Sei sulla pagina 1di 14

Supplier Audit Questionnaire (V1.

4)

Supplier Qualification - On-Site Audit


Language Selection:

English

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions

Show Criterias

Supplier visited
Company:
Supplier ERP ID
Location(s) audited:
Audit Date

City

Country

Main Business Focus

Lead Auditor and Co Auditor(s)


Name

Role

Participants/List of Interviewees:
Name

Form

Role

Status: FR 1/14

300357919/FR1/001/01

Supplier Audit Questionnaire


Date:
Completed by:

Supplier Qualification
Result of On-Site Audit
Supplier visited
Company:

0
Summary
Audit Scope

Include BU-Specific Questions

(x)

1. Management

72%

2. Finance

80%

3. Quality Management

70%

4. Product Development

74%

5. Customer Relationship

75%

6. Supply Chain

71%

7. Manufacturing and Assembly

71%

8. Business Continuity Management

71%

9. Information Systems

69%

10. Sustainability

65%

72%

10

Overall Impression

Excellent

Observations
Strength

Improvement Areas

Forging and Machining in same premises

Need improvement in house keeping as per 5S STD

Plant is big enough

Kaizen implementation required

Good Finencial condition

Set up and hot inspection to be conducted as per control plan

Well Equiped

Back up data should be stored parralel to recover in case of failure


No work instruction at shot blasting

Process standard at CNC-5 part no. 5141641 manually corrected on sheet.


Internal audit need more authenticity
Inspection freqency of parts not follwed to C.P. at some places in machine shop
Add packing std in PPAP document.

Form

Status: FR 2/14

300357919/FR1/001/01

0
0 Supplier Audit Questionnaire
Date:
Completed by:

Show/Hide

December 30, 1899


December 30, 1899

Management

Result:

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions
Show Criterias

72%

Adequate

1.1

Responsibilities and Leadership

1.1.01

How are managements responsibilities and accountabilities for the company's financial and nonfinancial objectives defined?

1.1.02

How can you demonstrate the involvement of the management related to maintain the Quality
Management System ( QMS ) and how do they review it?

1.1.03

How is the management involved and how do they promote the Continuous Improvement Process
(CIP) and do they support the needed resources?

1.1.04

Are all key functions staffed? (Provide organizational charts covering management, quality, and
engineering)

1.1.05

How does management recognize and reward employees success?

1.1.06

How does the company use benchmarks and competitor information to improve their competitive
position ?

1.1.07

How does the company determine current and future requirements and expectations of
Customers ?

1.1.08

Are corrective actions arranged ( CIP / PDCA ) and monitored ?

1.1.09

What activities and measures are performed by management to improve customer and supplier
relations?

1.1.10

Does the supplier conducting management reviews which incl. KPIs ? ( OTD, IRR, ERR, warranty
costs, CSI, etc. ) ==> on regular basis !

1.2

People development

1.2.2

How does the company translate requirements from strategic business planning to specific Human
resources plan ? What is the professional development process?

1.2.3

What type of opinion survey/suggestion/ communication program is in place?

1.2.4

How is the development plan documented and controlled?

1.3

Resources

1.3.1

Does the supplier ensured the availability of the necessary resources ?

1.3.2

Is personnel competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, skills and experience ?

1.3.3

Does the supplier ensure that responsibilities and authorities are defined and communicated within
the whole organization ?

1.3.4

Is a management representative announced and communicated within the whole organization ?

1.3.5

Are the authorities of this representative defined and are they adequate to monitor, develop and
improve the quality management system ?

1.4

General

1.4.1

Has the supplier established and published his quality policy ?

1.4.2

Is the supplier monitoring his quality policy ?

1.4.3

Does the supplier establish quality objectives ?

1.4.4

Is the supplier monitoring and measuring this quality objectives ?

1.5

BU-specific Questions

1.5.01

BU-spec. Q1

1.5.02

BU-spec. Q2

1.5.03

BU-spec. Q2

Excellent / World Class

Unacceptable

Minimum Requirements

Not Applicable

Mandatory

Include BU-Specific Questions

Assessor Comments

Management objectives defined


Ts 16949,and periodic review
Not properly documented
Yes

Periodic progress of Improvement activities will be


monitored and shall be reviewed with the
management on weekly basis.

