Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
53
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
SUCCESSION
SUCCESSION
A mode of acquisition by virtue of
which the property, rights and
obligations to the extent of the
value of the inheritance, of a
person are transmitted through his
death to another or others either
by his will or by operation of law.
(Art. 774)
Kinds:
1. Testamentary or Testacy (by will);
2. Legal or intestacy (by operation of law
based on the decedents presumed
will);
3. Mixed (Partly Testamentary and Legal);
and
4. Partition inter vivos (to a certain
degree).
Elements:
1. DECEDENT (subjective element)
2. SUCCESSORS (subjective element)
a. Heirs - those who are called to the
whole or to an aliquot portion of
the inheritance either by will or by
operation of law
1) Voluntary those instituted by
the testator in his will, to
succeed to the inheritance or
the portion thereof of which
the
testator
can
freely
dispose.
2) Compulsory or Forced those
who succeed by force of law to
some
portion
of
the
inheritance, in an amount
predetermined by law, known
as the legitime.
3) Legal or Intestate those who
succeed to the estate of the
decedent who dies without a
valid will, or to the portion of
such estate not disposed of by
will.
b. Devisees or legatees - persons to
whom gifts of real or personal
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
INHERITANCE
Refers
to
the
universality
or
entirety of the
property,
rights
and obligations of a
person who died
Inheritance includes:
1. PROPERTY, RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
NOT EXTINGUISHED BY DEATH
General
rules
on
rights
and
obligations extinguished by his death
a) Rights which are purely personal
are by their nature and purpose
intransmissible for they are
extinguished by death (e.g. those
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
relating to civil personality, family
rights, discharge of office).
b) Rights which are patrimonial or
relating to property are generally
part of inheritance as they are not
extinguished by death.
c) Rights of obligations are by nature
transmissible and may constitute
part of inheritance both with
respect to the rights of the
creditor and as regards to the
obligations of the debtor.
2. ALL WHICH HAVE ACCRUED THERETO
SINCE THE OPENING OF SUCCESSION
(Article 781 Civil Code)
I. TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION
A. CONCEPT
WILL - an act whereby a person is
permitted, with the formalities prescribed
by law, to control to a certain degree the
disposition of his estate to take effect
after his death (Art. 783)
NOTE: Thus, a document that does not
purport to dispose of ones estate either
by the institution of heirs or designation of
devisees/legatees
or, indirectly, by
effecting a disinheritance, is not to be
governed by the law on testamentary
succession but by some other applicable
laws.
Kinds of Wills:
1. Notarial or ordinary
2. Holographic
Characteristics of a Will:
1. UNILATERAL
2. STRICTLY PERSONAL ACT - The
disposition of property is solely
dependent upon the testator.
NOTE: The following acts MAY NOT be left
to the discretion of a third person:
(Article 785, 787 Civil Code)
duration or efficacy of the designation of
heirs, devisees or legatees;
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
shall be preferred. That construction is to
be adopted which will sustain and uphold
the will in all its parts, if it can be done
consistently with the established rules of
law.
Kinds of Ambiguities: (Article 786)
1. LATENT OR INTRINSIC AMBIGUITIES that
which does not appear on the face of the
will and is discovered only by extrinsic
evidence.
2. PATENT OR EXTRINSIC AMBIGUITIES
that which appears on the face of the will
itself
NOTES:
There is no distinction between patent
and latent ambiguities, in so far as the
admissibility of parol or extrinsic
evidence
to
aid
testamentary
disposition is concerned.
Extrinsic
evidence
to
explain
ambiguities in a will cannot include
oral declarations of the testator as to
his intention.
The validity of a will as to its form
depends upon the observance of law in
force at the time it is made. (Art.
795).
If a law different from the law in force
at the time of the execution of the
will goes into effect before or after
the death of the testator, such a law
shall not affect the validity of the will,
provided that such will was duly
executed In accordance with the
formalities prescribed by law in force
at the time it was made.
AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY (Art. 793)
Gen. Rule: Property acquired during the
period between the execution of the will
and the death of the testator is NOT
included among the property disposed of.
Exception: When a contrary intention
expressly appears in the will
NOTE: This rule applies only to legacies
and devises and not to institution of heirs.
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
C. TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY
refers to the ability as well as the power
to make a will.
- must be present at the time of the
execution of the will.
Requisites:
1. At least 18 years of age
2. Of sound mind, i.e., the ability to
know:
a. the nature of the estate to be
disposed of;
b. the proper objects of his bounty;
and
c. the character of the testamentary
act.
NOTE: The law presumes that the testator
is of sound mind, UNLESS:
a. he, one month or less, before making
his will, was publicly known to be insane;
or
b. was under guardianship at the time of
making his will. (Torres and Lopez de
Bueno vs. Lopez 48 Phil 772)
In both cases, the burden of proving
sanity is cast upon proponents of the will.
Effect of Certain Infirmities:
1. mere senility or infirmity of old age
does not necessarily imply that a
person lacks testamentary capacity;
2. physical infirmity or disease is not
inconsistent
with
testamentary
capacity;
3. persons suffering from idiocy (those
congenitally deficient in intellect),
imbecility (those who are mentally
deficient as a result of disease), and
senile dementia (peculiar decay of the
mental faculties whereby the person
afflicted is reduced to second
childhood) do not possess the
necessary mental capacity to make a
will;
4. an insane delusion which will render
one incapable of making a will may be
defined as a belief in things which do
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
not exist, and which no rational mind
would believe to exist;
5. if the insane delusion touches to
subject
matter
of
the
will,
testamentary disposition is void.
