Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250147461
CITATIONS
READS
50
4 authors, including:
Supawan Tirawanichakul
Somkiat Prachayawarakorn
52 PUBLICATIONS 90 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
2009
Article 6
Somkiat Prachayawarakorn
Warunee Varanyanond
Somchart Soponronnarit
c
Copyright
2009
The Berkeley Electronic Press. All rights reserved.
Abstract
The main objective of this work was to determine an effective moisture diffusivity of long
grain rice during fluidized-bed drying (FBD) with inlet drying temperatures ranging of 40-150 C
by 10 C/step and to investigate the specific energy consumption of the FBD process. Three initial
moisture contents of the local indica paddy were set at 25.0, 28.8 and 32.5% dry-basis. The experimental results of thin-layer fluidized-bed drying for the long grain rice variety were determined
and statistically analyzed by non-linear regression method. The results showed that an effective
diffusion coefficient was highly dependent on the drying temperature, compared to initial moisture content. Consequently, the mathematical simulation of FBD, using the developed thin-layer
drying mentioned above, was evaluated and used for predicting the paddy drying system. The
simulated value of energy consumption in each of the drying conditions was comparatively simulated. The simulated results showed that a FBD with low temperatures and low initial moisture
content gave higher specific energy consumption than drying with high temperatures and high initial moisture contents. The total specific energy consumption increased with a decreased fraction
of re-circulated outlet drying air. According to the simulation results and our previous work, the
conclusion is that the long grain paddy drying with FBD technique under a high initial moisture
content and drying air temperature over 100 C is the good drying condition for recommendation.
KEYWORDS: effective diffusivity, energy consumption, long grain paddy, mathematical modeling, non-glutinous rice
The authors wish to express our sincere thanks to the Thailand Research Fund (TRF); the Japan
International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS); the Institute of Food Research
and Product Development (IFRPD), Kasetsart University; the Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Energy Technology, School of Energy Environment
and Materials, King Mongkuts University of Technology Thonburi; and the Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University for their support and their
facilities.
1. Introduction
Normally, fresh paddy after harvesting contains moisture content of 24-35% drybasis. The high moisture content paddy is easy to deteriorate, especially storage in
tropical climate surrounding. These moisture content values must be removed to
preserve the storage life of the grain (Quitco, 1982; Soponronnarit and
Nathakaranakule, 1990; Sutherland and Ghaly, 1990; Siebenmorgen et al., 1998;
Zhou et al., 2002; Tirawanichakul et al., 2003) and to reduce handling cost.
Drying is the most common forms of grain, cereal grain and food preservation. In
addition, drying provides long term storage and extends grain shelf life without
deterioration. Even a solar drying is regularly used for reducing moisture content
of fresh paddy but sometimes, it is difficult to practice in tropical areas during
rainy season period. Some researchers recommended that fresh paddy with a
moisture content over 24% dry-basis should be first removed to 22% dry-basis
within 24 hours by the fast hot air drying (using high temperature with a short
drying time) and then followed by natural air drying (using low temperature)
(Driscoll and Adamczak, 1988; Soponronnarit et al., 1999; Poomsa-ad et al.,
2002). Thus, an force convection air drying such as the cross-flow dryer, spoutedbed and fluidized-bed is an appropriate method to solve this problem because
drying time for high percentages of moisture removal is relatively short such as
the spouted-bed (Devahastin and Mujumdar, 2001) and fluidized-bed drying;
(Soponronnarit and Prachayawarakorn, 1994). The fluidized-bed drying is an
effective approach and of the main interest in this work. This is because a hot air
fluidized-bed drying is one of the drying techniques that provides faster moisture
reduction and uniformity of drying. Consequently, this drying technique improves
the physical quality in terms of head rice yield and maintains some qualities
(Tirawanichakul et al., 2004). However, many researchers were interested in
paddy FBD with inlet air temperature over 100C (Soponronnarit et al., 1996;
Soponronnarit et al., 1999; Tirawanichakul et al., 2004). Despite of the popularity
of fluidized-bed dryer for paddy, there are a few reports concerning theoretical
drying model using effective diffusivity and development of mathematical
fluidized-bed paddy drying model for predicting evolution of moisture transfer
and energy consumption covering wide ranges of drying temperature.
