Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
&
Authenticity
Having accepted our discipline to embody both the actual and the
virtual, the consideration of conservation of architecture suddenly
becomes more complicated than previously perceived. With an
infinite amount of theories of conservation focussing on authenticity
in light of object materiality and process of works (Jokilehto, 2009),
perhaps throwing in a Deleuzian spin on the debate would open
the potential for an entirely new discussion.
In the discussion of conservation, irrelevant of the standpoint
being taken, time, and ergo the passage of time - duration, is of the
essence. What we grasp when we think in terms of duration is an
alteration that is one with the essence or substance (materiality) of
the object (Moulard-Leonard, 2008). However this thought also
conveys an uncertainty and unpredictability of the future.
In order to maintain a Deleuzian frame of mind we must take a
stand point of a virtual realist (as opposed to a critical realist).
From this standpoint we can view old depths as a certain folding,
unfolding and refolding of the surface the fold being the potential
to differ from the original (Doel & Clarke, 1999). Therefore we are
not able to say that there is only one world, for this one world is
folded in many ways.
Real Virtuality is not duplicitous, but multiplicitous it is an
immanent manifold, the consistency of which depends, precisely,
upon ones point of view (Doel & Clarke, 1999).
In arriving at the surface, which I understand to be the new (and
possibly the now) we are freed from enslavement of the depths
(the old) and must therefore negotiate another version of virtuality.
This new virtuality still interacts with the actual (the depths), and
does not lack reality or authenticity (as simply a copy). Rather, it is
the actual that lacks virtuality. From this latter viewpoint, we may
7
follows that the actual naturally lacks what the virtual will come to
furnish in what Baudrillard refers to as the virtual realisation of
the world (Doel & Clarke, 1999).
This hyper-realisation however is in no way an ex nihilo gift
of nature, but is rather produced by the priority and privilege
we must give it in creating some special effect resulting in the
full supplement which will fulfil the lack in the original. This is
precisely where the notion of the authentic culminates or rather,
the point of its abandonment. One should forget the quest for the
authentic representation, for there can be no Second Comings in
this world, and only a return of difference. What this means is that
things, rather than varying qualitatively in time, rather only differ in
degrees from other things or from their depths (Moulard-Leonard,
2008). This is the essence of Deleuzes transcendental empiricism.
Perhaps what this shift in thought is directing us towards is not a
conservation in the sense of the actual, authentic and untouched,
but rather in conservation of the interactivity of the actual with its
virtuality. Deleuze speaks of an embodiment of difference, which
is crucial for the survival of the interactivity (or dynamic tension) of
the virtual with the actual (Massumi, 1998). A certain optimism may
emerge from this point that not all is at the mercy of the passage
of time but that duration has the power to ground thoughts
relationship to the world (or the relation between the consciousness
and the unconscious, the actual to the virtual) (Moulard-Leonard,
2008). The survival of the past therefore need not depend on matter
for its conservation in time.
11
12
Bibliography
Hayles, N.K. & Gannon, T. (2012). Virtual Architecture, Actual
Media. In Crysler, C.G, Cairns, S. & Heynen, H. (Eds), The
SAGE Handbook of Architectural Theory (pp. 484-500).
London:SAGE Publications Ltd.
Massumi, B. (May-June 1998). Sensing the Virtual, Building the
Insensible. Hypersurface Architecture, Architectural Design
(Profile no. 133), vol. 68, no. 5/6, May-June 1998, pp. 16-24
Jacob, S. (2012). Mascontext. Retrieved 29 December, 2015, from
http://www.mascontext.com/issues/14-communication-summer-12/
the-communicative-mode-of-architecture/
Doel, M.A. & Clarke, D.B (1999). Virtual Worlds Simulation,
suppletion, seduction and simulcra. In Crang, M, Crang, P &
May, J (Eds), Virtual Geographies Body Space and Relations
(pp.261-283). London: Routeledge
Anarchist without content. (2013, 8th April). The Fold,
explained. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from https://
anarchistwithoutcontent.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/the-foldexplained/
Jokilehto, E (2009). Conserving the Authentic: Essays in honour of
Jukka Jokilehto. 1st ed. Rome, Italy: ICCROM.
Moulard-Leonard, V (2008). Bergson - Deleuze Encounters:
Transcendental Experience and the Thought of the Virtual (1st
ed.). New York: SUNY press.
13