Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
FACTS: Petitioner Marietta Azcueta and Rodolfo Azcueta met in 1993. Less than two
months after their first meeting, they got married. After four years of marriage,
Marietta decided to leave Rodolfo. Marietta complained that despite her
encouragement, Rodolfo never bothered to look for a job and always depended on
his mother for financial assistance and for his decisions. In fact it was Rodolfos
mother who found them a room near the Azcueta home and paid the monthly
rental. She also averred that Rodolfo also pretended to have found work and gave
Marietta money which actually came from Rodolfos mother. When Marietta
confronted him, Rodolfo cried like a child and told her his parents could support
their needs. They had sex only once a month which Marietta never enjoyed. When
they discussed this, Rodolfo told Marietta that sex was sacred and should not be
enjoyed or abused. Rodolfo also told her he was not ready for a child. In 2002,
Marietta filed a petition for declaration of absolute nullity of her marriage to Rodolfo.
Marietta averred that Rodolfo was psychologically incapacitated to comply with the
essential obligations of marriage. Marieta presented as expert witness Dr. Cecilia
Villegas. Villegas did not personally evaluate Rodolfo but based on her interview
with Marieta, she concluded that Rodolfo is inflicted with Dependent Personality
Disorder (mamas boy) as he was too dependent on his mother so much so that he
cannot decide for himself. The RTC ruled in favor of Marietta but on appeal, the
Court of Appeals reversed the RTCs decision.
ISSUE: Whether or not the totality of the evidence presented is adequate to sustain
a finding that Rodolfo is psychologically incapacitated to comply with his essential
marital obligations.
HELD: After a thorough review of the records of the case, the SC held that there
was sufficient compliance with Molina to warrant the annulment of the parties
marriage under Article 36.