(Commonwealth of Pennsylvania [DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [333 Marker St, Harrisburg, PA 17126-0333, Pennsylvania Statewide Evaluation Form for Student Professional Knowledge and Practice Drisotl Donna ‘Student/Candidate’s Last Name First Middle Social Security Number Cosmotology Subject(s) Taught Grade Level ‘This form is to serve as a permanent record of a student teacher/eandidate’s professional performance evaluation during a specific ime period, based on specific eriteria. This form must be used at least twice during the 12-week (minimum) student teaching experience. “PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Directions: Examine all sourees of evidence provided by the student teacher/eandidate and bear in mind the aspects of teaching for each ofthe four categories used in this form, Check the appropriate aspects of student teaching, and indicate the sources of evidence used to determine the evaluation of the results in each category. Assign an evaluation for each of the four categories and then assign an overall evaluation of performance. Sign the form and gain the signature of the student teacher. ‘Category I: Planning and Preparation — Student tcachev/eandiate demonsrates thorough knowledge of conten and pedagogical skills in planning and ‘Santon, Student teacher aks plans and sets als based onthe content tobe taughenrned, knowledge of asigned students, an the Instructional ‘Alignment: 384.83. 2A) B).(C,(G). 0D, ‘Student Teacher/Candidate's performance appropriately demonstrates + Knowledge of content + Knowledge of pedagogy © Knoisledge of Pennsylvania's K-12 Academie Standards 1 Knowledge of students and how to se this knowledge to impart instruction + Use of resources, materials or technology available through the school or district Instructional goats that show a recognizable sequence with adaptations for individual student needs “Assexstnents of student leaming aligned tothe instructional goals and adapted as required for student needs {Use of educational psychological principlestheorie in the construction of lesson plans and setting instructional goals Sources of Evidence (Check all that apply and include dats, typeutitles and number) i Lesson/Unit Plans ‘See Attached 430-A [C] Student Teacher Interviews _ See Attached 430-A & Resources/Materials/Technology ‘See Attached 430-A DX] Classroom Observations ‘See Attached 430-4 El Assessment Materials See Attached 430-A —_ [%J Resource Documents ‘See Attached 430-A Ei tnformation About Students See Atached 430A C} Other See Atached 430-A | Geciuing IEP) Ser asia Saas | Soper Fe Seon Toa | asi @ Po Seer maig — acca asia cacao To ai omen] ia 6 To a mnie Fee Taacaun | scquaehdenensete | neoprene or uel wt aca ot | orpatomce Sire fortes | detract = toma Tag = is is : Undicate ) Justification for Evaluation Mrs. Driscoll is very knowledgeable of the cosmotology content area, pedagogical skills, and PA Academic Standards, The amount of time she spends preparing for lesson delivery is apparent. Mrs. Driscoll makes every attempt to prepare her theory, as well as lab assignments, and to connect the duties and tasks to real world conditions. She does an excellent job in using all of the resources available for student instruction. PDE-430 |(Commonwealth of Pennsylvania [CBEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [333 Market St, Harrisburg, PA17126:0333 ] Driscoll Donna ‘Student/Candidate’s Last Name First Middle Social Security Number “Category 11 Tasruetonal Delivery = Stdent acheveanidte, through knowledge of content, pedagogy and shin dtvring istration eens students in learning by using a variety of instructional strates. ‘Mligament: 388.38. ()OO)M4G) ‘Sudent Teacher/candidate's performance appropriately demonstrates Use of knowledge of content and pedagogical theory through his/her instructional delivery Instructional goals reflecting Pennsylvania K-12 standards ‘Communication of procedures and clear explanations of eontent Cavatineuetional goals that show a recognizable sequence, clear student expectations and adaptations for individual student news Use of questioning and discussion strategies that encourage many students to participate Engagement of students in learning and adequate pacing of instruction Feedback to students on their leaming. Use of informal and formal assessments to mest leaning goals and to monitor student leering Flexibility and responsiveness in meeting the leaning needs of students Integration of disciplines within the educational curriculum ‘Sources of Evidence (Cheek all that apply and include dates, rypesttes, or number) [Bd Classroom Observations See Attached 430-A Bi Student Assignment Sheets See Attached 430-A Informal Observations/Visits See Attached 430A [] Student Work See Attached 430-A [i] Assessment Materials See Attached 430-A [J Instructional Resources! See Attached 430-A i student TeacheriCandidate See Attached 430-4 _Materials/Technology Interviews Dotter See Attached 430-A Gaieao Exemplary 3 Points Superior 2 Feints ‘Satisfactory Point Tnsatiafaciory O Pola | Criteria “Tic candidate conronty | Te caida aval ak “The candle sities and | The candidate arty oF never ad and shoroushly veecareiydemenstitcs indicators | adequately demenstaes | énappropriatly or superficial ‘emonstats indicators of | of performance. indicator of perfomance, | demonstrates ndzators of performance pevformance ang a oo a indicate) Tustification for Evaluation Ma Driscoll engages the students inthe learning process and is excellent at using questions throughout the delivery of aarruction to check for understanding as wel as to guide instruction. She engages students in the learning process and provides excellent fedback on thelr lenrning, She employs a variety f excellent strategies that engage students in earnings Prcluding a LCD projector as well asa variety of visual and interactive aides throughout the classroom and lab areas. PDE-430 3Commonwealth of Pennsylvania [DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION | 333 Market St, Harrisburg. PA 17126-0333 | ‘Overall Rating Cateaory Excaplary Ciinimum of | Superior (Minimum of # Points) | Saistactory (Minimum of] Unsatisfactory (0 Points) i 12 Point), wT “a points) ‘Criteria for Rating | The candidate consistent | The candidate anally and “The candidate someimer and | The cane rarely ov never and and thorough xrensnely demonstrates ndators | adequately demonstrates | Unappropriatly or supericialy demonstrates indicates of | of performance. Indiators of performance | demonstrate indicators of perfomance perfomance, Rating diate) Note: This assessment instrument must be used a minimum of two times. A satisfactory rating (1) in each of the 4 categories, resulting in a minimum total of at least (4) points, must be achieved on the final summative rating to favorably complete this assessment. ‘Tustification for Overall Rating: ‘Mrs. Driscoll plans, prepares, and delivers excellent instruction to students. She is very professional as an educator and is ‘making a significant impact on the students as they achieve their goals through the educational system. Driscoll Donna Student Teacher/Candidate’s Last Name First Middle Social Security Number Columbia Montour Avts Columbia Montour Avts, 1019/2015 DistrievtU School Interview/Conference Date School Year: 2015-2016 Term: Fall Required Signatures: ‘Supervisor/Evaluator: Date: 11/20/2015 setecirietec /() Candian Kon KOiee Dat: 1/202018 (Confidential Document) PDE430 5,