Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Accept: 17/2/2013
287
*1
.1
.2
91/6/27 :
91/11/29 :
.
. ) (1975
.
-
)( .
)( .
-
.
: . .
.1
.
:
Email: samatin@ut.ac.ir m
4) 4 (16 1392172-151
...
.
.
.
)
(
.
3
.
)
(... .
4 .
.
5
) Danet,
.(1980: 446 & 1985: 278; Gibbons, 1994: 285
.
) (1969, 1975 .
1Corpus
2 Sy stemic
L inguistics
Functional Lingu istics
3Forensic
Discourse Analy sis
4Pragmatics
5Speech Act
152
4 ) 4 (16 1392
.
:
-
) (1975
- )(
.
.2
. 1990
.6
) Solan,
.9
) (1390:
) (1390
: ) (1391 .10
)6 : 1994 1990 6 .(1990
7The International Association of Forensic Linguis ts
8International
Journal of Speech, Language and the Law
2005 9 (2007
)9 : 2003 2005 2005
10 1384
)10 . . 1389 1384
153
...
. ) (1969
. 11
) Gustafsson,
(1975
. 1980
) .(Shuy, 1982: 113; Kurzon, 1986: 19
) (
12
1980 13
.
).(Gibbons, 1994: 286 1985
14 .
... .
.
.
.
15 16
.17 1980
11Legal Register
12Law and
13Brenda society review
Danet
14Spo ken legal
discourse
15Structural
16 Functional
(17 .
)18 . . 1979 1389
154
4 ) 4 (16 1392
. 18
19 .
20 .
21
). Dumas, 1990 :
22 ( 1
.
23
.2-1
24 )
(12 :1389
. 25
18Adjacency pairs
19
Formulaic language
20Case
21 ( 1979Stu
)22 . :1982 dy
22Speech
23Critical dacts
iscourse analy sis
24Verbal and
structural complexity
25Pragmatics
of legal discourse
155
...
.
) Levinson,
.(1983: 31
) .(Danet, 1985: 276
26
) Kurzon,
.3 27
28 .29
.
.
.
.
.30
27
.
28Performative
)30 . : 1962 1969 29 1996
30 (.(1390
)31 . : 1980 1994 1994 1994
156
4 ) 4 (16 1392
.
.
) (Illocutionary ) (Locutionary ) (Perlocutionary
) (81 :1384
.
.3-1
) (1975
) (Declarative) (Representative ) (Expressive )(Directive
) (Commissive ) (Austin, 1962; Searle, 1975
.31
. : ) (
) .(Searle, 1975: 354; Danet, 1980: 458
.:
.... .... . .. ... ... . ...
.
. :
) .(Ibid: 355; Ibid
31 .
157
...
.:
... . ... ... ... .
... .
. :
) .(Ibid: 354; Ibid
.:
. .
...
.
. : -
) .(Ibid: 356; Ibid:
... . ... . ...
.
. :
.
) .(Ibid; Ibid: 358:
... . ... ... .
... .
158
4 ) 4 (16 1392
.3-2
) (1989
. 32 .
33
34
. :35
. :36
. .
):(Habermas,1989: 63; Leech, 1983: 198-199
37
)(
. : .
38
. )(
. : .
):(Cao, 2007: 71-82
. 39 :
) ( . :
.
32Constative Speech Acts
33
Regulative Speech Acts
34 Expressive
Speech Acts
35 Legislative
Speech Acts
36 Judicial
37
Acts Acts
Speaker Speech
based Speech
38 Hearer-Oriented
Speech Acts
39 Prohibitio
n force
159
...
. 40 :
) .(... :
.
41
. :
) .(... :
.
.42
.4
1390
. Rtf
Microsoft Office Word 2010 .
:
Rtf.
2052
668640
87320
138
Freq.
) (1975
) (1983
PSAW Statistics V.18
. )(
:
. :
40Permission force
41
Obligation force
(42 .
)43 . .2000 , 1996
160
4 ) 4 (16 1392
. : .
. : .
/
. : .
) (
. :
) (.