Therefore, the aims of this research were to use the mathematical model
developed for continuous fluidized-bed paddy dryer to simulate drying kinetic of
paddy with various initial moisture contents of 25.0-32.5% dry-basis and to
determine the specific energy consumptions when the dryer is ideally operated at
different drying conditions. The effective diffusivity of paddy determined by nonlinear regression analysis was used in the theoretical thin-layer drying equation in
this simulation. Finally, comparative study between experimental data and
simulated data are presented.
Published by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2009
D = Dexp
RTabs
where
D
Ea
R
Tabs
=
=
=
(1)
http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol5/iss2/art6
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1401
and D is the Arrhenius factor and depends on the drying air temperature and the
moisture content or a constant value (Hebber and Rastogi, 2001). Some previous
researchers also reported that the Arrhenius factor ( D ) was in the form of the
second order polynomial in relation with moisture content of paddy kernel. The
D and Ea values were determined by the non-linear regression analysis from the
experimental data.
(C) Mathematical model
Considering the energy analysis of continuous fluidized-bed dryer, a schematic
diagram of a fluidized-bed dryer was illustrated in Figure 1. The assumptions of
the mathematical model of a continuous fluidized-bed drying are in the thermal
equilibrium between moist air and paddy, the walls of dryer are adiabatic, the
moisture is transferred by liquid diffusion and the shrinkage is negligible during
the drying. The flow chart of calculation procedure is shown in Figure 2. A
mathematical model for predicting the moisture reduction and temperature in this
work was corresponded to that previously described by Soponronnarit et al.,
(1996). The derivations of energy and mass equations are written based on basic
physical laws.
(1) Basic parameters of continuous fluidized-bed drying
Mean residence time is defined as the time which paddy stays in drying chamber
until it leaves from it, is calculated by the following equation
Hold up
F
where
F
Hold up
=
=
=
(2)
Hold up = (AC)(pw))(Hi)
where
AC
pw
Hi
=
=
=
(3)
(4)
& mix
m
n
(5)
hp
n
where
t
hpi
& mix
m
& mixi
m
n
=
=
=
=
(6)
time used for moving from the ith layer to the (i+1)th
layer, min
dry mass of paddy at the ith layer, kg
air mass flow rate, kg/min
air mass flow rate at the ith layer, kg/min
number of layer for paddy
0, 0 r r0
l z +l
0, r = r0
z = l
0, r = 0
M =
M =
M =
M =
M
=0
r
http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol5/iss2/art6
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1401
Min
Min
Meq
Meq
MR(r,l, t) =
M(r,l,t) - Meq
Min - Meq
2m Dt
r
4
2
J
exp
2
0 m
m=1 m2 J1 (m ) r0
r0
2 n + 1 cos
n =0
2 (2 n + 1) 2 Dt
(2 n + 1) z
exp
2l
4l
where
MR
t
m
r
z
l
M
Min
n
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
(-1) n
(7)
The equilibrium moisture content (EMC, Meq) for paddy was modified in
form of Hendersons equation (Henderson, 1952). By integrating of Eqn.(7) over
the volume of cylinder and dividing by its total volume, the average moisture
content can be expressed as:
2 Dt
2 (2 n + 1) 2 Dt
1
8 4
MR = 2 2 exp m 2
exp
2
4l
m =1 m
ro n =0 (2 n + 1)
(8)
Considering a given thin layer drying, the energy equation is derived based on the
first law of Thermodynamics. It is assumed that the flow of paddy in drying
chamber is the plug flow type and uniform hot air flow passing though each
paddy layer is considered. As shown in Figure 1 for the control volume CV1,
change of enthalpy of air and internal energy change of paddy and drying
chamber are equal to total heat transfer between drying chamber and environment.
