Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
word choices on meaning and tone, including words with multiple meanings or language that is
particularly fresh, engaging, or beautiful. (Include Shakespeare as well as other authors.))
(11.4.5.5/11.5.5.5/11.12.5.5/11.13.5.5 Analyze how an authors choices concerning how to
structure specific parts of a text (e.g., the choice of where to begin or end a story, the choice to
provide a comedic or tragic resolution) contribute to its overall structure and meaning as well as
its aesthetic impact.)
(11.4.6.6/11.5.6.6/11.12.6.6 Analyze a case in which grasping point of view requires
distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g., satire, sarcasm,
irony, or understatement).)
(11.4.7.7/11.12.7.7/11.13.7.7 Analyze multiple interpretations of a story, drama, or poem (e.g.,
recorded or live production of a play or recorded novel or poetry), evaluating how each version
interprets the source text. (Include at least one play by Shakespeare and one play by an American
dramatist.))
(11.4.9.9 Demonstrate knowledge of eighteenth-, nineteenth- and early-twentieth- century
foundational works of American literature, including American Indian and other diverse cultures
texts and how two or more texts from the same period treat similar themes or topics.)
11.4.10.10 By the end of grade 11, read and comprehend literature and other texts including
stories, dramas, and poems, in the grades 11CCR text complexity band proficiently, with
scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range
11.5.7.7 Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in different media or
formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words in order to address a question or solve
a problem.
(11.5.8.8 Delineate and evaluate the reasoning in seminal U.S. texts, including the application of
constitutional principles and use of legal reasoning (e.g., in U.S. Supreme Court majority
opinions and dissents) and the premises, purposes, and arguments in works of public advocacy
(e.g., The Federalist, presidential addresses).)
(11.5.9.9 Analyze seventeenth-, eighteenth-, and nineteenth-century foundational U.S. documents
of historical and literary significance (including The Declaration of Independence, the Preamble
to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and Lincolns Second Inaugural Address) for their themes,
purposes, and rhetorical features.)
(11.5.10.10 By the end of grade 11, read and comprehend literary nonfiction in the grades 11
CCR text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range.)
11.7.1.1 Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using
valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
11.7.2.2 Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts,
and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis
of content.
11.7.4.4 Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style
are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
11.7.5.5 Use a writing process to develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, drafting,
revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on addressing what is most
significant for a specific purpose and audience.
11.7.7.7 Conduct a sustained research project to answer a question (including a self-generated
question) or solve a problem.
11.7.8.8 Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using
advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the
task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of
ideas, avoiding plagiarism and overreliance on any one source and following a standard format
for citation.
11.7.9.9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and
research.
11.7.10.10 Write routinely over extended time frames and shorter time frames for a range of
tasks, purposes, and audiences.
11.9.4.4 While respecting intellectual property, present information, findings, and supporting
evidence, conveying a clear and distinct perspective, such that listeners can follow the line of
reasoning, alternative or opposing perspectives are addressed, and the organization,
development, substance, and style are appropriate to purpose, audience, and a range of formal
and informal tasks (e.g., persuasion, argumentation, debate).
11.11.1.1 Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage
when writing or speaking.
11.11.2.2 Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization,
punctuation, and spelling when writing.
11.11.3.3 Apply knowledge of language to understand how language functions in different
contexts, to make effective choices for meaning or style, and to comprehend more fully when
reading or listening.
(11.11.5.5 Demonstrate understanding of figurative language, word relationships, and nuances in
word meanings.)
11.11.6.6 Acquire and use accurately general academic and domain-specific words and phrases,
sufficient for reading, writing, speaking, and listening at the college and career readiness level;
demonstrate independence in gathering vocabulary knowledge when considering a word or
phrase important to comprehension or expression.
How do I do research?
What sort of questions do I need to ask?
What kind of sources do I need? How do I find them?
How do I come up with unique ideas to add to experts discussions?
How do I revise my work to improve my writing?
These essential questions target common problems among college freshmen writing
students. The typically large gap between high school writing standards and college writing
standards indicates an importance for handling this material in 11th and 12th grades. In addition
to my own observations, I have spoken with teachers who recognize a particular difficulty with
students understanding research as a synthesis of existing information into something new, rather
than just a collection and report of information theyve found.
Among issues students often struggle with, framing their research with an appropriate
question is the most significant problem that stymies progress. Issues of analysis are essential in
answering the question, and most often students view knowledge as something that exists in the
hands of experts (i.e. teachers), and need some coaching before they feel comfortable
contributing to academic conversations. The final hindrance to student progress is poor
knowledge of revision processes, and near the end of the unit students will engage in a guided
workshop to cover targeted reading of their paper and others, emphasizing how to give helpful
feedback.
