Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
resources
(.
2013).
This
migration
often
occurs
on
an
annual
cycle
as
weather
and
climate
changes,
in
order
to
stay
near
to
food
sources
for
proper
foraging
(Hays2013).
Within aviary, terrestrial and aquatic species, this migration distance can
vary
drastically.
Some
birds
will
fly
thousands
of
kilometers
such
as
the
Arctic
terns
(Sterna
paradisea),
while
others
fly
only
a
few
hundred
kilometers
in
order
to
evade
colder
temperatures
and
keep
well
fed
(Hays
2013).
Some
terrestrial
ungulates
may
migrate
several
hundred
kilometers,
such
as
the
wildebeest
(Connochaestes
taurinus)
or
simply
adjust
elevation
as
many
mount
species
do
(Hays
2013,
Mysterude
2016).
Of
those
that
migrate
in
the
oceanic
regions
many
are
known
for
their
great
distances
such
as
the
Humpback
Whale
(Megaptera
novaeangliae),
which
has
been
known
to
migrate
up
to
16,000
kilometer
round
trips
from
feeding
and
birthing
areas
(Flix
2014).
While
body
size
often
plays
a
role
on
the
distance
of
the
migration
undertaken
by
a
species,
or
taxa,
many
species
do
differentiate
between
their
breeding
and
feeding
grounds
(Hays
2013).
Generally
speaking,
those
with
the
least
resistance
will
travel
the
furthest
(Hays
2013).
This
is
supported
when
considering
birds
travel
the
furthest,
followed
by
swimmers,
and
then
terrestrial
species
(Hays
2013).
Sea
turtles
(family
Cheloniidae)
are
amongst
the
species
known
to
travel
great
distances
between
their
breeding
and
foraging
grounds;
however,
they
are
in
a
taxa
known
to
not
commonly
nest
year
after
year
(Hays
2013,
Luschi
2003).
Of
the
seven
species
of
sea
turtle,
only
the
Flatback
turtle
(Natator
depresus)
refrains
from
During
the
breeding
seasons
Atlantic
leatherbacks
move
back
south
for
mating
and
nesting
(James
2007).
Data
shows
that
turtles
feeding
in
high
longitudinal
regions,
such
as
Nova
Scotia
and
Canada,
nested
in
Central
America
and
Caribbean
states,
such
as
Venezuela,
Trinidad,
Grenada,
Colombia,
Costa
Rica
and
Puerto
Rico
(James
2007).
For
the
leatherbacks
located
in
the
Pacific
Ocean,
nesting
occurs
in
the
eastern
Pacific
within
the
tropical
latitudes,
between
Mexico
and
Costa
Rica
(Shillinger
2008).
In
the
western
Pacific,
nesting
occurs
along
the
coasts
of
Indonesia
and
Malaysia
(Dutton
2007).
Those
nesting
in
the
eastern
Pacific
tend
to
forage
south
off
the
coast
of
South
America,
while
those
nesting
in
the
western
Pacific
forage
in
the
South
China
Sea
and
the
North
Pacific
Transitional
Zone
(Seminoff).
These
migrations
can
span
between
2,000km
and
4100km
(Hays
2013).
During
feeding
season,
leatherbacks
locate
themselves
around
geographic
regions
associated
with
upwelling
due
to
the
natural
amounts
of
nutrients
being
brought
up
from
the
ocean
floor,
providing
sustenance
for
their
primary
food
source,
jellyfish
(Cnidaria)
(Heaslip
2012,
Seminoff
2012,
Dodge
2011).
Of
large
oceanic
species
specializing
in
the
gelatinous
diet
of
jellyfish,
leatherback
and
sunfish
(Mola
mola)
are
the
only
large
vertebrates
(Dodge
2011).
As
the
diet
is
rather
energetically
improbable
and
deficient,
leatherbacks
reciprocate
by
consuming
anywhere
between
70%
and
180%
of
their
body
mass
per
day
(Houghton
2011,
Heaslip
2012).