To determine the outlet air temperature from the ith drying layer, the following
equation can be written as:
& mixi + c a Tmix + (h fg + c v Tmix )Wmix = c a Tfi + (h fg + c v Tfi )Wfi + u p
Q 1 /m
(9)
or
and
Q1
UA(T)
where
ca
cv
hfg
Q1
=
=
=
=
U
A
T
=
=
=
Tfi
up
=
=
Wfi
Wmixi
=
=
(11)
= (M i M f ) hp i
or
Wfi
where
Wfi
Wi
hp i (M i M i +1 )
+ Wmix
& mixi t i ]
[m
=
=
(12)
http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol5/iss2/art6
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1401
Mi
Mf
=
=
mp
ti
=
=
Finally, the average outlet temperature and humidity ratio of exit air can be
determined by Eqns.(13) and (14), respectively.
n
Tf1
Tfi dn
1
(13)
dn
0
Wf1
Wfi dn
1
(14)
dn
1
where
Tf1
Wf1
=
=
Tf2
where
Tf2
Q2
+ c a Tfi + Wfi (c v Tfi )
& mix
(RC)m
(c a + Wfi c v )
(15)
RC
& RC
m
Q2
=
=
=
To determine the humidity ratio after mixing between fresh air and recycled air as
shown in Figure 1, the conservation of mass is made with control volume CV4 in
which amount of water vapour after mixing is equal to the summation of water
vapour from fresh air stream and recycled air. The mass balance equation for
water vapour can be written as follows:
& RC Wf + m
& i Wi
m
& RC + m
& i )Wmix
= (m
(16)
Finally, dry mass flow rate of inlet drying air at drying chamber entrance is
equal to the summation of dry mass flow rate of fresh air and recycled air. Thus,
the following equation is written as
& mix = m
& RC + m
&i
m
(17)
From Eqns.(16) and (17), the humidity ratios after mixing between recycled
air and fresh air is determined by:
= (1 RC)Wi + RCWfi
Wmix
(18)
where
RC
& RC
m
& mix
m
(19)
The energy balance is applied for CV4 to determine the temperature after mixing
between the recycled air and fresh air, thus yielding:
http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol5/iss2/art6
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1401
& mix c a Tx + m
& mix Wmix (h fg + c v Tx ) - m
& i c a Ti - m
& i Wi (h fg + c v Ti )
m
& rc c a Tf2 - m
& rc Wf1 (h fg + c v Tf2 ) = 0
m
(20)
and
Tx+Tfan
Tb
where
Tb
Tx
Tfan
Ti
=
=
=
=
(21)
The energy balance is applied for CV4 to determine the temperature after mixing
between the recycled air and fresh air as follows:
Tfan =
where
a
P
Ef
P
[1000( a E f )(c a + c v Wmix )]
=
=
=
(22)
(23)
(24)
where
Published by The Berkeley Electronic Press, 2009
PL
RC
PB
H
p
a
g
gc
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Pt =
(25)
where
Pt
Thus, the shaft power for driving fan can be calculated by the following
equation:
BP
where
BP
q
Em
(c)
(q)(Pt )
Em
=
=
=
(26)
shaft power, kW
volumetric air flow rate, m3/s
mechanical efficiency, decimal
As shown in the control volume CV3 in Figure 1, the change of enthalpy of air
stream is equal to heat loss and supplemental heat from electrical heater. The
equation can be written as follows:
Q3 + Q h
http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol5/iss2/art6
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1401
(27)
10
where
Qh
Q3
=
=
Considering a given thin layer drying, the energy equation is derived based
on the first law of Thermodynamics. It is assumed that the flow of paddy in
drying chamber is the plug flow type and uniform hot air flow passing though
each paddy layer is considered. For the control volume CV1 as shown in Figure 1,
change of enthalpy of air and internal energy change of paddy and drying
chamber are equal to total heat transfer between drying chamber and environment
and determining of the outlet air temperature from the ith drying layer can be
achieved. In a small time interval of t, a certain amount of moisture evaporates
from the grain bed at the ith layer into the air, resulting in a change of the humidity
ratio of inlet air can be determined from equation of mass balance. Finally, the
average outlet temperature of exit air can be determined by integration of product
of final temperature and number of layer dividing by total number of layers as the
same as calculating of average humidity ratio of outlet air.