System in place
No such record for comparision

Corrective Action/ Improvement Proposal

Benchmark practice is already in practice, it will be


properly documented

Planning for automation


Yes

Yes

Yes

Training provid

System in place
System in place

x
Yes
X

X
system evident but not properly
documented

Competency Mapping is already in practice

Yes
Yes
Yes

Yes
Yes
Yes
Needs improvement

0
0
0

Form

Status: FR 3/14

Monitoring of Quality Objectives will be done in


graphical form.

300357919/FR1/001/01

0
0
0

0
Show/Hide
Supplier Audit Questionnaire

Date: December 30, 1899


Completed by: December 30, 1899

0
0

Adequate

2.1

Finance

2.1.1

What is the suppliers turnover vs. the expected Oerlikon purchasing volume
(dependency ratio)?

2.1.2

What is the suppliers current cash flow and capital situation?

2.1.3

Has the supplier currently or had they in the last five years experienced financial
difficulties?

2.1.4

What is the suppliers financial rating (D&B, Bank investigations, Credit reform)
resp. financial standing?

2.1.5

Are there any social / political / environmental risks that need to be considered ?
( Wars, Corruption, Poverty, natural disasters, diseases etc. )

2.2

BU-specific Questions

2.2.01

BU-spec. Q1

2.2.02

BU-spec. Q2

Form

80%

Include BU-Specific Questions

Excellent / World Class

Unacceptable

Minimum Requirements

Not Applicable

Result:

Mandatory

Finance

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions
Show Criterias

Assessor Comments

Corrective Action/ Improvement Proposal

OK

Ok

No difficulties
OK
ok

Status: FR 4/14

300357919/FR1/001/01

0
0
0

0
Show/Hide
Supplier Audit Questionnaire

Date: December 30, 1899


Completed by: December 30, 1899

Adequate

Unacceptable

70%

Include BU-Specific Questions

Excellent / World Class

Quality Management

Minimum Requirements

3.1

Not Applicable

Result:

Mandatory

Quality Management

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions
Show Criterias

Assessor Comments

Corrective Action/ Improvement Proposal

TS 16949 from Vincotte,ValidTill aug 2013


3.1.1

What is the current status on ISO 9001(or similar)?

3.1.2

What procedure is in place to ensure Internal Audits?

3.2

Process Control

3.2.1

How are specific manufacturing processes defined and documented?

3.2.2

What is the procedure for identifying and controlling non-conformities in all


business processes? Are all non conforming materials identified?

3.2.3

What is the preventative and corrective action process?

3.2.4

What method is in operation, to ensure that personnel and processes are


qualified and controlled?

3.2.5

How are statistical techniques and related tools integrated into the QMS?

3.2.6

What and how does the organization set targets for process improvement and
how are they measured ?

3.2.7

How can you demonstrate your internal/external continuous improvement


process ( CIP )?

3.2.8

Do you have a formal Production Part Approval (PPAP) process to qualify and
get Customer approval for quality critical process or product changes ?

Document Evident

3.3

Inspection & Testing

3.3.1

What is the calibration and preventative maintenance process for


test/inspection equipment and are the performance results recorded?

Goss meter not calibrated

3.3.2

How is inspection & test status documented and traceable?

3.3.3

To what extent is the strategy and process for inspection and testing
documented, controlled and traceable?

3.3.4

Whats the process for receiving and shipping inspection?

3.3.5

Are the final tests made according to standards? Are test reports generated?

3.3.6

Does the inspection/test team have authority to liberate or not any product?

3.4

Document, Data Control and Archiving

3.4.1

Has the supplier established a documented procedure which defines the


identification, storage, protection, retrieval, retention time and disposition of
quality documents and quality records

3.4.2

Does the supplier have a documented procedure for the effective storage time
of relevant data and is this according to Oerlikon requirements?

3.4.3

Are documents and applicable standards (international, own country) available


and easy to access?

3.5

BU-specific Questions

3.5.01

BU-spec. Q1

3.5.02

BU-spec. Q2

Audit carried out but action plan not proper


X

Action Plan will be expressed in Audit Report in more detailed Form.


Internal audit non-conformity report will be used along with
observation report to record the corrcetive action plan.

Opn std and CP evident


System in place

8D monitoring

Process standard at CNC-5 part no.


