Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
EXP. NO
:5
: CE096508
SECTION
: 01
GROUP
: 02
Performed Date
10
TH
Due Date
AUGUST 2015
Submitted Date
10TH AUGUST 2015
1
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE
Objective
PAGE
3
Theory
3-7
Anticipated Results
8 - 10
Apparatus
11 - 12
Procedure
13-15
16 - 21
Discussions
22
Conclusions
23
Critique
23
References
23
Appendix
24
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this experiment is to measure head loss in pipes for different water
flow rates and pipe diameters. The experiment is also conducted to estimate the values of loss
coefficient for pipes of different flow conditions and diameters and determine the effect of
sudden change in pipe diameter and flow direction on the total energy or head losses in pipes.
THEORY
In Bernoulli's equation, hf represents the head loss due to friction between the fluid and the
internal surface of the constant diameter pipe as well as the friction between the adjacent fluid
layers
p1/g + V12/2g + Z1 = p2 / g + V22/2g + Z2 + hf
(1)
This will result in a continuous change of energy from a valuable mechanical form (such as
kinetic or potential energies) to a less valuable thermal form that is heat. This change of energy is
usually referred to as friction head loss, which represents the amount of energy converted into
heat per unit weight of fluid.
The head losses (hf) in pipe due to friction can be determined using Darcy-Weisbach
equation;
Turbulent flowhf = 4 fLV2
2 gD
(2)
Where:
f
L
V
g
D
=
=
=
=
=
Friction factor
Length
Mean velocity (Q/A)
Gravity
Constant diameter
The friction head loss for both laminar and turbulent flows can be expressed by similar formulas
although the original derivation of each one is different:
hf f
L V2
D 2g
(3)
In laminar flow, the friction factor is only a function of Reynolds number while
for turbulent flow it is a function of Reynolds (Re) number and the relative
roughness of the pipe.
Re
VD
(4)
= 64
Re
Turbulent Flow
(5)
= 0.316
Re0.25
(6)
Equation (6) is Blausius Equation and only valid for smooth pipe and 3000 < Re< 105. The
value of f for turbulent flow can be obtained experimentally from the Moody Chart.
Moreover, for turbulent flow, the relationship between hf and V takes the form
hf = K. Vn
(7)
where K is a loss coefficient and n ranges from 1.7 to 2.0 (depending on the
value of Re and ks/D).This equation can be written as
Log hf = Log K + n Log V
(8)
hf = (P1- P2) /g = h1 - h2
(9)
Energy losses are proportional to the velocity head of the fluid as it flows around an elbow,
through an enlargement or contraction of the flow section, or through a valve. Experimental
values for energy losses are usually reported in terms of a resistance or loss coefficient K as
follows:
hL
KV 2
2g
(10)
where hL is the minor loss, K is the resistance or loss coefficient, and V is the average
velocity
of flow in the pipe in the vicinity where the minor loss occurs. The resistance or loss
where,
V1 = velocity at small cross-section (upstream)
V2 = velocity at large cross-section (downstream)
The minor loss (hL) due to sudden enlargement of the pipe can be estimated by integrating the
momentum, continuity and Bernoulli equations between positions 1 and 2 to give
hL
V1 V2 2
(11)
2g
Substituting again for the continuity equation to get an expression involving the two areas,
(i.e. V2=V1(A1/A2) gives
hL
KV1
2g
(12)
A
Where , K 1 1
A
2
D
1 1
D2
In a sudden contraction, flow contracts from point 1 to point 1', forming a vena contraction. It
is possible to assume that energy losses from 1 to 1' are negligible (no separation occurs in
contracting flow) but that major losses occur between 1' and 2 as the flow expands again
If the vena contracta area is A1=Ac, then the minor loss (hL) can be estimated by integrating
the momentum , continuity and Bernoulli equations between positions 1 and 2 to give
A
hL 1 C
A2
V22
2g
(13)
The above equation is commonly expressed as a function of loss coefficient (K) and the
average velocity (V2) in the smaller pipe downstream from the contraction as follows;
hL
KV2
2g
A
K 1 C
A2
(14)
KV 2
2g
(15)
where,
(16)
hl + Vl 2 / 2 g + Z1 = h2 + V2 2 / 2 g + Z2 + hL
(17)
and since Z1 = Z2 ,
then
V12 V22
hL h1 h2
2g
(18)
ANTICIPATED RESULT
7
For this experimenrt the predicted result is the result that we calculated using the provided
formula which is also referring to the theoretical result.
