The Story of the CARP (Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program)

Format:
1. 1.5 spacing
2. 1 on all sides
3. 12 font size
4. Trebuchet MS
5. Minimum of 35 pages excluding table of contents, acknowledgment and the like.
6. No bibliography but with footnotes
7. Soft and hard copy
8. Short bond paper

Outline
A. Introduction
a. Background of the Study
b. Methodology
c. Strategy
B. Body
a. Brief introduction on the CARP
b. CARL - Legislation
i. Introduction
ii. Legal foundations

iii. Mission-Vision
iv. Salient Features
v. RA 6657 vs. PARCODE: Which Is More Comprehensive?
vi. Conclusion
c. CARP - Implementation (1988-2013)
i. Introduction: What Carp Is
ii. Land Distribution
iii. Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries
iv. Non-land Transfer and Deferment Schemes
v. Provision and Delivery of Support Services
vi. Financial Status of the CARL
vii. Major Benefits of the Implementaion
1. Prominent Jurisprudence
a. xxx
viii. Major Problems in Implementation
1. Notorious Jurisprudence
a. Hacienda Luicita case
b. xxx
ix. Conclusion

d. CARPER - Extension (2013-2014)

i. Introduction: What CARPER Is
ii. Reasons of Extension
iii. Salient Features
iv. Implementation of CARPER
v. Conclusion
e. Expiration (July 2014-present)
i. What Expired?
ii. Reasons of Expiration
iii. Effects of the Expiration
iv. Jurisprudence after the Expiration
*Cases declaring that/about the expiration of land distribution
and acquisition
*Cases involving the CARL.
*Cases are below are suggestions. Not yet sure if they apply.
1. DAR v. Berina et al, July 9, 2014
2. Automat v. Sps. Dela Cruz, October 2014
3. Land Bank v. Heirs of Jesus Alsua, February 2015
4. ARBA et al v. Fil-Estate, August 12, 2015

5. Canas-Manuel v. Egano, August 19, 2015

v. Current Bills in the Congress
C. Conclusion
D. Recommendation