Team Process Analysis & Post-reflection * CBL Team Teaching Project * (Note: this is a multi-page form)

( 40 % of project grade)
Below and on the next page(s), indicate how you think each group member (including yourself) performed in the process of creating
this project. Be sure to write in your name and your group members name(s) where indicated. Be sure to also the post-reflection
narrative portion (instructions below).
Values

5
4
3
2
1

Excellent
Very Good, but needs some improvement
Good but needs much improvement
Fair. Needs a lot of work
Needs major improvement

Yourself (give your name)______________________

Communication: Cleary communicated your progress, as well as any problems/challenges in a timely fashion, and in the way which
you agreed upon in the team contract. Communicated in a way that reflects the guidelines of civil discussion with teammates and with
the community thats the focus of your project.
1 2 3 4 5
Reliability: Met all deadlines, or if you were unable to meet group expectations, you were proactive to communicate that with the
group as soon as possible as well as suggesting possible ways to address/solve the issue.
1 2 3 4 5
Collaboration: Worked with your group members to understand and utilize the strengths of your teammates. Attended all meetings, or
if unable, clearly communicated you will be absent. Willing to collaborate (no bad apple behavior). Demonstrated an openness to the
ideas of others and willing to do your equal share of the effort required for a successful project.
1 2 3 4 5
Quality of Content: Work you did for the team is well researched, from legitimate sources, and relevant to the project. Helped ensure
that the teams work was overall well researched, authoritative, and had necessary citation.
1 2 3 4 5

Post-Reflection Narrative

In 2-3 typed (double spaced) pages, reflect on the following questions:

How do you rate your overall performance and contribution to the team? What specific skills, talents, and perspectives did
you contribute to the team? What kind(s) of leadership did you provide? (You may use the 4 creative roles of von Oech to
help describe: explorer, artist, judge, warrior). What didnt you do, but wish you had (or had done better)?

What did you learn from the process about yourself and how you collaborate with others? How well did the pre-mortem
exercise in mentor session help you prepare for the process, especially the team contract? What would you have added or
changed to the contract or how you worked with the team, knowing what you know now?

What was the most interesting thing you learned about your teams subject during this project? Did anything surprise,
challenge, or reinforce your preconceptions? How so? What personal power and role do you feel you have in the larger
economic, social, ecological, cultural, and other dynamics involved that reinforce and/or can help change the problem? Why?

Team member __________________________

Communication: Cleary communicated their progress, as well as any problems/challenges in a timely fashion, and in the way which
agreed upon in the team contract. Communicated in a way that reflects the guidelines of civil discussion with teammates and with the
community thats the focus of your project.
1 2 3 4 5
Reliability: Met all deadlines, or if unable to meet group expectations, was proactive to communicate that with the group as soon as
possible as well as suggesting possible ways to address/solve the issue.
1 2 3 4 5
Collaboration: Worked with group members to understand and utilize the strengths of all teammates. Attended all meetings, or if
unable, clearly communicated they would be absent. Willing to collaborate (no bad apple behavior). Demonstrated an openness to the
ideas of others and willing to do equal share of the effort required for a successful project.
1 2 3 4 5
Quality of Content: Work completed for the team is well researched, from legitimate sources, and relevant to the project. Helped
ensure that the teams work was overall well researched, authoritative, and had necessary citation.
1 2 3 4 5
Overall performance and contribution to the team

1 2 3 4 5

Additional feedback: What role(s) did this person take in making the project successful? (If you wish, you can use van Oechs terms-explorer, artist, judge, warrior--to help describe, or use your own descriptions. However you choose, be specific!) What work did they
do for the group? What is this persons most significant contribution to the team? What didnt this person do, but you wish they had
(or had done better)? What did this person do well? What do you see as the greatest strengths and talents of this person?