6. a deaf-mute and blind person can
make a will (i.e. Art. 807-808). A blind
man with a sound and disposing mind
can make a holographic will.
7. an intoxicated person or person under
the influence of drugs may make a will
as there is no complete loss of
understanding.
Exception: where the testator has
used intoxicating liquor or drugs
excessively to such an extent as to
impair his mind, so that at the time
the will is executed, he does not know
the extent and value of his property,
or the names of persons who are the
natural objects of his bounty, the
instrument thus executed will be
denied
probate
for
lack
of
testamentary capacity.
D. FORMALITIES OF WILLS
(EXTRINSIC VALIDITY)
COMMON FORMALITIES
1. Every will must be in writing; and
2. Executed in a language or dialect
known to the testator.
SPECIAL FORMALITIES
I. NOTARIAL OR ORDINARY WILL
a. SUBSCRIPTION made at the end
thereof by the testator himself or by
the testator's name written by some
other person in his presence and by his
express direction;
Subscription refers to the manual
act of testator and also of his
instrumental witnesses of affixing
their signature to the instrument.
b. ATTESTATION AND SUBSCRIPTION (evidenced by an attestation clause)
by 3 or more credible witnesses in the
presence of the testator and of one
another;
Attestation consists in the act of
witnesses
of witnessing
the
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
SUBSCRIPTION
1. an act of the
senses
2. mental act
3. purpose is to
render available
proof during
probate of will
1. an act of the
hand
2. mechanical act
3. purpose is
identification
d. PAGE
NUMBERINGS
Written
correlatively in letters placed on the
upper part of each page;
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
NOTE: This is not necessary when all of
the dispositive parts of a will are written
on one sheet only.
e. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Done before a
notary public by the testator and the
instrumental witnesses.
NOTE: The notary public before whom the
will was acknowledged cannot be
considered as the third instrumental
witness since he cannot acknowledge
before himself his having signed the will.
If the third witness were the notary public
himself, he would have to avow, assent, or
admit his having signed the will in front of
himself. To allow such would have the
effect of having only two attesting
witnesses to the will which would be in
contravention of Arts. 805 and 806. (Cruz
vs. Villasor 54 SCRA 31)
CIVIL LAW
MANNER OF SIGNING:
The use of any signature, marks or
design intended by the testator to
authenticate
renders
the
will
sufficiently signed by the testator.
A signature by mark will be sufficient
even if at the time of placing it, the
testator knew how to write and is able
to do so.
It is sufficiently signed by writing his
initials, or his first name, or he may
use even an assumed name.
A complete signature is not essential
to the validity of a will, provided the
part of the name written was affixed
to the instrument with intent to
execute it as a will.
ATTESTATION CLAUSE
- memorandum or record of facts wherein
the witnesses certify that the will has
been executed before them, and that it
has been executed in accordance with the
formalities prescribed by law.
Absence of this clause will render the
will a nullity.
IN
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
interpreted to said witnesses. (Caneda
vs. CA 222 SCRA 781)
Effects of defects or imperfections in the
Attestation Clause:
If the defect of the attestation clause
goes into the very essence of the
clause itself or consists in the omission
of one, some, or all of the essential
facts, and such omission cannot be
cured by an examination of the will
itself, the defect is substantial in
character, as a consequence of which
the will is invalidated.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
testator, the will remains valid but
the insertion is void.
c. If the insertion after the execution is
validated by the testator by his
signature thereon, then the insertion
becomes part of the will, and the
entire will becomes void, because of
failure
to
comply
with
the
requirement that it must be wholly
written by the testator.
d. If the insertion made by a third person
is made contemporaneous to the
execution of the will, then the will is
void because it is not written entirely
by the testator.
Probate of Holographic Will
1. If UNCONTESTED, requires that at
least 1 witness who knows the
handwriting and signature of the
testator explicitly declare that the will
and signature are in the handwriting of
the testator; if no witness, expert
testimony may be resorted to.
2. If CONTESTED, requires at least 3 of
such credible witnesses, if none expert
witness.
NOTE: Where the testator himself
petitions for the probate of his holographic
will and no contest is file, the fact that he
affirms that the holographic will and the
signature are in his own handwriting, shall
be sufficient evidence thereof. If the
holographic will is contested, the burden
of disproving the genuineness and due
execution thereof shall be on the
contestant.
IN
CIVIL LAW
2. As to place:
a. Filipino testator executing a will in the
Philippines: Philippine law
b. Filipino testator executing a will
outside of the Philippines: either
1) The law of the country in which it
is executed; or
2) The law of the Philippines.
c. Alien testator executing a will in the
Philippines: either
1) The law of the Philippines; or
2) The law of the country of which he
is a citizen or subject.
d. Alien testator executing a will outside
of the Philippines: either
1) The law of the place where it is
executed; or
2) The law of the place in which he
resides; or
3) The law of his country; or
4) The law of the Philippines.
Aspects of the will governed by National
Law of the Decedent (Article 1039 and
Article 16 Civil Code)
a. Order of succession
b. Amount of successional rights
c. Intrinsic validity
d. Capacity to succeed
Joint will a single testamentary
instrument which contains the wills of two
or more persons, jointly executed by
them, either for their reciprocal benefit or
for the benefit of a third person
--will of 2 or more persons is made in the
same instrument and is jointly signed by
them
Mutual wills wills executed pursuant to
an agreement between two or more
persons to dispose of their property in a
particular manner, each in consideration of
the other
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
--separate wills of 2 persons, which are
reciprocal in their provisions.
Reciprocal wills- wills in which the
testators name each other as beneficiaries
under similar testamentary plans
NOTE: A will that is both joint and mutual
is one executed jointly by two or more
persons, the provisions of which are
reciprocal and which shows on its face
that the devises are made in consideration
of the other. Such is prohibited.
Reasons:
1. will is purely personal and unilateral
act
2. contrary to the revocable character of
a will
3. may expose the testator to undue
influence, and may even induce one of
the testators to kill the other.
NOTE: Joint wills executed by Filipinos in
a foreign country shall not be valid in the
Philippines, even though authorized by the
foreign country in which they may have
been executed (Article 819 Civil Code).
This prohibition is applicable
only in joint wills executed by Filipinos in
a foreign country; it does NOT APPLY to
joint wills executed by aliens.
E. CODICIL AND
REFERENCE
INCORPORATION
BY
CODICIL
A supplement or addition to a will,
made after the execution of a will and
annexed to be taken as a part thereof,
by which any disposition made in the
original will is explained, added to, or
altered. (Article 825)
NOTE:
To be effective, it must be
executed as in the case of a will. Its
execution has the effect of republishing
the will as modified.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
(ART 827)
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
AND
REVOCATION
An act of the mind, terminating the
potential capacity of the will to
operate at the death of the testator,
manifested by some outward or visible
act or sign, symbolic thereof. Such
right to revoke a will cannot be waived
or restricted.
LAWS WHICH GOVERN REVOCATION (ART
829)
1. If the revocation takes place in the
Philippines, whether the testator is
domiciled in the Philippines or in
some other country, it is valid when it
is in accordance with the laws of the
Philippines
2. If the revocation takes place outside
the Philippines, by a testator who is
domiciled in the Philippines, it is valid
when it is in accordance with the laws
of the Philippines
3. Revocation
done
outside
the
Philippines, by a testator who does
not have his domicile in this country,
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
is valid when it is done according to
the:
a. laws of the place where the will
was made, or
b. laws of the place in which the
testator had his domicile at the
time of revocation;
MODES OF REVOCATION (ART 830)
1. By implication of law:
a. legal
separation
revokes
testamentary provisions in favor of
the offending spouse;
b. preterition revokes the institution
of heir;
c. judicial action for recovery of debt
revokes
a
legacy
of
credit/remission of debt;
d. transformation, alienation, or loss
of bequeathed property revokes a
legacy of such property;
e. act of unworthiness by an heir,
devisee/legatee
revokes
testamentary provisions in his
favor;
f. if both spouses of the subsequent
marriage acted in bad faith, said
marriage shall be void ab initio
and testamentary dispositions
made by one in favor of the other
are revoked by operation of law
(Art. 44, Family Code); and
g. void ab initio or annulled
marriages revoke testamentary
dispositions made by one spouse in
favor of the other (Art. 50, Family
Code).
2. By some will, codicil, or other writing,
executed as provided in case of wills,
which may either be:
a. Express when there is a
revocatory
clause
expressly
revoking the previous will or a part
thereof
b. Implied when the provisions
thereof are partially or entirely
inconsistent with those of the
previous will
NOTE: While express revocation may be
effected by a subsequent will, or a codicil,
or a nontestamentary writing executed as
provided in case of wills, implied
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
DOCTRINE OF DEPENDENT RELATIVE
REVOCATION (ART 832)
A revocation subject to a condition
does not revoke a will unless and until
the condition occurs. Thus, where a
testator revokes a will with the
proven intention that he would
execute another will, his failure to
validly make a latter will would permit
the allowance of the earlier will.
Revocation by mistake
A revocation of a will based on a false
cause or an illegal cause is null and
void. Thus, where a testator by a
codicil or later will, expressly
grounding such revocation on the
assumption of fact which turns out to
be false, as where it is stated that the
legatees/devisees named therein are
dead, when in fact, they are living,
the revocation does not take effect.
G. REPUBLICATION
WILLS
AND
REVIVAL
OF
REPUBLICATION
The act of the testator whereby he
reproduces in a subsequent will
(express) the dispositions contained in
a previous will which is void as to its
form, or he executes a codicil
(constructive) to his will.
Its purpose is to cure the will of its
formal defects.
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
NOTES:
To republish a will void as to its form,
all
the
dispositions
must
be
reproduced or copied in the new or
subsequent will;
To republish a will valid as to its form
but already revoked the execution of a
codicil which makes reference to the
revoked will is sufficient.
Effects of Republication by virtue of a
Codicil:
1. Codicil revives the previous will
2. The old will is republished as of the
date of the codicil makes it speak, as
it were, from the new and later date.
3. A will republished by a codicil is
governed by a statute enacted to the
execution of the will, but which was
operative when the codicil was
executed.
REPUBLICATION
REVIVAL
1. Takes place by an
act of the testator
1. Takes place by
operation of law.
2. Corrects extrinsic
and
intrinsic
defects.
2. Restores a revoked
will
REVIVAL
The restoration to validity of a will
previously revoked by operation of law
(implied revocation).
PRINCIPLE OF INSTANTER
The express revocation of the first will
renders it void because the revocatory
clause of the second will, not being
testamentary in character, operates to
revoke the previous will instantly upon
the execution of the will containing it.