5141641 manually corrected on sheet.

Periodic Review of Process Sheets will be done so that they cannot


be corrected manually by any person

Monitoring during development only

Online SPC is also conducted

X
System in place
System in place

Gossmeter shall be calibrated form NABL Lab by 10.07.12

ok
Record evident
System in place

Yes
Yes

0
0

Form

Yes

Ok

OK
X

Status: FR 5/14

300357919/FR1/001/01

0
0 Supplier Audit Questionnaire
Date:
Completed by:

Show/Hide

December 30, 1899


December 30, 1899

0
0

Adequate

74%

Assessor Comments

4.1

Product Development and Improvement

4.1.01

Does the supplier demonstrate understanding of Design Validation?

Yes,Design section is there.

4.1.02

Are design and development inputs relating to the product requirements defined, proved and
documented ?

Ok

4.1.03

Has the supplier a documented procedure for controlling of technical changes?

Yes,changes recorded with proper system

4.1.04

Is there evidence of regular design and development reviews with customers?

Yes

4.1.05

Are multi-function project management techniques in place to effectively track and meet all key
event dates (i.e., quote programs, prototype material, tooling programs, sample submission dates,
and new product launch programs, etc.)?

Yes

4.1.06

How is the project - production interface guaranteed?

Ok

4.1.07

Are final products accompanied by complete specifications?


And are these specifications supplied for final users?

Ok

4.1.08

Does supplier have prior use and knowledge of Design Failure Mode Effects Analysis (DFMEA)?

4.1.09

Does the supplier have a documented development process?

4.1.10

How are the design inputs and outputs defined and how are they documented?

Design records evident

4.1.11

Does the supplier have a documented procedure related to how the design is checked and
documented ?

Yes

4.1.12

How and when does the supplier realized the validation and the verification of the new or modified
designed products ?

Discuus during APQP

4.2

Product and Technology Roadmap

4.2.1

Does supplier utilize technology road maps or planning tools to insure they will remain competitive?

Yes

4.2.2

How does the supplier manage core competencies?

Regularly updation

4.2.3

Does the supplier use benchmarking to develop new designs?

Yes

4.3

Intellectual Properties

4.3.1

How has the NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) been communicated and enforced throughout the
company and the supply chain?

Yes

4.3.2

How does the supplier guarantee that the NDA is effective in his company and on sub-supplier
side?

Yes

4.4

Development Capabilities and References

4.4.1

Has the supplier a lab or access to a lab with adequate and calibrated measuring equipment / tools
if required.

Yes

4.4.2

Is there any evidence that the supplier is truly embracing Advanced Product Quality Planning
(APQP) and not just doing paperwork?

Evident

4.4.3

Which references can you show?

APQP data

4.4.4

How well does the company's engineering capabilities match with the required profile?

Ok

4.4.5

Is the infrastructure of the lab adequate to the requirements of the product ?

Ok

4.5

BU-specific Questions

4.5.01

BU-spec. Q 1

4.5.02

BU-spec. Q 2

Form

Show Criterias

Include BU-Specific Questions

Excellent / World Class

Unacceptable

Minimum Requirements

Not Applicable

Result:

Mandatory

Product Development

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions

Corrective Action/ Improvement Proposal

X
X

Some record evident

x
X

x
X

Status: FR 6/14

300357919/FR1/001/01

0
0 Supplier Audit Questionnaire
Date:
Completed by:

Show/Hide

December 30, 1899


December 30, 1899

0
0

Adequate

Excellent / World Class

Unacceptable

Show Criterias

75%

Include BU-Specific Questions


Assessor Comments

5.1

Sales and Delivery

5.1.1

What is the process for documenting and coordinating purchase orders, quotes and contracts to
ensure that order requirements are within supplier capabilities prior to order acceptance?

System in place

5.1.2

How can you demonstrate your change process?

Procedure available

5.1.3

Are contracts revised formally with the supplier's customers in relation to the scope, price and
term?

Yes,Periodic review

5.1.4

Is the sales scope clearly defined in the proposal or order?

Yes

5.2

Cost Management

5.2.1

Does the supplier have a cost reduction program which is extended to his sub-suppliers? Is cost
reduction passed along to customers?

Yes

5.2.2

Do you compare your suppliers cost/prices with low cost regions?