:
) (Dec-01 (Rep-02) (Exp-03)
) (Com-04 (Pro-05) (Per-06)
(Obl-07) (Part B) (Part C)
(Part D) ) (Part E
.
p0/05 a= 0/89 .
.
.5
1.
161
...
1
Frequency
Valid
Valid Per.
Cum. Per.
Exp-03
20
1/4
3/0
3/0
Per-06
40
2/7
6/1
9/1
Obl-07
82
5/6
12/5
21/6
Pro-05
83
5/7
12/6
34/2
Dec-01
103
7/0
15/7
49/9
Rep-02
329
22/4
50/1
100/0
Total
657
44/8
100/0
Part C
Percent
Valid Per.
Cum. Per.
Com-04
80
5/5
5/5
5/5
Obl-07
100
6/8
6/8
12/3
Pro-05
122
8/3
8/3
20/6
Dec-01
201
13/7
13/7
34/3
Rep-02
962
65/6
65/7
100/0
Total
1465
99/9
100/0
Frequency
Percent
Valid Per.
Cum. Per.
Exp-03
20
1/4
2/3
2/3
Rep-02
239
16/3
27/2
29/5
Dec-01
620
42/3
70/5
100/0
Total
879
60/0
100/0
Frequency
Percent
Valid Per.
Cum. Per.
Pro-05
60
4/1
11/8
11/8
Rep-02
122
8/3
24/0
35/8
Dec-01
327
22/3
64/2
100/0
Total
509
34/7
100/0
Frequency
Valid
Part B
Percent
Part D
Valid
Part E
Valid
162
4 ) 4 (16 1392
) (1 :
. )(Part B 50/1
31/2 15/7 3/0
. )(Part C 65/7 15/1
13/7 5/5
. )(Part D 70/5
27/2 2/3
. )(Part E 64/2 24/0
11/8 .
2
Percent
Percent
18/7
657
PartB
25/1
879
PartD
41/7
100
3510
Total N
14/5
N
0
PartA
1465
PartC
509
PartE
3510 41/7
25/1 18/7
14/5 ) .(2
1
.
)75/5
( ) 65/7( .
163
...
2 .
164
4 ) 4 (16 1392
.
3 33 19
7 . 41
.
.5-1
)( .
. ) 43 (
.
.
43String A naly sis
165
...
:
} = 1148 1652 + {
44
.
. )(
)(
.
.
.6
) (1975
.
3-2
.
.
:
.
.
.
44Pragmatic act of declaration
166
4 ) 4 (16 1392
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.7
corpus linguistics
systemic functional linguistics
forensic discourse analysis
pragmatics
speech act
See: Gibbons, 1994; Levi & Walker, 1990; Rieber & Stewart, 1990.
The International Association of Forensic Linguists
International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law
See: Cotterill, 2003; Eades, 1994, 2005; Heffer, 2005; Hydon, 2005; Rock,2007.
.10 . .1389 1384 .1383
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
...
.8
.2 .( ) .(1390)
. :
: ( ).(1384) ________
: . .
.225-215 .
168
1392 (16 )4 4
.(1389)
. :
.11 .1 .1 .( )
. : .(1390)
. : .
: . .(1379) .
.
. : . .(1384) .________
. . .(1383) .
.380-365 .48-49 .68 .
. : .(1391)
. : .
Reference:
Aghagolzadeh, Ferdows (2005). Forensic Linguistics: A New Approach in
Applied Linguistics. The First Seminar of Linguistics Society of Iran (LSI).
Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University Press. Pp. 215-225 [In Persian].
Aghagolzadeh, Ferdows (2011). Forensic Linguistics (A Course Book). 2nd Ed.
Tehran: Nashshre Elm [In Persian].
Aghagolzadeh, Ferdows, Arsalan Golfam & Faezeh Farazandeh-Pour (2010).
Linguistic Analysis of jury Votes/Verdicts Based on Innovative Parrern.
Language Related Research (Comparative Language and Literature Research).
Year 1. No. 1. Pp. 11 [In Persian].
Archer, Dawn (2011). Cross-examining Lawyers, Facework and the Adversarial
Courtroom. Journal of Pragmatics. 43.
Austin, Joh. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
169
...
1392 (16 )4 4
171
...
172