*7,95
GeTeNce : | Y
ey
Mh
ISIS
Reshaping
: ro 7 Shipbuilding
¢ Tere LE)
Global Airlift
10 C-17 Globemasters?
attlefield Helos
on upward operational pathTHE COMMERCIAL MARITIME AND NAVAL DEFENCE SHOWCASE
FOR AUSTRALIA, ASIA AND THE INDO-PACIFIC‘managing editor John Armstrong
‘business development David Teitzel
creative Michelle Burt
‘contributing authors Nigel Pittaxay
Peter Layton
advertising enquiries +61 (0) 73282 9019
DefenceTODAY « vol 11 no 3 . JUNE 2015
published by Stike Publications Pry Ltd
PO Box 124 Ipswich 4305 Queensland Australia
telephone: +61 (0)7 32829019
facsimile: +61 (0)? 38123233,
‘email: editor@stiikepublications.com.au
internet: wwwdefence-today.comau.
Publications
‘ABN 41 010 922335,
rin Past 190004407
ISSN 1447-0446
FROM THE EDITOR
This edition of DefenceToday concentrates on Land Force
‘apabiliy, including the need to combat ISIS forces. While
Australia's contribution at present is essentially alr power, the
‘need eventually will be land force operations.
Dr Peter Layton examines the war on ISIS on two fronts in rag,
the USed coalition is conducting ae strikes against ISIS from
the countrys north and west; and in Syria, a messy civil war,
‘The moder combat soldier is expected to cary more and more
equipment and weaponry, wich can slow mobility and fighting
effectiveness. Nigel Pittavay looks at the use of solar power to
‘charge batters and exoskeletons to enable soldiers to transfor
load to the ground and provide increased strength and mobility
‘The Australian Army's Tiger Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter
and MIRH90 battlefield helicopter have not met expectations in
terms of availablity for operations and lying haut targets. Nigel
Pittaway examines the outcomes of remediation programs that
ate bringing the rotary wing types back on track.
Austala's Air Warfare Destroyer program has been fraught with
delays and cost averuns, leading many to question whether
‘usttala should indeed be in the shipbuilding industry. Peter
Layton describes how 2 relatively small national industry is
reshaping to obtain ongoing work for future programs
“The delivery ofthe first two CH-47F Chinook helicopters to the
Australian Army some months ago has brought an updated
‘apablity to Land Force operations. Nigel Pittawey looks at the
enhancements of this new type and how ifits with the Army’s
battlefield strategies.
Australia’s C-17A Globemaster II atifters have served with
distinction since the fist four aircraft entered service in 2006.
Operations into the Middle East and increased humanitarian
missions led t0 orders for two more and, more recency, an
‘order for anather two. Nigel Pitaway looks at the impressive
‘apabllites of the C-7 and why the fleet could become 10.
The $10 billion LAND 400 program to replace the Army's
armoured vehicies has industry wondering what Defence really
‘wants, Nigel Pitaway examines the industy quandary.
John Armstrong
‘Managing tor
CONTENTS
‘AustalanFA-184 Hares ooo
‘ares mth lt ateroon ag the
kes oer ag Tesi’ ones
replaced ine PA 1 Siper Horne
aspartate contin at operations
‘age 15 orcas as pata param
oxna,
(Oorenca)
FEATURE REPORT,
2 AUSTRALIA WAR AGAINST ISIS FORCES IN IRAQ
Continuing operations against SI’ gains across Iraq and Syria
9 SOLAR-POWERED SOLDIERS AND EXOSKELETONS
Enabling soldiers to carry less weight and! transfer load off their backs
Peter Layton, Canberra
10 BATTLEFIELD HELICOPTERS ON UPWARD OPERATIONAL PATH
[MIRH9D Taipan an Tiger ARH coming our of remediation programs
“Nigel Pitaway, Melbourne
16 RESHAPING AUSTRALIA'S WARSHIP & SUBMARINE INDUSTRY
CCan Australia sustain shipbuilding industry in three States
Peter Layton, Canberra
20 ARIMY'S ROTARY WING CAPABILITY ENHANCED WITH CH-47F
Sth Aviation Regiment takes devery of fist Chinook’ models
“Nigel Pitaway, Melbourne
24 STRATEGIC AIRLIFT GROWTH TO MEET FUTURE TASKING
Fleet of -17A Globemaster Il aicraft may increase to 10 airframes
Nigel Pitaviay, Melbourne
28. DEFENCE CONFUSES LAND 400 PRIME CONTRACTORS
(Questions about $10 billion program to replace armoured fleet
Nigel Pitaway, Melbourne2
NICEr
Australia’s war against
ISIS forces in Iraq
Peter Layton
‘an FA-1BF Super Homa propares to ret om a United States Force KO-104tankor aca mi
(erence)
The war against the Islamic State of
Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) continues.
Over the past year, the group has
captured substantial territory across
Iraq and Syria, creating a self-declared
caliphate titled ‘The Islamic State
ISIS leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, now
rules over some six milion people. In
recent times no other armed non-state
‘group has bean as successful. There
are two separate wars being waged
against ISS. In Syria, the remnants of
the national armed forces are allied
with Lebanon's Hezbollah infighting a
no-holds barred war against ISIS and
several other insurgency groups.
(amo ot res on ne move ag
today
Intrag, the elected iraqi govemment assisted
by ran and a US-led coalition are trying to
eject ISIS from the country’s north and west.
Syria Isa confused and messy clvil war but
Iraq is subtly different, being seemingly a war
to repel an armed intervention from across
the Syrian border. It is in raq that Western
nations feel most compelled to assist, partly
because of lraq’s recent history but also
because the ISIS threat here Is more clearcut
Accordingly, itis in Iraq that Australia finds
Itself engaged in is latest war.
The ISIS Foe
‘The origins of ISIS can be traced back to Abu
Mus'ab al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian of the Sunni
branch ofthe Islamic faith. Al-Zarqavi joined
al-Qaeda while fighting in the Afghanistan
War and on return to Jordan formed
terrorist group intent on overthrowing its
tre sn sts rer Fag,
government. With the 2003 US-led invasion
of faq, al-Zarqawi transformed his group
into al-Qaeda in Iraq and focused on inciting
sectarian violence, frequently attacking
minority Shia Muslim mosques and religious
gatherings. The group steadily developed
2 reputation - that ISIS continues - for well
‘organised, muktple suicide attacks, the use of
foreign fighters and well publicised brutality,
which includes beheadings
In response, the US adopted a new approach:
the use of special operations forces that
closely integrate intelligence and operations
in an “industrial strength” campaign (see the
December 2013 Defence Today)
This campaign commanded by General
Stanley McChrystal proved highly successful
with Al-Zargawi being killed in a US Air
Force air stike in 2006, The group only
just survived, becoming Inactive until thePe Re
— cn —
Sime Eun)
Sy
OC adeparture of US forces from Iraq, then in 2013
‘changing its name to ISS.
ISIS today is much more than a ramshackle
terrorist group, as it began, and as are most
similar groups. Itis now a highiy regimented
‘organization with a centralized command
and control system. Skiled, central planners
devise long-term campaigns that are then
implemented in a decentralised manner
by experienced regional commanders
responding to the local conditions. This
focus on organisation means that ISIS has
been able to achieve astonishing results
using comparatively small armed forces. in
late 2014, General James Austin, Commander
US Central Command, estimated that the
group probably only had some 9,000.
17,000 committed front-line combat fighters
‘operating in rag
ISIS typically uses 2 methodical approach to
achieve tactical success. Initially, IIS covert
‘operators enter an areato determine the local
tea, political, social and security structure,
Those Identified as important local leaders
and experienced security personnel are then
assassinated, subverted or forced to flee after
threats to their families. Others who may be
supportive of the government are noted, for
retribution later when ISIS takes conte.
Having prepared the battlefield, the group
then employs well-coordinated car bomb
land suicide attacks to panic the defenders
who are by new operating within a badly
weakened command and leadership
structure, These attacks can inelude swvaems
cof semi-armoured vehicies driven by suicide
bomibers able to precisely target government
strong-points, Closely timed with these
attacks, a mass infantry assaults then usually
undertaken aiming to quickly overwhelm
the defenders through shock action. ISIS,
however occasionally now also uses captured
Iraqi tanks, armoured vehicles and artillery
in combined arms actions. ISIS's tactics
are highly effective and in sowing fear and
panic amongst the defending forces have
_AnAstralin 0-17 Globemaster tuches down tT
awe fo resupgysors deploy wi ke ria
and feconstcton sk Farce-Mao (ITZ). (Defence)
allowed the group to capture large areas with
relatively little fighting.
Having taken an area, the focus shifts to
religious administration matters and quietly
eliminating any opposition. In this phase ISIS
exploits deep grievances among the Sunni
‘population to gain support for its agenda. In
Iraq, many Sunnis consider the government
oth discriminates against them and
represents a threat through its use of armed
Shia militias. As thele control deepens, ISIS
begins to actively drive out those who do not
wish to embrace its ideas. Nor-Muslims and
heretics are initial warned to leave, then
strategically targeted with steadily escalating
violence including large-scale kidnapping,
murder sprees and car bombings that
Intensify over several weeks. ISIS also cuts off
‘water and power supplies to such groups to
further encourage their departure.
