Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.345
Materials Handling
REFERENCES
American Society of Mechanical EngineersASME Materials Handling Handbook; AppleMaterial Handling
Systems Design, Wiley; BrookMechanics of Bulk Materials Handling, Butterworths; DomanDesign Guides for
Radioactive Material Handling Facilities and Equipment, American Nuclear Society; EastmanMaterials Handling, Marcel Dekker; FrazelleWorld-Class Warehousing and Material Handling, McGraw-Hill; Fruohtbaum
Bulk Materials Handling Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold; HollierAutomated Materials Handling, Springer
Verlag; LevineGuidelines for Safe Storage and Handling of High Toxic Hazard Materials, American Institute of
Chemical Engineers; LindkvistHandbook of Materials Handling, Ellis Horwood; Meyers and Stephens
Manufacturing Facilities Design and Material Handling, Prentice Hall; MulcahyMaterials Handling Handbook, McGraw-Hill; Nicholson, Ayoub, and MitalA Guide to Manual Materials Handling, T&F STM;
ReeseMaterial Handling Systems: Designing for Safety and Health, Tylor & Francis; Skocir and Fayed
Mechanical Conveyors: Selection and Operation, Technomic; Wasp, Kenny, and GhandiSlurry Pipeline Transportation, Trans Tech; WilliamsUsing Industrial Trucks for Materials HandlingCentury Hutchinson.
Vertical
Capacity range,
tons/h (t/h),
material
weighing 50 lb/ft3
(800.5 kg/m3)
Speed range,
ft/min (m/min)
Location of
loading point
Location of
discharge point
Handling
abrasive
materials
Perfect
discharge
Continuous
bucket
Gravity discharge
Pivoted bucket
Vertical to
inclination
15 from
vertical
345 (312.9)
Vertical and
horizontal
Vertical and
horizontal
78 (70.8)
Vertical to
inclination
15 from
vertical
34 (30.8)
191 (173.3)
255 (231.3)
306 (93.3)
120 (36.6)
100 (30.5)
100 (30.5)
80 (24.4)
Boot
Boot
Boot
On lower
horizontal run
On horizontal run
On lower
horizontal run
On horizontal run
Not recommended
Recommended
Over head
Over head
wheel
wheel
Not preferred Not preferred
Over head
wheel
Recommended
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.346
SECTION THREE
would be a good choice, because it is a recommended type for abrasive materials. The second choice
would be a pivoted bucket elevator. However, the continuous bucket type is popular and will be
chosen for this application.
2. Compute the elevator height. To allow for satisfactory loading of the bulk material, the elevator length is usually increased by about 5 ft (1.5 m) more than the vertical lift. Hence, the elevator
height = 75 + 5 = 80 ft (24.4 m).
3. Compute the required power input to the elevator. Use the relation hp = 2CH/1000, where C =
elevator capacity, tons/h; H = elevator height, ft. Thus, for this elevator, hp = 2(150)(80)/1000 = 24.0 hp
(17.9 kW).
The power input relation given above is valid for continuous-bucket, centrifugal-discharge,
perfect-discharge, and super-capacity elevators. A 25-hp (18.7-kW) motor would probably be
chosen for this elevator.
4. Select the type of conveyor to use. Since the elevator discharges onto the conveyor, the capacity of the conveyor should be the same, per unit time, as the elevator. Table 2 lists the characteristics
of various types of conveyors. Study of the tabulation shows that a belt conveyor would probably be
best for this application, based on the speed, capacity, and type of material it can handle. Hence, it
will be chosen for this installation.
5. Compute the required power input to the conveyor. The power input to a conveyor is composed
of two portions: the power required to move the empty belt conveyor and the power required to move
the load horizontally.
Determine from Fig. 1 the power required to move the empty belt conveyor, after choosing the
required belt width. Determine the belt width from Table 3.
