Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
3-17
Kenneth Brown is the principal owner of Brown Oil Inc. After quitting his university
teaching job, Ken has been able to increase his annual salary by a factor of over 100. At
the present time, Ken is forced to consider purchasing some more equipment for brown
oil because of competition. His alternatives are showing in the following table:
Equipment
Sub 100
Oiler J
Texan
300,000
250,000
75,000
-200,000
-100,000
-18,000
For example, if Ken purchases a Sub 100 and if there is a favorable market, he will
realize a profit of $300,000. On the other hand, if the market is unfavorable, Ken will
suffer a loss of $200,000. But Ken has always been a very optimistic decision maker.
A. What type of decision is Ken facing?
Ken is facing decision under uncertainty since there are several possible
outcomes for each alternative, and the decision maker does not know the
probabilities of the various outcomes.
B. What decision criterion should he use?
Since Ken is an optimistic decision maker, he should use the maximax criterion in
order to find the alternative that maximizes the maximum payoff or the
consequence for each alternative.
C. What alternative is best?
Equipment
Favorable
Market
Unfavorable
Market
Maximax or
Optimistic
Sub 100
300,000
-200,000
300,000
Oiler J
250,000
-100,000
250,000
Texan
75,000
-18,000
75,000
The best alternative that Ken should choose is Sub 100 since it has the best
possible outcome because the favorable market has the highest value.
3-18
Although Ken Brown (discussed in Problem 3-17) is the principal owner of Brown Oil, his
brother Bob is credited with making the company a financial success. Bob is vice
president of finance. Bob attributes his success to his pessimistic attitude about
business and the oil industry. Given the information from Problem 3-17, it is likely that
Bob will arrive at a different decision. What decision criterion should Bob use, and what
alternative will he select?
Given that Bob has a pessimistic attitude, he should use the MAXIMIN criterion.
This criterion guarantees the payoff will be at least the maximin value (the best of
the worst values).
Equipment
Favorable
Market
Unfavorable
Market
Maximax or
Optimistic
Sub 100
300,000
-200,000
-200,000
Oiler J
250,000
-100,000
-100,000
Texan
75,000
-18,000
-18,000
Given that Bob is pessimistic, the maximin decision criterion should be used. In
this criterion, the best value among the worst possible outcomes for each
decision will be chosen. In this case, the best among the worst is -18,000.
Hence, Bob should choose the Texan alternative.
3-24
Todays electronics specializes in manufacturing modern electronic components. It also
builds the equipment that produces the components. Phyllis Weinberger, who is
responsible for advising the president of Today's Electronics on electronics
manufacturing equipment, has developed the following table concerning a proposed
facility.
Large Facility
Medium-Sized Facility
Small Facility
No Facility
PROFIT ($)
STRONG
FAIR
MARKET
MARKET
550,000
110,000
300,000
129,000
200,000
100,000
0
0
POOR MARKET
-310,000
-100,000
-32,000
0
FAIR MARKET
($)
Small
Medium
Large
Very Large
50,000
80,000
100,000
300,000
20,000
30,000
30,000
25,000
-10,000
-20,000
-40,000
-160,000
For example, if Susan constructs a small station and the market is good, she will realize
a profit of $50,000.