‘A major feature of ISIS has been Its highly
successful mobilization of foreign supporters
to travel to Iraq to Join it. These foreign
fighters are effectively acting as 2 strategic
reserve, allowing the group to continuously
replenish its ranks with fresh, wel- motivated
volunteers. The raqi Prime Minister recently
estimated some 58 per cent of ISIS's fighters
= now about 14,000 across both lraq and
Plot af a RAAF KO-304 Mult al Tank anspor postions foto frst hookup via be Aaa Realng Boom
Sjsem on another KC-304 area (Derenre
today
-PAISE Super Home arew wai io el area for
another combat mission oer ay, (etece)
6 Initially, ISIS covert operators
enter an area to determine
the local tribal, political,
social and security structure.
Those identified as important
local leaders and experienced
security personnel are ther
assassinated, subverted or
forced to flee after threats
to their families. Others
who may be supportive
of the government a
noted, for retribution later
when ISIS takes control. 9
AEA Hore pit on combat ak pat
(Getence)
over an.SUPERIOR AIR POWER
SaaS oe
Australia's military pilots answer the call for any mission, no matter how
CCW aCe eeu cu ae tcu
PGs usa uke Renu ct Cunard
Australia. Team 21—the right choice for training, to enable Australia’s air
Past ACU Rua
www.lockheedmartin.com/team21
La‘usozlan ara assgred fe A Task Grou deploy tol Mad A Base the UAE Ry Trmatln:KC-50A Mute Tanke Transpo, ee F/-10F
Super Hares and an E74 Weal Arbrme Early Waring & Canara (Defence)
Sytia ~ are foreigners. Some 70 per cent are
from the Middle East but there are also some
hundreds of British, French, Belgian, Dutch,
and Australlan nationals,
ISIS has also proved adept at using social
media to direct its global followers. In late
2014 ISIS spokesman, Abu. Mohammad
alAdnani, urged these followers to
attack citizens of member countries of
the Intemational coalition opposing ISIS
‘wherever they were and by whatever means
possible. Senator Mike Roger, chairman of
the US House Permanent Select Committee
fon Intelligence observed that the ISIS
message to Its supporters Is, “ We want you
to randomly kidnap people off the street,
behead them, videotape it, send it to use
for further propaganda” ISIS foreign fighter
Abu Salman al-Faranci says the intent is to
“terrorise...and...not allow [those in their
home countries] to sleep due to fear and
horror.”
Australia's Three-Front War
ISIS has taken the strategies and tactics used
by earlier terrorist groups and developed
them further. The group now represents a
threat to states like Australia across three
‘domains: the local, the international and the
Global. A state must now act to prevent
ISIS supporters attacking it and providing
material suppor, including sending fighters
to the ragl warzone. Second, states must also
‘extend this concern ta other countries across
the globe where attacks on their interests
may occur or material support for ISIS
may be provided from. Third, to ultimately
defeat ISIS, countrles must now deploy thelt
armed forces into the Middle East to directly
confront it ISIS may not pose as large-scale
dofenoot
threat as a hostile nation but it does pose a
complex one,
For Australia the domestic challenge has
been especialy vexing. There has been
sharp ramping up of domestic security
in the face of threats of ISIS sympathisers
undertaking terrorist actions here. The
dangers wete graphically demonstrated in
the Lindt cafe terrorist siege that killed three
Including the ISIS-inspired perpetrator, Man
Haron Monis. While Austalla previously
was concemed about domestic terrorism
{emanating from the Al-Qaeda group, the SIS-
inspired domestic threat is of much greater
magnitude, sophistication and effectiveness.
In response, the Australian government has
taken a number of measures.
The 2015 budget includes
an additional AS1.2bn_ for
strengthening counter
terrorist activities. The
capabilities of the Australian
domestic security agencies
including the Australian
Federal Police are being
improved, and several
agencies expanded. New
laws on meta-data retention
have been passed requiring
Intemet and mobile phone
providers to keep electronic
fecords of customer's use
of thelr telecommunication
services for two years. Travel
restrictions have been placed
fon Australians travelling to
Iraq and those who have been
ISIS fighters now face arrest
if they return, Lastly, a new
senior overarching counter
terrorism position has been established
to coordinate across all departments and
agencies
Inthe second domain of international action,
‘Australia has been active In international
forums, focusing on stopping the flow of
money and foreign fighters to 1515. In late
2014 Australia, while still part of the UN
Security Council, successfully pushed for
UN Resolution 2178 that sought to stem
foreign terrorist fighters and thelr financing
In early June at the 22-nation Paris Summit
the Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, advocated
international action to further impede ISIS
finances and prevent its influence spreading
In mid-June, a large regional Countering
Font view ofthe E-7A WedgtaArtome Ear Waring & Cott aca
‘swing the Mult Aol Evetonicaly Scanned Araya antenna
(erence)Violent Extremism summit was. he been involved in these tasks since 2003 and October and conducting thelr fest airstrikes
sydney, Involving some 30 nations and is the ADF unit with the longest continuing tober. The Group operates six strike
focusing on preventing ISIS exploiting the presence in the Middle East fi, an ETA Wedgetall
Intermet to recrurt foreign fighters. Operation Okra comprises three elements: Warning & Control aircraft and a K
In the thied domain of fighting ISIS on its Air Task Group (ATG), the Special Operations Multi Role Tanker Transport aircraft. The
home territory, Australia is now deeply Task Group and Task Group Taji. The ATG strike alcrat v six F/A-IBF Super
through two interlocking ADF dep ctober 2014, flying their Hoznets from 1 Squadron at RAAF Amberley
‘operations. Operation Okra concerns combat _ fist armed combat missions over Ira
‘operations against ISIS forces and has some
F personne involved. Operation
Accordion provides logistic support to
‘Okra and involves some 400 ADF personne!
conducting multiple activities including
ng ADF air transport operations to,
from and within the Middle East
In this, the RAAF component of Operation
Accordion, the Combat Support Unit, has
se Deore a combat mise ag Tio fly set FATA Homes on combat pat ve ag pul aay ater retucngom 2 RARE KY
in kag (Defence) (Osten)
Ho Ae UU BRL
TH er SUT
1 PHOTONIE se.
&
WHITE LIGHT TOLERANT
Ug
ee
eo rs)
eer
eee
Operations in highly dynamic light conditions
Rt eee at
O
ane a)DefenceAustralia
‘A Royal Force G4 Tama oar he Mate East Aga ater ia arming
‘om &KC-30A Muto Tanker anspor. ‘Detence)
‘dass’ Homets from 75 Squadron at RAAF
Willamtown in late March 2015.
During their almost seven months of
continuous combat air operations, the Super
Hometsflew more than3300aircombat hours,
This was a remarkable accomplishment from
Just she aircraft, being more than the annual
flying rate of a home-based Super Hornet
squadron with 12 aircraft, Also remarkable
‘was the maintenance effort, which saw no
sortieslost due to unserviceability. In their 416
‘combat missions, the Super Hornets dropped
some 268 guided weapons. Appraising the air
ceffor, the ATG Commander Air Commodore
Braz observed that: ‘When the ATG arrived in
theatre, [SIS were on the march throughout
Iraq and were brazenly terrorising the lragi
population. Thanks to the air strikes, IIS
no longer feels able to move openly on the
roads, nor are they able to mass troops as
they did before
The six ‘classic’ Homets deployed to the
Middle East early March then undertook
familiarization training before formally taking
lover strike operations on 27 March. By the
fend of May they about 1100 hours were
flown in some 146 sorties that dropped 84
‘guided bombs.
The Super Homet and Homet sorties range
deep into northern and western Iraq in thelr
attacks on ISIS held areas, This involves
transits both ways of more than 1700kms
making air-to-air refuelling from either the
ATG's own KC-30A tanker or other coalition
tankers essential on every mission. In this rae,
the KC-30A has been particularly busy fying
about 35 sorties a month for an average of
vera. (Detence)
about 250 hours monthly. So far the KC-30A
has only been using Its probe and drogue
refuelling system but, with recent successful
trails at RAAF Amberley, the boom system
«will shortly be certified for use with the ATG's
Wedgetal airerat.
The ATG's Wedgetall aircraft was intially
fiying about 15 missions a month but since
February this has reduced to about 9 missions
each month. These can be long missions
though, including two of some 16 hours that
requied air-to-air refuelling by USAF KC-135,
taker altcraft, The Wedgetall's combat
support flights have involved controlling up
+0 80 aitcrafta mission and allowed the RAAF
to declare the aircraft fully operationally
capable.
The initial ground deployments into Iraq
Involved the Special Operations Task Group
(SOTG) that from late 2014 has focused on
providing military advice and assistance to
the CounterTerrorism Service of the Iraqi
Security Forces. This involves training Iraqis
in urban combat, close quarter battle skills,
countering improvised explosive devices,
counter-sniping, medical skills and counter
terrorism operations planning. Some 200
personnel are currently assigned to the SOTG,
expected to draw down fromlater this year.
