Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Product-Moment
Correlation
slide 1
slide 2
What to Expect?
Strength
Describe
Direction
Calculate r
r=
SXY
( SSX ) ( SSY )
Hypothesis Test
slide 3
Components of
Pearson r analysis
Pearson corr.
coefficient, r
Descriptive
Direction
Strength/
Magnitude
Inferential
Hypothesis Test:
HO: = 0
HA: 0
> 0
< 0
slide 4
Descriptive
+/-
( X ) ( Y )
n
=
2 ( X ) 2 2 ( Y ) 2
Y
X
n
n
XY
SXY
( SSX ) ( SSY )
slide 5
Positive
Relationship
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
xx
x x x
x x x
x x
x xx
x
x
x
x
No
Relationship
x x x
x
x
x x x x x
x x x x
x
x
X
Negative
Relationship
X
slide 6
Strength/Magnitude
Correlation coefficient, r
-1 r 1
slide 7
Strength of Relationship
< .2
Negligible Relationship
.2 - .4
Low relationship
.4 - .7
Moderate relationship
.7 - .9
High relationship
> .9
0.00
slide 8
Inferential
Steps in Hypothesis Testing
1.
2.
1 r 2
n2
slide 9
3.
t , df
Two-tailed - t /2,
4.
5.
Make conclusion
df
Manual
Criteria
|tcal| > |tcritical|
|tcal| |tcritical|
Decision
Reject HO
Fail to reject HO
Sig-t
Fail to reject HO
Reject HO:
Significant relationship between the two
variables
SPSS
Fail to reject HO:
Criteria
Decision
No significant relationship between the two
Sig-t <
Reject HO
variables
slide 10
bas statistics for Social Science
slide 11
Example 1:
Data were collected from a randomly selected sample to determine
relationship between average assignment and test scores in statistics.
Distribution for the data is presented in the table below. Assuming
the data are normally distributed,
1.
2.
3.
Data set:
Assign
8.5
6
9
10
8
7
5
6
7.5
5
Test
88
66
94
98
87
72
45
63
85
77
slide 12
1.
n
n
(72) (775)
5,795.5
10
=
(72) 2
(775) 2
544.5
62,441
10
10
XY
215.5
(26.1)(2378.5)
215.5
249.1563
ID
X
Y
1
8.5
88
Summary
2
6stat: 66
n3
10
9
94
4
10
98
X
72
5
8
87
Y
775
62
7
72
X
544.5
7
5
45
2
Y
8
6 62,441
63
9
7.5 5,795.5
85
XY
10
5
77
= .865
2.
slide 13
3.
2.
1 r 2
n2
.865 0
1 .865 2
10 2
.865
=
.1774
= 4.876
slide 14
3.
4.
Decision
Since |tcal| (4.876) is bigger than |tcritical| (3.355)
Reject the null hypothesis
5.
Conclusion
Conclude there is a significant relationship between
average assignment and test scores at .01 level of
significance
slide 15
Correlations
Average
assignment
scores
Average assignment
scores
Test scores
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Test scores
1
.865**
.
.001
10
10
.865**
1
.001
.
10
10
slide 16
Example 2:
Reviews of literature show that anxiety is correlated negatively with
team cohesiveness. To ascertain this relationship, Dr Irman collected
data from a randomly selected sample. Summary of the data follow:
1.
2.
3.
Summary Statistics:
n
X
Y
X 2
Y 2
XY
21
417
446
8,697
9,802
8,566
slide 17
1.
n
n
(417) (446)
8,566
21
=
(417) 2
(446) 2
8,697
9,802
21
21
XY
290.2857
(416.5714)(329.8095)
Summary Statistics:
n
21
X
417
Y
446
X 2
8,697
Y 2
9,802
XY
8,566
290.2857
370.6605
= .783
2.
slide 18
3.
2.
1 r 2
n2
.783 0
1 ( .783) 2
21 2
.783
=
.1427
= 5.487
slide 19
3.
4.
Decision
Since |tcal| (-5.487) is bigger than |tcritical| (1.729)
Reject the null hypothesis
5.
Conclusion
Conclude there is a significant relationship between
anxiety and team cohesiveness at .05 level of
significance
slide 20
Correlations
Anxiety
Team cohesiveness
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Team
Anxiety
cohesiveness
1
-.783**
.
.000
21
21
-.783**
1
.000
.
21
21
slide 21
bas statistics for Social Science
slide 22