Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Key Points
The Ring of Gyges (from Platos Republic) this is the
new one.
Glaucon, one of Socrates interlocutors in this dialogue, wants
Socrates to defend the proposition that it is always to ones
advantage to be just in ones dealings with others.
Glaucon invokes the myth of the Ring of Gyges, according to
which a shepherd finds a magic ring which has the power to
make its wearer invisible.
The shepherd uses this magic ring to seduce the queen and
conspire against, and eventually assassinate, the king, and
make himself a tyrant, enjoying fabulous wealth and great
power.
Socrates now has to find a way to defend the idea that justice is its
own reward, that being unjust is NEVER profitable or advantageous,
contrary to what the Ring of Gyges myth suggests.
Socrates begins his defense of the life of justice over injustice with a
discussion of virtue or human excellence.
All things, he suggests, are characterized by a specific work,
function, or purpose that could not be accomplished, or not so well
accomplished, by any other thing.
The specific activity or function of a given thing is its unique virtue or
excellence.
For example, the specific virtue or excellence of the eye is to see,
since no other organ in the body can do this work.
Spiritedness obeys reasons commands, and thus only gets angry at the
right time and for the right reasons.
Appetite/desire seek to satisfy needs and wants. They can be unruly, and
thus must be firmly controlled by reason and spiritedness so as to achieve
moderation. Nothing in excess!
Moderation is the condition whereby the three faculties of the soul are in
friendly harmony, and the moderate man will be him in whom the one
ruling principle of reason, and the two subject ones of spiritedness and
desire are equally agreed that reason ought to rule, and do not rebel.
Justice finally emerges as the condition of exercising moderation. The just
man is the moderate man.
The Just man will not wish to act unjustly because his two lower faculties
(spiritedness and appetite) will be guided by what is good for the whole
human being (as prescribed by reason).
Callicles readily asserts that pleasure and good are one and the
same. Socrates will attempt to expose the inconsistency in Callicles
statement through a long and somewhat complicated argument,
whose main points we will briefly summarize here:
(a) Pleasure is identical to good, and pain is identical to evil
(according to Callicles)
(b) Good & evil, and happiness & misery, however, are contraries,
and as such they cannot coexist in the same individual in the same
respect. It is impossible, in other words, to be both happy and
miserable, or good and evil, at the same time, but one must be the
one or the other.
(c) When hungry or thirsty, one experiences pain (i.e., the pain of
hunger or thirst).