Assessment Feedback

Summative Formative

Student Name Student ID

Foundation Degree (Science) Broadcast
Programme Level 2
Media Technology
Project Title Project Value
Unit Title Contextual Studies 2 Unit Code BMT202/FDC202
Project Leader Unit Leader

Assessment Criteria Indicative Grading

Excellent V Good Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N/A
Presentation
1 The degree to which they have displayed knowledge and
understanding of their chosen topic; (LO1)
2 Reflection on new areas and how they how they are
related to practical work based knowledge; (LO2)
3 Organisation of ideas and the ability to relate them verbally
to a group using appropriate supporting visual/audio
materials. (LO5)
Independent Project
4 Their ability to articulate their findings and conclusions in a
structured and well-argued report; (LO5)
5 Their ability to demonstrate a sound understanding of the
salient issues involved in the chosen area of study; (LO1,
LO2)
6 Their ability to relate academic knowledge to the work
based application of practical skills; (LO6)
7 Their ability to relate their personal practice to the area
chosen for independent study; (LO3)
8 Evidence of the development of a plan and the ability to
deliver work within a timeframe. (LO4)
Note 1 - Unless specified in the Project Brief it is assumed that all assessment criteria are equally weighted

Overall comment including strengths and areas for improvement

Grade Banding Brief Grade Descriptor

A+ 90-100 High Excellent all round work or outstanding
A 80-89 Medium performance Grade (where appropriate)
A- 70-79 Low
B+ 67-69 High High level achievement or very good level of
B 64-66 Medium performance
B- 60-63 Low
C+ 57-59 High Good level of achievement or proficient
C 54-56 Medium performance
C- 50-53 Low
D+ 47-49 High Satisfactory level of achievement or competent
D 44-46 Medium performance
D- 40-43 Low
E 35-39 Marginal Elementary achievement or basic level of Note 2 - All summative grades are subject to ratification by the Examination Board
Pass performance
F+ 30-34 Marginal Does not achieve the learning outcomes but
Fail may be some element of understanding or Please contact your Unit Leader about retrieval
competence arrangements (where appropriate)
Assessor(s)
F < 30 Name:
Fail No evidence of achievement or competence
F- > 10 Poor Fail
0 0 no submission or special circumstances

Student signature: Date sent to student: