LOGISTICS CASE

ANALYSIS

BYJUHI
POOJA
PHANI
SATYA
UTKARSH
RAHUL

WHY UNIT II DOESNT CARE ABOUT

THE GOODS?
They might have changed the supplier
They might not have a requirement at this point
They might have forecasted the demand for the consignment
incorrectly
They are averting the claim that VRT is asking

WHY UNIT II HAVE ORDERED

WITHOUT THE REQUIREMENT ?
Incorrect forecast
Decisions would have been made in an hastily manner

WHY UNIT II ORDERED WITHOUT

THE CONCERN ABOUT SPACE
CONSTRAINT?
Some other consignment would have come that would have
occupied space
Incorrect space planning
Predicted sales did not happen

WHY UNIT II DOESNT RESPOND TO

THE LR REMINDER GIVEN BY VRT ?
They did not want the product
They did not have to store the product
Since the LR was given through ordinary post no importance given

WHY KL HAS GIVEN THE LR

TO UNIT II?
KL did not want to store the products themselves hence receiving
the LR from VRT they immediately sent it to Unit II.

WHY KL DOESNT FOLLOW UP THIS

LR?
KL is a third party logistic for the company and the company did not
respond to the LR.
VRT directly contacted Unit II.

WHY VRT DOESNT INFORM TO EITHER

KL OR COMPANY TRANSPORT DIVISION ?
Different priorities
Negligence

WHY VRT HAD SENT ONLY REMINDER

ABOUT 2 BUNDLES? (THEY
SUPPOSED TO SEND FOR 3 BUNDLES)
Some damage or extremities
Did not receive from the supplier

WHAT DO U DO IF U R THE
LOGISTICS MANAGER ?
Negotiation
This is what VRT is asking-

WHAT WE PROPOSE!
1. Storage to be paid for 11 months
2. Compensation only for 2 bundles