The third element of Okra, Task Group Tal (TS
Taji) is @ combined Australian-New Zealand
‘raining force deployed for at least two years
to the Taji Military Complex northwest of
Baghdad. TG Taji became fully operational
in May and is involved in training Iraqi Army
personnel rom the individual soldier through
to the brigade level as part of the larger
Building Partner Capacity
international training
mission. The Task Group
Consists of some 300 ADF
personnel drawn mainly
from the Brisbane-based
7th Brigade and about
110 New Zealand Defence
Force personnel. TG Taji
‘comprises a mix of trainers,
force protection, support
= and command elements,
TG Taj faces a number of
‘A Fant Ar oo Rat C completes rating am a RAAF KE: 0A MTT aeatt
challenges. The Iraqi Army has at times
performed poorly on the battlefield with
some smal ISIS elements defeating much
larger and better-equipped lragi Army units
This has lead some to argue that the TC's
soldiers should accompany Iraqi forces into
battle to provide not only advice but also to
direct coalition close air support air strikes
when necessary. This would be a similar
approach to that Special Forces used in
assisting Afghan forces to defeat the Taliban
in2001
‘Complicating matters is that the kind of new
Iraqi Army that the international effort wishes
to build is a more inclusive one that includes
both Shias and Sunnis. This is to overcome
the fears held by many Sunnis In ISIS held
towns that the lragi Army is Shia dominated
‘and may wage a sectarian conflict against
them if it recaptures these areas. This task
is made more difficult given iran is backing
Shia militia groups, equipping them and
providing Special Force advisers. Lasty, there
Isa real danger of insider attacks, and not just
from ISIS supporters. US Brigadier General
Kurt Ciytzer recently noted concems about
Iranian-fuelled rumours that coalition forces
are secretly helping ISIS. These rumours led
to American helicopters eing shot at by
the lraai Army and may encourage insider
attacks
ISIS is proving a hard enemy to defeat
and this means that Operation Okra is
likely to continue for several more years.
The Australian government is envisaging
forces will be deployed for the next five
years at least. Already the RAAF is planning
to replace the Homet aircraft currently in
theatre with another six Super Hornet aircraft,
probably in August, and then continuing
with @ Hoxnet/ Super Homet rotation cycle
indefinitely after that, Accompanying this
there may be further a further expansion of
Australia's domestic security agencies and
ew antliSIS laws along with an additional
push internationally to contain ISIS and limit
Its influence. Australia's war against ISIS is
proving dificult, compiex and protracted.
DrPeter Layton isa Visiting Felow at the Grit
Asia Institute, Grifth University.
‘An Austra str ote combined Australian and Now Zeke Tsk Group Tarsus
‘ag sors te ne Ta Mtary Camper nartnnest f Baghdad, oq (etence)Solar-powered soldiers
and exoskeletons
Today's combat infantryman is required
to carry body armour, a pack, load
carriage webbing, radios’ batteries,
and weapons, so it's no surprise that
the average weight of a fully-equipped
‘Digger’ is in the vicinity of 150 ko.
The Soldier Intearated Power Systean (SIPS)
aims to reduce the number of batteries,
fang thetefore the weight bom by the
combat infantiyman, SIPS is developed
by" Tectonica Australia in partnership
wth ‘the Commonwealth ‘Scientific. and
Industri Research Organisation (CSIRO)
and the Australian National Universty (ANU)
tinder DSTO's Capability and. Technology
Demonstrator (TD) programme,
The second. innovation is a_ relatively
inexpensive passive non sig exoskeleton
(oR) being developed by DSTO to wansfer
much ofthe weight of a sodier® backpack
Givecty ‘0 the ground rather than via his
knees or ankles.
The Solar-Powered Soldier
The Capability Technology Demonstrator
(CTD) programme, managed by DSTO, is @
collaborative activity between Defence and
industry where ideas can be funded for
further development. The Soldier Integrated
Power System completed its CTD phase in
September last year and Is now ready to be
taken to market by industry.
Tectonica, in collaboration with the CSIRO
and ANU entered the CTD programme with
SIPS in August 2071, when it was awarded
funding to develop and demonstrate an
Integrated power system which improved
soldiers’ mobility and endurance
SIPS utilises flexible and lightweight ‘Siver
solar cells attached to the load-carrying
webbing on the torso of the solder. The cells
are used with mobile electronic devices and
canalso be mounted on every-day items such
a5 a mobile phone case.
The system also incorporates a Tectonica
ower management system to power
equipment such as personal and section
radios, helmet-mounted night vision
equipment and weapons thermal sights
cattied by asoldier. Trower usage and power
levels remaining are monitored, and power
can be distributed throughout a section of.
soldiers via a USB-ike cable, which allows
soldiers to plug into the SIPS of a colleague
If required,
‘The system integrates with the soldier's lead
cartiage webbing using conductive pathways
‘through the fabric developed by the CSIRO
and called Etextile.
Testing by soldiers at Edinburgh Barracks in
South Austalla, included patrols of up to 72
hhouts’ duration. The testing also revealed
no detectable thermal or electromagnetic
radiation signature.
NoREx ~ sharing the load
The NonRigid Exoskeleton (NoREX), or
‘Flexoskeleton’ uses a system of Bowden
‘push-pull cables to transfer the weight of
2 combat soldier's backpack to the ground.
Developed in-house by DSTO, the flexible
Bowden cables connects the soldier's
backpack via his load-cariage webbing to a
specially designed avershoe, which transfers
2 large portion of the weight to the ground,
‘The cables are attached to the soldiers legs
by Velcro tape and the entire system can be
removed in approximately ve seconds.
There have been exoskeletons developed
and tested overseas, but the majority are
rigid and powered which, according to DSTO
are complex, dificult to use and also increase
the wearer's power requirements
DSTO claims that NoREx eliminates many of
the problems ascoclated with the powered
exoskeletons because it matches and mimics
a user's anthropometry and their multi-
dimensional movements
The 'lexoskeleton’ transfers more than sixty
pet cent of the weight of a soldiers backpack
to the ground. For a SOkg pack the burden
cattied by the soldier is only 15 ko.
The NOREX unit i stil a concept technology
demonstrator but it has already been tested
at weights of up to 32 kg. DSTO has a patent
pending on the system and Is looking to
Sponsor further development work, with a
view to the production ofa working prototype
DSTO says that commercial opportunities
in the Australian and intemational defence
‘Nigel Pittaway, Melbourne
plus civilian leisure industries will be offered
to ‘the right commercial partner. Concept
discussions with industry have already
‘occurred and DSTO says the system could be
in commercial production in afew years.
With an estimated cost per unit of between
52000 and $3000 region, the NoREx could
provide a very costeffective means of
reducing fatigue and injury to. Australia's
combat soldiens,
DSTO Partnerships
‘The Soldier Integrated Power System and
NoREx were just two of the developments
fon display at DSTO's facility in Edinburgh,
during Partnership Week. The event will
‘most probably become a regular event and
Is designed to foster closer ties with Industry
and academia as part of DSTOs Outreach
iniative.
“Strategic alliances are the way forward
in developing Australia's future, cutting
edge technologies. Partnerships Week ill
establish new discussions, as well as continue
existing ones,” said Chief Defence Scientist
Dr Alex Zelinsky. Partnerships, collaboration
and innovation are the comerstones of the
capabilities we want to achieve for defence
and national securlty.”
Above: Aa Austin oor wear Nts, Aghneight
‘her soar ces ons webaing, o charge bates
Bolo: on Agi esto, or Fok’
‘Mantes ns ote ground, eoveing welt caredDefenceAustralia
Battlefield helicopters on
upward operational path
Tigerai 38-007 pertomang 3 etson os Courter Measure Dispensing Stem 3 tbe Fort akefed proving grund.(Deence)
Nigel Pitaway, Melbourne
Despite a difficult operational
development phase, the Australian
Army's Tiger Armed Reconnaissance
Helicopter (ARH) and MRH 90 Taipan
Muiti-Role Helicopter (MH) are now
coming out of remadiation programmes.
put in place by the Commonwealth and
industry
The Taipan, also operated in the maritime
supporthelicopterrole by the Royal Australian
Navy, has experienced similar issues.
Both helicopter types are expected to achieve
a number of significant milestones over the
next twelve months or so, as sustainmentand
reliability problems (both helicopters) and
technical issues (Taipan) continue to require
remediation.
Senior Defence officials now consider both
helicopters to be on an upwards trajectory
towards operational goals. However, this
has taken an inordinate amount of time,
Considering thatthe Tiger has been in service
In Austalia for more than 10 years and the
10 dofencetoday
Talpan since December 2007,
‘The Tiger is expected to achieve its Final
Operational Capability (FOC) milestone
carly next year, and there are operational
milestones in the pipeline for both Army and
Navy's Talpans.
Tiger Rate of Effort
In the 2013-14 financial year, the Army's
fleet of 22 Tigers had only achieved 3000
flying hours, just half the mature Rate of
Effort required. Such was the evel af concern,
doubts were voicedlin Canberra over thelong-
term viability of the armed reconnaissance
rotary-wing capability
With Tiger Capability Assurance Programme
(CAP) upgrade planned in the next decade,
this poor operational performance required
urgent remedial action if the project was to
.go ahead in any form.
Although there were several factors
contributing to the poor Rate of Effort,
fone major concern related to sustainment
arrangements for the helicopter, such
{as the length of time taken for repairable
‘components to be returned from Europe after
‘overhaul. In some cases components took
more than a year to re-enter Army's supply
system; together with other sustainment
shortcomings this logistics delay significantly
contributed to the cost of ownership of Tiger.