Enduring Understandings:
Students should learn guidelines and methods for initiating and designing open-ended
assignments with no clear right answers.
A thesis statement should both answer a question asked for their research and outline the
paper theyve written.
Students can create their own unique interpretations of books and contribute original
ideas to topics by effectively citing and analyzing evidence.
Several writing processes exist to help them construct and revise their papers.
Proper sources exist outside of simple internet searches.
Writing research papers can help students organize thoughts to think through a problem
methodically.
Proper citation methods are vital for discourse, not for purposes of credit and copyright,
but for locating information. Students must know how to easily find others works, as
well as providing others pathways to their own sources.
Most students should have a) a thesis that successfully answers a research question, b) a
variety of properly cited sources and primary texts relevant to their thesis and c) well-conceived
additions of personal voice and analysis that help further the academic discussion. In addition,
these students will have d) identified a style of research that targets a field or an area of life
significant to their interests, and/or chosen primary texts that follow their preferred reading
habits. These papers should make few mistakes in employing grammar, spelling, format and
mechanics.
Some students will have a) a thesis that successfully answers a research question and contributes
a unique idea to the academic discussion, b) a well-developed list of sources and primary texts
with extensive citations placed properly within their paper whenever required, c) thoughtful,
deep reflection leading to extensive analysis of their sources and research ideas, d) identified a
style of research targeting a field passionate to their interests as well as e) chosen primary texts
that not only follow their preferred reading habits, but clearly expand upon the texts they are
familiar with outside of class. These papers should be nearly flawless in grammar, spelling,
format, and mechanics.
Assessment evidence:
Formative:
Each of these assignments will produce a partial draft of their paper. The topic proposal
should begin the first step toward formulating a thesis. After searching for sources to help answer
their thesis, theyll put together a rough bibliography. The analysis of sources paper will become
the critical conversation section of their final draft. A more formal thesis exercise will help them
write a thesis after theyve reigned in (and probably changed) the focus of their research. The
only part missing from this is adding personal voice to create an argument answering the thesis-that will be included in the rough draft, examined in the guided workshop sessions.
Summative:
Thesis clarity,
construction and
relevance.
3
Thesis statement successfully
answers a research question
with an original, unique
assertion. Thesis fully outlines
construction of paper.
Organization and
flow of the
argument
Argument follows
reasonably sounding logic
but contains holes, asking
the reader to take certain
assertions on faith.
Occasionally uses sources
to make assertions.
Sources and
Bibliography
Analysis of Sources
Grammar,
Punctuation, and
Mechanics
Unit Calendar:
Selecting a
Topic: Questions
Research Styles:
Literature
Research Styles:
History
Research Styles:
Investigative
Journalism
Research Styles:
Science:
Scientific
Method
Research Styles:
Science Pt. 2:
Writing about
research
How to Search
for Sources
Library Day 1:
Source Hunting
Part Two:
Conferences
Topic Proposal
Conferences
Proposals
Proposals
Part Three:
First Steps
What is a
Thesis? What is
it good for?
Library Day 2:
Refined Source
Search
Preliminary
Sources Due
Analysis
Worksheet
Introduction to
the Critical
Conversation
Analysis
Activity:
Propaganda
Problems
Analysis
Activity: Source
Analysis
Problems
Lesson on
Citations:
Reasons, Styles,
Need
Proper Citation
Exercise
Critical
Informative
Conversations
Speeches / Q&A
Due: Informative
Speeches / Q&A
Informative
Speeches / Q&A
Bibliography /
Citations Due
Part Four:
Drafting
Library Day 3:
What sources do
you still need?
Adding Personal
Voice 1
Adding Personal
Voice 2
Computer Day:
Writing
Thesis Revision
Activity
How to revise 1
Computer Day:
Writing
Part Five:
Revision
Guided
Workshopping:
Rough Draft
Workshopping
Rough Draft
How to revise 2
Computer Day:
Writing
(Other, simpler
tasks, giving
time for student
(Other tasks)
(Other tasks)
(Other tasks)
to write or to
return to earlier
problems in
research that
need
clarification)
Students bring their drafts to class and exchange with other students for group revision.
Time will be given to guide them through this process. They will read intently with specific
questions in mind (e.g. Can you identify the thesis? Can you summarize the writers arguments?
Did they use citations properly? Did you find anything confusing?). Authors must receive
feedback silently, accepting that their readers wont always react the way the authors want them
to. After group revisions, students will be given time to revise their paper. Attention will no
longer be given to the paper in class, but more simpler tasks will be performed so as not to take
time away from writing.