Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
www.jee.ro
1. Introduction
Small-signal stability analysis is concerned with
the behavior of power systems under small
perturbations. Its main objective is to predict the lowfrequency electromechanical oscillations resulting
from poorly damped rotor oscillations. The most
critical types of these oscillations are the local-mode
and interarea-mode oscillations [1]-[3]. The former
occurs between one machine and the rest of the
system, while the later occurs between
interconnected machines. The study of these
oscillations is very important to power system
planning, operation, and control. The stability of
these oscillations is a vital concern and essential for
secure power system operation.
1
1
Vref +
-
Tm
-
+
KA
1+TAs
Efd
K3
E`q
K2
s
1+ K3Tdo
Vt
Te
1
sM
K1
K6
+
+
K5
2
2
X& = AX + BU
d 0
dt
d K1
M
= ddtE = K 4
Tdo
dt
K A K5
dE fd T
A
dt
0
1
+ M
0
0
0
K2
M
K3
Tdo
K A K6
TA
D
M
0
0
1
Eq
Tdo
1 E fd
TA
0
0 T
m
0 V
K A ref
KA
x(t )=
(1)
0
E q
0
E fd
0
1
0
0
0 K2
(2)
X = AX
(3)
Y = CX
The state equations of the linearized model given in
(3) can be used to determine the eigenvalues i of the
system matrix A, where i = i ji are the distinct
eigenvalues with a corresponding set of right and left
eigenvectors Ui and Vi, respectively; i is the
damping factor and i is the damped angular
frequency. The right and left eigenvectors are
orthogonal, and are usually scaled to be orthonormal.
The state equations of (3) can be expressed in terms
of modal variables by using the modal transformation
X = UZ, which leads to
Z =Vi AU i z = Z
(4)
where =diag(i) [15]. Following small disturbance,
the dynamic response of the system states can be
described as a linear summation of various modes of
oscillations
X (t )=
(V X )e
i
i =1
i t
Ui
(5)
B e = A e
i
i =1
Y = CX
1
= 0
Te K 1
it
cos(2f i t + i )
(6)
i =1
3
3
R
o
to
rA
n
g
le(d
e
g
re
e
s)
-1
-2
-3
5
Time (s)
10
10
10
x 10
0.8
0.6
R
o
to
rS
p
e
e
d(ra
d
/s)
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
5
Time (s)
E
le
ctro
m
a
g
n
e
ticT
o
rq
u
e(p
u
)
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
-0.02
-0.04
-0.06
-0.08
5
Time (s)
X = A Te
(9)
where A = [ (k ) ( k )] , and X=[ Ks Kd]T.
Solving (9) using the left pseudo inverse of matrix A
gives the values of Ks and Kd for the corresponding
operating point.
4
4
W (k + 1) = W (k ) +
e(k ) sgn ( X (k ) )
+ X (k ) sgn ( X ( k ) )
T
(14)
+ 1 if x i > 0
sgn( x i ) =
1 if x i < 0
(15)
5. Adaline training
The Adaline algorithm is utilized in this study to
approximate the torque deviation Te (k ) as a linear
combination of the synchronizing torque Ks(k) and
the damping torque Kd(k):
(k )
Te (k ) = [w1 (k ) w2 (k )]
(16)
(k )
Figure 3 shows the Adaline block diagram based
estimator of Ks and Kd, where (k) and (k) are
given as inputs to the single neuron, Te (k ) is the
output of the Adaline, Te (k ) is desired output
torque and w1(k)=Ks and w2(k)=Kd [21].
Vt
TL
Pe
Adaline
Qe
(k)
W(1)
Input
X(k)
(k)
Ks (pu/rad)
Weight Vector
W(k)
1.5
LS
KF
Actual Output
Te ( k )
W(2)
Weight
Adaptation
Algorithm
0.5
Error
e(k)
100
200
300
700
800
900
1000
800
900
1000
Fig. 4-a
Desired output
Te(k)
3.5
LS
Adaline
2.5
Kd (pu/rad/s)
6. Simulation results
This paper is an extension of the work presented
in [21]. Performance evaluation of both Adaline
schemes, for the estimation of Ks and Kd, is compared
with LSE and KF estimation techniques. The
evaluation is carried out by conducting several
offline simulation cases on the linearized model of
the SMIBS. Either the state-space model or the
Phillips-Hefferon block diagram implemented in
SIMULINK can be used for offline simulation. The
system input is a 0.1 pu mechanical torque pulse
400
500
600
Time Index
KF
1.5
0.5
100
200
300
400
500
600
Time Index
700
Fig. 4-b
Fig. 4. Adaline-1 and KF estimation of Ks and Kd. Vto=1.05
pu; Pe=0.8 pu;Qe=-0.6 pu.