So the theoretical result for
HEAD LOSS DUE TO PIPE
For Pipe Diameter 1-inch: 0.0254m
Flow Rate,
Q (l/min)
Theoretical
Head Loss
10
15
20
25
30
0.009
0.018
0.03
0.045
0.062
Theoretical
Head Loss
10
15
20
25
30
0.035
0.071
0.117
0.173
0.239
Theoretical
Head Loss
0.243
0.493
0.816
1.206
1.659
Gate valve
Flow Rate,
Q (l/min)
10
15
20
25
30
Theoretical
Head Loss
0.035
0.071
0.117
0.173
0.239
Ball valve
Flow Rate,
Q (l/min)
10
15
20
25
30
Theoretical
Head Loss
0.035
0.071
0.117
0.173
0.239
Flow Rate,
Q (l/min)
10
15
20
25
30
Theoretical
Head Loss
0.035
0.071
0.117
0.173
0.239
Flow Rate,
Q (l/min)
10
15
20
25
30
Theoretical
Head Loss
-0.002
-0.003
-0.004
-0.005
-0.007
Flow Rate,
Q (l/min)
10
15
20
25
30
Theoretical
Head Loss
0.000122
0.000273
0.000486
0.000759
0.001094
10
APPARATUS
11
12
The flow control valve is fully opened and isolating valve is inlet.
The gate valve and globe valve are closed.
The main switch for hydraulic bench and digital pressure indicator is on.
The outlet control valve is opened.
The isolating valve is open for the test pipe No. 1.
The two manometer tubes (from digital pressure indicator) is inserted into the tapping valve
of pipe No. 1.
7. The pump of hydraulic bench is switched on.
8. The water flow is let through the system for a while.
9. The reading on the differential pressure indicator is recorded.
10. The drain is closed and a stopwatch is used to measure the time taken for 4 liters of water to
flow into the measuring tank
11. The drain is opened once it is done and the water is let to flow into the sump tank.
12. The flow rate of water is changed by adjusting outlet control valve to get different differential
pressure reading.
13. Again, the differential pressure reading is taken and the time taken to collect the water is
recorded.
14. Five readings of various flow rates is used.
15. Switch off the pump and shut the isolating valve for test pipe No. 1.
16. The above procedures are repeated for test pipe No. 2 (repeat procedures 4 to 14).
17. The pump is switched off and the isolating valve is shut down for test pipe No. 2.
18. Step number 17 is repeated for test pipe No. 3.
PROCEDURE (To Test the Head Loss at the valves (Gate and Ball valves)
1. The control valve (turn clockwise) is slowly controlled until maximum turn. The
manometer rubber tube is moved from the inlet flowing pressure (H 1) of pipe 3 to
the outlet flowing pressure (H2) of pipe 4 (gate valve). The system is now flowing
through the gate valve pipe.
2. Both water manometer rubber tubes is put at inlet flowing pressure (H 1) and outlet
flowing pressure (H2) while at the same time the control valve (turn counterclockwise) is slowly controlled until flow rate Q reaches maximum value 30
liter/minute. During the process, if air bubbles present in the flowing pipe, the air
will move through the higher end of water manometer rubber tube. The air bubbles
are removed up to the manometer glass tube.
3. The flow rate is readjusted to appropriate maximum value 30 liter/minute, and 5
(five) different flow rates Q is determined from maximum value 30 liter/minute to
the lowest value (let the increment as large as possible). The value of H 1 and H2 in
millimeter (mm) of the inlet is recorded and the outlet of water manometer flowing
pressure as Q is changed
4.
13
14
15
=
= 1.267 x
=
= 0.986 m/s
R =
=
= 24513.87
= 0.316
Re0.25
=
0.316
(24513.87)0.25
= 0.0253
2 Dgh f ,exp
LV 2
= (2)(0.0127)(9.81)(0.041)
(1.25)(0.986)2
= 0.01680
16
= (0.0253) (
= 0.062
The Percent Error is calculated by the following formula:
Percentage error, %
x 100
x 100
= 33.48
17
DISCUSSION
18