By mid-2014 this cost of ownership had
hecome unacceptable, and was well in
‘excess of the comparable cost for other ADF
helicopters, including the Army/s Black Hawk
(ue 00 Tapa rom a Sh Aiaton Rogan depart
‘an arstip wth solders rm st ata, Te Royal
‘Austral Raginent(TRAR) n oar. (ence)PNM eaten Uf
you need
Warltime Surveillance Compact HF DF
G&SARIGMTI Payload —COMINT System
WHEN RESULTS HATTERArea Resear and Development Unt cles ou £2660 Heine Acceptance Tsung fr Amea ecomatssanceHelcaper (49 Tie at Womere.(etence)
‘and Chinook types along with the Naw’s
Seahaviks. By way of example, senior Defence
officials identified the Tiger's Turbomeca MTR.
390 engine as having the highest cost of any
helicopter engine in the ADF.
Remediating the Tiger
Reacting to the Commoniveaktn’s concerns,
Airbus Group Australia Pacific (formeriy
‘Australian Aerospace) and Airbus Helicopters
(formerly Eurocopter) and their suppliers last
year formed a Tiger Task Force’ tolnvestigate
‘hays of temedlating the supply chain sues,
tn adaltton, the Commonwealth and) AGAP
signed a Viebilly Review Deed of Agreement
(VR Deca) last December, aimed at cepping
the cost of ownership and, over time,
oubling the Rate of Effort
With the costs capped and the fying rate
doubled, the cost of ownership is then
effectively halves, bringing the Tiger ARH
12 dofencat
‘An SO tale red helper nds oe deck oF pag ig as (erence
Into line with other ADF helicopters.
The VR Deed is based upon a similar
agreement to remediate the Taipan a couple
of years ago and sees AGAP remunerated for
the number of hours flown by the Tiger.
The goal is to incrementally increase fying
to around 4000 hours by the end of this
financial year, and then further increase it by
another thousand over each of the next two
years until I the 2016-17 financial year, the
full 6900 hour Rate of Effort is expected to he
achieved,
“We're seeing the Rate of Effort getting better
every day; the new contractual arrangements
have been in place since the beginning of
this year and it's on an upward trajectory,”
said Brigadier Andrew Mathewson, DMO's
Director General Army Aviation Systems. We
want to see the Rate of Effort continue to
Improve over the next year and 3 half before
we declare victory though,
"But the signs are very positive and the level
of engagement we are getting from industry,
both AGAP here in Australia and their parent
Abus Helicopters in France has been quite
remarkable”
With the spares availability problem now on
the way towards resolution, attention now
‘tums towards remediation of reliability issues
‘and, beyond that, maintainability in the harsh
Norther Territory climate,
BRIG Mathewson said that Army Is now
working with AGAP to open a third Tiger
deeper maintenance line in Darwin, which
‘would allow some work currently performed.
by uniformed personnel to be undertaken
by the civilan workforce. The company
presently has two lines in operation.
“it will also expose our soldiers to those
deeper level technical experiences by
working with the civilian team,” he said
“ivs one way of remediating the next step,
‘Tiger ARH berg te own antoard a C-17A eran.ADCU Defence
home loans.
Not like ordinary home loans.
You don't have an ordinary life. And when it comes,
to buying a home, you're no ordinary purchaser
home loans provide special features that are
commitments. Find out more
ADCU DH
tailored to sui
from a Mobile
life a
janker today
adcu.com.au | 1300 23 46 27
Defence‘Solr Rom 13 tan, To Royal usatan
‘egient (AE) beara rt 90 aan aca ram
‘tho 5 Ataton Pegi abe canon ofa
Detence exercise. ‘Detence)
Many of the technical
challenges have been
overcome but others remain,
which may affect the timetable
looking forward. One is the
testing of the Electronic
Warfare Self Protection
(EWSP) system on both
helicopters, which has proven
more challenging than hoped.
9
because once we have all the parts and
reliability Issues solved we know that we
need to have a maintenance system that
works more effectively up in Darwin
Final Operational Capability
Brigadier Mathewson said the major
milestone for Tiger was the declaration of
Final Operational Capability (FOC), which is
expected to occur early next year.
“The Army capacity in Darwin is growing
and they have now stood up No 162
Reconnaissance Squadron, which Is the
second squadron within the Ist Aviation
Regiment based at Robertson Barracks,” he
noted.
“They remain on track at this point in time
t0 go to their FOC milestone early next year,
which is represented by bath squadrons
being declared fully operational in Darwin”
Interim Tactical Datalink
In operational service the Tiger ARH is
considered by Army to be a formidable
weapons system but its Achilles Heel is
arguably that in Its original configuration
It cannot share information with other
networks, including the Army's Battlefield
Management System (BMS) being rolled out
through a group of projects known as Land,
200,
Land 200 is made up of elements of Land
Projects 75,125 and 2072, aimed at digitising
the modem Army. Eibitis the prime for the
installation of the BMS in Army's fleet of
‘ground vehicles.
Although Tiger was delivered with the
Eurogrid datalink system, wich is effective
for sharing data between Tigers and between
Tiger and its ground station, ie cannot ‘plug
into the Land 200 BMS,
To remedy this shortcoming an interim
Tactical Data Link (TDL) which introduces a
new Enhanced Position Location Reporting
System (EPLRS) radio, GPS and a cockpit
mounted tablet will shortly be trialled under
‘operational conditions
Funded by Joint Project 2089 Phase 36,
21 of the 22 aircraft are being modified
under a co-operative agreement. between
the Army, OMO, AGAP and Elbit (one Tiger
being permanently fitted with fight test
instrumentation and will not be modified to
support ITDL. The frst four MDL aircraft are
‘due to be trialled in 2 multiple helicopter
scenario during Exercise Hare in July
‘An 24.90 Heleoperon te ft deck of HALAS Choues or acasvay evacuadon exercise during Eerie Sea Davm 2074 (Defence)
14 dofencatoday“The tablet is mounted in the cockpit but
the MDL is a stand-alone system and not
Integrated into the alrcraft system,” BRIG
Mathewson sai.
“it's a really neat programme that
demonstrates we can get the industry
elements working together to produce an
‘outcome that Army requires.”
A flly integrated TDL vill be considered by
the Tiger CAP programme
MRH 90 Milestones
The MRH 90 Taipan battieReld helicopter is
2 less mature platform than Tiger, and there
hhas been the added distraction of a number
‘of technical isues to resolve, some of which
are ongoing today.
However, this helicopter too has required
remediation agreements between the
Commonwealth and AGAP and last year
recorded a 44 per cent increase in its Rate of
Effort across Army and Navy.
“We still have challenges, and the MAH story
isa bit ofa journey," BRIG Mathewson said
‘We're sll discovering some issues with the
product, which will take some time to resolve,
but we are working through them at the
moment and it's all part of remediating an
Immature design, But its making very good
progress and i's worth noting that we in
‘Australia employ this helicopter in a multiple
array of uses, arguably more than any other
nation, so we are stretching the envelope in
every direction.
Recent milestones have included the
declaration of an inital maritime capability
(Operational Capability Maritime 1) by Navy in
February, representing the ability ofa single
flight to operate in a permissive environment.
The expansion of ths into more challenging
environments will occur under OCM2 and
(OCM3 aver the next 18 months. First of
Class flight trials aboard HMAS Canberra, the
Navy's first LHD have also begun ane loading
trials aboard an RAAF C-17A, validating the
strategic transportability of Taipan, have
been carried out.
From an Army perspective, the first
Operational Capability Amphibious (OCA
4) milestone was declared in December
‘An MR 0 Hecate beng ioaced oni a RAK C-
last year and will be followed by the first
Operational Capability Land (OCL1, a platoon
lift capability) milestone inthe July timeframe
with OCA2, which is further workin relation
‘to the LHO.
‘The Sth Aviation Regiment at Townsville
has now tetired the Black Hawk and they
really have adapted to the MRH 90. The MAH
is particularly suited to the operations they
Undertake up there,’ BRIG Mathewson sai.
“The Rate of Effortin 5 Aviation Regiment has
really taken off and they've done really well.
Certainly from a pilot’s perspective they are
very happy with the alrcraf.”
Technical Challenges
Many of the technical challenges have been
overcome but others remain, which may
affect the timetable looking forward. One
Is the testing of the Electronic Warfare Self
Protection EWSP) system on both helicopter
which has proven more challenging than
hoped.
The plan is to have that in place by the
tend of the year, in time for Tiger FOC,” BRIG
Mathewson sald. “Then we hape to leverage
the information we have derived into the
MRH space.”
mY
7A lobrastes Wt aera curing ts. Deence)
‘staf Army Tiger ARH pense Se potion coumtermasires(Deenc)
Another challenge is the current design of
the cargo hook, which restricts Navy's use of
a rigid strop for an underslung load. Because
the hook is integrated with the aircraft
software it can determine the weight of
the load on the hook when itis lifted off the
‘ground for example, this i nota simple fh
‘The Commonwealth is in contract with AGAP
to modify the hook, and it is expected that
the solution will commence being rolled out
across the fleet in about 18 months'time,
One issue being remediated at present
Which arguably isn't a technical deficiency of
the design, Is the replacement of the cabin
seats with wider units, to seat an infantryman
in full combat gear.
The size and weight of the modem combat
soldier has grown over the years, and the
seats as originally designed are no longer
Wide enough. This s an issue facing transport
helicopters and fixed wing aircraft worldwide.
The new, wider, seats will limit the number
cof combat soldiers in the MRH, but up to 14
ill stil be able to be carried, depending on
cother role equipment being used, Brigadier
Mathewson says this stil offers: adequate
capability compared with similar helicopter
types
"We will retain the standard seats, so that
we can install them when we perform
Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster
Relief (HADR) tasking, so when people
aren't required to wear combat armour ancl
webbing we can carry more, and still in
seats that are energy attenuating and offer
contemporary crash protection," he said
WhiletheNRH 90 maynothave been amature
design when first introduced to service, the
Up-side is that its airframe, engines and drive
train have significant growth potential
“This isan aircraft at the start ofits life and it
thas had a lat of thought put inta its original
design to be able to give t that growth path,”
BRIG Mathewson concluded.
“In the meantime both helicopters are on
{9003 trajectory. We're looking forward to the
Tiger FOC milestone being achieved early
next year and to further capability milestones
for MRH coming up over the next two years."Reshaping Australia’s
warship and submarine
building industry
Ausaias newest wars, te Ay Ware Destoyer MAS Hanart avoing ts auch at capo Sou Ausra nay.
Peter Layton
Australia's new Defence White Paper
when released later this year is
expected to continue the strategic
direction set by earlier White Papers. It
willbe evolutionary, not revolutionary
The major exception is likely to be a
new path laid out for the Australian
ship and submarine building industry,
one that focuses on improving
efficiency, though the way to achieve
this appears uncertain.
A contentious debate is underway about
Where to bulld Australia's new ships and
submarines. The Federal government favors
building more offshore, arguing that that
this offers better value for money, with ships
delivered sooner at lower cost. Reflecting
this preference, only Spain's Navantia and
South Korea's Daewoo shipyards are being
allowed to tender for the new at-sea support
ship acquisition program, Those against
this stragegy, mainly the State governments,
most affected, argue that building naval
ships onshore is good for jobs, the national
‘economy and the long term maintenance
and support ofthe new ships acquired,
Those who seek to build offshore stress
maximizing the Defence budget, getting the
most ‘bang for the buck. Those seeking
onshore building stress taking a much
broader view, speaking of nation building
and revitalizing domestic manufacturing
Resolving these two viewpoints appears
likely to Involve making tough political
ccholees that will inflet real pain on some
local communities. Accordingly, this debate
has featured some intense and at times
‘acrimonious politicking,
In stark contrast, the strategic side of
Australia’s neve ships and submarines has
received little discussion, There seems
widespread agreement that these new
vessels should meet the challenge thrown
up by an incteasingly assertive China and
its accompanying impressive naval buildup.
This focus means the new ships are seen
as needing the long range and endurance
necessary to operate deep inta Northeast
‘Asia from Australian bases. Moreover, they
should be technologically very advanced and
be able to work closely with the USN. These
requirements mean the new vessels acquired
will be both large, and inclvidually costly.
The rancorous hunt for efficiency and the
agreed strategic direction come together in
today’s two most difficult defence issues
the Air Warfare Destroyer (AWD) build
program and the proposed new submarine
acquisition. Both matters are stronglyslpan oferng 2 medted Seyu Class submarhe as 8
‘placement oth Colin Class feet under he ure
sipmarin gj
interrelated and when resolved wil shape the
future of Australian naval shipand submarine
buiing,
The AWD Saga
In 2007 the Howard government selected
the modified Navantia F100 design over that
offered by American shipbuilder Gibb and
Cox. The Spanish option was less capable
bout significantly cheaper, avaliable quicker
and being in sevice Seemingly much les
Tisky. The government acting on advice from
‘management consultants, industy experts
and the Defence Material Organization (DMO)
choose an unusual alliance management
approach to build the thtee new AWDs. The
liance comprising the Australian Submarine
Corporation (ASC), Raytheon and the OMO
were to all work together in a partnership.
None had built a surface warship before
On 23 May the fist AWD, HIMAS Hobart,
was floated off fom its Adelaide shipyard
to begin an extensive fiting out program.
Tis was much later than originaly planned
tn 2007, the schedule envisaged the three
ships being delivered in December 2014,
March 2016 and June 2017, whereas itis
now June 2017, September 2018 and March
2020. The price has similay biown ott,
with a recent forensic audit estimating the
program nov costs some $1.2on more than
Initally contracted for. This aualt then ade
another $800m additional expense to this
figure when considering the costs of keeping
in service the ships meant to be replaced
by the ANDs, The total cost of the AWDs is
accordingly now some $9bn; advanced naval
vessels able to operate at long range against
top-tier adversaries do not come cheap, The
difficulties in building the three AWDS are
focused mainly on two factors.
Firstly, in retrospect the management
structure appears to have been flawed from
the outset. The highly successful ANZAC
ship bulld program used a single prime
contractor responsible for management and
ship delivery. In contrast, the AWD's alliance
structure has proven complex, umivieldy,
{and without clear lines of management
responsibilty. After several reviews last year,
the government has responded with Finance
Minister Mathias Cormann announcing in
Tate May that: “The Government will begin
a limited tender, to either insert a managing
Contractor into’ ASC for the remainder of
the build, or further enhance ASC capability
‘rough a partnering arrangement:
This tender is possible, as ASC Is a
government owned company administered
by the Department of Finance. This makes
the government deeply involved in, and
Ultimately responsible for, the management
cof the AWD project. BAE Systems or Navantia
‘appear front-runners to win the management
tender.
Secondly, the F-100 ships had only ever been
built ata single shipyard that had developed
Considerable shipbullding skils and expertise
lover several decades. In exporting the
design, a Key requirement was having very
accurate and very detailed plans. This was
made even more critical by the modular
construction technique that was adopted in
which three separate faciites across Australia
were to build the 31 individual blocks that
‘make up each complete hull. The numerous
‘Australian companies involved seem to have
hhad considerable problems with the plans
provided, at times making multiple reworks
necessary and leading to long delays. n this
regard, Chris Burns, CEO of the Adelaide-
bbased Defence Teaming Centre, charges the
DMO: “to save money, only purchased paper
based designs as opposed to the computer
bbased designs that were available for 2
‘marginal additional cost.
This all stands in contrast to the ANZAC ship
build program. ‘The record of this program
though is judged in the light of eight ships
successfully delivered. The ship design at the
time was well-defined and intended forexport
to shipyards worldwide. South Australian
State Premier Jay Weatherill has complained
‘that judging the AWD project so early may be
misleading in ignoring the efficiencies that
will be gained through the rest of the bull
program. For example, labour costs on the
third ship will be only haf that ofthe first ship.
\Weatheril claims that the forensic report "has
lumped all the start-up costs Inclusive of
separate faclty costs to somehow come up
with 2 large figure multiplied [across] the
entire project” Moreover, the forensic report
will not apparently be released, leading Chis
ta design, integration an masenance probems vit)
‘Austaa's Coline Glass submarine Pave encouraged the
‘Goverment fo taour a proven design ors replacement
‘ater than a nen cesign (Deteme)DefenceAustralia
Burns to angry complain that “we don't
‘even know who did this audit, how it was
conducted, what was the methodology and
who was involved.”
The upshot has been that the Australian
naval shipbuilding programs in the future
will be markedly different. Defence Minister
Kevin Andrews recently announced a number
Of new key principles for future Australian
naval shipbuilding including having: “a well
integrated designer, builder and supplier
team; preferencing mature designs of
‘vessels; thoroughly testing Navy's capability
requirement against readily available military
‘vessels; limiting the amount of changes to the
{design selected [and spending more time at
the beginning of the project on planning the
{design and bulld program.”
Combined with this, there Is now strong
‘governmentinterestin adoptingacontinuous
build approach that avoids the peaks and
troughs of eatlier stop-start contracting. The
Intent is to create a sustainable shipbuilding
Industry that in being more efficient will
make the cost of building naval ships in
Australia comparable to that offshore, For
‘example US shipyards are seen as able to
build naval ships using the continuous buile
approach for some 30 to 40 per cent less than
Australian shipyards.
This Is an appealing idea, albeit with some
issues. Continuous shipbuilding means
18 dofencat
¢ The government would prefer not to
award new contracts to ASC or consider
an evolved Collins Class option. This
is unfortunate as the Collins - on
range, endurance, combat system and
weapons fit out - appears closer to
the Navy’s requirements than some
other alternatives being investigated. 9
replacing ships earlier than necessary. Some
have estimated about sbc years earlier when
there remains about 25 per cent of the ship's,
life left. Ina ship that say costs $bn, this
means forgoing $250m of use. Continuous
build can also lock in future governments
making changes to long-term defence
plans to meet new and emerging strategic
challenges problematic. Moreover, the
‘approach may further mean that old designs
are persevered with when new innovative
designs from new companies should instead
be embraced. Often not included in the
‘continuous build discussion is that Australia's
shipbuilding industry handles not just surface
warships but also submarines.
