Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Submitted by :
SAYANTAN MANDAL
SAYANTAN BISWAS
KOUSHIK GHOSH
INTRODUCTION
The energy supply to demand narrowing down day by day around the
world, the growing demand of power has made the power plants of
scientific interest, but most of the power plants are designed by the
energetic performance criteria based on first law of thermodynamics
only. The real useful energy loss cannot be justified by the fist law of
thermodynamics, because it does not differentiate between the quality
and quantity of energy. Exergy is never in balance for real processes.
Energy is a measure of quantity but Exergy is a measure of quality
and quantity. Power plants are normally examined using energy
analysis but, as pointed out previously, a better understanding is
attained when a more complete thermodynamic view is taken, which
uses the second law of thermodynamics in conjunction with energy
analysis via exergy methods.
Page 2
PROJECT SUMMARY
The objective of the present work is to energy & exergy based
analysis based on operating data of a 500MW thermal power plant at
different unit load like 100%, 80%, 60% to design a model which
helps us to determine different losses and irreversibility of different
components of the turbine cycle. Based on these determinations, it is
possible to take different measures to increase the efficiency the
turbine cycle. For this purpose, Mejia Thermal Power Station of
Damodar Valley Corporation is taken into consideration.
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
The exergy of
kinetic and
potential energies
are equal to
themselves, and
they are entirely
available for work.
The work
potential or
exergy of
potential energy
is equal to the
potential energy
itself.
Unavailable energy is
the portion of energy
that cannot be
converted to work by
even a reversible heat
engine.
Page 6
Thermodynamic Analysis
Mass balance:
m m
in
Energy balance: Q W
out
h m in hin
out out
Page 7
Thermodynamic Analysis
phy
where phy h h0 T0 ( s s0 )
Total exergy rate of a fluid steam becomes
X m m h h0 T0 ( s s0 )
Page 8
Page 9
PRESSURE
TEMP
ENERGY
FLOW RATE
EXERGY FLOW
RATE
(s)
SPECIFIC
EXERGY
()
()
( x)
kJ/Kg
kJ/Kg-K
kJ/Kg
MW
MW
250.73
229.67
20.14
229.66
194.69
12.41
23.01
3392.35
3055.78
3055.78
3544.83
3049.52
3292.08
3049.52
6.40
6.67
6.67
7.42
7.48
7.46
7.48
1489.65
1073.51
1072.62
1337.27
823.87
1073.50
823.87
850.58
701.81
61.53
814.12
593.72
40.85
70.18
373.51
246.55
21.60
307.12
160.40
13.32
18.96
DRYNESS
FRACTION
MASS FLOW
RATE
()
SPECIFIC
ENTHALPY
SPECIFIC
ENTROPY
(h)
kg/s
bar
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
170.00
28.09
28.09
25.32
4.53
10.99
4.53
537.00
332.70
322.70
537.00
292.10
413.70
292.10
0.10
0.94
171.98
2446.13
7.70
155.28
420.69
26.71
0.23
0.96
4.79
2531.98
7.60
271.68
12.13
1.30
10
11
12
13
14
0.97
1.80
27.36
10.62
4.26
11.67
6.45
20.14
12.46
10.58
2748.37
2859.68
3055.72
3292.00
3049.61
7.56
7.53
6.69
7.48
7.51
499.99
620.24
1067.93
1067.48
816.60
32.06
18.44
61.53
41.03
32.25
5.83
4.00
21.50
13.31
8.64
15
0.23
4.79
2526.74
7.62
261.37
12.11
1.25
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
0.93
1.74
187.39
187.39
26.15
26.15
26.15
0.10
26.15
26.15
26.15
26.15
4.11
187.39
187.39
187.39
187.39
187.39
3.91
11.67
8.12
20.14
32.54
6.45
18.11
23.05
207.61
207.61
207.61
207.61
207.61
250.73
250.73
26.39
224.34
224.34
224.34
12.44
2748.33
2859.60
804.62
645.00
416.36
270.88
263.36
193.03
197.39
259.18
402.89
478.80
605.97
633.51
633.51
633.51
795.05
997.66
3049.50
7.58
7.55
2.19
1.83
1.29
0.88
0.86
0.65
0.66
0.84
1.26
1.46
1.78
1.80
1.80
1.80
2.17
2.59
7.55
493.98
614.58
157.54
105.64
35.66
12.51
11.87
2.94
5.68
13.36
33.04
49.11
80.17
102.20
102.20
102.20
154.16
231.23
804.96
32.06
23.21
16.20
20.99
2.68
4.91
6.07
40.08
40.98
53.81
83.65
99.41
151.94
158.84
16.72
142.12
178.36
223.82
37.93
5.76
4.99
3.17
3.44
0.23
0.23
0.27
0.61
1.18
2.77
6.86
10.20
20.10
25.63
2.70
22.93
34.59
51.88
10.01
135.70
194.00
321.90
413.40
291.80
0.97
135.50
193.80
187.40
150.30
98.90
64.20
62.40
46.10
46.60
61.40
95.70
113.70
143.90
147.60
147.60
147.60
185.20
230.80
291.30
Page 10
DEAD STATE
A system is said to be in the dead state when it is in thermodynamic
equilibrium with the environment it is in.
Dead
state
Temperature
(oC)
Specific enthalpy
(kJ/kg)
Specific entropy
(kJ/kg-K)
25.00
104.93
0.37
Page 11
Rate of Exergy
Turbines
Pumps
Destruction
I
X X
turbine
in
out
W turbine
I turbine
II ,turbine 1
X in X out
I pump
II , pump 1
W
pump
Heaters
I heater X in X out
II ,heater
Condenser
I condenser X in X out
II ,condenser
Deaerator
I dearator X in X out
I heater
1
X in
I condenser
1
X
in
II ,dearator
I dearator
1
X in
Page 12
DATA ANALYSIS
Page 13
20
IRREVERSIBILITY
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
IRREVERSIBILITY
Page 14
60
38.05
40
20
0
80.14
82.41
95.56
90.15
76.1
68.21
94.38
89.42
43.95
90.22
Page 15
Page 16
CONCLUSION
In this study an energy and exergy analysis of design and off design
condition of a 500MW coal fired thermal power plant has been
carried out based on mass, energy and exergy balance equation.
The thermodynamic states of the plant components are shown in
Table1. Exergy destruction, exergy and energy efficiency of the
boiler components are presented in Table2. It has been found that
maximum exergy destruction occurs due to combustion process. It
has also been found that exergy efficiency is lower than energy
efficiency.
According to the table-2 we get LPH-2 exergy efficiency or 2 nd law
efficiency 38% which is really poor. To overcome this problem some
precaution should be taken and these are air venting and retubing.
After doing all this operation if we did not get our desired efficiency
then we have to replace the heater, but it will increase the overall
cost. The performance can be improved maintaining an optimum
excess air level and also with change in ambient temperature.
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
THANK YOU
Page 20