Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Course Syllabus1
A.Y. 2015 2016
Associate Solicitor Jose Angelo A. David
THE CONSTITUTION AND REQUISITES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
FUNDAMENTAL POWERS OF THE STATE
POLICE POWER
1. Aquino v. Municipality of Malay Aklan [G.R. No. 211356, September
29, 2014]
2. MMDA v. Bel-Air [G.R. No. 135962, March 27, 2000]
3. Philippine Association of Service Exporters vs. Drilon [G.R. No. L81958, June 30, 1988]
4. Ichong vs. Hernandez [G.R. No. L-7995, May 31, 1957]
5. Lutz vs. Araneta [G.R. No. L-7859, December 22, 1955]
6. Association of Small Landowners vs. Secretary of Agrarian Reform
[G.R. No. 78742, July 14, 1989]
7. Lozano vs. Martinez [G.R. No. L-63419, December 18, 1986]
8. Department of Education, Culture and Sports vs. San Diego[G.R. No.
89572, December 21, 1989]
9. Ynot vs. Intermediate Appellate Court [G.R. No. 74457, March 20,
1987]
10.City Government of Quezon City vs. Ericta [G.R. No. L-34915, June 24,
1983]
11.Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)
12.Pennsylvania Coal Co v. Mahon, 43 Sup Ct 158 (1922)
POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN
1.
2.
3.
4.
1 This syllabus is subject to change with notice at least three days prior to the next
scheduled meeting.
2. Punsalan vs. Municipal Board of Manila [G.R. No. L-4817, May 26,
1954]
3. Lladoc vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue [G.R. No. L-19201, June 16,
1965]
4. Abra Valley College vs. Aquino [G.R. No. L-39086, June 15, 1988]
5. Ferrer v. Bautista [G.R. No. 210551, June 30, 2015]
ARTICLE III THE BILL OF RIGHTS
PBM Employees Association vs. Philippine Blooming Mills [G.R. No. L-31195,
June 5, 1973]
Section 1
Due Process of Law
1. Ichong vs. Hernandez [G.R. No. L-7995, May 31, 1957]
2. Philippine Phosphate Fertilizer Corp. vs. Torres [G.R. No. 98050, March 17,
1994]
3. Ynot vs. Intermediate Appellate Court [G.R. No. 74457, March 20,
1987]
4. Alonte vs. Savellano [G.R. No. 131652, March 9, 1998]
5. Aniag vs. COMELEC [G.R. No. 104961, October 7, 1994]
6. Philippine Communications Satellite Corp. vs. Alcuaz [G.R. No. 84818,
December 18, 1989]
7. Ang Tibay vs. Court of Industrial Relations [G.R. No. 46496, February 27,
1940]
8. Ateneo de Manila vs. Capulong [G.R. No. 99327, May 27, 1993]
9. Cudia v. Superintendent of the PMA [G.R. No. 211362, February 24, 2015]
10.Mortel v. Kerr [G.R. No. 156296, November 12, 2012]
Equal protection of the Laws
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ramirez vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 93833, September 28, 1995]
Zulueta vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 107383, February 20, 1996]
Navarro vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 121087, August 26, 1999]
Ople vs. Torres [G.R. No. 127685, July 23, 1998]
Vivares v. STC [G.R. No. 202666, September 29, 2014]
Gamboa v. Chan [G.R. No. 193636, July 24, 2012]
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347
Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928)
Section 4
Freedom of Expression
1. United States vs. Bustos [G.R. No. L-12592, March 8, 1918]
2. People vs. Alarcon [G.R. No. 46551, December 12, 1939]
3. Ayer Productions PTY Ltd. vs. Capulong [G.R. No. L-82380, April 29, 1988]
4. Borjal vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 126466, January 14, 1999]
5. Reyes vs. Bagatsing [G.R. No. L-65366, November 9, 1983]
6. Pita vs. Court of Appeals [G.R. No. 80806, October 5, 1989]
7. Social Weather Stations, Inc. vs. COMELEC [G.R. No. 147571, May 5, 2001]
8. Social Weather Stations, Inc. vs. COMELEC [G.R. No. 208062, April 7, 2015]
9. 1-United Transport v. COMELEC [G.R. No. 206020, April 14, 2015]
10.Diocese of Bacolod v. COMELEC [G.R. No. 205728, January 21, 2015]
Assembly and Petition
1.
2.
3.
4.
2.
3.
4.
5.