New Submarine Problems
Australia built sic Collins Class submarines
in the 1990s, The boats have proven an
‘operational success, being popular with their
crews who consider the type one of the
best conventional submarines in the world,
The same is not true of their maintenance
{and sustainment, which by the 2010 was
considered seriously failing. Driven by the
findings of the 2012 Coles Report, the DMO,
ASC and the Navy developed a completely
new long-term maintenance approach that
has already delivered major improvements in
performance, cost and schedule
In thinking about replacing the Collins Class,
chi to
cx apa aroma poer vaso os
fre earccs seman
ho Aamo 30 Fe Nara cs ay bo
onstage a suomarie wre
‘ng
“he Te 20 popes Aste ne
‘Marne based enon sige pe 22 bot
the previous government had decided upon
Investigating an evolved Collins Class or
wholly new design. The Abbott government
when elected rejected this approach, opting
instead to reinvestigate either an_offthe-
shelf or a modified existing design. The new
strategic push to operate in distant NE Asia
though means that no off-the-shelf designs
are suitable; accordingly, buying a modified
existing design is now favored
This matter is complicated by the intense
‘governmental iritation with ASC, the builder
ff the Collins Class submarine, over AWD
bile problems. The issue is further obscured,
in that the government has had a long-
running. political campaign that asserts
the Collins Clas isa failure, the boats were
acquired by the Opposition when they were
in power. Accordingly, the government
would prefer not to award new contracts
to ASC or consider an evolved Collins Class
option. This is unfortunate as the Collins
fon ange, endurance, combat system and
weapons fit cut appears closer to the Navy’s
requirements than some other alternatives
being investigated
Further uncertainty has arisen as the Prime
Minster, concerned about the direction of
Australia’s most expensive ever defence
program, has become progressively more
involved. This has occurred against 2
backdrop of Australia, responding toee
regional geopolitical realignments, moving
strategically closer to Japan. Moreover,
both country’s rime Ministers have become
personally close. These developments meant
that by late 2014 it seemed to some that
the Australian Prime Minister had decided
that Australia would buy 10 Soryu class
submarines off-the-shelf to be builtin Japan,
thus reversing a pre-election commitment to
build the Collins replacements in Adelaide
This was doubly remarkable as since the
Second World War Japan has not exported
advanced military equipment.
The matter became more complex when it
was realized that the Soryuclassdid not meet
the Navy's requirements in terms of range,
endurance, combat system and weapons fit-
‘out, The boats would need to be extensively
‘modified and thus could not be off-the-shelf,
Compounding this, with deep concerns
‘over his politcal furure growing, the Prime
Minster suddenly acquiesced to opening the
‘competition up and considering a role in the
future submarine program for Adelaide and
ASC.
The result is that early this year, the
‘government announced a new competitive
evaluation process that would consider
proposals from Germany's TKMS, France's
DCNS and Japan while excluding Sweden,
the criginal Collins Class designer. The
countries ate to offer three options: one
that maximizes offshore constuction, one
that maximizes onshore construction and
an altemative in between. The evaluation
;processis to be completed by early next year,
Al the designs will be evolved versions of
existing submarines. The TKMS Type 216
proposal is based on an enlarged Type 212,
the DCNS is proposing a nonnuclear powered
version of its large Barracuda submarine
with Japan offering a mocified Soryu Class.
While Germany and France are pushing hard,
politcal factors appear to favor the Japanese
‘The Prime Minster in Parliament in February
noted that Defence Department discussions
fon the future submarine project: “have been
‘more detailed with the Japanese, because the
Japanese make the best large conventional
submarine in the world”
Indeed,whileneedingextensivemodifications
to meet Austtaian Navy requitements, the
Cary Margot ah Hafan ASW vat of he FREMM European Mult Parse ate
Soryu'sare very impressive, proven, in-service
boats. Their propulsion system and especially
‘their advanced batteries are of great interest
to the Navy. If Australia buys the Soryu class,
the first two boats are likely te be bull at
the Kawasaki and Mitsubishi shipyards in
Japan with the next two boats built by a
Joint Japanese-Australian workforce. The last
four boats would then be buift in Australia
by ASC. This approach should overcome
the probleme with the AWD project in
terms of accurate plans and tansferring
construction skis, Even so, acquiring the
Japanese boats has considerable technical
risks given the hull design changes needed
{and in integrating a new combat system and
‘weapons. Moreover, the Japanese have never
exported a submarine before of provided
long-term logistic backup and support to a
foreign military.
A Brave New Future?
For the surface naval ship building industry
the future looks reasonably clear, even if
the beginning may be some time yet. The
{government appears set to embrace a plan
to build surface warships under a iong-term
Continuous build program that uses proven
designs. The first ships to be built using this
approach are likely to be the new large anti-
submarine warfare figates
As patt of this project, the previous Defence
Minster, David Johnston, had funded studies
into an evolved AWD ‘design that would
have had considerable Austallan industry
Involvement. This now looks rather unlikely
given the current Defence Minister's
new acquisition principles. Instead the
competition seems between the UK's Type
26, the European FREMM, two BlohimVoss
options and the Norwegian F310 Fridtjof
Nansen-class. Hopefully, with the lessons
of the AWD leamed, the new frigate buile
program should be as successful as the
earlier ANZAC ship program. In this, the new
program is almost certain to feature a single
prime contractor.
‘On the submarine front itseemslikely thatthe
intial boats (probably Japanese) will be built
overseas. Further boats will then be built by
ASCin Adelaide several years later. Whichever
submarine type wins the competition though,
‘there remain real concems, Given the Navy's
demanding requirements for distant NE Asi
‘operations, the modifications to an existing
design needed present significant technical
risks. Such complex developmental projects
commonly suffer unexpected cost inereases
and delivery delays,
Accordingly, it would be prudent to plan on
extending the Collins submarines’ life, There
some talk of the first Colin's replacement
being delivered as early as 2025 but this
seems unrealistic
A 2013 study found the Collin’s Class
service life could be extended to 2031-2038,
Embracing this would allow for the almost
inevitable new build project slippages.
Alternatively, perhaps the option of leasing
boats as an interim capability to fil the aap
between the Collins leaving service and the
new boats arriving could be investigated.
Certainly having no ‘Plan 8° seems most
Lnwise given Australias recent SF acquisition
project experience of suddenly having to
spend several billion dollars to buy interim
aircraft when technical problems caused
JSF delivery delay of several years.
‘There is an old supposediy-Chinese curse
about living in interesting times. It'seems that
is the future of the Australian naval ship and
submarine building industry.
‘Peter Layton stg Fellow ate Grn Asta
‘stat, Gen veri
competion to Australis ner age ant-sutmarne
arora gates soem obs botvoon tho UK Type
26 pcre, the European FREMM, hu Boh oss
‘pins and to Norwegian F370 Fj aso as.Army’s Rotary Wing
Capability enhanced srs —
“Austen skiers fos the 2 Cov Regt Task Soup prepare to board a US Ary CH-47FChtok hlcptraring pert
In a ceremony largely unrecorded by
Australia's media, the first two Boeing
CH-47F Chinook heavy-lft helicopters
were formally commissioned into
Australian Army service during May.
Seven CH-47F Chinooks are being
acquired to replace si earlier CH-470
variants, expected to be in service with
C Squadron of the Townsvile-based
Sth Aviation Regiment by August.
Mejor Mate Evert. St Auton Regiment
ranstates a CH-47F Cook naicooe sinuttr
‘artinistr Defence, Kev Ares, dung te
‘emnmissoning eeerony at RAAF Base Toms
20 dofencetoday
[At the handover ceremony in Townsville
Defence Minister Kevin Andrews said that
the CH47 ‘Foxtrot’ programme represented
a Commonwealth investment of $631 milion
inthe overhaul of Army's heavylift helicopter
capability, which will provide modern and
improved cargo helicopter.
‘in addition to this investment, following
Parliamentary approval last year, $49.8 millon
will be invested fo support the introduction
and sustainment of the Chinook” he told
invited guests
‘Construction at RAAF Base Townsville is
scheduled for completion in mid 2017. This
project will provide strong economic benefit
tothe local community, with opportunities for
Up to 800 construction industry personne!
‘Foxtrot’ Enhancements
Although the aerodynamic performance and
load-carrying capacity of the new Chinook is
largely identical to that of the earlier Delta
model, Boeing has made some significant
Improvements under the ‘skin’ of the
helicopter to make it easier to operate and
maintain.
The airframe is now constructed, in part,
from machined components rather then a
structure bullt up by fabricated sheet-metal
sub-assemblies. According to Boeing, this
reduces vibration and therefore the likelihood
of structural cracks occurring through the 30
year plus life ofthe helicopter.
To make the Chinook mote readily
transportable by alr (aboard a C-5 Galaxy or
CITA Globemaster) quick disconnect fittings
in Alghanstn (Defence)
have been added to the numerous fluid
couplings in the aft rotor pylon, enabling the
helicopter to be disassembled more rapidly
and, importantly, reassembled in less time at
Its deployed destination
Boeing has also made major improvements
to the cockpit , including the incorporation
fof the Rockwell Collins Common Avionics
Architecture System (CAS) glass cockpit
used by contemporary US Army helicopters
such a5 the MH-47G Chinook and the latest
variants of the UH-60 Black Hawk. Also
incorporated is the BAE Systems Digital
‘Automatic Flight Control System (DAFCS).