Thus, for this conveyor, Table 3 shows that a belt width of 42 in (106.7 cm) is required to transport up to 150 tons/h (136.1 t/h) at a belt speed of 100 ft/min (30.5 m/min). [Note that the next larger
capacity, 162 tons/h (146.9 t/h), is used when the exact capacity required is not tabulated.] Find the
horsepower required to drive the empty belt by entering Fig. 1 at the belt distance between centers,
2160 (1959.5)
600 (182.9)
Any point
Recommended
Capacity range,
tons/h (t/h)
material weighing
50 lb/ft3 (800.5
kg/m3)
Location of loading
point
Location of
discharge
point
Handling abrasive
materials
Horizontal to 18
Carrying paths
Belt conveyor
Recommended
Any point
100 (30.5)
100 (90.7)
Horizontal to 25
Apron conveyor
Not
recommended
At end of trough
and
intermediate
points by gates
Any point
150 (45.7)
360 (326.6)
Horizontal to 45
Flight conveyor
Recommended
with special
steels
At end of
trough
Any point
20 (6.1)
20 (18.1)
Horizontal or
slight incline,
10
Drag chain
Not
recommended
Any point on
horizontal runs
by gate
On horizontal
runs
80 (24.4)
100 (90.7)
Horizontal to 90
En masse
conveyor
Not preferred
At end of trough
and
intermediate
points by gates
Any point
100 (30.5)
150 (136.1)
Horizontal to 15;
may be used
up to 90 but
capacity falls
off rapidly
Screw conveyor
Recommended
At end of trough
Any point
40 (12.2)
100 (90.7)
Horizontal or
slight incline,
5 above or
below
horizontal
Vibratory
conveyor
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.347
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.348
SECTION THREE
50 (800.5)
100 (1601)
150 (2402)
47 (42.6)
69 (62.6)
97 (87.9)
130 (117.9)
207 (187.8)
79 (71.7)
114 (103.4)
162 (146.9)
215 (195.0)
345 (312.9)
158 (143.3)
228 (206.8)
324 (293.9)
430 (390.1)
690 (625.9)
237 (214.9)
342 (310.2)
486 (440.9)
645 (585.1)
1035 (938.9)
1400 ft (426.7 m), and projecting vertically upward to the belt width, 42 in (106.7 cm). At the left,
read the required power input as 7.2 hp (5.4 kW).
Compute the power required to move the load horizontally from hp = (C/100)(0.4 + 0.00345L),
where L = distance between conveyor centers, ft; other symbols as before. For this conveyor, hp =
(150/100)(0.4 + 0.00325 1400) = 6.83 hp (5.1 kW). Hence, the total horse-power to drive this horizontal conveyor is 7.2 + 6.83 = 14.03 hp (10.5 kW).
The total horsepower input to this conveyor installation is the sum of the elevator and conveyor
belt horsepowers, or 14.03 + 24.0 = 38.03 hp (28.4 kW).
Related Calculations The procedure given here is valid for conveyors using rubber belts reinforced with cotton duck, open-mesh fabric, cords, or steel wires. It is also valid for stitchedcanvas belts, balata belts, and flat-steel belts. The required horsepower input includes any power
absorbed by idler pulleys.
Table 4 shows the minimum recommended belt widths for lumpy materials of various sizes.
Maximum recommended belt speeds for various materials are shown in Table 5.
When a conveyor belt is equipped with a tripper, the belt must rise about 5 ft (1.5 m) above
its horizontal plane of travel.
This rise must be included in the vertical-lift power input computation. When the tripper is driven
by the belt, allow 1 hp (0.75 kW) for a 16-in (406.4-mm) belt, 3 hp (2.2 kW) for a 36-in (914.4-mm)
belt, and 7 hp (5.2 kW) for a 60-in (1524-mm) belt. Where a rotary cleaning brush is driven by the
conveyor shaft, allow about the same power input to the brush for belts of various widths.
24 (609.6)
41/2 (114.3)
8 (203.2)
36 (914.4)
8 (203.2)
14 (355.6)
42 (1066.8)
10 (254)
20 (508)
48 (1219.2)
12 (304.9)
35 (889)
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.349
Width of belt
Moderately
free-flowing
sand, gravel,
fine stone, etc.
Lump coal,
coarse stone,
crushed ore
Heavy sharp
lumpy
materials,
heavy ores,
lump coke
in
mm
ft/min
m/min
ft/min
m/min
ft/min
m/mim
ft/min
m/min
1214
1618
2024
3036
305356
406457
508610
762914
400
500
600
750
122
152
183
229
250
300
400
500
76
91
122
152
250
350
400
76
107
122
250
300
76
91
Dry coal ashes are commonly rated as group 3 materials, Table 7, i.e., materials with small mixed
lumps with fines.
