creating ads and a website that are visually appealing. Uses images and sound to express ideas. On-camera appearances look mostly professional (scripts well-rehearsed, etc). Ads are easy to watch and, for the most part, interesting and engaging. Obvious that constituencies and target words were considered by the editors.
Final products show some creativity.
Visual appeal is lacking somewhat. Oncamera appearances are lacking in some professionalism (reading some of the script, etc) Ads were mostly engaging but lacking sound target words and/or overlooks constituency.
The content includes clear and
information is appropriately for the product and the intended audience. Products achieve campaign goals. A rich variety of supporting information in the ads contributes to the appeal of the ad. Messages are presented in a logical order.
Information somewhat more cursory but
is still presented clearly and accurately so that information contributes to understanding the campaign and the candidates message. Details are logical and persuasive information is effectively used. The content includes a clear point of view with a progression of ideas.
The content does not present
clearly stated information. Depth of content is exceedingly superficial. Information is vague, and some of the supporting information does not seem to fit the campaign or is inappropriate for the product.
Production Quality And Editing
All ads and website were completed
and had all required elements. The ads and website were well edited and had ample content. Audio, images (including campaign logo), and other enhancements were well used.
All ads and website were completed
and contain all required items. Some poor shots or audio remain in the ads. Video is still somewhat choppy. Audio, visuals other enhancements were utilized, but not for maximum effect (logo ineffective but present).
Ads and website were made,
but had very little if any editing. Many poor shots or audio remain in ads. Audio and visuals not utilized (logo missing).
Teamwork/ Collaboratio n
Met often as a group. Each member
appeared to contribute equally and to follow through on all responsibilities. Handled stressful situations and disagreements well. Learned to play to one anothers strengths. Met deadlines well.
Met regularly as a group but spent most
of the project working independently. One or 2 members failed to meet individual responsibilities. Group seemed to break down during times of stress. Did not quite master the challenge of playing to one anothers strengths. Struggled with deadlines.
Group worked mostly as
individuals and did little collaboratively. Several members did not meet their responsibilities. Group handled stressful situations really poorly. Group continually expected individuals to meet expectations they were incapable of meeting. Deadlines a consistent challenge.
Aesthetic Appeal and Creativity
Content/ Organization
Partially Proficient (7-13)
There is little creativity present in the final products. The ads are dull and audio difficult to hear. Little evidence that aesthetic and constituency appeal was taken into consideration. Target words impossible to discern.
Incomplete (0-6)
POINTS
There is almost nothing appealing
about the final products.
Content lacks any depth and little
logical sequence. Much of the supporting information is irrelevant to the overall idea of the campaign. The viewer is unsure what the message is because there is little persuasive information. Information is incorrect, out of date, or incomplete or thoroughly inappropriate for the product.
One or more of the products are
missing. All or few terribly done.
Group worked very little together,
failed to put together a collaborative project.generally did not work together as a team at all.