Boeing's director of carga helicopter business
development Randy Rotte, an ex Chinook
pilot with the US Army, says the new
equipment makes the Foxtrot a much more
capable and cost-effective helicopter than its
forebears
“The Delta had ‘steamy’ gauges and needles
and now it's an all-glass cockoit, which gets
Inputs from a range of different sources:
radios, a moving map display, survivability
information - and you can choose which
pages you want to look at and you can also
customise them, *he sal
‘This provides tremendous situational
awareness for the flight crew. There's no
excuse for getting lost now, it's lke flying
with a GPS. You can have your eyes out ofthe
cockpit more and you can see on the moving
‘map where you are. It really enables you to
adjust to threats and enemy locations, or to
‘change where your refuel point might be. It
realy lets the pilots focus more outside andLes
OTC eRe CoN RD
Be part of one of South East Queensland’s
most progressive cities
Peon aaa eel er eaat cia
LE Mo aoa Memes tae aoe] La)
Se ca ea TO
Pope ene Re nicer Oma
Net oD een code ECs mec a)
Pecrcaccmece eens
Ieee eae ene imeu ner Uarae Ree couia
Ermira Maes ao UMC LUT
Ce sree Monica LOE
CRE CMa eer
Petar sR CR mae yess
Coca Menara EMR La toad
networks, the City of Ipswich offers companies
Ce Wer on Clallam conor ala
Pee Eee Men cen Ss
Piet
Witha proactive council, moderninfrastructure,
onc ore Con Mie AC od
networks, Ipswich is a major hub of activity
er Re aC nT ent)
caer cae hems
Sag Meee ne)
Pere TIC ECC Man a
eernenie ne crane tien
When considering your future business needs,
think location, think lifestyle, think affordability,
eset came
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE CONTACT:
Ipswich City Councils Office of Economic Development
Bs set I Se
Sure Sune Mor Se CRT
Website: www.ipswich.qld.gov.au
IpsWichTwo stain Amy CH-470 Cook hecoplers Ny
employ the helicopter in a better way.”
Rotte says that it is the DAFCS which has realy
revolutionised the way the Foxtrot Chinookis
used, with the ability to automatically bring
the helicopter to a hover over its intended
landing point and allow the pilot to lower
the alreraft in one foot increments (called
beeping the helicopter down’ by US Army
crews) without any drift.
“Imagine a brown-out condition in thedesert,
(oF white-out in the snow, fog. Having the
Confidence that yur aircraft 6 not drifting
means you can land in those areas with much
more precision,” he explained.
“DAFCS improves the flight profile from take
off to landing and every place in between,
‘especially when carrying aslingloadasDAFCS
automatically dampens any oscillation out It
really isa tremendous system.”
‘According to Rotte, US Army analysis
has found that Foxtrot’s operating and
sustainment costs are 30 per cent less than
those of the eatller Delta model
Special Operations Task Srp SOTS soles
‘peraton in norern Kanaahar (Deere)
22 dofence!
‘oman cing operations nie Mle East, (ete
Replacing the CH-47D, Air 9000 5C
Project Air 9000 Phase SC was developed
In the mid 2000s to replace the ‘analogue
CH-47D with the CH-47F then entering
service with the US Army,
The US Defense Security Cooperation Agency
(OSCA) notified Congress in mid 2009 of a
possible Foreign Military Sales (FMS) sale of
seven Foxtrots to Australia,
Equipment included 16 Honeywell T55-GA-
TIAA engines, 7 Dillon Aerospace M1340
‘mini-guns, 16 AN/ARC-201D Single Channel
Ground and Airborne Radios (SINCGARS),
7 Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and
Below Blue Force Trackers (FBCB2/BFT), plus
mission, support and training equipment.
[As an FMS sale, the deal leverages off the
larger US Army orders, and Australia’s
Foxtrots are included in a bridging contract
between thelr Multi Year One (MY') and Mule
Year Two (MY2) production batches,
“The beauty of being on the back of the US
Army negotiation for MY2 means that we
ark Mor Une Sales ry Gh Ook fer
have seen the price come down and we
‘also have a far ‘cleaner’ procuction process”
‘explained Rear Admiral Tony Dalton, with the
Defence Materiel Organisation (MO)
‘Alot of the modifications coming out of MY
were post-production modifications. That sall
been rolled into MY2 production by Boeing,
so we actually have afar cleaner production
pprocess, with all of the modifications
incorporated on the production line, and at
lower price
‘Australia’s Foxtrots are almost identical to
thelr American counterparts, and the aim isto
maintain them as close as possible to the US
configuration, to realise efficiencies in both
interoperability and sustainment.
Differences include a Boeing optional rotor
brake, tledown adaptors to secure the
helicopters when deployed aboard Navy's
LHDs, ballistic underfloor protection an:
mounts for the mini-guns.
In the near future Australia's Foxtrots will be
fitted with energy-attenuating cockpit seats
‘and later on the cabin will be upgraded in
line with a future US Army modification to
enhance crash protection,
‘Another element of Air 9000, the Chinook
Capability Alignment Programme (CH
CCAP), was announced in the 2012 Defence
Capability Plan (OCP) and will buy in to the
US Aimy fleet upgrade programme to ensure
Australia’s Foxtrots remain aligned with the
‘American fleet.
‘Australia has also. recently signed a
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with
the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and
Canada to work with the US Army on future
developments
“Together, having each of the other nations
contribute will allow Australia to have some
influence on the future development of the
product, Rear Admiral Dalton said
"Collectively, it gives us the opportunity to
influence the spiral upgrade programme the
US Army has in place"‘Austalan Amy sider Coporl Trent Bass Acrenman Tecnnin, Si Aran Aepment aig te
‘armissonng eorernany a tn new CH-47F Cha, (shor)
Training for Foxtrot
{As part of Air 9900 Phase 5C two simulators,
known as Transportable Flight Proficiency
‘Trainers (TFTPs), have been acquired and
delivered to Townsville over the last 12
months, the first in April 2014 and the second
in February this year.
Initial training of Australian Foxtrot crews
will shortly begin in Townsville and will be
conducted by a US Army New Equipment
Training Team (NET), which has been
responsible for converting American crews
throughout the world to the Chinook Foxtrot
since it began entering US Amy service in
2006.
“The US Army NETT is getting to the end of
the process of converting US Army Chinook
Units and we'te tapping in to that to begin
‘our training here in Australia, The transition
period from Delta to Foxtrot takes between
six and eight weeks per pilot,” ADM Dalton
detailed
“From a pilot's perspective the helicopter
handles in a similar fashion but it’s a digital
aircraft's got the CAAS cockpit and digital
AFCS, They ate the big issues, but in terms
of weights and performance it's a relatively
straightforward transition. I'e been up to
Townsville and flown the trainer and it Is
completely immersive and a fantastic training
doviee.
The trainers are designed to fit Inside
‘transport containers, which can be airlifted
aboartl a C-5 Galaxy. Once deployed, they can
bbe extended out to form a fixed-base CH-47F
cockpit with a fll visual system,
Once initial taining has been completed,
the TEPTS will be operated in-house by the
Australian Army Aviation Corps, but will be
maintained by civilian contractors
Maintaining, sustaining the Fleet
Boeing Defence Australia is under contract for
delivery and on-site operational support for
the Foxtrots and BAE Systems, who currently
hhold the deeper level maintenance for the
folder CH-470 fleet, will also maintain the
Foxtrot through to the end of their current
contract, at which point its renewal will be
competed for by industry.
‘Operational level maintenance is undertaken
fon the CH-47D intemally within 5 Aviation
Regiment and this will also be the case with
the CH-47F. However, because the Deltas are
being retired, as or before they come up for
their next deep maintenance checks, RADM.
Dalton said that the DMO was working with
BAE Systems to have them perform some
‘operational level maintenance duting the
‘ansition period
"We are working with BAE Systems to keep
‘heir workforce in Townsville together,” he
said.
"We have negotiated with industry to
‘maintain that skill base in Townsulle during
the transition period to the Foxtrot”
though Australia is ‘plugged in’ to the
US Army logistics chain, it does not have
a sustainment contract with them and the
management of spare parts is managed
Inhouse. An example of this isthe overhaul
ofthe T55 engine, which is common between
‘the CH-47D and F, by Columbia Helicoptersin
the United States.
"We found that trying to get into the US Army
system with Honeywell we ere stuck at the
end of a very long queue, so we are using
Columbia to do engine overhauls and things
such as that.’ RADM Dalton continued.
"We have our own sustainment system which
does plug into parts of,
the US Amy system,
but effectively we are
nt considered anether
Us Army squadron and
we're not completely
Integrated into the
US Army sustainment
programme.”
Arrival and entry
into Service
The first two Foxtrots
were delivered to
Australia aboard a USAF
C5 Galaxy in early
April and reassembled
by Boeing Defence
Australia at the Sth
Aviation Regiment's
homebasein Townsville.
‘The second pair arrived
Major Senera Gus MLactian, Head of Modesto and
‘Sateen - Army. (Detence)
in Townsville by C-5 in May: the seventh and
final aircraft remains on schedule for delivery
In August
‘An Airworthiness Board Special Flight Permit
‘was issued in April to support intial flying in
Australia, which began in May and, following
initial training, the transition to operational
service ie due to begin later this yea.