To determine a suitable screw diameter, assume two typical values and obtain the recommended
rpm from the sources listed above or Table 6. Thus, the maximum rpm recommended for a 6-in
(152.4-mm) screw when handling group 3 material is 90, as shown in Table 6; for a 20-in (508.0mm) screw, 60 r/min. Assume a 6-in (152.4-mm) screw as a trial diameter.
2. Determine the material factor for the conveyor. A material factor is used in the screw conveyor
power input computation to allow for the character of the substance handled. Table 7 lists the material factor for dry ashes as F = 4.0. Standard references show that the average weight of dry coal
ashes is 35 to 40 lb/ft3 (640.4 kg/m3).
3. Determine the conveyor size factor. A size factor that is a function of the conveyor diameter is
also used in the power input computation. Table 8 shows that for a 6-in (152.4-mm) diameter conveyor the size factor A = 54.
4. Compute the required power input to the conveyor. Use the relation hp = 106 (ALN + CWLF),
where hp = hp input to the screw conveyor head shaft; A = size factor from step 3; L = conveyor
length, ft; N = conveyor rpm; C = quantity of material handled, ft3/h; W = density of material, lb/ft3;
F = material factor from step 2. For this conveyor, given the data listed above, hp = 106(54 100
60 + 1500 40 100 4.0) = 24.3 hp (18.1 kW). With a 90 percent motor efficiency, the required
motor rating would be 24.3/0.90 = 27 hp (20.1 kW). A 30-hp (22.4-kW) motor would be chosen to
drive this conveyor. Since this is not an excessive power input, the 6-in (152.4-mm) conveyor is suitable for this application.
Material
group
1
2
3
4
5
Maximum material
density
lb/ft3
kg/m3
6 in (152 mm)
20 in (508 mm)
50
50
75
100
125
801
801
1201
1601
2001
170
120
90
70
30
110
75
60
50
25
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.350
SECTION THREE
Material type
Material factor
Lightweight:
Barley, beans, flour, oats, pulverized coal, etc.
Fines and granular:
Coalslack or fines
Sawdust, soda ash
Flyash
Small lumps and fines:
Ashes, dry alum
Salt
Semiabrasives; small lumps:
Phosphate, cement
Clay, limestone
Sugar, white lead
Abrasive lumps:
Wet ashes
Sewage sludge
Flue dust
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.4
4.0
1.4
1.4
2.0
1.0
5.0
6.0
4.0
If the calculation indicates that an excessively large power input, say 50 hp (37.3 kW) or more, is
required, then the larger-diameter conveyor should be analyzed. In general, a higher initial investment
in conveyor size that reduces the power input will be more than recovered by the savings in power
costs.
Related Calculations Use the procedure given here for screw or spiral conveyors and feeders
handling any material that will flow. The usual screw or spiral conveyor is suitable for conveying
materials for distances up to about 200 ft (60.9 m), although special designs can be built for
greater distances. Conveyors of this type can be sloped upward to angles of 35 with the horizontal. However, the capacity of the conveyor decreases as the angle of inclination is increased.
Thus the reduction in capacity at a 10 inclination is 10 percent over the horizontal capacity; at
35 the reduction is 78 percent.
The capacities of screw and spiral conveyors are generally stated in ft3/h (m3/h) of various
classes of materials at the maximum recommended shaft rpm. As the size of the lumps in the
material conveyed increases, the recommended shaft rpm decreases. The capacity of a screw or
spiral conveyor at a lower speed is found from (capacity at given speed, ft3/h) [(lower speed,
r/min)/(higher speed, r/min)]. Table 6 shows typical screw conveyor capacities at usual operating
speeds.
Various types of screws are used for modern conveyors. These include short-pitch, variablepitch, cut flights, ribbon, and paddle screws. The procedure given above also applies to these
screws.