5
5
2.5
2.5
Adaline
2
Adaline
1.5
Ks (pu/rad)
Ks (pu/rad)
LS
KF
LS
0.5
0.5
KF
1.5
100
200
300
400
500
600
Time Index
700
800
900
1000
100
200
300
Fig. 5-a
400
500
600
Time Index
700
800
900
1000
Fig. 7-a
0.3
0.25
1.5
0.2
0.1
Kd (pu/rad/s)
Kd (pu/rad/s)
0.15
0.05
Adaline
KF
0.5
KF
0
-0.05
-0.1
LS
-0.5
LS
Adaline
-0.15
-0.2
100
200
300
400
500
600
Time Index
700
800
900
1000
Fig. 5-b
Fig. 5. Adaline-1 and KF estimation of Ks and Kd. Vto=1.05
pu; Pe=0.8 pu;Qe=0.60 pu.
4
3.5
3
Adaline
Ks (pu/rad)
2.5
2
1.5
KF
LS
1
0.5
0
-0.5
100
200
300
400
500
600
Time Index
700
800
900
1000
Fig. 6-a
7
Kd (pu/rad/s)
Adaline
-1
100
200
300
400
500
600
Time Index
700
800
900
1000
Fig. 7-b
Fig.7. Adaline-2 and KF estimation of Ks and Kd. Vto=1.05
pu; Pe=0.8 pu;Qe=0.60 pu.
3
LS
2
KF
1
100
200
300
400
500
600
Time Index
700
800
900
1000
Fig. 6-b
Fig. 6. Adaline-2 and KF estimation of Ks and Kd. Vto=1.05
pu; Pe=0.8 pu;Qe=-0.6 pu.
6
6
4.
1.9
5.
Ks (pu/rad)
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
6.
1.3
0.5
0
Qe (pu)
-0.5
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
7.
Pe (pu)
Fig. 8-a
8.
Kd (pu/rad/s)
9.
1
0
-1
0.5
0
Qe (pu)
-0.5
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
10.
Pe (pu)
Fig. 8-b
11.
7. Conclusion
An online adaptive technique for accurate
estimation of the synchronizing and damping torque
coefficients, Ks and Kd, using Adaline is presented in
this paper. The performance of the technique has
been compared with KF and LSE techniques.
Simulation results have shown that Adaline
technique is accurate and can be implemented with
small computing time and storage. It is believed, that
Adaline is a good candidate for online estimation of
small signal stability indices.
References
1. Rogers, G.: Power System Oscillations. Kluwer
Academic Publisher, 2000.
2. Kundur, P.: Power System Stability and Control,
McGraw-Hill, 1994.
3. Yu, Y. N.: Electric Power System Dynamics,
Academic Press, 1983.
13.
14.
15.
16.
7
7
Appendix A
The dynamical nonlinear differential equations of the
SMIBS are given below [4]:
d 1
(Tm Te )
=
dt M
d
= b ( 1)
dt
dE q
1
=
E fd E q ( x d x d )i d
dt
Tdo
dE fd
1
=
K A (Vref v t + u PSS ) E fd
dt
TA
(A-1)
(A-2)
(A-3)
Appendix B
The parameters of the synchronous generator and
transmission line are given below [4].
Machine Parameters (pu)
x d = 0.973, x q = 0.550, xd = 0.190
M = 9.26, Tdo = 7.76 s, D = 0, b=377 rad/s
Exciter:
KA = 50, TA = 0.05 s
Transmission Line (pu)
re = 0.0, xe = 0.40
Nominal Operating Point (pu)
Peo = 0.9, Qeo = 0.1, Vto = 1.05
Appendix C
For a SMIBS the following relationships apply with
all the variables with subscript o are calculated at
their pre-disturbance operating values corresponding
to the operating conditions Po, Qo, and Vto.[5]:
PoVto
i q =
(C-1)
2
( Po x q ) + (Vto2 + Qo x q ) 2
v do = iqo x q
(C-2)
2
v qo = Vto2 v do
)
(C-3)
ido =
2
Qo + x q iqo
v qo
E qo = v qo + ido x q
E o = (v do + x e i qo ) 2 + (v qo x e i do ) 2
(C-4)
(C-5)
(C-6)
v do + x e i qo
(C-7)
v qo x e i do
o = tan 1
(A-4)
K2 =
K3 =
E o sin o
x e + x d
x e + x d
xe + xd
x x d
K4 = d
E o sin o
x e + x d
K5 =
(C-8)
(C-9)
(C-10)
(C-11)
v qo
v do
x d
E o cos o
E o sin o
xe + x q Vto
xe + x d Vto
xq
(C-12)
xe v qo
K6 =
xe + x d Vto
(C-13)
8
8