Initial Operational Capability (IOQ), which is
Home Loans for Defence Force members
Mobile Home Loan Consultants available
to come to you
> Investments and Superannuation
> Award
ing Car Loans
> Home, Contents and Car Insurance
Contact us today:
EB) 1800 033 139, sam-spm AEST weekdays
defencebank.com.au
DV Visit your tocal Defence Bank branch
info@defencebank.com.au
@® Defence Bank
We ServeDefenceAustralia
Defence confuses Land 400
prime contractors
With a price tag of around $10 billion,
Land 400, the Army's ambitious
programme to replace its armoured
fighting vehicle fleet, is one ofthe
largest projects ever undertaken in the
Land Force domain — and certainly the
most costly. Phase 2, now underway,
aims to acquire around 225 Combat
Reconnaissance Vehicles to replace
the existing Australian Light Armoured
Vehicle (ASLAV). Other phases wil
later replace the M113AS4 Armoured
Personnel Carries and introduce an
Integrated Training System (TS),
Luxe contenders or LAND 400 tockurs rom tp)
General Oamic Land Sysems AVE, hrnstal's
Boxer and singapore Yecmoloes' Terex Bx (etece)
28 dofencet
[A Request for Tender for Phase 2 released
in February, with bids to close on June 25,
makes for an extremely tight timeline for
industry primes to study the document, form,
teaming agreements, then select a vehicle
upon which to place their bid,
Despite Defence's claim of close engagement
with industry throughout the process, there
are concems that both the timeline and the
fextent of requirements are difficult to meet.
In the ease of the latter, concems have been
raised that the requirements are too detailed
‘on the one hand, contradictory on the other
and do not provide clear guidance on exactly
what sort of vehicle Defence actually wants.
For example, informed opinion is divided over
Whether the RFT really calls for a wheeled
fr tracked vehicle, a manned or unmanned
turret or passive or active defence systems
{oreven both)?
Unfortunately, defence primes likely to bid
are unwilling to speak about the project or
their plans, last they suffer the displeasure
fof the Commonwealth, For its part, Defence
declined an interview request and only
responded to written questions, attributed
merely (oa ‘Defence Spokesperson’
Phase Two Requirements
The Mounted Combat Reconnaissance
Vehicle capability is required to deliver
survivability systems and have a life of type
(of 30 years.
‘Nigel Pittaway
Defence clemands that the vehicles proposed.
are a Military Off The Shelf (MOTS) design
already established in service with the armed
forces of anather western country. They must
bee sourced from an established production
faciity and at most, requite only minor
‘modifications to be interoperability with ADF
and coalition assets
The RFT requires also requires bidders to
provide a copy of an executed contract or
other documentary evidence to prove that
the configuration of their baseline CRV (Le.
the fully integrated Mission System) satisfies
this definition of MOTS.
In addition, Defence says that providing a
bidder offers a vehicle that meets the MOTS
designation it may also offer one ‘MOTS Plus’
vehicle
“In the LAND 400 Phase 2 RFT, MOTS Plus
means a MOTS baseline vehicle (including
MOTS variants) reconfigured with a single
package of upgrades in order to deliver
{an Increased level of compliance with the
technical, functional and performance
requirements of the RFT” said the Defence
Spokesperson,
The tender documentation is extremely
complicated andincludes aKey Requirements
[Matix (KRM), which forms the basis against
Which the technical compliance is assessed
for the field to be narrowed down to a short-
list of contenders.
However, ane industry observer notes thatthe KRM requires exceptionally high levels in
performance in a range of key areas, but the
Commonwealth has not attached a priority
tothem.
“Although the Commonwealth has said that
protection, lethality and mobility are the
‘most important things, thelr statements are
not clear enough to drive bidders toa specific
‘operational platform,” the individual sad.
To further complicate matters another
document in the suite is an Operational
Concept Document (OCD), which also
Includes a lot of further information and
desired outcomes, but the document is not
Understood to be a commercially or legally
enforceable document.
The problem arses where there is
contradiction between the two documents.
According to industty sources, the OCD
points to a wheeled vehicle but, because
is not a legally enforceable document, it
might imply that the Commonwealth may
also accept a tracked vehicle
‘What that means in a sense, is that the
companies wishing to prime for Land 400
hhave been placed in a position where they
will have to undertake cost, capability and
operational trade-off analysis themselves,”
added one observer
‘There will have to be a large number of
trade-offs and detailed discussions to ensure
that what is finally delivered is actually
what the Army wants, because if you read
the KRM they want everything. | think the
Commanveealth is going to be very surprised
atthe size of the vehicles required to do winat
they want them to do."
Testing and evaluation
Defence says it will conduct a detailed
evaluation of the tenders against the
evaluation criteria provided by the KRM. This,
evaluation wil also include an assessment of
the value for money to the Commonwealth
and result in the production of 2 shortlist
ff one or more tenderers. I says it wil also
evaluate a ‘MOTS Plus’ offer as a separate
tender and will advise the bidder if and when
they ae shortlisted which vehicle(s it prefers.
“The Commonwealth has engaged
closely ith industry on Land 400 over
‘@ number of years and openly discussed
the detailed acquisition strategy for Phase
2 of the programme. Drafts of the KAM,
OCD and Government Furnished Materiel
and Indicative Communications Fit, were
publicly released on 11 Sep 14, five months
prior to release of the RFT," the Defence
Spokesperson said.
“This early engagement and high level of
transparency, coupled with the MOTS based
approach, should maximise the number of
competitive bids received"
‘The shortlisted contender(s) will then move
to Stage 2 ofthe evaluation purpose, the Risk
Mitigation Activities (RMA) which Is aimed
at mitigating any significant technical and
commercial risks, validating the bidders’
claims and assessing cost and capability
trade-off options.
‘The Commonwealth will provide up to $25
million to each shortlisted team to assist
with the RMA, but part of this process will
be ballistic protection testing, which will
require the rapid provision (presumably from
the manufacturer's assembly line, where it
Is destined for an existing customer at that
point in time} and tested to destruction,
Defence say this testing would occur
at the Defence Proof and Experimental
Establishment -Graytown (PEE-G) and will be
tundertaken by the Land Engineering Agency
(LEA) with support provided by the Defence
Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO)
and the Joint Proof & Experimental Unit
PEW.
“The vehicles that will be evaluated during
the Risk Mitigation Activities - the second
stage of the tender evaluation process - must
reflect the configuration of the Tenderer's
proposed Combat Reconnaissance Vehicle
[CRV) solution,” the Defence spokesperson
detailed
“Where applicable, as part of acceptance, the
Commonwealth would consider third party
‘test results from accredited test agencies
a5 supporting evidence towards compliance
Claims made against technical requirements.
However, due to the safety critical nature
fof requirements such as blast protection,
‘the Commonwealth Intends to conduct
Independent tasting to validate claims as
part ofthe Risk Mitigation Activities.”
‘The published timetable calls for the
shortlisted vehicles supplied by the
manufacturers in support of the RMA to be
delivered in the second quarter of 2016, no
later than 17 weeks after the RMA contract(s)
are awarded.
“This is some 20 months after
Industry was it
of this requirement,”
spokesperson continued. "This
should allow sufficient time for
MOTS based vehicles to either
be manufactured, or for loan
arrangements with existing
‘customers to be established.”
Following the conclusion of
‘the RMA in January 2017, final
‘evaluation of the shortlisted
contenders will occur between
‘then and April 2017, with initial
contract negotiations with the
‘winner(s) to begin the following
month,
Australian Industry Content
Another (arguably) contentious issue is the
amount of worktobe performed by Australian
industry on the Land 400 programme,
Defence says there is no requirement for
either the manufacture or assembly of
vehicles to occur in Australia, although it
leaves the door open for bidders to make
such offers if they so desire.
This is an emotive subject across industry
a5 a whole at the moment, with Land 400
being the fst major land vehicle programme
after the wholesale loss of Australia’s motor
Vehicie manufacturing industry. There is a
political dimension too, with lobby groups
pressing for assembly, at least in part, in
Geelong in Victoria, or in Adelaide,
“Compliance with Australian Industry
Capability (AIC) requirements, including
the proposed value of work performed in
Australi, ‘5 one of the evaluation criteria
nified in the LAND 400 Phase 2 RFT.
As part of the evaluation of tenders,
comparative assessment of the ‘proposed
value of work performed in Australia’ will
‘occur? Defence says.
‘TheRFTalsomakescieartheCommonwealth’s
intent to investigate opportunities to further
maximise the Tenderer’s proposed level
ff AIC, subject to there being no adverse
Impacts on quality, schedule or cost, during
the Risk Mitigation Activities”
However, this once again puts the onus back
‘on the primes, who are now trying to decide
whether to engage with the local small to
medium enterprises and, if so, with whom
and for what work
This is also quite possibly resulting in the
‘SMEs buming up money they can il afford to
lose, responding to Requests for Information
from the primes that may go absolutely
‘nowhere in the not too distant future
“AIC may not be important enough to make
you a winner" observed one analyst. But it’s
Important enough to make you a loser.”
To Bid or Not to Bid
‘The problem for the primes in particular, is
that if they want to be a player in the land
space in Australia in the future, they need to
be involved in Land 400,
For some there just isn't a business case and
for others the lack of claity in many of the
requirements (despite the unprecedented
level of engagement with industry) makes
selecting a vehicle, or teaming with a partner
with the right expertise, very difficult
There have already been some big names
in the defence industry space announcing
‘thelr intention net to bid for Phase 2 and in
all likelihood there will be more by the time
‘tenders close on June 25.
“The Commonwealth understands that Land
400 is too Important for primes not to be
involved in” said one defence analyst
“lifyou don't know what the Commonwealth
wants, itis a pretty brave customer that’s
‘going to offer a solution
‘Let Pama AMY (mored Modes Yr) 20 x3
‘muta itty vehicle pronicedby the Finish
‘etence may company Patra.
eaoa