6
(152.4)
9
(228.6)
10
(254)
12
(304.8)
16
(406.4)
18
(457.2)
20
(508)
24
(609.6)
Size factor
54
96
114
171
336
414
510
690
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.351
FIGURE 2
3.352
Duct
run
Booth or
hood
(2)
(1)
4000
(1219)
3500
(1067)
4000
(1219)
4000
(1219)
4000
(1219)
4000
(1219)
4000
(1219)
3000
(1914)
2000
(610)
Design
velocity,
ft/min
(m/min)
ft3/min
(m3/
min) in
duct
600
(16.98)
800
(22.65)
800
(22.65)
2200
(62.28)
550
(15.57)
550
(15.57)
3300
(93.42)
3300
(93.42)
3300
(93.42)
(4)
(3)
0.150
(0.014)
0.228
(0.021)
0.200
(0.019)
0.550
(0.051)
0.137
(0.013)
0.137
(0.013)
0.825
(0.077)
1.10
(0.102)
1.65
(0.153)
Duct area
= column
3/column
4, ft2 (m2)
(5)
5
(127)
6
(152)
6
(152)
10
(254)
5
(127)
5
(127)
12
(305)
14
(356)
18
(457)
Duct
diameter,
in (mm)
(6)
4300
(1311)
4200
(1280)
4200
(1280)
4000
(1219)
4000
(1219)
4000
(1219)
4200
(1280)
3000
(914)
2000
(610)
Actual
velocity,
ft/min
(m/min)
(7)
10
(3.0)
20
(6.1)
10
(3.0)
20
(6.1)
10
(3.0)
5
(1.5)
10
(3.0)
10
(3.0)
200
(60.9)
Length
of
straight
duct, ft
(m)
Actual
velocity
pressure,
inH2O
(mmH2O)
1.15
(29.2)
1.0
(25.4)
1.0
(25.4)
1.0
(25.4)
1.0
(25.4)
1.0
(25.4)
1.0
(25.4)
0.55
(13.9)
0.25
(6.4)
(9)
(8)
0
(0)
18
(5.5)
6
(1.8)
0
(0)
5
(1.5)
5
(1.5)
0
(0)
14
(4.3)
0
(0)
Equivalent
length of
elbows, ft
(m)
(10)
10
(3.0)
38
(11.6)
16
(4.8)
20
(6.1)
15
(4.5)
10
(3.0)
10
(3.0)
24
(7.3)
200
(60.9)
Total duct
length =
column 9 +
column 10,
ft (m)
(11)
5.4
(137.2)
4.0
(101.6)
4.0
(101.6)
2.1
(53.3)
4.6
(116.8)
4.6
(116.8)
1.9
(48.3)
0.84
(21.3)
0.25
(6.4)
(12)
Friction
per 100 ft
(30 m) of
duct,
inH2O
(mmH2O)
0.54
(13.7)
1.57
(39.9)
0.64
(16.3)
0.42
(10.7)
0.69
(17.5)
0.46
(11.7)
0.19
(4.8)
0.20
(5.1)
0.50
(12.7)
Actual
friction,
inH2O
(mmH2O)
(13)
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
0.42
(10.7)
0.42
(10.7)
0.19
(4.8)
0.20
(5.1)
0.50
(12.7)
2.00
(50.8)
4.43
(112.4)
C
D
F
G
0.58
(14.6)
0.54
(13.7)
0.19
(4.8)
0.20
(5.1)
0.50
(12.7)
2.00
(50.8)
4.99
(126.8)
1.57
(39.9)
0.11
(2.8)
(11)
(50)
2
1.0
(25.4)
11
1.15
(29.2)
50
System resistance
0.19
(4.8)
0.20
(5.1)
0.50
(12.7)
2.00
(50.8)
4.45
(113.1)
0.64
(16.3)
0.42
(10.7)
0.50
(12.7)
(50)
1.0
(25.4)
50
Hood number
4
0.19
(4.8)
0.20
(5.1)
0.50
(12.7)
2.00
(50.8)
4.18
(106.1)
0.69
(17.5)
0.60
(15.2)
(60)
1.0
(25.4)
60
0.46
(11.7)
0.19
(4.8)
0.20
(5.1)
0.50
(12.7)
2.00
(50.8)
3.95
(100.3)
0.60
(15.2)
(60)
1.0
(25.4)
60
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.353
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.354
SECTION THREE
Operation
Sanding:
Single drum, [10-in (25.4-cm) diameter]
Disk
Circular saws [16- to 24-in (40.6- to 60.9cm) diameter]
Shoe machinery
Buffing and polishing wheels [16- to 24-in
(40.6- to 60.9-cm) diameter]
Grinding wheels [16- to 20-in (40.6- to 50.8cm) diameter]
Abrasive blast rooms
Pharmaceuticals
ft3/min
(m3/min)
Branch duct
velocity, ft/
min (m/min)
Branch duct
diameter, in
(mm)
400 (11.32)
550 (15.57)
450 (12.74)
4000 (1219)
4000 (1219)
4000 (1219)
4 (101.6)
5 (127)
4.5 (114.3)
550 (15.57)
600 (16.98)
4000 (1219)
4500 (1372)
5 (127)
5 (127)
600 (16.98)
4500 (1372)
5 (127)
3500 (1067)
3000 (1067)
Conveying velocities
Material conveyed
Area
2
in
mm
ft
m2
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
10.0
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
102
127
152.4
178
203.2
254
305
356
406.4
457.2
508
559
610
0.0873
0.1364
0.1964
0.2673
0.3491
0.5454
0.7854
1.069
1.396
1.767
2.182
2.640
3.142
0.008
0.013
0.018
0.025
0.032
0.051
0.073
0.099
0.130
0.164
0.203
0.245
0.292
FIGURE 3