In
order
to
maximize
on
energy
efficiency
during
diving
and
foraging,
leatherback
focus
on
regions
and
pods
of
jellyfish
with
high
densities,
using
foraging
techniques
equitable
to
terrestrial
grazers.
Loggerhead
Sea
Turtle
(Caretta
caretta):
The loggerhead sea turtle can be found in both the Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans
and
has
large
nesting
grounds
in
Japan,
Australia
and
off
the
US
state
of
Florida,
as
they
occupy
the
higher
latitudes
of
the
subtropical
gyres
(Boyle
2009,
Polovina
2004).
Once
hatched,
loggerheads
will
move
to
pelagic
regions
of
the
ocean
and
drift
in
oceanic
gyrs,
such
as
the
North
Atlantic
Gyre
system
or
the
Peruvian
Current,
until
reaching
maturity
(Bolten1998,
Boyle
2009).
During
this
time,
many
loggerheads
hatchlings
from
Japan
or
Australian
rookeries,
will
drift
all
the
way
across
the
Pacific
to
foraging
areas
in
the
eastern
Pacific
of
North
and
Central
America
(Boyle
2009).
Loggerhead
sea
turtles,
like
all
sea
turtle
species,
will
return
to
the
area
of
their
natal
beach
to
nest,
meaning
that
some
must
migrate
across
the
Pacific
(Bolten
1998).
While in the deeper pelagic regions during their youth, loggerheads are
primarily
carnivorous,
as
they
have
been
recorded
to
consume
large
amounts
of
fish
and
gastropods,
barnacles
and
species
of
pelagic
crab
in
their
intestine
(Seney
2007,
Polovina
2004).
Because
loggerheads
and
sea
turtles
in
general
are
not
quick
moving
predators,
it
is
widely
believed
that
the
pelagic
fish
diets
are
primarily
a
source
of
bycatch
from
fishing
vessels
(Seney
2009).
However
once
their
juvenile
period
has
come
to
fruition,
loggerheads
move
to
more
neritic
regions
where
their
diet
and
feeding
tactics
shift
into
more
predatory
and
crustacean
based
(Lazar
2011,
Seney
2007).
Loggerheads in the Atlantic are recorded to forage heavily off the shore of
Virginia
and
feed
heavily
on
Atlantic
Horsehoe
Crabs
(Limulus
polyphemus),
the
Common
Blue
Crab
(Callinectes
sapidus)
and
many
types
of
molluscs
(Lazar
2011,
Seney
2007).
Loggerheads
whom
have
additional
foraging
areas,
such
as
in
the
Mediterranean
or
in
neritic
regions
of
Japan,
typically
have
larger
clutch
sizes
than
those
in
the
more
pelagic
foraging
areas
(Zanden
2014,
Polovina
2004).
Olive
Ridley
(Lepidochelys
olivacea):
The olive ridley sea turtle is considered the most numerous of the sea turtles
exhibiting
a
strong
presence
in
the
Indian
Ocean,
eastern
Pacific
region
and
throughout
the
Atlantic
Ocean
(Whiting
2007,
Polovina
2004,
2014).
Unfortunately,
the
olive
ridley
is
still
classified
as
endangered
by
the
International
Union
of
Conservation
of
Natures
Red
List
(Colman
2014,
Abreu
2008).
Olive
ridley
sea
turtles
are
found
predominantly
in
the
equatorial
and
southern
regions
of
the
globe,
such
as
Australia,
as
they
prefer
warmer
waters
between
23C
and
28C,
which
provide
deep
thermoclines
for
diving
(Polovino
2004).
Because
of
this,
olive
ridleys
in
the
Pacific
exhibit
primarily
pelagic
opportunistic
feeding
habits
while
spending
time
near
the
equator
and
circulating
in
the
warmer
Subtropical
Gyres
(Polovina
2004,
Wildermann
2012).
Those
living
in
the
Atlantic
exhibit
similar
tactics,
however
they
rely
less
on
the
pelagic
methods
than
they
do
foraging
in
the
benthic
regions
of
neritic
coastlines
(Colman
2014,
Wildermann
2012).