NOTE: In implied revocation, the first will
is not instantly revoked by the second will
because the inconsistent testamentary
dispositions of the latter do not take
effect immediately but only after the
death of the testator.
H. ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF
WILLS
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
PROBATE
A special proceeding mandatorily
required
for
the
purpose
of
establishing the validity of a will.
The statute of limitations is not
applicable to probate of wills.
Questions determinable by the probate
court: (ICE)
1. identity of the will;
2. testamentary capacity of the testator
at the time of the execution of the
will; and
3. due execution of the will.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
6. Testator acted by mistake or did not
intend that the instrument he signed
should be his will at the time of
affixing his signature thereto.
NOTE: GROUNDS ARE EXCLUSIVE.
DISALLOWANCE
1. voluntary act of
the testator.
1. given by judicial
decree.
2. with or without
cause.
2. must always be
for a legal cause.
3. may be partial or
total.
3. always total
except: when the
ground of fraud or
influence
for
example
affects
only
certain
portions of the
will.
I. INSTITUTION OF HEIRS
(ARTS. 840-856)
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
INSTITUTION
An act by virtue of which a testator
designates in his will the person or
persons who are to succeed him in his
property and transmissible rights and
obligations. (Art 840)
The proper test in order to determine
the validity of an institution of heir is
the possibility of finally ascertaining
the identity of the instituted heir by
intrinsic or extrinsic evidence.
PRESUMPTIONS
1. Presumption of Equality Heirs
instituted without designation of
shares shall inherit in equal parts.
This is limited only to the case where
all of the heirs are of the same class or
juridical condition, and where there
are compulsory heirs among the heirs
instituted, it should be applied only to
the disposable free portion.
2. Presumption of Individuality When
the testator institutes some heirs
individually and others collectively,
those collectively designated shall be
considered as individually instituted,
unless it clearly appears that the
intention of the testator was
otherwise.
3. Presumption of Simultaneity when
the testator calls to the succession a
person and his children, they are all
deemed to have been instituted
simultaneously and not successively.
INSTITUTION BASED ON A FALSE CAUSE
(Article 850)
GENERAL RULE: The statement of a false
cause for the institution of an heir shall be
considered as not written.
Reason: Generosity of the testator is
the real cause of the testamentary
disposition.
EXCEPTION: If it appears from the face
of the will that the testator would not
have made the institution had he known
the falsity of the cause.
Example: Where the person instituted
is a total stranger to the testator, it is
obvious that the real cause of the
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
Effects of Preterition:
1. It annuls the institution of heir;
2. The devises and legacies are valid
insofar as they are not inofficious; and
3. If the omitted compulsory heir should
die before the testator, the institution
shall be effectual, without prejudice
to the right of representation.
NOTE:
In case of omission without
preterition, the rule in Art. 855 should be
followed. The suggested alternate phrasing
of Dr. Tolentino to the said article is: The
share of the compulsory heir omitted in a
will must be first taken from the part of
the estate not disposed of by the will, if
any; if that is not sufficient, so much as
may be necessary must be taken
proportionally from the shares of the
heirs given to them by will.
PRETERITION
DISINHERITANCE
1. deprivation of a
compulsory heir of
his legitime is tacit
1. deprivation of a
compulsory heir of
his
legitime
is
express.
2. may be voluntary
but
the
law
presumes that it is
involuntary
2.
voluntary.
3. law presumes
that there has been
merely an oversight
or mistake on the
part of the testator.
3. done with
legal cause.
4. if disinheritance
is
not
lawful,
compulsory heir is
merely restored to
his legitime.
always
Where
the
deceased
left
no
descendants,
legitimate
or
illegitimate, but she left forced heirs
in the direct ascending lineher
parents, and her holographic will does
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
not explicitly disinherit them but
simply omits them altogether, the case
is one of preterition of parents, not a
case of ineffective disinheritance.
(Nuguid vs. Nuguid 17 SCRA 449)
NOTE: Preterition of the surviving spouse
(SS) does not entirely annul the institution
of the heir since SS is not a compulsory
heir in the direct line. However, since
Article 842 protects the legitime of the SS,
the institution is partially annulled by
reducing the rights of the instituted heir
to the extent necessary to cover the
legitime of SS. (Tolentino)
EFFECT OF PREDECEASE
--an heir who dies before the testator shall
transmit no right to his own heirs (rule is
absolute with respect to a voluntary heir)
--what
is
transmitted
to
the
representatives of compulsory heir is his
right to the legitime and not to the free
portion
EFFECT OF INCAPACITY
--A voluntary heir who is incapacitated to
succeed from testator shall transmit no
right to his own heirs.
--compulsory heir may be represented, but
only with respect to his legitime
EFFECT OF REPUDIATION
--whether voluntary or compulsory, the
heir who repudiates his inheritance cannot
transmit any right to his own heirs.
J. SUBSTITUTION OF HEIRS
(ARTS 857-870)
SUBSTITUTION
The act by which the testator
designates the person or persons to
take the place of the heir or heirs first
instituted (Tolentino). It may be
considered as a subsidiary and
conditional institution.
Kinds:
1. Simple or Common (that which takes
place when the testator designates
one or more persons to substitute the
heirs/s instituted in case such heir/s
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
Effect of substitution:
General rule: once the substitution
has taken place, the substitute shall
not only take over the share that
would have passed to the instituted
heir, but he shall be subject to the
same charges and conditions imposed
upon such instituted heir.