Yes

5.3

Customer Services

5.3.1

What is the process for handling customer accounts?

5.3.2

Does the company have a key account manager?

5.3.3

What are the companys education programs for customers?

5.4

Warranty and Product Liability

5.4.1

What is the companys after sales service process?

5.4.2

Does the supplier have an acceptable complaint management process? For example 8D report, or
corrective action report, etc

5.4.3

How do you manage warranty claims ?

5.4.4

How long is your warranty period?

5.5

BU-specific Questions

5.5.01

BU-spec. Q 1

5.5.02

BU-spec. Q 2

Form

Minimum Requirements

Not Applicable

Result:

Mandatory

Customer Relationship

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions

Corrective Action/ Improvement Proposal

x
X

x
X

X Account department is there


X Yes
X

x
X
X Yes
X
X

As per OG System
NA

Status: FR 7/14

300357919/FR1/001/01

0
0 Supplier Audit Questionnaire
Date:
Completed by:

Show/Hide

December 30, 1899


December 30, 1899

Adequate

Show Criterias

71%

Include BU-Specific Questions

Excellent / World Class

Unacceptable

Minimum Requirements

Not Applicable

Result:

Mandatory

Supply Chain Management

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions

Assessor Comments

6.1

Supply Management ( SM )

6.1.1

How does your organization evaluate and select its suppliers?

By Audit

6.1.2

How are suppliers initially qualified?

Iso certification

6.1.3

What method is in place to ensure supplier performance measurements and suppliers continuous
improvement process ( CIP )?

System in place but no review

6.1.4

What partnering relationships have been established with Key Suppliers (Education and Training
also to be considered)?

No such record

6.1.5

Can the supplier provide a breakdown of full cost disclosure (material, labor, overhead) by part
number / product?

Ok

6.1.6

How are cost improvement results shared with your customers?

Yes

6.1.7

Is an acceptable documentation process in place and controlled with suppliers NDA, QA, etc.

Yes

6.2

Inventory Management

6.2.1

What is the internal and external inventory management system?

Inventory management in place

6.2.2

How are materials and products identified and traceable through the production and service
process?

Traceability evident

6.2.3

How are customer supplied products controlled?

Partially systems in place not linked with


ERP

6.2.4

What are the material handling and storage processes?

Satisfactory

6.2.5

What are the packaging, labeling and shipping processes?

As per customer requirement

6.2.6

Are the storage, production, final products and non-conform materials areas clearly separated and
identified?

OK

6.2.7

Are all materials controlled from receiving to customer's acceptance?

Yes

6.2.8

Does the supplier have VMI (Vendor Managed Inventory) or VCI (Vendor Consigned Inventory)
Capabilities?

Yes

6.3

Logistics

6.3.01

In which way do you measure your on-time-delivery ( OTD ) towards your customers?

Plan Vs Actual

6.3.02

Is the company prepared and experienced in export control regulations?

Yes

6.3.03

How does the company measure their lead-time ?

Monitoring

6.3.04

What is the process to communicate progress and updated planned delivery times to your
customers including any delays ?

By mail

6.3.05

Is there a procedure in place to ensure capacity planning and is it regularly updated?

Yes

6.3.06

How do you plan and ensure critical material supply ?

Close monitoring

6.3.07

What is the company process for shipping ( national/international )?

Schedule adherance

6.3.08

Is the company prepared and experienced in international logistics management?

Yes

6.3.09

Is the company prepared and experienced in international customs handling?

Yes

6.3.10

How do you apply advanced logistical concepts (as Kanban, vendor managed inventory, XMLordering & invoicing , EDI) ?

Corrective Action/ Improvement Proposal

Supplier performance is being monitored as per


procedure for continuous assesment of supplier. We
shall start monitoring Supplier CIP and record it
properly.
Not Feasible due to larger scale of Steel Mill suppliers
than customer

Route card to implement in shop floor.

system to implement to avoid piece to piece touch.

6.3.11

How does the company work with lead-time reduction ?

6.4

BU-specific Questions

6.4.01

BU-spec. Q 1

Form

System need improvement

System need improvement

Status: FR 8/14

ERP System will be introduced


to reduce the lead time we are maintaing invcentory
of raw material , and die and tool design time has
already been minimised using latest software and
machines.