As illustrated in control volume CV2 in Figure 1, the outlet temperature
from recycle tube can be calculated by balancing the change of enthalpy of air
stream and summation of heat exchange between recycled air and environment
whilst determining the humidity ratio after mixing between fresh air and recycled
air also can be calculated by the mass balance equation for water vapour in
control volume CV4 (Figure 1). Finally, dry mass flow rate of inlet drying air at
drying chamber entrance is equal to the summation of dry mass flow rate of fresh
air and recycled air and the humidity ratios after mixing between recycled air and
fresh air is determined. In addition, the energy balance is applied for control
volume CV4 to determine the temperature after mixing between the recycled air
and fresh air.
Electrical energy consumption of fan is determined from pressure drop in
recycle tube, pressure drop at exit tube and pressure drop at paddy bed in drying
chamber, following to Tirawanichakul (2004). As shown in the control volume
CV3, the change of enthalpy of air stream is equal to heat loss and supplemental
heat from electrical heater. To compare energy consumption among different inlet
drying air temperature, the specific energy consumption of this fluidization is
considered. The specific energy consumption for each drying condition is defined
as energy consumption divided by total water evaporated and multiplied by
drying time. The total specific energy consumption is a summation of specific
thermal energy consumption and specific electrical energy consumption
multiplied by total drying time. In the mathematical modeling, assumption is
11
stated that the continuous fluidized-bed drying was used for drying paddy at the
temperatures between 60 and 150C using inlet air velocity of 2.5 m/s and the
fraction of recycled air was varied between 0 and 95%. Initial moisture contents
of 25.0%, 28.8% and 32.5% dry-basis were dried to 22.50.5% dry-basis.
Ambient temperature was fixed at the condition of dry bulb temperature of 30C
and relative humidity of 70%.
3. Results and discussions
(A) Determination of effective diffusivity
Table 1 shows the determination of constant values in two diffusion models using
non-linear regression analysis among inlet drying air temperatures of 40-150C
and initial moisture contents of 22-32.5% dry-basis The diffusion Model 1 and
Model 2 have the activation energy of -37099 kJ/mol and -40904.79 kJ/mol,
respectively as shown in Eqns. (28) and (29), respectively. The result indicates
that the Arrhenius factor ( D ) for Model 1 is determined as 4.33x10-5 m2/s [or
2600 mm2/min] whilst the Arrhenius factor for Model 2 depends on initial
moisture content for example: 2.0x10-4 m2/s for the initial moisture content of
25% dry-basis. The correlation coefficient (r2) for both of equations is about 0.9
while the mean residue square value (MRS) for Model 1 and Model 2 are 0.005
and 0.001, respectively. The results indicate that the mean residual square value
(MRS) for Model 2 has a high accuracy comparing to that of Model 1. From the
evolution of moisture content throughout the drying time at different inlet drying
air temperatures (40C-150C) of simulated and measured values for Model 1 and
for Model 2, all drying curves of these figures clearly show that drying rates of
paddy are in the falling rate period. The results show that the simulated results
using both of diffusion coefficients for Model 1 and Model 2 are also in good
agreement with the experimental results. However, the predicted values using the
diffusion Model 2 are slightly close to experimental values, comparing to the
predicted values using the diffusion Model 1. By non-linear regression technique,
it indicated that the effective diffusion coefficient strongly depended on the inlet
drying air temperature and was slightly related to the initial moisture content of
paddy as shown in Table 1. Thus, drying time at the high drying air temperature,
which has a high diffusivity, was shorter than that of drying at the low drying air
temperature.
http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol5/iss2/art6
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1401
12
13
aforementioned above, they indicate that the operation of fluidized-bed at the inlet
air temperature below 100C is not be suitable for commercial point of view
because it takes long time for drying paddy and the specific total energy
consumption is relatively high. Moreover, to determine effect of drying
temperature and moisture content of paddy, the previous work of our research has
been presented (Tirawanichakul et al., 2004) and the results showed that the head
rice yield of Suphanburi 1 rice variety was significantly related to the inlet drying
temperature and initial moisture content whilst there was no significantly relation
between the head rice yield, drying temperatures and initial moisture contents for
Pathumthani 1 rice variety. The whiteness value of the two rice varieties was
slightly decreased with increase in drying temperature and initial moisture
content. However, for all experiments, the whiteness values were within an
acceptable range for the commercial purpose (Soponronnarit et al., 1999). For
determining taste analysis, the hardness value of both cooked rice varieties
exhibited insignificant difference (p<0.05) comparing to control rice, which was
thin-layer dried by ambient air aeration. The thermal analysis by digitized
scanning calorimeter (DSC) also showed that the partial gelatinization occurred
during drying at higher temperatures and high initial moisture content. The
experiments concluded that using inlet drying air of 40-150C did not affect the
quality of both cook and uncooked rice while the milling quality of paddy was
also well maintained.