Exceptions:
(1) When the testator has expressly to
the contrary;
(2) When the charges or conditions are
personally applicable only to the heir
instituted.
3. Fideicommissary
Requisites:
a. First heir (fiduciary) called to the
succession.
b. An obligation clearly imposed upon
such first heir to preserve the property
and to transmit it to the second heir.
c. Second heir (fideicommissary) to
whom the property is transmitted by
the first heir.
Without
the
obligation
clearly
imposing upon the first heir the
preservation of the property and its
transmission to the second heir, there
is no fideicommissary substitution
(Rabadilla vs. CA 334 SCRA 522)
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
NOTE: Pending transmission of property,
the fiduciary is entitled to all the rights of
a
usufructuary,
although
the
fideicommissary is entitled to all the rights
of a naked owner.
Limitations:
a. Substitution must not go beyond one
degree from the heir originally
instituted.
b. Degree
means
degree
of
relationship.
c. Fiduciary and fideicommissary must be
living at the time of the death of the
testator.
d. Substitution must not burden the
legitime of compulsory heirs.
e. Substitution must be made expressly.
A fideicommissary substitution is void
if the first heir is not related in the 1 st
degree to the second heir (Ramirez vs.
Vda. De Ramirez 111 SCRA 704)
K. CONDITIONAL, MODAL TESTAMENTARY
DISPOSITIONS,
AND
TESTAMENTARY
DISPOSITIONS WITH A TERM (ART 871-885)
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
2. Causal Condition depends upon the
will of the heir, devisee, or legatee,
but upon the will of a third person.
3. Mixed depends jointly upon the will
of the heir, devisee, or legatee and
upon chance and/or will of a third
person.
Fulfillment of Conditions:
1. Potestative Conditions
must be
fulfilled after the death of the
testator (except when it has already
been fulfilled and is of such nature
that it cannot be repeated);
2. Causal or mixed conditions may be
fulfilled either before or after such
death, unless the testator has
provided otherwise.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
Kinds of Compulsory Heirs:
1. Primary those who have precedence
over and exclude other CH. E.g. LCD.
2. Secondary those who succeed only
in the absence of the primary CH. E.g.
LPA or IP.
3. Concurring those who succeed
together with the primary or
secondary CH. E.g. ICD and SS.
If the testator is
a LEGITIMATE
person
If the testator is
an ILLEGITIMATE
person
1.
Legitimate
children
and
descendants
(LCD)
1.
In default of
the foregoing,
legitimate
parents
and
ascendants
(LPA)
2.
Surviving
spouse (SS)
3.
2.
3.
4.
Illegitimate
children
and
descendants
(ICD)
4.
Legitimate
children
and
descendants
(LCD)
Surviving
spouse (SS)
TABLE OF LEGITIMES
SURVIVOR
LEGITIME
NOTES
LC
1 LC
SS
2 or more
LC
SS
equal to 1
LC
LC
IC
of 1 LC
LC
SS
IC
of 1 LC
All
the
concurring CH
get from the
half
free
portion, the
share of the
SS
having
preference
over that of
the IC, whose
share
may
suffer
reduction pro
rata because
there is no
preference
among
themselves.
LPA
Whether they
survive alone
NOTES:
See Sections 17 & 18 of R.A. 8552.
By force of the Family Code, adopted
children are deemed legitimate
children of the adopters.
By force of the Family Code, IC
without distinction and so long as their
filiation is duly established or proved
in accordance with law, are each
entitled to 1/2 of the legitime of a LC,
thus abrogating the 5:4 ratio between
natural and non-natural IC.
RULES:
1. Direct descending line
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CIVIL LAW
Illegitimate
children and
descendants
(ICD)
In default of
the foregoing,
illegitimate
parents
only
(IP)
IN
Divide by the
#
of
LC,
whether they
survive alone
or
with
concurring
CH.
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
or
with
concurring
CH.
LPA
IC
LPA
SS
LPA
SS
IC
1/8
IC
SS
IC
1/3
1/3
SS
IC succeed in
the
in
equal shares.
Divide equally
among the IC.
1/3
if
marriage is in
articulo
mortis
and
deceased
spouse
dies
within 3 mos.
after
the
marriage.
IP
IP
Any child
-excludedIt depends
Children
inherit in the
amounts
established in
the foregoing
rules.
IP
SS
Only
the
parents are of
IC
are
included.
Grandparents
and
other
ascendants
are excluded.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
Requisites:
1. The property should have been
acquired by operation of law by an
ascendant (reservista) from his
descendant (propositus) upon the
death of the latter.
2. The property should have been
previously acquired by gratuitous title
by the descendant (propositus) from
another ascendant or from a brother
or sister (originator).
3. The descendant (propositus) should
have died without any legitimate issue
in the direct descending line who
could inherit from him.
Personal elements:
1. Originator the ascendant, or brother
or sister from whom the propositus
had acquired the property by
gratuitous
title
(e.g.
donation,
remission,
testate
or
intestate
succession);
2. Propositus the descendant who died
and from whose death the reservista in
turn had acquired the property by
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
Obligations of Reservista:
(1) To make an inventory of all
reservable property;
(2) To appraise value of all reservable
movable property;
(3) To annotate in Registry of
property the reservable character
of all reservable immovable
property;
(4) To secure by mortgage (a)
restitution of movables not
alienated,
(b)
payment
of
damages caused by his fault or
negligence, (c) return of price
received for movables alienated
and (d) payment of value of
immovable alienated.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
5. Unconditional;
6. Total; and
7. The heir disinherited must be
designated in such a manner that
there can be no doubt as to his
identity.
