Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
rated the married candidate, and less favorable than those people who were
over 40 for both the married and the homosexual candidate. Our hypothesis
did not hold true for question one.
For question two, does the candidate have sufficient work experience
to be a U.S. Senator for Utah, 93.3% of the people who were over 40 who
responded to the married candidates survey agreed or strongly agreed with
the statement. None were neutral and 6.7% disagreed. It appears that
neither gender nor religion affected the results. The people that were under
the age of 40, 68.8% agreed or strongly agreed with the statement.18.8%
were neutral and 12.5% disagreed with the statement. All but one of the
respondents that were over 40 that answered disagree and neutral on the
second statement, were LDS. On the married survey, comparing 93.3% and
68.8%, the people over 40 agree with Sorenson having sufficient work
experience to be a U.S. Senator from Utah more than the people under the
age of 40. On the homosexual survey, for people over 40, 86.7% of
respondents agreed or strongly agreed, while 6.7% were neutral, and 6.7%
disagreed. For under the age of 40, only 43.8% of respondents agreed, while
none strongly agreed with the statement. 50% were neutral and 6.3%
disagreed. The under 40 females typically agreed more than the males on
this statement. All of the agrees on this statement were LDS. Of the people
over the age of 40 who responded to the survey for the homosexual
candidate, 86.7% felt that the candidate did have sufficient work experience,
with 20% strongly agreeing. Of the people under the age of 40, only 43.8% of
agreed or strongly agreed, while 33.3% were neutral and 13.3% disagreed.
For both age groups on this particular question, religion and gender did not
affect the scores. For question four, the under 40 age group did support the
homosexual candidate more than the over 40 group, but was not as much of
a significant difference.
For the fifth question, on supporting more of his policy than opposing,
68.8% of people under the age of 40 who responded to the married
candidate survey agreed or strongly agreed with the statement. 12.5%
disagreed, while 12.5% were neutral. It appears that gender nor religion
effected the scores. For the people over the age of 40, 60% agreed or
strongly agreed, 33.3% were neutral, and 6.7% disagreed. For the life parted
survey, 68.8% of participants younger than 40 agreed or strongly agreed
with the statement.12.5% disagreed while 18.8% were neutral. 60% of older
than 40 participants agreed or strongly agreed, 26.7% disagreed, and 13.3%
were neutral. Interestingly, both surveys had approximately the same
percentages for the age groups. Theoretically, our hypothesis is correct with
this question, but there is a very little difference between the two
percentages of the two age groups on both of the surveys.
The first thing that I would like to add to this survey is find out if they
would actually vote for the candidate. The participants may agree with his
experience and education, but still doesnt imply that they won their vote.
Finding out if they would actually vote for them would give us a better idea if
our hypothesis was right for the most part. That question alone gives us
more accurate information that would better for answering our hypothesis. I
also suggest that having a checklist of religious options than leaving it blank.
That leaves it open for anything to be written. It would be interesting to see
if religious affiliation affects our hypothesis. There is more of a variability
with a blank option for religious affiliation, where as if there was a checklist,
it would be more defined. N/A was answered on several surveys- well what
does N/A mean in this case? There are a lot of other factors that could
influence a persons vote. Besides age, other demographic qualities such as
gender and race can effect a persons view on a political candidate.
Depending on how well educated the participant is can also affect a view of
another. A participant of the survey who has a high-level education level
wouldnt be as impressed of the resume as someone who does not. Social
class could also be an additional factor. Some could view a candidate
differently based on their income. A suggestion that I would like to include
would be a better fitting, accurate survey that could get rid of these
variables that could affect the results that we receive.