4. Conclusion
Based on the results of this study, the following conclusions stated that the
effective moisture diffusivity in form of Arrhenius type equation, which was used
for predicting drying kinetic in the mathematical model, has a good agreement
with the experimental data. To determine the energy consumption, the simulation
model was developed and validated comparing to the experimental data showing
that specific energy consumption without air recirculation was relatively high
comparing to those of fraction of air recycled below 95%. Moreover, the low
potential of fluidized-bed drying process occurred at the low drying air
temperature (100C) and low initial moisture content (<28.8% dry-basis) while
the drying with high inlet drying air temperature (>100C) and high initial
moisture content had a high potential for fluidized-bed drying techniques.
http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol5/iss2/art6
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1401
14
W f1
Recycled air
Q2 Inlet air
Wi, Ti
CV2
Q1
Paddy bed
Tf2
Tf1
CV1
Q3
CV5
CV3
Tb
Tmix
Electric heater
Fan
Tx
CV4
Perforated steel
15
Start
INPUT DATA: v, F, RC, H, mmix, T mix, T i, Twb, Mi
CAULATE : mean residence time
CALCULATE: t,mmixi, hold up (hpi)
NO
For i > n
YES
CALCULATE: Tf1, Wf1
NO
Check Wf1
YES
End
http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol5/iss2/art6
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1401
16
- 37099
D = 2600 exp
RTabs
D = (1.18 M 4209.99 M in
MRS*
0.93
0.005
0.97
0.001
(28)
2
in
- 40904.79
+ 13999.99) exp
RTabs
r2
(29)
MRS
(MR
i =1
Predicted, i
MR observed, i ) 2
17
130
130
140
140
150
150
150
150
3.12
4.82
4.72
4.82
6.42
6.09
5.10
4.82
Bed height
(m)
0.115
0.115
0.147
0.115
0.119
0.150
0.150
0.115
130
130
140
140
150
150
150
150
3.12
4.82
4.72
4.82
6.42
6.09
5.10
4.82
0.115
0.115
0.147
0.115
0.119
0.150
0.150
0.115
Min
(% drybasis)
25.9
26.8
26.7
24.1
25.9
25.9
26.1
28.0
Mf (% dry-basis)
Exp.1
Sim2
Min
(% drybasis)
STEC
(MJ/kg of water
evaporated)
Exp1
Sim2
6.45
5.82
5.47
5.88
4.83
4.88
4.69
5.02
4.93
5.11
6.70
7.72
6.01
5.66
3.80
5.26
25.9
26.8
26.7
24.1
25.9
25.9
26.1
28.0
130
130
140
140
150
150
150
150
3.12
4.82
4.72
4.82
6.42
6.09
5.10
4.82
0.115
0.115
0.147
0.115
0.119
0.150
0.150
0.115
25.9
26.8
26.7
24.1
25.9
25.9
26.1
28.0
22.5
23.7
23.3
20.7
23.3
23.7
23.4
23.0
22.5
24.0
23.1
20.5
23.2
23.2
22.8
23.6
SEPEC
(MJ/kg of water
evaporated)
Exp1
Sim2
0.90
0.82
0.77
0.73
0.73
0.60
0.66
0.54
0.70
0.41
0.85
0.61
0.79
0.61
0.48
0.46
Note : 1Experimental results ; 2Simulated results (thin-layer equation developed using analytical
method)
http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol5/iss2/art6
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1401
18
References
19
http://www.bepress.com/ijfe/vol5/iss2/art6
DOI: 10.2202/1556-3758.1401
20