Effects of Disinheritance:
1. Deprivation of the compulsory heir
who is disinherited of any participation
in the inheritance including the
legitime.
2. The children/descendants of the
person disinherited shall take his or
her place and shall preserve the rights
of compulsory heirs with respect to
the legitime.
3. The disinherited parent shall not have
the usufruct or administration of the
property
which
constitutes
the
legitime.
IMPERFECT DISINHERITANCE
A disinheritance which does not have
one or more of the essential requisites
for its validity.
Effects:
1. If testator had made disposition of the
entire estate: annulment of the
testamentary dispositions only in so far
as they prejudice the legitime of the
person disinherited; does not affect
the dispositions of the testator with
respect to the free portion.
2. If testator did not dispose of the free
portion: compulsory heir is given all
that he is entitled to receive as if the
disinheritance has not been made,
without
prejudice
to
lawful
dispositions made by the testator in
favor of others.
3. Devises,
legacies
and
other
testamentary dispositions shall be
valid to such extent as will not impair
the legitime.
IMPERFECT
DISINHERITANCE
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
PRETERITION
IN
CIVIL LAW
1.
The
person
disinherited may be
any compulsory heir
1.
The
person
omitted must be a
compulsory heir in
the direct line
2. Always express
2. Always implied
3.Always intentional
3.
May
intentional
unintentional
4. Effect: Partial
annulment
of
institution of heirs
4. Effect: Total
annulment
of
institution of heirs
be
or
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
NOTES:
Mere civility which may characterize
their relationship, a conduct that is
naturally expected of every decent
person, is not enough.
In order to be effective, the testator
must pardon the disinherited heir.
Such pardon must specifically refer to
the heir and to the acts causing the
disinheritance. The heir must accept
the pardon.
No particular form is required. It may
be made expressly or tacitly.
NOTE: Where the cause for disinheritance
is likewise a ground for unworthiness to
succeed, what is the effect of a
subsequent reconciliation upon the heirs
capacity to succeed?
1. If disinheritance has been made: Rule
on
reconciliation
applies.
The
disinheritance becomes ineffective.
2. If disinheritance has not been made:
Rule on reconciliation does not apply.
The heir continues to be incapacitated
to succeed unless pardoned by the
testator under Art. 1033. The law
effects the disinheritance.
N. LEGACIES AND DEVISES (ARTS. 924
959)
Persons charged with
devises:
(1) compulsory heir;
(2) voluntary heir;
(3) legatee or devisee;
(4) estate
legacies
and
NOTES:
If the will is silent with regard to the
person who shall pay or deliver the
legacy/devise, there is a presumption
that such legacy or devise constitutes
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
STATUS OF
PROPERTY GIVEN BY
LEGACY/DEVISE
1. Belonging to the
testator at the time of
the execution of the
will until his death
2. Belonging to the
testator at the time of
the execution of the
will but alienated in
favor of a 3rd person
EFFECT ON THE
LEGACY/DEVISE
Effective
Revoked
3. Belonging to the
testator at the time of
the execution of the
will but alienated in
favor
of
the
legatee/devisee
gratuitously
No
revocation.
There is a clear
intention
to
comply
with
legacy or devise.
4. Belonging to the
testator at the time of
the execution of the
will but alienated in
favor of the legatee or
devisee onerously
Legatee/devisee
can
demand
reimbursement
from the heir or
estate
IN
CIVIL LAW
Effective
Ineffective
Ineffective
10.Testator
had
knowledge that the
thing
bequeathed
belonged to a third
person
and
the
legatee/devisee
acquired the property
gratuitously after the
execution of the will
Legatee/devisee
can claim nothing
by virtue of the
legacy/devise
11.Testator
had
knowledge that the
thing
bequeathed
belonged to a third
person
and
the
legatee/devisee
acquired the property
by onerous title
Legatee/devisee
can
demand
reimbursement
from the heir or
estate
Effective
Void
ART. 911
ART. 950
Order of
preference:
(LIPO)
Order of preference:
(RPSESO)
1. Legitime of
compulsory
heirs
2. Donations inter
vivos
3. Preferential
1. Remuneratory L/D
2.Preferential L/D
3.L for support
4.L for education
5.L/D of a specific,
determinate thing
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
legacies or
devices
4. All other
legacies or
devices pro
rata
Application:
(1)
When
the
reduction
is
necessary
to
preserve
the
legitime
of
compulsory heirs
from impairment
whether there are
donations
inter
vivos or not; or
(2)
When,
although,
the
legitime has been
preserved by the
testator
himself
there
are
donations
inter
vivos.
NOTES:
In case of reduction in the above
cases, the inverse order of payment
should be followed.
CIVIL LAW
Application:
IN
II.
LEGAL
SUCCESSION
OR
INTESTATE
CAUSES OF INTESTACY
1. If a person dies without a will, or with
a void will, or one which has
subsequently lost its validity;
2. Absence of an institution of heir;
3. Partial institution of heir. In such case,
intestacy takes place as to the
undisposed portion (mixed succession);
4. Non-fulfillment of suspensive condition
attached to the institution of heir;
5. Predecease of the instituted heir;
6. Repudiation by the instituted heir;
7. Incapacity of instituted heir;
8. Preterition. Intestacy may be total or
partial depending on whether or not
there are legacies/devises;
9. Fulfillment of resolutory condition;
10. Expiration of term or period of
institution;
11. Non-compliance or impossibility of
compliance with the will.