Olive ridley sea turtles primarily feed off crustacean species, such as the
pelagic
red
crab
(Pleuroncodes
planipes),
varying
species
of
Callinectes
and
some
Moluscs
(Colman
2014,
Wildermann
2012).
Studies
have
begun
to
show
evidence
of
olive
ridley
consumption
of
fishing
vessel
bycatch
as
many
crustacean
species
considered
to
by
bycatch,
such
as
Persephona
lichtensteinii,
are
being
found
in
olive
ridley
intestinal
tracts
(Colman
2014).
Olive ridley sea turtles will typically migrate between 180km to 1000km, but
have
also
been
recorded
to
travel
up
to
1500km
in
extreme
cases
(Whiting
2007).
When
relocating
to
more
neritic
regions
before
nesting,
olive
ridley
sea
turtles
are
primarily
found
in
the
shallow
coastal
and
continental
shelf
where
they
can
move
to
their
final
nesting
region
(Whites
2007).
While
in
their
juvenile
stage
living
in
open
ocean
pelagic
areas,
green
turtles
survive
on
a
general
omnivorous
diet,
feeding
on
a
very
wide
verity
of
planktonic
species
for
between
5
and
10
years
(Arthur
2008,
Hatase
2006,
Luschi
2003).
Once
their
juvenile
period
has
passed
and
they
have
reached
an
approximate
curved
carapace
length
of
44cm,
they
move
to
the
more
neritic
foraging
areas
and
transition
into
a
herbivorous
diet
of
sea
grass
or
macroalgae
(Arthur
2008,
Hatase
2006).
Once
sexual
maturity
is
reached,
female
green
turtles
begin
their
migration
along
neritic
coastlines
to
nesting
areas,
which
may
be
up
to
2600
km
away,
however
usually
average
between
800
and
600
km
(Arthur
2008,
Hays
2013,
Hart
2015,
Hatase
2006).
During
the
green
turtles
migration
to
the
rookeries,
they
follow
neritic
foraging
paths
allowing
them
to
stay
well
fed
and
energized
(Hart
2015).
Because
green
turtles
do
return
to
the
beach
they
were
born
on,
some
turtles
must
inevitably
go
out
of
their
way
to
return
to
their
hatching
areas,
sometimes
migrating
up
1600km
in
the
case
of
one
study
tracking
a
turtle
that
nested
on
the
island
of
Taipin
Tao
in
the
South
China
Sea
(Cheng
2007).
Discussion
Of the four species being reviewed, the leatherback has the furthest
migratory
distance
averaging
between
2,000km
and
4,100km,
followed
by
the
green
turtle
migrating
600km
to
800km,
the
loggerhead
migrating
450km
to
600km
and
the
kemps
ridley
migrating
between
280km
and
500km
(Hays
2013).
While
all
these
species
migrate
great
distances,
only
the
leatherback
and
loggerhead
appear
to
make
regular
trans
oceanic
movements,
with
the
loggerhead
migrating
primarily
during
its
juvenile
years
(Dutton
2007,
Boyle
2009).
When
comparing
the
different
diets
of
sea
turtles,
all
but
the
leatherback
and
green
turtle
may
be
considered
omnivorous,
as
both
the
leatherback
and
green
have
much
more
unique
and
developed
diets
(Heaslip
2012,
Seminoff
2012).
Loggerhead
and
olive
ridley
sea
turtles
have
fairly
similar
diets
as
they
both
feed
off
of
crustacean
and
occasional
fish
from
bycatch
(Polovina
2004).
While
all
turtles
are
believed
to
spend
a
portion
of
their
life
during
their
lost
years
in
the
open
ocean,
the
leatherback
and
olive
ridley
appear
to
return
between
their
nesting
periods,
using
these
open
waters
as
their
primary
foraging
grounds
(Whiting
2007,
James
2007).