300357919/FR1/001/01

0
0 Supplier Audit Questionnaire
Date:
Completed by:

Show/Hide

December 30, 1899


December 30, 1899

Manufacturing and Assembly

Result:

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions
Show Criterias

71%

0
0

Adequate

Excellent / World Class

Unacceptable

Minimum Requirements

Not Applicable

Mandatory

Include BU-Specific Questions

Assessor Comments

7.1

Shop floor and Equipment

7.1.01

Is the company capable to handle the amount and the volatility of Oerlikon' demand?

Yes

7.1.02

Is a documented and clear manufacturing process flow followed?

Yes

7.1.03

Does a documented manufacturing process exist for unique product and is the company qualified
to live up to relevant special requirements (like tolerances, dimensions, extreme temperatures,
extreme pressures, etc.)

7.1.04

Is the shop floor equipped with lifting devices able to move our finished and semi-finished
products?

7.1.05

Is the shop floor big enough to handle our modules/components/sub-assemblies?

7.1.06

Is the company capable to handle the typically expected lot sizes?

Yes

7.1.07

Is the shop floor equipped to handle all relevant media (air, water, industrial gases, liquids, etc.)?

Yes

7.1.08

Is the company able to process and assemble the required materials?

Yes

7.1.09

Does the company have all relevant testing equipment?

Yes

7.1.10

Is capacity determined appropriately?

Yes

7.1.11

Are parts, tools & equipments arranged in fixed location?

Needs improvement

7.1.12

Is personal safety equipment provided?

Provide but not followed

7.1.13

Are Safety Audits conducted?

Yes but need effectiveness

7.1.14

Are resources available to design tools & gauges?

Ok

7.1.15

Is skilled manpower available to carryout machineries maintenance?

yes

7.2

Skills and Capabilities

7.2.1

Does the suppliers manufacturing equipment correspond with the supply requirement profile?

Yes

7.2.2

Does the company's manufacturing equipment correspond with the supply requirement profile?

Yes

7.2.3

Does the company have sufficient relevant engineering/assembly/manufacturing know how (e.g. in
mechanical, electrical, pneumatically engineering)?

Yes

7.2.4

What processes are in place to ensure that the equipment/systems/people/operators can meet our
requirements in manufacturing/testing/shipping?

APQP study and system

7.2.5

What processes are in place to ensure that the equipment/systems/people/operators can meet our
requirements in design & engineering?

APQP study and system

7.2.6

How will additional / new business be addressed?

As per capacity plan

7.3

BU-specific Questions

7.3.01

BU-spec. Q 1

7.3.02

BU-spec. Q 2

Form

Corrective Action/ Improvement Proposal

Record evident

Ok

X Yes

Status: FR 9/14

Training and awareness will be provided to operators


to manage the tools properly
Training and awareness will be provided to operators to use the
PPE's
Training will be provided to concerned auditors

300357919/FR1/001/01

0
0 Supplier Audit Questionnaire
Date:
Completed by:

Show/Hide

December 30, 1899


December 30, 1899

Business Continuity Management

Result:

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions
Show Criterias

71%

Adequate

Excellent / World Class

Unacceptable

Minimum Requirements

Not Applicable

Mandatory

Include BU-Specific Questions

Assessor Comments

8.1

Business Continuity Management

8.1.1

Is your company located in a high risk country/area?

No

8.1.2

Do you have a Business Continuity Plan (BCP)?

BCP availble

8.1.3

Does your BCP include your critical sub-suppliers?

If required

8.1.4

Is your BCP approved and signed by your Managing Director?

8.1.5

RT80: Counting from the time when an Estimated Maximum Loss scenario (EML) occurs, how long
time does it take for you to recover to an 80% supply capability of the goods we are buying from
you ?

8.1.5.5

Product / Product Groups 1

8.1.5.6

Product / Product Groups 2

8.1.5.7

Product / Product Groups 3

8.1.5.8

Product / Product Groups 4

8.1.6

Are all necessary acceptance criteria met by your alternative suppliers in case your original/main
supplier's location is hit by a disturbance?

8.1.7

How is it ensured that the company can always be reached?

8.1.8

Have you identified the person whom to contact around the clock Oerlikon in case of a major
disturbance occurs?