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.355
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.356
SECTION THREE
(1310.6 m/min), hv = (4300/4005)2 = 1.15 in (29.2 mm) H2O. Compute the actual velocity pressure in
each duct run, and enter the result in column 8, Table 9.
6. Compute the equivalent length of each duct. Enter the total straight length of each duct,
including any vertical drops, in column 9, Table 9. Use accurate lengths, because the system resistance is affected by the duct length.
Next list the equivalent length of each elbow in the duct runs in column 10, Table 9. For convenience, assume that the equivalent length of an elbow is 12 times the duct diameter in ft. Thus, an
elbow in a 6-in (152.4-mm) diameter duct has an equivalent resistance of (6-in diameter/[(12 in/ft)
(12)]) = 6 ft (1.83 m) of straight duct. When making this calculation, assume that all elbows have a
radius equal to twice the diameter of the duct. Consider 45 bends as having the same resistance as
90 elbows. Note that branch ducts are usually arranged to enter the main duct at an angle of 45 or
less. These assumptions are valid for all typical industrial exhaust systems and pneumatic conveying
systems.
Find the total equivalent length of each duct by taking the sum of columns 9 and 10, Table 9, horizontally, for each duct run. Enter the result in column 11, Table 9.
7. Determine the actual friction in each duct. Using Fig. 3, determine the resistance, inH2O
(mmH2O) per 100 ft (30.5 m) of each duct by entering with the air quantity and diameter of that duct.
Enter the frictional resistance thus found in column 12, Table 9.
Compute actual friction in each duct by multiplying the friction per 100 ft (30.5 m) of duct,
column 12, Table 9, by the total duct length, column 11 100. Thus for duct run A, actual friction =
5.4(10/100) = 0.54 in (13.7 mm) H2O. Compute the actual friction for the other duct runs in the same
manner. Tabulate the results in column 13, Table 9.
8. Compute the hood entrance losses. Hoods are used in industrial exhaust systems to remove
vapors, dust, fumes, and other undesirable airborne contaminants from the work area. The hood
entrance loss, which depends upon the hood configuration, is usually expressed as a certain percentage of the velocity pressure in the branch duct connected to the hood, Fig. 4. Since the hood
entrance loss usually accounts for a large portion of the branch resistance, the entrance loss chosen
should always be on the safe side.
List the hood designation number under the System Resistance heading, as shown in Table 9.
Under each hood designation number, list the velocity pressure in the branch connected to that hood.
Obtain this value from column 8, Table 9. List under the velocity pressure, the hood entrance loss from
Fig. 4 for the particular type of hood used in that duct run. Take the product of these two values, and
enter the result under the hood number on the entrance loss, inH2O line. Thus, for hood 1, entrance
loss = 1.15(0.50) = 0.58 in (14.7 mm) H2O. Follow the same procedure for the other hoods listed.
9. Find the resistance of each branch run. List the main and branch runs, A through F, Table 9.
Trace out each main and branch run in Fig. 2, and enter the actual friction listed in column 3 of
Table 9. Thus for booth 1, the main and branch runs consist of A, D, G, H, and I. Insert the actual
friction, in (mm) H2O, as shown in Table 9, or A = 9.54(242.3), D = 0.42(10.7), G = 0.19(4.8), H =
0.20(5.1), I = 0.50(12.7).
