
initially I thought 2 per bag would be necessary due to the weight. But as we went on everyone
seemed to be having a fairly easy time transporting the bags. therefor an improvement I would
make would be to have 1 person per bag as this would mean larger quantities of soil would
have been transported - making the team more efficient.
In comparison to the other teams, when they went through stages based off the eyes of
tuckman's theory they seemed to have a much harder time in comparison to ours. For example,
when they went through the storming stage, negative cliques were being created therefore
people felt uncomfortable and left out. People were also angry as there was a hierarchy
situation as the leader seemed to be taking too much control - this made the norming and
performing stages a more difficult process for this group as they had a bad start and
disagreements at the beginning.