Sei sulla pagina 1di 6

Coady 1

Paul Coady
Deby Jizi
UWRT 1103-013
30 November 2015
EIP Research Essay
I.
Scientific discoveries have led to some development of nuclear energy, but lots of panic
and tragedy has been directly correlated to such advancement. Nuclear weaponry has caused
countries around the world to become more competitive with each other as to who could blow
the other up and it has caused a global scare. Weapons are only part of the problem with nuclear
advancement or lack thereof. Major disasters have occurred where lots of people have died and
the land was destroyed such as the explosions in Fukushima and Chernobyl.

Figure 1. Shimbun, Asahi. A Woman Cries While Sitting on a Road in Natori, Japan, on March 13, 2011.
Digital image. Slate. N.p., 26 Sept. 2013. Web. 22 Nov. 2015.

Coady 2

I have no experience being affected by nuclear energy besides being one of worried
civilians in a world that could become extinct in the blink of an eye. Weapons, however, are not
the reason that nuclear energy was conceived and I see great potential for nuclear energy. In my
Environmental Science class in high school I conducted research on fossil fuels over the course
of a semester and found that the carbon dioxide emissions from coal in particular is killing this
planet at an alarming rate. Other sources of energy have been explored, but coal remains on top
as the most fitting fuel source for the world. Publications by the Nuclear Energy Agency suggest
it is very possible that nuclear energy could replace coal and save the life of this planet and lots
of people in it if safer methods of extraction were created. In order to determine whether or not
such a claim about nuclear energy is true, I researched information based on the following
question: What technology needs to develop in order to facilitate the evolution of nuclear
energy?
II.
The lives of people who work in nuclear power plants would be a lot safer if nuclear
technology were to further develop because the probability of explosions happening would be
minimized. Those who would also be immediately affected by more evolved nuclear technology
are people living near nuclear power plants and people in countries such as France where nuclear
power largely contributes as a source of energy. Evolved nuclear technology would not only
mean that extraction methods would be safer, but more production would be possible. Increased
production of nuclear energy may potentially lower the costs of energy which would affect
anyone who pays for electricity. One of the biggest differences that nuclear energy could make is
the improvement of environmental health because the quality of air would be improved due to a
significant drop in the rate at which greenhouse gasses are emitted. The reason that nuclear

Coady 3

technology in particular needs to improve is because the current processes of obtaining nuclear
energy are too uncontrollable and harmful to the environment.
III.
Lixin Cheng discusses boiling water reactors which involve nuclear fission. He says there
are still uncertainties about the difference between macroscale and microscale channels. The
official results critical heat flux results, mechanisms, and prediction methods were not commonly
agreed upon and there werent ways to predict critical heat flux in microscale channels and
confined spaces (Cheng, 2013). My question could have been partly answered with this
information because nuclear technologies such as boiling water reactors would need to improve
in order for nuclear energy to evolve. Still, I wouldnt have a complete answer because I would
need to analyze the developmental status of other nuclear fission reactors and so I wondered: Are
all the other nuclear fission reactors as underdeveloped?
The Nuclear Energy Agency published a book saying that it is very possible that nuclear
energy could fulfil the needs of everyone on this planet. The book mentions that programs have
already been created with hopes to improve the overall quality of nuclear power plants
(Innovation, 2007). This information didnt answer my question, but it still implied that
advancement in nuclear technology may come along. I started to wonder what the problems were
with the ways people already collect nuclear energy and found that the two forms of extraction
are nuclear fission and nuclear fusion. Of the two, nuclear fission is the only way that anyone
knows enough about to obtain nuclear energy which raised this question for me: Would nuclear
fusion be a safer method of extraction that nuclear fission?

Coady 4

According to the Max Planck Society, the idea at the heart of fusion research is
developing a source of power that is good for the environment and the Wendelstein 7-X is an
almost finished nuclear fusion reactor (Society, 2015). The WX-7 doesnt actually produce
nuclear energy, but it will be used as reference for other fusion reactors. This information
answered my question with a reasonable answer. My next question then became: What would be
the difference between the WX-7 and functioning fusion reactors?
Aahba Dixit published a webpage based on her recordings of an International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA) meeting saying that, because of the increasing amount of people
becoming concerned for the environment, the progress of the International Thermonuclear
Experimental Reactor (ITER) needs greatly improve (Dixit, 2015). This information also gives
my question an acceptable answer. Still, I didnt understand: What needs to been done in order to
boost the progress of ITER?
IV.
I found that the most significance thing that needs to happen in order to facilitate the
evolution of nuclear energy is for nuclear fusion reactors to be constructed based on the WX-7.
The most convincing voice was that of the Max Planck Society because it answered my question
by explaining the purpose of nuclear fusion reactor and provided a specific example that seems
to have little downside.
V.
The difference that my discoveries about the evolution of nuclear energy will make in the
lives of me and my readers will be how we plan to use the energy we have access to. I would like
to know if it would be possible improve the extraction process of nuclear fission. Further inquiry

Coady 5

may direct me towards the negative effects of nuclear fission reactors and how they could be
eliminated.

Coady 6

Works Cited
Cheng, Lixin. "Fundamental Issues Of Critical Heat Flux Phenomena During Flow Boiling In
Microscale-Channels And Nucleate Pool Boiling In Confined Spaces." Heat Transfer
Engineering 34.13 (2013): 1016-1043. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Nov. 2015.
Dixit, Aabha. "The Energy of the Future: The Status of Nuclear Fusion Research and the Role of
the IAEA." IAEA. IAEA Office of Public Information and Communication, 15 Sept.
2015. Web. 10 Nov. 2015.
Innovation in Nuclear Energy Technology. Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development, 2007. Internet resource.
Janeschitz, Guenter. "Fusion Technology for ITER, the ITER Project. Further Development
Towards a DEMO Fusion Power Plant (3/4)." Academic Training Lecture Regular
Programme. Academic Training Lectures, Geneva. 14 Apr. 2011. Lecture.
"Physics of Uranium and Nuclear Energy." World Nuclear Association. N.p., Sept. 2014. Web.
10 Nov. 2015.
Society, Max Planck. "Initial Testing of the Wendelstein 7-X Magnetic Field." Phys. N.p., 17
July 2015. Web. 10 Nov. 2015.

Potrebbero piacerti anche