8.1.9

Do you have the insurance company's survey report including the Estimated Maximum Loss (EML)
scenario?

Form

Yes

X
X

NA

N/A

Corrective Action/ Improvement Proposal

Adherance strongly

yes.
N/A

Status: FR 10/14

300357919/FR1/001/01

0
0 Supplier Audit Questionnaire
Date:
Completed by:

Show/Hide

December 30, 1899


December 30, 1899

Information System

Result:

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions
Show Criterias

69%

Adequate

Excellent / World Class

Unacceptable

Minimum Requirements

Not Applicable

Mandatory

Include BU-Specific Questions

Assessor Comments

9.1

Business Software / SCM Software

9.1.1

What kind of office software are you using and how are you supporting available market
standards?

9.1.2

Does the supplier use any ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Software?

9.1.3

Does the supplier use any external quality management software?

9.1.4

Does the supplier provide any electronic configuration support to your customers?

Yes

9.1.5

Does the supplier use any software support to manage the maintenance of you machines, test
equipment and tools?

Yes

9.1.6

Does the supplier use any kind of statistical software programs?

9.2

Development Tools

9.2.1

Which engineering software are you using and how are you supporting available market
standards?

9.2.2

How are you supporting the electronic transmittal of engineering results (bill of material, drawings)?

9.3

Data Exchange Formats

9.3.1

Does the supplier use any kind of internet platforms to communicate with your business partners?

9.3.2

What kind of testing software are you using and what possibilities do you provide to submit test
records?

9.3.3

Can the supplier support the use of barcode labels?

9.4

Archiving, Data Back-up

9.4.1

Is a procedure implemented ensuring the archiving of critical business documents for a sufficient
period of time?

Document retain system evident.

9.4.2

Are there measures in place to ensure no loss of critical business data on a frequent basis?

Back up for all Machinery..

9.4.3

Is a procedure installed ensuring that quality records are maintained to demonstrate effective
operation of the system.

System in place,needs improvement at


shop blasting and H/T Stage

Form

Oracle

using excel.

through excel Sheet

Corrective Action/ Improvement Proposal

Not evident

ERP System will be implemented


No need is felt to use Quality Management Software

Minitab is being used for Statistical Tools

x
X

Autocad & Pro-e.

Drawings in Autocad and BOM in excel.

N/A

Software attached with measuring


instruments
N/A

Status: FR 11/14

300357919/FR1/001/01

0
0 Supplier Audit Questionnaire
Date:
Completed by:

Show/Hide

December 30, 1899


December 30, 1899

Adequate

Excellent / World Class

Unacceptable

Mandatory

65%

Assessor Comments

Environment Management System (EMS)

10.1.01

What is the suppliers current status on environmental certification?

Certified

10.1.02

Is the supplier in compliance with relevant applicable environmental laws and regulations?
For example RoHS, WEEE, REACH, CE, etc

Followed

10.1.03

Has a senior manager been given the responsibility for managing environmental issues?

System in place but review not by


Sr.Mgmt.

10.1.04

Has the company identified its significant environmental aspects, and introduced suitable controls
to prevent or reduce their impact?

Maintained

10.1.05

If relevant, are the environmental aspects of products and services considered at the design stage,
with actions taken to eliminate or where this is not possible reduce impacts?

Procedure evident

10.1.06

Employees have defined environmental responsibilities, and have received suitable training?

10.1.07

Does the supplier have a continuous improvement program for its environmental performance?

10.1.08

Does the senior management team conduct regular management reviews to assess the companys
environmental performance?

Annualy

10.1.09

Does the company have a programme to ensure that their key suppliers are encouraged to reduce
their environmental impacts, and ensure legal compliance?

Needs improvement

10.1.10

Are wastes that are stored, treated, or disposed of on-site managed in properly designed facilities
that will prevent future environmental impacts?

Legal ok needs improvement

10.1.11

Does the supplier have a program to identify, evaluate and control workplace exposures to
chemical, biological and physical agents (e.g. chemical fumes, noise, dust, mold) at or below levels
established as safe by applicable laws and regulations?

Noise protection plug provide but not


using

Not fully aware


X

Does the supplier have a program to provide and require the use of personal protective equipment
when safety hazards and workplace exposures cannot be controlled by other means?

No such plan

Personal protectives equipments not


being used.