Determine the filter friction loss from the manufacturers engineering data. It is common practice
to design industrial exhaust systems on the basis of dirty filters or separators; i.e., the frictional resistance used in the design calculations is the resistance of a filter or separator containing the maximum
amount of dust allowable under normal operating conditions. The frictional resistance of dirty filters
can vary from 0.5 to 6 in (12.7 to 152.4 mm) H2O or more. Assume that the frictional resistance of
the filter used in this industrial exhaust system is 2.0 in (50.8 mm) H2O.
Add the filter resistance to the main and branch duct resistance as shown in Table 9. Find the sum
of each column in the table, as shown. This is the total resistance in each branch, inH2O, Table 9.
10. Balance the exhaust system. Inspection of the lower part of Table 9 shows that the computed
branch resistances are unequal. This condition is usually encountered during system design.
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
FIGURE 4
3.357
To balance the system, certain duct sizes must be changed to produce equal resistance in all ducts.
Or, if possible, certain ducts can be shortened. If duct shortening is not possible, as is often the
case, an exhaust fan capable of operating against the largest resistance in a branch can be chosen.
If this alternative is selected, special dampers must be fitted to the air inlets of the booths or ducts.
For economical system operation, choose the balancing method that permits the exhaust fan to
operate against the minimum resistance.
In the system being considered here, a fairly accurate balance can be obtained by decreasing the
size of ducts E and F to 4.75 in (120.7 mm) and 4.375 in (111.1 mm), respectively. Duct B would be
increased to 6.5 in (165.1 mm) in diameter.
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
3.358
SECTION THREE
11. Choose the exhaust fan capacity and static pressure. Find the required exhaust fan capacity
in ft3/min from the sum of the airflows in the ducts, A through H, column 3, Table 9, or 3300 ft3/min
(93.5 m3/min). Choose a static pressure equal to or greater than the total resistance in the branch
duct having the greatest resistance. Since this is slightly less than 4.5 in (114.3 mm) H2O, a fan
developing 4.5 in (114.3 mm) H2O static pressure will be chosen. A 10 percent safety factor is usually applied to these values, giving a capacity of 3600 ft3/min (101.9 m3/min) and a static pressure
of 5.0 in (127 mm) H2O for this system.
12. Select the duct material and thickness. Galvanized sheet steel is popular for industrial exhaust
systems, except where corrosive fumes and gases rule out galvanized material. Under these conditions,
plastic, tile, stainless steel, or composition ducts may be substituted for galvanized ducts. Table 12
shows the recommended metal gage for galvanized ducts of various diameters. Do not use
TABLE 12 Exhaust-System Duct Gages
galvanized-steel ducts for gas temperatures
higher than 400F (204C).
Duct diameter, in (mm)
Metal gage
Hoods should be two gages heavier than the
Up to 8 (203.2)
22
connected
branch duct. Use supports not more
9 to 18 (228.6 to 457.2)
20
than 12 ft (3.7 m) apart for horizontal ducts up
19 to 30 (482.6 to 762)
18
to 8-in (203.2-mm) diameter. Supports can be
31 and larger (787.4 and larger)
16
spaced up to 20 ft (6.1 m) apart for larger ducts.
Fit a duct cleanout opening every 10 ft (3 m).
Where changes of diameter are made in the main duct, fit an eccentric taper with a length of at least
5 in (127 mm) for every 1-in (25.4-mm) change in diameter. The end of the main duct is usually
extended 6 in (152.4 mm) beyond the last branch and closed with a removable cap. For additional
data on industrial exhaust system design, see the newest issue of the ASHRAE Guide.
Use this procedure for any type of industrial exhaust system, such as
those serving metalworking, woodworking, plating, welding, paint spraying, barrel filling,
foundry, crushing, tumbling, and similar operations. Consult the local code or ASHRAE Guide
for specific airflow requirements for these and other industrial operations.
This design procedure is also valid, in general, for industrial pneumatic conveying systems.
For several comprehensive, worked-out designs of pneumatic conveying systems, see Hudson
Conveyors, Wiley.
Related Calculations