The
leatherback
utilizes
the
continental
shelfs
and
more
polar
regions
as
their
larger
body
is
capable
of
withstanding
the
colder
temperatures,
while
the
olive
ridley
remains
in
the
warmer
equatorial
regions
where
a
deep
thermocline
and
shallow
stratification
allows
for
deep
diving
and
a
wide
variety
of
food
(James
2007,
Polovina
2004).
For
green
turtles,
the
distance
of
migration
and
diet
is
more
a
question
of
where
the
turtle
has
decided
to
forage
(Arthur
2008).
Some
green
turtles
have
been
recorded
to
undergo
no
migration,
as
they
have
chosen
to
forage
adjacent
to
their
nesting
region
(Hays
2013).
In
this
manner,
diet
and
migration
distance
would
be
case
by
case.
Loggerheads
undergo
a
very
long
transoceanic
migration
between
their
youth
and
reaching
sexual
maturity
(Boyle
2009).
While
this
migration
is
quite
extensive,
it
is
also
quite
slow,
as
it
is
mediated
by
years
of
neritic
foraging
before
returning
to
their
natal
nesting
grounds
(Bolten
1998).
This
migration
will
occur
periodically
throughout
the
mature
loggerheads
life
(Boyle
2009).
Conclusion
With
the
change
in
global
temperatures
and
potential
rise
in
ocean
elevation,
these
foraging
areas
have
potential
to
change
and
possibly
move.
By
better
understanding
the
distances
a
species
is
willing
to
migrate
and
its
methods
of
foraging,
conservation
efforts
in
line
with
these
issues
can
be
pursued
or
further
studied.
10
Work
Cited:
1. Abreu-Grobois, A & Plotkin, P. (IUCN SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group).
2008. Lepidochelys olivacea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008:
e.T11534A3292503.http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T11534A3292503.e
n. 28 April 2016.
Arthur Karen, Boyle M, Limpus C. 2008. Ontogenetic Changes in Diet and Habitat Use in
Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas) Life History. Inter-Research. Vol. 362: 303-311
3. Bolten Alan, Bjorndal K, Martins H, Dellinger T, Biscoito M, Encalada S, Bowen. 1998.
Transatlantic Developmental Migrations of Loggerhead Sea Turtles Demonstrated by
mtDNA Sequence Analysis. Ecological Society of America. Vol. 8, No.1: 1-7
4. Boyle M, FitzSimmons N, Limpus C, Kelez S, Velez-Zuazo X, Waycott M. 2009.
Evidence for Transoceanic Migrations by Loggerhead Turtles in the Southern Pacific
Ocean. The Royal Society. Vol. 276: 1993-1999
5. Cheng I-Jiunn. 2007. Nesting Ecology and Postnesting Migration of Sea Turtles on
Taipin Tao Nansha Archipelago, South China Sea. Chelonian Consecration and Biology.
Vol.6, No.2: 277-283.
2.
6. Colman
Liliana,
Sampaio
C,
Weber
M,
Castilhos
J.
2014.
Diet
of
olive
ridley
sea
turtles,
Lepidochelys
olivacea,
in
the
waters
of
Sergipe
Brazil.
Chelonian
Conservation
and
Biology.
13(2):
266-271.
Endangered
Species
research.
3:1-9.
7. Dodge Kara, Logan J, Lutcavage M. 2011. Foraging ecology of leatherback sea turtles in
the Western North Atlantic determined through multi-tissue stable isotope analysis.
Marine Biology 158: 2813-2824.
Dutton Peter, Hitipeuw C, Zein M, Benson S, Petro G, Pita J, Rei V, Ambio L,
Bakerbessy J. 2007. Status and Genetic Structure of Nesting Populations of
Leatherback Turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in Western Pacific. Chelonian Conservation
and Biology. 6: 47-53.
9. Hart Catherine, Blanco G, Coyne M, Delgado-Trejo C, Godley B, Jones T, Resendiz A,
Seminoff J, Witt M, Nichols W. 2015. Multinational Tagging Efforts Illustrate Regional
Scale of Distribution and Threats for East Pacific Green Turtles (Chelonia mydas
agassizii). PLos ONE.10(2):1-17
10. Hart Kristen, Lamont M, Sartain A, Fujisaki I. 2014. Migration, Foraging, and Residency
Patterns for Northern Gulf Loggerheads: Implications of Local Threats and International
Movements. PLos ONE. Vol. 9, Issue 7: 1-20.