NOTE: In all cases where there has been
an institution of heir, follow the I.S.R.A.I.
order of Justice Paras. If the Institution
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
fails, Substitution occurs. If there is no
substitute, the right of Representation
applies in the direct descending line to the
legitime if the vacancy is caused by
predecease, incapacity, or disinheritance.
The right of Accretion applies to the free
portion when the requisites in Art. 1016
are present. If there is no substitute, and
the right of Representation or Accretion
does not apply, the rules on Intestate
succession shall take over.
A. RULES
1. Rule of Preference between lines
Those in the direct descending line
shall exclude those in the direct
ascending and collateral lines, and
those in the direct ascending line
shall, in turn, exclude those in the
collateral line.
2. Rule of Proximity
The relative nearest in degree
excludes the more distant ones,
saving the right of representation
when it properly takes place.
This rule is subject to the rule of
preference between lines.
3. Rule of Equal Division
Relatives in the same degree shall
inherit in equal shares.
EXCEPTIONS:
a) Division in the ascending line
(between paternal and maternal
grandparents);
b) Division among brothers and sisters,
some of whom are of the full and
others of half blood; and
c) Division In cases where the right of
representation takes place.
NOTE: This rule is subject to the rule
of preference between lines.
4. Rule of Barrier between the legitimate
family and the illegitimate family
The illegitimate family cannot
inherit by intestate succession
from the legitimate family and
vice-versa.
5. Rule of Double Share for full blood
collaterals
When full and half-blood brothers
or sisters, nephews or nieces,
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
1. Testamentary Succession
a) When a compulsory heir in the
direct
descending
line
had
predeceased the testator and was
survived by his children or
descendants.
b) When a compulsory heir in the
direct descending line is excluded
from the inheritance due to
incapacity or unworthiness and he
has children or descendants.
c) When a compulsory heir in the
direct
descending
line
is
disinherited and he has children or
descendants;
representation
covers only the legitime.
d) A legatee/devisee who died after
the death of the testator may be
represented by his heirs.
2. Intestate Succession
a) When a legal heir in the direct
descending line had predeceased
the decedent and was survived by
his children or descendants.
b)
When a legal heir in the direct
descending line is excluded from
the inheritance due to incapacity
or unworthiness and he has
children or descendants.
c) When brothers or sisters had
predeceased the decedent and
they had children or descendants.
d)
When illegitimate children
represent
their
illegitimate
parents who already died in the
estate of their grandparents.
e) When nephews and nieces inherit
together with their uncles and
aunts in representation of their
deceased parents who are the
CIVIL LAW
IN
INTESTATE SHARE
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
Any class
alone
1 LC
SS
2 or more LC
SS
LPA
SS
LPA
SS
IC
IP
SS
SS
BS/NN
1 LC
SS
IC
2 or more LC
SS
IC
IN
CIVIL LAW
Entire estate
1/2
1/2
(Diongson vs. Cinco, 74
SCRA 118)
Consider SS as 1 LC,
then divide estate by
total number.
1/2
1/2
1/2
1/4
1/4
1/2
1/2
(The law is silent. Apply
concurrence theory.)
1/2
1/2
First, satisfy legitimes.
Estate
would
be
insufficient. Reduction
must be made according
to
the
rules
on
legitimes. The legitimes
of LCD and SS shall
always be first satisfied
in preference to the ICD.
First, satisfy legitimes.
There would be an
excess in the estate.
Distribute such excess in
the proportion 1:2:2, in
accordance with the
concurrence theory.
2. LPA/IP
AP
SS
3. LPA
AP
ICD
4. LPA
AP
SS
ICD
1/3
1/3
1/3
6.
7.
8.
9.
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
RULES:
1. The law of legitimes must be brought
into operation in partial intestacy,
because the testamentary dispositions
can affect only the disposable free
portion but never the legitimes.
2. If among the concurring intestate heirs
there are compulsory heirs, whose
legal or intestate portions exceed
their respective legitimes, then the
amount
of
the
testamentary
disposition must be deducted from the
disposable free portion, to be borne by
all the intestate heirs in the
proportions that they are entitled to
receive from such disposable free
portion as intestate heirs.
3. If the intestate share of a compulsory
heir is equal to his legitime, then the
amount
of
the
testamentary
disposition must be deducted only
from the intestate shares of the
others, in the proportions stated
above.
4. If the testamentary dispositions
consume the entire disposable free
portion, then the intestate heirs who
are compulsory heirs will get only their
legitime, and those who are not
compulsory heirs will get nothing.
IV.
PROVISIONS
COMMON
TO
TESTAMENTARY
AND
INTESTATE
SUCCESSIONS
A. RIGHT OF ACCRETION (A)
(ARTS 1015 1023)
A right by virtue of which, when two
or more persons are called to the same
inheritance, devise or legacy, the part
assigned to one who renounce or
cannot receive his share, or who died
before
testator,
is
added
or
incorporated to that of his co-heirs,
co-devisees, or co-legatees.
