0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
7 visualizzazioni1 pagina
Transactional communication means that when you are communicating you are technically making a "transaction" the receiver had a hard time listening to the recorded message and then had to replay it back and take notes. The sender and the receiver could improve by giving each other feedback.
Transactional communication means that when you are communicating you are technically making a "transaction" the receiver had a hard time listening to the recorded message and then had to replay it back and take notes. The sender and the receiver could improve by giving each other feedback.
Transactional communication means that when you are communicating you are technically making a "transaction" the receiver had a hard time listening to the recorded message and then had to replay it back and take notes. The sender and the receiver could improve by giving each other feedback.
While doing clinical rotations at the hospital, we would record a report regarding our patients just before we left duty. When the next RN would come on, they would play the recording. We would record information such as their current status, level of consciousness, what medications were given and which ones are due. It would get confusing to me at times while listening to the recordings. I found it helpful to listen to the entire message first, and then listen to it again while taking notes. I would also pause the recording if I needed extra time. It was very helpful when the previous nurse didnt ramble, and was able to talk about one patient at a time. Transactional communication means that when you are communicating you are technically making a "transaction". You are making a transaction in the fact that you have to have a sender and a receiver(page 9 in text). You have to have two people involved and it is unavoidable and strategic. You are communicating back and forth and sending signals to encode and decode.. The perceived meaning of the encoder and the decoder in this case study seems to not be relevant as there were no details in this case study about the specifics that were talked about in this recording. The channel that this information was given in this transaction did not seem to work for both the sender and the receiver. The receiver had a hard time listening to the recorded message and then had to replay it back and take notes. The receiver also had feedback about the noise involved. The receiver found it easier when the sender did not ramble and talked about one patient at a time. The two people involved in this "transaction" could improve by giving each other feedback. They could listen to how the other bests decodes this information, i.e. writing it down, and try to use that channel of communication to best improve their shared understanding of the information that was given about each patient.