10.2

Social

10.2.01

Has a senior manager been given the responsibility for managing social policy issues, and
understand their role?

Yes

10.2.02

How well are young workers protected, and child labor prevented

Yes,system in place

10.2.03

Is an acceptable level of Health and Safety management being achieved?

Routene checkup

10.2.04

How well is freedom of engagement being managed?

Ok

10.2.05

What is the fatal and serious injury annual frequency rate?

recorded,minor enjury 2 cases in last one


year

10.2.06

How well is Employee consultation and communication being managed?

Open reviews

10.2.07

How well is equality of opportunity being managed?

Improvement required.

10.2.08

Are procedures in place to prevent inappropriate behavior or practices?

Yes

10.2.09

How well is the prevention of working excessive hours managed?

Followed rules and regulations

10.2.10

How well does the supplier ensure that employees received adequate compensation?

Best in industry

10.2.11

How well are key suppliers being encouraged to apply the expectations set out above in 5.2.1 5.2.10?

improvements communicated

10.3

Ethics

10.3.1

Does the supplier have an ethic policy and is this policy in according with the Oerlikon values ?

Yes

10.3.2

What processes are in place to ensure that the policy is being implemented ?

10.3.3

Is there any claim or lawsuit against your company or its employees with regard to compliance or
ethic issues?

10.3.4

Do you have a process in place for training employees concerning ethics?

10.4

BU-specific Questions

10.4.01

BU-spec. Q 1

10.4.02

BU-spec. Q 2

10.4.03

BU-spec. Q 3

Form

Show Criterias

Include BU-Specific Questions

10.1

10.1.12

Minimum Requirements

Result:
Not Applicable

Sustainability

Mandatory Questions only


BU-Specific Questions

Corrective Action/ Improvement Proposal

4 Monthly Review will be done for Environmetal Issues and Sr.


management shall be involved into it.

Roles and Reponsibilities will be documented upto supervision level


employees
CIP for Environment will be documented in detail

Training and awareness will be provided to operators to use the


PPE's

Training and awareness will be provided to operators to use the


PPE's

X
X

Policy review on six monthly


X

No
need improvement

Status: FR 12/14

Training module shall be made and training will be


provided accordingly

300357919/FR1/001/01

Supplier Audit Questionnaire


Date:

Completed by:

Critical Key Inventories


11.1 Key and/or Critical Production Equipment (main):

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Type of Machine:
CNC
VMC

Suitable for machining of products such as:


Blank Gear
Blank Gear

Capacity:

Years old:

11.2 Other Critical / Key Equipment or Software available at the supplier:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Type of Equipment or Software:


CMM,
MS 2007

Function / Application / Area of usage


QA
All Department.

11.3 Key Personell by Supplier:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Form

Person or role within company


Mr.B.N.Uphadhya
Mr. Tribhuvan

Process where this role is critical


Development and Q.A.
Production.

Status: FR 13/14

300357919/FR1/001/01

For each section you can define 15 additional questions for your specific BU.
Leave the excess cells empty, if you don't fill in all 15 questions per section.
Reference ID
English
Chinese
Do no change!!!
1.5.01

1 Management
BU-spec. Q1

1.5.01.1
1.5.01.2
1.5.01.3

Answer 1 - 1.5.01.1
Answer 2
Answer 3

1.5.01.4
1.5.02

Answer 4
BU-spec. Q2

1.5.02.1
1.5.02.2
1.5.02.3

Answer 1
Answer 2
Answer 3

1.5.02.4
1.5.03

Answer 4
BU-spec. Q2

1.5.03.1
1.5.03.2
1.5.03.3

Answer 1
Answer 2
Answer 3

1.5.03.4
1.5.04

Answer 4 - 1.5.03.04

1.5.04.1
1.5.04.2
1.5.04.3
1.5.04.4
1.5.05
1.5.05.1
1.5.05.2
1.5.05.3
1.5.05.4
1.5.06
1.5.06.1
1.5.06.2
1.5.06.3
1.5.06.4
1.5.07
1.5.07.1
1.5.07.2
1.5.07.3
1.5.07.4
1.5.08
1.5.08.1
1.5.08.2
1.5.08.3
1.5.08.4

1 Management

German
1 Management

Potrebbero piacerti anche