A right based on the presumed will of
the deceased that he prefers to give
certain
properties
to
certain
CIVIL LAW COMMITTEE
IN
CIVIL LAW
Predecease
Incapacity
Disinheritance
Repudiation
TESTAMENTARY
SUCCESSION
Legitime
Free
Portion
1. RR
1. A
2. IS
2. IS
RR
A
2. IS
IS
1. RR
_
2. IS
IS
A
INTESTATE
SUCCESSION
(IS)
1. RR
2. IS
1. RR
2. IS
_
A
Summary:
(A)
In
testamentary succession:
(1) Legitime:
(a) In case of predecease of an
heir, there is representation
if there are children or
descendants; if none, the
others inherit in their own
right.
(b) In case of incapacity, results
are
the
same
as
in
predecease.
(c) In case of disinheritance,
results are the same as in
predecease.
(d) In case of repudiation by an
heir, the others inherit in
their own right.
(2) Disposable free portion:
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
Accretion takes place when
requisites are present; but if such
requisites are not present, the
others inherit in their own right.
(B) In intestate succession:
(1) In case of predecease, there is
representation if there are children or
descendants; if none, the others
inherit in their own right.
(2) In case of incapacity, results are the
same as in predecease.
(3) In case of repudiation, there is always
accretion.
B. CAPACITY TO SUCCEED BY WILL OR BY
INTESTACY (ARTS. 1024 1040)
Requisites:
1. The heir, legatee/devisee must be
living or in existence at the moment
the succession opens; and
2. He must not be incapacitated or
disqualified by law to succeed.
THE FOLLOWING ARE INCAPABLE OF
SUCCEEDING:
A. Based on Undue Influence or Interest:
(PIGRAP)
1. Priest who heard the confession of the
testator during his last illness, or the
minister of the gospel who extended
spiritual aid to him during the same
period;
2. Individuals,
associations
and
corporations not permitted by law to
inherit;
3. Guardian with respect to testamentary
dispositions given by a ward in his
favor before the final accounts of the
guardianship have been approved,
even if the testator should die after
the approval thereof; nevertheless,
any provision made by the ward in
favor of the guardian when the latter
is his ascendant, descendant, brother,
sister, or spouse, shall be valid;
4. Relatives of such priest or minister of
the gospel within the 4th degree, the
church, order, chapter, community,
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
6. Any person who by fraud, violence,
intimidation, or undue influence
should cause the testator to make a
will or to change one already made;
7. Any person who falsifies or forges a
supposed will of the decedent; and
8. Any person who by the same means
prevents another from making a will,
or from revoking one already made, or
who supplants, conceals, or alters the
latter's will.
NOTE: The moment the testator uses one
of the acts of unworthiness as a cause for
disinheritance, he thereby submits it to
the rules on disinheritance. Thus,
reconciliation renders the disinheritance
ineffective.
PARDON OF ACTS OF UNWORTHINESS
EXPRESS
IMPLIED
1.
made by the
execution
of
a
document or any
writing in which the
decedent condones
the
cause
of
incapacity
2.
cannot
be
revoked
1. effected when
testator makes a
will instituting the
unworthy heir with
knowledge of the
cause of incapacity
2. revoked when
the
testator
revokes the will or
the institution
IN
CIVIL LAW
while
repudiation
renders
such
transmission ineffective.
(2)
Repudiatio
n is equivalent to an act of disposition
and alienation.
(3)
The
publicity required for repudiation is
necessary for the protection of other
heirs and also of creditors.
Form of Acceptance
1. Express Acceptance one made in a
public or private document.
2. Tacit Acceptance one resulting from
acts by which the intention to accept
is necessarily implied or which one
would have no right to do except in
the capacity of an heir
Tacit acceptance is presumed from
certain acts of the heir as:
1. When heir sells, donates, or assigns his
right.
2. When heir renounces it for the benefit
of one or more heirs.
3. When renunciation is in favor of all
heirs indiscriminately for consideration
4. Other acts of tacit acceptance
a. heir demands partition of the
inheritance
b. heir alienates some objects of the
inheritance
c. Under Art 1057, failure to signify
acceptance or repudiation within
30 days after an order of
distribution by the probate court.
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
solemn than the act of acceptance and
that repudiation produces a more
violent and disturbing consequences.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
clothing, and outfit except when
they exceed 1/10 of the sum
disposable by will.
E. PARTITION AND DISTRIBUTION OF
ESTATE (ARTS. 1078 1105)
It is the separation, division and
assignment of a thing held in common
among those to whom it may belong. It
includes every act which is intended to
put an end to indivision among coheirs, and legatees or devisees,
although it should purport to be a
sale, exchange, compromise, or any
other transaction. It is not subject to
any form.
Who may effect partition:
1. decedent himself during his lifetime
by an act inter vivos or by will;
2. heirs themselves;
3. competent court;
4. 3rd person designated by the decedent.
Who can demand partition:
1. compulsory heir;
2. voluntary heir;
3. legatee or devisee;
4. any person who has acquired interest
in the estate.
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)
MEMORY AID
IN
CIVIL LAW
CHAIRPERSON: Romuald Padilla ASST.CHAIRPERSON: Vida Bocar, Joyce Vidad EDP: Alnaiza Hassiman, Dorothy Gayon
SUBJECT HEADS: Christopher Rey Marasigan (Persons and Family Relations), Alejandro Casabar(Property), Ma. Rhodora
Ferrer(Wills and Succession), Ian Dominic Pua(Obligations and Contracts), Sha Elijah Dumama(Sales and Lease), John
Stephen
Quiambao(PAT), Christopher Cabigao(Credit Transactions), Ligaya Alipao(Torts and Damages), Anthony Purganan(LTD),
Ma. Ricasion Tugadi (Conflicts of Law)