11. Hatase Hideo, Sato K, Yamaguchi M, Takahashi K, Tsukamoto K. 2006. Individual
Variation in Feeding Habitat Use by Adult Female Green Sea Turtles (Chelonia mydas):
Are They Obligately Neritic Herbivores? Oecologia. Vol. 149: 52-64.
8.
12.
Hays Craeme, Scott R. 2013. Global pattern for upper ceiling on migration distance in
sea turtles and comparisons with fish, birds and mammals. Functional Ecology. 27: 748756.
13. Heaslip Susan, Iverson S, Bowen W, James M. 2012. Jellyfish Support High Energy
11
15. James Michael, Sherrill-Mix S., Myers R. 2007. Population characteristic and seasonal
migrations of leatherback sea turtles at high latitudes. Marine Ecology Progress Series.
337:245-254.
16. Lazar Bojan, Gracan R, Katic J, Zavodnik, Jaklin A, Tvrtkovic. 2010. Loggerhead Sea
Turtles (Caretta caretta) as Bioturbators in Neritic Habitats: an Insight Through the
Analysis of Benthic Molluscs in the Diet. Blackwell Verlag GmbH. Vol. 32: 65-74
17. Luschi Paolo, Graeme H, Floriano P. 2003. A review of long-distance movements by
marine turtles, and the possible role of ocean currents. OIKOS. 103: 293-302.
18. Mysteruse Atle, Qviller L, Meisingset E, Viljugrein H. 2016. Parasite Load and Seasonal
migration in Red Dear. Oecologia. 180(2):401-407.
19. Parker Denise, Dutton P, Balazs G. 2011. Oceanic Diet and Distribution of Haplotypes
for the Green Turtle, Chelonia mydas, in the Central North Pacific. Pacific Science. Vol
65, No. 4: 419-431
20. Polovina Jeffrey, Balazs G, Howell E, Parker D, Seki M, Dutton P. 2004. Forage and
migration habitat in loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea)
sea turtles in the central North Pacific Ocean. Fisheries Oceanography. 13(1): 36-51.
21. Seminoff Jeffrey, Resendiz A, Nichols W. 2002. Diet of East Pacific Green Turtles
(Chelonia mydas) in the Central Gulf of California, Mexico. Society of Amphibians and
Reptiles. Vol. 36, No. 3: 447-453
22. Seminoff Jefrey, Benson S, Arthur K, Eguchi T, Dutton P, Tapilatu R, Popp B. 2012.
Stable Isotope Tracking of Endangered Sea Turtles: Validation with Satellite Telemetry
and ^15N Analysis of Amino Acids. Plos ONE. 7(5) 1-11.
23. Seney Erin, Musick J. 2007. Historical Diet Analysis of Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta
caretta) in Virginia. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. Vol. 2007,
No. 2: 478-489
24. Shillinger George, Palacios D, Bailey H, Bograd S, Swithenbank A, Gaspar P, Wallace
B, Spotila J, Paladino F, Piedra R, Eckert S, Block B. 2008. Persistent Leatherback
Turtle Migrations Present Opportunities for Conservation. PLoS Biology. 6(7): e171.
25. Whiting S, Long J, Coyne M. 2007. Migration routed and foraging behacior of olive ridley
turtles Lepidochelys olivacea in northern Australia. Endanger
26. Zanden Hannah, Pfaller J, Reich K, Pajuelo M, Bolten A, Williams K, Frick M, Shamblin
B, Nairn C, Bjorndal K. 2013. Foraging Areas Differentially Affect Reproductive Output
and Interpretation of Trends in Abundance of Loggerhead Turtles. Springer-Verlag Berlin
Heidelberg. Vol. 161: 585-598.
12