Team member __________________________

Communication: Cleary communicated their progress, as well as any problems/challenges in a timely fashion, and in the way which
agreed upon in the team contract. Communicated in a way that reflects the guidelines of civil discussion with teammates and with the
community thats the focus of your project.
1 2 3 4 5
Reliability: Met all deadlines, or if unable to meet group expectations, was proactive to communicate that with the group as soon as
possible as well as suggesting possible ways to address/solve the issue.
1 2 3 4 5
Collaboration: Worked with group members to understand and utilize the strengths of all teammates. Attended all meetings, or if
unable, clearly communicated they would be absent. Willing to collaborate (no bad apple behavior). Demonstrated an openness to the
ideas of others and willing to do equal share of the effort required for a successful project.
1 2 3 4 5
Quality of Content: Work completed for the team is well researched, from legitimate sources, and relevant to the project. Helped
ensure that the teams work was overall well researched, authoritative, and had necessary citation.
1 2 3 4 5
Overall performance and contribution to the team

1 2 3 4 5

Additional feedback: What role(s) did this person take in making the project successful? (If you wish, you can use van Oechs terms-explorer, artist, judge, warrior--to help describe, or use your own descriptions. However you choose, be specific!) What work did they
do for the group? What is this persons most significant contribution to the team? What didnt this person do, but you wish they had
(or had done better)? What did this person do well? What do you see as the greatest strengths and talents of this person?

Team member __________________________

Communication: Cleary communicated their progress, as well as any problems/challenges in a timely fashion, and in the way which
agreed upon in the team contract. Communicated in a way that reflects the guidelines of civil discussion with teammates and with the
community thats the focus of your project.
1 2 3 4 5
Reliability: Met all deadlines, or if unable to meet group expectations, was proactive to communicate that with the group as soon as
possible as well as suggesting possible ways to address/solve the issue.
1 2 3 4 5
Collaboration: Worked with group members to understand and utilize the strengths of all teammates. Attended all meetings, or if
unable, clearly communicated they would be absent. Willing to collaborate (no bad apple behavior). Demonstrated an openness to the
ideas of others and willing to do equal share of the effort required for a successful project.
1 2 3 4 5
Quality of Content: Work completed for the team is well researched, from legitimate sources, and relevant to the project. Helped
ensure that the teams work was overall well researched, authoritative, and had necessary citation.
1 2 3 4 5
Overall performance and contribution to the team

1 2 3 4 5

Additional feedback: What role(s) did this person take in making the project successful? (If you wish, you can use van Oechs terms-explorer, artist, judge, warrior--to help describe, or use your own descriptions. However you choose, be specific!) What work did they
do for the group? What is this persons most significant contribution to the team? What didnt this person do, but you wish they had
(or had done better)? What did this person do well? What do you see as the greatest strengths and talents of this person?

Team member __________________________

Communication: Cleary communicated their progress, as well as any problems/challenges in a timely fashion, and in the way which
agreed upon in the team contract. Communicated in a way that reflects the guidelines of civil discussion with teammates and with the
community thats the focus of your project.
1 2 3 4 5
Reliability: Met all deadlines, or if unable to meet group expectations, was proactive to communicate that with the group as soon as
possible as well as suggesting possible ways to address/solve the issue.
1 2 3 4 5
Collaboration: Worked with group members to understand and utilize the strengths of all teammates. Attended all meetings, or if
unable, clearly communicated they would be absent. Willing to collaborate (no bad apple behavior). Demonstrated an openness to the
ideas of others and willing to do equal share of the effort required for a successful project.
1 2 3 4 5
Quality of Content: Work completed for the team is well researched, from legitimate sources, and relevant to the project. Helped
ensure that the teams work was overall well researched, authoritative, and had necessary citation.
1 2 3 4 5
Overall performance and contribution to the team

1 2 3 4 5

Additional feedback: What role(s) did this person take in making the project successful? (If you wish, you can use van Oechs terms-explorer, artist, judge, warrior--to help describe, or use your own descriptions. However you choose, be specific!) What work did they
do for the group? What is this persons most significant contribution to the team? What didnt this person do, but you wish they had
(or had done better)? What did this person do well? What do you see as the greatest strengths and talents of this person?